Fuji FinePix S1000fd
Fuji FinePix S1000fd
1
Hey! You should know that Fuji has released a newer version of this product: the Fuji FinePix S1600.
Fuji FinePix S1000fd
Editor's Review
The S1000 has been around the block once or twice, so check out one of the newer S series models like the S1600 (bigger zoom, lower price).
For middle range shutter fans, the FinePix S1000fd comes with a 10 megapixel CCD, 12x optical zoom and face detection. In addition, it's Panorama mode captures and combines max 3 consecutive shots into one master wide angle photo.
Specifications
- 10 Megapixels
- 12x optical zoom/5.7x digital zoom
- Auto Focus with Face detection
- AVI Movie Mode with mono sound
- 256-zone metering with Face Detection
- ISO Levels 64-3200
- JPEG file format
- 2.7-inch LCD with 97% coverage
- xD (16MB - 2GB), SD, SDHC, and 24MB Internal memory
- 4 AA, Ni-MH rechargeable or Lithium batteries
- Part Number: F-FX S1000-US-CD
- UPC: 3660662014943
- Release Date: Apr 01, 2008
Shop for S1000fd Accessories
Fuji FinePix S1000fd Comments & Questions (write your own!)
David (09/22/2012)
I got mine used and have nothing but good pictures.
Sablizer if amasing, good sharp shots every time, indoor or out. Solid construction. I would recommend it to any developing photographer as a starter. Fast, fun small to carry.
reply to this comment
Sablizer if amasing, good sharp shots every time, indoor or out. Solid construction. I would recommend it to any developing photographer as a starter. Fast, fun small to carry.
Ursula Fuchs (06/14/2012)
I bought this camera 4 years ago and it is now unusable and irreparable. The plastic latch on the battery compartment is broken, which means the batteries are loose and the camera will not work. A camera repair shop put in a tiny screw, which helped for about 2 months.
I would not recommend this camera to anyone. Like a lot of shoddy electric products out there, we are getting a lot of whiz-bang features but no durability whatsoever. I maintain that manufacturing companies should just be asking for donations without pretending to offer a customer a product in return, because that is in effect what we are doing--providing them with revenue and not getting anything significant in return.
reply to this comment
I would not recommend this camera to anyone. Like a lot of shoddy electric products out there, we are getting a lot of whiz-bang features but no durability whatsoever. I maintain that manufacturing companies should just be asking for donations without pretending to offer a customer a product in return, because that is in effect what we are doing--providing them with revenue and not getting anything significant in return.
Help me please!!! (Anna — 02/23/2012)
I just bought this camera to take fun pictures of people at the flea market and photoshop them onto fun backgrounds. I am not expecting perfect photography pictures but I need better than I am getting.
I am indoors with commercial flourescent lighting. It is pretty bright in there. I am usually taking the picture about 8-10 feet away from the people with a tripod.
Could you help me with a good setting for this camera to get a clean clear picture?
reply to this comment
I am indoors with commercial flourescent lighting. It is pretty bright in there. I am usually taking the picture about 8-10 feet away from the people with a tripod.
Could you help me with a good setting for this camera to get a clean clear picture?
yellow tinted pictures (Julie — 12/03/2011)
all my pictures have a yellow tint. The sales clerks tell me it's the lighting but it happens to all my indoor pictures.
reply to this comment
LGB (09/23/2010)
Does the S1000fd have a Date Stamp option when saving pictures? I need this for a new job and I'd hate to have to buy a new camera. Thank you in advance.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/23/2010)
It will if your printer is DPOF compatible.
reply to this comment
Blog 6 10 (My URL — 08/07/2011)
Alighieri Dante~ Lasciate ogni speranza voi chentrate. (Abandon all hope all ye who enter here)
- advertise-your-products.blo...
reply to this comment
- advertise-your-products.blo...
Rohit Chauhan (07/14/2010)
I bought a 1000fd last year and recently I
discovered that the zoom function is not working. It is otherwise
functioning normally. I am frankly quite disappointed by the quality of
the product which breaks down for no apparent reason. If I did not need
a zoom I would not have bought this model. I had bought this in January 2009 and by May 2010, this had happened, outside the guarantee and free repair was refused by Fuji.
reply to this comment
discovered that the zoom function is not working. It is otherwise
functioning normally. I am frankly quite disappointed by the quality of
the product which breaks down for no apparent reason. If I did not need
a zoom I would not have bought this model. I had bought this in January 2009 and by May 2010, this had happened, outside the guarantee and free repair was refused by Fuji.
Fuzz (Manolo — 07/14/2010)
At that ISO setting the pictures are anything but fuzz-free, Mr. Wood.
This camera "s1000", has been a great disappointment. The amount of thinkering needed to produce a decent, if rather below average picture on this camera is so high, it simply defeats its own purpose.
reply to this comment
This camera "s1000", has been a great disappointment. The amount of thinkering needed to produce a decent, if rather below average picture on this camera is so high, it simply defeats its own purpose.
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2010)
If you want to get a good cross section of samples, I recommend searching flickr.com for Fuji FinePix S1000fd. I did that and found a bunch of images with pretty impressive results from low light to macro shots and everything in between. Just sayin'.
reply to this comment
batteries (gail Dorrington — 06/09/2010)
yes i have! The batteries last a day. I now use rechargeables. Another annoying thing is there is no power plug for this cmaera so when uploading pics to a mac ( or PC t uses battery power) The previous finepix came with a better battery and power pack.
reply to this comment
web cam on a mac? (Gail Dorrington — 06/09/2010)
can i use his camera as a web cam on skype with a Mac?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/09/2010)
Nope. You need a dedicated webcam.
reply to this comment
Power problem (John Trest — 04/06/2010)
My S1000fd is only about a year old and recently it started eating batteries. I can put fresh batteries in, check to see if it is working properly then put it back in the case. When I get it out a few days later the batteries are dead. Has anyone else experienced this??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
Check to see if there's a firmware update for your camera. Your camera's firmware is only as current as the day it was made. Updates will address bugs in the firmware that crop up afterwards. So the first thing I would do is update your firmware. Then clean your battery contacts with a pencil eraser. Lastly, only use the type of batteries recommended by the manufacturer. These days, digital cameras require high energy and you need batteries with an "mah" of at least 3000 to keep up with it's high power needs.
reply to this comment
Firmware updates (John Trest — 04/07/2010)
I'm a complete novice and rarely take the camera off the auto setting. What is firmware?
I sent the camera to Fuji for repairs and they still have it. Estimated cost of repairs is $116. Would firmware updates be something they would routinely do while making repairs?
I'm mainly trying to decide whether to go ahead with repairs or just buy a new camera. I didn't see any comments on dependability, or lack of, and other than the power issue I'm pleased with the camera. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
I sent the camera to Fuji for repairs and they still have it. Estimated cost of repairs is $116. Would firmware updates be something they would routinely do while making repairs?
I'm mainly trying to decide whether to go ahead with repairs or just buy a new camera. I didn't see any comments on dependability, or lack of, and other than the power issue I'm pleased with the camera. Any suggestions?
Zoom Errors. How do you solve it? S1000FD (dblucas — 11/01/2009)
Zoom Errors. How do you solve it? S1000FD
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/02/2009)
My experience has been that zoom errors are caused by underpowered batteries. Are you using recommended battery types? You really need batts with an mAh of at least 2500 for today's digital cameras. They're power pigs. Also, try cleaning the battery contacts, checking with Fuji for a firmware updates and installing them. Outside of that, it may just need to be serviced.
reply to this comment
time stamps fuji s1000fd (topscot — 10/29/2009)
can my fuji S1000FD print the time and date on the front or back of the photo
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/29/2009)
Well it won't do it on the back of the photo for sure, but the camera is "PICTBRIDGE" compatible, and if your printer is, than the printer will pick up the EXIF data, including the date/time and print it on your print.
reply to this comment
No Date/Time Stamp on my Finepix S1000fd (Earl Gross — 10/01/2010)
I have tried every conceivable setting and read the manual especially the pages that seem to address this issue. I love my camera but not being able to turn on a time/date stamp is beginning to annoy this Real Estate Agent.
reply to this comment
problems with usb driver (HawkeyeRanoo — 10/14/2009)
My usb cable is not being recognised I have to put memory card into my kodak and up load onto compu that way, i've removed and reinstalled using disc supplied with camera but still with no success, i even recieved new usb cable and it still gets rejected. i'm using windows xp
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/14/2009)
Could be spyware. Could be a defective USB cable. Could be your USB driver is defective. I'd go into your device manager and delete your USB ports. Then reboot. Windows will reacquire the ports. You may need your Windows install disc as well.
But there's a much easier way. Invest in a USB Memory card reader and and place your memory card into it. Then all you need to do is insert the SD card (your PC will recognize it as another drive), and then simply drag and drop wherever you want.
reply to this comment
But there's a much easier way. Invest in a USB Memory card reader and and place your memory card into it. Then all you need to do is insert the SD card (your PC will recognize it as another drive), and then simply drag and drop wherever you want.
date stamp fujifilm finepix s1000fd digital camera (adwhite88 — 09/29/2009)
I have a fujifilm finepix s1000fd digital camera (not s100). How do you turn on the ability to have the date taken appear on your photos? Other digital cameras I have had allowed the option to add/remove the date stamp.
reply to this comment
wezzie (09/29/2009)
when you are looking at your pic.hit the disp/back button...
reply to this comment
"Zoom Error" on screen. Can't remove it. Camera can't function. (onecompany — 08/01/2009)
When I turn on camera a "zoom error" appears on screen and won't go away. Changed batteries. Turned camera off and on several times. Removed batteries and reinstalled in 30 minutes. No change.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/03/2009)
If there's a reset function in your menu settings, try that. Also, check with Fujifilmusa.com for a firmware update. If that doesn't work, your camera needs repair.
reply to this comment
why is my camera on continous zoom? (dmccormick4310 — 07/27/2009)
I haven't changed any setting, it just one day went to continous zoom and not setting will change it
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/29/2009)
Try resetting your camera. The firmware may have loaded "wonky". I'd also see if there's a firmware update available. Download and install it.
reply to this comment
whats the differance in the fuji s1000sd and the fuji s1500sd (gottaloveus — 07/22/2009)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/23/2009)
Essentially the same camera except the S1500sd can shoot at ISO 6400. It also has 1MB less of onboard memory.
reply to this comment
How to set Fuji Finepix S1000fd into image stabilization mode? (Shanalogy — 07/09/2009)
I just bought the Fuji Finepix S1000fd and took it to a concert to get some good photos with the zoom. NO pictures came out focused. I read online about the fuji image stabilization and I can't figure out how to set my camera to this option....any step by step help?
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
by James DeRuvo (07/09/2009)
Image stabilization will only work so much. The problem isn't the IS, it's that the camera and it's lens isn't fast enough to handle the low lighting of a concert. It'll open up as much as it can, and then it'll drop shutter speeds to compensate. The shutter speed is slow enough, you get camera shake and above what the IS can handle since you end up with long exposure times.
You can boost the ISO. Also, your scene selections/presets may work with low light scenes.
reply to this comment
You can boost the ISO. Also, your scene selections/presets may work with low light scenes.
