Canon PowerShot A630
Canon PowerShot A630
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Canon PowerShot A630
Editor's Review
Old as dirt. Take a look at a more recent A-series model, like the A3000. Here's what we had to say about the A630 when it was released in August 2006:
Canon's A630 is a great follow up to the popular A610, and at 8 megapixels, a fantastic choice for point-and-shoot photographers. The A630 is another great mainstream camera from Canon; extremely affordable yet technologically advanced yet easy to use and understand. The 8MP sensor is the big draw, as well as the nice 4x optical zoom and rotating 2.5-inch LCD. You can't go wrong with this one.
Specifications
- 8 megapixels
- 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Auto focus, auto and manual exposure
- JPEG file format
- ISO 80-800
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- Movie mode with sound
- Secure Digital card storage
- 4 AA batteries
- Part Number: 1288B001
- UPC: 013803072419
- Release Date: Aug 31, 2006
Shop for A630 Accessories
Canon PowerShot A630 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
error 1647 (wendell — 01/19/2013)
error 1647 what does it mean? A fix can it be done
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (01/24/2013)
A technician could help, but it is usually cheaper to purchase a new camera.
reply to this comment
Black spot on A630's LCD (Saifullah Khan — 09/12/2012)
Recently noticed a small dull black spot on my A630 lcd screen. Does not show on the old pics when reviewed but does show on the new ones taken. Could this be due to excessive moisture as we are going through the monsoon season.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (09/13/2012)
Have you tried uploading the pics to a computer and looking there? If the spot is still on the pictures on your computer screen, you mostly likely have a spot of dust or dirt on the sensor or in the lens. There's no real way to get this out, unfortunately, without sending it in for repair.
reply to this comment
Cannon Powershot A630: Flash makes pictures darker (Brittany Sparkles — 08/21/2012)
I just bought this camera off of ebay. When I first got it the flash wouldn't work, then the flash randomly started working, but it makes the pictures darker in all of the settings. How do I fix this? I've reset the camera to it's default settings, I've messed with the ISO, I've tried adjusting the levels of the flash in all of the settings, and removing the batteries, and turning it on and off several times.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/22/2012)
Did you purchase the camera new? This is a really odd problem, does it do the same when the camera is in manual mode? It sounds like the shutter speed is being adjusted when the flash is enabled, so try using it in either shutter priority or manual mode and see if that fixes the issue.
reply to this comment
John Calhoun (01/21/2012)
why does the camera shaking indicator always come on when I am focusing a shot?
reply to this comment
Simple solution to problems with flash (Mark Jansen — 08/19/2010)
I also had the problem with the flash that didn't work any longer. When I read Liszt's solution (from 05/03/2008: a harsh-but-short-shake)I really had to laugh very hard. Then I tried ... and had to laugh even harder! It works, a short firm shake and that's it. Brilliant! Long live the web.
reply to this comment
blog 9 9 (my URL — 08/07/2011)
reply to this comment
Steve Smythe (08/13/2010)
Flash doesn't sync with shutter in Auto mode. In Manual it works decent. Flash does work.
reply to this comment
stitches on the computer (Uri — 07/24/2010)
It stitches the photos on the computer--not the camera--with a great, simple and easy to use Canon program that comes with the camera
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/28/2010)
Just about any photo editor can handle it these days. And stitchers have gotten so sophisticated that it's nearly seemless.
reply to this comment
Working thanks SBLEVINE (Melissa — 01/22/2010)
Thank you so much SBLEVINE for posting this information. I had seen it on fixya.com, but was scared to try it. After reading so many people having the same problem with the flash, I figured I had nothing to lose and I didn't! I followed the instructions (thanks for the heads up on the different screw sizes) and my camera is back to working as great as it did new.
reply to this comment
graham manser (06/06/2011)
I have the srange dark picture when taken with flash on auto.
Canon is very quiete about it all!
reply to this comment
Canon is very quiete about it all!
Why would A-630 under-expose in "auto" mode? (gringoloco — 12/23/2009)
My A-630 works fine in manual mode but the pictures come out dark
and grainy in auto mode. The flash works but seems to have a timing
problem that was not corrected by removing the batteries or doing a
reset. Any ideas?
reply to this comment
and grainy in auto mode. The flash works but seems to have a timing
problem that was not corrected by removing the batteries or doing a
reset. Any ideas?
by James DeRuvo (12/24/2009)
Reset your camera. I suspect that the camera has exposure compensation engaged or the white balance is out of whack. A simple reset should solve the issue.
reply to this comment
gringoloco (12/26/2009)
Tnx for the answer, James but a reset did not work nor did removing the batteries.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/26/2009)
Check with Canon to see if a firmware update has been made. Remember that a camera's firmware is only as current as the day it was built. Between then and now, issues that crop up may have been addressed and released as a firmware update. Absent that, though, you may be looking at a camera repair. And with the average cost of a camera repair around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
reply to this comment
Can I connect a Canon A630 to an external flash? Is there a connection for a sync cord? (sbsoso — 12/17/2009)
Can the cannon A630 digital camera be connected to an external flash with a sync cord?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/17/2009)
No. But what you could do is use a superbright LCD light that attaches to the tripod mount. I like CameraBright. Then you flash with your built on flash to freeze the action.
reply to this comment
sbsoso (12/23/2009)
Thanks so much for answering my question. I appreciate it!
reply to this comment
My camera (a630) has a blank real time display - only symbols of settings,etc. Can't view pictures taken either. Everything else seems to be fine. (murphyallen53 — 10/18/2009)
I'm thinking my son changed a setting when he borrowed it. I've used it and loved it for years. But I can't seem to take pictures. No display and no viewing of shots taken. New batteries. Returned camera to default settings. Still no display. The camera will flash as if taking a picture.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/19/2009)
Could he have dropped it? It sounds like a failed CCD since you didn't get an image after resetting the camera. I'd send it it for a repair estimate and see what Canon says. At least you'll know what the problem is and how much it would cost to repair it.
But keep this in mind. If it does require repair, it may cost more than it's worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
reply to this comment
But keep this in mind. If it does require repair, it may cost more than it's worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
When I try to reset my default settings it says busy. What can I do? (swebb — 09/12/2009)
My camera will not take pictures. It will focus but not snap. There are a lot of setting chosen on the camera. I am trying to reset to the default, but I keep getting a busy error when I hit reset all. Suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/12/2009)
Pull the batteries for a few hours. Then put them back in and try resetting again. I'd also suggest seeing if Canon has a firmware update. Download and install it.
reply to this comment
Powershor 630 have blackspor on the LCD monito (kvmathai — 08/22/2009)
Black spots developed on the LCD monitor. Is it possible to removeit whethr it affecxt the quality of the picture, is there any simple method to rectify it?
reply to this comment
kvmathai (08/22/2009)
Powershot 630 have black spots on the LCD monitor
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/28/2009)
If they don't appear on the image, then they're probably dead pixels on your LCD. Annoying sure, but costly to repair if your camera is out of warranty.
reply to this comment
What is the next best camera which is similiar to the A630? My A630 suffered an unfortunate accident and now needs to be replaced. :( (cwb1017 — 08/18/2009)
The only complaint I ever had with this camera was the movie mode.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/19/2009)
Well the latest in the "A" series is the A1100is and A1000. Price between $150-200. But the SD990IS and the SX10 are also very good, using the new DIGIC IV processor for improved face detection, color and low light perofrmance.
reply to this comment
A630 camera mode automatically switching problem (klohr26 — 07/25/2009)
I have had the A630 for a few years and have loved it until it recently started acting up. lately, more often than not, when I am trying to take a picture, it automatically switches into the picture viewing mode, it will continue to switch back and forth until I shut it off. We have taken it into a camera shop who "repaired" it but it started acting up again in a few weeks. Has anyone else had this problem.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/26/2009)
Sounds to me like it wasn't repaired at all. I'd send it back. But it sounds to me like a loose wheel on top there.
reply to this comment
Lens will not retract. (vagalboomer — 03/12/2009)
I have a Canon Powershot A560. The lens will not stay retracted and the display is blank.
When the power button is pressed then the lens retracts and then comes back out. The display remains blank. Pressing the shot button or switching the zoom control do nothing. I have tried removing/replacing the batteries; resetting the SDRam; tapping on a table.
reply to this comment
When the power button is pressed then the lens retracts and then comes back out. The display remains blank. Pressing the shot button or switching the zoom control do nothing. I have tried removing/replacing the batteries; resetting the SDRam; tapping on a table.
by James DeRuvo (03/13/2009)
You may have to check the battery contacts to see if there's corrosion or dirt that is affecting the connection. Clean it with a pencil eraser. I'd also take the camera and put it in a zip lock with a half cup of uncooked rice. This will draw out any additional moisture that is fitizing with the camera performance. Update the firmware and use stronger batteries. Underpowered batteries can cause lens errors like this. You should be using batteries with at least 2500 mAh.
reply to this comment
Larry (03/21/2009)
Advise you to go VERY EASY with that tapping on the table procedure. Digital P&S cameras are notoriously fragile. Tapping and the like should be last resorts to be used when you have definitely decided to NOT send the camera in for repairs, definitely will be getting another camera, and if it breaks completely you won't feel like you have lost anything anyway.
reply to this comment
I went to the touble of writing a review of the A630. Several days later, it still is not here. Why do I bother? (MalcolmRoberts — 02/02/2009)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/09/2009)
Did you post it here? ( digitalcamera-hq.com/forms/... ). If so, be patient. It's only Monday.
reply to this comment
number count of remaining pictures gone haywire. (tommyleigh2003 — 12/14/2008)
my daughter brought her memory card so we could use my camera to load some of her pictures into the computer. we both have an a630. the process worked fine and we loaded about 75 pictures. when she checked her card before she removed it the number she had remaining was way, way off. she put mine back in and now i supposedly have 8,000 remaining. it should read around 700. can i fix this. appreciate any help i can get. thanks.
reply to this comment
camera? (12/15/2008)
Perhaps you changed the Picture Quality settings? For example, lower quality pictures take up less space than high quality ones, so if you could take 700 HQ pics, it's not inconceivable that you could take 8000 LQ pics. Try playing with that setting and see if it changes.
reply to this comment
tommyleigh2003 (12/15/2008)
don't know how I did it, but that was the problem. I'd like to blame my wife, but since she rarely uses the camera, it must have been one of my senior moments. anyhoo, appreciate your help, i was a little worried it was something more serious. you made it simple. thank you very much and have a blessed day.
tommy leigh
reply to this comment
don't know how I did it, but that was the problem. I'd like to blame my wife, but since she rarely uses the camera, it must have been one of my senior moments. anyhoo, appreciate your help, i was a little worried it was something more serious. you made it simple. thank you very much and have a blessed day.
tommy leigh
A630 Locks Up (Waterman1 — 11/20/2008)
Camera starts to power up, but after anywhere from 15 seconds to 1 minute it freezes. Sometimes will take a pix before freezing. Have to turn it off. Then then lens cycles closed and open again and it may work for a few seconds. LCD screen is normal
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/21/2008)
If you have enough time, try resetting the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
If that doesn't work, the recommendation from Canon is to send it in for a repair estimate. But understand that without warranty coverage, the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
reply to this comment
If that doesn't work, the recommendation from Canon is to send it in for a repair estimate. But understand that without warranty coverage, the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
Waterman1 (11/21/2008)
James-
I was able to get to the reset menu today, and tried reset to defaults. As of now it seems to work ! This turned the USB back on, and allowed downloading pix to the computer.
Now I can try some of the hack programs.
What I really want to do is flash it for remote shooting like my broken A 400 had. But it appears that in the A 500 and 600 series only the even numbered models have remote shooting. I use it for wildlfife.
I had a broken Elph S230 which supported this but instead of fixing it Canon sent me a SD1000 as a replacement. While the 1000 is a good camera it lacks remote.
Thanks again.
Dave
reply to this comment
I was able to get to the reset menu today, and tried reset to defaults. As of now it seems to work ! This turned the USB back on, and allowed downloading pix to the computer.
Now I can try some of the hack programs.
What I really want to do is flash it for remote shooting like my broken A 400 had. But it appears that in the A 500 and 600 series only the even numbered models have remote shooting. I use it for wildlfife.
I had a broken Elph S230 which supported this but instead of fixing it Canon sent me a SD1000 as a replacement. While the 1000 is a good camera it lacks remote.
Thanks again.
Dave
I want to take close ups of baseball cards from 6-8 inches away. How do I do it? (Gino67 — 10/20/2008)
I am selling baseball cards on Ebay and can not get a focused
picture. I do not use the flash. What settings do I use? I take them between 5 and 8 inches away. I will buy a table tripod if necessary. Is it possible?
reply to this comment
picture. I do not use the flash. What settings do I use? I take them between 5 and 8 inches away. I will buy a table tripod if necessary. Is it possible?
Kcho Loren (10/20/2008)
Yes, you can do it using zoom if you want to put the cards 6-8 inches away from the camera.
Instead my choice would be use macro feature at minimum zoom and exploit 2.8 lens.
reply to this comment
Instead my choice would be use macro feature at minimum zoom and exploit 2.8 lens.
Gino67 (10/20/2008)
Thanks. I will read up on that as it is not clear to me yet.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (10/20/2008)
If your picture is blur it could be because you aren't set On the macro feature.
It appears as a flower in the menu.
reply to this comment
It appears as a flower in the menu.
The mode switch quit working and I cannot review pictures I have taken and therefore cannot delete pictures. How can I fix this? (Beckham — 09/19/2008)
When I move the mode switch to the left to review a picture I have taken, I still get the moving screen you see when you have the mode switch to the right and are preparing to take a picture. I cannot
review any pictures I have taken and therefore cannot delete any. The camera still takes pictures fine. Is the switch broken or has
any else had this problem? Anyone know a fix? Thanks.
Melba Beckham
reply to this comment
review any pictures I have taken and therefore cannot delete any. The camera still takes pictures fine. Is the switch broken or has
any else had this problem? Anyone know a fix? Thanks.
Melba Beckham
bukit97 (09/20/2008)
There are better ways of viewing and deleting pictures than the camera way and you may want to take a look at Picasa which can perform many functions that camera couldn't do.
Besides viewing and deleting pictures, it can do basic photo editing like removing red eye, increase brightness, increase contrast, crop pictures and turn photos into movies and slide shows, and the best part is it is free.
If you are interested, you can download Picasa at <a href="picasa.google.com/"> this site </a>.
Coming back to your camera, the switch probably needs a change to a new one because of the electrical contact problem.
People do have some success at blowing away the dirt etc beneath the switch, but this is only temporary solution.
You probably don't miss it because the camera still takes pictures and Picasa will let you view, delete and edit the pictures on the computer much more efficiently than the camera.
reply to this comment
Besides viewing and deleting pictures, it can do basic photo editing like removing red eye, increase brightness, increase contrast, crop pictures and turn photos into movies and slide shows, and the best part is it is free.
If you are interested, you can download Picasa at <a href="picasa.google.com/"> this site </a>.
Coming back to your camera, the switch probably needs a change to a new one because of the electrical contact problem.
People do have some success at blowing away the dirt etc beneath the switch, but this is only temporary solution.
You probably don't miss it because the camera still takes pictures and Picasa will let you view, delete and edit the pictures on the computer much more efficiently than the camera.
Aditya D (09/22/2008)
I think its possible that the outer switch may have just come off the inner switch. So first, try to reposition the switch yourself, applying a little bit of force, and if that doesn't work, a camera store can repair the problem pretty quickly, and for a little amount of money. If you don't mind not being able to switch the modes, then you can go with Bukit's solution as well, which is a lot cheaper (free).
reply to this comment
Any ideas why my camera won't turn on? (mak45 — 08/16/2008)
It was working fine, next thing I know, it doesn't come on. I've replaced the batteries.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/19/2008)
Well, your contacts could be dirty. Take a pencil eraser and rub it on the contacts to clean them. Secondly, your camera could have condensation effecting it. Try placing it in a ziplock bag with about a cup of uncooked rice and leave it for a few hours. The rice will act as a dessicant to draw out the moisture.
Make sure you're using high capacity AAs. Along the lines of 2500mah. Cameras require alot of power and garden variety AAs won't power them as well.
Absent that, you may be looking at sending it into Canon for a repair estimate.
reply to this comment
Make sure you're using high capacity AAs. Along the lines of 2500mah. Cameras require alot of power and garden variety AAs won't power them as well.
Absent that, you may be looking at sending it into Canon for a repair estimate.
Sean (12/14/2009)
heyplease hlp.. same problem canon a630 i think besides that.. a series. wont power on just bought it .. off someone i dont know.. i bought DOLLAR STORE batteries. iam wondering if this will power the camera @ ALL.. thanks please reply before i buy 30$ batteries.. thanks.. for the help in advance
reply to this comment
Is the battery door on the A630 the same as the A620? (animalhart — 08/14/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/19/2008)
There's a good chance that it is. Since it's part of the A600 series.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (09/20/2008)
I have a feeling you are concerned about the battery door of A630 just because some people had problems with the A620.
Well, I wouldn't worry about battery door because it is so cheap and easily available. If you check <a href="stores.ebay.com/prophotosd_... this site </a>, replacement battery doors for models like Canon 10D, 20D, 30D and 300D are offered for sale, showing that battery doors are expected to be replaced due to wear and tear irrespective of models.
I would say if you like A630, don't let battery door stop you from buying one.
reply to this comment
Well, I wouldn't worry about battery door because it is so cheap and easily available. If you check <a href="stores.ebay.com/prophotosd_... this site </a>, replacement battery doors for models like Canon 10D, 20D, 30D and 300D are offered for sale, showing that battery doors are expected to be replaced due to wear and tear irrespective of models.
I would say if you like A630, don't let battery door stop you from buying one.
my viewfinder stays dark (buddyboy — 07/30/2008)
when looking at previous pictures that were taken w/camera the viewscreen is lighted but when trying to take a picture the screen is black.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (07/30/2008)
Try pushing the Display button (a small square with lines on the sides that's located near the LCD).
reply to this comment
buddyboy (07/31/2008)
THANK YOU!BRENDA YOU RECTIFIED MY PROBLEM----LOU H.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (07/31/2008)
No problem! I've had the exact same thing happen myself, which is why I knew what it was. :) Glad to help!
reply to this comment
My camera is not working after I went to beach. How can I have after service ? (soohaenghuh1964 — 07/26/2008)
If I push the button "on" I can hear a sound "tick tick "then on the screen
"Lens error. Resrat carema.' appears. I do not know what should I do...
reply to this comment
"Lens error. Resrat carema.' appears. I do not know what should I do...
by James DeRuvo (07/29/2008)
Well could be you got sand in the mechanism and it's having trouble zooming out from it's hole. I'd use some canned air and also cycle the camera on/off several times to see if it can work it's way free. Next, try resetting the camera. If that doesn't work, you may have to have it serviced.
reply to this comment
soohaenghuh1964 (07/29/2008)
Thank you so much James. I tried as what you said. But it didn't work. By the way, what do you mean canned air ?
How do I use canned air ?
And I do not know how and where can I have my camera serviced. Can I know that the warranty is finished If I check any
product number on camera ?
Thanks a lot again and have a good night !
Soo Haeng Huh
reply to this comment
How do I use canned air ?
And I do not know how and where can I have my camera serviced. Can I know that the warranty is finished If I check any
product number on camera ?
Thanks a lot again and have a good night !
Soo Haeng Huh
by James DeRuvo (07/30/2008)
You can get canned air at any radio shack or store that sells computer equipment. Or even at an office supply store. It has a small straw which allows you to directly specifically the air into the nooks an crannies you need, blowing out the dirt and dust.
As for repairs, log on to CanonUSA.com and press the support tab. There will be a link to arranging a repair.
reply to this comment
As for repairs, log on to CanonUSA.com and press the support tab. There will be a link to arranging a repair.
Missing Software and Interface cable for Canon A630 (marks52 — 05/29/2008)
I bought a Canon A630 on sale w/o the software disk or interface cable. Do I need those or can I just download pics using a card reader? Otherwise, where can I download the software for windows XP? Thanks,
Mark
reply to this comment
Mark
Kcho Loren (05/30/2008)
Please see it old post: Driver Update for Vista Home Premium ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
reply to this comment
marks52 (05/30/2008)
Kcho, thanks for your quick reply, but the link in the old post does not work.
Mark
reply to this comment
Mark
Kcho Loren (05/30/2008)
With a USB cable, you no need drivers for WinXP. See here ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... )
If you just download your pictures using a card reader, it's the most simple option.
reply to this comment
If you just download your pictures using a card reader, it's the most simple option.
marks52 (05/30/2008)
Thanks, Kcho. Thats what I thought I could do w/o the software and cable. I just wanted someone to confirm it,
Mark
reply to this comment
Mark
I have a Canon A630, I don't know how to set camera to take extremely close photos of coins. can anybody give me step by step instructions? (Penny72 — 04/04/2008)
I am a stay at home mom who buys coins off ebay to fill coin books for my kids. I have accumulated way too many I don't need by buying bulk. I want to start listing the ones I don't need to help pay for ones I do need. I have the Canon powershot A630 which is suppossed to be one of the best budget friendly cameras. I have tried and tried to take close ups of my coins and they ALL come out blurry. Horribly blurry. Or, the shake indicator keeps coming on. I went so far as to prop the camera to where I wasn't even holding it to press the button (to take picture) and shake was still showing. If I zoom way out it takes great pics but that will do me no good as I need to be seriously zoomed in. Please can anybody tell me how to set the camera so I can get detailed closeups. Thank you so much in advance! : ) Penny
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (04/04/2008)
First, you can try with a tripod. Later you can put your coins on a table and point it with the camera. Remember to set the macro feature on, and to use a good light source.
Read this page if you need more explanations: Coins ( tabletopstudio.com/document... )
reply to this comment
Read this page if you need more explanations: Coins ( tabletopstudio.com/document... )
Penny72 (04/09/2008)
i know the camera has awesome features as i've read about others who zoom in on the pits in strawberries, i just don't know how to adjust the camera to do that. the extreme zoom is what i need. tripod wouldn't get the close up needed. i basically need the camera lens on the coin! lol... thanks anyway for your suggestion.
reply to this comment
Jab (04/10/2008)
Hi Penny,
Don't forget though, that the closest you will get with this camera is up to 1cm. You can use the manual focus by pressing "down" direction on the ring until you see "MF" on then got to the 1cm setting. Then just the camera back & forward until you are happy with what you see on the screen. That's the way i do it.
Other than that, I haven't come across any macro adapter for this model, but I might be wrong. Pity the adapter range is so limited, coz it's a great camera.
reply to this comment
Don't forget though, that the closest you will get with this camera is up to 1cm. You can use the manual focus by pressing "down" direction on the ring until you see "MF" on then got to the 1cm setting. Then just the camera back & forward until you are happy with what you see on the screen. That's the way i do it.
Other than that, I haven't come across any macro adapter for this model, but I might be wrong. Pity the adapter range is so limited, coz it's a great camera.
pvs57 (04/10/2008)
Did you try the Macro setting on the camera?
reply to this comment
Larry (04/17/2008)
I recommend using the macro setting (flower symbol) AND making sure you have lots of light and evenly distributed light. If you are going to be selling lots of coins on eBay you might want to buy or build a light box. Your local camera store probably has one for $30 or so. The idea is that it is a box where the sides are made out of thin white cloth to spread the light out evenly. Then you place a bright light bulb on each side of the box to light your object which is inside the box. One side of the box is open for the camera to shoot through.
If all this improves the image but the color is all wrong then you will need to adjust the White Balance.
reply to this comment
If all this improves the image but the color is all wrong then you will need to adjust the White Balance.
camera wont connect to my pc, but connects to another pc. Whats wrong? (izzykatz — 03/17/2008)
a630 and winXP pro.
Izzy
reply to this comment
Izzy
Kcho Loren (03/17/2008)
More details? ... could be a lot of problems: bad USB port, bad BIOS setting, bad data cable.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2008)
The USB port may not actually be bad. As a power saving feature, Windows will turn off USB ports. It's a dumb idea, frankly. But to access it you right click on my computer, select properties. then device manager. right click each USB hub and select power mangement. uncheck the box that says "allow windows to turn off usb hub to conserve power." Do this for every hub.
Also try using the main USB port and not a hub. Check for driver/firmware updates from Canon. And as Kcho mentioned, try a different cable.
Or even better, Invest in a $10 USB memory card reader and simply take your card out and plug it in. The PC will read it as a drive and it's a simple drag and drop to get your pictures onto the PC for editing and printing. Much better than trying to trouble shoot driver issues.
reply to this comment
Also try using the main USB port and not a hub. Check for driver/firmware updates from Canon. And as Kcho mentioned, try a different cable.
Or even better, Invest in a $10 USB memory card reader and simply take your card out and plug it in. The PC will read it as a drive and it's a simple drag and drop to get your pictures onto the PC for editing and printing. Much better than trying to trouble shoot driver issues.
izzykatz (03/17/2008)
Thanks,
I used same cable on another pc - no problem.
Tried different usb ports - no help. other devices are connected and functioning.
same ports connected to vreative mp3 worked ok.
any other ideas?
Izzy
reply to this comment
I used same cable on another pc - no problem.
Tried different usb ports - no help. other devices are connected and functioning.
same ports connected to vreative mp3 worked ok.
any other ideas?
Izzy
Kcho Loren (03/17/2008)
Mmmm, I can't understand what problem is, but ... have you admin privileges in windows?
I have no idea :(
reply to this comment
I have no idea :(
Aditya D (03/17/2008)
Try these two things:
1) Make sure you have the drivers for the camera if needed, which you can download off the camera site.
2) If there are no drivers, or this doesn't work, go to Start and open up the Control Panel. Then go to Add New Hardware, and see if you can use the wizard to detect the camera.
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
1) Make sure you have the drivers for the camera if needed, which you can download off the camera site.
2) If there are no drivers, or this doesn't work, go to Start and open up the Control Panel. Then go to Add New Hardware, and see if you can use the wizard to detect the camera.
Hope this helps.
izzykatz (03/17/2008)
Thanks to all, I 'll continue searching.
Izzy.
reply to this comment
Izzy.
by James DeRuvo (03/18/2008)
Well, you could try reinstalling the drivers. Remove the driver first, then reboot. Plug the camera back in and let it reacquire the driver. Sometimes drivers get corrupted. This could be due to incomplete installation, spyware, or a hardware crash. But I'm tellin' ya, having a card reader is your best, and easiest, solution.
reply to this comment
izzykatz (03/18/2008)
To all friends who tried to help: I tampered with the services while trying to speed up the PC. now I started some of them and everything came alive!!. DONT PLAY WITH SERVICES!!...
IZZY
reply to this comment
IZZY
by James DeRuvo (03/19/2008)
A lesson well learned then. ;) BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or, you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
Although it looks to be that YOU had the best solution!
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
reply to this comment
Although it looks to be that YOU had the best solution!
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
Where is a place that I can purchase this camera in a store in the madison wi. area (mums42 — 03/13/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/13/2008)
We deal primarily with web based vendors. However, you may wish to check with Circuit City in Madison to see if they can order you one.
reply to this comment
pvs57 (03/13/2008)
I ordered mine thru Dell at a very good price...less than $200.00 about a year ago. I saw one on Amazon for well over $200.00. Try B&H Photo...they have everything.
reply to this comment
(06/07/2008)
Used camera section in B&H, just bought one for $159
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/09/2008)
B&H is a very good distributor. Unfortunately, their website isn't accepting orders right now and won't be until Tuesday 9:45 PM EDT.
reply to this comment
Can I make the flash shoot faster? (camper — 02/17/2008)
It's slow compared to my old Kodak digital camera. Looking for a way to make it faster, but there are a lot of complicated instructions about this camera.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/17/2008)
Jeannie,
What camera mode are you shooting in? If you're in anything but M, Tv, or Av mode, the flash is on auto exposure, so you can't change it. If you're in one of those three modes, you can change the flash output in three steps (page 70 of your user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090000... )). You can adjust the flash comensation output in these modes by going into your menu, then changing the settings by selecting the icon that has a lightening bolt next to a postive and negative sign (+/-). I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
What camera mode are you shooting in? If you're in anything but M, Tv, or Av mode, the flash is on auto exposure, so you can't change it. If you're in one of those three modes, you can change the flash output in three steps (page 70 of your user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090000... )). You can adjust the flash comensation output in these modes by going into your menu, then changing the settings by selecting the icon that has a lightening bolt next to a postive and negative sign (+/-). I hope this helps.
Andrew
Kcho Loren (02/19/2008)
Andrew's answer is ok, but for me the correct answer is "no", you can't modify the flash speed. You can use "slow syncro" option in the menu and take more faster or slower pictures than 1/60 sec. with flash, but never modify the flash speed.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/20/2008)
Kcho,
Thanks for the clarification. The flash speed can not be changed, just the compensation for the flash and the timing. That is what is walked through in the manual.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Thanks for the clarification. The flash speed can not be changed, just the compensation for the flash and the timing. That is what is walked through in the manual.
Andrew
camper (02/21/2008)
Thank you for your responses. I'll study this more when I have time! You are kind to help me.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/22/2008)
Jeannie,
Good luck with your work. Please come back and let us know how it works out for you.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Good luck with your work. Please come back and let us know how it works out for you.
Andrew
I've got Canon PowerShot A630. But display is damaged. I tried to clean it, but now it looks like the black covering layer is peeled off. What to do? (irchikinSC — 01/07/2008)
At hte same time the display works
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (01/08/2008)
Ira,
This is something you'll need a repair for. You can either take it to a local camera shop like Ritz, or arrange a repair through Canon ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ). Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This is something you'll need a repair for. You can either take it to a local camera shop like Ritz, or arrange a repair through Canon ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ). Good luck.
Andrew
irchikinSC (01/09/2008)
Thanks, Andrew!!!
But display works as usually!!! I mean I can see pictures, but the surface (this black layer) is kind of peeled off. I have never seen this happening to yhe LCD Monitor. Do you think it needs to be repaired? Do you know what they can do?
Thanks once again for your reply.
reply to this comment
But display works as usually!!! I mean I can see pictures, but the surface (this black layer) is kind of peeled off. I have never seen this happening to yhe LCD Monitor. Do you think it needs to be repaired? Do you know what they can do?
Thanks once again for your reply.
Larry (01/09/2008)
Hi Ira,
Just how did you try to clean your LCD. Any chemicals involved? What is this black layer you are talking about? Is it thin like plastic? Was there any problem with your LCD before you tried to clean it? How dirty was it? Also, did you buy this camera new or used? Is it possible someone applied a protective layer on top of the LCD and that layer is peeling off leaving the LCD "like new" underneath the protective layer?
I think we should sleuth this one out some more before concluding it is really a problem at all.
Your local camera shop can figure this one out in a second or two.
Larry
reply to this comment
Just how did you try to clean your LCD. Any chemicals involved? What is this black layer you are talking about? Is it thin like plastic? Was there any problem with your LCD before you tried to clean it? How dirty was it? Also, did you buy this camera new or used? Is it possible someone applied a protective layer on top of the LCD and that layer is peeling off leaving the LCD "like new" underneath the protective layer?
I think we should sleuth this one out some more before concluding it is really a problem at all.
Your local camera shop can figure this one out in a second or two.
Larry
irchikinSC (01/10/2008)
Thanks, Larry! This a layer on the LCD screen that can be wipped off over time. It wasn't really dirty, there were just a few fingerprints and a couple schratches. I tried to clean it with a piece of cloth for cleaning glasses. My camera was new when I bought and no, it wasn't "a plastic protective layer".
Do you have any ideas about it? Thanks for your reply!!!
reply to this comment
Do you have any ideas about it? Thanks for your reply!!!
Larry (01/10/2008)
Ira,
This is very bizarre. I've never heard of such a thing before. Using a proper eyeglass cleaning cloth shouldn't have caused any problem. I would really like to know what your local camera shop technician has to say about this one! Be sure to take the cloth in to the shop also.
At least it is still usable. Perhaps you could now apply one of the LCD protectors to prevent any further peeling off. I just don't know what to suggest. I'm totally stumped.
Larry
reply to this comment
This is very bizarre. I've never heard of such a thing before. Using a proper eyeglass cleaning cloth shouldn't have caused any problem. I would really like to know what your local camera shop technician has to say about this one! Be sure to take the cloth in to the shop also.
At least it is still usable. Perhaps you could now apply one of the LCD protectors to prevent any further peeling off. I just don't know what to suggest. I'm totally stumped.
Larry
Andrew Skinner (01/12/2008)
Ira,
Is this plastic piece a clear plastic that is peeling off? If so, Larry's idea for the LCD protector would work well for that.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Is this plastic piece a clear plastic that is peeling off? If so, Larry's idea for the LCD protector would work well for that.
Andrew
Can anyone tell me why at certain times in auto mode the focus does not come in? (TZ — 12/27/2007)
I only had the camera for one week so far, and I already experienced this several times. I'll try to take a photo in auto mode (I so far only use auto mode) using some zoom, I depress the shutter button half way but it does not focus at all. It blurs the LCD. I try to adjust the zoom and it remains blurry. I either have to shut the camera off or reset the zoom all the way to wide angle and back to the zoom I wanted. Do I have a defective camera or is this common?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/27/2007)
From Canon: Aim the camera at object that is at the same focal distance as the main subject from the camera so that is centered in the viewfinder or in the AF frame displayed on the LCD monitor.
Press the shutter button halfway to set the focus. Without releasing the shutter button, aim the camera at the main subject so that it is centered in the camera's viewfinder or in the LCD monitor.
Press the shutter button fully to shoot the main subject.
If these tips don't help you, then according to Canon, the camera needs servicing.
reply to this comment
Press the shutter button halfway to set the focus. Without releasing the shutter button, aim the camera at the main subject so that it is centered in the camera's viewfinder or in the LCD monitor.
Press the shutter button fully to shoot the main subject.
If these tips don't help you, then according to Canon, the camera needs servicing.
Larry (12/28/2007)
I agree with James. Of course, as James points out without saying it is so many words, if the camera is focusing on the wrong point then you must show the camera where you want the focus point to be. You do this by using the technique James quoted from Canon.
TZ, let us know if this corrects the difficulty.
reply to this comment
TZ, let us know if this corrects the difficulty.
Why is the flash on my a630 malfunctioning? (artimusclyde — 12/17/2007)
My a630 doesnt want to flash anymore, i've tried tweaking the modes and settings and it used to work from time to time. But now it just doesnt work at all. It takes a pic if and only if i turn the flash off. Please advise.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (12/17/2007)
Bad news, flash could be broken, I would recommend taking it to an authorized repair person.
reply to this comment
Larry (12/20/2007)
Might try a full reset of the camera by removing batteries for a minute and replace them, but it does sound like a repair shop will be required for this problem.
Larry
reply to this comment
Larry
diana (10/29/2008)
Hi Art,
can you please tell how you solved the problem at your Canon A630? I have exactly the same problem and I don't know what to do.
Thanks,
Diana
reply to this comment
can you please tell how you solved the problem at your Canon A630? I have exactly the same problem and I don't know what to do.
Thanks,
Diana
diana (10/29/2008)
Hi,
I tried all posibilities today. I used full-charged batteries, I formatted the card, I reset all the settings, I removed the card and the batteries from the camera, I put them back after a while and I make a photo in a very dark place with Flash on - and also with Macro option on -.
It isn't logical why the flash works now, but it worth to try before going on service.
reply to this comment
I tried all posibilities today. I used full-charged batteries, I formatted the card, I reset all the settings, I removed the card and the batteries from the camera, I put them back after a while and I make a photo in a very dark place with Flash on - and also with Macro option on -.
It isn't logical why the flash works now, but it worth to try before going on service.
Allen aka thagalogki (02/11/2009)
I actually just pushed on the left side of the camera where the flash is hard... and it started to use the flash again.. I have this problem and my camera is iffy on some days on when the flash works.. I am watching the SAP Open.. and hopefully it will work then.. if not ... GARBAGE !!!
reply to this comment
Nicole Loomis (07/10/2009)
I want to thank Allen for his help! I tried everything Diana tried, and then I read your post. It worked, strangely! Thanks!! I love this camera, and this is the first problem I've had with it in two years. Whew! I hope it doesn't continue to mess up. Thank you!
reply to this comment
Which Canon with viewfinder and stabilizer is best under $300 (Pe — 12/04/2007)
I have a Canon 540..I feel I need the viewfinder for sun photos and like the option of chargeable and AA battery option/
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/04/2007)
Peggy,
I would go with the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a huge optical zoom (12x), and runs on AA batteries. You can get a good rechargeable set, with a charger, at Target, or online at eBay for around $20. If you're looking for a more compact camera, I would recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a better choice. It has less optical zoom, but is smaller and still meets your requirements. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I would go with the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a huge optical zoom (12x), and runs on AA batteries. You can get a good rechargeable set, with a charger, at Target, or online at eBay for around $20. If you're looking for a more compact camera, I would recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a better choice. It has less optical zoom, but is smaller and still meets your requirements. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Pe (12/04/2007)
thanks for help...I'll look into it this week.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/05/2007)
Peggy,
Glad we could help. Please come back with any other questions.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Glad we could help. Please come back with any other questions.
Andrew
Pe (12/13/2007)
Andrew this is Peggy again. been away a week and took a camera class and love the SLR cameras but I need something compact....so the A 630 may be best..I presently have a Canon 540 but it has no stabilizer--I keep replacing AA batteries..I buy the Lithium 7X power but it gets pricey. My question should I get a camera with Lithium rechargeable battery and buy a back up battery when traveling..do they last long the lithiums or stick to the AA. ....if I go lithium I could go to one of the ELFPH size cameras...thanks for you reply..this is going to be a Christmas gift form my son....he wants me to get great photos of his kids (my grandkids)...Happy Holidays Peggy
reply to this comment
pvs57 (12/13/2007)
The A630 is an excellent choice, but it does not have the IS feature. The quality of the photos are wonderful and it is easy to use.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/17/2007)
Peggy,
I've used cameras with rechargeable NiMH batteries and found them to be a great option to the pricey Lithium batteries. If you're looking for something in the ELPH line, you can try the Canon SD850 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has an 8MP resolution, a viewfinder, and image stabilization. It also has a rechargeable lithium ion battery. I would recommend buying a backup battery. It is always good to have extras around. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I've used cameras with rechargeable NiMH batteries and found them to be a great option to the pricey Lithium batteries. If you're looking for something in the ELPH line, you can try the Canon SD850 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has an 8MP resolution, a viewfinder, and image stabilization. It also has a rechargeable lithium ion battery. I would recommend buying a backup battery. It is always good to have extras around. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Pe (12/18/2007)
Before I received your latest reply I told my son (he is buying me this for Christmas) to get the Canon A750 IS and will get a NiMH recharger and batteries. I am a teacher and always have a camera on me..and want the option of changing batteries quickly and often toss them (or lose them)..Thanks for your help....Happy Holidays Peggy
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/18/2007)
Peggy,
Glad we could be of assistance. Please come back with any more questions. Happy shooting and best wishes this holiday season.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Glad we could be of assistance. Please come back with any more questions. Happy shooting and best wishes this holiday season.
Andrew
Hair removal from inside of A630 lens (dsearfass — 11/26/2007)
I have a hair (or some sort of fiber) on the inside of my A630 lens. Is there anyway I could remove this myself? I'm fairly certain it is a fiber and not a crack as I can see it when I hold the camera under a bright light and look into the front of the lens. It shows up mostly in video mode. Thanks ahead of time for any help. -Dave
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/26/2007)
Dave,
You can attempt taking the camera apart, but that could void any warranty left on it. I would recommend taking it to an authorized repair person, or you can contact Canon customer support ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) for assistance. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can attempt taking the camera apart, but that could void any warranty left on it. I would recommend taking it to an authorized repair person, or you can contact Canon customer support ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) for assistance. Good luck.
Andrew
Larry (12/20/2007)
If your camera is outside the warranty period AND you don't mind risking making it totally UNREPAIRABLE AND you are especially able to deal with TINY parts AND have (or can get) the tools for such repair, you may find some encouragement here:
ask.metafilter.com/76034/Po... slowly and you must make many notes as to how you took it apart to have any hope of getting it back together.
A second camera to take macro shots as you go along will help a lot when you get to the reassembly part too.
I DO NOT RECOMMEND attempting this. You really are on your own here, but if you have written the camera off anyway.....
Larry
reply to this comment
ask.metafilter.com/76034/Po... slowly and you must make many notes as to how you took it apart to have any hope of getting it back together.
A second camera to take macro shots as you go along will help a lot when you get to the reassembly part too.
I DO NOT RECOMMEND attempting this. You really are on your own here, but if you have written the camera off anyway.....
Larry
Andrew Skinner (12/20/2007)
Dave,
I would use the self repair as a last resort. If you really like it, I would price compare a repair with a new camera. You might find yourself purchasing a new one for less than a repair, if repairing your current camera isn't an option. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I would use the self repair as a last resort. If you really like it, I would price compare a repair with a new camera. You might find yourself purchasing a new one for less than a repair, if repairing your current camera isn't an option. Good luck.
Andrew
Larry (12/20/2007)
Absolutely, self repair of digital cameras is a LAST RESORT only to be attempted if you will be perfectly happy just to see the insides of your camera before you throw it away (which could easily be the result).
Larry
reply to this comment
Larry
dsearfass (12/21/2007)
Thank you both for your replies. Larry, your link is exactly what I was looking for. Unfortunately, I didn't realize it would be THAT involved. I will look into how much a repair would be. If it is too much, I will drink a couple of beers and then convince myself I can repair it on my own!
reply to this comment
Larry (12/21/2007)
Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout! :)
reply to this comment
Why do all of my indoor pics have an orange overtone? (cz2007 — 11/18/2007)
I use automatic features b/c I'm a novice. I'm heartbroken b/c all pics of my baby's first year makes him look like he has a fake orange tan. Also, faces look shiny indoors. I read in another review that this can happen from reflections from incadescent indoor light. How do I avoid this? I'm ready to go back to Kodak EasyShare cameras. HELP! This was an expensive Christmas gift last year!
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (11/19/2007)
In automatic mode with flash you cannot have orange pictures. Have you tried this option?
reply to this comment
cz2007 (11/19/2007)
Hi Kcho- Yes, I keep the camera on Auto with the flash on.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (11/19/2007)
Mmmm, and the white balance is in AWB?
reply to this comment
cz2007 (11/19/2007)
In the auto mode, you are not able to change the AWB.
The only thing I changed was to shoot in "postcard" b/c that was the only way I could figure out how to get the date stamped on the print.
reply to this comment
The only thing I changed was to shoot in "postcard" b/c that was the only way I could figure out how to get the date stamped on the print.
Kcho Loren (11/19/2007)
Ouch! it's true. I'm sorry :)
Then I can't understand what is your problem. Do you have problems with outdoor pictures?
reply to this comment
Then I can't understand what is your problem. Do you have problems with outdoor pictures?
cz2007 (11/19/2007)
My outdoor pics are gorgeous...but indoor pics with lights on (regular lamps, chandeliers, high hats...any indoor light) reflects orange. I did not have this problem with the same lights with my old Kodak EasyShare camera. I'm really making you work!
reply to this comment
cz2007 (11/19/2007)
Hey Kcho- If I go into portrait mode, change the AWB to "Tangsten Lighting" do you think this will help? I've been doing some reading on the internet. When I try this, the "yellow light " in the LCD image goes away. On the website www.photo-forums.com at least 3 people had this same reddish face complaint, but it's from a year ago so no one has responded to my posting and there were no answers for them either!
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (11/20/2007)
In general I take indoor pictures in Auto mode, but you can try either Indoor mode inside of SCN mode or not automatic P mode. In this case you need to take care with flash intensity, because in this mode is manual, but you can adjust white balance mode. As you say in Portrait mode you can do it too.
reply to this comment
Larry (12/09/2007)
I think you are on the right track with adjusting the white balance. You can use the Tungsten setting in P, Tv, Av and M modes. If the Tungsten setting does not correct the problem, then you may have to use the custom white balance with any of the same modes. In your manual see page 58 for the Tungsten setting and pages 59 and 60 for custom white balance setting.
Also, you may be able to correct the orange tint on photos already taken by using post processing such as found in Picasa2 (available free as an internet download compliments of Google) or PhotoShop (not free and harder to learn to use, but more powerful once you do).
Here is the URL for Picasa2 download
picasa.google.com/download/... wishes and feel free to ask further on this thread as needed.
Larry
reply to this comment
Also, you may be able to correct the orange tint on photos already taken by using post processing such as found in Picasa2 (available free as an internet download compliments of Google) or PhotoShop (not free and harder to learn to use, but more powerful once you do).
Here is the URL for Picasa2 download
picasa.google.com/download/... wishes and feel free to ask further on this thread as needed.
Larry
Larry (12/11/2007)
CZ,
Glad I was of help to you. This website/forum has been a lot of help to me too.
Good luck on correcting the color on your baby's pictures from year one. Maybe that can be a project for after the Holidays.
Larry
reply to this comment
Glad I was of help to you. This website/forum has been a lot of help to me too.
Good luck on correcting the color on your baby's pictures from year one. Maybe that can be a project for after the Holidays.
Larry
cz2007 (12/12/2007)
Hi Larry-
Thanks for your help. I'm probably still going to buy another Kodak Easy Share. As a mom with 2 babies, I need to be able to point and shoot at a moments notice and not worry about lighting. I might go back and print my favorites in black and white. I'll never have time to retouch over 500 pictures (yes, I took way over 500 pics!). Happy holidays and I really appreciate you (and Kcho) taking the time to reply to my questions!
-CZ
reply to this comment
Thanks for your help. I'm probably still going to buy another Kodak Easy Share. As a mom with 2 babies, I need to be able to point and shoot at a moments notice and not worry about lighting. I might go back and print my favorites in black and white. I'll never have time to retouch over 500 pictures (yes, I took way over 500 pics!). Happy holidays and I really appreciate you (and Kcho) taking the time to reply to my questions!
-CZ
Larry (12/12/2007)
CZ,
Please don't give up on all those first year pictures. Picasa 2 has a feature to batch process pictures and with auto color correction you could be done in 10 minutes. Even if you fixed them one at a time using the individual eyedropper to designate a spot on the picture that should be white, it takes about 5 seconds per picture. I just tried a batch of my own and it is amazingly fast and easy. Yes, I know time is a precious commodity when two babies are around. We have two grandchildren and their mom really has to arrange her time carefully in order to do any scrapbooking. At the very least, make a copy of the originals before you change them to B&W so you can fix them "later" even if it is 6 years from now when they are both in school during the day.
Best Wishes, Larry
reply to this comment
Please don't give up on all those first year pictures. Picasa 2 has a feature to batch process pictures and with auto color correction you could be done in 10 minutes. Even if you fixed them one at a time using the individual eyedropper to designate a spot on the picture that should be white, it takes about 5 seconds per picture. I just tried a batch of my own and it is amazingly fast and easy. Yes, I know time is a precious commodity when two babies are around. We have two grandchildren and their mom really has to arrange her time carefully in order to do any scrapbooking. At the very least, make a copy of the originals before you change them to B&W so you can fix them "later" even if it is 6 years from now when they are both in school during the day.
Best Wishes, Larry
cz2007 (12/13/2007)
Larry-
I'll try it. Check back every once in a while so I can ask questions if I need help with it!
What could be a problem...when I see the pic on camera, on the computer screen, or on a digital picture frame, it looks FINE. When it's printed on paper though, it's orange. So it will be hard to adjust the color on computer b/c it looks fine on the computer. I guess I'll have to try a few, print them, and see.
Thanks,
CZ
reply to this comment
I'll try it. Check back every once in a while so I can ask questions if I need help with it!
What could be a problem...when I see the pic on camera, on the computer screen, or on a digital picture frame, it looks FINE. When it's printed on paper though, it's orange. So it will be hard to adjust the color on computer b/c it looks fine on the computer. I guess I'll have to try a few, print them, and see.
Thanks,
CZ
Larry (12/13/2007)
CZ,
Now you're talking. The Picasa2 program is FREE to download.
