Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Canon Powershot A1000 IS
Editor's Review
The Canon A1000 IS is a new point-and-shoot meant for novice and casual photographers, with plenty of features that will aid users in taking an excellent photo. The A1000 IS has an "easy mode," which displays helpful callouts and instructions on the LCD display, guiding users through the various functions and settings. It's got a dash of style, as well, and can be found in brown, gray, purple, and blue dual-tone shades. It's aging a bit -- you might consider a newer model, like the A3000.
Specifications
- 10 megapixels
- 4x optical zoom
- Image stabilization
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- AA batteries
- Part Number: PowerShot SD1000
- UPC: 013803100839
- Release Date: Sep 07, 2008
Shop for A1000 IS Accessories
Canon Powershot A1000 IS Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Thank you, Wendell
2. Press the <FUNC./SET> () button.
3. A screen like the one below will appear on the monitor.
Select [Date Stamp] () in the [Recording Pixels] section .
Press the <DISP.> () button.
4. A screen like the one below will appear on the monitor.
Press the camera button as shown above (right and left), select [Date Stamp] and set it to [Date] or [Date & Time].
Press the <DISP.> () button.
5. Press the <FUNC./SET> () button.
6. Make sure that the [Date Stamp] is set and the following screen will appear with the icon () in the lower-left corner of the screen.
7. When shooting with this setting, the date will be embedded in the image as shown below.
[Date]
[Date & Time]
2. Press the <FUNC./SET> () button.
3. A screen like the one below will appear on the monitor.
Select [Date Stamp] () in the [Recording Pixels] section .
Press the <DISP.> () button.
4. A screen like the one below will appear on the monitor.
Press the camera button as shown above (right and left), select [Date Stamp] and set it to [Date] or [Date & Time].
Press the <DISP.> () button.
5. Press the <FUNC./SET> () button.
6. Make sure that the [Date Stamp] is set and the following screen will appear with the icon () in the lower-left corner of the screen.
7. When shooting with this setting, the date will be embedded in the image as shown below.
[Date]
[Date & Time]
* The date, its font and color, and the position where it is displayed cannot be changed. Also, dates and times recorded with [Date Stamp] cannot be deleted.
So don't buy into the more is better trap. Now, having said all that, the A1000IS is a pretty good camera.
Kaye H.
The Kids and Pets modes and Sports mode both do really similar things. Sports Mode is a little more intense, ie it's designed for even faster speed (since a sports game is gonna probably be faster than a toddler). I'm not sure why cameras seem to be including it less often these days, because it's a super-useful mode.
Anyhow, both modes make a variety of adjustments to the camera so that they can capture fast movement. What they do is they kick up the ISO, reduce the f-stop, speed up the shutter speed, and usually they also adjust the auto focus so that it 'tracks' a moving object when focusing. Like I said, both modes do these things, but Sports mode does it to a greater extent.
It's not super important that you understand what all of those functions do, but the basic rundown is this: the fast shutter speed freezes the action/ prevents blur. The other adjustments (ISO and f-stop) let more light into the camera to make up for how fast the shutter closes, so that your photo doesn't come out too dark.
So, these are things that you can do yourself if you have a camera with manual controls. It takes some know-how and some patience to get it right, and unless you buy a professional-level DSLR, you probably won't be able to replicate ALL of the things that the modes do - a typical pocket camera, even one with manual f-stop and shutter speed, may not let you change the auto focus settings, for example. But you could get darn close and get good results, and the bonus in doing it manually would be that you could tinker with it until you liked the results.
The downside, of course, is that it isn't as handy and until you know exactly what you're doing, it takes time to set manual controls, which is time you may not have when you're trying to get a quick-action shot. I shoot weddings for a living, and when things are happening fast, I still revert to some of the auto modes on my DSLR just because there's no way to keep up with those settings myself, even though I know them like the back of my hand.
If you are interested, though, I can point you toward some pocket-type cameras that would give you enough manual control to do this yourself.
Having said all of that, I'm curious, first of all, what model your new Canon is. Because there might be some adjustments you can make to it (depending on what settings it has) that would improve your shots, even without Sports Mode. For example, some Canons let you choose to track moving objects, or increase your ISO, both of which would be easy to set and may solve your problem. If you tell me which one it is I can check and see what it has.
I'm also curious what your old model was, if you remember; I may be able to find out what the Sports settings were and if there isn't something comparable still available.
The other thing to be aware of is how you're shooting. The key is going to be pre-focusing. If you're not doing this already, give it a try. Basically, before you take the shot, press the shutter button down halfway, and let the camera focus before you fire. If you are just pushing the button all the way all at once, the odds of the camera locking focus are very low and your photo will probably be blurry. By pre-focusing, you'll find that not only does the camera lock focus better, but the 'shutter lag' time (how long it takes to actually shoot the photo) is hugely reduced, which means the shutter is faster, which means way less blur.
You can also use the pre-focus to help you when dealing with moving things. Try this: when dealing with something in motion, picture in your head where it's going to be in a few seconds, and aim the camera at that spot. Press the button halfway, let it lock focus, and then fire the shot when the object comes into that spot. This is kind of the MacGuyver method of focus tracking but it can be very helpful. :)
Let me know if you have further questions, or if you know your camera model, I'd be happy to check it out further for you!
It is a big letdown to me that they have removed this mode and provided no equivalent mode and since this has no manual controls you cannot just set it up correctly yourself. I can only assume they have done this for marketing purposes so as to position certain capabilities in certain price ranges.
