Cool! You know a lot of things others would love to know. Go ahead and write your own review and let the world know if you made a great choice!
Subscribe to receive email notifications of new questions and answers for this product.
You can keep track of all the products you want on your profile page once you have registered.
Click here to receive email notifications of new questions and answers for this product.
| A | is outstanding and exceptional, rated in the top 10% of digital cameras. |
| B | means they are good, with some standout features. |
| C | means they are mediocre, and probably more trouble than they are worth. |
| D & F | mean they are absolutely awful or old. Avoid at all costs. |
- 4 out of 5
- 5 out of 5
Submit your own Canon A720 IS review!
- 18th of 92 in Point and Shoot
- 7th of 53 in 8 Megapixel
- 45th of 82 in Canon
- 23rd of 87 in $350 - $600
- 24th of 71 in Over $600
| Compare 2 store ratings and prices... | ||
| Shop for Canon A720 IS accessories. | ||
| Electronics Club | $599.99 |
|
| C4DEALZ | $629.99 |
|
Have a question about the A720 IS?
Enter it here:
(You can enter more details in the next step)
Is the Powershot 720 A Battery Hog?
I just purchased the Canon Powershot A 720 IS camera. I love it except for one problem: it appears to be eating up batteries at an alarming rate. My first time using the camera was last week on a 3-day trip to Las Vegas. I shot approximately 100 pictures, most without flash, and went through three full sets of batteries (6 alkalines), and had to put in a fourth set when I got home. I can't figure what else to do to conserve power, and the batteries I used were all fresh and name brand. Has anyone else found battery consumption a drawback on this particular camera? I love the 720 in every other way, but can't afford to "feed its power habit" if this keeps up!
-- Kip
I'm still hoping that this new 720 camera will show normal, average usage on its batteries. My husband has an older Powershot model (about 4 years old). It uses four AA batteries rather than just two per usage -- but it takes a ton of photos without a battery change.
As I mentioned, feature for feature and pricewise, the new Canon 720 is exactly what I want -- but the jury's still out on how I'll feel if it turns out to "hog up" lithium AA's as well as conventional AA batteries. No one should have to change batteries three times in less than 100 photos, especially with 75% of these photos taken WITHOUT using the flash!! And considering that the camera's own manual claims you should get at least 140 photos minimum -- with flash -- on a set of regular AA alkalines, there's no excuse for what I've encountered thus far.
I hope other new users of the Canon A 720 IS camera will continue to post about their own experiences, so we can find out if this is an aberration with my particular camera unit, or an actual across-the-board problem with this new model line itself.
Did you contact Canon to ask them about your battery hog problem? I find that Canon after sales service are very helpful, so they might have an idea on what's going on, maybe they'll even check out your camera for you. Better do this before warranty expires! My mom's A570 IS is experiencing a similar problem, it hogs even rechargeable NiMH 2500 mAH batteries, battery indicator comes out even putting in a newly recharged set of the NiMH. Could be due to the quality of the NiMH, don't know.
But obviously this is NOT an isolated issue.
-- Kip
This camera has a lot of cool features, but some of them are unnecessary sometimes. So, I decided to look into the configurations of the camera to find something i could deactivate to improve the power consuming. The evil one here I think is the Image Stabilizer. The default setting for this option is Continuous, which means the camera will try to stabilize the image at the moment you are focusing until you press the shutter button and this can be a long time. I changed it to Shoot Only, but If you use a tripod or something, turn it off.
The other settings i have deactivated: Red Eyes (leave this for Photoshop or adjust in Playback mode), Auto Rotate, MF-Point Zoom, Safety MF, AF-assist Beam. I only activate these features in situations they can be used, otherwise they remains off.
I bought a set with 4 NiMH rechargeable batteries from Sony and now I got 200 pictures with 2 of these batteries, including flash sometimes.
It's a little better now.
[]'s
In the past, I have found Canon's Tech Support department to be marginal at times. I called about the A720 IS camera shortly after I got it and realized the battery issue. The woman I got was little more than a customer service agent. She read me what the manual said and that was all she could suggest. She was not trained in any fashion to handle technical questions. The second time I called in (about a Canon printer, unrelated to the A720 problem), I got an excellent guy who'd been with Canon printers for 10 years. He told me that most of their agents really aren't trained as technical experts, but that he had worked with printers for years on the side. So, I got lucky, I guess.
I feel that Canon's Owners' is not accurate and that they need to adjust it immediately for people considering the purchase of this camera. Eating batteries the way it does negates the advantage of its many features. Who wants to buy new batteries -- or have to recharge? -- every minimum number of shots.
