Hey! You should know that Canon has released a newer version of this product: the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS.
Canon Powershot SX210 IS:
Hands On Review
Canon's latest travel zoom isn't much of an upgrade over the previous model -- which is fine, for the most part, but some design flaws continue to irritate.
By Liam McCabe
- SX210 Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
The photo industry has been bitten by the travel-zoom bug. This year,
nine of the 10 major digital-camera manufacturers have taken a crack at
producing a thin-bodied, high-zoom shooter, the kind of camera that was a
rarity just a few years ago.

Wide-angle 28mm (left) vs. telephoto 392mm (right)
I have no complaints about the camera's speed. It isn't blazingly fast, but the shutter is unnoticeable, it processes images promptly, and the 14x zoom extends and retracts quickly. The physical design might be dunderheaded, but Canon's intuitive menu system still remains, and above all, it's easy to get good shots. (And yes, you can zoom while filming videos. You'll hear some faint motor-noise, but nothing too distracting.)
Video quality is solid as well. It records in H.264 (Quicktime) format. There might be some pixelation, but that's difficult to avoid on a low-end video device like this. Still, the quality rivals that of a typical pocket camcorder -- that is, good enough for most purposes.
This class of camera -- call it a travel zoom, compact zoom, fun zoom, or whatever you want -- is popular with consumers because it does everything from macro shots to telephoto shots to video recording reasonably well, in a pocket-sized frame. When a travel zoom is done right, it's an excellent all-in-one package for families and (you guessed it) travelers. Since they tend to offer manual exposure control, even discerning photo enthusiasts get excited about them, too.
That said, it's tough to pull off a truly great travel zoom. We've already looked at a handful of new models this year, only one of which (Casio FH100) really hit all the marks, in our opinion. For consideration today, the Canon SX210 IS. It's a 14 megapixel, 14x-zoom pocket camera with a 3-inch widescreen LCD, 720p HD video, and automatic and manual exposure for a smooth $300. It replaces the SX200, but I'd call it an update rather than an upgrade. The same design flaws that hampered our reviewer's experience with the SX200 are still present. But none of them really degrade the SX210's performance or the results, and in general, the SX210 performs well enough to warrant a close look from anyone looking for a powerful compact camera.
Design
We'll start with the good stuff: The SX210 is designed in the sleek, minimalist spirit of the SD series, though longer and thicker than its ultra-compact forebears. Its predominantly metal body feels well built and has a nice heft to it. Most users should find its medium-sized frame (by compact camera standards) comfortable to hold. The three-inch, widescreen LCD is like a Cadillac: bigger than you really need, but quite luxurious. Pictures shot in the standard 4:3 aspect ratio are book-ended by black bars, like watching old TV shows on an HDTV, though the SX210's HD videos do fill the entire screen. It's about as bright as any Canon LCD, which is to say that it's visible anywhere but direct sunlight.The button layout is standard, aside from the wheel that replaces the typical d-pad on the back. It was actually my first time using a compact camera with that feature. The four directions still correspond to the usual flash, focus, exposure, and timer hot-keys, but they're unmarked, so there was a bit of a learning curve. But the wheel can cycle through shutter speeds and apertures like a very fast thing, which, to me at least, justifies the fumbling I did at first. Those who will stick to the automatic modes probably won't find the scroll wheel as appealing.
Now for those design flaws I mentioned: For starters, the zoom "tab" on top is too small. I prefer a more tactile response from zoom controls. The mode dial on the back is always a welcome feature, but it's just too tight on the SX210. You might need to squeeze it between your thumb and index finger to turn it. And then there's the obnoxious pop-up flash. It's located right where my left index finger rests. It pops up automatically at power-up, but my finger was usually there when I hit the power button, so it stayed down. When it's down, you have to pull it up manually -- the interface even blocks the option for taking a flash picture when it's down. I suppose it's a convenient way to turn off the flash, but I viewed it as an irritating way to turn it back on. The flash caused me more frustration than any other aspect of the SX210.
Performance
The auto modes are spot-on and the typical slew of scene presets are available, so novices or anyone looking for an automatic-shooting experience will be just fine. But the SX210 also offers program, shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure control too. Hobbyists and experienced photographers will appreciate the extra control, and beginners will have room to grow with it.

Wide-angle 28mm (left) vs. telephoto 392mm (right)
I have no complaints about the camera's speed. It isn't blazingly fast, but the shutter is unnoticeable, it processes images promptly, and the 14x zoom extends and retracts quickly. The physical design might be dunderheaded, but Canon's intuitive menu system still remains, and above all, it's easy to get good shots. (And yes, you can zoom while filming videos. You'll hear some faint motor-noise, but nothing too distracting.)
Image Quality
The SX210's images in general are very good. Most people, most of the time, will be completely and utterly satisfied with the image quality. Details can be a bit blurry at the edges of wide-angle shots, but it's only an issue when you view the images at a high resolution, and it's less apparent in telephoto shots. So unless you're regularly making 8x10-inch prints, you probably won't notice.Low-light image quality is nothing special. Noise is well controlled up to ISO 800, which is a little better than par for the course (the Samsung HZ35W I reviewed was noisy by ISO 400). The manual controls can help wrangle decent shots from dark scenes, not like the S90 can, but decently well.
Video quality is solid as well. It records in H.264 (Quicktime) format. There might be some pixelation, but that's difficult to avoid on a low-end video device like this. Still, the quality rivals that of a typical pocket camcorder -- that is, good enough for most purposes.
Bottom Line
The SX210 is an extremely versatile camera that can impress casual photographers and satisfy hobbyists, and travelers might find that it's an invaluable tool. It's compact enough to go anywhere, large enough to feel comfortable in your hand, simple enough for anyone to use, and powerful enough to capture some excellent images.It's regrettable that Canon failed to fix the design flaws from the last generation that irritated so many users, because I've already seen several user reviews expressing frustration with those very same quirks. The reaction comes in part, no doubt, because of the price tag. I think $300 is a fair price for this camera, but most consumers -- understandably so -- think that a camera should be near-perfect at this price.
Competition is a great thing though. This travel-zoom category is crowded, and a handful of competitors churn out comparable (if not better) performance for less money -- the Samsung HZ30W and Casio FH100 spring to mind immediately and I've heard great things about the Panasonic ZS5. That knowledge makes the SX210 a little harder to recommend.
But the Canon name does count for a lot. They've earned their reputation for making reliable cameras that take sharp pictures with minimum fuss, and the SX210 is certainly in line with that. It's impossible to be everything to everyone all the time, but the SX210 is most things that most casual or hobbyist photographers could use most of the time.
Similar Products
Canon Powershot SX210 IS Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Canon SX210 IS (Adrian — 10/02/2012)
How do I delete the time and date from photos already taken?
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
Chris Weigl (10/05/2012)
The date and time are written onto the photos at the time you taken them. You can turn off date stamp in the menus for future photos, but you'll need Photoshop to remove them afterward.
reply to this comment
Bijay chaudhary (02/23/2011)
canon camera very good but also battery made in china this one not good this one also made in japan to mucch good & camera bag also low quality this one also not good i am first time this one purchase .
reply to this comment
16:9 ration DVD (Carol — 02/06/2011)
Can I burn a DVD that will show widescreen - 16:9 resolution on the TV?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/08/2011)
Sure, but you have to make sure your TV supports it and that your camera shoots widescreen video. If it does, the TV will create a letter box to show it. You can encode your video with letterbox manually. I like to use TMPGENC for that.
tmpgenc.net/en/index.html videohelp.com for tips.
reply to this comment
tmpgenc.net/en/index.html
Still undecided? ( — 12/30/2010)
My search seems to have come down to SX210 and Nikons S8100. Please give your opinion which would be better for "family" photos indoor and outside along with some videos of concerts.
In the review of the S8100 it said outdoor photos were "average". Does the SX210 fair better outdoors?
I recently found a bunch of videos taken with the S8100 at a Trans-Siberian Orchestra concert which were very impressive for both video and audio quality at first. But at times the camera struggled to focus and also would lose focus during zooming. Zooming also would cause the impressive audio to become muted and muddy until zooming action stopped. Probably to cover for motor noise, or maybe it was motor noise but due to the loud nature of the concert it came across as muted. Maybe in a quieter setting instead of muting the audio it would be a buzzing sound? Any experience with the Canon having these issues!
I also believe the Canon has aperture and shutter priority modes and Nikon does not.
Would also like to add that Canons S95 was an option despite limited zoom as I understand it would be better for photos. I understand that the zoom is not usable in video mode so that killed this model from consideration. Any chance of a new model fixing this as I'm not in a hurry to purchase, I just want to be happy with it! My last purchase,Nikons S70, left me pretty disappointed.
