Fuji FinePix F30
Editors' Comments
The Fuji F30 is meant to supersede their popular F10 and F11 models with a bevy of powerful new features for versatile shooting. Fuji claims that the F30 is the closer to the sensitivity of the human eye than any other digital camera. It's the first digital camera to allow for an ISO of 3200 at full resolution, and is specially tuned for low-light, and sports or action photography. The F30 is topped off with a nice 6.3 megapixel sensor to capture as much of that extra sensitivity as possible.
Specifications
- 6.3 megapixels
- 3x optical zoom / 6.2x digital zoom
- auto focus
- auto exposure
- ISO 100-3200
- JPEG file format
- movie mode w/sound
- lithium ion battery
- 2.5 inch LCD
- xD-Picture card storage (10MB internal)
Fuji FinePix F30 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
what is the best point and shoot camera for under $300? (Dave — 09/26/2006)
reply to this comment
tharrison (09/27/2006)
Users love the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and we think the new Kodak C875 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) looks promising.
reply to this comment
what is the best point and shoot camera for available light pictures? (hooper22 — 09/29/2006)
reply to this comment
tharrison (09/29/2006)
Cameras that work well in low-light, without flash would have these features: high ISO settings (800 or higher) and image stabilization. High ISO means the camera's image sensor is able to get an exposure with less light. Image stabilization reduces the effect of camera shake, thereby allowing a longer shutter speed.
Just because a camera has high ISO doesn't mean it will take a good picture at that setting. Look for reviews indicating low "image noise". And actually, all other things being the same, a [i]lower[i] resolution (megapixel) camera may be better, because the image sensors are mostly the same size. Noise is affected by how close the individual sensors (pixels) are to each other.
Putting this all together, I would recommend the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has gotten praise from a lot of users. The Olympus FE-180 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is new, and while less expensive and probably a fine camera, may not be the best bet for your needs.
reply to this comment
Just because a camera has high ISO doesn't mean it will take a good picture at that setting. Look for reviews indicating low "image noise". And actually, all other things being the same, a [i]lower[i] resolution (megapixel) camera may be better, because the image sensors are mostly the same size. Noise is affected by how close the individual sensors (pixels) are to each other.
Putting this all together, I would recommend the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has gotten praise from a lot of users. The Olympus FE-180 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is new, and while less expensive and probably a fine camera, may not be the best bet for your needs.
Does the F-30 have a stabilizer ? (Lyn Pence — 10/06/2006)
reply to this comment
camera? (10/06/2006)
The Fuji F-30 does not have image stabilization.
reply to this comment
WPS (10/15/2006)
No. Just something they call "picture stabilizer" that mearly boots the ISO speed which in turn uses a higher shutter speed. A true optical stabilizer is more intelligent and does not degrade the image at all.
reply to this comment
Is image stabilization important, F30 doesn't have it? (Ben H — 10/08/2006)
Saw some shots taken with image stabilizers on other brands and it makes a huge difference when you are zoomed in on your target object.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/08/2006)
Image stabilization can be really helpful if you have a long zoom or if you do a lot of low light (slow shutter speed) shooting. It can also help if you have real problems holding the camera still.
It's not a magic tool- you still need to frame the shot carefully and have all settings correct, and it won't take a perfect picture if you are walking or jogging or something like that- but if you zoom a lot, don't like to use tripods, or shoot in low light you will definitely notice a difference.
If you do choose image stabilization I recommend optical rather than digital... it is more effective albeit more expensive.
reply to this comment
It's not a magic tool- you still need to frame the shot carefully and have all settings correct, and it won't take a perfect picture if you are walking or jogging or something like that- but if you zoom a lot, don't like to use tripods, or shoot in low light you will definitely notice a difference.
If you do choose image stabilization I recommend optical rather than digital... it is more effective albeit more expensive.
Harry Conley (12/03/2006)
Doess the Kodak V550 have image stabilization?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/03/2006)
Yes, it does; although it's electronic as opposed to optical, and some people argue that that kind of stabilization isn't as effective. But it does have it.
reply to this comment
which digital camera has the best video audio capabilites (Julie — 10/10/2006)
in a point & shoot camera
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/10/2006)
The F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes with video capture with mono sound, which is pretty much standard in the point and shoot category. However, the Canon PowerShot S3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes with stereo audio capture. You do run into a 1GB capture ceiling, and it's a good idea to get an SD card with the fastest capture speed you can afford.
Another option is Pure Digital Point and Shoot Video Camcorder. It holds up to 30 minutes of video onboard, which in my experience is more than enough for capturing special moments while out and about. It also comes with a built in USB 2.0 jack which plugs directly into your PC for downloading and editing, or use the a/v cables for TV playback.
You can pick them up at Target and some Costco locations for about $130.00, plus there's a $20 rebate through Pure Digital's website.
Great for the kiddies too!
reply to this comment
Another option is Pure Digital Point and Shoot Video Camcorder. It holds up to 30 minutes of video onboard, which in my experience is more than enough for capturing special moments while out and about. It also comes with a built in USB 2.0 jack which plugs directly into your PC for downloading and editing, or use the a/v cables for TV playback.
You can pick them up at Target and some Costco locations for about $130.00, plus there's a $20 rebate through Pure Digital's website.
Great for the kiddies too!
how old is this camera (John Bennett — 10/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/10/2006)
John,
The Fujifilm F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) was released in early 2006. The brochure ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ) shows information as of January 2006.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Fujifilm F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) was released in early 2006. The brochure ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ) shows information as of January 2006.
Andrew
by James DeRuvo (10/10/2006)
it came out this year. so it's pretty new.
reply to this comment
Which one to buy fuji f30 or canon ixus 65, 700,800,900? help me please! (Bal — 10/12/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (11/10/2006)
Hi, I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com ( DigitalCamera-HQ.com ), so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Fuji Finepix F30 compatible with mac os10.4.4 (Chris Lewis-Smith — 10/15/2006)
Can pictuires be downloaded from a Fuji Finepix ibto i photo on a Mac os 10.4.4?
Chris
reply to this comment
Chris
Pier (10/28/2006)
Haven't bothered installing the bundled software but iphoto can import pictures from it so the answer overall is "yes". However the mac doesn't recognize the xD card so it won't appear on the desktop like a memory stick. You have to use iphoto to import.
reply to this comment
Chris L-S (10/30/2006)
Thanks Pier
reply to this comment
Chris L-S (10/30/2006)
Thanks Pier
reply to this comment
kwark (11/12/2006)
iPhoto don't import properly your videos from camera so make sure that you get them before formatting the xD card.
reply to this comment
Why are my movie clips inverted after I downloaded them into my pc from my F30? (Kim Hwee — 10/16/2006)
The movie clip plays back normally, i.e. upright on my camera. But after downloading it (manually and via finepix bundled software) the clips become inverted, i.e. up-side down. For for the other images, they are ok.
reply to this comment
Kim Hwee (10/16/2006)
Beats me.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/11/2006)
Hi, I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
WHAT IS THE BEST DIGITAL CAMERA THATS NOT TOO EXPENSIVE (NBERG789@AOL.COM — 10/16/2006)
I DON'T WANT TO SPEND MORE THAN 250.00 AND I WANT A CAMERA FOR DUMMIES WITH A BIG SCREEN
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/16/2006)
The Canon Powershot A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera for close to $250.... the screen is only 2 inches but it has a nifty swivel. It's very user-friendly.
You might also like the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Pentax Optio A10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both have nice 2.5 inch LCDs and both offer auto settings for the beginner.
And, the other one we always mention to people as an excellent easy-to-use camera for cheap is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Bargain price, fun to use, quality images. Two-inch screen.
reply to this comment
You might also like the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Pentax Optio A10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both have nice 2.5 inch LCDs and both offer auto settings for the beginner.
And, the other one we always mention to people as an excellent easy-to-use camera for cheap is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Bargain price, fun to use, quality images. Two-inch screen.
aug_aug (11/29/2006)
Definitely the F30. I've done tons of research on cameras but was in the same price range. For 250.00 (Butterfly Photo website) + 50.00 Fuji mail-in rebate = 200.00 plus: right now circuit city has a 2 gig card for 50.00. Quite the setup for 250.00.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/01/2006)
Hi,
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer" yet. Are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer" yet. Are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
Ahmed Abou-Zeid (02/08/2007)
I prefer Canon PowerShots A640
reply to this comment
Alan Schamber (02/09/2007)
Here you've got some cameras for less than 250 bucks:
* Kodak C875.
