Hey! You should know that Canon has released a newer version of this product: the Canon Powershot SD1300 IS.
Canon Powershot SD1200 IS
Editor's Review
The Canon SD1200 was a typically excellent SD-series shooter from Canon, light on flashy specs but strong on image quality and performance. It was one of the last compact cameras to sport an optical viewfinder (though Canon has since brought that feature back on one new model) and was exceptionally popular throughout 2009. Alas, its time has passed, and has since been replaced. We'll miss this camera.
Editor's Review
The Canon SD1200 was a typically excellent SD-series shooter from Canon, light on flashy specs but strong on image quality and performance. It was one of the last compact cameras to sport an optical viewfinder (though Canon has since brought that feature back on one new model) and was exceptionally popular throughout 2009. Alas, its time has passed, and has since been replaced. We'll miss this camera.
Specifications
- 10 megapixels
- Movie mode with sound (60 minutes / 4GB)
- JPEG file format
- 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Lens-shift image stabilization
- Face-detection auto focus
- ISO 80-1600
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- Secure Digital memory card storage
- Lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: SD1200IS PK
- UPC: 013803106442
- Release Date: Apr 01, 2009
Shop for SD1200 IS Accessories
Canon Powershot SD1200 IS Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Canon Power Shot SD1200 IS
DIGITAL ELPH
The Canon powershot SD1200 or the Canon Powershot SD1300 IS ?? I just want a nice little compact camera with good MP and good zoom but view finder would be handy. Any suggestions? Thanks. Also under $200
Use a tripod if you can.
A few other things to try and resetting your camera, cleaning your battery contacts with a pencil eraser, and updating your firmware. Good luck.
The SD1200's image quality is also superior to either Nikon. I'd go with the SD1200.
& PS SD1200 $148.00, Walmart $Cdn.
I have done comparisons using your recommended links, with the SD1200 coming out ahead in shutter/shooting speeds. On the Imaging site the resolution of the SD1200 is somewhat crisper.
However, when implementing the "unaltered original camera image" the results of the A480 photo shows greater resolution, is clear and crisp whereas the SD1200 is dull, blurred and grainy.
What does this mean? Is the A480 photo pretty much ready to go with little or no software enhancement? Also any comments on the pros/cons of selecting one of these cameras over the other would be appreciated. Price is not a deciding factor but I question that perhaps the cheaper A480 is the better camera. Thanks!
As for it being a better camera, that's debatable. And IIRC the A480 may have had to real with a faulty CCD issue.
Also in another comment re: A480 you recommend the fastest memory card possible - IIRC Class 8. Could you give me an example, brand etc.
I will also consider the FH20. Thanks again!
CCD = charge-coupled device (it's a type of image sensor used in low-cost cameras).
The first one I bought had at least six, two of which were very bright and right in the middle of the picture. I exchanged the camera for another SD1200is, and the next one had at least three bright white stuck pixels. A stuck pixel in the LCD display I could have reluctantly tolerated, but not in the CCD. It ends up in every picture taken!
This can't be normal, can it?
Also, the filesize for an average picture from this 10mp camera is roughly the same as the pictures from my old 4mp camera. That can only mean that the pictures from this new 10mp camera are much more compressed than my old camera. Upon examing the 10mp images, they are in fact full of horrible JPEG compression artifacts. (viewed at 100% of original size)
What's the point of having 2.5 times as many pixels if you ruin the images with overcompression? It's like listening to a 128kbs MP3.
This is progress? pffftt...
That said, since your wife probably wants more zoom, and you're looking to "consolidate" your gadgets so to speak, I think the FH20 might be the better choice for you. It shoots in 720p HD, like the Flip does. I think it uses a lower-quality codec than the Flip, but the quality shouldn't be too much of an issue. Hope this helps, good luck.
Which one should I buy? Even though there isn't much upgrade to SD1300, is it worth to buy SD1300 since its newer version or just stick with SD1200? Please help..
Why is the image and picture quality worst than an older model Canon camera? How can I check if my megapixel setting is set properly? Is it better to use automode or manual setting?
Bill, North Carolina
SD780?
Next, check out imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
The bottom line though, is that with the exception of subtle differences, they are essentially the same camera because they're from the same SD line.
Le agradezco Respuesta su.
