Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Canon Digital Rebel 300D
Editor's Review
The Canon EOS 300D SLR, also known as the Digital Rebel, is nothing short of a revolutionary step for the digital camera industry. Offering all the advantages and flexibility of a digital SLR, yet with a price tag that puts it within the reach of amateur photographers, the 300D offers a compelling combination of high tech and low price.
Editor's Review
The Canon EOS 300D SLR, also known as the Digital Rebel, is nothing short of a revolutionary step for the digital camera industry. Offering all the advantages and flexibility of a digital SLR, yet with a price tag that puts it within the reach of amateur photographers, the 300D offers a compelling combination of high tech and low price.
Specifications
- 6.3 megapixels (effective)
- auto and manual focus
- program and manual exposure
- JPEG and RAW file format
- ISO range 100 - 1600
- proprietary Lithium-Ion battery. Accepts interchangeable Canon EF lenses -- lens not included
- UPC: 00013803028997
- Release Date: Sep 05, 2003
Shop for 300D Accessories
Canon Digital Rebel 300D Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Regards Pete
Maria
consumer.usa.canon.com/cusa...
Do the same thing with the gold contacts inside the camera body.
thanks
It's the Canon Rebel EOS 300D, purchased in 2004.
Err 02: There is a problem with the CF card. Do one of the following: Remove and reload the CF card, use another CF card, or format the CF card.
It can also occur When a pin in the card slot gets bent.
look inside the cf unit of the camera! It's possible the pin bent while putting the card in.
Thanks in advance.. :)
The top two systems are Canon and Nikon. Hands down. Nikon has the added bonus of it's legacy lens support where older manual lenses from the past 50 years are usable.
A good entry level camera is the Canon XSi and the T1. The T1 has the added benefit of shooting HD video in 720p.
Lastly, cameras are terrible for file reading or management. Use a USB card reader to read and transfer your images, rather than the camera connection to the PC itself. It's much better than dealing with connectivity issues and a camera that simply isn't really designed to properly read like a computer drive.
The flash not working is due to a circuit board - £100 ish + a 3 week wait for the part!
tomshardware.com/forum/3154... this helps.
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
If you can't access RAW then, either it isn't really available in the mode your in (some cameras only make RAW available as an option in manual only) or your camera needs servicing.
I checked the pins on my camera and they are not bent.
I have tried to format the card from the card reader with no luck."
I have tried the disk utility and it didn't work.
I don't have the sync cord. Is it possible that mac tiger has corrupted my firmware? Any other suggestions? HELP. I need to work.
Err 02: CF DRIVER
DESCRIPTION: This error occurs when image data cannot be written to the CF card. This error can occur when the CF card is not fully seated in the camera or if the camera does not detect a card-ready signal within a specified time limit or when the CF card is not usable because it has been corrupted or physically damaged. It can also occur when the camera's battery level is insufficient to completely write the file to the CF card.
REMEDIAL MEASURE: Use the DC Coupler or recharge the battery first. If the error continues to occur with sufficient power available to the camera, check that the CF card is properly inserted. If that's not the problem, then try replacing the CF card. If that does not solve the problem, have the camera and one of the CF cards that is causing the problem examined by a qualified service technician. This error is similar to Error 22 on the D30.
Try running a different card recovery utility. There are literally hundreds out there.
same promlem loss of shap edges. only a soft focus on all images.
Have you tried using the auto focus function? If that is what you're using, you may try using manual then. A lot of times toggling the function can help with that. What other settings are you using?
Andrew
Larry
check out this link
billybear4kids.com/CanonReb...
mcvr.com/canon_digital_rebe... Scott Johnson. It appears Mike B has found the solution to your camera problem. Check it out and consider awarding points to Mike B. for his effort.
I have not seen this issue on either of the Canon dSLRs that I have. This sounds like a faulty LCD screen. You can take this to a local shop like a Ritz Camera to be sent out for repair. Have them give an estimate before you do though. These repairs can sometimes run up to and over $300, so make sure its worth it to you. Another way to find an authorized repair shop is to use the Canon site ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) to find an authorized repair location. You can also arrange a repair through Canon ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ). Good luck.
Andrew
That's how you choose a lens. BTW - whatever lens you get, invest another $25 or so into a 1A Skylight filter. Reason being ... insurance. I can't tell you how many 1As I trashed and saved the lens it was protecting.
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
More information with a first person perspective on Error 99 can be found here ( richardsnotes.org/archives/... ). It points to a lens issue and a fairly easy fix to troubleshoot it.
Help
Any programs to help get photos back????????????????
Help!!!!!!!!!!
Photo@castles.com
Franci
925-228-4338
!
I did the same thing just a few days ago, fortunately I had purchased
a scandisk memory card and with that memory card came this lovely
little program. It's called SanDisk RescuePRO 3.2
Franci
I've read many people online *asking* for help with FORMATTED CARDS and *getting* help with DELETED FILES. None of these suggestions for deleted files work with the formatted card I'm trying to save, nor do any of the other online misguided help forums I've read, which seem to get locked as "answered" once someone suggests an undelete utility which can't unformat.
