Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Ultra Compact Digital Cameras category.
Casio Exilim Z1050
Editor's Review
Casio Exilim cameras are noted for their extremely small profiles, even by ultracompact standards, and the Exilim Z1050 is no different. At 24.2mm deep, it is perhaps the slimmest 10-megapixel camera currently available, and makes for an excellent worry-free pocket camera. The Z1050 is a stylish, sophisticated camera that will draw a lot of attention to itself.
Editor's Review
Casio Exilim cameras are noted for their extremely small profiles, even by ultracompact standards, and the Exilim Z1050 is no different. At 24.2mm deep, it is perhaps the slimmest 10-megapixel camera currently available, and makes for an excellent worry-free pocket camera. The Z1050 is a stylish, sophisticated camera that will draw a lot of attention to itself.
Specifications
- 10.1 megapixels
- 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- Movie mode
- ISO 80-400
- JPEG file format
- 2.6-inch LCD
- Secure Digital card storage (15.4MB internal)
- Lithium ion battery
- Release Date: Jan 30, 2007
Shop for Z1050 Accessories
Casio Exilim Z1050 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Barbara
But the picture quality isn't any better. In fact, there are better options of both cameras out there. Since neither of these cameras have optical image stabilization (just DSP, which is essentially useless), even the Canon SD750 would be a step up, at least in terms of picture quality, LCD screen quality and performance. Yes, it's slightly more expensive, but it's definitely worth it. And if you're willing to spend a little more (~250), the SD850IS is great.
I'm not sure what you mean by Best Shot option. I'm assuming you just mean the preset modes you can use on a camera, like Underwater, Night, Fireworks, etc. Yes, the Z1050 has these, as well, including a new High Sensitivity Best Shot, which gives you the ISO800 (unfortunately, this is something better to avoid, as the noise is very noticable).
1.) 7.1MP (S770) or 10.0 MP (Z1050)
2.) True 16:9 widescreen (Z1050)
3.) Better CCD (Z1050; although it's essentially the same when you factor in the MP count)
4.) 640x480 video at full 30fps (S770; although the Z1050 does 25fps, which is perfectly fine)
5.) Better flash (S770; 5.5-22 feet)
6.) LCD Screen (S770; the Z1050 only has 115,000 pixels on the 2.6" screen, the S770 has 230,400 pixels on the 2.8" screen)
They're both about the same size (S770 is slightly smaller); both use the same card format; both have the same digital and optical zoom; neither have image stabiliztion (they both have what Casio likes to call Anti-Shake, but it's not as good).
And both are about the same price.
From the hundreds of pictures I just went through to help you decide, I would fully go with the Z1050.
For the purpose of your son, a 2 gig SD card will be quite sufficient for a start, graduating to SDHC cards later on when he takes more pictures and videos.
It is the video clips that take up a lot of memory space, otherwise for the snapshots, a 1 gig card would take 900+ pictures at 2 meg size and 300+ pictures at 5 meg size, which is more than sufficient for single event.
Although I have never encounter any problem with the brand, it pays to buy Sandisk,Toshiba or Kingston and avoid the relatively unknown ones.
For further information, you may wish to log on to <a href="zipreviews.com/digital-came... site</a> about memory cards.
barrbarrella
While I have your attention, allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like "F-Recovery" to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
Still have not bought this card yet, saw a Kingston one with was one of the recommendations above, and seeing reviews for it, some people said it was not good in a card reader..... sorry but do not know what that is.... or more to the point, will that matter .... my son just wants to take pics and put them on his pc as they all do these days. Perhaps a card reader if not necessary or is it? He has a cable to put the camera pics to the pc and that is all he wants to do. Not sure if a card reader is something we need.......?! Thanks for taking the time to reply, we are totally ignorant all this modern camera stuff.
I'm not sure what you mean, exactly. The Z1050 is a 10MP camera, so it should select the 10MP shooting mode by default. Is yours not doing this?
Good luck!
The problem is entirely on Photobucket's end, and there's not really much you can do. Sites like Photobucket and Youtube compress the video significantly and really damage the image quality. I don't think you'd get much better results from any one other camera.
If the Casio by any chance produces video using the Divx codec, you might consider using stage6.divx.com
Good luck!
I also uploaded to Dailymotion as you suggested, and they were much, much better. Still need to check out the stage6, as well as possibly a compression program for my computer to use and not rely on the hosting sites for that feature.
Thanks!
The Casios are great little cameras under certain circumstances, so some of that choice will depend on when and what you typically shoot.
I already returned the Sony W90, this is what I remember about the settings, most of the time I was using the auto setting and when in the P mode I had the iso set at 200.
