Hey! You should know that Canon has released a newer version of this product: the Canon Powershot A490.
Canon Powershot A590 IS
Editor's Review
The image-stabilized Canon A590 IS is a solid point-and-shoot camera that provides power for photographers who know how to use it, but is still a great entry-level camera for novice users. The special "Easy Mode" simplifies the camera's operation, letting you take great pictures without sweating the details. Face-detection autofocus is also included, meaning you won't miss those smiles when you snap the shutter.
Editor's Review
The image-stabilized Canon A590 IS is a solid point-and-shoot camera that provides power for photographers who know how to use it, but is still a great entry-level camera for novice users. The special "Easy Mode" simplifies the camera's operation, letting you take great pictures without sweating the details. Face-detection autofocus is also included, meaning you won't miss those smiles when you snap the shutter.
Specifications
- 8 megapixels
- Lens-shift image stabilization
- 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- JPEG file format
- Face-detection auto focus
- Auto and manual exposure
- ISO 80-1600
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- Secure Digital memory storage (32MB internal)
- 2 AA batteries
- Part Number: PSA590IS
- UPC: 718122187928
- Release Date: Jan 25, 2008
Shop for A590 IS Accessories
Canon Powershot A590 IS Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Merci d'avance
The A590, for example, won't take an SD card over 2GB.
As for getting it out ... have you pushed it in until it clicks and pops up? That's how they operate. If so, there may be a pulled contact that is keeping it in, or you may ahve placed it in backwards, which is hard to do unless you've forced it. Eitehr way, if you can't get it out, you'll likely need to take it to a authorized repair house to have it removed.
El A590 sólo dispara en JPEG. Sin embargo, hay una manera alrededor de ella con CHDK. Ésta es una solución de firmware que permite que su Canon salvo en RAW. Para ello, cargar un nuevo firmware de la tarjeta SD. Y porque usted no es "intermitente" el firmware para que lo reemplace, simplemente la de eludir, que no anula la garantía.
Compruébelo usted mismo en chdk.wikia.com/wiki/A590IS<...> por Google Translate
Translation - The A590 only shoots in JPEG. HOWEVER, there is a way around it with CHDK. This is a firmware workaround which lets your Canon save in RAW. It does this by loading a new firmware from the SD card. And because you're not "flashing" the firmware to replace it, merely bypassing it, it doesn't void your warranty.
Check it out at chdk.wikia.com/wiki/A590IS<...> by Google Translate
Does it appear on the images you print?
In terms of the card reader to get, it'll be based on what type of memory cards your camera is using. If you are using the SD/ SDHC cards, just look for a reader that accepts those. You can find card readers almost anywhere (I bought my last one at Target), and you'll notice that they vary in price, size, etc. The more expensive ones tend to have various slots that are designed to read any type of card. The cheaper ones are designed for just certain cards. Basically, just take a look at what's there, and the package will tell you what kind of cards it reads. Bring your card along with you if you're unsure what it is, so you can verify.
If you can afford the multi-card readers that accept all types, I'd spring for one, so that later down the road if you buy a different camera with a different memory type you don't need a new reader. Hope that helps!
If you haven't already done so, you might want to try Picasa3 software which is a free download from Google. It does a great job of keeping your pics organized plus it has lots of goodies such as red eye removal, cropping, etc.
Use the card reader to get the images into the computer, then use the camera to reformat (erase) the card for reuse. I don't recommend using the computer for reformatting the card.
Thanks very much for letting us know the outcome. It makes my day to know I was a part of helping someone. :)
Try darntoothysam.com/servlet/S... stuff like this can void any warranty coverage left over, even with service advisories.
What are the best settings you would suggest in sunny conditions to capture this kind of action?
Does the A590 IS have a burst mode or something similar?
For a bit more money, you can get a Panasonic Lumix FX-48 (over $300) that has a 10 fps mode.
The settings you use will largely depend on your distance away from the action as well as the lighting of the day. Look for sports mode (or use a fast shutter speed) to try to freeze action.
Okay this is the deal- Camera makers release new cameras on a cycle. There is a trade show called PMA which is held at the end of Feb. This is a trade show where camera makers show off their newest models. The Cameras from that show get on retailers shelves around end of March-April (Right in time for cameras to be on the shelves for- you guessed it Wedding/Vacation Season). Then right around end of October/Early November more models of cameras, typically slightly upgraded versions of the cameras released earlier in the year, tend to get released for the Christmas shopping season.
People will often ask me what is the best Digital Camera to buy and when to buy it.... This depends on what you are planning on doing with the camera (AKA with what you want to do is a; SuperZoom, SLR, Ultra-Compact, Etc...Etc appropriate) however I always tell them, unless you need the bleeding edge technology (AKA currently the 26X Optical zoom or 12-14 MP) buy last years camera in the last week or so of March- First week of April, In August (Back to school sales for college students), the end of October, and end of December (After Christmas). Why? The price comes down significantly and the manufacture has time to apply patches to the firmware to fix wonkiness in the camera. I do not recommend buying last -last years camera (Unless it is under $60) because at this point it may cost more and you will get less features for your money. Of course if you need the camera now- then buy it.
WalMart was putting these cameras out on the clearance racks for $95 last Saturday. RadioShack has them on special for $109 (In store only) to move them off the shelves. WalMart, BestBuy (Model already removed from their website but last Saturday the local BestBuy where I live still had some in stock), OfficeDepot, and RadioShack all have new find in store utilities on their websites which will tell you which store has a stock of the item. Look up which stores still have them (locally for me 2 Radio Shacks and 2 Office Depots still have them in stock but none of the local WalMarts list them as in stock). You can also call your local retailers and see if they are still in stock.
Reputable online retailers such as Amazon, Canon's E Store (On Back Order), OfficeMax.com(In stock and on sale for $109+Bonus Digital Keychain), OfficeDepot.com (In stock $129), Ritz/Wolf Camera (On Back Order), Adorama Camera (In Stock), WalMart.com (In Stock Online-$129), or BeachCamera (In Stock but charging $149). You want to pay tween 100-130 for it.
Using the proper batteries and you should get over 400 shots according to Canon.
But i gets about 50 with CHDK.
If you want to use the mini or micro sized, you'll need an adapter to insert the mini or micro into so it essentially becomes a full sized card.
Most of the mini and micro cards come with adapters when you buy the card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Also, make sure you have fresh high capacity (mAh) batteries in it. Often undercharged or depleted batteries can easily affect camera performance.
As for an IR filter ... that may be your only way to go. Google how others have done it - there's tons of tutorials out there, particularly at "instructables.com."
Setting your camera to a lower setting will reduce the image is reduced to a set quality after it has been processed by the CCD. As such, the light still goes through those pixels, only that after some basic processing steps pixels "thrown out" to make the image to the desired setting and size. This process is called "Choking" and that will cause Artifacting and noise. Additionally, you'll also loose details of the recorded image.
Some cameras have written into their firmware a process called "binning," which merges the signals of multiple pixels to make larger pixels. Usually at a 4-1 ratio. This will essentially turn a 8-megapixel camera into a 2-megapixel camera.
The other option you can change is the Compression. On the menu on the left this is the second to last option and looks like a square with rounded right corner. If you switch it to normal the photos will take up less space on the card.
By lowering the resolution and switching the compression to normal instead of Fine or Superfine you can get more photos on your camera's memory card.
Sure its great to be able to apply compression at home on your computer but when you are out and only have a few shots left on the card you can get more shots out of the limited space you have left by lowering the MP and adding compression to get the shots.