Anyway, a friend of mine accidentally formatted her card with her Canon SD750 and all the tools will only "save" the files that have not been deleted and will not save or even detect any of the formatted data. I've been working on it for days and may give up.
got with a memory card I purchased and it worked great for me.
I have done this myself. It works.
I have tried at least 6 tools now, including F-Recovery, and they find nothing. One of the tools finds blank FAT files, the rest find not a single block of anything. It's like ever sector was erased during the reformat, or I somehow was given an unused card from which to try to recover things, or I don't know what.
I am stumped. Does the write-protection setting affect anything? I'm using an external USB drive to read the card. Win XP. I'm using a USB hub, that wont matter I hope. I'll try a few more tools...
I think my friend had already downloaded her pics, but she could never get her videos off her old camera so a bunch of them are gone :(
Thanks for the help, all.
lc-tech.com/demo/rescueprod... only thing is with the demo you can't save the recovered files but at least you can
see that they are still there and if it's worth buying the software. I got my software
along with a new memory card I purchased.
It was pretty straight forward about what you need to do to recover your files.
If the card is damaged or corrupted beyond repair, it may be possible to still get your pictures. But data recovery services are VERY expensive.
This is a perfect reason to have several cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem.
I know that doesn't help now.
Here's what I've tried so far, plus maybe one or two old tools:
ZAR
Active File Recovery
F-Recovery
Restore 2000 Pro
R-Studio
PC Inspector Smart Memory
Rescue Pro Demo
Unless the memory got damaged at the exact second that the card formatted it, I don't think there is anything wrong with the media. It seems the camera overwrote everything... Why anyone would ever program a camera to do all that extra work for no benefit... Ugh. Now I get to tell an already very snappy and stressed out friend her videos are gone.
Thanks for all your help.
Anyway, he seemed to say that if it was a low-level format it would write all zeros. My friend doesn't know what she did, but will demonstrate it for me.
I suggested to the tech that normal people might think "format" has something to do with the format of a picture, given that this is a camera and all, and maybe they should use less tech-speak when they are selling products to grandmas. I'm sure he will escalate my advice to the top.
The tech also gave me 4 web sites for tools to try. 2 of them don't exist, and the other 2 I've already tried.
I am defeated.
are my non-canon lenses useless to me now????
There are two useful threads on re-chipping that you can read and they are found in
<a href="photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fe... EOS Forum</a> and <a href="photography-on-the.net/foru... lens problem</a>
Your non-Canon lenses are not completely useless, they are still OK as long as you can get it re-chipped.
The reason or this error message is that the mirror not is returning after a shot. To normalize the camera, a second press on the trigger button is necessary. 4. Note that all functions operate perfect, and the mirror slides smooth in its trace.
The 5 error often happens when using 3rd party lenses (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) which cause incompatibility problems. Were you using a non-Canon lens?
Also clean all contacts with a pencil eraser. Do this with your battery contacts as well and try fresh batteries.
I see you posted in the similar thread here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Did you take a look at the pins in the memory card slot as Mel in that thread indicated? Could be an easy fix to your problem, even if it is a longshot.
If the problem is something else, it's likely going to require service, and since the camera is no doubt out of the warranty period at this point, that probably means a hefty repair bill. Nevertheless, if you can't find any other solution you should give it a shot and see what Canon says. Check here ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) if you decide to go that route.
Good luck, and I hope you find an easier solution!
What do you think?
a. you have used the Canon-Tamron combination for 3 years.
b. only lately you experience battery low, camera freeze, cannot focus.
What probably happens is that after 3 years of usage, your Tamron lens has develop problems, causing sporadic short circuits and draining off battery power. The short circuit also provide wrong feedbacks to the Camera body and damaging the parts inside.
New Tamron lens would not have this problem and it pays to have the lens serviced or to replace it with a new one.
However, it's primary use is for situations where wide angle lens do best : capturing buildings within close range, handling large groups of people in enclosed spaces and so on.
To get real closeup shots, the traditional ways of using closeup lens, reverse adapter rings or even extension bellows are still unbeatable.
Someone has reported this on a 300D before and it turns out that when he puts in a new card, it works.
You might like to try putting in a new card. Meanwhile use a picture recovery software to recover the pictures from the existing card and save them to the computer.
All the above cards can be read by the Canon G5 and a card Reader attached to a PC
Reluctant to take it to a dealer, as a repair will probably cost more than the camera is worth
Any ideas?
help me outtttt
-steve
Canon 350D. Kingston 4GB 133x.
It simply lock-up. Power off, shooting again, image save completely, the err-02 and camera lock. Try 4 times, same result 4 times.
Change to new card solve the problem immediately.
Forensic analysis show (whose?) stupidity. It turns out that the 4GB IS ALMOST FULL (10 MB left). As I shoot in raw ... the file is around 8 MB.
However, that doesn't explain WHY I can shoot 4 raw pictures? And WHY canon doesn't show "full memory"?
Can you help me?
