Unbiased digital camera reviews, advice, and prices
  • Sorry, the guide you were looking for is no longer available. Here's a list of our current guides and editorial roundups.
Note: this camera was first sold in Aug 2006. There may be newer versions available.
Canon Digital Rebel XTi / Canon 400D (Body Only)
Canon Digital Rebel XTi / Canon 400D (Body Only)
B
HQ Grade: B
A is outstanding and exceptional, rated in the top 10% of digital cameras.
B means they are good, with some standout features.
C means they are mediocre, and probably more trouble than they are worth.
D & F mean they are absolutely awful or old. Avoid at all costs.
  • 4 out of 5
"Very good starter camera"
  • 4 out of 5
"New toy for old timer"
See rating based on 1856 user reviews
Submit your own Canon 400D review!
This camera is ranked
Ask

Have a question about the 400D?
Enter it here: (You can enter more details in the next step)

Back to List
Question Answered!
Rafael (Rafael) 0 pts
December 3, 2006 12:03 PM

HUGE CONFLICT! (or maybe not) Canon 20D or Canon 400D (Digital Rebel Xti)??

I've been through countless camera review websites such as "dpreview.com". I've read countless personal reviews for both cameras. But the question still remains: "For a first digital SLR, does one buy the typical entry level, latest model canon 400d. Or is it worth it to spend a little more for a more durable, more responsive camera like the canon 20d?"
I already have decent glass in my 2 current eos lenses, so megapixels don't factor into my decision (I wont be printing bigger than 11x14). The 400d's still seem to be having glitches in underexposure, while the 20d's have been around long enough to have corrected all of their own glitches. They seemingly have the same amount of features, except for the notable dust-reduction technology on the 400d, and only the 20d features spot metering. Are there more notable differences I should know about? One important difference is in the material. The 400d is only fragile plastic, while the 20d sports a more rugged magnesium alloy body (some say that the solid feeling adds for more handheld stability). But does the material of the body even really matter? I would gratefully appreciate an answer to these questions and whatever other insight I can get on this topic.
Report Abuse Did you find this question helpful or not helpful?

This question is also associated with Kodak C743.

Answers This question has been answered!
Andrew Skinner (blackdoorphotos) 18535 pts
December 3, 2006 1:48 PM
1 people rated this answer helpful, 1 people rated this answer not helpful
 
Rafael,

Personally, if I had the money for it, I would go with the Canon 20D. If you already have EOS lenses, then I'll assume you know how to work with SLR cameras. You won't need the entry level. Go for the big boy in the 20D.

Andrew
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
kz (kzjr) 2 pts
December 3, 2006 8:27 PM
1 people rated this answer helpful, 1 people rated this answer not helpful
 
yeah the rebel has no spot meter!
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
TomH (tharrison) 9645 pts
December 3, 2006 11:46 PM
9 people rated this answer helpful, 1 people rated this answer not helpful
 
First, it's important to understand that there are three parallel generations of Canon SLRs:

* 10D and Rebel 300
* 20D and Rebel 350 XT
* 30D and Rebel 400 XTi

Within each generation, the cameras use the same (identical) image processing chip and internal electronics, so are the same in some important ways: start up time, focus and exposure time, image quality. Non-Rebel and Rebel within each generation differ in two main ways: metal vs. polycarbonate bodies, and some software functions are disabled in the Rebel, making the metal version a bit heavier, and also a bit more durable. Otherwise, they take the same lenses, take the same pictures and are all great, great cameras.

It was clear that there was a big leap in performance between first generation and second. The 20D and 350D were blockbuster cameras -- they completely wowed the reviewers and the people who use them. Perhaps the most important change is the 2-/12 LCD, which is a good thing. While the third generation is not so dramatically better than the second -- a bit faster, better high-ISO performance, bigger LCD: generally reviews come down to something like "even better".

So I'll take a slightly different position than Andrew and recommend the 400D (XTi) over the 20D, unless you are doing a lot of photography in bad weather or rough conditions.

The 20D is no longer being made, so what you buy is either old stock, returns, or refurbished -- all of these are fine as long as you're sure you're getting the genuine article ... but even so, prices are still around $850 (the 30D is around $1050). The 400D is around $700.

Are your going to be taking your camera in rough conditions on a regular basis? If you'll be hiking, climbing, river wading, snow storms and other non-camera-friendly adventures, the more durable metal body is worth the extra money, even if it's heavier. Otherwise, save your money for a nicer lens and go with the Rebel and get one incredibly blazing fast and great camera.
Best Answer
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
Rafael (Rafael) 0 pts
December 4, 2006 4:52 PM
2 people rated this answer helpful, 1 people rated this answer not helpful
 
hey tom,

i wish they had reply buttons for posts. anyway, thanks a lot for taking the time to answer my question.
i guess my qualm about the body material is because i hope to have a camera that lasts me through college (or at least 2-3 years). furthermore, no, i will not be taking my camera through rough conditions. but i will however be travelling with it a lot (a eurotrip this summer). so i just want to make sure that i have a dependable camera, one that i can carry around with me the whole time and not have to worry about missing a shot. i suppose i'm just paranoid about the plastic body breaking. but then again, who goes around dropping their d-slr, right?
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
Ray 0 pts
February 20, 2007 6:53 PM
0 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
mmm,you've answered all the questions I had in mind.Thanks,great job teleman1@cox.net
Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?
Andy 1 pts
June 25, 2008 6:10 PM
1 people rated this answer helpful, 0 people rated this answer not helpful
 
personally I find the difference between a 24 oz. camera and an 18 oz camera to be significant.
That is when I am backpacking, skiing or generally hiking. I own the 20D and use it for all these things, but
am seeking a 400D as a backup camera for the outdoor excursions when every ounce counts.
If I pair the 400D with a 24-85 Canon lens (pretty sharp for a consumer lens), then I have a sub-two-pound
package for the backcountry.

Report Abuse Did you find this answer helpful or not helpful?

This Question is Answered. If you have further information you may add it here.

Need to add formatting or links? Use BBCode.
Spell-check
Start Here!
Most Popular
  1. Panasonic FZ35
  2. Canon SD1200 IS
  3. Canon 500D
  4. Canon A1000 IS
  5. Canon SX20 IS
  6. Panasonic FS15
  7. Samsung SL30
  8. Canon 50D
  9. Nikon D90
  10. Canon SX120
Camera Brand
Price Range
Camera Type
Camera Line
Megapixels
Hands-On Reviews
Latest Cameras
Top Searches
Our Other Sites

Close
Loading