Hey! You should know that Canon has released a newer version of this product: the Canon Powershot SD1300 IS.
Canon Powershot SD1000
| Fetching our Best Offer… |
Read why: Editor's comments.
| 27th | of 27 | in 6 - 8 Megapixels |
| 49th | of 49 | in $350 - $600 |
| 57th | of 57 | in Canon |
| 97th | of 97 | in Ultra Compact |
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the Canon Powershot SD1000
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|
|||
Editors' Comments
A great camera when it was released, the SD1000 has since been replaced by several new generations of SD series cameras. Check out the latest, the SD1300. Here's what we had to say when the SD1000 was originally released in March 2007:
Canon looked to the original ELPH when they designed the retro-styled Powershot SD1000, and the result is one of the smallest and sleekest digitals on the market. The body of this camera is remarkably thin; in fact, the SD1000 is smaller than a deck of playing cards, making it ideal for travelers or style-conscious consumers looking for an unobtrusive camera companion. 7.1 megapixels, 3x optical zoom, and DIGIC III with Face Detection and Noise Reduction ensure the great results we've come to expect from Canon. Fast operation, improved image quality, and long battery life make the SD1000 ideal for almost any user.
Specifications
- 7.1 megapixels
- 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- JPEG file format
- Movie mode with sound
- ISO 80-1600
- 2.5-inch LCD
- Secure Digital memory (32MB included)
- Lithium-ion battery
Product Information
| Manufacturer | Canon |
|---|---|
| Part Number | 1863B010AA |
| UPC | 492411307395 |
| Release Date | Mar 01, 2007 |
SD1000 Accessories:
Shop for SD1000 accessories.
Canon Powershot SD1000 Reviews
Canon Powershot SD1000 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 1.0 out of 5
- 1.0 out of 5
Camera worked fine until one day the lens would not close. This is a common problem I found with this camera. Just do a search with model and stuck lens. I'm certain the issue is a design problem.
- 4.0 out of 5
I truly enjoyed this camera for all shots until that terrible day at my niece's graduation when i turned it on and no image came up. No matter what was tried the image just did not show just pure blackness while, the flash went on and all that. When reading the reviews i heard of older models lasting 5-6 years. So in this area i was highly disappointed that the camera did not even give 4 years. I believe however, that if the ccd problem found in the older models is the problem for this malfunction we should have the option of an internal reconstruction (free of course) or half off on the next purcahse/ or better yet a new camera. Since i know for a fact that others encountered this same problem with their SD1000. As for me i cannot afford to buy a new camera anytime soon. Thanks Canon ....for nothing.
- 2.0 out of 5
I love this little camera but one day, after taken several photos, the screen turn to black. I tried everything: recharge the battery, change the new SD card, the lens is still OK, but still no luck.
- 5.0 out of 5
well it takes good pic its small and im a teen so i can be hard on things but this camera has worked good for me the lens error has came up put that was because of me so all i can say is get one i love love love it
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera was great to me! It was small and sleek to fit in my purse yet the screen was very large so it was easy to view my images. The features were cool and the buttons were easy to use. I was rough with it and it worked great every time. The battery lasted forever! Unfortunately, my camera was stolen and now it is discontinued! Boooo!
- 2.0 out of 5
Great little camera but the lens is stuck open and won't respond to gentle whacks or trying to reduce the lens. Multiple web entries describing this problem. I assume a small piece of sand jammed the ring. This is too common a problem with this camera. Love Cannon but they screwed this one up. Don't buy it.
- 2.0 out of 5
This has to be the worst camera for this problem to come up and so many people have it. Cannon needs to fix this problem works great when it worked it is over now. you might as well throw it out.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've had mine for over a year and am very pleased with it's performance. The only problem, which I am about to fix, is the display was "broken" while in my pocket with a set of keys. While helping my daughter move, the weight of a box pushed the keys on to the display causing the lcd display to "crack" A replacement display from canon (800-652-2666) $18.40 plus $6 fpr shipping.
- 5.0 out of 5
since I have owned this digital camera, I am satisfied with my camera problem. This product is a complete package in terms of performance and functioning. I am really happy to own this awsome thing.
- 4.0 out of 5
Sleek design,sufficient weight to be in hand.Can be used rough by children.Auto option is good.Satisfied for picture quality.But a little bit difficult to go for personal settings.Finally my opinion is very good to use by all the family members.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my everyday camera. It takes great pictures under all circumstances. It is the best point and shoot I've ever owned.
- 3.0 out of 5
My Canon PowerShot SD1000 is a sweet little camera. I get more redeye than I would have hoped, perhaps because the flash is so close to the lens
- 1.0 out of 5
Lens error in after 1yr 2mo. Also lens error with an SD7800(Not sure if 7800 is accurate as that camera is already trashed) It is safe to say cannon has serious problems with their compact cameras.(Or maybe our household is jinxed.)
- 2.0 out of 5
Camera was great! until we turned it on and than we got the lens error-restart camera. We tried all of the techniques to get it started ...it will not...I recommend not to buy canon cameras!! They should fix the problem..
- 5.0 out of 5
this rocks!
- 4.0 out of 5
I have had this for aboout a year, and i was impressed with it from day 1. the screen is big enough, the layout of the buttons are easy to use, and the battery life is good. The only downside I see is that the zoom is only 3x, but that is a standard for any ultra compact camera these days.
- 4.0 out of 5
I got this camera to replace my old PowerShot 100, that I have had since 2000. Right from the box, it was simple to set up and install it. I was soon taking pictures that were very pleasing to look at, and when it was time to put them to the computer the software was designed to make it as easy as can be! The video is easy to use and review, and the microphone does a good job with the sound.
Now for the downside: The included 32mb card seemed a little small, so I snagged a few 2gb ones from somewhere. No manual controls, and some low-light grainess. Not really an issue with me, so I am perfectly happy with it.
- 2.0 out of 5
I bought this camera about a year ago as a follow up to my previous Canon Powershot 3.5 (or thereabouts).
This is more sophisticated, slimmer and all the rest but the photos from my previous Canon outshine in terms of clarity, tone and above all when it comes to taking photos with little light which my previous Canon excelled at.
Maybe I am missing something in the setup or the way I use the camera but by and large I am very disappointed in this Canon. It was cheap but ithe photos definitely do not compare to my last one.
- 5.0 out of 5
Asa professional photographer for over 35 years, I can honestly
say this is one great camera. I bought the sd1000 for family and vacation photos. As almost always, Canon leads the way. This
camera has a sharp lens, plenty of resolution for most situations, and more then enough shooting options for anyone.
The sd1000 is easy to use and at about $170 is a real deal.
I would recommend this to anyone.
- 5.0 out of 5
I am able to handle this camera with one hand. Makes it handy for unobtrusive shooting. I use my left hand (even though I am right-handed) and I find that all the controls are easy to reach, even the zoom, with the one hand.
I really like the way that Canon has incorporated the zoom lever with the other aspects of the camera. For example, the zoom lever allows you to zoom in on a tiny potion of the photo (in display mode) --- or you can go back to the "wide angle" setting and get NINE of your photos to display on the LCD. At that (nine photo) setting, then you can "scroll" though your stock of photos, nine at a time, to quickly get to where you want to be. Not a big deal if you only have a dozen or two photos, but pretty handy if you have 50 or more stored on the SD card.
Perhaps other cameras have this implementation, I don't know, but it IS on all of the three Canon Powershots that I own
- 4.0 out of 5
I just bought this camera quite reasonably at Staples. Also bought a 4-gig card at Sears for $20! Apparently the camera is being discontinued now (or shortly) due to some new models coming from Canon next month.
I really like the body; it appears to be all-aluminum, rather than the pervasive plastic. The small quantities of plastic I see on this camera are the LCD screen, the flash, one slide switch, the USB cover and the threaded mount for a tripod. It reminds of the spy-type cameras from the 60's, like the Minox and the Minolta 16mm film cameras. The controls are easily accessible, except for the wide-tele rocker lever, which is a bit short---but then this is an ultra-compact camera.
The comprehensive "nesting" menus are a bit overwhelming. Of course, they will give me more control (once they are understood and remembered). I am enticed by the "intervalometer" which allows slo-mo movies to be constructed. With this feature, you can record up to two hours, with an interval of either 1 or 2 seconds, for a time-lapse movie (like building a house).
And how about "digital macro"? This setting allows you to focus on a subject that is approximately 1/4 inch by 1/3 inch. This means that you could take a photo of a fly, and have it fill your computer screen! But I think the most useful feature is the size of the camera. It is so small, it can go with you anywhere. Even though cell phones take photos, they just don't have the optics or the megapixels that are present in this small wonder.
- 4.0 out of 5
I can't believe this camera has NO fill-in flash as an option. Am I missing something?
- 5.0 out of 5
In digital cameras, i always prefer to go with canon models. my earlier one is canon powershot SD600 with 3x zoom facility. In thanksgiving i purchased SD1000. Functions are simmilar to SD600 with extra feature, facefocus, improved digital zoom, photo quality improved due to pixels, and video shoot of longer time. Great for outdoor shooting, in travel very comfortable to carry along. I am lucky enough to own this camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
My 1st digicam was the Canon s100, it gave me 6 years of excellent servitude. This camera is awsome, smaller and lighter. I consider myself a better than average photographer, though not heavy in the manaul features, if you know what your doing you can compisate for it, the only drawback is the extremly powerful flash at close distances, like in a bar or outside w/o added props. Ive purchased a 1gb sd as well as a 2gb and 4gb. The video does get blurry at zoom, but its not meant to be used as a digicamcorder. Solid camera with great GLASS lenses, bright monitor @ 230,000 pixels keep a microfiber cloth with you for smudges, no prob with the battery life...I do use the monitor often and get about 110-140 pics and video. I suggest going to ebay and getting yourself a silicon cover, best thing I did to protect my investment, and extra batteries perhaps, charger is compatible in Euro, but would hate to loose it @ $60.00 a pop. Customer service is AWESOME, and the manual is easy to read, youll be snapping pics ina very short time. It doesent hav an anti-shock mech...so what. turn up the ISO.I have the all silver and paid $238.00 back in August @ B.B.. Ive also managed to sell my dad his girlfriend and and another relative(she returned the one she had previously purchesed a N%&*n), they got back to me in the last couple of days. The best camera EVER!!! Go Canon :-)
- 5.0 out of 5
I previously owned an old 3mp camera so for me the quality on this one is great. The red eye effect does seem to happen a lot but I dont find it that bothersome. The video quality on the camera is amazing with great quality sound. I would recommend this to a friend.
- 5.0 out of 5
An excellent camera. Takes very high quality pictures. It is nice that this type of slim camera take top notch pics. It is hard to get image stabalized cam as this slim camera but image stablization must not be a problem for amateurs. It may be a problem for laptop users due to high sized movie but I dont think people take movie by digicam much. Searching for RAW format in a ultra compact means the person must be professional. So RAW isn't a problem and I think this is not the camera professionals should use.
No image stablizer but one of the best from Canon.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is an outstanding camera. Take very very good pictures. Only thing is that battery life is rather short.
- 5.0 out of 5
never felt comfortable with digitals till now
great pictures and easy to use
only thing is i haven't mastered the self timer yet..
- 4.0 out of 5
I wanted a small camera to take on trips abroad for snapshot type pictures, but this is way more than a snapshot picture maker. I now use the manual mode because of the many features and can take good pictures of almost anything. I was in an aquarium and taking pictures of fish in tanks where the flash wouldn't work, but switching to cloudy day light and pushing the ISO they came out surprisingly well, some so good they looked like out to national geographic! Yes there is a bit of a problem on fuzziness though and as far as I can tell it is not pushing the shutter button half way and allowing the camera to focus in certain low light situations and trying to grip it too tight and pressing the shutter button too hard and moving the camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
I used this camera on my recent trip to Vegas and it was great. Pictures are excellent and when I download them to the computer they were great. I like the view finder which is a must for sunlight photo taking so you know exactly what you are taking a picture of with the screen in sunlight you can't see the imagine. View finder and it's on target! Great camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
i am using this camera since 3 months and it is excellent. dropped it once on rock floor but no change. i recommend it to all.
sound quality is excellent.
- 4.0 out of 5
This is a great little camera if you learn how to use it and understand its limitations. The lighter a camera is the harder it is to get a steady hold as the tiniest muscle twitches can cause a blurred picture. You are much better off if you use the optical viewfinder because it puts you in a more stable position. Get the largest memory card you can and use the highest resolution with the lowest compression. And keep in mind that lower light means more noise and small CCDs gather less light than large ones so if pictures in dim lighting are really important go with a DSLR but if just having a camera at the right moment is important this is a great one. And for those that want to take movies be aware that canon does not use very much compression and movies take up a lot of memory (4 gig will get you 33 min.) but because of this playback on my 27" TV looks much better than my old 8mm camcorder. I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 only because I would like to see a shutter and aperture priority mode or a better description of the scene modes.
- 2.0 out of 5
Don't know why everyone loves this camera. Yeah, it's tiny but the picture quality is a real disappointment. And I will never understand why they've developed cameras with huge megapixel capacity then save only in JPEG, which throws out a bunch of the data to shrink file size. I think the pics come out blotchy and soft at best, especially skin tones. Manually setting it to 80 ISO helps a bit, but then you have to use flash for most pics. Unfortunately I'm beyond my return date, but am looking for a replacement that, at least, saves RAW.
- 5.0 out of 5
I own several (4 or 5) digital cameras and also use quite a few in my job as a multi-media teacher. I got my Canon SD1000 with credit card points so my expectations weren't too high. But it quickly became my favorite. It has all the features one could ask for in small size (about the size of a deck of cards) that you can take with you anywhere. I'm not sure yet how it will withstand outdoor Canadian winter temperatures, but I expect it won't do any worse than my other cameras.
- 5.0 out of 5
even though i have only hav had the camera for a short period i feel that it is a very good camera. It is small, has a great flash, many shooting modes, and can even shoot widescreen photos.
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this camera to replace my S400. It was between the Panasonic Lumix FX01 and the SD1000. I tried both out in the store and really liked the feel of each. Both also had comparable MP ratings and both do widescreen pix (a reqt for me). The FX has image stabilization but as with past Canon models - it is NOT necessary - especially now that I have the ability to set ISO speeds.
In the end I'm staying with Canon since they've been so good to me in the past. The other thing that cinched it for me was that the SD1000 now has a protective plate over the LCD screen - this is great.
