Canon Powershot G10
| Fetching our Best Offer… |
Read why: Editor's comments
| 21st | of 21 | in Over $600 |
| 12th | of 12 | in Advanced |
| 44th | of 46 | in Canon |
| 44th | of 46 | in 13 & 14 Megapixels |
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the Canon Powershot G10
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|
|||
Editors' Comments
The Canon Powershot G10 is a replacement for the popular G9 advanced point-and-shoot camera. It boasts a tremendous 14.7 megapixel sensor, 28mm wide angle lens, and support for the RAW file format. The G10 offers exceptional control for photographers interested in taking charge of their photographs, while still maintaining a convenient and comfortable design.
Specifications
- 14.7 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Lens-shift image stabilization
- Auto and manual exposure
- JPEG and RAW file formats
- 28-140mm wide angle lens
- ISO 80-1600
- Lithium-ion battery
- Secure digital memory storage
- 3-inch LCD display
Product Information
| Manufacturer | Canon |
|---|---|
| Part Number | PowerShot G10 |
| UPC | 013803100075 |
| Release Date | Oct 15, 2008 |
G10 Accessories:
Canon Powershot G10 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
But CNet does say that "this doesn't look like the kind of update that will inspire envy in G9 owners."
Your answer was informative, but I think that I will wait until the 15th of October (the release date) for some user reviews.
Thank you
Thank you
But hey, it's your money.
This is mostly true but if Wide angle is important to you the G10 gives you the equivalent of 28mm while the G9 is 34-35mm I believe. I'm looking for a higher end P/S to get away from carrying my DSLR around. Since I like scenics and dense city shots, Wide & Raw capability is important to me and that kills many contenders. I have also looked at small Dslr's like the D40 /60 and the newest Oley entries. Dave 18 years as a portrait photographer
So, in the end, if video is your dealbreaker, you may want to consider going the other way and getting a camcorder that shoots digital stills. Canon has one right now that can go up to 8MP.
You can access Mycolor by pressing Func button and using the directional button.
See the link for the image.
images.digitalcamerainfo.co...
In this connection, it may be relevant to point out that Canon has a camera plant in China known as Canon Zhuhai Inc., and it is located in Guangdong province on the Chinese mainland not far from Hong Kong.
Taking S5 IS as an example, both the Japanese plant and the China plant at Zhuhai produce S5IS and this is printed in the base plate. see <a href="stevesforums.com/forums/vie... this forum </a>
If the OP sees something on the base plate, which he did not tell us, it is possible that G10 could be produced both in Japan as well as in China.
However, I wouldn't worry about it because whether it is made in Japan or Taiwan, it is still under the control of Canon.
For more information, you can log on to <a href="blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008... this site </a>
or <a href="the-digital-picture.com/Pre... this site </a>
What Mr. Rockwell was referring to: compact cameras for scenes, was the lack of high ISO quality resolution and therefore recommends a DSLR for sports (long distances need high ISO speeds and fast movement need fast shutter speeds). Groups are scenes, just close -up scenes where you can use flash.
You can save about half your money, get the same great pictures and get a Canon SD880 according to Rockwell.
He recommends it OVER the G10. (How's that for honesty)
Does anybody have experience with adding the external flash to provide better lighting?
Ron
This is particularly so if enlargements of 16 x 20 is required.
In your case where you take a lot of group pictures, you will find it even more worthwhile investing in a dSLR .
Price wise, there is actually not much difference between a G10 and the lower end dSLR.
G10, as one of the top P&S camera, sells for around $440, whereas Canon digital rebel XS sells for around $465 and XTi sells for around $500.
Most professional photographers would be using one or more external flash to improve the lighting. For the same reason you will probably find <a href="photonotes.org/articles/eos... this article </a> on flash photography useful for your work.
regards
Ron
Canon teleconverter can be found at <a href="amazon.com/Canon-TC-DC58D-C... this site </a> .
You can also find cheaper tele and wide angle converters at <a href="bestlaptopbattery.com/b.cfm... this site </a>.
