Fuji FinePix A900
Fuji FinePix A900
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Fuji FinePix A900
Editor's Review
For a newer, low-cost alternative look at the Fuji FinePix A170. This is what we wrote about the A900 when it was on the market:
The Fuji FinePix A900 is like the girl next door dressed up as a beauty queen. It packs a bevy of eye-catching features that look great in ads: a solid 4x optical zoom, a selectable image stabilization mode and a big 2.5" LCD. However, the A900 isn't the class-leading heavyweight it might sound like. An in-depth look at its specs uncovers several budget-conscious design choices the manufacturer has made. The CCD and lens are definitely top quality, but the paltry ISO range, low resolution LCD screen and tiny amount of internal memory will be a concern for serious users. Fuji's well-advertised image stabilization is software-based, as it auto-adjusts settings like ISO and shutter speed to side-step blurred shots. This method of stabilization often results in unwanted image noise, something that the optical or CCD-shift stabilization systems included in other models avoids. With those warnings out of the way, it's safe to say that this is a very good and very inexpensive entry-level camera. As stated above, it's packed with a fine sensor/lens combo, and it also can boast a fine graphical user interface. The budget-conscious shopper, who it's clearly aimed at, should take note of the fact that the only thing differentiating it from the cheaper A820 is its 9 megapixel sensor (compared to the A820's 8.3 megapixels).
Specifications
- 9 megapixels
- 4x optical zoom / 7.6x digital zoom
- Auto focus
- Auto and manual exposure
- JPEG file format
- ISO 100-800
- AVI (motion JPEG) movie mode w/sound
- AA batteries
- 2.5 inch LCD
- SD/MMC, xD Picture Card storage (10MB internal)
- IrSimple wireless capable
- Part Number: A900
- UPC: 074101404302
- Release Date: Feb 22, 2007
Shop for A900 Accessories
Fuji FinePix A900 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Linda (10/22/2010)
How fast is the shutter speed?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/26/2010)
1/1200.
reply to this comment
Dave (09/19/2010)
I dont agree with your review of the a 900 . Its a fantastic camera and beats more expensive cameras i have bought hands down .
reply to this comment
Card Error (yannypoos — 09/06/2008)
i have a fujifilm finepix a900 and it keeps reading card error i have tried various memory cards as well as resetting the camera but nothing seems to work. any ideas of what else i could try?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (09/06/2008)
Ans deleted since OP has no response for so many days.
reply to this comment
Zaffo (11/01/2008)
I was having this problem with my SDHC card but with a regular SD card it was working. I updated the firmware from 1.00 to 1.10 with the regular SD and then the SDHC card was working.
reply to this comment
Can I change the file name that the camera creates? (acameron2 — 06/27/2008)
I have 2 Fuji Finepix cameras (an S5500 & A900) which name the photos the same file name (i.e. DSCF0001 etc). How can I change one of the cameras to auto-name some other way so that photo files do not overwrite or get left behind?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/04/2008)
Automatically generated, I'm afraid. You'll have to change them manually.
reply to this comment
all pictures a bit dark. (Bigrubsie — 04/26/2008)
I have been told to adjust the white ballance, but it says automatic.on the settings. all pictures are on the dark side and I have to brighten them up on the computer before I can print them. please help as I love the camera and it's probably something stupid I am doing as I am in my [Senior] YEARS.
thank you. finepix a 900
reply to this comment
thank you. finepix a 900
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2008)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Fuji's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
You can only change the A900's white balance and exposure compensation settings in Manual mode, which is mysteriously hidden among Landscape, Night, and Sports modes under scene presets.
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Fuji's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
You can only change the A900's white balance and exposure compensation settings in Manual mode, which is mysteriously hidden among Landscape, Night, and Sports modes under scene presets.