Thank you for your time!
reply to this comment
In the review of the S8100 it said outdoor photos were "average". Does the SX210 fair better outdoors?
I recently found a bunch of videos taken with the S8100 at a Trans-Siberian Orchestra concert which were very impressive for both video and audio quality at first. But at times the camera struggled to focus and also would lose focus during zooming. Zooming also would cause the impressive audio to become muted and muddy until zooming action stopped. Probably to cover for motor noise, or maybe it was motor noise but due to the loud nature of the concert it came across as muted. Maybe in a quieter setting instead of muting the audio it would be a buzzing sound? Any experience with the Canon having these issues!
I also believe the Canon has aperture and shutter priority modes and Nikon does not.
Would also like to add that Canons S95 was an option despite limited zoom as I understand it would be better for photos. I understand that the zoom is not usable in video mode so that killed this model from consideration. Any chance of a new model fixing this as I'm not in a hurry to purchase, I just want to be happy with it! My last purchase,Nikons S70, left me pretty disappointed.
Thank you for your time!
Liam McCabe (12/31/2010)
Yes from what I recall the SX210 shot more vibrant outdoor pictures, but it's not without its own flaws. The barrel distortion -- unnatual "curving" and softness at the edges and corners of the shots -- was as bad as any camera that we reviewed this year. And as for indoor/night shots, it doesn't hold a candle to the S8100. The SX210 does have the aperture/shutter priority, I find it bizarre that the S8100 doesn't.
But since you'll be using it at concerts, I think the S8100 is the better choice for you -- the muting/focusing/motor noise issues you heard in the TSO videos: These are all common for cameras like this. I believe that the Nikon does lower volume to mask the motor noise, but doesn't cut it completely. I believe that the Canon lets the noise come out in full force. There's no elegant way around this situation.
And as for new models -- CES is next week and there will be some new camera announcements, but this event is usually for lower-end models, so I don't think you'll see any new developments until late February at the PMA show, and those cameras won't hit shelves until April. And even at that, I don't know if we'll see anything that really makes a big difference, and traditionally, advanced models like the S95 get replaced in late summer. I'd say go with the S8100, but buy it from somebody with a good return policy if you don't like it.
reply to this comment
But since you'll be using it at concerts, I think the S8100 is the better choice for you -- the muting/focusing/motor noise issues you heard in the TSO videos: These are all common for cameras like this. I believe that the Nikon does lower volume to mask the motor noise, but doesn't cut it completely. I believe that the Canon lets the noise come out in full force. There's no elegant way around this situation.
And as for new models -- CES is next week and there will be some new camera announcements, but this event is usually for lower-end models, so I don't think you'll see any new developments until late February at the PMA show, and those cameras won't hit shelves until April. And even at that, I don't know if we'll see anything that really makes a big difference, and traditionally, advanced models like the S95 get replaced in late summer. I'd say go with the S8100, but buy it from somebody with a good return policy if you don't like it.
need help deciding which camera better (Tina Kegley — 12/17/2010)
Help! It's almost Christmas and I need to decide about a camera for my dd. I am looking at the Canon SX120,130,and 210, and I just saw the SD1400. I don't know much about cameras, but don't want to spend much more than $300.00, and would like it to take good, clear, pictures, plus good video with sound as she has an adorable little guy-almost 18 mo. old. My husband and I always regretted not having a good camera and video. Can you please tell me which is better? I would like image stabilization, and fast capabilities. Any help would be appreciated. Some manual adj. are fine, along with auto. Please help!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/18/2010)
All point and shoots will have some shutter delay but many now have a special sports/kids scene setting to help. Also prefocusing can lock in the focus so it cuts down on the delay as well.
As for the Canon cameras, all are good performance wise by with varying results. First I'd use Canon's side by side comparison utility (under choose the right product) to compare features. You'll see a lot of similarities. Also visit imaging-resource.com to compare sample images side by side. But in the end it'll come down to what features you want and can live without. The SX line will give you greater zoom though.
reply to this comment
As for the Canon cameras, all are good performance wise by with varying results. First I'd use Canon's side by side comparison utility (under choose the right product) to compare features. You'll see a lot of similarities. Also visit imaging-resource.com to compare sample images side by side. But in the end it'll come down to what features you want and can live without. The SX line will give you greater zoom though.
thanks so much (Tina — 12/20/2010)
I have ordered this camera and am excited about it. The local camera store gave the same discount as Amazon, and I am picking it up there. I appreciate the input. Merry Christmas!
reply to this comment
steve (12/16/2010)
What is the best SD card for Cannon SX 210?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/16/2010)
The fastest cards go up to Class 10, but you really won't see much of a difference from Class 6.
reply to this comment
choice (cliff church — 12/02/2010)
Which one? Between sx21o or sd1300
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/02/2010)
I'd go with the SX210IS. Far better zoom and H.264 HD video.
reply to this comment
Cori (11/25/2010)
Timer? Hello! Way to overthink a camera. As far as I can tell this camera has no simple timer. You have to program it to recognize a smile, that's really cute until it just refuses to take a photograph until someone is three feet in front of it.
Other than the timer issue it's a great camera. Furthermore why is it so hard to find a simple user guide. All that comes up on Google is a bunch of paid reviews that Canon hired out. IRRITATING!!!!!!
reply to this comment
Other than the timer issue it's a great camera. Furthermore why is it so hard to find a simple user guide. All that comes up on Google is a bunch of paid reviews that Canon hired out. IRRITATING!!!!!!
by James DeRuvo (11/27/2010)
You can download the manual in PDF form at canonusa.com.
reply to this comment
ambivalent (Chris — 10/08/2010)
I have bught the Powershot SX210 but Im still ambivalent about its picture quality, I feel at short distance the colours are saturated and at 200mm and more the colours show unclear details, can someone explain why ? is it because at short distance 14 mios is too many pixels ? how about longer distance ? For a good picture quality at long and or night features which of the canon/panasonic digital or bridge camera would you suggest ? which one does a good job at low light and long distance ? Thank you very much
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/12/2010)
Two things. First, the farther out your push your lens, the slower it gets. Additionally, the more pronounced camera shake becomes. Both of these can affect the image quality. This would be true no matter what the brand, although some models handle it better than others.
reply to this comment
Second thoughts about SX210 IS (Michael — 10/06/2010)
Hello, I have bought this camera for the lens capacity 395mm, I still have a few days left on my "satisfied or refund" warranty. I have tried it on short and long distance shot, I must say that Im a little ambivalent about the long distance quality as when passin 250 mm the colours do get blur and mashed up thats why Im considering to exchnage it with the Panasonic Lumix FZ45 only trouble is that it is 10% more expensive and slightly heavier to carry around. Another option was Canon SD4000 which has a shorter lens but since I should be tempted to take pictures at dusk and/or dawm the latter is better for low light pictures, can someone give me a hint or perhaps suggest to think of another camera ? thank you very much
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/07/2010)
Thing is, the longer the focal length, the more likely you'll get camera shake and more difficulty locking into an image. So it isn't surprising the pictures are a tad soft. It won't be much different with another camera. And comparing at imaging-resource.com, I think the FZ45 is softer in focus, but maybe a tad more colorful. But not by much.
Remember, you can always adjust in software. It's clarity you really want.
reply to this comment
Remember, you can always adjust in software. It's clarity you really want.
reducing (Michael — 10/07/2010)
If I was to reduce the pixel from 14 to 10 would my pictures have a more real colour look ? would it look less saturated whether at 1m or 20m how would my picture look like (my SX210 is now back in its selling box)
Also I mentioned the Lumix FZ45 to be 10% more expensive than the SX210 it is actually 50% more expensive ! For picture quality at long and or night features which of the canon/panasonic digital or bridge camera would you suggest ? which one does good job at low light and long distance ? Thank you very much
reply to this comment
Also I mentioned the Lumix FZ45 to be 10% more expensive than the SX210 it is actually 50% more expensive ! For picture quality at long and or night features which of the canon/panasonic digital or bridge camera would you suggest ? which one does good job at low light and long distance ? Thank you very much
compare canonsx210 and plympus600uz (rajiv — 09/27/2010)
plz teel me what mamera is better- canonsx210 or olympus 600uz
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/27/2010)
Canon in this case, though I don't think they're really comparable.
reply to this comment
low light video (DR Petyon — 09/18/2010)
Which camera takes the best video in evening or low light
Cannon sx210, Pana zs7, or Sony HZ55, Fuji jz300?
reply to this comment
Cannon sx210, Pana zs7, or Sony HZ55, Fuji jz300?