Finally, you run up against a basic optical/engineering truth: the lens built into the camera is not at its best when using supplementary lenses (even though Canon does offer that teleconverter lens).
If you really want a camera with interchangeable lenses, you should be looking at a DSLR. By the time you add the supplementary lenses you've spent the same amount of money to achieve inferior photographs.
Check out Ken Rockwell's review of the G10 here:
kenrockwell.com/canon/g10.htm
He rates it the best compact he's used but reminds us all that no P&S can match an SLR, even an entry level SLR.
Also, the new Canon SX1is with a CMOS sensor is faster but no larger than the CCD sensor on the SX10is despite the $200 difference.
Thanks James
why not have both in one great camera .... the panasonic tz5
the tz5 has a wide angle lens (28mm) and a 10x optical zoom.
it is also has a superb leica lens with with great color accuracy
have a look at this flickr album.
flickr.com/photos/wristshot...
Steve points out some nice tele power on the Lumix lineup; however, a tourist really doesn't NEED more than 5x or 6x zoom power. I admit, I love to play with tele shots. But when I'm a tourist, I AM AT THE TOURIST SPOT---I AM NOT A MILE DOWN THE ROAD.
You can't beat trying these cameras out at the store. I had read a lot about how "big" the G10 was before I bought one. But when I tried it on for size, it was smaller than I thought it would be after I read all the "big" hype.
Storage Media
SD/SDHC Memory Card, MultiMediaCard, MMC Plus Card, HC MMC Plus Card
From:
usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...
And a typical bait and switch in order to either get you to buy extra accessories which should come with the camera anyway or they'll contact you to say that the camera is unavailable and try and upsell you.
[search.live.com/results.asp... are many sites which catalog complaints from this company[/url] and outline this scam, so you are right to listen to your little voice. I'd stick with a mainstream provider like Amazon, even if more expensive.
"You gets what you pays for" and sometimes you can get less than you paid for!
B. You can't beat the telephoto when it is impossible to get close enough (crowd, roped off area, etc.)
C. While the tz5 is a great camera with a powerful zoom lens, the lens is slower than the G's so indoor shooting would be a little tougher without the flash. Italian museums don't allow flash shots.
D. The tz5 doesn't have manual controls, so if you are experienced in manual shooting and like to occasionally take over the settings then the tz5 would restrict you.
E. Check out the Ken Rockwell review of the G10 with comparison to the G9 here:
kenrockwell.com/canon/g10.htm
F. You really have to decide what kind of shooting you are most likely to do
Auto mode vs some control?
Lots of non-flash indoors?
Photos in museums and other locations where you can not get close to the subject?
Countryside/Landscape views?
How experienced are you with wide angle lens? It takes a while to really be able to get the most out of a wide angle lens. Ken Rockwell's site has some nice tips.
Take at least two memory cards (preferable 3 or 4) and at least two batteries. You really don't want to try to get replacements in Italy.
Once you get your camera start practicing by going to places similar to what you plan to visit (churches, museums, etc.) and take lots of pics with all kinds of settings. You'll be glad you did.
Have a great trip.
kenrockwell.com/canon/g10.htm
and includes some comparisons with the G9. Also check out his gallery shots.
Tina
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
I tried the SX10 and had trouble with pics that looked overexposed. Maybe I needed to fuss more but my 7 day return policy was soon to end. Is it possible the same problem can happen with the G10? In bright lite the whites were way burnt out. My older Fuji F45fd took superior pictures in those situations. Thank you. (no more space!)
Thank you again.
Not surprised that the Fuji F45fd took better pictures since it had a much lower pixel density and consequently a wider dynamic range. Current P&S cameras do not have the wide dynamic range to be able to cover from darkest to lightest areas of some scenes. That is why some cameras now have the ability to lighten up the darker areas AFTER taking the photo but still in camera. This would be something similar to the "fill flash" function on Picasa.
I'm sorry I can't give you a specific camera recommendation, but I can say that my G9 has been wonderful and the G10 with its wide angle lens looks great too. Check out the G10 review at
kenrockwell.com.
