Don't Buy The Kodak EasyShare C813 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Luckiest guy in the world? (or maybe canadian versions are more durable) (Eric Larocque — 04/15/2013)
i own one of these myself...the only problems i have found is that it eats batteries turned on or not. Other than that, and the odd time one shutter sticks, this camera works perfectly for me...i think im the luckiest guy in the world right now! Mind you, though, a canon would be nice to have...a friend of mine has one, and this thing is friggin amazing! My review: If you are particular enough about taking care of your stuff that you yell at your friend for an hour and a half for sticking his finger on your laptop screen, then maybe this camera will live past a week. (P.S. For those who have troubles turning this thing on after 20-30 photos, or a week, let it sit for a full day, then get some really powerful batteries, like duracells [i personally find] and kickstart the camera with them!)
reply to this comment
Kodak C813 (André — 11/16/2011)
Three years ago I purchased a Kodak Easyshare C813 from Canadian Tire because it was on sale for $70. I liked the camera so much, that I bought one for each of my three daughters!
I am still using that same camera today! It takes great pictures, and I am really impressed with the battery life! I use only alkaline batteries.I get about three weeks of battery life with regular use. I found that standard batteries lasted only for a very short time.
My daughters are still using their C813's as well.
We have got over three years of use out of these cameras!
I have no complaints what so ever!
reply to this comment
I am still using that same camera today! It takes great pictures, and I am really impressed with the battery life! I use only alkaline batteries.I get about three weeks of battery life with regular use. I found that standard batteries lasted only for a very short time.
My daughters are still using their C813's as well.
We have got over three years of use out of these cameras!
I have no complaints what so ever!
What I want to add is no need to add ! (Thanh — 04/13/2011)
I have got a Kodak EasyShare C813s and have got the same trouble as people said. I think, there is no need to add some comment. My conclusion : Don't buy Kodak EasyShare C813.
A customer from Viet Nam.
reply to this comment
A customer from Viet Nam.
I AM CANADIAN!!! (with the same camera) (prizedcoffeecup — 04/15/2013)
I live in canada, and my brother bought one a long time ago, used it for a week, then put it in storage for the same shutdown problems. I pulled it out 2 YEARS LATER...then kickstarted this camera with a couple of duracells, and have had no such problems since! Weird.....
reply to this comment
Mine's been great (Some Guy — 09/26/2010)
How about a long term review...
I use a C813 for work that I bought about a year ago. I take site pictures with it to the tune of about 100 pictures per week. It gets knocked around in the truck so it looks pretty beat up, but it runs like a champ.
I use it to check out installations on top of power poles, so even when zoomed the resolution is more than acceptable - this isn't meant to be a 12.0 DSLR after all.
It does have a cheap 'feel' to it and that may have biased some reviewers, but as to the battery life : I can't see how it would vary that much between units and I get at least a week out of mine. Besides, it's two AA batteries, so who cares ? I buy them a dozen at a time anyway.
I don't like that there isn't a battery meter on the display, but spare batts are never far away.
That, and the odd case where the lens cover sticks open or shut (just touch it to release it) are my only complaints about this camera.
With a tripod, the video is pretty good too. I have sat it on my dash and recorded roadways as well and it looks good. A 2MB SD card (also cheap) gives me 45 mins of video and the batteries will do that at least twice before changing.
This isn't a fancy piece of kit by any stretch of the imagination, but mine's been functional and reliable.
The flash works like a champ, especially the red-eye function.
When it eventually packs it in, I won't shed a tear - it owes me nothing.
reply to this comment
I use a C813 for work that I bought about a year ago. I take site pictures with it to the tune of about 100 pictures per week. It gets knocked around in the truck so it looks pretty beat up, but it runs like a champ.
I use it to check out installations on top of power poles, so even when zoomed the resolution is more than acceptable - this isn't meant to be a 12.0 DSLR after all.
It does have a cheap 'feel' to it and that may have biased some reviewers, but as to the battery life : I can't see how it would vary that much between units and I get at least a week out of mine. Besides, it's two AA batteries, so who cares ? I buy them a dozen at a time anyway.
I don't like that there isn't a battery meter on the display, but spare batts are never far away.
That, and the odd case where the lens cover sticks open or shut (just touch it to release it) are my only complaints about this camera.
With a tripod, the video is pretty good too. I have sat it on my dash and recorded roadways as well and it looks good. A 2MB SD card (also cheap) gives me 45 mins of video and the batteries will do that at least twice before changing.
This isn't a fancy piece of kit by any stretch of the imagination, but mine's been functional and reliable.
The flash works like a champ, especially the red-eye function.
When it eventually packs it in, I won't shed a tear - it owes me nothing.
DONT BUY KODAK (Lucy — 07/14/2010)
DONT BUY ANY CAMERA EVER FROM KODAK. I bought one last year and the warranty has now fully expired. During this period I have had to send it back four times and have only had it working for one month. This company is shit and deserves to be shut down. But anyway, happy camera buying!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/15/2010)
One battery camera doesn't spoil the entire realm of cameras, Lucy. Every manufacturer makes thousands of cameras of each model and at that realm, a certain percentage are going to have problems. It's just the nature of mass production. Now, DHQ doesn't recommend the C813 for clear reasons. But there have been a few Kodaks which have worked quite well.
