Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Consumer dSLR category.
Canon Digital Rebel T2i:
Hands On Review
We spent a few weeks with the latest Canon Digital Rebel, the T2i/550D. Performance is fast, image and video quality are excellent, and it's another great offering from one of the imaging heavyweights. Is it "too much camera" for the entry-level market? Not enough for most enthusiasts? Or can we have it both ways?
By Chris Weigl
- T2i/550D Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
If you have any experience with dSLRs, chances are you’ll have heard of and possibly handled a Canon Rebel. A carry-over camera line from the film days, the Rebel series perfected the price-to-performance ratio and ushered in the era of cheap dSLRs. The T2i (also knows as the 550D), released in February, is now the seventh Digital Rebel and, accordingly, it's the most full-featured yet. The headliners on this body are a ludicrously high 18-megapixel CMOS sensor as well as full 1080p HD video recording. For a modest $850 with the kit lens, the Canon T2i is priced to compete with other mid-range offerings from Nikon and Sony. Read on to see if it performs as well as the white paper reads.
Build Quality

Although not the budget model of Canon’s dSLR lineup (that honor belongs to the Rebel XS), the T2i’s build is nothing to get especially excited about, pretty standard for a sub-$1,000 dSLR. The T2i is built around a sturdy metal chassis while the outer build is made up entirely of a light plastic that, while not exuding quality, does its job and doesn’t warp with pressure. The grip is a bit small for my large hands but would be just fine for women and men with average-sized hands. It’s a lightweight camera (as far as dSLRs go), especially with the kit lens, and I had no trouble carrying it around for a few hours.
The back of the camera boasts a sharp 3-inch LCD (non-articulating, unfortunately) that makes taking videos and reviewing images enjoyable. Buttons along the back include the expected bevy of controls: Exposure Compensation, White Balance, AF mode, Picture Styles, Review, Trash, AE/AF lock, Live View, Focus Point, Display and a zoom in/out pair. There’s also an ISO button (yay!) at the top in addition to the Mode Dial, On/Off switch, single control wheel and Shutter button. It sounds like a lot when typed out, but you’ll get the hang of the interface in no time and be glad for the level of external control.
Because most people buy the T2i along with the EF-S 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS kit lens, it makes sense to spend a few words talking about it as well throughout this review. It, too, is of matching relatively cheap construction. This is par for the course as far as kit lenses go, although the plastic mount seems like overboard cost-cutting.
User Experience and Performance
As with all dSLRs, the T2i is a snappy performer. Startup is essentially instantaneous: You’ll never have to worry about missing a shot while waiting for the camera to turn on. Like most consumer dSLRs, the T2i has no top-side LCD, and relies instead on the rear LCD for information readouts (shutter speed, ISO, exposure, etc.). This data is relayed in huge, easy-to-read font sizes. Settings are grayed-out when they're unchangeable -- for example, the aperture setting is displayed in gray if the camera is in shutter priority mode.
The mode dial has all the scene modes one would expect, from Sport to Landscape, as well as the common manual modes and an HD video mode. There’s also, in addition to the Green automatic mode, a Creative Auto (CA) mode featuring sliders that visually demonstrate how changing exposure or aperture affects a photograph. This is perfect for those who want a little more control than full-auto mode, but still don’t have a firm grasp on photography lingo and the fundamentals of exposure. There’s also an array of custom functions regarding items like choosing ISO step values, noise reduction and assigning a function to the Set button. If this amount of control is worrisome, rest assured that the camera ships ready to work right out of the box.
Autofocus (despite no ultrasonic motor in the kit lens) is still snappy and relatively quiet. The 18-55mm kit lens is too short to shoot most sports, but the continuous AI Servo focus tracking keeps up with a running person in good light. Autofocus even works surprisingly well in live view mode; it’s still a touch too slow to capture moving subjects, but proves that Canon is approaching the gold standard set by Sony with the A390. Autofocus can also be enabled during video recording, albeit not continuously and with the added noise of the focusing motor.