In addition, any front USB ports away from the main USB ports in the back do not carry enough electrical power to charge the Kodak camera. You must plug the USB into your rear ports.
I do not have this camera but I have a Canon Powershot SX1oo IS so it's kind of similar. The thing is, the card battery slider doesn't even budge at all!!
The camera wont turn on either, I am scared.
Here's what I suggest - First thing I would do is go to the Canon site for either camera. In the upper right hand corner you'll see a button for "choose the right product." Then, click on "product comparison." A popup window will let you compare up to three cameras for features. This will give you a chance to compare them side by side to see the differences, and more importantly, the similarities.
Next, check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
The bottom line though, is that with the exception of subtle differences, they are essentially the same camera because they're from the same A line.
But other research I've done suggests a simple reformatting of the card could also solve the issue. So I'd try that first. Then contact Canon about a repair estimate. Is there still time left on the warranty?
As for cons, C'net seems to not like the limited shooting controls or the hit or miss performance.
Also, try using a flash, even in daytime. This will freeze the subject and make it "pop" in the picture. But in low light, don't use it for anything 10 feet or more away as the flash dissipates rapidly and you end up with an underexposed image.
the best place to choose a camera here:
1: reviews.cnet.com/digital-ca... dpreview.com/reviews/compar...
On the other hand, if you mean that you need the date and time included in the metadata (file properties) of the jpg file you are going to upload, yes, this camera has that feature at all resolutions.
In either case, you do need to properly set the date and time so that the camera's internal clock will put the correct date and time in or with each picture.
There are subtle differences - the A1000is has 10MP, while the A590 has 8.3MP - not much difference when looking at a 4x6 snapshot or even an 8x10 enlargement. The A590 has a wider angle lens. The A590 shoots slightly faster at 1.4 fps, but you only slightly. Outside of that, they're pretty much the same camera.
Next, check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Also, make sure you have fresh high capacity (mAh) batteries in it. Often undercharged or depleted batteries can easily affect camera performance.
It involves two steps in the setting. Step one selects the postcard mode :
Function > Recording Pixels > Post card
Step two sets the date to on/off :
Record Menu > Date off/on.
Date stamp is set to off by default and there is no way to remove the date once it is stamped on the picture.
If you have any suggestions on which to buy I'd appreciate the input. I'd like to spend about $50 but willing to go up to $300 or more. In other words I'd like to spend the least I can but I truly want a camera that does a lot for me and one that I'd enjoy.
Thanks, Matt.
The Canon A series is also not bad for beginners...
Anyhow for $100 or less (on Amazon) these cameras would be good for a beginner also (Your in luck as I just looked this up);
Lumix FS4 (4X zoom under 100 bucks- this one is from Walmart)
Olympus FE-340 (under 100 bucks and 5X zoom)
Olympus Stylus 840 (Under 100 bucks and 5Xzoom, optical stabilized- it can take MicroSD or XD)
Pentax Optio M50
I personally would go with the Olympus Stylus, Pentax, or a Canon AXXX Model-- Agfa If I really didn't want to spend the cash.
If you are going in the store- Eg; Target or Walmart you need to look in the budget camera shelf (Which are shrink wrapped and not on the camera display table- often it is behind it) for the Xacti/Polariod kits. Stay away from the DIgital Concepts/Sakar and S2 brands unless you really want a very cheap camera.
If you want to spend some more cash the Nikon L100, Nikon P60, Fuji f60fd, Canon SD1100, and Canon SD990 IS
are good choices.
All of the cameras I have listed have Auto Mode in which the camera will select the optimal ISO , Aperture, and Shutter Speed and some have an Easy Mode in which the Camera selects everything but the zoom.
In general you want to get the largest media card available for the camera and for cameras that take AA or AAA Batteries you want high capacity (Look at the mAh rating) rechargeable batteries unless you let the camera sit, in which case you want the slow discharge batteries (Duracell PreCharged, Enloop, ETC) .
I would suggest reading a basic guide to get a basic understanding of photography... The BetterPhoto Guide to Digital Photography(Jim Miotke) or Understanding Digital Photography: Techniques for Getting Great Pictures (Bryan Peterson) are good places to start... In fact buy and read the book first before going and buying the camera.
After acquiring the camera and getting a basic primer on photography go out and familiarize yourself with the camera.... You will want to set aside at least an 1 hour twice a week (For at least 3-4 weeks) where you just shoot as many snaps as you can of a few number of subject from different angles, focuses, distances, and compositions. Read a section of the manual with your camera prior to shooting and use the feature that is outlined in it. I would go for at least 30-50 snaps per session.... I would shoot either in the early morning or evening and then download and look at your photos at the end of the day if you took morning shots or the next day. Compare your photos to previous photos that you took but try not to compare your work against others (Yet or even ever).
What this does is gets you used to the way your camera operates and allows you to estimate more accurately the best methods for AF and minimal focal distance/sensitivity settings for your camera. A large factor in getting a good shot is how familiar you are with your own camera. It also allows you to develop composition techniques.
If you then still feel you need a class take one.