Using new AA batteries, camera does not power on (linda56 — 06/22/2009)
Just received new camera. Camera usually will not power on at all, but sometimes comes on for just a fraction of a second before shutting off. Replaced the AA batteries that came with teh camera with new ones, same problem. Could the problem be in the power supply? Thank you.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/25/2009)
Could be underpowered batteries, are you using what's recommended? You want batteries with an mAh of at least 2500. 3000 even better.
reply to this comment
linda56 (06/30/2009)
I am using alkaline AA batteries, as recommended in the user manual. I have replaced the ones that came with the camera with new ones 2 times. I have heard (from other sources) that NiMH batteries are preferred, but they are only 1.2 V instead of alkalines' 1.5 V, so I don't see how they could be better. Is voltage not everything? Maybe NiMH batteries deliver more current, therefore more power? I am reluctant to invest in NiMH batteries and charger unless I know it will solve this problem. Anyone have any insight re NiMH batteries?
reply to this comment
linda56 (07/21/2009)
I went ahead and invested in the NiMH batteries, and despite the lower voltage, they work great! Must be higher power. All the documentation says alkaline batteries are recommended, but that must be incorrect. Thank you for your help, James.
reply to this comment
can the S1000FD be used as a webcam? (katelyn042993 — 05/26/2009)
If so, how?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/28/2009)
Few point and shoot cameras can act as a webcam, largely due to the lack of drivers. Better to try getting your camcorder to perform that function. Which is fairly simple if it's a firewire connection.
reply to this comment
does this camera always take noisey pictures ? (goddess515 — 02/15/2009)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/16/2009)
The issue is probably that the camera is choosing higher ISOs and that usually means more noise. Let me explain. I came across an interesting article about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels without a corresponding increase of chip size, causes them to lose light sensitivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
So, the key to combating the issue of more MP bringing more noise to the party is to keep the ISO down below 800. Try using the presets, rather then relying on automatic all the time. Secondly, use a flash, even in daylight. The flash will make your image "pop." But beware that over-relying on the flash - especially when the subject is more than 10 feet away, will cause that flash to dissipate and you're right back where you started.
reply to this comment
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels without a corresponding increase of chip size, causes them to lose light sensitivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
So, the key to combating the issue of more MP bringing more noise to the party is to keep the ISO down below 800. Try using the presets, rather then relying on automatic all the time. Secondly, use a flash, even in daylight. The flash will make your image "pop." But beware that over-relying on the flash - especially when the subject is more than 10 feet away, will cause that flash to dissipate and you're right back where you started.
Aditya D (02/22/2009)
Also, just to be a little more frank, this camera is not very expensive, and as camera price decreases, you'll usually tend to see a high increase in noise, especially, as James said, at high ISOs. Usually Fujifilm cameras have lower noise than most others, but I honestly wouldn't be surprised if you saw a lot of Noise from this camera.
reply to this comment
How does the S1000FD compare in picture quality with the S8000FD for telephoto shots used at the approx equivalent of an SLR 200mm telephoto lens? (RoweAC — 02/10/2009)
Apart from longer telephoto on S8000, how do the 2 cameras compare in picture quality when taking telephoto shots at SLR equivalent of say 200-300mm?
Trying decide between the two. The long zoom in the S8000FD is attractive but so is the lighter weight and panoramic feature in the S1000FD.
reply to this comment
Trying decide between the two. The long zoom in the S8000FD is attractive but so is the lighter weight and panoramic feature in the S1000FD.
by James DeRuvo (02/14/2009)
Another thing to consider is that the heavier the camera and longer the lens, the greater the capacity for camera shake. My feeling is that outside of these things, they are essentially the same camera. There may be a few extra features here or there, but I'm thinking' they're very similar.
reply to this comment
RoweAC (02/14/2009)
I believe there may be a difference between the 2 cameras as to how camera shake is handled: the S8000 being in the lens (CCD??) and the 1000 in the camera. In one camera shop, the sales assistant said the S800(0?) was easier to focus: but since that was the more expensive camera and he was selling it, I'd be interested in other views on that. (Don't know if the battery life in both cameras was equal.)
reply to this comment
Matthew Cassidy (03/15/2009)
I really like this camera, I'm 17 right now, and I got this camera as a christmas present, It is very nice for someone like me, even though I would have rather had an slr, this does just fine for my needs. The picture quality 2 me is excellent as long as you have the right settings for the shots your are taking.
<img src="c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com... src="c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...
reply to this comment
<img src="c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com... src="c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2009)
Nicely done.
reply to this comment
Will my fuji finepix s1000fd work with a 4GB sd card? (Tesaria — 01/20/2009)
The owners manual say's 2GB.I bought a 4gig sd card when I bought the camera without knowing.It seems to work ok but will I get the full use of the 4GB?
reply to this comment
Mr. C (01/20/2009)
Yes, the Fuji S1000fd works with SDHC cards. That means you will be able to all 4GB on that card.
fujifilmusa.com/products/di...
reply to this comment
fujifilmusa.com/products/di...
Tesaria (01/23/2009)
Thank You Mr. C.
I'm taking the family on vacation to Colorado mid March.I've not had any experience with digital cameras.Man this one sure has a lot of bells and whistles.
Thanks again!
reply to this comment
I'm taking the family on vacation to Colorado mid March.I've not had any experience with digital cameras.Man this one sure has a lot of bells and whistles.
Thanks again!
VERONICA (08/07/2009)
I HAVE A 8GB CARD AND MY PICTURES DO NOT COME OUT WITH THE RIGHT LEVEL OF RED COULD IT BE THE SIZE OF THE MEMORY CARD I AM USING.
reply to this comment
How can I download driver of Fuji Finepix s1000fd ? (kensamui — 01/18/2009)
I would like to download software driver of Fuji Finepix s1000fd, becuase I have problem with my cd rom in my CPU. Please advise me for download driver for use my camera and that's very important for my job right now.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/23/2009)
You should be able to find what you need here ( fujifilm.com/products/digit... ).
reply to this comment
pnoyxtrm (03/22/2009)
check this site www.fujifilm.com then click your state
for your driver go here fujifilmusa.com/products/di... click software and drivers
reply to this comment
for your driver go here fujifilmusa.com/products/di... click software and drivers
by James DeRuvo (03/23/2009)
Gee, thought I said that. ;P
reply to this comment
moving objects blurry? (merlin18 — 12/29/2008)
okay i selected continous shoothing mode on the fujifilm finepix s1000fd and i take pictures of moving objects and they come out blurry? is this normal is there anyway i can fix this please help
thanks:)
reply to this comment
thanks:)
merlin18 (12/29/2008)
okay just to clarify i will select continuos mode and i will take pictures of people jumping up and down and the picture will come out blurry. i have a horse and i wanted to take pictures of him jumping ect but will it turn blurry?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/02/2009)
Well you still have to deal with shutter lag and the time it takes to write to the memory card. Ways you can minimize this are to 1) pre-focus (press the shutter button half way down and 2) pan with the action. Also 3) use sports presets 4) use an ISO of 400.
These will help to cut your shutter lag by 80% and prevent having to wait.
reply to this comment
These will help to cut your shutter lag by 80% and prevent having to wait.
Zoom Freezes (dyan3893 — 12/04/2008)
This is my first digital zoom camera, and I am very inexperienced with the different settings
When I use the zoom at maximum zoom, it will freeze and not turn off. I have to take the batteries out and reinsert them to get the camera to turn off. I seem to have better luck with the high speed setting turned off. Does anyone else experience this problem. I need all the help I can get.
I have only had this camera for 2 months
reply to this comment
When I use the zoom at maximum zoom, it will freeze and not turn off. I have to take the batteries out and reinsert them to get the camera to turn off. I seem to have better luck with the high speed setting turned off. Does anyone else experience this problem. I need all the help I can get.
I have only had this camera for 2 months
phi-infinity (12/04/2008)
Are you using Optical or Digital or both? What firmware version do you have?
reply to this comment
dyan3893 (12/05/2008)
It is the Optical zoom- I am not sure what you are referring to as "firmware".
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (12/05/2008)
Firmware is software that corrects or improve camera function. Your S1000fd manual should give your "troubleshooting" tips.
Firmware Version 1.03: fujifilm.com/products/digit...
and manual. and full manual: fujifilm.com/products/digit...
reply to this comment
Firmware Version 1.03: fujifilm.com/products/digit...
and manual. and full manual: fujifilm.com/products/digit...
Larry (03/22/2009)
And don't wait around on this. You want to get it totally corrected while under warranty.
reply to this comment
Rich (10/07/2009)
reply to this comment
Is the picture stabilization automatic when zooming ? (artie — 11/30/2008)
An icon appears on the lcd screen when zooming.
Artie
reply to this comment
Artie
artie (11/30/2008)
Thank you,
Artie
reply to this comment
Artie
artie (11/30/2008)
reply to this comment
camera? (12/02/2008)
The icon is probably the zoom indicator?
reply to this comment
artie (12/02/2008)
Thanks, thats my thought too. If there is someone who knows for sure, please let me know.
reply to this comment
artie (05/28/2009)
The picture stabilization is automatic and an icon appears during operation of the zoom.
Thanks, Artie
reply to this comment
Thanks, Artie
Movie length? (dbid22 — 11/19/2008)
My sisters camera only allows 60 second movies. Can anyone tell me how long movies from this camera can be?
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (11/20/2008)
It depends on the size of the SD/xD card, and if you shoot 640 or 320 VGA
Z Standard number of available frames/recording time per xD-Picture Card, SD Memory Card and internal memory
The number of available frames and recording time is approximate. Actual number of frames and recording time varies
depending on the types of Memory Card or shooting condition. Also, the number of frames and recording time displayed in the
LCD monitor may not decrease regularly.
% $
% [ 3 2 `
Quality setting F N
(30 fps) (30 fps)
Number of recorded
3648 × 2432 2592 × 1944 2048 × 1536 1600 × 1200 640 × 480 640 × 480 320 × 240
3648 × 2736
pixels
Image data size 4.9 MB 2.5 MB 2.2 MB 1.3 MB 789 KB 630 KB 130 KB – –
Internal memory
5 9 11 19 30 38 170 29 sec. 46 sec.
(approx. 24 MB)
16 MB 3 6 7 12 19 24 110 17 sec. 27 sec.
32 MB 6 12 14 25 39 49 222 34 sec. 55 sec.
64 MB 13 25 29 50 79 99 444 1.2 min. 1.8 min.
128 MB 26 51 58 101 159 199 888 2.3 min. 3.7 min.
256 MB 52 103 116 202 319 399 1777 4.7 min. 7.4 min.
512 MB 104 207 233 404 638 799 3551 9.3 min. 14.8 min.
1 GB 209 415 466 809 1279 1599 7108 18.7 min. 29.6 min.
2 GB 418 830 927 1599 2559 3199 12796 36.8 min. 59.2 min.
512 MB 100 199 222 386 606 754 3438 9.0 min. 14.3 min.
1 GB 202 402 452 784 1239 1549 6885 18.1 min. 28.7 min.
2 GB 410 815 910 1569 2511 3139 12559 35.6 min. 57.4 min.
113.5
4 GB 801 1592 1776 3064 4903 6129 24518 70.5 min.*
min.*
141.1 227.3
8 GB 1604 3188 3557 6137 9819 12274 49097
min.* min.*
* A movie recording will stop automatically when a movie file becomes approx. 2GB. If you want to continue recording another
movie, press the shutter button again. The available recording time is displayed based on approx. 2GB.
SD SDHC
xD-Picture Card
Memory Memory
Card Card
46
Here is the PDF link from Fuji: fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/... at page 46 of the S1000fd manual
reply to this comment
Z Standard number of available frames/recording time per xD-Picture Card, SD Memory Card and internal memory
The number of available frames and recording time is approximate. Actual number of frames and recording time varies
depending on the types of Memory Card or shooting condition. Also, the number of frames and recording time displayed in the
LCD monitor may not decrease regularly.
% $
% [ 3 2 `
Quality setting F N
(30 fps) (30 fps)
Number of recorded
3648 × 2432 2592 × 1944 2048 × 1536 1600 × 1200 640 × 480 640 × 480 320 × 240
3648 × 2736
pixels
Image data size 4.9 MB 2.5 MB 2.2 MB 1.3 MB 789 KB 630 KB 130 KB – –
Internal memory
5 9 11 19 30 38 170 29 sec. 46 sec.
(approx. 24 MB)
16 MB 3 6 7 12 19 24 110 17 sec. 27 sec.
32 MB 6 12 14 25 39 49 222 34 sec. 55 sec.
64 MB 13 25 29 50 79 99 444 1.2 min. 1.8 min.
128 MB 26 51 58 101 159 199 888 2.3 min. 3.7 min.
256 MB 52 103 116 202 319 399 1777 4.7 min. 7.4 min.
512 MB 104 207 233 404 638 799 3551 9.3 min. 14.8 min.
1 GB 209 415 466 809 1279 1599 7108 18.7 min. 29.6 min.
2 GB 418 830 927 1599 2559 3199 12796 36.8 min. 59.2 min.
512 MB 100 199 222 386 606 754 3438 9.0 min. 14.3 min.
1 GB 202 402 452 784 1239 1549 6885 18.1 min. 28.7 min.
2 GB 410 815 910 1569 2511 3139 12559 35.6 min. 57.4 min.
113.5
4 GB 801 1592 1776 3064 4903 6129 24518 70.5 min.*
min.*
141.1 227.3
8 GB 1604 3188 3557 6137 9819 12274 49097
min.* min.*
* A movie recording will stop automatically when a movie file becomes approx. 2GB. If you want to continue recording another
movie, press the shutter button again. The available recording time is displayed based on approx. 2GB.