-Sarah
Thanks
The startup time of the 300D is the same as my 10D; a few seconds. The new versions of these cameras are much much faster. That's the pain we suffer being "early adopters" :-)
It does work as you say. Don't know why I didn't think to try the other modes.
I am now a happy photographer.
Thanks again
Janet
Between these two I would lean towards the Canon XTI ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
The Nikon D50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is closer comparison-wise to the Canon 300D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) than it is to the Rebel XTI. The Rebel XTI is on a slightly higher level and can be compared to the Nikon D70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). So rather than choose between the Rebel and the D50 I'd narrow it to the Rebel and the D70 if both are in your price range.
As far as the difference between the Canon and the Nikon models, they can both do the same thing. They have more or less the same amount of settings and both can produce great photos if used correctly. It's mostly a matter of preference.
As to whether IS is important, the answer is ... kinda. IS in consumer cameras/lenses is a new phenomenon. But it caught on because it really works. I have been using non-image stabilized SLR lenses for 25 years, and was able to take clear shots. But now with my IS lens I can take clear shots without a tripod, or in lower light -- IS gives you more latitude. It's kind of one of those things that's just out and out good. And given that you are shooting fast-moving scenes, IS can be invaluable.
The Sony a100 is a new camera, sort of. It is a rework of the Minolta Maxxum 7D. Minolta is no longer in the camera business and sold their SLR line to Sony. It seems like a good camera and is getting good reviews. The internal IS feature is appealing, but I don't know if it really works. And no SLR has gotten reviews like the Canon digital SLR line.
I have a Canon 10D, several generations earlier than the XTi. I cannot say enough good things about it; my only complaints are LCD size, and startup time, both of which are fixed in new versions. I wouldn't be concerned about battery life of the XTi. I can take probably 100 or more shots on a battery, and extras are something like $12 a piece. I have three.
The Nikon is also very well reviewed, in particular the D200, but the D80 is good, too. If this feels better to you than the Canon, that's the right decision. If you're willing to take a risk on the a100, it's probably a good option.
I would get the XTi, but I am wildly biased :-)
I too want a nikon D80 or D200 but it is out of my price range. I was looking around and notice that the D70 is a good choice as well as the canon Xti or XT. The main difference I can see is that the Nikon has a more vibrant color profile (the green are much more vivid). However, unless you compare the same picture taken side by side on the two type of cameras, you probably can't tell the difference.
The reason avid photographers like nikon is because they have superior lenses and that will make a diffence in your photographys. There is a D40x out, it is 10mp and cheaper than the d200/d80.
I also think that most people buy nikon because they retain their value a lot longer and that's why I want to by a nikon. I have a sony DSC717 and although it's 5mp it works great. However, I did notice that sony camera are grainy if it does not have very good lighting and are so in shadowy area.
www.dpreview.com is a great resounce to research camera, they have a side-by-side comparision chart on all types of camera.
I also go on www.flickr.com and look at the pictures taken by the various camera and see what they're capabilities are.
The Rebel XTi is solid, but i'm not sure how it's value will hold up after time and I personall don't like how it feel. The Rebel XT is a favored choice as well (at 8mp). A lot of art students/creatives like that camera.
I bought a D70 on-line and I should get it soon. I'll let you all know how it turns out.
This is one of those issues without a real right answer. Anyone you talk to will have a different opinion on it. The news is that Canon's professional cameras will supposedly still be made in Japan... not sure if that's true or not. Regardless, they are now making most of their point and shoots in Taiwan and similar countries.
The basic answer is that no, you shouldn't have to worry... because most of the manufacturing process is computer-controlled and because Canon is a large enough company to be fully in charge of their standards, there should not be a quality difference. Of course, there are many, many people who will claim differently and say that they have had issues with cameras manufactured in Taiwan.
So... I really don't have an answer for you. <a href="photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fe... is an interesting discussion about this very subject, though.
Actually, if you have the A/C Adapter, plug that in -- does the camera start then? If not, that probably rules out the battery, since I am pretty sure the A/C adapter bypasses the battery. If it works with the A/C adapter, then it's most likely the battery connections.
Good luck!
I had a fully charged battery in the camera and checked it to be sure before I left for work this morning. When I got to work and tried to turn the camera on it would not power up. I've tried removing the battery and charging it again, etc, etc. No power.
I've dug through Canon support without much success so I'd love to know if you resolved your problem.
ARGH! I am going to clean everything, replace the CF card, and if all else fails......have my Hubby take it apart. I don't know if it would be worth $250 to fix it. I love it. It would cost about $1000 to replace it and my 710 point and shoot does not take comparable photos.
Thanks for the tip.
Anthony
ant_isip@yahoo.com
Diana
I wonder what version of Windows you are using? I would suggest to re-install camera drivers from CD or dowload latest from Canon website. In 90% cases it solves the problem.
Or as alternative I would suggest to buy very simple USB card reader, that will be seen by your computer as an additional drive. It is very handy if you want just to download your RAW or JPEG pictures and save them on your hard drive for later review.