A general rule about color problems: They are typically too orange or too blue. Therefore, if they are too orange the program throws some blue at it to get the color back in balance. That is why it is called white balance. Vice versa if the picture is too blue.... So when you get the Picasa2 program, you import your pictures and you have (at least) three ways to try and fix the color balance. 1. Under the tab "basic fixes" click on the button "auto color" and see how it does. (For the beginning, just do one picture at a time. After you get what you want then you can try the batch edit later.) 2. A second possibility is found when you click on the Tuning tab. Next click on the Neutral Color Picker (looks like an eyedropper). Now more your cursor over to the photo and click on something that is supposed to be white in the picture. The program will adjust the white balance to force that spot to be white and, hopefully, all the other colors will now be correct (or at least a heck of a lot better). 3. Lastly, also under the tuning tab, click on Color Temperature button and drag it to the left slowly while watching the picture. Sliding the button to the left adds blueness to balance the excess orange. This is the toughest method because you are doing the judging as to whether you have achieved the color balance you desire. Of course, if the first two don't accomplish it then the third is your last chance.
After you have tried all three methods on a few pictures you will have a good idea how easy it is and which method works best for your picture problem. Also, notice the "undo tuning" button. If you try method 1 and you don't like it, just click on "undo tuning" and you'll be back where you started and can proceed to method 2 and so on.
Now to address the issue of color differences between your computer screen and the printer. This can be as simple as you have said. Try a few pictures using some a little blue and some with more blue until it looks good. Then you are ready to roll them out or learn the batch edit method. If this simple method doesn't do it (though I think it will) you are looking at getting another free program to calibrate your monitor because it may not be showing the correct colors in the first place. Of course, it could also be miscalibration on the part of the printer and I don't know where to start if that is the problem!
Just take it one step at a time and you'll be cranking out some beautiful baby pictures you can be proud of.
Larry
PS I don't actually have to check back here. Every time you post another response just as you have been doing, the program sends me an email to let me know so I can then see what's going on at my convenience. It's all so easy and fun I can't believe it.
PPS I just re-read your last post and it does seem odd that the pictures look OK on camera, computer screen and digital frame but orange on paper. You should still be able to shift the balance toward blue on Picasa2, print it, and then undo the tuning so your picture still looks good on the screen views. Perhaps, you should start by checking your printer out for simple things like low ink or very old ink (it does age and "go bad"). Does your printer work OK for non-photographic color purposes? What brand/model of printer do you have? We must save your baby's pictures if at all possible!!!
reply to this comment
Now you're talking. The Picasa2 program is FREE to download.
A general rule about color problems: They are typically too orange or too blue. Therefore, if they are too orange the program throws some blue at it to get the color back in balance. That is why it is called white balance. Vice versa if the picture is too blue.... So when you get the Picasa2 program, you import your pictures and you have (at least) three ways to try and fix the color balance. 1. Under the tab "basic fixes" click on the button "auto color" and see how it does. (For the beginning, just do one picture at a time. After you get what you want then you can try the batch edit later.) 2. A second possibility is found when you click on the Tuning tab. Next click on the Neutral Color Picker (looks like an eyedropper). Now more your cursor over to the photo and click on something that is supposed to be white in the picture. The program will adjust the white balance to force that spot to be white and, hopefully, all the other colors will now be correct (or at least a heck of a lot better). 3. Lastly, also under the tuning tab, click on Color Temperature button and drag it to the left slowly while watching the picture. Sliding the button to the left adds blueness to balance the excess orange. This is the toughest method because you are doing the judging as to whether you have achieved the color balance you desire. Of course, if the first two don't accomplish it then the third is your last chance.
After you have tried all three methods on a few pictures you will have a good idea how easy it is and which method works best for your picture problem. Also, notice the "undo tuning" button. If you try method 1 and you don't like it, just click on "undo tuning" and you'll be back where you started and can proceed to method 2 and so on.
Now to address the issue of color differences between your computer screen and the printer. This can be as simple as you have said. Try a few pictures using some a little blue and some with more blue until it looks good. Then you are ready to roll them out or learn the batch edit method. If this simple method doesn't do it (though I think it will) you are looking at getting another free program to calibrate your monitor because it may not be showing the correct colors in the first place. Of course, it could also be miscalibration on the part of the printer and I don't know where to start if that is the problem!
Just take it one step at a time and you'll be cranking out some beautiful baby pictures you can be proud of.
Larry
PS I don't actually have to check back here. Every time you post another response just as you have been doing, the program sends me an email to let me know so I can then see what's going on at my convenience. It's all so easy and fun I can't believe it.
PPS I just re-read your last post and it does seem odd that the pictures look OK on camera, computer screen and digital frame but orange on paper. You should still be able to shift the balance toward blue on Picasa2, print it, and then undo the tuning so your picture still looks good on the screen views. Perhaps, you should start by checking your printer out for simple things like low ink or very old ink (it does age and "go bad"). Does your printer work OK for non-photographic color purposes? What brand/model of printer do you have? We must save your baby's pictures if at all possible!!!
which would you recommend? canon a630 or canon s3is? (jordanacorda — 11/11/2007)
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (11/11/2007)
Well ... there are a lot of differences. A630 has a bigger sensor but not IS features. S3IS has more optical zoom and TFT viewfinder. A630 is more compact camera.
If you want a easy camera then buy A630, if you want a more advanced camera buy S3IS.
I think that PowerShot A650 IS is the best option by now.
Note: S3IS disappear from Canon website, now you have S5IS.
reply to this comment
If you want a easy camera then buy A630, if you want a more advanced camera buy S3IS.
I think that PowerShot A650 IS is the best option by now.
Note: S3IS disappear from Canon website, now you have S5IS.
where in Lakeland, Florida can I buy a Canon A630 camera? (jburnett07 — 10/28/2007)
I have tried Best Buy, WalMart, and circut City....It must be an older model, but I like the ratings on it and would like to find one in this area.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (10/28/2007)
Yep, but this is not a good question for this site.
reply to this comment
pvs57 (10/28/2007)
If you can't find this camera in your local stores, try Amazon or Dell. I got mine at Amazon for less than $200.00 a few months ago.
reply to this comment
With the Powershot A630, can I record video form TV? I mean, connect it to the TV and record what's in the TV monitor... (sebaslunak — 10/25/2007)
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (10/25/2007)
No, you cant use it as a digital VCR. You can connect it to your VCR or tiVo and record your captured videos only.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (10/25/2007)
Set the camera on a tripod in front of the TV, and film that. You might have to experiment with the camera settings. I did it a few times, but I don't remember the camera settings I used.
reply to this comment
No stabilizing feature. (jvman100 — 08/17/2007)
My husband is very shakey, will the fact that this camera doesn't have the stabilizing feature be a big factor in the clarity of the pictures.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (08/17/2007)
If you have already bought the camera, do not let the issue of image stabilization worry you so much.
Image stabilization is a help, but not a cure all for unclear pictures due to shaky hands.
The main reason being that there is a limit to what image stabilization can do, and the limit is usually a two stop advantage. You can regain the two stops by setting the ISO to a higher figure, not too high of course otherwise the picture will be noisy (grainy).
You can also set the mode dial to shutter priority, and higher shutter speed helps to minimize camera shake.
The best solution is non other than making use of flash to improve the lighting condition, just like photographers used to do during the film camera era. To this end, you probably like to know that Canon A630 has an optional External High Power Flash.
Shaky hand is not uncommon, and it should not stop enthusiasts from taking pictures, your husband should be OK if he plays around with more powerful flash guns, higher shutter speed and higher ISOs.
reply to this comment
Image stabilization is a help, but not a cure all for unclear pictures due to shaky hands.
The main reason being that there is a limit to what image stabilization can do, and the limit is usually a two stop advantage. You can regain the two stops by setting the ISO to a higher figure, not too high of course otherwise the picture will be noisy (grainy).
You can also set the mode dial to shutter priority, and higher shutter speed helps to minimize camera shake.
The best solution is non other than making use of flash to improve the lighting condition, just like photographers used to do during the film camera era. To this end, you probably like to know that Canon A630 has an optional External High Power Flash.
Shaky hand is not uncommon, and it should not stop enthusiasts from taking pictures, your husband should be OK if he plays around with more powerful flash guns, higher shutter speed and higher ISOs.
jvman100 (08/17/2007)
thank you very much for the help
reply to this comment
batteries (Ceejay — 08/10/2007)
We owned a sony that had the alkaline batteries and had BIG BIG problems with it. Everytime we re-charged them or put in brand new ones, after taking 10 pictures the battery light flashed on and said low batteries then the camera would shut off. We took it in to 3 sony stores and they said that there was nother wrong with it but we still were unable to use it. We then purchased the cannon A630 and noticed that it also uses alkaline batteries and we were told by lots and lots of people that this camera will have the same problem the sony one did cause of the alkaline batteries and that we should take it back. This camera was not a cheap one and we do not want to have any problems in the near furture with it cause we cannot afford to go out and buy another one.
We would like to know if cannon has had any problems with there camera that uses alkaline batteries??
reply to this comment
We would like to know if cannon has had any problems with there camera that uses alkaline batteries??
Matt (08/10/2007)
If you're buying a Canon A-series camera, buy rechargeable batteries that hold 2500mAh. If you buy the 1800 or 2200 mAh ones, the battery gets zapped so fast you'll have the low-charge indicator on your camera after about 20 pictures. With 2500mAh batteries, you should get about 250 pictures.
Sony, Rayovac, Energizer... all good brands. You shouldn't have any problems.
reply to this comment
Sony, Rayovac, Energizer... all good brands. You shouldn't have any problems.
Ceejay (08/10/2007)
Thank you
reply to this comment
Ceejay (08/10/2007)
Also, we went to Future shop for batteries before we saw the above reply from Matt and they sold us panasonic rechargeable AA Ni-MhH up to 2050 mAh. Then we read the above reply and checked the web under panasonic batteries and they do not sell rechargeables up to 2500mAh like Matt advised.
Can you please suggest the proper make of batteries we need for our A630 Cannon camera, so we don't have to keep recharging them after 20 pictures????
reply to this comment
Can you please suggest the proper make of batteries we need for our A630 Cannon camera, so we don't have to keep recharging them after 20 pictures????
Matt (08/12/2007)
Panasonic manufactures batteries? News to me. Anyway, 2500 mAH batteries are of the likes of these ( amazon.com/Sony-2500-Rechar... ) (click link).
Unfortunately, you'll need to buy a battery charger if you don't have one. I like mine ( amazon.com/Rayovac-Universa... ) (again, click link). but it may be a little too big if you wanted to travel with it. Sony makes one, at a much more portable size. My suggestion is to stay away from rechargers that claim they can recharge in 15 minutes or less. A good, consistent recharge that won't harm the batteries or make them hot will take about 2 hours.
But yeah, these AA rechargeable batteries, even though not made by Panasonic, are completely fine.
reply to this comment
Unfortunately, you'll need to buy a battery charger if you don't have one. I like mine ( amazon.com/Rayovac-Universa... ) (again, click link). but it may be a little too big if you wanted to travel with it. Sony makes one, at a much more portable size. My suggestion is to stay away from rechargers that claim they can recharge in 15 minutes or less. A good, consistent recharge that won't harm the batteries or make them hot will take about 2 hours.
But yeah, these AA rechargeable batteries, even though not made by Panasonic, are completely fine.
Ceejay (08/12/2007)
Thanks again Matt,
Now am very leary about this camera or any camera that uses rechargeable batteries. Like I mentioned in my first question, I had nothing by big problems with my Sony camera and I had their AA 2500 mAh rechargeable batteries (as per your first link) as well.
reply to this comment
Now am very leary about this camera or any camera that uses rechargeable batteries. Like I mentioned in my first question, I had nothing by big problems with my Sony camera and I had their AA 2500 mAh rechargeable batteries (as per your first link) as well.
Matt (08/12/2007)
I'm a big proponent of ultra-compacts or larger cameras. There are very few advantages to a compact camera over an ultra-compact, and the size difference between a compact and larger camera still requires a "doesn't-fit-in-your-pocket" mentality.
That being said, 2500mAh rechargeable batteries will do the trick with your A630, should you choose to keep it. You'll get over 200 pictures on a charge. If you end up taking it back under the "doesn't-hold-its-charge-like-advertised" complaint, there are plenty of awesome cameras with lithium-ion batteries or the like.
reply to this comment
That being said, 2500mAh rechargeable batteries will do the trick with your A630, should you choose to keep it. You'll get over 200 pictures on a charge. If you end up taking it back under the "doesn't-hold-its-charge-like-advertised" complaint, there are plenty of awesome cameras with lithium-ion batteries or the like.
ND (08/22/2007)
My canon A570 IS has the same low battery indication problem after about 40-50 shots using Uniross 2100mAh rechargeables...what do you advice??should I go for 2700 mAh batteries,and whether I can use 2700s with powershot A570?...Moreover would my uniross mini charger I am using for 2100s can charge 2700s or would I have to buy a new charger....If so plz suggest some good 2700mAh battery+charger combination.
Thanx
reply to this comment
Thanx
Matt (08/22/2007)
2700 mAh NiMH batteries will work with your A570IS, and should net you around 300 pictures.
I'm not sure about the "uniross mini charger...for 2100s" you're referring to. But as for battery chargers, I've personally had a good experience with this one: amazon.com/Rayovac-Universa... bulky, because it's universal and can hold 8 AA batteries at a time. But it's a nice slow recharge, allowing you to recharge batteries seemingly forever. You don't have to worry about taking the batteries on time to avoid them getting hot. And the charger will charge batteries until capacity. I myself bought Sony 2,500 mAh batteries and haven't had a problem with those, either. But Energize, Sony and Rayovac are all good rechargable battery brands.
Some examples: amazon.com/Rechargeable-Bat... $20 for Canon brand.
I'd get 2 packs of these instead, personally. Especially if you end up getting (or have, and it works) a 4-battery charger: amazon.com/Energizer-NH15BP...
reply to this comment
I'm not sure about the "uniross mini charger...for 2100s" you're referring to. But as for battery chargers, I've personally had a good experience with this one: amazon.com/Rayovac-Universa... bulky, because it's universal and can hold 8 AA batteries at a time. But it's a nice slow recharge, allowing you to recharge batteries seemingly forever. You don't have to worry about taking the batteries on time to avoid them getting hot. And the charger will charge batteries until capacity. I myself bought Sony 2,500 mAh batteries and haven't had a problem with those, either. But Energize, Sony and Rayovac are all good rechargable battery brands.
Some examples: amazon.com/Rechargeable-Bat... $20 for Canon brand.
I'd get 2 packs of these instead, personally. Especially if you end up getting (or have, and it works) a 4-battery charger: amazon.com/Energizer-NH15BP...
BHUVNESH2009 (01/29/2009)
My canon A590 IS has the same low battery indication problem after about 25-30 shots using Uniross 2100mAh rechargeables Batteries what do you advice??should I go for 2500 mAh or 2700 mAh batteries,and whether I can use 2500s or 2700s with powershot A590?...Moreover would my uniross mini charger I am using for 2100s can charge 2500s or 2700s or would I have to buy a new charger....If so plz suggest some good 2500 mAh or 2700mAh battery+charger combination.
Thanx
Also Will you tell me how many pictures i will take with 2500 mAh or 2700 mAh rechargable battery with my Canon A590 IS Digital Camera
If possible please give me answer on my mail id bhuvnesh.jsai@gmail.com
reply to this comment
Thanx
Also Will you tell me how many pictures i will take with 2500 mAh or 2700 mAh rechargable battery with my Canon A590 IS Digital Camera
If possible please give me answer on my mail id bhuvnesh.jsai@gmail.com
will the a630 power shot support a 2gb sd card? (scubadiver — 08/05/2007)
after buying the 2gb card i found this waring inside the package.
some sd readers and camers may not ssupport 2gb or higher capacity cards. contact manufactor of target product.
this is a 2gb lexar sd card.
reply to this comment
some sd readers and camers may not ssupport 2gb or higher capacity cards. contact manufactor of target product.
this is a 2gb lexar sd card.
bukit97 (08/05/2007)
Yes A630 supports 2 gig card.
The warning is meant for older models with low resolution sensors.
reply to this comment
The warning is meant for older models with low resolution sensors.
pgotowko (08/06/2007)
I have installed a 2gig SanDisk card and have not had any problem is works.
reply to this comment
robert stovall (08/08/2007)
thanks for your help. i"m new to digital camers, this is my first one.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (08/17/2007)
I have installed a 2GB Sandisk Extreme II and haven't any kind of problems.
reply to this comment
Advice on buying additional memory and rechargeable batteries (ccrosner — 08/03/2007)
Any advice on what rechargeable battery and memory card to buy for my new Canon A630?
reply to this comment
Steelerqueen (08/03/2007)
The fastest one you can afford up to a 4 gb. AT least 2700 BAtteries
reply to this comment
bukit97 (08/03/2007)
Canon A630 uses SD memory card and AA rechargeable batteries.
For memory cards, although the camera will accept 4gig cards, 2 gig will be more than sufficient for normal circumstance because at 8 meg per picture, a 2 gig card can take 525 pictures, more than enough for a single event.
So if you buy 2 pieces, there will be no worries for any holidays.
for if anything goes wrong with a card during a holiday trip, you still have a spare card to save the days. If nothing goes wrong, you will have the luxury of 1000 over pictures to take home.
For rechargeable batteries, I would go for a high capacity Ni MH rechargeable like 2600 mAh GP battery or 2500mAh Energizer battery.
<a href="gpbatteries.com/html/produc... location</a> tells you more about the batteries that you will need for digital cameras and if you want to go deeper into the subject, you can log on to <a href="energizer.com/products/faq.... site</a>
reply to this comment
For memory cards, although the camera will accept 4gig cards, 2 gig will be more than sufficient for normal circumstance because at 8 meg per picture, a 2 gig card can take 525 pictures, more than enough for a single event.
So if you buy 2 pieces, there will be no worries for any holidays.
for if anything goes wrong with a card during a holiday trip, you still have a spare card to save the days. If nothing goes wrong, you will have the luxury of 1000 over pictures to take home.
For rechargeable batteries, I would go for a high capacity Ni MH rechargeable like 2600 mAh GP battery or 2500mAh Energizer battery.
<a href="gpbatteries.com/html/produc... location</a> tells you more about the batteries that you will need for digital cameras and if you want to go deeper into the subject, you can log on to <a href="energizer.com/products/faq.... site</a>
Can anyone recommend any books or websites on using the various features of the A630, the manuals that come with the camera are really confusing? (smk1957 — 07/31/2007)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (08/01/2007)
They're not exactly designed to function as manuals, but there are a few review sites that I find to be super-helpful. They go into the various functions, buttons & menus of the cameras in detail. Here are some good ones:
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
reply to this comment
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
Brenda Paro (08/01/2007)
And one more, since I can't put that many links in one post without getting flagged for spam:
steves-digicams.com/2006_re... (great one!)
reply to this comment
steves-digicams.com/2006_re... (great one!)
One of my Most important factors in getting a new Camera is lag time between photos. How does this Camera Do. I currently have an Olympus C750 . (Steelerqueen — 07/26/2007)
With my current camera there is such a lag time between when the shutter takes the picture and when I click the photo. Also in between photos. I am looking for a camera that does not have a bigt delay between pushing the Button and getting the photo. Also concerned with the time between photos. I alaso wanty a small size camera 8 megs or better to carry in my purse.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/27/2007)
Well if shutter lag is a deal breaker, then you should be looking for an SLR, where shutter lag is non existent.
However, in point and shoots it is getting better. MUCH better. Today, most cameras have a shutter lag of 0.3 second or under. And the A630 consistently gets rated highly for it's quick reaction shutter. But there still is a very slight lag. and the longer the lens range on your camera, the longer the lag.
The good news is that Canon and other manufacturers are about to put the same chips they use in the DSLRS into their point and shoots to address the shutter lag issue. So if you can wait a tad longer, you will enjoy instant shutter reaction with a point and shoot down the road.
Until then, there's a little trick to make take the lag down to as fast as .1 sec. It's what what the pros do.
Frame your shot and press the shutter button halfway down.
(this allows the camera time to focus lock)
Now re-frame your shot and wait for the action to occur.
At the right time, press the shutter button the rest of the way down.
That gives you an effective shutter lag of under 0.1 second.
reply to this comment
However, in point and shoots it is getting better. MUCH better. Today, most cameras have a shutter lag of 0.3 second or under. And the A630 consistently gets rated highly for it's quick reaction shutter. But there still is a very slight lag. and the longer the lens range on your camera, the longer the lag.
The good news is that Canon and other manufacturers are about to put the same chips they use in the DSLRS into their point and shoots to address the shutter lag issue. So if you can wait a tad longer, you will enjoy instant shutter reaction with a point and shoot down the road.
Until then, there's a little trick to make take the lag down to as fast as .1 sec. It's what what the pros do.
Frame your shot and press the shutter button halfway down.
(this allows the camera time to focus lock)
Now re-frame your shot and wait for the action to occur.
At the right time, press the shutter button the rest of the way down.
That gives you an effective shutter lag of under 0.1 second.
Kelly (08/14/2007)
Hi, this camera takes 4 AA's so it adds to the weight of the camera. Thus, it will weight your purse down. I carry a larger purse cause my kids are always handing me something, its a bulkier camera but it will fit. I was quite surprised with the performance of the camera. Hardly any lag what so ever between shots. Even with flash, it was ready to go. I am very happy with my A630. I was test driving other Canon's that only took 2 AA's before I decided on the A630. There is a big difference in power. This camera takes beautiful clear pictures. Very crisp, not somewhat fuzzy like some others I've tried. The swival screen comes in handy when you just toss it in your purse. You don't have to worry about the screen getting scratched. But for camera lag between pictures, hardy none. Camera has enough power to keep on clickin'. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
which camera is the best for taking pictures in a very low light place and has image stabilization (anlalic23 — 07/16/2007)
I have a Canon A620 7.1 MP. I took pictures in a very low light place with a night shot mode or night scene and still comes up dark pictures. I thought Olympus Stylus 1000 is good camera with 10.0 MP with bright captures technology. When I read the reviews in it. Is not very good camera. Which camera is the best for taking in a very low light place and has face detection just like in Canon, image stabilization, and not too bulky and also with 9 or 10.0 MP cause I already have 7.1 MP. And also with 4 or 5 optical zoom. And not too expensive. I need to buy a new camera cause i just change batteries and only one day. And now it says low batt. Do cameras with 9 or 10 MP have a 4.0 optical zoom and not too bulky. And all around camera, Or just the 8 MP carries 4X optical zoom. Do you think it's going make any difference on 9 or 10 MP with 3x optical zoom or 8 MP with 4 x optical zoom. And which one do you prefer?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/26/2007)
First off, let's look at your A620. You may want to try resetting the camera. Sometimes when a camera loads in it's firmware, settings can get corrupted or not load properly. This can cause the camera to think the batteries are low when they aren't. If a reset doesn't clear the issue, then I'd try cleaning the contacts with a pencil eraser. They could be dirty and causing less power to get to the contacts.
Where do you get your batteries? Often, when you purchase batteries in bulk, it isn't uncommon that some or many of them are near dead or worse. Batteries bought in bulk tend to have a long turnover and such, can lose much of their battery power before they are used. And many batteries such as AAs are general purpose batteries and are not designed for the high energy use of digital cameras and the flashes they trigger. As such, I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
At the very least, make sure you are using Alkalines.
Now, why am I spending so much time on troubleshooting your A620? Because it's still a good camera and you won't really see that much difference between a 7.1mp camera and a 10Mp camera for pictures 8x10 and below.
As for the dark pictures, have you tried using the presets? Do you have high expectations of a point and shoot flash? understand that a point and shoot flash has a limited range - certainly no more than 20 feet and I'd even say less than that. It's primarily designed for portrait and group settings where you're taking pictures to get faces. Capturing action outside of that range and you will end up with darker pictures.
Using the night presets will help alot. And shooting at ISo400 for night shots will expand the light range without causing too much noise in the shot. It may be that relying on Auto is not where you want to be for that.
But if you really want a change, the A620 It has been replaced by the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both highly rated successors with 8 and 10 megapixels respectively.
reply to this comment
Where do you get your batteries? Often, when you purchase batteries in bulk, it isn't uncommon that some or many of them are near dead or worse. Batteries bought in bulk tend to have a long turnover and such, can lose much of their battery power before they are used. And many batteries such as AAs are general purpose batteries and are not designed for the high energy use of digital cameras and the flashes they trigger. As such, I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
At the very least, make sure you are using Alkalines.
Now, why am I spending so much time on troubleshooting your A620? Because it's still a good camera and you won't really see that much difference between a 7.1mp camera and a 10Mp camera for pictures 8x10 and below.
As for the dark pictures, have you tried using the presets? Do you have high expectations of a point and shoot flash? understand that a point and shoot flash has a limited range - certainly no more than 20 feet and I'd even say less than that. It's primarily designed for portrait and group settings where you're taking pictures to get faces. Capturing action outside of that range and you will end up with darker pictures.
Using the night presets will help alot. And shooting at ISo400 for night shots will expand the light range without causing too much noise in the shot. It may be that relying on Auto is not where you want to be for that.
But if you really want a change, the A620 It has been replaced by the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both highly rated successors with 8 and 10 megapixels respectively.
Problems with direct transfer of images to computer (mccalamas — 07/15/2007)
I have a Canon Powershot A630 that I consistently have trouble with the direct transfer of images. I have downloaded the software and sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
Generally, I will get 3 or 4 images to transfer and then it locks up. After that, it is a lost cause and won't even recognize my camera. HELP!
reply to this comment
Generally, I will get 3 or 4 images to transfer and then it locks up. After that, it is a lost cause and won't even recognize my camera. HELP!
bukit97 (07/15/2007)
If you are using XP, it probably means you have to re-install the OS, and if you are using Win 2000, then you need to re-install the driver.
I would do it the simple way by using a card reader. An SD card reader would be around $10-$15 and Win 2000 or Win XP will recognize it instantly. The rest is just copy and paste.
Give it a try and you will never be troubled by the download problem again.
reply to this comment
I would do it the simple way by using a card reader. An SD card reader would be around $10-$15 and Win 2000 or Win XP will recognize it instantly. The rest is just copy and paste.
Give it a try and you will never be troubled by the download problem again.
I get a flashing flash symbol on the screen and flash does not work. Why? (Atousa — 07/14/2007)
This is on the Canon Powershot A630. I get a flashing flash symbol in the screen and the flash wont work. It will not take a picture at all! When you press down the picture taking button (sorry dont know technical term) it will not take a picture and the flash indicator will flash. And no picture taken. If we turn the flash off...it will take a picture. It will do this on all modes. What is wrong?? I have 3 kids and take lots and lots of pictures and I need my flash to work! Hope you all can help
thanks
reply to this comment
thanks
by James DeRuvo (07/25/2007)
Often times you're in light situations that confuse the auto settings of the camera. Dark enough to warrant a flash but it isn't really needed. I bet if you set it for "fill flash," it'll shoot just like if you took the camera off. In fact, the nice thing about using the fill flash is that it will not only catch those kids in action, but it will also make them "pop" in the picture.
Also make sure your batteries are fresh. The older the batteries or the weaker they become, the longer the flash recovery and sometimes the batteries get to the point that they can't power the flash and the camera as well. So it won't take.
Having said that, it depending on how often you use it, it could just need a service.
reply to this comment
Also make sure your batteries are fresh. The older the batteries or the weaker they become, the longer the flash recovery and sometimes the batteries get to the point that they can't power the flash and the camera as well. So it won't take.
Having said that, it depending on how often you use it, it could just need a service.
Atousa (07/26/2007)
It will do the flashing thing even in bright daylight when no flash is needed, but I have it in Auto. Also it will do this for a day or so and then I will pick it up and use it again in a couple days...and the flash works just fine. The batteries are fresh rechargables. I thought the batteries were the problem so I charged them and it still did it. I will try the fill flash (never heard of it). I will look at the manual and let you know if this helps.
thanks
reply to this comment
thanks
by James DeRuvo (07/26/2007)
While you're looking in the manual, you may want to see how to do a camera reset. If you can reset the camera, it may fix the problem. Sometimes, the firmware settings can get corrupted and resetting the camera will clear it up.
reply to this comment
VidCast (12/24/2007)
Canon SD550.
I am having a problem with the flash not working.
When I try to take a photo (single) the flash symbol will appear (there is a orange light that lights up) flash a couple times and then says to change the battery pack. I've charged it until the green light shows on the charger and bought a 2nd battery that is fully charged with the same outcome. I still have the box, manuals (except the BASIC manual) so if you could help me or direct me to a website where I could download it or read it on line, I would be very happy.
Thank You
reply to this comment
I am having a problem with the flash not working.
When I try to take a photo (single) the flash symbol will appear (there is a orange light that lights up) flash a couple times and then says to change the battery pack. I've charged it until the green light shows on the charger and bought a 2nd battery that is fully charged with the same outcome. I still have the box, manuals (except the BASIC manual) so if you could help me or direct me to a website where I could download it or read it on line, I would be very happy.
Thank You
Jab (01/17/2008)
A630.
Same problem here, my camera started doing the same thing with the Flash icon blinking and not allowing me to take any pictures. Tried as well to factory reset, but no difference.
Perhaps a firmware reset would do the trick. Does anyone know how to do this?
reply to this comment
Same problem here, my camera started doing the same thing with the Flash icon blinking and not allowing me to take any pictures. Tried as well to factory reset, but no difference.
Perhaps a firmware reset would do the trick. Does anyone know how to do this?
Kate (03/17/2008)
same problem here. And I'm past my warranty...
reply to this comment
Deb (03/26/2008)
I have the same problem with my A630. Also past warranty, although I sent it to Canon before the warranty was out and they said they fixed it but they didn't. Mine does the same thing another person posted, some days it works fine other days it doesn't. Really makes me mad. None of that reset stuff works. I think Canon should recall the cameras.
reply to this comment
liszt (04/01/2008)
Same problem here, what shall I do?
What is a "fill flash" and how can I set it?
reply to this comment
What is a "fill flash" and how can I set it?
Mark (04/02/2008)
Exact same problem here with my SD%%). I have tried three fully charged batteries including a new one I bought today. Are there any solutions other than sending it to Cannon and giving them their $125+ ?
reply to this comment
Deb (04/02/2008)
Canon needs to recall this camera. There are way too many people with the same problem.
reply to this comment
Jab (04/10/2008)
I did manage to resolve mine in the end.
I took it to a Camera shop, and they made the request & sent it to Canon. Cost me £25 though for the service.
According to Canon (what a joke). There was no problem with the camera in the 1st place!!
This is definitely not the case, since I showed all the symptoms to the shopkeeper.
Anyway, my camera is now working. Not sure for how long though!!
I'm quite frankly dissapointed with how Canon are dealing with this. Thinking I'm that stupid & telling me to read the manual. lol!
In my opinion, they probably reflashed the firmware on my camera, which is a straight forward procedure. Wish the firmware was available for download though, could have done it myself & save the money.
I would probably recommend that you try and INSIST with canon technical support!
And complain on forums as well like dpreview.com/
They can't just keep ignoring their customers!!
Having said that, I love this camera. I've gradually learnt a lot from it.
Would I still recommend canon cameras?! Yes, so long as you don't have to deal with their support! Quite frankly a joke!!
And yes, they
reply to this comment
I took it to a Camera shop, and they made the request & sent it to Canon. Cost me £25 though for the service.
According to Canon (what a joke). There was no problem with the camera in the 1st place!!
This is definitely not the case, since I showed all the symptoms to the shopkeeper.
Anyway, my camera is now working. Not sure for how long though!!
I'm quite frankly dissapointed with how Canon are dealing with this. Thinking I'm that stupid & telling me to read the manual. lol!
In my opinion, they probably reflashed the firmware on my camera, which is a straight forward procedure. Wish the firmware was available for download though, could have done it myself & save the money.
I would probably recommend that you try and INSIST with canon technical support!
And complain on forums as well like dpreview.com/
They can't just keep ignoring their customers!!
Having said that, I love this camera. I've gradually learnt a lot from it.
Would I still recommend canon cameras?! Yes, so long as you don't have to deal with their support! Quite frankly a joke!!
And yes, they
Jab (04/11/2008)
mmmm. wordcount problem!!
I was saying, yes, they should definitely make a recall on this model. But given it's more than a year old, i doubt they'll do it.
reply to this comment
I was saying, yes, they should definitely make a recall on this model. But given it's more than a year old, i doubt they'll do it.
Lynn (04/15/2008)
I have the same problem - what is the easiet way to call Canon - my camera will take photos, just no flash, ever.
reply to this comment
Jab (04/16/2008)
Hi Lynn,
You could try from this link. canon.co.uk/Support/index.a... never know, someone else more helpful might pick up your e-mail.
In my case i took it to small specialist camera shop.
Good luck.
reply to this comment
You could try from this link. canon.co.uk/Support/index.a... never know, someone else more helpful might pick up your e-mail.
In my case i took it to small specialist camera shop.
Good luck.
Jab (04/17/2008)
I have raised this issue, again, with Canon. It seems this has been passed on to their level2 support. Hopefully they'll come back with something positive. I'm just hoping though that others users having the same problem raised the issue as well. Otherwise this won't go far.
Will keep posted once, (if) i do get an update.
reply to this comment
Will keep posted once, (if) i do get an update.
make (04/24/2008)
I got the same problem in my A630. Flash stop working after 12 months.
reply to this comment
Ro (04/25/2008)
Same problem here. Unfortunately, I already got the A630 as a free replacement for my old A70 which had this problem:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... wonder if I can get a new one again...?
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... wonder if I can get a new one again...?
Liszt (05/03/2008)
I have the same problem, (as I wrote before) I tried to shake the camera (one harsh-but-small shake) and then the flash worked.
I tried this several times so far and it seems that its helping.
I know its not a perfect solution, but its the cheapest! :)
Can you try that out as well and tell if it works for you too?
reply to this comment
I tried this several times so far and it seems that its helping.
I know its not a perfect solution, but its the cheapest! :)
Can you try that out as well and tell if it works for you too?
Spud (05/25/2008)
Same problem - shaking the camera resolved it (for now).
Looks like I'll be budgeting for a new camera in the near future...
reply to this comment
Looks like I'll be budgeting for a new camera in the near future...
Kevin (06/10/2008)
This happened to my Powershot SD870.
I contacted technical service and they informed me that my flash was broken.
I will be sending it in soon.
reply to this comment
I contacted technical service and they informed me that my flash was broken.
I will be sending it in soon.
Martha (06/27/2008)
I'm having the same problem. I've had my A630 for 1.5 years. I love it... well loved it.
I haven't contacted Canon or taken it to a camera shop yet. I was hoping to get a solution myself first. Will try to reset & shake it.
Seems like a pretty common problem. Canon, are you listening?
Let me know when they choose to recall them.
reply to this comment
I haven't contacted Canon or taken it to a camera shop yet. I was hoping to get a solution myself first. Will try to reset & shake it.
Seems like a pretty common problem. Canon, are you listening?
Let me know when they choose to recall them.
Jab (07/03/2008)
Hi Martha,
Unfortunately, Canon don't seem to be listening! I've contacted, and they seem to deny that there is any problem with this model (A630). The technician ask me to reply to him if I had any further query, but their e-mail system doesn't take incoming e-mail, so I have to go through their ticketing system again. It seems it becomes a "shake & shoot" for the meantime..
As for a recall, i think that will be unlikely, as it seems to happen pass the 1yr warranty.
I will keep posted if I do get somewhere with them.
reply to this comment
Unfortunately, Canon don't seem to be listening! I've contacted, and they seem to deny that there is any problem with this model (A630). The technician ask me to reply to him if I had any further query, but their e-mail system doesn't take incoming e-mail, so I have to go through their ticketing system again. It seems it becomes a "shake & shoot" for the meantime..
As for a recall, i think that will be unlikely, as it seems to happen pass the 1yr warranty.
I will keep posted if I do get somewhere with them.
Sine (07/16/2008)
I have had this same problem for about a year with my A550, believe it or not I just wacked it on the table a few times and its fixed!!!
reply to this comment
Itay (07/18/2008)
It is sad to say but after reading all the thread, the solution that worked for me was to hit the camera :-)
Working for now.
Thanks
reply to this comment
Working for now.
Thanks
jenn (07/19/2008)
I have the exact same problem. I am out of warranty. Looks like i'll be shopping for another camera AGAIN!!!
reply to this comment
Nix (07/27/2008)
I discovered the same problem with our IXUS 750 model last night.
Played around with settings and then it just shut off and displayed a message saying "Change The Battery Pack"
Recharged the battery pack and tried again.
Still the same error.
Will try the shaking / hitting / banging on table solution.
reply to this comment
Played around with settings and then it just shut off and displayed a message saying "Change The Battery Pack"
Recharged the battery pack and tried again.
Still the same error.
Will try the shaking / hitting / banging on table solution.
Nix (07/27/2008)
P.S. I didn't get the low battery indicator before the "Change The Battery Pack" message so I don't believe the battery is the problem.
Maybe the flash bulb just works it way lose over time or something and the shaking / tapping sets it back into place ??
reply to this comment
Maybe the flash bulb just works it way lose over time or something and the shaking / tapping sets it back into place ??
nick.blakeney@ozemail.com.au (07/30/2008)
Nothing worked, shaking vigorously, banging on table, dropping on floor from a short distance.
I'm thinking the change the battery pack messgage is displayed as the faulty flash is shorting out or something.
My parents have the exact same camera, so I might try out their battery to see if it's a battery issue.
I'm guessing I'll be off to the repair shop.
Ironically I went to the Australian Canon webiste and put in my postcode and it listed one in the very next suburb plus a couple of others both still reasonably close.
The next day I tried the postcode of my work and it listed the same 3.
I tried my parents postcode who are a good 85km from where I live and it listed the same 3.
I tried a postcode out in the sticks and this time it only came up with the head office for my state.
So it seems I'm lucky to have an authorised repairer in the next suburb to where I live.
reply to this comment
I'm thinking the change the battery pack messgage is displayed as the faulty flash is shorting out or something.
My parents have the exact same camera, so I might try out their battery to see if it's a battery issue.
I'm guessing I'll be off to the repair shop.
Ironically I went to the Australian Canon webiste and put in my postcode and it listed one in the very next suburb plus a couple of others both still reasonably close.
The next day I tried the postcode of my work and it listed the same 3.
I tried my parents postcode who are a good 85km from where I live and it listed the same 3.
I tried a postcode out in the sticks and this time it only came up with the head office for my state.
So it seems I'm lucky to have an authorised repairer in the next suburb to where I live.
angie (07/30/2008)
I have the A630 and this just happened to me last night [while I was saying goodbye to a dear friend and trying to take one last photo with him]. Not happy. I never bought the extended warranty because Amazon provided a review of the warranty offer and everyone advised against it. I just tried knocking it on my desk and it fixed the problem for the moment.
I really loved this camera and I'm so sad it did this [almost a year to the day after I bought it]. I'm cursed...you should see how HP screwed me with my laptop...
Anyway, please let me know if anyone has a more long-term solution/Canon steps up to fix this. Thank you.
reply to this comment
I really loved this camera and I'm so sad it did this [almost a year to the day after I bought it]. I'm cursed...you should see how HP screwed me with my laptop...
Anyway, please let me know if anyone has a more long-term solution/Canon steps up to fix this. Thank you.
Nix (07/30/2008)
Hey angie, where did you knock it ie on the camera, maybe I'm knocking mine in the wrong spot.
Although having said that, I know our 4 year old likes to wander around with the camera taking shots, but has always been told he needs to have the strap round his wrist, but I notice last night that there are some scratches on the case just above the flash.
Hmmm...
reply to this comment
Although having said that, I know our 4 year old likes to wander around with the camera taking shots, but has always been told he needs to have the strap round his wrist, but I notice last night that there are some scratches on the case just above the flash.
Hmmm...
Lynn (07/30/2008)
I had a similar problem - all of the sudden at Disney the flash just stopped working - still took photos - falsh light lit but no flash - I send it to a camera shop and he replaced the flash board and it is working just fine now - of course it cost me $125 but I had only had it a year.
reply to this comment
Nix (08/04/2008)
Went to the repair shop and the guys says it needs a new flash that will cost me AU$120
reply to this comment
KT (08/11/2008)
Canon Powershot A630. I had the same problem and tapping the base of the camera on a table worked... for now. I hope Canon are reading this!
reply to this comment
Sine (08/11/2008)
well it was only a temporary fix, I tried the same thing and it broke, I went back to a Sony cybershot, I had one before and its still works 6 years on, will never buy a canon again...
reply to this comment
Nix (08/11/2008)
Just further to my last comment.
I asked the guy at the repair shop if it was a common problem and he said that it wasn't.
I asked what might have caused it and he said that the circuitry in the camera is pretty high voltage and that if something is going to get zapped then it is likely to be the flash.
Doesn't explain why some people have had luck tapping, banging, shaking their cameras, but at least those people have saved them self $100+
reply to this comment
I asked the guy at the repair shop if it was a common problem and he said that it wasn't.
I asked what might have caused it and he said that the circuitry in the camera is pretty high voltage and that if something is going to get zapped then it is likely to be the flash.
Doesn't explain why some people have had luck tapping, banging, shaking their cameras, but at least those people have saved them self $100+
j9riter (08/23/2008)
I'm having the same trouble with my 630. Anyone have a good link to complain to Canon about it??
reply to this comment
AJ (09/10/2008)
Same problem for me too. The flash just refused to ...umm... flash(!).
This problem had cropped up once before too. Back then, it also gave the "Change the Batteries" message. So I did just that and the problem seemed to go away. But 3 weeks after I started using the new batteries, the flash stopped functioning all over again. After reading all the posts here, I tried resetting the setting, and it worked!
Hopefully, I won't have to use the Bang-and-Shoot method mentioned here, because my camera already has a hairline fracture from a fall long ago and banging it again wouldn't be just a great idea.
reply to this comment
This problem had cropped up once before too. Back then, it also gave the "Change the Batteries" message. So I did just that and the problem seemed to go away. But 3 weeks after I started using the new batteries, the flash stopped functioning all over again. After reading all the posts here, I tried resetting the setting, and it worked!
Hopefully, I won't have to use the Bang-and-Shoot method mentioned here, because my camera already has a hairline fracture from a fall long ago and banging it again wouldn't be just a great idea.
Lilt (09/16/2008)
I started experiencing similar problems with my A550 recently....gave it a smack and bingo it worked again! I'm thinking of swapping it for another camera coz i need my camera for work and can't afford to have it suddenly stop working. It's a shame coz otherwise the camera was pretty good and reliable.
reply to this comment
Same problem with A540 - guntle bang solved it (Manoj — 04/03/2010)
I had same problem (flashing flash symbol) and was looking for more info. I didnt know what it means. Most folks on this thread suggested a guntle bang or a tap around flash, and WOW, it worked like a magic for me. Seems to be working now, but I have had a same flash related problem with my EOS 500 SLR too. Wish I would have read this tread before !!
reply to this comment
Hugo (10/08/2008)
Yeow! New batteries didn't work. Cleaning the batteries and the contacts didn't work. Reset didn't work. But smacking the camera on a pile of papers on a table worked. Luckily this is a work camera and not something that I paid for. It has survived a few years in rough conditions, so I hope it keeps going.
reply to this comment
Dan C. (10/20/2008)
Folks - I've tried everything!
New rechargable batteries- twice, new battery charger, reset camera,cleaned it, new SD card!
Finally, after contacting Canon service on my 10 month old camera they said send it in and we'll repair it. Well after two weeks they said "the problem has been identified", please remitt $98.00 so you can have your camera back!
I asked for the issue to be escalated due to so many other folks having same issue or keep the camera and I'll go back to a Nikon! I will NOT pay nearly half the cost of a new A630 to cover their product deficiency!
This is why class actions are taken up! Manufacturers not standing by their products and making profit off the repairs!
reply to this comment
New rechargable batteries- twice, new battery charger, reset camera,cleaned it, new SD card!
Finally, after contacting Canon service on my 10 month old camera they said send it in and we'll repair it. Well after two weeks they said "the problem has been identified", please remitt $98.00 so you can have your camera back!
I asked for the issue to be escalated due to so many other folks having same issue or keep the camera and I'll go back to a Nikon! I will NOT pay nearly half the cost of a new A630 to cover their product deficiency!
This is why class actions are taken up! Manufacturers not standing by their products and making profit off the repairs!
angie (10/20/2008)
I'm the same Angie from July 30, 2008: Nix, I knocked it on the corner, right where the Batteries/SD Card are inserted.
Don't want to jinx myself but......I have to say it: I haven't had any issues since the second or third time I had to knock it on something. Now I expect it to die within the next week.
If anyone has info on the prospect Canon class action suit, please let us know!
reply to this comment
Don't want to jinx myself but......I have to say it: I haven't had any issues since the second or third time I had to knock it on something. Now I expect it to die within the next week.
If anyone has info on the prospect Canon class action suit, please let us know!
Deb (10/20/2008)
Well I also hit mine on the table and it has worked fine since then. I also sent mine back to Cannon, prior to finding this website and knocking it on the table. They also tried to charge me $98.00 and I basically refused and had a fit on them. They finally sent it back and didn't charge me. It worked for awhile but then started doing the same thing again. I knew there was no way they were going to fix it for me again. So my suggestion to everyone........beat it on the table. Don't worry you don't have to do it very hard and it will work fine !!
reply to this comment
Nix (10/20/2008)
Thanks Angie, I ended up getting it fixed for A$120.
When the guy quoted us that price I wasn't sure, but the guy said the camera was worth getting repaired.
admittedly it cost me A$499 so....
My mum has the same camera and so far hers has had no problem.
reply to this comment
When the guy quoted us that price I wasn't sure, but the guy said the camera was worth getting repaired.
admittedly it cost me A$499 so....
My mum has the same camera and so far hers has had no problem.
Beth (11/04/2008)
Wow - I had the same problem - flash wouldn't work on either setting but if I turned it off, it would snap a picture. When it first happened a couple weeks ago I was able to get the flash to work if I turned the flash off, took a picture and then turned the flash on again. At my nephew's birthday party, I couldn't get it to work at all. So I just tried the hitting it on the desk and it worked! I love this camera and I am not happy that Canon isn't addressing the problem since it seems this is not a new issue.
reply to this comment
Dan C. (11/04/2008)
Hey folks!
Canon is a very large Corporation that simply doesn't care about our "little" problem on the A630 camera!
My problem was reported to Canon 4 months after I bought the unit and was documented on their tech call log! However, even though the initial report was well within the warranty period, I sent the camera in 1 month after the warranty period. The rather curt service lady said too late, too bad! This after I explained trying to change out batteries and chargers, reset camera, etc...
The agent was very prepared to sell me some other refurbished camera model at $129.00. So my choice was to pay $98.00 to fix their defect or buy another piece of unknown hardware!
As I mentioned in previous post, I just had them send my camera back without repair. Guess what? After all the reports of tappimg the camera on a table - it started to work again when I tapped it! However, I have had to bang the camera several times more to get it to work after it stopped flashing again!!!
I mentioned all of us out here with this same problem on the world wide web and their response was "we can't answer for disgruntled consumers on some crazy blog". Can you believe that?! So we are just crazy consumers and they are big daddy canon!
Please consider boycotting canon products - all of them! Printers, cameras, copiers, etc... I'm going back to Nikon the camera I had before the A630 that got stolen from my car!
The only message we can give them is - no sales! That is what big pushy poor customer service companies understand! Maybe someday they will change their policies and start caring about their little customers again!
reply to this comment
Canon is a very large Corporation that simply doesn't care about our "little" problem on the A630 camera!
My problem was reported to Canon 4 months after I bought the unit and was documented on their tech call log! However, even though the initial report was well within the warranty period, I sent the camera in 1 month after the warranty period. The rather curt service lady said too late, too bad! This after I explained trying to change out batteries and chargers, reset camera, etc...
The agent was very prepared to sell me some other refurbished camera model at $129.00. So my choice was to pay $98.00 to fix their defect or buy another piece of unknown hardware!
As I mentioned in previous post, I just had them send my camera back without repair. Guess what? After all the reports of tappimg the camera on a table - it started to work again when I tapped it! However, I have had to bang the camera several times more to get it to work after it stopped flashing again!!!