We would like to know if cannon has had any problems with there camera that uses alkaline batteries??
Energizer sells such now days with a 2450 mAh rating in packs of 4 for a little over 15 bucks, Duracell likewise sells such (Theirs are 2650 mAh), Sanyo under the Eneloop name, Kodak, as does Rayovac (You need the high energy rechargeable batteries and not the regular rechargeable), and pretty much most battery manufactures.
Anyhow what you are looking for is NiMH with the highest mAh rating you can get.
Other things you can do is... In the cameras settings switch the Image Stabilization from continuous to shoot only or Pan Only. The IS function will consume power if it is on the entire time. At least turn off the display, if not the camera, when you are not shooting. Doing both of these things will draw less power hence increase the number of shots you get from your batteries.
Don't use regular Alkaline Batteries unless you are in a pinch- as stated before they will be sucked dry in no time. On the other hand they are cheaper and universally available.
Lithium batteries are much better than alkaline, but very expensive and also single use. Too expensive when there is a far cheaper alternative which I now use and am amazed how well they work.
Lithium-ion rechargeable batteries are ok, but expensive and not as good as the ones I describe below. I have Nikon lithium-ion's for my digital camera, but they were very expensive.
The successful batteries I use are NiMH, nickel metal hydride, and 2000mAh. This is not just the ordinary NiMH, these are the newly designed ones, for sale only in the last few years. There are still early version NiMH for sale, but not very good because they lose their charge over time. This is called self discharge. I was using this old version, and the self discharge was terrible.
The new design rechargeable NiMH have a very low self discharge, claimed to be 85 percent of the charge left after one year. As well, they are fine for the high load needed for digital cameras. I have used a set of Eneloop AA batteries and a Eneloop charger, plus several sets of Kodak NiMH AA's also charging with the Eneloop charger. You may never have heard of Eneloop, but they are one of the leaders for this advanced battery, and are available at Costco for an amazing price. I got all mine at Wal-Mart in Dec. 2007, and the price was so inexpensive I bought just a few to try out, and went back for the rest a week later (now a total of 20 AA's). Batteries of this type come pre-charged, and can be used right out of the package. I use them in my wireless mouse, camera, cd disk player, etc. I have a couple relatives also happily using these type.
The new batteries take a large number of pictures, over several weeks, without recharging, and sitting on the shelf in the camera between uses.
The rechargeable NiMH cells that offer a high capacity, say 2500mA (milli ampere hours), are good if you want to shoot a lot of pictures in a short time, say 1 - 3 days. If you are like most consumers, your camera will sit on the shelf unused for several days. The high capacity cells self-discharge, meaning a loss of capacity every day just sitting - "self-discharge". The new tech cells have a very low self discharge, and therefore, if they sit for a few months, you can still get many shots without a recharge first.
Check the following link to Eneloop batteries. You may also find forums on the internet where this subject is discussed.
us.sanyo.com/batteries
...
What is most interesting is the comment posted relating to a test done by a retired engineer . The results were (Recall this was in 2007)
For AA low self discharge battery:
#1MAHA IMEDION 2100 mAh
#2Kodak Pre-Charged 2100 mAh
#3GP Recyko 2100 mAh
#4Duracell Precharged 2100 mAH
#5Hybrio by Ultralast 2100 mAh
#6Ansmann Max-e 2100 mAh
#7Nexcell EnergyON 2000 mAh
#8Eneloop by Sanyo 2000 mAh
#9Hybrid by Ray-O-Vac 2100 mAh
Even in 2006-2007 Eneloop was not the leader in this type of battery.
Since then Duracell has added higher capacities to their pre-charge batteries and Energizer improved their batteries to compete (note
they now indicate on their packaging that they now last 4x longer than their 2005 product).
Australia Choice Magazine has a free report on high capacity batteries;
choice.com.au/viewArticle.a... compared batteries from;
* DICK SMITH ELECTRONICS
* DURACELL
* ENERGIZER
* EVEREADY
* FUJIFILM
* # GP
* INCA
* KODAK
* # MEMOREX
* PANASONIC
* SONY
* # VARTA
The short of it is that Kodak 2500 mAh rechargeable , FujiFiml 2500 mAh rechargeable , Duracell 2650 mAh rechargeable , and Energizer 2500 mAh rechargeable batteries should get you 7-8 times more photos than regular Alkaline batteries.
They also have a review from November 2008 on rechargables (Must become a member to see the report though) choice.com.au/viewArticle.a...
They compared;
* Camelion Always Ready
* Duracell Rechargeable 2650mAh
* Energizer Rechargeable 2500
* Eveready Rechargeable
* Kodak Digital Camera Battery
* Kodak Pre-Charged Digital Camera Battery
* Sanyo Eneloop Ready to Use Rechargeable Battery
* Uniross Hybrio Ready to Use
* Uniross Rechargeable 2700mAh
* Varta Ready2Use Mignon
(It will cost you $5.00 to get this report)
The test result you list above done by a retired engineer seems to be interested only in the rated mAh. From what I have read elsewhere, such small differences of 100 MAh in rating makes no significant performance difference. That is what I have found with 2000 and 2100's. Is there any more to the engineer's test report that is not in your post?
The free report from Choice Magazine has hardly any meat on this link. Am I missing something, or is this conclusion the whole thing?
Could you describe what the Choice Magazine review from November 2008 covers? Are you recommending the report and is the $5 charge worth more than the many user comments in several forums?
I would like to get some quality, objective test results that could guide my next AA purchases.
The first of the Choice magazine reports (the free one) is 3-4 pages... you have to click the links... The Hybrios did better then the Eneloops while Duracell precharged did about as well as the Eneloops. Both were middle of the pack with Rayovac trailing. You can decide if it is worth 5 bucks....
Report 4 (From March 2009)
Compared;
* Duracell Rechargeable Pre-charged
* Powerex Imedion
* President's Choice Rechargeable
* Rayovac Hybrid
* Sanyo Eneloop
* Sony CycleEnergy
stefanv.com/electronics/low... 5 (Also from 09);
edn.com/blog/1470000147/pos... 6 (From Late 2008)
servaas.com.au/blog/index.p...
Report 7 (Forum post data for report 6);
forums.dpreview.com/forums/...
servaas.com.au/blog/index.p... to break it all down....
As of 2009 if you plan on using your device within a month of charging your batteries the high capacity non-low discharge battery is your best bet, resulting in more pictures/flashes ETC per charge.
If you plan on charging and letting it sit a long time (More than a month) then the Low Self Discharge NiMH batteries are your ticket. The Eneloop, Duracel Pre-charged, and Sony CycleEnergy all provide very similar results (You can check the rumors... all three batteries are rumored to be rebrands from the same manufacture) . The Hybrio rates slightly better than the Eneloop.
If you don't plan on using rechargeable batteries then Lithium batteries perform the best.
and
Uniross 2200 mAH
both are capable of bringing obove 200 snaps .(without CHDK)
And I don't think you can use one on this camera anyway. I'd suggest steering clear.
Now, I'm wanting to get a new camera (and stick with Canon). Is there a Canon for under $200 that uses the rechargeable battery?
Thanks in advance!
Angela
www.flickr.com/photos/33346716@N03/
To be honest, I don't recommend them because the tradeoffs involved simply outweigh the benefits in my mind. And you can always use software to crop what you need.
This lens was working well for my real estate needs - for example i need to get as much of a room as possible when taking pictures for the listing so i would just attach the adapter to my S400 via the tripod mount and start shooting.