As for picture quality, again WOW. I am blown away by this cam. I take a lot of family photos and display them on my widescreen plasma tv which is hooked up to a Mac Mini running iPhoto which is why I like the widescreen photo setting. Everyone who sees an iPhoto slideshow with photos taken by this cam have been incredibly impressed.
Just buy it. You wont find a sleeker, sexier, higer photo quality cam in this price range.
- 5.0 out of 5
I wanted a smaller digital camera than our Fuji Fine Pix to fit into the diaper bag. I LOVE this camera! We have a 3 month old and taking clear pictures is hard to do because she moves all over. This camera has a kids/pets setting that takes the clearest shots. I love the size. It fits right in the inside pocket of my diaper bag or the back pocket of my jeans if we are going for a walk. The features are great too! It's a must have for new parents!
- 5.0 out of 5
Having been disappointed in a string of small cameras I tried the SD1000 to replace my S500. With the s500 it takes so long to focus and shoot that the picture is gone. The SD1000 looked good in the store and even better in the field. The pictures come off fast enough to use shooting active children and the focus was spot on. I haven't used all of the features (the color substitute mode looks neat, but why???) The movies it took are great.
It's not a full replacement for my Canon 1D MK-II. But for most family and vacation snapshots it is nearly perfect. My sister wants to replace her D20 with one.
As an extra bonus the included software makes sorting and printing pictures easier and faster and with at least as high a quality as I get with Photoshop CS2.
- 4.0 out of 5
This is a very nice camera loaded with features and definitely worth the money. It is literally, the same size as my cell phone. While this sounds like a "Pro", it can also be a "con" for those users who take it everywhere. My wife and I learned this first-hand when we lost our Canon SD450 5.0MP camera last week. We chose Canon again because it is simply the best camera I've ever owned. Lots of cool features that are easy to operate after getting to know the camera for a few hours. I just wish it came with a built-in GPS locating device.
- 4.45321100917431 out of 5
Canon Powershot SD1000 Ratings By Site
-
Circuit City0 User Reviews
-
Yahoo! Shopping0 User Reviews
-
CNET95 User Reviews
-
Amazon860 User Reviews
-
NexTag39 User Reviews
-
Newegg127 User Reviews
-
Shopping.com54 User Reviews
-
Shopzilla137 User Reviews
-
PriceGrabber24 User Reviews

Canon Powershot SD1000 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
It should be quite sufficient under the normal circumstances, but do remember that CIPA standard is different from the conditions under which you will be taking pictures. So down size a bit, a fully charged ND 4L should give you about 100 pictures.
If you need to take a lot of flash pictures, and do a lot of zooming, then it is advisable to have a spare battery around. Otherwise you should be alright.
My answer is that I bought one with the camera and in the last month needed it once and was very glad I had it. I don't always carry it with the camera but if the shots are important or I anticipate taking a lot of them I take it.
I'm looking for a "second camera" to join my Canon Rebel XTi DSLR on a quickly-approaching trip to Ireland. I bought the XTI around Christmas, and am still in the lower part of the learning curve. I want the 2nd pocket point-and-shoot camera initially for my 82-y/o mom to use on the trip with me, but also as my own back-up camera in Ireland and afterwards (e.g., toss it in the motorcycle bag to use on day trips rather than the XTi, etc.).
It's going to take some real logic to talk me out of getting a camera with Image Stabilization. IS may be the difference between my mom taking a decent picture, or a bunch of duds. I bought an IS zoom lens for my XTi and love it! So I'm probably looking at the SD700 IS and SD 800 IS ... not the SD900 or SD1000, even though those two are much more "pocket-friendly" (both size- and price-wise).
Some posted reviews say that the SD700 is a better overall deal than the newer SD 800. Yes, it is one megapixel less (6mp vs. 7mp) and doesn't fill as wide a wide-angle (35-140mm vs. 28-105), but it's maybe $45-100 cheaper (US $) and has a slightly longer optical zoom (4x vs. 3.8x). An extra one MP might never make a difference unless I want to blow a picture up to poster size. The SD700 IS also has a widescreen resolution option, so your pictures would fill up a widescreen TV/monitor if you display them that way.
Here's my thought re: your use -- if you are taking pictures of kids (your children, students, etc.), the "IS" feature alone may be the best reason to get the SD700 or SD800, because THEY move a lot so YOU will move (the camera) a lot. IS will help you take crisper-looking pictures.
So I hope that someone answers your/our question(s) SOON, because I probably have to order my camera no later than April 16th.
Overall, as I noted, the biggest nice thing is that is can focus and shoot fast enough and accurately enough to capture the kids. Second the face detection got the focus for most shots pretty well first time (no try to refocus to get the face right). The last point is that it is tiny so it was in my shirt pocket when I needed it, rather than in a camera bag or the hotel room. It makes a perfect backup for my 1DMKII.
should I upgrade to 700 line?
It is important when you take pictures in low light condition or using extreme zoom like 6X, 10X or more. At close range, a flash will do equally well, if not better, in getting your picture.
If you have already got a camera, there is no necessity to change it just for the feature alone. If you are upgrading to a better camera, then go for it.
#2.) For smaller zooms, bukit97 is exactly right that it doesn't make much of a difference. If you have shaky hands, it'll help somewhat, but with the fast shutter speeds it won't make a huge difference.
#3.) In low light, bukit97 is right again. Keep in mind, though -- IMAGE STABILIZATION DOES NOT KEEP YOUR TARGET FROM BLURRING! It only keeps YOU from blurring the picture. When your shutter speed is extended due to poor lighting, moving objects will blur, and there's nothing you can do about it. Try to take a picture with the fastest shutter speed and lowest ISO possible in the lighting you're given. Try to do it without a flash, too, if possible. This is all experience, so be patient and take hundreds of pictures!
The Canon SD700IS is a beautiful camera. If you want wide-angle, go for the SD800IS (they're the same price). If you don't care about image stabilization, get the SD750.
As technology improves, you will find it less and less likely to find cameras without optical image stabilization. It's the future of cameras and, if you can get the feature on a camera you like, you definitely should.
The A570 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another new model that offers image stabilization that is getting rave reviews. Definitely worth a look if you like the new Canons but want IS.
This isn't really a direct answer to your question, but one other option you might want to consider is the Canon SD800 IS. It's a little older than the two you mention here, but it has similar specs and also includes Canon's (very good) image stabilization system. It's a moderate bump up in price, but in addition to the IS system it also tacks on a very nice wide angle lens. It's been very well reviewed by users and pro reviewers alike.
As you said, there aren't yet very many reviews of the s200, so it's tough to stack it up against the SD1000. My gut says that Canon's superior picture quality will carry the day, IS or no (especially since the SD1000 is something of a party camera, which means it's often used with flash, and IS doesn't make much difference when flash is used).
Hope this helps a little.
Here are the two reviews which might help you more:
<A HREF="dcresource.com/reviews/cano... PowerShot SD1000 Digital ELPH</A>
<A HREF="dcresource.com/reviews/cano... PowerShot SD700 IS Digital ELPH</A>
Hope this helps,
Mark
As soon as I read your post, I thought of the Olympus Stylus line, because (although the 770W is the toughest of the group by far) all of them are designed to be extra-rugged, water-resistant, etc. (Not all of the Stylus can go underwater, but they're designed to keep out moisture, protect against shocks, etc.) Unfortunately I don't believe any of them offer an electronic viewfinder. Also unfortunately, I can't think of any other compact digitals at the moment that are quite as tough as these. So I guess the question is, what's more important- the viewfinder or the durability? Let me know if the viewfinder is integral, and I'll try to help you find some other models that, while not as tough as these, may do the job...
Lastly, and I assume most cameras are now this way, no delay in shutter...my good old Coolpix 5000 got good pictures but the shutter delay just does not cut it..
Thanks for the help! Oh yes, I believe only Canon has viewfinders and they said they do not have even a water resistent sub/compact digital...Phil::
I totally understand your need for the viewfinder. On the plus side, I've owned a Canon A-series camera for quite a few years, and although it's not advertised as being rugged, waterproof, or otherwise, the thing is an absolute tank. I've dropped it, stepped on it, dropped it again, taken it out in the snow, left it in my car, and it still runs like a workhorse. By comparison, other cameras I've owned would break if I looked at them sideways. What I'm saying is, if the Olympus that is advertised as durable doesn't suit your needs, I'm wondering if you couldn't get away with purchasing a Canon and having it live up to some rough handling.
Unfortunately, though, most of the Canon ultra compacts are the Elphs (the SD-series), and although they're fantastic cameras, the earlier ones had a problem with very delicate LCD screens. I've heard about this problem enough to be wary of them when people ask for durable cameras, and although the newer Elphs (the SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is fantastic) do have improved LCDs in terms of view, I have not heard it said that they've improved in terms of durability. The camera does have an optical viewfinder, so I suppose a broken LCD wouldn't be the end of the world, but I doubt you want to let the screen break and continue using the camera. It might be worth looking into whether the screen really is more durable in the newer ones; I haven't heard that it is, however.
I might suggest for you, since my old A-series is so rugged and the new ones haven't changed much, something like the A550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This camera does have a plastic body, and apparently the switch cover is somewhat flimsy, but in terms of overall durability the bodies of these models tend to be resilient (and they do have optical viewfinders). With a little bit of care it would likely hold up to quite a bit of handling. Not so sure about waterproof, though.
Also, in terms of delay/ lag, you're right- most newer models are doing just fine on this. The Canons are now using a faster processor that has reduced shutter lag quite a bit, and while no camera eliminates it completely (the big fancy DSLRs come the closest to doing so), you should be much happier with the new ones in terms of this problem; they have really sped up.
Thanks again...this is my first time posting and appreciate the help!
Phil::
The LCD problem with the Elphs was an actual physical break, with the screen cracking or blobbing on many users. Most complaints were that it took a minimal amount of pressure (like carrying it in a pocket or purse) to make this happen. What's more, it wasn't covered under warranty since it counted as mis-handling.
I did a little bit more reading on it, and found something interesting. Someone has stated that the problem with the screens breaking on earlier Elphs was a manufacturing error. I don't necessarily buy that, but this person does claim that the newer screens (2.5-inch vs. 2-inch) are clear of this error and more durable. <a href="reviews.cnet.com/Canon_Powe... the link... take from it what you will. I will add to that, that while I haven't heard a ton of people talking about the newer Elphs, so far I haven't heard the amount of complaints that I heard immediately about the LCD problems with the older models. I would hope that if the new ones were just as bad as the old ones, there would have been a deluge of complaints about it by now. Just a theory.
I didn't think of this before, but of course, if you do want an Elph, there are screen protectors available, and that might help even if the new cameras have the same delicate screen. You can also buy a hard case for it and just take it out when you're ready to shoot.
In terms of image quality, I honestly think that there's not really a difference between the A-series and the SDs. Provided you choose a camera with comparable megapixels and all of that, I think both have excellent quality. A few years ago, the main difference was that the A-series were larger while the SDs were the compacts that lacked the manual controls of the A-series, but with some of the new A-series coming out as ultracompacts, that doesn't really apply anymore. But in terms of factors that affect image quality, there really isn't anything that puts one of them ahead of the other. The A-series runs on AA rather than the lithium-ion of the SD; the lens on the A-series tends to stick out while the SD retracts all the way in; etc.
For shutter lag, you should be safe if you're buying one of the new models. Look for something with the Digic III processor (as opposed to the older Digic II) for absolute fastest response; you should have no problem getting a lag that's under 1 second with these.
I know I'm throwing a ton of info at you here, so if you're looking at a few different cameras and are unsure how to decide, let me know which ones they are and I'll try to help narrow it down.
Looking at the two cameras <A HREF="dpreview.com/reviews/compar... I would go for the Canon.
Although the Olympus has image stabilisation, these cameras aren't ultra zoom so that's not so important. The reason why I'd go for the Canon is because it uses their new Digic III processor, which is faster, produces better images and uses their new "face detection" technology, which is particularly good for people pictures. It's also compatible with SDHC memory cards which give you tons more space and speed up the camera writing the image to the card and transferring the images to computer.
Hope this helps and good luck in your choice.
Mark
You're welcome and well done on your purchase. I'm sure in time you'll get used to it and all the functions will become second nature. As long as the picture quality is great, that's what it's all about:)
Good lcuk with the camera and happy shooting:)
Mark
I'll hope for the best, and hope you enjoy your new camera!
That's pretty good in my view.
7.1 megapixels, that's pretty solid, the 3x optical zoom is a tad limited for my tastes as anything but a simple point and shoot (forget the socalled 4x digital zoom, that's just marketing), total Auto focus and exposure, has movies & sound (as does most these days), saves to SD cards.
But looking at the basics, it's a pretty basic rig - little fluff or whistles and bells here.
This camera has never entered my list for a camera I would buy. Try both the SD750 and SD1000 at the store and see if you feel the same.
Thanks again!
And still, if you want the optical viewfinder and don't mind not having the wide-angle (since the SD1000 doesn't, either), consider the SD700IS. Very nice camera.
I don't blame you about not wanting the "A" series of Canon... if you go bulky, you might as well get a dSLR! And with the SD700IS and SD800IS both nearing $300, I see your hesitation.
I'm glad you'll go check out the cameras personally. Sometimes that extra $50 will make you a happy camera owner... or a disappointed one. Pick one you're happy with... lots of cameras look good on paper. If you're happy with the quality shots you take in the conditions you typically take them at, that's all that matters! :)
I have a friend who has the SD750 and loves it but she's a recreational point and shoot girl whereas I like to do a lot of low light and macro work so I may wait for some reviews of the SD850 IS and see if it's better than the SD700 IS before buying.
Please feel free if anyone has any strong thoughts or feelings here.
I spent so much on a Fuji finepix e550 that has been awful several years ago I am ready to upgrade but want to make the right choice.
There doesn't look to be anything special about the SD850IS... it's the higher-megapixel SD700IS, and losing the wide-angle of the SD800IS. Unless they've significantly improved their CCD, the extra megapixels of the SD850IS will likely make it take less quality photos than the SD700IS.
I was going to look at Olympus since they use Xd Cards as well but everything I've read about Canon and the people I've known who have one love it. Also, as you stated, with memory so cheap these days it doesn't make a difference to switch to SD from xD.
I do have to admit I am getting mired in the model numbers but the SD 700 IS has received such incredible all around reviews I am leaning towards it but since I don't need a new camnera until a wedding July and Bermuda trip in September I still think I will wait for some reviews of the new SD 850 IS before making my decision. I could be talked out of it thought if ...
