5 Questions To Ask Before You Buy A Digital Camera
Last updated on 12/03/2010
Our man on the inside spends his days guiding customers toward a new digital camera. He lays out five questions that digital camera shoppers should ask themselves to focus their search.
By TJ Donegan.
As a salesperson, most customers I deal with try to buy a new digital camera the way I usually get stuck buying groceries: they're acting on impulse, and they haven't thought the decision through. They just want something, anything, and they want it fast. This isn't such a big deal at the supermarket—you'll be back in a week—but a camera is a much bigger investment than cereal or bread, so it's worth some forethought.
If you're reading this, it's because you're willing to do your homework and to look at camera specifications, reviews, and sample images. But there are dozens of cameras out there, and the search can be overwhelming. Start by asking yourself these five basic questions before you go on a wild goose chase through every available camera. It will save you time, confusion, and ensure that you don't end up with too much or too little camera.
What Would I Like To Use It For?
Think about what you will actually use your digital camera for. What do you shoot now? Is there anything you'd like to take pictures of that you currently can't, like concerts in dark clubs? Are you printing and framing them? Putting them up on Facebook? Is this camera just for snapshots with friends? Are you trying to get into photography, or do you just want to take pictures? A bit of reflection here will narrow down your search tremendously.
What Do I Hate About My Current Camera?
Digital cameras have been around for about 15 years, and for most of us, our next digital camera won't be our first. If you are replacing a digital camera think about what frustrates you the most about your current camera. Does it take forever to shoot? Is its focus incredibly slow? Do the images come out flat and noisy? Is it too bulky to fit in your pocket?
Almost every camera you buy will, in some way, be a compromise. You'll be trading size for quality, price for speed, simplicity for specialization. Know what you are absolutely unwilling to deal with in your new camera so when it comes time to make that compromise, you'll know what you can't live with anymore so you're not spending more money just to live with the same problems.
What Do I Want Most: Portability, Picture Quality, Or A Mix?
This is an important question to ask because it will quickly narrow down your options to a certain range of cameras and can turn a choice between 50 cameras into a choice between five. First, a primer: With cameras, the size of the camera's image sensor has a great deal to do with the quality of the images.
A dSLR is large because it sports a very large image sensor, which produces amazing-quality photos but requires larger, interchangeable lenses to produce clean, sharp images over such a big area.
A point-and-shoot, alternatively, is amazingly portable and can even pack a great zoom into a tiny package because of its small sensor. But compare the images that come from a typical point-and-shoot to a dSLR, especially in low-light settings, and the difference is obvious.
There are, of course, compromises between the two, like fixed-lens super-zoomers and interchangeable-lens mirrorless formats. It's up to you to decide if splitting the difference is a worthy move.
Which Camera Would The Salesperson Buy?
The usefulness of this question depends on the sales associate's experience, but they tend to be knowledgable about the cameras in stock, and develop opinions about certain brands and models.
So once you've established what your needs are, ask the associate for their opinion. Make them think about which camera they would spend money on, and why. Maybe they have a serious anti-Canon bias, or they see Nikons returned constantly, or they have customers who can't stop raving about their Samsung. At best, they'll give you that extra nugget of wisdom that will seal your decision. At worst, they'll give you just a little more information to eventually make a decision. (If you don't have a good camera shop nearby, ask for advice from a photographer friend or from a website like ours.)
How Much Am I Willing To Invest?
The more you spend, the more you'll get (for the most part). dSLRs are phenomenal cameras, but you'll have to buy the camera body, lenses, and accessories, so the cost can quickly cross four figures. Consider whether you'll use it enough to justify that expense.
It's likely that more of you reading this right now are figuring out whether to spend $250 or $350 (rather than $599 versus $899). At this price range, it's important to take the time to understand the true quality difference between the cameras in that price range. Is it something that actually affects image quality like a larger sensor or optical stabilization? Or is it superficial, like a touchscreen LCD versus physical buttons?
Really, put some thought into this decision. Time is the best investment you can make.
5 Questions To Ask Before You Buy A Digital Camera Comments & Questions (write your own!)
I am looking for a point and shoot camera good for both clicking pics and making short videos. Basically for sight seeing,parties in night as well as day. I will be using it in high humid conditions in city like Mumbai. My budget is around Rs 7000. Can u please guide me which will be best digital for me. I basically need a handy one too that I can keep it in my pocket.
-No fish, so these will be stills.
-Photos will be shared on the internet, but not printed.
-I’m not able to turn off the overhead lights in the room, and reflections are an issue.
I’m considering a used Canon G9 because of the manual controls, RAW format, and it can take a polarizing lens (I think). But I’d like to consider something new in the $100-200 range that would produce a quality image w. automatic settings and have a decent battery life (my 9-yr-old Fuji wants new batteries every 20 pictures!).
I’ve been learning a lot from your website, and would welcome your thoughts.
A little background... My family and I like spending the weekends at the beach; love visiting new places; my husband and I always bring our 6-year old (we often let her take shots of us or whatever interests her -don't really like lugging around a tripod) with us. One other thing, we'll be moving to another country (with four seasons).