I now have the Casio Z1050. I'm not sure I am going to keep it because most of the pictures have to be sharpened to suit my taste and the flash is weak. I have the sharpening setting set to +2 in the camera at this time and I will test to see if that helps.
The next camera I will try if this one doesn't work out will probably be the Canon SD750. I also here that the Sony T100 is pretty good.
I already returned the Sony W90, this is what I remember about the settings, most of the time I was using the auto setting and when in the P mode I had the iso set at 200.
I now have the Casio Z1050. I'm not sure I am going to keep it because most of the pictures have to be sharpened to suit my taste and the flash is weak. I have the sharpening setting set to +2 in the camera at this time and I will test to see if that helps.
The next camera I will try if this one doesn't work out will probably be the Canon SD750. I also here that the Sony T100 is pretty good.
I just received an email from Staples advertising the Sony W80 with a free memory stick and a free printer, all for $249.99. I am re thinking about buying the Sony back. I realize there isn't much difference between the W90 & the W80.
What do you think? Do you have any knowledge about the Casio Z1050. I have 90 days to decide (bought it in Costco).
Richard
Haven't used the Z1050 but have heard both good and bad- ranging from the issue of blurry photos (which comes up a lot in the reviews for it ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) to the fact that it's extremely speedy on start-up and very easy to use. The blurriness seems to be a big drawback however.
If you didn't like the W90, the W80 is the same just with different megapixels (which you probably knew). You know, I am ridiculously excited myself about the Canon SD750. Are you still considering that one?
I presently have the Casio Z1050 and I am going to give it a real try to see if works out ok for me.
But if it doesn't my next choice right now would be to try the Canon SD750.
I passed on the Sony W80 that was on sale assuming I would get the same results that I had with the W90. The only other thing is perhaps I had a bad W90.
What kind of point & shot are you using?
What are you considering for your next purchase?
Richard
My next purchase, honestly, will probably be a DSLR. I am really, really coveting the Canon SD750 myself, but I'm currently shooting with an SD800 and loving it, so I keep telling myself I don't need another Canon compact, no matter how good this one looks. I've also got an old 4 megapixel Canon A85 that I still take out pretty often for the really rough stuff, since if that one breaks, I won't mind TOO much, but it never seems to break. =) I think I'm a Canon convert, but let me know how the Z1050 works out. I think the Casios are great little cameras, and was actually considering purchasing this one until I saw all those 'blurry' comments. I'd like to know if it works out for you.
whats this point thingy?? :S
In the end, you may need to go to a camera store and hold both. I can say that I'm not thrilled with the design of the T20 over the Z1050, but it's compactness doesn't show in the photos, I can tell you that.
a. 'Standard cards' which is compatible to most digital cameras.
b. 'SDHC' cards which are high capacity cards of 4 gig and above.
SDHC cards only work on SDHC compatible cameras such as your Casio Z1050.
Depending on the write speed, SDHC cards are further split into classes. This is where your class 2 and class 4 come about. There is also a class 6 SDHC.
Class 2 card writes ar 2mb/sec, Class 4 card writes at 4mb/sec and as you might have guessed, class 6 cards write at 6mb/sec.
These are minimum write speed for each class and normally users, myself included, don't bother to find out mainly because, except for the 4 gig cards, the other SDHCs are expensive and until now mostly used by Professionals.
My computer has a built-in SD card reader and it couldn't read a 4GB SDHC (something to do with the larger capacity higher speed). Whenever you get a card and conect it directly to your computer instead of via the camera - you'll need to make sure you can read the card...
The wide angle of the Z1050 is 38mm, which is pretty standard for subcompact digitals. It doesn't really count as true wide angle (which is generally considered 28mm and lower) but it will still do fairly well for landscape and group shots.
Hope this helps!
Based on what I've read of customer and pro reviews, the Z1050 seems to be a pretty solid performer all around. It gets good marks for picture quality in general, with most complaints having to do with blurriness when shooting indoors or in poor light in general--the truth is that ALL subcompact digital cameras suffer from this problem, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. Many reviewers comment on the surprising brightness of the LCD when shooting outside in good sunlight, which is a rarity on digitals.
Hope this helps!
I own this camera and have for a few months now. I took it with me on my class trip to the East Coast and took tons of great pictures. I have had no problems with it. I don't care for the software, but that's just personal preference. I don't know what everyone's complaining about blurriness. The only time I've had blurry pictures is when I have it set to one of the modes with a longer exposure time and this as far as I know, a common problem. The LCD screen is good, I don't know what other people are complaining about. I really like having so many shooting modes to choose from and even the video quality is decent (considering its a subcompact digital camera.)