Expect similar reviews of the SD850IS as the SD900... only difference will be the image stabilization, even though with absolutely no zoom or low-level capabilities, image stabilization isn't that important.
I'm looking forward to reviews of the SD850IS as well. You're right about the DS700IS being an awesome camera, though!
1.) The size, even after playing around with it at stores, is smaller than I expected. It's very compact, quiet and solidly built.
2.) The "plastic" battery/memory card compartment is chinsy for some reason, but nothing to worry about. I could see where it could break if you opened the compartment all the way and then smashed it on the table! But for general purposes there's nothing to worry about, and it closes nicely into the compact frame.
3.) The power on/off switch, although there were complaints it was difficult to depress because it was flush with the body, is a very nice feature. A good click is required to turn it on, so you never have to worry about turning it on accidentally when in your pocket/purse.
4.) The time to power on is faster than any camera I've seen. The auto-focus is very fast, and the face recognition seems to work well, although I've never used this feature on other cameras, so need to play around with it more.
5.) The owner's manual is very easy to read, actually enjoyable (if that's possible!). I learned how to use the Color Accent feature (2 clicks was all it took!), and it's a slick feature.
6.) The colors are SUPERB! Puts any camera I've used to shame. A quick snapshot is sharp and colorful, with not only beautiful colors, but the RIGHT colors. Too many times I've seen pictures (especially Casio's) come out pretty, but off color to the point of looking cartoony/fake. Not this camera.
7.) The video is amazing. I was recording at 640x480 at 30fps, and just recorded the Red Wings game, and it looks like you were actually at the game! You can use the optical zoom during video as well, which I didn't think was possible on this camera. A very nice surprise!
8.) The general dial you use to switch between video, picture previews, scene select, etc is hard to click through. It's somewhat of a good thing (it won't switch to something else unexpectedly) but you do need to concentrate on the change. No bigger, just more "clicky" than I'm used to from the iPod like dial of my POS Casio. This is more like the Sansa MP3 click, if I need to compare it to anything!
9.) I haven't printed out pictures yet, but the digital zoom seems to work very well. Including the digital zoom brought me up to 15x, and the results (at least on the LCD) were great. I was able to, from 20 feet away, zoom completely up to a baby's face, and fit a Coca-Cola can full-screen. No distortion, full sharpness, like I didn't even go to digital zoom. Very impressive.
10.) The flash is very powerful. I took a picture of my girlfriend from about 4 feet away, and she was washed out by the flash. I wasn't expecting this strong of a flash and that's a good thing. If you stand about 6 feet away (like you should in the first place) the flash is very effective.
11.) I took a few pictures of a darker room with flash, and the room lit up with subtle tones that made the picture look like there was natural light.
12.) Skin tone on people was phenomenal. My girlfriend has a dSLR, and this camera competes against it. That's how good this camera is.
13.) From my experience so far, DO NOT GO OVER ISO400. If Auto mode puts your ISO above 400, you can just click UP on the control layout and change it manually. Image stabilization cannot help you with moving objects, so ISO80-200 is garbage in dark light (the shutter stays open way too long, and your picture is just a blur if it was moving in the first place, although great for scenery). Depending on your lighting situation, ISO400 should take a quick enough shot to avoid blurring, and you may even be able to get away with ISO800 (I did in a few occasions). But if you still get unacceptable blurring, you may need to switch to a flash. (REMEMBER, POST PROCESSING CAN HELP WITH NOISE REDUCTION, BUT NOT ON BLURRING. IF AVOIDING FLASH IS COMPLETELY NECESSARY, USE HIGHER ISO RATHER THAN LOW ISO WITH BLUR.)
I could go on and on with this camera. If anyone has specific questions on the SD800IS, I'll happily answer them. And if you want me to send test pictures to an E-mail, let me know. So far, this camera far exceeded my expectations.
I figure the SD850IS will cost $400, and won't have the wide-angle, either. If the argument is that megapixels isn't a big deal, then this camera shouldn't even be in consideration.
Keep in mind the SD800IS only has ~3x zoom, the 3.8x zoom is because of the 28mm wide-angle. The SD700IS is 4x telephoto only. You will barely notice the 3x vs 4x optical zoom difference and, realistically, if you're looking for real zoom, neither of these cameras will satisfy you. I've accepted that compromise long ago with ultracompacts.
The small aperture difference won't make much difference -- you could even argue it's needed for the SD800IS because of the increased megapixels.
The extra 1.1MP will be a difference if you want to blow up a picture. You can EASILY add that extra zoom difference by cropping a picture in post-processing without noticing any difference at all.
The same argument goes for macro shots. Are you really going to notice the difference of standing about 3/4" macro vs. 1.2"? And again, post-editing can solve any of this with no time at all.
I can fully understand being on the fence with such great cameras. And I can tell you, if you don't take group shots and aren't interested in scenery where a wide-angle will come in handy, just get the SD700IS. To me, I miss so much more in the short-zoom of a camera that the wide-angle is important to me. For $300, it's a lot of money to plop down for a camera, especially when you're new and don't know if it's the right decision.
I can easily tell you, my girlfriend was skeptical of my Canon SD800IS when I told her I ordered it. She likes the dSLR cameras because of the zoom and picture quality. She constantly compared my Casio EX-Z750 to her dSLR and demonstrated how bad my pictures were.
Now she's jealous of my camera. :o)
After reading many of the reviews I am still undecided. What is very important to me is quality (crisp and clear pictures)....not to mention shutter response as I have a 1 yr old that I need to capture in a seconds notice...ha ha. I'm sure w/ the technological advances since the S45 purchase that I made nearly four years ago, any canon model will be better than the S45.
I know the view finder doesn't get much use on my current camera but for some situations (mainly bright sunny days) it's been very handy. I would like to continue w/ that feature. So right there I limit myself.
One of the frustrations I have w/ the S45 is the overexposure in low lighting...but then again, that could be b/c I am taking close up shots of my baby girl and the flash washes her out.
After a week of researching and reading reviews I don't think I am any closure to a decision. It seems like I would be very happy w/ any of the previously mentioned Canon choices. I would like to keep the price below $300. Any other advice you have to offer would be greatly appreciated!
Right now, most of the pictures I take are of my active 1 yr old. Primarily indoors. I do, on occasion and with summer just around the corner, need a camera that takes outdoor pictures as well. I do take a lot of group shots. I've made my rounds to the store to get some hands on feel for each of the cameras...and still have no idea which one to get. It did however reinforce the decision to stick w/ Canon! After this post, I might as well head back to the store with the more very informative insight that you've shared to see which one might actually make it home w/ me. lol Any final thoughts???
~~ Thanks, Nicole
Thanks a lot
Gideon
Do NOT buy at Best Buy. They have the worst prices, even with their 10-12% coupons they always throw around. The SD800IS, for example, is over $50 cheaper on Amazon when you take into account tax. That brings you down to a $310 camera instead of a $350-360, or the price range of a SD750 that is typically $300 at Best Buy.
Similarly, the SD750 is $260 on Amazon.com, while it's $300 at Best Buy. And lastly, the SD1000 is $219 on Amazon while $250 at Best Buy.
If you're worried about price ranges and were willing to pay $250 for the SD1000 at Best Buy, at least do yourself the favor of buying the SD750 for $260 at Amazon (here in Michigan, just the sales tax at Best Buy of $250 would bring the total to $265!!)
What I'm saying is, if you insist on an optical viewfinder (I've yet to use it), get the SD800IS. If you don't care about the optical viewfinder and are on a ~$250 budget, get the SD750.
As for me, I shopped around, and ended up getting the SD800IS for $252 out-the-door from Dell.com. :)
At least do this: Look at these customer's pictures, and remember this is the best they're getting -- amazon.com/gp/product/custo...
Look at how fuzzy the pictures are... the lack of clarity, the short depth of field. Then go and look at the pictures of the SD800IS and SD750, they're much better.
I'm not saying the SD1000 is a bad camera... it's just not up to par for Canon, especially with similar, better cameras out there for only a few bucks more.
Again, I hope this helps, and best of luck!
I might be on the same page as you, waiting until the SD850IS comes out....sounds like a good camera.
Matt - thanks so much for all your posts. I think I am steering away from the SD1000. Like you said, it just doesn't offer as much in the way of quality. I've crossed out the SD750 b/c of the no view finder feature. So I am pretty much left w/ the SD800IS and the SD850IS (coming in mid-June). I did a google on the SD850IS...found it in Australia....guess I will have to find it when it comes to the states in June.
The only feature I found on the SD850IS that does not appear to be on the SD800IS is the FD (face detection) technology. Is it worth it?
Any requests for a subject picture? Otherwise, I pretty much only have pictures of my puppy, haha! I'm not really imaginative when it comes to pictures, but if you give me a request I'll go out and make as artsy a picture as I can (within reason!). Color accent, full-zoom, brightness, flash, etc. Let me know :)
$6 cheaper for the SD750 at Beach Camera. Never knew about that site. Nice find.
Dell customer service is surprisingly nice, too. It's a patience game, but that's what I'm all about for the deals. These Dell codes are very nice for computers, as well, and more expensive digital cameras, since you save so much more. You can't "have to have it" by tomorrow, obviously, but if you can wait, you can't beat www.slickdeals.net.
1.) Change camera setting to Program Auto
2.) Choose "stitch" feature
3.) Camera will show you 2 camera frames in the LCD. Take your first shot.
4.) The first shot will be shown in the left frame in the LCD. Your new shot will be shown on the right-frame. You just manually take a picture where you want the seam, or "stitch" to be. The camera will then take the shot, and the 2 pictures will become one.
If you have steady hands, and the seam getting stitched together isn't life-or-death (ie, mountain range, lake, etc) you won't have a problem. However, I was stitching together my living room, and one of my stitches was by a clock. That was VERY difficult to seam together by hand without noticing the break on the minute hand! lol With a tripod..... not even a second though, it's that simple.
But anyway, to answer your question! Yes, the camera automatically stitches the pictures together. You keep taking them, it'll keep stitching them until you turn the mode off.
Thanks--your review(s!!!) sold me on this camera!
You can get the SD800IS for <$280 at most places now if you look through the Sunday papers. Again, search www.slickdeals.net for SD800IS and you should be able to find what you're looking for. If not now, then soon :)
Canon Powershot A570IS Digital Camera for $152.00 ( gosale.com/4925023/canon-po... )
But since it's a gift for someone who might appreciate better styling, I think I'm going to go with the SD800IS which is now down to $229.94
Canon Powershot SD800 IS Digital Camera for $229.94 ( gosale.com/4917998/canon-po... )
So it looks like I'm going with the SD800 IS.
Thanks for the help!
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Have you tried formatting the card via a card reader or another camera? It might be a formatting problem and not a beef that the camera has with that particular brand/model of card.
However, it seems like a lot of reviewers at newegg and other places are complaining ( newegg.com/Product/Product.... ) about this particular card not working in their devices. And it's not just Canon cameras, either. Sony and Sanyo products also seem to have issues with it.
It might just be a lemon card. My advice is to do some research in terms of customer reviews and see which cards are rated highest for cameras.
Sorry, this probably isn't terribly helpful. :[
Thanks for the reply. That was my current plan of action. I'm currently awaiting my card reader now. I will attempt to format the card via pc and then try it again. Unfortunately, I don't have another camera as this was my 1st purchase after extensive research.
What scares me is that I have yet to find anyone that has provided a customer review anywhere that states they are using a SDHC card!
If all else fails, I'll return it and get a spec. 1 card, or two.
Yes, your response was very helpful in that it confirmed my plan of action.
Perhaps it pays to remember that formatting memory cards with a PC usually render it un-recognizable by the camera.
All memory cards to be used on a camera should preferably be formatted by the camera itself.
Although Canon specifications mentioned that SD1000 works with SDHC cards, you probably will be alright if you buy Sandisk or Kingston. Otherwise, you can go one step lower and buy the 2 gig cards which are more likely to work without much problem.
Thanks for the response. Yes, I remember reading that somewhere. While I've never had a problem with FAT16 cards, this might be a problem with FAT32.
I've been going back and forth with Canon support and they suggested that I try formatting the card with my computer to see if the camera would then recognize it. This did not work either and Canon support refuses to answer my repeated question of what cards were actually used for the testing and verification of SDHC compatibility. I don't think they tested SDHC at all.
I've already started buying 2Gb cards however, my next SDHC endeavor will be either a Kingston or Sandisk, preferably in that order.
It's just very frustrating to do extensive research on an item prior to purchase only to discover that the manufacturer's documentation is either false or greatly exaggerated. I even went to sdcard.com to gain a better understanding of the SDHC specification BEFORE I purchased the camera! This purchase was well planned.
Does anyone else wonder why NO Canon SD1000 owners have come forth and stated the successful usage of a SDHC card??? Surely, I can't be the ONLY person that has tried!
Does anyone else wonder why Canon refuses to disclose what cards were used in testing???
Canon's docs and customer support states this camera will take ALL SDHC cards not just some of them. My research has determined that this camera model will NOT take ANY SDHC card and Canon has supported my conclusion by refusing to disclose any information to the contrary.
If and when I decide to buy and try a Kingston or Sandisk SDHC card, I will be happy to post the results here. But for now, I am still waiting to hear from any SD1000 owner that has used any SDHC card with success.
Just in case your interested the 2GB card is limited only by the camera and should have a speed of 18MB/sec the 4GB is guarenteed to write 2MB/sec but this one is able to do a little better than 5MB/sec. or 36X.
Since my question was "Has anyone successfully used a SDHC card in a Canon SD1000", I would mark Sam's response as the best answer.
So there you have it: KINGSTON and SANDISK SDHC cards are compatible with the Canon PowerShot SD1000 camera. All other cards have been unconfirmed.
This itself is good enough for me and my confidence in Canon products.
I'll add the ATP Pro Max to my list of compatible cards. So far, that makes Kingston, SanDisk, and ATP. Thanks again to everyone!
Let us know of the results and good luck! I haven't read much positive about Buy.com. I don't mean to scare you but if you check Resellerratings.com, you won't see a "pretty picture".
The list of SDHC cards compatible with the Canon SD1000 so far is:
Kingston
SanDisk
ATP
PNY
Toshiba
Thanks to All and if you keep sharing the knowledge, I'll keep updating this list!
BUT what does the "class" mean? I'm new at this, and i'm looking at EBAY to buy sdcards.
is there a certain speed rating these cards should have? what am i looking for exactly?
The class is basically a performance spec for the SDHC memory. The class sets minimum speeds the card must meet, however many cards will exceed the minimum but are not guarenteed to. A class 2 card will do almost everything this camera is capable of except max resolution continuous shooting. But with the prices so low I would buy the fastest card I could find incase I had a need for it later in another unit.