I hope and encourage all of you who are expressing the same problems and frustrations that I've raised to PLEASE CALL CANON IMMEDIATELY and register your dissatisfaction with them. Unless they hear from a large number of disgruntled consumers with the A720 IS, they will think it's an isolated issue. When I call them this week, I plan to ask them if they are hearing from other consumers with the same battery issues. I hope they tell me yes, but unless they DO hear from all of us, Canon will have no way of knowing. I will also post to this group what Canon tells me about my warranty and how they think the problem can be resolved (new camera? repair? rebate?). I'm afraid they'll suggest I send the camera back to them for servicing and "repair" -- which won't help at all, since this battery-eating problem seems to be attached to this particular model and can't be "repaired. "
-- Kip
You should all be aware: You should not use traditional alkaline batteries with *any* digital camera. They will not last. You need to use NiMH batteries to get the most longevity.
If the NiMH's are still giving you trouble then definitely contact Canon (after you make sure they are fully charged and not suffering from old age), but if you're seeing poor battery performance from alkaline batteries, that's because those type of batteries never play well with digital cameras.
Battery usage isn't mentioned in Steve's full review of the Canon A720 IS model; his review merely quotes what Canon's Owners' Manual claims for pictures per battery installation. Obviously the manual is severely misleading. As more people purchase the PowerShot A 720 and bump into the battery issue, it's going to bring more displeased postings.
It would be useful if the people who review for this site read and notice what we share. Perhaps they will amend their review or at least, do their own testings to check on the accuracy of our concerns.
-- Kip
On your note of the review sites checking out this forum or any other of the like, I guess you are a bit over hopeful on that end.
What you could do is email them instead and point them to this discussion. Some of this review sites have discussion pages of their own, so that might be the way to go to "Notificy" them of the issues and concerns that users are experiencing.
Rough idea of what they are concluding is that due to the 2 AA usage, the camera required higher running voltage compared to the ones using 4 AAs. Hence, as not all brands of NiMH are equal, not many in the market will be that compatible. It seems that SANYO's Eneloop is a good choice of NiMH for the A570 due to it's better performance in providing constant running high voltage. Other NiMH which provides lower running voltages maybe start to display the low battery warning early even though they have plenty of charge left as the camera low battery indicator activates based on the running voltage?!
Another suggestion was that the battery contact point at the lid was not good enough. A guy came up with using "toothpicks" as "jacks" to push up the contact point and he say the problem was solved. Some other forumers there are trying that and are agreeing with him.
Go over to the A570 IS page and have a read, the problem most probably is similar!
I took a few moments today to call Canon's Tech Support department. According to the rep that I spoke with, Canon does NOT recommend using lithium batteries at all in its PowerShot models. Canon recommends either straight alkaline batteries or else rechargeable NiMH batteries. We spoke for a while, and I told him I'd had no success using straight alkaline batteries -- I went through those rapidly.
The Canon guy told me that another option that could help conserve battery strength is turning the Image Stabilization feature from continuous mode (on all the time) to the "shoot" mode, where it doesn't kick into play until the shutter is pressed down halfway. He also pointed out that the LCD screen uses additional power. (Maybe the Owners' Manual tests only used the optical viewfinder and not the LCD screen!) He seemed somewhat surprised to hear my concerns, and indicated Canon hasn't had any/many complaints at all on the A 720 IS PowerShot model. I asked him if it was realistic to expect to get the 400 shots per battery set that the Owners' Manual indicates. He said the tests are done under optimum conditions (whatever those are), so maybe it's like the EPA tests on how many miles to the gallon a certain model of car is supposed to get. They rarely give you anything like their estimated sticker mileage once you get them out on the road!
Anyway, Canon's suggestion is to avoid using lithium batteries completely. They recommended I buy a charger and NiMH batteries, turn off the constant Image Stabilization feature, and track my battery usage to see if I notice any difference. If not, then they suggested I send the camera back under its warranty for servicing.
But somehow I don't think my problems stem from a malfunctioning camera. I think what we're seeing may be more a trait of the newer PowerShot models.
-- Kip
Well, then the next question would be: are there other camera manufacturers' models on the market that match these series of PowerShots feature for feature, but don't eat up the batteries? I've always shot with Canon cameras since they first introduced the EOS system some years ago. I've always found Canon cameras to be excellent. Is it possible that Nikon, Olympus, Sony, etc. now make models that are comparable (viewfinder, large LCD screen, and extensive shooting modes and features) yet are more reasonable in their battery usage?
Maybe all of these models use batteries at an alarming rate, no matter who makes the camera.
Canon still claims that they aren't hearing from consumers about PowerShot cameras hogging batteries.