Having said that, you can do better.
reply to this comment
Having said that, you can do better.
crap camera (hash — 06/17/2010)
its a real crap camera !! kodak should be shut down as a business trying to fleece people
reply to this comment
Think about this...have you had bad experiences with other kodak cammys before? (Eric Larocque — 04/15/2013)
This other guy just finished saying that one camera doesn't fuck around a whole company...although i would personally prefer canon (more options), a lot of their other cameras can be tossed around carelessly and still crap out a sharp image effortlessly! My grandparents had a kodak for the longest time...most of their living room photos (you can barely see their wall) came from that camera, and it had to be dropped in the water about 8-9 times, as well as 20-25 times on land. Yet all of those photos are still worth framing!!! So if anything, this camera is spilt milk rather than a car crash, if you know what i mean.
reply to this comment
Ron (06/10/2010)
I bought a used Kodak EasyShare C813 on eBay last week and received it today. I installed new batteries and entered the date/time info in the setup menu. Well, after only 2 pictures (plus setup), the camera shut down with a "low battery" icon visible on the LCD screen. As I had only used it for a few minutes, I refused to believe this and tried to turn it back "on"; it came on for a couple of seconds then went back off!
I installed new batteries (still not really believing it could possibly have eaten them THIS quickly), and took three more pictures, when the same thing happened again!
I checked the batteries on a volt meter and found that the camera had depleted over 10% from the two, 1.5 volt, 'AA' batteries, leaving them with only 1.4 volts of power, which is evidently not enough voltage to operate the camera!?
At this rate, (on a normal days usage of taking pictures), one would have to lug a "bag" of batteries around and spend on average of $1.00 per pictures for just battery usage!
This is not only ridiculous, it is absolutely unacceptable!
reply to this comment
I installed new batteries (still not really believing it could possibly have eaten them THIS quickly), and took three more pictures, when the same thing happened again!
I checked the batteries on a volt meter and found that the camera had depleted over 10% from the two, 1.5 volt, 'AA' batteries, leaving them with only 1.4 volts of power, which is evidently not enough voltage to operate the camera!?
At this rate, (on a normal days usage of taking pictures), one would have to lug a "bag" of batteries around and spend on average of $1.00 per pictures for just battery usage!
This is not only ridiculous, it is absolutely unacceptable!
by James DeRuvo (06/11/2010)
Good idea to return it, I would say.
reply to this comment
Some Guy (09/26/2010)
First off: your batteries were dead. Just because it says "1.5V" on a AA battery doesn't mean that what a meter reads. That's what your meter will read on a new battery WITH A LOAD ON. A new battery should be around 1.6 - 1.8 open circuit volts depending on the battery's type (chemistry), as measured at 77 degF. 1.0 OCV is a dead battery. That's why you don't buy batteries at the dollar store.
I'm not saying you didn't get a lemon, just that your info might not be as empirical as you'd like people to think.
reply to this comment
I'm not saying you didn't get a lemon, just that your info might not be as empirical as you'd like people to think.
Mine has been great. (Alice — 01/29/2010)
Gee, I bought my C813 in September 2008, have taken a couple of thousand pics with it, it doesn't fry batteries rapidly, my 9 year old granddaughter shoots movies with it, and until she dropped it and cracked the battery cover I never looked it up on line. Having superglued the cover twice, I'm now out buying a replacement battery cover for a whopping $10.
I'm averaging about 3 months to a set of batteries. Did I buy a mis-labelled camera? (I paid about $100 at Target in a hurry the day I bought it and did not shop around.)
reply to this comment
I'm averaging about 3 months to a set of batteries. Did I buy a mis-labelled camera? (I paid about $100 at Target in a hurry the day I bought it and did not shop around.)
by James DeRuvo (02/04/2010)
That's great battery life. I'm not sure I understand your complaint.
reply to this comment
jabbo23 (11/04/2009)
ditto, this camera is baaad. they had me send it to Precision Camera for repair and TWICE they said it was fixed, but it still faded out. so what do they do, have me send it again. tKodak will do everything they can NOT to replace it. Kodak is garbage.
reply to this comment
amberdawnsimpson (11/01/2009)
My cameras flash did not work properly the first day that I Got it on Christmas!!!! Yes the batteries go dead quick and the pictures are poor quality!!! I wish I would have taken it back and got a whole different camera!!! DO NOT RECCOMEND THAT ANYBODY PURCHASES THIS CAMERA BY ANY MEANS!!!
reply to this comment
aaronbost (10/16/2009)
After reading these comments about Kodak, I feel extremely fortunate to have one that does seem to work as advertised. I own a ZD710. I payed a bit more than 75 dollars for it, but got it at a discount. I will say that it is the first Kodak digital camera that I have owned in quite some time and seems to work very well. I have tried all the modes and they seem to work. Maybe ZD means zero defects in my case. Now there exists a big ? in the back of my mind, "Will this thing continue to work? When will this thing die?" My next camera will more than likely be a Canon or Nikon DSLR, Ten or more MP.
reply to this comment
skbatta (10/06/2009)
U r right, the battery life even when the camera is off, is very short, may a week or less than that. I will never buy another Kodak product.
reply to this comment