SD SDHC
xD-Picture Card
Memory Memory
Card Card
46
Here is the PDF link from Fuji: fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/... at page 46 of the S1000fd manual
The camera has frozen up for the second time. Shows a small "yellow camera" icon on screen? (gwmjcayahoocom — 11/09/2008)
The camera froze up. Took camera back where purchased and salesperson rebooted by removing the batteries; but all pictures were lost. Removed disc and gave new one which we put in. Have been taking photos and now camera has frozen up again. Do not want to reboot as before as do not want to lose pictures!!! Screen shows a small "yellow camera" icon. Cannot turn on or off, zoom or any function. Just put in newly charged "rechargeable batteries" 2 hours ago. Has anyone experienced this malfunction? And if so, do you know how to fix? The manual says not to remove batteries while the camera is "on", as you could lose photos.
reply to this comment
camera? (11/10/2008)
Sounds like you need to call Customer Support: fujifilmusa.com/support/Ser...
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (11/20/2008)
Have you read the manual? A yellow camera icon indicates a "camera shake", especially if you are taking Macro/Supermacro or with the Optical zoom, this icon will appear. In any case, if you intend to use the Macro/ Supermacro or even the zoom, use a tripod.
Also get the latest firmware from Fuji: fujifilmusa.com/support/Ser... is the manual: fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/... Look @ the pages 36-41 of the pdf
reply to this comment
Also get the latest firmware from Fuji: fujifilmusa.com/support/Ser... is the manual: fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/... Look @ the pages 36-41 of the pdf
Babyboo (01/09/2009)
having the same problem with mine, locks up, have to remove the batteries to fix it!
reply to this comment
Mark Fucci (03/31/2009)
mine locks up too. can't even use it.
reply to this comment
Can you explain how to get the depth of field with this camera (Iceberg08 — 10/17/2008)
Would you recommend this camera for taking depth of field pictures?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (10/17/2008)
Here's a site that explains depth of field for all cameras, its usually not camera specific, it depends on several of the settings in the camera, including aperture, focusing distance etc:
cambridgeincolour.com/tutor... also has a depth of field calculator.
Honestly a lot of depth of field is photography technique more than the camera itself (within certain limits), but for the best depth of field pictures I would go for the new Canon G10. Maybe even the older G9, which has amazing picture quality. Another one to consider is the Sony H50.
reply to this comment
cambridgeincolour.com/tutor... also has a depth of field calculator.
Honestly a lot of depth of field is photography technique more than the camera itself (within certain limits), but for the best depth of field pictures I would go for the new Canon G10. Maybe even the older G9, which has amazing picture quality. Another one to consider is the Sony H50.
Does this camera S1000fd have a self timer capability for tripod use (tiffanym — 10/02/2008)
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (10/05/2008)
Yes, a 10sec and 2sec timer. But to my knowledge it does not have a remote function for a self-timer release.
reply to this comment
I am trying to decide between the Fuji Finepix s1000fd or the Nikon Coolpix P80..Does anyone have any advice?! I would really appreciate it! (XXNewbieXX — 09/19/2008)
I am interested in taking my photography to the next level and can't decide which is a better camera-
reply to this comment
Aditya D (09/22/2008)
If you're really looking to take your photography to the next level, you may want to invest in an SLR, even a cheaper one. It gives you a lot of manual controls, interchangeable lenses, as well as a ton of flexibility in creativity and photographic merit. I would recommend taking a look at the Canon xSi, if you did decide to go the SLR route. Otherwise, if you wanted to decide between these two, I like the Fuji a little bit better, just because of the low light capabilities, but both the P80 and S1000 offer you plenty of manual controls, and have great image quality, you can't go wrong either way. See which one feels better to you and which pictures you like more.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (09/23/2008)
Superzoom is like an all-in-one camera, providing up to 400+ mm zoom (P80), takes movie clips, ' live view ' as standard, light weight (325 gm S1000fd) , while having some dSLR features like hotshoe and image stabilization (P80).
People who takes pictures only once in a while, not very serious about going into photography for a living, don't want to pursue photography as an 'art ', don't want to have many giant blowups in the house, will find superzoom meeting his needs quite well.
What tips the balance tween P80 and S1000fd will probably be the ' sensor shift image stabilization ', impressive zoom power of P80 (486mm) and the Nikon quality or the lighter and slightly better noise level in Fuji S1000fd.
The final choice basically depends on what feature you feel is more important to you.
reply to this comment
People who takes pictures only once in a while, not very serious about going into photography for a living, don't want to pursue photography as an 'art ', don't want to have many giant blowups in the house, will find superzoom meeting his needs quite well.
What tips the balance tween P80 and S1000fd will probably be the ' sensor shift image stabilization ', impressive zoom power of P80 (486mm) and the Nikon quality or the lighter and slightly better noise level in Fuji S1000fd.
The final choice basically depends on what feature you feel is more important to you.
why won't fuji adapter5VX fit? (mjw3 — 09/13/2008)
I ordered new AC Power Adapter AC-5VX . it won't fit.Do I need DC Coupler CP-04 too?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (09/14/2008)
THe AC-5VX is not designed for the S1000fd. If you take a look at the item under amazon.com, amazon.com/Fujifilm-Adapter... , the S1000FD is not listed under compatibility, so the likelihood is that it will not fit because of that. There actually isn't an adapter for the S1000fd out yet, or at least not that I could find. I would give it a couple months before the adapter comes out.
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (09/16/2008)
I believe you need a coupler. Look here: fujifilm.com/products/digit...
reply to this comment
Shutter speed on the S1000fd (mrdahlen — 09/11/2008)
I currently own a Fuji finepix A820, I have a toddler who is constantly on the go and want to upgrade so that I can take pictures more quickly. Will this camera be quicker?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (09/13/2008)
S1000fd definitely will be quicker because it can capture the action at 7.5 fps @ 2MP for 15 shots; 3.3 fps @ 5MP for 6 shots; and 1.4 fps @ 10MP for 3 shots.
Meanwhile, if you take a second look at your A820, you probably can set the camera to ' Manual ' mode which allows you to raise the ISO and the shutter speed. This will also catch the kids in action.
reply to this comment
Meanwhile, if you take a second look at your A820, you probably can set the camera to ' Manual ' mode which allows you to raise the ISO and the shutter speed. This will also catch the kids in action.
Aditya D (09/14/2008)
I would go withe the Fuji, it's usually much quicker, especially in lower lighting settings, such as indoor, where kids sometimes tend to play. The shutter lag of the Fuji is a bit lower from my experience than Canon, Nikon, or Panasonic, and I think shutter lag is going to be what it comes down to rather than frames per second. So the answer to your question is yes, the camera is one of the quicker ones.
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (09/16/2008)
Shutter speed
1/4 sec. to 1/2000 sec. (Auto mode)
8 sec. to 1/2000 sec. (All other modes)
(depends on shooting mode)
Fuji Specs
reply to this comment
1/4 sec. to 1/2000 sec. (Auto mode)
8 sec. to 1/2000 sec. (All other modes)
(depends on shooting mode)
Fuji Specs
bukit97 (09/16/2008)
Thanks Stephane.
Shutter lag is a measure of the time between triggering of the shutter and recording of the picture.
It roughly tells you when you can take the next picture.
If it takes 1 sec from clicking to recording, I would be worried because you can only take 1 picture per second.
But if Fuji S1000fd can take 7.5 frames in 1 second, shutter lag is no more the primary consideration for not buying the camera.
To top it all, S1000fd can take movie clips at 30 frames per second. You won't miss a smile.
reply to this comment
Shutter lag is a measure of the time between triggering of the shutter and recording of the picture.
It roughly tells you when you can take the next picture.
If it takes 1 sec from clicking to recording, I would be worried because you can only take 1 picture per second.
But if Fuji S1000fd can take 7.5 frames in 1 second, shutter lag is no more the primary consideration for not buying the camera.
To top it all, S1000fd can take movie clips at 30 frames per second. You won't miss a smile.
Aditya D (09/16/2008)
It's also 7.5 frames per second for 2 megapixels... 1.4 frames per second for the full megapixels. More likely than not you'd want to take a picture in its full capability. Also frames per second is taken usually from the continuous shooting mode, or sports mode, rather than from consecutive single shots. So, it may still be very wise to consider shutter lag.
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (09/17/2008)
I've tried the burst speed of my S1000fd. To get most of the burst function of this camera, I bought a 15mb/s (150x) read/write SD card. The data is written faster compared to a nornal SD card.
reply to this comment
mrdahlen (09/17/2008)
Thank you all for your answers. You have definitely given me more ideas to think about and a greater understanding of what I need.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (09/17/2008)
The question asked for a comparison of shutter speed between Fuji S1000fd and Fuji A820.
There is no doubt Fuji S1000fd is faster than Fuji A820, unless Aditya can come out with figures that shutter lag in S1000fd is worse than A820.
Stephane has contributed well from an Owner's point of view. Thanks Stephane.
mnelson's last post probably serve well to close this question.
reply to this comment
There is no doubt Fuji S1000fd is faster than Fuji A820, unless Aditya can come out with figures that shutter lag in S1000fd is worse than A820.
Stephane has contributed well from an Owner's point of view. Thanks Stephane.
mnelson's last post probably serve well to close this question.
Can I use a Transcend 16GB SDHC CARD (SD 2.0 SPD CLASS 6) with the Fuji S1000FD? (haydo — 08/19/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/21/2008)
Well, the specs say it can handle SDHC cards, so you should be good to go. But allow me to make an pitch for using several cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like "F-Recovery" ( filerecoverytools.com/produ... ) to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
reply to this comment
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
haydo (08/22/2008)
Thanks James. And I have found that two 8GB cards are cheaper than one 16BG card. I still may get one to have the opportunity to film something over 1 hour in a good quality mode. Like an outdoor concert.
Rgds,
Jon
reply to this comment
Rgds,
Jon
by James DeRuvo (08/22/2008)
We're happy to help.
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or, you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
reply to this comment
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or, you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
Suggestions for the best amongst these 3 cameras (amaediyinka — 07/04/2008)
HI can anyone please suggest which camera i should go for between the following, I'm looking for a mid-range point & shoot with semi-professional features, i.e is affordable :
1) Fujifilm FinePix S8000fd Digital Camera 2)Kodak EasyShare ZD710 Black 7.1 MP Digital Camera 3) Canon PowerShot S5-IS Black ~ 8 MP Digital Camera.
Thanks
reply to this comment
1) Fujifilm FinePix S8000fd Digital Camera 2)Kodak EasyShare ZD710 Black 7.1 MP Digital Camera 3) Canon PowerShot S5-IS Black ~ 8 MP Digital Camera.
Thanks
Aditya D (07/09/2008)
I like both the Fuji and the Canon. The Fuji is great in low light and is very quick in taking pictures. The Canon has slightly better contrast and color, but its not too noticeable. The differences are slight, and it really depends on what kind of pictures you'll be taking. If you think more indoor and at night pictures, go with the Fuji, but if you're in daylight and outside, go with the Canon. I would also recommend taking a look the Sony H10.
reply to this comment
amaediyinka (07/09/2008)
Thanks so much for the clarity Aditya,
Actually i was more concerned with a camera that takes great pictures indoor pictures and especially great night shots. If the difference is slight then i might as well consider the Fuji as its less expensive.
As a matter of fact I've just taken a look at the Sony H10 and if it's a combination of camera features of both the fuji and canon then I'll take your suggestion and go for it ( i.e the Sony) . The price seems right and lots of features.
Thanks a lot.
reply to this comment
Actually i was more concerned with a camera that takes great pictures indoor pictures and especially great night shots. If the difference is slight then i might as well consider the Fuji as its less expensive.
As a matter of fact I've just taken a look at the Sony H10 and if it's a combination of camera features of both the fuji and canon then I'll take your suggestion and go for it ( i.e the Sony) . The price seems right and lots of features.