When looking at a camera a few things you want to look at;
1. Picture Quality of the camera .
a. You want to look at Noise or Degraded sharpness due to over aggressive noise reduction routines applied in the camera's firmware (Built in software) at the ISO setting (International Standards Organization norm for sensitivity of emulsion based film) you plan to shoot under. Basically ISO 200 or under in sunny outdoor conditions, ISO 200-400 for indoor settings with good light and evening/dusk or extremely overcast conditions, ISO 400+ for night shots or indoor conditions in poorer light. Acceptable noise at higher ISO levels as effects high open you will need to set the aperture and how fast you can set the shutter speed.
b. You want to look at lens aberrations, especially on a fixed lens camera. You want to look for chromatic aberrations along the edges throughout the zoom length of the lens. Chromatic aberrations will appear typically as a purple or green fringes around edges. You also want to look for Optical aberrations throughout the zoom length of the lens. You will tend to find barreling (Edges push out) at the far wide end of the zoom and cushioning (Edges push in) at the telephoto end . Look for vigneting (soft color or dark edges ) along the sides of the photo and soft (Fuzzy detail) places in the corners of the image.
c. You will want to look at sharpness of the photo. Sharpness is both a function of resultion , and how many MP and how well a camera can utilize the MP (each pixel in a camera relates to a photodiode, that sends an electronic impulse when exposed to light, located on a sensor chip) on the sensor and accutance (contrast). High MP cameras with small sensor sizes (More than 7-8 MP and less than 1/16" size) tend to produce more noise at low light levels because each diode is exposed to less light energy. The noise looks like little flecks and they are either removed by the camera's digital procesor or can be removed in software installed on your computer- Removing the noise almost always destroys detail. Sensor with high resolution but low accutance will produce images with lots of detail, but it will look "flatened" and the detail won't be apperent to the eye. The reverse will produce less actual detail but it will be apperent to the eye. Assuming the noise reduction routine did not destroy the detail you may be able to salvage photos with the first problem using an "unsharpening Mask" in your photo editing software- then again do you really want to retouch every photo you take.
d. Color reproduction. This is how well the camera reproduces the colors of the object it is taking photos of. Some cameras will have a mode to saturate colors making them more vivid... some cameras just take more vivid or less vivid colored shots. This can often be corrected in photo editing software.... again do you really want to retouch every photo you take?
2. Lens and aperture
a. You want to look at the zoom ratio of the lens . Optical zoom is true zoom (The image itself is being magnified on the sensor) where as digital zoom increases the size of each pixel and crops the image. Digital zoom actually reduces the resolution of the shot. Optical zoom is great until you exceed the equivalent of 300 mm. Once you exceed 300 mm Image stabilization is required to reduce shake. Over 500 mm equivalent and the camera really needs to be on a tripod. More important than the zoom factor is the adjusted equivalencey (Adjusted for the crop factor) of the lens. The human eye sees at a magnification of around 50 mm equivalncey. Zoom factor is found by taking the telephoto mm (The bigger number) of the lens divided by the widest angel of the zoom lens (The smaller number). A 18-180 mm lens thus would be a 10X zoom as would a 50-500mm lens however the two lenses would produce very different results.
b. Optical stabilization (Sometimes called IS or VR) built into the lens provides a stabilized image in the screen / viewfinder while focusing. Studies tend to suggest that other types of stabilization, such as CCD shift, produce the similar results but optically stabilizing the image helps the shooter focus while taking the shot. Optical stabilization is preferred by most users over other methods.
c. Lens equivalence after adjustment for crop. Sometimes this is called crop factor others call this focal length multiplier. The crop factor relates the focal length of a lens used on a smaller format to a 35 mm lens producing an equivalent angle of view. It is the square root of the ratio of the diagonal measurement of the sensor to the measurement of 35 mm film (43.3 mm). Anyhow the mm equivalence will tell you about what to expect about the angel of view of the camera. Look at both numbers... the lower one is the wide end of the zoom end and the big number is the telephoto end. The telephoto end acts like a telescope to magnify images with the larger the mm equivalent telephoto end number the larger the magnification but smaller actual space you focus on because your angel of view is reduced .... anyhow to break this down (And yes the experts can't agree on these terms and may differ depending on your source) under 20 mm equivalent is considered super wide angel (More than 94 degrees), 20-28 mm equivalent wide angel(94-75 degrees), 28-55 mm is considered standard angel (75-43 degrees), 55 mm- 200 mm equivalent is telephoto (43-12 degrees), and 200+ mm equivalent is considered super telephoto (less than 12 degrees).
d. Actual focal length of the lens. There are three things that effect depth of field; actual focal length (effects distribution of the DOF and is not part of the classic DOF calculation but has a real impact on the end result), aperture, and distance from the subject. Depth of field refers to the range of area that appears acceptably sharp in front of and behind the focused object. If more objects in the background or foreground of the focal plane appear sharp, then the Depth of Field is called deep. If the background and foreground are blurred then it is shallow. Anyhow the actual focal length distribution (front/rear) percents are roughly 10 mm 30/70, 20 mm 40/60, 50 mm 45/55, 100 mm 48/52 , 200 mm 51/49 , and 400 mm 50/50. Longer focal lengths also appear to have a shallower depth of field because they flatten perspective rendering the background much larger relative to the foreground due to magnification. Larger lenses, AKA those found on a SLR or full sized bridge camera/superzoom, will appear shallower than for compact digital cameras, because the larger camera require a longer focal length to achieve the same field of view. What I am telling you is that cameras with smaller sensors and thus smaller lenses will give you less control over DOF. AKA if DOF is important to you then a 15 X zoom camera with a 1/2.5" sensor is going to appear deeper than the DOF of 2/3" sensor with a 15X zoom because the actual focal length is larger.