I mentioned all of us out here with this same problem on the world wide web and their response was "we can't answer for disgruntled consumers on some crazy blog". Can you believe that?! So we are just crazy consumers and they are big daddy canon!
Please consider boycotting canon products - all of them! Printers, cameras, copiers, etc... I'm going back to Nikon the camera I had before the A630 that got stolen from my car!
The only message we can give them is - no sales! That is what big pushy poor customer service companies understand! Maybe someday they will change their policies and start caring about their little customers again!
Nix (11/04/2008)
Hey Cannon don't Dis my gruntle !!!
Crazy Blog - hmm I can see a rehashed version of that Axel F hit from Beverly Hills Cop coming.
reply to this comment
Crazy Blog - hmm I can see a rehashed version of that Axel F hit from Beverly Hills Cop coming.
Ryan (11/06/2008)
just give it a strong tap.....it worked for me!
reply to this comment
Patrick (11/28/2008)
I'm glad that I located this forum. My one year old (out of warranty for 4 weeks now) Canon A630 has the same problem. I tapped it on the table top near the battery door and the camera began working once again. I'll be practicing the bang and shoot until the camera finally dies. This is my last Canon, I believe (which is unfortunate as it has taken some beautiful photos).
reply to this comment
Carl (12/21/2008)
Hey Everybody:
I was having the same problem with my Canon A630 and the flash not working properly.
I gave it a sharp rap on the top right corner where the SD card / USB cover is located....and Voila`!!!....ITS NOW WORKING !!!!
Thanks for the suggestion; and I hope my camera keeps working.
:)
reply to this comment
I was having the same problem with my Canon A630 and the flash not working properly.
I gave it a sharp rap on the top right corner where the SD card / USB cover is located....and Voila`!!!....ITS NOW WORKING !!!!
Thanks for the suggestion; and I hope my camera keeps working.
:)
angie (12/21/2008)
Just had to smack mine on the bar again a few nights ago. Not too bad...a good 6 months between knocks. LOL
The embarrassing part is that people were sitting there praising my camera for the swivel screen and I'm like "Uh yeah...*knock knock*...great camera." Just so happens that it happened at another "Going Away"/final goodbye moment with a dear friend. Thank goodness I knew what to do this time.
reply to this comment
The embarrassing part is that people were sitting there praising my camera for the swivel screen and I'm like "Uh yeah...*knock knock*...great camera." Just so happens that it happened at another "Going Away"/final goodbye moment with a dear friend. Thank goodness I knew what to do this time.
Dan C. (12/22/2008)
Hey folks,
After you bang your cameras to pieces and it finally won't work try NIKON! They have better picture, software, focus, and all around better point & shoot cameras! Look at the Nikon Coolpix line of cameras. I'm buying the Coolpix P6000! I had a Coolpix that got stolen before I bought this Canon A630 piece of junk! Canon has great marketing and advertising no doubt. However, their cameras are plagued with little defects and firmware issues and they obviously don't care about you after the sale! The customer support people are rude and don't care about us customers! They live off the name Canon that mattered a few years ago. They hope that heavy continous advertising will get them business. We should show them that our statisfaction is what really matters to maintain the brand name recognition and earn OUR hard earned dollars! Good luck with your Canon cameras!
reply to this comment
After you bang your cameras to pieces and it finally won't work try NIKON! They have better picture, software, focus, and all around better point & shoot cameras! Look at the Nikon Coolpix line of cameras. I'm buying the Coolpix P6000! I had a Coolpix that got stolen before I bought this Canon A630 piece of junk! Canon has great marketing and advertising no doubt. However, their cameras are plagued with little defects and firmware issues and they obviously don't care about you after the sale! The customer support people are rude and don't care about us customers! They live off the name Canon that mattered a few years ago. They hope that heavy continous advertising will get them business. We should show them that our statisfaction is what really matters to maintain the brand name recognition and earn OUR hard earned dollars! Good luck with your Canon cameras!
Tom L (12/26/2008)
I am, sad that that I'm not alone. I love this A630 and just can't handle the flash not working.I've given it a shake - and it works. But, I also tried scripting the firmware and now I'm getting RAW pictures - and that's pretty cool. What a trade-off.
reply to this comment
sblevine (12/28/2008)
I got this answer from over on fixya.com. (Credit to huyhuyhuy.) This fix requires a jeweler's-size phillips screwdriver. It requires removing 3 screws, and shouldn't void the warranty (writer takes no responsiblity for damage).
1. Remove the batteries and memory card.
2. On the side of the camera where the flash it, there is a side panal attached to the camera with 3 screws, 2 on the side, one on the bottom. Remove the screws. (Note that the two screws on the side are different sizes. Be sure to note which hole goes with the larger screw for reassembly.)
3. Once the panel is removed you will be able to see inside the camera through some exposed holes in the casing. In one of these holes at the top is a round capacitor, something which looks like the bottom of a battery. Use a pencil and jiggle the capacitor. This will reseat it into it's normal place.
4. Reassemble the camera and test it. Repeat if necessary.
I suspect the problem we have all been having is because this capacitor is designed to sit tightly against a metal contact (it should have been soldered to the contact). Dropping or banging the camera unseats the capaticor from it's place. The people who have had success fixing the problem by banging the camera, are succeeding in reseating the capacitor, but are in danger of breaking something else.
reply to this comment
1. Remove the batteries and memory card.
2. On the side of the camera where the flash it, there is a side panal attached to the camera with 3 screws, 2 on the side, one on the bottom. Remove the screws. (Note that the two screws on the side are different sizes. Be sure to note which hole goes with the larger screw for reassembly.)
3. Once the panel is removed you will be able to see inside the camera through some exposed holes in the casing. In one of these holes at the top is a round capacitor, something which looks like the bottom of a battery. Use a pencil and jiggle the capacitor. This will reseat it into it's normal place.
4. Reassemble the camera and test it. Repeat if necessary.
I suspect the problem we have all been having is because this capacitor is designed to sit tightly against a metal contact (it should have been soldered to the contact). Dropping or banging the camera unseats the capaticor from it's place. The people who have had success fixing the problem by banging the camera, are succeeding in reseating the capacitor, but are in danger of breaking something else.
JanJL (01/30/2009)
A big THANK YOU to sblevine for digging up the "surgery" solution; worked for me ! Had the blinking flash icon, could not shoot in any mode but NO FLASH. Tried the gentle rapping at first with no success. Opened the side of the camera as described; jiggled the capacitor (no real feeling of reseating or any other snapping into place), closed the camera up and it is working now for at least 48 hours. Received the usual reply from Canon....... clean the contacts, put in fresh batteries, if that does not solve the problem then two alternatives. Refurbished camera for $75 to $125US (funny that the A630/640 is not offered as one of the refurb models) or send in for repair, $79US minimum. My camera is two years old.
reply to this comment
Mark (01/30/2009)
I was excited to read the solution offered by sblevine. However, the advice did not apply to the problem when experienced with the SD550 as there are no access holes under the side cover. I suppose I could disassemble the entire thing and look for the the capacitor but I am a bit nervous about yanking it all apart. Has anyone tried to find the charging capacitor in a SD500?
reply to this comment
Ryan (03/20/2009)
Cool the shaking solution works! I wonder how long until it's broken for good. This is my first canon digital camera and I think if this problem keeps up I'm going to try Sony next time.
reply to this comment
JanJL (03/22/2009)
My A630 problem (flashing flash icon, no flash) came back two weeks later even though I was now much more gently handling my camera, worrying about shaking the capacitor out of position again. This time I moved the capacitor on one direction only after opening up again. Tried to see if the flash was back again without reassembling the end plate. If not, then shift the capacitor at a direction 90 degrees from the first adjustment. Kept this up until I found the capacitor shift direction that solved the problem. Then I cut the end off a tapered, hardwood, toothpick and pushed it into the camera beside the capacitor to try to wedge the capacitor in the flash fix direction. Reassembled the camera and it is still working now a month and a half later.
reply to this comment
Tom L (03/22/2009)
The flash worked for sometime after "jiggling" the A630. However, on it's 2nd birthday almost 2 weeks ago it just totally died. Batteries drained and not even the AC adapter would light up the camera. I was leaving for a trip in two days.I went and bought the Canon 2000 IS at $199 Canadian dollars. It was $49 off.
I love this one. Face recognition, anti-vibration,10 megapixel,6X zoom and with DigicIII it's back to just 2 batteries. And about $75 less than my A630 was.
Goodbye A630 - it's a goner.
reply to this comment
I love this one. Face recognition, anti-vibration,10 megapixel,6X zoom and with DigicIII it's back to just 2 batteries. And about $75 less than my A630 was.
Goodbye A630 - it's a goner.
Caryn (04/09/2009)
I have had the same problem off and on the past year. Usually it just stops working for a period, then i'll leave it alone afew days and its back up. however, the past 3 weeks i've tried to use the flash, and it doesnt go.
i have, while reading this thread, tried every suggestion, and what made it work was a combination of hiting it on my desk and shaking it heavily while jumping around. hopefully that works in the future too.
reply to this comment
i have, while reading this thread, tried every suggestion, and what made it work was a combination of hiting it on my desk and shaking it heavily while jumping around. hopefully that works in the future too.
claytronic (05/19/2009)
sblevine's tip fixed my A630. Just a small wiggle of the capacitor was all that was needed.
reply to this comment
JanJL (05/20/2009)
See my further "repair", posted Mar 22, 2009 if the problem reoccurs. Since my March wedging in of the capacitor, my camera has been working OK. It is carried everyday, including a weekly, very bumpy hike.
reply to this comment
Chac (06/04/2009)
Thanks to Sblevine (Dec 28-08), the method worked fine to me. It is a pity that Canon does not take the responsability. I will buy a Panasonic - Lumix with Leica lens -, no more Canon digital cameras for me.
reply to this comment
Mark (06/04/2009)
I posted several months ago and got no response and thought I would try again. Has anyone found the flash capacitor on the SD550? It is not visible under the cover like on the 630s or 640s.
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
Jennifer (06/21/2009)
I am on vacation and mine started doing the no flash thing last night. I tried shaking and no luck. I was afraid to shake too hard, so I tried a few more times, and it didn't work. Then I got a little frustrated, banged it on my other hand (harder) and said a few choice words -- It worked!!! And I got a good laugh
reply to this comment
popper1101 (06/23/2009)
I have an A640, same symptoms as everyone on here has mentioned (flashing flash symbol and no flash).
Just tried the gentle-wack, and voila...worked.
Will try the more technical solution next time when it happens, but so sad Canon won't fix or resolve this for their customers. Such nice cameras...
Anyhow, reminds me of a prior issue with one of my earlier A series of Canon's that required a "whack" to fix it...am sensing a pattern here. May have to consider another brand, this is my 3rd A series in the past 9 years...come on Canon, help us out.
Pop
reply to this comment
Just tried the gentle-wack, and voila...worked.
Will try the more technical solution next time when it happens, but so sad Canon won't fix or resolve this for their customers. Such nice cameras...
Anyhow, reminds me of a prior issue with one of my earlier A series of Canon's that required a "whack" to fix it...am sensing a pattern here. May have to consider another brand, this is my 3rd A series in the past 9 years...come on Canon, help us out.
Pop
Kelly O (07/24/2009)
i have the same exact problem, and im going to a huge party tommrow. just tried to hit it anaginst the wall and it worked! hopefully i does this to work again! haha
anyone know the best yet decently priced digital slr's? im thinking of buying one!
reply to this comment
anyone know the best yet decently priced digital slr's? im thinking of buying one!
Kyle (07/28/2009)
I can't believe it. For six months I thought I had messed up some setting. I went through the entire manual, basic and advanced and could not find anything that showed where I messed up. Then today while trying to document a leak in a door due to driving rain, I couldn't take the shot. I hope the manufacturer of the door is more interested in maintaining their reputation than Cannon is. After searching the internet looking for a solution, I stumbled on this blog and wow, I fixed the problem by tapping it on the palm of my left hand. I may take it apart later but for now its working. To bad the driving rains that penetrated my door dried up before I could document it.
reply to this comment
Canon Sucker (08/01/2009)
I have gone through the manual, searched the net, gone to Canon online support to help fix my Flashing flash Icon but no flash issue. I read here several people had luck smacking their cameras. This issue has been on again off again for several months on my A550. I had no trouble smacking it against my palm and guess what, yup it's fixed. Canon you got to get with the program, not good Public Relations when hitting the camera is a Prerequisite to taking a picture.
reply to this comment
Chase (08/02/2009)
Well I have been having the same problem with the A630. I loved this camera until the flash/focus stopped working. I just finished reading this thread and took the advice given on here to try and shake the camera. IT WORKED! I guess I am safe for awhile. We will see how it works out. I have had mine for just over 2 years and it just started doing it now. Good luck ya'll.
reply to this comment
JBG (08/17/2009)
I, too, have had this SAME problem regarding the flash not working. I, too, went thru all the settings, etc..all to no avail. Shaking didn't work, but a nice wack on the palm of my other hand did. What a shame that such a great, electronic, high tech device is reduced to a wack on the hand to make it work!! The only problem with this solution is that one might just miss that 'great' shot because the flash didn't work. Are we reduced to wack and shoot???
Thanks to all of you above who figured out and perfected the solution and to sblevine for the surgical solution.
reply to this comment
Thanks to all of you above who figured out and perfected the solution and to sblevine for the surgical solution.
outdoorben (08/18/2009)
This forum was a camera life-saver. I held my A630 in my hand, made a fist and banged it down quite hard onto the door where the memory card goes and it's working!
Shame on Canon if so many people are experiencing this. I've never had a problem with their cameras before (A70, A95 and this one).
reply to this comment
Shame on Canon if so many people are experiencing this. I've never had a problem with their cameras before (A70, A95 and this one).
CameraGuy (08/21/2009)
My flash does not work on the portrait setting. I have a Canon 630A. I use the optional flash as a fill-in for many of my photos. Banging it seemed to fix it. There is no info in the manual on this issue.
reply to this comment
K.Topaz (08/26/2009)
Same problem here. Hitting it with the heel of my hand worked (for now). I love the camera and Canon products in general. I was hoping to eventually get a Rebel XSi, which is obviously a lot more expensive than this P&S. I just hope there aren't any more problems like this.
reply to this comment
paju514 (08/28/2009)
Same issue as well. My A630 was not put through any kind of punishment until i discovered that banging it by the battery/sd card will temporarily fix. Who knows what else is going to break after all that banging. The A630 was supposed to be an upgrade after my a60 was fixed by Canon due to loose wire problem. Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice shame on you. Dissapointed in Canon. May have to go with Nikon if they do not recall this.
reply to this comment
BarryBURBs (09/24/2009)
Another A630 user here with the same problem. Whacking it fixed it! Yay to this forum and boo to canon. I guess when it comes to good customer service, canon can't.
reply to this comment
dgrimmer (10/02/2009)
Same issue with my 2 y/o A630. I used Sblevine's approach, and so far so good. Thanks. I didn't want to say goodbye to this camera, so many good shots!
reply to this comment
tpeck (10/10/2009)
Thanks for all the help with this problem with my canon A630. So, I tried the "bang the camera" trick and i'll be darned..the flash started working! Unbelieveable!! It's kinda like back in the day when you'd hit the side of the tv to make it come in better. All this technology and we are still banging things to make them work.....thanks again for the help.
reply to this comment
Mandinka (10/21/2009)
Liszt..Unbelievable!! Shaking it like crazy actually fixed the flash. Hooray!!! Thank you.......
reply to this comment
ellen (10/21/2009)
I thought you guys were crazy, but it really does work to bang the A630 with your hand
reply to this comment
Claire (10/26/2009)
Another person that went with the bang theory and it worked :)
reply to this comment
gringoloco (10/31/2009)
I may have the same problem with my A630 but here goes. My flash does fire but the photos come out under-exposed. The flash
symbol does blink but the picture is dark. I tried rapping on the side by the batteries but no difference. I thought I had a
"calibrated hand" after working in electronics for 35yrs but no go. The camera is 2-3 yrs old but I like it.
Any ideas?
reply to this comment
symbol does blink but the picture is dark. I tried rapping on the side by the batteries but no difference. I thought I had a
"calibrated hand" after working in electronics for 35yrs but no go. The camera is 2-3 yrs old but I like it.
Any ideas?
Louis (11/06/2009)
I'm with ellen, thought you bangers were nutters. But I can't afford a new camera and had to give it a try. Banged it on my desk at the battery door corner, and voila! Damn thing works now. Had it about 2 1/2 years. Thanks all for proving out the theory.
reply to this comment
amp4716 (11/06/2009)
I have exactly the same issue as gringoloco (Oct 31, 09). Does anyone have any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Erik (11/16/2009)
Can't believe it... I have the A630. Same flash problem -- stopped working. Shook it really hard and good to go. Incredible.
reply to this comment
Toni (11/21/2009)
My A640 had the same problem. Fortunately, sblevine's solution (see his
December 28, 2008 6:40 AM post) worked for me. It's really easy (if you have the screwdriver) and WORKS!! Just press the capacitor a little... And you don't have to shake or hit the camera!
Thanks a lot sblevine! You are my idol!! ;)
reply to this comment
December 28, 2008 6:40 AM post) worked for me. It's really easy (if you have the screwdriver) and WORKS!! Just press the capacitor a little... And you don't have to shake or hit the camera!
Thanks a lot sblevine! You are my idol!! ;)
JanJL (11/21/2009)
Please note all the Canon A630/A640 bangers, see my further "repair", posted Mar 22, 2009 and May 20, 2009 if the problem reoccurs.
Solution to the problem, if periodically recurring, and are not happy with banging the camera all the time and its potential damage. Since my March wedging in of the capacitor, my camera has been working OK; it is now over 6 months. It is carried everyday, including a weekly, very bumpy hike.
reply to this comment
Solution to the problem, if periodically recurring, and are not happy with banging the camera all the time and its potential damage. Since my March wedging in of the capacitor, my camera has been working OK; it is now over 6 months. It is carried everyday, including a weekly, very bumpy hike.
Toni (11/23/2009)
Here ( img22.imageshack.us/img22/4... ) you can see a photo of a Canon A640 with the side panel removed. The yellow circle shows where the capacitor is (only a little part of it can be seen) and the red arrows show the places where you should press. I hope this can help somebody...
I'll try to put the picture below, but I don't know it will work. If not, use the above link.
img22.imageshack.us/img22/4...
reply to this comment
I'll try to put the picture below, but I don't know it will work. If not, use the above link.
img22.imageshack.us/img22/4...
Toni (11/23/2009)
Well, everything went wrong in the above message, but the link is still usable. I'm sorry...
reply to this comment
Dpag135 (12/20/2009)
gringoloco & Amp = I have the same problem as you guys. Did you ever get to resolve this? It is only in "auto" and works in "manual" mode.
reply to this comment
JanJL (12/21/2009)
Not sure what you mean by resolution. Canon appears to offer no real support other than a camera exchange at a cost, or a pricey repair. Source of the problem is a loose capacitor that holds a charge for the flash.
This forum has users solving the problem :
Short term - bang the camera into the palm of your hand, or more drastically, against a hard surface. Not responsible for damage to any other parts of the camera. Not my recommendation.
Medium term is to remove the end plate using a jewelers Phillips head screwdriver and jiggle the capacitor until the camera works. Capacitor may work itself loose again and you may have to repeat the procedure. Details by sblevine's in a post on December 28, 2008 6:40 AM.
Long term solution, remove the end plate and after jiggling the capacitor to work, then wedge capacitor in place using the cut off ends of a pointy toothpick. Details in my posts JanJL on Mar 22, 2009 and May 20, 2009.
reply to this comment
This forum has users solving the problem :
Short term - bang the camera into the palm of your hand, or more drastically, against a hard surface. Not responsible for damage to any other parts of the camera. Not my recommendation.
Medium term is to remove the end plate using a jewelers Phillips head screwdriver and jiggle the capacitor until the camera works. Capacitor may work itself loose again and you may have to repeat the procedure. Details by sblevine's in a post on December 28, 2008 6:40 AM.
Long term solution, remove the end plate and after jiggling the capacitor to work, then wedge capacitor in place using the cut off ends of a pointy toothpick. Details in my posts JanJL on Mar 22, 2009 and May 20, 2009.
Dan C. (12/21/2009)
JanJL - Long term solution: don't buy Canon products because they don't stand by product defects like this one!!!!!!!!!!!
They know their is a problem & won't help you! They have turned their defective product returns into a cost/ profit center and offer you another defective "table banging" piece of crap for $120.00
I was Nikon and I'm now Nikon! No problems at all and frankly Nikon is a better product! Better pictures! Canon sucks!!!!!
reply to this comment
They know their is a problem & won't help you! They have turned their defective product returns into a cost/ profit center and offer you another defective "table banging" piece of crap for $120.00
I was Nikon and I'm now Nikon! No problems at all and frankly Nikon is a better product! Better pictures! Canon sucks!!!!!
Dan C. (12/21/2009)
Dpag135 - it is a Canon defect in this and other cameras that Canon won't repair at their cost! Not enough of us to threaten class action suit and recall I guess. Canon is arrogant and belligerent about the whole issue... Don't buy their products! If we continue to buy their stuff their quality and attitude will continue to erode! For now read some crazy stuff people did above to get their crappy Canons to work!
reply to this comment
Dan C. (12/21/2009)
Hey, maybe Canon can hire all the newly skilled and trained "table bangers" and capacitor repair techs we read about in above comments?
YOU TOO CAN WORK FOR CANON! Great toilet training above folks! So this is what we settle for? Paying good money and then repairing and banging the product on floors and tables - great... Like the rest of the country, horribly misguided about what to do?
Take the crap back and demand a refund!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
reply to this comment
YOU TOO CAN WORK FOR CANON! Great toilet training above folks! So this is what we settle for? Paying good money and then repairing and banging the product on floors and tables - great... Like the rest of the country, horribly misguided about what to do?
Take the crap back and demand a refund!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
gringoloco (12/23/2009)
Dpag135 - You're right about the manual mode working, I hadn't tried that. No solution so far but I love this camera
and don't want to give up yet. Maybe someone will add something here that will help.
My first Canon was a TLB so I've been with them for a while.
reply to this comment
and don't want to give up yet. Maybe someone will add something here that will help.
My first Canon was a TLB so I've been with them for a while.
Dpag135 (12/23/2009)
All my situation is different from the rest. Like gringoloco, my flash works. It just is not synced with when an actual picture is taken. Therefore, the picture is grainy and dark. This only happens in auto mode. In manual mode the flash works.
Janjl - the resolution provided in this forum is to get the flash to actually work. I was wondering if anyone knew how to get the flash synced.
Christmas is here and I have two children...sux that I won't be able to easily take the pictures needed to capture these moments.
reply to this comment
Janjl - the resolution provided in this forum is to get the flash to actually work. I was wondering if anyone knew how to get the flash synced.
Christmas is here and I have two children...sux that I won't be able to easily take the pictures needed to capture these moments.
phototj (12/24/2009)
FYI - same damn problem as most - thanks for the table banging advice (Christmas eve - don't want to not take pictures). It worked for me!
Canon - step up about the problem! Post these solutions on your website or something!!! I love my a630 - but problems like this make me consider going Nikon
reply to this comment
Canon - step up about the problem! Post these solutions on your website or something!!! I love my a630 - but problems like this make me consider going Nikon
Terry (12/28/2009)
I experienced this same problem on Christmas Eve (I had it happen in the past occasionally). The next morning it was working fine again. For me, it seems to work one day and not on another day. I just discovered the "bang and shoot" solution so I'll try that the next time. I do not want to pay Canon $100 to fix a camera when you can buy a new one for $150.
reply to this comment
Louis (12/28/2009)
Table banging worked for a day or two. Took the thing apart and pushed, pulled, cajoled that damn capacitor to no effect.
After 15 years exclusively buying Canon products, I got a Nikon Coolpix L620 for Christmas and am very happy with it (so much so I bought a pink one for my wife and she loves it too). F2.7 5mm (28mm equiv.) lens. Fast and wide! I'm sure I'd be happy with a SD-series from Canon, but this stupid capacitor issue put me over the edge. And by the way, it cost us $280 for BOTH cameras through Amazon.
Will probably dump my plans to buy a 7D, sell off my Canon EF lenses, and start over with Nikon.
reply to this comment
After 15 years exclusively buying Canon products, I got a Nikon Coolpix L620 for Christmas and am very happy with it (so much so I bought a pink one for my wife and she loves it too). F2.7 5mm (28mm equiv.) lens. Fast and wide! I'm sure I'd be happy with a SD-series from Canon, but this stupid capacitor issue put me over the edge. And by the way, it cost us $280 for BOTH cameras through Amazon.
Will probably dump my plans to buy a 7D, sell off my Canon EF lenses, and start over with Nikon.
Candy (12/29/2009)
I have the same problem.....I have hit it and it work for now. I did try to call the Canon phone line and was told that it is just a minor problem and that I could send it in for $75 and get it fixed.... I will not buy Canon in the future. They should give all of us refunds.
reply to this comment
How do you know if the Cannon PowerShot 630 has optical image stabilzation? (pgotowko — 07/08/2007)
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (07/08/2007)
Nop, this camera hasn't image stabilization capabilities.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (08/10/2007)
It does not have IS, however it is pretty hard to take a picture that is out of focus. In fact one reviewer TRIED to take blurry pictures of his son by shaking the camera as he shot. It did not work. The pictures were perfect. The camera has built in settings for certain situations that adjust for expected blur. You can use Kids&Pets or you can manually control the aperture and shutter to maximize your focus, but "auto" does pretty well in good light as a default. Not sure why they took the IS out, but it's not really necessary in this model.
I have found that the only times I have blur are when I am shooting in a dark place or when I am unstable. For example, I have taken lots of clear shots from a moving vehicle, where there was momentum but not shake, per se. But I have also been in a quite windy place where I could not really hold my footing - those shots were a bit blurry.
Elbows in, camera on forehead (use the view finder when you need that extra corporeal stability) and when all else fails, use a monopod or a tripod.
Although, I have had very little need for any of those remedies and I have taken over 5000 pictures with this camera since I bought it in mid-March!
Good luck,
Lisa
reply to this comment
I have found that the only times I have blur are when I am shooting in a dark place or when I am unstable. For example, I have taken lots of clear shots from a moving vehicle, where there was momentum but not shake, per se. But I have also been in a quite windy place where I could not really hold my footing - those shots were a bit blurry.
Elbows in, camera on forehead (use the view finder when you need that extra corporeal stability) and when all else fails, use a monopod or a tripod.
Although, I have had very little need for any of those remedies and I have taken over 5000 pictures with this camera since I bought it in mid-March!
Good luck,
Lisa
A630 - when in auto mode, cuts off the lower half of the picture, should i use another mode (grammy — 07/01/2007)
Beginner, when I use auto mode, the lower half of the object is cut off on the screen - full size in the view finder
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (07/13/2007)
Hi Grammy,
That's very strange. Does this not happen when shooting in the camera's manual modes?
The main advantage of LCD monitors and viewfinders over traditional optical viewfinders is that they ensure 100% coverage of the actual frame--WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get), so it's strange that this should happen.
-Ben
reply to this comment
That's very strange. Does this not happen when shooting in the camera's manual modes?
The main advantage of LCD monitors and viewfinders over traditional optical viewfinders is that they ensure 100% coverage of the actual frame--WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get), so it's strange that this should happen.
-Ben
Canon A630, frequently have problems with blurred images... (reeknee — 06/27/2007)
Why are my pictures often blurry? It doesn't happen all the time.
Also, when I want to get a quick picture say of kids who don't pose, I have a lot of trouble even in the kid/pet mode. Infact, I have more trouble it seems with lag time from when I hit the button to when the picture is taken in kid/pet mode. Why won't my camera take pictures when I want to capture a quick moment that's not posed for? This is very frustrating to me especially trying to catch kids at that perfect moment. Could there be something wrong with my camera or is it just the operator?
reply to this comment
Also, when I want to get a quick picture say of kids who don't pose, I have a lot of trouble even in the kid/pet mode. Infact, I have more trouble it seems with lag time from when I hit the button to when the picture is taken in kid/pet mode. Why won't my camera take pictures when I want to capture a quick moment that's not posed for? This is very frustrating to me especially trying to catch kids at that perfect moment. Could there be something wrong with my camera or is it just the operator?
Andrew Skinner (06/27/2007)
Maria,
A lot of the "lag" people find like this are due to the auto-focus readjusting on the subjects. If you hold the shutter button down half way, it should freeze the focal length so you can capture the moment better. Anything out of that focal length that the camera froze on has a greater chance of being out of focus too, causing blulrriness.
As for the blurriness you're finding now, to allow the right amount of light in, the camera automatically adjusts the shutter speed to stay open longer in lower light settings. This will capture movement a lot easier, and cause blurriness in the photos. I would try setting the camera's ISO at 800 to allow the most light in that this camera can. I hope this helps.
Andrew ( blackdoorphotos.com )
reply to this comment
A lot of the "lag" people find like this are due to the auto-focus readjusting on the subjects. If you hold the shutter button down half way, it should freeze the focal length so you can capture the moment better. Anything out of that focal length that the camera froze on has a greater chance of being out of focus too, causing blulrriness.
As for the blurriness you're finding now, to allow the right amount of light in, the camera automatically adjusts the shutter speed to stay open longer in lower light settings. This will capture movement a lot easier, and cause blurriness in the photos. I would try setting the camera's ISO at 800 to allow the most light in that this camera can. I hope this helps.
Andrew ( blackdoorphotos.com )
web cam (mecho722 — 06/26/2007)
can i use canon A630 camera as web cam ?
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (06/26/2007)
Nop, you cannot use this camera as a webcam. This camera automatically turn back the lens when you connect the USB cable to the PC. I'm sorry.
reply to this comment
Has anyone used this camera with Vista yet and how did the software respond? (ptgramma — 06/25/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/26/2007)
Canon states that "most Canon digital cameras that support the Picture Transfer Protocol (PTP) standard will connect to PCs running Windows Vista and allow for basic image transfer functionality. This includes all Canon digital cameras produced in the last several years. Please see the table below to see if your camera model is Vista compatible."
They also recommend that if any problems, to check out Canon's Windows Vista Support page ( usa.canon.com/opd/controlle... ) for more information.
Course, all too often, drivers alone are only needed and one can avoid the software itself (you may need to install it just to get the drivers, then uninstall just the utility part).
What I recommend for file transfer and photo management is Picasa by Google ( picasa.google.com/ ). It's an awesome and free program.
Course, if you shot on standard SD cards, you don't need the drivers or software at all, just a USB all in one memory card reader (about $10). Plug it in and it's a simple drag and drop.
reply to this comment
They also recommend that if any problems, to check out Canon's Windows Vista Support page ( usa.canon.com/opd/controlle... ) for more information.
Course, all too often, drivers alone are only needed and one can avoid the software itself (you may need to install it just to get the drivers, then uninstall just the utility part).
What I recommend for file transfer and photo management is Picasa by Google ( picasa.google.com/ ). It's an awesome and free program.
Course, if you shot on standard SD cards, you don't need the drivers or software at all, just a USB all in one memory card reader (about $10). Plug it in and it's a simple drag and drop.
Driver Update for Vista Home Premium (colbyp59 — 06/23/2007)
I just purchased a Canon Powershot A630 and it included instructions for Windows XP, but not for Windows Vista. I think I will probably need a updated driver. Does anyone know a website where one is available?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/23/2007)
Pam,
The software downloads for your camera are located here ( alpha03.c-wss.com/inc/ApplS... ). It doesn't look like they have a Vist update yet, but you should keep an eye on it.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The software downloads for your camera are located here ( alpha03.c-wss.com/inc/ApplS... ). It doesn't look like they have a Vist update yet, but you should keep an eye on it.
Andrew
Kcho Loren (06/23/2007)
Probably you don't need a driver update, windows xp automatically detect this device and vista probably too.
reply to this comment
colbyp59 (06/23/2007)
Thank you for your quick response, I appreciate it.
reply to this comment
Hassan Wahid (01/19/2008)
I have purchased a SANYO VPC-HD1A and it include instruction for Windows XP, but not for Windows Vista. I need an updated driver to for my Window Vista computer. Does anyone know a website where one is available?
reply to this comment
Can the A630 handle a 4GB Storage card? (robrogers — 06/18/2007)
reply to this comment
Joe (06/19/2007)
Yes it can!
Good Luck
reply to this comment
Good Luck
What memory stick or card fits this camera and the cost? (sld46 — 06/17/2007)
In determining the total cost of purchasing this camera, I need to know the additional costs associated with it.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (06/17/2007)
Canon A630 uses SD card and a 2 gig SD card retails for about $25. You can expect to see a variation of price among different brands and different shops.
<a href="buy.com/prod/Kingston_2GB_S... supplier</a> for example sells Kingston 2gig card for less than $15.
Compared to a few years ago, the price of memory cards have dropped tremendously and does not form a significant part of the total cost of this camera.
reply to this comment
<a href="buy.com/prod/Kingston_2GB_S... supplier</a> for example sells Kingston 2gig card for less than $15.
Compared to a few years ago, the price of memory cards have dropped tremendously and does not form a significant part of the total cost of this camera.
sld46 (06/18/2007)
Thank you - very helpful!! And a relief
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/23/2007)
Allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
reply to this comment
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
Steelerqueen (07/30/2007)
Cards have different speeds? What speed should I look for on a 2GIG card for my A630 I would like the optimum speed in taking photos.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/31/2007)
As fast as you can afford. I know that sounds trite, but it's true.
reply to this comment
How much difference is there between Canon A630 & A640? I am no expert would I notice the difference? (pflowers77 — 06/07/2007)
I am trying to decide between these 2 cameras - I need more zoom than Canon S30.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (06/07/2007)
The only one difference is the megapixels. The 640 has 10Mpxls and the 630 8Mpxls. I have one 630 and the manual is the same one that the 640.
reply to this comment
Need to upgrade from Canon film camera....HELP! (Deester — 06/06/2007)
I have been using a Canon sure shot zoom 35mm film camera for almost 20 years now. I love it, and it takes amazing pictures. However, it's on the blink & I have to break down & buy a digital.
I own an older cheap digital strictly for quick shots ( not for printing ) more for emailing BUT I always use my 35mm film camera for everything else. I really dont want to switch to digital. These days it seems I have no choice but to move in that direction. I have been online doing endless research, and this model seems to be a good choice?? Money is not a factor..I would spend more if it guaranteed great shots. I never had problem with red eye EVER on my film camera...as i take most of my pictures with people, I also want to make sure this wont be a ongoing problem....
My question is this....I want a camera that will be comparable to my film camera, will this camera do the job?
It was a simple point & click with fill in flash mode ( something i used alot ), and it took amazing pictures. Picture quality is most important to me. Simple & quick , as i take pictures spontaneously & do ALOT of travelling. I have kids & so I take a millon pictures constantly. I don't want to use an SLR camera, I want a camera that can be taken everywhere & used qucikly but at same time takes great pictures. It doesnt matter is its a bit bulky, as my film camera is...so I am used to that. Any digital out there is way smaller than that anyways.
If you have any advice, I would REALLY appreciate it. I choice this camera as one of the ones basically because my film canmera is canon so i know that it was a good brand. I read alot of reviews 7 the Caqnon A640 was my first choice but after reading, its seems that unless you are printing larger images the higher MP are useles? I only print 4 x 6, and the odd time I print 5 x 7. I have yet to do an 8 x 10...so really I just need the qualityas foremost....
thanks again!
Email me at Deester@mts.net
Thank-you
Dee
reply to this comment
I own an older cheap digital strictly for quick shots ( not for printing ) more for emailing BUT I always use my 35mm film camera for everything else. I really dont want to switch to digital. These days it seems I have no choice but to move in that direction. I have been online doing endless research, and this model seems to be a good choice?? Money is not a factor..I would spend more if it guaranteed great shots. I never had problem with red eye EVER on my film camera...as i take most of my pictures with people, I also want to make sure this wont be a ongoing problem....
My question is this....I want a camera that will be comparable to my film camera, will this camera do the job?
It was a simple point & click with fill in flash mode ( something i used alot ), and it took amazing pictures. Picture quality is most important to me. Simple & quick , as i take pictures spontaneously & do ALOT of travelling. I have kids & so I take a millon pictures constantly. I don't want to use an SLR camera, I want a camera that can be taken everywhere & used qucikly but at same time takes great pictures. It doesnt matter is its a bit bulky, as my film camera is...so I am used to that. Any digital out there is way smaller than that anyways.
If you have any advice, I would REALLY appreciate it. I choice this camera as one of the ones basically because my film canmera is canon so i know that it was a good brand. I read alot of reviews 7 the Caqnon A640 was my first choice but after reading, its seems that unless you are printing larger images the higher MP are useles? I only print 4 x 6, and the odd time I print 5 x 7. I have yet to do an 8 x 10...so really I just need the qualityas foremost....
thanks again!
Email me at Deester@mts.net
Thank-you
Dee
Joe (06/19/2007)
You have really answered your own question here, this is the right camera for you. It is a good transition with high quality results that are good enough to print and share just like 35mm images. You did good research the A640 will satisfy your needs. Plus you won't soon grow out of it.
reply to this comment
i am struggling to find instructions on how to take a self portrait. Can anyone help this dumb blonde? (macawi — 06/02/2007)
reply to this comment
Josh Vine (06/04/2007)
If you can find it the macro mode is probably what you want for self portraits the you hold at arms length. It will focus on you face more clearly. The macro mode is usually displayed with a flower symbol.
reply to this comment
macawi (06/04/2007)
Thanks Josh but that is not what i was looking for. i realized just how dumb i didnt even put in what camera i have. but not to worry i sat for about two hours and finally found it! so thanks again...
reply to this comment
lisasturm (08/10/2007)
I would not use Macro, but instead the Portrait setting, with the LCD swung out to the front and the timer set on custom with several shots during the 10 second period.
It works out pretty well. If you are using a tripod, or are more than just a few inches away, you definitely don't want to use macro. It's intended for VERY close up stuff, like I have a self-pic of my eyeball and eyelashes. But for your face, use the regular distance settings.
Also, if you are close enough that you are using macro, be aware that the flash will cast a shadow at that close distance due to the projection of the lens too close to the subject (your face).
Happy shooting,
Lisa
reply to this comment
It works out pretty well. If you are using a tripod, or are more than just a few inches away, you definitely don't want to use macro. It's intended for VERY close up stuff, like I have a self-pic of my eyeball and eyelashes. But for your face, use the regular distance settings.
Also, if you are close enough that you are using macro, be aware that the flash will cast a shadow at that close distance due to the projection of the lens too close to the subject (your face).
Happy shooting,
Lisa
Would you buy the Canon A630 or the Nikon P5000 (hirsch — 06/01/2007)
I am not sure between these two cameras. Also, what is the speed from pressing the button to the shutter snapping?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/25/2007)
From what I've read, Canon is shortening the shutter lag time with each new model. The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )specs out at 0.38 seconds for shutter lag, whereas the P5000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) specs out a tad longer at 0.43, seconds. Shot to shot, the A630 tests out at 8.3 seconds for five shots, while the P5000 gets to five shots in just over 11 seconds.
And even though the lag test results don't show it, some Nikon P5000 users I've read have called the shutter lag "unbearable" and will cause you to miss the shot more often than not.
Your mileage may vary, but I'd be considering that.
reply to this comment
And even though the lag test results don't show it, some Nikon P5000 users I've read have called the shutter lag "unbearable" and will cause you to miss the shot more often than not.
Your mileage may vary, but I'd be considering that.
Is the A630 a better value than the a570 or a710? (doreensmith — 05/29/2007)
Is the IS really usefull? Is the variable LCD usefull? Which of the 3 would you buy and why? (a630 vs a710is vs a570is)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (05/31/2007)
The A630 is nice, and it has a great 'feel' and polish to it. But it is larger than the A710, which I bought since it IS smaller than the A630 and A640. The IS is a great and useful feature. Users that have the swivel LCD swear by it. What if you want a (horizontal) shot of a flower that is only 10" off the ground?? Easy with the swivel LCD.
Doesn't the A570 have only 3x or 4x zoom? Both the 570 and the 710 are similar, but I sure like the extra zoom on the 710.
reply to this comment
Doesn't the A570 have only 3x or 4x zoom? Both the 570 and the 710 are similar, but I sure like the extra zoom on the 710.
toni (06/04/2007)
I bought a630, which is my third digital camera and it is by my opinion the best buy among three you mentioned.
reply to this comment
doreensmith (06/04/2007)
Thanks guys for your response.
It is still sort of a coin toss for me. I still do not really know the value of the IS, the extra zoom, or the variable LCD. Since it is such a close choice and the sensor on the 630 is twice the size of the other cameras (should produce a better image) and I think that I might really enjoy using a variable LCD - I have opted to buy the 630. Also it is about $50 less than the other two.
reply to this comment
It is still sort of a coin toss for me. I still do not really know the value of the IS, the extra zoom, or the variable LCD. Since it is such a close choice and the sensor on the 630 is twice the size of the other cameras (should produce a better image) and I think that I might really enjoy using a variable LCD - I have opted to buy the 630. Also it is about $50 less than the other two.
Looking for long-lasting digi anywhere up to $170 US. Any bargain ideas? (kiara — 05/22/2007)
I'm thinking of buying a new digital camera with around 6-7 mp. Just for everyday use, (and holidays). Preferably one that can take a beating as I'm generally a clumsy person, so fragile/delicate wouldn't be the way to go.
Any ideas would be most appreciated! :)
reply to this comment
Any ideas would be most appreciated! :)
Brenda Paro (05/24/2007)
I'd recommend anything from the Canon A-series in terms of delicacy, as I've dropped mine plenty of times. They aren't ultracompacts, but they're built to withstand some 'everyday' use.
Perhaps the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? Good image quality, easy to operate, very close to your price range. There are cheaper ones available if that isn't quite what you want, but they tend to be older (thus slower) and fewer megapixels.
reply to this comment
Perhaps the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? Good image quality, easy to operate, very close to your price range. There are cheaper ones available if that isn't quite what you want, but they tend to be older (thus slower) and fewer megapixels.
kiara (05/25/2007)
Thanks heaps! The A630 looks like a nice shot.
reply to this comment
Corners are dark (Robin Abernethy — 05/11/2007)
I take very close up pictures of some of my animals (snakes) on a white towel indoors with flash. I've noticed that the colors of the photos are dark, as if the lens gets in the way of the flash. Does anyone know how I can rememdy this, or is my camera defective in someway? For examples, go here: s37.photobucket.com/albums/... how the corners have dark shadows?
reply to this comment
Robin Abernethy (05/11/2007)
"I've noticed that the COLORS of the photos are dark"
Should read:
"I've noticed that the CORNERS of the photos are dark"
reply to this comment
Should read:
"I've noticed that the CORNERS of the photos are dark"
tharrison (05/11/2007)
Robin -- your diagnosis is right, I think. The lens may be getting in the way of the flash, which explains why the shadows are only on the right side of the images in some cases. In others, there's a clear center area that's lit with drop-off around the edges.
The flashes on a point-and-shoot camera like the A630 are pretty bad and subject to both of these problems. The camera is not defective, but the design is limited.
The simplest possible solution would be to back away from the subject a little and zoom in. If the camera is further away from the subject, the light from the flash will have more chance to spread out and cover the whole area. Zooming does extend the length of the lens, which might exacerbate the shadow issue, but in net, I think this may be all you'll need.
However you might be able to build a simple enclosure that will help reflect the light around more evenly. With a few pieces of white copy paper and some tape, you could build a kind of "tent" that would bounce some of the light from the flash back onto the subject. This will also help reduce the shadows visible on the cloth background. You can also use standard lights to brighten the scene overall -- a couple placed to either side might help as well.
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
The flashes on a point-and-shoot camera like the A630 are pretty bad and subject to both of these problems. The camera is not defective, but the design is limited.
The simplest possible solution would be to back away from the subject a little and zoom in. If the camera is further away from the subject, the light from the flash will have more chance to spread out and cover the whole area. Zooming does extend the length of the lens, which might exacerbate the shadow issue, but in net, I think this may be all you'll need.
However you might be able to build a simple enclosure that will help reflect the light around more evenly. With a few pieces of white copy paper and some tape, you could build a kind of "tent" that would bounce some of the light from the flash back onto the subject. This will also help reduce the shadows visible on the cloth background. You can also use standard lights to brighten the scene overall -- a couple placed to either side might help as well.
Hope this helps.
Kcho Loren (05/11/2007)
I think that you have a problem with the flash's coverage angle. I think that the flash has a angle smaller than one of the lens. It is visible in macro photos only. Try with some kind of external source of light.
reply to this comment
Robin Abernethy (05/11/2007)
Thanks guys - I do plan to set up a light box to photograph the kiddos in, as I plan to breed next season and need to be able to take good pictures with true-color represenations of the animals.
I just haven't gotten around to it yet, and quite honestly haven't played around with all my settings and options yet. Macro tends to darken my pictures for some reason.
I've never been able to get a great close up of just scales of the snakes like I'd like to without the flash washing them out. Zooming in blurs the pictures, going wide angle and coming in close the subject washes them out.
reply to this comment
I just haven't gotten around to it yet, and quite honestly haven't played around with all my settings and options yet. Macro tends to darken my pictures for some reason.
I've never been able to get a great close up of just scales of the snakes like I'd like to without the flash washing them out. Zooming in blurs the pictures, going wide angle and coming in close the subject washes them out.
jay (05/12/2007)
I use a slave flash or two to get even lighting.
you can get small ones for around £10ukp
reply to this comment
you can get small ones for around £10ukp
What am I doing wrong? Took photos in my dinning room with lighting from a chandelier....the photo was on auto and it came out dull and washed out. (pvs57 — 05/04/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/04/2007)
It's an easy case of shooting with available light that is strong enough to disengage your flash, but weak enough to under expose. Using a fill flash will make your subject "pop." Don't ever rely simply on interior ambient light.
reply to this comment
On the Canon A630 - can you zoom in video mode? (KYMom — 05/04/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/04/2007)
Well, there's no saying you can't either in the specs or the manual. I'm thinking probably not. I haven't seen very many still cameras that don't disable the zoom control while videotaping. It mystifies me as to why that is, but I'd rather defer to someone else who may have a more personal experience with this particular model before you go out and purchase it.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (05/06/2007)
The answer is no. You can't zoom while you are recording a movie.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Actually YES YES YES!!! You can zoom in and out and back in again. I have done so many times at rock shows in my town and they look GREAT! Sound is not that hot, but after all, it's NOT a video camera.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Addendum to my last - when the motor is running to move the range in and out, the recorded sound drops a bit, so if you don't want a lot of interruption in your sound, use it minimally.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (05/10/2007)
Again: please read the Advanced Manual (available in alpha02u.c-wss.com/inc/Appl... at page #39. It say:
"The focus and optical zoom settings remain fixed for subsequent frames at the values selected for the first frame"
reply to this comment
"The focus and optical zoom settings remain fixed for subsequent frames at the values selected for the first frame"
lisasturm (08/10/2007)
Yes, the focus remains the same but you can zoom. It is digital zoom and not optical. But considering that it's not a "movie camera," the loss of quality due to being digitally zoomed is expected.
For what it's worth, most photo cameras won't do either, so this is still a great feature, despite the optical vs. digital loss of quality.
reply to this comment
For what it's worth, most photo cameras won't do either, so this is still a great feature, despite the optical vs. digital loss of quality.
i cant decide between the canon S80 or the canon A630.....i enjoy mostly street scene documentary photography..but wo (Awonderland23 — 04/20/2007)
i am new to photography, had a lovely cool pix nikon that helped me have 1 exposition. i loved the image quality an dmacro capability. i am in mexico these canons are the best choices within my price range. thank you!1
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (04/21/2007)
Allison, street scenes also mean architecture photography since you may want to get a specific building in the frame for a good background. Therefore I recommend the s80 because it has wide angle lens.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Or - you can purchase a wide angle lens for the Canon A630. I got my Optika lens from 47th St. Photo at a no-regret price. As with any add-on lens you have to deal with vignetting, but go ahead and take the shot with more in the field than you want, crop off the outside edges to get rid of the dark corners on your computer, resize and VOILA! You have a perfect wide angle shot at 8MP with no evidence of resolution losses. (That's the beauty of having such high resolution to begin with).