* Panasonic LZ5
* Olympus Stylus 740
* Pentax Optio A10
* Samsung L85
* Panasonic TZ1
* Nikon Coolpix L5
* Sony W70
Take a close look for each. But... I've like to say my own point of view: The best one, is the Panasonic because of the 10x optical zoom (with Leica lenses...), but it's also too big comparing it to the Nikon L5 that has a high quality lens of 5x. The Kodak also have 5x, but Nikon has the best Image procesor, so you may have better pictures. The Olympus is not bad, but you can have something better for that price. The Samsung is an excellent camera, with 5x and a bigger sensor, which will make higher quality pics (and bigger, with 8 mp).
So... buy the Panasonic if you don't care of the size. If not, the Nikon L5, or the Samsung.
Hope to be helpful,
Alan.
reply to this comment
* Kodak C875.
* Panasonic LZ5
* Olympus Stylus 740
* Pentax Optio A10
* Samsung L85
* Panasonic TZ1
* Nikon Coolpix L5
* Sony W70
Take a close look for each. But... I've like to say my own point of view: The best one, is the Panasonic because of the 10x optical zoom (with Leica lenses...), but it's also too big comparing it to the Nikon L5 that has a high quality lens of 5x. The Kodak also have 5x, but Nikon has the best Image procesor, so you may have better pictures. The Olympus is not bad, but you can have something better for that price. The Samsung is an excellent camera, with 5x and a bigger sensor, which will make higher quality pics (and bigger, with 8 mp).
So... buy the Panasonic if you don't care of the size. If not, the Nikon L5, or the Samsung.
Hope to be helpful,
Alan.
Pete (02/17/2007)
Canon SD600
Big screen, easy, good
reply to this comment
Big screen, easy, good
how best it fuji fine pix F30 be used for video shooting (Viany Desai — 10/19/2006)
Compare Fuji fine pix F30 with Canon S3 IS in terms of video shooting in low light
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
I would recommend the Fuji over the Canon if you are looking to take video in low light. The fuji with 3200 ISO is a better night camera and that helps when it comes to video, not as much as it will with stills but useful none the less.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/06/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I am trying to decide between the A640, A710 IS, SD800 IS and fuji finepix F30 which would be the better camera? (Vanish — 10/21/2006)
I need to use the camera to take pictures of family, celebrations and item for ebay.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/24/2006)
Hey,
Here are some stats that might help you decide:
Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )= 10 megapixels (PLENTY for posting pics on Ebay as well as printing good photos if you want to). Nice super easy to use camera with good results and user friendly controls. Really effective although it doesn't have the greatest low-light effects.
Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- a step up in the Canon line, this one has a better zoom and features image stabilization, which is good if you take lots of zooms or if you have problems with camera shake. However, the 640 offers 4x zoom, which should be plenty for the average user... this one has 6x zoom which might be 'a little too much camera' for your needs.
Powershot SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has image stabilization. May also be a good choice for you, but it does have a wide angle lens which not everyone appreciates, so that's something to consider.
Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another solid contender... 6.3 megapixels is again more than enough for printing basic-sized photos and posting online, and this camera has some very good light sensitivity and performs well in various settings.
For your purposes I'd lean towards the SD800 or the F30.
reply to this comment
Here are some stats that might help you decide:
Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )= 10 megapixels (PLENTY for posting pics on Ebay as well as printing good photos if you want to). Nice super easy to use camera with good results and user friendly controls. Really effective although it doesn't have the greatest low-light effects.
Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- a step up in the Canon line, this one has a better zoom and features image stabilization, which is good if you take lots of zooms or if you have problems with camera shake. However, the 640 offers 4x zoom, which should be plenty for the average user... this one has 6x zoom which might be 'a little too much camera' for your needs.
Powershot SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has image stabilization. May also be a good choice for you, but it does have a wide angle lens which not everyone appreciates, so that's something to consider.
Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another solid contender... 6.3 megapixels is again more than enough for printing basic-sized photos and posting online, and this camera has some very good light sensitivity and performs well in various settings.
For your purposes I'd lean towards the SD800 or the F30.
CANNON SD600 VERSUS FUJI F30 (PAUL — 10/26/2006)
WHICH CAMERA IS THE BETTER OF THE TWO. I DO A LOT OF TRAVELING PLUS I LIKE TO TAKE YOUR EVERY DAY SHOTS ALSO. THIS WILL BE MY FIRST DIDDITAL SO I WANT THE ONE THAT IS MOST USER FRIENDLY AND TAKES GOOD PICTURES. THESE TWO SEEM TO HAVE THE HIGHEST REVIEWS ALTHOUGH THE FUJI IS LESS MONEY.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/27/2006)
Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) gets my vote. Super easy to use and takes wonderful pictures on a point-and-shoot basis... simple and effective in almost all lighting situations, light or dark.
SD600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes great pics but is known for a fragile LCD... not so great for traveling purposes. It also has a worse battery life than the Fuji.
The only disadvantage to the Fuji is that it's somewhat larger than the Canon. Still I think it's a better choice.
reply to this comment
SD600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes great pics but is known for a fragile LCD... not so great for traveling purposes. It also has a worse battery life than the Fuji.
The only disadvantage to the Fuji is that it's somewhat larger than the Canon. Still I think it's a better choice.
Paul (11/01/2006)
Thanks Brenda, I ordered the Fuji f30 and am looking forward to receiving it.
reply to this comment
how well does this camera taking photographs of lanscapes from a distance (Phil — 10/31/2006)
I am interested in buying the Fuji finepix f30 digital camera.I am a keen hiker/mountain climber and want to use it on my trips,taking landscape,sports and close up shots.Is this camera also easy to use?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/02/2006)
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera and should suit your needs just fine. It's very flexible in terms of close-up vs. long distance shots. It has a kajillion pre-set scene modes, so is simple to use in that you can simply set it to the appropriate scene and let the camera do the adjusting. I've seen some outdoor photos taken with this camera and was very impressed with the vibrancy of the colors.
reply to this comment
how old is this camera (Mary Ann — 11/06/2006)
Fuji Finepix F30
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/06/2006)
I think it was announced by Fuji in February of 2006.
reply to this comment
How do u compare it with canon sd800is? (Jippy — 11/08/2006)
Especially in low light condition and usability. Thanks
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (11/22/2006)
There is only one major difference between F30 and SD800is: the focal length of the lenses. F30's lens has very common focal length- starts at about 36 mm equivalent and then zooms 3 times. The Canon's lens starts at 28mm equivalent and then zooms 3.8 times. 28 mm makes the Canon a wide angle lens camera. Only very few point-and-shoot cameras have wide angle lens so we can put this Canon into quite different category. If you are planning to take pictures indoors, group photos or architecture, then SD800is would be an excellent choice.
reply to this comment
Good for concert photography? (Aiwendillie — 11/24/2006)
I currently have one of the Kodak EasyShare cameras, and frankly, it's a piece of crap. I hate everything about it, but especially the horrible quality photos and videos taken at concerts (I'm really close to the stage, but they all turn out pretty much black, even in decent lighting, and are always blurry). Would this camera be decent at low-light settings for moving objects? And would the videos be decent? I'm considering buying this one (which I can get for $190), or just getting a better-quality Canon S2 (for $100 more). I'm an amateur photographer, but I want decent-quality photos, which my current Kodak camera fails to produce.
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (11/24/2006)
Taking pictures of moving objects in low light is very difficult even if you use professional DSLR camera. And it is nearly impossible using any point-and-shoot camera. So I don't think that you can get much better results just switching to Canon or other brand point-and-shoot. The very few things to try: 1. Set the ISO setting to the highest number your camera has; 2. Set your lens to the widest angle, do not zoom at all; 3. Manually turn off the flash.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/24/2006)
Hi,
With non-SLR digital cameras there are almost always going to be issues with darkness and blurriness in low light photographs. Usually, the only way to really effectively counteract this is with use of a flash. This, of course, ruins the cool lighting effects you usually find at a show. However, with the right camera and the right control over certain settings, it's possible to minimize these problems without resorting to flash. I recommend you try some of the following with your current camera before resorting to buying a new one.