Hope this helps you decide!
Just go to <a href="world.casio.com/qv/download... site</a> and download it for free.
If anything goes wrong try <a href="casio.com/support/manuals/&... this location first</a> and select ' digital cameras ' .
The file is sized on small paper - but I suspect you would print it on full size letter paper therefore the document would be too big to carry around.
Here's two things to try...
1. Using Adobe Acrobat (NOT the reader) you can delete the pages you do not need. You could get it down from the 252 pages to a more managable size.
2. Try printing programs like FinePrint (www.fineprint.com) as their software will print 1, 2, 4 or 8 pages to a single page on your printer.
Does that help?
Which camera is better? I could find them for about the same price, so I wanted to know which is better. I couldn't find very many reviews for the Casio because it is pretty new.
I want a small, portable, camera. I want one that is well made and easy to navigate. The most important thing for me though, is good, clear, high quality pictures that have natural looking colors. I don't really need the 10 megapixels that the Casio has, but I wouldn't mind having that much.
I also would like to have pretty good video quality, that is not the most important thing for me though.
Which one would be the best for me to buy?
As you said, you don't need the higher MP, especially for the CCDs on these cameras right now. The more megapixels, the less light is filtered and the worse the picture quality becomes.
Between the two cameras you've suggested, I'd go with the Panasonic FX10. It's great in good-light, but not really that good with low-light, though.
Are you looking in the $180 price range? If you want to bump yourself up to a really nice camera, I would suggest the Canon SD700IS, SD800IS or SD750, or the Fuji F31D.
I haven't had any good experiences with Casio cameras, either.
As such, just based on the camera there shouldn't be any problems with taking pictures. The camera is responsive, and time between depressing the button to actually getting the picture is fairly short. You can also set the shutter speed faster if you're in good light.
All I can do is suggest the Canon SD800IS. Wide-angle (28mm) would be convenient when you're in close range, the response time is nearly instantaneous, and the photo quality is beautiful. And, as all Canons it seems, the skin tone is spot-on.
by technical specifications the A630 looks the best. It has BOTH of the following options- manual controls, and optical viewfinder. It also has the highest optical zoom.
1.) Casio EX-Z1050. Good camera, but compromises to reach the "ridiculously ultra-slim" status. I will never recommend Casio, due to all their focusing issues. That's just me.
2.) Canon A630: Great camera, but for that size you may want to consider the A700IS. I would figure that you'd want this size camera for the zoom, otherwise you can get ultra-compacts with right around a 4x zoom as well.
3.) Finepix F40: Can't argue with you on this one. The F31D has a lower resolution, so you'll get less noisy pictures in low-light that this camera is known for.
4.) SD600: This was an amazing camera a year ago, and still is. But you should rather opt for the SD750 instead. Or, for a great ultra-compact, either the SD700IS or SD800IS (if you want wide-angle)
I have been using the Casio, but, I really am not sold like I thought I was at first.
The Canon SD1000 elph came out with a lot of extras and with a sd 2 bit card..well, you can imagine.
I was really after an anti shake, so the casio has it, but with the canon, the processor makes it an "anti shake blurr".
Thank you again.
Lucky I purchased the casio and canon where there is an excellent return policy without restocking fee. Has to be within 90 days!
Sue
Took back the Canon sd1000. Still have 2 more months to work with the Fuji, but, I really think it is a keeper.
Sue
you better download photo program to clean up red eyes by click mouse to aim on dogs eyes or people eyes then burn CD or flash drive to take photo shop to delvop the beautyyy photos!!
good luck
revhead227!
dont you agree with me ?? smile
it is a waste of time trying to find a camera that eliminates the red eye problem. As of today, the only option is to use an appropriate software. Adobe Photoshop Elements is an example of a software that fixes the problem even automatically.
according to the manufacturer's website, the camera has digital image stabilization. It means that the lens is not mechanically stabilized like in most of other cameras. Instead of that the imaging processor analyzes the signal changes and tries to fix the picture.
I actually own the z1050 camera (in blue) and it has image stabilization. I'm not sure if it fixes the picture or if the lens is stabilized, but I've taken quite a few photos, both of moving subjects and with my hands not being very still and the pictures are not blurry at all.
Hope this helps!
i suggest a camera from the panansonic lumix range
it has a very good anti shake system.
they also have special modes for indoor shots.
i have a fz3 but the latest one is the fz7
to see how good it is. look at this image
flickr.com/photos/zandperl/...
