Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Ultra Compact Digital Cameras category.
Canon PowerShot SD700 IS
Editor's Review
Don't be afraid to shake things up with the all-new, stabilized Canon SD700. The SD700 is the first ultra-compact camera from Canon with built-in image stabilization, issuing in a new era of stable party pictures and high-quality candid shots. They also managed to cram a large, 2.5 inch LCD screen on the back for high-resolution previews, so you can see, in real-time, just how stable your pictures are going to look. Talk about immediate satisfaction. The SD700 is also capable of taking 30 fps videos and widescreen 16:9 still photos for panoramic shots. All that in a slim, attractive frame, the SD700 is sure to be a crowd-pleaser.
Specifications
- 6 megapixels
- 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- auto focus
- auto and manual exposure
- JPEG file format
- ISO 80-800 (High ISO auto)
- movie mode w/sound
- lithium ion battery
- 2.5 inch LCD
- SD card storage (16MB included)
- Release Date: Feb 24, 2006
Shop for SD700 IS Accessories
Canon PowerShot SD700 IS Comments & Questions (write your own!)
I opened my Canon IXUS 800is (also knows as PowerShot SD700 in other countries) and fixed a little
problem with the gearing.
After that it worked fine, I made some testpictures.
After putting on the two case parts again, the camera did not turn on again.
No beep, no click, no nothing. Dead.
What I have already tried is the following:
- opened it again and checked correct assembling, OK
- checked batterie and contacts, OK
- removed batterie and buffer batterie for a while
In eBay Germany and Austria there are guys offering a repair of especially this type of camera if it
does not power on. So I guess it is a known error and maybe fixed easily, if you know how.
Is anybody able to help me please? Thanks a lot!
Malte
camera?
This camera does not support SDHC technology. You'll have to stick to the regular SD cards.
Andrew
Good thing I asked, otherwise I will buy the product already... thanks a lot.
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any other questions or issues.
Andrew
in usa SD800IS is IXY850IS = support SDHC
Doe red-eye occur more/less often based on the distance away from the subject? I've noticed that there is generally a distance range where red-eye reduction is useless, but also a range where it works the best. Other than that, I don't think there's a cure. Sorry :-/
The problem with ultracompact cameras is that the flash is so close to the lens that even a slightly offset flash before the shutter can't completely correct the problem. Even my SD800IS that I love has the occasional red-eye issue... but there hasn't been one I couldn't correct with the simple fix I mentioned above.
I don't know if this can possibly be an issue, but sometimes the camera's autofocus may not be focusing exactly on what you believe it's focusing on. This may make the camera think it's focusing on a different focal distance, and misjudge the strength of the flash and time delay on the red-eye avoidance flash.
Larry
A Washington Post reporter who accidentally dropped his Blackberry in the toilet was able to retrieve it and dry it out to working order again: by leaving it turned off in a bowl of uncooked rice. Reader Chris writes in to say:
There's a grain of truth (punny, huh?) to this in that rice quickly sucks up the surrounding moisture. Make sure the environment is free from excess humidity, drop the wet device in a container of rice and let it sit. For a better desiccant, it'd be a good idea to store all those little silica gel packets that come in anything from shoe boxes to moisture-sensitive gadgets.
Ass for frying the electronics, Matt, that usually only happens in salt water.
1) Once the camera is on, the image on the LCD screen is blurry, except when I zoom out to maximum length, then the image is sharp (no change when I try to zoom in as image still blurry)
2) But then after I press the shutter, I get the message "lens error, restart camera"
3) The lens retracts, but the lens cpver doesn't close completely.
4) If I take the battery out and reinsert, camera turns off properly.
I've tried resetting the menu options, pressing the menu button for 5 seconds, lightly twisting the lens while extended, but nothing fixes the problem. I feel like I'm this close to making the camera work, but just cannot get there.
I think it has something to do with the lens being fully extended at the maximum zoom length (the only way I can get a sharp image), where the lens cannnot retract to zoom in, only to close.
Any advice would be helpful.
There's an entire website ( e18error.com/ ) devoted to this. In a nutshell, Canon E18 error happens when the lens gets stuck while trying to extend. The camera will beep a few times and the LCD will display a little E18 in the lower-left corner. The lens gets stuck in the extended position, and refuses to move either to focus the lens or to retract when powered off.
If your camera is still under warranty, the best thing you can do have Canon should fix it. Warning though, they may nail you for repair charges due to impact damage.
If your camera is out of warranty, or if Canon refuses to repair it for free, the one thing you can try is to If you gently, and I do mean GENTLY push against the lens with the PALM of your hand as you turn it on, it may cause it to depress back into the camera. If that doesn't work, and you can't reset it or turn it on/off several times, then you may have to send it in for a repair estimate anyway.
Be advised, however, that if it's out of warranty, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
In the meantime, I'm going to use my new Canon 750 to take pictures.
Can anybody plz tell me,is that true that Canon gives us a scrap battery with SD700 IS?
how long the battery life could be?
and which site will be the best choice for buying this camera?
I desparately want this camera ASAP, as I am going back to my country very soon.Plz help
I'd usually tell you to buy it from Amazon, but they don't seem to have any available. Unfortunately I don't have much experience with other online retailers. But the one from the top of the page, fotoelectronics.com, DOES say that the NB-5L battery comes with it. I wonder if Broadwayphoto had the same thing? Wherever you order it, as long as it includes that battery, you will be fine.
The NB-5L does come in the original packaging. If you want an additional battery, I haven't had any problems with a non-OEM battery I bought from Amazon.
Brenda's right, you should get about 240 shots, give or take, based on how long you leave your LCD on between shots, how many movies you take, etc.
Any reputable website will be fine for this purchase. You can also purchase it at a store if there's one around you. Most stores pricematch to each other already if you have the competitor's ad.
BTW - you should be able to download a pdf copy of the manual here ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ).
Under drivers/downloads.
The lens opening and closing is probably just because it is beginning to power up, then losing power immediately and turning back off.
- In order to update to ZoomBrowser EX 5.8, it is necessary that ZoomBrowser EX 2 or 3 is already installed on the target computer.
The only thing I can think of otherwise is to see what's different between your wife's and your computer. Maybe you're missing something (or have something preventing) this software from running.
The only way I found to fix the problem was by going into regedit and deleting all registry data that had the word 'canon' in them (and entire keys if the only data they contained was 'canon'). After that, the installation worked fine.
If you do this, do it at your own risk. Make sure that each registry key that you delete really is refering to the canon software, and make sure to back up the registry first.
