Canon Powershot SD3500 IS
Canon Powershot SD3500 IS
1
Hey! You should know that Canon has released a newer version of this product: the Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS.
Canon Powershot SD3500 IS
Editor's Review
The SD3500 is one of Canon's luxury ELPHs, featuring the sleek design, fast performance, user friendliness, and strong image quality that has made this line a huge hit for years and years. It's similar to the SD1300 and SD1400 models, also released this year, but its ultra-wide 24mm lens and 3.5-inch touchscreen set it apart. Settings can be controlled through a drag-and-drop interface and playback mode is controlled through screen taps. If the other models are like a Toyota Camry and Honda Accord, the SD3500 is more like a Cadillac. It's pricey, and the performance isn't notably better than its lower-cost companions, but it's sure comfortable.
Specifications
- 14 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom
- Optical image stabilization
- 3.5-inch touchscreen LCD
- 720p HD video
- 24mm ultra wide-angle lens
- Captures to SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards
- Rechargeable lithium-ion battery
- Release Date: Feb 23, 2010
Shop for SD3500 Accessories
Canon Powershot SD3500 IS Comments & Questions (write your own!)
C. Chandler (02/13/2011)
This is my first digital camera. How many pictures does can be stored?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/14/2011)
It all depends on the size of the memory card -- you need a memory card to save any significant number of pictures. Here's a guide:
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
Confused... (MEG86 — 12/09/2010)
I have been reasearching digital camera's for months. Everytime I think that I have decided on one, I read terrible reviews. I would like a camera in the $250-$350 range point and shoot. I would like it to be easy to travel with, but to take crystal clear, sharp pictures with great quality indoor/outdoor. I was originally considering a Nikon, but keep reading terrible reviews on their newest models. Then I thought I had decided on the SD 3500 until I read several reviews that said the picture were very disappointing and grainy.
Stumped!!
reply to this comment
Stumped!!
Liam McCabe (12/09/2010)
The reviews about the grainy quality on the SD3500 are greatly exaggerated. People think that they'll be getting gallery quality shots with a $250-$300 camera, which simply isn't going to happen. The SD3500 takes good shots for an ultracompact, but I don't think the shots are any better than the SD1300 or SD1400, so it is a bit overpriced.
If you want better shots from an ultracompact for under $300, look at the SD4000 -- the feature set isn't as "rich" but the image quality, particularly indoors, is notably better.
reply to this comment
If you want better shots from an ultracompact for under $300, look at the SD4000 -- the feature set isn't as "rich" but the image quality, particularly indoors, is notably better.
MEG86 (12/09/2010)
The SD4000 only has 10 mp does the 2-4 mp increase in other cameras make that big of a difference?
Also, I have read a lot about shutter lag. How doest the SD4000 compare in that department?
I currently have a Casio Exilim 7.2 mp. I have a feeling almost anything will be a vast improvement from what I have. I just do not want to make the wrong decision. As far as Nikon goes, is there one that would be comparable to the SD4000?
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Also, I have read a lot about shutter lag. How doest the SD4000 compare in that department?
I currently have a Casio Exilim 7.2 mp. I have a feeling almost anything will be a vast improvement from what I have. I just do not want to make the wrong decision. As far as Nikon goes, is there one that would be comparable to the SD4000?
Thanks!
Canon Powershot SD3500 IS or Nikon Coolpix S8100 (Sara Forbes — 12/06/2010)
I'm on my 5th camera in 3 weeks. I started with the Canon Powershot SX130. It took really great pictures, but was too slow. I have an 8 year old that is always on the move so I was missing a lot of great pictures. I currently have the Nikon Coolpix S8100. It does take pictures faster and they seem to be pretty decent. However I'm not totally satisfied. I've been thinking on trading to the SD3500. Is this a good trade or stay with the Nikon? I've also been looking at the Powershot SD4500 IS and the Powershot SX30. I'm totally confused and would love some input!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/07/2010)
Well, we've heard pretty mixed things about the SD4500 (short battery life, less than ideal image quality) and the SX30 (iffy image quality for the price). The S8100's strength is that it's pretty fast and does better indoors than most similar cameras, but the length of the zoom does get in the way. I don't think you'll be totally happy with the SD3500 -- I'm going to recommend the SD4000, which has the same indoor-shooting strengths of the Nikon, but with a shorter zoom lens, so it should be even better.
