Fuji FinePix S5200 Zoom
- 4.0 out of 5
- 4.0 out of 5
| Shop for S5200 Zoom accessories. | ||
| Loading… |
Research the Fuji FinePix S5200 Zoom
Editors' Comments
The Fuji FinePix S5200 offers SLR-style without SLR-responsibility. For the budding amateur photographer, the S5200 has an impressive 10x optical zoom and a fixed lens that can take wide and telephoto shots. Fuji's Anti-Blur feature claims to be superior to image stabilization features for tightening up long zooms. If you're daunted by the involvement of true SLR cameras but still want something more than a typical digital camera, this might be a good choice, but the moderate 5.1 megapixels and lack of upgradeability could mean you'll be stuck in the middle for a while.
Specifications
- 5.1 megapixels
- 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- auto and manual focus
- manual exposure
- ISO 80-1600
- JPEG and RAW file formats
- 4 "AA" batteries (charger optional)
- movie mode with sound
Comments on the Fuji S5200 Zoom
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the Fuji FinePix S5200 Zoom
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|
|||
Fuji FinePix S5200 Zoom Reviews
Fuji FinePix S5200 Zoom Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
For the $$$$ it is well worth it .Im a Novice and still Learning about the different setting.
Great clear pictures , I have had a few different ones,but I looked around and this was in my budget. Give it a Try,but shop around. There are so many new ones it can get confusing
- 4.0 out of 5
This is a very good camera, i also own a Kodak Z710 and i thought that was a good camera. It was not until i used this camera that i find the Kodak is the runner-up. Beautiful colour in the pictures, very easy to use, good zoom, Great movie mode. I would recommend this camera to anyone who wants a great camera for such a small price!
- 1.0 out of 5
I bought this camera to replace my s3000. I was happy at first, the options and rapidity is an improvement, shutter spedd great compared to an s3000. However, I started making tests and comparing identical pics taken with my s3000 and my s5200... I was surprised to find that in EVERY mode, my S3000 was superior. How sad, my old model was better for color, flash moode, grain, and focus. I sent it back!
- 5.0 out of 5
I am still pretty wet behind the ears when it comes to knowing all about photography but this camera makes it so simply and easy! My pictures come out so clear and beautiful!
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my second digital camera, the first one was just a learning tool; but this camera is amazing. Since I purchased the digital camera I have been spending a lot more time with nature and my creativity has increased 75%.
- 5.0 out of 5
I wanted a camera that gave me freedom to choose settings, good color rendition and RAW capability. This camera has proven itself and impressed friends. Extras like filter thread are just a small bonus. I always shoot tele with a tripod so the lack of IS doesn't worry me. Being able to shoot in very low light without flash is impressive. There is some noise but it still gives you a useable image instead of the one dimensional and intrusive flash. I tried the Canon S2 IS and am so happy I settled for the Fuji. Easy to use and I would recommend it as a step before buyiing a DSLR. I've bought a few filters for it and am really enjoying this camera..did I mention the great price?
- 5.0 out of 5
I have taken hundred of photo with this camera and am extremely pleased. I have taken photo in total darkness using the zoom and in micro and received excellent results. I doubt many other camera could have even taken these pictures. It's great for portraits, and nature photo. I love the long zoom. I took a photo of my car in normal about 1/4 mile away and could barely see my car, when I zoom it I took a photo of the license plate, I love it. It is really a great camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
I am an advanced amatuer photographer. I was looking at a Nikon D70s, but I didn't have the money for it. So, I found the Fuji s5200. I was skeptical at first, and I haven't had it long enough to fully explore everything, but the picture quality is amazing. I am an old school Canon AE-1 user, and the Fuji blows it out of the water. My only beef with this camera is that it doesnt focus well close up, other than that, wonderful!
- 5.0 out of 5
I had a FinePix 2300 that I loved but this one is even better. It had to be, of course, given that is a more modern and capable camera. Fortunately, it has bettered my expectations. The FinePix S5200 handles like an SLR, takes 55mm filters and produces crisp printed images. The "Chrome" mode offers a color saturation similar to Velvia but with improved skin tones. There are too many features to list. Only would-be-nice feature I could think of is an optical viewfinder and a smaller apertures (f/8 is a little shallow). If you haven't got yours yet go and grab one at the closest photo store!