e. Minimum focal distance (Especially in Macro Mode). This is usually included in the specs and is the min distance you have to be from your subject to achieve sharp focus. The closer you can get to the object the better you can fill the frame with the small object. Smaller is better. Something to keep in mind is that as you increase the focal length of your lens the Minimum Focal distance of the lens increases. Many of the higher end cameras have super macro modes that allow you to shoot at 1 cm or less. Many specs will tell you the min focal length at the full wide end/macro mode but will bury in the very back of the manual or just not tell you the min focal length at full telephoto (because it will be anywhere from 18 inches to 3.5+ feet).
f. Aperture size and number of stops. The aperture is the opening in the lens that allows light to enter the camera and its size, range, and control of it is extremely important. Aperture effects; exposure (larger apertures allow faster shutter speeds), aberrations (If the stop is too large you get aberrations which effects quality), vignetting (Larger stops cause the intensity reaching the sensor to fall off toward the edges of the picture effecting photo quality), and depth of field (Larger f numbers producer deeper DOF). The aperture size is expressed by the f number which is the ratio of focal length to effective aperture diameter. The smaller the f number the larger the opening - It is counter intuitive. Each lens has a number of stops relating to f numbers the lens can be set to. The more stops the more control you have. Many specs will tell you the aperture range at the wide end of the lens but fail to tell you the range at the telephoto end (Mostly cause it stinks on cheaper cameras) and you may need to physically grab a camera and fully extend the lens and see what the f number range is in aperture priority mode.
g. Lens construction, design, and quality. Some of the bottom budget cameras actually use plastic instead of glass for their lenses. Plastic doesn't have the same light diffraction qualities of glass resulting in degraded performance (Aberrations and Focal ability). The same is true with lenses with lower quality glass. The design of the lens is also very important. With cheaper lenses with greater range between wide and telephoto focal lengths their tends to be aberrations and smaller aperture sizes (Larger F numbers)... This effects both picture quality and how fast the shutter speed can be set to archive proper exposure. The other thing you want to look at is how fast the lens focuses. The focus speed of the lens effects shutter lag (We will talk about that next- Lag is a function of how fast the camera Auto Meters, Auto Focuses, Fastest shutter speed for proper exposure, in some cases the mechanical speed of the shutter mechanism itself, and cycle time).
3. Camera speed is how fast the camera can take photos and is a factor of several things;
a. How fast the camera sets Auto Exposure and Auto Focus. This is achieved by depressing the shutter button half way. It is a combination of how fast the camera can auto meter to determine the proper aperture , ISO, and shutter speed functions plus auto focus the lens and make those adjustments. Auto Exposure/Metering and Auto Focus greatly effect camera performance with more than just speed.
b. Shutter release speed- This is both how fast the shutter can operate and how fast you can take a properly exposed photo under the conditions you are shooting under. Aperture, ISO, and shutter speed all effect this.
c. Cycle time is how long it takes for the image to be transfered to memory-buffer or storage media and the camera is ready to take the next shot. Internal memory, processor, file size, media card type all effect this.
d. Total Lag Time is how long it takes the camera to snap a shot from a full depress of the shutter button. Total lag time IS NOT always (or really ever) equal to the AE/AF and shutter release speed. Look for reviews that test and publish all three times.
e. FPS tends to relate to how many shots and full resolution a camera can take in continuous/burst shooting mode. It is measure of frames per second the camera can snap shots at the same focus and exposure setting. It is a combination of many things including buffer size, shutter design, and sensor design. The larger the number the faster the camera can take shots. Entry level SLrs can shoot at 2.5 FPS-- keep that in mind while comparing.
d. Sports-Continuous, High Speed Continuous, Action Continuous/ETC mode FPS- Every camera maker uses a different name for this but it is essentially the same thing. The camera reduces the MP of the photo and stores it in internal memory buffer and shoots at the same focus and exposure for a set number of frames or until the shutter button is released. It will range from 7 FPS to 120 FPS depending on the camera and resolution. When comparing make sure you look at resolution versus speed. The Ricoh CX1 can shoot at 120 FPS but at a very low resolution. You will get x shots at that resolution as long as the shutter is held down and then the camera will stop taking photos and save the buffer to the media card. The higher number at higher resolution is better.
e. Startup time is the time it takes for the camera to power on and be ready to take photos from off. Turning the camera off between shots/group of shots increases the effective amount of shots you can get with the battery as you aren't powering the camera while it is turned off. Most SLRs have a start up speed of less than .30 seconds where as most compacts have a start up time of 2.5 seconds or greater. The lower the number the better it is if you plan to turn the camera off between groups of shots.
4. Power Source and Battery life
a. Does it take standard batteries or a custom rechargeable battery. Some cameras have a built in battery that is non-removable (I absolutely don't recommend these if you plan on taking many shots at one time) but rechargeable through USB. Standard AA or AAA batteries are universally available (If you are in an urban area), and are very transportable (Several sets will easily fit in your camera case/suitcase, jacket pocket, backpack) but not all batteries are the same - you must look at the capacity in mAh and how fast the battery self discharges. Generic AA or AAA batteries may only lead to 12-20 shots from the camera before complete discharge. If you are going to use rechargeable standard batteries use NiMh (Instead of NiCd) and look for the highest capacity if you will shoot soon after charging but if you will let them sit before charging you want a slow self discharge battery. If you use non-rechargeable batteries then Lithium batteries perform the best - I have had personally had good luck with Duracell Brand 2650 mAh rechargeable, Energizer brand 2450 mAh rechargeable, Duracell Precharged, Energizer Lithium, and Panasonic Alkaline batteries.
b. What is the expected life of the battery. Keep in mind how you use your camera and under what conditions you shoot in will alter the battery life. Anyhow you have Estimated, Lab Test, and Field Test values to look at in reviews. The Specs and Manual will list either the Estimated or Lab test values... Look at how they performed the test for the lab test. Now ask yourself is this how I will use my camera. A better indicator is the filed test results from reviews. A good example; Canon lists the battery life of 200 shots per set of batteries for its A590 camera- In real life conditions most users are only getting 120 shots per set of quality Alkaline batteries and less than 20 with generic Heavy-Duty Alkaline Batteries. Anyhow longer field test values in reviews is better.