Thanks a lot.
by James DeRuvo (07/09/2008)
I advise the S5. Better macro, more natural photos in color and clarity, better zoom quality. Also sharper.
reply to this comment
amaediyinka (07/10/2008)
Thanks James,
But what about the weight of the canon isn't it a bulky camera? Is it manageable to carry around ? and between the Canon S5 IS and the Sony H10 which do you suggest. Because i took Aditya's comment to consider the H10.
I've decided to forgo the fujifine pix and try between the Canon S5 or Sony H10. Besides the Fuji s8000 got a B- rating so I've dropped that camera. I've been so confused and just want a nice semi-professional camera, which takes great night shots, certainly great day shots, with extremely sharp prints (I'm not too bothered about really large prints sizes) and is affordable ( by this i mean $200 - $300) range. what do think?
Thanks
reply to this comment
But what about the weight of the canon isn't it a bulky camera? Is it manageable to carry around ? and between the Canon S5 IS and the Sony H10 which do you suggest. Because i took Aditya's comment to consider the H10.
I've decided to forgo the fujifine pix and try between the Canon S5 or Sony H10. Besides the Fuji s8000 got a B- rating so I've dropped that camera. I've been so confused and just want a nice semi-professional camera, which takes great night shots, certainly great day shots, with extremely sharp prints (I'm not too bothered about really large prints sizes) and is affordable ( by this i mean $200 - $300) range. what do think?
Thanks
Aditya D (07/10/2008)
Amaedi,
Honestly I don't think you can go wrong with either the S5 or the H10. James is more of a fan of the S5, and I am more of a fan of the H10, and we could go back and forth for hours. The Canon, as you said, is a little more bulky, but I don't really think its a significant difference. What I guess it comes down to is the Canon does tend to have better contrast and color and slightly better sharpness, while the Sony has a better processor and focusing system, and a plethora of features. You can try going in stores such as Best Buy and trying out both cameras, seeing which one feels better and takes better pictures in your opinion, or you can also try going online to see pictures that people have taken with both cameras and see which ones you like better. Like I said before, I'm very certain you can't go wrong purchasing either camera, and I know you won't be disappointed with either.
reply to this comment
Honestly I don't think you can go wrong with either the S5 or the H10. James is more of a fan of the S5, and I am more of a fan of the H10, and we could go back and forth for hours. The Canon, as you said, is a little more bulky, but I don't really think its a significant difference. What I guess it comes down to is the Canon does tend to have better contrast and color and slightly better sharpness, while the Sony has a better processor and focusing system, and a plethora of features. You can try going in stores such as Best Buy and trying out both cameras, seeing which one feels better and takes better pictures in your opinion, or you can also try going online to see pictures that people have taken with both cameras and see which ones you like better. Like I said before, I'm very certain you can't go wrong purchasing either camera, and I know you won't be disappointed with either.
Brenda Paro (07/10/2008)
I think Aditya is right in every fact she stated, but I'm also going to cast my vote for the S5 between the S5 and H10, because I think Canon handles low light better than Sony does; having used both cameras, I was more pleased with the Canon's flexibility/ ability to capture in low light situations as well as its color reproduction and handling. Just a matter of different processors.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/10/2008)
Well, if you want a long zoom, that's going to equate to weight. So you have to decide which is more important. I would also toss in teh G9, but I'm not much a fan of stuffing chips with megapixels and continuing to enable the "more mp is better" myth.
My issue with SONY is that they are proprietary obsessed and you end up paying a premium for that SONY nameplate. Great electronics, sure, but they paint you into a technological corner.
reply to this comment
My issue with SONY is that they are proprietary obsessed and you end up paying a premium for that SONY nameplate. Great electronics, sure, but they paint you into a technological corner.
amaediyinka (07/17/2008)
Ok now , i have to decide between the G9 and Sony H10.... because i recently used a canon sx100 and also a Kodak easy share ( can't remember the model) and i immediately saw the difference.. the canon took vivid,sharper, brighter pictures. both indoors and outdoors. this particular model didn't handle a full zoom as well as Ive seen a sony h9 take fabulous moving shots. So I'm not sure if its a Sony or canon ''thing'' or model specific ''thing''.
So i will let u all know which i eventually decide on the G9 - (cos it's supposed to be less heavy than the S5 ) or the Sony H10. And my pockets will decide the rest. thanks again.
reply to this comment
So i will let u all know which i eventually decide on the G9 - (cos it's supposed to be less heavy than the S5 ) or the Sony H10. And my pockets will decide the rest. thanks again.
by James DeRuvo (07/17/2008)
The G9 hands down then. Sony's are less sharp and bring more noise to the party at high ISOs. ANd the G9 is the backup point and shoot of choice of most professionals.
reply to this comment
amaediyinka (07/17/2008)
I agree with you james, i'm finally leaning towards the G9.
Thanks so much for all your tips and comments... and to every other person too, Brenda and Aditya...
Cheers
reply to this comment
Thanks so much for all your tips and comments... and to every other person too, Brenda and Aditya...
Cheers
Can you recommend a digital SLR camera that's not too expensive? (dmarks420 — 06/23/2008)
I'm looking for decent digital camera to get me out of my Canon EOS ElanII film camera. I would like to use my Tamron lenses if possible. However I do not want to pay the high price of a D-70 or highest end Rebel.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/26/2008)
Well, since the XSi has come out (a great entry level DSLR, BTW), the prices on the XTi have plummeted. You'd end up with about 90% of the functionality of the newer XSi and still be able to use your lenses (if they are EF compatible).
The XTi is where I'd be looking.
reply to this comment
The XTi is where I'd be looking.
bukit97 (09/23/2008)
Yah Yah James is right though it's 3 month's late . ( I haven't said that for some time LOL )
But I have a reason for saying so. Elan II uses the same lens mount as XTi, so you will save a lot on lenses since your Tamron for Elan will fit XTi.
reply to this comment
But I have a reason for saying so. Elan II uses the same lens mount as XTi, so you will save a lot on lenses since your Tamron for Elan will fit XTi.
is there a uv filter that can be used on a s1000 (micko444 — 06/16/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/18/2008)
Unfortunately, no. There doesn't seem to be a screw threads at the end of the lens to accomodate a UV filter. Pitty too since they work as great insurance policies against impact damage.
reply to this comment
micko444 (06/19/2008)
is there an adapter tube that can be used to attach filter
reply to this comment
Bill (06/22/2008)
The end of the lens tube seems to have a double bayonet mount. I'd look for a filter with that type of attachment.
reply to this comment
Ben Hur (07/18/2008)
I'm ancious to know the model/part number(such as step up ring)
I bought a 46 to 52 mm step up ring but it can not be fit to s1000fd ...
I have been spending my energy for this matter.
Could you please let me know the information where I can find it ?
Thanks a lot.....
Ben Hur (mossben2002@yahoo.com)
reply to this comment
I bought a 46 to 52 mm step up ring but it can not be fit to s1000fd ...
I have been spending my energy for this matter.
Could you please let me know the information where I can find it ?
Thanks a lot.....
Ben Hur (mossben2002@yahoo.com)
micko444 (07/29/2008)
still looking but thanks anyway
reply to this comment
laney (10/20/2008)
reply to this comment
Does this really have image stabilization? That is what is stopping me from purchasing and maybe going for the Canon Sx 100 (tgalati — 05/25/2008)
reply to this comment
Steve (05/28/2008)
According to the Fuji website, the S1000fd has "Fujifilm’s Picture Stabilization powered by high ISO" -- in other words, they up the ISO so the camera can use a higher shutter speed to reduce the effects of shaking. This isn't image stabilization as it's usually understood, and the image will be degraded because of the increased ISO. Real image stabilization comes in two flavors: optical or mechanical. Optical stabilization, like that found in the Canon Powershot IS cameras (A720 IS, S5 IS, etc.) shifts the lens elements in response to piezoelectric sensors (electronic gyroscopes). Mechanical stabilization shifts the CCD itself in response to camera movement. The Pentax SLRs (K100, K10D, etc.) use this method. In an SLR with interchangeable lenses this means you don't have to buy expensive lenses with optical stabilization (Canon IS, Nikon VR, etc.); you can use normal lenses. I just bought the Fuji Finepix S1000fd yesterday, and will probably return it because the displayed features highlighted "picture stabilization" while conveniently omitting the "powered by high ISO" qualifier. I found out about that little feature as I was reading the owner's manual. I want a camera that will stabilize the image in telephoto or low-light conditions, and the FinePix doesn't do that. As an aside, I just discovered the CHDK project for Canon cameras, which adds fantastic features (e.g., RAW, three-color histogram, time-lapse, etc.) to cameras that are already pretty good, and have well-reviewed optical stabilization. You can read more here: chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK. Hopes this helps.
reply to this comment
frdf (06/10/2008)
Straight from Fuji:
Fujifilm’s new FinePix S1000fd also offers the following useful features:
Picture Stabilization mode: A selectable mode, Picture Stabilization uses the heightened sensitivity of the FinePix S1000fd and high-speed shutter settings to reduce blur caused by hand-shake or subject movement. It allows the camera to automatically choose the correct light sensitivity and optimal shutter speed to produce clear, blur-free images.
reply to this comment
Fujifilm’s new FinePix S1000fd also offers the following useful features:
Picture Stabilization mode: A selectable mode, Picture Stabilization uses the heightened sensitivity of the FinePix S1000fd and high-speed shutter settings to reduce blur caused by hand-shake or subject movement. It allows the camera to automatically choose the correct light sensitivity and optimal shutter speed to produce clear, blur-free images.
Hugo (06/25/2008)
I'm in the same scenario, and I've decided to return this one for the Cannon one which indeed has optical stabilization. The problem is when you are zooming at max and you are not super still then you will se the problem or at low light. The other consideration is that I read the cannon had better overall picture quality.
reply to this comment
macon (07/19/2008)
I just returned a Canon A720IS, the image stabilization didn't work very well. Not well enough in any case. My Fuji A340 takes better pictures! and has no I.S. I'm thinking of upgrading and want a camera with a viewfinder in addition to the screen. The Fuji S1000 ?
reply to this comment
Guru (09/18/2008)
the first answer is about the way this camera performs the image stabilzation( igh ISO and not optical or digital). again u need to check with urself that if its really necessary. as long as u r not 75 yr old u dont need that ! while purchasing anything we need to check what we will use it for and not just new tech! i get great pictures with this cam, i send u!
reply to this comment
macon (09/19/2008)
I bought and returned the Fuji S1000fd. Not good enough. I finally settled into the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18, a little heavier and not as convenient as the Fuji A340, but pictures and speed comparable with more features. As a pocket camera the FujiA340 is still my camera of choice.
reply to this comment
r.m (12/20/2008)
The camera has a stablelizer I use for taking pictures of holiday lighing and they cames out nice, please don;t take and settle for negative reports about this camera fine out for your self and you will be suprise if you just pick up the phone and call fuji they will answer your questions and tell you what to do about a problem.
reply to this comment
what is the battery life of the s1000fd and how can I check how much is left on batteries? (scooterpuppy — 05/22/2008)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/26/2008)
Wanda,
Battery life will vary depending on how you use your camera. When you take movies, review pictures, and use the LCD screen more, the battery will not last as long for picture taking. Battery life will also vary depending on what kind of battery you use and their maximum storage levels. A higher storage battery will last longer.
There is a rudamentary battery life indicator that will flash when your battery gets low. As for total life, I would say most batteries will last around 2 to 3 hours of continuous use.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Battery life will vary depending on how you use your camera. When you take movies, review pictures, and use the LCD screen more, the battery will not last as long for picture taking. Battery life will also vary depending on what kind of battery you use and their maximum storage levels. A higher storage battery will last longer.
There is a rudamentary battery life indicator that will flash when your battery gets low. As for total life, I would say most batteries will last around 2 to 3 hours of continuous use.
Andrew
Grant J. Wood (06/02/2008)
Hello there Wanda!