Now, having said all that, the G10 would work great. But for what you're using it for, the G9 or even one of the SD camera line would be sufficient as well. And you could then invest in a lightbox to improve your picture quality.
How would using a lightbox improve my picture quality?
The 2d fine artworks are paintings on canvas, hence the tripod. I'm thinking the lightbox would be better for small works on paper, not fine art. Now I see what you were getting at. No such luck getting out the easy way; I will indeed need to use 3 point lighting with photo bulbs. :)
Thanks again for your reply.
Any suggestions?
Today was sunny and I had more luck. I tried to anticipate a bug's movement and realize that that will take a lot of practice. I will work on bumping up the shutter speed as well. The G10 is absolutely awesome. I never imagined that a point and shoot could make such amazing macro shots...(tiny red spider mites carrying off bits of green food. These bugs are smaller than the head of a pin.) Awesome.
When I get totally richer and can afford any toy I want, I was thinking about the H20 Sony cybershot because it will automatically move into focus and, if I'm correct, also automatically slide into macro mode. I will have to see examples of photos from that camera to see if they are good quality. Seems like those features would make fast-flitting bee photography easier.
Thanks for answering so many of my questions!
Pardon my being somewhat negative here, but... the whole point of these cameras is simplicity (though it's rather difficult to claim they're 'simple' in any way) and compactness. When you start adding more lenses, etc., you're rather defeating the fundamental purpose.
Finally, you run up against a basic optical/engineering truth: the lens built into the camera is not at its best when using supplementary lenses (even though Canon does offer that teleconverter lens).
If you really want a camera with interchangeable lenses, you should be looking at a DSLR. By the time you add the supplementary lenses, you've spent the same amount of money to achieve inferior photographs.
If you like to decide when to flash and not to flash.. and you can dial in these settings to avoid flash, then you'll enjoy the G10. If not , you'll long for the point and shoots. i own both. good luck...
Canon's seemingly sudden switch back to Imperial, claiming a (1x 1.7)” sensor smacks of the abrasive sales hustle perpetuated by tacky television set and PC salesmen who conveniently switch from Imperial to metric sizes when quoting set and monitor screen diagonals.
I mean, either the Powershot has a true (25.4 x 43.18) mm sensor, or just another unremarkable thumbnail size capturing bit.
There was more than enough obfuscation over sensor sizes when Olympus produced their 4/3ds "system”. No matter how it's dressed up with sales hype, it's just another much smaller sensor. But we forgive Olympus. It's always had a leaning toward quirkiness.
However, image sensor size is on balance more important than megapixel count.
The Olympus 4/3ds size sensor is very ordinary in low light.
But what then is the Canon Powershot G10 with it's 1x 1.7 sensor?
While the sales pitch could, in certain conditions be correct, and the Canon Powershot series may be capable of poster size prints, the true test is the size of cropped image sections. A lower megapixel count from a close to 35mm full frame sensor can, with a proper lens, produce a billboard size print, or an image suitable for publication after severe cropping.
Low light sensitivity is another factor with larger sensors. As too is lens quality and speed.
Earlier Powershot models had better, faster, lenses - and the Powershot is after all merely a fixed lens rangefinder; the so-called wide and long focus attachments will inevitably degrade image quality.
It is now beyond the usual 18-month digital camera production run, and there are reasonable whispers of a replacement coming soon: a G11?
Will this mark a return to the faster lens, or just more marketing hyperbole?
Not worth waiting for anyway.
It's not sufficient to say that the US still uses imperial measures as its standard, because whilst that is true, many other measures in cameras are universally metric. For instance when has 35mm photography ever been expressed as 1 and one third inch photography? And when did anyone ever express a focal length or lens diameter or filter thread diameter in anything other than standard metric - even in the US? So, clearly it is to confuse us all into making less informed decisions.
You can insert those dates when printing images in ZoomBrowser EX, which comes with the camera.
Are the images you recorded with your G9 in "RAW" format or JPEG? Both should work; at least Canon's site doesn't distinguish between the file formats.