The A-series camera which use to run on 4AA NiMH didn't have the battery hogging problem. Shame on Canon for forgoing this to get their A-series camera smaller and lighter to compete with other manufacturers small size shooters. They should have stick with the 4AA batts system as it was the features and functions of the camera that was the attractiveness. Now since employing on 2AA for most of their A-series models, not only battery hogging has become a problem for some models, the shooting time performance has also dropped, ie you'll have to wait a few seconds after a shoot with flash to even know that your camera is alive?! With my previous 4AA Canon A70, I was able to use burst mode with flash! How different the cameras have become! Maybe that's why Camera manufacturers keep promoting no flash photography with high ISO etc... sigh....
DB, on you $200 budget, well it'll be hard press to get you a digital IXUS, which should have been an ideal choice for size, quality and features. So maybe you could either check out those little Nikons (which are deprive of functions and control) or maybe Sonys (W-series seems to be around that price point, although the memory cards will be slightly more expensive, but not by too much)...
Tigervh is so right on about the lag time in shooting between flash charges. It seems to take forever, even on fresh batteries, for the flash to recycle so you can shoot again.
I think Tigervh is dead on as well about the 4 AA batteries versus the 2 AA batteries these cameras now use. When I saw how compact the A 720 IS model is, how many features it packs, and yet only uses 2 batteries instead of 4, I thought it was an improvement. Obviously that was an erroneous assumption. :-)
There are so many things that are right with this model, and so much to love about this camera, that it's saddening to find such a weakness. I really love shooting with the 720.
The issue with the battery is not about high capacity. It's just that the camera always use/suck up battery power from both batteries at any one time for any one function. High capacity NiMH may just help a wee bit here, but the lag will still be very apparent, as Canon themselves states the flash recycle time to be around 10 seconds. That's why the 4AA batteries models shows a significant difference as it uses 2AA batteries at any one time for any function, hence when you do one function with the camera, 2AA will be used, while the other 2AA will be ready for the next task.
The major difference between higher vs. lower capacity NiMH will be the number of photos / longer usage time. Not really on the speed of power recycle.
Are most of you finding that the camera usually actually shuts down shortly after the premature battery warning? Or is it more the case that the warning makes us (very understandably) feel trepidation, but that the camera continues to function for a good long time.
This reviewer's remarks are kind of interesting...
http://kenrockwell.com/canon/compacts/a570.htm
If you don't feel like sifting through his whole review, here's an excerpt...
"The A570 has the same overly sensitive low battery warning as the other A-series Canons I've used. It often will flash the red battery symbol or shut down, even if the batteries are fine or new. Don't believe it; keep trying and keep shooting. My 4-year-old Canon A70 has always done the same thing."
THis camera uses AA size batteries. So it is advisable to get those NiMH rechargeable battery packs. Currently, Sanyo's Eneloop is getting good reviews from users, I myself are using a set of Eneloop and they are performing well. Apart from this, any reputable brand of rechargeable AA should be good enough, although I would still recommend you get a set of 4 Eneloop. 2 for using and 2 for backup. If you can't find any Eneloops, then get a set of reputable brand NiMH with at least 2700mAH.
I stumbled across these link as I googled Powershot 720 battery useage. Yes I have this problem as well, some nice tips here. Two techs at Cannon both said to remove the batteries from the camera when not in use would help, is this true? My question is this, this is my first digital camera and I am paralyzed so I have to get my nurse aid to take my pictures and she is very non tech. I usually just leave it set to AUTO, but is there any easy steps I should be aware of to get the best picture? Any tips are very appreciated.
Ok, it's true that having the batteries removed from the camera will help in reducing the battery drain somewhat, but I must say that it won't be that much, since the battery will drain itself slowly even if not in the camera! For this reason, I have recommended to use Sanyo's Eneloop NiMH, this is because it is one of the new types of batteries that drains extremely slowly, and Sanyo states that it will keep about 80% of its charge for up to a year if not use. Removing batteries from the camera is not a practical idea for me, since you may miss you chance at a shot, when you see something interesting.
Leaving it at AUTO is best for people who are not into photography. It's better than spending a few hours getting the settings right. Another easier way will be to use to camera preset functions such as landscape, protrait, scenes, etc... for different types of shots when you know which shot to take. Like if say you want to take some portraits or portraity shots, just ask your nurse aid to turn the knob to the portrait position... it will be difficult for non-enthusiast to venture into the Av, Tv, M functions, so it's best to just leave it at Auto or the presets.
I read in the manual about the different scenes, like flowers, landscape, etc as you mentioned but those littles symbols are hard to remember which is for which. So I just leave it on AUTO but one day we took some pictures of Mom's flowers and used the flower function and this camera takes great looking shots! If somehow I could mark those function symbols, but AUTO works very good. Maybe one day we'll learn the function symbols out.