Yes, the SD1000 can use any SDHC card of any size as long as it conforms to the SDHC format. The post right above yours is from an owner using a 8gb card. If you look at my previous post, you'll see a list of card makers that have been confirmed as compatible with the SD1000.
Hope this helps......Dex
I see a lot of posts saying "I have X card and it works great," but the only people that mentioned what class card it was were using class 4 or less. Most people haven't even said what class the card they have is :/
hey....theJesus, ur cookie is due.. :)
k, so bbcode doesn't work? whatever, that's the url to your cookie regardless
3 for 3. I'll never have to worry about running out of digital film again.
right, i recently bought a Samsung ES15 Camera, it was working all fine with my Lexar sdhc 4gb memory card.. but now everytime i attempt to put my memory card into the camera, a light flashes continuously and the top and it shows me a card error warning.. i need some advice soon-ish please.
According to the SD1000 manual, you need to press the button with the multiple screen icon and then press up or down on the directional pad until the multiple screen icon comes up in the middle of the LCD. Once it comes up, just hold down the shutter release to shoot continuously.
Good luck!
thanks for your help
www21.flickr.com/groups/sd1...
Flickr is a site where anyone can post photos, and that is a group of people who are shooting with this camera. There should be some low-light shots in there for you to examine. Hope that helps!
There are a few <a href="digicamreview.com/photos/ga... out there, but sometimes those can be tricky since reviewers don't always post a wide range of non-biased shots.
Good luck- feel free to repost your question to bump it back up the list if you need to!
good luck
any camera can do that either if you are proffeisnal photographer!!
smileeee
Here are a few possible cameras to check into:
SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- the smallest of the group. Viewfinder, shutter lag about .45 seconds in high contrast (slightly more with flash, much less with prefocus) and about 2 seconds between shots. Fairly new, so I haven't heard of a serious red-eye problem, but as I said above, it'll probably occur from time to time. This camera has some new Red Eye correction technology that can be used in Playback mode on the camera, basically helps you edit out Red Eye after you've taken the photo. The reviews claim it works well, I'm not sure exactly HOW well.
SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- cool wider angle lens, image stabilization, has flash mode that helps prevent red-eye (pre-flash, which means one little flash before the big one so that subject's eyes have time to dilate, thus lessening red eye; this is about 65% successful in my experience), shutter lag is around the same as the SD1000.
Hope that helps somewhat.
I know this is an old question, but just wondering if you have found a camera yet. There are a few I'm thinking of that might suit you; nowadays (thankfully) things are speeding up and there are some compacts available that could suit your needs in terms of response time, etc. Let me know if you're still in the market and I'll try to make some suggestions!
Sorry it took me a few days to reply- we are swamped with questions over here! =) Let me run over a few things and then make some recommendations:
-As far as resizing/ enlarging photos for scrapbooking purposes, the best thing you can do is make sure the camera offers a few different resolutions (all of them do; low to high quality) and that there are enough megapixels for you to be able to blow up the photo decently. The rest of the work you can do with editing software (<a href="picasa.google.com/">... is a great free tool if you don't own something like Photoshop). Unless you want to blow photos up very, very large, you should be just fine with something 6 megapixels or more.
-For speed, you obviously want something without much lag time, both between photos (shot to shot time) and from when you push the button to when the shot fires (shutter lag). Having an SLR, you are probably used to super-fast response; a smaller point & shoot is going to be a little slower than that, but luckily most of the cameras on the market today are still good and fast and should suit you well enough.
There are a LOT of great cameras in this price range that offer all these options.
Here are a few possibles:
Canon SD750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) - This is the camera I want for my birthday (I hope my boyfriend is listening. =)) It's super speedy, compact, takes great photos and has all the options you'd need. The SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is basically the same camera with a slightly smaller screen but a super skinny body.
Maybe you want more zoom than these have? While it won't be as small, you can check out the Panasonic Lumix TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), just as speedy but perhaps slightly less total image quality than the Canons.
I tend to point people towards Canons. Not because I'm biased but because I think they truly give you the best shot for your money. Although the zoom is attractive, though, avoid the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) unless you never shoot with a flash. This camera has a very slow shot-to-shot time when flash is used.
Does this help at all? The ones I threw at you are mainly new models which tend to be faster in operation (technology is speeding along!) Let me know if you need further advice.
With all that being said - if you are looking to shoot soccer games or other sporting events or auditorium events - then you need either a long zoom (for distance) or an SLR (for speed of focus and shooting). I suggest getting the Nikon D40 (not the D40x, as you can save money and don't need the 10MP of the "x") and if money is not an issue - get a VR lens, like the 18-200 VR. Otherwise if you don't want SLR, then maybe the Panasonic TZ3, Sony H5, H7 or H9.
Good luck
Adam
However, allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem. To be forearmed is to be forewarned.
picture quality of this camera is fabulous. i guranteed you will like it.
However I have a concern:
I heard that it is better to get a regular battery operated camera instead of a proprietary battery like this sd1000 seems to have.
I'm going to china for 3 weeks and am worried about the camera always being dead due to lack of power or too many pictures taken,
so the question is: How many shots can you typically get off with the Canon SD1000?
thanks,
Al
BTW non-special batteries are no better. I have had a couple of cameras that used them and I had to get rechargeable batteries since the cameras ate them so fast. It was much more of a PITA that the special batteries in the canon.
(translated by Google Translate ( translate.google.com/transl... ), apologies)
Hello. For comparison, you may want to check out imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
Personally, I think that the Olympus Stylus has slightly better color and contrast. And sharper as well. Your mileage may vary however.
(translated via Google Translate)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
Good Luck
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Good Luck, hit us back up if that doesn't solve the problem you could have a defect cable, computer, or camera, but it is unlikely.
As it turned out, the camera did not include a recharger unit. The schematic in owners book didn't include it a picture of it so I didn't even know it existed until you all mentioned it. The store provided a new one.
Thank you!
The SD600 does come with some editing features, sure. But the SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has replaced it.
I know the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does just that, as well as several other photo editing features.
The SD600 does have digital zoom (4x, which is about the limit of what you'd want to use). To be honest, I have no idea how to go about saving the photo once you've digitally zoomed it, but there probably is a way to do so.
Of course, you can always just do this with photo editing software once you've downloaded the photo. Another reason people aren't too crazy about having digital zoom.
Among the softwares for this camera, you should have no problem reading the Users Guide ( basic and advance ), Software starter guide and Direct Print User Guide because there are earlier versions of Acrobat reader that will work with Win 98SE.
Your main concern probably will be the lack of a driver to enable the computer to communicate with the camera.
This means all transfer of photographs has to be carried out using card readers.
If the latest Zoom Browser won't work with Win98SE, you can download free picture viewers,such as Irfanview, from the internet.
I went into the Disk Management area (Control Panel >> Computer Management) -- and the disc isn't even showing up. I tried to repair the disc... no luck. There are no installation drives or anything to "repair" ... So-- maybe our computer are missing something.
Hope someone out there has a useful answer!
Be advised, however, that if it's out of warranty, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model. The model replacing this one is the SD1000. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
I'm convinced it is an alignment issue also with the zoom ring as in photo review mode if i push the ring to the left it works( by bunching the photos in groups of 9) but pushing to the right appears to do nothing. Canon charge 155 euro as a standard charge so I'm hoping I can open the camera case and fix this myself I'd really like to know how I do this. Thanks again for the response
Neither does TV mode, and who knows how many other complicated potentialities are just a brain tease and not effective?
I bought it online from B and H Camera, and my next purchase comes from a bricks and mortar retailer.
Thanks for the replies, I went ahead and opened the camera and managed to fix it( The fall had made a little tear in the printed circuit strip(?) and I was able to tape it back into place, It worked briefly but now It won't power up at all I fear I've short circuited the thing and Its only fit for the dump. I've no credit card or recourse so Its the recycling bin for this sd600 unless any there is any miraculous suggestion!!
BTW. I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
LOOK INTO IT!
I think what it's telling you is that your computer screen is set too small to view the software. This happens sometimes with newer software. I bet your computer screen resolution just needs to be moved up. To do this, click on the Start button and go into Control Panel, then choose Display. Look through the settings for a little slide-bar that lets you move up the computer screen resolution. Standard nowadays seems to be 1028x768, so I bet yours is set at something lower than that which is preventing the software from working. I had the same issue with a photo editing program myself.
You've hit it square on the nose here. The bigger, higher resolution LCD is the SD750's main advantage. Aside from that the two are nearly identical.
Good luck!
However, according to the Canon FAQ on the SD1000, you can set the digital zoom to off in the camera settings:
# Set the camera to (Rec.) mode and press the <MENU> button to display the record menu.
# Use the or buttons to select [Digital Zoom].
# Use the or button to select [Standard], [Off], [1.5x]* or [1.9x]* and press the <MENU> button. The display will return to the Shooting screen.
More information on this can be found here ( cipa.jp/battery/index_e.html ).
It may be nothing - this may be a good deal. But I'd double check before clicking buy.
Safety Notice: Counterfeit Lithium-Ion Battery Packs (Update)
Updated: December 11, 2006
Affected products:
All Digital SLR Cameras, All PowerShot Cameras, All Digital Video Cameras
The purpose of this document is to notify you that counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and battery chargers are being used with Canon brand Digital Cameras and Digital Camcorders. Canon recently discovered these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and chargers on sale, and in circulation on internet auction websites, being passed off as Canon genuine lithium-ion battery packs and chargers. Canon also learned of an explosion which appears to have been caused by one of these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs.
Because these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and battery chargers are often not equipped with certain protective devices meeting Canon's and the industry's basic quality standards, using or recharging these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs could cause your camcorder to malfunction, or lead these battery packs to overheat, leak liquids, ignite, or explode. In the worst case, this could not only damage your camera or camcorder, but also result in fire, burns and/or injuries (including loss of eyesight). Accordingly, these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and/or battery chargers should not be used.
Please be advised that Canon is not responsible, and will not be liable, for any malfunctions, damages or injuries caused by non-Canon genuine lithium-ion battery packs and/or battery chargers (including any counterfeit products).
For questions about "Counterfeit" products, please contact us at the following: Telephone: 1 (800) 828-4040.
Also, for further information on counterfeit batteries, please see Camera & Imaging Products Association (CIPA) "Notice Concerning Counterfeit Battery Packs" at:
cipa.jp/battery/index_e.html
I honestly don't see the SD1000 being a huge improvement over the SD800 IS when it comes to night shooting. In fact, if anything I'd expect it to be slightly worse since it doesn't have the image stabilization technology that the SD800 IS has. Since night photography involves slower shutter speeds, the image stabilization is essential for minimizing blur due to movement.
Aside from that difference, the cameras are virtually identical, specs-wise.
Hope this helps!
As for SONY, it's a good idea to steer clear, as they tend to force their customers into proprietary technologies such as the memory stick, their own spin on formatting, and a host of others which the Nikon won't do. Nikon relies on SD cards, which are pretty much the standard in point and shoot for memory cards. This means you can use any you happen to currently have and they are much cheaper than memory sticks. You can also use them in other technologies like PDAs, DMPs, and even mp3 players, whereas that memory stick is only going to be used in another SONY.
And this may seem closed minded, but SONY is an electronics company - a jack of all trades. Nikon makes cameras. That's all I really need to know. Stick with the company with focus.
However, in the end you can get opinions and reviews, you may still stuck between 2 options. Therefore, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Oh, I should add that I owned a Canon Elph 440 which seemed prone to breaking down.
You could get a case for the Canon, but that adds to the bulk.
thanks for the reply. Let me focus my question: I am aware of the shock and waterproof features of the Olympus SW 725 and 770. However, many reviews say that it takes rather poor photographs.
The Canon SD 1000 gets excellent reviews for the quality of its images. I would buy it in a moment if I felt confident that it could withstand the rigors of running and biking without problem. Can you, or anyone else, answer that question from experience and/or expert knowledge of the Canon SD 1000.
My experience with the Canon Elph 440 was not so positive in this regard. It took great photos but required significant repair a total of three times over a three year period. I don't know if this repair record had anything to do with taking the camera running several times but it does not inspire confidence in Canon cameras.
Thanks Richio, but its not the Elph camera I need to know about but how tough is the SD 1000. If I felt confident that it could withstand being taken running etc I'd buy it.
Or alternatively if someone could let me know that its possible to get good images from the Olympus then I might be encouraged to go with that. I've heard a lot of negative comments about what poor images it produces.
Somebody else has dropped their SD1000 three times in 8 months, and finally it broke the third time---and so now they get on the web and complain about how flimsy the SD1000 is.
Even Consumer Reports doesn't test cameras the way that they test other appliances. You won't find CR setting up cameras with robots pushing the shutter buttons every 3 seconds, and then coming back in 6 weeks to how they are all doing.
How about if someone who owns an SD 1000, and goes running/biking/dancing with it, responds and tells me its held up well. Then I would be given some real information on which to decide.
Or they respond that their SD 1000 hasn't held up to the running/dancing/biking.
Or someone who owns an Olympus SW 770/725 says, Yes, this camera does take poor images but if you play with this setting and that setting you can produce a quality image'. Or, maybe they tell me a little image correction after taking the photo is all that is needed to turn a mediocre image into a great one.
All of this feedback would be anecdotal, for sure, but on point, and therefore useful to me in making a decision.
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
www.flickr.com/photos/alexbarrow
Pick up a couple of good SD cards for her as well.
And for you, I'd like to recommend the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and have so far been quite pleased with the results. 7.1 MP, 18x zoom, image stabilization and some great scene based program features including a 15fps burst mode. This is great for sports photography.
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panorama, even a mode for shooting documents.
If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
Your other suggestion for a camera with added features for me was appreciated as well. I will certainly take a closer look at the Olympus. I have had a couple of Olympus cameras over the years starting with one purchased in Japan back in 1951 while in the Navy. Again, thanks for supporting this internet feature for camera enthusiasts.
I agree that a viewfinder is important. There are just times - particularly in bright lighting conditions - where using the LCD is problematic. A viewfinder is a must and it mystifies me why many camera makers are doing away with it. However, if the design has a small LCD viewfinder rather than a true optical viewfinder, the arguement would be to save on power consumption. Which is a valid argument, but frankly I'd rather have it and choose to turn it off than not have it at all. But if you can get an optical VF, you're better off.
As for which one to buy ... when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check them out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
I did this and the SD1000 felt the best. Nice symmetrical shape. Light but still felt solid. Very nice compact size.
suggestions?