Given that it will probably cost you an arm and a leg to repair your Olympus (unless it's under warranty and the crack wasn't from physical trauma), upgrading is probably a good idea at this point. I would suggest the SD800 IS or SD900 instead of the SD700, though all three are good cameras.
As to Olympus being repair-prone... only insomuch as all digital cameras have the potential to break down. They're fragile things, and I've never heard of one that's indestructible. :]
Good luck!
I'm pretty much down to the SD700 IS and SD800 IS because I really like the IS features in a lens I bought for the XTi. I also like point&shooters with both LCD and traditional eyehole focusing.
Thoughts on these 2 cameras? Any reason to NOT get one of these and get the SD900 or SD1000?
A quick reply will be greatly appreciated because I probably have to buy the camera by April 16th to receive it before the plane takes off from JFK! ;-) THANKS!!
Either camera will suit you fine. :) The SD900 is just an overpriced point-and-shoot, without IS! The SD1000 is built for ultra-compactness and also doesn't have IS. You picked out 2 good cameras!
Both Canon and Panasonic make good cameras. When choosing between these two, you really have to ask what you want to do with the camera. I will outline the major differences below (The Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will be listed first).
Optical Zoom: 3.6x VS 4x
- This will let you zoom in more for better close-ups. Digital zoom will lower the quality of the photos, so I generally don't use it.
Manual Exposure Settings: No VS Yes
- Having the option to set your exposure manually is great as your photography skills advance. You can play with the exposure for different light settings, yielding better pictures at times.
ISO Range: 80-1600 VS 80-800
- A higher ISO setting will let you take sharper photos in lower light settings. Note that the higher ISO setting will also cause "graininess" in photos. This graininess or noise can be reduced with photo editing software.
Based on the differences, I would personally go with the Canon SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The more powerful zoom and manual exposure settings are features that I prefer to have. I have also had great luck with the 3 Canon cameras I already own. I hope this helps.
Andrew
These are indeed all genuine Canon products, but they're not all the same camera. These are two cameras. The confusion here is from the naming conventions Canon uses for different countries, so I'm going to use the US names as the base here.
1. SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (also known as the IXY/IXUS SD800)
2. SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (also known as the IXY/IXUS SD850 IS)
You can get a side-by-side comparison of the cameras' stats here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ). Here are the key differences:
1. The SD800 IS has slightly higher resolution (7.1MP vs. 6.0MP).
2. The SD800 IS has a 28mm wide angle lens, while the SD700 IS has a basic 35mm lens. (This means it can take better crowd/landscape shots.)
3. Both have a 2.5" LCD screen, but the SD800 IS's is higher resolution.
Hope this helps!
I did sort of cover that in my reply, but yes, that's exactly what's going on here. In Europe and Southeast Asia, they use one naming convention (IXUS). In Japan they use another (IXY). And in the US, another (ELPH).
According to the wikipedia page for the line, the only different comes in the form of the front faceplate. All the other parts are identical. As far as I can tell, the differences are merely marketing choices.
Thanks for the complete answer. Someone out there always seems to have the answer.
Thanks for taking the time to answer my question.
so the US version and none US version does have difference?
The minimum aperture of this camera is f/5.5 at max telephoto. Your depth of field won't improve much at that setting. To get it to that setting at the 35mm equivalent focal length, you can allow the least amount of light in through the exposure compensation (closing the aperture as much as possible) while at the wide angle. I would recommend using the highest ISO possible (800) to let the light you want in, as well as setting a longer shutter speed to allow more light in. To avoid camera shake, I would use a tripod. If you don't have a tripod, you can set the camera on self timer and put it on a steady surface with your subject in the viewfinder. This will work too. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Thank you for your answer all of which is quite right, but now you get to the problem. How do you force the camera use the smallest lens opening at 35mm? I think the answer is you can't but I was hoping I am wrong.
If someone knows an answer please help. Otherwise we should let this thread die.
The only way you can do that it by "tricking" the camera. Use your highest ISO and leave the shutter open as long as you can. It will force the aperture closed through the auto settings. If this doesn't work, you're out of luck. Sorry.
Andrew
Even though everyone raves about the canon and I have to admit the images are sharp when I compare photos on line from both cameras especially in portrait and foilage shots the P4 has the most beautiful and lustrous color and seems to render more sensitive pictures (reminds me more of film) Are my eyes decieving me? does the ccd 1/1.8 make all the difference? help me out! have to choose in the next few days! thanks.
Let me ask you this: are there other things about the camera aside from image quality that might make or break this for you? We just had a user complaining that her P4 was very, very slow to operate (shutter lag, I think was the problem) and she was about to return it. So are factors like those important? If so, let me know and we can dissect the cameras in a little more detail.
In terms of image quality, be careful where you're getting your sample images from. Try to pull them from the same website if possible, as many review sites punch up their samples differently.
The Canon A540 is a nice camera, at about $200, Sears sells it. There is also an A530 model, a bit less, at about $150, with fewer features.
The last enlargement I had made was an 11x14. I had it blown up from a photo on a Canon A520, which has 4 megapixels. I found the resolution satisfactory. Others may quibble with this. But, after all, a person doesn't put an 11x14 in front of his face---it is made to frame and hang. Anyway, it was satisfactory enough to sell at an art exhibition. Most decent cameras (especially at your price point) are going to be at least 6 megapixels, and quite possibly more. My point is, I think 6 megapixels is sufficient for most amateurs. There is a big advantage is going past that, though. You can crop your photo, and still have good resolution. For example, you could crop one-half of a 10-megapixel photo, and it (the remaining area) would be equivalent to a 5-megapixel photo. It's like getting extra zoom on your lens.
Speed:
How fast is fast? If the photos of quilters will be flash, then you have to worry about flash recycle time. Some cameras recycle in 5 seconds; others are agonizingly slow at 17 seconds. 9 to 10 seconds seems to be about average. Will that work for you? Or maybe you don't need flash on the stage. Examples--- The Canon A640 recycles it's flash in 5 seconds, the Canon S3IS recycles in 9.9 seconds, the Canon Elph SD700IS flash recycles in 6 seconds, while the Sony H5 flash recycles in 17 seconds.
Summary:
I like the A640, it's about $350. The S3IS is nice, too, ($375 - $400) with image stabilization, if you can handle the 9.9 second flash recycle time. Plus it has a big (fast) lens. If you like compact, pocket sized, the SD700IS is great (I think it's about $300). But it doesn't have full manual control like the other two.