I just called Cannon support and the guy was extremely nice and help. As we were talking his camera even got the low battery warning:) I told him the last Cannon tech wasn't so nice and he apolgized and said Canon is lifetime support, he was awesome. We went through all the options to save on the battery but a question. When I turn the flash to OFF, whenever the camera is turned back on, so is the flash. Shouldn't the flash stay off until turned back on?
With me leaving the camera to AUTO he advised me to not change like the suggestions below which were posted here:
The other settings i have deactivated: Red Eyes (leave this for Photoshop or adjust in Playback mode), Auto Rotate, MF-Point Zoom, Safety MF, AF-assist Beam. I only activate these features in situations they can be used, otherwise they remains off.
Thanks for the reply!
Mickey
Av, Tv, M functions, so it's best to just leave it at Auto or the presets.
Report Abuse Did you find this
1. red eye function, I find that whether you turn it on or not, Canon A-series shoots the same way, I might be wrong, where the camera will flash a weak light before the shot, hence turning this off will help.
2. Auto rotate, well, I actually find the auto rotate a nice feature, so I kept it on.
3. MF-Point Zoom, safety MF, these won't apply for Auto and preset modes, so you don't have to worry about them.
4. AF-assist beam, very useful to improve focusing speed...
On the flash, I guess Canon set the firmware in a way where when you turn off the camera and switch it back and, some of the functions like flash will revert to default setting in AUTO... that means you just have to keep it in mind.
To make sure I made some measurements in my camera: the low battery warning occurs at an operating voltage of 2.30 volt, and the camera quits at 2.07 volt ('change batteries' warning). A low battery warning is useless if it occurs at a voltage above the plateau of the NIMH battery's discharge curve. For example, the low battery warning in my camera is useless for a pair of batteries with a plateau of 2.30-2.15 volt, which is typical for the batteries I use. Sanyo Eneloop batteries seem to have a higher plateau (2.6-2.4 volt), so that would be better in the camera.
MF-Point Zoom, safety MF, these won't apply for Auto and preset modes, so you don't have to worry about them.
And the LCD of course drains the batteries the most I would think, the last tech said I could turn it off if I wanted. Just push the display twice, but of course you could not see the pictures you take. I'm thinking about this until I get the NiMH rechargeable batteries, thoughts? Thanks again..
1. ISO can be set to any of the set-able values for P mode, AUTO mode you'd just get ISO Auto and ISO High.
2. The flash thing, I'm using a S5, and the flash stays on/off before and after shut down for P, I'm not sure about Auto, but I guess the firmware setup is the same between these Canons P&S.
3. Face detection: for P mode, the face detection works a bit differently compare to Auto, you'd have to press a few buttons to fix on a face, where as for AUTO, the default auto face detection is on. Just try it out, you'd get used to it, but if you need others to take a photo for you of people (portraits/group shots), it'll still be best to shoot in AUTO mode.
Apart from that, it's pretty much the same for P and AUTO, where you would get to manipulate more settings with P mode, ie. ISO, flash etc...
ok, for the MF-Point zoom and safety MF, it'll only apply for shooting in 'M' mode, ie the full manual mode, so it should be ok to leave it as it is, it would do much effect to the power, so no worries.
Well, trying to safe the power with turning off the LCD is a good idea, but then you'd missed out on some shooting habits that digital cameras brought to photography. One thing with A720IS, the viewfinder will only show you about 80% of the actual shot! So if you shoot through the viewfinder, you will have to keep that in mind. and this would effect the framing of the shot. The viewfinder main objective (to me at least), is for shooting outdoors when it's too bright to see the image properly through the LCD.
Do get those NiMH early, it safes you tonnes of alkalines! I'd again recommend Eneloops.
Good luck on sorting out your battery issues.
photography. For those who said they get the red icon for low battery, but when they cut the camera back on and no low battery warning. Tech guy mentioned the batteries getting warm and maybe other parts and they cool off, thus no blinking icon when turning the camera back on..maybe just his thoughts..
TZ, it's not a disgusting problem, it's just some people just don't want to find out what the actual reason behind the issue. It's just a matter of batteries. heck, I'd better stop explaining about this thing... and stick with 35mm if you wish... 35mm produces great pictures, but you'd missed out on tonnes of benefits of the digital camera brings... heck... I better not elaborate on this either...
As the person who originally initiated this conversational thread, "Is the A720IS A Battery Hog?," I've greatly enjoyed seeing the ongoing dialog on this camera! Currently I'm using Energizer Lithium Batteries, which have helped a lot, and also purchased rechargeable batteries, which I haven't used yet. I agree with the person who said, "If you turn off all the features, why'd you buy the camera in the first place?" That seems counterproductive to me. :-)
So . . . .where are these Sanyo Eneloop batteries sold? Are they available everywhere, or only at professional camera supply dealers?