Liam McCabe (09/20/2010)
None are particularly strong, but the Panasonic ZS7 is the best of that bunch in my opinion.
reply to this comment
HOWWWW (Youssry — 09/15/2010)
My camera lens extend and not retracted give me lens error I only used my camera for 1 m
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/16/2010)
Have you dropped it? THis is a common issue for people who drop their cameras, knocking the lens out of alignment. Cycling the camera on/off many times without forcing it may cause it to work it's way back on the rails. Also, it can be caused by battery connection issues - dirty contacts. Give them cleaning.
reply to this comment
Need help choosing (Don — 08/30/2010)
Guys, simple question:
Should I get Fuji F80, Canon SX210, Canon G11 (trade-in deal allow me to buy it for $260), Canon S90, Panasonic Lumix ZS5 or Casio Exilim EX-FH100?
reply to this comment
Should I get Fuji F80, Canon SX210, Canon G11 (trade-in deal allow me to buy it for $260), Canon S90, Panasonic Lumix ZS5 or Casio Exilim EX-FH100?
Liam McCabe (08/31/2010)
Some cameras are in different classes -- you're comparing travel zooms to high-end compacts -- so it's not really a simple question. But the high-end compacts take better pictures. Both the S90 and G11 are excellent cameras. However, the S95 is coming out soon, and Canon will be announcing the G12 soon as well. Don't know if it's really worth waiting, especially if you can get a G11 for that price.
If you want a camera with a bigger zoom, go with the Panasonic or the Casio.
reply to this comment
If you want a camera with a bigger zoom, go with the Panasonic or the Casio.
Jaxsun (08/25/2010)
how is it for night pictures?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/25/2010)
The flash is pretty powerful, so if you're going to use the flash, back up a bit and use the zoom to compensate. Without flash in auto mode, not particularly great. Pretty noisy. But it has manual settings, so you can slow down the shutter speed, open up the aperture (lower number means wider), and turn the ISO down. (You can do this with any camera that has manual settings though.) In short, the SX210 is OK for night pictures, as long as you operate within its limits.
reply to this comment
ahmad (08/19/2010)
i am going to a wedding and i need to buy a camera which one i should choose canon 500d or sx210 i never used slr camera before
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/19/2010)
Those are two very different cameras. The 500d will be much better in low light but the 18-55mm kit lens will be way too short for good ceremony pictures. You could try the Canon sx210IS but results indoors will be mediocre at best. Of the two, the 500d is the better choice in my mind.
reply to this comment
Heather (08/18/2010)
How sturdy is this camera? I'm guessing it is not comparable to an Olympus Tough but would like to know it won't break into pieces if I accidentally drop it. Any thoughts?
reply to this comment
Audio quality (Woody — 08/16/2010)
Hi.I bought a Sony HX5V,after doing some research I found out that this camera has a horrible mic, especially at loud decibels like concerts.So it's going back.I've narrowed it down to the ZS7 or the Sx210IS.Does anyone have any experience with either of these models concerning taking videos at concerts,and the audio performance.Any feedback is greatly appreciated,I have 2 weeks to decide.
reply to this comment
George (08/10/2010)
I would like to have seen a viewfinder o this camera-locking the camera to your nose and arms against chest provides a 'quick' tripod which helps reduce shake.
reply to this comment
Price (Mike W — 08/09/2010)
I like this. Any reason to think the price will drop much soon?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/10/2010)
If it does it'll be before the Holidays ... Black Friday. Otherwise not until January at least. That's when new models are usually introduced.
reply to this comment
SX210 vs. SX200...or Casio FH100? (Cat913 — 08/04/2010)
Is the SX200 similar to the SX210? I can get a pretty good deal on last year's model and I was wondering if they are pretty much the same. I also became interested in the FH100 because of the good performance in low light conditions. I want something that is fast and can give me a good (but not perfect) low light conditions. I read over and over about the panasonic FH20 also, but I heard mixed things about the low light conditions and it worries me, also, the lens not being the high quality lecia lens is scaring me.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/04/2010)
Well the SX210 is a definite upgrade. 2X more optical zoom (14x), faster lens (f3.1), "continuous" shooting (.7fps really isn't much). But is it worth another $70? Probably not.
reply to this comment
But Casio FH100 over a Cannon in the SX line? (Cat913 — 08/07/2010)
I noticed you saying how much you like the Casio FH100 on a few threads. I am now leaning towards that one. Would that be comparable in photo quality and performance to a cannon in the SX line (SX210)? Would you choose the casio over the cannon?
reply to this comment
not happy with this camera (Kathy9s — 07/27/2010)
I bought this camera about 6 months ago and altho it has lots of "bells & whistles", it's not as user friendly as I thought it would be. Worst part is after only going through 2 sets of batteries, I now have a thin white line thru my LCD screen. It doesn't show up on my photos but thru blogs & friends, its a DEAD pixel and will only get worse from here on in.
reply to this comment
Wide screen feature is definately NOT 4:6 ! ( — 07/26/2010)
A Best Buy salesman told me the SX210IS took pictures in the 4:6 aspect ratio, like my SLR. This made it worth it to buy this incredibly heavy and expensive sub-compact. But, wait a minute! After my first photo expedition, the "wide screen" shots were actually 3.3:6! A general question: is there ANY sub-compact that takes 4:6 shots ???
reply to this comment
Jalpa (07/25/2010)
HI, I cannot make up my mind between a Canon SX210 and Sony H55. The salesperson tells me sony is good, with good features like panorama and I-Auto but my earlier sony w150 gave grainy pictures and now I am confused. Pls advise.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/29/2010)
I think the proof is in the images. Looking at the sample images at imaging-resource.com, I think the SX pictures are more accurate in color, even at higher ISO the sharpness holds up while the H55 really starts to fall apart with noise.
Go with the SX210.
reply to this comment
Go with the SX210.
Canon SX210 vs Panasonic ZS7 (Richard Faith — 07/18/2010)
I am trying to make up my mind on the Cannon SX210 and the Panasonic ZS7. About the most impressive differnece I can see is the GPS capability on the Panasonic. We are heading for Europe in August and the GPS feature for identifying landmarks seems like a real ++. Main concern I have is which camera has the fastest recovery time between shots. I find I miss alot of shots waiting for recovery.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
I've tried both (ZS7 review coming in the next few days) -- I think I prefer the ZS7 by a sliver. The GPS has been a bit wonky for me, but if you're outdoors most of the time, it should work better. (I also tried the Samsung HZ35W, the GPS barely worked on that one).
But to the point, both are fairly quick to recover, but the ZS7 has a bit of an edge, and also a burst speed about 3x faster than the SX210. You can make it even faster by using a speedier SD/SDHC card -- the higher the class, the faster the camera can save the picture to the card, and the sooner it can shoot again. Try Class 6 or higher.
I think you'll be happy with either, but probably a bit happier with the Panasonic especially considering your use of GPS. Also, take a look at the Casio FH100 -- not a brand name, but a very good camera with a sizeable zoom.
reply to this comment
But to the point, both are fairly quick to recover, but the ZS7 has a bit of an edge, and also a burst speed about 3x faster than the SX210. You can make it even faster by using a speedier SD/SDHC card -- the higher the class, the faster the camera can save the picture to the card, and the sooner it can shoot again. Try Class 6 or higher.
I think you'll be happy with either, but probably a bit happier with the Panasonic especially considering your use of GPS. Also, take a look at the Casio FH100 -- not a brand name, but a very good camera with a sizeable zoom.
YMChau (07/17/2010)
I love taking shots of mother nature; landscape as well as close up shots of flora. Is one with a bigger optical zoom better for outdoor photography? I can't decide on either of these as recomended by friends: Canon S90, SX210 or SX20IS? What is your take?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
In my opinion, more zoom is always a good thing outdoors -- doesn't matter so much for landscapes or flowers, but if you want to shoot animals from a distance without scaring them away, zoom is a good thing.
Here's what I think: The S90 is a great camera all-around, but you're paying for the ability to shoot indoors or in low lighting. Sounds like you'll be doing most of your shooting outdoors in good light, so this probably isn't much of a concern for you. The zoom is also pretty small.
That leaves the SX210 and the SX20. The SX20 has a bigger zoom, marginally better images (less distortion at the edges), and takes AA batteries, so you won't be SOL if you're out for a hike and your battery dies -- just pop in some more. The SX210 is much more portable, and in a sleeker design. You can easily fit in in a pocket/purse.
I can't gauge how much the size matters to you, but if you don't mind having a bulkier camera and using AA batteries (you can always buy rechargeable ones), I think you'll be happier with the SX20.
One more thing before you buy -- this is the time of year for "second half announcements," meaning Canon will probably be announcing new cameras any day now. The SX20 is a year old, so I'm willing to bet that they'll be announcing an update. That said, it probably won't be available for purchase until September 1, and I have no idea if it's significant enough of an upgrade to a) justify holding off on a camera or b) paying the "new model" premium.