I have the CANON Digital Rebel EOS (6.3 ) . The instruction book says I should be able to shoot in RAW,but the MENU under "Quality" does not ahave a RAW choice. Is there a difference between the Digtial Rebel EOS ans the EOS300D? The instruction book has both on the cover, (I thought they were the same) . I assumed it would indicate if I could not use RAW settings inteh Rebel EOS.
I have the CANON Digital Rebel EOS (6.3 ) . The instruction book says I should be able to shoot in RAW,but the MENU under "Quality" does not ahave a RAW choice. Is there a difference between the Digtial Rebel EOS ans the EOS300D? The instruction book has both on the cover, (I thought they were the same) . I assumed it would indicate if I could not use RAW settings inteh Rebel EOS.
Honestly, it comes with experience and trial-and-error method. :))
Canon Rebel EOS Xt anyway I put setting on raw, took a few pictures. When I try to download the onto my pc, it doesnt show the pictures but I can see them on the camera? When I try to go the advanced setting way to view or download the pics, the picture shows up as a thumbnail, I try right clicking it and it comes up saying unavailable format. I tried getting picture after downloading the raw software? could someone hopefullly help me out? is there a setting on the camera I need to change? thanks
I could be a connectivity issue if it were dropped such as wires are out of place. It could also be a software issue. It doesn't sound like it is something you can fix with out servicing. Bummer.
since the raw option slows down the entire camera so much i shoot jpeg large with the 18-55 ef-s is lense and with a fast card you don not ntoice it slwing down that much as when shooting raw
In a DUST FREE place, get set with a Q-tip and a little but of rubbing alcohol (or even lens cleaning fluid) and very slightly dampen the Q-tip. Place the camera on a flat surface, back down, and remove the lens. On the bottom of the opening in the camera body, you'll see 8 or so shiny gold points. Gently clean them all with the Q-tip.
If this doesn't work, try each of these 1) resetting the camera (Menu > Clear Settings), 2) remove the backup battery and main battery for a few minutes, then replace them, 3) update the firmware for the camera which you can download from Canon here ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ).
If those fail, a local camera shop might take pity on you, or else you'll probably need to send it back to Canon for repair. Sigh.
I'd also suggest that you take a look at more up to date models of the Digital Rebel, the 350D and 400D.
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... this helps!
Canon Digital Rebel 300D Reviews
Canon Digital Rebel 300D Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
the canon 300D aka dgital rebel / kiss digital is a 6.3 mp effective digital Single Lens Reflex (dslr) wich was the first on the market at 2003/2004. This review is based on two eos 300 D that i had . at this moment i still have one and i enjoy using it , i would have given it a 5 star if it was perfect.
The biggest flaw (which bothers me the most) is the slow writing speed after the buffer has run full. It can take up to 40 seconds to write 4 raw frames to a CF card and then i am using a fast card capable of 20mb/sec aka 133x rating at 4gb.
When you have the time , the canon still makes a more than decent picture , it gets better if the "glass" gets better
With glass i mean lenses , this is one of a few that can work with EF-S and EF lenses wich give you a good and great choice of glass to choose from.
i have got my last eos 300D from a friend it had the 18-55 kitlens on it which i sold to get the canon ef-s 18-55 IS .
One advantage of that lense (glass) is that it has a onboard image stableliser up to 4 stops longer shooting than without IS would not have been possible .
the disadvantage of this lens is power consuming it drains the battery / accu faster .
still this is a good to very good camera, and i am happy with it , and those who say this camera doesn't make good pictures , well contact me and i show you that it does make great pictures ..
stabilty 4.5 stars
Image Qual. 5 stars
handyness 5 stars'
easy of use 4 stars
duarability 4 stars .. bge catious and it will last long
recommendable Yes
- 5.0 out of 5
I have two of these camera's and have owned and worked them for the past five years l am a freelance photographer and purchased these camera's to move me into the digital era from using 35mm format cameras and have not looked back my previous 35mm camera now sit on a shelf in my office as a reminder of days gone by originally l put in my bag as my back up camera but after about a year l realised how reliable my 300d was and purchased a second body and have not looked back since l just have one of them serviced on a regular basis and l think this is why they have served me for such a long time
- 5.0 out of 5
The canon eos 300d aka Kiss digital Or Digital Rebel is a very good Digital Single Lens Reflex Camera. It has 6.3 Mp effective resolution, 7 Autofocus Points, a easy to use menu / setup and logical handeling WB = does White Balance and Iso handles Iso , there is one main command dial and further on the selection goes with the 4 buttons arround the Set button, wich is equal to a enter button on a pc.
It has a fine handeling , the way you can grip and hold it firmly is nice , not unique but more than good.
Canon is a major player on the market of digital camera's and it does deliver a camera for professionals who want a good body but want to be able to think self instead of the tool that they use.
This is not to say that starters can't use the camera, there is the green rectangle designed for in all canon camera's it is the auto mode ..
- 5.0 out of 5
I've met alot of people who get their parents to buy them very expensive, new cameras but they don't know the first thing about photography. They think that because I own a 300d and they own the newest, best thing that they're better. WRONG.