When you get add on lenses, make sure that your first one comes with an adapter ring. After that, you won't need to get one and you can then purchase only the lenses or filters that you need and not have to get a "kit".
reply to this comment
When you get add on lenses, make sure that your first one comes with an adapter ring. After that, you won't need to get one and you can then purchase only the lenses or filters that you need and not have to get a "kit".
How to reduce Mega Pixels? (ghughes1978 — 04/19/2007)
Hello
I am hope someone can inlighten me on how to go about reducing the Mega Pixels on my Canon PowerShot A630 which is 8 Mega Pixels. I have been into all the Menu options but to no avail. I also have a Fuji camera at home which allows you to change my 5 mega pixel's down to 2 if i wish. Surely you must be able to do the same on a Canon. Any ideas???
Glen.
reply to this comment
I am hope someone can inlighten me on how to go about reducing the Mega Pixels on my Canon PowerShot A630 which is 8 Mega Pixels. I have been into all the Menu options but to no avail. I also have a Fuji camera at home which allows you to change my 5 mega pixel's down to 2 if i wish. Surely you must be able to do the same on a Canon. Any ideas???
Glen.
Kcho Loren (04/19/2007)
This capability is not present on this entry level camera. I saw it in Canon EOS cameras.
reply to this comment
sc2007 (04/21/2007)
I just bought this camera. I am not an expert, just a beginner. But you have a good question. I need the answer too, so I look up at the advanced manual. It is at p. 27/28. FUNC. menu > etc (Compression)/ L. I can'rt reproduce the exact pictures on the instruction. You may read it yourself. Stephen
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
To add to the last answer (by Stephen Cheung), on p. 27 you will see what the camera screen looks like when you press the "FUNC. SET" in the center of the circular directional on the back of the camera. From all modes except movie, you can chose your resolution to 6 different sizes, plus a setting for post-cards. The table on p. 28 will tell you exactly what size corresponds with which setting (L, M1, M2, M3, S, W, postcard). The option just above that on the settings screen will be for compression size (superfine, fine and normal), which is described on p. 29.
Unless you are worried about memory space, I would suggest you ALWAYS leave it at L and S, only because you are able to do much more with the image on your computer if you have not limited your options when you shot it. Most software programs will allow you to resize all the way down to a thumbnail - just be VERY CAREFUL to make a copy of your original before you go messing with things like, well anything! I learned the hard way. I compressed pictures for posting on the web before I realized that I had converted the original and my only copy. They are now permanently 2 MP but they were shot at 5 (on my last camera).
reply to this comment
Unless you are worried about memory space, I would suggest you ALWAYS leave it at L and S, only because you are able to do much more with the image on your computer if you have not limited your options when you shot it. Most software programs will allow you to resize all the way down to a thumbnail - just be VERY CAREFUL to make a copy of your original before you go messing with things like, well anything! I learned the hard way. I compressed pictures for posting on the web before I realized that I had converted the original and my only copy. They are now permanently 2 MP but they were shot at 5 (on my last camera).
A630 - Lens error (ghughes1978 — 04/17/2007)
I have a PowerShot A630 which comes up with 'lens error - restart camera' any ideas how to fix this problem??
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (04/17/2007)
From the manual:
This error can occur if you hold the lens while it's in motion or you operate it in a location with excessive dust or sand in the air. (...) If this messages continues to display, contact your Customer Support ( :( ) as there may be a problem with the lens.
reply to this comment
This error can occur if you hold the lens while it's in motion or you operate it in a location with excessive dust or sand in the air. (...) If this messages continues to display, contact your Customer Support ( :( ) as there may be a problem with the lens.
ghughes1978 (04/17/2007)
Yeah i have tried doing what the manual says but to no avail! maybe i will have to take it to a shop or see if it will come under the warranty. Cheers.
reply to this comment
Scott (04/23/2007)
After 5 months I got the lens error. I bought this @ Best Buy, I also bought the "Performance Plan" extra special plan. They sent it to a company called Precision Camera for repair. They called me and want $169 to fix it because it had physical damage. There was not damage, this was confirmed by the Best Buy technician. The repair company said that I tried broke it trying to push it back in, not true. This appears to be a real problem with Canon and a scam with the warranty process.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
My mom and I both bought the A630 and then promptly bought a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech. The cost is about $45 and you can register your camera online once you receive the packet. It includes annual repair/adjustment visits (the website will tell you who can service you in your area, but you have to make sure they are on contract with Repair Tech) as well as a no-hidden-fees repair plan. You can even get the camera serviced away from home, anywhere in the world where they have an affiliated service center. There is no deductible or other upfront charges to get your camera fixed. They also have a no-lemon policy - if the repair place cannot fix the problem in three (?) tries, they will replace your camera.
Repair Tech also has plans for other of our precious toys, so shop their site. They also have a 3 year plan for $10 less, but what's the point of that!?
reply to this comment
Repair Tech also has plans for other of our precious toys, so shop their site. They also have a 3 year plan for $10 less, but what's the point of that!?
lisasturm (08/10/2007)
Addendum to my last:
I did have a problem with my lens motor. I was told that this problem usually happens after about 3 years, but since I had already taken over 5K photos, I upped the curve!
Anyway, I called RepairTech and they referred me to Canon - this camera was still under the 1-year manufacturer's warranty. The 5-year Repair Tech plan begins AFTER the Canon one runs out! How cool is that?
So, I shipped it off to Canon (Priority Mail) and got it back in just over one week. Free.
Good luck!
Lisa
reply to this comment
I did have a problem with my lens motor. I was told that this problem usually happens after about 3 years, but since I had already taken over 5K photos, I upped the curve!
Anyway, I called RepairTech and they referred me to Canon - this camera was still under the 1-year manufacturer's warranty. The 5-year Repair Tech plan begins AFTER the Canon one runs out! How cool is that?
So, I shipped it off to Canon (Priority Mail) and got it back in just over one week. Free.
Good luck!
Lisa
Steelerqueen (08/10/2007)
I just got my Camera A630 today. Where can I get a reliable and inexpensive extended warranty?
reply to this comment
Which is the better camera A630 or 710 IS (rose — 04/10/2007)
According to reviews A630 is having good rating.And price is also low for it.But optical stabilization is not there for it.It makes a big difference???? I am buying the camera for the first time so some one can clarify this....
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (04/10/2007)
Remembering other answer made it by me:
Image stabilization is very important for situations with low light levels and/or with zoom lenses. This situation will produce low shutter speeds and blurred pictures. Image stabilization will try to compensate the motion of your hand with lens corrections.
I think that A710IS is a better camera. It has 6x of optical zoom with IS (vs. 4x in my A630), but I looked for a camera with vari-angle LCD monitor and 4 batteries when I bought my camera. The first characteristic is good for out-of-view shottings, and the second is good for low recycle times in flash pictures.
reply to this comment
Image stabilization is very important for situations with low light levels and/or with zoom lenses. This situation will produce low shutter speeds and blurred pictures. Image stabilization will try to compensate the motion of your hand with lens corrections.
I think that A710IS is a better camera. It has 6x of optical zoom with IS (vs. 4x in my A630), but I looked for a camera with vari-angle LCD monitor and 4 batteries when I bought my camera. The first characteristic is good for out-of-view shottings, and the second is good for low recycle times in flash pictures.
Matt (05/09/2007)
There wasn't even hesitation that the A710IS is the better camera. But reviews show them both as exceptional. I'm still siding with the A710IS, though :)
steves-digicams.com/2006_re...
reply to this comment
steves-digicams.com/2006_re...
Kelly (06/17/2007)
When I was comming off of film onto digital I was confused about these two cameras. So I bought the Canon A710 first, for the image stablization and 6x zoom. But was very unhappy with the picture quality in Auto Mode. Low light photos, indoors were very grainy. Outdoor pictures were nice but I shot a lot of indoor of my kids and I wasn't happy with the results. So I returned the camera. Then I purchased the Canon A630, which I am still using, and love it. Pictures are very crisp and clear. Great quality. Indoors and outdoors, low light and bright light. I'm extremely satisified. I find in low light zoom conditions I get the camera shake warning..but if you hold still enough, you really don't have any problems with the pictures comming out crisp. I have a pretty steady hand, and haven't had any problems with this camera lacking image stablization. My answer to you, on my experience, is that image stablization didn't seem to make a difference. But picture quality is far more crisp on the A630 than the A710, especially in Auto Mode. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Having trouble loading batteries and memory card. Door at bottom won't close. (michglazer — 04/09/2007)
The batteries and memory card are both loaded correctly, so that isn't the problem. The little door won't latch.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (04/09/2007)
First, try without batteries. Later, push the door at maximum and move it to the center of the camera. This process is very simple. If no, the lock could be wrong.
reply to this comment
michglazer (04/25/2007)
I ended up having to send the camera out for repair. There was a flaw with the door clasp. Thanks anyway!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (05/25/2007)
Duct tape has typically been my response for this. =) I have heard of this issue with similar models; hopefully you got it repaired without it costing too much.
reply to this comment
michglazer (05/25/2007)
Thanks, sent it off to be fixed. Faulty design.
reply to this comment
i use a self- timer alot ,would the vari-angle LCD on the a630 be of help in setting up the shot or should i go with my other choice the a710is? (dtchap59 — 04/05/2007)
the canon A710is or canon A630?
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (04/05/2007)
The vari-angle capacity of the A630 is not very usefull for selftimer pictures, only for direct shots (I think). I will choose the A710IS camera for your purposes.
reply to this comment
Matt (05/09/2007)
Ditto with Kcho. Some people swear by the vari-angle LCD for everything, but I think it's more of a novelty. Granted, if you're holding the camera above your head and want to see what you're recording or taking a picture of, it would help. But again, with how seldom you'll <probably> be doing this, the A710IS is my pick, too.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
The vari-angle LCD, as mentioned before, is mostly useful when you want to shoot from a strange angle by hand. Since you are going to be setting up the shot while actually holding the camera, it would not be useful in this situation.
However, I think the utility of it is not a novelty by a long-shot. It makes for a very versatile camera - particularly for short people like myself and for getting low angle shots without getting on the ground. It is also great for use on a high tripod - you can fully operate all the controls by looking above you while leaving it mounted.
reply to this comment
However, I think the utility of it is not a novelty by a long-shot. It makes for a very versatile camera - particularly for short people like myself and for getting low angle shots without getting on the ground. It is also great for use on a high tripod - you can fully operate all the controls by looking above you while leaving it mounted.
Brenda Paro (05/19/2007)
I agree with Lisa that it's not a novelty, it can actually help quite a bit if you like to get down and dirty with your shots. Furthermore, although you frame the self-timer shot from behind the camera, with the swivel LCD, you can see how it'll look once you get in position yourself, and adjust if necessary. So, yes, it is actually helpful during self timer shots- although not necessary, of course.
reply to this comment
Aside from the megapixel difference, how do you compare the A630 to the new A570IS? (Robby99 — 03/22/2007)
I am a current Powershot owner looking to upgrade to one of these two cameras. I like the new technology of the 570 but the 630 has its own specialty features.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (03/22/2007)
Good points in new 570IS:
* new processor Digic III (instead of Digic II)
* ISO 1600 (instead of 800)
* Image Stabilization
* Face detection technology
* f/2.6 aperture (instead of f/2.8)
* video recording at 320 x 240 in 60 fps
Bad points in new 570IS:
* no vari-angle LCD monitor
* 1/2.5 inch CCD (instead of 1/1.8)
* two-batteries (four is better for flash pictures)
* 2.0 inch macro focus (instead of 0.39 inch)
reply to this comment
* new processor Digic III (instead of Digic II)
* ISO 1600 (instead of 800)
* Image Stabilization
* Face detection technology
* f/2.6 aperture (instead of f/2.8)
* video recording at 320 x 240 in 60 fps
Bad points in new 570IS:
* no vari-angle LCD monitor
* 1/2.5 inch CCD (instead of 1/1.8)
* two-batteries (four is better for flash pictures)
* 2.0 inch macro focus (instead of 0.39 inch)
will it accept a 8gb sdhc card? (bigmark — 03/19/2007)
I allready own a 8 gb sd high capacity card by transcend.NOw i want a good digi cam rated high that it will work in.Also does this camera have image stabilization?
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (03/19/2007)
I don't know about 8 GB SHDC cards, but it hasn't image stabilization capabilities.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.
As for image stabilization, that is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read in the book that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with.
reply to this comment
As for image stabilization, that is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read in the book that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with.
How important is Image Stabilization? (jjones13 — 03/12/2007)
The A630 and A640 don't have it and are very popular cameras as compared to the A710IS.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (03/12/2007)
Image stabilization is very important for situations with low light levels and/or with zoom lenses. This situation will produce low shutter speeds and blurred pictures. Image stabilization will try to compensate the motion of your hand with lens corrections.
reply to this comment
jjones13 (03/12/2007)
So - does the popularity (and high ratings in reviews) for cameras without this feature indicate that many people don't care about shots with low light levels or zoom lenses? Or do these cameras - Canon Powershot 630 and 640 just have so many other qualities that this is overlooked? Again comparing the lesser rated A710IS. I am trying to decide between these.
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (03/12/2007)
I think that A710IS is a better camera. It has 6x of optical zoom with IS (vs. 4x in my A630), but I looked for a camera with vari-angle LCD monitor and 4 batteries when I bought my camera. The first characteristic is good for out-of-view shottings, and the second is good for low recycle times in flash pictures.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with.
reply to this comment
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with.
can you compare difference between canon power shot A630 to canon power shot A 80 (cookiepuppy2000 — 03/05/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (03/06/2007)
Hi Cookie,
If you just want to compare stats, you can see the two cameras' specifications side by side here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
But let me break it down for you a bit.
1. Sensor size/pixels. Though both cameras have a 1/1.8" sensor, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) packs in 8 megapixels compared to the A80's 4 megapixels.
2. Zoom/lens. The A80 has a 3x optical zoom (114mm), while the A630 has a 4x (140mm). Not a huge difference, but appreciable. Furthermore, the A630 has a macro shooting range of 1cm, compared to the A80's 5cm range. This means you can get much closer to your subject with the A630 and still keep it in perfect focus.
3. Memory card. The A80 takes CompactFlash memory cards, which are gradually being phased out and replaced by SecureDigital, which the A630 takes.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
If you just want to compare stats, you can see the two cameras' specifications side by side here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
But let me break it down for you a bit.
1. Sensor size/pixels. Though both cameras have a 1/1.8" sensor, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) packs in 8 megapixels compared to the A80's 4 megapixels.
2. Zoom/lens. The A80 has a 3x optical zoom (114mm), while the A630 has a 4x (140mm). Not a huge difference, but appreciable. Furthermore, the A630 has a macro shooting range of 1cm, compared to the A80's 5cm range. This means you can get much closer to your subject with the A630 and still keep it in perfect focus.
3. Memory card. The A80 takes CompactFlash memory cards, which are gradually being phased out and replaced by SecureDigital, which the A630 takes.
Hope this helps!
What about 4GB or 8GB SD Mem Cards? Anyone using these? (rcblu2 — 02/28/2007)
I have a Canon A620 and A630. I only have a 1GB card. I was thinking of moving to a fast 4GB or 8GB cards. I have been trying to find out if these will work in both cameras, but I can't find anything. Anyone know for sure?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/28/2007)
I have been telling people that Sandisk maintained a site which lists the Sandisk cards compatible to selected cameras.
For your Canon A630 these are the compatible memory cards :
SanDisk Ultra® II SDHC 4GB High Performance Card
SDSDRH-4096
SanDisk Standard SDHCâ„¢ Card 4GB
SDSDBR-4096
SanDisk Extreme® III SD™ 2GB
SDSDX3-2048
You can log on to the following site for further information :
sandisk.com/Compatibility/D...
reply to this comment
For your Canon A630 these are the compatible memory cards :
SanDisk Ultra® II SDHC 4GB High Performance Card
SDSDRH-4096
SanDisk Standard SDHCâ„¢ Card 4GB
SDSDBR-4096
SanDisk Extreme® III SD™ 2GB
SDSDX3-2048
You can log on to the following site for further information :
sandisk.com/Compatibility/D...
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.
I have not tried a 4GB, but I can't imagine that it would skip this card capacity.
reply to this comment
I have not tried a 4GB, but I can't imagine that it would skip this card capacity.
Indoor photos are to dark (taranammk — 02/20/2007)
reply to this comment
taranammk (02/20/2007)
I just bought a Canon A630. In Auto mode, indoor pictures are too dark.
I tried the Pragram AE Mode, used custom White Balance (Since no other White Balance settings did not work), I get some good pictures maybe 1 in 20.
Custom White Balance - setting each time is a pain & still I am not getting good pictures.
Is this a known problem with A630 (Bad Indoor Pics!)? or Is my unit faulty?
My major need for photos is Indoor pictures. Should I keep this model or get another model?
Any help will be appreciated
reply to this comment
I tried the Pragram AE Mode, used custom White Balance (Since no other White Balance settings did not work), I get some good pictures maybe 1 in 20.
Custom White Balance - setting each time is a pain & still I am not getting good pictures.
Is this a known problem with A630 (Bad Indoor Pics!)? or Is my unit faulty?
My major need for photos is Indoor pictures. Should I keep this model or get another model?
Any help will be appreciated
kikapics (03/09/2007)
I am having the exact problem with mine - and quite disappointed. The outdoor pics are great, but kids parties and indoor school functions look orange for some reason. I too am considering getting another camera but I have no idea which one. I need one that takes clear crisp pictures with a good zoom lens and not too much fuss.
reply to this comment
PhilH (04/13/2007)
I would suggest digging into the other options such as shutter speed before writing off this camera. The difference between 1/4 and 1/500 is staggering. Auto mode may be a bit off for your needs, but you don't have to be an expert to use one of the other modes (I'm a novice).
reply to this comment
smk1957 (07/24/2007)
Try using the Nighttime snapshot setting for indoor shots. I've done this and it works fine for me.
reply to this comment
Canon A630 flash is cuasing a yellowish cast (tarana — 02/17/2007)
I usually take pictures of my Kids indoors & outdoors with the Flash ON all the time.
With a Sony DSC-S70 I get excellent pictures in the Auto mode with Flash ON. With Canon A630 same subject & same loaction I get a yellowish cast, mostly noticibly in the skin tone. I have all the settings reset to default. I tried Proam AE, Auto & Potrait shooting mode. Same result with Auto Flash & Flash ON.
Today I took some pictures indoors in a brightly lit room (sunlight), with Flash OFF, the yellowish cast is not there.
Does this mean my unit has a defective Flash? Or am I missing something?
I have had this camera for 4 days & have't had any success getting any good pictures of my kids.
reply to this comment
With a Sony DSC-S70 I get excellent pictures in the Auto mode with Flash ON. With Canon A630 same subject & same loaction I get a yellowish cast, mostly noticibly in the skin tone. I have all the settings reset to default. I tried Proam AE, Auto & Potrait shooting mode. Same result with Auto Flash & Flash ON.
Today I took some pictures indoors in a brightly lit room (sunlight), with Flash OFF, the yellowish cast is not there.
Does this mean my unit has a defective Flash? Or am I missing something?
I have had this camera for 4 days & have't had any success getting any good pictures of my kids.
M K (02/21/2007)
I exchanged the unit for another A630. Same result. Custom White Balance seems to help. But it is a pain to set it up each time I want to take a picture of my kids. I have to be quick!!
Appears the Custom White Balance does not get saved between Power OFF & ON in Program AE mode.
Auto mode really is useless on this camera.
I read in another Forum same problem exists with Canon A640. I am really disappointed with the indoor pictures I have got so far.
So I have decided to ditch this camera & may be find another brand.
reply to this comment
Appears the Custom White Balance does not get saved between Power OFF & ON in Program AE mode.
Auto mode really is useless on this camera.
I read in another Forum same problem exists with Canon A640. I am really disappointed with the indoor pictures I have got so far.
So I have decided to ditch this camera & may be find another brand.
Brenda Paro (03/02/2007)
MK, I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. I have to say that I never shoot with Flash, so I am unable to say whether or not this is something I've run into with Canons... but I have noticed that I deal with a yellowish cast when I shoot in low light WITHOUT a flash. You already mentioned white balance, so I won't point you in that direction. The only other thing I would add is this: if you use photo editing software, the Contrast/ Balance adjustment typically takes this tint away- at least, it does when it's the low light tint (as I said I haven't tried the flash). I know that's just one more step to deal with, but if you can't find a replacement camera it's a possible solution that doesn't interfere while shooting. Good luck!
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Are you in fluorescent lighting? That may be the culprit. You can set your P mode to do everything that the Kids & Pets has and manually set the fluo or fluo H setting as your default. Then you can use this mode every time you are shooting them inside.
You can also pick up a very cheap set of fluo/uv/Polarize filters (with adapter) from eBay. My set was about $15. You should keep a UV on at all times anyway since it does not alter indoor shots and does nothing to night shots either. The only drawback is it makes the camera too big to keep in your purse if you keep the adapter on all the time like I do. *Actually, it does fit in my purse, because I want it with me more than most of the other crap we tend to carry around.
reply to this comment
You can also pick up a very cheap set of fluo/uv/Polarize filters (with adapter) from eBay. My set was about $15. You should keep a UV on at all times anyway since it does not alter indoor shots and does nothing to night shots either. The only drawback is it makes the camera too big to keep in your purse if you keep the adapter on all the time like I do. *Actually, it does fit in my purse, because I want it with me more than most of the other crap we tend to carry around.
What type of memory card for all around reliabilty ? (chamois56 — 02/17/2007)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
I know of a few brand names: Lexar, Kingston, SanDisk. I think these would be more reliable overall than an upstart fab company out of nowheresville.
reply to this comment
chamois56 (02/19/2007)
Thanks for the reply.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.
I have used all of the brands that you mentioned in my last digicam (Konica DiMage 500) with no problem.
P.S. I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB. If you don't know how to do this, this is what I did:
Find a corresponding sized folder on your computer (music folders are usually good for this, or your "Program Files" folder). Check the original folder size by right-clicking and going to the Properties page. Write down the exact file size and the number of folders/files inside the folder you are using to test. Copy the entire folder to the card via your PC card reader or through the cable inside the camera. That will take a while for the larger sizes. When that is done, close the original source folder, navigate to your card and look at the Properties page. The file size and number of folders/files should match. Then open the folder on the card and select "details" view. Look at the registered sizes of the files. There should not be any that are 1K - those are thumbnails and a dead giveaway of a fake card (unless they were that way in on your PC as well).
reply to this comment
I have used all of the brands that you mentioned in my last digicam (Konica DiMage 500) with no problem.
P.S. I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB. If you don't know how to do this, this is what I did:
Find a corresponding sized folder on your computer (music folders are usually good for this, or your "Program Files" folder). Check the original folder size by right-clicking and going to the Properties page. Write down the exact file size and the number of folders/files inside the folder you are using to test. Copy the entire folder to the card via your PC card reader or through the cable inside the camera. That will take a while for the larger sizes. When that is done, close the original source folder, navigate to your card and look at the Properties page. The file size and number of folders/files should match. Then open the folder on the card and select "details" view. Look at the registered sizes of the files. There should not be any that are 1K - those are thumbnails and a dead giveaway of a fake card (unless they were that way in on your PC as well).
Is the canon A540 you are selling for $159 new or refub? (ladybugm — 02/15/2007)
I am shopping for a new camera. I use the camera for family and travel photos. Will the quality of this camera give that to me? is it user friendly?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/15/2007)
Hi Sandy,
We don't actually sell anything here at DCHQ. We merely link to online merchants who do sell the cameras.
The $159 deal you're talking about is from RefurbDepot.com, and as the name suggests, it's for a refurbished model. If you go here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) you'll see a list of merchants in the upper right hand corner. Click on one of the prices to be taken to that merchant's page, where you'll get full info on the camera being offered.
As to the camera's quality--it's very good. Personally, I'd spend a little more and upgrade to the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but either one would get you good results for general-purpose photography. All of Canon's consumer cameras are very user-friendly and have very good automatic shooting modes.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
We don't actually sell anything here at DCHQ. We merely link to online merchants who do sell the cameras.
The $159 deal you're talking about is from RefurbDepot.com, and as the name suggests, it's for a refurbished model. If you go here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) you'll see a list of merchants in the upper right hand corner. Click on one of the prices to be taken to that merchant's page, where you'll get full info on the camera being offered.
As to the camera's quality--it's very good. Personally, I'd spend a little more and upgrade to the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but either one would get you good results for general-purpose photography. All of Canon's consumer cameras are very user-friendly and have very good automatic shooting modes.
Hope this helps!
How do I read reviews about the stores (not camera)? (sc2007 — 02/12/2007)
I can't figure out how to read customer reviews of the stores listed at this host. Also, how do I post review after shopping from a store through this host? Appreciate your advice. Stephen
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/12/2007)
Hi Stephen,
The best way to get reviews of online merchants is from ResellerRatings.com ( resellerratings.com/ ) or Shopping.com ( shopping.com/ ). Just a little bit down the center of the page you'll see a text box with the text "Enter Store Name" in it. Type in the name of the shop you want reviews of, and away you go.
If you want to post a camera review here on DCHQ, you should go to the product page for the camera you've bought (like the one up there, to the A630), click on the "Reviews" tab, and write a review. If you want to review the seller, you'll want to do that via ResellerRatings or Shopping.com, as we don't do that here.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The best way to get reviews of online merchants is from ResellerRatings.com ( resellerratings.com/ ) or Shopping.com ( shopping.com/ ). Just a little bit down the center of the page you'll see a text box with the text "Enter Store Name" in it. Type in the name of the shop you want reviews of, and away you go.
If you want to post a camera review here on DCHQ, you should go to the product page for the camera you've bought (like the one up there, to the A630), click on the "Reviews" tab, and write a review. If you want to review the seller, you'll want to do that via ResellerRatings or Shopping.com, as we don't do that here.
Good luck!
csaumure (02/16/2007)
Cnew reviews also show the cheapest price along with merchant ratings based on customer feedbacks.
reply to this comment
Can I change the brightness settings in canonA630? If so how? I feel my pictures are bit dark. (sandy343 — 02/07/2007)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/07/2007)
Sandy,
You can change the brightness on your photos. While in photo mode, you should be able to push the WB button and adjust the brightness left and right for darker and lighter respectfully. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can change the brightness on your photos. While in photo mode, you should be able to push the WB button and adjust the brightness left and right for darker and lighter respectfully. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Kcho Loren (03/23/2007)
You cannot change the brightness of your pictures directly. You can use the manual mode and choose the right aperture and shutter settings.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Yes, Manual, P or C will all do it. You can also chose AV or TV to adjust only one or the other. Just watch for the exposure warning. If it's red, you need to adjust first.
Here's something I learned from a pro Canon photog - after you take your shot, you can press the DISP button in review mode and it will show you all the settings that were used, a spectral anaysis and a thumbnail of your shot. Any areas that are flashing are over-exposed. So what you do is retake the shot by first selecting a different spot in your field to set the exposure value, then recenter and shoot.
To get out of this mode, either press DISP again (2X) or just switch back to shooting mode.
And thanks Andrew, I had forgotten about that feature!
reply to this comment
Here's something I learned from a pro Canon photog - after you take your shot, you can press the DISP button in review mode and it will show you all the settings that were used, a spectral anaysis and a thumbnail of your shot. Any areas that are flashing are over-exposed. So what you do is retake the shot by first selecting a different spot in your field to set the exposure value, then recenter and shoot.
To get out of this mode, either press DISP again (2X) or just switch back to shooting mode.
And thanks Andrew, I had forgotten about that feature!
Canon A630 Flash readiness (sc2007 — 01/18/2007)
How long do I have to wait before the flash is ready for the next picture?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/18/2007)
Hi Stephen,
The figure I'm seeing most often is "10 seconds or less," and all of the user reviews that mention the flash recycle period say that it's "very good" without giving a specific number. Its near-identical twin the A640 got these timings in dpreview's in-depth review:
Shot to Shot Flash off 1.7sec
Shot to Shot Flash on (red-eye reduction off)* 2.6sec
Shot to Shot Flash on (red-eye reduction on)* 3.2sec
The *s are there to indicate that these timings were taken with the subject 3ft from the camera, and that they will increase as the subject gets further from the lens.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The figure I'm seeing most often is "10 seconds or less," and all of the user reviews that mention the flash recycle period say that it's "very good" without giving a specific number. Its near-identical twin the A640 got these timings in dpreview's in-depth review:
Shot to Shot Flash off 1.7sec
Shot to Shot Flash on (red-eye reduction off)* 2.6sec
Shot to Shot Flash on (red-eye reduction on)* 3.2sec
The *s are there to indicate that these timings were taken with the subject 3ft from the camera, and that they will increase as the subject gets further from the lens.
Hope this helps!
bukit97 (01/19/2007)
The time that you have to wait for the flash to get ready for the next picture depends on the condition of your battery more than the re-cycling time of the built-in flash.
Fully charged batteries should re-charge a built-in flash of Canon A630 within 2 or 3 seconds.
Weak batteries, however, may drag on to 4 or more seconds to get the flash ready.
Plug your camera to an AC adapter and you will see the difference.
reply to this comment
Fully charged batteries should re-charge a built-in flash of Canon A630 within 2 or 3 seconds.
Weak batteries, however, may drag on to 4 or more seconds to get the flash ready.
Plug your camera to an AC adapter and you will see the difference.
sc2007 (01/22/2007)
Both answers from bukit97 and from Ben Keough are very concise and helpful. I select bukit97 as winner only because I will select Ben as winner in one or more of my other questions. I love this site. The answers from users are extremely helpful. Thanks. This is the camera I will buy soon. Just waiting for the price to drop a little bit more.
Stephen
reply to this comment
Stephen
Ben Keough (01/22/2007)
Great to hear we were helpful for you, Stephen. The A630 is a great camera and I'm sure you'll be pleased with it. :)
reply to this comment
How long is the lag for Canon A630? (sc2007 — 01/18/2007)
How fast the shutter responses after the button is pressed?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/18/2007)
Hi Stephen,
As with the flash recycle time question, I'm going to quote dpreview.com's comprehensive review ( dpreview.com/reviews/canona... ) of the A630's big brother the A640. These cameras are nearly identical and perform very similarly. In the following stats, "half press lag" is the time it takes the camera to focus when you half-press the shutter button; "half to full-press lag" is the time it takes to capture the image when you shoot from the pre-focused half-press state; "full press lag" is the seamless combination of these two actions. It's worth noting that these are average figures, and that they will be slightly higher in low light and at the longest end of the zoom:
Half-press Lag (0->S1) Wide angle (AiAF or FlexiZone focus) ~ 0.4sec
Half-press Lag (0->S1) Telephoto (AiAF or FlexiZone focus) ~ 0.5sec
Half to Full-press Lag (S1->S2) LCD live view ~ 0.08sec
Half to Full-press Lag (S1->S2) Optical Viewfinder ~ 0.05sec
Full-press Lag (0->S2) LCD live view, wide angle ~ 0.6sec
Off to Shot Taken LCD live view 1.7sec
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
As with the flash recycle time question, I'm going to quote dpreview.com's comprehensive review ( dpreview.com/reviews/canona... ) of the A630's big brother the A640. These cameras are nearly identical and perform very similarly. In the following stats, "half press lag" is the time it takes the camera to focus when you half-press the shutter button; "half to full-press lag" is the time it takes to capture the image when you shoot from the pre-focused half-press state; "full press lag" is the seamless combination of these two actions. It's worth noting that these are average figures, and that they will be slightly higher in low light and at the longest end of the zoom:
Half-press Lag (0->S1) Wide angle (AiAF or FlexiZone focus) ~ 0.4sec
Half-press Lag (0->S1) Telephoto (AiAF or FlexiZone focus) ~ 0.5sec
Half to Full-press Lag (S1->S2) LCD live view ~ 0.08sec
Half to Full-press Lag (S1->S2) Optical Viewfinder ~ 0.05sec
Full-press Lag (0->S2) LCD live view, wide angle ~ 0.6sec
Off to Shot Taken LCD live view 1.7sec
Hope this helps!
sc2007 (01/22/2007)
Thanks Ben It is so wonderful you care to share your knowledge with others. I also find your reference to dpreview.com very useful.
Stephen
reply to this comment
Stephen
How good is the wide angle capability of the Canon A630? (sc2007 — 01/18/2007)
I sometimes take group pictures of many people at a distance of about 10-12 feet. Is the A630 able to cover 60 degrees?
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (01/20/2007)
Hi Stephen,
35mm lens covers about 64 degrees
reply to this comment
35mm lens covers about 64 degrees
sc2007 (01/22/2007)
Ardi,
Thanks. Do you happen to know what is the typical angle with point and shoot cameras featuring wide angle?
Stephen
reply to this comment
Thanks. Do you happen to know what is the typical angle with point and shoot cameras featuring wide angle?
Stephen
Kcho Loren (03/23/2007)
There are not many cameras with wide angle capabilities. But Panasonic's DMC-FX01s models has 28mm (35mm equivalent) lens. I don't know which angle cover it lens. My A630 covers 50 degrees approximately.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
This camera's "wide angle" is actually just letterbox. I have tried it. It gives the illusion of wide by inserting a black strip along the long edges. For a true wide, you will need to purchase a wide angle lens (and adapter). The one I got from 47th St. Photo was super cheap and came with a 10X macro base that you can use alone.
Just watch out for vignetting. What I have learned is to shoot a pic larger than the frame I actually want, ignoring the dark corners and then crop all the borders off on my computer and resize back up to the original size. Since this is 8 MP there is absolutely no loss of res when you resize up by that small an amount.
reply to this comment
Just watch out for vignetting. What I have learned is to shoot a pic larger than the frame I actually want, ignoring the dark corners and then crop all the borders off on my computer and resize back up to the original size. Since this is 8 MP there is absolutely no loss of res when you resize up by that small an amount.
A good mid priced camera for ebay auction close-up pics on reflective coins (callcam — 01/18/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/18/2007)
Duane,
The best middle of the road camera I can think of is the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's got a nice 8MP sensor, a decent 4x optical zoom, a nice big LCD screen (that pops out and rotates), and most importantly for your closeups, a 1cm macro range. That range, combined with the 8MP resolution means that you'll get tons of detail on your coins. You can get great results in full auto mode, but it also features total manual control should you want to get creative. Furthermore, it's one of the best-rated cameras out right now, both in terms of pro reviews and user ratings.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The best middle of the road camera I can think of is the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's got a nice 8MP sensor, a decent 4x optical zoom, a nice big LCD screen (that pops out and rotates), and most importantly for your closeups, a 1cm macro range. That range, combined with the 8MP resolution means that you'll get tons of detail on your coins. You can get great results in full auto mode, but it also features total manual control should you want to get creative. Furthermore, it's one of the best-rated cameras out right now, both in terms of pro reviews and user ratings.
Good luck!
Duane (01/19/2007)
Thanks, everything you wrote corroberates what they told me at Best Buy. I decided to pay a little more and get a Sony DSC-P10, which has a magnifying glass sttings for getting details.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I would NOT get it at Best Buy (or any other retail store), simply because of their price. Go to psrush.com. You will save in the neighborhood of 50 bucks! I bought two (me & mom) from them at $212.85 in March, and two of my friends are getting them tomorrow online from the same place for about $190. The shipping varies (I paid $20 for both to Hawaii - 3 days via UPS), but if you use their Google checkout feature, and you are a first time user, you get $10 off your order.
Also never NEVER buy refurb - at this price, new is the only way to go.
reply to this comment
Also never NEVER buy refurb - at this price, new is the only way to go.
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
OOOOPS!! Thats' PCRush, not psrush
reply to this comment
What is the best overall camera in the $250 -300 range for family/vacation shots? (stacir — 01/17/2007)
I have had the Sony Cybershot 3.2 megapixels (model DSC-P5). I have had it a long time and am going on vacation soon. I was just going to buy the new Cybershot with 8.1 megapixels but was reading some complaints about the low lighting pictures which worried me. (I guess I was being too brand loyal!) The only complaints I have had with this camera are the lag time to take a picture (and between pictures) and the problem with taking low light pictures. These are the only reasons I am looking to buy a new camera. I take a lot of pictures of my daughters, and I want a camera that will take faster pictures so I don't have to make them sit & wait for the camera between shots. Also, I want it to be able to take low light pictures (ie: inside a restaurant). Lastly, my Sony has a rechargeable battery. I did replace it once. What are the benefits of AA batteries vs. this rechargeable kind?
Thanks for any advice!
reply to this comment
Thanks for any advice!
Joe (01/17/2007)
I would suggest the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has what you are looking for. No AA batts which can be a pain because AAs are easy to replace at any corner store if travelling. The packs last longer and recharge better.
reply to this comment
stacir (01/17/2007)
I had read from a few people who bought this camera that they had trouble taking shots with low lighting. Is there a special feature that helps with this that maybe these users didn't know about?
reply to this comment
Why is there such a difference between what I see in the view finder and what appears on the LCD screen (A630)? (rdf — 01/16/2007)
I love the A630, but when I crop a picture tight in the viewfinder I see a much wider shot on the LCD screen
reply to this comment
bukit97 (01/16/2007)
This is mainly due to the fact that Digital compact uses separate lenses for taking pictures and for the view finder.
In the "olden days", range finder cameras with such a design would have a yellow rectangle in the view finder to show the actual frame of the picture being taken. however, this is lacking in modern digital compacts.
DSLR uses the same lens for viewing and taking pictures and would not have the same problem.
reply to this comment
In the "olden days", range finder cameras with such a design would have a yellow rectangle in the view finder to show the actual frame of the picture being taken. however, this is lacking in modern digital compacts.
DSLR uses the same lens for viewing and taking pictures and would not have the same problem.
rdf (01/16/2007)
Do all compact digital cameras have this issue? I have a G1 and can't recall a problem to this extent. My wife is ready to return the A630. Your right on the DSLR, I have a digital Rebel and don't experience this problem.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (01/16/2007)
Not all compact digitals have this issue. In fact many have moved from two lens design to single lens design, doing away with the view finder altogether.
The what-you-see-is-what-you-get concept of SLRs becomes true in such digital compacts and it is made much easier to see, and crop,because of the advantage of big LCD screens.
For digital compacts which retain a separate view finder, there would be varying degrees of difference in the picture as seen through the view finder and on the LCDs.
Some models are more noticeable than others.
reply to this comment
The what-you-see-is-what-you-get concept of SLRs becomes true in such digital compacts and it is made much easier to see, and crop,because of the advantage of big LCD screens.
For digital compacts which retain a separate view finder, there would be varying degrees of difference in the picture as seen through the view finder and on the LCDs.
Some models are more noticeable than others.
Rich Watson (01/20/2007)
The zooming capability (and small size) of modern cameras adds to the problem of getting an accurate rendition in the viewfinder. In the "old days" a 35mm rangefinder camera with (yawn) a 35-80 mm light zoom lens was easy to translate to the large viewfinder. After all, the camera itself was pretty hefty (with lots of room for optics). So a really accurate viewfinder, I'm afraid, would take up a lot of valuable camera space, which quite frankly, is of limited use on a camera with a 3 inch LCD.
reply to this comment
Canon A series vs. Canon Elph SD series - what is the difference (beyond the obvious) (PamG — 01/16/2007)
The Canon A630 on sale is currently the same price as the Canon ELPH SD600 (including an extra battery). I mostly take pictures of my young children and other people shots then print them in 4x6 after having cropped and removed redeye. Faster flash recharge time and faster recycle time appeals to me as does the 4x zoom, I think. Obviously, The Canon ELPH is smaller (pros and cons to that, I understand), doesn't use 4AAs, and has fewer megapixels and a smaller zoom. I don't know what else to look at in comparing these cameras. I just want an easy-to-use camera that takes great pictures in all situations.. is that too much to ask?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/18/2007)
Hi Pam,
You've covered the differences pretty well yourself. The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is definitely a superior camera to the SD600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and yes, it has faster flash recharge, lower shutter lag, and is an all-around better performer. Furthermore, it has a lot more options when it comes to settings, so if you want to get creative somewhere down the line (messing with manual settings like aperture, shutter speed, white balance, etc) you'll be able to. The SD600 lacks full manual control, which many people would find very limiting. Personally, I wouldn't recommend the SD600 over the A630 to anyone who isn't specifically looking for a camera that'll fit in a tight pocket. The A630 isn't that much bigger, and the jump in performance is substantial.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
You've covered the differences pretty well yourself. The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is definitely a superior camera to the SD600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and yes, it has faster flash recharge, lower shutter lag, and is an all-around better performer. Furthermore, it has a lot more options when it comes to settings, so if you want to get creative somewhere down the line (messing with manual settings like aperture, shutter speed, white balance, etc) you'll be able to. The SD600 lacks full manual control, which many people would find very limiting. Personally, I wouldn't recommend the SD600 over the A630 to anyone who isn't specifically looking for a camera that'll fit in a tight pocket. The A630 isn't that much bigger, and the jump in performance is substantial.
Hope this helps!
PamG (01/18/2007)
Extremely helpful - a really terrific answer. I couldn't find this kind of information anywhere - even in some stores. Thanks!
reply to this comment
I need to take closeups of small things; what kind of macro do I need? (Leopardcur — 01/15/2007)
I want to take closeup pics of rings, coins, & jewelry. What type of rig do I need? What kind of lens power & macro.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Hi Jake,
There aren't really different "kinds" of macros. Macro is simply a term used to signify close-up photography as a whole.
There are many models of camera that offer very good macro capability. The most impressive that I've seen are Canon's S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which include a "Super Macro" mode that allows them to focus on subjects that are actually touching the glass of the lens. You can't really get any better than that.
Are there any other considerations you have in making your choice? Do you care if it's a bulkier camera? What's your price range? Do you plan to do any manual shooting, or will it all be in automatic mode? If I have a slightly better idea of what you're looking for I can help you better.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
There aren't really different "kinds" of macros. Macro is simply a term used to signify close-up photography as a whole.
There are many models of camera that offer very good macro capability. The most impressive that I've seen are Canon's S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which include a "Super Macro" mode that allows them to focus on subjects that are actually touching the glass of the lens. You can't really get any better than that.
Are there any other considerations you have in making your choice? Do you care if it's a bulkier camera? What's your price range? Do you plan to do any manual shooting, or will it all be in automatic mode? If I have a slightly better idea of what you're looking for I can help you better.
Good luck!
Leopardcur (01/16/2007)
Thanks much Ben!! I'd really not like to buy a very expensive camera, unless I have to. I just want a camera that will take nice closeups of coins....where the dates are highly visible. Some of my internet friends post pics of gold rings....and ya can see the gold karat stamps inside the ring. I have a Kodak CX 7430 camera....we love it for point & shoot.....but so far....it isn't doing the job on the closeup pics. I don't care if it's heavy or not. I usually shoot my pics on auto.....I am an amatur......but most of my pics have been great!! Your further imput would be greatly appreciated. I'll check out the cameras ya mentioned. Thanks Jake Leopardcur
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Jake,
Could you be more specific than "not very expensive"? What's your upper limit in terms of dollars? I'd like to recommend something that will be the best camera for your money.
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Could you be more specific than "not very expensive"? What's your upper limit in terms of dollars? I'd like to recommend something that will be the best camera for your money.
Thanks!
Leopardcur (01/16/2007)
Let's try $250!! Will this work?? Jake
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
$250 is just about perfect. I was already leaning toward recommending the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and it fits right into that price range ($245 at Amazon right now). It's a fantastic camera in pretty much all respects, but its macro mode is really awesome. You can focus on objects as close as 1cm away from the lens, which should be plenty close for what you want to do. Additionally, the nice 2.5" LCD swivels out from the body, so you can use different angles without having to crane your neck into uncomfortable positions. It has an 8MP sensor, which will leave you plenty of room to crop your images.
That's the best recommendation I've got, and to be honest it's probably the best camera bar none in the $250 range (check out those glowing user reviews!).
Good luck!
reply to this comment
That's the best recommendation I've got, and to be honest it's probably the best camera bar none in the $250 range (check out those glowing user reviews!).
Good luck!
Leopardcur (01/17/2007)
Great Ben.....I'll check them out. Appreciate your imput!! Take care Jake Leopardcur
reply to this comment
camara advise (01/21/2007)
I would like a camara that has a great close up like this camara & is great with night shots. Do you have a better idea on a camara than the S2 IS?
Judi
reply to this comment
Judi
LLTaylor Designs (02/17/2007)
My God. This answer is what I have been looking and looking for. Thanks a Million. I was wondering around in the dark. I am returning the one I got tonight the sd900 for the A630 it's just what I needed. Tiny Close-ups. I can't thank you enough!
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Jake, here are some macro shots with the A630 in auto mode:
i118.photobucket.com/albums... aware that for indoor shots of small close things like jewelry, you will have to tweak the flash settings and you may experience a shadow on your subject from the projection of the lens apparatus. The way to avoid this is to take the shots in natural light outdoors or indoors with an alternate light source aimed at the object. You will also have to make some adjustments due to glare from that other light. Since you will be so close, you may have to take several shots to get just the right combination of light, angle, shadow, reflection, etc. The emerald necklace was not taken in any kind of setting as described above - it was sitting on a piece of paper on my desk with my goose neck lamp shining in it. So don't judge by the lighting. Do judge by the detail. It was taken about 1" away.
The bees are on flowers about 1.5 inches across, and the lens is practically touching them - the bees that is. (Luckily I am not allergic like my mom!) I really like how you can see the pollen on their backs and legs and head! Also I like how you can see the detail inside the small center part of the flower, including the pollen on the stamens, and the wings are in perfect focus and you can clearly see through them, and you can see their veins!
The little larva on my strawberry has two transparent membranes, one smooth on the outside and one undulating on the inside. You can see his posterior projections and the freckles on his back!
Watch out! I have already recommended this camera to three people and they have all bought them!
reply to this comment
i118.photobucket.com/albums... aware that for indoor shots of small close things like jewelry, you will have to tweak the flash settings and you may experience a shadow on your subject from the projection of the lens apparatus. The way to avoid this is to take the shots in natural light outdoors or indoors with an alternate light source aimed at the object. You will also have to make some adjustments due to glare from that other light. Since you will be so close, you may have to take several shots to get just the right combination of light, angle, shadow, reflection, etc. The emerald necklace was not taken in any kind of setting as described above - it was sitting on a piece of paper on my desk with my goose neck lamp shining in it. So don't judge by the lighting. Do judge by the detail. It was taken about 1" away.
The bees are on flowers about 1.5 inches across, and the lens is practically touching them - the bees that is. (Luckily I am not allergic like my mom!) I really like how you can see the pollen on their backs and legs and head! Also I like how you can see the detail inside the small center part of the flower, including the pollen on the stamens, and the wings are in perfect focus and you can clearly see through them, and you can see their veins!
The little larva on my strawberry has two transparent membranes, one smooth on the outside and one undulating on the inside. You can see his posterior projections and the freckles on his back!
Watch out! I have already recommended this camera to three people and they have all bought them!
Ben Keough (05/10/2007)
Awesome photos, Lisa! The strawberry one in particular is really beautiful. :]
reply to this comment
Leopardcur (05/10/2007)
Lisa....Nice Pics!!! Thanks for the info & pics!! Take care Jake
reply to this comment
liberty (06/17/2007)
Is anybody familiar with using macro on a canon S2 IS? I just got one, but can't get any good macro shots. Camera won't focus that close. Any ideas?
reply to this comment
lisasturm (06/18/2007)
Thanks for the compliments. I have now convinced 7 people, either personally or through my review, to buy the Canon A630. I think I need to write to Canon and work out some kind of deal at this point!
And I can now add to my recommendation that so far 3 of my Canon photos have been selected for publication in two different amateur photo books, and one publisher has requested another submission. The one I posted with the bee on the right side will be in "Endless Journeys", which also contains another A630 shot (Dashing Donor) and one from my Minolta DiMage G500 (Mists of Mokule`ia).