Thank you for your reply
Traducción - Las cosas que usted está planteando, no son realmente en nuestro pervue aquí. Este es un foro basado en Q & A del sitio. Para conocer los términos de envío, y todo lo demás, tiene que ponerse en contacto con los vendedores individuales. Deben tener una página en su parcela de términos y condiciones. Probablemente el mejor lugar para empezar es Amazon.com. buena suerte.
Traducido con Google Translate.
Answer: The things you are asking about aren't really in our pervue here. This is a forum based Q&A site. To find out shipping terms, et all, you need to get in contact with the individual vendors. They should have a page on their site covering terms and conditions. Probably the best place to start is Amazon.com. good luck.
Translated with Google Translate.
I&... also look at amazon.com, they do ship internationally.
But, it just so happens that the SD1200 has a less-wide angle lens than many. The SD1300's lens is wider, if that helps, and it's a very similar camera.
And while you're at the store, UPGRADE TO WINDOWS 7. Far more stable, more secure, and a much better computing experience.
So to blame Canon for this isn't really fair unless there's a widespread issue similar to this with other cards that are recommended.
a100 IS - which is best?
Are the bodies of these cameras plastic or metal?
Which is better lithium ion battery or AA battery?
As for which battery is better, that's a matter of opinion. Rechargeable lithium ion are great because you don't need to spend money on new batteries all the time (better for the environment too). AA batteries can come in handy if you plan to take a lot of pictures but won't be anywhere near an outlet to recharge the battery (like a long camping trip). Hope this helps.
I bought a Sanyo VPC-T1284 and am disappointed with it. Its not very user friendly. I need something user friendly but I am not totally clueless. For example, I know you need to push the button down halfway for focus before taking the picture.
At this point I have done so much research that I am totally lost. I need a user friendly, not totally dumbed down camera for under $150. I have had good luck with Kodak and Fuji in the past.
My pictures are in two categories-animate (such as my son playing with his bunnies, etc.) and inanimate close ups (my crochet projects).
Is this too much information for a suggestion?
Press the <MENU> button to display the Rec. or Play menu.
- Use the button to select the (Set up) menu.
- Use the or button to select (clock icon).
Use the or button to select a field (year, month, day, hour, minute and date format), and the or button to change its value.
To put the settings into effect, press the <FUNC/SET> button after setting the date format.
Press the <MENU> button to redisplay the Rec. or Play screen.
I am new to digital cameras, pls. help
I am new to digital cameras, pls. help
can you zoom while in video mode?
what is the shutter-lag time from when you push the button?
can you zoom while in video mode? No. The motor noise would be picked up by the mic.
what is the shutter-lag time from when you push the button? HALF SECOND (.5)
One thing you can try fairly easily (and for free). Download Picasa3 software. It is free from Google. Use your card reader or computer card slot instead of your camera with USB cord. Use the import button to download your images. Next use the format button to reformat the card. Under normal circumstances it is best to reformat cards in the camera, but in this situation I would try using the computer and Picasa3.
Having said that, most cameras this size/ level have something around a 3x zoom, so I can't really suggest anything better, unless you're willing to go up in size (and price). 3x is pretty standard for a pocket-type point and shoot. So it's not anything that's wrong with this model, persay, just a catch you might run into unless you want to drag a heavy super-zoom camera around DC. My personal opinion is that you'd be perfectly happy with this one. :)
The image quality difference between this and DIGIC 3 cameras like the A1100 is amazing.
Would advise everyone to go for SD1200 i.s.o A1100 despite the non-generic battery (which is the only -ve IMHO).
pete4814
My impression is that the SD1200 is NOT just a new version of the SD 1100. Your mileage may differ.
Filing highly NOT recommended. Lithium batteries are susceptible to fire. Really. Don't alter lithium batteries.
Suggested retail price for the SD 1200 is $200, the SD 1100 retail was $140.
Be careful to compare equal "kits" as some advertisers lower their price by selling you only the camera (no accessories) and then overcharge you for the individual accessories that normally come with the camera. Also, some dealers will sell cameras that do NOT have a warranty! Beware of unusually low prices.
I take photos and tell me who has no memory. The just bought, will not let me take pictures because it says to have no memory
translated with Google translate
traducido con Google Translate
That's correct. The Canon SD1200 has no onboard memory, so you need a memory card to save your pictures. That camera takes a SD/SDHC Memory Card, MultiMediaCard, MMC Plus Card, HC MMC Plus Card
translated with Google translate
this camera is an entry level camera. a more suitable camera would be the panasonic lumix lx3
here is a link to flickr set by Dave Fayram which shows the lx3 at its best
flickr.com/photos/davefayra...
