There is a "stich assist" function with the A630, which enables you to "stitch" photos together. With that setting, you take multiple shots - after the first one, a 'ghost' from the first image will show on your screen and help you to line up your second shot so the two can be 'stitched' together into a panaromic image. Apparently Canon's software can do this as well regardless of what mode you took your photos in - you select the photos you want to join, and the software takes over.

The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) was very well received and has excellent reviews on this site. The A540 was a bit disappointing even tho it has a bigger CCD sensor of 1/2.5 compared to 1/1.8cm.

The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is a good choice because of its iSAPS (Intelligent Scene Analysis based on Photographic Space) automatically optimises camera settings before your shot. Basically it does the labor for you given a certain environment. And it is under $300

Actually, the A630 is under $200 right now at pcrush.com. I got mine in March for $213. I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB.

It will also record video up to one hour or until you run out of memory, whichever happens first. The sound is not video camera quality, but again, this is not a video camera! You can use the wide and tele while filming and you can also use the fun color accent and color swap features. But once you start recording you can't turn them off unless you quit first.

If you get a tripod (I got one for $12 including shipping) you can set it up at the first buzzer and let it run!

Look at my other answers for more info about this camera.

Your best options would be the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) or the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  )

The W100 has a lot of very positive user reviews, more than the relatively new A630, but Canon is known for reputable cameras, and the A630 should be just as fantastic as the preceding A620/A610 models.

I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix DMC LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) it is a very afforadable price (as far as digital cameras go) and it is very easy to use. Plus unlike other easy to use cameras this has a lot of power behind it so just because you are camera impaired you don't have to suffer bad pictures.

If you are will to pay a bit more the Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is easy to use and a great value for the amount of features it has.

Check them both out, see what you are willing to spend. Good luck. They are both excellent cameras.

The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) takes nice nighttime photos and might be a good choice. It's easy to use and all-around good for most situations.

Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com  so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!

No, the Canon A630 uses a Secure Digital card.

I'm thinking you mean the A620. Well, first think you see is that the pixel count reaches the 10 MegaPixel plateau, compared to the A620a 7.1MP threshold. The LCD screen has also been enlarged. With the A640, shutter speeds also go to 1/2500 of a second, over the 1/2000 of a second with the A620.

ISO control now goes to 800 ASA. Flash range has increased and there's a few more whistles and bells in the special scene shooting modes.

So, in essence, they are the same as far as basics, just a little bit more which is what you would expect in a model upgrade.

The A640 also has remote capture ability which is not available on the A630. This means you can set up your computer to take pictures with your camera.

I found the following link of a comparison btwn the two cameras ... there doesn't seem to be any differences except to the megapixel increase for the A640 and the (very) kool black case color. Other than that there are no other differences noted.

dpreview.com/news/0608/0608... 

Dale, the difference in list price is only $100, not $200. The A630 is $299 while the A640 is $399. I concluded the same thing that George did (no significant differences except for the megapixels) and bought the A630 a couple of weeks ago. I am extremely happy with the camera, but I knew that I would be because this is my third Canon Powershot.

No. The A630 does not have IS (Image Stabilization). For a good review check out the following,

steves-digicams.com/2006_re... 

The A630 has 8MP with 4X zoom, uses 4 AA batteries and no image stablization,but has a flip lcd screen.
The Z710 has 7.1 MP with 6X zoom, uses 2 AA batteries and has image stablization. The A710 is smaller.

Hi Jeff,
You've got a lot of questions in here and I can help with at least a few of them. I have not heard that more pixels can result in a lower quality image, although I'd be fascinated to hear the reasoning behind that (I don't mean that sarcastically, I really am interested!) What is pretty certain is that 8 vs. 10mp is not a huge amount of difference, and the amount of pixels is not what's causing your low light problem. (For a great discussion of how little difference 2 pixels makes, go <a href="kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth... 

When you say you get poor low light images I'm assuming you mean they are grainy/ swirly/ maybe missing detail? This is less related to your mp count and more related to your image sensor and how well it handles the brightness/ contrast/ colors it is receiving. All cameras have some issues with low light photos, but some are better than others.

With that said, I've always thought the Canon Powershots did well in low light. Rather than just giving up on your camera it might be worth exploring what's wrong with your low light images and how to fix it. This may take some playing around with the balances and settings on your camera, or possibly changing the image resolution.

If you want to tell us more about what problems you're having in low light I can try to help solve them. I wouldn't give up just yet... the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is a wonderful camera.

Yes this camera uses NiMH batteries AA batteries, which is rechargeable. This is an excellent camera, 4 AA batts can be a pain but with the recharge feature it is not such a big deal, use those batts again and again.

it takes great pictures in auto mode. anyways the software it comes with allows you to do so many things to your photos once you have downloaded them on your computer

Well, I kinda ended up answering my own question. I purchased the A710 out of total curiousity. I wanted to see if was a good "mom" camera. I found out it was not. Not for my needs. The flash recycle time was way too slow, kids don't wait for moms camera. And Auto Mode picture quality, I found, was too grainy for a $350+ camera. Camera could not take any kind of contrast in Auto Mode. I have read reviews on this problem but needed to find out for myself. Camera takes really nice pictures in other modes, but I was looking for a new camera that presented excellent (crisp) quality in Auto Mode. One that I could use quickly without having to think ahead on which mode I should be in. I was really disappointed. So I returned this camera and purchased the Canon A630. Consumers report rated the A620 as a fantastic camera, so I decided to try the A630, which supposedly takes the place of the A620. This camera is excellent! and is all that I hoped it would be. Very fast recycle time on the flash due to (4) AA instead of (2) on the A710. The pictures in Auto Mode are beautiful, crisp, exactly what I was looking for. This camera is slightly heavier and alittle bigger than the A710, but its due to the (4) AA vs. the (2)AA of the A710. Its worth the difference is waiting time on the flash. The A630 does not have the image stablization that the A710 has, but I find I really don't need it. Not with 4X opt. zoom. I'm pretty steady with holding the camera. The A710 has 6X opt. zoom, where I can see where it may be needed. But so many people put up such fuss about image stablization, its not a fix all to photography. I hope this helps people out there who are considering either camera. I have also tried the Nikon L5, and the Kodak C875. I would pick the Nikon over the Kodak but in the end, I choose the Canon A630. Picture quality and quick flash recycling time won over all of them.