The 300d has the potential to take great pictures, it's YOU who has to learn it. It doesn't matter if you buy this for 300$ but really want an XTI. My pictures are better than alot of people who buy the best cameras.
This camera treats me very well and I've never had a problem with it. I love it very much and we're taken some great pictures together. If your pictures aren't turning out so good, try investing in a better Canon lens. That really does make a difference.
to view some of my pictures taken with this camera, go to www.myspace.com/christaboylesphotography
- 5.0 out of 5
in africa i was taking pictures of the animals it was just brilliant
- 4.0 out of 5
I enjoy using the camera. If I was not so busy with life I would be out learning all of the function's with this camera!
- 4.0 out of 5
I had purchased the Canon Rebel 300D and was told by the salesman that all canon lens fit the digital camera, WRONG !!, since I own 2 canon SLR camera's I thought it would be nice to have the canon Digital and then I could use all my lens WRONG!! my 300 mm,
my macro lens are not Canon lens so I come up with a error 99 thats great. THANKS Canon, for not letting me know are the public know that certain lens will not work unless they are made by Canon.
Buyer please beware of this other that that the camera works great except at night if you do not have a dedicated flash you are in big trouble as with 2 or 3 flash's you battery is dead as a door nail and as a Freelance photographer I need the camera at all times.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have had my camera for 2 years now and haven't even thought of looking at another. It takes great pictures and have used it for all types of photos. Everything from outdoor photos to wedding photos and the results are the same, GREAT! The Canon Digital Rebel is easy to use, the software is easy to use also. It accepts all brands of lenses made for this camera with no problems. Have 3 lenses for this camera and buying a 4th and I am sure I will have no problems with the news lens. Wonderful camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
I pay 1700$Can 3 years ago and i thing it's still the best buy i made. I could change for xti but the result whit my rebel is perfect. i will wait for another year.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have had the camera for almost two-years. The picture quality is great and I have been very happy with its ease of use. The camera and I have been in extreme climates all over the world, including underwater. Can't say enough good stuff about this camera
- 5.0 out of 5
I have several digital camera's and was looking for a DSLR camera. I tried it in the second hand store and was supprissed by the speed. there is practically no delay (unless you use the flash)between pressing the shutter and the time between the photo is taken.
You definitely need the manual but when you have it you will understand that this is not junk like most digital compact camera's but a semi professional camera.
ok there are better ones with more megapixels, but let your self not be fooled, 6.34 megapixel is enough. the finest thing is that you can switch lenses! and better a good lens and a good body than the newest eos with a cheap lens.
Ok you have to give yourself time to get used to highspeed digital photography but i can tell you try it and you get addicted too
The camera i have is the dutch version, with firmware 1.1.1 which give the eos 300d functions of it much more expensive sister or brother eos 10D!
my camera has the same functions as a 10d but for the price of a 300d and that makes it awesome
there a enough used and new 300d or kiss or digital rebels . do not forget the kiss=digital rebel=eos 300d 3 names for one of the same camera
- 4.0 out of 5
This camera belonged to our school paper before I started as the instructor, so it is older than the 9 months I've used it. The body has that cheap, plasticy look going on, and I wish it was a touch heavier (even slightly larger lenses really throw it off balance) I've been told that the BG-E1 battery grip can do a lot to fix the balance problem. The performance— Wow!
I bought a 420 flash, but I can't seem to get students to use it. They opt for underexposed shots made with the built-in flash, which is ok, because even in photos not shot in RAW, we can balance the exposure in Photoshop with no problems. Some of our worst underexposed shots have become amazing finished images. If you aren't going to Photoshop, use an external flash anytime you are indoors (which you should do with any camera).
These things are disappearing fast, and I haven't checked out the new Rebel, so if you find a new 300D, especially in black (so it doesn't look like a toy), grab it now!
- 4.0 out of 5
i bought this camera in florida but live in uk , 5 days after buying it i took my family to universal studios and put the camera on the floor of spider man ride .. ride was a little bumpy but kids enjoyed it, aftr the ride spider man apperaed and my son wanted a pic of him .....would you belive it the cam didnt work...sounded like a bag of spanners..... took to back to the sjops and the exchanged the body ..( little white lie about the damage)
so far the pics have been first class, cant work out if i can take B and W pics with it tho'? any ideas.
- 3.0 out of 5
I bought the Digital Rebel about a year ago and have had a love hate relationship with it. I am not a professional photographer so some user error may be involved, but I have shot pictures for years and feel fairly confident with a camera. I would have to agree with the reviews posted about its flaws with focusing and low light shots. after struggling with these issues for some time, I asked friend, who also bought this camera, if he experienced the same difficulties. He said that he has had the same problems. For the $$$ put into this camera I would expect a much higher performance then I have recieved. I am wondering for those who have had better results if they are using nicer lenses??? It might make a difference if you use better glass?