Adding on to Andrew's reply here: I am using an S1000FD (Which I absolutely love for the price) along with 4, Kodak 2100mAH Ni-HM rechargeable batteries (around 8 dollars US at Wal-Mart for the pack of batteries, and about 20USD for a pack containing 4 pre-charged batteries and a charger) Using flash at +/-0 and a setting of 10MP-N quality, I can get almost 900 photos. Reducing the quality of the image and not using flash will also increase the life considerably. IE. Setting to 3MP JPG files, or using the "top 15" continuous shot mode, I can achieve almost 3,000 amazing shots! These batteries work great with this camera, allowing for extremely extended usage. It's not unheard of for me to go 6-7 hours of off and on shooting before needing to swap the units out for fully charged ones. Kodak also sells a higher storage battery for just a fraction more in cost, and they are defiantly worth the extra few bucks.
Keep in mind the more features you use the more you will drain your batteries. So if you have your face detection and/or red-eye removal on it will tax the processor of the camera more, causing it to use more power to get the job done. Obviously sometimes these options are a necessity, but if you can get away with not using them by trying to find a more creative way to achieve a similar shot I would suggest it. (not to mention there are times that doing things just slightly different can give you a really neat effect!)
Hopefully this helps you a little more.
Sincerely,
Grant.
reply to this comment
Adding on to Andrew's reply here: I am using an S1000FD (Which I absolutely love for the price) along with 4, Kodak 2100mAH Ni-HM rechargeable batteries (around 8 dollars US at Wal-Mart for the pack of batteries, and about 20USD for a pack containing 4 pre-charged batteries and a charger) Using flash at +/-0 and a setting of 10MP-N quality, I can get almost 900 photos. Reducing the quality of the image and not using flash will also increase the life considerably. IE. Setting to 3MP JPG files, or using the "top 15" continuous shot mode, I can achieve almost 3,000 amazing shots! These batteries work great with this camera, allowing for extremely extended usage. It's not unheard of for me to go 6-7 hours of off and on shooting before needing to swap the units out for fully charged ones. Kodak also sells a higher storage battery for just a fraction more in cost, and they are defiantly worth the extra few bucks.
Keep in mind the more features you use the more you will drain your batteries. So if you have your face detection and/or red-eye removal on it will tax the processor of the camera more, causing it to use more power to get the job done. Obviously sometimes these options are a necessity, but if you can get away with not using them by trying to find a more creative way to achieve a similar shot I would suggest it. (not to mention there are times that doing things just slightly different can give you a really neat effect!)
Hopefully this helps you a little more.
Sincerely,
Grant.
phi-infinity (08/01/2008)
Alkline battery:approx. 300 frames ,Ni-MH: approx. 500 frames, Lithium: approx. 700 frames. . This is from the Fuji S1000fd manual. fujifilm.com/products/digit...
reply to this comment
Which would you choose - a FujiS1000FD or a FujiS100fs? (bimlico99 — 05/19/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/20/2008)
I think it's draw, actually. There really isn't much a difference. But for comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
Finally, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
reply to this comment
Finally, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Rob Fieser (06/12/2008)
I think there's a big difference. The S100fs is much bigger, much more expensive, and much more versatile.
First, the S1000fd costs between $200 and $250, depending on the dealer/etailer. The S100FS costs between $600 and $800. It also weighs more than many entry level DSLR's with kit lenses. The S100FS has optical image stabilization, but the S1000fd doesn't. The S100FS probably has superior image quality at higher ISO's due to its much bigger sensor. The one drawback of the S100FS, besides its weight, is probably purple fringing. You can check this out at dpreview, if you want.
If I had the money, I would get the S100FS. If I had just $250, I would get the S1000fd.
reply to this comment
First, the S1000fd costs between $200 and $250, depending on the dealer/etailer. The S100FS costs between $600 and $800. It also weighs more than many entry level DSLR's with kit lenses. The S100FS has optical image stabilization, but the S1000fd doesn't. The S100FS probably has superior image quality at higher ISO's due to its much bigger sensor. The one drawback of the S100FS, besides its weight, is probably purple fringing. You can check this out at dpreview, if you want.
If I had the money, I would get the S100FS. If I had just $250, I would get the S1000fd.
bimlico99 (06/14/2008)
Thanks very much Rob. I've had a look at both and there is a huge difference between them not the least of which is the price. The S1000fd was not quite what I wanted but the S100FS was too expensive. After a fair bit of research, I actually purchased a Canon Powershot S5 IS which has an excellent spec and suits all my needs. Thanks again.
Jack
reply to this comment
Jack
how much time between shots? focus time? (KarHeide — 05/18/2008)
I currently have the Fuji S9000. It is 2 1/2 years old and has served me VERY well. I do "casual" photography of my kids, but this is my PASSION (in the past two years i have taken over 20,000 "causal" shots). I am looking to upgrade to a camera with a faster focus and the ability to take sequential shots a little quicker than I can get away with my S9000, as well as a greater zoom (S9000 has 10.7optical). I am ok with the $300-400 price range (am willing to go a little higher if it will be worth my $$ but am not comfortable going much higher than that). I am happy staying with Fuji b/c my last two cameras were Fuji's and feel it will be an easy transition, but if you recommend something else, I am flexible. Thanks for any suggestions.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/22/2008)
Well, the wrap I'm hearing is that it has an extremely slow shutter lag. From "Trusted Reviews:"
Unfortunately the camera's performance is also rather lacklustre. It starts up quickly enough in a little under two seconds, but it's all downhill from there. In single-shot mode it can only manage a shot every three seconds, which is very slow by recent standards. In long-period continuous mode it can shoot at well over a frame a second, but it doesn't focus or change exposure between shots, making it useless for moving subjects or changeable light conditions.
So I don't know if this is the right way to go here, especially for the price. And for snapshots, I also think the MP count is a bit overkill. You'll no doubt have to deal with noise at ISO settings above 400.
Surely not what you're looking for.
I've also seen where it averages a 6/10 overall. I think you can do better.
reply to this comment
Unfortunately the camera's performance is also rather lacklustre. It starts up quickly enough in a little under two seconds, but it's all downhill from there. In single-shot mode it can only manage a shot every three seconds, which is very slow by recent standards. In long-period continuous mode it can shoot at well over a frame a second, but it doesn't focus or change exposure between shots, making it useless for moving subjects or changeable light conditions.
So I don't know if this is the right way to go here, especially for the price. And for snapshots, I also think the MP count is a bit overkill. You'll no doubt have to deal with noise at ISO settings above 400.
Surely not what you're looking for.
I've also seen where it averages a 6/10 overall. I think you can do better.
What is so great with this camera? (joe doe — 05/10/2008)
I cannot understand why this camera is receiving such great reviews. It is a small body with a long zoom and NO optical image stabilization. It merely uses a higher ISO to try and compensate. A high ISO on a small, high megapixel image sensor will lead to a lot of noise.
Not to mention that it does not record audio in stereo (like a similar priced kodak z812is does) nor does shoot in high definition.
The lens is not even a wide angle (like it is on the 10x Panasonic tz4).
I have a feeling that the people giving this such high ratings are either first time digital camera owners or people who are fuji fanboys because based on the camera's specs and merits it is way out of its league with the competition.
I would love to hear some reasons why this camera is worth the money.
reply to this comment
Not to mention that it does not record audio in stereo (like a similar priced kodak z812is does) nor does shoot in high definition.
The lens is not even a wide angle (like it is on the 10x Panasonic tz4).
I have a feeling that the people giving this such high ratings are either first time digital camera owners or people who are fuji fanboys because based on the camera's specs and merits it is way out of its league with the competition.
I would love to hear some reasons why this camera is worth the money.
Andrew Skinner (05/10/2008)
Joe,
When compared to similar cameras with a longer zoom and high megapixel count, this camera isn't as expensive. Being that it is new, there are only 3 user reviews written on it (as of me answering this question).
As for the camera's functionality, I would personally go with something like the Canon S5 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if I was in the market for an extended zoom camera like this. It comes with the optical image stabilization and the newer Digic II Processor.
Andrew
reply to this comment
When compared to similar cameras with a longer zoom and high megapixel count, this camera isn't as expensive. Being that it is new, there are only 3 user reviews written on it (as of me answering this question).
As for the camera's functionality, I would personally go with something like the Canon S5 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if I was in the market for an extended zoom camera like this. It comes with the optical image stabilization and the newer Digic II Processor.
Andrew
joe doe (05/11/2008)
Thanks for the response Andrew. I agree that the price is right for this camera but honestly even at this price there are better choices like the Kodak Z812is or even Sony H3. I agree with you that the Canon S5 is significantly better but of course the price is at least $80 bucks more. I just want to know why there is so much buzz regarding this camera when the specs are really nothing to be buzzing about.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/12/2008)
Having not used the camera, and being experienced with previous versions of the Canon S5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (I previously owned a S2 IS), I would pay the extra money for the Canon.
I've heard Kodak has some issues with their digital cameras in regards to build quality, so that may not be your best choice. If you like the specs on the Sony H3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) better than this choice, I would go with that camera.
I would also recommend going into a retailer to see how the cameras feel in your hand. A shop like Wolf, Penn, or Ritz will often let you shoot a couple practice shots in the store to see if you like them. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I've heard Kodak has some issues with their digital cameras in regards to build quality, so that may not be your best choice. If you like the specs on the Sony H3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) better than this choice, I would go with that camera.
I would also recommend going into a retailer to see how the cameras feel in your hand. A shop like Wolf, Penn, or Ritz will often let you shoot a couple practice shots in the store to see if you like them. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
joe doe (05/23/2008)
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the reply. I agree that Canon seems to be worth the extra money but I am just really curious about why this model is so highly regarded by its owners. I actually think there may be something that I am missing out on and so that is why I posted this question to try and gather input as to why the owners of this Fuji are so satisfied especially considering the weak specs.
As for the H3... honestly I may never buy another Sony camera again after my ownership experience with an H7. The pictures are lowsy when looking at the pixel level and the hyper noise reduction scheme really is not the way that a semi pro camera should be tackling picture quality.
I know the H7 gets glowing review from users but honestly they must only be looking at 4x6 prints without even examining the pictures in detail on the computer. Either that or they have been blinded by the Sony logo.
I remember even reading one users comments that the Sony Bionz engine is the greatest thing for picture quality because the Sony DSLRs use it... guess what? The Bionz is the cause of all that noise reduction in the first place!!! If only sony would allow the user to select the noise reduction level then all the problems would fade.... knowing Sony though, they will introduce that option on a later (and higher priced) model.
reply to this comment
Thanks for the reply. I agree that Canon seems to be worth the extra money but I am just really curious about why this model is so highly regarded by its owners. I actually think there may be something that I am missing out on and so that is why I posted this question to try and gather input as to why the owners of this Fuji are so satisfied especially considering the weak specs.
As for the H3... honestly I may never buy another Sony camera again after my ownership experience with an H7. The pictures are lowsy when looking at the pixel level and the hyper noise reduction scheme really is not the way that a semi pro camera should be tackling picture quality.
I know the H7 gets glowing review from users but honestly they must only be looking at 4x6 prints without even examining the pictures in detail on the computer. Either that or they have been blinded by the Sony logo.
I remember even reading one users comments that the Sony Bionz engine is the greatest thing for picture quality because the Sony DSLRs use it... guess what? The Bionz is the cause of all that noise reduction in the first place!!! If only sony would allow the user to select the noise reduction level then all the problems would fade.... knowing Sony though, they will introduce that option on a later (and higher priced) model.
Andrew Skinner (05/26/2008)
Joe,
With only 13 user reviews (as of May 26th, 2008), I would still be cautious about saying that the camera is getting glowing reviews. Yes, the reviews are consistent, so that may help.
What do you plan on using your new camera for? That might help lead us down a better path.
Andrew
reply to this comment
With only 13 user reviews (as of May 26th, 2008), I would still be cautious about saying that the camera is getting glowing reviews. Yes, the reviews are consistent, so that may help.
What do you plan on using your new camera for? That might help lead us down a better path.
Andrew
joe doe (06/10/2008)
Andrew,
I totally agree with you that 13 reviews is not a significant sample population to draw conclusions. I was just hoping that one of those 13 would take the time to state the glories they perceive or at least discuss certain issues that I see.
As for me, well I own a Sony H7 and I just recently bought the Panasonic TZ4. I tried both out on a trip to New York so I will make some conclusions when I have the time to examine all the photographs in detail (with over a 1000 photos that is going to take some time!!).
reply to this comment
I totally agree with you that 13 reviews is not a significant sample population to draw conclusions. I was just hoping that one of those 13 would take the time to state the glories they perceive or at least discuss certain issues that I see.
