Unbiased digital camera reviews, advice, and prices
Note: this camera was first sold in Dec 2003. There may be newer versions available.
HP Photosmart 435
HP Photosmart 435
F
HQ Grade: F
A is outstanding and exceptional, rated in the top 10% of digital cameras.
B means they are good, with some standout features.
C means they are mediocre, and probably more trouble than they are worth.
D & F mean they are absolutely awful or old. Avoid at all costs.
  • 3 out of 5
"Very easy to use"
  • 3 out of 5
"Average Review for Low priced camera/ CAMERA FIXES MENTIONED"
See rating based on 263 user reviews
Submit your own Hewlett Packard 435 review!
This camera is ranked
No current offers available

Hewlett Packard 435 Reviews by DigitalCamera-HQ Users

Page 2 of 3 (52 reviews total)

  • 2 out of 5
Mediocre shots, died using a few times ( - 9/19/05)

Came free with color printer, shots were grainy, won't power on now.read more

  • 2 out of 5
I am sorry I purchased it ( - 9/12/05)

I purchased the HP Photography Bundle package with a 435 digital camera and a 325v printer. What a mistake. The quality is very poor and... read more

  • 2 out of 5
Not that great ( - 6/14/05)

This is a good kids camera or first timer for newbies. ***Please Note*** The movie mode does not have sound!!!read more

  • 2 out of 5
takes ok pictures ( - 6/6/05)

my only complaint is: I've tried several sets of rechargeable batteries and every set I've tried only lasts maybe 15 to 20 minutes, then I... read more

  • 2 out of 5
pictures are decent ( - 6/6/05)

battery life is terrible. Warranty good for 90days. Tech. support fair. My camera lasted 6 months then it would not support the memory card. Had... read more

  • 2 out of 5
Short battery life ( - 4/13/05)

I've taken about 350 pictures with this camera and have gone through a dozen batteries in one month. The live view drains the battery power... read more

  • 2 out of 5
This camera defines "ON A BUDGET" ( - 4/8/05)

The picture quality was almost perfect when I took a couple of photos the very same day the camera was purchased however, the picture quality... read more

  • 2 out of 5
Bad Flash Shots ( - 3/22/05)

I had a Photosmart 320 2.1 and was very happy with it. Sadly though, it got the view screen broken during a flight. We replaced... read more

  • 2 out of 5
picture deteriorates on uploading ( gets dark) can fix in photo suite ( - 3/3/05)

For the novice. Okay for the price but if you expect much you will be disappointed. After fixing photo in a photo suite does... read more

  • 4 out of 5
Good for the price ( - 2/1/06)

It is a great camera for the money and has alot of features that even some more expensive cameras don't have. I use it to... read more

  • 4 out of 5
good for beginners ( - 11/28/05)

This camera takes decent quality pictures and o.k quality movies with sound. You must upload the movies with the required software (provided) in order for... read more

  • 4 out of 5
Nice entry level camera... ( - 11/9/05)

I purchased this camera on the way home for Christmas. While it is not nearly as elaborate as more expensive cameras, it is a nice... read more

  • 4 out of 5
good budget camera ( - 9/7/05)

I like this simple little camera. While other family members are trying to figure out their complicated cameras, I usually have the shot taken already. read more

  • 4 out of 5
Good quality, takes great pictures. ( - 3/9/05)

This is a very good camera! Even for the price!
Takes great picture. One thing that I don't like is that the battery goes down... read more

  • 4 out of 5
give it a chance ( - 3/2/05)

regular batteries die quickly, but put in digital camera quality batteries and they last me 4 to 5 months. great picture quality too, seen other... read more

  • 1 out of 5
Horrible! (Chrissy - 6/30/07)

I've had this camera for quite some time now.
Its a battery eater.
You might get 10 pictures before it dies, if you're lucky.
The... read more

  • 1 out of 5
this is an AWFUL CAMERA. ( - 5/15/06)

i've had this camera for two years and i am fed up with it. the flash on this camera is completely horrible and there is... read more

  • 1 out of 5
OH MY GOSH!!!!! ( - 3/24/06)

This camera is so horrible. It doesn't have a timer that is definite. The pictures are dark even with flash. It only holds up to... read more

  • 1 out of 5
WORST camera ever!!!!! ( - 1/9/06)

Was great at first then the memory card became unsupported. When I contacted HP i was informed there was a defect in the camera. They... read more

  • 1 out of 5
Thee worst digital *if you could call it that* out there ( - 12/20/05)

This camera is so crappy. I too bought it with a bundled package at Target. The price was right but even the HP printer (7760... read more

« Previous | Page 2 of 3 | Next »

Start Here!
Most Popular
  1. Panasonic FZ35
  2. Canon SD1200 IS
  3. Canon 500D
  4. Canon A1000 IS
  5. Canon SX20 IS
  6. Panasonic FS15
  7. Samsung SL30
  8. Canon 50D
  9. Nikon D90
  10. Canon SX120
Camera Brand
Price Range
Camera Type
Camera Line
Megapixels
Hands-On Reviews
Latest Cameras
Top Searches
Our Other Sites

Close
Loading