- 4.0 out of 5
I was thrilled with my Eos. It took excellent photos, is relatively light, performed a multitude of functions. My only complaint was that it is not compatible with my flash. (Make sure you check into this before you buy.) But now I have another complaint...my camera died this weekend. Luckily it was toward the end of the photo shoot. The shutter will not open the other way, the camera won't always focus, and sometimes won't snap a picture at all. I did a lot of research to try to figure out the problem which involved an error 99 message. There is a lot of conflicting information about this problem with Canon cameras. Please research the Error 99 before buying! I took over 10,000 photos with my camera and will buy a Canon again because I have Canon lenses, but I"m a little wary. I hope my next camera doesn't die after only a few years.
- 4.0 out of 5
I bought this camera to replace my Fuji s602 zoom.I thought that double the pixel power would improve my photo's(I have been a keen photographer for 40 years).
More pixels do not mean necessarily better,or sharper pictures it seems,as my daughter has a Canon A60 compact,only 2 MP,and can produce excellent 10*8 prints!
However,I find I often prefer the pictures from the Fuji,instead of my 300d,as the colours are so vivid,and unless you enlarge to really big prints,they seem just as sharp as the Canon.Also,as the Fuji is so much lighter and more compact,it is much easier to hand hold at slow shutter speeds.I know in theory the bigger chip on the Canon should be superior,but I find,when deciding which camera to take on a trip,I invariably take the Fuji,as it always turns out bright,colourful,perfectly exposed photoes,and is so much lighter than the 300d with an equivalent Sigma zoom lens attached.
For a wedding,or similar,I would probably use the 300d,as it is a bit quicker to use than the S602,and looks more professional,with a big lens on,but for close ups of flowers,etc,and while out in the countryside walking,the S602 is my choice.I think it is one of the best cameras Fuji have made to date for sheer picture quality,and useability.
I would not replace my 300d,however,as it offers everything anyone could need from a digital slr,certainly 6MP is plenty to produce large prints if required,and with the added features of the 10d "hack",it has all the functions,and more,of my old Canon 35mm slrs.
But..I still like my old s602!!
- 3.0 out of 5
Whenever I have taken a photo in a point/shoot catgory, the photos almost always have to be lightened.
I dealt with this by pumping up the big flash-but then I had this mirror problem-disabling autofocus and making it impossible to use without the mirror being taped up out of the way.
trying to figure out what camera to buy next....
- 5.0 out of 5
I have had and used my camera religously for almost a year. I have never had any problems with the camera other than things that the camera, in it's own right, were not it's problem. I do resolve that it does have a very download speed. that is quickly fixed with a card reader.
- 5.0 out of 5
The camera it's professional and easy to use not like anothers. It's perfect!
- 3.0 out of 5
I was excited to get this new camera, but have to say the more I use it, the less I am feeling excited. Many of my photos come out with just the slightest blur (even with a tripod). I use the auto and portrait mode a great deal and the crispness just isn't there. Also, I agree, the indoor lighting or low lighting situations usually come out poorly. I even took several photo classes to see if it was "operator error" and didn't see that as the problem. My printed photos just don't have the bright colors in them. Had I read these reviews before spending $1,000 on this camera I would have looked at other companies.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have had so many friends ask me about my camera and my pictures, that I decided to create a site called (...) that you might find helpful in making your decision and learning about the basics of digital SLR photography. It's specifically for owners of the Canon EOS digital SLRs. Check it out for useful tips and research that will help you get started on this rewarding journey of digital photography! Either way you won't regret your purchase. It would make an incredible gift, not only for Christmas or a birthday, but for life. It sure did change mine.
- 4.0 out of 5
My 300D has been working perfectly for me (not an advanced amateur user). Built-in flash is not too strong but it never is on any camera so I always use an external flash unit and results are perfectly acceptable. Aftermarket lenses with updated firmware for 300D work fine and don't have many complaints with the Sigma (70-300 APO) except that its focussing is a little slow for my requirement - I sometimes have to depend on manual focus. Need to get the 50mm Canon lens for a fast basic fixed lens. Its SLR feel is perfect to replace my old SLR in a reasonable sized camera. My main complaints (relatively slow start up time as compared to Nikon-D70 and image transfer speed) have been adddressed in the new Canon 350D. My wife and I have taken some pretty decent pictures of our son to the extent that we do not need to go to a professional photographer.
- 5.0 out of 5
When I looked into bying a digital camera, I knew I wanted one which worked like a SLR. None of the other cameras I looked at even came close to the 300D! Soo many features. So many options. Automatic settings to compleatly manual, I love my camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
The Canon 300D is a fantastic camera. I have taken shots with this camera that look much better than my skill level! I'm an enthusiastic amateur...this is my third digital camera. Before I bought it, I did some research and I knew it was an SLR and didn't expect to find a viewscreen LCD. After about 8.5 months I decided to add the "hack" and this is so cool. I now can take RAW pictures in ALL formats. The advantage to RAW is being able to adjust the picture, almost like it was still in the camera. Saved many a picture this way. I have added external flash strobes, fired via radio and this has been a blast. Still working on the light...but no under exposure problems to be sure. Just ordered some battery powered "pro" strobes and umbrellas to try with my Canon. A friend has a 300 XT and it just seems too small. I'm glad I have this camera with the hack that adds some 10D features.