The kit lens features Canon’s proven image stabilization, which minimizes hand-shake blur at shutter speeds as low as 1/4 second. It's a great feature in low-light and for static subjects. It’s great that Canon and Nikon are responding to the in-body systems of Pentax, Sony, and Olympus by including stabilized kit lenses.
While all the above is great, there were a few small things that struck me as awkward regarding the T2i’s usability. Firstly, the viewfinder is smaller than most in this category and doesn’t offer a very high eye-relief. This means that it can be difficult to simultaneously see the whole scene as well as the settings along the bottom. Furthermore, the control wheel, and this may seem nitpicky, doesn’t feel as refined as it does on competing models; it requires a bit too much effort to turn and clicks quite loudly when it does. A second control wheel would have been a nice touch for a camera in this price range too(which would truly put the T2i head-to-head with Nikon's D90).
Image Quality
The Canon T2i delivered no surprises during the review period as far as image quality is concerned. Photos at lowest sensitivities are appropriately smooth and devoid of any detail-destroying noise. Image quality is more than usable through ISO 1600, after which noise becomes too much of a problem for my tastes. Still, ISO 6400 is usable in a pinch and would work fine for small prints and web work.
If optimum image quality is a great concern, consider switching from JPEG to RAW. Default out-of-camera JPEGs, shot with noise reduction at factory-set standard level were overcooked and lacking in fine detail. Even lower ISO settings, as low as 400, had early signs of the smudging that turns fine hair into a mottled mess at higher sensitivities. Setting the noise reduction to low was the best compromise, losing slight detail at higher ISOs while retaining some color noise reduction. Still, shooting in RAW+JPEG mode (simultaneous shooting) and comparing the two reveals just how much there is to gain from processing the RAW data yourself.
Realistically, most of those who purchase the Canon T2i will be shooting JPEG and will appreciate some of the options available that make images look better right out of the camera. The most useful option is the Auto Lighting Optimizer, which is enabled from the camera’s menu. What this attempts to do is boost the shadows of an image to reveal more detail at the expense of slightly greater noise. The standard setting was too strong for my tastes, resulting in images that looked washed out, but keeping it set to low yielded a well-balanced scene. There are also a half-dozen Picture Style presents, such as Neutral, Portrait, and Monochrome, in addition to three user-defined options.
Kit Lens Performance
The 18 megapixel sensor is capable of producing a great deal of detail, provided you use a lens that’s up to the task. While the camera certainly produced more detail than its 12-megapixel competitors, the 18-55mm kit lens is clearly not the best choice for optimum sharpness. Images taken with the lens look very good on a full-screen display, and even when heavily cropped, but at pixel level there’s little of the crispness one is used to seeing from a dSLR. To be clear, this is an issue with the stock lens, not the camera. Since most folks who buy a consumer dSLR like the T2i won't be pixel-peeping, it's a minor issue.
To get the most out of the T2i’s 18 megapixels, users will want to look into pro-grade zoom or prime lenses, either of which will help you eke out the best image quality from such a densely packed sensor. Other than not living up to 18-megapixel demands, the kit lens exhibits some corner softness at wider apertures and is prone to flare when the sun or a bright light is in the frame. Neither of these problems is unusual, however, and probably wont be huge issues in real world shooting once you’re aware of the lens’ limitations.
Video Quality
The Canon t2i is the only dSLR in this price segment to feature 1080p video recording. [This was true at the time of writing, though Nikon just announced the D3100, featuring 1080p video, for $699. - Ed.] The clips look fantastic, devoid of artifacts and appropriately large for high-definition recording. We haven't tested the 7D here at DCHQ, but the majority of outside reviews indicate that the T2i and the far-more-expensive 7D have comparable video quality, so this is clearly a major selling point for the T2i.