Richio
ones I tried did not want to fit. What is your choice?
What kind of memory card did you try to use? The info I'm finding on this printer says that SD cards, Flash cards, memory sticks, etc. are all compatible. I'm wondering what you have and why it isn't fitting.
So if you're trying to use a miniSD, xD or Pro/Pro Duo cards, you'll need that adapter.
Is there anyone who has scruitinized both? Anyone tried both? Any thoughts?
I own the 700. I looked at the 800 closely in the store.
EG
Yes, I would certainly say you need a camera with a good IS system. Aside from that, I can't really think of any features that would benefit you on a boat. Perhaps weatherproofing? I don't know, though... most of the cameras that are advertised as weatherproof are unimpressive in just about every other area.
What kind of shooting do you want to do? Is long zoom important to you? Megapixels? (Hint: don't get hung up on these.) Is any type of memory card better for you than the others? Is a good macro mode a priority? Do you want wide angle? Anything you can tell me will help me help you.
Thanks!
Good luck!
That said, many people still prefer dealing with the single rechargeable battery rather than a whole mess of AA rechargeables. Basically, whichever one works best for you is the one you should go for.
Thanks for your help.
One thing you should be aware of as you conduct your search is that a higher megapixel count DOES NOT necessarily mean better image quality. The only thing that more megapixels means is that your images will be larger, and therefore have a larger native print size. In fact, if you're not planning on making huge prints (like... poster size), you don't really need anything over 5 megapixels. You can read more on the "megapixel myth" here ( majid.info/mylos/stories/20... ).
As the above link will tell you, image quality from a digital camera is the result of a complex equation involving quality of the camera's lens, quality of its sensor, quality of its software JPEG processing, and, of course, the human factor. In other words, again, don't simply trust numbers to tell you which camera will give you the best image.
I'd recommend checking out the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is an ultracompact 6MP camera with a 4x stabilized zoom (which greatly reduces blurriness caused by hand movement). If you don't mind going a little bigger (I'm assuming you want an ultracompact since those are the sort you mentioned) there are a lot more options. Hope this helps, and let me know if you need more help!
I like to have such a feature in my camera.
Both of these cameras feature optical image stabilization, which is indeed a great help when you're shooting without a tripod, especially at longer zoom. I personally prefer the SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s IS system to Nikon's VR system, but they're both quite effective.
The difference between the two cameras is in the small details. Though the Nikon captures more megapixels (8 to the Canon's 6), this won't be a huge benefit to you unless you're planning to make huge prints. Both cameras have a 2.5" LCD, but the Canon's is higher resolution. The Canon has a slightly longer zoom (140mm to the Nikon's 126mm). The Canon's macro focus range is half that of the Nikon, which is a big improvement if you want to get in close. Both weigh about the same size, but the Canon is slightly smaller.
User opinion is roughly the same on both cameras. My personal preference is for the Canon due to its superior overall image quality and the small things listed above. Hope this helps!
Extremely helpful description and suggestion and I have decided to go with Canon SD700.
SD 700 IS - Image Stabilizer, 6.00 Mp with a Lens of 4.00x zoom (35 - 140 mm) on-line price under $350. The SD700 IS's high ISO capabilities give this camera the potential to be a low-light killer and eliminate the need for flash which may flood the photo with light. Movie clips 640 x 480 at 30 fps (frames per second) with sound, 16:9 Widescreen still image capture mode,
SD 800 IS - Image Stabilizer, 7.10 Mp with a Lens: 3.80x zoom (28 - 105 mm) on-line price under under $370. 16:9 Widescreen still image capture mode, Movie modes with sound up to 640 x 480 at 30 fps or 60 fps at 320 x 240. The big feature of this camera is the 28mm lens which is wide-angle. This allows for large group pictures.
Cyber-shot DSC-W70 Digital Camera 7.2MP, 3x Optical lens. On-line price $225. Cyber-shot line is very thin with a compact body style perfectly suited for travel in your pocket. Very capable movie mode
Cyber-shot DSC-T50 Digital Camera wit Super SteadyShot optical image stabilization, (7.2MP, 3x Optical lens. On-line price under $350. LCD Size: 3.0 inch with a touch screen for all menu navigation. "ultra compact" digital camera. Movie mode with MPEG VX Movie option for continuous 30 fps recording at 640 x 480 resolution.
Conclusions:
I like Canon cameras and own a couple of them. Both Canon camera as well as the Sony T50 have Image Stabilization. This is a great feature and if you can afford the $100 increase I would recommend one of these 3 cameras.
Now to identify the differences. The Canon's both have 4x lens. This is an advance as you are able to get closer to the subject matter. The Canon SD800 has a wide angle lens which is very nice when you want to take a large family picture or similar photos.
The Sony is smaller and will fit in any pocket or purse and has a larger LCD. Touch screen is your choice. The Canon's are both the same size but larger than the Sony.
I personally like longer zoom lens and will always select them over 3x lens. I don't mind the large size of the camera. My wife wants a camera as small as possible.
The final decision is yours. Select one and go take some pictures.
Happy Holiday's
Thanks again! Enjoy the festive season
ps
There are two main differences between the SD and A series.
1. Size. The SD series are pocket cameras--ultracompacts. They manage to pack a lot of power into a very small size. The A series are small (palm-size), but not quite as small--much thicker and a little wider/taller.
2. Features/manual controls. The A series are generally much closer to pro-level in terms of the options it gives you for manual control of important settings like ISO, aperture, shutter speed, and so on. SD series cameras tend to be nearly exclusively point-and-shoot, while the A series gives you options not available from their smaller cousins.
I personally tend to lean toward bigger, more advanced cameras in almost all situations since I like to have control over all aspects of my photography--you might value the smaller size more than I do. In addition, I feel (and user reviews tend to agree) that the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is a much better camera than the SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), in many respects. Check out some of the user reviews here at DCHQ and at sites like Amazon.com--they might help you make up your mind. Good luck!
Since they're rated almost exactly alike by users, and since the SD800 IS is newer and has better features than the SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I'd say it's a no-brainer to go with the SD800. It adds an additional megapixel over the SD700, a 3:2 shooting mode, a wide angle (28mm) lens, a better flash, and a better LCD. Go for it! Good luck.
You really need to know what you want to do with a camera before picking one. For the types of photos that I take, I would pick the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Although it has a lower resolution than the other two, the camera is more versatile with manual exposure settings and more optical zoom (digital zoom lowers the resolution even more). I am a more hands on photographer. If you want a more automatic camera that you can't experiment with as much, I would go with the Nikon P4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Its high resolution makes it great for blowing pictures up, and it is completely automatic. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Otherwise, I'd point you towards the P4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You said you wanted something simple, and this is a really beautiful extremely powerful little camera, with auto settings all the way around.