What camera are you specifically talking about? Whatever it is it sounds like a decent camera. 8 Megaplixels is more than enough especially if you are not planning on printing massive images with it. I assume that the 6 in "6-8x" zoom is the Optical zoom and the 8x is the Digital zoom. There is a difference between the two, simply put Optical zoom is much higher quality. 75mb is not a whole lot of memory. I like to have at least 256mb. But this camera sounds good, whats the brand? and what is the price?

I LOVE my Canon A630 - so does my mom. We got ours for $213 from pcrush.com in March. They are now priced at about $190. DO NOT BUY REFURB - it's not worth the risk at this low price for new!

For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further. No internal memory, which sucks a little. But that just means that you can buy the size you need.

I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.

I have used all of the brands that you mentioned in my last digicam (Konica DiMage 500) with no problem.

I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB. If you don't know how to do this, this is what I did:

Find a corresponding sized folder on your computer (music folders are usually good for this, or your "Program Files" folder). Check the original folder size by right-clicking and going to the Properties page. Write down the exact file size and the number of folders/files inside the folder you are using to test. Copy the entire folder to the card via your PC card reader or through the cable inside the camera. That will take a while for the larger sizes. When that is done, close the original source folder, navigate to your card and look at the Properties page. The file size and number of folders/files should match. Then open the folder on the card and select "details" view. Look at the registered sizes of the files. There should not be any that are 1K - those are thumbnails and a dead giveaway of a fake card (unless they were that way in on your PC as well).

As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!

So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).

The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.

That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.

I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.

If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.

Last hint - NEVER buy refurbished. At under $200 the Canon A630 is cheap enough to buy new and avoid the risks.

If you want to go for the AA batts I would recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) which you meantioned. It is a powerful camera that certainly has what you are looking for and then some. It is a camera that you won't soon grow out of, a great price too.

The Olympus FE190 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is a great camera but certainly not as powerful as the canon and no AA batts. But much sleeker and a bit cheaper.

Hello Owen,

For Ultra-Compact check out - Sony Cybershot T series (T10, T30, T5, T7, etc.)
For Image Stabilizer check out - again Sony Cybershot T series - they have Optical stabilization
For Resolution - again Sony Cybershot T series - most are 5MP and above
For 3X zoom - again Sony Cybershot T series - most are 5MP and above
For price under $250 for the above - wait for some more time for some models to be discontinued

My Personal recomendation (I own a canon 20d and I love it):
Sony Cybershot T30 because 3" LCD, 400+ shots battery life (very useful in ultra compact with HUGE 3" LCD), and Ultra-compact, and Optical Image stabilization.

Hope this helps.

Ash,

There are good qualities in both cameras. You have to take price and capability into consideration when purchasing. I've outlined the main differences below (the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is listed first).

-Megapixels: 7.1 vs 8.0
-Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
-Image Stabilization: yes VS no

The other settings in the cameras are not much difference. You're going to get better resolution from the 8.0 megapixel Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ), but better zoom capabilities with the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ). Ask what is more important to you, and you might also want to go to a retailer to see how each camera feels in your hand.

Andrew

I checked both. 2 of my friends have both cameras. take 630 and you won't make a mistake. The prize is good now on the market.
Youliana

Be careful - I bought the 610 (I think) and took it back because it ALWAYS wanted to use ISO 100 with my 3-year-old which meant always blurry pictures inside. So bad that I thought I had a problem with AutoFocus. I'm still looking for a replacement and the 710 is in my sights because of its HIGH ISO setting (good for fast kids). I know I'm not very helpful but thought I would put in my 2 cents.

P.S. I'm not the Kelly from the previous post, even though she had valid points!

Steppen,

Most cameras come with a registration card in the box that you can mail in. To register a camera online with Canon, you can go to its registration site ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...  ).

Andrew

Steppen,

I would recommend mailing the card via the post office then, unless you can call it in through the card you have as well.

Andrew

Dave am a us resident and did click on the right site as the camera came with cards for canada, usa .....

Here u go

canon.co.in/EosCamera/new/c... 

Are you sure you are plugging into a USB 2.0 slot at home? Also update the fireware on your camera, downloadable at canon.usa.com.

Your purpose isn't very clear. What do you exactly mean by general purpose? If you are planning to use for low light conditions then you are better off with A710 IS or A640 because A710 IS has image stabilization and A640 is good at high ISO.
If you look at A6x0 siblings then A640 handles noise much better than A630. This is important to note as in low light, if you leave your camera on auto ISO mode then it will shoot at higher ISO, something like fast film and then A640 will take a better picture than A630.

As far as my knowledge goes, apart from pixels issue, this is the major place where all of these vary.
Otherwise all of them perform equally good under rest of the conditions.

I would personally go after A640 if I have money or I will settle down with A630. For some reason, I didn't like A710 IS design so I will give up image stabilization taking into account WFA (Wife acceptability factor)

If I would concern for night/low light photography so much then I would rather prefer Fujifilm FinePix F30 which is gem in low light WITHOUT image stabilization.

I agree it is low in resolution as compared to A630 but again, are you really going to make prints larger than 8x12 inches? or just want to fall prey of camera manufacturer's megapixel gimmick?

I LOVE my Canon A630 - so does my mom. We got ours for $213 from pcrush.com in March. They are now priced at about $190. DO NOT BUY REFURB - it's not worth the risk at this low price for new!

For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.

As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!

So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).

The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.

That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.

I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.

If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.

Both are really great cameras. If you do choose the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) beware that that flip-out screen can be a little fragile, although if you're gentle it should be fine. I would personally choose the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) simply because I have more use for zoom and image stabilization than I do for a flip-out LCD.

Hi Dom,

There are several notable differences between the two cameras. I'll try to lay them out for you.