5. Physical design of the camera
a. Ruggedness is very important. It is a factor of the quality and materials used in the camera. Metal and composite will be more durable than just plastic. More metal will however lead to a heavier camera. This is very important if you drop the camera and will effect weather or not it will break.
b. Form Factor- This relates to the physical dimensions and weight of the camera. Do you want the camera to fit in your shirt pocket, jacket pocket, back of the back pack, or in its own case/hung around your neck. I personally have bigger hands with longer fingers and have difficulty handling slim design cameras (In my case a small SLR like a Nikon D40, Pentax K2000, Olympus Evolt, or Canon Rebel will fit in my palm and I can wrap my fingers all the way to the top of the camera body). In most of the slim models I have to push the shutter button with the edge of my finger nail and holding them for extended periods of time cramps my hand. The Canon Powershot A series/Afga Photosensor/Nikon P60, is the form factor for a compact camera that I prefer. You will need to physically go to the store and see how the camera fits your own hand to measure this ( I can completely wrap my hand around these cameras and they all have side grips which my index finger can go across the top of to the shutter button and my thumb can reach the mode wheel while holding the camera) . Heavier superzooms tend to be easier to hold with less shake, which is also important.
c. Camera balance is how well the camera can balance in the hand with the zoom at full extension without shaking the end of the lens. This is somewhat subjective... again you will want to handle the camera.
d. Ergonomic design- Did they rubberize the grip- even include a grip? Are buttons and wheels placed so you can hold the camera without hitting the button? Size of the shutter button? Can you easily asses the mode wheel without cramping your hand? Some of this depends on your body size and shape so is subjective. Again you want to handle the camera. What I think is comfortable most likely is not what others would think is comfy.
e. Weatherproof/waterproof. If your camera is going to be used outside in the elements this may appeal to you. Some cameras are waterproof up to 10 feet without a special case (If you are shooting pictures of fish)
f. Size of / maneuverability of the display screen and EVF/Optical view finder. The new thing is larger displays and displays that slide out and angel. The inclusion of EVF/Optical view finders is typically a preference by some folks. Viewfinders tend to be useful when snapping multiple shots in outdoor environments due to glare on the screen. Some camera makers do away with the EVF/OVF altogether.
6. Sensor size and design
a. CMOS or CCD or Proprietary (Live MOS or Super CCD). Traditionally CMOS sensors have had lower power consumption faster processing but able to capture lower detail (This is changing with advances in CMOS technology) where as CCD had higher detail but consumed more power and were slower to process (Again this is changing). Super CCD is a proprietary technology developed by Fuji that combines larger and smaller photodiodes on the sensor in a non-rectangular pattern to both increase photo quality and lower power consumption while Live MOS was developed jointly by Olympus and Panasonic to improve the CMOS technology at the time to match FFT-CCD senors with lower power requirements (Thus improving battery life and enabling Live View on a Consumer grade SLR).
b. Sensor size and aspect ratio. Camera makers can't agree on how to measure this but it is typically speced out in old imperial inch fractions measuring the diagonal of the outer envelope of the sensor and multiplying by 0.66 (engineers found that only 2/3 of the sensor was usable for various reasons). Aspect ratio is the shape of the sensor itself (Hence the shape of the pixels) and is expressed as width:height for example 3:4 (1.33:1) the SD TV/ Computer Monitors/ Three fourths ratio used by Olympus SLR/ most non SLR digital cameras, 3:2 ( 1.5:1) which is what most SLR cameras Shoot (And the dimensions of standard film), or 16:9 (1.78:1) HDTV ratio, 1.37:1 which most closely mimics the human eye. The 4:6 drugstore print matches the 3:2 ratio so there is no distortion nor crop.... Okay now lets talk about MP and Sensor size; in general larger sensors also have larger pixels which give them the potential to produce lower image noise, due to physically larger light cavities in the photodiodes, and have a higher range of tones which the sensor can capture below where a pixel becomes white, but above where texture is indiscernible from background noise (black/dark grey). When you have a 1/2.3" sensor or worse yet a 1/16" sensor (OR SMALLER) and you exceed 7-8 MP you end up with more noise than signal at low light levels (Making ISO 400 and above very noisy or worse yet the camera uses aggressive noise reduction and you loose detail) degrading photo quality. Okay, now this is where it gets fun, if you have the same amount of noise on two different MP cameras with the same sensor size when viewed at 100% crop the sensor with more pixels will PRINT cleaner because the noise gets enlarged less for the higher pixel count , for a given print size, and thus will print as finer looking grain. Okay ready for some more fun? Larger sensors with larger pixels do not have to be enlarged as much in order to achieve the same print size hence a smaller aperture can be used to obtain the same depth of field and sharpness. At 300 DPI (With a 2/3" or larger sensor) you need to print clearly (and this is subjective) 2 MP to print 4X6, 3 MP for 5 X 7, 6 MP for 8 X 10, 14 MP for 11 X 14, and 23 MP for 13 X 20. Anything over 4-6 MP is wasted when posted on the web, shown on a HDTV, or displayed in a digital photo frame because they can not display that resolution. So basically a 8, 10, or 12 MP camera only gives you more room to aggressively crop and a little finer noise when printed but costs you sensitivity to light and increases the signal to noise ratio at the same time making the file size larger. Some cameras , several Fuji models I know for sure have this feature, will display a grayed out section where the print will crop and auto crop your photo for 8 X 10 and 4 X6. A camera shooting video at a 4:3 aspect will distort or crop when you show it on your 16:9 WideScreen TV (AKA it will look bad).