I love taking pictures of nature, sunrise/sunset, people in action, etc. I need a reliable point and shoot (able to produce good quality photos). Do you have anything that comes into mind? I was looking at the reviews of the following: ZS5, FZ100, TS2 vs their current competitors.
Thanks in advance for your reply.
If your daughter will be using the camera a lot around water/beach, it's also worth considering the Canon D10 -- not quite as rugged as most "durable" cameras but you can drop it in sand or in the surf and it'll survive. Better picture quality than the other rugged cameras too.
In point and shoots, I fancy the Canon S95, SX30. Panasonic's ZS5.
I will go shopping for a Pentax digital now.
Thanks again
Jack
So if you can swing around $300 or so, that's what I'd do. Many Canon models can take advantage of the CHKDK firmware hack to shoot it. So you can even then afford under $200. But take a look at the Canon S90.
You might be disappointed with your current Canon's low-light shots, but that's probably a function of the specific model, not the brand as a whole. Overall, I hear the best things about the G12, as Canon has a lot of practice in the advanced compact market. That's not to discount the P7000 -- just haven't heard much about it at all. It's certainly attractive for its longer zoom.
If you still want something smaller than that, and don't need a zoom, a camera like the Canon S95 or SD4000 does better in low lighting than most compacts, though the burst shooting mode isn't notable -- shot to shot time is decent, however.
But all in camera, I like Canon's SD line, Panasonic has some good ones like the ZS5 or the FH20. Using them with an EyeFi wireless card and you can upload immediately as well. More options here - digitalcamera-hq.com/search...
But if you're looking for a pocket option, it depends on your budget. Most pros like the Canon G11 or the Panasonic LX3 for a backup.
In your view, which camera is better for still photography? Which is better for video? (My guess is Canon for still, Panasonic for video.) How wide are the differences? Also, I was surprised that neither Panasonic nor Canon allows zooming while shooting video. How can that be? I have owned Nikon and Minolta super-zooms that allowed for zooming while shooting a video. Did I read wrong, or did Canon and Panasonic miss the boat?
Thanks much in advance. I just ran across this site today, and it seems knowledgeable, unbiased, and useful. Oh one more thing. I am unfamiliar with Panasonic or its model nomenclature. What's the difference between a GH1 and a GH1K? And what is Panasonic's general reputation in the digital camera field? It really took me by surprise that they get such favorable mention.
In any case, I didn't discount the 5DMk2 because of anyone's comments about the T1i (not the T2i). I did that because of the moire patterns on the T1i pics. But yeah, you're right, there's no comparison between the sensors and I'll be surprised if moire patterns are a problem with the 5D.
Beyond that, there is the other truth, which I will admit and most other buyers of cameras like this probably won't: I'm going to have to grow into this one. I have a far, far better camera than I currently know how to use. That's the bad news, but the good news is that I know it, which means I'm going to go to school.
Anyhow, thanks for your reply.
actually, the photos that i'm going to take, are nature photos under sunlight, in addition to portrait photos, and photos at streets where people and things are moving, and i may take photos at night in clubs or concerts.
my budget is under 500 USD, what do u recommend?
i prefer it small of course :)
thank you
somebody told me that CANON D1000 what do you think !
please recommedn if Sony / Nikon or any other ...
This is the first time I am actually doing the research,(even though I need a camera for team pictures tomorrow night) so any feedback you can provide is appreciated.
That'll give you fantastic image quality and a lens that is very capable of focusing at close distances. I'd also be easy on your salespeople in this regard, a camera's minimal focus distance is generally a pretty esoteric piece of knowledge to have and it'll be based on individual camera models. It will generally list that in the specifications published online or in the manuals that come with every camera, which any store in your area should keep when they put their models on display.
Hope that helps!
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher, stronger batteries. You want batteries with an "mAh" of at least 2500.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
Now, having said all that, back to your question. You're other problem is that you're expecting a "good zoom" at under $200. There are few to choose from. Fortunately, the leader in this class is the Panasonic FH20, which sports an 8x optical zoom for around $200.
I just got a new Lumix ZS7 (or TZ10 in Europe) and am disappointed with the image quality compared to my last camera, a Canon Ixus 75 (or SD750 in US).
The Lumix has a wide angle lens, so it is not as straightforward to compare the two in the exact same way, but the images taken with the new camera do seem much more pixelated despite the higher pixel count (I know megapixels aren't everything!).
This is based on the automatic settings of both cameras (canons were pretty good to begin with, limited manual controls. I haven't yet got around to mastering the manual controls on the lumix yet which is why I stuck with automatic).
Do you know if there is a reason for this?
Thanks in advance!
Micro 4/3s (or 'mirrorless' as we call them now, because Micro 4/3s is specific to Panasonic and Olympus models) are a good option as well. They're smaller, so more portable, and the image quality is almost as good as a dSLR.
I need to know a little bit more about your budget before I can give you a strong recommendation. We don't know much at all about the NEX5, since it hasn't been released yet. I've heard very good things about the Olympus E-PL1 as far as mirrorless cameras go. The Panasonic G10 looks like a good competitor too. But tell us how much you want to spend and we can give you an idea.