As for me, well I own a Sony H7 and I just recently bought the Panasonic TZ4. I tried both out on a trip to New York so I will make some conclusions when I have the time to examine all the photographs in detail (with over a 1000 photos that is going to take some time!!).
Andrew Skinner (06/12/2008)
Joe,
Thanks for the update. I'm looking forward to hearing about the photo comparisons. Let us know when you're done going through them.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Thanks for the update. I'm looking forward to hearing about the photo comparisons. Let us know when you're done going through them.
Andrew
Stephane (07/31/2008)
Why the S1000fd? Well, I' am an owner of a Fuji S1000fd and Kodak ZD710. As far as picture quality, the S1000fd does well in SuperMacro (20mm) mode, night mode also. Why are people giving glowing reviews, well it is all metal, the Canon S5 (plastic), 10MPx vs 8MPx for the S5. Here's a link to my photos: flickr.com/photos/phi-infin... and flickr.com/photos/phi-infin... .For the functions, versatility and price I went with the S1000fd. It comes down to choice, preference, and budget. Some prefer Nikon, or Canon, Leica, etc....
reply to this comment
eghershey (07/31/2008)
I purchased the S5 because of recommendations received when I queried "what would be a good camera in that price range". I'm not convinced that it was the best choice in the $350.00 price range. I have to admit, I'm still learning more and more of the cameras functions: ie, adding vivid color, etc.
But I can't figure out why I used to get a wide angle picture in the "C" mode and now its the same "non-wide" image that all the other modes are capable of.
I do like the 40X telephoto with digital help, got some pretty nice pictures of eagles in the Grand Tetons this week, both stationary and a couple in flight.
reply to this comment
But I can't figure out why I used to get a wide angle picture in the "C" mode and now its the same "non-wide" image that all the other modes are capable of.
I do like the 40X telephoto with digital help, got some pretty nice pictures of eagles in the Grand Tetons this week, both stationary and a couple in flight.
joe doe (08/29/2008)
Stephane,
Great photos! My views on the camera are based on some experience with Fuji cameras and their non- optical stabilization. While Fuji makes some great lenses and they also have very good color, the problem I found was that many of the shots were blurry. This was due to the lack of stabilzation. If you are getting great pictures with the camera then that is wonderful, but from my experience the Fuji cameras take great pictures... but it will be 1 great photo out of several blurry ones. That is the deal killer for me.
reply to this comment
Great photos! My views on the camera are based on some experience with Fuji cameras and their non- optical stabilization. While Fuji makes some great lenses and they also have very good color, the problem I found was that many of the shots were blurry. This was due to the lack of stabilzation. If you are getting great pictures with the camera then that is wonderful, but from my experience the Fuji cameras take great pictures... but it will be 1 great photo out of several blurry ones. That is the deal killer for me.
joe doe (08/29/2008)
Stephane,
I forgot to mention... 10 megapixels are not necesarily better than 8. Most would agree that more megapix on a small sensor leads to more noise so 10 megapixels is actually a negative when compared to the Cannon.
As for the metal body... well quite frankly if you drop a camera with a metal body it will break just the same as the one with the plastic body. The metal may seem better to touch but if I can have a lighter plastic bodied camera that would be worth a lot more than the metal "feel."
reply to this comment
I forgot to mention... 10 megapixels are not necesarily better than 8. Most would agree that more megapix on a small sensor leads to more noise so 10 megapixels is actually a negative when compared to the Cannon.
As for the metal body... well quite frankly if you drop a camera with a metal body it will break just the same as the one with the plastic body. The metal may seem better to touch but if I can have a lighter plastic bodied camera that would be worth a lot more than the metal "feel."
joe doe (08/29/2008)
Hershey,
Yeah the Cannon can be a handful to the novice photographer. I too have had a hard time with all the features on my Sony h7. I still prefer it but it just takes a lot of practice to get all the finer points down.
reply to this comment
Yeah the Cannon can be a handful to the novice photographer. I too have had a hard time with all the features on my Sony h7. I still prefer it but it just takes a lot of practice to get all the finer points down.
Where can i get usb drivers for vista? (MB — 05/08/2008)
I can't find a usb driver for vista. The disk that came with it won't install the drivers. I don't know what to do. I can't find any support for this camera. At least not for vista. Where else can i get what i need? I have tried to reinstall from scratch. Nothing!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/08/2008)
I wouldn't bother, Mb. Vista is a pain and most aren't even writing drivers to correct any issue since Windows 10 is coming next year and Microsoft has extended XP support since most are downgrading back to XP and downloading SP3 for it. My suggestion is invest in a USB memory card reader and simply take your card out and plug it in. The PC will read it as a drive and it's a simple drag and drop to get your pictures onto the PC for editing and printing. Much better than trying to trouble shoot driver issues.
reply to this comment
MB (05/16/2008)
Well, the drivers were corrupt or something. I had to restart window from disk to fix the problem. I tried the memory card reader but it would not read that either. But thanks for the help. I do agree with you about vista. Vista is a pain.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/22/2008)
Couldn't read a memory card reader? I'd be checking your USB settings.
reply to this comment
phi-infinity (07/29/2008)
Heres a link for the USB driver for Vista (that is if you have the Fuji): fujifilm.ca/x3586.xml and fujifilm.ca/x13595.xml . (PTP) Picture Transfer Protocol ,(MTP) Media Transfer Protocol
reply to this comment
Roberto (01/07/2010)
I could not install either! I dont have card reader, please, what do I do?
reply to this comment
zipperermisty3 (01/07/2010)
Just to let you know reader/writer cards are very cheap on eBay $2.00 I've bought many and had no problems with them it a cheap way to try.
reply to this comment
I am looking at the Fuji S1000fd and the Olympus SP-550, What would you recommend? (mtc523 — 05/03/2008)
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (05/12/2008)
I don't have the S1000fd, but have had similar cameras from Fuji. I did have the SP-550. The SP-550 takes good pictures, if you can put up with fairly slowly focusing, especially in cases of low contrast. It does have a bigger zoom and it is optically stabilized, unlike the Fuji. The Fuji can use XD and SD cards; the latter are now fairly cheap. If fast focusing is important for you, get the Fuji. If you are taking action photos (sports), it may serve you better. If you want a longer zoomed, optically stabilized camera which focuses fast, get the Panasonic FZ-18.
reply to this comment
mtc523 (05/15/2008)
Rob thanks for the answer. I am leaning towards Fuji. The two cameras I am looking at are the S1000fd and the S800fd. I was going with the S1000fd but if it's not optically stabilized, that concerns me. Can you use the 12X zoom without it and still get good photos without a tripod?
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (05/16/2008)
The general rule of thumb for camera without optical image stabilization is that you need a shutter speed whose denominator is equal to the mm at a given zoom setting. At full zoom, the S1000fd has goes out to 396mm. That means you need a shutter speed of about 1/400 of a second or faster. In daylight, that's usually not a problem. Of course you can buy a tripod and then it won't be a problem at all. I had the S5200 which went out to 380mm at full zoom. I took lots of shots that turned out ok. I just had brace myself to hold the camera really, really still if there was low light (e.g. nightime pro baseball games). If you want an alternative, consider the Canon S5IS or S3IS. They both have 12X optical zoom with stabilization.
reply to this comment
mtc523 (05/16/2008)
Rob - Thanks for all your help!!!
reply to this comment
stampalot (05/16/2008)
Fuji s1000fd is not optically stabalized??? It has an option for picture stabilization. what's the difference between optically and picture?
Can the picture stabilization be combined with another option at the same time?
reply to this comment
Can the picture stabilization be combined with another option at the same time?
Rob Fieser (05/16/2008)
There are two kinds of stabilization. Actually, three. Two work by compensating for movement in the sensor or lens. I am not sure exactly how they do it. In my mind, this is the better kind of stabilization - sometimes called optical stabilization. It enables you to get sharp shots even when the shutter speed is so slow that normally you would end up with blurry images. The second kind of stabilization is sometimes called digital stabilization. The camera automatically hikes the light sensitivity (ISO rating) so that the shutter speed is fast enough to avoid blurs. The downside of this is that sometimes you get "noisy' images with lots of colored speckles/dots and image detail can be lost. Ideally, you have both. The S1000fd uses digital stabilization. It hikes the ISO.
reply to this comment
Bill (06/22/2008)
The Fuji works well with the digital stabilization. Unless you are making extremely large enlargements, you should get excellent results. For the money, the Fuji S1000FD is one of the best buys on the market!
reply to this comment
Jim (07/13/2008)
Has anyone used and if so what is your opinion of the HD video capability of the Fuji S1000FD? I need a camera that has both good quality digital and video. I can't believe that for the price I can get "both" features in the S1000FD!!!
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (07/16/2008)
I think you have been misinformed. I think the S1000FD does video clips at 640 X 480, which is not HD video.
The Panasonic TZ-5 does HD videos and some other cameras do, too.
reply to this comment
The Panasonic TZ-5 does HD videos and some other cameras do, too.
Does this camera have to use only Sandisk SD cards or any brand (like Kingston etc.)? Also, does this camera require xD for use of the panorama? (passionphoto8 — 04/25/2008)
reply to this comment
passionphoto8 (04/25/2008)
The last time I looked into a Fujifilm digicam, to use the panorama function it required using an xD card. These cards are more expensive since they're proprietary. According to the manual I downloaded it seemed to allude to the fact that only Sandisk SD cards can be used in this camera. Is that true or not... and is this a slight marketing ploy. I tried calling Fujifilm today with none available to answer my call during the afternoon.
reply to this comment
Aditya D (04/29/2008)
Most manufacturers recommend Sandisk because they tend to be built better than others, and also they have most of the market share. Also some may have a slight partnership with Sandisk. In general, you can use any SD card, but Sandisk tends to work the best just because of their quality. I can't find anything in the settings that says you have to have an xD card for panorma, so I believe that you can use either card, but there could be something I'm missing. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Terrageezer (05/09/2008)
I recently purchased this camera and also a Trancend 8gb Class 6 sdhc card. The camera is perfect for my backpacking needs due to size and weight. The features available on this camera far outclass any other in its price range. I bought it a month ahead of a trip to the Rockies so that I could familiarize myself with its features. I have had absolutely NO problem in using the Transcend cards which I also use in a Kodak point and shoot. Write speed is incredibly fast and have had no problems at all with storage capacity or downloading times. The Transcend card is an incredible value and works very well in this camera.
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/10/2008)
The first answer posted is not entirely correct. The fact is that Sandisk is the leader of this technology because they are the ones that developed it first and own many of the patents. Still other companies provide excellent card with excellent quality which can be used with all brands of cameras. Don't forget the SD is actually a standard that manufacturers must follow. So all of the big name manufacturers produce good quality cards.
What you want to be careful about is buying imitation cards (usually found on ebay). These cards are not necessarily made to specifications and they tend to be very poor quality and performance.
Where Sandisk truely leads is in the high speed cards. If your camera requires one of these high speed cards then Sandisk will be the best because their performance ratings actually measure up to the claimed speeds
reply to this comment
What you want to be careful about is buying imitation cards (usually found on ebay). These cards are not necessarily made to specifications and they tend to be very poor quality and performance.
Where Sandisk truely leads is in the high speed cards. If your camera requires one of these high speed cards then Sandisk will be the best because their performance ratings actually measure up to the claimed speeds
mark (09/24/2008)
I have this camera and use a SD card. I have taken several pictures with the panorama setting. No problems. For some reason I have had problems with the kingston SD cards giving me write errors.
reply to this comment
Does the S1000fd have a through the lens view finder (riverpilot — 04/17/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/23/2008)
Sort of. It has an Electronic Viewfinder which would obviously read through the lens. But it's not a true optical TTL.
reply to this comment
riverpilot (04/25/2008)
Thanks! James
which is better the s1000fd or the s8100fd price and quality?
Ken
reply to this comment
which is better the s1000fd or the s8100fd price and quality?