c. MP, which is short for megapixels, is the number of pixels, in millions, for a given maximum resolution. Each pixel relates to a diode on the sensor however MP is very deceptive. The size of the photodiode effects picture quality greatly and this is the kicker.... the pixel count quoted in the specs may not be the number of full-color photodiodes on the sensor. A lot of this has to do with sensor design used which will not be in the specs. The short of it - look at sample pics or snap some in the store and compare detail. Regardless of detail MP provide more MP will increase file size, meaning you will need a larger memory card for the same number of shots, need more server space to upload your photos, and need more hard drive pace to store as many shots.
7. Other Features worth noting
a. AE and AF points. AE are auto exposure metering points and AF is autofocus points. More typically means better, however if the processor does a bad job focusing on the points it is a throw away. I personally don't like Canon's AiAF system and always turn the AF focus to center.
b. Some cameras have different metering options.
c. Number of settings that can be manually controlled. The Canon A series alows you to control most of them as does several Fuji Camera Models.
d. Ease of use of the controls... As said above Canon and Fuji Cameras allow you to manually control most features on many of their cameras, including focus, except that manual focus using a toggle switch or D-Pad is not very useful. If you are manually focusing the best control and accuracy is obtained with a mechanical focus ring (Found on some brands of Fuji and Panasonic cameras- and of course all SLR camera lenses)... Electronically controlled Manual Focus tends to be more work than it is worth.
e. Menu system/User interface. How easy is it to get to the settings. This is quite important as some cameras have really confusing menu systems.
f. Preset scene modes. These are settings that the camera manufacture have programed into the camera that they feel take the best picture under those conditions... Typical are sunset, beach, snow, flowers, foliage, beach, indoors, action, and night. Some cameras have up to 26 preset scenes. This is a matter of how killed you are and setting the appropriate settings yourself and whether or not you liked what the factory programed.
g. Hot Shoe- external flash. Some cameras allow you the ability to add external flashes-some don't. Its a matter of whether you feel the need for external flash or not.
h. Semi Automatic Modes- Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, and Program mode. Basically the camera allows you to set the aperture and it figures shutter speed and ISO for you or Shutter speed and it figures aperture and ISO mode. Program mode the camera figures the settings you do not set. For example you can set in program mode the ISO not to exceed 200 because you know that 200+ ISO makes unclear photos with your camera.
i. Programmable and adjustable Flash settings- This is a feature in at least some Fuji Models... It allows you to set the flash settings so the flash doesn't burn out all the details.
j. Multi photo modes (Bracketing or Intelligent Selection) . Some cameras will take 2-3 photos in quick secession when you depress the shutter release with slight variations on the settings. Some cameras automatically choose what it is programed to think is the best photo others will show you the photos and you choose. Some Nikon and Fuji models I know have this feature. The Fuji 200 EXR takes two shots per press and combines them. Many Fuji S series cameras allow you to do bracketing in which the camera takes 2-3 shots at once with different settings. Nikon's new cameras will take 3 shots at once and pick the sharpest of the 3.
k. Image Stitching, Auction Mode, Panoramic mode- It all goes by different names but what it allows you to do is stitch multiple photos together in the camera to create one image (I don't find it that useful but if that is what you want- go for it).
l. Video- Digital cameras do okay for short segments of video to post on video sharing sites or displayed on a standard definition TV (Non-HD). They do not take videos as well as camcorders though (One of the reasons is the aspect ratio of the sensor, lens design is another, camcorders use multiple sensors now where as cameras only use 1, length of video, mic design and placement, lens design, I could go on) - If you are serious about video buy a camcorder.
m. In camera editing. Many cameras allow you to crop (some will call the feature trimming), correct red eye, or make color adjustments on the camera itself.
n. Face detection- If you need it. If you are shooting landscapes and buildings do you really care about face detection? You can also AF on a face.
o. Anti Shake- More or less required with more than 3 times zoom. A weighted tripod is required when you exceed the 500 mm equivalent.
Okay with all that said... The best camera for a beginner is a relatively responsive camera with a fixed prime lens or very limited zoom and plenty of semi-auto/manual settings without bells or whistles. I say this because it keeps the photographer focused on composition techniques and style instead of distracting them from focusing on composition.
If, for some reasons, it is discharged, it can be recharged within 4 hours using AA batteries or the AC adapter.
I would try to recharge the battery. If that doesn't work, you may have to get Canon to look deeper into the issue since it is less than a month old.
If you already have your pictures organized under EasyShare, adding/integrating pictures taken by Canon is not a problem. What you need to do is to click 'add picture', and EasyShare will take care of the rest, prompting you for the location of pictures to add and name of album to create.
Some, like Nikon's Picture Project, let you improve the dynamic range of pictures using D-lighting, a bonus if the pictures are taken with Casio, Samsung or any other brand besides Nikon.