All that said, I thin you'll be a happy camper if you go ahead with the SX20.
reply to this comment
Here's what I think: The S90 is a great camera all-around, but you're paying for the ability to shoot indoors or in low lighting. Sounds like you'll be doing most of your shooting outdoors in good light, so this probably isn't much of a concern for you. The zoom is also pretty small.
That leaves the SX210 and the SX20. The SX20 has a bigger zoom, marginally better images (less distortion at the edges), and takes AA batteries, so you won't be SOL if you're out for a hike and your battery dies -- just pop in some more. The SX210 is much more portable, and in a sleeker design. You can easily fit in in a pocket/purse.
I can't gauge how much the size matters to you, but if you don't mind having a bulkier camera and using AA batteries (you can always buy rechargeable ones), I think you'll be happier with the SX20.
One more thing before you buy -- this is the time of year for "second half announcements," meaning Canon will probably be announcing new cameras any day now. The SX20 is a year old, so I'm willing to bet that they'll be announcing an update. That said, it probably won't be available for purchase until September 1, and I have no idea if it's significant enough of an upgrade to a) justify holding off on a camera or b) paying the "new model" premium.
All that said, I thin you'll be a happy camper if you go ahead with the SX20.
YMChau (07/20/2010)
Thanks for your advice. I am more inclined towards SX20 despite its size and AA batteries. However, this model is being phased out in my country and as mentioned, an updated model should be launched soon (camera dealers told me so too). Guess I will wait for a while before deciding on a new purchase.
reply to this comment
Should I be looking at a totally different camera? (Michelle — 07/14/2010)
I am having to replace my Canon A650is. I LOVED this camera. I've looked at the sx120 and the sx210. I like the features of the 210, but not really the size (it feels a little small to me)or the placement of the flash. I like the size & feel of the 120, but want more mp's, zoom/optical zoom, and stitch assist (some of the features that are important to me). Should I be looking at totally different cameras? I've always had Canon's and am partial to them, but with good recommendation would be willing to look at other options. I use my camera for pictures of kids/vacations/regular activities etc. Use both manual and auto. Day/Night/Inside/Outside. Thanks in advance for advice.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2010)
Well first off, more MP is not necessarily "all that." Sure, the 210is has 4mp more, but are you going to see that MP in 99% of your shots? Not really. It'll really be beneficial in sizes above 11x14, but how often will you be doing that?
Both are good cameras though.
reply to this comment
Both are good cameras though.
black spot noticed on Canon SX210 IS (Adriana Vaquera — 07/14/2010)
I just bought the Canon SX210 IS. I read some customer reviews that have problems with a black spot that appears when using the zoom. Sure enough I noticed the black spot when I zoom in. The black spot shows up even in video mode. Is this a design flaw or is it just this particular camera that I should exchange?
That was the suggestion I got from the Canon Customer Support person.
reply to this comment
That was the suggestion I got from the Canon Customer Support person.
Liam McCabe (07/20/2010)
I think you should just exchange it for a different one -- not a problem on the one that I tested. It's inevitable that some cameras will have minor manufacturing defects like this, so just swap it out for one that works.
reply to this comment
Should I upgrade? (Marilyn Weil — 07/12/2010)
I'm looking at the Canon SX210 as a possible replacement for the Canon SD800 that I have. I take a lot of macro shots for selling jewelry on the internet and I also travel a lot. So I need a good macro as well as something lightweight to carry on trips. The idea of the 14x optical zoom is appealing. But would the macro shots be good enough? Is it worth upgrading? The 800 takes good pics, but just not real close macro shots.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2010)
The macro setting isn't not nearly as good as the SX120. In fact, it's not even close. So I'd say the SX210 isn't an option macro wise.
reply to this comment
Adriana (07/09/2010)
I have recently bought the Canon SX210 and I have found that some of my pics and videos have a black spot on the upper rt hand corner and I have read some of the reviews where other people have had this problem but I decided to buy the camera hoping it wouldnt be a problem but it defintely is
noticeable. Do you know of any way to avoid getting the black spot?
reply to this comment
noticeable. Do you know of any way to avoid getting the black spot?
Liam McCabe (07/12/2010)
I did not get the black spot when I tested this camera, so that sounds to me like there's a defect. I don't think there would be a way to correct it in the camera settings. Go back to where you bought it and try to swap it for a different unit -- if you bought it recently from a decent retailer, they should let you do this no problem if you tell them that there's a defect. Otherwise, get in touch with Canon customer service.
reply to this comment
michelle (07/08/2010)
I bought the panasonic zs5 and the photo quality was not near as good and clear as the canon sx210.
reply to this comment
Tammy (06/30/2010)
Thank you for the help! Which of those two takes the best photos?
reply to this comment
What camera for a person who likes the auto feature! (Tammy — 06/30/2010)
I am looking for a new camera that is small for travel. I am not a camera pro, and I usually use the auto feature and shoot. I like a decent zoom, as my old kodak has 10x optical zoom. I am interested in the cannon sx120, and the sx210 as well as the casio exh10 or the samsung hz30w. I like the zooms, but which one would be the best in all around photos. both in and out, and different lighting. Thanks.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/30/2010)
Well I'd drop the sx120 right away because it doesn't have a wide-angle lens. The Canon is a bit larger than both the Casio and Samsung, so I'd say go with the Samsung. The hz30w and sx210 will both be adequate for what you're looking for.
reply to this comment
Kathy (06/23/2010)
Wow, $199 for either is impossible for me to find! We want great zoom, but the smaller size is also important and the Canon seems to fill that requirement better, since the Samsung is weightier?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/23/2010)
It's a good, solid choice. But if you want to stay under $200, check out the Panasonic FH20 as well. Slightly smaller zoom, but in the price range.
reply to this comment
Sandi (06/18/2010)
Comparing the Canon SX210 and the Samsung HZ30W at $199. Primary use is outdoor and pet photos to use for doing paintings and kids sports, but will use indoors too. At $199, I'm leaning to the Samsung. Thoughts?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/18/2010)
I tested the HZ35W and the SX210 (review coming soon, I promise). I think they're pretty even, to be honest. DPreview.com recently did a "travel zoom" roundup comparing a number of cameras in this category, and picked the Samsung (HZ35W, which is basically the HZ30W with a GPS unit and nicer screen) over the Canon as well. $199, by the way, is an excellent price for either of these cameras.
reply to this comment
Seems SX210IS lacks sharpness of easrlier, simpler ELPH SD890 (Martin Stringer — 06/17/2010)
Just purchased one. Testing it in side-by-side shooting with my old Powershot SD890. Sharpness in both auto and P modes is much less than the SD890. Is this because Canon products no longer have "superfine"compression settings, or because of the monster zoom lense? Disappointed because my old SD890 gave me exceptionally sharp (almost unbelievably sharp photos...Any ideas? Elimination of superfine option, or just the price of a zoom lense? Or something else?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/17/2010)
Yes. It may also be a more MP on the same CCD size. This will cause a censor to be less sensitive, not more.
reply to this comment
S 90, SD 3500IS or SX210 by Canon (Attwell — 06/16/2010)
I am looking for a not too complicated camera to take pictures of my grandchildren who are always on the go. Several will be taken indoors or at events where the light is poor and the distance from the side might be a problem. I have narrowed the choices to Canon S 90, Canon SX 210, and the Canon SD3500 IS.Any suggestions which might be the better choice?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/16/2010)
Either really. They all have the same processors, IIRCz. The key will be to prefocus and pan with the action. You can compare all three at Canonusa.com under choose the right product. Then compare them side by side.
reply to this comment
Excellent speed?? (Mia — 06/16/2010)
What's the processing speed of the SX210 IS like?? and also is it good for action/sport shots even though it doesn't have a sports mode??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/16/2010)
Depends on the speed of your card, bt the sx210 is pretty good. Then again, I shoot sports w a DSLR. No shutter lag and a far faster lens and shutter speed.
reply to this comment
grace (06/15/2010)
which is better, Canon sx210 or panasonic lumix lx3?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/15/2010)
Very different cameras, not comparable. The SX210 has a huge zoom and some other cool features, the LX3 has a much better optical system and as such much better image quality. Both have manual control, but the LX3 is a much more powerful camera -- you just have to sacrifice a lot of zoom.
reply to this comment
prasanth (06/13/2010)
sx210 vs samsung hz35
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/14/2010)
I've tested both, full Canon SX210 review forthcoming. The Canon's image quality is so much better than the HZ35W. The GPS on the HZ35W doesn't work particularly well either. I'd go with the Canon here.
reply to this comment
Wedding Camera. (J SHAFER — 06/11/2010)
NEED A NEW CAMERA FOR A WEDDING. IN THIS CATEGORY WHICH IS THE BETTER BET. CANON SX210IS, PANASONIC ZS7 OR THE SAMSUNG HZ30(OR 35)W.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/11/2010)
I prefer the Canon, but Pannys are really good these days.
reply to this comment
Robin (06/11/2010)
I'm really confused between canon sx210, panasonic ZS7 and sony hx5v. Picture quality (both in daylight and low-light) and performance- these two are top most priority for me. Video quality is not a issue as I've a handycam.