Blurriness in low light is a result of several factors. First, your camera (on auto mode) is setting your shutter speed to a slower setting in order to allow more light to hit the photo sensors. Unfortunately, when it does this, it gives you more time to move your hand (or, in a concert situation, for the performers to move), which causes blurriness. <a href="boudist.com/archive/2006/02... site</a> has a pretty good rundown of what settings you'll need control over in order to minimize this problem. If you don't feel like reading all of that, they are: ISO, metering, aperture, and shutter speed.
The Z650 offers manual control over ISO up to ISO 800. In low light, the higher the ISO the better. However, given that it's the camera's max ISO setting, and given that Kodaks in general tend to be plagued by noise problems, images taken at this setting will likely be really, really grainy. Furthermore, at ISO 800 the camera limits images to 1 megapixel. Shooting at its minimum aperture of f2.8 will help somewhat. Still I don't think it's really the camera you're looking for.
As an owner of the S2 IS, I can tell you that low light performance isn't its strong suit. It does have one major strength over the Kodak, though: image stabilization. Even in low light, the IS system will do a great deal to reduce blurriness. Even so, I have my doubts that it will ever be a good concert photography camera.
Luckily, there are some models that are being produced especially for situations like yours. One in particular that's been making big waves is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... FinePix F30</a>, which offers manual control over ISO all the way up to ISO 3200 at full resolution. Many users have reported great success with this camera in low light action scenes. Short of a dSLR, it might just be your best bet. Good luck!
reply to this comment
With non-SLR digital cameras there are almost always going to be issues with darkness and blurriness in low light photographs. Usually, the only way to really effectively counteract this is with use of a flash. This, of course, ruins the cool lighting effects you usually find at a show. However, with the right camera and the right control over certain settings, it's possible to minimize these problems without resorting to flash. I recommend you try some of the following with your current camera before resorting to buying a new one.
Blurriness in low light is a result of several factors. First, your camera (on auto mode) is setting your shutter speed to a slower setting in order to allow more light to hit the photo sensors. Unfortunately, when it does this, it gives you more time to move your hand (or, in a concert situation, for the performers to move), which causes blurriness. <a href="boudist.com/archive/2006/02... site</a> has a pretty good rundown of what settings you'll need control over in order to minimize this problem. If you don't feel like reading all of that, they are: ISO, metering, aperture, and shutter speed.
The Z650 offers manual control over ISO up to ISO 800. In low light, the higher the ISO the better. However, given that it's the camera's max ISO setting, and given that Kodaks in general tend to be plagued by noise problems, images taken at this setting will likely be really, really grainy. Furthermore, at ISO 800 the camera limits images to 1 megapixel. Shooting at its minimum aperture of f2.8 will help somewhat. Still I don't think it's really the camera you're looking for.
As an owner of the S2 IS, I can tell you that low light performance isn't its strong suit. It does have one major strength over the Kodak, though: image stabilization. Even in low light, the IS system will do a great deal to reduce blurriness. Even so, I have my doubts that it will ever be a good concert photography camera.
Luckily, there are some models that are being produced especially for situations like yours. One in particular that's been making big waves is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... FinePix F30</a>, which offers manual control over ISO all the way up to ISO 3200 at full resolution. Many users have reported great success with this camera in low light action scenes. Short of a dSLR, it might just be your best bet. Good luck!
Is the Fuji F30 or Panasonic DMC-FX01 better for an old lady who only uses the auto mode? (vran2004 — 11/24/2006)
Is the Fuji F30 or Panasonic DMC-FX01 better for an old lady who only uses the auto mode?
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/24/2006)
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... DMC-FX01</a> and the Fuji F30 are pretty much equivalent cameras. Both are well rated, both will do well. As far as usability, neither is particularly focused on being easy to use. Consider <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Easyshare digital cameras</a> for ease-of-use (and remarkably good cameras, as well). But in truth, as long as you're in auto-mode, mostly it's just a press of the button. The bits that can be troublesome mostly involve transferring pictures, etc. For that I would get Google's free Picasa photo editor, which is out-and-out wonderful.
reply to this comment
js2006 (11/25/2006)
I have gone through Kodak Easyshare series after the advise. However i am concern that without the Image Stabiliser, will it be difficult to get good pic under shaky hand?
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/25/2006)
An image stabilizer is a great advancement in photography -- they really do work. They cost a little more though. They are most appropriate for cameras with long telephoto lenses, since the greater the magnification, the more camera shake is magnified, creating blur. But it's also true that a very small camera can be hard to hold steady. I'm a big fan of the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it's small and also has a nice zoom and image stabilizer.
reply to this comment
aliquis (01/25/2007)
Recently bought the Fuji F30 for my sister but couldn't find the image stabilization in the manual or camera so I checked the price comparision page I had used and yes, it stood there. Googled for reviews and found out that there are no image stabilization on the Fuji, just the mode which raises the ISO (light sensetivity) even more to make it handle low light situations better (better sensetivity == shorter time with the shutter open == less chance of you moving your hands a lot.)
I don't know which one is better thought, the Panasonic got image stabilization and optics starts of at 28mm, but the Fuji takes better and more crisp photos due to a better CCD, it have awesome batterylife, better flash and better LCD.
reply to this comment
I don't know which one is better thought, the Panasonic got image stabilization and optics starts of at 28mm, but the Fuji takes better and more crisp photos due to a better CCD, it have awesome batterylife, better flash and better LCD.
Is the Fuji F30 or Panasonic DMC-FX01 better for an old lady who only uses the auto mode? (js2006 — 11/24/2006)
work well for both indoor & outdoor.
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (11/24/2006)
The Panasonic has a couple of advantages for indoor and low light conditions: wide angle lens and image stabilizer. So if we use the criteria based on technical specifications, I would recommend the DMC-FX01.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/27/2006)
Jess, actually the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) gets my vote here!
I think the Fuji has better low light performance than the Panasonic. It also nice clear sharp photos, a big LCD, easy-to-use menus and a comfortable grip. It has limited manual controls, but if you're just using Auto anyhow you should be totally fine with that. The one major drawback I've found on it is that the LCD can be hard to see in bright light... but that's a problem with practically every camera on the market, so it's not like it's a huge issue with this one.
The FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great little camera, but it can be somewhat grainy in low light conditions- this is just plain a problem with Panasonics, so if you shoot indoors without flash you may sometimes be disappointed. Also, the body is pretty small and flat, and it's sort of easy to push multiple buttons if you try to shoot using just one hand. It's more awkward to hold than the Fuji.
Ardi is right on the image stabilization of the Panasonic; the Panasonic may also do a little better outdoors in bright light. But I think the F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will suit your needs better. Just another opinion to ponder. =)
reply to this comment
I think the Fuji has better low light performance than the Panasonic. It also nice clear sharp photos, a big LCD, easy-to-use menus and a comfortable grip. It has limited manual controls, but if you're just using Auto anyhow you should be totally fine with that. The one major drawback I've found on it is that the LCD can be hard to see in bright light... but that's a problem with practically every camera on the market, so it's not like it's a huge issue with this one.
The FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great little camera, but it can be somewhat grainy in low light conditions- this is just plain a problem with Panasonics, so if you shoot indoors without flash you may sometimes be disappointed. Also, the body is pretty small and flat, and it's sort of easy to push multiple buttons if you try to shoot using just one hand. It's more awkward to hold than the Fuji.