Thank you in advance!
If it is void, you have nothing to lose by taking it apart & giving it a good dry clean.
Whatever happens, good luck!
bestbyteinc.com/Tools/3M_Du...
A simple tip for everybody who owns a camera, when going to the beach don't take your digital camera-buy a disposible!!
The SD1000 shoots AVI encoded with motion JPEG (not the best) and has mono for audio recording. Additionally, you will not be able to zoom and record at the same time or if you can, you will lose the audio. I believe the SD1000 just won't let you zoom.
If video quality is of concern to you, you're better off going the other way and getting a video camera that shoots stills. The quality is getting much better.
If you hope to shoot HD quality video or sound, forget it and get the video camera. OTOH if you intend to shoot and edit HD video you should already know what you are doing. When I really care about the quality (i.e. it is for public display) I use a real video camera.
Battery wise, the camera can take 450 pictures with a single charge of Ni MH batteries (CIPA standard). The beauty is that it can do it with LCD on.
Picture quality wise, it takes pictures at 8 mega pixels, that allows good quality enlargements unmatched by smaller mega pixel compact cameras.
For more information, you may wish to read the review of S5is at <a href="dpreview.com/reviews/canons... location</a> which also include samples of pictures taken with the camera.
In general, grainy LCDs are normal when either in dimly lit locations or in ultra-zoom. I have the same problem with my SD800IS. It doesn't even bother me anymore, because I know the picture will be great after I take the picture. I'm not sure how to explain it, except the LCD sensor not being able to resolve the detail on the LCD screen and it gets confused. But yes, this is a common occurance to most ultracompacts. You may also see vertical lines when focusing on a very bright object, especially in a dimly lit area. Rest assured, the pictures will come out fine, and will even show up correctly on the LCD screen after the picture is taken.
Thanks!
However, I can compare benchmarks - Olympus Stylus 760:
Power-on Time 1.9 sec
Shutter Lag,
Full Autofocus 0.699 - 0.600 sec
Prefocused 0.085 sec
Shot to Shot time 2.59 sec
Battery Life
(CIPA standard) 220 shots
Canon SD1000
Power-on Time 1.1 sec
Shutter Lag,
Full Autofocus 0.360 - 0.400 sec
Prefocused 0.085 sec
Shot to Shot time 2.14 sec
Continuous Speed 0.75 fps
(No limit)
Battery Life
(CIPA standard) 210 shots
So, the Stylus has a slight edge in battery life, but the Canon is far superior in performance when it comes to shutter lag, shot to shot time, continuous speed shooting, etc.
So, in the end, I give the edge to the SD1000 - it breaks the tape in a "photo" finish (pardon the pun).
However, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Can you see the files on the disk, but your computer refuses download them? The files on the CD could be protected for some reason.
I guess one final reason could be that you don't have the drivers/software on your computer to open the file in the format it wants. That seems unlikely.
In either respect, I'd contact Canon. The files you're looking for are probably somewhere on their website. And if not, they should be able to send you another disk, free of charge.
Should I buy a lot of 2GB Memory cards? A lot of batteries? Can I use the included charger in these countries?
Help would be appreciated.
or Walmart.)
Stocking up on chips is a reasonable thing. I usually take a laptop and transfer images to it daily. They are easier to view on the larger screen of the computer. Then you can burn them onto DVDs as backup, just in case. When I am traveling I carry two batteries but seldom take enough pictures (over 200) in a day to use both.
I am laptop-free and not technically oriented. Very helpful info.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
that would work for this camera and not take such a huge bite out of my wallet? The camera came with Extra Battery & Memory, Lens Cleaning Kit & Tripod. All this and this is my first digital camera. Is there anything else I might need? Thanks!
Do I have enough of whatever I need on my camera to get good pix for this purpose or is there something more I should consider? Thank you.
I have personally had great experiences with both Epson and Canon printers when it comes to printing shots taken with Canon digitals. If you want a good multi-function printer, the Canon Pixma MP600 ( amazon.com/gp/product/B000I... ) is pretty impressive. Great photos, solid text and good scanning. If you want to go smaller and more singlemindedly photo-oriented, I'd recommend the Pixma iP6700D ( amazon.com/gp/product/B000G... ). It's quite quick and the color reproduction is excellent.
Hope this helps!
Thanks for responding. I try to be an informed consumer but when it comes to electronics, I seem to be able to anticipate the questions but real answers are often more technical than I am fully capable of understanding. I very much appreciate you distilled your suggestions to very basic simple language...this I understood! So, I went and looked up both the CANON printers, since the camera is a CANON, and both get overall excellent reviews. Of course there are always some folks who had problems...after all, it's a machine, they can mis-behave but their major issue wasn't so much that a problem had occurred as much as it was about how they were treated or their problems resolved/not resolved by CANON customer service which got really bad reviews from those who encountered them. If I was as lucky and happy as most were with both of these printers it would be great but one reviewer pointed out something I thought I should concerned about. He said he's had the Pixma MP600, not the smaller, less expensive one, which he'd had for two years and had just recently discovered CANON does not update their driver software. My computer's coming up on 4 yrs old, so the bigger issue, if I understand this, is that if/when I buy a new computer, if I update to VISTA, it will essentially render the printer useless?
I don't mean to over-think this...it seems there is a fine line between doing enough researching on a purchase and doing too much or anticipating too many potential issues because there is always a point at when it doesn't matter what you do, you will be behind light years behind the technology curve within a nano-second of having made that buying decision before you can sign your credit card slip :)
Does anyone have any information about this?
As for Canon not updating their drivers... I certainly don't think that's a corporate policy. I know for a fact that they've updated the drivers for several different models of cameras and printers in the past. I think you're ok here. :]
The main things i care about are : Image and Video Quality, Durability (i've heard that the SD 1000 is prone to breaking very easily, not sure if this is true), Optical Zoom, and perhaps what other additional features the cameras have.
Finally, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
If I were you, I would have baught the Canon.
--signed, frustrated in digital cameraville
You can use a photo recovery utility like "F-Recovery" to get back your pictures and recover your card.
This is largely the reason why having several gives you insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
Start on AUTO. Then branch out from there. Play with flash settings (I like to use the flash even in day time to make my subject portraits "pop." Also, practice the "rule of thirds." ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_... ) This is a photographic technique which bascially states that:
... an image can be divided into nine equal parts by two equally-spaced horizontal lines and two equally-spaced vertical lines. The four points formed by the intersections of these lines can be used to align features in the photograph. Proponents of this technique claim that aligning a photograph with these points creates more tension, energy and interest in the photo than simply centering the feature would.
There's a nifty little website called Short Courses ( shortcourses.com/ ) which will help you to learn to use your digital camera ( shortcourses.com/use/ ) and other lessons. That may help.
But in the end, it's going to come down to you reading the manual and just taking shots and learning as you go and trying different things to experiment with your camera. You'll grow into it, so be patient with yourself.
Larry
I'll also toss in that one can probably take a digital photography class at a local community college. They are invaluable to learning how to develop a photographer's eye.
Vaughn
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
For example, the low-light (without a flash) pictures are either very blurry with minimal movement, or very blotchy/pixel-y at higher ISO's. The pictures themselves are generally on the "soft" side, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, as it gives the pictures a more realistic appearance. But some people don't like that.
Moving past the negatives, though, and to answer your actual question about close-ups: If you have good light, or are using a flash, this camera does a very good job with macro (up to about 2") and just all-purpose shots. If you're doing some severe macro with fine detail on the subject, you may have difficulty getting completely clear pictures without stabilizing the camera with a tripod -- makeshift or otherwise. But if there's enough light, the high shutter speed will take care of the problem.
I don't mean to scare you away from this camera. I've seen it go for as cheap as $150, which is a great price for this. But at anything over $200, this camera starts looking less attractive as it approaches the price range of the SD750 or other "SD" cameras with optical image stabilization. Of course, I'm very nit-picky... look at the reviews on amazon.com. 280 people, with a 4.5/5 average. Very impressive. amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-... And as you can see, you shouldn't pay any more than $183.
"Further instructions for Canon Digital Camera Solution Software can be found in the Software Starter Guide supplied with your Canon digital camera. PDF versions of most Software Starter Guides are available in Download Library. The latest Canon Digital Camera Solution Disks and EOS Digital Solution Disks are available to USA residents for purchase at 1-800-828-4040 for $19.95 subject to availability."
Buy a new installation dissk for $20 nd you're all set.
I'm also guessing he doesn't want an expensive camera that could end up getting ruined overseas.
That being said, the SD1000 would be a good camera. And for <$200, it's also a good value. The only complaint I have is no image stabilization. But in good light, that really won't make a difference. If you're worried about battery life, just send him one or two of these, and there won't be any problems: amazon.com/Lenmar-Lithium-i... Great price, and I own two of these and haven't had a problem with either (I have the SD800IS).
I could suggest other cameras for you, but they get more expensive. Is the battery life the only thing keeping you from getting this camera? If it is, I'd get it. For only $10 you can quell your fears of battery life. And the camera itself is good for the money and would seem to fit what your son would need.
Is there a really skinny camera with Image stabilization that still takes great pictures and possibly wide angle shots?
G.
amazon.com/Lenmar-Lithium-i...
And yes, there IS a camera that has image stabilization, is thin, AND has wide-angle (28mm): the SD800IS. However, it costs about $250. For $50 more, I think it's worth it, and I LOVE mine. Nothing is quite as thin as the SD1000 (.8" thin vs. .99" for the SD800IS, for instance), but it's neglible. The SD800IS is $281.76 at amazon.com, and getting cheaper (when I bought mine somewhere else, amazon was selling it for $309).
Right now, online at least, the SD800IS's best price is at amazon. But at Office Depot, Staples, Best Buy (after price match), you can get it for about $250. Even Dell.com sometimes have one-time coupons to cut some of the price off. So you can save about $30 by looking around, or just get it for ~$280 now (and with amazon, if the price goes down, they credit your card the difference, which is nice).
Hope that helps! (P.S., the rechargable battery link I included works with the SD800IS as well!)
picturee starts getting blurred.
it should not happen with 7 megapixel right?
Before getting worried, I'd get your pictures onto a computer and print out a few pictures you're worried about on 4"x6" prints. That is the only way to get the answer you're looking for. The LCD doesn't always display everything precisely.
or its set to 7. megapixel by default?
can we turn off the flash in settings, or we need to do that manually every time when we turn on the camera.
camera shows only time or it shows date also,
( i m talking about time thats get displayed on full screen, rotating in a square box)
You should have the option of Program Auto, which allows you to set many different features, including flash, ISO, etc. When you turn the camera off and come back to Program Auto later, your presets should still be there. Pure Auto mode will also have auto flash unless you manually set it each time you turn the camera on. (I made this mistake once, and ended up taking flash at a wedding that didn't allow flash... how embarrassing!!!)
You should also be able to display the time and date in the format you wish (mm/dd/yy, dd/mm/yy, etc) as well as time (standard, military, etc). They won't be printed on the picture when you print them out (there are many software applications that can read the storage information off the file and put the dates on the pictures if you want), but for previewing purposes, you can change that data.
Hope that helps!
I have been reading abt the image stabilisation of sd1000 camera. I have heard that sd1000 has poor image stabilisation.In this circmstances is it recomended to buy this camera?
how much is the max memory card size for sd1000.Memory size of max 32MB mentioned on the site.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
1.) You need a ridiculously small camera
2.) Flash recyling time (picture to picture, with flash)
For #1, you have to concern yourself with whether you want a truly pocketable camera, or don't mind maybe carrying it on a wriststrap or a purse (or baggy pants pocket would still work). For #2, this is the only issue -- 4-6 seconds between pictures, depending on battery strength and subject distance. Not good at all... but even with other cameras you have a 3 second delay, so it's not HORRIBLY different. Besides, you should be able to speed the picture speed with flash by buying strong (2500 mAh or better) NiMH batteries. This will help with battery life, as well.
On the other hand, the A570IS has better picture quality, image stabilization, a little better zoom, better movie mode, etc. If you can get past the need for "AA" NiMH rechargable batteries, a slower flash recharge time (without flash, there's no difference), and a bigger camera, then the A570IS is the easy choice.
Camera will be used primarily by wife as a point and shoot.
Camera will be used primarily by wife as a point and shoot.
I still think the olympus took better low light shots though and that is really bugging me :(
It seems that the only camera in this price range that is small enough to fit in a pocket is the Samsung S850/1050, but I've heard that the image quality is not good. What should I do?
This camera can be adjusted manually for some settings. Both the white balance, exposure compensation, shutter speeds can be manually adjusted as well as a full manual mode. You can look through the user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090001... ) to get a better idea of what the camera can do. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Good luck and happy shooting! :)
Thanks.
Jo
- Resolution: Both have 7.1MP
- Optical zoom: 4x vs 3x
More optical zoom gets you closer to your subject in the photo.
- Image stabilization?: Yes vs No
IS functionality helps with low light situations and camera shake.
- Battery type: AA vs. Lithium rechargeable
You can purchase NiMH AA rechargeable batteries pretty cheap, so this isn't that big of a difference.
- Dimensions (WxDxH): 3.52"x1.69"x2.53" & 0.39lbs VS 3.38"x0.76"x2.11" & 0.28lbs
The Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is smaller and easily portable, but the Canon A570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) isn't that much larger and offers a little more functionality. I would choose the A570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the longer zoom range and the image stabilization. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
A570IS is best at... everything else!
Seriously, Camera manufacturers have to make compromises when designing and building the smallest cameras, the end result is fewer features and slightly lower overall performance. I looked at the SD1000; when I first noticed that it uses the new DigicIII I was excited, then I looked at all the details and quickly decided it wasn't in the same league with the 570.
The A570IS is best because..
1) Takes better quality photos in low light, mostly due to image stabilization, partly due to better high ISO performance.
2) Takes better quality photos of distant objects due to the higher 4X optical zoom AND the image stabilization.
3) Can focus much closer for macro shots, as close as 2 inches at widest angle.
4) Easier to hold stable with right hand due to the shape of the battery compartment, reduced natural shake so the image stabilization can be most effective.
5) Takes more photos before you must recharge/change batteries. The SD1000 is limited to about 210 photos with it's custom battery pack. With the AA batteries in the A570IS, you decide the quality of battery you use and how many spares you keep around. I highly recommend the Energizer Lithium, longest lasting battery there is, and just happens to have the lowest cost-per-photo of any disposable AA battery because it lasts so long. (I dont have a number to put in here yet, but will as soon as my 16-year old manages to run down the set we put in yesterday) Rechargables cost less in the long run, but they need regular recharging just like the battery pack in the SD1000.