So among these three which is the best according to my priority? Waiting for valuable opinion...
reply to this comment
So among these three which is the best according to my priority? Waiting for valuable opinion...
HELP PLEASE (Corita — 06/08/2010)
I'm stuck between a Sony Cybershot HX5V and a Canon SX210IS. I want a camera to use everyday. I have 2 and 5 year old boys. They NEVER stay still!!! I'm using an old Canon Powershot now. My pictures are almost always blurry with the exception of when my oldest poses for me. Getting ready for football (flag) and am looking at the power burst to capture the action. Please let me know which camera is preferred for this type of activity.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/09/2010)
You most likely wont be happy with either. There's a reason sports photographers use DSLRs over pocket cameras and that's image quality. Both of these cameras have very slow lenses and slow response times. If you can afford it you would be much happier with a budget DSLR and telezoom lens.
reply to this comment
Tom K (06/04/2010)
Excellent Camera
reply to this comment
canon xs210 (Samantha — 06/03/2010)
my canon sx210 flash makes a weird popping noise whenever it pops up or goes back down. is that normal?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
Not really. Sounds like you may need to have Canon take a look at it.
reply to this comment
upgrade advice please! ( — 06/03/2010)
I would really like your help! I have a Panasonic FX37 that is one year old. I love this camera, but I am about to go on a trip to Europe and I am browsing upgrade options. I take my camera everywhere and take a lot of people pics, as well as scenic pics. I'm not a professional, but I appreciate quality photos. Is the SX210 worth selling my FX37? I'm not even sure what that camera is worth now, but it is in great condition. I assume the SX210 is better than the new Canon SD models, but I would love your opinion on whether to upgrade or stick to my Panasonic. Thanks!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
The SX210 is a great camera, but my question is, why do you want to dump your existing camera if you love it? You say to upgrade, but upgrade to what? And don't say more MP because more MP doesn't always equate to better photographs. In fact, more MP can sometimes make for a poorer quality image if those MPs haven't come with a larger chip.
reply to this comment
Katie (06/04/2010)
Thanks for your response. I do love my current camera, but it is not always perfect. I don't expect this class of camera to be perfect, but I was told that the sx210 takes some of the best pictures for a small/portable digital camera. The only reason I am browsing for an upgrade is because I am going on a vacation and the pictures are going to be very important to me. Without getting an SLR, I want to be sure I at least investigate the best cameras within this range. If you think the sx210 is not far superior to the FX37, then I will stick with what I've got, but I just wanted to ask. Thanks!
reply to this comment
(05/30/2010)
hey guys plz. help me i was looking a good picture camera which is color sharper /good in low light/easy to use/video are also good choice between are sony hx5v/canono sx 210/nikon coolpix s8000/samsung wb 650/panasonic zs7 ??? which is the bestest plz..tell me
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/02/2010)
Go with the SX210.
reply to this comment
Low Light without using flash. (Shing Kuo — 05/20/2010)
25 to 35 percent of my trip photos are indoor (churches, museums, Palaces), use flash light will lost details of background image.
I am looking for a compact camera with low light capability. Compare SX210. Lumix ZS7, and Sony DSC-HX5, which one is better for low light without using flash light?
Also, which one of them is good for video recording (focus properly while zooming)? Believe all of them save the file with MP4 image.
reply to this comment
I am looking for a compact camera with low light capability. Compare SX210. Lumix ZS7, and Sony DSC-HX5, which one is better for low light without using flash light?
Also, which one of them is good for video recording (focus properly while zooming)? Believe all of them save the file with MP4 image.
by James DeRuvo (05/21/2010)
The SX210 is a pretty good camera. Panasonic is making some great cameras right now. I'm not much a fan of the Sony.
I do have to recommend you also consider the Panasonic FH20. It has great video quality and good low light performance.
reply to this comment
I do have to recommend you also consider the Panasonic FH20. It has great video quality and good low light performance.
Shing Kuo (05/20/2010)
25 to 35 percent of my trip photos are indoor (churches, museums, palaces), use flash light will lost details of background image.
I am looking for a compact camera with low light capability. Compare SX210 and Lumix ZS7, which one is better for low light without using flash light?
reply to this comment
I am looking for a compact camera with low light capability. Compare SX210 and Lumix ZS7, which one is better for low light without using flash light?
by James DeRuvo (05/21/2010)
Check out the Panasonic Fh20. 8x optical zoom. Leica lens. Good low light performance.
reply to this comment
(05/17/2010)
I am looking at the Canon SX210IS, the Cannon Power Shot SX20 IS, and the KodakEasyShare Z981. Which is the best or are they comparable? Thanks.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/20/2010)
I think it's down to either SX model. Question is, do you want a more compact variant. Both are great.
reply to this comment
SX201 or the SD3500 (CheLeona — 05/16/2010)
Torn between the SX210 or the SD3500. Take mostly pics of kids and they never sit still - want something with quick shutter speed. Also looking for something that shoots well in low light. Also want camera with a decent zoom. Torn between wich model is best for me??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/20/2010)
I think either one will do. You can go to CanonUSA.com and compare the two under the "choose the right product" button on either product page. One thing though, I'd act quickly. There's up to a $50 rebate if you by before May 22nd. canonusa.com/consumer/contr...
reply to this comment
canon sx 210 or sony hx5 (Adeela — 05/07/2010)
I've been looking reviews at sony hx5 and canon sx210 for over a month some say canon is good and some say sony hx5.still i've not come to any conclusion and am very confused, i want a camera with good quality images ,(i'll be printing 4 * 6 size pictures) and with good video too,
Adeela
reply to this comment
Adeela
Liam McCabe (05/07/2010)
Well, both seem to be solid cameras. I've heard complaints about both, but lots of good things about both (though a lot of folks have complained that the SX210's pop-up flash is in a bad location, right where your finger will probably be to steady the camera).
It's going to come down to which one you like the most -- one just might be a great fit for you. If you can, try to go to a Best Buy or a photography store and try them out for yourself in person.
I might also suggest the Panasonic ZS7, or even last year's ZS3. The ZS3 is a great camera, and you should be able to get it for a deal now -- retailers are trying to empty out last year's stock, so now's the time to buy.
reply to this comment
It's going to come down to which one you like the most -- one just might be a great fit for you. If you can, try to go to a Best Buy or a photography store and try them out for yourself in person.
I might also suggest the Panasonic ZS7, or even last year's ZS3. The ZS3 is a great camera, and you should be able to get it for a deal now -- retailers are trying to empty out last year's stock, so now's the time to buy.
G11 or SX210?? (Sam Adamson — 05/02/2010)
I am looking for a new Canon point and shoot digital camera. After reading many reviews, I am torn between the G11 and SX210. My pics are mainly family and holiday shots (with the odd use of video), but I would like better image quality than I have now with my Sony. Which do you advise?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2010)
I'd go with the SX210. If you wanted a good backup for a DSLR, the G11 is a good choice, but for snapshots, the SX210 seems more practical.
reply to this comment
Sam Adamson (05/03/2010)
Thanks for that advice James! And lastly, in choosing between the SX210, and S90 ... should I still choose the SX210 for my needs?
reply to this comment
Interior Design -I would like your advice (Jocelyn Norden — 04/27/2010)
My last camera was a Canon Powershot SD1100. I was disappointed in the color of pictures. They did not seem true - especially when taken in low light nor was the detail clear. I would like your advice on purchasing a new camera. I take pictures for interior design, so color is important. Also is wide angle to take room shots and zoom to take detail shots. I also take family pictures on special occasions and I like to take close up pics. We travel frequently, so small is good. I am looking at the Canon Powershot SX210 IS. Does it have the features I should be looking for? Would you recommend it or another camera?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2010)
The SX210 is a good option. But also take a look at the Pansonic LH20. With it's 8x F2.0 lens, it's one of the fastest in it's class. And gets high marks for low light performance.
reply to this comment
Interior Design I would like your advice (Jocelyn Norden — 05/15/2010)
Can the Panasonic FH20 camera be used with Apple's iPhone MobileMe and iTunes? If you have any tips, they would be appreciated.
reply to this comment
lyn hulslander (04/22/2010)
im looking to buy a canon for my daughters birthday and am torn between the powershot sx200is, canon s90, canon 210is. which camara would be best for a photobug college student?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/23/2010)
It's pretty much a draw there. But I think the S90 is a great option.
reply to this comment
Absolutely NOT an Everyday Camera.. (Rhoda Winoneh — 04/22/2010)
SX210 IS?!