One point: neither camera downloads into the browser software." There's a little program called "camera window" that handles the actual download. After the download is complete, the browser opens automatically to allow you to do whatever you like with the images. The camera window has an option as to which program it launches after the download: Image Browser or Digital Photo Professional.
I'd make sure that the browser is looking in the right place for your downloaded files. Check carefully to be sure it's not just selecting the "C" drive by default.
There is a setting in the camera that allows you to choose the numbers assigned to the file.
Does anyone know whether the camera functions properly with a circular polarizing filter attached (assuming of course that there's no vignetting problem, etc.)?
Should be easy enough to test, but I'd appreciate hearing from others who've experimented.
Still, there are a number of filters that I found very useful when shooting film, and I'm considering the possibility of using them with my G10. The adapter rings are really simple mechanical devices, allowing you to attach a filter of a different size to the front of your lens.
It is true that it would be very silly to use any of the color-compensating filters, or the "special effects" filters; all of those effects can be much more cleanly accomplished with photo-editing software. However, I can see a number of situations in which the polarizing filters might be useful to control reflections, something not so easily done with software.* And I can imagine that something like a gradient neutral-density filter might make it easier to get some images with a brightness range beyond what the camera can capture.
*If I'm wrong on that point, I'd love to learn how to do it: I haven't been able to figure it out.
As for a user forum, what I would do is post some shots on Flickr, tag it with G10 and solicit feedback.
any info on the following would be GREATLY appreciated
- black and white
- black and white with colour subjects
- shooting at night
But look at the G11. The G10 was an admitted step back for Canon - which fell into the more MP is better myth. They learned and backed back to 9MP in the G11. And it's paying off.
I need to get strong photos of my fine artwork ceramic sculptures--see my site for examples. I'm planning on using a softbox (have to figure out that too) and other set-up tricks to add dimension, etc., but I need a camera designed primarily for this purpose. My surfaces tend to be subtle with colors softer and warmer. The rebel slr was recommended but I think is beyond my abilities and pricey (I'm writing a grant proposal for this and crossing my fingers).
But the G11 would work okay if you're on a budget.
Canon Powershot G10 Reviews
Canon Powershot G10 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
G10: Noisy sensor above ISO 100, poor optical viewfinder, no HD movies, no articulated LCD. All of this has been corrected in the soon to be available G11 so don't buy the G10. Having said all this-I still love my G10.
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is great for when you want to travel light but have the creative freedom, control and quality of a DSLR. Granted nothing beats the lens quality of the big guys but this little one does a more than adequate job of keeing up.
This camera is expensive, so if you want nothing more than a point and shoot, stay at that end of the market. If you want quality, control, covenience and the ability to be creative, look into it!
- 1.0 out of 5
The factory service sent me the wrong camera—and won't return my G10 until I send back their (wandering) SD1100IS. Fat chance!! I need my G10 back before I let theirs go. I'm a long-time Canon fan, but this is a parting of the ways.
- 5.0 out of 5
l had done lots of research on this camera prior to purchase. It rated with the Cool Pix 500 although it had more options than the G10. I did it right and read the owners manual and then started to take pictures. It has been fun. I took a picture of a hawk sitting on a post while I was traveling at 60 mph in my SUV. It was a perfect pic (not blurry at all). I have taken low light, bright light, skyline, people in action, animals in action, macro, telephoto, everything I could shoot, I did. The features are great and all the pictures turned out great!
I am new at photography but I would be safe to say that all photographers would use this very well rounded camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
My friends are all envious of the photos I take. Even the ones who don't know much about photography can recognize that my photos are "nicer" than theirs. The colours are excellent, and exposure is always perfect - even with flash. I've taken some really cool photos in different lighting situations. I don't know how to use too many features yet, but even to just point and shoot, you won't be disappointed.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is a great camera, read the reviews for the specifics of performance that validate the claim that this is the fixed lens camera for the pro on the go.