- 5.0 out of 5
I love my Fuji 5200. It takes great pictures. I get complemented on how much better my pictures are from people who bought a higher priced camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
I am a novice at photography. This is my first digital camera with adjustable functions, and I have taken pictures that look professional. No Joke. The color is amazing, I donât even need to use editing software half of the time. I took portraits of my family outside, and I can say they are amazing. Only two problems, indoor light does not do well with this camera. Very yellow, but the flash seems to counter act with it. The other problem is that it doesn't do so well with distance photography. It looks great, but can be a tad grainy at long distances. But you can see extreme detail at about 2 inches away from the lens on close-up shots. Overall, I am very satisfied with my camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
Not much to say great camera. It took me about a day to get used to how the auto focus worked to take awesome pics, after that I haven't stopped taking breathtaking photos and I love it!
- 4.0 out of 5
I have read reviews that state their camera has grainy photos. Make sure your camera Quality is set at 4M or higher pixels. I suspect these grainy photos are because the Quality is set on low!
- 2.0 out of 5
i was a very strong fan of fuji's 5000, when i bought a z1 i found the added resolution was not useful as i shot most product shots for ebay. i sold the z1 on ebay. bought a 5200 and realized it had nearly the same brain. it also has a hard time focusing on close up shots. and does not expose properly on automatic setting, which is what i almost always use. but what made me buy a new camera was when the flash started to fire for redeye reduction (twice) when the switch wasnt even turned on for r.e.r.?? it made my slaves fire prematurely and resulted in inadequate picture quality. Im selling the 5200, already bought a kodak p880! sorry fuji, but your 3mp camera was better, much better, as well as trustworth.
kim herrick
saugatuck michigan
ebay power seller = piercove1
- 5.0 out of 5
Get great shots, especially fond of the high speed shooting mode. Lets you catch detailed pic without movement blur. Image stablizing another plus. The F button which allows access to the three most used menu functions quickley. Some indoor shots print darker than I would like, but I believe that is caused by not using the prober lighting setting.
- 3.0 out of 5
I fell in love with this camera the first time I ever saw it. So I got it for christmas... Ive had it about 7.5 months now and its been working great... amazingly for me actualy... love the scenic pics it takes HOW EVER recently... I have experienced a Focus Error [] And NOBODY has been able to help me.... Im sorry but I dont spend that much on a camera, and have it rendered useless after not even a year. I cannot take pictures on it because the Focus Error [] will nto allow me to
- 5.0 out of 5
I have been in photography for over 35 years, and still have 2 Konica SLR's that are manual. I take film, including slides, and was reluctant to buy a digital camera. About 10 years ago I had a Fujifilm point-and-shoot 35mm camera, and was impressed with their quality. When it came to going digital, I checked out Fujifilm's line of cameras. I bought the Fujifilm S5200, and am very happy with it. Even though I still use ancient technology (film), the picture quality is excellent. I would highly recommend this model.
- 2.0 out of 5
takes excellent pictures but after a trip to a hot and humid wild life sanctuary the camera stopped taking picturs due to a ccd/ccd circuit problm(confirmed by fuji authorised repair shop in mumbai.No replacement for the ccd is available so the camera is atotal waste.
- 5.0 out of 5
i love this camera
- 5.0 out of 5
I was a diehard 35 mm camera user. This camera is easy to use and takes great pictures. I like the natural light setting and the choice for manual with filters. I haven't made any pictures larger than 8 by 10 but so far it has been fantastic. For amateur and most professional pictures you don't need anything else.
- 2.0 out of 5
The S5200 has some good reviews but mine has been sent back to FujiFilm twice for focusing & color blahs. They can't seem to fix or even recognize there IS a problem. Side by side photos using both my S5000 & S5200 clearly demonstrate the S5200's poor image quality even considering the S5200's 2-megapixel advantage. I'm not a happy customer.
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this for a trip to Europe. I was amazed at how great the pictures turned out and the telephoto was excellent from the Eiffel Tower!
- 4.0 out of 5
I've tested this camera both in low light and
sunny situations,sunrise and sunsets. have printed the pictures and they all have good details.
Had also tried playing with the exposure level 'real time ' meter on manual mode taking pix on a waterfalls and it was really great.
Natural light and Anti-blur also works!!
i'm still experimenting with this camera pushing its performance as far as it can go. So far, i can say this camera is really a big performer!