Ken
AndyfromVA (04/25/2008)
The S8100fd is much better overall, as it has more optical zoom than the S1000, 18x to 12x, a wider wide angle, 27mm to 33 mm, and CCD shift image stabilization (which the S1000 doesn't have). However, the S8100fd is also considerably more expensive than the S1000.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/25/2008)
And believe you me, that extra 6x in optical zoom can really come in handy. Course, the longer the zoom, the more the need to rely on the IS due to camera shake. But it's of little consequence or concern if you have a practiced hand. And the more wide angle means more in the group shot or when shooting landscapes.
If you can afford the longer lens, I say go for it.
reply to this comment
If you can afford the longer lens, I say go for it.
riverpilot (04/30/2008)
Thanks that was very helpfull S8100 it is!!!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/01/2008)
You bet. We're happy to help.
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or, you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
reply to this comment
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or, you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
marie (05/06/2008)
Hi, My husband bought me the s1000fd camera and I was wondering if it was a good camera. Is there another one out there that's better for about the same price? I want something easy to use, good picture quality, long battery life!!! and no more blurry pictures!!!! any help on this would be greatly appreciated..
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/06/2008)
Well, as I stated above - The S8100fd is much better overall, as it has more optical zoom than the S1000, 18x to 12x, a wider wide angle, 27mm to 33 mm, and CCD shift image stabilization (which the S1000 doesn't have). However, the S8100fd is also considerably more expensive than the S1000.
As for the S1000, it's a little too soon to tell. But so far from the reviews posted, it's getting high marks.
reply to this comment
As for the S1000, it's a little too soon to tell. But so far from the reviews posted, it's getting high marks.
marie (05/06/2008)
Thanks James, I guess I'll keep it if it's getting good reviews. I don't want to spend more money, so I guess this one is good for the price. I was just wondering if there was another brand out there that was better for the same price. marie
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/10/2008)
The viewfinder is NOT through the lens. There is no such thing as a digital with through the lens viewfinders. Some cameras come closeand provide 100% of the image view (through an electronic viewfinder such as that on the kodak z812is) but most do not. The closest digital with through the lens viewfinding is the sony alpha dslr ... the newest model not the older one.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/10/2008)
Well, you can look at it that way, but in fact, it IS through the lens as the electronic image is from the lens itself after it goes through the CCD. That's through the lens by definition. The only other viewfinder is an offset viewfinder that has it's own separate point of view.
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/14/2008)
A counterpoint to Fuji cameras... beware of blurry pictures.
The problem with Fuji is that they do not use optical image stabilization. They use CCD shift or even high ISO but no real optical stabilization. The problem is that when you have such a large zoom lens, any slight hand shake will lead to a blurry photo. The CCD shift and high ISO can make up for very minor movements but the amount of shake that a 18x will magnify cannot be controlled without optical stabilization.
Fuji may have kept the cost down by not including this feature but honestly this is a dealbreaker because most of the competetion has optical stabilzation. A lower price is not worth the blurry pictures it will lead to!!
reply to this comment
The problem with Fuji is that they do not use optical image stabilization. They use CCD shift or even high ISO but no real optical stabilization. The problem is that when you have such a large zoom lens, any slight hand shake will lead to a blurry photo. The CCD shift and high ISO can make up for very minor movements but the amount of shake that a 18x will magnify cannot be controlled without optical stabilization.
Fuji may have kept the cost down by not including this feature but honestly this is a dealbreaker because most of the competetion has optical stabilzation. A lower price is not worth the blurry pictures it will lead to!!
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2008)
Well said, Joe.
reply to this comment
Grant J. Wood (06/02/2008)
I have to disagree with Joe, the S1000FD has an incredibly accurate AF. I purchased this unit for my wife shortly after it was released, and as I am using a Canon Rebel xsi myself, I had to admit, I was extremely impressed with the Fujifilm s1000FD. The trick is to make sure you begin the Auto-Focus sequence on something at the proper distance you will be taking the final image at. In reality its no different then a manual focus in a lot of ways. To be honest, I have taken more crisp, clear, precise shots with her S1000FD then I have with my daughters more expensive Nikon which has "true IS" so to speak. Joe is correct that the S1000FD uses an ISO trick to 'fake' IS, however, even at 3200 ISO (Which if you are not familiar, is a fairly high setting and should normally cause extreme graininess) the S1000FD is incredibly 'fuz-free.'
Long story short, my point is that, even though it does not have a true Image stabilization, this camera has not once produced a shot for me that is blurry do to anything other than me not focusing on the correct area to start with. And seeing as I have severe RA that says a lot! Even at full 12x optical, or full optical + partial digital (must admit its digital zoom quality is not that impressive, but its good enough for the price)
reply to this comment
Long story short, my point is that, even though it does not have a true Image stabilization, this camera has not once produced a shot for me that is blurry do to anything other than me not focusing on the correct area to start with. And seeing as I have severe RA that says a lot! Even at full 12x optical, or full optical + partial digital (must admit its digital zoom quality is not that impressive, but its good enough for the price)
by James DeRuvo (06/02/2008)
I just hope it's better than the quality of the 8000fd at 3200, which is FAR from fuzz free. And to be completely absent of noise at 3200, is a boast at best, Grant. But that's the beauty of the concept "your mileage may vary ..." on user's pleasant experience is another's disappointment.
reply to this comment
joe doe (06/10/2008)
Hi Grant,
Thanks for the insight into the Fuji... I have been waiting for a while for actual users of this camera to comment. I am glad to hear that you have good experiences with the Fuji but honestly I have to agree with James that taking a photo at ISO 3200 is not going to be a "fuzz free" experience no matter which digital camera you own. The Fuji is relatively inexpensive (or at best mid priced depending on your wallets pov) and does not have anything special (specs wise) to make its photos noise free at iso levels of 3200. The camera may have a noise reduction scheme to give the appearance of little noise (like my Sony H7 does) but this will eat away significant detail in your shots.... to the point of making them appear like water paintings!
As for getting clear pictures without image stabilzation... it is good to know that you were able to get clear photos but honestly anyone will tell you that if you want clear shots on a high zoom camera then nothing compares with true optical image stabilization. Fuji has come up with a clever way to avoid using true IS but this is a cost cutting measure and not something that works as well as the real deal.
The few professional reviews I have read of Fuji's high ISO trick to avoid optical IS all state that it works ok but still leads to blurry shots at high zoom levels. High ISO will also cause excessive levels of noise (again Fuji (nor any other camera maker) has not yet been able to devise a method to achieve high ISO without noise increases.
If I am wrong (which may indeed be the case) I would love to hear any comments you have because honestly I am still seeking the perfect high zoom camera myself!
reply to this comment
Thanks for the insight into the Fuji... I have been waiting for a while for actual users of this camera to comment. I am glad to hear that you have good experiences with the Fuji but honestly I have to agree with James that taking a photo at ISO 3200 is not going to be a "fuzz free" experience no matter which digital camera you own. The Fuji is relatively inexpensive (or at best mid priced depending on your wallets pov) and does not have anything special (specs wise) to make its photos noise free at iso levels of 3200. The camera may have a noise reduction scheme to give the appearance of little noise (like my Sony H7 does) but this will eat away significant detail in your shots.... to the point of making them appear like water paintings!
As for getting clear pictures without image stabilzation... it is good to know that you were able to get clear photos but honestly anyone will tell you that if you want clear shots on a high zoom camera then nothing compares with true optical image stabilization. Fuji has come up with a clever way to avoid using true IS but this is a cost cutting measure and not something that works as well as the real deal.
The few professional reviews I have read of Fuji's high ISO trick to avoid optical IS all state that it works ok but still leads to blurry shots at high zoom levels. High ISO will also cause excessive levels of noise (again Fuji (nor any other camera maker) has not yet been able to devise a method to achieve high ISO without noise increases.
If I am wrong (which may indeed be the case) I would love to hear any comments you have because honestly I am still seeking the perfect high zoom camera myself!
Grant J. Wood (06/11/2008)
Oh no, by no means is it truly FREE of noise, but for being 3200 ISO it is amazingly stable. I suppose I should have chosen a few better words for that though. Just as a comparison 3200 ISO on this Fuji has about the same amount of noise as my D80 does at 800. Which to my eyes is quite an achievement. Either way, hopefully it helped out a wee bit.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/11/2008)
That's the beauty of "you mileage may vary," what you see as a stable noise ratio may be different from me or others. All I can tell you is that when comparing ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ) other Fuji models around the S1000fd, I see a dramatic amount noise and fuzzy images as a result. Especially when compared to the D80 at 800 ISO.
But if you like it, by all means.
reply to this comment
But if you like it, by all means.
Fuji FinePix S1000fd Reviews
Fuji FinePix S1000fd Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Great all purpose camera
(Candy Allison — 11/04/2010)
I bought this camera to upgrade from a Kodak Easyshare---It took some getting used to but 95% of the time you get crystal clear shots. I got it for taking sports/action shots of my son's football & wrestling. It takes amazing action shots even in continuous shooting. The only draw back was as night comes on and lighting gets lower the quality of action shots start to get blurry if you use continuous shooting. When I have sufficient lighting you can even catch even the most tiny thing in a shoot. Take the time to read the manual and other than low light sporting shots you will never be disappointed.
- 1.0 out of 5
Start freezing and hanging up -
(BPM — 01/13/2010)
Really it takes excelent pictures, but after a while the camera stops working.
It starts freezing images and then starts hanging up.
Putting a new SHC memory card as sugested by some users apparently resolved, but after some hundred od fotos all the problems reapper.
In Fuji official Web site no mention of the problem, even when hundred of same claims can be found in Internet from custemers around the word.
I will never buy a Fujy camera again.
- 2.0 out of 5
Crashes ruin an otherwise great camera
(Laura — 12/29/2009)
After 9 months my camera has started to freeze. You have to take the batteries out to unfreeze it. I'm hoping to be able to return it to the store where I purchased it. It seems to be a prevalent problem (look it up on the internet). Too bad because its a great camera otherwise.
- 1.0 out of 5
Junk
(Phil — 10/31/2009)
I have come to the conclusion that this is a total piece of junk ! Broke in little over a month after purcasing,again 3 months later and now4months later. This is my first and last purchase of any Fuji product.
- 1.0 out of 5
Junk
(Phil — 10/30/2009)
I have come to the conclusion that this is a total piece of junk! Broke in little over a month after purchasing, again 3 months later and now 4 months later. This is my first and last purchase of any Fuji product.
- 4.0 out of 5
Easy to use gives good pics
(rikkiduncan — 10/15/2009)
glad I bought it, only prob is uploading pics to compu, I'm having probs with compu not recognising usb driver.
- 5.0 out of 5
s1000fd
(mark barnes — 10/13/2009)
this is a great camera. I use the olympus xd 1gb picture card and rechargeable nickel metal hydride 1.2v 2500mha batteries. picture quality depends on how well you get to know the camera. even takes good videos and can make clear shots of long distance objects. the close ups take a little getting used to.
- 3.0 out of 5
ZOOM ERROR
(florence pocius — 10/11/2009)
We have never owned any camera except a Fuji. This s1000 worked fine for a few months when suddenly it ceased to work and message read "ZOOM ERROR." Every web site I checked said to find a repair service. I purchased this camera for $350. The cost to have it repaired would be $90.00. I am very disappointed and will not spend $90.00 for the repair and will not replace it with another Fuji.
- 5.0 out of 5
Best camera ever
(Jesse — 10/01/2009)
I got this camera online after my mom broke mine and it takes awesome pics!! like the auto mode, takes great pics in any light i recommend it to anyone!!
- 2.0 out of 5
zoom error
(James Hart — 09/29/2009)
took good pictures for about 10 months then it comes up with a zoom error. Manual says take it to a fugi dealer to get it repaired. Really with the price of this camera would it be worth fixing???? Buy another camera......
- 4.0 out of 5
new camera
(Dawn McCormick — 07/28/2009)
I haven't had it long. But the daily changing of batteries it a bit annoying.
- 4.0 out of 5
Comparable to the $600 rage.
(Andrew — 07/10/2009)
Bad- In high zoom it doesn't focus well. In full sun it can overcompensate in full auto. It has limited settings, F/.8 - F/7.1, SS 2000-8".
Good- Amazing quality pictures, Awesome continuous shooting, easy to use, no extraneous features you'll never use.
Overall I would suggest that everyone looking at the $200 range get this one. It gives you all you need and nothing you don't. Everyone from the highest gallery pros to fun with friends can use this camera. Highly recommended.
