The Best Consumer Camera of 2010
Last updated on 01/18/2013
The votes are in, the results have been tallied, and after much deliberation, we've chosen the best consumer camera of 2010.
By Liam McCabe and Chris Weigl
Winner: Panasonic Lumix FH20
We knew that we
liked the FH20 pretty early on this year, and we were pretty sure that
it would catch on with readers as well -- we just didn't expect it to
catch on to the degree that it did. The FH20 garnered almost one-third
of all reader votes, and 50 percent more votes than the second-place
Canon SD1300.
For a few years, Panasonic has been the go-to manufacturer for thin cameras with huge zooms that somehow maintain excellent image quality. It's a popular configuration, one that almost any kind of photographer can benefit from; a little extra zoom comes in handy every now and then, and won't get in the way the rest of the time.
But these thin Panasonic zoomers have been pricey, usually selling for at least $250. Now that there's an affordable model in the FH20, consumers are snapping it up in droves.
Based
on voter comments, the FH20 has been a big hit because of that thin
frame/big zoom combination, and also because it's pretty cheap -- as
little as $150 through some retailers, though the average price (at the
time of writing) is more like $170. The performance is quick and
smooth, the auto modes (particularly iAuto) are accurate and easy for
anyone to use, and the image quality is very solid considering the
cost. Its HD video capability is always a welcome feature, too. We have
been a bit generous in our assessment of the FH20's low-light ability
in our comments section, but we still believe that its performance in
dim lighting is commensurate with that of a more expensive camera.
Other cameras in this poll have the FH20 beat in a
certain aspect; the Canon SD1300 has better image quality, the Sony
W370 has a richer feature set, and the Nikon S4000 has a slicker
interface. But the FH20 is incredibly well-rounded, and as such appeals
to a huge range of photographers, from complete novices to casual
shooters to hobbyists and even advanced users. It's clearly not meant
to be a photo enthusiast's primary camera (those are far more
expensive), but it could work as a reliable, affordable, pocket-sized
backup.
As our reviewer said about the FH20 back in February: “I'm typically reticent to recommend a camera to a huge variety of users. Most cameras, no matter how good they are, work best for certain niche groups ... but I think nearly anyone, regardless of skill level, age, camera abilities, or expectations, would be pretty satisfied with the FH20.”
We were looking for the camera with the most mass appeal, the one that would work for most people in most situations for the most reasonable price. This year, it's the Panasonic FH20.
1st Runner Up: Canon SD1300 IS
Canon's
Digital ELPH series (or those given the SD tag), have been
the most consistent pocket-sized performers since the digital age
began. While they're not always the most feature-packed cameras on the
market, ELPHs have always produced stellar images for the
style-conscious consumer -- and have consequently sold by the
bucketload.
The SD1300 IS doesn't stray far from this tested tradition, offering an
average feature set paired with typically superb Canon build quality. Notable specs include a 4x zoom, image stabilization, a slew of automatic scene modes, and decent handling for a camera so small. At
this price point Canon skimped out on a couple things, most notably HD
video. The omission of a viewfinder (which is great for bright
daylight) is an odd choice as well considering that it was one of the features that set its predecessor, the
SD1200, apart from the pack (that camera is still readily available, for less than the SD1300 too).
But all told there's really very little to complain about with this little beast, and it may have even garnered the top spot if it had a longer zoom range and a video mode that wasn't stuck in 2004. As it stands, the SD1300IS offers the best image quality of any camera on this list in a compact, trustworthy, and affordable package.
2nd Runner Up: Sony Cybershot W370
In
third, we have the Sony W370. The Cybershot brand name has a great
reputation among consumers, and these models tend to have more stylish designs than
the competition. The W370 has a slick feature set to match its exterior,
including a generous 7x zoom, HD video, and iSweep panorama, all
stuffed into a compact frame. Our reviewer had a generally positive
experience with the W370, citing the ease-of-use and the aforementioned
iSweep mode.
Judging by the voter comments, that feature set helped it
grab votes, as did the Sony nameplate. The electronics giant has been
so influential for such a long time that they'll have an audience for
just about any gadget they release.
While the
features are impressive, other expert and user reviews found that the
imaging performance leaves something to be desired. It's a bit on the
slow side and there are some focusing issues, resulting in a few too
many soft-looking shots. The Sony-brand lens is a point of contention for disgruntled commentators, and
it's just 34mm (equivalent) at the wide angle, which is uncommonly
narrow; group shots will be tough with this camera.
The Best Consumer Camera of 2010 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Good or bad
production.digitalcamera-hq... want to be mindful of extreme low light situations. But still a great camera.
TIA, Linda
1. Most customer service is pretty bad. I haven't dealt with Panasonic personally, so I can't speak first-hand, but I rarely hear good things about customer service from any company (though Canon is usually very good). Perhaps because people rarely take the time to give positive feedback on positive experiences; they're much more likely to vent negative feedback on negative experiences. Anybody that has any good or bad things to say about Panasonic customer service, please do so.