- 4.0 out of 5
I have 30 years of experience in photography and have used Nikon 35mm for 20 of those years. I now shoot 35mm and medium format and will continue to do so for most critical things like weddings and portraits.
Yesterday I photographed a large event with great results. I bought the camera so that I could upload to a web site and publish newsletters. The features of this lighweight camera allow me to handle almost any lighting and photographic situation. Software installed easily. Images download without a problem. I'm considering purchasing one for home. The downside of this camera and I knew it going into it, is the fact there is no hotshoe or off camera flash capability. If it did have off camera flash I would be selling 35mm film equipment.
- 5.0 out of 5
this is a great camera hands down. my father got one as a gift from his brother and the pictures are great, even by his standards, and hes been a photography nut for years. when i came to choose a new camera i decided to get the same one, knowing it was what i was looking for at the time. When i received mine i found that every shot i took was BLURED! all the images were grainy. i first remmebered this site and how id read that this was a common problem, and it is. I quickly called fuji and told them the issue, they told me that its a fault with some of the CCD chips and that it needs to be replaced, which of couse is free. SO for anyone whos reading this thinking its a common issue with all cameras in this line, its not. its a defect thats afflicted a few cameras, so if you have the issue, just call the retialer and they will replace it free of charge.
other than the simple issue of a problem from the factory, the camera is excellent. its well build, well designed and easy to use. a great choice for the pro-sumer, not quite ready for a full blown digital SLR camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've been a user of a small pocket digital camera for a couple of years now. I've gotten to the point where I wanted something closer to 35mm quality. I did a lot of cost-to-quality comparison and when the price of the FinePix S5200 came down to a level I was willing to pay, I bought it. I have no regrets. This camera gave me the features I was looking for. I have gotten excellent results. The macro feature gets outstanding results — something I never could have done with the little 2MP pocket camera I had before. The natural light setting is really a bonus. I've never gotten that kind of image quality using a digital flash. More often than not, I wound up getting "hot spots" and picture "burnout". I know it is not "professional quality" gear, but I am just a hobbyist, anyways. For the money, I know I made the right choice.
- 5.0 out of 5
As a professional who's averse with a great many digital cameras of all descriptions, I can safely say that this model has to be the best value buck for buck on planet Earth. There's but one possible downside for enthusiasts who want something to pop into their top pocket; it's too big for that, though it's much smaller than you might imagine from viewing images of it on the Internet. The pros, in addition to the price, the picture quality is quite superb. Shutter lag - there doesn't to be any, it's faster than a speeding bullet. And the zoom is also excellent. I have not the slightest hesitation in recommending this camera to everyone.
- 1.0 out of 5
I had gotten a very low end fine pix camera about 3 years ago and was amazed at how crisp and clear the pix came out for a 150 dollar camera. So I was set on picking up another fuji for my next camera. I'm having a horible time with my s5200 and grainy pix. My old camera takes sharper pix thand the 5200 and it's only a 2 mega pixel. The options are endless on this camera, but unfourtanatly the pictures are awful, ecspecialy for the price. I'm realy disapointed in the camera and unfourtanatly am still making 2 more payments on the camera :(
- 5.0 out of 5
I've had the Fuji Finepix s5200 for a little over 3 months now and I have nothing but good things to say about it! It's a great camera for beginners and the more advance professional photographer as well. It feels great in the hand. It takes excellent pictures up to 8" x 10" with clear, sharp details all around. At night, it takes wonderful pictures in low light. If you are in the market for a good camera, I recommend this one and the price is great also. You will love this camera... I do! Wnoderful shots in auto focus and manual! Just get a good battery charger and some spare AA batteries, the AC power adapter, and a 1 GB XD Picture Card and u will be able to take over 900 shots. Buy it!
- 2.0 out of 5
What a disappointment!!!.I had a Finepix 3800 and sold it to have better camera.I feel sick to think I made such a BIG MISTAKE.The photos do not seem to be as good of quality and find the camera much hard to use.Wish I could get my old camera back.