1. Size/Weight
Canon's A-series cameras are a little bigger and heavier than their SD-series counterparts. They tend to feel a little more solid in your hand, and might in fact be a better fit for people with larger hands. They aren't, however, quite as easy to slide into your pocket.

2. Zoom
The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) has a 4x optical zoom to the SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  )'s 3x.

3. Megapixels
The A630 wins again here, at 8MP to the SD630's 6MP. It also has a larger CCD sensor, which means that it will also have fine detail at that larger resolution.

4. LCD
The SD630 has a huge 3" LCD screen. It's so huge, in fact, that Canon has done away with the traditional optical viewfinder. All previews must be done with the LCD. The A630's LCD is a smaller 2.5", with a much lower screen resolution, but it does tilt out and swivel, and the camera does include a traditional optical viewfinder.

5. Battery
The SD630 uses a proprietary Li-Ion battery that doesn't get quite as good battery life as the A630's four AAs (I'd recommend rechargeable NiMH AAs). This is another byproduct of the SD630's small size.

6. Features/Manual Controls
Canon's A-series traditionally offers far more control over manual photographic settings than does the SD-series. This includes shutter speed, ISO, manual focus, etc.

7. Price
They're about even here. No real winner.

The question of which one is better for you is going to depend on what you want from the camera. Both are excellent machines, but do you want a small, light, point and shoot kind of camera or a slightly bulkier but more feature-rich camera?

I hope this answers some of your questions.

The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  is still for sale; click on that link and there are some websites listed that offer it, although I believe just used/ refurbished.

The Powershots usually come around in sets of two; for awhile it was the A610 and A620, and those were both replaced in August 2006 by the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  (released at the same time). I highly recommend the A640 for a solid point and shoot.

I would go with the Kodak since konika minolta has mergered with Sony. So getting support is said to be difficult.

Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com  so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!

Katherine,

The lithium ion AA's will work more than fine with this camera. Good luck and happy shooting.

Andrew

You have found three very similar cameras, and all are good options.

I would choose the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ), I think. Panasonic has done an outstanding job in this camera. Like the Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) it's nice and small, but it has a slightly wider telephoto range, and uses SD cards, not memory stick; SD is the clear standard these days. The Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is a great camera, too from a good pedigree, and would be the choice if you like AA batteries -- they are bigger, but widely available.

Vicky,

You should be able to get decent shots with the ISO 800 setting on the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ). For even more sensitivity to light on the ISO settings (ISO 1600) and a similar price tag, you might look at the Olympus 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ). It is also a 8 MP camera, will easily fit in a pocket and give good night/low light results. It does have lower zoom capabilitites, but does come with a longer lasting lithium ion battery. Good luck and happy shooting.

Andrew

Hi Kamille,

To answer your question, yes, the processor changed between the two cameras. The A60 used the original DIGIC processor, while the A540 uses the DIGIC II, its successor. Many other things have changed between the two, however, and it would be a mistake to blame a difference in image quality solely on the processor. The lens, CCD, and pretty much the rest of the internals are all entirely different. I don't think you could get anyone to say that the DIGIC II processor is inferior to its ancestor, but you could certainly get a few people to accuse Canon of what's known as "pixel-stuffing"--essentially attempting to cram more pixels onto a sensor chip that's roughly the same size. This practice often results in noisy, overly processed-looking shots. The A540's sensor chip is 1/2.5", as compared to the A60's 1/2.7", so the A540 is fitting 4 million more pixels into those few extra millimeters. There have certainly been some great advances in CCD technology since the A60 was produced, but Canon is definitely cutting corners a bit here.

I too had an A60 and used it for years. A few months ago I stepped up to the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ), which I absolutely adore, though it does have its issues too (mainly with low-light performance). It's also kind of bulky... I don't know if you need a pocket-sized camera or if you're ok with some heft.

It seems like a lot of other users share your opinion of the picture quality with the A540. If you're looking for cameras that are generally in the same size range as the A60 and A540, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) are rated quite a bit higher. The A710 IS also has some nice features, including a 6x stabilized zoom. Canons are the cameras I'm most familiar with and the ones I'm most comfortable recommending, so there you go. Good luck!

What is the difference between Canon A series and Canon Sd?
I don't plan onmaking large pictures, just want a camera to take grandkid shots and vacation shots, maybe witha little extra zoom and such. I have an old HP612 now. Any suggestions? I was leaning toward Canon A620, mostly based on consumer reports.
Thanks
Debby

Paul,

After looking over the cameras' specifications, I would go with the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ). It has a higher photo resolution (8 vs 7.1) and more optical zoom (4x vs 3x). Since you already have the cards, and the price evens out, it is the choice I would make. I've also had a lot of good experiences with the 3 Canons I already own.

Andrew

It all depends on the given situation, factors like; light, speed of subject, whether you are zoomed in, whether you have a tripod are all important. But with the Canon A630 you get an ISo rating of 800 which is fast so action shots in "normal" conditions, meaning decent light, will yield excellent results. I would recommend a monopod if possible.

Hi Kirk,

As you can see here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) the SD500 is a camera that plenty of people have and like. It's been produced within the last two years, so it's not exactly obsolete, but there are a number of newer models in the Canon SD series.

The SD500 was introduced in February of 2005. Since then, there have been about eight new SD models introduced, including a couple with optical image stabilization. The newest models are the SD800 IS ( dpreview.com/reviews/specs/...  ) (one of the models featuring the image stabilization system) and the SD900 ( dpreview.com/reviews/specs/...  ).

I don't think you necessarily need to purchase a newer model simply because yours isn't the newest. That should be a decision based on how well you like the photos your SD500 produces, and whether it's a good overall fit for your needs.

Good luck!

Kirk,

I'd recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ). It can be had for at or under $250 (don't deal with those gray market dealers, though) and it's extremely well-rated by users and pros alike. It's got an 8MP sensor paired with a nice 4x optical zoom and a big, rotating LCD. It takes fantastic pictures on auto, and it's got a bunch of manual settings too, in case she decides she wants to get artistic later on. Hope this helps. :)

The Canon A630 has relativly high ISO rating up to 800 which is good for low light situations, but don't expect perfection. There will still be some noise on the lowest of light pictures and I would recommend a tripod or a monopod (when travelling) for night shots. Because the iris is open longer to retain more light shaking or moving the camera can cause that streaking effect that sometimes looks cool, but not for most shots. This is a decent camera for doing what you want.