However, the S400 has stopped working so i've been looking at the A590. There is a 52mm tube adapter available... but my lens is 58mm. Could I add a 52 -58mm step up ring and then use my lens? What might be the effect of the extra focal length? Again, this is a non-critical application (wide angle room shots for real estate listings), but i am used to getting sharp shots with no distortion with this lens on the S400 so it would be nice if i could port this capability to the A590.
I haven't been able to find any 58mm tube adapters for the A590. Perhaps I'm not looking in the right place.
I appreciate your response.
Or else, take at look at cgi.ebay.com/UV-PL-Adapter-...
Digital zoom is fake, you need Optical zoom.
A SanDisk 1GB card will serve you well.
I set the IS to "shoot only" and tend to turn the camera off when not shooting which will extend your battery life (As will turning off the display). I got about 150-160 shots off with the supplied batteries. My first replacement set was a set of Energizer Alkaline batteries that performed just as well . My third replacement set was a Dollar General Heavy Duty Alkaline (20 batteries for about $5) and got a little less than 70-80 shots from it. I then purchased a set of Digital Concept NiMH batteries but they must have been defective as the camera wouldn't turn on. I replaced them with Rayovac rechargeable NiMH batteries and am getting around 100 shots per charge. Rayovacs are budget end NiMH (4 for about $5) and I have found they perform reasonably well for the cost so keep that in mind. I have heard that Sanyo Enloop batteries also perform well for the money.
You will get about 8 photos with the 32 MB card that came with the camera at full resolution and superfine compression (The least amount of compression but largest file size). A 1 GB card will get you about 250 photos and will cost as much nowdays as 2 or 4 GB cards, if you can even find 1 GB cards. I have never had problems with SanDisk or Kingston cards. 2 GB cards will cost around $5-$14 and 4GB cards will run $8-$20 depending on brand, retailer, and any sales they may have at the time.
To change it, you have to focus Manually or use Manual Focus in combination with Auto Focus.
The MF button lets you do this and the left and right arrow button let you adjust the focus.
More details can be found on pages 98 and 99 of your User Manual.
some people say the canon powershot sx100is has a problem on focusing, the 10x optical zoom was great.
canon powershpt a650is is a bit wee expensive
but there's a canon sale here this week
might check that out
by the way
should i trust a SALE?
based on experience, these companies go on sale to clear out old products, or sell defective ones(as in the case of clothes)
hmmm
i guess i better trust them now, lol
i'll check that sale perhaps on tuesday
by the way, they say some items are up to 40 percent off! that's a lot of savings for me, might direct my funds on good memory cards and all. planning to buy sanyo eneloop, from a reputable source of course. fake sanyo eneloops are all over the market.
:)
My current budget is $300.00. I don't want a REBEL because of the price.
HELP!!!
Thanks.
G5 Lover
Aside from Aditya's help, does anyone else have other ideas? Thanks
Batteries have what is known as <a href="zbattery.com/Battery-Memory... effect ' </a>.
If you start with a fully discharge battery, it will receive the full charge.
Otherwise it will end up with a much lower capacity than you would expect from a 2500 mAh battery.
New generation rechargeables, like eneloop and recyko, retains their charge up to around a year and would not give you so much problems.
If you feel your camera, rather than anything else, is faulty, sending it back to Canon is a better option than trying to solve the problem yourself.
The camera is unusable.
It is the second A590 camera, the first one was immediatly returned to the store bacause it could only take 2 or 3 pictures and powered off even with new alkaline batteries !!!
Otherwise it's a prima camera.
The problem does not reproduced with normal AA alkaline batteries.
My A590 (bought used) will not work at all on freshly charged NiMH batteries. These same batteries will then power the A70 for countless photos, even using flash, or power my headlamp for a long time. The A590 will not work at all with somewhat tired alkali batteries that power the A70 or my headlamp beautifully. It only works with brand-new non-rechargeable batteries, and it just ate 4 of these on a weekend backpacking trip at moderate temperatures without flash or LCD review.
I think it's a design mistake. Perhaps they should have stayed with 4 batteries. It saves me no weight, because I have to carry so many spare batteries; because of this, I'd say its net weight is heavier than the A75.
I love the camera except for this battery problem. Glad I only spent $100 on it. It is unusable except for short weekend trips. I'm really disappointed.
it's show the low battery indicator, and only able to take about 15 shoot, even with a brand-new AA battery (non rechargeable). I try to use some diffierent brand of rechargeable and non-rechargeable battery, but the problem still exist.
One big improval was the DISABLE IS CONTINUOUS MODE and set to one shot.
We use the Green Power 2700 batteries and they give the best power after being discharged and charged a few times. With one pair of battereies more than 100 pictures can be taken even with flash. Very important are clean contacts, clean the contacts of battery and camera regulary.
So I hope this could help some frustrated people, I was one of them.
Grtz
Luc
Plus my colleague's A550 have the same problem too, he sent back to Canon Service center for checking, but seem can not solve this problem.
So this is make me as Anti Canon Fans now.
So go with the A590.
Nice hack, but for most it's lost on them.
Correct, a dslr is much better when it comes to image quality, even at low iso, and has RAW support anyway. So indeed, if you're serious and have the money to spare, a dslr is the way to go. But then again, there are situations that I do not like to take my dslrs with me, but prefer a low cost solution that doesn't cost me an arm and leg to replace when lost. CHDK can just make the difference why one might choose this cam above another one. I wish more brand had similar possibilities, but I'm wandering astray, back to the point:
My bottom line: If you want to experiment with RAW and get more out of the A590, CHDK is a free bonus. However, for nice pictures you do not need it in 99% or more of the cases. The 590 is a nice camera on it's own.
chdk.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ#Q._... also using Canon Powershot A590IS, and using CHDK, the result is superb, I do occassional photo, but I'm not a profesional, and dSLR is just too big to carry around everyday. I certainly reccomend to install this software because it really extend the camera's already impresive manual control. Even if you're not planning to shot RAW, give it a try because I found the histogram function is very good to have (and understand) under/over exposure scenes.
In my openion CHDK is a real steroid.
Advantages
========
Shutter speed & aperture override, Live histogram, Exact battery indicator and more...
Dis advantage
==========
Reduced battery life.
Conclusion
=============
What im doing is that i will lock the mem: card when ever CHDK is required and other wise as usual I will keep my mem card unlocked sothat it will behave as an ordinary 590is.
The memmory card should be locked for CHDK to boot.
Go for CHDK if u wanna expirement with ur 590is a bit more....
I id it when found my 590 limitting me with shutter speed and all...
RAW is not much needed or useful for me since it is not processed by the DIGIC 3 we need to do much @ PS to publish it either printed or online....
I'm not sure what is going on with your camera, but I can try to help. First of all, what happens when you halfway press the shutter button down? You didn't say if you are doing this, and you probably are, but I just want to make sure. That should be what gives you the boxes that show you where the camera is focusing.
The fact that this camera has manual focus makes me wonder if that is somehow contributing to the problem. I don't mean to treat you like an idiot, I just want to cover all the bases: you're sure you're not in Manual Focus mode/ there is no MF at the bottom of the screen, right?
It may or may not help to reset the camera to factory settings. You can do that via the Setup Menu.
The camera does need generally to see two eyes to recognize a face, so that might contribute to the face detection not working.
If none of that works or helps, I'm wondering if there isn't something wrong. I'm tempted to ask if you bought it at the same place and if you're sure they're reputable!
The AF in fact is a pain and takes work .... I reviewed this camera and gave it a 3- Mostly because if you work at it, for the price it can take good snaps.