- 5.0 out of 5
first off i would consider myself an advanced beginner in the photography ratings. still have a lot to learn but know enough to be dangerous. the fuji s5200 is a very good camera. the pictures you can take with it are of excellent quality and color.the pros: 1.many good features,2.excellent pictures,3.excellent colors in pictures,4.very fast start-up and shot-shot,5.excellent low-light capability,6.good movie pictures.7.camera feels good in hand,8.good battery life (approx. 300-350 shots),9.like the software that comes with pkg.,10.good looking camera. the cons: 1. the digital zoom is not good for pictures (although all cameras are the same)they work fairly well to crop pictures, 2.they could have made lcd screen bigger-plenty of room for 2.5", 3.the menu is rather lengthy and cumbersome to get around in. 4.manual focus is slow and awkward. 5. could use image stabilization-especially at 10X zoom. overall i am very impressed with the camera. one feature i really like is that you can attach voice messages to every picture-i think that will be nice on trips when taking lots of pictures and you can identify pictures. i thought that would eat up memory but it doesn't seem to. in the field of very competitive super-zooms i think this camera is right at the top. some would argue that it needs image stabilization-which would add a nice feature- but the low light capability of this camera leaves the rest of the field in the dust. i would recommend this camera to beginners all the way up to advanced intermediate. sorry this review is so lengthy but with so many features on this camera you could go on and on.
- 4.0 out of 5
First off let me warn everyone out there WAWADIGITAL.COM IS A SCAM The good reviews are typed by them. Just do your self a favor and google search their name before ordering. They advertised the Fuji S5200 for 219.00 Then they called to ask what high priced memory and batteries we wanted. When we told him we were ok. He said the order was cancelled. I called back to ask why he said the camera is now out of stock. I said that was bait and switch and was gonna report to the Better Business Bureau He said and I quote "DON'T YOU DARE YOU F'ING BASTARD I HAVE ALL YOUR INFORMATION TO RUIN YOUR CREDIT OR VISIT YOUR HOUSE YOU PIECE OF ****" I said omg no way you did nt just threaten me like that. He said I don't give a shit just try to make a complaint your not the first one. PLEASSEEEEEEEEEE check history on this company before dealing with them.
OK now for the good news I dealt with a company called http://www.bhphotovideo.com B 7 H PHOTO In NYC I have no connection with this company at all I have done business with them twice and have had nothing but great dealings. I got the Fuji S5200 from them for 239.00 after a 50.00 rebate. Great camera no problems with B & H
- 4.0 out of 5
The photo quality is excellent, but dont know how to have date/time stamp on the photos. the memory card too small, but overall good camra.. the 10 x zoom is excellent...its simply great.. and a proud owner of one.
- 5.0 out of 5
Takes great pictures,wonderful camera
- 1.0 out of 5
jpeg compression to high, very bad pictures, no details in picture, no answer/help from Fuji-support. I will never bye another Fuji product!
- 4.0 out of 5
See/ref: BEST DEAL review. The reviewer bought his/her camera from WAWADIGITAL.COM and got a good deal. After I read the review, I did the same. I purchased this camera from that website, and received an e-mail to call them to confirm the order. The website said the camera is in stock. When I called them the next day, I got the RUDEST salesman on the phone. The person has no phone personality, which I can accept. When I gave him the order number. He said: "the order is canceled" with no explanation. So I asked why. He said: "the camera is sold out" and hang up. That is the total number of words spoken to me in a sarcastic tone. I wasted time and energy, and disappointed.
- 1.0 out of 5
Have had the camera for just 7 weeks. Great at first. Now suddenly the CCD has failed. Now pictures are completely obscured by green and purple lines. This is exactly what is reported in consumer reviews of the F700 on Digital Camera HQ. I note that there has been a service advisory from Fujifilm about a CCD problem with the F700 (and also with the A303, F410 and S2 Pro). I understand Sony, Canon, Nikon, Konica-Minolta and other manufacturers have made similar advisories about cameras of theirs which apparently share the same CCD defect. Luckily, mine has failed within the 12 month warranty period. However, I read that others have had the problem occur after two years. Fuji (and others) appear to be fixing the problem for free even outside the warranty period. I imagine this may need to extend to other models including the S5200/5600. Others please report similar experiences.
- 5.0 out of 5
just got mine and love it but wanted to point out that price wise I got the best deal I could find at wawadigital.com started out on ebay at $319.00 and ended up with wawa at $230.00. Love the camera and the price!