Ardi is right on the image stabilization of the Panasonic; the Panasonic may also do a little better outdoors in bright light. But I think the F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will suit your needs better. Just another opinion to ponder. =)
I'm looking for 2 key things, ability to take fast pictures (with a baby I need to catch them) and works well in low light and outside (jewelie — 12/04/2006)
I have been researching a camera to death. I need to take clear pictures, I don't want a delay in taking them and they need to work in low light. (I'm tired of trying to pile the lamps in one room just to take a picture). A movie feature w/ sound would be nice and if it used AA's and a SD memory card that would be nice too. I was hoping to spend under $400.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/04/2006)
Julie,
You might try the Canon A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It uses AA batteries, SD Cards, can be found for under $400 ( amazon.com/gp/offer-listing... ), will do well in low and bright lighting (ISO 80-800), and gets high marks in customerreviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). One reviewer that has a fast crawling baby even states that the camera is "great with kids." Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You might try the Canon A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It uses AA batteries, SD Cards, can be found for under $400 ( amazon.com/gp/offer-listing... ), will do well in low and bright lighting (ISO 80-800), and gets high marks in customerreviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). One reviewer that has a fast crawling baby even states that the camera is "great with kids." Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
Possibly also the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is somewhat similar to the A700 but has a few changes, among them a swivel LCD.
I really, really want to send you to the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), because its low light performance outshines the Canons. But it does not use SD cards or AA batteries.
reply to this comment
I really, really want to send you to the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), because its low light performance outshines the Canons. But it does not use SD cards or AA batteries.
which one is the best camera between fuji F30 and Canon A630? (indushrs — 12/04/2006)
reply to this comment
indushrs (12/04/2006)
I am so surprised not to see any Fuji product in Editor's choices in digital cameras though I guess Fuji F30 the best camera of 2006. May I know why is it so? I would love to have answer for this question as soon as possible.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
It's a really good question. I'm not the editor, so I can't explain their choices of best picks; I do know that Canon is considered a leader in terms of easy to use camera that deliver consistent quality photos.
Comparing these two, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more megapixels and a higher zoom. But you're right, the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is pretty amazing... I'm personally very impressed by this camera's performance in low light, I think Fuji made some big steps in low light P&S technology with this one.
So.... this is a close race.
reply to this comment
Comparing these two, the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more megapixels and a higher zoom. But you're right, the Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is pretty amazing... I'm personally very impressed by this camera's performance in low light, I think Fuji made some big steps in low light P&S technology with this one.
So.... this is a close race.
indushrs (12/09/2006)
Thanks a lot for ur precious answer.
reply to this comment
Amy K (12/30/2006)
I've wanted to know the answer to this question as well- thing that worries me about the Fuji is it tends to have quite bad purple fringing, and also they sometimes sell rubbish cameras due to bad quality control. I don't know much about Canon but a friend of mine has the A620 and he loves it to bits. The ability of the F30 in low light does sound good though...:S
reply to this comment
Want a new cam that is good for indoor! (mOstwanted — 12/05/2006)
Here's what i want for my New Cam.
1. GOOD to take INDOOR pictures such as DARK ROOM, or NO LIGHTINGS at all (Concerts, parties)
2. Compact in size
3. not too expensive
reply to this comment
1. GOOD to take INDOOR pictures such as DARK ROOM, or NO LIGHTINGS at all (Concerts, parties)
2. Compact in size
3. not too expensive
Ardi Ounapuu (12/05/2006)
Unfortunately it is pretty much impossible to get good pictures in low light using compact size cheap camera. Unless you are trying to shoot non-moving objects. But concerts and parties always involve a lot of fast moving. So in your case the only way is to think about digital SLR...
reply to this comment
mOstwanted (12/06/2006)
Ardi, whats the BEST compact one for indoor then?
carrying a big camera to a party or dinner banquet makes one look stupid or "pretend to be a pro"
u know what i mean ? =D
reply to this comment
carrying a big camera to a party or dinner banquet makes one look stupid or "pretend to be a pro"
u know what i mean ? =D
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
Hey,
It's not an 'ultra' compact, but it's pretty small... please check out the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's broken some ground in terms of low light performance among digital point and shoots. It has a couple of features that make it really good for this type of shooting:
-"Intelligent" flash, which increases sensitivity to light and turns the flash down as far as possible automatically, resulting in a nicely lit foreground and a darkened background. This means that the camera can use a higher shutter speed than normal in synch flash mode, resulting in less camera blur... huge in dark conditions.
- 'Natural Light & Flash' mode takes two shots automatically right after each other, one with flash and one without at a higher ISO, so you can choose the best one.
-High ISO of 3200!! This is pretty darned high and means the camera can shoot in VERY low light. Of course, the images get pretty grainy when you shoot at that high of an ISO, but on the plus side, this camera does a great job of avoiding graininess all the way up to ISO 800 or so, which means that it's still more usable in low light than most on the market.
It isn't a perfect camera- it has a few color/ tone issues, but really, honestly nothing that you can't fix by playing with the contrast a little if you don't quite like the Auto settings.
As Ardi said, yes to take superb photos in the conditions you're describing you'll need a pretty fancy camera. But if you just want a point and shoot I highly recommend the F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
It's not an 'ultra' compact, but it's pretty small... please check out the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's broken some ground in terms of low light performance among digital point and shoots. It has a couple of features that make it really good for this type of shooting:
-"Intelligent" flash, which increases sensitivity to light and turns the flash down as far as possible automatically, resulting in a nicely lit foreground and a darkened background. This means that the camera can use a higher shutter speed than normal in synch flash mode, resulting in less camera blur... huge in dark conditions.
- 'Natural Light & Flash' mode takes two shots automatically right after each other, one with flash and one without at a higher ISO, so you can choose the best one.
-High ISO of 3200!! This is pretty darned high and means the camera can shoot in VERY low light. Of course, the images get pretty grainy when you shoot at that high of an ISO, but on the plus side, this camera does a great job of avoiding graininess all the way up to ISO 800 or so, which means that it's still more usable in low light than most on the market.
It isn't a perfect camera- it has a few color/ tone issues, but really, honestly nothing that you can't fix by playing with the contrast a little if you don't quite like the Auto settings.
As Ardi said, yes to take superb photos in the conditions you're describing you'll need a pretty fancy camera. But if you just want a point and shoot I highly recommend the F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
mOstwanted (12/09/2006)
thanks brenda i will consider it
reply to this comment
Does the A630 take good night/low light pictures? (fishkebab — 12/08/2006)
I'm buying my first digicam and am torn bet the A630 and the A710. I'd already decided on the A710 when some people mentioned problems with the pic quality in Auto mode and the long shot-shot time (10 secs) when you're using the flash. Besides night/low light photography I want an all-around cam, and since I'm a beginner (who wants to grow w/ the cam since it'll be years before I purchase again), I don't want to have to fiddle around too much before taking a shot. Besides taking the cam with me when I travel, I'm also going to use it to take shots of band gigs, concerts, nights out with friends and other evening events, so I would like ease of use and great pic quality, both for daytime and nighttime shots. Also open to other brand/model suggs. Thanks very much!
reply to this comment
Joe (12/08/2006)
The Canon A630 has relativly high ISO rating up to 800 which is good for low light situations, but don't expect perfection. There will still be some noise on the lowest of light pictures and I would recommend a tripod or a monopod (when travelling) for night shots. Because the iris is open longer to retain more light shaking or moving the camera can cause that streaking effect that sometimes looks cool, but not for most shots. This is a decent camera for doing what you want.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/08/2006)
It will be decent, and chances are you will get a yellowish cast to your low light photos (this can be edited out if you adjust the contrast, or with software; personally, I like it and I tend to leave it in). The A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an excellent all-around camera and you should be happy with it for all-around photos.
For lots and lots of nighttime shots, I would direct you to the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is an excellent camera that has some interesting technology that results in really good low light shots. It would also work well for all-around usage. But you sound like you're a Canon fan, and that is totally fine... the A630 should definitely do the job.
reply to this comment
For lots and lots of nighttime shots, I would direct you to the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is an excellent camera that has some interesting technology that results in really good low light shots. It would also work well for all-around usage. But you sound like you're a Canon fan, and that is totally fine... the A630 should definitely do the job.
fishkebab (12/11/2006)
Thanks for all your replies, you've been really helpful. I also considered the Finepix F30 while I was doing my research, but was disappointed with what reviewers said was the lack of manual settings on the cam.
I guess it's the A630, then.
reply to this comment
I guess it's the A630, then.