Thanks for all your replies, you've been really helpful. I also considered the Finepix F30 while I was doing my research, but was disappointed with what reviewers said was the lack of manual settings on the cam.

I guess it's the A630, then.

Generally, Apple computers work very well with most digital cameras. In fact I had had far fewer problems then even Windows packages that were claimed to work. I have had a Canon S230 for a few years and used it with Apple desktop and laptop machines, likewise for my wife digital cameras. In general it is probably faster and easier to insert the SD (or CF) media into a PC-card adapter instead of using the USB interface (this can also bypass some possible compatibility problems as a bonus).

Hi John,

Both the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) and its big brother the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) would be a fantastic choice. They're among the highest-rated cameras by users here at DCHQ, and they get wonderful reviews from pros as well. Its shutter lag is typically around 0.25sec, and nearly instantaneous with pre-focusing (a half-press on the shutter release before shooting). You'd do well to get either of these.

THank you for your help my brother inlaw purchased the camera A 640 that you suggested John

I'd steer clear of this one actually. Recycle times are not that great. It's a nice little camera, but if speed is your primary concern you may find this one frustrating, particularly with the flash on. Ranges from 4-7 seconds. Problem is with the digic chip- the newer A-series from Canon use a newer chip and thus have faster times. If you like the A-series you might want to consider the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) or the A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) (both just over two hundred bucks).

Outside of Canon, the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) deserves a look.

Hi Tracey,

I have one strong recommendation for you.

If video is important, no manufacturer is going to be able to top Canon. Their PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) offers a great 8 megapixel sensor, a 4x optical zoom, and a very smooth automatic mode. It can shoot at 30 frames per second at 640x480 pixels. I own a similar Canon camera, and I can attest to its great image quality. Your parents should be able to connect the camera to their television and stream the video from the camera to the tv via the included A/V cables. Users seem to love this camera, and the pro reviewers do too.

The A630 takes AA batteries, which means you can either use normal alkalines or--and I recommend this--you can pick up 4 or 8 NiMH rechargeable AAs and a rapid charger for about $15. These will allow for much longer battery life and re-use of the same batteries for up to 1000 charge cycles.

Finally, you should be aware that no digital camera comes with a large amount of memory. This camera takes SecureDigital (SD) cards, so if you choose to buy it, you'll want to pick one up. I'd recommend a 1gb card, which can be had for about $25 at reputable online stores.

Hope this helps!

Actually, I got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact) for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20.

This camera has no internal memory whatsoever, which is one of the very few downsides. But if it's going to be used for video, you will be happy to know that it does have tele/wide function while shooting and the fun color swap and color accent features are available in video also. The sound is not the best, but it's NOT a video camera to begin with.

P.S. My 62 year old mom got hers at the same time and she is photo CRAZY now. When she used film she would barely take anything. For example we spent a month in Peru last year and she only had 6 rolls to process. But she took the camera on a road trip the other day and shot nearly 40 in just one place!


Good luck.

Hi Erin,

The A630 takes four AA batteries, which is generally a very good thing if you're looking for long battery life. Normal AA alkaline batteries won't last very long at all with the camera. Canon supplies them in the box, but you might as well throw them out as soon as you get the camera, for all the good they'll do you. However, with AA NiMH rechargeable batteries, according to this review ( dcresource.com/reviews/cano...  ) you should be able to get up to 500 shots out of the camera per charge cycle. NiMH batteries last up to 1000 charge cycles before wearing out, so the $15 it will cost you to get four batteries and a charger will be well worth it. I'd actually recommend getting eight instead of four, so you always have a backup set ready to go just in case.

When using NiMH batteries, you should be aware that unlike alkalines, they discharge on their own over time, and are greatly affected by cold and heat. You can read up more on their self-discharge behavior here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiMH#...  ).

I'd definitely recommend this camera over the Kodak, especially if you're hiking.

Good luck!

Hi Diana,

All three of the cameras you've mentioned are great machines. The FZ50 does indeed have an impressive zoom, but I think that here you're making a key mistake. Since you're looking to take product shots, generally pretty close to the camera, what you're looking for is not a long zoom (which lets you get close to things that are far away), but rather a good macro mode (which gets you clear shots of things that are very close to the camera). I think the FZ50 would probably be overkill for this sort of application.

The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ), however, are more modest (read: cheaper) cameras that will give you just as good (if not better) image quality and also have impressive macro modes. Both models will let you focus on objects that are as little as 1cm from the lens, which is pretty impressive and great for detail shots on clothes and other goods. Aside from their macro abilities, they're among the best-rated cameras on the market.

Hope this helps!

Diana,

The A640's main advantage over the A630 is 2 additional megapixels, but if you're shooting for the web, this doesn't make any difference for you. I have no hesitation in saying that the A630 will serve your needs just as well as the A640, and at a significantly lower price tag. Go for it. :)

Louis,
Hello I would say that there are probably two differences. First, the import may be cheaper or at least advertised cheaper. Second, if you live in the USA and buy an import model the warranty is void. Always be cautious when purchasing items from another country, sometimes AC adapters will not work in the US. Manufacturing regulations can be different depending on where it was made, not to mention on screen menus can be in a different language.

Hi... I have the same question. I was looking to purchase either a Canon t1i or the Nikon d5000 and ended up going with the Nikon. I am afraid now that I may have purchased an import version even though it said nothing about this!! And the sales person that I asked said that it had settings for every language. I got 2 lenses, the body, and several other accessories for $640.00.... GREAT DEAL if it's not some gimic. I ordered from elitecamcorders.com ....

To help with your question.... my husband called canon and they told him that the diff between the usa model and the import are that it has no warranty and that the parts could be counterfeit. I wouldn't recommend buying unless you know for SURE that it's the usa model. I am worried to death that I got ripped off now. I wish I had just spend the extra and ordered from somewhere like Best Buy or Walmart!!