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my first digital camera, and I purchased it based on the reviews that say it has little delay between shots. So far I have been very impressed with ease of use, functionality, and picture quality. Overall I would recommend this camera to anyone.
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera. I am a college photographer and this camera has been taking great pictures. I haven't had any unhappy customers yet. I love the multiple settings for the camera and all its features. For this price range, I think this is the best camera for anyone who is getting into serious photography.
- 5.0 out of 5
Just purchased it yesterday. and It feels great. Excellent as an intermediate camera. Compared to the Canon IS2 this is a run away, that Canon is way too much overpriced. for that price you might as well get the Finepix S9000
- 5.0 out of 5
I have only had the camera for a few days but I am very impressed. I took pics of a small waterfall inside a Embassy Suits. The pic was so clear and detailed that you can see the dozens of water drops. NO LIE!!!!! This is a awesome camera. I have gotten my money's worth already!
- 4.0 out of 5
So far I have enjoyed using this camera a great deal. Speed of autofocus and very short shutter lag are two strong points. Camera has a nice overall feel. Most controls and function buttons are easily operated and are easily accessible but a few that require combinations of buttons to be pushed simultaneously can be a little awkward for big hands. So far th S5200 has produced very nice quality prints at 8x10 and even larger. I would like to see a manual zoom instead of electronic zoom buttons. Focusing with the toggle buttons in the manual mode is awkward and slow. Pop up flash is ok but the option for an off camera flash for more flash power should be included. The electronic viewfinder is not bad but an optical viewfinder would be a huge improvement.
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought the S5200 because I got tired of other cameras having a background so dark you couldn't see anything in it, especially with a flash. The S5200 does great on this - I've taken pictures outdoors at night and the background is clearly visible. Same for indoor pictures with a flash. The RP makes a huge difference. As for everything else, I think it's about the same as any other camera in it's class.
- 5.0 out of 5
Quite the camera - great looks, fantastic pictures, and lots of manual options. I've had it for a week now and can't put it down. The long 10X lens is great, little noticeable purple fringing or distortion, but don't rely on the Anti-Blur mode to function like Image Stabilization - all it does is boost ISO and shutter speed. Sometimes it works pretty well, other times not at all. Luckily, I didn't throw my tripod away.
Pro's - Nice 10X zoom.
Automatic pop-up flash.
Flash throttles down well for close-up and macro shots.
High ISO capability with acceptable noise levels, even at ISO 1600 - amazing!
Very fast operation, almost no shutter lag.
Lots of manual settings for creative control.
Diopter adjustment for EVF.
Natural Light mode works very well.
Hefty, solidly built, except maybe for flimsy battery-compartment door. Feels like a real camera.
Takes excellent pictures. I've already printed up a few 8X10s that look every bit as good as 35mm.
Uses AA batteries, no need to buy a second expensive proprietary battery pack.
Records RAW files!
Very good video recording - with a big enough card, who needs a camcorder anymore?
Con's - Inscrutable Fuji control layout. You have to push two buttons at the same time to adjust EV compensation and shutter-speed, in Manual mode. You'll never figure this out unless you read the owner's manual. Zoom buttons set too close to view-finder. Why two seperate buttons for menu functions?
Tunnel-vision EVF.
LCD could be a bit bigger.
That's about it. A few small improvements and this thing would be perfect.
- 5.0 out of 5
Well, I am not a pro but I will try to write something about this camera for those who are trying to decide if they will buy it or not...
I bought this camera after analysing the reviews of S5200's antecesors; S5000 and S5100.
Both were top sellers and every one (or almost) liked their performance. I also analysed if it was better to buy the strong competitor Canon S1 IS. For my need I chose to buy one of the Fujis.
After reading some reviews about the S5000, some complaining and seeing that the complaining was much less on the Fuji S5100, I decided that the latter would be a great idea had not I done more research. I saw that the few complainings on S5100 would not (probably) be in its up-graded version (S5200) and some nice features would be included, too.
In the site of Fuji I saw that S5200 would come with their newest kinda sensor (5th generation). Also it would come with Anti-blur (comparable to Canon's Image Stabilizer) and with the Real Photo Tecnology.
Despite having it only for one week now, I have to say that I am very satisfied with the camera. It was a bit expensive but worth every Yen (I am in Japan, the first place where it had its premiere). I took some shots at night with surprising results, such as those Fuji promissed in their homepage. The Real Photo Tec is really good; instead of a dark and impenetrable background in night shots, you can have a vision of how the party was like. If you know how to use the camera, you can even get many details that I doubt you would ever get with another camera but S5200.