The big benefit of using a dSLR for movies over a dedicated camcorder or compact camera is the sheer dynamic range and low noise of the footage, as well as the mouth-watering depth of field effects previously only possible with camcorders many times the price. Budding film students will also appreciate manual controls that allow access to shutter speed, frame rate, aperture and ISO.
Conclusion
The Canon t2i continues to do what Canon’s Rebel series has done for years now, produce high-quality images in a well designed, feature-rich, if not particularly inspiring, package. Most notable are the fantastic 18-megapixel sensor and full 1080p HD video mode, both of which are firsts in the class and help the T2i stand out. If you need that kind of resolution, or even plan on doing high-quality video-shooting on the cheap, this camera is a sure bet.
So what is the Canon T2i? Despite the numerous automatic settings, one could argue that the Canon T2i is an enthusiast’s camera rather than a beginner's model. Auto-mode shooters will probably be better served by the cheaper T1i, which has a less-impressive video mode but similarly stellar image quality and nearly identical construction. Even the basic XS is worth a look.
Honestly, an 18 megapixel sensor really does require extra work, equipment, and attention to detail to achieve the best results, something typical shooters may not be willing to spend the time or money to achieve. But the enthusiasts who make photography their main hobby will find plenty to love in the T2i; the images are fantastically detailed, especially when paired with a better lens than the kit.
It boils down to this: The Canon T2i is a feature-loaded camera for those with a knack for photography but a (relatively) limited budget. Anyone can take truly excellent photos and videos with this camera, but it takes the right hands and knowledge to get the most out of the Canon T2i.
Similar Products
Canon Digital Rebel T2i Comments & Questions (write your own!)
trying to decide which camera to buy, debating between Canon t1i, or the Nikon D1300..which is better? I appreciate your comment..thanks
I think you'll be fine with the T2i, to be honest. Anybody have any lens suggestions for James? Not my area of expertise.
Can anyone suggest which of these would give better IQ with my 550D, for wildlife/bird shots: EF 400 f5.6L USM or EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM?
Some reviews suggest that the prime takes sharper but warmer pics & the lack of IS is a non-issue with the 550D as one can bump up the shutter speeds & ISO.
Is it that simple a choice? How does the IQ of Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3 (with OS & HSM) stack up against these two? Some users seem to face AF inconsistencies. Is that a known complaint? The price seems a marvel, though.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
Any remarks on the choice between the other two, ie, 400mm 5.6 prime & 100-400mm 4.5-5.6 IS.
I own one 18-55 & a 55-250 IS & this third one would probably be my last addition for a long time to come.
But which camera IN MY price range,do u think has the best image quality other?
Thanks again :)
Also, if going with the T2i, found a deal on B&H photo that includes the T2i and the 18-135mm EF-S lens for under $1000 as opposed to the standard 18-55 kit lens. Do you think that would be a better way to go??
Anyway help would be much appreciated! :)
The T2i Is still laid out so that new dSLR users won't be too confused by the interface and controls. The main draw of the T2i over cheaper Canon dSLRs is the video mode -- it can shoot excellent high-def videos, whereas the XS can't shoot video at all.
I don't think that the T2i will be too much camera. It is popular with novice dSLR users, pretty much the go-to camera for entry level users these days. I think it's worth the extra money, but if your budget is tight, the XS is a fine camera as well -- just Canon's absolute lowest-end dSLR at the moment.
As for that lens deal, yes, that's a great deal, good idea to get a versatile lens like that. When your kids start participating in activities (sports, dance, etc), the extra range will help you get better shots from the stands/seats/etc.
I think we've decided to spend the extra right now for the T2i...now, the question is what exactly to get.
Here are the two options that we've been trying to decide between--they are the exact same price:
T2i with 18-55mm kit lens + 55-250mm zoom lens OR T2i with 18-135mm lens
What are your thoughts?
Anything else you think I should consider?
Thanks so much!
Thank you.