Bigrubsie (04/30/2008)
Many thanks for your kind and prompt reply, problem solved on your advice, well done.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/30/2008)
Happy to help.Happy to help, Reuben. Good luck.
reply to this comment
denise (05/18/2008)
hi I JUST GOT THIS CAMERA TODAY AND SOMEHOW ITS IN THE WRONG LAUAGE loL I NEED IT IN ENGLISH I TRY TAKING THE BARRIES OUT AND HOLDING DOWN THE MENU BUTTON WITH NO LUCK CAN SOEM ONE HELP THANKs SO MUCH ! Denise
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/20/2008)
The A900? There should be a language setting in the menu which will allow you to change it into English. You're probably going to need to talk to Fuji tech support to talk you through it though. And while you're at it, see if they can tell you if it's a "gray market" ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_... ) camera. If something is gray market, it means that - although you may have gotten a great deal on it - it doesn't come with a warranty that will be honored here in this country. Which means if something goes wrong with the camera, you'll either have to send it to China to repair or pay to have it fixed yourself.
Be warned.
reply to this comment
Be warned.
What ultra compact camera to buy? (pmb816 — 12/01/2007)
I presently have a Sony DSC-H1 camera which I have had good luck with. I would like to go instead with one of the new ultra compact camera. Basically I want something to carry in my purse to take pictures whenever I like. I would also like to go with the movie mode with audio too. Help...I have looked at so many and am getting confused. I'm looking to spend in the $200 range. Would the Olympus 760 be a good camera for me after using my Sony for a couple years? Thanks for everyones help.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/02/2007)
Patty,
This would be a versatile camera that meets your specifications. If you want to stay with Sony, I would recommend the W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is a bit more limited when compared to the Olympus 760 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). If I had to choose between the two, I would pick the Olympus 760 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This would be a versatile camera that meets your specifications. If you want to stay with Sony, I would recommend the W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is a bit more limited when compared to the Olympus 760 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). If I had to choose between the two, I would pick the Olympus 760 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
pmb816 (12/02/2007)
Andrew...Thanks for your input. Since you seem to know your stuff...if you could pick any ultra compact camera in the $200 price range...which would it be? To me, an actual user of a camera means more than what the manufacturer says a camera will do. Thanks again...Patty
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/04/2007)
Patty,
I am a big fan of the Canon ELPH line. I have had one for 6 years now, and it still works great. You could try the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Its compact size is fantastic to keep in a pocket or purse, and the 7.1 MP resolution will make it great for producing photos at 8x10 or larger (when set at the finest resolution). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I am a big fan of the Canon ELPH line. I have had one for 6 years now, and it still works great. You could try the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Its compact size is fantastic to keep in a pocket or purse, and the 7.1 MP resolution will make it great for producing photos at 8x10 or larger (when set at the finest resolution). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
pmb816 (12/04/2007)
Thanks for your input...Happy Holidays
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/05/2007)
You have a happy holidays as well Patty. Please come back with any other questions.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
blauvelt70 (12/06/2007)
Andrew I see you know a little or alot about digital cameras and was wondering if you can help me out! :) I am torn between a canon sd1000 and the olympus fe280 I seem to like the size of the Olympus better but which is going to give me a better printed pic. I would appreciate any advise you can give. :)
Bernadette
reply to this comment
Bernadette
pmb816 (12/06/2007)
Hi Bernadette...Yes Andrew does seem to know a lot about cameras. Right now I'm looking at the Olympus 760, Canon SD1000 and a FujiFilm A900. Now the had part, to make a decision. So if anyone would like to give me their input, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks and Happy Holidays.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/06/2007)
Patty and Bernadette,
While the Fuji A900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might sound impressive at first with its 9MP resolution, I don't like the image shift software or the low ISO setting options. I prefer to set things more manually. That being said, the new Olympus FE280, looks to have a lot of nice features. If its price fits into your budget, it might be the way to go. My favorite of the group is still the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
While the Fuji A900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might sound impressive at first with its 9MP resolution, I don't like the image shift software or the low ISO setting options. I prefer to set things more manually. That being said, the new Olympus FE280, looks to have a lot of nice features. If its price fits into your budget, it might be the way to go. My favorite of the group is still the Canon SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
pmb816 (12/06/2007)
Andrew...I guess I have been kind of ignoring the Canon SD1000 because it does't have image stabilization but will give it a look. Also the Canon SD750. Thanks for pointing out about the Fuji A900 image shift software. I read about it and now have a much better understanding between the different kinds of image stabilization on cameras. The Olympus cameras kind of have some bad reviews as opposed to the Canon. Thanks again for your help....Patty
reply to this comment
Kathy (12/07/2007)
I have had several digital cameras and am in the market for a compact digital for my purse but I need a fast shutter speed. I mostly take candid shots of my grandkids and by the time I capture the photo the picture I was intending to take is long gone. Also unless I hold perfectly still the image is sometimes blurry. I have a Sony Cyber-Shot 7.2. What camera do you recommend? Thanks so much. The more I read the more confused I get!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/09/2007)
Kathy,
First, I have to ask if you have the Sony Cybershot W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ); it has a 7.2 megapixel resolution. Is this the camera you have?