2. Press the <MENU> button.
3. A screen like the one below will appear on the monitor.
Operate the <directional buttons> to select the [Shooting] menu.
Operate the <directional buttons> to set [Date Stamp] to [Date] or [Date & Time].
After making these settings, press the <MENU> () button.
4. If you set [Date Stamp], [DATE] will appear on the LCD monitor.
If [DATE] does not appear, press the <DISP.> button a few times to switch the screen display.
5. When shooting with this setting, the date will be embedded in the image as shown below.
[Date]
[Date & Time]
Warning:
The date, its font and color, and the position where it is displayed cannot be changed. Also, dates and times recorded with [Date Stamp] cannot be deleted.
Still, it's getting fantastic reviews and it's certainly worthy of consideration considering it's price point and lens speed.
CAnon sd 1100 8 megapixels but the greatest fastest photo taken on top of each other,. MISS that ;
Remember the old addage ... if it sounds too good to be true ... it is. And since you're wondering, I'd say listen to your instincts and look elsewhere.
KEEP AWAY!
thanks
Dan
the sony wxi is a great camera with lots of usefull features
the downside is that it uses sony only memory cards and sony only cables which are expensive.
my choice is panasonic tz5 it might not the latest model but it is great camera which uses standard sd memory cards
the tz5 also can use non panasonic batteries which the later models cannot
Thanks
But also, IIRC, Sony's W line suffers from severe noise levels at higher ISOs. Though that smile shutter is a nice feature.
By contrast, Canon's DIGIC IV processor does a better job handling the low light and higher ISO settings. But regardless, you want to avoid falling into the "more megapixels is better myth" now matter what camera you buy. Stuffing more megapixels onto a chip without enlarging the size of that chip only serves to make the camera LESS sensitive to light, not more.
Next, check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
The bottom line though, is that with the exception of subtle differences, they are very similar cameras with the exception of their size. The A Series also uses AA batteries, while the SD uses a proprietary lithium ion battery.
thanks
Dan
The thrifty fox Photographers
Columbia,Md 21044
mps
So far, these are the cameras that I've looked at for him: Panasonic Lumix TS1, Olympus Tough 8000, Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1, Panasonic Lumix ZS3 and now, the Canon Powershot SD1200IS.
Here's a little bit about him and his camera use.
- He goes backpacking so it would be nice to have a durable & light weight camera
- A zoom lens for taking photos of things far away like up on a mountain, and maybe 4X or more optical zoom
- He's also a teacher and takes a lot of people pictures. Image quality is important.
- Maybe 10 megapixels resolution
- We have a video camera so the video aspect is not priority, although would be nice.
- Price - No more than about $350
His Birthday is soon, so any quick help would be most appreciated. Thank you, Virginia
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, thereís more data on the chip, but the chip canít absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since weíre talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply arenít being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
The key is the camera having a corresponding increase in chip size to go with that increased megapixel. the SD line enjoys improved performance thanks to the DIGIC IV processor. But in the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
I was wondering - is there a simple experiment that can test this? I note that many digicams allow selection of a number of options of photo quality - which in some cases is described as the numder of Megapixels. Often this can be 10Mp, or 5Mp or 2Mp or 1Mp or something like that. So, my question is, by taking an essentially identical photo with the same camera at two different settings, are we really testing this theory - or are we by selecting a setting below the theoretical maximum of a camera in fact not really testing the same thing as a camera that is manufactured to take photos at that same (lower) MP rating.
I wish they would make an 8MP camera with the latest processors and HD video. That I would buy.
You can use a Spyder to calibrate your monitor, but it’s important to keep in mind that the screen generates color differently than the printer, or the camera, does. One is projected, while the printer is reflected. Secondly, color standards aren’t accurate on screens vs. printing. (called “Gamut”) Calibration of the monitor and the printer has to be done, and then have the color profile applied properly. It’s a house of colorful cards. Much easier to have things printed professionally if you’re looking for an accurate color.
for comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
Function > Recording Pixels > Post card
Step two sets the date to on/off :
Record Menu > Date off/on.
Date stamp is set to off by default and there is no way to remove the date once it is stamped on the picture.