Well, I must say if you want a camera for all occasions, this one is just NOT worth it, considering its LOW quality pictures (a disappointing surprise), large black spot it puts on the bottom right of photos when using a flash in macro mode where there's low light (this is because the flash can't support the bottom right of the lens, and that you don't have access to all shooting modes in one place..
Much to my disappointment as a customer..
And I believe it should be the same for Canon..
reply to this comment
Well, I must say if you want a camera for all occasions, this one is just NOT worth it, considering its LOW quality pictures (a disappointing surprise), large black spot it puts on the bottom right of photos when using a flash in macro mode where there's low light (this is because the flash can't support the bottom right of the lens, and that you don't have access to all shooting modes in one place..
Much to my disappointment as a customer..
And I believe it should be the same for Canon..
Liam McCabe (04/22/2010)
Hmm it sounds like you got a lemon. We've heard nothing but good things about that camera, so you may want to get in touch with Canon about a repair or replacement.
reply to this comment
Reply (Rhoda Winoneh — 04/27/2010)
Hi there.. The flash problem I mentioned isn't just mine.. I read some professional's comment online who had the same trouble too (Of course this only happens with close objects -macro mode.).. He said I had bought it just to be in my pocket, but it was so poor in quality that I gave it back (I wish I had listened to him!) But perhaps we expect too much of our photos..
reply to this comment
I have a flash problem too (Julie — 06/25/2010)
I got the SX210 about 2 months ago. I took pictures in bright sunlight and they came out great, with awesome sharpness even when zoomed in. Then I took the camera on a Baltic cruise and was horribly disappointed. In cloudy conditions, the pictures weren't sharp at all. My older Canon cameras did a much better job at half the price. And the flash pictures were bad, either close-up or farther away. I also feel like the image stabilizer flat out quit working. I've brought the camera back to Best Buy as I purchased their service agreement. I'm hoping they are able to fix it as I was truly excited to get this camera, but now am feeling like I made a very expensive mistake.
reply to this comment
Update on camera problems (Julie — 07/04/2010)
I received a call from Best Buy that there were so many problems with my camera that it would be more expensive to fix it than to replace it. So I now have a brand new SX210 and so far so good. It's too late to replace all of the shots from my vacation, but I am hoping that future pictures are of the quality that I expected from Canon.
reply to this comment
hisham hensem (04/20/2010)
guys help me please,which do u prefer, sony tx7,ixus 200 is,ixus 210 or sx210??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
Well, you're not going to find much difference between the SX cameras except subtle ones. And the SX is where you should be looking.
So here's what I would do. Go to CanonUSA.com and click on cameras. Then, find one of the models and select it. You'll go to the product page. Then on the right you'll see "choose the right product." This is where you can choose up to three cameras and compare them side by side. You'll see the subtle differences and it'll help you decide which one works for you.
You can also go to imaging-resource.com and compare camera images side by side. I'd suggest that as well. Good luck.
reply to this comment
So here's what I would do. Go to CanonUSA.com and click on cameras. Then, find one of the models and select it. You'll go to the product page. Then on the right you'll see "choose the right product." This is where you can choose up to three cameras and compare them side by side. You'll see the subtle differences and it'll help you decide which one works for you.
You can also go to imaging-resource.com and compare camera images side by side. I'd suggest that as well. Good luck.
Need some advice please (AP — 04/17/2010)
I purchased this camera to shoot pictures at concerts. Without a media pass, patrons are pretty much limited to a point and shoot. Can someone advise me of the SX210 settings that I should use to get the best shots in these conditions (or will I still be subject to blurry shots without flash and too much noise with flash)?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/19/2010)
Yeah shooting at concerts is a real challenge. I know that a lot of places prefer no flash photography. You'll want to turn the ISO up, but not too high -- I'd say ISO 800 maximum. Try to hold the camera as still as possible, because the shutter is going to automatically stay open for some time in low light, I don't believe there's a way to adjust that on this camera.
Shots with flash usually aren't noisy. Noise is a problem when the flash is off and the ISO is turned up. If you can use the flash, you should be able to get better images. Try 'Slow Synchro' option, which does a decent job of balancing the brightness in the foreground and background, but again, try to hold the camera as still as possible.
reply to this comment
Shots with flash usually aren't noisy. Noise is a problem when the flash is off and the ISO is turned up. If you can use the flash, you should be able to get better images. Try 'Slow Synchro' option, which does a decent job of balancing the brightness in the foreground and background, but again, try to hold the camera as still as possible.
SX210 IS Quick Review (Eyeman — 04/17/2010)
I recently bought a Canon Powershot SX210 IS. In fact I went to buy the SX200 IS after reading all the reviews albeit with it's limitations eg pop-up flash, lack of zoom in video mode. The SX210 was just out and I am glad I went with this newer model for only about $50 extra. It has a pop-up flash that can be pushed down if not needed and can be lifted up as necessary. It does take video quite well with reasonable sound although does chew through memory. Battery life is reasonable, but it pays to have a charged spare on standby. It is a camera you can use very simply or get as complex as you wish. I was also using it to take copies of slide presentations during a conference - from a reasonable distance to the screen and without a flash and that is where the optical zoom and image stabilisation coped better than any camrea I have owned previously. Macro is reasonable, but still not as good as my Nikon Coolpix 990 for Ophthalmic work.
reply to this comment
Suggestions PLEASE (elou d — 04/15/2010)
considering the SX210, P100, S8000... plan on using for baby pics and video clips... which one give me more bang for my buck?? pic quality?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/15/2010)
I'd avoid the P series. Very poor in low light. The SX210 is getting good marks.
reply to this comment
DebSpringfield (04/14/2010)
I am considering the Cannon SX210 versus the Nikkon S8000. What are your thoughts regarding the two of them. Will be taking lots of baby and people pictures, but I still want a great "all occasion" camera.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/14/2010)
Out of those two, I'd take the SX210 hands down. Spec for spec, it's already a better camera, and then on top of that, Canon just makes much better point and shoots than Nikon right now.
One of our writers is currently reviewing the S8000, so maybe we're wrong -- we'll know if a week or two -- but I doubt it. Go with the Canon.
reply to this comment
One of our writers is currently reviewing the S8000, so maybe we're wrong -- we'll know if a week or two -- but I doubt it. Go with the Canon.
Selection (Raj — 04/11/2010)
I need a digital camera that is more Automatic rather than Manual and though I have to buy a camera asap, I am still confused..After a long study I have narrow down to my selection between Panasonic Lumix DMC ZS3 and Canon SX 210 IS. I would be grateful if any one reply to my query....
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/12/2010)
Both are great cameras. The Canon has a longer zoom, the Panasonic probably has better video. The other thing to consider is that the Panasonic has been out longer, so there are more positive reviews to back it up, though I have heard very good things about the SX210 since it came out a few weeks ago. Also, there's a newer model of the ZS3, the ZS7, which also looks great. You'll be happy with either, good luck.
reply to this comment
canon sx 210 vs canon sd 3500 (rajvi — 04/04/2010)
which is better?
what is memory of sx 210
for which camera i can go
what is the battery charging time
reply to this comment
what is memory of sx 210
for which camera i can go
what is the battery charging time
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
The SD3500 has a wider angle, faster lens. That's where the rubber meets the road. The faster your lens, the less likely you have to go with higher ISOs in low light situations.
Battery charging? First couple of times you want to charge it overnight, deplete it, repeat. Do that 2-3 times and then you can safely charge it in about 90 minutes to full capacity.
reply to this comment
Battery charging? First couple of times you want to charge it overnight, deplete it, repeat. Do that 2-3 times and then you can safely charge it in about 90 minutes to full capacity.