1. Fairly compact (enough to fit in a normal purse)
2. Image stabilizer or something like a wider aperature range that helps with night pictures
3. A viewfinder since it seems to be the opinion that it's most likely needed for outdoor pics
4. And at least a 4x optical zoom
5. SLR
I'm not too picky on megapixels either but these are the features I know I want. Can anyone help me? Thanks
If you don't like the size of your Kodak, then you certainly won't like the size of a dSLR camera ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). They are just as big or bigger than your present camera. With that being said, you might want to look at some ultra compact cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). They aren't SLR capable, but do fit into your other specifications. The Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) with 4x optical zoom and the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) with 3.8 optical zoom both come with optical viewfinders, image stabilization and a high ISO range for low light shots. I hope this helps.
Andrew
My first choice would be the Canon G7. It is fairly high-tech and is the first camera to employ Canon's new DIGIC III image processor. It takes high resolution pictures with its 10 mega-pixel ccd sensor and performs comparably to pretty much any dSLR camera. Also, like dSLR, this camera has the capability to allow you to swap its lense out for others lenses and tele- or wide-converters. Furthormore, this camera has a bright, 2.5 inch LCD screen that you should have no trouble seeing outside, however, if you still prefer a viewfinder, this camera has an optical viewfinder built in. The G7 is perfect for night pictures because of its high ISO rating of 1600. You would probably appreciate the G7's huge slew of manual features due to your implied experience with dSLR. Also, this camera comes fitted with a high-quality 6x optical zoom and uses Canon's nine-point sensor, optical image stabilization with face recognition. Due to the new image processor, this camera gets pretty good battery life, although you can buy additional Lithium-ion batteries at a pretty good price. Also, this camera has a pretty good movie mode, allowing you to record in QVGA, the usual VGA, and most notably, XGA. This XGA mode allows you to take vidoe in an incredible 1024x768 resolution. The Canon G7 measures in at 2.8 in. in height, 4.2 in. wide, and 1.7 in. thick. This is slightly bigger than the usual ultra slim-line camera but is still small enough to fit in a pocket and definetely in a purse. In addition, this camera is priced at about $540 dollars, somewhat expensive, although if you are used to dSLR, this shouldn't be a problem.
If the Canon G7 is too expensive or not small enough, i'd recomend the Canon A710 IS. This camera has a 6x optical zoom with nine-point sensor, optical image stabilization, just like the G7, however, it doesn't have face recognition. It also has a viefinder as well. Although, it takes lower resolution pictures at 7 meagapixels and doesn't have quite as high an ISO rating (800 ISO). This camera is cheaper (about $360) and smaller; 2.6 in. in height, 3.8 in. wide, and 1.6 in. thick. In reality, this camera is much thinner. The only part that is 1.6 in. thick is the hand grip with the rest at about half this thickness.
I like Canon camera and the SD line up. I have the SD550 which is a 7mp 3x lens. It takes great photo and is still available in the $235 range. My wife carries it with her all the time.
The SD700 camera and the others you are asking about are all from the Canon Point and Shot style. They are all pocket size and easy to use. All have movie mode with audio.
So what are the differences and price (on-line pricing):
SD900 - 10mp 3x lens $348
SD800 - 7.1mp 3.8x lens, IS $340
SD700 - 6mp 4x lens $240
SD600 - 6mp 3x lens $197
If you are not planning to crop your photo's and create print large poster size prints, the SD900 and its 10mp may not be worth the money as MP are not everything to be concerned with.
The SD700 has a 4xlens and image stablization. This is a real plus in the everyday world of family pictures and moving subjects.
I like longer zoom lens. I use the longer zoom on my current camera all the time and it only has 6mp which are more than I need to get great photos and closer up to the action.
As for your decision to select the SD700 over the alternatives, it sound like you have carefully evaluated the various options and made your decision based on your needs. This is much more important than the extra mp of the SD900 and the SD800 has only 1mp more for $100. This same $100 dollars could be used to purchase the SD card you will need and still have money in your pocket.
Its your decision. Have fun with the camera.
I myself am waiting on the Nikon P5000 to come out after almost purchasing the SD700. It has a Nikor lens like their SLR's I hope it takes the wonderful pictures it promises! we shall see.
gotta run!
Finally: yes, i find the longer zoom useful in most cases, but if you're a indoor snapper, the wide angle is better.
To really decide, you have to know what you're going to use the camera for. I've listed some major differences below and what the benefit of the difference is after. The Kodak C743 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is always listed first. Given that the S700 is not listed here, or on the Samsung site, I'm guessing you meant the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which will be listed second.
- Megapixels: 7.1 VS 6.0
A higher megapixel count will give clearer resolution to your photos and allow you to enlarge them more as prints.
- Optical zoom: 3x VS 4x
A larger optical zoom will bring things that much closer to you for closeup shots. I do not list the digital zoom because you lose resolution when it is used. You can get the same effect of digital zoom by enlarging the photo on your computer after it is downloaded.
- Battery Type: 2xAA VS lithium ion
A lithium ion battery will last much longer than AA batteries. You can purchase Ni-MH or lithium ion batteries with a charger seperately that will last longer as well, but it is an additional cost to you.
- The Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also comes with manual exposure settings. You can vary these based on how much light you want to let in to the photo. You can get more creative this way and experiment with the camera.
I hope this helps.
Andrew
Sorry for the confusion, but it is not coming up for me when I do a search for "S700" on the Samsung site samsung.com
<...> you looking at a specific country area on Samsung?
Andrew
Samsung digital camera site is samsungcamera.com. Camera full name Samsung Digimax S700.
Harry
Thanks for the link. The major differences in the cameras are below (Kodak C743 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) listed first).
Megapixels: 7.1 VS 7.2
LCD: 2.4" VS 2.5"
ISO: Up to 800 VS up to 1000
There are no huge differences in these cameras. I would recommend going to a retailer to see how the cameras feel in your hand. Being comfortable with your camera will show in your shots. Both have some interesting manual functions too, so it really is a toss up.
Andrew
Also the S700 allows zoom while making movie.
The S700 and 500/600 are almost identical in price. The S800 and S1000 use the same small CCD as the S500/600, the S700 is the only one that uses a bigger 1/2.5" CCD. I say, the S700 is the best in the S-serie (I would recommend the coming S730, since it adds Image Stabilisator).