(hat tip Bukit)
Thanks
Jeff
Some cameras have written into their firmware a process called "binning," which merges the signals of multiple pixels to make larger pixels. Usually at a 4-1 ratio. This will essentially turn a 12-megapixel camera into a 3-megapixel camera. And that gives you the opposite problem of too many pixels on the chip ... you now have too few and as such, will run into artifacting instead of noise.
-SD 1200 IS is 10 megapixels, SD 1100 IS 8 megapixels!
If you have the money to upgrade to the new one is faster and better, if not, SD 1100 IS is fine too:)
Function > Recording Pixels > Post card
Step two sets the date to on/off :
Record Menu > Date off/on.
Date stamp is set to off by default and there is no way to remove the date once it is stamped on the picture.
2. Press the <MENU> button.
3. A screen like the one below will appear on the monitor.
Operate the <directional buttons> to select the [Shooting] menu.
Operate the <directional buttons> to set [Date Stamp] to [Date] or [Date & Time].
After making these settings, press the <MENU> button.
4. If you set [Date Stamp], [DATE] will appear on the LCD monitor.
If [DATE] does not appear, press the <DISP.> button a few times to switch the screen display.
5. When shooting with this setting, the date will be embedded in the image as shown below.
[Date]
[Date & Time]
Thnakjs
Canon Powershot SD1200 IS Reviews
Canon Powershot SD1200 IS Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
- 4.0 out of 5
I just wanted a cheap, but fairly decent quality point-and-shoot for practice shots and fooling around. the last digital camera i owned only had 3.3mp and just died this year. while waiting for the tax return to get a professional dslr, i wanted something other than my cell phone to shoot around with.
yes, i'm getting the lens error message also, but it didn't bother me too much. i just restarted and it was fine, even though it happened a few times in one shoot. it does suck, but as long as your not going for those rare golden shots, you can survive.
however, the battery gave great performance, being that i was shooting in the snow for several hours. it stayed powered and ready even after i got home and reviewed all the shots before upload.
the shake factor was also incredible. i know a bunch of shots should have been blurred b/c of low light and natural camera shake, but they came out perfectly sharp!
i also like how you can change the exposure settings manually, but it got minorly quirky here and there. i'm sure fooling around more and perhaps reading the manual will help!
this definitely gives you bang for your buck!
- 5.0 out of 5
I owned an Olympus camera earlier and after losing it, bought the SD1200 after reading up all various aim and shoot models currently available.
Very satisfied with the choice I made. While the various features of this model have been described by the earlier reviewers, i wish to add that I am particularly impressed by the quality of videos I have shot with the camera. Sound quality is fabulous.
Auto focus in the still picture mode is very useful. however the camera is sensitive to even small movements of the suubject (resulting in blurred pictures) but that is only expected in a sensitive camera...
I love my camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
I am a sony fan (have owned P72 for 6 yrs) and was planning to buy the W220/290 till I came across this in the store.
The image quality in comparison with sony is simply huge. The colors look far more believable. Even when you compare with its sibling the A1100, there is a stark difference - no wonder its so popular.
Looks far better too than the current cybershot range. I got the dark grey one.
The only -ve would be the lack of AA batteries. Could do with more megapixels and higher zoom too.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is an excellent camera! It is very versatile and the image quality is great. It's so though too, I've dropped it outside several times and it's just like new. Soooooo glad I bought it!
- 5.0 out of 5
Great Camera, I'm taking great pictures, right out of the box - great night pictures, neat video's with good sound. Astonishing colors. Just leave it on Auto, and shoot away!!
- 5.0 out of 5
Fast subject acquisition, excellent pics for a p&s. Pics look great at ISO 80, surprisingly good up ISO 400; ISO 800 not as bad as you might think. Definitely better than p&s cameras made just a few years ago. The camera has an expensive feel due to aluminum body, metal parts, smooth operation, clean styling. Good software supplied, too. A fun, high quality snapshooter.
- 4.0 out of 5
As an ex pro with two Nikon DSLR's I was ready for another compact. My Fuji point & shoots are around 4 or 5 years old and a bit thick and bulky for trips and parties. I was going to buy a Lumix ZR1 or ZS3 but it would defeat the idea of an ultra compact. This little Canon is great, the menus are easy to work with, the picture quality seems fine for what I want it for and is half as fat as my last compact. I'd love a wider range zoom but size was my main criteria.
- 3.0 out of 5
Look at the memory card and see if there is a plastic sliding tab on the side of the card. The SIM Card might be locked if the tab is in the "locked" position.