I like the camera specifically for the hand feel and placement of controls. In a way, this reminds me of some of the great small film cameras of a few years back. Simple, easy to see knobs on top select shoot program mode, ISO settings and on the back by the huge LED screen are the very familiar canon line up of on-screen controls.
if I were to nit pick... Why not shoot video in HD like the G9? And I had to get used to the optical viewfinder being offset (without a grid to adjust by) from the actual shot taken so take care when using the viewfinder in close-up or critically cropped shots
Great Camera
- 5.0 out of 5
Cameras don´t take pictures, people do.
After years of leaving my Leica M6 behind I can now said that I found a substitute on digital.
Canon have their own experience and tradition on digital technology while Leica had Fuji and Panasonic.
The legendary lenses that Leica had, were marvelous for film, specially for Kodachrome and Kodak Tri X.
On digital there is a combination of optics and software that you disrupt with Photoshop.
But at the end is the eye and the mind of the photographer that make the picture.
With my G10 I regain the confidence and manual handling of a rangefinder.
- 5.0 out of 5
well, I have been using canon since 10 years may be, but I have a digital camera since 3 months. it is so nice and practical, I could not belive it. of course I do not compare it with SLR camera. But if you want a good shot and have control on the shooting, than I would say go for this camera, you will not be dissapointed at all..
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera, that lets you shoot in manual as well as auto modes. The 14 MP is nicce too, as well as raw
- 4.0 out of 5
I bought it with some reservations because of the size and some of the reviews regarding noise at ISO400+. So far I've been pretty satisfied with the camera. The indoor shots at night with flash are great for a point-and-shoot. The Av, Tv, and manual modes are great to have, which is something I dig since I mostly use my Canon SLR. The size isn't as compact to put in a pocket, but compared to my SLR it is better for carrying around. It fits in my jacket so I'm ok with it. I've tried pictures mostly indoors and I've been satisfied. There is noise beyond ISO 400, but which point-and-shoot doesn't? The pictures are usable. The flash is good, so in many indoor shots it can make up for the lower ISO. Tv is great for shooting in low light/indoor without flash. It doesn't do as well as my SLR, but it does it's job for what it is...a standby camera for my SLR. I'll keep this one....
- 5.0 out of 5
I make my living as a commercial photographer and have for 42 years. I'm a master photographer and have shot for some of the words largest corporations and publications. Over the years I've shot formats from 35mm to 11x14 film and have a very good eye for top image quality and understand how it relates to camera format. When considering any camera one has to understand there are tradeoffs in image quality vs size vs convenience and speed. This is true in film and is true in digital. When I'm selecting a format / camera for a job I weigh all of these factors and select the camera that's right for the job. When I'm selecting a camera for personal use I do the same. In reading reviews of the G10 most often the person writing compares it to a favorite DSLR. This is like comparing my 35mm Leica to my 4x5 Sinar. These are two totally different instruments for two totally different applications. Sorry but the same is true in comparing a mini sensor P&S with a full feature large sensor digital camera. Let's be real with our expectations. The G10 is no 1DsIII by any stretch of the imagination but I can't slip my full size Canons into my vest pocket and I can't use 600mm lenses on my G10. Noise at high ISO is obvious but so is the grain in high speed 35mm film. I could go on all day pointing out the differences but facts are facts, these are two totally different instruments with each doing a superb job for what they were designed to do. The second fact is there is no one perfect digital camera for every occasion just as there is no one single camera / format in film for every job.
My expectations were high for the G10 and I certainly have not been disappointed. However, I am realistic and know the limits and work within them. I do not expect the G10 to look like a Hasselblad H3DII 50mp camera or 8x10 scanned film. With this in mind I absolutely love the camera and have some remarkable results even at 1600 ISO. No regrets from me and I would buy another if something happened to the one I have.
Superb camera and images!