One of the reasons the camera shutter speed is slower is due the the auto focus. If you have the focal length you want, hold the button halfway down, and that should lock it, so when you push the whole way the camera will react faster.
As for the blurry shots, I'm guessing that you are in lower light situations when this happens. The camera will automatically adjust the shutter opening in those situations to allow more light in. To avoid this more, I would set your camera at ISO 1000 to allow more light in. You might see some graininess in the photos, but you will avoid the blurs.
If you would like to get a new camera all-together, I would recommend the Canon SD870 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is one of the highest rated compact cameras on the site, has a larger ISO setting range, image stabilization (which will futher help to avoid blurry shots in low light settings), and you white balance can be manually adjusted to further "tweak" the camera to work better in low light situations. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
First, I have to ask if you have the Sony Cybershot W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ); it has a 7.2 megapixel resolution. Is this the camera you have?
One of the reasons the camera shutter speed is slower is due the the auto focus. If you have the focal length you want, hold the button halfway down, and that should lock it, so when you push the whole way the camera will react faster.
As for the blurry shots, I'm guessing that you are in lower light situations when this happens. The camera will automatically adjust the shutter opening in those situations to allow more light in. To avoid this more, I would set your camera at ISO 1000 to allow more light in. You might see some graininess in the photos, but you will avoid the blurs.
If you would like to get a new camera all-together, I would recommend the Canon SD870 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is one of the highest rated compact cameras on the site, has a larger ISO setting range, image stabilization (which will futher help to avoid blurry shots in low light settings), and you white balance can be manually adjusted to further "tweak" the camera to work better in low light situations. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Kathy (12/20/2007)
Thanks so much for your help. The Canon SD870 IS sounds good to me but how is the shutter speed? The most important thing to me is that it is fast so I can catch candid shots of my grandkids. The camera I have now is a Sony Cyber-Shot 7.2 and even when I press the button halfway it still takes a long time to capture the shot and also once I press the button completely I have to hold the camera still until it is fully captured or it will be a blurry mess. Thanks for your help, I so appreciate it. Have a great Christmas!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/20/2007)
Kathy,
You might need to play with the settings to get your current camera, as well as any future camera, to work better in low light settings. That is where the image stabilization, setting a higher ISO number, and switching to a shutter priority mode. This camera does not have a shutter priority, but it does have a nightshot mode, which will essentially speed up your shutter speed, which you want to avoid the blurry shots. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You might need to play with the settings to get your current camera, as well as any future camera, to work better in low light settings. That is where the image stabilization, setting a higher ISO number, and switching to a shutter priority mode. This camera does not have a shutter priority, but it does have a nightshot mode, which will essentially speed up your shutter speed, which you want to avoid the blurry shots. I hope this helps.
Andrew
kanchupraveen (12/21/2007)
andrew,
could you please suggest me an ultracompact pocket camera that i use mostly in indoors as i have a small kid.i am really confused between canon sd 870 is and canon 1000.i read in the reviews that canon 1000 is not good for lowlights and to take pics of kids as it comes blurrry but i like its size and 870 is bit big than sa 1000.i torn between two which to choose.this chirstmas i need to buy for everyday use as i need to click my baby photos to cherish them for long time.thanku andrew in advance i know u will suggest me good one.
reply to this comment
could you please suggest me an ultracompact pocket camera that i use mostly in indoors as i have a small kid.i am really confused between canon sd 870 is and canon 1000.i read in the reviews that canon 1000 is not good for lowlights and to take pics of kids as it comes blurrry but i like its size and 870 is bit big than sa 1000.i torn between two which to choose.this chirstmas i need to buy for everyday use as i need to click my baby photos to cherish them for long time.thanku andrew in advance i know u will suggest me good one.
