Unbiased digital camera reviews, advice, and prices
  • Sorry, the guide you were looking for is no longer available. Here's a list of our current guides and editorial roundups.
Note: this camera was first sold in Apr 2008. There may be newer versions available.
Canon Digital Rebel XSi
Canon Digital Rebel XSi
A-
HQ Grade: A-
A is outstanding and exceptional, rated in the top 10% of digital cameras.
B means they are good, with some standout features.
C means they are mediocre, and probably more trouble than they are worth.
D & F mean they are absolutely awful or old. Avoid at all costs.
  • 4 out of 5
"I love this camera!"
  • 4 out of 5
"Cannon Rebel XSI"
See rating based on 1155 user reviews
Submit your own Canon XSi review!
This camera is ranked
Ask

Have a question about the XSi?
Enter it here: (You can enter more details in the next step)

Back to List
Question Answered!

Hi James, me again

Hi buddy, hope everything's fine. Finally I bought a DSLR kit which is Canon EOS 450D. Gave up Nikon D90 after detail analysis mainly on 2 grounds: a. It unnecessarily incorporates movie function that I don't need and strictly maintain dedicated equipment is always better than "2 in 1". b. I'm already familiar with Canon systems so it would be easier for me to master it. Moreover, found on the net and flickr that this camera produces really stunning results. Now, in addition to the kit lens I'm planning to get an EF-s 55-250 mm IS telezoom for safari purposes. What do u say?

BTW, became a flickr member with the username "bdsanjeed". May I invite u to view my photostream shot with P&Ss? U can follow this link: www.flickr.com/photos/sanjeed/

Sanjeed is my nickname.

Thnx & rgds.

Quazi
Report Abuse Did you find this question helpful or not helpful?
Answers This question has been answered!
by James DeRuvo (byjamesderuvo) 58450 pts
April 20, 2009 11:21 PM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Well, 250mm will give you some range, but on a safari, I think I'd rather have a little more distance from those hungry lions. Go to 300mm. And I'll check out your photos. Thanks for the heads up.
Best Answer
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
May 7, 2009 3:04 AM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Hi James. U know, as I keep learning, my EOS 450D is doing fine. But one thing concerns me. Although it produces rich and vivid greens and blues; but unlike my SX110 it does not produce vivid/rich red. The red comes rather little dull. I've tried different options under the picture style menu but could not get desired results.

Pls advise. Thnx in advance.
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
by James DeRuvo (byjamesderuvo) 58450 pts
May 8, 2009 2:16 AM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Hey Quaz. I guess I have to ask what you are judging the colors by? If you're looking at your computer monitor or even the print from your printer, it's important to understand that both your monitor and printer are probably not properly calibrated for the accuracy of the color you want. So they will look different from the camera LCD screen, to the PC monitor, to the printed page. There are calibration accessories out there, called Spyders, and they work to a certain degree. Using the Spyder is a good idea, but it’s important to keep in mind that the screen generates color differently than the printer does. One is projected, while the printer is reflected. Secondly, color standards aren’t accurate on screens vs. printing. (called “Gamut”) Calibration of the monitor and the printer has to be done, and then have the color profile applied properly. It’s a house of colorful cards. You can have the printer calibrated and adjust the monitor to match the printer (even if it looks off on the display), but it's much easier to have things printed professionally if you’re looking for an accurate color.
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
May 10, 2009 12:07 AM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Thnx buddy. I'll try to follow as u have advised.

There's one interesting thing I discovered with my local fellow TTL (Thru The Lens) group members under flickr. All of them are decades younger to me and they revealed this fact. In that group, most of the Canon DSLR users (some of them use the same model as mine) shoot in RAW. Subsequently, they give their pictures amazing looks by post processing mostly in Adobe. They have advised me to do the same.

Could you please throw some light on that? Thnx again.
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
by James DeRuvo (byjamesderuvo) 58450 pts
May 13, 2009 11:31 PM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Definitely. Adobe Lightroom is the software you want to use for that. A good book for that isAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Adventure by Mike Aaland. It'll show you just how much a difference post processing makes on your photographs.
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
May 14, 2009 12:31 AM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Thnx buddy, u have been of great help.
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?

This Question is Answered. If you have further information you may add it here.

Need to add formatting or links? Use BBCode.
Spell-check
Start Here!
Most Popular
  1. Panasonic FZ35
  2. Canon SD1200 IS
  3. Canon 500D
  4. Canon A1000 IS
  5. Canon SX20 IS
  6. Panasonic FS15
  7. Samsung SL30
  8. Canon 50D
  9. Nikon D90
  10. Canon SX120
Camera Brand
Price Range
Camera Type
Camera Line
Megapixels
Hands-On Reviews
Latest Cameras
Top Searches
Our Other Sites

Close
Loading