I have found the Face detect and AiAF to be near useless on this camera and have also set it to center.
A good example of what David is talking about;
picasaweb.google.com/john.s... here;
picasaweb.google.com/john.s... about 8 shots (and some swearing);
picasaweb.google.com/john.s...
picasaweb.google.com/john.s... AF is indeed not where it should be.
I have found moving further back from the subject and pressing the button halfway down until you can get the green square (In focus) then zooming/moving closer with it still in focus yields the best results.
I have also found the Auto mode in Indoor situations without the flash in dimmer light makes poor ISO /Aperture choices resulting in grainy photos. Taking it out of Auto mode will correct this.
The AF is completely useless, unless setting it in Macro mode, at focal distances less than 2.5 feet. Even with the Macro mode engaged I have found if your subject is less than 5"-6" in diameter the AF will not focus correctly at less than 2.5-3 feet and then you have to pull back and refocus. I have had better luck with manually focusing the camera, which fortunately is an option on this camera.
The Flash is also too aggressive.
With that said.... When I have had plenty of light and was 5-10 feet away from the subject the camera performs superbly in Auto and Easy modes. The color has been good and it does out-perform other 8MP cameras in this class (100-150 price range), assuming you can live futzing with the focusing issues. I think price and performance at 5-10+ feet and "Easy Mode" has a lot to do with the Fab reviews. The foul reviews are from folks whom are trying to take closer shots, shots in dim light in Auto/Easy Mode, and from folks whom are trying to snap smaller items up-close. Canon does deserve some ribbing here on this as they claim the minimum focal distance is 5 cm...
And, even though you think you've put in fresh batteries, underpowered batteries are just as bad. Batteries with a higher mAh - like around 2500mAh would satisfy the higher power requirements of your camera.
target.com/Duracell-Recharg... had an earlier model of this same camera and regular AAs did last about half an hour; the rechargeables go for weeks without needing recharging.
reviews.cnet.com/digital-ca... a great day!
PF
Since nobody wants to acknowledge the effort for providing a good answer, I am marking it as the best answer and award the points to Steve.
There are a few good cameras at your price range ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), including the Canon A590IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
With this function, images are shot 10 or 2 seconds after the shutter button is pressed. This is useful when you want to take a memorable photo with everyone including yourself in the picture. The self-timer can be used in any shooting mode. In addition, you can set the delay time and number of shots (Custom Timer).
1. Press the <FUNC./SET> button and then use the ^ or v button to choose either (10 seconds), (2 seconds), or (custom) using < or >.
* When the shutter button is pressed fully, the self-timer will activate and the selftimer lamp will blink.
* When the self-timer is set to ( 10 seconds), the shutter activates 10 (2) seconds after the shutter button is pressed fully.
* With the (Custom Timer) option, the specified number of shots are taken after the specified delay when the shutter button is pressed fully. You can change the delay time (0?10, 15, 20, 30sec.) and number of shots (1?10). When [Delay] is set to 2 or more sec., the self-timer sound begins to beep 2 sec. before the shutter releases. When [Shots] is set to more than 1, the self-timer sound only beeps before the first shot.
To Cancel the Self-Timer
Press the <FUNC./SET> button and then use the or button to display .
Thanks for you help
SD memory is basically the next version of MMC cards, and SDHC are high capacity SD cards. Before using a SDHC card, ensure that the camera you are using it with is compatible. MMC+ was developed to keep up with the faster SD cards. Both the MMC+ and SDHC cards need updated firmware in the devices to support them, so ensure whichever you buy is compatible with your camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
s the most common card on the market now, demand and supply...
I prefer something easy, point and shoot, but have a need for zoom since most photos are at rallies and events with large crowds and the stage area is not always close. Also, is there a camera that also shoots video...obviously, I also want good quality photos.
10x optical zoom which can be extened to 13x
auto focus and auto iso
3 inch screen
yes it shoot s not only video but hd video 848 x 480 at 30 fps
have a look at these
flickr.com/photos/u2slane/1...
All things being equal, however, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
As for the G9, I disagree again. It's 12MP is way too much for someone shooting snapshots. Others may contest that opinion. But frankly, it's overkill.
The A590 is out of its league between the G9 and the S5. The A590 is good for the price but it does not compete with the other 2.
Of the 3, the S5 provides the best performance and best flexibility. It will not produce pictures as good as the G9 but they are very close and the difference in performance and price is enough to recommend the S5.
Your best bet is to try both and see which one performs the way you want. If you can live with the performance of the G9 then it is a great camera (albeit much more expensive), but if you want all around performance and value then the S5 is the way to go.
Though 12 megapixels seem like overkill right now, in a few years it will be the standard. I remember when people thought 4 megapix was the absolute max that anyone needed for snapshots but now that number is 8. As people move into high definition, more megapixels will become more important even for snapshots.
It's a "give them a fish you feed em for a day, teach them to fish you feed em for a lifetime" sort of thing. As for the G9 - overkill. 99%+ of your snapshots will be 4x6 or below and you'll never see the extra MP, plus at high ISOs you meet his friend, Mr. Noise! For the price, I think going with a DSLR is a better move.
Joe, you state that in a few years it'll be standard. Well, that may be. But more is not necessarily better. Let me explain. I came across an interesting article today about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
I have to agree with you on one point, though, Joe. The S5. However, it's also bulkier. If someone needs a more compact photo option, then the A590 gives that.
I totally agree with you that higher megapix on a small sensor leads to increased noise but honestly if you keep the iso down and the size of the print low it leads to better pictures most of the time.
As for not needing the higher megapix... well I bought my first digicam in 2001 and the dang thing was not even a megapixel! I went to 2 megapix in 2003 and was happy with it but could not really get clear prints past 4x6. By 2005 I moved on to 4 megapix and was happy but the 8X10's are not as sharp as they could be. 2007 got me a 7 megapix and the 8x10 (as well as the 4x6) were much much better. I just got an 8 megapix Sony H7 and the 4x6 prints on this guy are indeed better still!!
So what is the point of this story? The rise in megapixels has most definately allowed me to print clearer and larger pictures. Most anyone who looks at my pictures can see the progression between cameras... its almost like a camera timeline when people look at my albums!
Most of the reviews I have looked at for the cannon G9 state that it has very good picture quality but it is sluggish owing to the issue you mentioned about handling the larger file size. Nonetheless, CPU's are only going to get faster so this seems to be a temporary hurdle.
Of course there are some models right now that are actually worse than their predecessors (the canon sd1100 comes to mind) because they have the higher megpix on the same sensor size. Again this is likely to be a temporary issue until the other bits of camera technology catch up.
Sorry I also forgot to mention that the higher megapix will also be very handy as we move into high definition and more varied ways of displaying our photos. I have used a 50 inch high def plasma to display photos and honestly the difference can be quite dramatic between a 4 megapix and an 8 megapix. Even the difference between 7 and 8 megapixels is noticeable (though to a much lower extent). As people start using more non traditional means to show their photos the higher megapixels will really make a difference.
For comparison of the 3 cameras, the G9 will give the best quality photos, don't know much about the A590 yet, but you could check on on that at camera review sites... there'll be lots of comparative photos to see. And yes, all 3 are of different class and type of cameras... so you can't really compare them head on... for performance, A590 will never reach the levels of the other 2. And S5 is more touted for its' long zoom and the USM lens, it performs well enough for low ISO shots but when the ISO is bumped up, then the noise will be terrible. G9 on the other hand will give you much much better results as it comes with RAW capabilities (but then S5 with the CHDK can give you RAW as well, which is another topic). A590, well, if you want a very portable shooter, then this will be the one to get among the 3, it's the smallest and lightest among the 3 and it actually looks quite good!