Want an all purpose point and shoot, between $250-400. (LCW — 12/08/2006)
Most important to me is shutter speed. I'll probably be in auto mode most of the time. I'd like some extended zoom ability, and therefore, probably IS, low light picture quality, and lastly a good movie mode with good sound (I've got four kids and never get the movie camera out anymore). Finally, while I don't need an ultra compact, I'd like to carry it in my purse most of the time - to catch the kids without having to "remember to bring the camera." Oh, and I won't be enlarging many pics - snapshots are fine.
reply to this comment
Joe (12/08/2006)
The Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice for several reasons. It has a high MP, and most importantly a fast shutter speed up to an ISO rating of 3200. Tripod will help if in low light.
reply to this comment
LCW (12/09/2006)
One clarificiation, while I do want it to work in low light, or at least indoors without a flash, when I said "shutter speed" I actually mean shutter reaction time - the time from when you press the button to when the picture is actually taken.
reply to this comment
chrisjj0686 (12/12/2006)
hello,
Fugi Finepix F30 has won all the low light awards - but it's ugly!. There is an upgrade just out - F31 I think, so may be worth a look.
I've just bought a camera & I have 3 kids under 3 so had similar requirements.
My short list was Sony T10, Panasonic FX07 & Canon 800. Though all compacts suffer from red eye, this is a major gripe of mine - I was looking for the camera that coped with this best - research showed that the FX07 was the best performing in this area.
I got the FX07 3 days ago, haven't had a chance to use it much but so far v happy - only one image out of 30 indoor flash pics showed noticable red eye - v impressive.
Have fun
reply to this comment
Fugi Finepix F30 has won all the low light awards - but it's ugly!. There is an upgrade just out - F31 I think, so may be worth a look.
I've just bought a camera & I have 3 kids under 3 so had similar requirements.
My short list was Sony T10, Panasonic FX07 & Canon 800. Though all compacts suffer from red eye, this is a major gripe of mine - I was looking for the camera that coped with this best - research showed that the FX07 was the best performing in this area.
I got the FX07 3 days ago, haven't had a chance to use it much but so far v happy - only one image out of 30 indoor flash pics showed noticable red eye - v impressive.
Have fun
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
I have already written so many replies here I am beginning to repeat myself. HAHA
My vote is the Canon A630. I have been digital since one of the first Sony Mavicas were just out (the one with the FLOPPY!!). I later moved to a Konica DiMage 500.
But this Canon is just the right size, res, price, feature and expandability for the casual user or the higher-level amateur.
I think if you click on my name you will be able to see all kinds of topics related to this camera.
I carry mine with me and I have bought some really awesome accessories online (buy NOTHING in the stores!). If you want some sample shots in a variety of settings and modes, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
My vote is the Canon A630. I have been digital since one of the first Sony Mavicas were just out (the one with the FLOPPY!!). I later moved to a Konica DiMage 500.
But this Canon is just the right size, res, price, feature and expandability for the casual user or the higher-level amateur.
I think if you click on my name you will be able to see all kinds of topics related to this camera.
I carry mine with me and I have bought some really awesome accessories online (buy NOTHING in the stores!). If you want some sample shots in a variety of settings and modes, email me at sherisdotter@aol.com.
Good luck!
Help with digi cam choice?! - please.. (Jamesb222 — 12/13/2006)
Hey there,
I've been looking for a cam for christmas, and i am fairly capable with technology yet have limited knowledge with digital camera's e.t.c
i want a cam that;
a) has the ability to capture detail in dark conditions (for concerts, or parties), or can capture the scene that is set with sunsets/sunrises/other picturesque settings e.t.c
b) isn't too small in size.. [however, not over bluky]
and
c) isn't too expensive.. below $300? or £150..
i am not fussed about the make of the cam, so please help and thanks! = )
reply to this comment
I've been looking for a cam for christmas, and i am fairly capable with technology yet have limited knowledge with digital camera's e.t.c
i want a cam that;
a) has the ability to capture detail in dark conditions (for concerts, or parties), or can capture the scene that is set with sunsets/sunrises/other picturesque settings e.t.c
b) isn't too small in size.. [however, not over bluky]
and
c) isn't too expensive.. below $300? or £150..
i am not fussed about the make of the cam, so please help and thanks! = )
Brenda Paro (12/13/2006)
If you don't mind a camera that doesn't allow much manual control (basically a point and shoot), I highly recommend the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's the best camera at this particular user/ price level when it comes to taking great low-light shots. If you want something a little more complex, look at the Canon Powershot S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It also takes good low light shots, and has a very strong zoom, image stabilization, and full manual controls if you're in the mood to control your own settings.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/14/2006)
James, another plus to the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is its ability to take on extra lenses with the appropriate lens adapter ( cgi.ebay.com/Canon-S3-IS-Le... ). It can be a bit bulky though because it is almost as large as a dSLR camera. If you don't want something like that, Brenda's suggestion for the Fuji F30 ( cgi.ebay.com/Canon-S3-IS-Le... ) is seconded by me. The ISO 3200 setting would be ideal for your low light photos.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
Fuji claims the F30/F31 have image stabilization but everyone says it doesn't - what gives? (brianbb — 12/14/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/14/2006)
Brian,
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has nothing about image stabilization or vibration reduction in its user manual ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ) or website. The Fuji F31fd is advertised as having Picture Stabilization (PS) on its website ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ) though. It is a setting on the camera to speed the shutter up.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has nothing about image stabilization or vibration reduction in its user manual ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ) or website. The Fuji F31fd is advertised as having Picture Stabilization (PS) on its website ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ) though. It is a setting on the camera to speed the shutter up.
Andrew
Merrill (12/22/2006)
It in fact does not have a physical image stabilization. Rather it has a software based "stabilization". What it does is adjusts the ISO up (increasing the light sensitivity) allowing the camera to increase the shutter speed -- thus reducing blurry shots. It simply adjusts the balance between shutter speed and ISO in such a way that if favors a faster shutter speed.
reply to this comment
Canon SD630 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC FX07 -- which is better for low-light photos? (AT1212 — 12/18/2006)
I've narrowed it down to these two cameras and am leaning toward the Panasonic, but am concerned about reviews complaining of noise at low-light levels with the Panasonic. Is the Canon really better? Isn't it true that any digital camera will produce noise at high ISO levels? I am drawn to the Panasonic's wider-angle lens, higher-megapixel and image stabilization (which I believe would be helpful in low-light conditions). Low light and nighttime photography are something I do a lot of. Many thanks!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/18/2006)
I think it's a truism that the Panasonic image sensors are noisier. It is a fact that any camera will have a noise issue at a high ISO level, but some of the Panasonics just don't seem to handle it as well. I've done some looking into this and the most scientific explanation I can come up with is that their sensor is just... different. Helpful, huh?
With that said, though, the FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is not the worst offender, not by a long shot. Among the Panasonics, I think the problem really creeps in in the higher-megapixel cameras- 5mp or above- and while this one is above five, it's not THAT far above five.
If you're really drawn to the Panasonic, then I wouldn't worry terribly much about the image noise. I did find some sample photos (<a href="cameras.co.uk/html/sample-i... unfortunately they don't say what ISO they were taken at, but a few of those could be considered low light, so you can judge the image noise for yourself.
One more thing though. If you haven't already, I would seriously take a glance at the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is calibrated for low light shots and has the best performance I've seen in low light situations out of anything short of a DSLR.
reply to this comment
With that said, though, the FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is not the worst offender, not by a long shot. Among the Panasonics, I think the problem really creeps in in the higher-megapixel cameras- 5mp or above- and while this one is above five, it's not THAT far above five.
If you're really drawn to the Panasonic, then I wouldn't worry terribly much about the image noise. I did find some sample photos (<a href="cameras.co.uk/html/sample-i... unfortunately they don't say what ISO they were taken at, but a few of those could be considered low light, so you can judge the image noise for yourself.
One more thing though. If you haven't already, I would seriously take a glance at the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is calibrated for low light shots and has the best performance I've seen in low light situations out of anything short of a DSLR.
AT1212 (12/19/2006)
Thanks, Brenda! Your answer was very helpful. I'll probably go with the Panasonic since I like so many of its other features, but thanks for pointing out the Fuji as well.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/21/2006)
You're very welcome. Good luck!
reply to this comment
What do I need to look for to take good action photo's? (tpflu1 — 12/24/2006)
My daughter is in gymnastics and my current camera misses the action, or more often, blurs it. My son plays basketball and I have the same problem. What do I need to look for in a camera that will take good action/moving photo's? I of course would like a decent zoom as well. HELP!