Honestly, it's tough to get everything you want for $300. Usually, you can either have a big zoom, or good indoor shooting, not both. The S8100 balances it the best I've seen so far.
reply to this comment
Honestly, it's tough to get everything you want for $300. Usually, you can either have a big zoom, or good indoor shooting, not both. The S8100 balances it the best I've seen so far.
gamage (11/11/2010)
I wish to know different between Canon AP series and SD series
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/11/2010)
The Canon AP series is a series of printers. If you meant the A series, it's Canon's entry-level point-and-shoot series -- simple cameras, mainly aimed at novices. SD-series cameras are also typically pretty easy to use, but the SD tag mostly refers to the sleek, ultracompact design type. A series cameras still take very good pictures, they're just a bit chunkier and don't have features like HD video, big zoom ranges, stuff like that.
reply to this comment
model (jaydden — 10/06/2010)
is the SD series the same with IXUS ?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/06/2010)
Yes. It's the European version.
reply to this comment
noted (G Alan — 09/16/2010)
Could this/is this a replacement for my Canon Powershot SD780 IS?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/16/2010)
Sure, they're pretty comparable.
reply to this comment
Stepmom (09/13/2010)
Canon 3500 or panasonic zs5 or fh20? Would like to stay under $300 but would pay a little more if I had to. I normally just shoot in auto mode. Main usage would be travelling and taking shots of family events - weddings, grads, etc. so low light pics are a must. Will be used in high humidity areas while travelling. I need to replace my Sony cybershot DSC-T20 which started to get a shake to it and makes it unusable. I never really liked in the first place, so just for that reason I would like to stay away from Sony. Looking for a Canon or Panasonic. Thanks for any help given.
reply to this comment
I LOVE MY SD 3500 (William Fernelly — 08/07/2010)
IS PERFECT. YOUR PICTURES ARE BEATIFUL. IS A BIG CAMERA AND I LOVE YOUR TOUCH INTERFAS BECAUSE IS VERY EASY TO USE. I SAY THAT CANON SD3500 IS A BIG CAMARA AEASY TO USE AND YOUR PHOTOGRAFIES ARE VERY MAGNIFIC. Amo mi cámara y la verdad es que se la puedo recomerdar a cualquier persona ya que las fotos son expectacules y si realmente no quieres pasar inadvertido en cualquier reunion, Simposio, Paseo o en la calle su gran pantalla de 3.5' con su interfax TOUCH harán de tu cámara la reina frente a las demás. y a tí te hará el ser la estrella y todos querrán saber como funciona y que tal és. Solo te preguntarán porque en tu cámara si cabe todo lo que ellos no pueden tomar. Y tú solo responderás que gracias a su Gran Angular de 24mm pueder disparar y disparar con la seguridad que todo lo que ves es lo que aparece en la fotografía.
reply to this comment
AMO MI POWERSHOT SD 3500 (William Fernelly — 08/07/2010)
AMO MI CANON IXUS 210 Ó SD 3500. Es lo más impecable en Fotos, Colores, Resolución, Facilidad de Uso y si realmente quieres impresionar a los demás solo es que la saques y su amplia pantalla Tactil robará toda las miradas de la reunion, del congreso o del paseo. Es una Joya y con está es como mi 14ava Cámara Fotográfica digital que he tenido. Siempre busco dentro lo último en técnologia lo mejor y te puedo asegurar que es lo máximo. Cualquier comerntario adicional solo contactame.
reply to this comment
Size comparison (Trev Bloomfield — 07/30/2010)
How does this camera compare in size to the old SD30?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/30/2010)
Very compact. Some of the slimmest in the class.
reply to this comment
Valerie (07/25/2010)
Which camera is the smallest and lightest for point and shoot. I saw a review that mentioned they were too small previously but which is the most compact?