Jake (05/13/2010)
Lion batteries do not suffer from the "memory effect" that older technologies had. Just like the ipod touch's, two 50% charge cycles equal one 100% charge cycle with no negative effect on the battery.
reply to this comment
canonsx210 and nikon coolpix s8000 (jignesh — 04/02/2010)
which is better? canon sx 210 or nikon coolpix s 8000
guide me properly as i m confused between this 2 cameras
compare all functions
reply to this comment
guide me properly as i m confused between this 2 cameras
compare all functions
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2010)
Go Canon. Simple fact is that Nikon's point and shoot line has had problems in low light across the board. Especially the P series. Canon's are more consistent.
reply to this comment
SX210 or Lumix ZS7? (Rani — 04/02/2010)
How does the SX210 stack up against the similar Panasonic Lumix ZS7? Which is the better camera overall?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2010)
I'd say their a dead heat. Both Canon and Panasonic are really at the top of their game right now when it comes to digital cameras. I've heard that the flash of the ZS7 is a tad too close to where you grip the camera so that may be an issue for larger hands.
reply to this comment
Jerry T (04/02/2010)
A few questions.. How long is the average lag or recycle time between flash shots? Can it handle indoor action shots minimizing blurring reasonably well... without flash? What's the battery life like? And I know this is asking a lot, but are the pictures comparable to SLR quality? Appreciate any insight on this.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2010)
A little too soon to tell, but it should hover around the same numbers as the SX200 which is about 2.3fps shot to shot. Added a little longer for flash recycle. I'm thinking about 4 seconds.
I don't think you can say any point and shoot is comparable to an SLR, especially if that SLR is full frame. They are really apples and oranges.
reply to this comment
I don't think you can say any point and shoot is comparable to an SLR, especially if that SLR is full frame. They are really apples and oranges.
rajvi (04/01/2010)
when shall i buy this camera
it's release date is 30th march
when will ti be available on amazone?
reply to this comment
it's release date is 30th march
when will ti be available on amazone?
Liam McCabe (04/01/2010)
It is currently shipping from Amazon. Buy whenever you'd like!
reply to this comment
Low light shots (Tom — 03/31/2010)
How does the SX210 handle shots in low light situations specifically indoors? Is it comparable to the PowerShot S90? Less or more grainy? I planning to use one primary for indoor shoots, but the S90 standard VGA video is a disappointment considering it's hefty price tag.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2010)
They are very similar. But understand that you're using a digital still CCD to process a video image. So it's not going to be as good as if you shot with a camcorder.
reply to this comment
Canon SX210 for Wildlife (dalethorn — 03/28/2010)
The Canon SX210 is nearly ideal for wildlife - I can't think of another compact that would come close to equaling the image quality of the 210 with maximum zoom. For vibe-free shutter releases, just use a short (~2 second) self timer. This is the best compact for wildlife, bar none. And the build quality is better than the G10/G11.
reply to this comment
re: wildlife shooting with the SX210 (Richard — 04/21/2010)
One drawback: long wait (at least 2 or 3 seconds but feels like an eternity) between shots while it saves to the card - and I splurged on a top-of the-line SDHC SanDisk Extreme card. Very annoying watching the perfect shot disappear while waiting for the previous shot to save before you can shoot again.
reply to this comment
viewfinder? (dawn lomas — 03/17/2010)
does this camera have a viewfinder? Outdoor pictures with just a monitor is challenging at times
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2010)
No it doesn't. Canon seems to be moving away from the viewfinder, which is a real shame, because in my mind, along with ambient light issues, the only thing a large LCD is for is killing your battery faster.
But if you're sold on this camera, check out the website hoodman.com. They offer hoods for LCD screens which block out a good portion of ambient light. They may have one for a camera LCD screen.
reply to this comment
But if you're sold on this camera, check out the website hoodman.com. They offer hoods for LCD screens which block out a good portion of ambient light. They may have one for a camera LCD screen.
batteries, sx120 IS or sx200 IS... (confused.. :( — 03/13/2010)
here are my questions:
1. is there any difference between Rechargeable lithium-ion battery and lithium-ion battery? on some cameras, it is showing on the specs "lithium-ion battery".. while on others, "Rechargeable lithium-ion battery".. what's the diffence between the two?
2. which is better.. SX120 IS or SX200 IS? i was about to buy SX120 IS but the seller told me that it is only using AA batteries so i better not buy it. what do u think w/ his comment? what AA battery can u recommend? any rechargable AA batteries that u can recommend?
thanks a lot :)
reply to this comment
1. is there any difference between Rechargeable lithium-ion battery and lithium-ion battery? on some cameras, it is showing on the specs "lithium-ion battery".. while on others, "Rechargeable lithium-ion battery".. what's the diffence between the two?
2. which is better.. SX120 IS or SX200 IS? i was about to buy SX120 IS but the seller told me that it is only using AA batteries so i better not buy it. what do u think w/ his comment? what AA battery can u recommend? any rechargable AA batteries that u can recommend?
thanks a lot :)
Liam McCabe (03/13/2010)
Hi there. To answer your first question, there usually isn't a difference between "lithium ion" or "rechargeable lithium ion" is it's listed here, just a minor inconsistency in the way we entered the product info (usually based on how the manufacturer lists the specs on their press materials). Unless we say "AA batteries," in all likelihood it's a proprietary, rechargeable lithium-ion battery that's included with the camera.
To answer your second question, the SX200 is a more powerful camera: The zoom is bigger, the body is smaller,it takes high-def videos, and you're right, it does run on a rechargeable battery. It is more expensive though. "Better" is a relative term, and depends on what you're looking for in a camera. the 10x zoom on the SX120 is still pretty big (look at your hand in front of you and imagine it 10 times larger -- really, really huge, right?). Some people prefer AA batteries. If you're out camping somewhere where there's no electricity for a week or more, for example, a rechargeable lithium-ion battery won't do you much good once it's dead. But if you bring a 20-pack of AA batteries, you're good to go for a while. It's things like that you have to think of. You can always get long-lasting, rechargeable lithium AA batteries too. Just check to make sure they're compatible with the specific camera.
Anybody have any suggestions for rechargeable AA brands?
Hope this helps, good luck!
reply to this comment
To answer your second question, the SX200 is a more powerful camera: The zoom is bigger, the body is smaller,it takes high-def videos, and you're right, it does run on a rechargeable battery. It is more expensive though. "Better" is a relative term, and depends on what you're looking for in a camera. the 10x zoom on the SX120 is still pretty big (look at your hand in front of you and imagine it 10 times larger -- really, really huge, right?). Some people prefer AA batteries. If you're out camping somewhere where there's no electricity for a week or more, for example, a rechargeable lithium-ion battery won't do you much good once it's dead. But if you bring a 20-pack of AA batteries, you're good to go for a while. It's things like that you have to think of. You can always get long-lasting, rechargeable lithium AA batteries too. Just check to make sure they're compatible with the specific camera.
Anybody have any suggestions for rechargeable AA brands?
Hope this helps, good luck!
Richard (04/21/2010)
SX210is has a Li-ion battery. Not impressed by battery life - needs charging every couple of days, even with moderate use.
reply to this comment
Canon G10 contra Canon SX210 (John Nicholson — 02/18/2010)
I am trying to compare the SX210 and the G10. Asfar as I can see the SX210 is both more compact and more verstile. The G10 wil have amore solid camera feel + an optic viewfinder (how importan?) and marginally more pixels but considerably less zoom. I am not clear what the implications of aperture are: f.2.8 - 4.5 (G10); f3.1-5.9 (SX 210). The G 10 seems to have a better macro setting (1cm), but surely 5 cm (SX210) is good enough for almost all situations? What does the G10 offer which is photographicall significantly better for the extra price-tag? Comments would be much appreciated.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/25/2010)
The implications are, the lower the aperture number, the faster the lens - which is an advantage in lower light.
But I'd skip the G10 altogether and go with the G11. Reason being, the G10 suffered from noise at low light because of too many MP which caused the chip to be less sensitive to light, not more. Canon learned this lesson pretty quickly and backed off to 10MP for the G11. And it shows.
reply to this comment
But I'd skip the G10 altogether and go with the G11. Reason being, the G10 suffered from noise at low light because of too many MP which caused the chip to be less sensitive to light, not more. Canon learned this lesson pretty quickly and backed off to 10MP for the G11. And it shows.
AHMAD (02/16/2010)
WHICH COUNTRY DOES IT MAKE?MADE IN JAPAN AVAILABLE OR NOT?AVAILABLE IN U.A.E?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/18/2010)
IIRC it's Taiwan.
reply to this comment
Top candidates ( — 02/14/2010)
The Cannon g11 has lousy specs for resolution-x-zoom. One of the Cannon SXs you recommended looks interesting though. For now, I'll watch for info on the Cannon SX210, Panasonic ZS5 and ZS7, the Olympus 8010, 9100 & 6020, and especially this Samsung HZ35. Any thoughts on others I should watch or any thoughts on these models? Most are not available, but I don't need to buy until July.
reply to this comment
Need view finder with screen (Ken — 02/11/2010)
Does it have a few finder option for taking outdoor shots when you can not see the screen; if not what would you suggest?
reply to this comment
Seeing the Screen (Victoria — 03/10/2010)
I have found that pretty much the only answer to the visibility in the screen is the Hoodman Loupe... ($89.99 in Canada) which is good for video applications when attached to the camera (I use it on my Canon T2i DSLR with bands attaching it when on a tripod) although there is one that attaches to the eyecup when you are shooting pics ($169.99 in Canada).