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (12/25/2006)
My son is in gymnastics too and the gymnasiums usually have low light. Also, they don't allow to use flash during the competitions and usually we can not get close anyway to use the flash. So the only way to get satisfactory pictures is to use a digital SLR and very high speed interchangeable lenses. For example: Nikon D50 and a couple of fixed lenses. Like Nikkor 1.8 50mm automatic and Braun 2.8 135mm manual lens. Those lenses are available for around $100 a piece. There are zoomable high speed lenses available too, but most of people can not afford to buy them.
reply to this comment
What's a good camera for taking candid shots of people indoors and out-- Canon A630, Fuji F30, or another? (fischhi — 12/26/2006)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/28/2006)
The Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its slightly pricier, more-megapixeled relative the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) will give you nice all-around performance. For casual shooting those should be great.
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) lacks manual controls, but has an absolutely amazing lowlight performance. So if you don't care about manual exposure and you plan to take lots of indoor/ low light shots without flash, I'd go for the F30. Really depends on your specific needs.
reply to this comment
The Fuji F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) lacks manual controls, but has an absolutely amazing lowlight performance. So if you don't care about manual exposure and you plan to take lots of indoor/ low light shots without flash, I'd go for the F30. Really depends on your specific needs.
best indoor (Cameracog — 01/06/2007)
I take photos of indoor spaces. Need easy to use camera that takes good indoor photos. Wide angle desired. Auto light adjustment required.
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (01/06/2007)
Hi Charles,
There is not easy to use camera for extreme conditions. So if you want to take really good pictures in low light then you need to use a digital SLR with a wide angle fast lens. However, if you still decide to go for point and shoot, then the widest angle camera is Kodak P880 ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... )
reply to this comment
There is not easy to use camera for extreme conditions. So if you want to take really good pictures in low light then you need to use a digital SLR with a wide angle fast lens. However, if you still decide to go for point and shoot, then the widest angle camera is Kodak P880 ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... )
Cameracog (01/06/2007)
This is exactly the advice I am looking for.
"use a digital SLR with a wide angle fast lens. "
Thank you so very much. :-)
reply to this comment
"use a digital SLR with a wide angle fast lens. "
Thank you so very much. :-)
Brenda Paro (01/07/2007)
It might not be ideal for you, but strictly for excellent indoor/ low light performance in a point and shoot you can look at the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This camera's sensitivity and lack of graininess (at least compared to other p&s cameras) in low light/ high ISO is really amazing. Lens is 36-108mm equivalent.
reply to this comment
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX07 VS. Fuji FinePix F30- which is better for normal picture taking? (Ifrit89 — 05/06/2007)
When using each of these camera, which is better for taking normal pictures ( not using flash, normal/same ISO levels...etc)?2
reply to this comment
Matt (05/08/2007)
The Lumix is horrible at low-light picture taking. They're about the same for good-lighting. Since the Lumix you're suggesting is about the same zoom, I'd pick the Fuji model you chose over the Lumix model you chose any day. Only thing that sucks is buying the xD cards, but you can get a 2GB xD card for $40, so it's not THAT bad.
reply to this comment
Ifrit89 (05/09/2007)
do you know anything about the Panasonic Lumix LZ7 ? if u dont it's ok but i like the features on that camera... what is another camera that is similar to the Panasonic Lumix LZ7 in functions? i also like a camera with the lithium ion batter and not AA batteries..but if it has both then that'll be even neater.
reply to this comment
Matt (05/09/2007)
The Lumix LZ7 is a nice camera. It's new, so there aren't professional reviews out yet. I actually sent someone a link to amazon, where there are 8 customer reviews, all giving the camera a 5/5 stars. You should check it out. Just type LZ7 at www.amazon.com.
reply to this comment
Ifrit89 (05/10/2007)
sweet thanks
but now im considering the Casio Exilim Z1050
lol can you tell me anything about that camera ,? is that even better than panasonic lines cause i want to be able to record good videos and at the same time take good picture (preferably w/o flash it's not importatnt to me ).
reply to this comment
but now im considering the Casio Exilim Z1050
lol can you tell me anything about that camera ,? is that even better than panasonic lines cause i want to be able to record good videos and at the same time take good picture (preferably w/o flash it's not importatnt to me ).
Matt (05/11/2007)
I will never recommend a Casio camera, due to all the lens issues I've heard about and had with mine, personally. That said, I can at least attest to Casio cameras having good movie quality. CNET readers (only 3 of them so far) give this camera a 6.3/10, and amazon readers give it just shy of 5/5 stars.
amazon.com/gp/product/custo...
If you're looking at a $250-$300 camera, though, I'd personally be looking at a Canon SD800IS, SD700IS, SD750, Fuji F31fd or Fuji F40.
I know the 10MP Casio looks attractive and sounds impressive -- on paper... but the more megapixels you squeeze onto the same CCD, the more blotchy/grainy your pictures will be.
Having a higher-quality 7MP camera allows you to do much more with it (zoom, crop, edit, etc). If you want a high megapixel camera, even consider the SD900 from Canon as well.
Again, I'm biased, so all I can say is that, from about 2 dozen reviews, reviewers are giving it a thumbs up.
dpreview.com/reviews/read_o...
reply to this comment
amazon.com/gp/product/custo...
If you're looking at a $250-$300 camera, though, I'd personally be looking at a Canon SD800IS, SD700IS, SD750, Fuji F31fd or Fuji F40.
I know the 10MP Casio looks attractive and sounds impressive -- on paper... but the more megapixels you squeeze onto the same CCD, the more blotchy/grainy your pictures will be.
Having a higher-quality 7MP camera allows you to do much more with it (zoom, crop, edit, etc). If you want a high megapixel camera, even consider the SD900 from Canon as well.
Again, I'm biased, so all I can say is that, from about 2 dozen reviews, reviewers are giving it a thumbs up.
dpreview.com/reviews/read_o...
Ifrit89 (05/11/2007)
with so much camera on the market it's so hard to choose -___- arrrgh.
umm besides the canon SD series and fuji, what is the next camera in line? lol
reply to this comment
umm besides the canon SD series and fuji, what is the next camera in line? lol
Matt (05/11/2007)
You want a good ultracompact? Probably the Sony N2 or T-50. I'm not too updated on those, so I don't know how much they run. They have the same problems with low-light as the Canons, but that's pretty much common as all ultra-compacts (outside of Fuji).
reply to this comment
Ifrit89 (05/20/2007)
Well thanks very much matt for these replies, right now windows vista on this new laptop is taking the time away from researching camera :) Theres too much cameras and i guess many have many flaws,
So I assume that either the Sony N-2 or T-50 has great movie taking quality and picture taking w/o the need of the flash? i dont really like to use flash that much unless its necessary
reply to this comment
So I assume that either the Sony N-2 or T-50 has great movie taking quality and picture taking w/o the need of the flash? i dont really like to use flash that much unless its necessary
Matt (05/20/2007)
You should really look into the Fuji F31fd or Fuji F40. You mention not using the flash a lot, and the Fuji is the only camera I know of with the super CCD that will bring in more light and help you avoid using flash. Like I said, they're great cameras. The Canon will take SLIGHTLY better outside/bright-light pictures, but overall, this no-flash idea you're looking at will more than make up for it.
reply to this comment
Ifrit89 (05/24/2007)
thanks bro my question has been answered
reply to this comment
Joey (11/06/2007)
You might be able to find a Fuji finepix f30 for around $200 "buy it now" on ebay. I'd say that's a better value than any 8, 10 or 12 megapixel compact you can find in terms of image quality in low light. The f40 is inferior to the f30, and the f50 is inferior to the f40.
reply to this comment
I want clear answer:what's the best:fuji f31 or canon g7 or pan lx2 or sony n2 or canon a640 (Bilal80 — 05/13/2007)
Give a class for each camera
reply to this comment
Matt (05/14/2007)
I'd rate them this way:
#1: A640 dpreview.com/reviews/canona...