6) The A570 costs about $15 less also, another testament to the economics of building smaller cameras, less capability at higher cost.
Happy shopping!
I would still stick with the A570 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the image stabilization. The A580 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not come with this feature, which is a nice to have for low light shots.
This big things with the A580 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are the "ease of use" features, which are nice for extreme novice users, and a newer processor. Unless you have never used a camera before, I don't think these are worth the upgrade.
Andrew
Find cameras with the following features:
- anti-shock/anti-vibration/anti-burr, whatever they name it. This feature produces sharper image even if camera shakes due to pressing shutter.
- With programmed shutter speed for 'SPORTS', a built-in setting adjusted by a dial or menu options. It uses higher shutter speed to capture moving subject.
After you find a camera with the above mentioned features, check the following:
Extra tips for better photos for your daily photo shoots of kids: (the faster, the better of the following)
- When switching on the camera, how fast is it ready for taking pictures. Watch the flash charging indicator.
- When half press the shutter button, how fast is the indicator to light up to confirm focus is ready.
- When you press the shutter to take a photo, is there a obvious shutter lag. Shutter lag is the measured time between the shutter button is depressed and the open/close of shutter itself to actually take the picture.
- In between shots, how fast is the camera to save the image just taken and recharge the flash after flash is used. Therefore you need to test one shot with flash.
All the above 4 points required when your photo is not blur but is the right moment caught of your kids to show on the photo....smiling, dashing to the FINISH, cute gesture etc., etc.
If you find a camera equipped with the above-mentioned features and is fast in all 4 speed checks. That's the camera you 'need', but you may still hold on to that and find another camera with all you 'need' plus some other features that you might want to have too.
To make it simple:
- decide the size of the camera to buy.
- look for cameras with the 2 features.
- check cameras equipped with the 2 features regarding the speed of the mentioned 4 points.
- When you have more than one camera that fulfilled your 'need', pick the one with the other features that you like most.
Final tips, if you want good pictures of your kids, take some time to choose a good camera. Yet, you still need to improve your picture taking skill to achieve. Good camera can help, skills make it perfect.
The Canon ELPH cameras are made with a metal housing and plastic pieces (buttons, etc.). I have had my ELPH for 6 years and it has been in and out of my pocket many times, and it still takes great photos. I hope this helps; good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Thanks for taking the time to answer my question!
Joe
Andrew
The Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a continuous shooting mode, an optical viewfinder, and it is more compact. Other than those two things, the cameras are pretty comparable. Because of those three differences, I would go with the SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Having something that fits in your pocket is very handy. I also like the optical viewfinder. When it is very bright outside, the LCD can be hard to see, so the viewfinder is nice to have. I hope this helps.
Andrew
This would be a versatile camera that meets your specifications. If you want to stay with Sony, I would recommend the W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is a bit more limited when compared to the Olympus 760 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). If I had to choose between the two, I would pick the Olympus 760 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
I am a big fan of the Canon ELPH line. I have had one for 6 years now, and it still works great. You could try the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Its compact size is fantastic to keep in a pocket or purse, and the 7.1 MP resolution will make it great for producing photos at 8x10 or larger (when set at the finest resolution). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Andrew
Bernadette
While the Fuji A900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might sound impressive at first with its 9MP resolution, I don't like the image shift software or the low ISO setting options. I prefer to set things more manually. That being said, the new Olympus FE280, looks to have a lot of nice features. If its price fits into your budget, it might be the way to go. My favorite of the group is still the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
First, I have to ask if you have the Sony Cybershot W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ); it has a 7.2 megapixel resolution. Is this the camera you have?
One of the reasons the camera shutter speed is slower is due the the auto focus. If you have the focal length you want, hold the button halfway down, and that should lock it, so when you push the whole way the camera will react faster.
As for the blurry shots, I'm guessing that you are in lower light situations when this happens. The camera will automatically adjust the shutter opening in those situations to allow more light in. To avoid this more, I would set your camera at ISO 1000 to allow more light in. You might see some graininess in the photos, but you will avoid the blurs.
If you would like to get a new camera all-together, I would recommend the Canon SD870 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is one of the highest rated compact cameras on the site, has a larger ISO setting range, image stabilization (which will futher help to avoid blurry shots in low light settings), and you white balance can be manually adjusted to further "tweak" the camera to work better in low light situations. I hope this helps.
Andrew
You might need to play with the settings to get your current camera, as well as any future camera, to work better in low light settings. That is where the image stabilization, setting a higher ISO number, and switching to a shutter priority mode. This camera does not have a shutter priority, but it does have a nightshot mode, which will essentially speed up your shutter speed, which you want to avoid the blurry shots. I hope this helps.
Andrew
could you please suggest me an ultracompact pocket camera that i use mostly in indoors as i have a small kid.i am really confused between canon sd 870 is and canon 1000.i read in the reviews that canon 1000 is not good for lowlights and to take pics of kids as it comes blurrry but i like its size and 870 is bit big than sa 1000.i torn between two which to choose.this chirstmas i need to buy for everyday use as i need to click my baby photos to cherish them for long time.thanku andrew in advance i know u will suggest me good one.
If you like the Canon cameras and are looking for something that will perform a little better in low light with children, I would recommend something with manual exposure settings and image stabilization. The two cameras you mentioned don't have the manual settings, but the Canon SD 850 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does. This camera has the ability to change the exposure settings manually to adjust better to low light situations. It is a bit bigger but that is to make room for the optical viewfinder which is nice on sunny days when you can't see the LCD screen as well. I hope this helps; good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
I love my Cannon SD850. It is a great camera for the price! It is small enough to fit in my purse so it goes almost everywhere with me. It does not have a great deal of shutter lag which I appreciate since I have quick moving children! I find that my only problem with slow shutter comes when I am shooting indoors with a flash and my battery is on it's last leg. Otherwise it is very quick to shoot. I have also figured out that the continuous shutter works best in well-lit outdoor situations where the flash is not required.
It also includes a viewfinder which I find is a must-have feature.
I have gotten some incredible shots with this camera in the last few months thanks to the tips and techniques I have gotten from the wonderful people on this board!
HTH!
Amy S.
I want a rechargable battery, memory card vs memory stick... what is the difference?
Thanks!
However, for comparison, you may want to check out this resource
( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side. Finally, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Also, try these tips to improve your performance:
there are also other tips to speed up your performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
What do you think? What will give me a better print? I just want crisp, clean pics of my faily and friends
but for every day use, I think the Canon SD1000 has your olympus beat.
But if you like it, B, by all means - that's what's important.
I still think the olympus took better low light shots though and that is really bugging me :(
I am interested in purchasing a camera to take pictures of friends and family but also to take scuba diving.
You mentioned that there was an Olympus model that geared for "extreme stuff like snorkeling, rapelling, etc".
Could you tell me what model that is or suggest a camera that would meet these needs.
Thanks!
I think this could meet your needs, but it largely depends on how deep you're going and where your doing your SCUBA. I'm sure you're aware what salt water can do to a digital camera and as such, I'd still be considering a dive case for any camera I use if I was planning on going anywhere near that 33ft. limit.
Originally it was the dive case option that was steering me towards Canon as most of their cameras have waterproof cases - which I believe can go as deep as 130 ft.
I'm also looking into strobe lights (which I know nothing about) so if anyone has any useful information or can direct me to where I can read up on them it would be much appreciated.
e18.bitnet.cx/comments.php
My camera is less than a month old (SD1000) and I got this error message today "Lens error, restart camera". Luckily I purchased the insurance from best buy. And I never do that.
Lame though.
Turn off the camera. Place it on the back with the lens facing up and take a look at the spacing between the lens and the lens housing. If you notice that the gap is not even all the way around the lens, the problem should be easy to fix. This type of a problem usually occurs if the camera was dropped while the lens was extended. Simply - VERY GENTLY - press down the lens on the side where the gap is the biggest. You should hear a "click" as it pops back into place. Try powering the camera back on.
Good luck
I bought this camera less than a year ago and have loved it thus far! I went on vacation and on the very last day, I got this "Lens Error" message. The lens would open but the picture appeared blurry and no amount of banging, or restarting solved the problem. I was so frustrated because I bought this camera at Black's Photography and when I brought it in I was told that the warranty likely would not cover the problem because it might be the result of a dropped camera (although I have no memory of it being dropped)! Regardless, I tried Don C's suggestion and it worked!! I had to open the lens in order to pop it back into place. I am so incredibly happy to save the money of repair but also the time of being without a camera. Thanks so much!
A few days after sending it in for warranty repair, I got an email from canon saying the camera had sand in the battery compartment and they would not cover it under warranty. They said the camera was full of sand and wanted $98 to fix it (best buy is selling it new for $150).
Before sending it in I read about this problem and used compressed air in the battery compartment and around the lens to make sure it was 100% clean, so I know there was no sand in the battery compartment. We only took some beach shots and did not drop the camera in the sand or anything like that.
The service tech I spoke to said the notes said sand poured out of the battery compartment. I know for a fact that the battery compartment was clean. He said he did not know that the lens error issue was a very common problem.
I asked them to send it back unrepaired. I will never buy a Cannon product again. Do not buy the Canon Power Shot SD1000 as it has a major flaw and they do not want to cover their warranty obligations.
The click was very subtle. Listen. You probably don't want to press on the lens assembly any more than you absolutely have to.
Thanks Don.
Regarding internet complaints, it is true when a product works normally people don't write compliments. I work in a business where the single product is between 1.5 & 5.6 million US dollars and we have formula 3-6 complaints normally means problem is real and not customer generated. Therefore I believe Canon Lens Error is a genuine engineering design error and it is a case of buyer beware. Fortunately camera is inexepensive.
it worked for me to
puch hard if you have
A note to the good people at Canon (in case they ever decide to visit this forum): You generally do good work and I'm willing to accept that this is an isolated and relatively minor problem in an otherwise excellent product. That said, you ABSOLUTELY MUST acknowledge your own culpability with this issue and not try to blame it on your customers or your reputation as a decent corporation will quickly begin to tarnish. I like the camera, but the stories I'm reading leave a sour taste in my mouth. No one is going to recommend your products if they feel they have been abused by customer service.
Along the lines of "Don C"'s idea, place the camera on its back:
1. If there is no gap in the "z-shaped" lens cover, gently push up on the top cover, and down on the bottom cover about halfway open, then release.
2. Do the same for the bottom half of the cover.
3. Remove & replace the battery, then try to power it back up (in photo mode).
This worked on ours.
Diificult to imagine going back to a larger camera. Space is very tight in a 100,000shp engine room.
Third Canon we've owned, third one heading to the trash. We tried all the suggestions on every forum on the net to no avail. (By the way, thanks for all the suggestions; I wish one of them had worked)
Canon customer service was downright nasty with us and the retailer that sold the most recent one to us wanted nothing to do with it.
This sd1000 was about a year old. Electronics, when properly cared for as we have done with this camera, should last far longer than this.
Linda nailed it; one shouldn't have to work so hard to get the camera to work.
My first attempts were not successful, but I was being too timid : needed a firm press - don't touch the black part in the center, it seems delicate however.
I had been using the camera outside and had placed it on the ground once or twice - didn't "drop it" exactly but didn't put it down super gently either. I am concluding the mechanism is delicate and easily "upset"
It seems as though technology these days is built to break... second Canon Elph to kick it after barely more than a year.
I tried to knock on the side of the camera WHILE it is turning on and the lens pop OPEN :]. You dont have to bang it, just knock on the side.
A whack finally worked, but I had to do it in the half-second between powering up the camera, and having it beep and give the error message. In that half second, the the lens does push out half a millimeter, higher on one side. When the camera beeps, the lens retracts, and the whacking wouldn't work.
It's turned on and extended the lens half a dozen times now, so I'm happy - Thanks!
cgi.ebay.com/Canon-SD1000-D...
If you have a different model or that link doesn't work, try this one:
search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZc...
Canon won't cover these lens errors and they quoted me over $150.00 to fix mine. These guys charged me a flat $69 for everything and they installed a Brand New lens and serviced the whole camera up, I don't know how it can get better than that. Just read all of their feedback, it's amazing and they earn it, these guys are fantastic. good luck
Hope this helps someone too....I hate Canon now LOL
I tried everything, then took your advise and banged the USB side of the camera in frustration while turning it on. Like you said - BAM! the lens popped out and the camera works fine. Super weird.
@Cannon: I really like your camera products - I find them to be very durable! I was using the camera for ecological fieldwork and was probably being pretty harsh with it: my hands were usually full of dirt and clay and I was constantly turning it on and off to snap pictures. After thinking "wow - this camera is still working, even after my abuse!" (That's when the lens error happened, of course). Still, I don't know if any other camera could hold up to the havoc I was giving my DS1000... and I will try to be more careful with it from here on out.
And I guess Canon makes a pretty durable camera?
Lots of laughs at myself and some of the comments above. Thanks
thanks to all of you for suggesting that you should just keep at it, banging away. Gave up last night but woke up early this morning planning to go buy a new camera. I gave it a few more raps as I was drinking my coffee and then the bang on the side was successful. So thanks to Don C who first suggested that we could fix it ourselves, but especially to those that said we can be tough with the camera and bang hard and keep at it!!!
While the camera is off, hold the function / OK button. Then power on while still holding the function button until you see the time on a blue screen (it will show military time). Then release the button and let it reset itself... Problem solved!!! That easy!
Do the reset as Jim is instructing and you'll have your camera back in a sec...
It's THAT easy...just do what the camera is asking you to do...
Thank you SO much Don C and everybody! You truly did save me
When I got home recently and found this post I followed Don C.'s instructions, and my camera work again! Thanks so much, Don C. :)
We have owned lots of Canons and even had some repaired for free after the warranty was up. Not sure what I will buy next, but I will check on-line first. The SD1000 has taken awesome pics and my wife loves it.
IF someone makes a camera with IS and the same shutter release speed I might upgrade, but so far I haven't found it.
I?m planning on buy a new digital camera for my daughter and I need a little help choosing one. My daughter currently has a Nikon L4 which has been taking mediocre pictures and has no sound for video. I?ve narrowed my choice down to the Cannon SD1000 and the Sony W90. I? leaning towards the Sony only because it has IS and the Cannon doesn?t, but after reading some reviews I?m not sure how important IS will be. The Sony also has 8.1 MP vs. 7.1 for the cannon. I?ve read that Cannon cameras have the best lenses and it?s hard to take a bad picture with or without IS with a Cannon. Any help would be great.