I am beginning to be a pain amongst my friends because I am always shooting, but you never know when that perfect moment might present itself!
Happy shooting to all,
Lisa
reply to this comment
And I can now add to my recommendation that so far 3 of my Canon photos have been selected for publication in two different amateur photo books, and one publisher has requested another submission. The one I posted with the bee on the right side will be in "Endless Journeys", which also contains another A630 shot (Dashing Donor) and one from my Minolta DiMage G500 (Mists of Mokule`ia).
I am beginning to be a pain amongst my friends because I am always shooting, but you never know when that perfect moment might present itself!
Happy shooting to all,
Lisa
Leopardcur (06/18/2007)
Your info has been most informative, Lisa. Am sure everyone has benefited from it. Take care & Thanks!!! Jake
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (06/25/2007)
Liberty, the S2 IS macro works by pressing the macro button (on the side of the lens housing) so that the small flower icon appears on the LCD. In all other modes than automatic, you can hold this button down to get to super macro mode.
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Hope this helps.
liberty (06/25/2007)
Thanks Ben!
reply to this comment
can anyone tell me the cheapest price for canon a630 camera in the uae (anisibu — 01/14/2007)
reply to this comment
Victor M. Ortega (01/14/2007)
If you mean the lowest price in the USA, I have been looking for several days and I found it at Thedigitalexpo.com The price is $215 + $8.49 for S&H
If anyone find a better price, plese let us know.
reply to this comment
If anyone find a better price, plese let us know.
P. C. (01/17/2007)
They are scum. The prices on their site are just to suck you in. Once you give them your credit card number they will request a phone call to verify your order. At that point they will try to sell you other item and tell you that the price is for the refurbished camera. The price was good enough so I was willing to go with refurbished. I called a couple of days later to confirm that the order had been sent. At that time they told me it was on back order. I told them I still wanted it but did call them scum. A few minutes later I got an email cancelling my order.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact) in March for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20 (that's how much to Hawaii, which is normally more that most other places in the US).
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
P.S. NEVER get refurb. At this price, new is the way to go. Why take the risk?
Also, check out Repair Tech. 5 yr warranty for about $40 which includes no-fee repairs, a no-lemon policy and annual cleaning and adjustments. The website will tell you where (in the WORLD) there are repair centers, you just have to confirm that they contract with Repair Tech. You may have to send it somewhere at your cost. Also, you are even covered when traveling - just find an affiliated repair center where you are!
reply to this comment
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
P.S. NEVER get refurb. At this price, new is the way to go. Why take the risk?
Also, check out Repair Tech. 5 yr warranty for about $40 which includes no-fee repairs, a no-lemon policy and annual cleaning and adjustments. The website will tell you where (in the WORLD) there are repair centers, you just have to confirm that they contract with Repair Tech. You may have to send it somewhere at your cost. Also, you are even covered when traveling - just find an affiliated repair center where you are!
lisasturm (08/10/2007)
P.P.S. About the warranty:
Since I have taken over 5K pix with this camera, I have finally worn out the lens motor. When I called Repair Tech, they referred me to Canon, since I am still under their one year warranty time. He also explained that my 5-yr Repair Tech policy starts AFTER the Canon one is done! I have SIX YEARS of service on this beautiful camera.
As for the lens motor problem, I was told that this is a problem that normally happens about 3 years in, but since I had taken so very many pictures, that I had upped the curve. Sent it in to Canon via Priority Mail, got it back in about one week. The repair was FREE!
Still in love with this A630!
reply to this comment
Since I have taken over 5K pix with this camera, I have finally worn out the lens motor. When I called Repair Tech, they referred me to Canon, since I am still under their one year warranty time. He also explained that my 5-yr Repair Tech policy starts AFTER the Canon one is done! I have SIX YEARS of service on this beautiful camera.
As for the lens motor problem, I was told that this is a problem that normally happens about 3 years in, but since I had taken so very many pictures, that I had upped the curve. Sent it in to Canon via Priority Mail, got it back in about one week. The repair was FREE!
Still in love with this A630!
Why will the settings on my LCD screen show, but not the image I am trying to shoot? (kimberlyturn — 01/11/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/11/2007)
Hi Kim,
First of all, press the DISP. button once or twice while in shooting mode to ensure that you don't simply have the LCD live preview turned off. Since you've got icons on-screen but no image, this seems sort of unlikely.
Second, does the camera still produce accurate pictures, despite your not being able to see anything on the screen, or are the images it produces black?
If the DISP. button doesn't fix the problem, and if the images it outputs are black or otherwise messed up, the problem is likely that you have an issue with the CCD sensor in your camera. Essentially, either the imaging sensor has failed, or it has somehow come undone from the rest of the camera. This sort of problem generally requires a repair, but if you've had the camera for less than a year and haven't dropped it or anything, you'll probably get a free repair from Canon (at your cost for shipping, though). You can request a repair here ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ).
Good luck!
reply to this comment
First of all, press the DISP. button once or twice while in shooting mode to ensure that you don't simply have the LCD live preview turned off. Since you've got icons on-screen but no image, this seems sort of unlikely.
Second, does the camera still produce accurate pictures, despite your not being able to see anything on the screen, or are the images it produces black?
If the DISP. button doesn't fix the problem, and if the images it outputs are black or otherwise messed up, the problem is likely that you have an issue with the CCD sensor in your camera. Essentially, either the imaging sensor has failed, or it has somehow come undone from the rest of the camera. This sort of problem generally requires a repair, but if you've had the camera for less than a year and haven't dropped it or anything, you'll probably get a free repair from Canon (at your cost for shipping, though). You can request a repair here ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ).
Good luck!
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Just a thought - I once had this problem and I nearly freaked out! Stupid question, but what mode are you in? My problem was I had it on Manual mode set at 1/2500 and f8.0. Not sure why it was like that, but the screen was completely black except for all the white and green indicators around the edges and the focus square in the middle.
I hope that's the problem and not something major.
Another thing that happened recently is that the plastic doors on the front of the lens closed once a little hard and got jammed shut. I did not notice until I powered up again and could not see anything on the LCD. All it took was a flick with my fingernail and the piece that was on the top popped open. I think the spring was just a little tight.
reply to this comment
I hope that's the problem and not something major.
Another thing that happened recently is that the plastic doors on the front of the lens closed once a little hard and got jammed shut. I did not notice until I powered up again and could not see anything on the LCD. All it took was a flick with my fingernail and the piece that was on the top popped open. I think the spring was just a little tight.
Which compact Canon (or other) camera would you advise for a very average, everyday photographer? (ksg310 — 01/10/2007)
I'm looking in the price range of $250ish. I want something easy to use that's reliable and small. Also, what additional accessories are most recommended to supplement the camera?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/10/2007)
Here's a good place to start. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) All within your price range and all highly rated. Of which, I'm partial to the PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). 8MP. 4x optical zoom. Large LCD screen. Movie mode with sound. Uses AA batteries. Nice for everyday.
However, everyday use may mean something you want with you at all times. As such, smaller pocket sized cameras like the Nikon Coolpix S7c ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) may be a goodie because it also allows you to wirelessly send your pictures anywhere. It has a slightly less resolution at 7.1MP, and smaller zoom at 3x, but it also comes with vibration reduction, a kind of image stabilization, slightly larger LCD.
reply to this comment
However, everyday use may mean something you want with you at all times. As such, smaller pocket sized cameras like the Nikon Coolpix S7c ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) may be a goodie because it also allows you to wirelessly send your pictures anywhere. It has a slightly less resolution at 7.1MP, and smaller zoom at 3x, but it also comes with vibration reduction, a kind of image stabilization, slightly larger LCD.
Brenda Paro (01/10/2007)
James is right on- I think just about anything in the Canon A-series is great for a beginning photographer who wants good image quality. I highly recommend the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... as well- it is extremely simple to use and offers just enough creative freedom, yet still does well as a basic point and shoot.
In terms of extra accessories, your main concern should be a memory card and batteries. You'll need a memory card, as for example the Canon only comes with a 16mb card, which won't hold many photos. I recommend a card of at least 256mb, which should only run around 30 dollars. For batteries, the Canon takes four AAs. I would invest in rechargeable NiMH AAs and a charger- they will last months longer than regular batteries. Energizer makes some good batteries and chargers that will probably run you around 30 dollars for both, and they can be bought at any electronics store or even at Walmart. Let me know if you need further assistance tracking down accessories.
reply to this comment
In terms of extra accessories, your main concern should be a memory card and batteries. You'll need a memory card, as for example the Canon only comes with a 16mb card, which won't hold many photos. I recommend a card of at least 256mb, which should only run around 30 dollars. For batteries, the Canon takes four AAs. I would invest in rechargeable NiMH AAs and a charger- they will last months longer than regular batteries. Energizer makes some good batteries and chargers that will probably run you around 30 dollars for both, and they can be bought at any electronics store or even at Walmart. Let me know if you need further assistance tracking down accessories.
by James DeRuvo (01/11/2007)
I agree with Brenda, but I'll take the memory card thing one step further. The temptation will be to get a large card - 2gb or there abouts. But allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
Additionally, I'd recommend using a Card Reader and placing your memory card into it. Then all you need to do is insert the SD card (your PC will recognize it as another drive), and then simply drag and drop wherever you want.
Cameras often come with their own software to manage your photos. I usually recommend to avoid using them as often, they're bloatware. For accessing, managing, and even doing minor corrections on your images I recommend Picasa 2 by Google ( picasa.com ). And it's free.
reply to this comment
Additionally, I'd recommend using a Card Reader and placing your memory card into it. Then all you need to do is insert the SD card (your PC will recognize it as another drive), and then simply drag and drop wherever you want.
Cameras often come with their own software to manage your photos. I usually recommend to avoid using them as often, they're bloatware. For accessing, managing, and even doing minor corrections on your images I recommend Picasa 2 by Google ( picasa.com ). And it's free.
MrBeachBouy (01/11/2007)
In regards to accessories with your point and shoot camera, I've got a mini tripod. Its just a simple little thing, stands maybe 20 cm or less high but very useful. It can stand on a table, on the ground or in a small space. I've used mine to take photo's of fireworks on long exposure with great results, just by sitting the legs of the tripod over a railing of my sisters balcony (so the legs straddle the bar) and holding the legs below the railing. It gives a good steady shot even for a 30 second exposure! Also a decent bag is essetial for protecting your investment.
A must is Picasa 2. I've got Photoshop CS2 and since I downloaded Picasa I have not used Photoshop for photos. Picasa is faster, simpler and very powerful.
reply to this comment
A must is Picasa 2. I've got Photoshop CS2 and since I downloaded Picasa I have not used Photoshop for photos. Picasa is faster, simpler and very powerful.
ksg310 (01/11/2007)
Thanks to everyone for sharing their insights with me. They were all helpful and I truly appreciate the prompt and thorough responses. Thanks again!
reply to this comment
Searching for best quality digital camera, which is also affordable. Can anyone help me out? (lbaile56 — 01/08/2007)
I have sort of shopping around to find a good camera with out paying a whole lot of money. I have heard that:
Canons - are for the most part very good, have good image quality
Lumix - are very grainy, not very good
Fuji- only good for low light indoor
Kodaks- good for fast point and shoot operation
Sonys- have not heard anything very good about them, and also very expensive
reply to this comment
Canons - are for the most part very good, have good image quality
Lumix - are very grainy, not very good
Fuji- only good for low light indoor
Kodaks- good for fast point and shoot operation
Sonys- have not heard anything very good about them, and also very expensive
Ben Keough (01/08/2007)
Hi Lauren,
I think it would be a mistake to overly generalize about any manufacturer. Some of the points you list are fairly accurate, but also somewhat distorted. Canons are indeed known for their consistently smooth images and accurate colors, but there are of course models that fall short of their high standards. While many of the Panasonic cameras do have issues with high image noise at higher ISO settings, but in the right conditions they can produce fantastic images. They also offer many useful features that their competitors do not--for example, all of their cameras, even the cheapest, have optical image stabilization.
Anyway, the point is that there are good and bad cameras from every brand. If you're looking for a decent, inexpensive, feature-packed camera, though, the best recommendation I can make is the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has all of the features of its more expensive big brother, the A640, for quite a bit less. It has a nice 8MP sensor, a 4x optical zoom, and a great flip-out and swivel LCD. Its operation is quick and intuitive, and it has a wide array of manual settings in addition to an easy auto mode.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
I think it would be a mistake to overly generalize about any manufacturer. Some of the points you list are fairly accurate, but also somewhat distorted. Canons are indeed known for their consistently smooth images and accurate colors, but there are of course models that fall short of their high standards. While many of the Panasonic cameras do have issues with high image noise at higher ISO settings, but in the right conditions they can produce fantastic images. They also offer many useful features that their competitors do not--for example, all of their cameras, even the cheapest, have optical image stabilization.
Anyway, the point is that there are good and bad cameras from every brand. If you're looking for a decent, inexpensive, feature-packed camera, though, the best recommendation I can make is the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has all of the features of its more expensive big brother, the A640, for quite a bit less. It has a nice 8MP sensor, a 4x optical zoom, and a great flip-out and swivel LCD. Its operation is quick and intuitive, and it has a wide array of manual settings in addition to an easy auto mode.
Hope this helps!
comparing the Kodak Z612 with Canon A630? (live-simply — 01/07/2007)
Hi -
I am having a difficult time deciding between the Kodak Z612 and Canon A630. (I am getting it as a no-charge replacement under a warranty plan for a Gateway camera.)
I am a novice who basically points & shoots but am interested in exploring features offered. I do need good closeups for uploading online, including hummingbirds and other critters. Probably won't be printing many photos, and definitely not large-size ones. The zoom and video features really appeal to me on the Kodak. Anything I should consider to make the decision either way is appreciated!!
reply to this comment
I am having a difficult time deciding between the Kodak Z612 and Canon A630. (I am getting it as a no-charge replacement under a warranty plan for a Gateway camera.)
I am a novice who basically points & shoots but am interested in exploring features offered. I do need good closeups for uploading online, including hummingbirds and other critters. Probably won't be printing many photos, and definitely not large-size ones. The zoom and video features really appeal to me on the Kodak. Anything I should consider to make the decision either way is appreciated!!
Brenda Paro (01/08/2007)
Hi Debbie,
If you like the zoom and the video on the Kodak Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I'd say go for it. I think you'll be totally happy. There is nothing major that the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers that the Z612 does not. The only things the Canon might have for it over the Kodak are a few extra megapixels (not a huge deal unless you're planning on blowing up very large prints, and even then the difference between 6 and 8 megapixels won't make or break the image quality); and the advantage of AA batteries (I prefer AAs because they are cheaper to replace than the lithium-ions, even if you buy the rechargeables). Compared to the zoom and the movie mode offered by the Kodak, these are minor advantages- in terms of image quality, these cameras are pretty comparable.
If you do have a store near you that carries both of them, you might want to go in and handle them both in person and see if one of them feels better to you- that's often a great way to decide between two similar cameras. Otherwise, I'd choose the Kodak with no qualms. =) Hope that helps.
reply to this comment
If you like the zoom and the video on the Kodak Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I'd say go for it. I think you'll be totally happy. There is nothing major that the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers that the Z612 does not. The only things the Canon might have for it over the Kodak are a few extra megapixels (not a huge deal unless you're planning on blowing up very large prints, and even then the difference between 6 and 8 megapixels won't make or break the image quality); and the advantage of AA batteries (I prefer AAs because they are cheaper to replace than the lithium-ions, even if you buy the rechargeables). Compared to the zoom and the movie mode offered by the Kodak, these are minor advantages- in terms of image quality, these cameras are pretty comparable.
If you do have a store near you that carries both of them, you might want to go in and handle them both in person and see if one of them feels better to you- that's often a great way to decide between two similar cameras. Otherwise, I'd choose the Kodak with no qualms. =) Hope that helps.
live-simply (01/08/2007)
Thanks for your answer, I understand your feelings about the batteries, though--that's the one feature I like about the Canon. You're right, I will try them both "in hand" for the feel. I'll post my decision.
reply to this comment
Which Memory card to get for the Canon A630 (ner1971 — 01/07/2007)
I am looking for a 1 GB memory card, but I'm confused about high speed options. Can anyone suggest a specific card? thanks.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/07/2007)
Hi Nancy,
Sure, I'd recommend this one ( amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/0... ), the SanDisk Ultra II 1gb card. Frankly, you'd probably be just fine with any old SD card--the A630 is fairly new so it should be compatible with all SD cards on the market, and the speed issue won't really affect you unless you're shooting for a long time in burst mode. SanDisk is the most reliable name in SD cards, however, and the Ultra II is plenty fast. Since prices on these cards are so low these days, you might as well go for the best.
Good Luck!
reply to this comment
Sure, I'd recommend this one ( amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/0... ), the SanDisk Ultra II 1gb card. Frankly, you'd probably be just fine with any old SD card--the A630 is fairly new so it should be compatible with all SD cards on the market, and the speed issue won't really affect you unless you're shooting for a long time in burst mode. SanDisk is the most reliable name in SD cards, however, and the Ultra II is plenty fast. Since prices on these cards are so low these days, you might as well go for the best.
Good Luck!
Ben Keough (01/07/2007)
I'd add that it might be a better idea to get two 512mb cards instead, as it's always good to have a backup in case you lose or just misplace one.
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. (I eBayed this card for $60 - be patient, you will find a good deal). Works like it was meant to be. As you may already know, if you get this card, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.
I have not tried a 4GB, but I can't imagine that it would skip this card capacity.
reply to this comment
I have not tried a 4GB, but I can't imagine that it would skip this card capacity.
what is the diff. between Canon XTi import and USA model? (lavarkadoz — 01/05/2007)
I see that there are many different prices offered for Canon XTi's - what is the difference between the imports and US models? How can you identify one from the other? Is it a big enough difference to make the price increase so much?
reply to this comment
melissaissim (01/05/2007)
Louis,
Hello I would say that there are probably two differences. First, the import may be cheaper or at least advertised cheaper. Second, if you live in the USA and buy an import model the warranty is void. Always be cautious when purchasing items from another country, sometimes AC adapters will not work in the US. Manufacturing regulations can be different depending on where it was made, not to mention on screen menus can be in a different language.
reply to this comment
Hello I would say that there are probably two differences. First, the import may be cheaper or at least advertised cheaper. Second, if you live in the USA and buy an import model the warranty is void. Always be cautious when purchasing items from another country, sometimes AC adapters will not work in the US. Manufacturing regulations can be different depending on where it was made, not to mention on screen menus can be in a different language.
Brenda Paro (01/12/2007)
Melissa is absolutely right. If there's a big price discrepancy between two of the same cameras from different sellers (especially imports vs. non-imports) you should definitely be cautious. The lack of a United States warranty will come back to bite you even if the deal is above-board.
reply to this comment
Deanna H (01/12/2010)
Hi... I have the same question. I was looking to purchase either a Canon t1i or the Nikon d5000 and ended up going with the Nikon. I am afraid now that I may have purchased an import version even though it said nothing about this!! And the sales person that I asked said that it had settings for every language. I got 2 lenses, the body, and several other accessories for $640.00.... GREAT DEAL if it's not some gimic. I ordered from elitecamcorders.com ....
To help with your question.... my husband called canon and they told him that the diff between the usa model and the import are that it has no warranty and that the parts could be counterfeit. I wouldn't recommend buying unless you know for SURE that it's the usa model. I am worried to death that I got ripped off now. I wish I had just spend the extra and ordered from somewhere like Best Buy or Walmart!!
reply to this comment
To help with your question.... my husband called canon and they told him that the diff between the usa model and the import are that it has no warranty and that the parts could be counterfeit. I wouldn't recommend buying unless you know for SURE that it's the usa model. I am worried to death that I got ripped off now. I wish I had just spend the extra and ordered from somewhere like Best Buy or Walmart!!
i just got the A630 and i can't figure out why the camra cord to the computerdoesn't work. (daveworld — 01/05/2007)
The info won't pop up on my computer.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/05/2007)
Hi Dave,
This could be a number of issues, so let's walk through the process of connecting the camera to your computer.
1. Plug USB minijack into the camera's port.
2. Plug other usb jack into the computer's USB port.
3. Ensure that the computer is on and turn on the camera.
At this point if you're running Windows XP you should get a popup window asking you what you want to do with the pictures on your camera. If this window doesn't pop up, open My Computer from the Start Menu and look for your camera in the list of devices (somewhere below the hard drive and optical disc drives).
If you've done all of this and the camera still isn't showing up as connected, let me know and we can get into more advanced troubleshooting.
reply to this comment
This could be a number of issues, so let's walk through the process of connecting the camera to your computer.
1. Plug USB minijack into the camera's port.
2. Plug other usb jack into the computer's USB port.
3. Ensure that the computer is on and turn on the camera.
At this point if you're running Windows XP you should get a popup window asking you what you want to do with the pictures on your camera. If this window doesn't pop up, open My Computer from the Start Menu and look for your camera in the list of devices (somewhere below the hard drive and optical disc drives).
If you've done all of this and the camera still isn't showing up as connected, let me know and we can get into more advanced troubleshooting.
melissaissim (01/05/2007)
Hi Dave, I don't have personal experience with the A630, but plenty of experience troubleshooting camera and computer problems. Pardon me if I go over anything you've already done, or think is obvious but its important to start from the begining.
Have you gotten it to work on this computer before?
If so, sometimes your computer loses sink with the usb device. It happens frequently with my HP camera.
Try unloading the device from the system tray (if it even shows up there) remove the usb cord from both camera and computer. Turn the camera off, restart your computer, plug in the usb to the camera and computer and then turn the camera on...wait to see if your computer automatically detects the new device.
If not, try uninstalling the device and software then re-installing from the camera CD.
You may also want to try a different usb port. (that has worked for me before)
If you haven't gotten it to work on your computer at all then check the manual to see if it supports the operating system you are running on your computer. If it does, then start over from the begining of the installation guide, install the camera drivers and check the cameras support website to see if there are updated drivers available.
Let me know what happens.
reply to this comment
Have you gotten it to work on this computer before?
If so, sometimes your computer loses sink with the usb device. It happens frequently with my HP camera.
Try unloading the device from the system tray (if it even shows up there) remove the usb cord from both camera and computer. Turn the camera off, restart your computer, plug in the usb to the camera and computer and then turn the camera on...wait to see if your computer automatically detects the new device.
If not, try uninstalling the device and software then re-installing from the camera CD.
You may also want to try a different usb port. (that has worked for me before)
If you haven't gotten it to work on your computer at all then check the manual to see if it supports the operating system you are running on your computer. If it does, then start over from the begining of the installation guide, install the camera drivers and check the cameras support website to see if there are updated drivers available.
Let me know what happens.
I am looking to upgrade my Canon A80. I take product shots of clothing for my online store, would this camera be a good fit? (hannasdream — 12/26/2006)
Although I take pics of my family, being able to get clear, accurate (especially in color) photos of my clothing I sell is my number one priority. Any suggestions? How important is the zoom for close up product shots? How important are the MP's? I am also looking at the Canon A630 and A640. Any recommendations for these three cameras? Thanks for your help! Diana
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/27/2006)
Hi Diana,
All three of the cameras you've mentioned are great machines. The FZ50 does indeed have an impressive zoom, but I think that here you're making a key mistake. Since you're looking to take product shots, generally pretty close to the camera, what you're looking for is not a long zoom (which lets you get close to things that are far away), but rather a good macro mode (which gets you clear shots of things that are very close to the camera). I think the FZ50 would probably be overkill for this sort of application.
The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), however, are more modest (read: cheaper) cameras that will give you just as good (if not better) image quality and also have impressive macro modes. Both models will let you focus on objects that are as little as 1cm from the lens, which is pretty impressive and great for detail shots on clothes and other goods. Aside from their macro abilities, they're among the best-rated cameras on the market.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
All three of the cameras you've mentioned are great machines. The FZ50 does indeed have an impressive zoom, but I think that here you're making a key mistake. Since you're looking to take product shots, generally pretty close to the camera, what you're looking for is not a long zoom (which lets you get close to things that are far away), but rather a good macro mode (which gets you clear shots of things that are very close to the camera). I think the FZ50 would probably be overkill for this sort of application.
The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), however, are more modest (read: cheaper) cameras that will give you just as good (if not better) image quality and also have impressive macro modes. Both models will let you focus on objects that are as little as 1cm from the lens, which is pretty impressive and great for detail shots on clothes and other goods. Aside from their macro abilities, they're among the best-rated cameras on the market.
Hope this helps!
hannasdream (12/28/2006)
Thanks! That is a great help! Would you mind clarifying for me the differences between the A630 and A640? From what I've read, I think the 630 would do a great job, but do you see anything about the 640 that would be beneficial for my product shots? Not sure if the 10 MP are necessary or even that significant. Thanks again for your help!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/28/2006)
Diana,
The A640's main advantage over the A630 is 2 additional megapixels, but if you're shooting for the web, this doesn't make any difference for you. I have no hesitation in saying that the A630 will serve your needs just as well as the A640, and at a significantly lower price tag. Go for it. :)
reply to this comment
The A640's main advantage over the A630 is 2 additional megapixels, but if you're shooting for the web, this doesn't make any difference for you. I have no hesitation in saying that the A630 will serve your needs just as well as the A640, and at a significantly lower price tag. Go for it. :)
What's a good camera for taking candid shots of people indoors and out-- Canon A630, Fuji F30, or another? (fischhi — 12/26/2006)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/28/2006)
The Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its slightly pricier, more-megapixeled relative the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) will give you nice all-around performance. For casual shooting those should be great.
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) lacks manual controls, but has an absolutely amazing lowlight performance. So if you don't care about manual exposure and you plan to take lots of indoor/ low light shots without flash, I'd go for the F30. Really depends on your specific needs.
reply to this comment
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) lacks manual controls, but has an absolutely amazing lowlight performance. So if you don't care about manual exposure and you plan to take lots of indoor/ low light shots without flash, I'd go for the F30. Really depends on your specific needs.
How is the battery life? (deliriumdriver — 12/25/2006)
I'm going to spend a semester abroad, and the last thing I want to worry about when I'm hiking across Europe is my camera dying. Can anyone give me an estimate of this camera's battery life? I'm also looking at the Kodak EasyShare Z650.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/26/2006)
Hi Erin,
The A630 takes four AA batteries, which is generally a very good thing if you're looking for long battery life. Normal AA alkaline batteries won't last very long at all with the camera. Canon supplies them in the box, but you might as well throw them out as soon as you get the camera, for all the good they'll do you. However, with AA NiMH rechargeable batteries, according to this review ( dcresource.com/reviews/cano... ) you should be able to get up to 500 shots out of the camera per charge cycle. NiMH batteries last up to 1000 charge cycles before wearing out, so the $15 it will cost you to get four batteries and a charger will be well worth it. I'd actually recommend getting eight instead of four, so you always have a backup set ready to go just in case.
When using NiMH batteries, you should be aware that unlike alkalines, they discharge on their own over time, and are greatly affected by cold and heat. You can read up more on their self-discharge behavior here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiMH#... ).
I'd definitely recommend this camera over the Kodak, especially if you're hiking.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The A630 takes four AA batteries, which is generally a very good thing if you're looking for long battery life. Normal AA alkaline batteries won't last very long at all with the camera. Canon supplies them in the box, but you might as well throw them out as soon as you get the camera, for all the good they'll do you. However, with AA NiMH rechargeable batteries, according to this review ( dcresource.com/reviews/cano... ) you should be able to get up to 500 shots out of the camera per charge cycle. NiMH batteries last up to 1000 charge cycles before wearing out, so the $15 it will cost you to get four batteries and a charger will be well worth it. I'd actually recommend getting eight instead of four, so you always have a backup set ready to go just in case.
When using NiMH batteries, you should be aware that unlike alkalines, they discharge on their own over time, and are greatly affected by cold and heat. You can read up more on their self-discharge behavior here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiMH#... ).
I'd definitely recommend this camera over the Kodak, especially if you're hiking.
Good luck!
how big a memory card can you put in the Canon A630? (Mayormaynot — 12/24/2006)
...without the size of the card and consequently the larger number of pictures stored on the camera slowing down the camera's performance? (I had a Canon A70 before and tried putting a 512 mb card in that, but the camera slowed so badly that I couldn't take picutres). Can I get a 1 gb card for the A630?
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (12/25/2006)
Canon is well known about not including all the technical information in their manuals and website. So in order to get an answer to your question you just need to call them and ask. Here is the number: 1-800-828-4040
reply to this comment
Mayormaynot (12/26/2006)
Thanks, Ardi. That would help me if I wasn't trying to buy a larger card at the Boxing Day sales--Canon is closed Xmas and Boxing Day, which apparently includes their automated help line.
reply to this comment
Russ (12/26/2006)
According to steves digicams, this camera can handle up to a 4 gig card. I have a 512 card in my A630 with no problems.
HTH
Russ
reply to this comment
HTH
Russ
Mayormaynot (01/01/2007)
Thanks, Russ. I sent an email to Canon and actually heard back from them Boxing Day evening; they said the A630 will take a 1 gig card but I suspect they're being conservative (I mean, come on, an 8 megapixel camera designed for only 1 gig????). I took a chance and ordered both a 1 gig and a 2 gig memory card on sale; so far the 1 gig seems to be working okay. Haven't received the 2 gig yet.
reply to this comment
Russ (01/01/2007)
I hope it works out for you. I see on Steves Digicams that they have a 2 gig card with their A630.
Happy Holidays!
Russ
reply to this comment
Happy Holidays!
Russ
I want a compact digital camera for my parents good quality, easy to use, video capability and large memory. Any recommendations? tracey in ny (tb123 — 12/20/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Hi Tracey,
I have one strong recommendation for you.
If video is important, no manufacturer is going to be able to top Canon. Their PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers a great 8 megapixel sensor, a 4x optical zoom, and a very smooth automatic mode. It can shoot at 30 frames per second at 640x480 pixels. I own a similar Canon camera, and I can attest to its great image quality. Your parents should be able to connect the camera to their television and stream the video from the camera to the tv via the included A/V cables. Users seem to love this camera, and the pro reviewers do too.
The A630 takes AA batteries, which means you can either use normal alkalines or--and I recommend this--you can pick up 4 or 8 NiMH rechargeable AAs and a rapid charger for about $15. These will allow for much longer battery life and re-use of the same batteries for up to 1000 charge cycles.
Finally, you should be aware that no digital camera comes with a large amount of memory. This camera takes SecureDigital (SD) cards, so if you choose to buy it, you'll want to pick one up. I'd recommend a 1gb card, which can be had for about $25 at reputable online stores.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
I have one strong recommendation for you.
If video is important, no manufacturer is going to be able to top Canon. Their PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers a great 8 megapixel sensor, a 4x optical zoom, and a very smooth automatic mode. It can shoot at 30 frames per second at 640x480 pixels. I own a similar Canon camera, and I can attest to its great image quality. Your parents should be able to connect the camera to their television and stream the video from the camera to the tv via the included A/V cables. Users seem to love this camera, and the pro reviewers do too.
The A630 takes AA batteries, which means you can either use normal alkalines or--and I recommend this--you can pick up 4 or 8 NiMH rechargeable AAs and a rapid charger for about $15. These will allow for much longer battery life and re-use of the same batteries for up to 1000 charge cycles.
Finally, you should be aware that no digital camera comes with a large amount of memory. This camera takes SecureDigital (SD) cards, so if you choose to buy it, you'll want to pick one up. I'd recommend a 1gb card, which can be had for about $25 at reputable online stores.
Hope this helps!
Sarah (12/21/2006)
I would recommend a Kodak over a Canon as far as ease of use any day. The Canons are nice and have great resolution. However, I have worked at a large electronics store for a significant amount of time and have seen countless older people come in to buy cameras. I have rarely seen them buy anything other than a Kodak. They are SO easy to use and they are extremely affordable too. The Canon Ben was referring to will cost around $299. While the Kodak c875 (8 megapixels and 5x optical zoom) will only cost around $199, or $150 if you can find it on a really nice sale. The older generation also tends to like something that is not terribly small. While the Canon A630 definitely isn't very small, the Kodak c875 isn't terribly small or really bulky either. There is plenty of room to hold on to it. Furthermore, my Mom owns a Kodak and the video quality is excellent! Canons just have too many manual functions that tend to overwhelm many users who are used to 35mm.
As far as memory, Kodak's also use SD memory which is the most affordable. Better sales are also run on these cards because they are the most universal. Almost everyone has a camera that takes this card, which also means that they are easy to find and are less likely to be obsolete in the near future.
reply to this comment
As far as memory, Kodak's also use SD memory which is the most affordable. Better sales are also run on these cards because they are the most universal. Almost everyone has a camera that takes this card, which also means that they are easy to find and are less likely to be obsolete in the near future.
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Actually, I got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact) for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20.
This camera has no internal memory whatsoever, which is one of the very few downsides. But if it's going to be used for video, you will be happy to know that it does have tele/wide function while shooting and the fun color swap and color accent features are available in video also. The sound is not the best, but it's NOT a video camera to begin with.
P.S. My 62 year old mom got hers at the same time and she is photo CRAZY now. When she used film she would barely take anything. For example we spent a month in Peru last year and she only had 6 rolls to process. But she took the camera on a road trip the other day and shot nearly 40 in just one place!
Good luck.
reply to this comment
This camera has no internal memory whatsoever, which is one of the very few downsides. But if it's going to be used for video, you will be happy to know that it does have tele/wide function while shooting and the fun color swap and color accent features are available in video also. The sound is not the best, but it's NOT a video camera to begin with.
P.S. My 62 year old mom got hers at the same time and she is photo CRAZY now. When she used film she would barely take anything. For example we spent a month in Peru last year and she only had 6 rolls to process. But she took the camera on a road trip the other day and shot nearly 40 in just one place!
Good luck.
Huge doubt buying pentax T10 or Canon A540... (sgstyla — 12/17/2006)
I`m going on a holiday to Egypt, so a lot of pictures are going to be taken. I don`t know much about digital camera`s... so maybe somebody could help me out !
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
reply to this comment
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
Ben Keough (12/18/2006)
Hi Steven,
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Thank you for answering Ben. I`ve checked them but they both need 4x AA.... I don`t find this very convenient. Today i went to the store to check some other ones.... The olympus MJU740 what is your opinion about this one ?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Steven,
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Ey Ben,
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
reply to this comment
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Steven,
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
reply to this comment
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Ben,
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
reply to this comment
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Yo Steven,
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
reply to this comment
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
OK ! You made a point here.... Thanks for helping me out and probably a lot more people too !
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
reply to this comment
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
No problem. Hope whichever one you choose works out for you. Let us know how it goes!
reply to this comment
sgstyla (12/21/2006)
The A710 IS has been ordered, I`ll definately share my experiences after my holiday !
reply to this comment
Val (02/17/2007)
Hi ! I was actually just looking at those cameras myself ! I was wondering how it went with the canon (Steven !) and Ben, is there any other cameras that came out since that could be added to the list ?
Thanks heaps
Val
reply to this comment
Thanks heaps
Val
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
Hi Val,
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
reply to this comment
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
Val (02/17/2007)
Hi Richio !
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
reply to this comment
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
Hi Val,
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
reply to this comment
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
sgstyla (02/18/2007)
Hi Val,
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
reply to this comment
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
Rich Watson (02/18/2007)
Hi Steve,
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
reply to this comment
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
Val (02/18/2007)
Hello guys !
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
reply to this comment
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
sgstyla (02/21/2007)
Hahahaha.... I think I have the good batteries but not the best charger ;) It's an old one.... the batteries are 3200mAh NI-MH. Val Good luck with the Panasonic. Hope the camera will provide your wishes. Where in Europe are you heading too ? I`m from Holland, maybe you`ll need some tips ?!
StevoOo...
reply to this comment
StevoOo...
Rich Watson (02/21/2007)
Who made the 3200 mAh? I mean, the brand? I haven't seen any that large.
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
reply to this comment
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
Val (02/21/2007)
Hihi :o) No thanks Steven, I am from France (and Switzerland) myself... Should be better to visit our friends first before they kill us (it's been 4 years we are in Australia, and they've never seen the 2 kids we got since) !! Thanks Richio for the tip about the battery charger. We have an old camera that takes AAs, we may purchase one !!
Val
reply to this comment
Val
WiccaMan (NZ) (02/22/2007)
Well I knew nothing about cameras when I got mine. The only things I knew were
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
reply to this comment
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
grace (03/25/2007)
well after reading all of your comments i am confused as to where to go from here. I was nearly sold on the panasonic fx07 till now. The main features that i am concerned with are macro lens, i photograph lots of small gemstones and need crispness and acurate color. I also want a fast burst feature as i always seem to miss the shots with my now very outdated canon A300. But i am traveller and on the road heaps so i need small and convenient. I am going to look up this canon a710 now but after how my a300 deteriorated after a few years i am a bit skeptical. I want a good price, but can spend a bit more if all these features are top notch of one. If anyone can recommend something for me it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
grace
reply to this comment
Thanks
grace
Tracey (03/25/2007)
Help! Going on vacation and looking for a great compact easy to use camera. Was told the Casio EX Z75 was the best but also looked at some Canons. Now confused. Want great pictures of grandbaby, mountains etc. Have a Canon Powershot S2 IS but have never liked it. I don't really know much and just like to point and shoot. The Canon I have always seems to blur pictures exp if baby moves etc. So need easier but like quality and small size so I can take easily on trips. Can anyone help?
Thanks! Tracey
reply to this comment
Thanks! Tracey
Among point-and-shoot camera under $200, which are ready to shoot next shot quickly? (sudburybill — 12/17/2006)
Thinking about the Canon PowerShot A540. Will I be frustrated by the refresh rate?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/18/2006)
I'd steer clear of this one actually. Recycle times are not that great. It's a nice little camera, but if speed is your primary concern you may find this one frustrating, particularly with the flash on. Ranges from 4-7 seconds. Problem is with the digic chip- the newer A-series from Canon use a newer chip and thus have faster times. If you like the A-series you might want to consider the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (both just over two hundred bucks).
Outside of Canon, the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) deserves a look.
reply to this comment
Outside of Canon, the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) deserves a look.
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact, one for mom) in March for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20 (that's how much to ship to Hawaii, which is normally more that most other places in the US).
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
reply to this comment
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
Wanting quality ultra/compact for taking pics of my small grandchildren. The Fuji advertises no blurry shots...Anything else comparable/beter? (blonddbaby — 12/16/2006)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/17/2006)
Hi there,
The F20 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a nice little camera. It works particularly well in low light situations where you don't want to use flash- it captures what light there is very well, and does a good job avoiding "graininess" even when the photo is fairly dark.
There's no such thing as a camera that delivers 'no blurry shots,' but this camera does have what they call Anti-blur. But it's not quite what you might think. It is based on the idea that in low light situations, cameras usually use a very slow shutter speed (the shutter stays open a longer time to capture more light so the picture isn't too dark). This long exposure time can increase the chance of the image becoming blurry. The anti-blur speeds up the shutter by making the camera more light-sensitive so the long exposure isn't required; this reduces the chance of a blurred image due to a slow shutter. Also, the faster shutter speed is better at capturing fast-moving things (like grandkids!)
I would recommend this camera but I have one question for you first. Are you concerned about blurry shots for a particular reason? If it is because of fast-moving subjects, then this camera will work great. If you are getting blur because the camera is shaking or because of something else, you may want to look for a model with Image Stabilization instead.
reply to this comment
The F20 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a nice little camera. It works particularly well in low light situations where you don't want to use flash- it captures what light there is very well, and does a good job avoiding "graininess" even when the photo is fairly dark.
There's no such thing as a camera that delivers 'no blurry shots,' but this camera does have what they call Anti-blur. But it's not quite what you might think. It is based on the idea that in low light situations, cameras usually use a very slow shutter speed (the shutter stays open a longer time to capture more light so the picture isn't too dark). This long exposure time can increase the chance of the image becoming blurry. The anti-blur speeds up the shutter by making the camera more light-sensitive so the long exposure isn't required; this reduces the chance of a blurred image due to a slow shutter. Also, the faster shutter speed is better at capturing fast-moving things (like grandkids!)
I would recommend this camera but I have one question for you first. Are you concerned about blurry shots for a particular reason? If it is because of fast-moving subjects, then this camera will work great. If you are getting blur because the camera is shaking or because of something else, you may want to look for a model with Image Stabilization instead.
blonddbaby (12/21/2006)
Thanks for the info. We are still looking ...Any info on the Canon. We've looked at the SD620, 630 and the new SD800 IS. We have also looked at the lower/middle Casio's My problem with the Casio is I think of watches, keyboards, etc., not camera's. Will any of these perform better. We currently have a Sony Cybershot w/5.0 mega pixels which is several years old. It is large and takes beautiful pictures, however it's not quick enough. The kids smile, I take the pic, it flashes, clicks a couple of times then records.. so by then the kids have already either moved or quit smiling!! It's just too slow. I noticed the 800 does have image stabilization. Does one have a quicker shutter speed than the other? Sony/Nikkon/Cannon I'm seeing mixed reviews of the 800. Alot of salesmen (kids) are recommending the 630. Any comments or thoughts...
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/21/2006)
In terms of speed, the Canons you mentioned should be just fine. Avoid any of the early A-series Canons (the A520, A540) as they use slightly different chips and operate slower. I'm kind of surprised they are pushing the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), not because it isn't good (it's a newer A-series so the lag time is excellent) but because the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is out and seems to be the big one this year.
In terms of speed, you're looking at a very close race between the A630/640 and the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I think the SD800 is a hair faster, but you're also paying more for the ultracompact size and the image stabilization. But both are speedy cameras and you should not have the issues you're having with your current one in terms of lag time with either of the A cameras (630/640) or the SD800.
My advice on shutter lag: regardless of what camera you have, you can reduce shutter lag a lot with a little trick. Put your finger on the button and push it down halfway; let the camera frame and focus. Then, when the action actually happens, push it the rest of the way down, and the picture will fire much much faster. It can be a pain to have to set it up beforehand like this, but it does lower shutter lag to fractions of a second over pushing it once and making the camera do all that focusing before it snaps.
Also, I was going to say that Casios seem to be speedy little cameras from what I've heard. But I don't know a lot about them beyond that so I'd hesitate to recommend one.
reply to this comment
In terms of speed, you're looking at a very close race between the A630/640 and the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I think the SD800 is a hair faster, but you're also paying more for the ultracompact size and the image stabilization. But both are speedy cameras and you should not have the issues you're having with your current one in terms of lag time with either of the A cameras (630/640) or the SD800.
My advice on shutter lag: regardless of what camera you have, you can reduce shutter lag a lot with a little trick. Put your finger on the button and push it down halfway; let the camera frame and focus. Then, when the action actually happens, push it the rest of the way down, and the picture will fire much much faster. It can be a pain to have to set it up beforehand like this, but it does lower shutter lag to fractions of a second over pushing it once and making the camera do all that focusing before it snaps.
Also, I was going to say that Casios seem to be speedy little cameras from what I've heard. But I don't know a lot about them beyond that so I'd hesitate to recommend one.
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I take a lot of moving pictures in low light (I go to bars to listen to live rock bands). The Canon A630 camera usually delivers flawless shots in auto mode - AND there is little to no delay between pressing the shutter button and the aperture opening. I have tried both the night scene and night portrait in this setting with disappointing results - they are a bit blurry and for some reason pick up a lot of pink and purple from the lights. However, those two flaws combined sometimes make for a cool action shot of the bands! So, I stick to auto with flash. But when I have the opportunity, I will try to use the other modes just to see what they do.
Night shot mode
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... mode
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... mode
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... absolute ultimate test: this shot was taken to truly test the camera's power. It was pitch black in my bedroom. I sat on my bed about 4 feet away. My fan is on high speed. I pressed the button half way to meter the light and set the focus - CLICK! Zoom in on the fan blades if you can. Not a hint of blur. Remember - the fan is on high in total darkness. BEAT THAT!
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact, one for mom) in March for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20 (that's how much to ship to Hawaii, which is normally more that most other places in the US).
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
As for IS, the Canon A630 has a warning light. I thought the red shaking camera in the corner meant that the pic was going to be blurry, but it is just a suggestion to use a tripod based on a calculation by the processor based on the settings, light, focal distance, f-stop, aperture, etc. However, I read a reviewer who said he TRIED to make the shots blurry while shooting (HAHA) his son outside in daylight (and I have taken shots from moving vehicles) with no problem. The only time there is a problem is in low light, which I have addressed above.
Happy shooting!
reply to this comment
Night shot mode
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... mode
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... mode
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... absolute ultimate test: this shot was taken to truly test the camera's power. It was pitch black in my bedroom. I sat on my bed about 4 feet away. My fan is on high speed. I pressed the button half way to meter the light and set the focus - CLICK! Zoom in on the fan blades if you can. Not a hint of blur. Remember - the fan is on high in total darkness. BEAT THAT!
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... got the Canon A630 (two of them in fact, one for mom) in March for $213 from PCrush.com. Now the list price is just over $190 and two of my friends are each getting one tomorrow. The shipping is 2 or 3 days via UPS and is under $20 (that's how much to ship to Hawaii, which is normally more that most other places in the US).
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
As for IS, the Canon A630 has a warning light. I thought the red shaking camera in the corner meant that the pic was going to be blurry, but it is just a suggestion to use a tripod based on a calculation by the processor based on the settings, light, focal distance, f-stop, aperture, etc. However, I read a reviewer who said he TRIED to make the shots blurry while shooting (HAHA) his son outside in daylight (and I have taken shots from moving vehicles) with no problem. The only time there is a problem is in low light, which I have addressed above.
Happy shooting!
Matt (07/20/2007)
Ready to close on this question, or can we help you with anything else, SLA?
reply to this comment
I am looking for a 8+ meg canon with a fast recovery time point and shoot. (johnpendergast — 12/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/11/2006)
Hi John,
Both the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and its big brother the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be a fantastic choice. They're among the highest-rated cameras by users here at DCHQ, and they get wonderful reviews from pros as well. Its shutter lag is typically around 0.25sec, and nearly instantaneous with pre-focusing (a half-press on the shutter release before shooting). You'd do well to get either of these.
reply to this comment
Both the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and its big brother the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be a fantastic choice. They're among the highest-rated cameras by users here at DCHQ, and they get wonderful reviews from pros as well. Its shutter lag is typically around 0.25sec, and nearly instantaneous with pre-focusing (a half-press on the shutter release before shooting). You'd do well to get either of these.
johnpendergast (12/11/2006)
Thank you very much, John
reply to this comment
johnpendergast (01/24/2007)
THank you for your help my brother inlaw purchased the camera A 640 that you suggested John
reply to this comment
camera with high resolution close upcaccroo zooming pictures of patients and illustrations good price (mddoddy — 12/10/2006)
could you advise what digital camera i buy. i am professor of surgery and need a high resolution camera 5 megapexils and above wiyh maccroo ad reasonable close up and zoom.i need it to get clear pictures of my patients and pictures of high resolution of illustrations in books in our libraries. the price should also be reasonablle.much obliged
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/10/2006)
Hi,
There are many cameras that fit your requirements. A good middle-ground choice would be the Canon PowerShot A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is one of the hottest and best-rated cameras around these days. It features a 10 megapixel sensor, a 2.5" swiveling LCD screen, a 1cm macro focus range, and a 4x optical zoom. It retails for around $315 from reliable shops, but you'll want to factor in about $40 more for rechargeable (NiMH) AA batteries, a battery charger, and a larger SD memory card (at least 1gb).
If you want to save a few bucks, you can try the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is pretty much the same camera, minus a couple megapixels. It's also rated extremely well. It should retail around $250 + accessories. Good luck!
reply to this comment
There are many cameras that fit your requirements. A good middle-ground choice would be the Canon PowerShot A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is one of the hottest and best-rated cameras around these days. It features a 10 megapixel sensor, a 2.5" swiveling LCD screen, a 1cm macro focus range, and a 4x optical zoom. It retails for around $315 from reliable shops, but you'll want to factor in about $40 more for rechargeable (NiMH) AA batteries, a battery charger, and a larger SD memory card (at least 1gb).
If you want to save a few bucks, you can try the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is pretty much the same camera, minus a couple megapixels. It's also rated extremely well. It should retail around $250 + accessories. Good luck!