reply to this comment
macro photography (ned simonds — 07/08/2010)
How does the SD3500 do in the world of macro photography? I like to do ultra close flowers and bugs. Thanks, Ned
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/09/2010)
Ned, the SD3500 is just average for macro photography. Most compact cameras focus closest at the widest angle with the lens only an inch from the subject. Obviously this isn't great for insects. What you may want to do is get a superzoom camera like the Panasonic FZ35 and then buy a Raynox 250 closeup lens. This will get you some really great shots for relatively cheap.
reply to this comment
canon 3500 (ned simonds — 07/09/2010)
Over how does the camera shape up to the competition in your opinion. Thanks for the input. Aloha, Ned
reply to this comment
physical dimensions + touchscreen (norm — 07/01/2010)
anyone know its physical dimensions? also, i usually hate touchscreens. anyone know if this model or one similar to it comes without a touchscreen?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/02/2010)
Sadly the SD3500 does have a touchscreen and really doesn't have any comparable models without one that have the same zoom ratio etc... Take a look at the SD1400, though, for a good compromise between zoom range and size.
reply to this comment
Buying advice canon 3500 sd or any other brand (Bilal — 05/07/2010)
Canon sd 3500 seems very good but i am not an expert and would need your advice on buying it. is this the best camera in its range, keeping in view its competitors?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/07/2010)
Yeah, I'd say it's probably among the best mid-tier ultracompacts out there. One thing to consider: do you like touchscreens? I know that I don't, because it kills the battery faster, doesn't really add anything to the experience except a bigger price tag. Some people love them, and the SD3500 has a huge screen, which makes the interface easier to use. Your call, but the SD3500 does appear to take very good photos from the reviews I've read.
reply to this comment
sunny (05/05/2010)
how is the video recording on the sd3500?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/06/2010)
Shoots HD in 720p.
reply to this comment
Jeni Photographer (04/14/2010)
I LOVE my canon sd3500. I am a professional photographer and shoot with a Canon 5D, and wanted something that was dependable, but SMALL for my little, casual trips. LOVE this. The touch screen is easy to use, and the shots are VERY crisp. I'd highly recommend it.
reply to this comment
about SD3500 IS (Mary — 06/25/2010)
I am looking for a camera with a good close up. is this camera good on that. Please let me know. Thanks
reply to this comment
video audio (Alison — 04/07/2010)
Thank you so much.
I just found an external mike jack in my old canon SD800IS, but it's hidden next to the jack to connect to the computer. but the external mike didn't improve the sound much. We still need another camera. So thank you.
reply to this comment
I just found an external mike jack in my old canon SD800IS, but it's hidden next to the jack to connect to the computer. but the external mike didn't improve the sound much. We still need another camera. So thank you.
video sound (Alison — 04/07/2010)
What is the sound of the video like? Is it adequate to record someone talking and to post it on youtube? Is there a place to plug in an external microphone? Thanks.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/07/2010)
I haven't tried it, but if it's anything like the sound on the cheaper SD1300 (it's probably better, TBH), then it'll be fine for regular talking on YouTube. No external microphone jack, unfortunately. I can't think of any point and shoots that do have one. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Jo Ro (03/02/2010)
Has anyone tried the SD3500. How does it compare to the SD980?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/04/2010)
If you go to canonusa.com and find the product page, on the r/h side you'll see "choose the right product" where you can compare features aide by side. Then go to imaging-resource.com and compare sample images. That wlll give you an good idea.
reply to this comment
Canon sd3500 (Radha Manickam — 02/20/2010)
Thanks for your help James.
Radha
reply to this comment
Radha
Memory size (Radha Manickam — 02/16/2010)
what is the maximum of memory side that canon sd3500 will take?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/20/2010)
Up to 16GB. But I'd stick with a smaller card and have more than one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like [url=filerecoverytools.com/produ... to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
reply to this comment
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
Alexander (03/04/2010)
The maximum memory is not up to 16 GB. It supports SDXC cards with possible memory of 2 TB. You can already buy 64 GB cards
reply to this comment