2. I have not heard that Panasonic is unreliable, and it's my perception that they're actually one of the most reliable brands. Surveys that I've read seem to indicate that Panasonic is more reliable than any other brand. This study showed that it has the lowest 2-year failure rate for any camera brand:
blog.squaretrade.com/2010/0... the post: "Panasonic is the only manufacturer to have less than a 6 percent failure rate for sub-$300 models and they achieved a less than 2 percent failure rate for $300-500 models." Not sure where you heard that Panasonic has a high failure rate, doesn't seem to be the case.
3. Battery life is not one of Panasonic's strong suits, no. It probably gets 180 shots out of a default battery where a similar Canon would get 220 shot. Casio even makes a battery that lasts 1,000 shots, which is way beyond anything out there.
98% of cameras you'll buy today run on proprietary, rechargeable lithim-ion batteries that are included with the camera, so you don't have to worry about running out and buying a new set of AA batteries after every photo shoot. If running out of battery power is a concern, buy a backup battery for like $25. So Panasonic isn't amazing in terms of battery life, nor is it abysmal.
So I'm not sure where you got your hangups about Panasonic, but I don't think you need to worry about it as much as you are, especially in regards to reliability.
That said, several manufacturers make cameras worth your money. All compact cameras have video recording.
Affordable Canon compacts like the SD1300 or SD1400 are the best out there in terms of usability and image quality, but their feature sets are pretty sparse relative to the price. None of their compacts in your price range have a big zoom. The SX120 or new SX130 both have a big zoom, but those are pretty big compared to your SD780 -- you'll have a hard time fitting either one in a pant pocket.
That said, the FH20 pretty much fits the profile of the camera you're describing on the low end of the price range, as does the Sony W370 (if you still have hangups about the Panasonic brand). Toward the higher end of your price range, you might want to look at the Panasonic ZS5 and maybe the Casio FH100 or Samsung HZ30W. Those are smallish cameras with big zooms, HD video, and decent screens that I think fit your price range.
-sandesh
i don't know much about cameras but now i think of buying a new one.
i am looking for a digital camera for below 500$,its just for home use.i prefer to have these futures
-nearly 14 megapixel
-20x zoom
-compact(not problem if it is bulky also)
-capture moving things
- excellent picture quality with no blur
-good autofocus
-excellent quality in dim light
I am going to buy a camera. My budget is upto $300. It should have atleast 10MP, atleast 8x optical zoom, good low-light shooting, good macro mode and panorama mode is an added advantage. I read your reviews often and am struck between Panasonic FH20/Panasonic ZR3/Sony H55/Canon SX120IS. Please suggest a suitable one (not necessarily among the aforesaid). Is Fuji a good option is this range? Thanks in anticipation.
The ZS5 might be better suited for your vacation, if you're not really a photography enthusiast. It has a big, 12x zoom, which helps taking pictures of monuments, landmarks, etc from far away, as well as HD video, and quite good image quality for its type (not exactly as good as the LX3, but still good). It's a robust camera for the price.
Here are my contenders after reading reviews:
Panasonic Lumix FH20
Panasonic Lumix ZR1 (or maybe ZR3 though CNET found it to be slower)
Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
Canon PowerShot A3100 IS
How would you say the A3100 and ZR1/3 stack up with the ones rated here?
Both Canons offer slightly better image quality than the FH20, but no HD video and the zooms are pretty short. The feature sets are pretty light, in other words.
We haven't reviewed the ZR1, but we weren't particularly enamored of the ZR3 -- it's a solid camera, for sure, and outperforms the others you've listed here, but it's also in a different pricing bracket.
The Olympus Tough line is a wider at 28mm. Same temperature and waterproof specs otherwise.
You won't find a fish eye though, sorry. But there are ways around that.
Also, all dSLRs have viewfinders, many extended zoom cameras do as well, but very few point-and-shoots have a viewfinder anymore.
A few Canon A models still use AAs though.
i'm not a professional photographer and i'm looking for a camera which i'll take on my vacation in Europe.. the characteristic i needed:
- easy to use (just point and shoot)
- great at night
- can capture scenery perfectly
so far, i pick panasonic lumix ZS7 and FH20..
wht's the best camera for me..? please help mee... tx..!
alex
But what a shame!!! It is not available in the Netherlands/Belgium/Germany. How is this possible. Panasonic Netherlands told me that this Best Consumer Camera of 2010 was not ment to be for Europe at all?? Why?,.. they are 100% focusing their line up marketing on the Lumix G2. That's really to bad.
Yes of course the video won't be in PAL format. Thanks for reminding me!. I guess I just have to wait.
There's also the FH20, which has an 8x optical zoom, but it's low light performance isn't stellar. But you need to understand that any point and shoot will have a limited range for flash of about 10 feet.
Thank you!
Something like the FH20 isn't a bad option -- the big zoom and image stabilization are certainly a plus. The low light performance is not bad for the price either.
But to get great band shots, you should spend a little more and go for a camera like the Canon S90 or SD4000, both of which are designed to do well in dim lighting.
Thanks for your imput!
error 18 message. Canon won't do anything about it. Many people have this same
problem with many of the canon cameras.
Comments that blast an entire line for nothing more than a single bad experience are worse than unhelpful. Keep it to yourselves.
The only ways around this problem are an optical viewfinder (not many cameras with these left, but look some of last year's Canon SD series models) or with an AMOLED screen (expensive, and as far as I know only available on some Samsung cameras). Good luck.