It occurs to me though that something this small can't be that easy to hold, and if it isn't easy to hold then it won't be easy to hold STEADY. Since it doesn't have image stabilization I want to know if that is going to be a problem.
Also, I wanted to know what sort of batteries it takes. I'm hoping for something of the AA variety, so I can buy some rechargeables ones for normal use but still be able to cart around some standard alkaline AAs as backups. If it does require me to use a custom battery, then I'll still buy a spare. Do those stay charged up properly when they aren't used?
Finally, and I know I'm pushing this with only a 5 point bonus for you guys, but is there anything about this camera that I should be aware of before making a purchase? Any surprises? I mean, the 6 MP isn't going to be messed up by a poor lens, or there be some vital feature that is nonexistent that I'll sorely miss as soon as I discover its not there?
This will be my first digital camera and I'm trying to research things thoroughly, so sorry if I seem a bit out of the loop on things.
Cheers,
Len
The SD600 uses a proprietary lithium ion battery. Very few really small cameras use AA ... because they are bigger :-). Lithium Ion is the best battery technology out there for this purpose, so they last pretty well. A spare is a good idea.
As to being small, yeah, this is a problem with any small camera. They are hard to hold steady, and image stabilization can really help ... but it costs more. But only a little. Let me try to sell you on the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is about $40 more. It's about the same camera, but people love it. It has image stabilization and a 4x zoom, instead of the 3x. These two things alone are why this camera is well liked by users and the SD600 is just "so so". I think the SD700 is a much better option and still in your stated price range.
However, I like the body design, looks good and easy carry-on to anywhere.
[url=]dpreview.com/reviews/compar... see that the Canon has 4x zoom vs 3x in the Sony. The wide end is also a bit wider. Canon has image stabilization, a 15 second minimun shutter vs 1 sec. in the Sony. (great for artsy night shots) The LCD has many more pixels which means a better resolution (easier to see if the image is in focus) 173,000 vs 115,000.
The reviews seem to indicate most people are satisfied with either model, but I think the added features make this an easy choice.
Thanks again for your help. I will go with the cannon unless you think there is a better small camera out there. I have a large camera and it gets annoying carring it so want a good but small camera.
THANK YOU ALL
What other features would you like? Do you like zoom lenses, how large do you want to print photos, do you want something compact, do you like touchscreens, do you want to be able to manually control settings, is there a brand you prefer? Let me know a little more info about your preferences and I'll try to point you to the right camera.
Anyhow, I agree with you that the Canons are a great choice, easy to use and good picture quality, plus advancing quickly as far as digital technology. I would recommend the Powershot A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as my current favorite all-around camera. If you want something a little smaller/ sleeker, the Powershot SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is fantastic, and the Sony Cybershot T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is good if you're considering looking outside of Canon.
regards
yellow
It's not required to push the button halfway, then wait, then push the rest of the way; you can just push it once, but doing so means that the camera focuses and then shoots the picture all at once, so there is often a much longer shutter lag time.
Today, it the very first time I've not been able to get it to power on? Had the battery checked - OK.
So my best guess is? That it's no longer any good? Right? time to replace?
Before you replace the camera, you might try Canon online. They offer a step-by-step troubleshooting area ( alpha02u.c-wss.com/inc/Appl... ) online that just might make your camera last a little longer. If that doesn't work, you might even try contacting Canon ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ). Sometimes there are recalls (even for old cameras) that they will replace for free. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
The SD700 has a longer focal length. That's about it; my personal choice is the SD800, because I love the wide angle.
If you want to try another great brand the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is a similar camera, less megapixels (6MP), but great image stablization which is great for kids.
Both takes wonderful pics, check out the user reviews to totally sell you.
I haven't heard about the durability (or lack thereof) of the body, although I do believe both cameras are made almost entirely of metal, so they're probably pretty similarly built.
The pictures need to be at the highest possible quality.
IF possible, use standardised batteries.
Have an excellent flash, or the abilitiy to attach a powerfull flash.
Any ideas??
The flash is not particularly strong, but flash photos are generally very clean and colored well. It's one to consider.
My no.1 priority is the quality, but with a good flash.
The battery issue is secondary/bonus.
I'm looking for something with a higher quality.
The camera suggested is only about 1 step ahead of my current camera.
Thanks for your suggestion tho, much appreciated.
You may want to look at the Canon EOS 30D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The flash range is about 15 ft. at ISO 100 with 2.8/f (not astoundingly powerful, but pretty darned good). But the reason I mention it is because this camera lets you control flash and ambient exposure separately from each other, which is a really neat feature and lets you use flash lighting while still creating some nice natural-looking photos. You can also use Canon's external speedlight flashes with this camera for some good options.
Battery life is also rated high for a camera of this calibre.
amazon.com/Canon-Battery-Ch... you can download the manuals for free from Canon. Here's the link- just click on Product/ Software Manuals:
usa.canon.com/consumer/cont...
1.2 seconds to start up (turning it on until you can take a shot)
.38 seconds shutter lag at wide angle
.48 seconds shutter lag at tele (these times are approx. how long from when you push the button to when the shot actually fires. these are excellent times).
1.3 seconds between photos (once you take a photo, how long until you can take another one)
.46 seconds between shots in "burst" or continuous mode- where you set the camera to take shots in succession automatically.
All in all these are great times esp. for this price range and level of camera.
The optical IS is oviously far better than digical IS which simply increases ISO sensitivity.
I've been searching for this info but no success so far. (Panasonic makes it very clear that they're O.I.S - optical IS)
Did Canon added the fearures to the new SD800 ?
supposed to be faster shooting performance and lower noise. Also "face detection" when shooting people.
I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for a reply? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com"&... so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
have you heard of this happening with other pointand shoot cameras with 2.5 or larger LCDs? it seems to happen a LOT wtih CANONS for some reason.
The SD 550 and 700 do not. I don't think this is necessarily a design flaw, but rather a decision by the manufacturer. Think of it like a picture window, the bigger it gets, the more fragile it is. I work in a camera store, and I am always stunned by the number of people who do not have a camera case! If you are concerned about this, check out some of the other Canon models like the SD630. This you will notice has a screen cover that goes flush with the edges around it. (And its cool looking too!)
I will champion Canon dSLRs but not flimsy made point and shoots where the company wont even acknowledge the LCD breaking for no reason. you dont hear stuff like this happening with other brands. it sucks.
The SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) vs. the SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is sort of a matter of taste. The improvements are all debatable according to your needs:
-SD800 has a wide angle lens (28mm-105mm). To balance this, the SD700 has a slightly better zoom with 4x compared to the SD800's 3.8x. Some would argue the wide angle lens is what sells the SD800; I would agree, provided you NEED/ WANT the wide angle.
-SD800 has 1 more megapixel; this won't matter unless you're printing huge images.
-The SD800 goes clear up to ISO 1600, while the SD700 only goes up to 800. However, the high ISO images are supposedly very noisy, and the Noise Reduction feature can result in some cartoony pictures... many people don't like the effect. So it is debatable how much of this high ISO you would actually use.
As you can see it is really up to you whether it is worth the cost.
Regarding speed, <a href="review.zdnet.com/Canon_Powe... SD800 was clocked</a> at 1.3 second intervals between shots (2 seconds with flash), with a tiny .4 second shutter lag. Burst mode operates at 1 shot per second. <a href="imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... review I found</a> shows the SD700 at more or less the same speeds.
usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... should be able to choose your product from the drop-downs and then download software and drivers.
If you're looking for Image Stabilization (which I think you probably should), that narrows it down to the SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and A710IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are fairly comparable cameras, the major difference being that the A710IS is a larger, point-and-shoot camera that has more of a grip to it, while the SD700 is a tiny ultracompact.
You may also want to consider the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This recent update on the SD700 also has image stabilization and is ultracompact, but supports ISO sensitivities up to ISO 1600 (which is good for capturing fast-moving subjects without blur, like your grandkids. It's also roughly the same price as the somewhat older SD700.
<a href="DigitalCamera-HQ.com/digita...
im not sure about the A710IS but the sd550 and the sd700 lacks a plastic built-in cover that protects the LCDs (i wish i had known about this cuz my LCD on my sd700 cracked after a month that i had it)
the sd630 has the built in cover. also it has that gorgeous 3inch cover to boot. i think that the durabilty/lack of headaches makes it somewhat worth it, dont you? my friends have this camera and they love the picture quality despite the fact that it lacks Image Stabilization. well ppl in the past have dealt with not having IS in the past...also I.S. doesnt really help when it comes to taking manual pictures with high ISO anyway...
It's a video compression issue.
Other cameras use mpeg files. (video compression)
Don J.
Low light photos
Quick cycle between photo's
all weather conditions
outdoor photos (without view screen washing out)
durable camera, ie: kids
decent video clips
ultra compact
Is one a clear winner?
I think the Olympus Stylus 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) wins out in this one. Here are a few things I found about it that make me think it is better suited to your needs than the Canon Powershot SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ):
-The Olympus has ISO 80-1600 available, while the Canon has 80-800. The high ISO on the Olympus would come in handy in low light situations and is also supported by what Olympus calls BrightCapture technology, which makes for better pictures in very low light.
-The Olympus has a larger sensor which results in clearer photos all around.
-Olympus offers QuickTime Motion JPG with sound; higher quality video clips.
-Olympus is lighter (114grams) while Canon is 165grams (without batteries).
-The Olympus has many more scene modes- 27 of them, I think, compared to the Canon's 9.
I could not find info on the exact speeds, but did find plenty of reviews saying that the Turbo technology of the Olympus makes it very fast. Also, the Olympus is weather-proof and durable. Unfortunately I did find a few places where they said the screen washing out is a problem. Still, this camera seems better suited to what you're looking for in my opinion.
Hope that helps somewhat.
2. There is severe lcd washout and reflection in bright sun. Needed baseball cap or hand cupping to see screen. No classical viewfinder to overcome problem. Perhaps Delkin will offer custom shade screen before long.
3. Otherwise, camera is light, small, stylish. Should appreciate weatherization, dual stabilazation and nice megapixel/optical zoom numbers. Also a good combination of simple point and shoot and multiple scene settings for those who want more specific use settings.
I have been told that in a camera that takes 90 pictures on AA batteries before going dead, you can expect up to 600 pictures from lithium batteries. While that isn't a guaranteed figure, it gives you an idea of the huge difference between the two.
I am planning to buy a new digital camera and after reading so many reviews, have decided to go for Canon. I am neither a beginner nor an expert. For my purposes, I found Canon SD700 and Canon A710 to be best bet. The things that I take as cons for SD700 are the Lithium Ion battery (may be this is good, but I have had a real bad experience with the one supplied with HP camera) and the 4X optical zoom as against the 6X in A710. The only thing that slightly would be a con for A710 would be its higher cost, but that may not be a big deal. But if someone could provide me a comparison and suggest the better one, it would be great (esp, if you could remove my fear regarding the li ion battery..)
Thanks a lot
Such
Advantages of LiIon batteries:
- power / weight ratio. Way better than standard batteries. That means you get a camera that can fit in your jeans.
- length of battery life. I easily get 200+ pictures per charge. The real determinant of battery life is how much you use the screen and the flash. Disable it and you'll get more photos than I do.
- rechargability. Very quick it takes about an hour to recharge. I don't believe there is a comprable for standard rechargable batteries. The recharger is lightweight and compact. I don't need to worry about the recharger on day trips and when I'm travelling for longer, it is easy to stash it in whatever bag I'm travelling with.
The A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will allow for greater zoom, and AA batteries can be handy if you dont want to have to keep plugging in your l-i charger.
So, I think that the 4 differences:
-Batteries: special vs standard
-Camera case: aluminum vs plastic
-Adjustability: just point and shoot vs exposure and shutter speed adjust.
-Optical zoom: 4x vs 6x
You can find out what 5 and 6 MP cameras are the highest rated by checking the 5 and 6 MP sections here:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
If you're having trouble with blurry shots due to shakiness and jitters, you'll want to find a camera with Image Stabilization. Most Panasonic cameras have "Mega Optical Image Stabilization" and cameras like the Canon SD700IS feature it as well. It's important to have IS in ultracompacts, especially, since they are extra sensitive to subtle movements of the hand.
As far as shot timing and delays, you want a camera with a low 'shutter lag.' Canon's SD line is pretty good about being quick and on target.
Panasonic Cameras: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Canon SD700 (with image stabilization): digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
That's kind of a bummer -- kind of like a car with no gas gauge, just a flashing warning when the tank's about to run out. What were they thinking? :-)
But the truth is, you should probably have at least one spare battery anyway so one can be charging while the other in in the camera.
(By the way -- sorry for the extremely long reply time on your question. It got lost in the shuffle).
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Without any additional gear, you can take the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Stylus 720sw</a> underwater up to 10 feet. Good for snorkeling.