Brenda Paro (12/14/2006)
For good close-up and zoom try the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a 12x zoom and offers Macro and Super Macro modes that let you get nice detailed shots.
reply to this comment
mdelzawahry (12/14/2006)
dear Brenda
many thanks for your advice.I got confused what camera to buy. As you can see I was recommended the power shot 640. You recommend the the canon S3 IS.I am professor of surgery and would like a camera with high resolution to gige the details of the pictures of my patients and coloured and black and white pictures and illustrations.It sohould be of goood zooming and macroo.could you advise which one of the suggested tow cqamers to choose. Many thanks and best regards
yours
MD EL ZAWAHRY
FRCSED.,FRCS ENGLAND,FACS
reply to this comment
many thanks for your advice.I got confused what camera to buy. As you can see I was recommended the power shot 640. You recommend the the canon S3 IS.I am professor of surgery and would like a camera with high resolution to gige the details of the pictures of my patients and coloured and black and white pictures and illustrations.It sohould be of goood zooming and macroo.could you advise which one of the suggested tow cqamers to choose. Many thanks and best regards
yours
MD EL ZAWAHRY
FRCSED.,FRCS ENGLAND,FACS
Brenda Paro (12/14/2006)
Hi there,
I typically try to recommend just one choice or the other, but in this case I think either of these cameras (the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) will work for your purposes. Here are a few differences between them that might help you decide:
-The S3 has a much larger zoom- 12x vs. the A640's 4x. It also offers image stabilization, which can cut down on camera shake. If you use the zoom a lot, or have issues with blurry photos, the image stabilization can be a very helpful tool. Score one for the S3.
-The A640 has more megapixels- 10 vs. the S3's 6. If you do lots of blowing up of photos or lots of cropping, you might want to go for the higher megapixels- in this case, score one for the A640. But in almost all cases 6 megapixels should be sufficient for your needs... I can't be much more specific without knowing how much you plan to blow up the photos, but since you said 5 mp or above I think 6 should be fine.
-The S3 offers the option of conversion lenses, which can be useful if you're going to get into more detailed shooting in the future. There's even an optional close-up lens you can buy which helps immensely with Macro shots. Both of these cameras have great Macro modes, by the way.
I guess, my conclusion would be that if you really need the extra megapixels, go for the A640 because 10 is quite a jump up from 6 megapixels. But if 6 megapixels is enough, then I think the S3 is a smarter all-around choice. I hope that helps.
reply to this comment
I typically try to recommend just one choice or the other, but in this case I think either of these cameras (the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) will work for your purposes. Here are a few differences between them that might help you decide:
-The S3 has a much larger zoom- 12x vs. the A640's 4x. It also offers image stabilization, which can cut down on camera shake. If you use the zoom a lot, or have issues with blurry photos, the image stabilization can be a very helpful tool. Score one for the S3.
-The A640 has more megapixels- 10 vs. the S3's 6. If you do lots of blowing up of photos or lots of cropping, you might want to go for the higher megapixels- in this case, score one for the A640. But in almost all cases 6 megapixels should be sufficient for your needs... I can't be much more specific without knowing how much you plan to blow up the photos, but since you said 5 mp or above I think 6 should be fine.
-The S3 offers the option of conversion lenses, which can be useful if you're going to get into more detailed shooting in the future. There's even an optional close-up lens you can buy which helps immensely with Macro shots. Both of these cameras have great Macro modes, by the way.
I guess, my conclusion would be that if you really need the extra megapixels, go for the A640 because 10 is quite a jump up from 6 megapixels. But if 6 megapixels is enough, then I think the S3 is a smarter all-around choice. I hope that helps.
mdelzawahry (12/16/2006)
Dear Brenda
,
Many thanks for your reply and kind advice including a clear comparison between canon A 640 and S3 IS.
I wish I can be of any help for you. All that I can do now is to wish you and for all, a Mwerry Christmas and a happy new year. I apologise for the errors in typing.
yours
MD EL ZAWAHRY
FRCSED.,FRCS ENGLAND,FACS
reply to this comment
,
Many thanks for your reply and kind advice including a clear comparison between canon A 640 and S3 IS.
I wish I can be of any help for you. All that I can do now is to wish you and for all, a Mwerry Christmas and a happy new year. I apologise for the errors in typing.
yours
MD EL ZAWAHRY
FRCSED.,FRCS ENGLAND,FACS
Brenda Paro (12/16/2006)
It is no problem at all. Feel free to ask if you have further questions, I am happy to help. Let me know how the camera you choose works out for you!
reply to this comment
Are Canon digital cameras compatible with the latest version of Apple Macbook? (ewwatson85 — 12/09/2006)
I have the 10.4.8 version of the Apple Macbook and I'm wondering if the new canon powershot digital cameras will be compatible. I'm aware that alot of software and hardware applications aren't always going to work with apple computers, and I want to make the right choice, naturally.
reply to this comment
Gregory Dudek (12/09/2006)
Generally, Apple computers work very well with most digital cameras. In fact I had had far fewer problems then even Windows packages that were claimed to work. I have had a Canon S230 for a few years and used it with Apple desktop and laptop machines, likewise for my wife digital cameras. In general it is probably faster and easier to insert the SD (or CF) media into a PC-card adapter instead of using the USB interface (this can also bypass some possible compatibility problems as a bonus).
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
My mom and I both bought the Canon A630 in March for $213 (pcrush.comP). I have a PC with Windows XP Media Center 2005 and she has a Mac running OS X.
We could not be happier!!
reply to this comment
We could not be happier!!
Want an all purpose point and shoot, between $250-400. (LCW — 12/08/2006)
Most important to me is shutter speed. I'll probably be in auto mode most of the time. I'd like some extended zoom ability, and therefore, probably IS, low light picture quality, and lastly a good movie mode with good sound (I've got four kids and never get the movie camera out anymore). Finally, while I don't need an ultra compact, I'd like to carry it in my purse most of the time - to catch the kids without having to "remember to bring the camera." Oh, and I won't be enlarging many pics - snapshots are fine.
reply to this comment
Joe (12/08/2006)
The Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice for several reasons. It has a high MP, and most importantly a fast shutter speed up to an ISO rating of 3200. Tripod will help if in low light.
reply to this comment
LCW (12/09/2006)
One clarificiation, while I do want it to work in low light, or at least indoors without a flash, when I said "shutter speed" I actually mean shutter reaction time - the time from when you press the button to when the picture is actually taken.
reply to this comment
chrisjj0686 (12/12/2006)
hello,
Fugi Finepix F30 has won all the low light awards - but it's ugly!. There is an upgrade just out - F31 I think, so may be worth a look.
I've just bought a camera & I have 3 kids under 3 so had similar requirements.
My short list was Sony T10, Panasonic FX07 & Canon 800. Though all compacts suffer from red eye, this is a major gripe of mine - I was looking for the camera that coped with this best - research showed that the FX07 was the best performing in this area.
I got the FX07 3 days ago, haven't had a chance to use it much but so far v happy - only one image out of 30 indoor flash pics showed noticable red eye - v impressive.
Have fun
reply to this comment
Fugi Finepix F30 has won all the low light awards - but it's ugly!. There is an upgrade just out - F31 I think, so may be worth a look.
I've just bought a camera & I have 3 kids under 3 so had similar requirements.
My short list was Sony T10, Panasonic FX07 & Canon 800. Though all compacts suffer from red eye, this is a major gripe of mine - I was looking for the camera that coped with this best - research showed that the FX07 was the best performing in this area.
I got the FX07 3 days ago, haven't had a chance to use it much but so far v happy - only one image out of 30 indoor flash pics showed noticable red eye - v impressive.
Have fun
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I have already written so many replies here I am beginning to repeat myself. HAHA
My vote is the Canon A630. I have been digital since one of the first Sony Mavicas were just out (the one with the FLOPPY!!). I later moved to a Konica DiMage 500.
But this Canon is just the right size, res, price, feature and expandability for the casual user or the higher-level amateur.
I think if you click on my name you will be able to see all kinds of topics related to this camera.
I carry mine with me and I have bought some really awesome accessories online (buy NOTHING in the stores!). If you want some sample shots in a variety of settings and modes, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
My vote is the Canon A630. I have been digital since one of the first Sony Mavicas were just out (the one with the FLOPPY!!). I later moved to a Konica DiMage 500.
But this Canon is just the right size, res, price, feature and expandability for the casual user or the higher-level amateur.
I think if you click on my name you will be able to see all kinds of topics related to this camera.
I carry mine with me and I have bought some really awesome accessories online (buy NOTHING in the stores!). If you want some sample shots in a variety of settings and modes, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com.
Good luck!
Does the A630 take good night/low light pictures? (fishkebab — 12/08/2006)
I'm buying my first digicam and am torn bet the A630 and the A710. I'd already decided on the A710 when some people mentioned problems with the pic quality in Auto mode and the long shot-shot time (10 secs) when you're using the flash. Besides night/low light photography I want an all-around cam, and since I'm a beginner (who wants to grow w/ the cam since it'll be years before I purchase again), I don't want to have to fiddle around too much before taking a shot. Besides taking the cam with me when I travel, I'm also going to use it to take shots of band gigs, concerts, nights out with friends and other evening events, so I would like ease of use and great pic quality, both for daytime and nighttime shots. Also open to other brand/model suggs. Thanks very much!
reply to this comment
Joe (12/08/2006)
The Canon A630 has relativly high ISO rating up to 800 which is good for low light situations, but don't expect perfection. There will still be some noise on the lowest of light pictures and I would recommend a tripod or a monopod (when travelling) for night shots. Because the iris is open longer to retain more light shaking or moving the camera can cause that streaking effect that sometimes looks cool, but not for most shots. This is a decent camera for doing what you want.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/08/2006)
It will be decent, and chances are you will get a yellowish cast to your low light photos (this can be edited out if you adjust the contrast, or with software; personally, I like it and I tend to leave it in). The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an excellent all-around camera and you should be happy with it for all-around photos.
For lots and lots of nighttime shots, I would direct you to the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is an excellent camera that has some interesting technology that results in really good low light shots. It would also work well for all-around usage. But you sound like you're a Canon fan, and that is totally fine... the A630 should definitely do the job.
reply to this comment
For lots and lots of nighttime shots, I would direct you to the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is an excellent camera that has some interesting technology that results in really good low light shots. It would also work well for all-around usage. But you sound like you're a Canon fan, and that is totally fine... the A630 should definitely do the job.
fishkebab (12/11/2006)
Thanks for all your replies, you've been really helpful. I also considered the Finepix F30 while I was doing my research, but was disappointed with what reviewers said was the lack of manual settings on the cam.
I guess it's the A630, then.
reply to this comment
I guess it's the A630, then.
which one is the best camera between fuji F30 and Canon A630? (indushrs — 12/04/2006)
reply to this comment
indushrs (12/04/2006)
I am so surprised not to see any Fuji product in Editor's choices in digital cameras though I guess Fuji F30 the best camera of 2006. May I know why is it so? I would love to have answer for this question as soon as possible.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
It's a really good question. I'm not the editor, so I can't explain their choices of best picks; I do know that Canon is considered a leader in terms of easy to use camera that deliver consistent quality photos.
Comparing these two, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more megapixels and a higher zoom. But you're right, the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is pretty amazing... I'm personally very impressed by this camera's performance in low light, I think Fuji made some big steps in low light P&S technology with this one.
So.... this is a close race.
reply to this comment
Comparing these two, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more megapixels and a higher zoom. But you're right, the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is pretty amazing... I'm personally very impressed by this camera's performance in low light, I think Fuji made some big steps in low light P&S technology with this one.
So.... this is a close race.
indushrs (12/09/2006)
Thanks a lot for ur precious answer.
reply to this comment
Amy K (12/30/2006)
I've wanted to know the answer to this question as well- thing that worries me about the Fuji is it tends to have quite bad purple fringing, and also they sometimes sell rubbish cameras due to bad quality control. I don't know much about Canon but a friend of mine has the A620 and he loves it to bits. The ability of the F30 in low light does sound good though...:S
reply to this comment
I purchased from Walmart a Canon PowerShot SD500, but I don't see it listed at other stores, and I can't find a review on it either. Is it obsolete? (g8edguy — 12/02/2006)
I'm wondering if I should be purchasing a model I see more frequently.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/02/2006)
Hi Kirk,
As you can see here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) the SD500 is a camera that plenty of people have and like. It's been produced within the last two years, so it's not exactly obsolete, but there are a number of newer models in the Canon SD series.
The SD500 was introduced in February of 2005. Since then, there have been about eight new SD models introduced, including a couple with optical image stabilization. The newest models are the SD800 IS ( dpreview.com/reviews/specs/... ) (one of the models featuring the image stabilization system) and the SD900 ( dpreview.com/reviews/specs/... ).
I don't think you necessarily need to purchase a newer model simply because yours isn't the newest. That should be a decision based on how well you like the photos your SD500 produces, and whether it's a good overall fit for your needs.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
As you can see here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) the SD500 is a camera that plenty of people have and like. It's been produced within the last two years, so it's not exactly obsolete, but there are a number of newer models in the Canon SD series.
The SD500 was introduced in February of 2005. Since then, there have been about eight new SD models introduced, including a couple with optical image stabilization. The newest models are the SD800 IS ( dpreview.com/reviews/specs/... ) (one of the models featuring the image stabilization system) and the SD900 ( dpreview.com/reviews/specs/... ).
I don't think you necessarily need to purchase a newer model simply because yours isn't the newest. That should be a decision based on how well you like the photos your SD500 produces, and whether it's a good overall fit for your needs.
Good luck!
g8edguy (12/03/2006)
Thank you so much. Based on so many reviews about broken LCD, I have decided not to get it. This camera will be a birthday present for my 18 year old daughter and it will certainly sustain lots of abuse. Now I'm wondering just what would be a good fit for her? She will be going to college next fall and just wants a camera that gets good pictures without all the bells and whistles, and I certainly don't want to spend lots of money if I don't need to.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/03/2006)
Kirk,
I'd recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It can be had for at or under $250 (don't deal with those gray market dealers, though) and it's extremely well-rated by users and pros alike. It's got an 8MP sensor paired with a nice 4x optical zoom and a big, rotating LCD. It takes fantastic pictures on auto, and it's got a bunch of manual settings too, in case she decides she wants to get artistic later on. Hope this helps. :)
reply to this comment
I'd recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It can be had for at or under $250 (don't deal with those gray market dealers, though) and it's extremely well-rated by users and pros alike. It's got an 8MP sensor paired with a nice 4x optical zoom and a big, rotating LCD. It takes fantastic pictures on auto, and it's got a bunch of manual settings too, in case she decides she wants to get artistic later on. Hope this helps. :)
How does Canon A530 or A540 compare to Canon A95? (dmiller803 — 12/01/2006)
I have a Canon A95. My daughter absolutely loves it. I wanted to get her a Canon for Christmas, however, I can't seem to find an A95 new. They are either used or refurbished. What Canon model would compare to the A95? How does the A530 or A540 compare with the A95?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/02/2006)
Hi Debbie,
Despite being newer, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... are something of a step down from the A95. Though the resolution (megapixels) remains similar, the CCD they're stuffing those pixels into is smaller, meaning that the picture quality is going to drop. The A530 in particular is crippled in some respects in terms of manual settings. User reviews are ok but not great.
If you want something that's at least as good or a little bump up from the A95, I'd recommend looking at the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... which are very, very good cameras. They retain all of the customizability and usability from the A95 and improve on the picture quality, resolution, LCD size, and overall size/weight of the camera. Users and pros alike seem to love them.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Despite being newer, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... are something of a step down from the A95. Though the resolution (megapixels) remains similar, the CCD they're stuffing those pixels into is smaller, meaning that the picture quality is going to drop. The A530 in particular is crippled in some respects in terms of manual settings. User reviews are ok but not great.
If you want something that's at least as good or a little bump up from the A95, I'd recommend looking at the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... which are very, very good cameras. They retain all of the customizability and usability from the A95 and improve on the picture quality, resolution, LCD size, and overall size/weight of the camera. Users and pros alike seem to love them.
Good luck!
fiona duffy (12/26/2006)
iwould like to buy a "point & shoot camera"...this camera would be for "still" shots only...i have a canon elura & love it...please advise....fiona duffy
reply to this comment
How does the A630 perform on action shots? (dce — 11/30/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (12/01/2006)
It all depends on the given situation, factors like; light, speed of subject, whether you are zoomed in, whether you have a tripod are all important. But with the Canon A630 you get an ISo rating of 800 which is fast so action shots in "normal" conditions, meaning decent light, will yield excellent results. I would recommend a monopod if possible.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/01/2006)
Because this camera isn't the 'fastest' out there in terms of shutter lag/ recycle time, etc., it may not be the top choice for an action shot. For true action shots, I'd point you towards a DSLR, but if you're interested more in point and shoots there might be some others out there that would capture action better than this camera (which I actually love, but not for the purposes it sounds like you need it for). Some of it does depend on the type of action and the factors and the way you're shooting. Give us a few more details about what you're trying to shoot and we might be able to recommend what would work best for you.
reply to this comment
my T7 was stolen, Im now looking to upgrade,which cam do i go for? (R-A-C-hel — 11/29/2006)
I need a new replacement. Pretty open minded. Im tempted by the Samsung NV10, but not sure as ive read mixed reviews. I dont really want anything larger than the NV10. Im not really a camera expert so i tended not to use all the functions and adjusments on the T7. Theres so much choice out there, please help!!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/29/2006)
Hi Rachel,
Sorry to hear about your stolen camera.
The NV10 has sort of a split critical consensus--lots of people love its design and features, but have issues with the quality of images it puts out. Check out the reviews at Amazon ( amazon.com/Samsung-NV10-Dig... ) for an example of this sort of reaction.
Personally, I'd recommend the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its little brother the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). It's got roughly the same feature set as the NV10 with a few added bonuses (flip-out LCD, longer zoom, etc) and a much more solid critical reaction. Everyone seems to love this camera. It is, however, a little larger than the NV10, mainly in thickness. If you really need to go small, check out the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is comparable in most categories to the NV10 and A640 (fewer megapixels, though) and also features optical image stabilization, which will save a lot of shots that would otherwise be lost to motion blur.
Hope this helps. :)
reply to this comment
Sorry to hear about your stolen camera.
The NV10 has sort of a split critical consensus--lots of people love its design and features, but have issues with the quality of images it puts out. Check out the reviews at Amazon ( amazon.com/Samsung-NV10-Dig... ) for an example of this sort of reaction.
Personally, I'd recommend the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its little brother the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). It's got roughly the same feature set as the NV10 with a few added bonuses (flip-out LCD, longer zoom, etc) and a much more solid critical reaction. Everyone seems to love this camera. It is, however, a little larger than the NV10, mainly in thickness. If you really need to go small, check out the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is comparable in most categories to the NV10 and A640 (fewer megapixels, though) and also features optical image stabilization, which will save a lot of shots that would otherwise be lost to motion blur.
Hope this helps. :)
R-A-C-hel (11/29/2006)
Hi! thanks for the response. Yes the loss of my T7 HURT!
ALOT ALOT of the pix I took with the T7 were on nights out with friends, and the fact that Ive had such a slimline camera in my hands kind of makes me reluctant to go much bigger.
Ive also never printed my shots. Theyve all been for email and online use.
What do u recommend as the best of the Sony Cybershot series?
And does your choice fair better than any of the Casio Exilims?
Im going on vacation next month and need to buy it soon, just so baffled with all the choice.
Thanks so much for ur advice.
reply to this comment
ALOT ALOT of the pix I took with the T7 were on nights out with friends, and the fact that Ive had such a slimline camera in my hands kind of makes me reluctant to go much bigger.
Ive also never printed my shots. Theyve all been for email and online use.
What do u recommend as the best of the Sony Cybershot series?
And does your choice fair better than any of the Casio Exilims?
Im going on vacation next month and need to buy it soon, just so baffled with all the choice.
Thanks so much for ur advice.
Ben Keough (11/29/2006)
Rachel,
As far as Sonys go, the top-rated ultra-compacts seem to be the T9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (the newer T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) seems to have some serious issues with pictures using flash) and, a little bigger but still smaller than the Canon A-series I mentioned, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's about 4mm bigger than the T9 in all dimensions--not bad.
In the Casio range I'd check out the EX-Z70, which is pretty feature-packed and rated well by users.
reply to this comment
As far as Sonys go, the top-rated ultra-compacts seem to be the T9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (the newer T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) seems to have some serious issues with pictures using flash) and, a little bigger but still smaller than the Canon A-series I mentioned, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's about 4mm bigger than the T9 in all dimensions--not bad.
In the Casio range I'd check out the EX-Z70, which is pretty feature-packed and rated well by users.
Olympus SP-320 or Canon Powershot A630 (pafarthing — 11/28/2006)
I am looking for an advanced compact with a high ISO setting available as a replacement for a Powershot A510. The SP-320 and A630 both have broadly similar specifications, sensor size, top ISO etc., as well as taking AA batteries (essential in a crunch) and having an optical viewfinder, which I also prefer.
The Olympus is smaller, but takes xD cards while the Canon would allow me to continue to use SD cards. The Canon is more expensive, but I would have to buy the cards if I went with the Olympus, so it works out the same price wise.
Advice, please? (Don't suggest the A710 IS as it is beyond my budget.)
reply to this comment
The Olympus is smaller, but takes xD cards while the Canon would allow me to continue to use SD cards. The Canon is more expensive, but I would have to buy the cards if I went with the Olympus, so it works out the same price wise.
Advice, please? (Don't suggest the A710 IS as it is beyond my budget.)
Andrew Skinner (11/28/2006)
Paul,
After looking over the cameras' specifications, I would go with the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a higher photo resolution (8 vs 7.1) and more optical zoom (4x vs 3x). Since you already have the cards, and the price evens out, it is the choice I would make. I've also had a lot of good experiences with the 3 Canons I already own.
Andrew
reply to this comment
After looking over the cameras' specifications, I would go with the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a higher photo resolution (8 vs 7.1) and more optical zoom (4x vs 3x). Since you already have the cards, and the price evens out, it is the choice I would make. I've also had a lot of good experiences with the 3 Canons I already own.
Andrew
What is the difference between the Canon A700 and the Canon A710? (cditomaso — 11/28/2006)
I know that the A710 has 7.1 MP vs. only 6.oMP with the A700 and the A710 also has a zoom stabaliztion. Is there anything else that contributes to the extra $100 or so in price for the A710?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/28/2006)
Hi Chris,
The cameras are really near-identical aside from those two differences. There are, however, a couple other small changes. The A710 IS is lighter (7.4oz to the A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s 8.8oz), offers an additional aspect ratio choice (3:2), and a couple extra manual settings (more white balance options, etc).
Really, though, the main advantage of the A710 IS is the image stabilization. It will rescue many, many shots that would otherwise be irretrievably blurred by hand movement either at long zoom or in low light.
The price in difference isn't really that big. The A710 IS is going for around $323 at Amazon these days, while the A700 isn't even there anymore--looks like it's being phased out. Despite the $219 price you see when you search for the A700 here on DCHQ, if you actually go to the price comparison page, the only price available is $309 from a single store.
Personally, I think the A710 is worth the little bit extra, but you might also want to consider the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if you're looking to shave a few dollars. No image stabilization, but the image quality is reputed to be greater than either of the A7xx models, and they're both cheaper.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The cameras are really near-identical aside from those two differences. There are, however, a couple other small changes. The A710 IS is lighter (7.4oz to the A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s 8.8oz), offers an additional aspect ratio choice (3:2), and a couple extra manual settings (more white balance options, etc).
Really, though, the main advantage of the A710 IS is the image stabilization. It will rescue many, many shots that would otherwise be irretrievably blurred by hand movement either at long zoom or in low light.
The price in difference isn't really that big. The A710 IS is going for around $323 at Amazon these days, while the A700 isn't even there anymore--looks like it's being phased out. Despite the $219 price you see when you search for the A700 here on DCHQ, if you actually go to the price comparison page, the only price available is $309 from a single store.
Personally, I think the A710 is worth the little bit extra, but you might also want to consider the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if you're looking to shave a few dollars. No image stabilization, but the image quality is reputed to be greater than either of the A7xx models, and they're both cheaper.
Good luck!
cditomaso (01/25/2007)
Thanks for the answer Ben. It cleared up a lot. I will look into the other cameras. I like the size of the Elphs, but they lack the zoom that I like. I'm a big fan of the A710 as well as the S3 IS (a little outta my price range right now though and I don't think im ready for a full SLR camera yet)
Cheers,
Chris
reply to this comment
Cheers,
Chris
Ben Keough (01/25/2007)
Hi Chris,
Glad to help. The A710 is a great camera, and if you're leaning that way already I have no problem giving it a full recommendation.
I should mention that the S3 IS is not a full SLR, though. It's certainly SLR-like, but it lacks several key features that would define it as a SLR: removable lenses and a true retractable mirror lens system being the biggies. The S3 is in a class of cameras that are the closest consumer digitals come to the SLR range, and since they're still consumer cameras, they have wonderful automatic modes for average joe users. In other words, don't be intimidated. :)
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Glad to help. The A710 is a great camera, and if you're leaning that way already I have no problem giving it a full recommendation.
I should mention that the S3 IS is not a full SLR, though. It's certainly SLR-like, but it lacks several key features that would define it as a SLR: removable lenses and a true retractable mirror lens system being the biggies. The S3 is in a class of cameras that are the closest consumer digitals come to the SLR range, and since they're still consumer cameras, they have wonderful automatic modes for average joe users. In other words, don't be intimidated. :)
Hope this helps.
JAYJAY (01/25/2007)
IS THE G7 MUCH BETTER THEN THE A710?
DOES IT PAY TO GET THE G7 RATHER THEN THE A710?
reply to this comment
DOES IT PAY TO GET THE G7 RATHER THEN THE A710?
Is there a difference in the processor chip from the power shot A60 to the A540? (ksd1001 — 11/26/2006)
I just bought an A540 and am disappointed so far. It is no where near the crisp clairty i had in my little 2 megapixel A60, whose shots just jump out at you and say "WOW". The A540 seem more fuji-like. (sorry fuji, but really, stick with film) lack luster. even slightly blurry. I have always been a hardcore canon fan, but i wondered if in an effort to be more competitive, that the quality of the processor chip went down.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/26/2006)
Hi Kamille,
To answer your question, yes, the processor changed between the two cameras. The A60 used the original DIGIC processor, while the A540 uses the DIGIC II, its successor. Many other things have changed between the two, however, and it would be a mistake to blame a difference in image quality solely on the processor. The lens, CCD, and pretty much the rest of the internals are all entirely different. I don't think you could get anyone to say that the DIGIC II processor is inferior to its ancestor, but you could certainly get a few people to accuse Canon of what's known as "pixel-stuffing"--essentially attempting to cram more pixels onto a sensor chip that's roughly the same size. This practice often results in noisy, overly processed-looking shots. The A540's sensor chip is 1/2.5", as compared to the A60's 1/2.7", so the A540 is fitting 4 million more pixels into those few extra millimeters. There have certainly been some great advances in CCD technology since the A60 was produced, but Canon is definitely cutting corners a bit here.
reply to this comment
To answer your question, yes, the processor changed between the two cameras. The A60 used the original DIGIC processor, while the A540 uses the DIGIC II, its successor. Many other things have changed between the two, however, and it would be a mistake to blame a difference in image quality solely on the processor. The lens, CCD, and pretty much the rest of the internals are all entirely different. I don't think you could get anyone to say that the DIGIC II processor is inferior to its ancestor, but you could certainly get a few people to accuse Canon of what's known as "pixel-stuffing"--essentially attempting to cram more pixels onto a sensor chip that's roughly the same size. This practice often results in noisy, overly processed-looking shots. The A540's sensor chip is 1/2.5", as compared to the A60's 1/2.7", so the A540 is fitting 4 million more pixels into those few extra millimeters. There have certainly been some great advances in CCD technology since the A60 was produced, but Canon is definitely cutting corners a bit here.
ksd1001 (11/27/2006)
WOW! do you know your stuff! :)
thank you! that explains a lot. now to the problem of finding one that i DO like...
do you have any favorites?
thanks so much!
reply to this comment
thank you! that explains a lot. now to the problem of finding one that i DO like...
do you have any favorites?
thanks so much!
Ben Keough (11/27/2006)
I too had an A60 and used it for years. A few months ago I stepped up to the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which I absolutely adore, though it does have its issues too (mainly with low-light performance). It's also kind of bulky... I don't know if you need a pocket-sized camera or if you're ok with some heft.
It seems like a lot of other users share your opinion of the picture quality with the A540. If you're looking for cameras that are generally in the same size range as the A60 and A540, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are rated quite a bit higher. The A710 IS also has some nice features, including a 6x stabilized zoom. Canons are the cameras I'm most familiar with and the ones I'm most comfortable recommending, so there you go. Good luck!
reply to this comment
It seems like a lot of other users share your opinion of the picture quality with the A540. If you're looking for cameras that are generally in the same size range as the A60 and A540, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are rated quite a bit higher. The A710 IS also has some nice features, including a 6x stabilized zoom. Canons are the cameras I'm most familiar with and the ones I'm most comfortable recommending, so there you go. Good luck!
ksd1001 (11/27/2006)
thank you so much for your insight!
i will check those out. i don't mind bulky. its harder to misplace that way! :)
you have been a great help!
reply to this comment
i will check those out. i don't mind bulky. its harder to misplace that way! :)
you have been a great help!
Debby Robinson (11/28/2006)
What is the difference between Canon A series and Canon Sd?
I don't plan onmaking large pictures, just want a camera to take grandkid shots and vacation shots, maybe witha little extra zoom and such. I have an old HP612 now. Any suggestions? I was leaning toward Canon A620, mostly based on consumer reports.
Thanks
Debby
reply to this comment
I don't plan onmaking large pictures, just want a camera to take grandkid shots and vacation shots, maybe witha little extra zoom and such. I have an old HP612 now. Any suggestions? I was leaning toward Canon A620, mostly based on consumer reports.
Thanks
Debby
Ben Keough (11/28/2006)
Hi Debby,
The main differences between the A and SD series boil down to two points:
1. Size. The A series cameras are somewhat bigger and heavier than the SD series. The SD models can generally fit easily into a shirt or pants pocket, while you'd have some considerable difficulty getting an A-series camera into your jeans pocket.
2. Features. The A series cameras offer a much broader range of manual controls over things like ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and other technical settings than do the SD cameras. They often have longer zooms, as well.
At this point, based on what you're looking for, I'd recommend staying away from the A620 (since it's pretty old and will be harder to find at reputable dealers) and I'd suggest the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) instead. They're rated extremely well by the pros and regular users alike. The A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is also a good candidate, as it's equipped with an image-stabilized lens that will help rescue photos that would otherwise be blurry due to your hands moving as the shot is taken.
If you value the smaller size of the SD line and can live without the extra features the A series is equipped with, I'd recommend the new SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is a fantastic (and fantastically small) camera. There's also the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features the same image stabilization technology that's in the A710 IS.
reply to this comment
The main differences between the A and SD series boil down to two points:
1. Size. The A series cameras are somewhat bigger and heavier than the SD series. The SD models can generally fit easily into a shirt or pants pocket, while you'd have some considerable difficulty getting an A-series camera into your jeans pocket.
2. Features. The A series cameras offer a much broader range of manual controls over things like ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and other technical settings than do the SD cameras. They often have longer zooms, as well.
At this point, based on what you're looking for, I'd recommend staying away from the A620 (since it's pretty old and will be harder to find at reputable dealers) and I'd suggest the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) instead. They're rated extremely well by the pros and regular users alike. The A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is also a good candidate, as it's equipped with an image-stabilized lens that will help rescue photos that would otherwise be blurry due to your hands moving as the shot is taken.
If you value the smaller size of the SD line and can live without the extra features the A series is equipped with, I'd recommend the new SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is a fantastic (and fantastically small) camera. There's also the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features the same image stabilization technology that's in the A710 IS.
I'm looking to buy a camera for $2-300. What's the best bang for my buck? (lms1130 — 11/26/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/26/2006)
Hi Stella,
There are lots of different kinds of cameras that fit into your price range. I can help you narrow them down, but first I need you to answer a few questions.
1. How will you be using the camera? Are you mainly a point-and-shoot photographer, or do you enjoy messing with manual settings and taking photos for their own sake?
2. Does size matter to you? Do you need a camera that can fit easily into your pocket or are you okay with carrying it in a bag?
3. Are there any features you really want? High megapixels? Long zoom? Image stabilization? Any of these will help me narrow it down.
Thanks!
reply to this comment
There are lots of different kinds of cameras that fit into your price range. I can help you narrow them down, but first I need you to answer a few questions.
1. How will you be using the camera? Are you mainly a point-and-shoot photographer, or do you enjoy messing with manual settings and taking photos for their own sake?
2. Does size matter to you? Do you need a camera that can fit easily into your pocket or are you okay with carrying it in a bag?
3. Are there any features you really want? High megapixels? Long zoom? Image stabilization? Any of these will help me narrow it down.
Thanks!
Andrew Skinner (11/27/2006)
Stella,
This camera is a great choice. You might try using the DCHQ Digital Camera Gift Guide ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You can pick cameras based on lifestyle, skill level, and price range. The cameras in your price range ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are also a good place to start. You should really ask what you want to use the camera for before you buy one as well. Will this be for parties and social functions, do you want to take landscape shots, or something completely different? These are all things to take into consideration. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This camera is a great choice. You might try using the DCHQ Digital Camera Gift Guide ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You can pick cameras based on lifestyle, skill level, and price range. The cameras in your price range ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are also a good place to start. You should really ask what you want to use the camera for before you buy one as well. Will this be for parties and social functions, do you want to take landscape shots, or something completely different? These are all things to take into consideration. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
lms1130 (11/27/2006)
I do like to take pictures and would like to have different settings such as black and white. I definitely don't want something too bulky, easy to carry. I honestly don't a lot about megapixels or any of that. Is more better? I also want something that zooms well and just takes an overall good quality picture. I also want a camera that's easy to work with and figure out. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/27/2006)
Stella,
As Andrew said, the LZ3 is a great choice. If you want to spend a little more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are also very good cameras, as is the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features a stabilized 6x zoom.
The A640 is at the higher end of your price range, but it's got almost a perfect 5-star rating here on DCHQ and I always feel comfortable recommending Canon's A-Series. They're simple to use but extremely powerful, and feature tons of manual options for someone who wants to get a little more serious about their art.
None of these are small enough to fit completely comfortably in your pocket, but they're a bit smaller than the size of your (my) open palm and would definitely fit into a jacket pocket or a purse without much trouble.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
reply to this comment
As Andrew said, the LZ3 is a great choice. If you want to spend a little more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are also very good cameras, as is the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features a stabilized 6x zoom.
The A640 is at the higher end of your price range, but it's got almost a perfect 5-star rating here on DCHQ and I always feel comfortable recommending Canon's A-Series. They're simple to use but extremely powerful, and feature tons of manual options for someone who wants to get a little more serious about their art.
None of these are small enough to fit completely comfortably in your pocket, but they're a bit smaller than the size of your (my) open palm and would definitely fit into a jacket pocket or a purse without much trouble.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I LOVE my Canon A630 - so does my mom. We got ours for $213 from pcrush.com in March. They are now priced at about $190. DO NOT BUY REFURB - it's not worth the risk at this low price for new!
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
reply to this comment
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
which works better in night to show the lights and surroundings, A630 or any other 8 megapixel camera ? (vicky — 11/26/2006)
can any body advise me a camera which is compact fitting in pocket, 8MP and good night results ?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/26/2006)
Vicky,
You should be able to get decent shots with the ISO 800 setting on the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). For even more sensitivity to light on the ISO settings (ISO 1600) and a similar price tag, you might look at the Olympus 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also a 8 MP camera, will easily fit in a pocket and give good night/low light results. It does have lower zoom capabilitites, but does come with a longer lasting lithium ion battery. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You should be able to get decent shots with the ISO 800 setting on the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). For even more sensitivity to light on the ISO settings (ISO 1600) and a similar price tag, you might look at the Olympus 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also a 8 MP camera, will easily fit in a pocket and give good night/low light results. It does have lower zoom capabilitites, but does come with a longer lasting lithium ion battery. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Brenda Paro (11/27/2006)
I second the Olympus 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) for great low light performance. I love the Canons and I think the Olympus wins on this particular point.
reply to this comment
I Is Canon A630 Edit Software Difficult and Troublesome? (ds-a630 — 11/25/2006)
I read that the software used to transfer or edit photos is clugy and difficult to navigate? My concern is keeping me from buying the camera. I'd appreciate any comments regarding my concern.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/25/2006)
Hi Daniel,
Most manufacturer-provided software is clunky and poorly designed, though often it provides necessary functions (like the ability to edit RAW files). Luckily, the A630 doesn't require any functions that any number of free photo organization/editing programs can't provide. I'd recommend you not even bother installing the software, and it certainly shouldn't affect your decision to buy the camera or not.
Windows allows you to copy files directly from the camera to your hard drive without any special software, but you might still want to get something like Google's Picasa ( picasa.google.com/ ) for organization and editing. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Most manufacturer-provided software is clunky and poorly designed, though often it provides necessary functions (like the ability to edit RAW files). Luckily, the A630 doesn't require any functions that any number of free photo organization/editing programs can't provide. I'd recommend you not even bother installing the software, and it certainly shouldn't affect your decision to buy the camera or not.
Windows allows you to copy files directly from the camera to your hard drive without any special software, but you might still want to get something like Google's Picasa ( picasa.google.com/ ) for organization and editing. Good luck!
Andrew Skinner (11/25/2006)
Daniel,
I don't usually use the software that comes with my Canon's. I've opted for the Paint Shop Pro ( corel.com/servlet/Satellite... ) software by Corel ( corel.com/ ). I've found it just as versatile as Photoshop and easier to use as well as a smaller drain on memory. The full version is only $70 right now, a steal.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I don't usually use the software that comes with my Canon's. I've opted for the Paint Shop Pro ( corel.com/servlet/Satellite... ) software by Corel ( corel.com/ ). I've found it just as versatile as Photoshop and easier to use as well as a smaller drain on memory. The full version is only $70 right now, a steal.
Andrew
ds-a630 (11/26/2006)
DeadWolfBones & blackdoorphotos thank you for your advice. I appreciate your time and wisdom of your response.
Grateful DS-A630
reply to this comment
Grateful DS-A630
Canon A630 Vs Sony W70 Vs Panasonic Lumix FX01 ... which one is better or a best buy in the three?? (papillon — 11/25/2006)
i wish to buy a decent digital camera with good features. i zeroed in on these three models and now not able to decide which one should i go for. i want to buy a camera with enough features such that i should not feel the want to buy a new camera atleast for the next three years. do advise which camera should i go for.
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/25/2006)
You have found three very similar cameras, and all are good options.
I would choose the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I think. Panasonic has done an outstanding job in this camera. Like the Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it's nice and small, but it has a slightly wider telephoto range, and uses SD cards, not memory stick; SD is the clear standard these days. The Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera, too from a good pedigree, and would be the choice if you like AA batteries -- they are bigger, but widely available.
reply to this comment
I would choose the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I think. Panasonic has done an outstanding job in this camera. Like the Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it's nice and small, but it has a slightly wider telephoto range, and uses SD cards, not memory stick; SD is the clear standard these days. The Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera, too from a good pedigree, and would be the choice if you like AA batteries -- they are bigger, but widely available.
i am an orthodontist which camera is suited for me to take inra oral pictures of the teeth (drarun995 — 11/23/2006)
i am not a professional photografer and do not intend to appoint someone i would like to use the camera myself i am presently using nikon 995 and i am very happy with it , now i wnt a new one
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/24/2006)
Hi,
In a situation like this, macro focus is the most important factor. Currently, Canon is the class leader in macro capability, with several cameras that allow you to focus on objects that are actually touching the lens. Of course, in many situations this isn't exactly helpful as the lens blocks out light, but with the proper lighting the capability is astonishing. Models that make use of this feature include the Powershot S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Several other Canons allow macro focusing as close as 1cm, including the Powershot G7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All of these are fantastic cameras and will serve you well.
If Canons aren't your thing, nearly every major manufacturer offers models with decent macro modes--there are dozens that can do the job you need them to. If you have other things to take into consideration when making your choice (price, megapixels, zoom, etc), you can let me know and I'll try to narrow your choices further. However, all of the models I've listed above are excellent. Good luck!
reply to this comment
In a situation like this, macro focus is the most important factor. Currently, Canon is the class leader in macro capability, with several cameras that allow you to focus on objects that are actually touching the lens. Of course, in many situations this isn't exactly helpful as the lens blocks out light, but with the proper lighting the capability is astonishing. Models that make use of this feature include the Powershot S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Several other Canons allow macro focusing as close as 1cm, including the Powershot G7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All of these are fantastic cameras and will serve you well.
If Canons aren't your thing, nearly every major manufacturer offers models with decent macro modes--there are dozens that can do the job you need them to. If you have other things to take into consideration when making your choice (price, megapixels, zoom, etc), you can let me know and I'll try to narrow your choices further. However, all of the models I've listed above are excellent. Good luck!
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Here are some shots with the Canon A630, taken in macro, in natural light, practically touching the subject:
The flower is about 1.5 inches across and I was in danger of actually brushing against the bee and scaring him away! Look at the pollen on his back, legs and head. Also, you can see good detail in the stamens of the flower and the pollen they carry too.
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... this one the top of the strawberry is overexposed (it was on a white background in sunlight) and is out of focus. That's because I was about 1.5 cm from the subject - the larva. You can see how very focussed he is - you can actually see that he has two clear membranes (one smooth and one undulating) and he has freckles on his back! Did you know that strawberries had hairs!?!
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... can also get add on lenses or filters to increase your magnification. I got all my stuff so far from 47th St. Photo. Just be aware that the extension of the lens causes a shadow with flash (even without any accessories) - as Ben mentioned. Since you have that really powerful and flexible lamp to your avail, this should be no problem. Turn off the flash and go in using full telephoto and macro on auto setting (unless you prefer to set your own focus, aperture, etc to suit the situation).
This camera is really very easy to use and give very high quality pictures for under $200 (pcrush.com).
Good luck
reply to this comment
The flower is about 1.5 inches across and I was in danger of actually brushing against the bee and scaring him away! Look at the pollen on his back, legs and head. Also, you can see good detail in the stamens of the flower and the pollen they carry too.
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... this one the top of the strawberry is overexposed (it was on a white background in sunlight) and is out of focus. That's because I was about 1.5 cm from the subject - the larva. You can see how very focussed he is - you can actually see that he has two clear membranes (one smooth and one undulating) and he has freckles on his back! Did you know that strawberries had hairs!?!
i80.photobucket.com/albums/... can also get add on lenses or filters to increase your magnification. I got all my stuff so far from 47th St. Photo. Just be aware that the extension of the lens causes a shadow with flash (even without any accessories) - as Ben mentioned. Since you have that really powerful and flexible lamp to your avail, this should be no problem. Turn off the flash and go in using full telephoto and macro on auto setting (unless you prefer to set your own focus, aperture, etc to suit the situation).
This camera is really very easy to use and give very high quality pictures for under $200 (pcrush.com).
Good luck
Can lithium AA batteries be used with this camera? (kepou06 — 11/19/2006)
I wanted to keep a pack on-hand just in case my NiMh rechargeables die. The manual doesn't mention lithium AA's at all. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/19/2006)
Katherine,
The lithium ion AA's will work more than fine with this camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The lithium ion AA's will work more than fine with this camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
kepou06 (11/19/2006)
Thanks so much!!! ;-)
reply to this comment
Self Timer (retiredfay — 11/16/2006)
How do you set a timer on the A630 so that you can get into the picture.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/16/2006)
With the camera in Record mode, push the center button on the four-way controller. This opens the Function menu. Use the arrows to scroll down the icons on the left of the screen until you come to an empty white box. This is the Drive icon; push the right arrow key to scroll thru the options. You'll see a little 2 and a little 10 appear in the box; these are the self timer options (2 and 10 seconds). Push the center button again when you've selected your choice.
*Note: I just realized that I don't remember if this camera has a Func button or not. If it does, push that instead of the center one on the four-way controller. One of the two will work!
reply to this comment
*Note: I just realized that I don't remember if this camera has a Func button or not. If it does, push that instead of the center one on the four-way controller. One of the two will work!
retiredfay (11/16/2006)
Brenda P,
Great - it works now, I am so glad I asked.
Fay Shepherd
reply to this comment
Great - it works now, I am so glad I asked.
Fay Shepherd
Maria (07/14/2009)
What's record mode? I can't do it.
reply to this comment
should i buy konika minolta dimage z20 or kodak digital c875,reply urgent,sana. (sanz — 11/15/2006)
i am about to get a camera as a gift, n i love photography, i m really confused what to ask for since my previous one was a film digital minolta camera that had really good results n i wud liek to have gud results from my next camera, i'm afraid with digital the pic's are usually blurred?
help me..?
reply to this comment
help me..?
Joe (11/15/2006)
I would go with the Kodak since konika minolta has mergered with Sony. So getting support is said to be difficult.
reply to this comment
Kelly (11/17/2006)
The Kodak C875 produced very grainy photos for me. I was very disappointed in its performance. Pictures were not sharp and defined. I've returned the camera since then and have been experimenting with the Canon A710 (not worth the money) and the Nikon L5. The Nikon is a really nice camera, and very easy to use. Produces nice photos. The Canon, on the other hand, I was disappointed. Photos, in auto mode, were not as sharp. They also have a warm/yellow tone to them. Not to mention red eye. Not severe, but its there. I will be returning the Canon and possibly keeping the Nikon. But I'm thinking about looking into the Canon A630. Reviews have been very good on the picture quality. The Nikon L5 is a great point and shoot camera, but it is slow with using flash. After all, it is only using two AA's. But other than that, its a nice little camera. Lightweight. Nice photo quality. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/19/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I can't say enough about the Canon A630. I got it for $213 in March and it is now at $190 (pcrush.com)
I have been digital since 1998 and I have owned both a Sony and a Konica. Both were good at the time, but this Canon is the last camera I will ever own.
Read my other reviews and look at some pix.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
I have been digital since 1998 and I have owned both a Sony and a Konica. Both were good at the time, but this Canon is the last camera I will ever own.
Read my other reviews and look at some pix.
Good luck!
Which is better, the Canon A620 or the newer A540? (Jim Brown — 11/13/2006)
I can get a free Canon Pixma IP6600 printer bundled with the A620. The A540 has a $40 rebate which I can apply to the purchase of any printer.
They're both selling for $199 at Office Depot.
Which is a better deal? The A620 bundled with a printer or the A540 with a $40 rebate.
reply to this comment
They're both selling for $199 at Office Depot.
Which is a better deal? The A620 bundled with a printer or the A540 with a $40 rebate.
Andrew Skinner (11/16/2006)
Jim,
You really have to look at what you want to do with them. The big differences between the two cameras are the 7.1 megapixels and more manual settings on the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A620</a> vs. 6 MP on the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... that comes with higher ISO settings for lower light situations. Both cameras use AA size batteries and come with 4x optical zoom. The better deal depends on how much the printer is worth.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You really have to look at what you want to do with them. The big differences between the two cameras are the 7.1 megapixels and more manual settings on the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A620</a> vs. 6 MP on the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... that comes with higher ISO settings for lower light situations. Both cameras use AA size batteries and come with 4x optical zoom. The better deal depends on how much the printer is worth.
Andrew
Jim Brown (11/17/2006)
Thanks Andrew:
Doesn't the A 540 also have a better LCD screen?
Also, what do you think of the Kodak Z 612 as an option?
Jim Brown
reply to this comment
Doesn't the A 540 also have a better LCD screen?
Also, what do you think of the Kodak Z 612 as an option?
Jim Brown
Jim Brown (11/17/2006)
Thanks Andrew:
Doesn't the A 540 also have a better LCD screen?
Also, what do you think of the Kodak Z 612 as an option?
Jim Brown
reply to this comment
Doesn't the A 540 also have a better LCD screen?
Also, what do you think of the Kodak Z 612 as an option?