Hi Debbie,
If you like the zoom and the video on the Kodak Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ), I'd say go for it. I think you'll be totally happy. There is nothing major that the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) offers that the Z612 does not. The only things the Canon might have for it over the Kodak are a few extra megapixels (not a huge deal unless you're planning on blowing up very large prints, and even then the difference between 6 and 8 megapixels won't make or break the image quality); and the advantage of AA batteries (I prefer AAs because they are cheaper to replace than the lithium-ions, even if you buy the rechargeables). Compared to the zoom and the movie mode offered by the Kodak, these are minor advantages- in terms of image quality, these cameras are pretty comparable.

If you do have a store near you that carries both of them, you might want to go in and handle them both in person and see if one of them feels better to you- that's often a great way to decide between two similar cameras. Otherwise, I'd choose the Kodak with no qualms. =) Hope that helps.

Here's a good place to start. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) All within your price range and all highly rated. Of which, I'm partial to the PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ). 8MP. 4x optical zoom. Large LCD screen. Movie mode with sound. Uses AA batteries. Nice for everyday.

However, everyday use may mean something you want with you at all times. As such, smaller pocket sized cameras like the Nikon Coolpix S7c ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) may be a goodie because it also allows you to wirelessly send your pictures anywhere. It has a slightly less resolution at 7.1MP, and smaller zoom at 3x, but it also comes with vibration reduction, a kind of image stabilization, slightly larger LCD.

I agree with Brenda, but I'll take the memory card thing one step further. The temptation will be to get a large card - 2gb or there abouts. But allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.

Additionally, I'd recommend using a Card Reader and placing your memory card into it. Then all you need to do is insert the SD card (your PC will recognize it as another drive), and then simply drag and drop wherever you want.

Cameras often come with their own software to manage your photos. I usually recommend to avoid using them as often, they're bloatware. For accessing, managing, and even doing minor corrections on your images I recommend Picasa 2 by Google ( picasa.com  ). And it's free.

Thanks to everyone for sharing their insights with me. They were all helpful and I truly appreciate the prompt and thorough responses. Thanks again!

If you mean the lowest price in the USA, I have been looking for several days and I found it at Thedigitalexpo.com The price is $215 + $8.49 for S&H
If anyone find a better price, plese let us know.

I got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact) in March for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20 (that's how much to Hawaii, which is normally more that most other places in the US).

If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.

P.S. NEVER get refurb. At this price, new is the way to go. Why take the risk?
Also, check out Repair Tech. 5 yr warranty for about $40 which includes no-fee repairs, a no-lemon policy and annual cleaning and adjustments. The website will tell you where (in the WORLD) there are repair centers, you just have to confirm that they contract with Repair Tech. You may have to send it somewhere at your cost. Also, you are even covered when traveling - just find an affiliated repair center where you are!

Hi Pam,

You've covered the differences pretty well yourself. The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) is definitely a superior camera to the SD600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ), and yes, it has faster flash recharge, lower shutter lag, and is an all-around better performer. Furthermore, it has a lot more options when it comes to settings, so if you want to get creative somewhere down the line (messing with manual settings like aperture, shutter speed, white balance, etc) you'll be able to. The SD600 lacks full manual control, which many people would find very limiting. Personally, I wouldn't recommend the SD600 over the A630 to anyone who isn't specifically looking for a camera that'll fit in a tight pocket. The A630 isn't that much bigger, and the jump in performance is substantial.

Hope this helps!

I would suggest the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) it has what you are looking for. No AA batts which can be a pain because AAs are easy to replace at any corner store if travelling. The packs last longer and recharge better.

Hi Stephen,
35mm lens covers about 64 degrees

There are not many cameras with wide angle capabilities. But Panasonic's DMC-FX01s models has 28mm (35mm equivalent) lens. I don't know which angle cover it lens. My A630 covers 50 degrees approximately.

Hi Stephen,

The figure I'm seeing most often is "10 seconds or less," and all of the user reviews that mention the flash recycle period say that it's "very good" without giving a specific number. Its near-identical twin the A640 got these timings in dpreview's in-depth review:

Shot to Shot    Flash off    1.7sec
Shot to Shot    Flash on (red-eye reduction off)*    2.6sec
Shot to Shot    Flash on (red-eye reduction on)*    3.2sec

The *s are there to indicate that these timings were taken with the subject 3ft from the camera, and that they will increase as the subject gets further from the lens.

Hope this helps!

Both answers from bukit97 and from Ben Keough are very concise and helpful. I select bukit97 as winner only because I will select Ben as winner in one or more of my other questions. I love this site. The answers from users are extremely helpful. Thanks. This is the camera I will buy soon. Just waiting for the price to drop a little bit more.

Stephen

Hi Stephen,

The best way to get reviews of online merchants is from ResellerRatings.com ( resellerratings.com/  ) or Shopping.com ( shopping.com/  ). Just a little bit down the center of the page you'll see a text box with the text "Enter Store Name" in it. Type in the name of the shop you want reviews of, and away you go.

If you want to post a camera review here on DCHQ, you should go to the product page for the camera you've bought (like the one up there, to the A630), click on the "Reviews" tab, and write a review. If you want to review the seller, you'll want to do that via ResellerRatings or Shopping.com, as we don't do that here.

Good luck!

I know of a few brand names: Lexar, Kingston, SanDisk. I think these would be more reliable overall than an upstart fab company out of nowheresville.

I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.

I have used all of the brands that you mentioned in my last digicam (Konica DiMage 500) with no problem.

P.S. I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB. If you don't know how to do this, this is what I did:

Find a corresponding sized folder on your computer (music folders are usually good for this, or your "Program Files" folder). Check the original folder size by right-clicking and going to the Properties page. Write down the exact file size and the number of folders/files inside the folder you are using to test. Copy the entire folder to the card via your PC card reader or through the cable inside the camera. That will take a while for the larger sizes. When that is done, close the original source folder, navigate to your card and look at the Properties page. The file size and number of folders/files should match. Then open the folder on the card and select "details" view. Look at the registered sizes of the files. There should not be any that are 1K - those are thumbnails and a dead giveaway of a fake card (unless they were that way in on your PC as well).

