Note: this camera was first sold in
Mar 2008.
There may be newer versions available.
Sony Alpha A350
See rating based on
162
user reviews
Submit your own Sony A350 review!
HQ Grade: B
| A | is outstanding and exceptional, rated in the top 10% of digital cameras. |
| B | means they are good, with some standout features. |
| C | means they are mediocre, and probably more trouble than they are worth. |
| D & F | mean they are absolutely awful or old. Avoid at all costs. |
- 5 out of 5
- 5 out of 5
Submit your own Sony A350 review!
This camera is ranked
- 23rd of 50 in SLR/Professional
- 4th of 6 in 14 Megapixels
- 7th of 41 in Sony
- 26th of 71 in Over $600
| Compare 2 store ratings and prices... | ||
| Shop for Sony A350 accessories. | ||
| CameraStore.com.au | $947.00 |
|
| 47digital | $899.00 |
|
Ask
Have a question about the A350?
Enter it here:
(You can enter more details in the next step)
Answered!
May 6, 2008 4:54 PM
Report Abuse
Did you find this question
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
This question has been answered!
May 10, 2008 10:11 PM
0
0
0
Orion,
Lens stabilization is nice for those cameras that do not have it built in yet while in-body stabilization might save you some cash on your lens purchases later.
The pluses to IS lenses are basically that the IS is tuned to the particular lens, and you will notice its effect better through your viewfinder. With a body, the major plus is what I listed above. You don't need to spend almost twice as much in your lens to achieve the IS functionality. There is a pretty decent write up of it all on this site here. In terms of performance difference, the in camera IS will lose effectiveness when used with longer lenses. The lenses with IS built in will cost more and are heavier because of the internal technology.
In my opinion, if you don't have lenses currently, you might look at getting a camera body with built in IS if you don't plan on using longer lenses. If you do want the functionality of a long lens, you might as well get a system that uses IS lenses instead. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Lens stabilization is nice for those cameras that do not have it built in yet while in-body stabilization might save you some cash on your lens purchases later.
The pluses to IS lenses are basically that the IS is tuned to the particular lens, and you will notice its effect better through your viewfinder. With a body, the major plus is what I listed above. You don't need to spend almost twice as much in your lens to achieve the IS functionality. There is a pretty decent write up of it all on this site here. In terms of performance difference, the in camera IS will lose effectiveness when used with longer lenses. The lenses with IS built in will cost more and are heavier because of the internal technology.
In my opinion, if you don't have lenses currently, you might look at getting a camera body with built in IS if you don't plan on using longer lenses. If you do want the functionality of a long lens, you might as well get a system that uses IS lenses instead. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
Louis van Senden
0 pts
June 3, 2008 6:03 AM
0
0
0
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
June 6, 2008 10:54 AM
0
0
0
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
Louis van Senden
0 pts
June 9, 2008 9:50 PM
0
0
0
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
June 12, 2008 8:38 AM
0
0
0
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
Shirley
0 pts
August 8, 2008 4:04 PM
0
0
0
Report Abuse
Did you find this answer
helpful or
not helpful?
helpful or
not helpful?