- 5.0 out of 5
auto w/ or w/o flash
(pnoy — 07/01/2009)
first of all, good choice of your camera. I have this camera and I love it, the only thing you need is just a little trick on your settings. Let's talk about the manual first, what I did is i went to fujifilm.com and download the manual. The cd that comes w/ the camera is just the basic. Now after you download the manual, it tells you what is the secret. Outdoor picture, use Aperture and you don't need flash. One more thing do not use the face detection, it makes the shutter slow. check my pictures, http://www.flickr.com/photos/pnoyxtrm/
this is where you can download the program and click what you need: http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/s/finepix_s1000fd/
email me if you have more question? Good luck....
pnoyxtrmryder@yahoo.com
- 5.0 out of 5
Great pirece of kit for the price!
(K — 06/25/2009)
Once you know what you're doing and don't get all upset when you do things like -
"I messed with every setting on the camera and never could get the pictures to turn out"
Cameras aren't for "messing" with settings, read up on what you're doing first and you'll enjoy the camera more. I don't know why people jump to attack things they clearly haven't given half a chance.
- 5.0 out of 5
excellent camera but I have a question?
(Rhonda — 06/11/2009)
I love this camera and recieve alot of compliments on my pics, I cant find my manual and all my pics on sunny days outdoors are turning out totally dark, this is in auto with and without flash, can someone help?
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera
(Artie — 05/29/2009)
Love the zoom.Great panoramic mode.Fine quality pictures.
I love everything about this camera.
Be sure to buy a battery charger and 4 rechargable double A batteries.
- 5.0 out of 5
An excellent camera for the price
(Melissa — 05/15/2009)
My complaint would be that the user's manual is on cd; but they had no problem printing three basic manuals in three different languages. I used one for notes to carry with me.
I have taken this camera to a couple different concerts and have used the video feature a few times. Of course the loudness is too great for the mic...if you'd ever be able to hear anything over me screaming that is...lol...and I'm really disappointed that you cannot zoom in or out while your recording. Be sure to do that before hitting the record button and let it focus first.
This camera was my upgrade from a Sanyo 603 6mp (?) and my goodness could I clearly see the difference. It has taken some time to get use to the size, all the features and to figure out; but I love it! I couldn't count the thousands of pictures I've taken with it in the short amount of time that I've owned it.
I recently took a trip to New Orleans and took around 1200 pix on three different cards (1, 2, and 4 GB), with room to spare on the last card. The camera does use 4 batteries and I thought this was going to be a problem at first, but I use rechargeable batteries. I think I only changed the batteries once while I was visiting NOLA.
I'll also mention that I like the voice memo feature that you can add to your pic.
The Museum mode is nice and the indoor/party settings as well. I used those features last week at my cousin's graduation and her friends were amazed by the camera not brightly flashing. I know they were wondering if the pix would even turn out well...and they DID! :)
I love my camera and I greatly recommend this one to anyone.
- 5.0 out of 5
Fuji Finepix S1000fd
(Skinna — 05/01/2009)
I bought this because my Finepix4.1mp was no longer really suitable, I design websites and need a good camera to obtain nice images for my customers' sites. I have had NO PROBLEM at all with my S1000, I find it to take beautiful clear pictures, and the colours are deep and vibrant.
- 1.0 out of 5
Total Junk
(Mark Fucci — 04/01/2009)
Camera locks up every 10 pictures regardless of what card you have in it. Can't even shut it off. Have to remove the battieres to start over. blurriest pics I've ever taken. Biggest
waste of money I ever spent.
- 5.0 out of 5
The best digital camera under $200 by far!
(Paul — 03/28/2009)
I would recommend this camera to anyone. Simple to use (if you read the instructions, it's even easier!) Takes good quality photos on the Auto setting, and you can manually adjust plenty if that's your thing. Also has plenty of presets for fireworks, snow, sport, landscape etc. Has the best zoom of any digital camera I've had.
- 5.0 out of 5
I LOOOOVE this camera!!
(Asheley — 03/27/2009)
I bought a kodak m1093is and HATED it so i exchanged for this and had to pay a difference of 20 dollars. and it is worth every penny. if this had image stabilization it would probably be perfect. also pics are taken in Avi not other format but i still love it!!my pics come out clear and my toddler is a runner so its a challenge taking pics of her but it is still worth it. Seriously, BUY this camera!! its size is absolutely perfect and very user friendly. this is a good choice for an advanced point and shoot and i still have a lot to learn.
- 4.0 out of 5
Good choice
(pnoy — 03/25/2009)
It's a good thing I choose this camera, It's easy to use and very handy. This is the only camera that you can change the pixel as far I know. I almost bought the Kodak but since the Fujifilm S1000fd, it's more stylist.
- 4.0 out of 5
do not return this product
(pnoyxtrm — 03/23/2009)
I'm sorry what happen to you on the cruise and the camera. it happen to me to but I'm not on the cruise, just taking pictures. First, I can't figure it out why this thing happening on the camera, so what I did is read the manual. Here's the problem, what kind of memory card do you use in the camera. Did you format the memory card on the camera before you use it. When I did all that format the memory card, you won't believe it that camera can take some good pictures. You can adjust the pixel, I mean there's a lot of things you can do. I suggest do your homework, Don't give up.
- 1.0 out of 5
Do not buy this camera
(Edyth Dorning — 03/02/2009)
I bought this camera to replace my olympus 3.2 camera. I wanted to update to 10 pixels and zoom 12. What a mistake. I took this camera on a cruise and all the pictures that I tried to take in sunlight would not take. I tried all the settings. Today there is snow on the ground and the sun is shining.I tried to take pictures and they all come out black. I took my old olympus camera and took beautiful pictures. I wasted my money on this piece of junk. Who wants a camera that does not take pictures in the sun.
- 2.0 out of 5
Unnatural color
(Danno — 02/28/2009)
Horrendously unnatural color, especially indoors. EVERYTHING comes out way too warm, too sensitive to yellows and reds, no matter what setting you use, even auto white balance. Colors are overly saturated. Skin tones are always orange. Tried all white balance settings. Also, 8 times out of 10 an outdoor shot in bright sunlight will come out underexposed.
- 2.0 out of 5
Just not what it says it is
(Joe Goff — 02/20/2009)
Why buy this S1000 camera when the upgrades are so much better? I also have a FujiS7000 camera which does so much more than the S1000, and at a much cheaper price. The S1000 just doesn't live up to the rave reviews it gets. Wish I could seel it, but cannot possibly recover the cost. Gave it to my grandson for simple point and show stuff.
- 5.0 out of 5
Very happy with this choice
(Rob B — 02/18/2009)
Great choice for anyone looking for a simple to use digital camera, but also good for the more experienced. Excellent picture quality; easy to learn if you take a few minutes; very good users options and settings. Definitely use Ni-Mh or Lithium batteries.
- 1.0 out of 5
I dont love it
(sheila — 02/16/2009)
takes noisey pics have to remove with corel im calling fuji HQ. For the 10 megapixels it takes pictures like a cheap web cam . very noisey
- 3.0 out of 5
More complex than film SLR
(Bob V — 02/12/2009)
I bought it because I saw how well it took pictures in Auto. I have run into the flash lock problem with weak bateries, perhaps they should have provided a separate battery for the flash. I was used to taking pictures with a FTN with a 1.4 lens so I never worried about low light levels, so I guess that there is some learning curve to the F2.8 lens. I hope that I can make up for it with a higher ISO #. Not too thrilled with the long delay once the button is depressed all of the way. It does take fantastic photos as I usually print 8 x 10's on an HP Photosmart 3310 and they are very sharp in that size. I also have to learn not to zoom unless I really have to because the higher F-Stop and slower shutter mean that my subjects need to be still. Too many functions to learn overnight, you really need to sit and play with it to learn what it can do.
- 4.0 out of 5
Good zoom, though fuzzy
(Charles Norman — 02/11/2009)
Lots of tricks, lots of MPs, good zoom though fuzzy at the extremes,
handy, fairly easy to understand and use.
- 5.0 out of 5
excellent
(nuwan gunasekera — 02/05/2009)
good camera with easy use and excellent quality
- 4.0 out of 5
Great Camera
(Peter — 01/25/2009)
I am a long time user of good quality 35mm film cameras (rangefinder and SLR). This was my first digital camera purchase and I have been very pleased with my choice. All outdoor shots in natural light come out great every time. I had a little trouble at first with indoor shots using the flash; most of my photos seemed to come out quite grainy. However, now that I am used to the settings and options that the camera provides, I also get good indoor results. Fuji colors are especially pleasing, just as they were when I used their 35mm film.
- 5.0 out of 5
Good cam at marvelous price
(Aviral Mediratta. — 01/08/2009)
I have been using this cam since 7 months, by now I am fully equipped with it.
This cam has amazing stability over flash and zoom. the different shooting modes and in-built options make it set for all occasions. The only drawback it has is that it has a limited accessories in market. (a demotivating point for camera savvy's).
On the other side, for a general photographic as it is use, its the best cam till date.
- 1.0 out of 5
Worst camera I've owned.
(Angie — 01/06/2009)
I bought this camera to replace a Nikon film camera I had. Boy was I disappointed. My pictures were terrible. They have a yellow glow to them. The lighting is terrible. I messed with every setting on the camera and never could get the pictures to turn out. Needless to say I didn't get any good x-mas pictures. I just bought the FUJI 8100 and love it. It is definetely worth the extra $100.
- 4.0 out of 5
brilliant but the flash freezes it
(candyman1313131 — 01/03/2009)
when you use the flash the screen freezes after 3 seconds or so and you have to take the batteries out to reset it. only if you quickly put the flash down a gain after taking a picture it doesent freeze. apart from thar it's excellent
- 1.0 out of 5
Terrible
(Terry — 12/30/2008)
Camera freezes up when taking pictures with flash "Write Error". Does not record flash pictures and will not operate again without taking out the batteries. Seems to work OK without the SD card in place, I'm hoping that a new xD card may solve the problem. Wish I'd bought another camera.
- 2.0 out of 5
Broke after 10 minutes!
(Kelsey Ramos — 10/06/2008)
I barely had taken ten pictures before the camera froze. Just like a computer- it was stuck on one screen and wouldn't even turn off. I was using the ScanDisk card as recommended, and hadn't even changed any of the settings. I am SO disappointed in this camera and will be taking it back tomorrow for the Canon that I should have bought in the first place.
- 5.0 out of 5
Quality and Satisfaction
(castortroy — 09/06/2008)
There are a few important categories to every model camera sold in a retail or online environment that no manufacturer or establishment can despute, one being the quality of the product and the other being customer satisfaction.
Never let any salesman, company or friend fool you into believing that any product is higher quality than it is or more satisfying to own than it is!
I've sold between 50 and 100 of this particular camera, and believe it when I tell you that this camera is VERY GOOD in both the above named categories. I have had only 1 returned camera, for some reason every 4th frame came out very dark on this particular camera. FujiFilm has done very well in both categories in a REAL WORLD environment with a mere 2% Return rate on this camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
Amazing price, great pics, good specification
(Stephane — 07/30/2008)
As a beginner photographer, I decided to purchase this camera to complement another. This camera has many function that a dSLR has, with an amazing price. Love the Super Macro setting. This camera has a max. burst speed of 7.5fps @ 3mpx. All pros, no cons at this point.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great compact camera!!
(Steve Robson — 07/15/2008)
I bought this camera to up-grade the older S5000 I also own. The flexiblilty of the camera is the same as can be found on a D-SLR type digital camera and a fraction of the price and at a fraction of the weight as well. I find it works well in most situations but there are times when I wish there was a manual focus option but overall, I just love the features one gets at the price you pay for it!!
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera
(Shannon — 07/01/2008)
This camera has all the gadjets with none of the price. It takes great high quality pictures! Should have a better lens cover than what you get
- 5.0 out of 5
Love it alot!!!
(Anthony — 04/28/2008)
This is an amazing camera, 12x optical zoom + 10 megapixels + high ISO = great pictures. I love the super macro for pictures as close as 2 cm. I get pictures of the same quality as a much more expensive and bulky SLR camera. This is the best camera I have ever used. And it's only the size of my fist. Amd the best part? the price!!! Around $250