Thanks, Marc
1. 8MP vs 7MP is no practical difference. Both should be more than adequate for these 3X zoom cameras.
2. Image Stabilization could be important if you take many low-light non-flash pictures. In that case, neither of these cameras will do very well (and neither will most other point and shoot digital cameras).
3. Since you have a Nikon already, I assume you have some SD memory cards already too. The Canon SD1000 will make good use of them. The Sony will require buying their own brand of memory cards which cost a little more than SD's do.
4. The Canon camera is cheaper than the Sony.
5. Canon's have a better reputation in the long run as you have noted.
6. My bias is towards the Canon in general just so you know that.
Good luck and happy shooting.
Larry
While the Canon SD1000 has a lot going for it, image stabilization is NOT on the list. I suppose they considered it not necessary due to having only 3X zoom. Or perhaps it just wouldn't fit on the VERY small pocket camera.
Current compact Canon models WITH IS are: SD950is, SD870is, SD850is, SD800is, A650is, A720is, A710is and A570is.
Increasing a little in size but staying in the PowerShot type: S5is, SX100is and G9 complete the list of non-slr Canons.
You can research these by clicking on the "Resources" button near the bottom right hand corner of this page.
Good luck with your search and good shooting with whichever new camera you choose. (I have the G9 and carry it with me everywhere and really enjoy it a lot).
Larry
The pictures are saved at 640 X 480 pixels picture sized only and without any sound track. You have two choices of speed -- one frame every second or one frame every two seconds. At one frame per second it takes 64KB/second of storage and compresses a maximum of 2 hours down to 8 minutes. At one frame every other second it takes 32KB/second of storage and compresses a maximum of 2 hours down to 4 minutes. You must make certain that you don't let it fill the memory card up while it is still videoing. Calculate how much storage you have left before you begin and shut it off before you get close to the end of your storage. If you "run off the end" you may not be able to view the video at all AND you may have to reformat the card to use it again. That last statement is based on rumor as no one has reported exactly what you have to do to get going again. Just be extra careful and you won't have to find out!
This nifty little camera also has the ability to customize the self-timer and allows taking up to 10 photos spaced up to 30 seconds apart (not with flash though). In the self-timer mode you are not restricted to 640 X 480 pixels picture size.
Merry Christmas, Larry
But I'm curious. Did you lose it or did the camera not come with it? If you bought this camera new and it didn't come with the manual, was it also missing the software, warranty card, and other important accessories? If so, you may have bought something that is considered "grey market" ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_... ) merchandise.
If something is gray market, it means that - although you may have gotten a great deal on it - it doesn't come with a warranty that will be honored here in this country. Which means if something goes wrong with the camera, you'll either have to send it to China to repair or pay to have it fixed yourself.
Be warned.
1. On your computer, turn off hibernation, standby, and sleep modes.
2. Turn off the camera.
3. Connect the USB cable from your camera directly to the USB port on your computer. Do not connect through a USB hub.
4. Determine that charging is complete. The Ready/Battery charging light remains on while charging, then turns off when charging is complete. Charging is complete in approximately 3 hours.
In addition, Windows has this power saving feature where it will turn off inactive USB ports as a power saving feature. Course, it won't tell you when it does. You need to go into device manager and disable that feature.
I don't think it's a matter of "not charging." I think the camera is fried. Any comments to help me out??
UPDATE: Yesterday I went to BB (the competitor of where the camera was actually purchased) and purchased the wall charger. I bring it home and still no deal. As a result, I call the store the camera was purchased from (CC) and I explain the problem and see what they are "willing" to do (prior to carting myself all the way out to the store at the rate of $3.09/gallon). "Bring it in and see if there is one in the store to exchange it for. If not, there is a 15% restocking fee." Restocking fee? What's to be restocked?
I go to the store and wait for the teens behind Customer "Service" to stop gossiping and help the long line of returnees out. I was then directed to the camera section, where the youth behind that counter told me, "This can happen with any camera. It doesn't matter if it's a Sony, Kodak, or Nikon. This just happens." Apparently I had stupid written across my face--or he feels he is very convincing since he "works" with technology on a daily basis. In my mind I was mulling over, "whatever, punk. At $200-$1,000+ a pop, this doesn't 'just happen' with digital cameras." Fortunately, there were none in stock. NONE. Anywhere--not in my home state, not in the wharehouse, not in the I-store. NOWHERE. (Are your suspicions up, yet?)
I return to Customer Service where the employee tries to sell me on a different brand, altogether. No. Refund the money and I'll go elsewhere. She takes the camera out of the box, asks again what happened, I tell her what happened, as well as the complaints I have read online, she then tells me, "Woah! Since we don't have any in stock anywhere, they [Kodak] are probably recalling, or not restocking this model because of these problems." If you have read this far, perhaps you may want to return your lemon before it's too late and no one will do anything about it.
Off to find a more reliable model.
Look at Canon.
Got it home, pulled it out of the box, and tried to charge it via the included USB/suspicious grey connector combo that were included. And nothing. No blinking lights. Nothing. I tried charging it on my husbands laptop....no dice. I tried it in our combined twelve USB ports of varying models and types, and it simply would not charge.
The Kodak EasyShare is all packed up and ready to go back to Best Buy this evening. After reading some reviews today, I've discovered that this whole thing with the charging is a common issue. I was semi tempted to just go buy a charging dock, because I really wanted to love this camera. But at $70+ for that package, I'm better off just returning this camera and going with a digital SLR now that I've spent so much!
It charges fine. Battery life actually lasts a long time
BUT...where is the battery icon to tell you how much is left? I coudln't find that anywhere!
any help?
but where is the icon for power supply? !!!!!!!
i like the camera. it takes so/so pictures, it only cost me 125 bucks at kmart a couple months back. does exactly what i want.
BUT COME ON NO POWER INDICATOR!
i would think a camera would have a check list when getting made,
lens - check
eye piece - check
shoot button - check
zoom - check
battery - check
flash - check
random options(like color settings, image mode, size) - check
well what did they forget???
A power indicator!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
who cares if you can't charge the thing, how the hell are you going to tell that it needs charging?!?!?!?!
love it actually i paid only $97.00 dlls including
tax at target the thing is that i cant believe
this camera doesn't have a power indicator :S
camera gives deadly shock
This power leakage is more than enough to spoil you fun filled holidays .
The products marketed by well Known retailers are selling at pair combination and promotional offers please see there are two write-ups in this forum
mouthshut.com/review/Kodak_...
mouthshut.com/review/Kodak_...
request the people not to buy this products
if by mistake if you bought one there is No guarantee this will work or you will get the service
in our contry our law is not consumer prtotective and comen man canot fight with the big comapnies so all ways beter to safe paly
I am dissapointed that it had no battery indicator... but other then that for a non professional photographer i think its ok..
I'm getting the same no-charge issue, and it will flash 3 times on the red and power off. I bought it for my wife for Christmas and it hasn't seen a whole lot of use! Sounds like grounds for a class action suit if there's enough people.
and now it wont even do that!
ive had this camera since last christmas and did not have any problems with it so i dont know why its just doing this now!
I just ordered a new USB cable because I have lost my other one..now it won't even charge im thinking its the battery but I'm afraid if it doesn't work!!
I found it at Best Buy for like $10.
I also don't know why they don't have the power indication. My friend's daughter bought a brand new Nikon Coolpix and the camera doesn't show a battery indicator until the battery is low and needed to be charged then the indicator shows up. May be the battery indicator take up space. Go figure.
i experienced the SOMETHING in usb CHarging!..:(!...cause my charger was broken..i dunno why...
i tried to connect it in pc ..it really won't work...
i tried in the USB port in my DVD player..yay it worked.....
and i noticed...when your charging it your battery should not be empty..--charge it immediately when u felt u used enough!..
Larry
Can we download a driver, or is additional purchases needed? Can anyone please tell me what we need to do to get pics from the NEW camera to the computer? Thanks so much!
This doesn't sound lilke an OS issue; it sounds more like a video driver/video card issue. How old is your computer's hardware? If the hardware and video settings aren't set appropriately, then your higher resolution images might not display.
If you right click your desktop and select properties, you can then select the "Settings" tab. From there, there should be a screen resolution slider bar at the bottom left, and a color settings drop down box on the bottom right. I would change the color settings to the highest available. I would also optimize your screen resolution by sliding it further to the right. I hope this helps.
Andrew
The basic disadvantage is that you don't really know what you are getting most of the time.
Larry
BrendaS.
if you are using vista, you can try this:
go to C:\windows\inf
and find this file: INFCACHE.1
delete it!
it should work!
after having used vista for sometime, i have changed back to win xp, so i don't remember the exact steps to solve your problem. but i remember i had the same problem trying to delete the file. the problems lies in the fact that this file is normally read only, so you need to edit your access level. you probably should do the following:
right click on the file name, select delet/edit as administrator or something similar. then look for the tabs for changing your level of access. then you'll be able to delete it. this file is a cache file generated each time you start your computer, so don't worry about deleting it. next time you restart your computer, a new file with the same file name but without usb errors will show up. good luck.
1. Attach camera via USB and turn on
2. Right click on Computer and pick Manage
3. Select Device Manager
4. Find the canon device in the tree. It will have the yellow exclamation point next to it.
5. Right click and select uninstall. This will uninstall the driver for the camera.
6. Turn off camera.
7. Turn on camera.
8. Vista will detect the camera and reinstall the driver.
Note that you might also need to delete the INFCACHE.1 file, although this alone did not work for me.
While the Kodak brand has been around for a while, I have heard that there are quality issues with their digital camera line. I'm not sure the 513 is listed here, but the C533 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is, and it has an overall rating of a C out of a F through A grading list. There are a lot better cameras out there.
If you're looking for something in the same price range and about the same size, I would recommend the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Panasonic FX30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I have had a Canon pocked camera for almost 6 years and it still works great, and the Panasonic has some great features like a wider angle lens for group shots and Image Stabilization. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Currently compact flash cards are used in digital SLR's. I don't see anything more recent than the S500 which uses the same battery as your S200. Sorry.
Larry
240 minutes of playback. That's one or the other, not both.
This information from Canon website at www.canonusa.com
Looking at samples, they're pretty comparable. I think the SD1000 captures a more natural image, though.
As a follow up, I took some pictures that are very "blurry" is there any way that I'll be able to view these clearly on my PC? What can I do to adjust the view?
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
Setting your camera to a lower setting doesn't help either. Essentially, the image is reduced to the set quality after it has been processed by the CCD. As such, the light still goes through those pixels, only that after some basic processing steps pixels "thrown out" to make the image to the desired setting and size. This process is called "Choking" and that will cause Artifacting and noise. Additionlly, you'll also loose details of the recorded image.
Some cameras have written into their firmware a process called "binning," which merges the signals of multiple pixels to make larger pixels. Usually at a 4-1 ration. This will essentially turn a 12-megapixel camera into a 3-megapixel camera. And that gives you the opposite problem of too many pixels on the chip ... you now have too few and as such, will run into artifacting instead of noise.
The best thing to do is make sure you don't ever really go above ISO 400 unless absolutely necessary and then using exposure compensation to make up for that compromise.
Now, Jaye, back to your followup questions. Blurry pictures are usually due to either camera shake, or falling victim to the camera's shutter lag, which makes the action pass before the shot is taken or the photographer pulling the camera away before the shutter has really engaged. You can combat all that by making sure your camera's image stabilization is engaged and most importantly ... PRE FOCUSING. This involves pressing your camera's shutter button down 1/2 way to lock in the focus. While keeping the button half way pressed, recompose your picture, pan with the action, and then depress the button the rest of the way to take the picture. Doing this will reduce that shutter lag by as much as 80%. You can also use your flash - even in daylight - to freeze the action and make your subject "pop."
As for after you have the picture saved onto your PC, I'd recommend Picasa ( picasa.google.com/ ). It's a great photo management tool for sharpening photos a tad, taking out red eye, and many other options. And it's free! A solid "pay" option is Adobe Photoshop Elements 6.0, which also has sharpening tools.
But understand, any post photo solution will only be able to do so much with the original image. And sharpening digitally will have it's trade offs of increased noise as well.
In the end, getting more experienced with your camera and experimenting with all features will enable you to improve your photography and take better photos.
Thanks for your help!
josh
I like the clarity and more natural colors that the both Canon's have of the LZ7.
This camera does not have wireless capabilities, but the [url=digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... S51c[url] does. It works over a home wireless network, and I don't think it will hook up through Bluetooth. I have not heard of a camera that can do that yet.
Andrew
Glad we could help. If you feel we've answered your question sufficiently, please mark best answer. If not, we would be glad to further answer any other questions you might have. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
This camera does not accept AA batteries, only the specialy sized lithium ion battery. Good luck.
Andrew
Andrew
The other possibility is that the camera's lens has been jarred out of adjustment. The camera will beep a few times and the LCD will display a little E18 in the lower-left corner. The lens gets stuck, and refuses to move either to focus the lens or to retract when powered off.[/i]
If your camera is still under warranty, the best thing you can do have Canon should fix it.
If your camera is out of warranty, or if Canon refuses to repair it for free, the one thing you can try is to If you gently, and I do mean GENTLY push against the lens with the PALM of your hand as you turn it on, it may cause it to depress back into the camera. If that doesn't work, and you can't reset it or turn it on/off several times, then you may have to send it in for a repair estimate anyway.
But understand that the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
Thanks.
If no notch or tab is located, you could be experiencing something that was reported on Canon S400 cameras and is correctable.
I found this elsewhere on this website:
(Amy Smith - 7/14/07)
As suggested in an earlier post:
- Removed the CF card
- Held down 'Menu' key until I could reset to factory default settings
- Popped in card
- Formatted it
- Restarted camera.
Well, it didn't work for me & not wanting to unscrew all the tiny screws and open up my camera
I just reformatted the card a 2nd time. This time it worked! What a relief!
Maybe that will help. Also, others have posted that they have had Canon fix this problem for free.
To adapt to your model camera -- first job is remove the SD card. next is resetting the camera. each model is different so you may have to read the manual for the procedure for this model. Some cameras require removal of the battery for several minutes then replacing it and turning the camera on. It is similar to rebooting a computer to reset everything to the factory defaults. Next reinsert the card and format it in the camera. Be aware that formatting the card will erase everything on it. If that is not acceptable, then buy a card reader and transfer everything on the card to your computer via the card reader before reformatting it in the camera.