If a person already has pictures saved under EasyShare, no harm continuing with it even if he buys new camera. EasyShare, like other picture viewers, has all the basic functions that one needs to crop pictures, change brightness/ contrast, rotate, Zoom, remove red eye, increase/decrease exposure, slide show, printing, email pictures and burning selected pictures to CD. You can also share you pictures on line in Kodak Gallery and upload video clips to YouTube.
yes the panasonic lumix lz8
cameras.co.uk/specs/panason... is a flickr album by "the jimmer"
flickr.com/photos/jimmerdch... photos were taken a lz8
All the A1000IS has going for it is the AA batteries. Only has 3X zoom.
So assuming you want more zoom and can afford more camera:
Canon SX10is /$360/340 shots on a set of 4 AA batteries/560mm zoom lens
Canon S5is /$315/170 shots on a set of 2 AA batteries/432mm zoom lens
Olympus SP 590UZ/$450/ shots on a set of 4 AA batteries/676mm zoom lens
Canon SX 110is /$200/220 shots on a set of 2 AA batteries/360mm zoom lens
Nikon L100 /$280/ shots on a set of 2 AA batteries/420mm zoom lens
Fuji S8100fd /$260/ shots on a set of 4 AA batteries/486mm zoom lens
If money is tight and you need the smallest camera, the Canon SX 110is fits the bill but not quite as much zoom. A good compromise.
If money is not a problem consider Canon SX10is or Olympus 590UZ both of which are larger and heavier and the Oly has the most zoom
I'm not familiar with the Nikon or Fuji
The Canon S5is is discontinued so you would have to buy used or find a new one leftover somewhere.
You'll have to do some internet searching to find reviews on these but at least now you have a list to get started.
Let me know if I can help further.
I am planning to buy a digital cam but am confused among Olympus Stylus 1010 , Canon Powershot A1000 IS , Nikon Coolpix S700 and Panasonic Lumix TZ5.
I am inclined towards Olympus 1010 for its optical zoom. I also heard TZ5 is good.? Can someone tell me which would be the best of these? Or suggest any other in the range of $150 to $200.
Thanks,
Vinod
If none, how do I handle this lighting condition?
This is much better than over relying on a preset which may or may not properly address the situation you're facing.
I just switched from a Nikon which had an easy to find setting & was very effective for back light situations.
Aloha!
my choice would be the panasonic tz5 it is a very good travel camera.
here is an example of a great night shot.
flickr.com/photos/thatrock/... here is very good wide angle shot.
flickr.com/photos/ian_d/320... tz5 has special ed lenses
Pictures taken with ED lenses tend to be clearer and sharper with little or no chromatic aberration
example:
flickr.com/photos/respres/2...
I had never considered Panasonic but will be now...another reviewer on this camera test drove this and the Canon 870, very similar to the 890 I was looking at, and said he would pick this camera hands down.
I like the 28mm, that is a big draw right there, but I wish it had a view finder. I think it's easier to set up better photos with that feature...maybe I'm just too old school and need to get used to using the display. How is the battery power?
sadly the shots are not mine but by a great photographer called furious Phil2005
the tz5 's 3 inch lcd display is very easy to use and makes setting up pictures very easy
the battery life is about 200 shots
again here is a link to a set of photos by another tz5 user taken during "the magic hour"
i think they show it at its best
flickr.com/photos/29596446@...
Found the TZ5 Forum at Flickr with the help of your link where I could read up on some more Q and A along with useful tips on the chat boards. This is the camera I will be purchasing. The photos are impressive for low light and color - they displayed the qualities I've been searching for and the 28 mm is the extra bonus over the Canons I was considering. Thanks for the information about this camera and taking the time to answer my questions... it's what makes these review sites work!
The other option is the SD990. Same Digic IV processor and it's getting great reviews with solid images.
the panasonic ls80 is a great little camera for those on a tight budget.
It has 3x optical zoom ,a good macro mode and good high quality lens.
look at this flickr album to see the quality of pictures that can be achieved using a ls80.
flickr.com/photos/ricardoba...
L.W.
Both cameras feature optical image stabilization which allows you to use a lower ISO, reducing noise without using a tripod. I also noticed the LCD on the Sony is of much better quality, 115k pixels on the Canon A1000 and 921k pixels on the T700. Then, you get 4GB of internal memory on the T700. Compared to the Canon A1000, I would keep the T700. The A1000 is plastic while the T700 is metal, so it holds up better.
But I think the easiest way would be to simply reset your camera back to default settings.
Press Function key and use the down arrow to locate MyColor. Turn it on and you will find B&W option.
If you are lost, check on page 75 of the manual which can be downloaded from the download library of Canon USA.
I like the SD1100, but I'm beginning to think that the lithium battery is a drawback, not a plus. So the second on my list is the A1000. When my rechargeable batteries peter out, I can pop in reg. AAs until I get home to recharge. Do the lithium batteries last longer, or should I be worried about my camera dying when the batteries give out?
But I really do like that AA option. Rechargables have gotten more powerful as teh technology matures. So, if battery power is your concern, I'd say go with the A1K. But if portability is the issue, then the SD1100 will fit in that shirt pocket or handbag a lot easier.
Thanks again!
Ella
Next, check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
The bottom line though, is that with the exception of subtle differences, they are essentially the same camera because they're from the same SD line. But one thing. Don't get caught up in the "more MP is better" myth. Sure, you get a few extra MP, but with 99% of your pics beign snapshots, and the fact that you won't even notice a difference until sizes reach 11x14 and above, paying for extra MP is really a waste of money.
