Cool! You know a lot of things others would love to know. Go ahead and write your own review and let the world know if you made a great choice!
Subscribe to receive email notifications of new questions and answers for this product.
You can keep track of all the products you want on your profile page once you have registered.
Click here to receive email notifications of new questions and answers for this product.
- 4 out of 5
- 4 out of 5
Submit your own Canon SD800 IS review!
Have a question about the SD800 IS?
Enter it here:
(You can enter more details in the next step)
Is the Canon PowerShot SD800 IS a good choice for me?
Sorry I don't have any points left because I asked my question once before a little differently. I awarded all the points to Ben who did try to help. In rethinking what I actually want and need my ideas have changed a bit. We own a digital Canon Rebel EOS. We have extra lenses and whatnot, however, what I am finding is that I like a smaller tuck-in-pocket point and shoot type camera.I take a lot of puppy portraits --inside in medium light. In addition I take outside photos. Here is a link so you can take a look at the type of thing I often do with my little Nikon Coolpix L3:
http://www.weims4sale.homestead.com/OwyheeStarWeims/True/FifthUpdate.html
I love the picture quality I am getting with this inexpensive point and shoot Nikon, however, no matter what I try the response between clicking and taking the picture or writing to the card is too slow. The Canon A640 was suggested and although it looks nice I realize it is larger than I want. If I don't have a camera on me the moment is lost. Everyday I snap a few pictures of our Weim children doing something very cute. I have read every question and answer on the Canon PowerShot SD800 IS. I am not sure I need the wide angle lens but at times it would helpful. Would it be a hinderance for the closeups I love to take?
I admit I am a novice photographer but I take a lot of photos these days. I think some of them are quite nice. I read about the 1600 ASA setting. Is that something I would want to make use of?
I think I need the Image Stabilization.
I believe the Canon PowerShot SD800 has continuous shooting and I am wondering if that would easily work in the portrait mode.
One thing I have been extremely happy about with the Nikon Coolpix L3 is that the puppies eyes show up their natural blue color. Even taking the closeup pictures their eyes have been great.
I am also reading about people complaining about white spots. I read that was due to the dust in the air but I have not had that problem with the Nikon Coolpix L3 either.
There are a lot of good things about this camera but it is too slow for me. I need to have a faster reacting camera. It is very slow on the portrait setting. The picture is great if the pup will sit there long enough.....quite a challenge. Smiles
You opinion would be greatly appreciated. I don't want to buy another camera and find out 6 months from now I wish I had something different.
1.) 3.5"x2.3"x.99", makes for a very compact camera!
2.) Your pictures are cute! If I can get my pictures of my puppy loaded up, I'll show you what this camera can do! But in the lighting you're showing, you probably won't even need a flash with the SD800IS if you have the ISO at about 400 (which will be plenty big for internet pictures and 4x6" prints). With flash, you can stand several feet away, zoom in on your puppies and take perfect pictures. From what I see in your pictures, it looks like you're standing too close, which I'm guessing is where the flushed out color is coming from.
3.) The A640 is probably something you may not want, because the time for pictures between flashes is surprisingly long because the 2 AA batteries can't recharge the flash fast enough. Correct me if I'm wrong, anyone...
4.) You do NOT want to use the ISO1600 setting on the SD800IS (nor should you have to, in medium light). ISO1600 should be reserved for emergencies, because the pictures will be extremely noisy and poor quality. You can touch them up in post processing, but it won't be worth the trouble. ISO800 can be easily salvaged, though. I haven't had a need for anything past ISO400 yet.
5.) Image Stabilization is a great feature and is not a novelty. Keep in mind that it won't keep a moving target from blurring, only the effects of your own hands' movements! In this respect, a low-light environment will need either a flash or a higher ISO setting -- you don't want to increase the shutter speed, or else any movements by the subject will cause blurriness.
6.) My puppy's eyes are brown, so I can't tell if this camera will retain your puppies' blue eyes, but I don't see why not. They will definitely be preserved without flash, and my guess would be they will be preserved with flash, as long as you don't take a direct picture and oversaturate the eyes.
7.) Continuous shooting is at 1.7fps, which is just shy of .6 seconds per picture. That's not THAT great, but because of the speed of the auto focus, the time to take the picture from when you depress the button is very fast. So you should be able to take the picture that you wanted without that annoying shutter lag!
8.) I'm beginning to think these white spots people are complaining about is from a camera defect. I haven't had any white spots on my camera. There WILL be some floating orbs and random white specks occasionally, from the reflections off the flash back into the lens. I haven't really noticed it myself, though.
If you decide on this camera, make sure to look into SDHC cards, as they will write faster. Also, the wideangle lens is very nice, but probably not something you'd really utilize on your puppies. You can always consider the SD700IS if you decide the wide-angle isn't for you.
Hope that helps!
Enjoy your new camera! And if you wanted the wide-angle and were wondering about the new cameras... none of them to my knowledge have the wide-angle anyway, so you're not missing out. You can always crop for a zoom, but you can't crop back for things you couldn't get in the picture :)
I have a recent experience with a computer that wasn't working. We kept it past the 14 days..........it was a lemon. We dinked around trying to get it to work and it has been gone for weeks. First to a repair center in Texas and now California. No one can get it to work. They are thinking of getting me a new computer. Duh.
I don't want a similar experience with a camera. I will post --do you earn points for posting a review? Since I have no points I was wondering. Smiles Have a great day and thank you for all the help!