#2: F31fd
dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
#3: G7 dpreview.com/reviews/canong...
#4: N2
dpreview.com/reviews/read_o...
I pick the A640 for a few reasons over the F31fd: Higher zoom, higher resolution, best post-production, and a few smaller things.
You may need to switch #1 and #2 depending on your intentions. I rated them according to general snapshots and mostly outdoor shots (where I do my picture-taking). If you're going to do more low-light shooting, put the Fuji-F31fd at #1. However, if you're going to only produce 4x6" prints at low-lighting, you won't notice the difference between the two cameras.
So to summarize again, the A640 is the best of your 4 cameras. Depending your preference (the F31fd is smaller has has better high-ISO performance), you'll need to make the final call, but I'd personally choose the A640. (Although, if you don't mind the size of the A640, you can get the Canon S3IS, which is also a great camera).
reply to this comment
#1: A640 dpreview.com/reviews/canona...
#2: F31fd
dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
#3: G7 dpreview.com/reviews/canong...
#4: N2
dpreview.com/reviews/read_o...
I pick the A640 for a few reasons over the F31fd: Higher zoom, higher resolution, best post-production, and a few smaller things.
You may need to switch #1 and #2 depending on your intentions. I rated them according to general snapshots and mostly outdoor shots (where I do my picture-taking). If you're going to do more low-light shooting, put the Fuji-F31fd at #1. However, if you're going to only produce 4x6" prints at low-lighting, you won't notice the difference between the two cameras.
So to summarize again, the A640 is the best of your 4 cameras. Depending your preference (the F31fd is smaller has has better high-ISO performance), you'll need to make the final call, but I'd personally choose the A640. (Although, if you don't mind the size of the A640, you can get the Canon S3IS, which is also a great camera).
Did Canon(&Nikon) unable to make sensor like or better than the Fuji's F30 super ccd or did Fuji unable to insert IS(or VR) in its lenses?? (Hunter985 — 05/14/2007)
And if Sony teach them how make slimest compact cameras,do we obtain in the combination the perfect compact?What is the perfect camera available now in the market?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/17/2007)
Hi Hunter,
It would be unreasonable to say that Canon and Nikon can't make a sensor of equal quality to the one in Fuji's F30, just as it would be unreasonable to say that Fuji cannot make a lens with IS technology. However, each company has its own goals, primary features, etc etc. Fuji has chosen to focus on their sensor technology as their big selling point. Canon is starting to push IS pretty heavily (though Panasonic is kinda way ahead of them there). Honestly, I'm not convinced that the F30's sensor is as great as Fuji claims--seems like a lot of marketing hype to me.
As to your second question.... I don't think you can reduce the entire field of digital cameras to one perfect camera, but the closest I can come to is the Canon EOS 1D Mk III dSLR. However, I get the feeling that you're looking for something in the compact, point-and-shoot range, and things get much, much more muddled there.
Sorry, but I don't think there's really a definitive answer for any of your questions.
reply to this comment
It would be unreasonable to say that Canon and Nikon can't make a sensor of equal quality to the one in Fuji's F30, just as it would be unreasonable to say that Fuji cannot make a lens with IS technology. However, each company has its own goals, primary features, etc etc. Fuji has chosen to focus on their sensor technology as their big selling point. Canon is starting to push IS pretty heavily (though Panasonic is kinda way ahead of them there). Honestly, I'm not convinced that the F30's sensor is as great as Fuji claims--seems like a lot of marketing hype to me.
As to your second question.... I don't think you can reduce the entire field of digital cameras to one perfect camera, but the closest I can come to is the Canon EOS 1D Mk III dSLR. However, I get the feeling that you're looking for something in the compact, point-and-shoot range, and things get much, much more muddled there.
Sorry, but I don't think there's really a definitive answer for any of your questions.
What i loose if i buy fuji f31fd instead of fuji f30? (Adam80 — 05/14/2007)
Also what i loose if i buy the f30 instead the f31fd , I realy want to minimize my choice and know-finaly-the winner between f30 & f31fd.
reply to this comment
Matt (05/14/2007)
Well, you'll
#1: Lose face detection if you get the F30.
#2: Lose noise reduction over sharpness if you get the F31fd.
There's really not much of a difference, at all.
Read the reviews at dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
and dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
You'll find that, if you take most of your pictures in low-light situations, these are the cameras to get. Otherwise, other cameras (Canon SD models, for instance) have the better good-light pictures.
If you HAVE to pick between these two, get the F31fd, you at least get the face detection algorithm.
reply to this comment
#1: Lose face detection if you get the F30.
#2: Lose noise reduction over sharpness if you get the F31fd.
There's really not much of a difference, at all.
Read the reviews at dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
and dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
You'll find that, if you take most of your pictures in low-light situations, these are the cameras to get. Otherwise, other cameras (Canon SD models, for instance) have the better good-light pictures.
If you HAVE to pick between these two, get the F31fd, you at least get the face detection algorithm.
Is Nikon p5000 better than Fuji f31fd? If not,why p5000 win over f31 in Tipa 2007? (Stranger1980 — 05/20/2007)
What's the real difference in photo quality between these 2 cameras,& what do you prefer?Same question between fuji f31fd vs fuji s6500fd vs fuji s9600 vs pany fz50 vs olympus 550 uz.(i know these cameras is not from the same categories but we talk about quality of it's images)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/06/2007)
Hi. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I found f40fd(299$) cheapest in my country than f31fd(360$),i buy f31 recommended by this site,am i right? (Hussein69 — 05/21/2007)
I hope that i am right because i want good picture quality not cheaper price.
reply to this comment
Matt (05/22/2007)
F40fd is a great camera. It has another 2MP over the F31fd, and the same zoom. The feature-set is smaller, which I don't know is something you need.
Look at what they do, and decide if the $60 is worth the features:
dpreview.com/reviews/specs/...
dpreview.com/reviews/specs/...
In the U.S., both of these cameras are about $250.
reply to this comment
Look at what they do, and decide if the $60 is worth the features:
dpreview.com/reviews/specs/...
dpreview.com/reviews/specs/...
In the U.S., both of these cameras are about $250.
Is fuji f31fd best (p&s) indoor with or without flash?? (Lombardo75 — 05/23/2007)
I just bought the f31fd yesterday and when i put in auto mode and i shot the flash run,and when flash run all the cameras are the same because i heard that the flash make photos not good.But when i shot in manual mode (without flash) at iso 800,the image is worse,i prefer the flash certainly,and we return to flash that decrease the quality of photo.I think that because i'm beginer in photo i dont understand how f31 is great.Can u explain how f31 better than the other?Is it better than f40 with flash?Please i need information clear.Thanks very much.
reply to this comment
Jan Meja Heir (05/23/2007)
Flash doesn't make a shot bad, using it badly does. On a compact camera the flash is usually bad since it's so close to the lense. But you can do things to improve the quality, like do a slow shutter sync. I'd imagine that camera can do that, usually referred to as something like night portrait mode. But that camera is really nice because it has very low ISO noise for a compact camera, so you can shoot at 800 and have a good result. What did you not like about the shot? If it was blurry, maybe there still wasn't enough light even with ISO 800. If it was the colour, maybe your white balance is off. Shot too dark/bright, adjust your exposure. If it's just the lighting, well, that's just the lighting. I'd recommend just shooting different modes until you find something you really like, but the biggest reason that camera is so good is because of it's great job of keeping noise low even at higher ISO.
Read this article and you'll see a nice comparison as to why that one is better than others:
dpreview.com/articles/compa...
reply to this comment
Read this article and you'll see a nice comparison as to why that one is better than others:
dpreview.com/articles/compa...
Urgent smart question need smart and clear answer : f40 or f31? (Dred70 — 06/03/2007)
50% make f31 the winner because it's better in low light (f31 iso 1600=iso 800 f40),and 50% make f40 the winner because it's better outdoor and better colors,is that information true??Please give clear answer that dont make me more hesitation.
reply to this comment
Snappy Happy (06/07/2007)
The F31 does do better in low light, and the F20 likely does take better daytime outdoor pictures. One reason is that the F20 has the "noise reduction" tuned down from what it was in the F30/31/20. It also has a third more megapixels crammed onto an only slighter larger sensor. The result is noisier pictures at higher ISO (less light), but a bit more detail at low ISO (bright daylight), where noise is not much of a problem to begin with.