If you want a camera that comes closer to an SLR (professional camera) then go with the A650IS. This camera has 6 times zoom and 12MP. It takes 4AA batteries and is very heavy for a point and shoot. You also get a flip screen which you can flip out to view the picture you are taking from different angles. Also this camera has manual modes for you to play with in case you are an aspiring pro.
If you want a camera that you can put it in your pocket or purse and take out and point and shoot then go with the A1000IS. It has 4 times zoom and takes 2 AA batteries and 10MP which is more than enough for regular sized photos.
I will say this, however, the Canon G9 is often the choice of professional photographers for a backup camera that can fit in their pocket and have manual features they can shoot with. And with a larger CCD chip, it doesn't suffer from higher noise in low light situations and at higher ISOs.
Of the choice, though, I like the SX100IS.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
Sure, the G10 has a larger chip, and that's a positive. But 15 megapixels? You'd need practically a full frame CCD chip to put that much MP onto the chip without making the camera less sensitive to light, not more.
And when you consider at 99%+ of pictures are usually snapshots, you don't even see the benefits of that much MP unless you're enlarging to 11x14 or above. So what's the point? I mean, it's like driving a Ferrari through town. Sure, you can do it and it's cool and all, but you don't get to experience any of that horsepower you've paid for.
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
Well Kyle, I just bought a A1000 and it works great! Since my previous digital camera only comes with basic functions without Image stability, face detection, scene mode etc. I'm very happy with this camera. As I compare, both A1000 and A2000 specifications is almost the same except A1000 has a 4x zoom while A2000 has 6x zoom. Since you mentioned that zoom capabilities are important you may want to consider grabbing the A2000 since it has better zoom function if it's not out of your budget. But also take note that A2000 doesn't have a viewfinder, some people may want to get a camera with viewfinder.
In my opinion, if you have the budget then go for A2000 since it has a better zoom capability and slimmer in size too. If your budget is tight, the A1000 would be a good replacement since its specification are almost the same but slightly better as your old A630 Digital camera.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
Canon Powershot A1000 IS Reviews
Canon Powershot A1000 IS Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
If you are looking for an image stabilization camera that sucks up batteries and quits in the middle of a small series of pictures and fits easily in your purse—this is it! If you want extremely poor customer service, buy this camera!! If you want to lose the picture on your grandbabies face as they smile at you—this one's for you. We won't even try to sell it on E-Bay because why should someone else be duped like we were. BEWARE!
- 5.0 out of 5
just one word to describe, excellent point and shoot camera
- 5.0 out of 5
Only 4x zoom, but any higher and you would have to use proprietary rechargeable lithium batteries (as in the A2100)or suffer short battery life (as with the A1100). In addition to high resolution pics, this camera has a stabilizer, which is useful for low light pics that require prolonged exposure. The A1000 also has an optical viewfinder, which is a must for shooting that is even a little backlighty. The A1000 also has lots of other bells and whistles, such as facial recognition-focus and special macro settings for night shots, etc. I have owned the Canon A!0, the A470, and the A1000. For my purposes, I won't need to get another camera for a long time.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have owned five digital cameras in six years. They were all good cameras made by well known companies.. However, they all fell short of all the features I wanted. The A1000 does it all !
I am a serious amateur photographer and am old enough to remember having to manually set my f stops and shutter speed. NO MORE ! Canon has even built-in parellax correction when using the viewfinder. I love this camera and it just may be my last......WOW !
- 5.0 out of 5
I did a lot of research on various cameras before choosing the A1000IS. And so when I purchased it, I knew I was getting a good camera for the price. What I didn't expect was the extreme ease of use and the phenomenal sharpness of the pics. I couldn't be happier with this camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
excellent photo & more function
easy to use
- 5.0 out of 5
Outstanding.
For SGD 299/- i got a 4 GB SD Card + Camera Case+ AA Battery Charger from BEST Singapore
- 5.0 out of 5
I originally purchased a Sony W150 because of all the bells and whistles it had...what a mistake. Sony's picture quality is terrible. Oh, sure it looks good on the LCD screen but when you print them or view them anywhere else the quality is horrible. Save yourself the hastle and buy a Canon! This camera rocks! Outstanding pictures and great features for the money!!!
- 1.0 out of 5
camera has given me notihing but trouble and canon help has been a night mear they made the camera work manually than I couldn't print they removed the spooler service to make the camera work so the printer scanner wouldn't work
- 4.0 out of 5
I have a ton of professional grade camera equipment. I hardly ever take it along on business trips. This little A1000 is not meant to substitue for that level of hardware. It was purchased as an inexpensive, small, AAA battery powered, easy to use, always ready to go on a business trip camera. It has both optical and LCD view finders and image stabilization and can be used outside in bright sunlight or inside with it's excellent flash (with fresh batteries). It fulfills the roll it was purchased for. I am sick of cameras with proprietary batteries that last an hour on a charge. So far it has not failed to work as long as called upon to produce good to excellent images under almost all lighting conditions. It is always at the ready in my brief case or computer bag adds no weight and takes up almost no room with a few extra flashlight batteries. If you are going on a once in a lifetime Alaska vacation take grown up camera equipment. If you are jumping on the compnay plane for a one day turn-around where you may need a snapshot of entrance to your latest business venture, this little point and shoot works fine. And for under $150 when it quits, throw it away and get another. I am very pleased with it for its price and features.