I like the Canon SX line, Panasonic's FH20 if it's good available light. But that T2i is an excellent entry level DSLR if you're looking to get into photography as a serious hobby.
2) Can using a Rebel (film) EF 28-105mm on the TSi give equal or better quality? Ciro
I am going nuts trying to decide which camera to buy. I am planning to buy Sony HDR-CX550V for video but am very confused about which SLR to buy. My needs are very simple. I want to take pictures of my children, both indoors (some very low light) and outdoors (playing soccer, school plays etc) and capture basic video in case I am not carrying the camcorder. I have been looking at T1i, T2i, XS but don't know which I should choose for the said purposes. Also, making it more confusing are the lenses. I have been looking at EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens/Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS or Canon EF-S 17-85mm 4.0-5.6 IS USM/Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM pairs. The latter seems very expensive. I don't want to spend more than 1400 and want to keep it for atleast 5 years. Any recommendations?
Thank you very much for your input.
But if you're looking at video, the key is shutter speed.
Which film SLR did you use? I'd suggest going with that brand, so that you can keep all your old lenses.
I'd ignore the 50D, since the 60D comes out next month and seems a bit more up your alley. It might still be a bit too much camera for a digicam novice. The T2i is great, particularly good video. Read our review. D90 is also a great camera and has more of the control you'd find on a higher-end camera. We're also excited about the Nikon D3100 -- it's a sort-of entry level dSLR, but has a lot of high end features.
Also consider the 7D if you can afford it. It processes the images with TWO DIGIC IV processors, not just one as the T2i does.
If a dSLR isn't in the price range, he might want an extended zoom like the Panasonic FZ35 or Canon SX20, or a travel zoom like the Panasonic ZS7 (which has built-in GPS) or Casio FH100. I'd recommend a dSLR for an experience like this though -- the image quality and performance are fantastic.
As for the difference in entry level and intermediate, the T2i vs. the 7D - the 7D has dual DIGIC IV processors, while the T2i has one. And the body is made of metal, rather than plastic.
With the t2i. Stills come out crystal clear with out having to run them through any Photoshop . The only thing that's better on the 7d is the speed , auto focus and
The whether seal .
But if you can swing it, go with the 7D. I've been testing with it and it's a sweet rig.
Overall I'd say it depends on your workflow. If you're buying for video quality and don't need 8 FPS shooting or magnesium construction, then get the T2i and a couple lenses and you'll end up with a much higher quality setup than the 7D with kit lens alone. I'd also say that availability is a concern with the T2i as it's currently backordered in many places as I think Canon underestimated the demand for the camera.
Also, what lens would you recommend for night time long exposures.
I like landscapes, cityscapes and such.
Thanks guys!
And, of course, candids and day-to-day shots.
I definitely want to mess around and experiment with the camera. But when it comes to DSLRs, I'm not too knowledgeable.
BTW, thanks for recommending the Lumix FH20...it was a SOLID choice!
In truth the D5000 really only has about 30 lenses to choose from as you're limited to Nikon's AF-S and AF-A lenses that have the motor built into the lens. Older lenses will mount (just as they will on a Sony, Pentax, Canon, and other brands) but you're going to be limited mostly to manual focus in addition to manual metering. For the extra money, I'd go with the T2i if you have any interest in the video feature. If not, go with the D5000 as the sensor is superior to the T2i and will produce better still images under most circumstances.
Oliver
I can't pick for you, but I think you're underestimating the T2i's build quality, if that helps. I haven't spent much time with the T2i, but it does feel pretty solid for a plastic dSLR, and Canon's cameras are well built even when they are plastic. Hope this helps.
If you're buying an SLR for video uses, know that you'll largely be working with manual focus--autofocus with canon lenses simply produces too much noise to make it useful unless you plan to pair the video from the camera with a second audio stream.
In my experience with both, the 7D bests the T2i in still durability, autofocus accuracy and speed, and frames per second while the T2i, at nearly $900 less provides video that is just as good by any reasonable standard.