I just bought a Canon A630. In Auto mode, indoor pictures are too dark.

I tried the Pragram AE Mode, used custom White Balance (Since no other White Balance settings did not work), I get some good pictures maybe 1 in 20.

Custom White Balance - setting each time is a pain & still I am not getting good pictures.

Is this a known problem with A630 (Bad Indoor Pics!)? or Is my unit faulty?

My major need for photos is Indoor pictures. Should I keep this model or get another model?

Any help will be appreciated

I would suggest digging into the other options such as shutter speed before writing off this camera. The difference between 1/4 and 1/500 is staggering. Auto mode may be a bit off for your needs, but you don't have to be an expert to use one of the other modes (I'm a novice).

Hi Cookie,

If you just want to compare stats, you can see the two cameras' specifications side by side here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar...  ).

But let me break it down for you a bit.

1. Sensor size/pixels. Though both cameras have a 1/1.8" sensor, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...  ) packs in 8 megapixels compared to the A80's 4 megapixels.

2. Zoom/lens. The A80 has a 3x optical zoom (114mm), while the A630 has a 4x (140mm). Not a huge difference, but appreciable. Furthermore, the A630 has a macro shooting range of 1cm, compared to the A80's 5cm range. This means you can get much closer to your subject with the A630 and still keep it in perfect focus.

3. Memory card. The A80 takes CompactFlash memory cards, which are gradually being phased out and replaced by SecureDigital, which the A630 takes.

Hope this helps!

I don't know about 8 GB SHDC cards, but it hasn't image stabilization capabilities.

The vari-angle capacity of the A630 is not very usefull for selftimer pictures, only for direct shots (I think). I will choose the A710IS camera for your purposes.

The vari-angle LCD, as mentioned before, is mostly useful when you want to shoot from a strange angle by hand. Since you are going to be setting up the shot while actually holding the camera, it would not be useful in this situation.

However, I think the utility of it is not a novelty by a long-shot. It makes for a very versatile camera - particularly for short people like myself and for getting low angle shots without getting on the ground. It is also great for use on a high tripod - you can fully operate all the controls by looking above you while leaving it mounted.

Remembering other answer made it by me:
Image stabilization is very important for situations with low light levels and/or with zoom lenses. This situation will produce low shutter speeds and blurred pictures. Image stabilization will try to compensate the motion of your hand with lens corrections.

I think that A710IS is a better camera. It has 6x of optical zoom with IS (vs. 4x in my A630), but I looked for a camera with vari-angle LCD monitor and 4 batteries when I bought my camera. The first characteristic is good for out-of-view shottings, and the second is good for low recycle times in flash pictures.

When I was comming off of film onto digital I was confused about these two cameras. So I bought the Canon A710 first, for the image stablization and 6x zoom. But was very unhappy with the picture quality in Auto Mode. Low light photos, indoors were very grainy. Outdoor pictures were nice but I shot a lot of indoor of my kids and I wasn't happy with the results. So I returned the camera. Then I purchased the Canon A630, which I am still using, and love it. Pictures are very crisp and clear. Great quality. Indoors and outdoors, low light and bright light. I'm extremely satisified. I find in low light zoom conditions I get the camera shake warning..but if you hold still enough, you really don't have any problems with the pictures comming out crisp. I have a pretty steady hand, and haven't had any problems with this camera lacking image stablization. My answer to you, on my experience, is that image stablization didn't seem to make a difference. But picture quality is far more crisp on the A630 than the A710, especially in Auto Mode. Hope this helps.

This capability is not present on this entry level camera. I saw it in Canon EOS cameras.

To add to the last answer (by Stephen Cheung), on p. 27 you will see what the camera screen looks like when you press the "FUNC. SET" in the center of the circular directional on the back of the camera. From all modes except movie, you can chose your resolution to 6 different sizes, plus a setting for post-cards. The table on p. 28 will tell you exactly what size corresponds with which setting (L, M1, M2, M3, S, W, postcard). The option just above that on the settings screen will be for compression size (superfine, fine and normal), which is described on p. 29.

Unless you are worried about memory space, I would suggest you ALWAYS leave it at L and S, only because you are able to do much more with the image on your computer if you have not limited your options when you shot it. Most software programs will allow you to resize all the way down to a thumbnail - just be VERY CAREFUL to make a copy of your original before you go messing with things like, well anything! I learned the hard way. I compressed pictures for posting on the web before I realized that I had converted the original and my only copy. They are now permanently 2 MP but they were shot at 5 (on my last camera).

Well, there's no saying you can't either in the specs or the manual. I'm thinking probably not. I haven't seen very many still cameras that don't disable the zoom control while videotaping. It mystifies me as to why that is, but I'd rather defer to someone else who may have a more personal experience with this particular model before you go out and purchase it.

Actually YES YES YES!!! You can zoom in and out and back in again. I have done so many times at rock shows in my town and they look GREAT! Sound is not that hot, but after all, it's NOT a video camera.

Again: please read the Advanced Manual (available in alpha02u.c-wss.com/inc/Appl...  at page #39. It say:

"The focus and optical zoom settings remain fixed for subsequent frames at the values selected for the first frame"

"I've noticed that the COLORS of the photos are dark"

Should read:

"I've noticed that the CORNERS of the photos are dark"

I think that you have a problem with the flash's coverage angle. I think that the flash has a angle smaller than one of the lens. It is visible in macro photos only. Try with some kind of external source of light.

I use a slave flash or two to get even lighting.
you can get small ones for around £10ukp

The A630 is nice, and it has a great 'feel' and polish to it. But it is larger than the A710, which I bought since it IS smaller than the A630 and A640. The IS is a great and useful feature. Users that have the swivel LCD swear by it. What if you want a (horizontal) shot of a flower that is only 10" off the ground?? Easy with the swivel LCD.

Doesn't the A570 have only 3x or 4x zoom? Both the 570 and the 710 are similar, but I sure like the extra zoom on the 710.

Thanks guys for your response.