- 5.0 out of 5
First of all, you guys who are complaining that you cant use the LCD as a viewfinder:
This camera is an SLR, it has a shutter in front of the cmos sensor, and a mirror in front of that, so its only obvious that you wouldnt be able to use the LCD as a viewfinder.
Think of it this way, this is an SLR that produces digital images, not just a digital-camera that uses interchangable lenses.
I've produced some excellent work with this camera, even with the 18-55mm lens that comes with it, I would reccomend it to anyone wanting to get into photography as a hobby. Canon's range of lenses is awesome too.
- 3.0 out of 5
outstanding pictures long battery life easy to use but this camera is too big in size and not being able to use the lcd as a viewfinder would make me not buy this camera and the pins in the compact flash are way to fragile. poor quality this thousand dollar camera is made in taiwan
- 5.0 out of 5
I have had this camera since Feb. of 2005. I made the switch from film to digital and have never looked back. I like the bulkyness and the large grip, unlike the new Canon Digital 350 which I think is too small. Some have complained about the third party lenses giving Error 99, I use Canon and Sigma brand lenses and have never had a problem with the Sigma lenses. For those also complaining about the Underexposure problems when using flash, if you shoot in RAW format, you can change the exposure in the fileviewer software that came with your camera. I'm an advanced amature photographer and I always shoot in RAW format, that way I can make adjustments when needed, which isn't very often with this camera. I have always had very good results using the built in flash on this camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera has been very fun and has improved my pictures. I also had a problem, due to me, with the mirror motor. Best buy replaced the camera at no charge with a smile!!
- 3.0 out of 5
good camera for average person, seems to have problems with 3rd party lens, like error 99, some focusing problems when all the way out like 70-300, 300 end soft and almost blurred. having taken 10.000,pictures with it.
- 5.0 out of 5
I was given the Canon Digital Rebel about a year ago as a gift. I own the 35mm Rebel as well and was able to interchange my lenses between the cameras. That has proved to be very usefull since I carry three cameras with me at a time and it cuts down on the amount of equipment I have to carry. The image quality is great and I have been able to enlarge photos taken with the camera to very large sizes. I love the versatility of this camera!!! The only thing that ever is some what of an aggravation is that the camera only seems to have continuous shooting for up to 4 frames and is a bit heavy. Otherwise, it is a great camera and well worth the money!
- 5.0 out of 5
this thing takes great photos. i even prefer it over the 350D because of the size and feel of the camera with a larger lens on it. highly highly recommend. several examples of what i have been able to do at www.jdonut.com
- 3.0 out of 5
The focus is intermittent and it doesn't work in low light conditions. My Fuji s602z leaves it in the dust on speed and reliability. On photo shoots I always take the Fuji. The Fuji will focus in total darkness and with the flash the photos are beautiful. The flash lacks an adjustment and it's difficult to take photos in all conditions. The pc download is deplorably slow and the weight makes it difficult to carry for long periods of time. I have read many reviews about the camera and most neglect to mention the faults. I own a rebel film camera and unfortunately I bought the name and only got the name instead of a camera. I work with 3.2 mega pixels and with the Fuji I can print an 8x11 at 200 dpi in beautiful color. I regret my decision to buy the camera and if I could return it for a refund I wouldn't hesitate. But in Costa Rica that isn't possible. To all those that bought name I wish you luck, you,ll need it.
Chuck
- 5.0 out of 5
Wonderful camera.....
I have been using Canon SLR's for over 20 years. I received the 300D as a gift, have to say its one of the best surprises I have ever received. I also love the inter-changable lens, now I have two great Canon's using the same lens.
Great Job Canon.....
- 3.0 out of 5
I love this camera. It's easy to use and does a great job.
The problem came 2 months after the warranty was gone and I went to eject the cf card and the button disappeared into the camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
i havev had great times with this camera! From the baseball fields to the beach in Mexico it is the best i have ever had!
- 5.0 out of 5
I have to say that I am extremely impressed with the Canon Digital Rebel. Although there are some definite things that annoy me slightly (the fact you need to hold down a separate button while using the scroll to change aperture, the cheap lens that comes with the camera, etc...) but overall this camera has amazing picture quality. The smaller than negative sized sensor is great when purchasing a lower quality lens since you will not see the imperfections in the lens as well, it turns a 300mm lens into about a 450mm lens which is nice for those who dig telephoto, although to get the true wide angle look you'll need to dish out the extra money to get a digital wide angle lens. Granted that the built in flash is not particularly amazing which is noted in many reviews (but no built in flash on an SLR is), it is decent for doing fill light in portraits and if you are serious about photography you'll already expect to get a decent flash after purchasing any camera. If you have the money, the 10D or 20D does have a stronger body and is a little more convenient for those of us who are camera snobs, but if you just use the main settings, this camera is perfect for high quality amazing images.
- 5.0 out of 5
I am VERY satisfied with the Canon EOS 300D. I use it with different lenses, and my main lens is a Tamron. The camera handles other brands beautifully, and when I use my external blitz, there are never red eyes.