Thanks
theres so many options along with the new line of SD models. Its boggling! SD300 has a new macro lens but it must not be out there yet.
GR
when I was reseaching I found out that the sd 800 IS has superb macro down to 1.2 inches , unklike the a570 IS which goes to only 2 inches. You will need a camera with image stabilization, it help out greatly. I have tested out the sd 800 IS and it locks on to targets alot closer, clearer and quicker than any of the cameras that u mentioned. It will cost u though. Otherwise if u can't afford go for the a570 IS it is the best all around budget deal for u.
In fact Casio recommends that for recording HQ movies, you have to use high speed SD cards with a recording speed of 10 mega pixels and above.
I have some more questions, too.
Are all these items compatible?
CASIO camera
Exilim Z1050BE
2GB SAN DISK Memory Card
Battery Charger
Standard Universal NiMh/NiCd...
I guess these letters include lithium and alkaline???
The camera comes with lithium.
Sandisk SDDR-99 ImageMate 5-in-1 Reader/Writer
Thank you!
2GB SAN DISK Memory Card - this is probably the standard card which is ok for photos, but you are better with the superior SanDisks Ultra II or (better again) the SanDisk Extreme III. These faster cards allows the camera to record the image (or and any video) at a much faster rate. Me - I'm shopping for the SanDisk Extreme III.
Sandisk SDDR-99 - This is fine. The ImageMate 5-in-1 Card Reader/Writer is a Hi-Speed USB 2.0 Multi-card Reader/Writer that connects to your computers USB 2.0 port.
Points : points are rewarded for the 'best answer' for a question and they are cumulative.
This means all the points that you collected will add up as a record of your contribution.
If you have accumulated a lot of points, it means you have contributed a lot of ' best answers'.
2. Compatibilities :
Z1050BE is compatible with 2 gig memory card and Casio Z1050 comes with it's own charger.
Chargers are specific for the batteries. NiMh charger will only charge NiMh batteries, similarly Lithium ion battery charger will only charge lithium ion batteries.
Lastly card readers can be single or multi. Single means it reads/writes to only one type of memory card. This can be SD card, xD card and so on.
Multi-card readers have multi slots for different cards. 5-in-1 means one card reader has 5 slots to read 5 different memory cards and if pays to make sure that your memory card is one of them before you buy.
HELP!
Many people I know handle the battery needs by buying a spare battery. As Casio uses Lithium rechargeable battery, it should last quite a while before requiring a recharge and a spare battery make sure you will be alright for the day.
Battery problem for Kodak is also handled in the same way.
Picture transfer is the same for both. Kodak also needs a camera dock to transfer pictures.
To travel light, what you need is just a tiny card reader to transfer pictures to the computer, not the big camera docks.
With the two concerns removed, you might wish to go ahead with the purchase of Casio if you like the 10 meg sensor, metal body, and anti shake DSP with a promise of Super Life Battery.
Is ready very fast to take the first picture.
Once the battery was charged, it seems to last a very long time. We didn't charge the last two days while taking about 200 5mp photos. We got a high speed 1GB card and still had plenty of room.
From the figures, you will have more chances of capturing a picture using wide angles where the flash will be effective within a distance of 10 feet.
Telephotos, on the other hand will only work within 5 feet.
If there are some enclosures, such as walls or something that reflect light, you will be better off. Otherwise, keep to the distance stated above and use more wide angles than telephotos, you will not come back empty handed.
It is not difficult to transfer pictures to the computer from a Casio Exilim Z1050 if you are using Windows XP.
If you have tried and encountered any problem that you cannot solve, you can take the memory card out of the camera and insert it into a card reader.
Plug the card reader to the USB port of the computer and you can download the pictures to the latter using the copy and paste method.
Alternatively, you can download Picasa2 from the internet to copy the picture from the card reader to the computer for you.
Picasa also has some picture editing and printing function that are quite user friendly.
Casio Exilim Z1050 Reviews
Casio Exilim Z1050 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
I have owned casio cameras before that produced fantastic pictures with bright colours. I thought I'd upgrade to this one, but half the pictures I take are blurry through no fault of mine, night time ones are systematically bad and red eyes are most common. Avoid at all costs.
- 4.0 out of 5
This is the third camera I own in less than a year. Hassle free, easy to understand and take pictures. I love the pics.