There're just too much to compare among the 3. So for your needs, if photo quality is top priority and you have the budget, you won't be disappointed with the G9. It's a bit bulkier than the normal P&S, but hey, you get in return the built quality and shoot-ability of a SLR (minus the changeable lens! ha)... If say you would enjoy having a superzoom, then get the S5... if you just want a very portable shooter, the A590 is a very capable shooter in itself... I don't think you would be disappointed with either one of the camera's photo quality, you just have to understand what mode and setting to use for which particular scene you would like to shoot!
Some cameras have written into their firmware a process called "binning," which merges the signals of multiple pixels to make larger pixels. Usually at a 4-1 ration. This will essentially turn a 12-megapixel camera into a 3-megapixel camera. And that gives you the opposite problem of too many pixels on the chip ... you now have too few and as such, will run into artifacts instead of noise.
It's simple math if you think about it. But look at it another way .... in the end, as I have stated time and time again, for the point and shoot crowd, 99% of the photos taken will be snapshots - with sizes 4x6 or smaller. At that size, 12MP is serious OVERKILL. You won't even be able to tell the difference between one shot at 12 and one shot at 6 at those sizes.
it's like driving around town in a Ferrari, sure, you can turn heads with that fancy gadget, but in the end, it'll drive the 35mph just like a VW micro bus, only at about 20 times the price.
Joe - displaying on HiDef is a good point. But I submit that using a DSLR will give you that advantage and you'll be shooting on full size chips with less of an issue pertaining to megapixel crowding.
There're many reasons for shooting at higher resolution, one of them is that you can actually crop out a smaller image within the shot you took...
Good points and thanks for the knowledge about the lower megapixel settings... I really did not realize how complicated that process was!!
As for using the DSLR... it will definately give you the advantage of higher quality pics for high definition but of course the full size chips come with full size prices. Until they can get the DSLR prices down to snapshot prices the best way to get high def pictures would be to buy a high quality high megapix camera that is not so crowded on the sensor as to kill the megapixel advantage.
You can increase the resolution of your photos by going through the setup menu. Select your menu button, then scroll to "Quality" on your LCD screen then press the "Set" button. From there you can select how you want to take the photos. I personally shoot in "Large Fine" mode (top left choice) to increase my ability to print large and crop when needed with minimal loss to image resolution. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Your camera might be a little different. This fix is for the Canon 20D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) dSLR camera. For your camera, the Canon A590 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), you can adjust the resolution in the following way:
1. Press the round "Func. Set" button on the back of your camera while in shooting mode. Along the left of your LCD you should see a quarter circle shape or perhaps an icon that looks like stairs near the bottom left.
2. Use your directional button to scroll down to that icon and use the "Func. Set" button to select it.
3. This allows you to change the quality of your photos or compression setting. The compression is denoted by a semi-circle with an S in it (for super-fine, giving you the highest quality available), a semi-circle (medium quality), and the icon that looks like stairs (lowest quality). The higher the quality used, the more memory you will take up with the photo. This will allow for sharper images when you print and view them on your computer though.
4. When you are done with your compression settings, go back to the menu on your shooting screen to select an image size (the letter below the compression settings). Select it with your directional button and "Func. Set" button and you will see a choice of L, M1, M2, M3, S, an icon with a clock on it for "Date Stamp," and W for 16:9 widescreen settings. The L, M and S settings correspond to different printing and use sizes for normal pictures. L, or large, will print at about 11.7 x 16.5" without cropping. As you move down, they will optimally print smaller and smaller and take up less memory.
You have now effectively changed the quality of your photos. If you plan on printing these at larger sizes or edit and crop the photos later, I would use the "Super-fine" and "large" size settings. This allows you the lowest loss of resolution when editing and printing later. You can always re-size the images on your computer before emailing them or posting them online too. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
it has a great marco lens and a good zoom.
here is al link to a photo set shot by a ls75 a very similar camera to ls80
flickr.com/photos/11264074@...
The Canon A590is will focus in macro mode from 2 inches to 1.5 feet.
I would lean toward the A720is because it also has more zooming power at 6X than the A590is at 4X just in case you start getting into pictures of bugs in addition to flowers!
wunderground.com/wximage/vi... is an advanced search feature that will allow you to type in a model like a590 and view pictures people took with that model camera. Compare models and pick out the Canon model you like the best.
Examples:
A720 - wunderground.com/wximage/vi... - wunderground.com/wximage/vi... - wunderground.com/wximage/vi...
Unless you are just married to the idea of having a Cannon, what I would do , is go to a store(or stores) and look at a number of these superzoom cameras and try them out. Make sure you have some loose change in your pocket. Lay a penny, a dime, and a Nickel/Quarter on the counter and snap off some shots. Get a feel for the camera. The results that I found the most pleasing with this exercise did not come from a Cannon in this price range.
I have had some luck with the A590IS for the same purposes that you plan on using it. The problem is the AiAF is wonky. Look at the bad reviews for the A590I - I have at times experienced all the negative things they say about the camera's focus, flash, and at times twitchy shooting. Now, with that said, once I figured out that by placing the camera AF on Center and using a 12-16 Inch or so min focus length (look in the full specs of the manual- you only get 5 cm focus with (W) - which means the lens is fully retracted - No zoom. With the optical zoom in use you must be 30-40 CM away) with the lens and in some cases switching to Manual focus or using the focus lock. Keep in mind now that you can in fact get the 590IS for under $100 in some stores now (Saw one at a Wal-Mart for $95 yesterday).
As you plan on hiking with the camera keep this in mind;
1. How rugged is the terrain you plan on hiking.
2. In what climate are you planning on hiking in.
3. Are you planning on snapping wildlife (birds in particular- To be exact birds in flight ) also?
4. What is the intended purpose of your photos (Enjoyment, Sell Them, Post on the web, or Enter them in contests?)
Keep this in mind.... Most professional wildlife photographers carry a SLR with a 70-300mm Lens (Typically a real high quality lens with built in anti-shake [VR/OS/IS depending on the manufacture as they can't agree on terminology] and another camera with a shorter lens on it/additional lenses . This would be a relative heavy camera/lens combination for most cameras.... not to mention expensive)- Well out of the $200 price range you are looking for. Weight while hiking is a very important factor, especially if you are traversing very rugged terrain. You most likely will not feel like toting a heavy lens combination with either additional lenses and/or additional camera. The benefit of a compact digital is that you have a wide range of shooting options built right into relative light and compact camera- you are sacrificing some lens and sensor quality though- AKA you aren't going to get the same results from a Compact Digital camera that you will from a SLR with a high quality lens on it. Keep this in mind though... The extreme super zooms 18X, 20X, and 24X suffer in the mid range (26 mm is where they start). The SX110IS starts at 6mm and the 590IS at 5.8mm which is reasonable.
The other thing about rugged terrain is the chances you will in fact drop the camera. How rugged is that camera (I dropped my 590IS the first time I went hiking with it... I think it fixed some of the AF problems dropping it). Construction of the camera is a very important feature - Ruggedness and weight. The other thing to keep in mind is do you mind loosing the camera? If you drop it into a canyon, off a cliff, or body of water you then you most likely will not retrieve it in working order.