It is still sort of a coin toss for me. I still do not really know the value of the IS, the extra zoom, or the variable LCD. Since it is such a close choice and the sensor on the 630 is twice the size of the other cameras (should produce a better image) and I think that I might really enjoy using a variable LCD - I have opted to buy the 630. Also it is about $50 less than the other two.

If you can find it the macro mode is probably what you want for self portraits the you hold at arms length. It will focus on you face more clearly. The macro mode is usually displayed with a flower symbol.

I would not use Macro, but instead the Portrait setting, with the LCD swung out to the front and the timer set on custom with several shots during the 10 second period.

It works out pretty well. If you are using a tripod, or are more than just a few inches away, you definitely don't want to use macro. It's intended for VERY close up stuff, like I have a self-pic of my eyeball and eyelashes. But for your face, use the regular distance settings.

Also, if you are close enough that you are using macro, be aware that the flash will cast a shadow at that close distance due to the projection of the lens too close to the subject (your face).

Happy shooting,
Lisa

The only one difference is the megapixels. The 640 has 10Mpxls and the 630 8Mpxls. I have one 630 and the manual is the same one that the 640.

Yes it can!

Good Luck

Canon states that "most Canon digital cameras that support the Picture Transfer Protocol (PTP) standard will connect to PCs running Windows Vista and allow for basic image transfer functionality. This includes all Canon digital cameras produced in the last several years. Please see the table below to see if your camera model is Vista compatible."

They also recommend that if any problems, to check out Canon's Windows Vista Support page ( usa.canon.com/opd/controlle...  ) for more information.

Course, all too often, drivers alone are only needed and one can avoid the software itself (you may need to install it just to get the drivers, then uninstall just the utility part).

What I recommend for file transfer and photo management is Picasa by Google ( picasa.google.com/  ). It's an awesome and free program.

Course, if you shot on standard SD cards, you don't need the drivers or software at all, just a USB all in one memory card reader (about $10). Plug it in and it's a simple drag and drop.

Maria,

A lot of the "lag" people find like this are due to the auto-focus readjusting on the subjects. If you hold the shutter button down half way, it should freeze the focal length so you can capture the moment better. Anything out of that focal length that the camera froze on has a greater chance of being out of focus too, causing blulrriness.

As for the blurriness you're finding now, to allow the right amount of light in, the camera automatically adjusts the shutter speed to stay open longer in lower light settings. This will capture movement a lot easier, and cause blurriness in the photos. I would try setting the camera's ISO at 800 to allow the most light in that this camera can. I hope this helps.

Andrew ( blackdoorphotos.com  )

Nop, this camera hasn't image stabilization capabilities.

If you are using XP, it probably means you have to re-install the OS, and if you are using Win 2000, then you need to re-install the driver.

I would do it the simple way by using a card reader. An SD card reader would be around $10-$15 and Win 2000 or Win XP will recognize it instantly. The rest is just copy and paste.

Give it a try and you will never be troubled by the download problem again.

Well if shutter lag is a deal breaker, then you should be looking for an SLR, where shutter lag is non existent.

However, in point and shoots it is getting better. MUCH better. Today, most cameras have a shutter lag of 0.3 second or under. And the A630 consistently gets rated highly for it's quick reaction shutter. But there still is a very slight lag. and the longer the lens range on your camera, the longer the lag.

The good news is that Canon and other manufacturers are about to put the same chips they use in the DSLRS into their point and shoots to address the shutter lag issue. So if you can wait a tad longer, you will enjoy instant shutter reaction with a point and shoot down the road.

Until then, there's a little trick to make take the lag down to as fast as .1 sec. It's what what the pros do.

Frame your shot and press the shutter button halfway down.
(this allows the camera time to focus lock)

Now re-frame your shot and wait for the action to occur.
At the right time, press the shutter button the rest of the way down.

That gives you an effective shutter lag of under 0.1 second.

The fastest one you can afford up to a 4 gb. AT least 2700 BAtteries

If you're buying a Canon A-series camera, buy rechargeable batteries that hold 2500mAh. If you buy the 1800 or 2200 mAh ones, the battery gets zapped so fast you'll have the low-charge indicator on your camera after about 20 pictures. With 2500mAh batteries, you should get about 250 pictures.

Sony, Rayovac, Energizer... all good brands. You shouldn't have any problems.

Also, we went to Future shop for batteries before we saw the above reply from Matt and they sold us panasonic rechargeable AA Ni-MhH up to 2050 mAh. Then we read the above reply and checked the web under panasonic batteries and they do not sell rechargeables up to 2500mAh like Matt advised.

Can you please suggest the proper make of batteries we need for our A630 Cannon camera, so we don't have to keep recharging them after 20 pictures????

Thanks again Matt,

Now am very leary about this camera or any camera that uses rechargeable batteries. Like I mentioned in my first question, I had nothing by big problems with my Sony camera and I had their AA 2500 mAh rechargeable batteries (as per your first link) as well.

My canon A570 IS has the same low battery indication problem after about 40-50 shots using Uniross 2100mAh rechargeables...what do you advice??should I go for 2700 mAh batteries,and whether I can use 2700s with powershot A570?...Moreover would my uniross mini charger I am using for 2100s can charge 2700s or would I have to buy a new charger....If so plz suggest some good 2700mAh battery+charger combination.
Thanx

My canon A590 IS has the same low battery indication problem after about 25-30 shots using Uniross 2100mAh rechargeables Batteries what do you advice??should I go for 2500 mAh or 2700 mAh batteries,and whether I can use 2500s or 2700s with powershot A590?...Moreover would my uniross mini charger I am using for 2100s can charge 2500s or 2700s or would I have to buy a new charger....If so plz suggest some good 2500 mAh or 2700mAh battery+charger combination.
Thanx
Also Will you tell me how many pictures i will take with 2500 mAh or 2700 mAh rechargable battery with my Canon A590 IS Digital Camera

If possible please give me answer on my mail id bhuvnesh.jsai@gmail.com

No, you cant use it as a digital VCR. You can connect it to your VCR or tiVo and record your captured videos only.