- 5.0 out of 5
i have owned both the g7 and the g9 previously to just getting the g10. i must say for someone like me who wants all that a dslr can do, but without all the weight and bulkiness...this is about as close as it will get. i would like to see a dslr cmos chip in it though. i also like all the new features they have added and how easily the ones i will need the most are easily accessible on the top of the camera itself instead of having to go to the menu to find them.
let's face it no camera is going to be everything to everyone. this camera will serve those who want something as small as a point and shoot, but with all the bells and whistles of a dslr without all the bulk and weight.
i had read someone elses opinion on another site that canon is sitting on the fence with the g10 trying to keep the point and shoot people happy and the dslr people happy, but by doing this, neither will be happy. i agree with that person in one respect...canon should get off the fence and make this camera one that has the same qualities as a dslr, but in a much smaller package. there are enough point and shoot & dslr cameras out there to choose from. now how about a true compact prosumer camera that is as good as any dslr.
having said all this...i still really like this camera for what it can do. i have tried many cameras, but keep going back to the g series for what they offer. i have gotten really good pics from them as well as some bad ones, but then you can also get that with dslr's. it takes two....the camera and the person taking the pics to make great photos....
i am just a simple amateur who wants a camera that will take great pics like everyone else does.
- 5.0 out of 5
I wasn't quite ready to pay the $$$ for an SLR, but I was frustrated with my basic point-and-shoot camera. So I upgraded to the G10, and it meets my needs well. While it works fine out of the box, it really shines when you use the Manual settings. I'm finally able to get the sharp, balanced, saturated photos I'd been trying and failing to get before. I find it's a little noisy at 400+, but far better than what the old 400 film used to be. I tweak my indoor shots with noise-reduction software for a flawless finish. The wide-angle-to-telephoto lens is a big plus as well. All in all, I'm very pleased and think this is probably as good as it gets this side of an SLR.
- 4.0 out of 5
No question about it! This camera is a great camera, but I guess the people at Canon could have done a much better job. Upgrading from an already great camera like the G9 had to be a very difficult task, but leaving great features out is a poor decision on their part. 5X zoom instead of 6X (addition of wider angle 28mm is great, but don't sacrifice telephoto 210mm). Movie resolution also sacrificied from 1024 X 768 back to 640 X 480. I guess they are not ready, or don't want to be ready for a high res. movie/still camera combo. Cosmetics don't look as good as the previous G9 (kind of funny: it took a while to get used to the design of the prevous models and now they redesign it for worse). The new battery is great at twice the amps, but what about the people that invested lots of $'s on the previous NB-2LH batteries...not good for the consumer. Conclusion, the camera is a great addition to the Canon's digital arsenal, but they could have done a much better job.
- 4.0 out of 5
I would say it's not worth the upgrade from the G9 for most people, but I love the new features on this camera. The viewfinder is much improved. Servo AF is a welcome addition. 28mm equivalent focal length is a big plus for me. The most noticeable improvement is the LCD and interface. Much higher resolution LCD, as well as a tremendous navigation speed improvement over the G9. Images zoom and move fluidly, and start-up and shut-down times are dramatically better.
This would be the most desirable camera ever if they put in a better sensor. Noise is like the G9, but I feel like the digic chip is over-doing the noise reduction, from 200 ISO up.
How about a CMOS sensor about twice as large? :)
I'm very happy with my purchase overall.
- 4.0 out of 5
I just got my canon G10 and I am in love. I went otside and took a couple shots on the macro setting and I am very happy with the way they turned out. Crisp,clear easy to shoot. I am such a beginner but this was real impressive right out of the box. I like the photo editing software it came with too. So far so good! Obviously I have a lot to learn about this camera but oh the possibilities with this one.
- 4.12821270310192 out of 5
Canon Powershot G10 Ratings By Site
-
Circuit City0 User Reviews
-
CNET0 User Reviews
-
Yahoo! Shopping0 User Reviews
-
Newegg38 User Reviews
-
PriceGrabber0 User Reviews
-
Shopzilla78 User Reviews
-
NexTag187 User Reviews
-
Shopping.com16 User Reviews
-
Amazon218 User Reviews

I do not have this camera. However, a friend just bought it and he reports a full f-stop increase in usability. So basically take the quality up one notch.
He claims that the ISO noise is handled very well up to 800 now, vs. 400 on the G9.