Andrew Skinner (12/21/2007)
Kanchan,
If you like the Canon cameras and are looking for something that will perform a little better in low light with children, I would recommend something with manual exposure settings and image stabilization. The two cameras you mentioned don't have the manual settings, but the Canon SD 850 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does. This camera has the ability to change the exposure settings manually to adjust better to low light situations. It is a bit bigger but that is to make room for the optical viewfinder which is nice on sunny days when you can't see the LCD screen as well. I hope this helps; good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
If you like the Canon cameras and are looking for something that will perform a little better in low light with children, I would recommend something with manual exposure settings and image stabilization. The two cameras you mentioned don't have the manual settings, but the Canon SD 850 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does. This camera has the ability to change the exposure settings manually to adjust better to low light situations. It is a bit bigger but that is to make room for the optical viewfinder which is nice on sunny days when you can't see the LCD screen as well. I hope this helps; good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
joy (12/23/2007)
I would like the most compac digital with image stabiliztion and good shutter speep and possibly a view finder. Joy
reply to this comment
Amy S. (12/23/2007)
Hi Joy,
I love my Cannon SD850. It is a great camera for the price! It is small enough to fit in my purse so it goes almost everywhere with me. It does not have a great deal of shutter lag which I appreciate since I have quick moving children! I find that my only problem with slow shutter comes when I am shooting indoors with a flash and my battery is on it's last leg. Otherwise it is very quick to shoot. I have also figured out that the continuous shutter works best in well-lit outdoor situations where the flash is not required.
It also includes a viewfinder which I find is a must-have feature.
I have gotten some incredible shots with this camera in the last few months thanks to the tips and techniques I have gotten from the wonderful people on this board!
HTH!
Amy S.
reply to this comment
I love my Cannon SD850. It is a great camera for the price! It is small enough to fit in my purse so it goes almost everywhere with me. It does not have a great deal of shutter lag which I appreciate since I have quick moving children! I find that my only problem with slow shutter comes when I am shooting indoors with a flash and my battery is on it's last leg. Otherwise it is very quick to shoot. I have also figured out that the continuous shutter works best in well-lit outdoor situations where the flash is not required.
It also includes a viewfinder which I find is a must-have feature.
I have gotten some incredible shots with this camera in the last few months thanks to the tips and techniques I have gotten from the wonderful people on this board!
HTH!
Amy S.
what is difference between A900 and A920 (pkapoor — 09/04/2007)
reply to this comment
Matt (09/14/2007)
A900: 9.1MP; A920: 9.1MP SAME
A900: 1/1.6" CCD; A920: 1/1.6" CCD SAME
A900: ISO800; A920: ISO800 SAME
A900: 39mm-156mm; A920: 39mm-156mm SAME
A900: 10cm macro; A920: 10cm macro SAME
A900: 1/1200 max shutter; A920: 1/1200 max shutter SAME
A900: 3.9-9m flash; A920: 3.9-9m flash SAME
A900: 320x240@30fps; A920: 320x240@30fps SAME
A900: 2.5" 115,000 pixel LCD; A920: 2.7" 115,000 pixel LCD A920
A900: 7.2oz; A920: 7.3oz A900
A900: 3.9"x2.4"x1.3"; A920: 3.9"x2.4"x1.3" SAME
The A920 has face detection, wi-fi transfer, and an anti-glare coating on the LCD, the A900 doesn't. The price difference is about $40. The weight difference comes from the larger LCD on the A920.