Jim Brown
Andrew Skinner (11/19/2006)
Jim,
The LCD screen on the A540 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is larger at 2.5" vs 2" on the A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
The Kodak Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6.1 MP camera with a lot more zoom to it at 12x optical. You will notice the zoom difference greatly over the Canons. It also comes with a lithium ion batter which runs longer than a standard AA, and you don't have to go out and buy rechargeable batteries this way. It also comes with a 2.5" LCD and manual exposure settings. If I was choosing between the 3, I would go with the Kodak ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). That is my personal choice though.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The LCD screen on the A540 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is larger at 2.5" vs 2" on the A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
The Kodak Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6.1 MP camera with a lot more zoom to it at 12x optical. You will notice the zoom difference greatly over the Canons. It also comes with a lithium ion batter which runs longer than a standard AA, and you don't have to go out and buy rechargeable batteries this way. It also comes with a 2.5" LCD and manual exposure settings. If I was choosing between the 3, I would go with the Kodak ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). That is my personal choice though.
Andrew
amac (02/01/2007)
First, better is always going to be subjective when comparing 2 cameras of different sizes and cost.
The A540 is smaller and may be more appealing as a 'throw in a coat pocket and bring anywhere' camera. The A640 isn't much bigger but it is also a little heavier (because of it's 4AA batteries vs the A540's 2AA).
Personally I really like the balance and weight of the A540 and it is the camera I bought. It's light enough and has a nice grip such that I can control it easily with one hand.
However if the question is asking which camera has the best image quality, well I would have to say the A620 is the better camera.
I've read several reviews of both cameras, compared pictures where the same scene was taken with each, and I would have to say the A620 wins hands down. It simply seems to have clearer, sharper, and more pleasing pictures in daylight and even more so in low light.
The A540 takes very good daytime pics. If one looks at the A540 pictures taken (at review sites), in low light with long exposures requiring a tripod, they look great on their own. But when pictures of those same scenes taken with the A620 are compared, suddenly the A540 pictures look a bit blurry and dark. Even the fabled Fuji F30 seems to be blurry compared to the A620 at night.
Now if I had only looked at one review site, I might have thought it was merely a bad composition by the photographer using the A540. The A620 has a faster lens at telephoto with an aperture of F4.1 whereas the A540 only opens to F5.5 or so. The A620 purportedly may have the same lens as the G6, a very high end point and shoot. I have also read that my A540's ISO800 is really marketing hype and that it's exposure parameters (aperture & shutter) are closer to the A620's ISO400. This seems to be borne out (true in other words) if one examines the EXIF data.
So there you go, decide what criteria are important to you. I suspect is for many folks, low light long exposures are not important. They weren't to me . I also know that on 4x6 prints, I won't notice a difference. But I still wish I owned an A620 (if I were going to own 2 cameras). It does seem to take great shots.
reply to this comment
The A540 is smaller and may be more appealing as a 'throw in a coat pocket and bring anywhere' camera. The A640 isn't much bigger but it is also a little heavier (because of it's 4AA batteries vs the A540's 2AA).
Personally I really like the balance and weight of the A540 and it is the camera I bought. It's light enough and has a nice grip such that I can control it easily with one hand.
However if the question is asking which camera has the best image quality, well I would have to say the A620 is the better camera.
I've read several reviews of both cameras, compared pictures where the same scene was taken with each, and I would have to say the A620 wins hands down. It simply seems to have clearer, sharper, and more pleasing pictures in daylight and even more so in low light.
The A540 takes very good daytime pics. If one looks at the A540 pictures taken (at review sites), in low light with long exposures requiring a tripod, they look great on their own. But when pictures of those same scenes taken with the A620 are compared, suddenly the A540 pictures look a bit blurry and dark. Even the fabled Fuji F30 seems to be blurry compared to the A620 at night.
Now if I had only looked at one review site, I might have thought it was merely a bad composition by the photographer using the A540. The A620 has a faster lens at telephoto with an aperture of F4.1 whereas the A540 only opens to F5.5 or so. The A620 purportedly may have the same lens as the G6, a very high end point and shoot. I have also read that my A540's ISO800 is really marketing hype and that it's exposure parameters (aperture & shutter) are closer to the A620's ISO400. This seems to be borne out (true in other words) if one examines the EXIF data.
So there you go, decide what criteria are important to you. I suspect is for many folks, low light long exposures are not important. They weren't to me . I also know that on 4x6 prints, I won't notice a difference. But I still wish I owned an A620 (if I were going to own 2 cameras). It does seem to take great shots.
Ahmed Abou-Zeid (02/08/2007)
The A620 sensor size is better than the A540
The A620 maximum ISO is 400 while the A540 maximum ISO is 800
The A620 LCD size is 2.0 in while the A540 LCD size is 2.5 in
The A620 uses 4 AA battaries (longer life) while the A540 uses 2 AA batteries
any way the A620 is better than the A540 for picture quality
reply to this comment
The A620 maximum ISO is 400 while the A540 maximum ISO is 800
The A620 LCD size is 2.0 in while the A540 LCD size is 2.5 in
The A620 uses 4 AA battaries (longer life) while the A540 uses 2 AA batteries
any way the A620 is better than the A540 for picture quality
What replaced the PowerShot A620? (Crash — 11/09/2006)
Can no longer find this camera in stores. If it was supposed to be such a great camera, according to all the review, what happened to that model.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/17/2006)
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is still for sale; click on that link and there are some websites listed that offer it, although I believe just used/ refurbished.
The Powershots usually come around in sets of two; for awhile it was the A610 and A620, and those were both replaced in August 2006 by the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... (released at the same time). I highly recommend the A640 for a solid point and shoot.
reply to this comment
The Powershots usually come around in sets of two; for awhile it was the A610 and A620, and those were both replaced in August 2006 by the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... (released at the same time). I highly recommend the A640 for a solid point and shoot.
I know I´m not comparing exact matches but between an A630 and a A540? there are many similarities execpt the MP (tomas — 11/06/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (11/07/2006)
Yes they are very similar cameras indeed. But strangly the A630 gets all the user review love. Must be loyalty. Has someone else used both of these camera that can give us a good comparison of the true differences not just those on paper?
reply to this comment
tomas (11/07/2006)
Joe!
Thanks much!
I made up my mind for the A-540, just because the "add ons" (the extra lenses) of the A630 would be preferably be on a bigger yet more professional camera: call it Nikon D series or whatever you could have for interchangable lenses. The A-540 suffices I believe for shooting and having at hand on your pocket!
reply to this comment
Thanks much!
I made up my mind for the A-540, just because the "add ons" (the extra lenses) of the A630 would be preferably be on a bigger yet more professional camera: call it Nikon D series or whatever you could have for interchangable lenses. The A-540 suffices I believe for shooting and having at hand on your pocket!
What is the major different between sd630 and a630 model and which one is better? (Dom K — 11/06/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/21/2006)
Hi Dom,
There are several notable differences between the two cameras. I'll try to lay them out for you.
1. Size/Weight
Canon's A-series cameras are a little bigger and heavier than their SD-series counterparts. They tend to feel a little more solid in your hand, and might in fact be a better fit for people with larger hands. They aren't, however, quite as easy to slide into your pocket.
2. Zoom
The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a 4x optical zoom to the SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s 3x.
3. Megapixels
The A630 wins again here, at 8MP to the SD630's 6MP. It also has a larger CCD sensor, which means that it will also have fine detail at that larger resolution.
4. LCD
The SD630 has a huge 3" LCD screen. It's so huge, in fact, that Canon has done away with the traditional optical viewfinder. All previews must be done with the LCD. The A630's LCD is a smaller 2.5", with a much lower screen resolution, but it does tilt out and swivel, and the camera does include a traditional optical viewfinder.
5. Battery
The SD630 uses a proprietary Li-Ion battery that doesn't get quite as good battery life as the A630's four AAs (I'd recommend rechargeable NiMH AAs). This is another byproduct of the SD630's small size.
6. Features/Manual Controls
Canon's A-series traditionally offers far more control over manual photographic settings than does the SD-series. This includes shutter speed, ISO, manual focus, etc.
7. Price
They're about even here. No real winner.
The question of which one is better for you is going to depend on what you want from the camera. Both are excellent machines, but do you want a small, light, point and shoot kind of camera or a slightly bulkier but more feature-rich camera?
I hope this answers some of your questions.
reply to this comment
There are several notable differences between the two cameras. I'll try to lay them out for you.
1. Size/Weight
Canon's A-series cameras are a little bigger and heavier than their SD-series counterparts. They tend to feel a little more solid in your hand, and might in fact be a better fit for people with larger hands. They aren't, however, quite as easy to slide into your pocket.
2. Zoom
The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a 4x optical zoom to the SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s 3x.
3. Megapixels
The A630 wins again here, at 8MP to the SD630's 6MP. It also has a larger CCD sensor, which means that it will also have fine detail at that larger resolution.
4. LCD
The SD630 has a huge 3" LCD screen. It's so huge, in fact, that Canon has done away with the traditional optical viewfinder. All previews must be done with the LCD. The A630's LCD is a smaller 2.5", with a much lower screen resolution, but it does tilt out and swivel, and the camera does include a traditional optical viewfinder.
5. Battery
The SD630 uses a proprietary Li-Ion battery that doesn't get quite as good battery life as the A630's four AAs (I'd recommend rechargeable NiMH AAs). This is another byproduct of the SD630's small size.
6. Features/Manual Controls
Canon's A-series traditionally offers far more control over manual photographic settings than does the SD-series. This includes shutter speed, ISO, manual focus, etc.
7. Price
They're about even here. No real winner.
The question of which one is better for you is going to depend on what you want from the camera. Both are excellent machines, but do you want a small, light, point and shoot kind of camera or a slightly bulkier but more feature-rich camera?
I hope this answers some of your questions.
Ardi Ounapuu (11/21/2006)
Major difference is Megapixels: the A630 has 8MP and the SD630 has 6MP. Another big difference is optical zoom: A630 has 4x and SD630 has 3x. At the same time A630 has smaller LCD screen than SD630 (2.5" versus 3").
reply to this comment
which camera canon power shota630 or nikon coolpix p3 (barb — 11/05/2006)
picture quality
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
Very, very similar. In fact I haven't heard complaints about quality from either one. I usually advise that the Powershots perform better in low light, but in this case they may be so similar that I'm not sure. Based on sample images I've seen from both in the past, I'd say buy whatever one feels better to you- the image quality will be awfully close to identical.
reply to this comment
which is better- the Canon A630 or the A710 S (Lorrie — 11/03/2006)
I'm trying to decide between the A630 and the A710 IS. I like the image stabilization and larger zoom on the 710, but I like the flip out screen on the a630. Which will perform better and give better pictures?
One review thought the A630 might have flash problems by only lighting the center of the picture.
reply to this comment
One review thought the A630 might have flash problems by only lighting the center of the picture.
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
Both are really great cameras. If you do choose the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) beware that that flip-out screen can be a little fragile, although if you're gentle it should be fine. I would personally choose the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) simply because I have more use for zoom and image stabilization than I do for a flip-out LCD.
reply to this comment
I am buying my wife point and shoot cam for Xmas. (MichaelS — 11/03/2006)
The three priorities are the simplest menu possible, a fast shutter lag and an optical view finder. I am looking at the Kodak c743. Any other suggestions or ideas?I would look at any cams that meet that criteria. Simple...Simple...simple is important. menu must be simple! Any of teh Canon A series fit this criteria? My daughter has a Fuji that takes great pics.
Help..please.
reply to this comment
Help..please.
Joe (11/03/2006)
The Canon a630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great purchase. It is easy to use, has an optical viewfinder, and various shutter speed settings which can reduce lag. Mainly I suggest this because I has used it and love it and many many users of this site have gone out of their way to praise this camera. Check out the great reviews on the cameras individual page.
reply to this comment
susanlo (11/11/2006)
I love the Canon Powershot SD630!
I'm 45 and the screen is HUGE - I see it easily.
It's slender and Best Buy has this really chic red leather case for carrying it. I like to keep it in my purse to take picutres of furniture and home decorating ideas. The one you are looking at is too big to carry around in your purse.
Your wife would love it.
reply to this comment
I'm 45 and the screen is HUGE - I see it easily.
It's slender and Best Buy has this really chic red leather case for carrying it. I like to keep it in my purse to take picutres of furniture and home decorating ideas. The one you are looking at is too big to carry around in your purse.
Your wife would love it.
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
Hi there,
I noticed you haven't marked a "Best Answer"... are you still in need of help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a "Best Answer"... are you still in need of help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I LOVE my Canon A630 - so does my mom. We got ours for $213 from pcrush.com in March. They are now priced at about $190. DO NOT BUY REFURB - it's not worth the risk at this low price for new!
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.
If you want to see some shots I have taken, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com.
reply to this comment
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.
If you want to see some shots I have taken, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com.
which is better, Canon Powershot A630, Canon Powershot A640 or Canon Powershot A710 IS? (Shilpa — 11/03/2006)
I am planning to buy a camera for general purpose. Please suggest me which camera i should buy from the three? Should i opt for Canon Powershot A630, Canon Powershot A640 or Canon Powershot A710 IS?
reply to this comment
Mindstyle (11/03/2006)
Your purpose isn't very clear. What do you exactly mean by general purpose? If you are planning to use for low light conditions then you are better off with A710 IS or A640 because A710 IS has image stabilization and A640 is good at high ISO.
If you look at A6x0 siblings then A640 handles noise much better than A630. This is important to note as in low light, if you leave your camera on auto ISO mode then it will shoot at higher ISO, something like fast film and then A640 will take a better picture than A630.
As far as my knowledge goes, apart from pixels issue, this is the major place where all of these vary.
Otherwise all of them perform equally good under rest of the conditions.
I would personally go after A640 if I have money or I will settle down with A630. For some reason, I didn't like A710 IS design so I will give up image stabilization taking into account WFA (Wife acceptability factor)
reply to this comment
If you look at A6x0 siblings then A640 handles noise much better than A630. This is important to note as in low light, if you leave your camera on auto ISO mode then it will shoot at higher ISO, something like fast film and then A640 will take a better picture than A630.
As far as my knowledge goes, apart from pixels issue, this is the major place where all of these vary.
Otherwise all of them perform equally good under rest of the conditions.
I would personally go after A640 if I have money or I will settle down with A630. For some reason, I didn't like A710 IS design so I will give up image stabilization taking into account WFA (Wife acceptability factor)
Joe (11/03/2006)
I would say that giving up image stiblization is the worst feature to compromise. It really is a feature that dramatically improves pictures. I agree that the a710 IS is a big larger and more clunky in feel it also takes great pictures. ISO should not be that big of a factor either because anything over 1000 is going to look very pixelated with loads of noise. So if you don't mind a bit of size I would go for the Canon a710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) your pictures will thank you.
reply to this comment
Mindstyle (11/03/2006)
If I would concern for night/low light photography so much then I would rather prefer Fujifilm FinePix F30 which is gem in low light WITHOUT image stabilization.
I agree it is low in resolution as compared to A630 but again, are you really going to make prints larger than 8x12 inches? or just want to fall prey of camera manufacturer's megapixel gimmick?
reply to this comment
I agree it is low in resolution as compared to A630 but again, are you really going to make prints larger than 8x12 inches? or just want to fall prey of camera manufacturer's megapixel gimmick?
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
Hi there,
I noticed you haven't marked a "Best Answer"... are you still in need of help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a "Best Answer"... are you still in need of help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I LOVE my Canon A630 - so does my mom. We got ours for $213 from pcrush.com in March. They are now priced at about $190. DO NOT BUY REFURB - it's not worth the risk at this low price for new!
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.
reply to this comment
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further.
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.
Does the XD memory card format only work with Fujifilm and Olympus cameras? (Suz — 11/01/2006)
I have many (including the 1gb) XD picture cards and need to buy a new camera. My Fujifilm E550 camera got spilled on and is useless. I have been told that it would be better to just buy a new camera than to fix the old one. I don't want to have to buy more memory cards for a different camera. Do I have to stay with the Fuji or Olympus models? Can XD work with an SD camera?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/01/2006)
From what I can find, the XD cards can only be used by Fuji or Olympus cameras.
reply to this comment
Mindstyle (11/03/2006)
Because xD card technology is developed by Fujifilm and Olympus. So it is obvious that they will use their own technology rather than paying royalty for using someone else's technology.
Personally, I hate it because it is expensive like Memory stick.
And, it will NOT work with SD camera. Use those card as backups to save your pictures on while on travel.
reply to this comment
Personally, I hate it because it is expensive like Memory stick.
And, it will NOT work with SD camera. Use those card as backups to save your pictures on while on travel.
only 1 out five computers recognizes my camera how can I get mine to work? (anonymous — 10/31/2006)
My home computer does not recognize that the camera is attached thru the USB port. I installed the disk first. what can I do to get my computer at home to work like the one at the office?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/31/2006)
Are you sure you are plugging into a USB 2.0 slot at home? Also update the fireware on your camera, downloadable at canon.usa.com.
reply to this comment
best camera for the money (Caleb — 10/30/2006)
I am looking for a camera for my fiance. She takes amazing pictures and I want to get her a camera that can capture the images she see's with a high level of clearity. I do not have a lot of monwey to spend at most $ 250.00. So I was wondering what camera at this price range would so suggest?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
The Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has gotten great reviews and does excellent as far as clear pictures with very true color. There are a few other factors to consider- for example, the A630 has a 4x zoom; if you want something that zooms more than that, there are other options like the Easyshare Z650 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is also great and has a 10x zoom.
reply to this comment
How do you register a canon powershot A630. Tried on line no luck. (steppen — 10/28/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Steppen,
Most cameras come with a registration card in the box that you can mail in. To register a camera online with Canon, you can go to its registration site ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ).
Andrew
reply to this comment
Most cameras come with a registration card in the box that you can mail in. To register a camera online with Canon, you can go to its registration site ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ).
Andrew
steppen (10/29/2006)
Been there did not work. Tried several times to go to site on reg card and failed.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/30/2006)
Steppen,
I would recommend mailing the card via the post office then, unless you can call it in through the card you have as well.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I would recommend mailing the card via the post office then, unless you can call it in through the card you have as well.
Andrew
dcam691 (10/31/2006)
Steppen
I am assuming that you are a US resident. If not the registration site will not work as it is for US registration only. If you live outside the US go to <a href="canon.com/">http://... and select the region that suits your needs.
reply to this comment
I am assuming that you are a US resident. If not the registration site will not work as it is for US registration only. If you live outside the US go to <a href="canon.com/">http://... and select the region that suits your needs.
steppen (11/04/2006)
Dave am a us resident and did click on the right site as the camera came with cards for canada, usa .....
reply to this comment
Betty (11/07/2006)
I am a new owener of Canon Powershot A540 Digital Camera and I can not reach the USA site either
reply to this comment
guest (05/19/2008)
reply to this comment
which is better, canon powershot a630 or sony dsc-w100 cyber shot? (danielle — 10/28/2006)
i need a multi purpose camera for vacation, sporting events, & family photo's w/8 magapixels.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/29/2006)
Hi Danielle,
I would go with the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but that is really just because I like the Powershots.
Compared to the Cybershot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the A630 has a lot of the same features- they both have movie mode with sound, 2.5-inch LCDs, and a nice combo of manual and auto controls. The A630 has a 4x optical zoom compared to the Sony's 3x zoom, but the Sony probably takes low light pictures a little better than the Canon. So it's mainly up to you.
reply to this comment
I would go with the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but that is really just because I like the Powershots.
Compared to the Cybershot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the A630 has a lot of the same features- they both have movie mode with sound, 2.5-inch LCDs, and a nice combo of manual and auto controls. The A630 has a 4x optical zoom compared to the Sony's 3x zoom, but the Sony probably takes low light pictures a little better than the Canon. So it's mainly up to you.
danielle (10/30/2006)
hi brenda,
thank you for responding. the a630 has a memory of 64mb & the cybershot has 16mb. is it better to have more memory with the 8.0/1 megapixels?
reply to this comment
thank you for responding. the a630 has a memory of 64mb & the cybershot has 16mb. is it better to have more memory with the 8.0/1 megapixels?
Brenda Paro (10/30/2006)
Hey Danielle,
The internal memory doesn't matter a whole bunch- even with 64mb of memory, an 8-megapixel camera will store less than 20 photos at the lowest resolution. Probably more like 10-15. So, with either camera you'll want to buy memory cards. I think of internal memory as more of an emergency situation fallback than as an actual method of storage. Also, with some cameras using the internal memory means that you lose the photos if your batteries die. So I wouldn't let built-in memory be too much of a factor.
reply to this comment
The internal memory doesn't matter a whole bunch- even with 64mb of memory, an 8-megapixel camera will store less than 20 photos at the lowest resolution. Probably more like 10-15. So, with either camera you'll want to buy memory cards. I think of internal memory as more of an emergency situation fallback than as an actual method of storage. Also, with some cameras using the internal memory means that you lose the photos if your batteries die. So I wouldn't let built-in memory be too much of a factor.
danielle (10/31/2006)
hi brenda,
thanks for the info. the canon a630 has a swing out lcd & i read that's a good thing to have especially for aerial shots. how duarable are these movabe lcd's?
reply to this comment
thanks for the info. the canon a630 has a swing out lcd & i read that's a good thing to have especially for aerial shots. how duarable are these movabe lcd's?
Brenda Paro (11/01/2006)
Because of its size and because it does fold out, it is somewhat fragile. The good news is that I haven't heard ten million complaints about it breaking like I have for LCDs from other types of cameras. So, I would exercise caution with it, but as far as I know it's not the type of thing that is just going to shatter in your pocket as long as you're gentle.
reply to this comment
danielle (11/02/2006)
hi brenda,
i've decided to get the canon a630. i sampled it @ the store & loved it. thanks for your help.
reply to this comment
i've decided to get the canon a630. i sampled it @ the store & loved it. thanks for your help.
Brenda Paro (11/02/2006)
Hey Danielle,
That's great- I love the Canons. I hope you enjoy it!
reply to this comment
That's great- I love the Canons. I hope you enjoy it!
i dont know what to buy A710 or A630 can any one help? (ash — 10/28/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Ash,
There are good qualities in both cameras. You have to take price and capability into consideration when purchasing. I've outlined the main differences below (the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is listed first).
-Megapixels: 7.1 vs 8.0
-Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
-Image Stabilization: yes VS no
The other settings in the cameras are not much difference. You're going to get better resolution from the 8.0 megapixel Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but better zoom capabilities with the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Ask what is more important to you, and you might also want to go to a retailer to see how each camera feels in your hand.
Andrew
reply to this comment
There are good qualities in both cameras. You have to take price and capability into consideration when purchasing. I've outlined the main differences below (the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is listed first).
-Megapixels: 7.1 vs 8.0
-Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
-Image Stabilization: yes VS no
The other settings in the cameras are not much difference. You're going to get better resolution from the 8.0 megapixel Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but better zoom capabilities with the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Ask what is more important to you, and you might also want to go to a retailer to see how each camera feels in your hand.
Andrew
Rich Watson (10/28/2006)
The two are similar, although the 630 is a bit larger, and also uses 4 AA cells instead of 2 on the 710. But the 4 cells gives a stronger flash, and more photos per charge. Both have 2.5 inch screens, although the 630 is reticulated (moveable, like on a camcorder).
Also, the 630 has 8 megapixels, with 4x optical, while the 710 has 7 megapixels, with 6x optical. Hence, the "useful zoom" factor on the 630 is 32 (8 x 4) while the useful zoom on the 710 is 42 (7 * 6). So the 710 is slightly more powerful, zoom-wise.
But the biggest difference by far is the IS, the image stabilization on the 710. THe 630 does not have that.
The 710 costs a little more, but I feel it is worth it. A closer call is between the A640 and the A710.
reply to this comment
Also, the 630 has 8 megapixels, with 4x optical, while the 710 has 7 megapixels, with 6x optical. Hence, the "useful zoom" factor on the 630 is 32 (8 x 4) while the useful zoom on the 710 is 42 (7 * 6). So the 710 is slightly more powerful, zoom-wise.
But the biggest difference by far is the IS, the image stabilization on the 710. THe 630 does not have that.
The 710 costs a little more, but I feel it is worth it. A closer call is between the A640 and the A710.
Youliana (11/05/2006)
I checked both. 2 of my friends have both cameras. take 630 and you won't make a mistake. The prize is good now on the market.
Youliana
reply to this comment
Youliana
Kelly (11/17/2006)
The Canon A710 is not a performer if using Auto Mode. Its very disappointing. Not vivid sharp pictures when using indoors under regular house lighting. I found the pictures to be very warm toned/yellow hue. I'm sure the camera is fantastic if you branch into other modes but for point and shoot auto (mom) mode, not very good. Red eye is slightly obvious.
reply to this comment
Kelly (11/22/2006)
Be careful - I bought the 610 (I think) and took it back because it ALWAYS wanted to use ISO 100 with my 3-year-old which meant always blurry pictures inside. So bad that I thought I had a problem with AutoFocus. I'm still looking for a replacement and the 710 is in my sights because of its HIGH ISO setting (good for fast kids). I know I'm not very helpful but thought I would put in my 2 cents.
P.S. I'm not the Kelly from the previous post, even though she had valid points!
reply to this comment
P.S. I'm not the Kelly from the previous post, even though she had valid points!
Rich Watson (11/23/2006)
To the "first" Kelly:
Indoor lighting is much warmer (i.e. yellow-toned) than daylight. Therefore, if you take a photo with indoor lighting, w/o flash, on AUTO (undoubtedly with ANY digital camera, and with a film camera, for that matter) the camera THINKS it is outdoors, and the tungsten lighting turns yellow.
So one has to set their camera for INDOORS mode. On the A710, just dial SCN (for scene) then pick the INDOORS setting. It's as easy as that.
ps flash guns use the "daylight" color, so that is why indoor photos with a flash work OK.
reply to this comment
Indoor lighting is much warmer (i.e. yellow-toned) than daylight. Therefore, if you take a photo with indoor lighting, w/o flash, on AUTO (undoubtedly with ANY digital camera, and with a film camera, for that matter) the camera THINKS it is outdoors, and the tungsten lighting turns yellow.
So one has to set their camera for INDOORS mode. On the A710, just dial SCN (for scene) then pick the INDOORS setting. It's as easy as that.
ps flash guns use the "daylight" color, so that is why indoor photos with a flash work OK.
i dont know what to buy A710 or A630 can any one help? (ash — 10/28/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Ash,
There are good qualities in both cameras. You have to take price and capability into consideration when purchasing. I've outlined the main differences below (the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A710 IS</a> is listed first).
-Megapixels: 7.1 vs 8.0
-Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
-Image Stabilization: yes VS no
The other settings in the cameras are not much difference. You're going to get better resolution from the 8.0 megapixel <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A630</a>, but better zoom capabilities with the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A710 IS</a>. Ask what is more important to you, and you might also want to go to a retailer to see how each camera feels in your hand.
Andrew
reply to this comment
There are good qualities in both cameras. You have to take price and capability into consideration when purchasing. I've outlined the main differences below (the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A710 IS</a> is listed first).
-Megapixels: 7.1 vs 8.0
-Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
-Image Stabilization: yes VS no
The other settings in the cameras are not much difference. You're going to get better resolution from the 8.0 megapixel <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A630</a>, but better zoom capabilities with the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... A710 IS</a>. Ask what is more important to you, and you might also want to go to a retailer to see how each camera feels in your hand.
Andrew
I need an ultra-compact with an image stabilizer and 800 ISO for under $250. What's my best option? (Owen — 10/25/2006)
I also need at least 4mp and 3x opt. zoom. I would prefer, but do not require, something that takes AA's. This seems rare among compact cameras. Canon SD series and Olypmus fe190 seem best. Recommendations?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/25/2006)
If you want to go for the AA batts I would recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which you meantioned. It is a powerful camera that certainly has what you are looking for and then some. It is a camera that you won't soon grow out of, a great price too.
The Olympus FE190 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera but certainly not as powerful as the canon and no AA batts. But much sleeker and a bit cheaper.
reply to this comment
The Olympus FE190 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera but certainly not as powerful as the canon and no AA batts. But much sleeker and a bit cheaper.
Owen (10/25/2006)
Thanks, I'm checking out the A630.
AA batteries aside, which do you recommend in the ultra compact size? Preferably with image stabilizer and under $250.
reply to this comment
AA batteries aside, which do you recommend in the ultra compact size? Preferably with image stabilizer and under $250.
Roopak (10/25/2006)
Hello Owen,
For Ultra-Compact check out - Sony Cybershot T series (T10, T30, T5, T7, etc.)
For Image Stabilizer check out - again Sony Cybershot T series - they have Optical stabilization
For Resolution - again Sony Cybershot T series - most are 5MP and above
For 3X zoom - again Sony Cybershot T series - most are 5MP and above
For price under $250 for the above - wait for some more time for some models to be discontinued
My Personal recomendation (I own a canon 20d and I love it):
Sony Cybershot T30 because 3" LCD, 400+ shots battery life (very useful in ultra compact with HUGE 3" LCD), and Ultra-compact, and Optical Image stabilization.
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
For Ultra-Compact check out - Sony Cybershot T series (T10, T30, T5, T7, etc.)
For Image Stabilizer check out - again Sony Cybershot T series - they have Optical stabilization
For Resolution - again Sony Cybershot T series - most are 5MP and above
For 3X zoom - again Sony Cybershot T series - most are 5MP and above
For price under $250 for the above - wait for some more time for some models to be discontinued
My Personal recomendation (I own a canon 20d and I love it):
Sony Cybershot T30 because 3" LCD, 400+ shots battery life (very useful in ultra compact with HUGE 3" LCD), and Ultra-compact, and Optical Image stabilization.
Hope this helps.
Roopak (10/25/2006)
Also the new CYBERSHOTS have ISO 1000.
reply to this comment
batteries (MichaelS — 10/24/2006)
What are the advantages and disadvantages of AA batteries as opposed to rechargables?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/24/2006)
Well first of all you can get rechargable AA batteries. Which is the best of both worlds but let me break it down for you.
Camera specific lithium ion battery packs usually take up much less room than AAs making the camera more compact. They also usually last a bit longer when fully recharged.
AA batts are bigger and bulkier but what is nice about them is that you can get AA batt anywhere. So if you are out and about and your batts start to die you can just go to a corner store and be full up again. It is difficult to find a special lithium ion battery pack in your local corner store or the canals of Venice or where ever you might be. But AAs are everywhere.
Now that brings us to Rechargable AAs which are simply AA batts then can be recharged. They do get weaker and weaker and depending on use will eventually need to be replace but they are fairly inexpensive.
The biggest difference really is accessiblity and size.
reply to this comment
Camera specific lithium ion battery packs usually take up much less room than AAs making the camera more compact. They also usually last a bit longer when fully recharged.
AA batts are bigger and bulkier but what is nice about them is that you can get AA batt anywhere. So if you are out and about and your batts start to die you can just go to a corner store and be full up again. It is difficult to find a special lithium ion battery pack in your local corner store or the canals of Venice or where ever you might be. But AAs are everywhere.
Now that brings us to Rechargable AAs which are simply AA batts then can be recharged. They do get weaker and weaker and depending on use will eventually need to be replace but they are fairly inexpensive.
The biggest difference really is accessiblity and size.
MichaelS (10/24/2006)
Thanks Joe.... I am looking for a simple easy to use point and shoot for my wife.
She is "technically challenged". Looking to spend up to $300. mostly for pics of teh kids and such. I was looking at the Canon A710 because of teh stabilization. Also tehe Kodak EasyShares and I heard good things about the Fuji's.Any suggestions?
Thanks again
reply to this comment
She is "technically challenged". Looking to spend up to $300. mostly for pics of teh kids and such. I was looking at the Canon A710 because of teh stabilization. Also tehe Kodak EasyShares and I heard good things about the Fuji's.Any suggestions?
Thanks again
a camera of 8megapixels 6-8x digital zoom and 75mb memory (kartikey — 10/24/2006)
has large zoom and superfine photo with memory of 70 above
reply to this comment
Joe (10/24/2006)
What camera are you specifically talking about? Whatever it is it sounds like a decent camera. 8 Megaplixels is more than enough especially if you are not planning on printing massive images with it. I assume that the 6 in "6-8x" zoom is the Optical zoom and the 8x is the Digital zoom. There is a difference between the two, simply put Optical zoom is much higher quality. 75mb is not a whole lot of memory. I like to have at least 256mb. But this camera sounds good, whats the brand? and what is the price?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/07/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I LOVE my Canon A630 - so does my mom. We got ours for $213 from pcrush.com in March. They are now priced at about $190. DO NOT BUY REFURB - it's not worth the risk at this low price for new!
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further. No internal memory, which sucks a little. But that just means that you can buy the size you need.
I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.
I have used all of the brands that you mentioned in my last digicam (Konica DiMage 500) with no problem.
I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB. If you don't know how to do this, this is what I did:
Find a corresponding sized folder on your computer (music folders are usually good for this, or your "Program Files" folder). Check the original folder size by right-clicking and going to the Properties page. Write down the exact file size and the number of folders/files inside the folder you are using to test. Copy the entire folder to the card via your PC card reader or through the cable inside the camera. That will take a while for the larger sizes. When that is done, close the original source folder, navigate to your card and look at the Properties page. The file size and number of folders/files should match. Then open the folder on the card and select "details" view. Look at the registered sizes of the files. There should not be any that are 1K - those are thumbnails and a dead giveaway of a fake card (unless they were that way in on your PC as well).
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.
Last hint - NEVER buy refurbished. At under $200 the Canon A630 is cheap enough to buy new and avoid the risks.
reply to this comment
For price, features, modes, user controls, range, macro, accessories, quality, etc, - look no further. No internal memory, which sucks a little. But that just means that you can buy the size you need.
I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. As you already know, you will either have to use your USB cable (included) or purchase a card reader since most readers are not rated for HC yet. It's fast, good, sturdy, no data losses, etc.
I have used all of the brands that you mentioned in my last digicam (Konica DiMage 500) with no problem.
I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB. If you don't know how to do this, this is what I did:
Find a corresponding sized folder on your computer (music folders are usually good for this, or your "Program Files" folder). Check the original folder size by right-clicking and going to the Properties page. Write down the exact file size and the number of folders/files inside the folder you are using to test. Copy the entire folder to the card via your PC card reader or through the cable inside the camera. That will take a while for the larger sizes. When that is done, close the original source folder, navigate to your card and look at the Properties page. The file size and number of folders/files should match. Then open the folder on the card and select "details" view. Look at the registered sizes of the files. There should not be any that are 1K - those are thumbnails and a dead giveaway of a fake card (unless they were that way in on your PC as well).
As for megapixels, my friend who is a pro photographer for over 26 years (used to shoot for National Geographic) said, and this is a quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be on a 30 foot by 50 foot billboard, there is no reason to get more than 8 MP's". Of course he has a 10 MP 20D, but that's how he eats!
So, as far as I am concerned, this is the last camera I will ever own. I also got a 5 year warranty from Repair Tech for about $45. So, at least until the year 2012, I will have a kick-ass camera. (In fact, a few of my pictures have already been approved for sale on a stock photo site).
The IS feature would be nice, and it is in earlier models. I don't know why Canon decided to eliminate it in the A630. Probably because the mechanism would have added weight to an already hefty camera.
That said, IS is just about the only thing I wish it had. It does have a warning light, which I though meant that the image WAS going to be shaky, but I have read that it is a warning based on the settings (focal distance, focus setting, f value, light, etc.) that are calculated by the processor and it is just telling you that you may want to use a tripod.
I have read a review from another user who said that he TRIED to make the image bad by shaking the camera when shooting and he could not get it to take a bad shot. However, this is also effected by the factors I listed above. I have taken out-of-focus shots in high-wind areas or when the focus was set at manual and I was moving. But they are minimal. I have even shot perfectly focussed pictures our of a moving car THROUGH THE GLASS. Be-yoo-tiful.
If you are at the level to play with the settings, use TV (or P or M) mode and manually speed up the shutter time until the warning light goes away. Or you may need to adjust the aperture to let in more light so the focuser will have more light to work with. However, even with the warning light on, the pix look flawless on my 19" wide, so it's not a big concern.
Last hint - NEVER buy refurbished. At under $200 the Canon A630 is cheap enough to buy new and avoid the risks.
Which would you pick the Kodak Z650 or the Canon A630? (John T. — 10/22/2006)
reply to this comment
Deanna (10/26/2006)
I'd choose the Canon A630. The Kodak Z650 has seemingly poor image quality, has noticable fringing and it's video is pretty "choppy." Although the Canon A630 doesn't have image stabilisation, it has much more better image quality, pricing for an 8MP camera and etc.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/02/2006)
Hi,
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
How is picture quality in Auto Mode for the Canon A710? (Kelly — 10/22/2006)
reply to this comment
travis popp (10/23/2006)
it takes great pictures in auto mode. anyways the software it comes with allows you to do so many things to your photos once you have downloaded them on your computer
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/01/2006)
Hello,
I noticed you haven't marked a response as Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a response as Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
Kelly (12/02/2006)
Well, I kinda ended up answering my own question. I purchased the A710 out of total curiousity. I wanted to see if was a good "mom" camera. I found out it was not. Not for my needs. The flash recycle time was way too slow, kids don't wait for moms camera. And Auto Mode picture quality, I found, was too grainy for a $350+ camera. Camera could not take any kind of contrast in Auto Mode. I have read reviews on this problem but needed to find out for myself. Camera takes really nice pictures in other modes, but I was looking for a new camera that presented excellent (crisp) quality in Auto Mode. One that I could use quickly without having to think ahead on which mode I should be in. I was really disappointed. So I returned this camera and purchased the Canon A630. Consumers report rated the A620 as a fantastic camera, so I decided to try the A630, which supposedly takes the place of the A620. This camera is excellent! and is all that I hoped it would be. Very fast recycle time on the flash due to (4) AA instead of (2) on the A710. The pictures in Auto Mode are beautiful, crisp, exactly what I was looking for. This camera is slightly heavier and alittle bigger than the A710, but its due to the (4) AA vs. the (2)AA of the A710. Its worth the difference is waiting time on the flash. The A630 does not have the image stablization that the A710 has, but I find I really don't need it. Not with 4X opt. zoom. I'm pretty steady with holding the camera. The A710 has 6X opt. zoom, where I can see where it may be needed. But so many people put up such fuss about image stablization, its not a fix all to photography. I hope this helps people out there who are considering either camera. I have also tried the Nikon L5, and the Kodak C875. I would pick the Nikon over the Kodak but in the end, I choose the Canon A630. Picture quality and quick flash recycling time won over all of them.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/02/2006)
Kelly, thanks for the update. That's a pretty accurate review- I have heard of the issues in Auto mode with the A710 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), as well as the sloooow flash recycle time. It's really too bad because in other modes it is such a fantastic camera. Interesting too, because all the other Canons (including the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is darned near the same camera) perform far and away better than this. It's most likely those 2 AA batteries that are the culprit.
I hope the new one works out for you (the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is on my list of best cameras, I loove the A series Powershots) and if you're OK with it not being an ultra compact and not having IS then it should be great for you. Let us know if anything else comes up.
reply to this comment
I hope the new one works out for you (the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is on my list of best cameras, I loove the A series Powershots) and if you're OK with it not being an ultra compact and not having IS then it should be great for you. Let us know if anything else comes up.
what is the main difference between the a620 and the a630? (foxycarmen@hotmail.com — 10/20/2006)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/22/2006)
The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 8 megapixels, a 2.5-inch flip-out LCD and ISO 80-800.
The A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 7.1 megapixels (not a huge difference), a 2-inch flip-out LCD (a little smaller), and ISO 50-400 (a little less flexibility).
Very comparable cameras in my opinion.
reply to this comment
The A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 7.1 megapixels (not a huge difference), a 2-inch flip-out LCD (a little smaller), and ISO 50-400 (a little less flexibility).
Very comparable cameras in my opinion.
Can i use rechargeable batteries with tihs camera. if not then suggest a good camera in a price range 0f $250 with rechargeable batteries (Eshban — 10/19/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/19/2006)
Yes this camera uses NiMH batteries AA batteries, which is rechargeable. This is an excellent camera, 4 AA batts can be a pain but with the recharge feature it is not such a big deal, use those batts again and again.
reply to this comment
Acquiring new installation disc? (Mike McKinley — 10/18/2006)
Just bought this camera and I have LOST the darn installation disc. I see it is not currently available as a download. How can I get another one?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/19/2006)
I think I found what you need- it's not on the Canon USA site, but I did find it on the European site. Let me know if this doesn't work:
software.canon-europe.com/p...
reply to this comment
software.canon-europe.com/p...
Is it true that more pixels can actually decrease the quality of the image? If so, then does the A630 (8 mp) produce better quality images than the a6 (Jeff Prentice — 10/18/2006)
I have the a640. Im dissappointed in the low light images. I am wondering if a switch to the a630 will help because with fewer pixels to crunch perhaps the image wont be so lossy - and if not, what camera will give me good low light images - I'd prefer a swivel LCD, but I'd settle for just quality images.
I have been shooting a canon powershot g1 3 mp for years now...just switched.
reply to this comment
I have been shooting a canon powershot g1 3 mp for years now...just switched.
Brenda Paro (10/18/2006)
Hi Jeff,
You've got a lot of questions in here and I can help with at least a few of them. I have not heard that more pixels can result in a lower quality image, although I'd be fascinated to hear the reasoning behind that (I don't mean that sarcastically, I really am interested!) What is pretty certain is that 8 vs. 10mp is not a huge amount of difference, and the amount of pixels is not what's causing your low light problem. (For a great discussion of how little difference 2 pixels makes, go <a href="kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth... you say you get poor low light images I'm assuming you mean they are grainy/ swirly/ maybe missing detail? This is less related to your mp count and more related to your image sensor and how well it handles the brightness/ contrast/ colors it is receiving. All cameras have some issues with low light photos, but some are better than others.
With that said, I've always thought the Canon Powershots did well in low light. Rather than just giving up on your camera it might be worth exploring what's wrong with your low light images and how to fix it. This may take some playing around with the balances and settings on your camera, or possibly changing the image resolution.
If you want to tell us more about what problems you're having in low light I can try to help solve them. I wouldn't give up just yet... the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a wonderful camera.
reply to this comment
You've got a lot of questions in here and I can help with at least a few of them. I have not heard that more pixels can result in a lower quality image, although I'd be fascinated to hear the reasoning behind that (I don't mean that sarcastically, I really am interested!) What is pretty certain is that 8 vs. 10mp is not a huge amount of difference, and the amount of pixels is not what's causing your low light problem. (For a great discussion of how little difference 2 pixels makes, go <a href="kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth... you say you get poor low light images I'm assuming you mean they are grainy/ swirly/ maybe missing detail? This is less related to your mp count and more related to your image sensor and how well it handles the brightness/ contrast/ colors it is receiving. All cameras have some issues with low light photos, but some are better than others.
With that said, I've always thought the Canon Powershots did well in low light. Rather than just giving up on your camera it might be worth exploring what's wrong with your low light images and how to fix it. This may take some playing around with the balances and settings on your camera, or possibly changing the image resolution.
If you want to tell us more about what problems you're having in low light I can try to help solve them. I wouldn't give up just yet... the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a wonderful camera.
i am a casual photographer but need quality pics...with a economical camera...affordable max up to 260 dollars (omer — 10/17/2006)
suggest a camera that is with my specifications..fits my needs and becomes my life time memory
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/17/2006)
In that price range, you have quite a selection, ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and most with nearly 5 star ratings.
For my money, I'm drawn to both the Canon PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak Easyshare C875 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Both are 8 MP cameras. The Kodak has a slight edge in optical zoom (5x vs. 4x), but it's a tad pricier.
Either one, however, will meet those casual picture taking needs.
reply to this comment
For my money, I'm drawn to both the Canon PowerShot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak Easyshare C875 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Both are 8 MP cameras. The Kodak has a slight edge in optical zoom (5x vs. 4x), but it's a tad pricier.
Either one, however, will meet those casual picture taking needs.
What is main difference between A630 & A710IS? (Liza — 10/16/2006)
I have an old Kodak but I want a Canon. I want good crisp pictures but with a decent zoom. I like inside and outside pictures. I like sports, people, nature, and landscaping. I am totallu confused with so many choices.
reply to this comment
anonymous (10/16/2006)
The A630 has 8MP with 4X zoom, uses 4 AA batteries and no image stablization,but has a flip lcd screen.
The Z710 has 7.1 MP with 6X zoom, uses 2 AA batteries and has image stablization. The A710 is smaller.
reply to this comment
The Z710 has 7.1 MP with 6X zoom, uses 2 AA batteries and has image stablization. The A710 is smaller.
camera? (10/17/2006)
Test
reply to this comment
Too bright sunlight (HALW2006 — 10/16/2006)
I recently purchased a Canon A630. I did the research and wanted a camera that could deliver high image quality. I took some landscapes the other day and was disapointed when they came out and the brightness of the sunlight was really exagerated both directly and reflecting off of objects in the photo. It was a sunny day and I was just using the auto setting. I had expected much better. Anyone else have this problem? Can I correct this? And lastly, should I then expect to have to alter the settings for each photo I take? Thanks in advance!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/18/2006)
Sometimes a very white or very sunny picture will cause this- the lightness tricks the exposure meter into overexposing the shot.
Did you try the Sunlight program mode rather than just plain Auto? That would be better equipped to handle all the brightness.
reply to this comment
Did you try the Sunlight program mode rather than just plain Auto? That would be better equipped to handle all the brightness.
Does the A630 have image stabilization? Is there a short or long delay between pressing the button and the picture being taken? (Brice Moss — 10/15/2006)
reply to this comment
Sam (10/25/2006)
No. The A630 does not have IS (Image Stabilization). For a good review check out the following,
steves-digicams.com/2006_re...
reply to this comment
steves-digicams.com/2006_re...
Does it matter much without the image stabilization function in A630 / 640? (Tommy — 10/15/2006)
I want to own my digital camera, not necessary be a expensive and sophisticated one. Some of my friends strongly urge me to buy one with the function of image stabilizing. In fact, I need a camera that allows me to take very close image. That's why I am considering canon A630 / A640. However, they both have no function of image stabilizing. Does it really a must to include this feature? Another question is: is it better to have the camera with charged battery than the one with dry cells?
Or you can suggest another model to me. What I need is a camera which can allow me to take very close image. Pixels is not very important to me, actually 800 Megpixel is more than enough to me.
reply to this comment
Or you can suggest another model to me. What I need is a camera which can allow me to take very close image. Pixels is not very important to me, actually 800 Megpixel is more than enough to me.
Brenda Paro (10/15/2006)
Image stabilization is a great tool, but not everyone needs it. It can help if you shoot a lot with low shutter speeds, with lots of zoom, or if you generally have problems holding the camera steady and get blurry images. Many people think image stabilization is a great addition to digital cameras and I agree, but it's not a strictly necessary one.
As far as the batteries go, I'm not quite sure which ones you're comparing- but if you're referring to regular batteries vs. rechargeable, definitely use the rechargeable. They tend to last up to seven times as long as regular batteries in a digital camera.
reply to this comment
As far as the batteries go, I'm not quite sure which ones you're comparing- but if you're referring to regular batteries vs. rechargeable, definitely use the rechargeable. They tend to last up to seven times as long as regular batteries in a digital camera.
Speedy (10/15/2006)
I don't miss image stabilization. The 630/640 is such a good all-around camera that it's hard to take a bad picture with it. If you must have image stabilization though, there is a new model, the PowerShot A710IS that includes it. This model also includes a 6x optical zoom (vs. 4x in the A6xx series) which is a nice improvement.
Batteries - I prefer models like the PowerShot 6xx series that use four AA's. There are very good NiMH rechargeable batteries available and in a pinch you can always use alkalines. Cameras with Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery packs tend to have very good battery life, but the battery packs are expensive (when they wear out or are lost) and you have to use the recharger to charge them (could be inconvenient when you're hiking the John Muir trail, for example).
reply to this comment
Batteries - I prefer models like the PowerShot 6xx series that use four AA's. There are very good NiMH rechargeable batteries available and in a pinch you can always use alkalines. Cameras with Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery packs tend to have very good battery life, but the battery packs are expensive (when they wear out or are lost) and you have to use the recharger to charge them (could be inconvenient when you're hiking the John Muir trail, for example).