Unfortunately, since the mirror flips up when video is shot, you can't just buy the eyecup one to use for both applications. The good news is that the Loupe can be used on all cameras, and adjusted specifically to your eye.
reply to this comment
Unfortunately, since the mirror flips up when video is shot, you can't just buy the eyecup one to use for both applications. The good news is that the Loupe can be used on all cameras, and adjusted specifically to your eye.
Need advice on pocket-size wildlife camera ( — 02/11/2010)
This and the others mentioned look promising, but why aren't similar Olympus cameras listed that are already available?
Please comment here if you have suggestions for me. I need something by this summer that is light and small with a zoom that can reach wildlife and still produce enough resolution for 12 megapixals and can be charged by a solar panel through its USB port. I don't expect yo see an AC outlet for a few weeks where I'm headed.
Druthers include as many of the following additional features as I can find: HD, GPS, weatherproof, waterproof, freeze-proof, maximum rate-of-fire at full resolution, full manual control, more megapixals, reasonable wide lens when pulled back (for landscape and cramped inside work) fastest lens/CCD possible for pushed in shooting in mixed light and tiny remote shutter release to minimize vibration. I may opt for a pair of cameras that have enough overlap to back each other up, in which case, they can be slightly more fragile but would need to be even smaller and lighter.
And I'll have to balance all that against cost.
I know I'll never find everything I want (not this year anyway), but don't bother recommending an SLR. I'd never get to where I need to be with a heavy/fragile piece of equipment like that.
reply to this comment
Please comment here if you have suggestions for me. I need something by this summer that is light and small with a zoom that can reach wildlife and still produce enough resolution for 12 megapixals and can be charged by a solar panel through its USB port. I don't expect yo see an AC outlet for a few weeks where I'm headed.
Druthers include as many of the following additional features as I can find: HD, GPS, weatherproof, waterproof, freeze-proof, maximum rate-of-fire at full resolution, full manual control, more megapixals, reasonable wide lens when pulled back (for landscape and cramped inside work) fastest lens/CCD possible for pushed in shooting in mixed light and tiny remote shutter release to minimize vibration. I may opt for a pair of cameras that have enough overlap to back each other up, in which case, they can be slightly more fragile but would need to be even smaller and lighter.
And I'll have to balance all that against cost.
I know I'll never find everything I want (not this year anyway), but don't bother recommending an SLR. I'd never get to where I need to be with a heavy/fragile piece of equipment like that.
by James DeRuvo (02/13/2010)
You petty much limited when it comes to being "proof." cameras that can stand extreme are usually limited in zoom. The Canon D10 and Olympus sw series lead the pack. The D10 probably best.
For zoom and some manual control, Canon's SX line and the g11 ( though a bit pricey, a good pocket w manual features). Also the Panasonic LX3.
reply to this comment
For zoom and some manual control, Canon's SX line and the g11 ( though a bit pricey, a good pocket w manual features). Also the Panasonic LX3.
Top candidates ( — 02/14/2010)
The Cannon g11 has lousy specs for resolution-x-zoom. One of the Cannon SXs you recommended looks interesting though. For now, I'll watch for info on the Cannon SX210, Panasonic ZS5 and ZS7, the Olympus 8010, 9100 & 6020, and especially this Samsung HZ35. Any thoughts on others I should watch or any thoughts on these models? Most are not available, but I don't need to buy until July.
reply to this comment
Canon Powershot SX210 IS Reviews
Canon Powershot SX210 IS Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Great pocket for advance shooters under $299
(pfoto — 01/02/2011)
Pros: Very well built, many custom features and manual controls for the advanced/pro photographer, good panoramic stitching, great overall performance, and a nice video quality with smooth zooming. Comes with lithium ion rechargeable battery and charger.
Cons: For it's quality performance at around $250 there isn't much to complain about. As for the pop-up flash issue it's really insignificant & it's an easy solution. If your expecting the overall performance to be of a Pro DSLR than I suggest to get a DSLR.
Summary: I am generally a Nikon diehard for their outstanding image quality but I have been disappointed with their pocket camera line as they have not introduced a comparable camera to the SX 210 with manual controls, so it was a tough decision between the Canon SX 210 and the Panasonic ZS7. Both models are neck to neck in overall performance for the money and with both having pros and cons. I am a big fan of Carl Ziess lenses which are one of the best in the world but on the ZS7 it only stops down to F/6.3 loosing some close-up focus unlike the SX 210 canon lens that has greater depth at F/8. The images may appear little sharper on the ZS7 and thats mostly because they have squeezed the histogram by increasing the image contrast but the downside to that is it losses the highlight and shadow detail color. A higher contrast image captures are usually more difficult to correct afterwards than an image with more even tone. The SX 210 captures pretty much a full tonal range and it allows you the option increase or reduce the contrast as you please in the function menu set-up. The GPS feature I didn't care for much but I did like the RAW image capture feature in the ZS7 which allows you process and convert image formats without compression afterwards. The video was also very sharp by the increased contrast in the ZS7 but it had a number of issues that went along with it such as light streaking across the movie image every time a street light or a high reflective object entered the frame. The Lumix ZS7 originally got me very excited and I was almost sold on it but at the end it fell a little short against the SX 210.
In my final decision I stepped up to the Canon SX 210 from the SX 130 and it's a huge difference, it's worth every penny. If you love the flexibility of manual controls and the ability to override all the programmable settings independently in TV, AV, M, P, and MOV, then the SX 210 by far is the best overall compact camera under $299. The picture quality is very good and it's capability of panoramic stitching was impressive. The lithium ion rechargeable battery and charger which comes with the SX 210 makes it a sweeter deal. The video quality for a still camera is also good but if you are looking for higher quality movies to playback on large flat screens then i suggest to get a real HD camcorder. Overall in it's class for the money the SX 210 is the best choice for a pocket camera and of course the further you reach in your wallet there are better cameras to buy.
I have been a professional digital studio photographer since '95. I have used 50MP digital cameras worth $50,000, I have used 10MP DSLRs at around $2000, and even used the earlier 3MP pocket cameras for around $750 that never even had a fraction of the features you can get now for $150, so I can honestly say that every system has it's pros and cons but out of all the cameras I have owned the SX 210 overall is the most impressive with it's great features for under $299. For anyone who says they were expecting allot more performance for that money should truly get a reality check, so if your expecting the quality performance to be equivalent of a Pro DSLR than I suggest you get one. The SX 210 is not only a great bang for your buck but it's also a great camera for more advanced shooters. Most negative camera reviews from point-and-shoot consumers are usually resulted from user errors and not necessarily from the camera itself despite the pop-up flash issue which is really insignificant in comparison of the camera's full capabilities. Yes, the possibilities are there that you could get a lemon with any digital camera but your'e always safer buying a trusted brand name.
- 1.0 out of 5
Don't
(brotherbob — 05/02/2010)
Bad pictures, hard to use, flash in a bad place. Terrible controls on this camera, This is the sixth Canon I have owned and it is the worst. The others I could at least get good pictures with but not this one. I am going to dump it on Craigs list for whatever I can get and go buy the Panasonic ZS7.
- 5.0 out of 5
Canon SX210 for all types of shooting
(Dale Thorn — 03/28/2010)
The SX210 zoom of ~400 mm really works. I have not gotten a better photo of a bird or small animal at a distance with the Panasonic G1 and its 400 mm equivalent zoom, in spite of the G1's larger sensor. The Canon SX210 can exhibit quite a bit of noise when images are viewed at 100 percent, so I would recommend keeping ISO low, and one way to do that is to set the ISO to a specific low value, and then brace the camera against something to minimize camera shake, if need be. Another possibility to reduce noise is to use a noise processor such as Noise Ninja (cheap), or Noiseware (more expensive).
The manual controls work well, battery life is quite good compared to other compacts such as the Panasonic ZS3 and TZ5, HD movies are very good, with stereo sound, and the overall image quality is excellent.
If I had any complaints, the biggest would be the one-minute lens retraction when switching to playback. I would much prefer 20 seconds or less, or an adjustable amount. Other than these items I've mentioned, I don't care about any of the other "features" such as face detection or vibrant colors etc. - I'm just a purist and I want the camera that gives me the best photo of a small animal or bird when a long zoom is required, and the SX210 is the best compact camera so far (so far as I know).
BTW, don't forget that with long zooms, 400 mm isn't just 4/3 better than 300 mm - since photos are two-dimensional, it's 16/9 better, giving you nearly twice the pixels for your cropped image when using maximum zoom.