Deeper? Sea-Life has made several cameras, notably the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... DC-500</a>. Good news: the camera can go as deep at 200 feet. Bad news, users don't like it at any depth :-).
Ok, well for any regular camera, you'll need an underwater housing. Choosing an underwater camera to use with a housing is similar to a regular camera, but you should concentrate on cameras that have high ISO (there's less light down there), and image stabilization (tripod are very uncool in the diving world, so I have heard. And of course you'll need a camera that has an appropriate housing available. Check sellers like <a href="bhphotovideo.com/bnh/contro... target="_blank">B & H photo's underwater gear section</a> to find a good housing for the camera you buy. Consider the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon SD 700</a> which has image stabilization and a high ISO setting. There are other good options as well, but it depends on your needs and budget.
Tom
But I have never tried this either, just it's just a guess :-)
Tom
To get large prints, almost any camera sold today will do the trick since this is mostly just a matter of mo' megapixels. 5MP or more should do the trick unless you want prints like 20x30 (6 to 9 MP would be best there).
Moving from the Nikon 3200 to the Canon 350D would be a rather major leap forward for sure. For one, the price of the 350d with a lens is about $750. And it is also significantly less easy to carry around. Not exactly a shirt-pocket camera!
For my money, the Canon SD700 is a great choice. It's around $400 and has a 4x zoom, plus an image stabilizer. digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... also thing Canon's S2 IS, which is now replaced by the S3 IS, is a good bet. It has 5MP and was pretty much the coolest camera around when it came out a little more than a year ago. Ratings are really great for this camera. digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... has some pretty cool extended zoom models you might check out ... digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... let me know if you have any other ideas -- budget? Size? Other things that bug you about the 3200 you have? Cameras have come a looooong way in the last couple of years!
Lenny
Carol,
I don't think either of those models have Image Stabilization. The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon SD700</a> does but that cost quite a bit more.
Rob
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Thanks, Cheryl
Any chance you could try out the camera your husband uses at work? Maybe bring him lunch and fiddle around with it while he eats? :)
The Canon Powershot SD630 is a great camera, but there are a few things you should keep in mind before switching from your Casio EX-Z850.
The SD630, like the Z850, is an ultra-compact camera, but unlike the Z850, it does not have an optical viewfinder. This means that all of your photos will be taken using the LCD screen as a preview. The SD630 also does not have Image Stabilization, which makes it susceptible to shaky hands.
With these things in mind, a more suitable camera to switch to might be the Canon Powershot SD700 IS. It's very similar to the SD630, but has Image Stabilization, which should help resolve some of your issues with blurry photos. I would also suggest that you take a look at Panasonic's line of ultra-compact cameras, particularly the Panasonic DMC-FX01. The FX01 also features Image Stabilization, but at a much lower price than the Canon cameras.
I will link to the cameras below. Hope this helps you out.
Canon PowerShot SD700
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Lumix FX01
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
I would be reluctant to move to a larger camera...
Thanks in advance for any thoughts-
DParker
dparker --
I think you should see these things have changed in the last few years:
<ul>
<li>Mo' megapixels</li>
<li>Bigger LCD screens</li>
<li>Trend toward "SD" memory cards smaller than CF compact flash)</li>
<li>Faster startup, focus and shot times</li>
<li>More durable, or at least don't break down so fast</li>
<li>Longer optical zooms with image stabilizers</li>
<li>USB 2.0 for faster downloads</li>
<li>Cheaper by a lot!</li>
</ul>
Ain't technology grand?
So what to replace with? Well, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Pentax S6</a> comes to mind. I haven't used it, but if you're happy with the S4, it looks like people think it's good (and it still fits in an Altoids tin!) I guess Canon has the lion's share of the market -- their A-Series cameras get raves, and the tiny ELPH cameras are well liked.
Check out <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... >these Canon SD cameras</a>. I have a Canon G6 (which is an entirely different beast) but I can say that the main thing I miss on that camera is a long zoom (5x or more) -- this can be really great for people shots and lots of other reasons.
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... >Canon SD700</a> is a tiny camera with a 6x zoom. It doesn't have an image stabilizer but the specs say it can get good pictures at a high ISO 800 rating which means the camera can set a faster shutter speed to avoid blurred images from camera shake.
I admit to being a Canon lover, so am not really familiar with some of the other brands. You might check out Panasonic which seem to get good ratings, and maybe Nikon, but they don't seem to make too many people happy with their point-and-shoot offerings.
DParker
Canon PowerShot SD700 IS Reviews
Canon PowerShot SD700 IS Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera takes awesome pictures. I got this camera for mother's day from my husband and i love it. It takes really great pictures, and I like all the different settings the camera has. It takes really good action photos if you use the kids/pets setting.
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this camera specifically for an overseas holiday - for me a once in a lifetime event as my better half will not fly. I was looking for quality in a camera and it had to fit in my pocket (no camera necklace for me). I bought the camera the day before my trip, packed it, but forgot to pack the user guides. Since this was my first digital camera, I had no idea what most of the icons meant when exploring the buttons, so I left in auto mode and hoped for the best. The results were truly splendid.
Focusing system is excellent, exposure was spot-on in all but a couple of extreme cases. I have read through the manuals by now , but for everyday snaps, I still revert to auto mode.
Biggest irritant is the camera's propensity to reset to auto-flash mode when taking photos indoors. Not very discrete. Would be nice for the camera to retain most recent settings at start up.
- 4.0 out of 5
This is one of the best camera I have own. I want a stabilze one because sometimes your hands shake and the picture comes out shaky
I RECOMMEND THIS CAMERA HIGHLY
- 5.0 out of 5
The camera takes excellent photographs, probably among the best I have seen in Digital camera technology. It is a "no brain-er" to operate, good well thought out menu selections with just enough options in manual mode to let you get creative and more in control without being a pro.
This is the third digital camera I have owned. I also have a Nikon digital and an HP. The photo quality of the Cannon is superior. It is as simple as that. It is compact, durable and user friendly.
- 5.0 out of 5
I didn't get the advanced guide book til just before Christmas - have been reading it and there are so many options that make your photo the best. Looking forward to a great adventure with it this spring. The possibilities seem to be endless - if you don't get a great photo - you just didn't get the right setting!
- 1.0 out of 5
My camera has this awful problem, and it seems it's not the only one: when pointing to a source of light, a vertical "strip of light" appears in the LCD, as if a vertical ray of light was crossing the scene. This doesn't affect the final image, but it's unbelievable that such a high quality product has such a problem.