reply to this comment
A900: 1/1.6" CCD; A920: 1/1.6" CCD SAME
A900: ISO800; A920: ISO800 SAME
A900: 39mm-156mm; A920: 39mm-156mm SAME
A900: 10cm macro; A920: 10cm macro SAME
A900: 1/1200 max shutter; A920: 1/1200 max shutter SAME
A900: 3.9-9m flash; A920: 3.9-9m flash SAME
A900: 320x240@30fps; A920: 320x240@30fps SAME
A900: 2.5" 115,000 pixel LCD; A920: 2.7" 115,000 pixel LCD A920
A900: 7.2oz; A920: 7.3oz A900
A900: 3.9"x2.4"x1.3"; A920: 3.9"x2.4"x1.3" SAME
The A920 has face detection, wi-fi transfer, and an anti-glare coating on the LCD, the A900 doesn't. The price difference is about $40. The weight difference comes from the larger LCD on the A920.
I was looking at the Fuji a900 but am not liking the reviews. What is the best small digital camera that uses XD media that I can buy? (cjhuntington — 07/13/2007)
I like image stablization and the baby feature of the a900. Already have XD cards and a card reader hence my wanting another XD card camera. Want something that is small and portable.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/25/2007)
I don't know. If you're looking for a basic point and shoot to get shots of the baby, it's got that down cold. Editor's comments here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) point to a top quality CCD chip and lens. However, it does get low marks for it's ISO range (which frankly I don't is much of an issue since most of the pictures you take will be from 100-400 ISO. And who cares if the LCD is considered "low res?" Looking at the picture on the camera screen isn't what you want a camera for. The image stabilization is a concern as it's software driven. But most cameras in this class are like that.
My opinion is that you want the money you spend to be where it counts and that's on the picture itself. And Fuji seems to have done that by focusing on the chip and the lens.
As for another option in the same class, I'd point you to the Canon Powershot A570IS. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) It has alot of the same features but comes with optical image stabilization and face detection autofocus, and the improved DIGIC III processor. Granted, it has only 7.1mp compared to the Fuji's 9.0mp, but the reality is that for snapshots, you really won't see a difference until you reach enlargements above 8x10 and only then, it's marginal.
reply to this comment
My opinion is that you want the money you spend to be where it counts and that's on the picture itself. And Fuji seems to have done that by focusing on the chip and the lens.
As for another option in the same class, I'd point you to the Canon Powershot A570IS. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) It has alot of the same features but comes with optical image stabilization and face detection autofocus, and the improved DIGIC III processor. Granted, it has only 7.1mp compared to the Fuji's 9.0mp, but the reality is that for snapshots, you really won't see a difference until you reach enlargements above 8x10 and only then, it's marginal.
Klaus (07/26/2007)
Get the Fuji 31Fd, good ISO range exeptional pictures don't get caught in the MP race - 5 to 6 MP is enough.
reply to this comment
FUJI FINEPIX A900 GOOD ZOOM? (INTERSTATEPLUMBING — 06/19/2007)
PLUMBING SUPPLY NEEDS TO TAKE CLOSE UP PICTURES OF LITTLE SCREWS AND INTRICATE PARTS. HOW CLOSE CAN THIS CAMERA GET TO THE SUBJECT WITH GOOD CLARITY AND ARE THERE ANY OTHER CAMERAS WITH GOOD ZOOM THAT YOU CAN RECCOMEND?
reply to this comment
John Ml. (06/19/2007)
Good zoom or good macro? If good macro this one should be ok.
reply to this comment
The shortcoming of this camera disappoint me, can anyone recommend a similar but more full featured camera? Req are: 4x optical min, MUST use AA bat. (revolutn — 04/15/2007)
To further explain: The fact that Image Stabilization is done via software causing artifacts and the low resolution of AVI recording clips was a major disappointment to my expectations.
Could anyone recommend an alternative model with similar specs?
I've considered the Canon PS A550 but that has NO image stabilization at all and a standard CCD chip.
My barebones requirements are: MUST use AA batteries! NO proprietary battery packs for me. Should have minimum of 4x OPTICAL zoom, Digital zoom thereafter would be nice, but not a requirement. Must allow video recordings and based on today's price points there's little reason to settle for anything less than 6MP imho but seeing as how anything over 2MP is technically overkill for 99.9% of the photo taking population the MP isn't a major factor to me.
Decent built in flash and low level lighting performance.