On the climate... If you are hiking in cooler weather you won't mind a jacket. A camera such as an A590IS or SX110IS will fit in a jacket pocket easily. A small cheap case will also fit nicely on a belt carrying case without too much problems. As these cameras take double A batteries it isn't to much to have a spare set or two either in a jacket pocket or in a backpack. This will allow you to keep shooting where as special NiCads will have to be plugged in to recharge.
If you plan on shooting wildlife look at how fast the camera can take shots in Continuous mode/burst mode. The A590IS is way too slow to capture several shots of birds in flight and it's zoom isn't great enough to get in close enough to capture images of birds without setting them in flight- The SX110I has 10X zoom and can shoot at 1.2 shots a second. Recall about what I said about cameras other than Cannon... At a very well known Big Box Store I saw a Nikon P80 CoolPix camera on clearance sale for $269 and if you search Amazon you can find some deals right now on some cameras from Fuji in the price range you are looking for. With that said the shutter speed on both of these cameras may yield 1-3 shots of a flying bird assuming the camera was already on when the bird started its flight. No such problems with little flowers though.
If you are snapping pix with an A590IS mostly for your own enjoyment with a sellable/contest pic every once in a while then it foots the bill. If you are doing some more serious photography you want something with both more zoom power and better focusing system.
Melissa
The advantage to the Axxx series of cameras from Canon over the SDxxx series is the manual control ability of the A series.
If you are satisfied with the scene modes and get good results then it doesn't matter, but if you want to be able to set the shutter speed or the aperture size then the A series will accomplish the task. Part of what you pay for in the SD series is the smaller size.
the new panasonic tz5 is the camera that has features you require.
the ease of use of the lumix cameras and thier high quality lens make this range the ideal camera for your needs
letsgodigital.org/en/18179/...
Have been looking up the TZ5 and am just wondering as the TZ3 is a good bit cheaper should I go with it? Leaning more towards the newer model though. I picked canon originally as I thought these were the best cameras for indoor pics.
hello marie
here is a link to the differences between the tz3 and tz5
cameralabs.com/reviews/Pana... depends on how you use your camera the tz5 is a better model for hd video
Thanks
Basically you want to orient the card for insertion with the contacts being the end of the card going in first and you want the contacts facing the back side of the camera which is the side with the display screen. Then just gently push on the card until you hear a click which is the locking mechanism being engaged and that should be it. Hoped this helped.
Help?
usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... under the Drivers & Downloads tab for the filename PSA590IS_CUG_EN.pdf
According to the User Guide, "You can use SD memory cards, SDHC (SD High Capacity) memory cards, MultiMediaCards, MMCplus cards and HC MMCplus cards in this camera."
Thanks
Canon Powershot A590 IS Reviews
Canon Powershot A590 IS Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my alternative to a DSLR and I love it. I got it for $108 because I had a Best Buy points coupon, and I am extremely satisfied. The battery life is the one downside, but I've found shutting off the LCD screen and just using the viewfinder helps when I'm going to shoot a lot of pics, and doing this also minimizes the problem of shutter lag. I have an 8gb card, and it will hold an infinite number of pictures, esp when you set it to shoot on 5mp. You can set the color settings for vivid color or neutral color, which I enjoy experimenting with, you can also set it to Sepia or B&W. Another drawback is the wheel. I have started taking pictures thinking it was in Aperture Priority mode, which is my preferred mode, and the wheel had been bumped and it made my pictures all funky, so you need to make sure you have the mode set correctly before shooting. Otherwise, its a great camera for its price.
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera. I bought it last year before Christmas at a great price. It takes really nice pictures, but sometimes does not focus on the things I want it to focus on. I have taken some great pictures with it and will continue to do so. It has so many functions, and most of them are great. I use the manual function sometimes, but it is a little tricky to work. Sometimes the pictures do come out a bit dull, but it's easy to adjust the finished product on the computer. I find the computer program really easy to use and fairly fast. You can also download the pictures and delete them directly off the camera without the use of the program. Altogether, a really great buy for someone who wants something good quality, easy to use and at a really affordable price.
- 4.0 out of 5
I just started photography and am now taking a class. This camera is best for beginners because there is nothing to complex about it. Also, unlike older cameras, has more options and is a bit more complex than your average Auto camera. For beginners I would recommend.
- 3.0 out of 5
I bought this as a replacement for a ten year old Fuji fine pix that finally died. I'll admit the a590 IS is really simple to use,
but the clarity on outside nature shots is really disappointing.
I live in a cabin in Vermont and I've been trying to get one decent shot of it - no dice. I've taken hundreds of shots on every setting during every type of lighting situation and haven't got one decent shot. Last year I tried to take a shot of a particularly beautiful tree during a glorious foliage season. Again, hundreds of shots in every light you can imagine and not one decent shot. Not one. Last year was the best foliage season in ten years and all my shots are are washed. No sharpness.
I've got off some decent shots of items for ebay. Indoors and close-ups - The camera is good for that. Also, I have yet to get a blurry shot due to hand motion.
My old Fuji was a clunky and had very few features. I did get a fair amount of blurry shots due to hand motion, but when I did get good shots they were GREAT!!! Put that Fuji lens on this camera and you'd have a real winner. I wish fuji would get their stuff together, they are really under achieving on their new cameras. They had technology ten years ago to get fantastic pictures.
I'll keep this camera for easy indoor shots and ebay pictures, but I'm currently looking for another camera for outdoor use.
- 3.0 out of 5
This camera is adequate. The photos from my Panasonic Lumix point and shoot were consistently clear- this camera takes beautiful shots sometimes, while other shots are not as sharp. It would be nice if there were less time between taking photos. It tends to save each photo pretty slowly and I have it set on a 2 sec. review. I had it without a review, but it took the same amount of time, anyway. It is a decent camera for most people. I will probably upgrade to a nicer camera at some point because I'm really becoming interested in digital photography.
- 3.0 out of 5
I bought this after reading a number a great reviews. However, I can't say I've really gotten one clear, sharp photo from it. Perhaps there's some way to tweak it that I haven't figured out. or perhaps it's hit or miss with the sensor. Either way, I feel like I've gone back to my old 110 days (rememebr those flimsy little cameras?) Lots of features, but not worth it.
- 3.0 out of 5
This camera is good for starters. start up rate is fast, slow burst rate,dont depend on the expected frame within a given second. In sunlight the speed is fast. video display is faded and dark during playback.
- 5.0 out of 5
Yes, the battery door is a bit cheap. We use these cameras at our department and the things never die! I've used them in rain right away from pulling it out of a 120 degree (at least) car. I absolutely love these cameras.
Their picture is excellent for the price and the ability to take a picture without having the thing "boot up or start up" like my Photosmart R927 does, I can take a picture immediately. (especially helpful if you want to catch a moment!)
- 3.0 out of 5
For the price this is not a bad camera.... Don't get me wrong- I have snapped several remarkable photos, and just as many junk out-of focus photo, with this camera so fudging with the focus is a pain.
I bought this camera to replace an aging A85. It looks like an upgrade to the A85 but the default AF performs nothing like its distant predecessor. I had to turn the AF Sensor to Center and that helped quite a bit. Still has problems focusing on items smaller than a 5" in diameter (Such as flowers). Backing away, 1-2 feet, from the object and refocusing helps- but where is the fun in that—One of the reasons I bought this camera was for the ability to get close to the subject matter (Canon claims it has a 5 cm Min Focal length) .
Battery life is okay (The A85 had longer life) about 100-150 shots from regular Alkaline Batteries. and some of the features like Digital Telephoto and on Display Grid are nice.
Camera is the "right size". It slips easily into a jacket pocket and isn't so small it slips out of your hands. Also has about the right weight to it.