-- Kip
Consumer Reports has just rated the Canon Powershot A720IS a Best Buy in their current issue that features top rated digital cameras. They single it out for a number of its features, including -- get this -- "longer than usual battery life."
I do love this camera. So many other camera models these days don't even have viewfinders, for starters. And the range of features on the A720IS really make it a standout.
http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/should-i-use-the-lcd-or-viewfinder-on-my-digital-camera/
Anyway, Macro shot... it's where you take the shot up close and personal! so to speak! ha! it does wonders on depth of field, but then, you have to be very close to the subject... mostly for taking closeup of flowers, insects, maybe some nice and tasty looking food (you know those nice food/cook books where the pictures of the food on the plate always looks so nice...) those are Macro shots! haha...
-- Kip
P.S. For a long time, I had 0 points. I'm not sure how I managed to accumulate 19 of them along the way, but I've sure enjoyed this conversation. Don't worry, though -- I'm not expecting any points for my last two posted comments, ha ha.
Sounds great -- I'd love to check it out, thanks!
Would that address be www.flickr.com?
just join the group, it's not limited to S5 users... although you can't post non-S5 photos, but still, the group discussion are always informative, if not fun!
Certain rechargeable batteries do have memory, but that's for the charging time and amount... but most new NiMH don't have that anymore... and I'm certain that cameras don't have this, unless it uses built in batteries...
Canon would be killing themselves if they built in a memory like this! It would be stupid! and Particularly for Canon, it has no point in doing this, since they don't manufacture alkaline batteries...
Somehow that information on "internal camera memory" didn't sound right to me, either. Sales people will tell you the weirdest stuff, and look you straight in the eye when they do it. Canon would indeed be shooting themselves in the foot to manufacture a camera with a potential recipe for disaster, depending on your batteries (and then not even mention it in their Owners' Manual).
What can I do with 25 points....?
=========================================
Thanks Kip, sorry for getting back this late. Before I could get the complete question out the Canon Tech said that is false. Cannon is built to use alkaline, NIHM and lithium.Using alkaline would in no way mess with the internal memory....Maybe I should put this on http://www.snopes.com/ :)
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/002-6111179-5494454?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=eneloop&Go.x=10&Go.y=7
All-battery.com did not find them in the search and I do not mind paying a few extra bucks as I want to get the best, thanks!
Mickey
-- Kip
Ajit
Ajit
http://thomas-distributing.com/la_crosse_bc-900_battery_charger.php
Now I see it already comes with batteries but I ordered 4 Sanyo Eneloop's and the total for the charger and four batteries was $57.91.
Was this a pretty good deal? I have no clue but I'll be set soon with the correct batteries..much thanks!
My camera is just over a year, and so when I called Canon they said they are not aware of any issues related to this problem, and would only offer to charge me to repair the camera.
It might be worth everyone here calling up and complaining. I think it is awful for Canon to hide and say they are not aware of such a problem when there are so many people in various forums on the web reporting this identical problem. The internet changes everything!
Good luck, and while I love this camera, it is probably my first and last Canon purchase. I expected excellent customer service and felt let down. I spent $400 on a camera and it lasts for a year? Come on Canon!!
I had occasion to call Canon's Tech Support department yesterday about another matter, and while I was on the phone, I brought up the subject of batteries for the Canon A720 IS PowerShot. I told the tech that I was using lithium batteries, but that Eneloops had been suggested by a number of folks more expert than me. He said that at one time, Canon didn't recommend lithium batteries at all, but that after additional testing, they now believe they are fine and do very well in this camera. He also recommended NIMH batteries. He said to avoid cheap brand alkaline batteries. As far as Eneloops, he seemed surprised that they were specially recommended and didn't suggest that they would increase my battery life or shooting time.
-- Kip
-michael
And as a technology engineer by profession, it's inexcusable to have to shut down features -- that's why we all bought the camera in the first place. This isn't Apollo 13 here...
This is my first Canon, and while I love it, it will be my last. I can't support a manufacturer who turns a blind eye on their customers and pretends nothing is wrong when they can read the posts in this and many other forums and see everybody complaining. Shame on Canon.
Thanks to all the tinkerers in this forum who helped work around the engineering problems on behalf of Canon.
michael
-michael
I bought A710IS 2yrs ago, and had the same problem with the battery.
Seems like it's working now.
I will never buy Canon again.
The owners manual does not state that Lithium cannot be used - is I'm using them.
One side note: The only drawback I have seen to these batteries (and it may not be related) is indoor night flash is a bit strong.