If there are many sources of light in the scene it becomes impossible to compose the image correctly, as all I can see is a series of vertical "laser-like" lines of light!
really bad...unexpected from Canon.
I'll definitely ask for a full refund.
horrible!
- 2.0 out of 5
I own a powershot s 400. I have recently decided to upgrade and after hearing all the wonderful stories about the powershot sd 700, I bought it. What a shame, the first one was a bum cam, noise problems. The second one (replacement), found out after getting home that their is a forever blue dot on the lense, even after cleaning. Shows up in pictures too! I have had the worst luck. I prefer the old canon! New is not better in this case!
- 1.0 out of 5
this is just ridiculous...and im reading that canon wont cover the screen. why NOT...when it is their OWN fault that they cant manufacture a more durable screen? also flash sucks. the only thing good about this camera is the 4x optical zoom. i took this camera to hawaii and i was finding that i wanted the camera to have more telephoto capabilty. hmm not looking fwd to calling canon and speaking to customer representative...
- 4.0 out of 5
I read the post by [zyt_digitalcamera - 8/14/06] and found that this seemed like a more common problem. I got the camera today and found that when I took the camera out in the sun, there were purple streaks across the screen. They did not effect the photo though. I'll play around more to confirm if this is a persistent nag. Pls let me know if this is not uncommon or I'll try to have the camera replaced. thx
- 2.0 out of 5
I have the same problem, the red and purple, sometimes while streaks are dramatic when i use the view finder. But the photos taken are good. Once I even found that the whole LCD screen is green and black. Is that a problem? I am thinking of asking for a change. I only have this camera for 2 months. :(
Thanks all.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my third digital point-and-shoot from canon, and I continue to enjoy these cameras.
POSITIVES: Small enough to keep in a purse or pocket, great pictures, no red-eye, custom white balance, image stab., 2.5 inch LCD screen, 140 mm tele, long battery life.
WISH CANON WOULD CHANGE THIS: I really don't understand the mode wheel, but I've learned to live with it. I previously had the SD300 and the modes where handled fine with the function key.
- 3.0 out of 5
SD700 is nice camera. picture is very nice. little bit heavy. Video is not so good. The major problem is the guide gook. It is very explained well at all. It is very difficult for new user to understand. Otherwise everything is alright!
- 5.0 out of 5
I teach art and need to take photos in museums. In museums the light tends to be low and no flash is allowed. I bought the SD 700 to take on a trip to Spain. It was inconspicuous and never a pain to carry. Most of my photos came out well even under difficult conditions.
What I like:
. the image stabilization, I was able to shoot often at a 13th of a second and sometimes at even lower shutter settings. Image stabilization was especially useful for dealing with low light conditions.
. the build quality, the camera easily withstood the travails of travel.
. the 2.5 inch LCD screen, I could (and did) use it to evaluate my photos so that I could discard bad photos while in our hotel room.
. the warning lights, these call for special comment: they really can be a great help if you pay attention to them (at first I did not). The yellow focus light is especially useful. In dim light a low contrast subject (such as a Bosch painting in the Prado) may give the auto-focus difficulty. I learned to deal with this with the help of the warning light.
What I wish for:
. More options for manual exposure control.
. I would like to have one or two custom modes and a museum mode.
With its combination of reliability, stability, flexibility, power in a very small package, and low weight this is a great a great travel camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
I tried several models of point andshoot camera. When I chose not to use flash, the image tend to be noisy. SD700's image was the cleanest.
But the video was noisy though.
- 3.0 out of 5
The picture quality of this camera is excellent. I have to question other reviews that I read, wondering if they actually used the camera, or just chose to summarize the product literature. When taking videos, the sound quality is terrible. There is a sizzling sound that is always present. I have tried taking clips indoors and outdoors. With IS turned on or turned off. In a nearly silent setting, or with music playing. In all cases, the sizzling sound and scratchyness was present. For comparison, I recently took a few video clips with an SD550 at a wedding. The audio did not have any of these problems with that camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
This is my 5th Canon Elf and I've loved every one of them. The Image Stabilizer is what I was waiting for since this type of camera is prone to movement when pressing the button. The IS is working well and sure makes a big difference, especially in less than average lighting conditions.
The 4 times zoom is a bonus that I wasn't expecting, however not of great value since it gives additional telephoto (which can be easily done with software cropping) rather than additional wide-angle.
I can't believe that Canon went back to a mode-selector-wheel. Just as on a previous Elf I once owned. It again regularly gets moved out of position when storing the camera in it's case and just handling it. I have to remember every time I pull it out to reset the mode wheel to where I want it and have lost some shots because of it.
The 800 ISO might come in handy in certain conditions but as a rule I'll avoid it in order to keep the "grain" at a more exceptable level.
Love the screen!! It's sharper and brighter than on the 450.
I chose the 700 over the Sony T9 mostly because of the digital viewfinder which the Sony sadly is missing thus making it impossible to see anything in low light conditions.
Although the flash in the 700 is again very weak, it is however stronger than the flash in the Sony.
Unfortunately this SD700 is also somewhat bigger again than the SD300 or SD400 and that makes a big difference considering that the small size is the only reason why I keep buying the elfs in the first place.
The Sony is thinner and slicker.
It's all about taking pictures and the pictures are better than ever, mostly due to the effects of the Image Stabilizer.
Bottom line:
Not sure yet if I'm going to keep it as I just can't live with that mode-wheel but also because of the bigger size.
- 5.0 out of 5
Strengths: Excellent picture quality, very good indoor pictures, 'NO MORE RE-EYE' and a Real-Image Optical Viewfinder.
Weakness: Pricey compared to other cameras, I paid $499, Surprised that it fit in the palm of my hand, it seems to be a little heavy to put in your shirt pocket but it fits perfectly in the front pants pocket.
Summary: Exquisitely styled with unique 'Curvature and Stream' design, the camera incorporates a host of cutting-edge features, Image-Stabilizer, Real-Image Optical Viewfinder, and 'NO MORE RED-EYE' were the most important features to me.
- 5.0 out of 5
this camera has been all over the world in the few short months I have owned it. It takes the best night shots of any camera I have owned. Close ups, macro, zoom, video,there is nothing that this camera cannot do. Battery life is good. Downloading is quick and if the camera is left on normal it can hold over 1000 pictures. Quality on any setting is fantastic. The only downside is that the booklet is a little difficult to understand. You do need a good padded case to protect the LCD but that can be said of any digital camera. All in all the best!