Lag is what is expected from a non-SLR point and shoot camera.
Controls are easy to use. The camera also has a Full Auto "Easy Mode" for first time photographers. It also has full manual mode but the manual focus is to clumsy to be of great use.
Just wish the camera would focus better.
- 2.0 out of 5
I have had this camera for about a year and one day it just decided to quit working. The display came up "memory error." I tried using a new photo card and the screen was black, but I was able to insert other photo cards that had photos stored on them and view those, but when I switched to the camera mode the screen was black. I will be calling the store I bought it from to see if covered by warranty. It was a good camera while it lasted. I believe nothing lasts forever.
- 4.0 out of 5
I was using a 35mm canon rebel that I love but
I needed a digi I love the ease of use and the similar format as the rebel. My children love it too. My only challenge is figuring out the software.
- 4.0 out of 5
I tried it and found wonderful realy good cjoice
- 2.0 out of 5
This is my second Canon A590. The first one the lens wouldn't open a month after I bought it. Canon replaced the first one. The second one now has the same lens problem. Clearly Canon has a technical problem with the lens mechanical operation.
- 4.0 out of 5
well its an worth for money camera. Its focusing capability is tremendous . Even If you are amature photographer u can work wonder I spend almost an hour comparing it with the same segment of nikon of near 7 megapixels but canon simply leaves behind all its nearest cameras.It is undisputed champion of the 7-8 megapixel & 4x optical zoom.
- 2.0 out of 5
I enjoyed the pictures of this camera but only 2 months after purchase from Ebay, I cannot turn it on. The lens is stuck without it falling and the warning "lens error, restart camera' is there. I tried 1000 times restarting but no positive result. I am really disappointed. I cannot return it, and am not able to repair it either.
- 3.0 out of 5
We recently took this camera as well as a 5-6 year old Nikon 3200 3.1mp "clunker" to Florida. We took many photos - sometime of much the same subject and I have to say that the old Nikon did a much better job as far as clarity, color rendition and lack of fuzziness and 'noise'. I'm hoping that some of this was due to lack of experience and we will get all of the settings right and it will be a good camera. When it was all over, I do regret not taking my pro level Nikon SLR even though it does weigh a short ton:-))
I've rated it average though as our usage level and experience might move it one way or the other positive, hopefully. Now, it's a disappointment to us!!
- 3.0 out of 5
My wife and I both bought this camera on the same day. We are people that take super good care of our cameras.
My camera still works, hers broke and is garbage now.
The lens started making a horrible noise and then it started going in & out and stopping halfway between the two positions....all pictures would come out as a blinding white overexposure.....
We never did send in our warranty cards - stupid move, in hindsight.....but we trusted that our Canon cameras would be reliable!
I guess we'll have to throw it away, $180.00 in the trash.
I imagine it would cost a lot of money to get fixed.
- 3.0 out of 5
I purchased the A590 IS camera in April 2008 to replace an excellent point and shoot Fuji 550 which had stopped functioning. I read a lot of good reviews about the Canon 590 IS camera which influenced my decision to purchase. After purchasing, I traveled to Russia. During one month in Russia, I took about 500 photos and some video. The quality of many photos were good, some were not so good. The snapshots were only average. The video feature was acceptable. I was pleased with the ease of use and battery life. Low light photos were better than I had been accustomed to with other point and shoot cameras. However, when I returned to the U.S. and begin to edit the photos, I discovered that the resolution was terrible on most of the photos that were zoomed and cropped. In summary, I was very disappointed in the overall picture quality. I would recommend this camera only for ease of use, video feature, and price. If you are serious about resolution of photos, do not purchase the Canon A590 IS. Presently, I am doing a lot of research to determine what camera to purchase to replace it.
- 4.0 out of 5
cannon powershot 590 is is my first digital camera.
and i have not seen all the other digital camera manufacturer's image.so i will not hardly tell that cannon 590 is's image quality is the best among all same spcification's built camera.
but it has some feature which is the plus point of it,the image quality naturally will not be same as slr digcam have.
i am quite happy having this digital camera as a first user.
as a message i will advice to take photo in manual made in as low as iso speed possible rather tha easy mode and auto made.
- 4.0 out of 5
This camera is a good compromise for beginners who don't want full automatic cameras although Canon added a full auto mode on this particular model. It's easy to use yet one can set manual mode to control everything like aperture, shutter speed, ISO, white balance etc. Perfect to learn how to handle a digital camera. I've shot over 1000 photos and videos in Thailand, England, France, indoor and outdoor and I haven't been disappointed so far. IS is quite effective, flash is good. It's got all I wanted, that's standard AA batteries so you never run out of batteries if you carry a couple extra sets in your pocket, a view finder maybe old fashioned but so convenient to either save battery life or use in very sunny places. It's fast, probably one of the fastest cameras for this price range. The solid aspect of this camera makes you feel confortable holding it. That's it, for those who can't afford the new SX1 IS, here's the next best choice ;)
- 1.0 out of 5
I have owned previous Canon powershot cameras an was so diappointed when I bought this one in August 2008. It broke within the first month! I sent it back to them for repair thinking it was just a fluck & under warranty. 3 months later the camera is broken AGAIN for a different reason...ALL warranty covered problems.
I am so disgusted that I am buying a new camerea to replace this TERRIBLE Canon camera.
Problems: Stopped taking photos, blinded people with the non-working flash's red beam, fuzzy photos, batteries draining every 2 days and not due to 'dirty' contacts, either. Oh, forget taking a picture of kids because the camera takes up to 5-10 seconds to recycle itself for the next shot!!!! Support thougth that was acceptable for this camera! NOT! The list goes on and this is a new camera.
Looking for new camera that will not be a Canon. Do Not buy this camera.
- 2.0 out of 5
You can't get more features for the money...but I'm returning my camera because I can't get it to take consistently clear photos. I have a 6 year old Olympus Camedia C-4000 (4.0MP), and it takes much sharper images than the A590 I received. My family has had great luck with Canon in the past, so this is very disappointing.
Another reviewer remarked that it was either feast or famine on the reviews for the A590. All people have the same issue: can't focus/fuzzy images. There has to be some substance to that, and it seems like buying this type of camera is a gamble.
- 5.0 out of 5
I received my camera as a Christmas gift this Christmas, I have owned it for a total of 5 days, and am in love with it. No, seriously, if I could I would marry it. I'm not sure what my husband would think of it, but oh well. This camera takes awesome pictures, the clarity is actually quite amazing. The disk that comes with the camera is no doubt the easiest download I have ever done. My son has an MP3 Player, and it was pure heck to get up and running. This camera and everything with it is quite simple, even for those that arent too sure about cameras. It has a video setting where you can actually take videos, inside and outside settings for the obvious, portrait setting for those upclose pics, and many more. It comes with cables that you hook up to your T.V., and can have the whole family review the pics instead of passing the camera around chancing it being dropped, etc. We have also discovered you can take pictures through your T.V. when the camera is hooked up. Its actually quite entertaining. This camera is, by far, the best I have ever owned. Thank you for reading my review.
- 5.0 out of 5
I must say, it's my favorite camera in the <$150 price range by far. Plenty of zoom, 8 MP (you really don't need more), Optical Image stabilization (instead of that phony software stuff), a very nice movie mode, and manual and novice modes are all features that make this camera a must have for those who aren't looking to spend a lot but want the best quality that their money can buy. I've taken several thousand pictures already, and I'd say only 1-2% of them have not met my high standard (probably the best result I've found in a camera in this price range). You'll be quite pleased. My only negative is that it's a little tricky to disable the camera's autofocus. However, on the whole, it's a fine machine.