Flash power is not related to type of batteries used, the power your batteries gives will only determine the length of time to which the flash recharges for you to take your photo.
Indoor flash too strong, few reasons,
1. might be that you are taking the photo too close to your subject,
2. Flash power can be set via the function menu (when you shoot in P, Av, Tv, M modes) check whether you've put it in the "0" setting (which will make it auto)...
Although I'm not going to say there's anything wrong with using lithium batteries for this camera, I've read somewhere that Canon does not advise using Lithiums for these cameras ( but I think main reason is because they did not run test on them), so if you find using them suits your needs, then it's ok. But again, I would say that using rechargeables NiMH will be much more economical, since a set will last a few hundred cycles if you use them regularly (vs. 1 set 1 cycle for lithiums). The costs mounts up if you shoot regularly...
I believe the Everyready Lithium battery solution works for the majority of camera users.
1) We are not professional photographers
2) We use our cameras maybe a few times a month
3) We are too lazy to recharge, and would have trouble remembering "where" we left the charger
4) We want batteries that will work when we need them too
I fully expect to get 1000 pics (or more) on a set of batteries, and that is not including the videos I take.
Thank God Cannon is still using AA batteries. Most of the high end cameras have switched to odd sized batteries. Doesn't that just figure? They finally perfect the perfect battery, only for camera manufacturers to change the size. Sigh ...
a good 40 minutes of video and going strong but the pics were very dark. Tech had me to try P mode instead of Auto and we tried bumping the ISO until all the way up but no help so I returned the camera to be looked at. The pictures taken in AUTO mode with flash on and close ups shouldn't had been dark, even in decent lighting areas. I will ask them about the toothpick trick, as the battery door is very hard to manage....
i've read about the toothpick solution, i hope it will work for me too. thanks for the great help..
hope i can give you a positive feedback later, ciao!
UPDATE==== below
I sent the camera in to be repaired, received it and today we took about 7 shots inside the house which wasn't brightly lighted but not dark either. Set on AUTO with the flash on and the pictures looked worse, it looked like a dark film over the object in the pictures even closeup shots. I'm pretty upset, Cannon is emailing me a label so I do not have to pay this time for shipping but this is not good........now I'll be without the camera another week and half....guess you can say I'm pi$$ed...:(
The downside to this faster shooting advantage is that due to the P&S relatively small CCD (sensor), photo shot at higher ISO will have a high amount of noise (grainy effect). Personally, if possible, I always shoot at the lowest ISO possible, unless the subject matter is moving too fast... then I'll step up the ISO... but before that, I'll try enlarging the aperture (using the lowest F number in Av setting)... But that's me, since I usually shoot in Av or Tv mode instead of Auto / P mode...
And to your question, we should restrict ourself from going to ISO HIGH setting. Only do this when you are: -
1. Shooting without flash in darkish conditions.
2. Subject matter is moving around and the lighting is insufficient.
You should never go for high ISO if you are shooting with flash... it defeats the purpose. The flash almost always correctly expose sufficiently, even at the lowest ISO80 setting. Especially Canon's flashes (which I think is quite superior to the other small P&S cameras on the market).
I can't seem to figure out how your problem manifested (if it's not some sort of malfunction). And since you shoot in AUTO mode, it's can't be any setting done by you!
Do you post your photos to FLICKR? Maybe we can have a look there at it? www.flickr.com
Alternatively, you could email your one of the bad pic to me for a look at the setting... maybe we can see something there, i.e. if it's some sort of camera settings gone haywired? my email: tigervyh@hotmail.com
Tiger is right on of course, and we look to him to school us!
I was able to capture an amazing photo with my 720 IS. It is a hi-rez photo of a sphinx moth on a butterfly bush. Now the sphinx moth's wings move so fast, they cannot be seen with the naked eye. I used close-up, and ISO 1600. Pretty cool pic. http://mttu.com/Sphinx_moth.jpg
And Tiger, thanks for suggesting Mickey post his photos on Flickr.com so we can see the problems he's dealing with. This might help all of us.
I am just a hacker photographer. See Tiger for the pro. I just am grateful for digital, as I am the guy who takes an entire roll of regular film - and it all comes back blank. LOL - I just had to reset everything to "default" on my Cannon as I goofed something up somewhere. As in most things, "experiment, experiment, experiment!"
Thanks again Kip. BTW - that Sphinx moth was only 3/4 of an inch long. What a great camera we have!