My only complaint is that the LCD screen in back can't be used as a view finder, but in reality it's just a question of finding a good technique to use, and once that's done, the ability of using a screen as a view finder is rather irrelevant in comparison to the results the camera gives.
I recently checked out the EOS 20D, but found it smaller and not as good to hold. So I plan to stay with the 300D until the need to upgrade becomes necessary in my line of work.
Great camera, great results!!
- 4.0 out of 5
This an awesome prosumer camera. Canon did an excellent job with the Digital Rebel. I used a friend's D70 and like it a lot more. The interface is a lot easier to grasp. Well worth the investment!
- 4.0 out of 5
Al in all I have found the Canon 300D Rebel to be a very impressive camera from the standpoint of digital imaging, and the photos on paper are very good..however the camera seems a little heavy, especially to a person accustomed to the PowerShot series and many shots with the flash come out somewhat dark......whenever I can, I'll go for the 20D
- 5.0 out of 5
Words can not express my wife and my love for our new Rebel. The awesome utility of the digital world but still the ability for photographic technique of an SLR. Home Run Canon. Thanks Chris and Terri
- 2.0 out of 5
My husband bought this camera for me to take pictures of our daughter playing fast pitch softball. Those action shots come out GREAT - because they are outdoors with great lighting. I assumed I'd also be able to get the same great shots while she is playing basketball. Think again....the games are indoor and often require a flash. The action setting just doesn't do it...very disappointed. What made me write this review a year later is I just took 50 pictures and a banquet in a banquet hall and *EVERY* picture is underexposed. I had to spend a fair amount of time lightening EVERY picture before I could share them. For the $1000 bucks that was spent, you think it would take good pictures both indoor and out, flash or not!
Very disappointed with the indoor photos taken with this camera!
- 2.0 out of 5
I bought my rebel a year ago and I loved the camera. I had recommended the camera to all my customers. yet I have come to find out there is a defect in the camera that doesn't show up until after you have used the camera. the pin in the secondary auto focus mirror, wears down after a year's worth of use. that is poor workmanship on canon's part. since I have always owned canon cameras I didn't hesitate to buy the rebel as a step into their digital slr's. and now that I am about to be with out my camera for 5 weeks for a $200 repair I am very unhappy with canon. I will probably still buy canon but I hope they correct this problem. and after reading message boards online I am not the only one with this problem. I would advise people to spend the extra money and buy into the higher end models. since they put no thought into semi-pro use of the rebel..shame on you canon. for a $1000 price tag you think you would have designed a camera that would get more than a year's use before it needs repair.
- 3.0 out of 5
I bought my 300D to take Pictures in Ireland. The pictures came out great, but once back home while re-inserting the compact flash card, I must have damaged the interior. The camera would not turn on and upon returning it to Canon, I was charged $185.35 to repair it. My repair bill is almost 25% of the total cost of the body and I have only had the camera for 9 months.
- 1.0 out of 5
After owning a Canon PowerShot for 4 years, and shooting hundreds of photos, I was very impressed with Canon quality. I just got the Rebel and have found out that I am not able to use the LCD screen as the view finder!!! This is one issue I did not expect to have with this camera. This is a very big issue to me. I am accustomed to shooting from my LCD screen, how could this not be included.
- 5.0 out of 5
I was a little disappointed by not being able to use my lcd screen as a viewfinder, but it forced me to become more used to the eye hole, in which I have been able to find better color and adjust my camera to the lighting due to this fact. It has made me a better photographer because of it.
- 3.0 out of 5
Having owned several Canon SLR (film) cameras, I am frequently impressed by the quality of pictures Canon cameras produce. I purchased a Canon Digital Rebel 300D in December 2005 and have been disappointed in the overall performance. One in four pictures taken with the 300d looks "washed out" (too much flash) which is easily adjusted with imaging software, but I would expect better consistency from a $1000. camera. It is probably my fault for not researching this more, but I was also disappointed to find that the LCD cannot be used as a viewfinder. When using my other (cheap) digitals, I love being able to hold the camera over my head while viewing the image on the LCD to get a better shot or different angle. I consider that one of the greatest advantages of going to a digital camera - not having to squint at images thru a 1" window! What annoys me so much with the 300d is, it is impossible to use the viewfinder without getting a huge cheek-smudge on the LCD....every single time! On the positive side, I commend Canon on the forethought to allow the use of previous lenses. This was a very important factor for me when purchasing the Digital Rebel. However, when I connect the Canon 85-300 zoom from my Rebel XS, the 300d gets "confused" and has trouble focusing. I would suggest that someone interested in purchasing the Digital Rebel, determine first if they need "that much" camera. I have enjoyed the "wow-factor" when using the 300d, from people who recognize that it is an expensive and impressive camera, but some of my best pictures are taken with a 2 megapixel, shirt pocket digital camera because of the convenience of being able to carry it with me all the time.
- 5.0 out of 5
- 3.0 out of 5
- 5.0 out of 5
- 5.0 out of 5
- 5.0 out of 5