Well ... there are a lot of differences. A630 has a bigger sensor but not IS features. S3IS has more optical zoom and TFT viewfinder. A630 is more compact camera.
If you want a easy camera then buy A630, if you want a more advanced camera buy S3IS.
I think that PowerShot A650 IS is the best option by now.
Note: S3IS disappear from Canon website, now you have S5IS.

Dave,

You can attempt taking the camera apart, but that could void any warranty left on it. I would recommend taking it to an authorized repair person, or you can contact Canon customer support ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...  ) for assistance. Good luck.

Andrew

Dave,

I would use the self repair as a last resort. If you really like it, I would price compare a repair with a new camera. You might find yourself purchasing a new one for less than a repair, if repairing your current camera isn't an option. Good luck.

Andrew

Thank you both for your replies. Larry, your link is exactly what I was looking for. Unfortunately, I didn't realize it would be THAT involved. I will look into how much a repair would be. If it is too much, I will drink a couple of beers and then convince myself I can repair it on my own!

Bad news, flash could be broken, I would recommend taking it to an authorized repair person.

Hi Art,

can you please tell how you solved the problem at your Canon A630? I have exactly the same problem and I don't know what to do.

Thanks,
Diana

I actually just pushed on the left side of the camera where the flash is hard... and it started to use the flash again.. I have this problem and my camera is iffy on some days on when the flash works.. I am watching the SAP Open.. and hopefully it will work then.. if not ... GARBAGE !!!

Ira,

This is something you'll need a repair for. You can either take it to a local camera shop like Ritz, or arrange a repair through Canon ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...  ). Good luck.

Andrew

Hi Ira,
Just how did you try to clean your LCD. Any chemicals involved? What is this black layer you are talking about? Is it thin like plastic? Was there any problem with your LCD before you tried to clean it? How dirty was it? Also, did you buy this camera new or used? Is it possible someone applied a protective layer on top of the LCD and that layer is peeling off leaving the LCD "like new" underneath the protective layer?
I think we should sleuth this one out some more before concluding it is really a problem at all.
Your local camera shop can figure this one out in a second or two.
Larry

Ira,
This is very bizarre. I've never heard of such a thing before. Using a proper eyeglass cleaning cloth shouldn't have caused any problem. I would really like to know what your local camera shop technician has to say about this one! Be sure to take the cloth in to the shop also.
At least it is still usable. Perhaps you could now apply one of the LCD protectors to prevent any further peeling off. I just don't know what to suggest. I'm totally stumped.
Larry

We deal primarily with web based vendors. However, you may wish to check with Circuit City in Madison to see if they can order you one.

Used camera section in B&H, just bought one for $159

First, you can try with a tripod. Later you can put your coins on a table and point it with the camera. Remember to set the macro feature on, and to use a good light source.

Read this page if you need more explanations: Coins ( tabletopstudio.com/document...  )

Hi Penny,

Don't forget though, that the closest you will get with this camera is up to 1cm. You can use the manual focus by pressing "down" direction on the ring until you see "MF" on then got to the 1cm setting. Then just the camera back & forward until you are happy with what you see on the screen. That's the way i do it.
Other than that, I haven't come across any macro adapter for this model, but I might be wrong. Pity the adapter range is so limited, coz it's a great camera.

I recommend using the macro setting (flower symbol) AND making sure you have lots of light and evenly distributed light. If you are going to be selling lots of coins on eBay you might want to buy or build a light box. Your local camera store probably has one for $30 or so. The idea is that it is a box where the sides are made out of thin white cloth to spread the light out evenly. Then you place a bright light bulb on each side of the box to light your object which is inside the box. One side of the box is open for the camera to shoot through.
If all this improves the image but the color is all wrong then you will need to adjust the White Balance.

Well could be you got sand in the mechanism and it's having trouble zooming out from it's hole. I'd use some canned air and also cycle the camera on/off several times to see if it can work it's way free. Next, try resetting the camera. If that doesn't work, you may have to have it serviced.

You can get canned air at any radio shack or store that sells computer equipment. Or even at an office supply store. It has a small straw which allows you to directly specifically the air into the nooks an crannies you need, blowing out the dirt and dust.

As for repairs, log on to CanonUSA.com and press the support tab. There will be a link to arranging a repair.

There's a good chance that it is. Since it's part of the A600 series.

There are better ways of viewing and deleting pictures than the camera way and you may want to take a look at Picasa which can perform many functions that camera couldn't do.

Besides viewing and deleting pictures, it can do basic photo editing like removing red eye, increase brightness, increase contrast, crop pictures and turn photos into movies and slide shows, and the best part is it is free.

If you are interested, you can download Picasa at <a href="picasa.google.com/">  this site </a>.

Coming back to your camera, the switch probably needs a change to a new one because of the electrical contact problem.
People do have some success at blowing away the dirt etc beneath the switch, but this is only temporary solution.
You probably don't miss it because the camera still takes pictures and Picasa will let you view, delete and edit the pictures on the computer much more efficiently than the camera.

If you have enough time, try resetting the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...  ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.

If that doesn't work, the recommendation from Canon is to send it in for a repair estimate. But understand that without warranty coverage, the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.

Did you post it here? ( digitalcamera-hq.com/forms/...  ). If so, be patient. It's only Monday.

Sounds to me like it wasn't repaired at all. I'd send it back. But it sounds to me like a loose wheel on top there.

Powershot 630 have black spots on the LCD monitor

Could he have dropped it? It sounds like a failed CCD since you didn't get an image after resetting the camera. I'd send it it for a repair estimate and see what Canon says. At least you'll know what the problem is and how much it would cost to repair it.

But keep this in mind. If it does require repair, it may cost more than it's worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.

Reset your camera. I suspect that the camera has exposure compensation engaged or the white balance is out of whack. A simple reset should solve the issue.

Check with Canon to see if a firmware update has been made. Remember that a camera's firmware is only as current as the day it was built. Between then and now, issues that crop up may have been addressed and released as a firmware update. Absent that, though, you may be looking at a camera repair. And with the average cost of a camera repair around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.

Just about any photo editor can handle it these days. And stitchers have gotten so sophisticated that it's nearly seemless.