- 2.0 out of 5
I read many great reviews about the camera so I thought I would buy one when my old pocket digital died (a Minolta). I have to say that I have been pretty disappointed with this camera. Many of the pictures (especially inside ones) are out of focus and blurry. I’m not a professional photographer but I have used digital cameras since the mid-1990s and I can keep a camera steady when shooting a shot. I recently took some pictures of my daughter for one of her school projects. Out of the 6 shots that I took (her sitting in a chair) 4 were out of focus and one was outstandingly clear. Very odd. Because of this I went out to Walmart about bought a cheap Nikon L12. Although this camera gets mediocre reviews, I’m pretty happy with it. The overall picture quality is better than the Casio and I no longer have the blurry problem.
- 4.0 out of 5
Fits in your pocket
The Best Shot software helps with the settings
The blurry pictures I have taken were because it is small and you have to have a steady hand.
tripod pics are great
great price
- 4.0 out of 5
After digicam experience with Nikons, Canons, and Casio Exilims, I'd have to say that the Canon Digic processessor (on the A610), for me, produced the best photos. BUT Contrary to the claims about the Z1050's photos being "blurry" or out of focus, my photos are turning out really, really well. And there IS a menu option to increase/decrease the level of sharpness in your photos. Try playing around with the autofocus and sharpness options. This is by far one of the best camera's I've had.
PS the "zoom during movie" feature is indespensible once you get used to it. And the widescreen resolution is awesome for using your landscape photos as backgrounds on widescreen monitors.
- 3.0 out of 5
I had the previous model before, I believe it was Z700 or something like that, 7.1Megapixels which I bought from Costco, after 10 months it just stopped working, wouldn't react to anything turn on or off, took it back to Costco. By that time the newer model came outand I took it (EX-Z1000). It broke this weekend, the lens would not go back. It seems like it is a common problem.
Overall I have mixed feeling about this camera, I did like it, took a lot of good pictures with it, although I have to agree that most of the pictures look blurry on LCD display, but ok when you download them, and also a lot of indoor (electrical lighting) pictures do not look very sharp also.
But I did like a lot of features in this camera, large LCD, compact size, etc....
- 3.0 out of 5
I have to say that I bought this camera from Costco as well for the 10megapixel feature. The images were very blurry in the viewfinder after the shot and printed out very dark and lack crispness. I will be returning it today. I also agree b/c I have a Canon 4 megapixel and it rocks. I just wanted something smaller. Oh well, back to Canon.
- 2.0 out of 5
Bought this at Costco after looking through ratings. After using it for 1 month, I find that almost every picture that you see in the viewfinder looks a little blurred, and the downloaded images are also not that sharp. When I compare picture from my two year old 3 MP Cannon to this 10 MP camera, the 3MP wins.
- 1.0 out of 5
my boyfriend bought me this camera last year and just recently i have been having problems like my lens when it is suppose to come out it gets stuck and makes funny clicking noises also the shutter doesnt completely shut i took very good care of my camera it doesnt even have a scratch on it and its never been dropped
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera! I have had no problems and the only blurry pictures I've ever taken have been with the longer exposure time modes because I can't hold it still. I do have the image stabilizer activated, so I'm not sure how much that affects my pictures. I took it on my class trip to the East Coast and took over a thousand pictures with a 2GB SD card. All of the pictures came out great and display beautifully on my widescreen laptop. The battery life was great, too! I bought an extra battery, just in case, and am continually amazed at its long life. Personally, I don't care for the software that came with it, but that's just me. There's nothing wrong with it, I just prefer others. The size of the camera is perfect for carrying in my pocket or my purse and allows me to take candid shots quickly and easily. The settings are very easy to figure out. There are lots of adjustable settings that someone more photographically literate could change to create the ideal photo, but even I can get great pictures every time!
Love it!!!
- 1.0 out of 5
No matter what I try, pictures come out blurry. It seems like it has a soft focus....taking it back to Costco. Very disappointed..will not buy another Casio.
- 2.0 out of 5
I owned a 4mp Casio before and it was great. Just got this one and no matter what setting I try to put it on alot come out blurry and some the color is kind've dull. Taking it back!
- 3.0 out of 5
I would like to say to those people that hardly know about cameras to stop giving good reviews on devices that are not giving customers great results. I am in the technology industry and my wife is a graphic designer with minor in photography. I own a kodak 2MP camera for 7 years and have used SLR cameras as well. My Kodak culd take pics inside and outside without picture coming out blurry. I took many pic with the CASIO and almost all pictures that I took inside where blurry and about 60% of outside pics were not. This is not acceptable for a $250 10MP camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my second digital camera, and I am very impressed. I would highly recommend that anyone buy this camera. I have taken a few test shots around the city and it has worked very well.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my second casio digital and this one is even easier to use. The large screen is a huge help. I just love the product and it's ease of use.
scottsdale az