Note: this camera was first sold in
Jan 2008.
There may be newer versions available.
Pentax K200D
See rating based on
174
user reviews
Submit your own Pentax K200D review!
HQ Grade: B
| A | is outstanding and exceptional, rated in the top 10% of digital cameras. |
| B | means they are good, with some standout features. |
| C | means they are mediocre, and probably more trouble than they are worth. |
| D & F | mean they are absolutely awful or old. Avoid at all costs. |
- 5 out of 5
- 5 out of 5
Submit your own Pentax K200D review!
This camera is ranked
- 22nd of 50 in SLR/Professional
- 41st of 102 in 9 and 10 Megapixels
- 4th of 29 in Pentax
- 21st of 71 in Over $600
| Compare 3 store ratings and prices... | ||
| Shop for Pentax K200D accessories. | ||
| Amazon | $699.95 |
|
| 47digital | $689.95 |
|
| Target | $699.99 |
|
Ask
Have a question about the K200D?
Enter it here:
(You can enter more details in the next step)
Answered!
April 22, 2009 4:37 PM
Report Abuse
Did you find this question
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
This question has been answered!
John Snider
464 pts
April 22, 2009 11:11 PM
2
0
0
The K2000 is the "Small" or "Compact" entry level SLR from Pentax. The K2000 is an entry Level SLR and currently sells in the 550-625 range (Complete with external flash kit and lens). Auto focus on the K2000 is 5 vs 11 points, the 200 has a more solid construction (more stainless and less plastic), they removed the orientation sensor from the 2000, and No top LCD on the 2000 but the K2000 has higher ISO, the 2000 is faster, and Is quite a bit smaller/lighter. The K2000 was released to compete with the entry level cameras from Nikon (Eg; the Nikon D40), Canon, Olympus, Etc.... It has about the same size of a D40 but weighs quite a bit more.
Other than size, dropping the top LCD, improving the ISO, tossing in a few extra preset scenes, and dropping the number of AF points the two cameras are near identical.
Other than size, dropping the top LCD, improving the ISO, tossing in a few extra preset scenes, and dropping the number of AF points the two cameras are near identical.
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
May 9, 2009 11:28 PM
0
0
0
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