Think of it this way -- if your car battery dies, do you go to the dealership to buy a GM/Toyota/etc brand battery for twice the price, or do you just go to WalMart/Belle Tire/etc and get a cheaper one? They all work the same! :)
I had a lemon of a laptop, took forever to fix. I'm not sure why companies would rather pay $150/hour for an IT tech to spend hours fixing a computer when they could send you a new one for less than the labor costs... go figure.
Yes if the camera is a go then I will buy the less expensive batteries. Two for $28
What about SD Cards............do I need to buy an upgrade so it can write faster? I hope that is not a stupid question but I thought I read that if you don't have a really high quality card your camera cannot write to it as fast.
Probably because of read/write times as well, I notice a little lag when deleting pictures and whatnot on my SD800IS. Maybe I should buy an ultraspeed card :)
No wonder the number of inquiries had fallen off. Thank you again
Here is the link http://www.weims4sale.homestead.com/OwyheeStarWeims/Topper/TopperandDurangoMay2007/Camera_PuppyPage.html
I would suggest you step back as far as the zoom allows when taking your pictures, to help the overexposure. Or just get a few auxillary lights so you may not even need the flash. This will definitely help the problem with the Rebel, since it has better zoom. With the SD800IS you may need to put it to 5.7x digital/optical enhance to get far enough to avoid flash overflow.
Otherwise, great pictures, and cute puppies!! I hope you continue to enjoy your camera :)
Just keep experimenting with the camera. I still haven't realized the full potential of this camera :) I haven't even used macro-mode yet, because I can get macro shots just by using the digital zoom, it's of such good quality.
This morning we snapped these quick photos of Mollie's puppies all lines up in the whelping pen without adequate lighting but they turned out great. Here is the link if you care to look: http://weims4sale.homestead.com/OwyheeStarWeims/Mollie/MollieXDurango2007/BonusPhotosA_Mollie_Durango.html
With the litter pictures, I can see what you mean about sub-optimal lighting! Really, that's all you can ask for, taking a picture in a small, nearly dark room with a flash. The overexposure comes from the flash's light having nowhere to dissipate. The only thing I can think of doing is standing further away (I don't know if that's even possible in that room! :)), or getting a 30W or so white light in the room and avoiding flash. Those are good pictures to demonstrate that the prevalence of white spots isn't what other reviewers are insisting.
I'm not sure if it's form post-editing or cropping pictures, but there seems to be some "noise" in the pictures. If you're using flash, you can have your ISO at 100 and there shouldn't be a problem with lack of light. It might help the overexposure, too. From the pictures I see on your website, it looks like ISO400 or so was used on those(?)
Thanks for the pictures :)
How do I set the ISO. You see point and shoot.........dont' think has been my motto. ha
I turned on the camera it said ISO High.......and it is set on auto. Well I am terrible at reading the directions ..........I just play at it when I can. Anyhow I will have to look up the directions. Anyhow, I cannot complain about the quality of picture for the circumstances. Well................. I need to learn how to reset the ISO it appears. Maybe I will have time today to check on that. Thanks again! S
To change the ISO, you need to be in Program Auto (the click-wheel one notch down). Then use the directional buttons to flip through the ISO settings. This is really the only main difference between Program Auto and full Auto. Just a word of warning -- if you're using Program Auto and have the ISO set to <400 in a low-light room with no flash, you will get excessive blurring... the higher the ISO, the less blur (and unfortunately more noise!). If you want to avoid the flash, you can put the camera on a table or floor and set it to 2-10 second timed picture, that way there's no movement on your part to blur the picture (any movement the puppies make will be blurred, though, so this would probably only be good when they're sleeping!).
Again, nothing wrong with your pictures, you're working with the worst lighting possible! Just trying to help. Enjoy :)
To be honest my mechanical ability is nil. ha ...........I wish that was a joke. So it takes me awhile to catch on, but as I have said from the start this camera is easy to operate and get decent pictures with little to no effort.
BTW we did get a few white spots when we first tried it but again when I read in the book and Cliff and I discussed this we decided quickly this was operator error and not a flaw in the camera. Since then, we have not gotten any white spots on any picture. I am sorry if that upsets some people but I believe it is true. If anything changes my mind I will be back to post that as well.
I am very happy with the pictures..........and those in the whelping box were pretty nice considering. We do have a lamp but when you are looking at this type of shot the less you move and adjust things the better the chance you will capture the moment. Mama is apt to jump up and drop-off feeding thinking she is missing out on something. Smiles
As always.........thanks so much S
http://www.weims4sale.homestead.com/OwyheeStarWeims/Topper/TopperandDurangoMay2007/Fifth_Puppy_Update.html
I think the pictures are as good as we often get with the Canon Rebel ..........anyhow I do thank you for the encouragement!
I continue to struggle with shutter lapse.........has anything happened that helps this in the point and shoot camera? Also my husband keeps thinking we need a photo cube to improve our pictures. I am having problems envisioning how I am going to handle a pup inside the cube. Most of those cubes are white and when I have used shiny white fabric behind the pups the pictures have not been stellar. Well ...........I never put enough time into learning photography to do a great job. Pictures are important but I must admit I spend more time chaning bedding, handing pups, taking care of Weims, and scooping pooh. smiles
Here are our most recent puppy pictures: http://weims4sale.homestead.com/OwyheeStarWeims/Penny/Penny_Dusty_Litter2008/Week_2.html
http://weims4sale.homestead.com/OwyheeStarWeims/Storm/Storm_Puppies_2008/Week_1.html
I look for many things in chosing which picture to use. There is a cuteness factor that overrides quality at times. REgardless of what I do some pictures are clearer and better than others. I do prefocus between shots to get a better pictures. Well.............I am interested in hearing back from some of you professionals. Thanks for all your help.