If you're still trying to choose between one or the other, most people I have heard from who have used both decided to stick with the F31.
You could also wait a number of months, if you're in no hurry at all, to see what will directly replace the F31 (the F40 being the replacement for the F20). Good luck.
reply to this comment
If you're still trying to choose between one or the other, most people I have heard from who have used both decided to stick with the F31.
You could also wait a number of months, if you're in no hurry at all, to see what will directly replace the F31 (the F40 being the replacement for the F20). Good luck.
When i bought my f31,i found the files number in the top right corner of the lcd monitor=2600,is it used? (Jason78 — 06/07/2007)
What mean 999-2600 in the top right corner,is it mean 2600 shots?Should i return it because it is used,or it dosnt matter?If i must return it,please tel me because i have one day to return the camera.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (06/07/2007)
It really doesn't matter very much. In fact I would buy a camera that has been tested and found to be working OK. In this case, if the camera can take 2600 pictures, it must be perfect and have no problems whatsoever.
On the other hand, if you really want to know for sure, try taking a few pictures, any picture for the matter.
If after taking the pictures the number drops to less than 2600, it means your memory card can record 2600 pictures and the camera has not been used before.
If the number increases, it means somebody has used the camera before and forgot to reset the folder, in which case you might want to check whether there are any signs of damage, whether the lens roll out and retracts properly, and whether the pictures taken are clear, sharp, with good colors and no detectable defects.
Alternatively, just return it for a new camera to keep your mind at ease.
reply to this comment
On the other hand, if you really want to know for sure, try taking a few pictures, any picture for the matter.
If after taking the pictures the number drops to less than 2600, it means your memory card can record 2600 pictures and the camera has not been used before.
If the number increases, it means somebody has used the camera before and forgot to reset the folder, in which case you might want to check whether there are any signs of damage, whether the lens roll out and retracts properly, and whether the pictures taken are clear, sharp, with good colors and no detectable defects.
Alternatively, just return it for a new camera to keep your mind at ease.
Jasun (06/08/2007)
Ok,tnx bukit,but even i dont understand from you : is this number realy in fact = number of shots?Because after taking a picture the number increase mean 2600-2601-2602-.....
reply to this comment
If g7=460$,f40+512mb=260$,Nikon p5000=399$,f31fd=360$,what to buy? (Yasser2007 — 06/08/2007)
And if ixus 850is=405$ and olympus mju 760+512mb=299$,should i bux the f40 koz it's better -and cheapest-than the others?I think that f31 is better than f40,but more expensive,what is the perfect choice?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/08/2007)
Yasser, what I woudl recommend is heading over to this site ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ): they take cameras and using the same subject, shoot examples for comparison. Pick two and then pick two more and see which one you like better. Then, I would head on down to the camera store and hold them. See which one you like sitting in your hand better.
In the end, it's what looks and feels good in your hand and what takes the best pictures to your eye that will be the 'pefect" choice.
reply to this comment
In the end, it's what looks and feels good in your hand and what takes the best pictures to your eye that will be the 'pefect" choice.
Can the F30 use the entire 2GB xD memory card? (carl2860 — 06/27/2007)
I purchased two new 2GB-M cards and after a format it still reflects 680 images to store as my 1GB card does.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/27/2007)
That's because you formatted it according to the camera's firmware. You could check and see if there's a firmware update and/or use a pc utility called F-Recovery to format it.
reply to this comment
carl2860 (06/27/2007)
I spoke with Fugi tech support and they told me this camera has no limit on the size of media used and did not require a firmware update.
reply to this comment
carl2860 (06/27/2007)
Problem was battry was low, the minute I plugged in the AC supply and formatted all was fine.
reply to this comment
carl2860 (07/08/2007)
Sorry but the correct answer was provided by Fugi support.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/31/2007)
No worries, Carl. Glad you got the right answer!
reply to this comment
Best low light camera?? (Salsachica — 08/01/2007)
I do a lot of salsa dancing in night clubs with funky lights... What will be my best bet to take good pics in darker lighting that will come out really well?? I also want to take pics of my dog upclose and of course friends and family. I also love photos that come out really clear without flashes
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (08/02/2007)
I highly recommend the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) for low light purposes. It is pretty amazing. Very sensitive to details without getting grainy. The single best camera for club and bar night shots!
It's also a good all-around cam, so should suit your other purposes as well. I'm a non-flash fan also, and I think this one will do the trick for you.
reply to this comment
It's also a good all-around cam, so should suit your other purposes as well. I'm a non-flash fan also, and I think this one will do the trick for you.
Matt (09/04/2007)
I agree with Brenda. The F30 or the F31fd. Either one is a great choice.
reply to this comment
I'm looking for a very affordable digital with a wide angle lens (ccraig — 08/16/2007)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/16/2007)
Check out imaging-resource.com/MFR1.HTM
Lots of tech info on cameras.
reply to this comment
Lots of tech info on cameras.
John Ml. (08/17/2007)
Give us a little more info like your budget for the camera, the size, the desired zoom, etc. For the moment i could tell you of 2 great cameras with wide angle lens, they are the Fujifilm S6000 and the Panasonic TZ3, both are around 300 to 350 dollars. Fujifilm is soon releasing the F480 which might be the camera you are looking for.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/17/2007)
How wide is 'wide'?
reply to this comment
ccraig (08/17/2007)
Thanks very much. I'll check on both, am leaning towards the Panasonic TZ3.
reply to this comment
Fuji FinePix F30 stopped downloading with iPhoto '08. What to do? (pjlarimer — 11/09/2007)
Upgraded to Leopard and iLife '08 and now the F30 won't download the pictures and says that the format is not recognizable. Is there a patch or something that needs to be downloaded to fix this problem?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/14/2007)
No worries. That often happens with major upgrades to an OS. it can break connectivity. The good news is that all you need to do is invest $10 in a USB memory card reader. Plug your SD card into it and your mac will read it as a drive. Then it's a simple drag and drop onto your mac and you can use any program you want to manage your photos. Then delete the photos USING THE MAC and you're back to shooting pictures.
reply to this comment
how to upload photos w/out a memory driver? (cq99 — 05/03/2009)
I lost my driver that I use to insert my memory card to upload pics on my computer.Is there another way to do it?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/05/2009)
You can always reload the camera driver from Fuji's website ... outside of that, use a USB memory card reader and plug your card into it. Then it's a simple drag and drop.
reply to this comment
Thank-you for any suggestions. Pat
Pat --
You have correctly identified the two main parts of taking pictures that can be slow as "before" and "after" taking the shot.
Before: the camera has to focus and set the "exposure" (settings to make the picture come out correctly). Then it has to take the picture, by opening the shutter and letting light in for a split second. All of these steps together are sometimes referred to as "shutter lag".
(Note: on almost all cameras, you can separate the focus/settings parts from the actual picture taking parts by pointing the camera and pressing and holding the shutter button half-way down -- the camera will probably beep after it's ready. Then you can finish pressing at just the right moment to take the picture.)
After: the camera needs to move the picture it has move from the "sensor" (electronics film, basically) to some memory, and also digitally "develop" the picture, and it has to do the whole picture before the camera is ready to take another shot. All cameras have memory cards where the picture eventually ends up -- you can actually take these out of the camera. But most cameras also have a little extra memory that will hold a few shots before they are actually moved to the card. This internal memory can get the picture on it much faster than most memory cards can. The more internal memory (sometimes known as "buffer") a camera has, the more pictures in a row you can take. This ability to take a few pictures one after the other without waiting is known as "burst mode", and usually lets you take 3 or so pictures in a row before you have to wait for them all to get saved to the memory card.
Ok, so now for the hard part: it's really hard to say exactly how long each of these times will actually be! It depends on a lot of things, some of the camera itself, but others with things like how much light there is, and how "fast" your memory card is.
If it were me, I would look for a camera that is good at the "before" parts. And easy to use. So people really like the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... F30</a>, and you might also check out <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... well-liked EasyShare models</a>.
Tom