- 2.0 out of 5
I used 2 cameras previously ( a Canon and a Sony ) and the pictures were always so much better.
Maybe this is a unique problem with my camera- pictures average or below average without using the zoom. I And the batteries are done after 20 or 30 pictures....
Even the video is not very clear...
Very blurry in low light....
But when it came to realy clsoe shots the pictures were very good.
- 5.0 out of 5
the powershot a590 Is is an excellent camera. This camera takes crystal clear pictures and the videos turned out to be good too.
- 5.0 out of 5
i have been using the CANON EOS DSLR and tried to purchase a digicam A590 IS and so far i havent been disappointed with this camera..almost all the abilities that a DSLR has is found in this piece of gem!the color and the quality of the pictures are great...when it comes to portrait which i do most, it gave me the best color and lighting effect i just needed. this gem really hit the spot though. i dont understand why some people get such negative impression on this..u should have learned how to operate it. it took me an hour to study and really learn how to use this camera just to get the right image result i desire.sometimes your issues just fall for some technical ignorance or mishandling of this gadgets...canon rocks!
- 5.0 out of 5
Having very happily used a traditional Canon camera for many years, we recently decided to make the move to digital; can only wish we had done it earlier. The Canon Powershot A590IS is simple to use, has a great range of features and takes the most crisply defined shots I have ever seen. The zoom really does what it says on the box!
Admittedly the camera is sold with a very limited memory card, but given the "budget" price, that is a very minor gripe.
Indeed, the results it produces are far superior to what you might expect in this price range. I would recommend this camera to anyone setting out on the digital photography journey!
- 2.0 out of 5
I bought this camera to take on my trip to Nicaragua in December. I have taken many pictures with it and tried mainly the auto and landscape modes. Unfortunately, ALL of the pictures are coming out slightly blurry. The color quality is not as good as I expected either. I took it to the park and on some trails to see how it did and wasn't too satisfied. Overall I am disappointed and I am returning it to Circuit City and I may try a Nikon.
- 5.0 out of 5
.I am a novice in digital photography...this camera has changed the way I shoot.Its a great camera to own.
- 1.0 out of 5
My A590 IS doesn't focus properly. It also doesn't adjust properly to light levels. No matter how I take the photos - indoor/outdoor day/night flash/no flash - I get the same result, the pictures are out of focus and the colors are washed out.
For example, I took a series of shots with my A590 on a bright, sunny, beautifully clear day. You'd never know it was that kind of day from the photos. The shots look it was a hazy, cloudy day.
I've been looking at scores of reviews of this camera, and the reviewers fall into two camps. Either they love the camera and rave about how clear and sharp the photos are, or they hate the camera, because all their photos are blurry and washed out. There's practically no middle ground between those two extremes.
I think Canon may have had a bad run of these cameras. It seems like a widespread problem from what I've seen. Canon should step up to the plate and issue a recall.
I'm going to send my A590 to Canon to be "evaluated". If they send it back to me like it is now, and tell me it's fine, I won't buy anything else from Canon for at least two years.
(Canon won't necessarily lose me as a customer forever, but the two year moratorium is my way of sending a message, via their sales numbers, that they're doing something wrong.)
- 2.0 out of 5
I am a professional, but love having a point and shoot for parties and vacations. I always use Canon and purchased this on the fly when I dropped my Powershot A610 while on vacation. This was the 4th time I dropped this thing and it worked great until this last time. I bought the A590 on a whim, trusting that since it was Canon, it would be fine. The pictures that I got off of this thing were washed out, as another reviewer said, and the delay time from the flash is guaranteed to miss the moment your trying to capture. I was terribly disappointed with the images even compared to other comparable cameras and will definitely spend the money for a better point and shoot.
- 1.0 out of 5
Bought the camera and received a lens error message after no misuse and owning camera only 4 months. Canon told me that it had an "internal dent to the lens" and wants me to pay $100 to fix. Many other users have same problem. Do not buy Canon.
- 1.0 out of 5
At how HORRIABLE the photos have turned out. I too like others have played with the different formatting options. Taken all different photos and so many of them look like they were taken with a web cam. My kodak that just broke that was 4 years old and a 3MP took much better then this 8MP camera. I am surprised some have had such good luck with it while others of us have had such opposite responses.
Also very dissappointed in the time to record an image, even with setting it to the HI ISO, it still was a good 30 seconds for it to save and then give me the option to take another. That was very upsetting. Felt like I was missing shots. Then when you would half press the shutter in to be ready for a shot most of the time it would take the shot without being pressed further in.
Beware of this ill preforming camera!
- 3.0 out of 5
I owned many Canon camera Sure Shot zoom, AE-1, T90, 10D, 300D, A70 and now A590.
By far A590 is the worst camera of the lot. Even the Sure Shot Zoom (purchased in 1989) is better than this. Clearly Canon is not longer making camera for consumers but making them for a price and very much with *Profits* in mind.
It's a pity that Canon has taken the eye off the ball. I will be switching to Nikon with my next DSLR and will move away from Canon.
- 1.0 out of 5
After reading all of the raving reviews of the A590IS, I purchased this camera to replace my Nikon L3 that was dropped on concrete. The features were great. However, I was unable to get the camera to produce hi quality images. I tried every combination of settings possible with the same lighting, distance, etc. Auto, Manual, Program, and on and on. It looks as if the pictures were taken at a lower resolution and then interpolated to a higher resolution. Overall, image quality was terrible. I didn't realize how terrible it was until I compared the A590IS images to the images from the 5.1 MP Nikon L3. I returned the 590 and purchased another Nikon. I love my Pixma printer and my friend's 30D and my brother's older 20D, but the A590IS doesn't even compare to a 3 year old L3.
- 5.0 out of 5
This little gem has most of the features of my EOS DSLR and then some newer ones. The lens has optical zoom from an equivalent 35mm to 140mm which corresponds nicely to my favorite 35mm to 135 mm EF lens. Little digital cameras certainly need image stabilization and the Canon version worked well during a photo shoot at a recent French Quarter festival. The resulting pictures were sharp and the colors turned out true to life. I have another little digital camera that cost about the same as the Canon and has a six-times optical lens but is usless outdoors because it doesn't have an optical viewfinder. In my experience, an optical viewfinder is a must for outdoor use. In short, this is a great little camera at a good price.
- 1.0 out of 5
I am extremely disappointed with the picture quality of the A590
the pictures are washed out and soft focus I have tried various combinations of settings but to no improvement. the features and controls are good but it is the image quality that is most important. This was a replacement supplied by my insurance company because my camera was stolen and the type was unatainable. I chose the canon because they have a good name bu it will be a long time before I consider a Canon again
- 5.0 out of 5
After a long debate and two weeks of studying most of the New Models I decided on the Canon A590,I have a DSLR But wanted a Small Pocket size Camera with all the Features of
my DSLR or at least most of them.And I have not been dissapointed .Where do I start the LCD even in bright Light Is more than exceptable and it also has a View finder another added Bonus,Obviously after only two days this is is,nt a long time as to really judge this Camera but I wanted you to know how pleased I am with this Camera,I have taken Landscapes ,Close ups Ect and Can,t really ask for from this Little Gem ,Image quality is Excellent,
Handling is Fine,and the Price is exceptional when you think that its cost is less than a quater of my DSLR,Batteries ( Life) I cannot comment on after two days but will be updating you soon.