The Anti-blur works fine. It is pretty good to take telephoto shots without a tripod and even for moving objects.
The ISO have a reduced amount of noise even in its highest; ISO 1600. Unbelievable!
The camera is pretty simple to use and the pre-programed functions are very useful with great results. If you just wanna have it to great snapshots, that is the camera.
Even if you wanna have a special effect, after reading the manual, the camera does what you want it to. The features are very nice.
Everything in the camera was thought, rethought and usually you can have what you want in a fingerful.
Cons: I didnt like the difficulty of manual focusing and the EVF (though I dont have much experience with other digital cameras and dont know if it could get much better);
The camera could have more options of aperture.
Out of the cons, the camera is worth for a non professional like me that are begining with photography and needs some nice features.
Some people ask if buying Fuji S9000 would be a beter idea. Need you more pixels, are you a professional (or at least know what White Balance, Aperture, Shutter Speed, ISO, Metering are and what they work for) and have more money to spend, then I would say that it be nice. Otherwise, if you are like me and just wanna practise with a good digital camera that many people will envy for its qualities, then you dont ever need to think about another camera.
I may not here be able to say how good Fuji S5200 is but I really love it and would not change it.
- 5.0 out of 5
the result of this camera is really nice.... i like it very much,... at present i have not any camera because of financial problem, but i bet when i buy camera i bought Fuji FinePix S5200 ..
Really it is a finest camera in reliable price...
really i say it by heart....
i like very much.... really
- 5.0 out of 5
Got the S5100 a month ago and took fantastic pictures all over Europe, particularly in low light situations in cathedrals and museums where flash use in not allowed. I am an advanced amateur photographer and found the features perfect for me yet it worked great as a point and shoot when less skilled family members and stangers took our pics on request. Super camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
This unit is very compact, but not to small. This camera, is best suited for someone who has a little SLR knowledge. It takes a little getting use to, but if you read the manual and play with it, its really not that hard. The zoom x10 is a great feature, but it does need a tripod. The cd that comes with the camera is a great idea, and it will fix some of the bloopers you make. You will need at minimum 125mb card, but all up it is a fun camera.

Fuji FinePix S5200 Zoom Comments & Questions (write your own!)
The budget is around $1000 and the preference is a fixed lens SLR type.
Wow -- excellent specs, James!
The world has changed a lot since those Sony Mavica cameras -- I remember ones that wrote to floppy disks, and then they made ones that write to Cd's. Neat idea, but these days pretty outmoded :-) And the good news is that today you'll probably have to pay only about 1/2 of your $1000 budget to get a good camera.
It sounds to me like you would want something more than a compact model. Almost any of the mid-priced cameras we list on DigitalAdvisor will meet your specifications for detail and color, and almost all will "just work" if you use their USB connection to a computer running Windows XP or recent Mac software.
But I think there's a trade-off between ease of use and the requirement to photograph documents and components. The issue here is lighting: smaller cameras, especially the really small ones tend to have underpowered flashes. Also, having a flash that is a few inches away from the camera lens can help a little, but almost all on-camera flashes result in flat looking photos. You may have noticed that wedding and other pro photographers have flashes mounted off to the side of the camera -- this allow the flash to cast a little shadow which tends to bring out shapes and contours.
The other issue is the close-ups of documents and parts. These need light, and on-camera flashes also tend to be bad in close-up situations because they either over-light and/or light unevenly.
In all these cases, a long zoom lens will help. For the close-up shots, the camera does not have to be so close, which gives the flash a chance to spread out evenly. In these cases, I strongly recommend a tripod which will ensure you get sharp images (and make sure the camera you choose has a tripod mount).
For the lighting issues, a zoom will help a little, as well. But you may find that many problems can be solved by buying an external flash that mount on a "hot shoe" on the camera. Flashes that tilt and swivel can allow you to bounce light off walls, or ceilings, or even a piece of white cardboard to dramatically improve the look of pictures. External flashes are no harder to use than built-in flashes and all cameras have built-in flashes for normal use.