Tom (10/18/2006)
Good comments from Brenda and Speedy. Especially Speedy. I do think that Powershot 6xx is a good option especially for those who always use the camera. If you leave the camera for days, the rechargable batterys will out of power. It is more convenient to use dry battery every time and take them out and reserve for next use
reply to this comment
What is the main difference between the A640 and the A630? Is it simply the pixels? (Shannon — 10/11/2006)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
I'm thinking you mean the A620. Well, first think you see is that the pixel count reaches the 10 MegaPixel plateau, compared to the A620a 7.1MP threshold. The LCD screen has also been enlarged. With the A640, shutter speeds also go to 1/2500 of a second, over the 1/2000 of a second with the A620.
ISO control now goes to 800 ASA. Flash range has increased and there's a few more whistles and bells in the special scene shooting modes.
So, in essence, they are the same as far as basics, just a little bit more which is what you would expect in a model upgrade.
reply to this comment
ISO control now goes to 800 ASA. Flash range has increased and there's a few more whistles and bells in the special scene shooting modes.
So, in essence, they are the same as far as basics, just a little bit more which is what you would expect in a model upgrade.
camera? (10/11/2006)
Actually, James, she is talking about the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is the 'sister' model to the A640, and has a 8 megapixel sensor.
Yes, Shannon, when it comes to the A640 and A630, the major difference is the megapixels. The 10MP sensor of the A640 is a nice power boost, but the A630's 8MP is more than enough for crisp, detailed photos.
They are both fantastic cameras.
reply to this comment
Yes, Shannon, when it comes to the A640 and A630, the major difference is the megapixels. The 10MP sensor of the A640 is a nice power boost, but the A630's 8MP is more than enough for crisp, detailed photos.
They are both fantastic cameras.
Glenda (10/11/2006)
The A640 also has remote capture ability which is not available on the A630. This means you can set up your computer to take pictures with your camera.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
Funny, in my research, there was nothing about the 630 on Canon's Website, so I figured it was a misspell. Oh well. Camera has a good point then. As does Glenda. That remote capture ability is a nice feature in this computer age.
reply to this comment
George (10/12/2006)
I found the following link of a comparison btwn the two cameras ... there doesn't seem to be any differences except to the megapixel increase for the A640 and the (very) kool black case color. Other than that there are no other differences noted.
dpreview.com/news/0608/0608...
reply to this comment
dpreview.com/news/0608/0608...
dale (10/14/2006)
about $200 is the main difference
reply to this comment
Speedy (10/15/2006)
Dale, the difference in list price is only $100, not $200. The A630 is $299 while the A640 is $399. I concluded the same thing that George did (no significant differences except for the megapixels) and bought the A630 a couple of weeks ago. I am extremely happy with the camera, but I knew that I would be because this is my third Canon Powershot.
reply to this comment
what is better canon sd900 ora630 (maria — 10/11/2006)
i enjoy take pic of my kidz indor and outdoor.i lost my canon s70, with was really good camera, beautiful pic. what will be best camera to get now?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/04/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Kcho Loren (08/14/2007)
My choice is A630, it is more "professional" and has 1x more optical zoom.
reply to this comment
Does the A630 use a compact flash card? (Mary — 10/10/2006)
I have a Canon A310 that broke. I had recently purchased a 1GB compact flash card for it - when I get a new camera, I want to be able to use that same card.
reply to this comment
camera? (10/10/2006)
No, the Canon A630 uses a Secure Digital card.
reply to this comment
text and document photography best performance (hrlbhatta — 10/09/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/10/2006)
Basically any camera with good macro capabilities, assuming you are shooting very close to the text would be great. I can recommend a few cameras taht are great but the most important part is going to be how you light the document. You are going to want to shut your cameras flash off so it doesnt blow out (aka over expose) the white paper. Here are some options:
Canon a630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic Lumix fx07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
These are all great cameras that are capable of doing what you ask. Check them out and see which ones have the features you would use for other things and which is the best value for you.
reply to this comment
Canon a630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic Lumix fx07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
These are all great cameras that are capable of doing what you ask. Check them out and see which ones have the features you would use for other things and which is the best value for you.
I am not professional. I am amateur. Please, advise me for best digital 8 + megapixel for making night photos (Youliana — 10/09/2006)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes nice nighttime photos and might be a good choice. It's easy to use and all-around good for most situations.
reply to this comment
Youliana (11/05/2006)
Thanks to Brenda P.
I want to know a camera about 8+ megapixel. When I se an object I want within seconds to make the photo. Which one is so quickly. Can you recommend me? I am not professional but I want good photos and especially night or evening photos. Thanks.
reply to this comment
I want to know a camera about 8+ megapixel. When I se an object I want within seconds to make the photo. Which one is so quickly. Can you recommend me? I am not professional but I want good photos and especially night or evening photos. Thanks.
Ben Keough (12/03/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
What is the difference between SD memory card and SD fast speed and which one should I use with the Canon a630? (Susan Marinello — 10/07/2006)
I just purchased the Canon A630 and the salesman tried to sell me a SD fast speed memory card saying that the camera was so slow I would need this particular card. Felt like he was just trying to sell me something extra when the plain 1gb SD card would surfice. Help please
reply to this comment
noamf (10/25/2006)
canon site says that usally the proccesor of the camera makes the writing into memory and the speed of the card does not have any effect.
The best thing to do is to enter regular card and a fast one and make a test /
reply to this comment
The best thing to do is to enter regular card and a fast one and make a test /
steppen (10/28/2006)
I just went to the A630 and am getting plenty of speed from a 256mb sandisk sd card.
reply to this comment
johnson (01/12/2007)
I have been using the A630 for the past couple of weeks and will be returning it shortly, due to its lag.
reply to this comment
Jack (08/13/2008)
I've had my A630 for 18 months and absolutely love it. I have a 2 gig PNY card in it and with 1647 pics on it. The pics are very sharp, both near and far. Lag? What lag? I particularly enjoy the battery life.
It's a great camera in my estimation
reply to this comment
It's a great camera in my estimation
what camera is easy to use? (Good-son-in-law — 10/07/2006)
mother-in-law, technologically impaired, wants to buy a digital camera that's easy to use. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/09/2006)
I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix DMC LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it is a very afforadable price (as far as digital cameras go) and it is very easy to use. Plus unlike other easy to use cameras this has a lot of power behind it so just because you are camera impaired you don't have to suffer bad pictures.
If you are will to pay a bit more the Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is easy to use and a great value for the amount of features it has.
Check them both out, see what you are willing to spend. Good luck. They are both excellent cameras.
reply to this comment
If you are will to pay a bit more the Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is easy to use and a great value for the amount of features it has.
Check them both out, see what you are willing to spend. Good luck. They are both excellent cameras.
I am an artist and need a digital camera to take close ups as well as full pictures (Laurie Justine — 10/06/2006)
I am an artist and need a digital camera to take close ups as well as full pictures of my work. The size of my work goes up to 26 x 26 inches. And then I would like to get close up. Is the A630 right for this use or is there a better reasonable priced option.
reply to this comment
Manish (10/31/2006)
Canon A710 IS
reply to this comment
Laurie Justine (10/31/2006)
Why is this better for me than the Canon A630? Thanks
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/30/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
which is better among Sony & Canon? (ankur — 10/04/2006)
i want to purchase 8 mega pixel camera for personal use.
reply to this comment
camera? (10/04/2006)
Your best options would be the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
The W100 has a lot of very positive user reviews, more than the relatively new A630, but Canon is known for reputable cameras, and the A630 should be just as fantastic as the preceding A620/A610 models.
reply to this comment
The W100 has a lot of very positive user reviews, more than the relatively new A630, but Canon is known for reputable cameras, and the A630 should be just as fantastic as the preceding A620/A610 models.
able to capture sports in action (Rocky — 10/03/2006)
I want to puchase a camera that enables me to take shots quickly during softball and football games
reply to this comment
Joe (10/06/2006)
The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a good choice because of its iSAPS (Intelligent Scene Analysis based on Photographic Space) automatically optimises camera settings before your shot. Basically it does the labor for you given a certain environment.
Also the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is great because of its Burst Shot Mode that take 5 shots in a row at a high rate to ensure you capture that homerun smack.
reply to this comment
Also the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is great because of its Burst Shot Mode that take 5 shots in a row at a high rate to ensure you capture that homerun smack.
What is the best camera under $300 for action shots (basketball games)? (basketball mom — 10/03/2006)
Here are some details that I am working with- easy to use, adjustable lighting (since lighting is different from gym to gym), above average viewfinder and comfortable to hold.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/06/2006)
The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a good choice because of its iSAPS (Intelligent Scene Analysis based on Photographic Space) automatically optimises camera settings before your shot. Basically it does the labor for you given a certain environment. And it is under $300
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/29/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Actually, the A630 is under $200 right now at pcrush.com. I got mine in March for $213. I use an AData 8 GB SDHC. Works like it was meant to be. I got my 8GB card for $60 through an eBay auction. Just look around and be patient. Once you get it check that it is legitimately 8 GB.
It will also record video up to one hour or until you run out of memory, whichever happens first. The sound is not video camera quality, but again, this is not a video camera! You can use the wide and tele while filming and you can also use the fun color accent and color swap features. But once you start recording you can't turn them off unless you quit first.
If you get a tripod (I got one for $12 including shipping) you can set it up at the first buzzer and let it run!
Look at my other answers for more info about this camera.
reply to this comment
It will also record video up to one hour or until you run out of memory, whichever happens first. The sound is not video camera quality, but again, this is not a video camera! You can use the wide and tele while filming and you can also use the fun color accent and color swap features. But once you start recording you can't turn them off unless you quit first.
If you get a tripod (I got one for $12 including shipping) you can set it up at the first buzzer and let it run!
Look at my other answers for more info about this camera.
I want to buy a Canon digital camera and can not tell how I find camera and lens that are autofocus in 10 pixical? (Randa — 10/02/2006)
I am 70 and work better with the camera doing the focusing. I do mostly macro work. Plus grandchildern. I see complete kits with cameras on ebay and can not tell the len's fit only that camera, or if they are gray market? What does EOS mean? I have been selling my work for years and used Pentax 33 milmeter, Sony F707 digital. Wanted something with even a better picture.
Randa
reply to this comment
Randa
David Parker (10/03/2006)
Canon makes wonderful digital cameras. EOS is just a name of the 'line' of cameras made by Canon - the higher end ones. I don't recommend buying off EBay unless you are knowledgable about the products - too many shady sellers out there. The stores featured on this site all have ratings next to them (click the "buy" tab on any camera's page to see the ratings).
That said, for taking pictures with macro, or of grandchildren, you don't need a super fancy camera. I recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). For around $250 you get a 8 megapixel, 4x zoom camera. Canon's A series cameras have been extremely successful and very popular with consumers. It should work great for you.
Good luck-
reply to this comment
That said, for taking pictures with macro, or of grandchildren, you don't need a super fancy camera. I recommend the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). For around $250 you get a 8 megapixel, 4x zoom camera. Canon's A series cameras have been extremely successful and very popular with consumers. It should work great for you.
Good luck-
compare a630 with a540 canon (garry rohrer — 10/02/2006)
please compare reviews of canon a540 with a630
reply to this comment
Joe (10/04/2006)
The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) was very well received and has excellent reviews on this site. The A540 was a bit disappointing even tho it has a bigger CCD sensor of 1/2.5 compared to 1/1.8cm.
reply to this comment
Which cameras have maneuvurable LCD displays? (Terry Howes — 09/27/2006)
Good day,
I'm a member of the Joint Health and Safety Committee at my workplace. We currently use an older model Kodak Easyshare camera to take pictures to help document Accident Investigations. We're looking to get a new camera (any brand) that has an LCD screen that pivots and rotates, seperate from the body of the camera. With the Kodak, when we need to take a 'birds eye view' shot, we can't see what's on the LCD display since its up above our heads.
I currently own a Canon S2 IS, which is great. But the price for this camera is more that my employer is willing to spend. A list of camera's with the pivoting display would be great.
Thanks for your time.
reply to this comment
I'm a member of the Joint Health and Safety Committee at my workplace. We currently use an older model Kodak Easyshare camera to take pictures to help document Accident Investigations. We're looking to get a new camera (any brand) that has an LCD screen that pivots and rotates, seperate from the body of the camera. With the Kodak, when we need to take a 'birds eye view' shot, we can't see what's on the LCD display since its up above our heads.
I currently own a Canon S2 IS, which is great. But the price for this camera is more that my employer is willing to spend. A list of camera's with the pivoting display would be great.
Thanks for your time.
David Parker (09/29/2006)
Canon is known for swiveling LCD screens. You should be able to find what you want in this list:
Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Good luck!
crash (09/29/2006)
a620 a630 a640
reply to this comment
can you take panoramic view photos with this camers? (Julia — 09/27/2006)
reply to this comment
David Parker (09/28/2006)
There is a "stich assist" function with the A630, which enables you to "stitch" photos together. With that setting, you take multiple shots - after the first one, a 'ghost' from the first image will show on your screen and help you to line up your second shot so the two can be 'stitched' together into a panaromic image. Apparently Canon's software can do this as well regardless of what mode you took your photos in - you select the photos you want to join, and the software takes over.
reply to this comment
panoramic question (ellen — 02/04/2010)
Does this camera stich photos in the camera or just on the card
reply to this comment
crash (09/29/2006)
yes --- ( i think im doing this wrong ? :P ---
reply to this comment
does this camera have the half and half photo? (anonymous — 09/26/2006)
where yo utake to pics and it puts half of each pic to make one
reply to this comment
David Parker (09/27/2006)
Unfortunately the DigitalAdvisor system doesn't yet show the product page you were viewing when you typed in your question - can you tell me which camera you have in mind?
reply to this comment
Joe (11/28/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you havent marked any replies as the best answer. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on Digitalcamera-hq.com ( digitalcamera-hq.com ) so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck
reply to this comment
Canon PowerShot A630 Reviews
Canon PowerShot A630 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 1.0 out of 5
Canon does not support factory design defect!
(Dan C. — 12/22/2009)
The capacitor device that drives the flash gets loose and flash stops working! Canon will not fix at their cost and offers another reworked piece of junk for $120.00 that will end up doing the same thing! Canon customer support was arrogant and belligerent at best when I demanded that Canon fix under warranty! They said the camera was past warranty from date it was made. I told them I had bought it 7 months ago (back then). They told me "Oh well, do you want to buy the reworked camera or not?"
- 3.0 out of 5
Not bad, but not perfect ( what is?)
(Ella — 09/17/2009)
Overall the camera isn't so bad...but I'm sure theres alot better out there for the same price. Like alot of other people, the flash stopped working suddenly. It'd do this on and off before but it'd usually seem to fix itself after a few days and work fine. However's its been 2 months now. Alittle too bulky to carry around constantly if your an avid photo-taker. Picture quality is good though, and the 4x zoom can be a benefit.
- 5.0 out of 5
Bought "Two"
(Bo Biernat — 08/19/2009)
Purchased one for myself two plus years ago. My son kept borrowing it so I purchased another for him about a month later. Just love it, easy and simple to use, computer friendly, haven`t had a single problem. My son`s on the other hand, last year, somehow the screen only worked for a split second when turned on, then went blank? He put it aside and left it as broken. A couple of months later I just picked it up and was checking it out and it ends up somehow the screen-on time was was the culprit. Adjusted the setting and that was that. He and his sister share and use it regularly and neither of them have any complaints. Actually my daughter gets artsy and uses many of the camera`s manual features and has taken some fantastic portraits and scenic shots. I do not regret these purchases, considering the original reason for this purchase was the price ( less than $250 Cdn. @ Costco). I wasn`t looking for any particular brand name at the time but, in the meantime... LIVE ON!!! Canon A630
- 1.0 out of 5
very unreliable with three big problems in 3 short years.
(jess — 08/11/2009)
After 13 month honeymoon with the A630 I took it on a Rome Italy trip. The lens locked up on the first tour. We spent $60. buying the Kodak 35mm one time use plus developing. After two years the shutter broke and I had it repaired. $255 dollars worth of repairs and now the play back is not working. I will never by Canon products again
- 4.0 out of 5
Love the camera, but flash broke.
(Nicole Loomis — 07/11/2009)
I absolutely love this camera and all of its capabilities. I love the swivel screen and color accent features the most. It takes great photos and the battery life lasts a long time. HOWEVER, my flash just stopped working for no reason the other day. I love this camera, but I do not love a faulty flash or the fact that it is apparently common. This model and swivel screen feature is no longer available in newer PowerShots. This upsets me.
- 2.0 out of 5
Not built to last
(Rock Gaillard — 07/05/2009)
We purchased this Canon after our old Canon's LCD quit working. We also love the swivel screen. Well, it worked great for a year or so... but that was about it. We were at Disney and the finished taking some pictures and cut it off..... the lens would not retract. That was it. The death of the Canon. They have flaws with this camera and the lens.... and it got us. Canon knows it. I will be sure next time to shop around the Canon cameras when purchasing our new one. IMHO, I wouldn't risk the money to buy a camera you are taking a chance on the lens.....
- 3.0 out of 5
Flash defect
(Sue — 06/11/2009)
The flash on my A630 just stopped working, which apparently is a very common problem with this model. Canon is refusing to acknowledge what is obviously a design flaw, and wants $100 to fix it. My next camera will be a Nikon - I've had good luck with them in the past (the Canon was a gift...)
- 5.0 out of 5
Canon A630 Power Shot
(Ray Gleason — 05/22/2009)
I took this camera on a 6 week trip to Europe and took some 1300 pictures. The camera performed flawlessly, On such a trip it did not receive the best of treatment. The pictures I brought home speak for themselves. I especially liked the lcd display as a viewfinder allowing me to shoot with the camera level.
- 2.0 out of 5
not happy with the A630
(Rosemary — 02/23/2009)
Loved the camera but the lens constantly gets stuck wont even come out at all now. Walmart said lots of trouble with this one. and they dont carry the model anymore. Pd 229.00 at walmart certainly didnt get my moneys worth.
- 3.0 out of 5
Good camera - flash broken - common problem
(Malcolm Roberts — 02/01/2009)
With full auto and manual modes and lots of features that I as a professional photographer could take advantage of, I loved this camera and everything about it, that is, until the flash stopped working. Canon don't want to know about the problem, but it is very common. There is a very real fault with this model and the A640. I would not buy this camera or the underwater housing. I had to send my underwater housing back to Canon 3 times because it leaked. I am in a dive club (and we know how to properly care for a housing) and 4 other people with this camera or the A640 have also had faulty housings. Canon's trick is to delay you with 'helpful tips' or send it back to you untouched telling you there is nothing wrong with it, until the warranty runs out and then they don't want to know about it.
This has also been the case with the faulty flash. They send it back and tell you it works fine, but it does not. (Just read the many complaints online.) This is not my first Canon camera, but I will not buy a compact Canon again. Their after sales 'service' is not. Avoid.
- 2.0 out of 5
Fuzzy photos
(Donn Pearlman — 12/24/2008)
I've been extremely disappointed in the quality of photos of the A630 compared to my previous (and first) digital camera, the Nikon Coolpix 3400. With the A630 I often get photos that just are not as sharp and clear as I expected, and often darker than anticipated.
- 1.0 out of 5
Canon lives on advertising - customer support is back seat!
(Dan C. — 12/23/2008)
When my A630 was 4-5 months old it started having flash & reset issues! Manfacturing and design defects, after much research are the issues. What a nightmare! Canon didn't care! They rejected an obvious defect for repair. Many folks are having same problems with A603 and similair cameras in the line - they don't care! Google canon A630 flash & firmware issues.
My recommendation is Nikon! Great camera line with people who actually care about their customers! Look at the Coolpix P6000! What a great camera! Excellent photos, software, features, color, focus, etc... 13.5 M pics! Give your hard earned dollars to a company that has great product and cares! I've had many brands of cameras - point & shoots, SLRs, etc...
Go Nikon!
- 1.0 out of 5
Powershot A630 has flash defect!
(Dan C. — 10/21/2008)
As many people have reported on the www - good camera as long as the flash is still working! Otherwise Canon service will charge you approximately $98.00 to fix their quality issue with the flash!
Without the flash issue I would rank the A630 as good...
However, MANY people are having this issue!
- 3.0 out of 5
My Canon
(Rock Gaillard — 10/13/2008)
I have owned the Canon A360 for about 2 1/2 years when all of a sudden, the lens just got stuck in the open position and would not move. I did get the old "restart camera" error message... but that won't work. Other than that, it was a good camera which my wife loved the swivel viewfinder.... BUT if it just lasts 2-3 years... they can keep it. It's just a good doorstop now.
I have already bought another camera since to fix this would cost at least $180. If you do buy this camera, do get the extended coverage. I really thought they made better cameras that this....
- 5.0 out of 5
Great Day pics
(Sheeba — 10/07/2008)
Easy to use, the PowerShot A630 takes great day pics. Not too good on low light, but have had some awesome night time shots of cereus cactus beginning to bloom at night. Best feature, to me, is the LCD.. movable to get into tight spots or overhead and still able to see what you are aiming at. It's a bit lighter than my old A-80, but just as good photos. Colors are brilliant! Batteries and memory card are in same section of camera.. just don't dump the batteries out when removing the SD card to download pics to your computer. Energizer batteries have worked best for me.. Panasonic came with it, but didn't last long, even with the disply features turned off. Have a set of Energizer Lithium batteries that will go in when current regular Energizers give out. My camera came as a bundle deal... Canon printer along for the ride. With tax, didn't pay any more than for the PowerShot A-80 plus camera case, plus rechargeable batteries, plus larger memory card.. bought 4 yrs ago.
Am more than satisfied.... can take pics more quickly than with old camera.
Certainly a winner in my book!
- 2.0 out of 5
lasts as long as the warranty
(Lisa — 06/05/2008)
Bought my first. Broke just after the warranty expired (camera decided on a fixed focus and wouldn't move in or out). Purchased a second. Same problem 3 months later. Sent it in and they fixed it (I had to pay shipping for the repair). Same problem a few months later with the "fixed" camera. They refused to refix the "repair". i only use it for vacations. Hadn't used it after the "fix" and before I found the same problem.
Worthless customer service and crummy camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
REALLY NICE WITH MANY FEATURES.
(LOUIE — 05/19/2008)
I am far from an expert on cameras and after doing some research and investigating, I decided to give this camera a shot. I am a novice, at best, and at frist was taken back by all the features that came with this piece. So I took it out one day and took as many pictures as I could and went and developed them. I made sure to take pictures in light, shade, day and night to see how they would turn out. I came to find out that they came out very crisp and detailed and the colors are deep and rich. I was impressed with the quality and after a couple of trial and error's, I became more comfortable with all the modes and scene settings. The flip out screen was also very useful and an extra cool feature to have. The software provided by Canon is pretty straight forward and easy to use. There are newer cameras out there since I purchased this one, but I am very happy and have many, many pictures that will last me a lifetime thanks to this great camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
Excellent Camera!
(David — 05/11/2008)
This little camera is all most people will ever need. It can be used in full auto or you have a lot of control it`s over functions. The photos it takes is great. Has a pretty good flash range. The batteries seem to last forever[350 to 400 shots]. Canon`s software for downloading to the computer works fine but I mostly just manually download photos. Great little 4X zoom but I would like a little more. The 2.5 in. swing out screen is really nice. Like most LCD screens it`s a little hard to see sometimes outdoors but you can look through the viewfinder just like a traditional film camera. I have heard of people having problems with the lenses but so far I have had none. I have used Canon film cameras for many years with great results and Canon is really on top of things in this now digital world. I am thinking of going to a SLR digital camera. You guessed it! It will be a Canon!
- 4.0 out of 5
Definitely worth the money.
(Jab — 04/11/2008)
I've really enjoyed using this camera, i've gradually learnt how to use all the different settings.
I was always after a camera that could where I could tilt the screen. And it has filled my expetations.
I would consider myself an average user, not pro or beginner.
Would I recommend it? yes, for someone who is not pro though. But definitely for someone who wants a bit more than just a "point & shoot".
So long as you don't have any warranty issues with it, because in my case I had a problem with the flash not working and a flash icon blinking on the screen.
Because of Canon's lack of support regarding the flash issue (and I'm not on my own in this case, they should've issued a recall), I am not giving it a 5 star!!
- 1.0 out of 5
Lens Broken Down
(Azhar Raza — 04/05/2008)
Lens broken down no new lens available where could I buy new lens for my a-630 camera plz... any one know help me .... my camera has no warrenty left...........
- 2.0 out of 5
poor reliability
(adrian garai — 11/01/2007)
Whilst the camera takes great shots with lots of options, it has now broken down on me twice with the lens jammed open, An unreliable camera is worse than useless.
- 5.0 out of 5
Complete Control
(Matt Glista — 10/01/2007)
I purchased the Nikon Coolpix L11 one week before I bought this camera and I was not satisfied with its lack of manual options. So I returned it and got this camera instead (for only twenty bucks more than the coolpix, since it was on clearance!) and man was there a difference. I mean, obviously there's going to be a significant level of improvement from 6 mpx to 8, but it's much more than just that. Almost EVERYTHING can be set manually, including ISO, shutter speed, white balance, shooting mode (with an excellent continuous shot mode for sports), color settings, and more. At first I was disappointed to find out that the camera did not feature any built in vibration reduction, but I soon realized that v.r. was unnecessary as long as the shutter speed is quick enough. Overall, I would say that this camera is for those on a tight budget who want crystal clear pictures and aren't going to cry about petty things like the camera not fitting in your pocket. Simply put, you're not going to find a more versatile or higher-quality camera in this price range.
Oh, and for all those whining about a cracked LCD screen, just take better care of your equipment!
- 1.0 out of 5
LCD cracked! Canon will not honor warranty.
(A.J. Davern — 09/28/2007)
I had my a630 for a week, took the camera out of it's case and the LSD was cracked! The camera and it's case were in a camera bag and weren't dropped or crushed. When I sent it to the Canon service center for warranty repair they tried to charge me $105 to replace the LCD and wouldn't budge from stating that it was my fault that the LCD cracked; basically calling me a liar!
I will NEVER buy a Canon product again.
- 5.0 out of 5
Worth the money
(Rhiannon — 09/15/2007)
This easy to use camera is a great treasure. I was looking for a easy to use @ a good price digital camera when I ran across this little number and I love it. I recommend it to all is looking for the same thing I was :)
- 5.0 out of 5
Precise Picture Taking Machine with style
(Johnny Nesbit — 08/11/2007)
I feel I invested my money wisely with this little point and shoot camera, and I have no regrets. Perfect picture quality, casing and design is lightweight but is sturdy plastic. Just be gentle with the battery case and memory card removal. It really has ALL the settings you need for a casual photo taker and a little more.
- 2.0 out of 5
A630 performs really bad compared to A610
(Remus Feuer — 08/02/2007)
I own an A610 and i just bought an A630. In the same lightning conditions A610 is about 20% more sensible to ligh so there is really no image noise until iso 200. On the A630 the noise amount is quite big just over iso 80. Also the A630 doesnt focus as good as the A610 and the background is always blurry and grained. I am sorry i bought the A630. Its a really bad camera because the size of the CCD sensor must be the same as the A610, only that the pixels are a lot smaller since its an 8 megapixel so that each pixel gets a smaller amount of light. In low lightning conditions there is no way of getting a good image and the flash is crappy along with the large, but low resolution display.
- 5.0 out of 5
Excellent color, clarity, manual control, macro photography
(max — 07/12/2007)
If you want a small almost-point-and-shoot that gives you enough optional manual controls like you had in a film SLR, without spending $800 to $1200 for a DSLR, this is the camera for you.
You can use it in full auto mode, or you can set it on aperture priority, shutter speed priority, full manual. It has a terrific macro focus mode that really can focus sharply down to under an inch away from the lens.
Flash is crap, but no worse than any other camera's built-in flash - all built-in flash photography always is. (Most people are not very discerning, and think their flash photos of family parties indoors are "just fine" but they are crap).
USB connector "door" is a flimsy rubber thing that I don't trust, but even if it eventually breaks off, it won't hamper the camera.
Battery life with 4 NiMH AA is EXCELLENT. I've shot probably 1000 photos with it so far, and have recharged the batteries only twice.
White balance is good. Color rendition looks great even under troublesome fluorescent lighting.
You can manually stop it down to f/8 - I'd like to have f/22, but you ain't gonna find that without buying an SLR. Controls are very intuitive. Some digicam controls and menus are pure agony, especially if you are used to using a film camera. These are not. It took about a day for me to be completely comfortable with them. The important ones - ISO, shutter speed, f/stop, macro mode, timer mode are quickly accessible.
- 4.0 out of 5
Very good quality photos and settings. one downside...
(Johnny — 07/10/2007)
This camera takes very good photos in dark and light with auto settings. All the manual settings you need. Maby a little complicated, especially for someone who is not used to compact digital cameras.
The only real downside is the flimsy plastic parts and some openings can break easy.
- 3.0 out of 5
Cannon Powershot A630
(Tracy Halverson — 07/03/2007)
The camera takes great pictures, but the camera is not very durable. I am on my second one and the battery door will not stay closed. I am embarassed to return it a second time.
- 4.0 out of 5
canon a630 digital camera
(w d — 04/23/2007)
good solid value digital camera
4xAA battery yields long life
feature rich
aperture/shutter priority and full manual
good video
SDHC compatible
excellent value
mediocre build quality not what you would expect of Canon, but still a terrific value for the price.
not good results in full auto mode in low light. Must force flash and ISO 100 for good low light photos. Terrific in good light. Buy a fuji f30 or f20 for low light photos.
- 5.0 out of 5
The last digicam I will ever own!!
(Lisa — 04/21/2007)
I have been a digital camera owner since Sony made the early Mavicas (1998) - a 640X480 with only a slot for a floppy. I used that camera until about 2004 and replaced it finally with a 5MP Minolta DiMage G500. It was like going from learning to crawl to running in a 10K.
But this Canon A630 is like suddenly turning into Flash Gordon! I am a beginning "ameteur" photog and am just learning about all the pro settings, like aperture and shutter speed. This camera makes it very easy. I especially like that you can control just about every aspect from just about every mode. Although, I am still trying to see the real differences between program, manual and custom. More than f8 would be nice, but I'll live!
For those of you who are completely clueless, never fear. This camera can be set to auto and do perfectly well until you are more comfortable playing with the settings.
All in all, I am overjoyed with this camera, especially since I have already taken several dozen sale-quality shots - according to my friend who has been a pro-photog for over 25 years and used to shoot for National Geographic! In fact, I have already posted some for sale on fotolia.com!
This pro, whom I will mention again below, also said that this particular camera at 8MP will serve all my needs. He said, and I quote, "Unless you are shooting for a magazine and the picture is going to be made into a billboard 20 feet by 50 feet, you will never need more than 8 MP". He uses Canon exclusively and would not steer me wrong.
I would like to address a few concerns that have been brought up on this thread. First, the macro works beautifully - the trick is that you have to set the zoom to fully wide angle (push the lever to the left). I found this out the hard way, because I have not even opened the instruction book! I wonder what I might find out if I did that for a change...
I have taken some macro shots of bees on little 1" flowers from about .7cm distance - there is no blur and no pixelation (which also both depend on the stillness of the wind and your hand). And you can clearly see the yellow pollen on his back, legs and on the tiny hairs on his little bee head!
(If anyone wants to see some of my shots, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com and let me know if you want to see some macro, panorama, color swap/accent, waterfall, nightclub, etc. and I will post some in my online album for you to see. I'm no pro, but I think I have some stuff that will help you decide if you want this camera for yourself. **I have already "sold" two, not counting the one my mom bought.)
These macro images look perfect even on my 19" widescreen monitor at home, even zoomed in - of course there is a limit to that even on more expensive pro cameras.
Second, I have also wished that it had image stabilization, but as another reviewer mentioned, there is very little loss in image quality even when you are moving. I thought that little red icon meant that the image will be bad, but it's just a warning that you "should" use a tripod, according to the pro I mentioned who uses a Canon D20. You can easily shorten the aperture time if it's a continuing problem..
Third, my regular Duracell batteries lasted until around shot 270, including several rapid fire shots (about 80 in three or four instances). I rarely used the flash since I was at a beach during daylight, but I had the LCD operating the whole time and adjusted the lens all day, which takes battery also.
I have a system where I put in regular disposables when I leave the house. Then if I need to replace them, I can throw them away and put in my NiMH, which I will use until I get home and recharge. This way I will always have fresh batteries available and won't have to carry around dead rechargeable batteries.
I have used both of the night shot functions at bars watching live music. The "Night Scene" and
"Night Snapshot" don't seem to do as well as plain old auto - maybe because the lighting is not even and the subject are moving a lot. Night snapshot seems to be a little slow and I get blur - also for some unknown reason it picked up a lot of pinks and purples.
Auto gets the pix just right, even in low light. The only concern is that since the camera will set the aperture and speed according to the brightest spot in the field, the image may be a bit blurry, however, the flash and the pre-flash/red-eye pretty much take care of that in auto.
Speaking of colors, I LOVE LOVE LOVE the color accent and swap features. I have been having fun changing my friends' guitars from red to yellow or some other color right on stage! The only complaint I have about those features is that the camera sees better than we do. So we might look at a person's blue shirt and select any old part for swapping with, say, a yellow. The camera seems to be able to swap the blues (or whatever color you have chosen) that are within a spectral range of the color you select, but since the processor is sensitive to light and shadow more than our retinas are, some of the 'other' blues are left behind in the final image. But who cares?! Those two features are really just for playing. The pix come out perfect in all other respects. If you really want to mess with your colors like that, do it in your computer.
On color accent - I have had fun removing all the colors from scenes at a swimming pool except for the light blue of the water. THOSE were some good shots!
The photo stitch feature is good, but you have to be careful when taking a large panorama of more than about 4 frames. This is because if you start out at a slight angle, that angle will be amplified as continue around your scene - you will continue to go down or up at that angle for each successive shot. Another problem I had was with the variations in sky and shoreline as I took each shot. The sky was slightly different in each frame, so I will have to take some time to blend them. As for the beach, since the water is constantly moving, the whitewash and tide edges are not going to match. If you are really good at PhotoShop or a similar application with cloning or blending, you may be able to fix that part up. But these things are not particular to this camera. It's just something you have to expect when taking panoramas.
The Stitch Assist software is really good. It is fast and you have pretty good control. It's also smart, selecting a cropping frame according to what the images' edges are.
Speaking of the software, I like the album because you can chose how you want to view your album without a lot of clicking around. I don't know what the EOS Utility is for. I have not tried any of the others yet, with the exception of Stitch Assist.
I like that you can also control your folder and numbering options right on the camera. I have mine set to continuous numbering and a new folder every day at midnight. This makes is very easy to give unique names on my computer and prevents duplicates.
The pro has forbidden my mom (who also bought the same model in the same online order as mine) from EVER using her digital zoom. He never uses it in any of his cameras because of digital zoom's reputation for producing crap at larger sizes. He disabled it on her camera. I have yet to test the resolution, so the jury is still out on that one.
As for the swivel LCD - why would anyone make a camera without one?!? I have never had one before, but since I am short (5'1") I will have a hard time doing without one again. Great for over head shots as well as rock star pix from knee to head from foot level. Self-portraits are great too.
I also think the customizable timer with multiple shots & flash is ingenious. No more running to get in the group picture just to go back and forth to take "just one more". You can take three at a time and cut your exercise to 1/3!
One of the very best features of this camera, which is not exclusive to this brand or model, is the ability to add lenses and filters. What an awesome idea!! That puts full professional ability right in the hands of the entry level/budget consumer.
I can't decide what to get first, but UV and polarized are no-brainers. Most online stores will include the adapter, so don't buy one separately unless you are sure you will need it. In fact, if you purchase more than one package, you will probably get one with every order you make.
Cases, chargers, tripods, screen protectors - all available. I got a nice semi-hard case which fits perfectly for $7.50. I also have an 8GB A-Data Super SDHC 2.0 SD card which works just fine in the camera ($80!!)* Be careful that your card is the size it says and that it's compatible with your setup. There are scammers out there). If you get this card, you will either need a high-capacity card reader, or you can use the USB cable to transfer your pix/vid.
You can also get a zipper and Velcro-style underwater case that accommodates the lens' extension for about $35 plus S&H on eBay. It is limited in use since you can't get to all of the controls, but if you set the underwater setting and flip over up your LCD before you put it in, you should be fine. The case that offers full dial control goes for well over $150.
Oh yeah - video at the bars is muuuuuuuch better than on my old Minolta. You can see the band even in low light and the sound is not too bad. It's no video camera, but it suffices for personal use.
It does lack a few things that I would like to have, i.e. a few MB's of internal memory for copying photos onto a friend's SD card or my PDA card. An image stabilizer would be nice, too, but is not really necessary. The batteries slide out waaaaay to easily, so it would be nice if the slots were just a tad more snug.
I will wrap this up now with one last thing. One person mentioned that they would have like a hot foot. Search eBay for a slave flash. You can get one for about $45 plus shipping. It is wireless and can even be placed in another part of the room , even behind your subject for professional looking portrait shots.
I will be purchasing an extended warranty for this camera for about $35. That way I will be guaranteed to have a good, working camera until 2010. At that time I can renew the contract for a few more dollars, or let it lapse until the camera dies and know that for under $250 I had a kick-ass camera for over 3 years!
I paid: $212.85 plus $10 S&H from pcRUSH.com on March 17, 2007. I got it by UPS in three days (I live in Hawaii, so it took an extra day).
So my final review: features 9.7; user controls 9.6; price 10.0; ease of learning/use 9.5; available accessories 10.0; video 8.2, software (not sure yet).
- 5.0 out of 5
Great Camera!
(Timothy Crawford — 04/01/2007)
I have only owned this for a week so I am still figuring out all the neat details this camera offers. Everything is pretty easy to use. The picture quality is awesome! I really scrutinized reviews for all different types of cameras. Now I see why this is a "Best Pick". I felt 8mp was adequate for my use so I opted for this over the A640. Glad I saved the 100 or so bucks. I also purchased; 12(total)eneloop batteries/with charger, and 3-1gig cards so I should be able to take loads of pics. Playing with this taking pics in my back yard I found the Optical and digital zoom impressive. As far as IS goes...I wasn't sure if I should look for a camera that had it. This camera doesn't need it! I purposely tried to shake it up and see what happened. It was pretty stable. Even when zoomed it takes great pics. So far I gotta say this camera "rocks" and the good reviews are spot on!
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera
(Bill — 03/28/2007)
Purchased this as an upgrade to an A520. Love it. Great features. Great battery life with NiMH batteries. Movies are great quality and unlimited length (dependent on SD card size). Great compliment to my 30D.
- 3.0 out of 5
Canon Powershot A630
(Katherine — 02/09/2007)
My husband and I are long-time Nikon fanatics who have crossed the road to Canon in the past few years. I held on to my Coolpix 990 until it really was about dead, and begrudgingly let it go before an important trip. In my efforts to find a smaller, less expensive camera still packed full of features, I found this.
The features comparisons at sites like dpreview and imaging-resource were my research. I spent many hours going through all the specs on several cameras. This camera was so new back in November '06, that not many reviews were up, to back up the awesome stats.
There are some really neat features. The size/weight, being able to use AA batteries; battery life which has been great with fully charged re-chargeables; the memory card slot location and manner of ejecting; the LCD screen which flips out, around, and closes in for protection; the video feature which is so crisp and clear, with audio!; the auto rotate feature during playback (depending on how you hold your camera, it flips the image to be right side up for your viewing!), and last but not least, the many manual settings available. I can think of more but those are the biggies that come to mind.
As for the complaints, I have more than I was expecting. The camera comes with a 16mb memory SD card. I accidentally broke it in half within about 5 minutes of opening the box! I never planned on using it since I got a 2GB card on sale, but I was pretty horrified at how flimsy it was. Auto mode has never been reliable—the flash is too bright, the ISO seems to be fixed at 800, and anything after 200 = noise with this camera. Did I mention the noise? I really am stunned at the amount of noise in most pictures. I never experienced this with any of my NIkons or the Canon digital rebel. This camera does not focus well or quickly. I have not had any success with the macro mode which I'm really disappointed about, since it's the only camera in it's price range that claims to be able to focus up to 1cm. I can hardly get it to focus 10 feet away in non macro mode! I've literally gone through every mode, every setting and just not had very good results. All but 1 of the manual modes do NOT save your settings. If I wanted to spend 5 minutes before every picture, fine-tuning all the settings, I'd have bought an SLR.
Maybe my camera is just defective? I have to wonder about the chip in this camera, maybe it's just substandard compared to the higher end models, or maybe it's a Canon issue? I'd love some feedback on all that. I'm seriously considering returning this camera in the small window of time I have left, and biting the bullet and just spending more money to get something I'm really thrilled with. Many moments you want to take pictures of never come around again, so it's worth being critical and really getting a well made camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
Canon Powershot A630
(Rachel Terrana — 02/06/2007)
For my last birthday i recieved an olympus, and i loved it. i was an ammeture photographer but now im getting more into it. so for this christmas i asked my dad for a kodak camera from $400. i did not get it, but i did get a vivatar. i hated it. so my dad recently got me the canon a630 and im in love with it. i love the flip screen and the video. its good with my photography needs and in about a week im leaving for disney and im looking forward to the pictures im going to take.
- 5.0 out of 5
Powershot A630
(Zach — 02/04/2007)
Best...Digital Camera....Ever
- 4.0 out of 5
INCREDIBLE
(Jenn — 01/20/2007)
I visit Sea World at least 4-5 times a year to take photos. This is the best so far! It creates the clearest and most detailed pictures for its price range. You can see some examples at www.dropsofgrace.com look for the rays of the sun reflections details and the true colors!
- 5.0 out of 5
Canon Powerhot A630
(Kelly — 01/04/2007)
Excellent camera with remarakable features. Able to use and easy to understand..I am a first time digiatla camera owner and found this camera to be VERY easy to use and function.
- 5.0 out of 5
A630 Blows away the competition!
(Serena — 01/03/2007)
Last Christmas I hastily bought a Pentax without researching it beforehand, unfortunately that was a mistake. So, this summer I took it upon myself to thoroughly research and find myself a reliable camera that was +6mp, 4x optical zoom, flip screen, quick turn on and focus, colour functions, AA batteries, a manuel mode, takes sharp photos without having to be on a tripod, and great colour saturation levels. I have found all these features and more in this camera.
My parents took it with them on a trip (novice users) and they had a great time. They came back with some great photos. They greatly enjoyed the camera, even the photos they took while in the plane and of the outside look great!
From the novice to photo enthusiast, it's an all around great pick. My only concern was red-eye (but we have technology to rid us of that), and it's hard to find a good fitting camera case/bag.
- 5.0 out of 5
MULTIFUNCTIONAL....THE BEST!
(Ric Howe — 12/29/2006)
This camera is absolutely the best camera that I have found for One, the Price and Two, the amount of STUFF... this camera can do. I thought about spending 1500 on a videocamera when i realized what is the point when you can spend almost half and get picture and SOUND quality equal or better in what you would in a videocamera. Absolutely a great buy.!!!
- 2.0 out of 5
camera
(alexis — 12/26/2006)
i hated this
it didnt record sounds clearly
pictures were often fuzzy
and then my motor burned out.
biggest waste of money
- 5.0 out of 5
I love it
(Roxanne Rosen — 12/01/2006)
I bought this camera after reading several reviews and searching for quality & price. I took this camera with me to New Orlenas for Thanksgiving and took pics from all around the city. I was very happy with the results, you can't go wrong if you decide on this baby.
- 5.0 out of 5
I Love It!
(Roxanne Rosen — 11/30/2006)
I recently purcahsed this camera after going online for weeks reading reviews and comparing price & quaility and I must say...I LOVE this camera. I took it with me to New Orleans for Thanksginving and took pictures from all around the city. The quality was very nice and I love the zoom range.
- 5.0 out of 5
Canon A630 Review
(Todd Wagner — 11/24/2006)
For the past month, I've been using this camera, having in the past used a Nikon Coolpix 5400. What I was looking most for was a point and shoot that took AA batteries, as well as had a preview screen that could be flipped and twisted around for protection when not in use. I would have liked a hotshoe on this camera, so almost bought the G7. However, the need to have a camera that took AA batteries and had a flip and twist preview screen was more important to me.
Bottom line, I'm impressed with the quality of this camera. I've been impressed with how the digital zoom does not give the "grainy" results I was used to with my prior camera.
The alkaline AA batteries gave out after only about 80 pictures. Then put in a set of Duracell rechargables, and took over 250 pictures before needing to recharge.
My favorite thing about this camera is the user's ability to control everything, including manual focus, & ability to change iso, aperture and shutter speeds.
So bottom line, if I were to lose this camera, I'd definitely go and purchase another one immediately.
- 3.0 out of 5
Another homerun from Canon
(M^F — 11/11/2006)
As a longtime Powershot A-series user, I was very happy with this upgrade... basically twice the camera of my A-4** for less money two years later. Twice as fast, 2x pixels, USEABLE movie mode! And let me say I LOVE the card in the battery case, a big improvement from last year's external slot. If you want the swiveling LCD, flexible photo controls, very good movie mode, and you don't need to make billboard-size photos, the 8MPx 630 is for you!
- 3.0 out of 5
Canon A630 Digital camera
(Alan — 11/08/2006)
I bought this camera just last week to take some pictures of my son's birthday. When I shot a video clip, I found out a lot of glares from the light source. ie, each candle from the birthday cake shows a vertical straight line even in the playback. I will bring this one back for a refund. I checked with other camera, I don't see this with Sony's. Pls let us know if you experience the same problem with your camera
- 5.0 out of 5
A Lot of features for the price
(Paul Ryan — 10/26/2006)
I just upgraded from a Kodak 3.2 MP "point and shoot" with no zoom, so I am finding that the Canon's 4X optical is a HUGE improvement. The image quality appears spectacular, the only drawback being the necessity of a large (>1Gb) SD card (those 8 MP images take up a lot of space). Also, the SD card is a PAIN to get to (it's in the battery compartment?!). However, I could not find another camera in the same price range (I paid just under $300) that includes a viewfinder as well as LCD screen (useful for bright sunny days), and the same or equivalent level of features. It will take a while to explore them all, but I am very pleased with its performance so far.
- 5.0 out of 5
Canon A630
(Mark Goldberg — 09/28/2006)
Great Camera. This has a ton of features. The flip and twist screen is handy for lining up photos where you are in the shot (not to mention it's a good way to protect the LCD screen when you are not using the camera). Movie mode is surprisingly good. Get the high-speed disk, it's a little more than the standard speed disk, but it's worth it for the speed between shots. Flash recharge is good (fast)between pics. It's very good in low light and the zoom (both optical and digital) is handy. I'm still learning the manual settings with this camera, but like any camera, the type of lighting you have is key. Image quality is great. The canon software that comes with the camera for downloading is simple to use. It comes with a USB cable and an AV cable for the TV. Very handy for showing pics to the whole family all at once.
The only complaint I have is the fact that the battery indicator only displays when your batteries are low (it's kind of analagous to the "check engine" light on your car). Once you see it, there's not too much life in the batteries. Battery life lasted for about 150 to 200 shots, which were a combination of still shots and movie clips that lasted from 10 seconds to 1 minute so I would rate the battery life as adequate for my needs, just bring an extra set of 4 batteries if you plan on taking a lot (>150) of pics. Also, you turn the LCD display off and use the view finder to conserve battery life if that's a problem. (I only have 2200mah NiMH rechargeable batteries; I suspect with 2700 mah you can go longer.)
Overall, I don't think you can go wrong buying this camera. It's a very good value.
- 3.0 out of 5
Cannon A630
(Gail Obradovich — 09/20/2006)
Replaced my A620 which I loved but broke. Great camera but HUGE design flaw. Chip in battery compartment. AWFUL idea. What a pain to remove.
- 5.0 out of 5
a630
(steve bagwell — 09/19/2006)
A lot of camera for the money,great pictures.