- 3.0 out of 5
Not sure why my new 4G SDHC keeps saying 'locked' and is brand new and isn't compatible. All reviews say a 4,6 or 10 should work. Any suggestions?
- 4.0 out of 5
I have taken a few pictures and video's in the past couple of days with this camera and I am still up in the air about keeping it. I find the video very poor quality and the picture quality very inconsistant from great to 'eh'. I have only taken portraits of my little one and have yet to do any landscapes photo's so this review might be a tad premature. I did try to compare some pics on my computer to those from my daughters 8.1meg Sony and found that she had quite a few blurry pics (none yet with the Canon) but some of her pics were really sharp looking compared to mine. At this price point I also expected a few more features to the camera. This being said I still need to take a few more pictures and do some printing to really tell the quality.
- 3.0 out of 5
WORKS WELL
- 4.0 out of 5
i am very happy with this camera because it has a good video feature. pictures are great and the battery life is excellent.
- 2.0 out of 5
I did a lot of research, some would say too much. I though I was getting a great camera. I got an ok camera at the price of a great camera. The reviews are wrong - this camera has very poor auto Focus and the LCD dispay is not good enough to show how bad the focus was until you get home and open them on your computer. If you get this camera take a class on photoshop so you can fix every picture you take.
- 2.0 out of 5
Not sure whats going on here. I happily owned the Canon SD200 (3.2mp) for 3 years and it time for a new one. I bought the SD1200 blindly thinking I was buying the same camera I had before, only better in every way. Well keeping this short the camera has 2 issues that I see right away. The Automode doesnt turn on the flash when its needed, so indoor pictures are coming out blurry. The second issue is related. I feel this camera should be able to take those same photos in the light given and have it not become blurry. I know my iphone can do it. Everything else is nice. When I switch to manual, the pics are great—when I control the flash and everything else. Still I dont want to have to switch the settings all the time. Sorry, this one is going back, maybe Ill look for a better Canon model, or even Olympus.
- 5.0 out of 5
Canon SD1200 IS is very clear, and has full HD-like focus. I always use my Canon the most out of all of my cameras. I am a photographer, so I need my photos to have the clearest quality. I reccomend this to people who are in need of HD cameras. This is an exellent camera.
- 2.0 out of 5
I read reviews of this camera and purchased it based on those reviews! After shooting miscellaneous shots, I reviewed the pics. Not one of the pictures provided an outstanding image. In fact, not one was even good. I continued to take pictures for a few more days, then took the camera back! I am looking for a better model.
- 4.0 out of 5
What I love most about the Canon Powershot 1200 is how compact it is. The second most important thing to me when buying a camera was clarity and focus. My powershot takes clear, sharp images with very little effort on my part. I have to actually try to make the picture come out blurry. I usually keep the setting on automatic, yet I have had a few great experiences taking pictures of my best friends' son's 1st birthday while using the kids and pets setting. Overall for the brief amount of time I have had the camera I am overjoyed.
- 3.0 out of 5
I checked out the review on Imaging Resources web site ( http://www.imaging-resource.com/ ) Photo comparisons with other cameras in its category revealed out of focus problems from the center of the photos to the left edge. The test they conducted on it predecessor camera, the SD 1100 resulted in images much sharper than on this SD 1200.
I have one of these cameras on order and will be very careful to check out its focusing accuracy. These and other cameras are known to have alignment problems with their sensor or lens.
- 4.0 out of 5
Pros:
-DIGIC 4 Image Processor with Canon Face Detection Technology is much faster than DIGIC 3(from SD 790 IS)
-Excellent camera for outdoor
-Easy to use
-Simple controls/menu
-Nice features/settings
-Bright LCD
-Self-timer lets you get in your own pictures, you can take up to 3 times
-Excellent image quality
-Lightweight/Portable
-Good battery life(Compact and lightweight battery charger with worldwide 100 ~220v compatability)
Cons:
-Made in China:(
-2.5 LCD display
-Poor Low-Light Performance
-Somewhat Pricey(more than $200USD)
- 5.0 out of 5
I had a kodak easyshare before this one, it ate batteries, I could only take 12 pics and I had to put in new batteries, love this camera, I had it for 2 months before the rechargable battery died. Takes great pics, easy to use, nothing bad to say about it, except make sure when you buy it to get the extended warranty, I dropped mine and it broke and they replaced it, I bought it at Sams.