Steve, what settings were you using when you took the picture of that Sphinx moth? Awesome pic, I have some beautiful flower shots from back in the Summer and using AUTO mode as I am a newbie. Here is the link to the pictures on Flickr, we were just taking radom shots fast so sort of dumb pics :)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/
I took a look at your photos, and I think I was able to recreate your problem. Take a look at my test photos, and tell me what you think. http://www.flickr.com/photos/32532888@N04/
I'm "in the dark" now because nobody is explaining anything. Tiger offered a comment on one of Mickey's Flickr photos, but not on any of the others; and Steve, you say you've recreated Mickey's problem but -- what IS the problem? What's causing it? Is it operator error or camera malfunction? What's the solution??? Help -- could someone please explain? This is like following a joke but never hearing the punch line . . . or something like that. :-)
took a look at your test shots, cool, you replicated the type of shots that were bugging Mickey, but how did you do that? Can't see your EXIF data on your photos? So if you replicated this problem, then it's NOT a problem? Steve, please elaborate!
KIP, problem Mickey having is with the badly exposed photo (which were shot using AUTO Mode with ISO AUTO and FLASH turn on). In normal cases, all of us would expect the photos capture under these settings to be properly exposed, hence the problem.
I'm using a S5 IS, so I've yet to experience this. Steve managed to replicate the problem/effect, so we'd like to find out how he did that!
The problem was not static. Sometimes the darkness was high, sometimes low. Sometimes to the left, sometimes to the right. If it was a problem with the camera, the problem would have remained static.
No my friends this problem is called a left finger. When he takes pictures, he is waving a finger in front of the flash bulb. That's why the darkness is all over the place! Which ever side of the flash bulb he covers with his finger, becomes dark. When he gets his finger out of the way, he has a perfect picture.
I can relate, as I had a nasty habit of sticking a left finger in the upper left hand side of a photo. As digital cameras become smaller and smaller, it becomes easier and easier to stick in finger in the wrong place.
Simple user error!
Mickey, better not tell Canon about the finger thing?! Else, They may charge you for the service this time!
Don't feel bad Mickey. I have done this myself, that's why I knew what it was (and why I was able to recreate the effect in 2 minutes). It's all part of the learning curve bro.
Hey - look at the bright side ... you could have been using 35mm film and had to pay not just for the film - but the photos as well. Thank God for digital cameras where one can *learn* to be a decent photographer, without paying an arm and leg for film!!!
I usually shoot one-handed if the camera is tiny, unless it's a long shutter shot.
Look at the bright side, Canon may not be able to "rectify" your problem, and they may proposed to replace your camera with a new one?! haha! Just my wishful thinking!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/3032696966/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/3031820647/
Why isn't this one below not bright?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/3032680506/
Much thanks!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32532888@N04/3042213186/ equals this http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/3032662808/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32532888@N04/3042213172/ equals this http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/3032653678/
BTW - I did a Google image search to find a pic of a finger. Sheesh - you should have seen the porn images it pulled up!
I found a page on the internet with some graphical illustrations. have a look,
http://vesnakozelj.com/photography/fundamentals/supporting-the-camera-holding-with-your-hands
Hope that helps.
Bone on bone ... every body part supported, and positions correct. I never thought of its application to photography - but it makes perfect sense now. Great link!
Anyway, it's great that you two were able to help Mickey. Now let's see what interesting solution Canon's tech department comes up with for Mickey's camera!! They'll probably just clean it and send it back again.
Kip
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32434168@N02/?saved=1
Don't say anything more to Brenda about her fingers. Just watch her hand positioning when she takes photos. Old habits die hard, and eventually she will go back to what she was doing before. Make a game of it. This could be a lot of fun!
Il y a quelques semaines, j'ai perdu mon livre d'instruction pour ma caméra CANON A720IS. Est-ce que je pourrais en avoir une copie sur le NET ou simplement des parties comme: Comment après avoir télécharger mes photos sur mon ordi. je peux enlever les photos que je ne veux pas faire imprimer. J'ai environ 180 photos sur ma caméra et je veux simplement avoir celles dont j'ai besoin.
SVP, aidez-moi!!!!!
Mes coordonnés sont au bas.
Just go to a Canon website, you should be able to find a link to download the manual.
You can pick out which photos you want in the computer after downloading your photos to it. Alternatively, you could pick out the photos you want to print by marking it in the camera one by one... I find choosing from the computer easier.
Hope that answers your question.
Il suffit d'aller sur un site Web de Canon, vous devriez être en mesure de trouver un lien pour télécharger le manuel.
Vous pouvez choisir les photos que vous voulez dans l'ordinateur après avoir téléchargé vos photos de celui-ci. Sinon, vous pouvez choisir les photos que vous souhaitez imprimer par un marquage dans l'appareil photo, un par un ... Je trouve le choix de l'ordinateur plus facile.
L'espoir que les réponses à votre question.
More points for you.