Thanks,
Rev
reply to this comment
Could anyone recommend an alternative model with similar specs?
I've considered the Canon PS A550 but that has NO image stabilization at all and a standard CCD chip.
My barebones requirements are: MUST use AA batteries! NO proprietary battery packs for me. Should have minimum of 4x OPTICAL zoom, Digital zoom thereafter would be nice, but not a requirement. Must allow video recordings and based on today's price points there's little reason to settle for anything less than 6MP imho but seeing as how anything over 2MP is technically overkill for 99.9% of the photo taking population the MP isn't a major factor to me.
Decent built in flash and low level lighting performance.
Thanks,
Rev
mike (04/16/2007)
look into the canon a560 actually. It has a canon's newest chip in it which makes it quicker and more reliable.
Image stabiliztion when done right would be a camera like the canon a570 IS. It uses a spectrometer and "physically moves the lens element" not digitally.
reply to this comment
Image stabiliztion when done right would be a camera like the canon a570 IS. It uses a spectrometer and "physically moves the lens element" not digitally.
mike (04/16/2007)
Canon's use of optical stabiliztion produces a quality result. Go with something like the sd 800 IS if you want image stabilization at its best. Without it a lot of my pics would be blurry.
ALso why no lithium ion when the sd 800 is is rated at 270 shots per charge.
reply to this comment
ALso why no lithium ion when the sd 800 is is rated at 270 shots per charge.
Chris (12/01/2007)
AA's are the way to go - easy to get, cheaper, get rechargeables. If you're out in Boothbay Harbor in December try running to the store and asking them if they have your specific lithium ion whatever battery....or just ask for AA's, you can get them at the local deli if you need to.
reply to this comment
RADAR (01/01/2008)
WHAT AC ADAPTER DO YOU USE FOR A900 SO MANY LISTED AC3VW AC3 VX ?? AND MANY MORE
reply to this comment
George Docherty (01/27/2008)
Why can i not use energiser AALithium batteries in my fuji A900 ?.
reply to this comment
Lithium Batteries in a A900 (lossy — 09/26/2010)
Mine never worked again after putting AA Lithium batteries in
must have blown something up in side and I only read the manual 1 Year after blowning it up. The Lens pops out for half a second but it never properly comes on for taking pictures or reviewing pictures.
I think there should have been a big lable on it saying only use Normal AA batteries with this product
reply to this comment
must have blown something up in side and I only read the manual 1 Year after blowning it up. The Lens pops out for half a second but it never properly comes on for taking pictures or reviewing pictures.
I think there should have been a big lable on it saying only use Normal AA batteries with this product
Fuji FinePix A900 Reviews
Fuji FinePix A900 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
for the Fuji FinePix A900
(Dante — 03/20/2008)
For the price and quality.. this is an excellent choice. It has pretty colors.......compared with my Panasonic DMC FX30 this Fuji has delightfull reds... and everything is fine except the size of the cam..
- 4.0 out of 5
Amazing dynamic range.
(Peter Huppertz — 10/04/2007)
Unassuming camera - but with very low noise, very good metering and autofocus, and excellent image processing.
But the most amazing feature of this camera is the amazing dynamic range - Fuji's SuperCCD sure pays off here.
I bought this because I wanted an affordable, unassuming pocketable camera - one that I can take whenever I don't carry my dSLR kit. Turns out that, for 75% of all my shots, the A900 is as good as my dSLR setup, which is the size of a backpack.
Limitations: what you'd expect of a digicompact. Depth of focus, even at fully open, is the size of a small country. Doesn't help with portraits, but comes in handy with macro shots. Limited zoom capacity, but the lens performs more than adequately over the entire zoom range. No manual settings. No RAW mode.
But the dynamic range is stunning. What a great little camera for the money.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've really enjoyed this camera
(Don — 07/09/2007)
I've had this camera for a month now and it has been an excellent point and shoot camera. It takes decent pictures in all modes and settings except for the video which was slightly distorted, but excellent sound. The menus and buttons are not to complicated to use plus it will tell you what to do on some of the functions.
I believe this camera to be will worth the price of $173.00 that I paid for it!