Let me know if that still doesn't do it for you. Also, was the camera working normally before this occurred? Did you use the computer to delete images or format the card? What brand and specification are your cards? Size in GB and speed by Class I, II or III?
Again, thanks so much.
Carol
And I tryed to format camera: BUT my Canon doesn't allow to do it (says - card locked). And my laptop don't want to recognize memory card anymore (also - doesn't allow to do anything with card).
SD Memory Card: Intenso, 2 Gb (intenso.de/product_pic.phtm...
I tryed to change memory cards: original Canon memory card still works well, but it's too small to work normally with camera.
My doubt is regarding SD1000. If i connect my camera with pc using the USB chord, the wizard says that there are no pictures in ur camera but those pictures can be viewed from the camera. any suggetions?
mycamera says the memory card is full ,but my computer wont show anything on the card.whats wrong ?
1111 FRUSTRATING. AS I BOUTGHT THIS MODEL BECAUSE CANON HAS BEEN IN THE BUSINESS FOREVER. THERE ARE ONLY 14 PICTURES ON MY 2 GB MEM CARD
ANY MORE SUGGESTIONS? ALTHOUGH FORMATING SHOULD BE EASY EVERYTHING I HAVE TRIED. DOESN'T SEEM TO UNLOCKED IT.....
can anyone help me to unlock the memory card that is locked in my cannon camera model A580 A1AF. I tried to move the small switch like thing in the memory card up and down, still it is not functioning.
Pllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
2) The first thing to try is resetting your camera. Check your users manual for "reset" or "initialize" and follow their instructions. If you don't find anything in the manual then try this generic method -- remove the battery and leave it out of the camera for at least 10 minutes. Then replace the battery and turn the camera on and try it.
3) Another option in this situation is to buy an SD card reader $10-20. It does require that you remove the SD card from the camera. Plug the card reader into your computer's USB port, then plug the SD card into the reader. You should be able to drag and drop the files. OR even better than drag and drop is download Picasa2 free from Google. It will transfer your pictures and keep them organized. It also has a lot of other useful functions all of which are easy to learn.
4) If these methods have not worked for you then you may have to go online and download the F-recovery software (or something similar) and use it to restore those hiding images and transfer them into your computer. Here is the URL
filerecoverytools.com/produ...
Best wishes and let me know if I can help further.
What? You say you already have a Class II or III card? Well then, it could be the computer processor or software that can't keep up. Also, a lot of other things can cause skips and blips in video. Check the card first and let me know how that goes.
Brooke
You can actually do this. If you use a USB memory card reader ( amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?u... ) instead of your camera for the exchange between your computer and your memory card. The memory card will act as another drive on your computer that way. Good luck.
Andrew
If you have an SD slot on your printer, an SD memory card should plug right into it and print directly. If you're using an SDHC card, it may not work on your printer if it is an older printer (more than a year old). Check your printer's manual as well as any updated information on its manufacturer's website. You may be able to download a driver to get the SDHC cards to work. Good luck.
Andrew
I was referring to Brooke's question (uploading to camera from the PC via the USBus).
With your printer slot, it may only a read and not a write. You would have to check your printer specs to make sure. What model and manufacturer is it?
Andrew
It's an inexpensive Canon Pixma MP470, about 6 months old I believe. It has SD, MMC, MS and CF slots.
Rich
ps can't get enuf Canons :)
I think those slots are just one way for printing. You won't be able to use it as an additional memory slot like a usb memory card reader.
Andrew
Worst case, you get your camera back and take it to these guys: darntoothysam.com/servlet/S...
andyozment.com/guides/broke...
As well, I called Canon Canada's parts department (1-888-832-4719) and was quoted a price of $26.35 + $10 or $17 for shipping, while the price of the mentioned ebay seller was $40 + $14.
I used Canon Elph LCD Replacements Instructions ( cannonlcdrepair.blogspot.com/ )
I used these directions:
<a href="cannonlcdrepair.blogspot.co... lcd fix</a>
usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...
As for the Sony Camera.... Sony tends to have a higher noise reduction than Canon so the pictures are not as sharp.
The canon Sd1000 and Sd1100 are essentially the same camera with the sd1100 being the newer model. Despite having 1 more megapixel and a few newer features (like motion prediction) the SD1000 is a much better camera because it takes clearer pictures and it is faster. Canon decided to cram 1 megapixel too many onto the SD1100 so the picture quality of the 1100 is noticeably better.
I do not have any experience with the SD750 so I won't comment on that one but honestly the SD1000 is very compact and produces excellent results... I don't think you will be dissapointed with that one.
Frankly, there's not a dime's worth of real difference from my p.o.v. with those Canon's. I do agree with the SONY sharpness issue though.
My suggestion is ... go with the one less mp, you won't even notice it in snapshots anyway.
I was actually making the case for the SD1000 which has LESS megapixels than the SD1100. Your comments about megapixels and sensor size are pretty well known by camera afficianados but the general public has yet to catch on.... although I think the word is spreading.
There are some good high megapixel cameras out there but not in this size or price range. Not counting the SD750 (for which I have no experience) I would agree that the SD1000 with less megapixels is the better camera.
Enjoy your new camera!!
they have roughly the same specs
my choice for for this type of photo is the panasonic tz3
the above cameras have only short zooms the panasonic has a 10x optical zoom which is better for ariel photography
here is an example of a tz3 used at a airshowi it was taken at 0.001 sec (1/1000)
flickr.com/photos/bighitter...
What operating system are you using on your Dell D505? That may be what is preventing you from using the camera.
The camera also synchs using a USB 2.0 interface. If you have an older interface, that could also be the problem.
Andrew
I'm using USB 2.0 interface and have not had problems with it.
Because your camera is recognized on other computers you use, I would say it is something wrong with the Latitude D505. While you can look for updated camera drivers on Canon's site ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ). You shouldn't need drivers for XP.
Try the other USB ports on the computer and see if all of them give you issues. I have seen single USB ports go bad on computers before as well. Other than that, it might be something internal on the computer itself. Dell ( support.dell.com/support/to... ) might be the best place to go for additional support.
Andrew
My USB ports work fine.
When I plugged the camera into my USB tree, my computer told me that my camera (correctly identified by the computer) was a high speed device and needed to be plugged directly into my USB port.
When I turn my camera on, I hear the sound that the computer has acknowledged that a device has been plugged in but the camera doesn't show up anywhere.
The Canon site doesn't offer me anything because I don't need drivers.
When my computer wants me to go through the process to install the camera, I come to a place where there are camera companies listed, but not Canon. I think that that must be an XP issue.
You said you plugged it into the USB tree and it said your camera needed to be plugged directly into the computer? I'm assuming you did this. If you're just trying to download photos to your computer, you might have better luck using a SD card reader ( amazon.com/Sandisk-MobileMa... ). Good luck.
Andrew
I have no problems when I use an sd card reader. I am trying to get around that necessity, however. I'm thinking that there is a simple resolution that someone will be able to give me. So far, no luck.
You might try going to Windows.com ( windows.com ) to download any available updates to XP. It may be a patch issue that you just need to download and install.
Andrew
In the set up information (I believe for recognition of hardware--images) through the computer software Nikon is listed but Canon is not. Perhaps that is where the problem is and I can't seem to find a way to get Canon on the list.
You would have to go through either Window's or Dell to get updated drivers (if possible). Good luck to you.
Andrew
If that works, great. It just might if you didn't actually physically format the card. If it doesn't work, there is recovery software you can try.
What you can do is go to <a href="photosrecovery.com/"> this site </a> and download a copy of the Photo-recovery software.
Run the software and follow the instructions, it should recover the pictures for you.
However if your objective is to transfer the pictures from the camera to the computer, a card reader will do the job very well.
Win XP will recognize most card reader, and the contents of the card, as soon as it is plug to the USB port.
What you need to do next is to copy all the pictures to a folder in the computer.
could you help me too? ;) I have a problem with copying some files from camera to pc. Some video files with file size more than 400-500 Mb are copied with zero size and no errors displayed after that, but files of course doesn't work. Do you have any ideas or solutions for that? The SD card is 4 Gb and 2 my card readers does not recognize it.
also some of the pictures on the memory card were changeged and now i can't open, copy or erase them, what do i do?
Follow the instructions given on the page and you will get your pictures back.
Just a gentle reminder, do not remove the card when the computer is reading it.
If time is not a constraint, since you have already started , might as well finish it, although I believe by this time, you probably have recovered all the pictures.
It is not often you come across such problem and when you do, there is a way out as you have also found out yourself.
Just remember that if you want to re-use the card again, use a ' memory card wiper ' to wipe it first before re-formatting. For the matter, a ' demo ' version card wiper will do the job very well.
I ended up purchasing the program you suggested cause after downloading the pics with PCInspector, they all turned out truncated!
Recover my photo retreived my pics within a few hours and they turned out great.
Thanks for the advise!
What have others done that have had this same problem?
First timer usually break the clips while trying to separate the two halves. So be very careful if you want to DIY.
The LCD is connected to the circuit board by a flex cable.What you need to do is to remove it and take out the LCD, replace the new LCD, reinsert the cable firmly and replace the cover.
Sound simple, but a lot of patience is needed.
2. If you want to go ahead with it, read <a href="andyozment.com/guides/broke... this article first </a> before sourcing for the LCD.
3. LCD protector would cost around $10-15, but be prepared to pay $50 or more for the LCD.
LiOn batteries do begin to lose capacities over time, but certainly not within a year. NOt to the point of utterly failing. But I suppose it can happen. What I would do is see if it fails with another battery. Sometimes you can go into a "mom and pop" store and they'll have an extra charged battery you can stick into it to see if you can replicate the problem. If so, then you know it's the camera. If not, then it's the battery.
i really would appriciate it if somebody would help me!!!
So sorry to hear that!
I have experienced this before. it really hurts when we lose our photos which hold our happy moments.
You still have an option !
Google for Image Recovery Freewares. You sure will get few freewares listed. Download one and try to recover your deleted photos from the memory card.
I have tried once and recovered few shots. Unfortunately, i dont have the software with me to share with you.
Good Luck.
Then again, why bother. A $20 USB Memory card reader will make the card show up as a drive on the computer. From there, it's a simple drag and drop.
Thanks
Absent that, if it still has a warranty, you'd be well served to take advantage of it.b
I have to admit I am astonished at how many times we see the story: A camera sits on a shelf for several months, was working fine when set on the shelf, and won't work at all after sitting that length of time despite charging the battery! Could this just be a worn out battery that won't hold a charge?
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...
It may also be it's out of alignment even if you think it isn't. Try cycling it on/off about 6 or 7 times to see if it works it's way back into alignment. If not, then I'd send it in for a repair estimate. But it's probably cheaper to get a new camera.
I've reverted to all the original settings but no flash. What could I try to get it working again? Or can that part break or quit working? Is it fixable for cheap? Or is it time to get another camera and what can I get that is cheap but takes easy pictures but would prefer one that does better night shots and allow me to focus on subject making the rest a bit blurry. I love those type of pictures.
THANKS
A card reader is about $10-20 and will cause your sd card to be read as a drive on the PC. Then it's a simple drag and drop. And it doesn't matter what OS you're using.
Jason
Language: English (change)
Thanks James for you reply but that is not the answer I was looking for. That's the reason I added the last line of my question, which was to try and avoid the "typical" answer of "better off left alone and let a professional do it". I actually have already disassembled it, removed all the parts, cleaned it and reassembled it and it is working perfectly now. No buttons sticking, no pictures automatically snapping now when you turn it off, so far so good.
Just in case anyone down the future might want to know the same thing and find this post later on, this is the way it comes apart!
1. If you are looking at the front of the camera you will see 2 screws on the LH side (looking at the front) go ahead and remove them.
2. Next you will see 2 screws on the RH side (with the strap) remove those and then the plastic piece the strap is attached to will come loose (you might have to remove the screws from the bottom first)
3. Next you will need to also remove the 2 screws on the bottom that I mentioned above. (these were the most difficult on my camera to remove) so be careful to not strip the heads of the screws.
4. After you have removed the 6 screws then take a pocket knife of something thin and gently pop off the silver front and back covers (silver on my camera, with the body being black)
5. once you have done this, you will see the the body (center part) of the camera has a band around it, remove this. (Oh, I forgot to mention there is a screw that holds this on you will need to remove it...sorry I have already reassembled my camera and doing this by memory)
6. Once you have removed the band you should have the piece where the button is to snap a picture still attached. You need to be careful here when removing this so that you do not brake it as this piece is were you attach your USB adapter. VERY GENTLY, raise up and unsnap this piece. Once you have done this, I would suggest that you go no further or do so at your own risk! I did but there is really not that much more that you need to access at this point.
7. As far as cleaning this is the method I used and I am not suggesting that you do this nor am I saying that it is the correct method in cleaning your camera therefore I am assuming NO RESPONSIBILITY if you damage your camera. Although, mine is working perfectly with absolutely no problems do this at your own risk! I used Q-tips and rubbing alcohol. Dip the !-tip into the alcohol, when you remove the Q-tip shake the excessive alcohol off the Q-tip (you might need to squeeze the tip gently too) it should just feel damp, almost dry to the touch. Then I just wiped off all the "gunk" that was on the ribbons from the Mt. Dew.
8. I also did this to clean the picture viewing screen as well...(I was worried about this but I didn't have an option if I wanted to clean it up, I personally did not have any problems and the screen looks like it is brand new) If you do not need to remove anything other than dust or something along those lines I would suggest you either wipe if off with a lent free cloth and maybe use regular window cleaner as U used this as well.
9. Once you have finished cleaning reassemble you camera. Oh yeah you will need to make sure the switch that chances you from picture, video, and viewing mode is in the down position or in the same position that it is on the cover that you are reattaching. Also the center piece "the band" will need to go back under the front and back cover. (there are some little ears that will slide up and under the two covers so pay attention or you will be taking the cover back off l like I did...
DISASSEMBLE YOUR CAMERA AT YOU OWN RISK! THE MYTHOD I OUTLINED ABOVE IS FROM MY PESONAL EXPERENCE AND WORKED FOR ME WITH NO PROBLEMS. I ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILIY IF YOU DO THIS AND CAN BARELY WALK AND CHEW GUM AT THE SAME TIME.
I would give you the same advice that James gave me BUT, I know (like me) if you have gone through the trouble of doing a search and found this site, you are ready for the challange and have already weighted you options and thought it threw. So I know that is NOT the answer you are looking for or what you want to hear.
Good luck.
Thanks again.
You will find more details on pages 16 and 17 of your users manual, basic.
Thanks!!!