Not that there's anywhere to use them, but they look nice next to your name....!
-- Kip
It took 8 months, 770 pictures, and 4 hours of video to finally do them in. That's some pretty good bang for your buck.
Reading some reviews, others have noted times of 8-10 seconds for the flash to recharge. With my Lithiums, it was no longer than 4 seconds - most times less.
I'll chime back in - oh say November - when my next set of batteries die. <GRIN>
I still LOVE this camera!
However, the shutter "fan blades" that cover the lens now don't close all the way when the camera is turned off. The warranty has expired, so I don't want to send it back to Canon and pay for repair. Everything else works fine and the Lithium batteries are fairly fresh. I managed to "poke" the plastic shutter blades together once or twice, but they still don't close all the way any more, which leaves the lens partially exposed. Anyone else had this problem?
My fan blades are still good. Have you tried blowing it out with compressed air - you know the canned air used to blow out CD-ROMS? Who knows, there might be a loose "finger nail" stopping the blades from closing. It's worth a shot any way.
I guess you have had your camera back for a while now? Any more problems? Ever catch your heavy-handed nurse fat fingering the flash?
Anyhow... lots of new camera out now, but again... if it still works... no reason not to stick with it!
I use AUTO at all times
and when I record video it is at its max..
which is better, energizer lithium double AA's, or the rechargable NiMH ones.... also, are the lithium's rechargable?
I've had this camera and problem for about a year, but apparently I've been using the wrong batteries. I've been using alkaline non-recharable batteries. I didn't realize this was ill-advised, even when I sent in the camera under the warranty to get fixed. Please please help. I'm seeing two sides to this, and I wonder if anyone has actually compared the two, and the variable of using alkalines for so long before it...
As you can tell by what I wrote, I ama huge Energizer Lithium battery fan - and no they are not rechargeable. 4 pack at Walmart for $9.99
The rechargeable batteries work well too, but I am lazy. Between charges, I'd probably lose the charger somewhere. One less wire to worry about is worth the $5 a year I spent on the Lithiums.
Hope that helps.
(Make sure you give us some feedback if you get the Lithiums. Of course, if you do, it will probably 10 months from now. That's OK ... we'll still be here!)
Ive had this camera for over a year. Went through batteries at an unbelievable pace. Switched to Energizer rechargable NiMh batteries and this made a tremendous difference. I would recommend these highly. I purchased them at Sam's Club. Don't remember the price but they come in a package deal with the charger. Hope this helps and Good Luck.
Under these conditions, there may be a contribution from the condition of the surface of the contacts of the rechargeables. In my experience, It is worth while cleaning the contacts with an old-style end-of-pencil eraser to reduce the contact resistance. Sometimes it is just enough to push the voltage recorded for the rechargeable over the threshold for the camera.
I rang Cannon and after a long wait was told to bring the camera in, they were not aware about any battery eating.
I'm still watching the drain and have not turned the camera on. I'm sure the voltage has no dropped to the point I'm sure it will not turn on.
Before this test, I fully charged a set of batteries and immediately set about trying to run the batteries down while shooting pictures. I gave up after 150 pictures. So it does seem to be a passive drain.
I have two 720 cameras in the family. Both show premature low battery warnings. Both are very sensitive to lowered voltage. However, only one of the two is nearly useless because it will often not even turn on with freshly charged batteries.
I have an A70, an A75, and these two 720s. Lots of complaints have been lodged here and elsewhere about similar battery problems, yet Canon says there is no problem. I've loved these Canon point and shoots, but will have to be very cautious when making future purchases. My daughter is getting ready to head out on an extended trip abroad and I don't think I can trust either of the 720s to send along with her. Sad.
I just tried to upgrade to a Nikon L-100. What a disappointment. Our Canon A720 takes a better picture - and it's video is far superior. The Nikon is going back to store, and staying with our old standby. Newer does not neccesarily mean better!
I use the Uniross Hybrio (similar to Sanyo Eneloops) low self-discharge Ni-MH rechargeables rated at 2100mha and it gives my Canon a720 awesome shooting longevity. I have taken several hundreds of shots on 2 AA cells without a low battery warning yet. These batteries can be stored for months and don't drop their charge like conventional Ni-MH rechargeable cells.
Other batteries similar to the Uniross Hybrio and Sanyo Enelopp are ReCyko from Gold Peak (GP), Active Charge by Duracell, Infinium by Panasonic, CycleEnergy by Sony, Instant from Vapex, Power by Delkin, Synergy by Hähnel, Ready 2 go by Camlink, Ready2use by Varta, Green by Ultralast and Enitime by Yuasa.
A lot of them are from the same production line but just rebranded (only a hand full of factories worldwide make these type of batteries).