So some suggestions:
<ul>
<li>
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Panasonic DMC FZ30</a> is well regarded, but maybe not so easy to use. I like this choice because it has nice optics, gets good reviews, and has a hot shoe for mounting a flash if you decide to later.
</li>
<li>
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Kodak EasyShare Z612</a> is part of Kodak's very well regarded EasyShare line -- they have done a lot of work to make it easy to get good pictures and to get them onto the computer. This camera does not have a hot shoe, but has a pop-up flash which can help with the lighting issues I mentioned. Also consider the just released update to this, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Kodak EasyShare P712</a> which does have the hot shoe.
</li>
<li>
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Fuji S5200</a> is a little less expensive and has a pop-up flash.
</li>
<li>
And I think I would be remiss to exclude the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon S3 IS</a> <i>except that people don't seem to be happy with it at all!</i>. The S2 was one of the first long zooms that had image stabilization and got raves -- the S3 is getting panned!
</li>
</ul>
I hope these ideas get you headed in the right direction!
Tom
The Kodak V603 is a little more money, but in reading user reviews, people have been generally happier with Kodak digital cameras than the Nikon point-and-shoots. Nikon is a world leader in photography, but they seen to have missed the consumer market. Neither of these is a stellar camera, though.
For about the same money, you might want to consider either the
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon PowerShot A540</a>, or the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Panasonic DMC FX01</a>. Another option is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon SD600</a>. The Panasonic cameras are getting lots of good reviews; Canon also generally does a good job.
Regarding shooting documents: you should consider a camera with image stabilization and a decent zoom (4x or better), and ideally a small tabletop tripod. It's important to get sharp pictures, and because you'll almost always be using flash, it's good to be able to step a few feet away from the page and then zoom in -- this lets the flash more evenly light the paper. All of these are small and capable cameras. If you want to consider another option, look at the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Fuji S5200</a> which has a pop-up flash, which might help. It's a bit bigger, but well rated.
Hope this helps!
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The H5 seems superior, specs-wise, to the S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
That said, I think you'll find that you can get them for cheaper than you think. Click the links I posted above and you'll see.
I mean that is, what we say, earth and sky...
The difference is soooo big that i wouldn't waste words for Fuji 5600 !!!!!
H5 DEFINITELY !!!
If You have money for it...
I am looking forward for some fine snaps. But IT IS TOO MUCH batery hungery!
Thank you
Ann
Digital HQ has a great breakdown for each here:
Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
FujiFilm FinePix S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Buyer's Guides ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are great ideas as well as they can help with comparison.
Nikon Coolpix S1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (up to 20 seconds of voice recording per image)
<a href="usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... Powershot S330</a> (60 seconds per image)
Fuji Finepix S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (30 seconds per image)
That's really just a sampling of what's out there, but that gives you some decent cameras with which to start your search.
You might try the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Fuji S5200 Zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both have the 5 megapixel (+) quality of the Panasonic LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) but have the viewfinder as well. Both are slightly more expensive though.
Andrew
Really it depends on what features appeal to you most. Keep in mind that the Fuji lacks image stabilization. They claim that their "Anti Blur" is superior to OIS, but it isn't- at least not from the examples I've seen. So if image shake is a problem I'd lean towards the Kodaks. On the other hand, the Kodak Z740 gives out some VERY saturated color. Some things (like indoor low light) look fantastic but some users find its outdoor portraitry a little overwhelming, so you might need to tone down its color balance in order to get realistic colors.
Hope I haven't confused you terribly with all these pros and cons. As you can see it's best to decide what matters most to you and buy accordingly.
This lens does not retract when you turn it off. You do need to utilize a lens cap when not in use as well.
Andrew
Bill
If it's in Record mode and you're seeing this on your screen, it's definitely a problem and if you just got it I would call Fuji. Sorry I don't have a more detailed answer.
Good luck!
In general manufacturers give their models a name, and then assign a part number that uniquely identifies each distinct item that can be sold. When there are variants of a product, each variant may get a different part number -- for example, color differences, or packaging for sale in different countries where power cords or languages are different. How this is done is far from standard or consistent.
So I think multiple MPN's means nothing.
This is a good size to get too. Excellent price. I am not sure if you can use H-style card which stands for high speed.
This camera does have a macro function attached to it. You should not get closer than approximately 0.1 meters (0.3 feet) to 2 meters (6.6 feet). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
@ 320=14.6 min
Any suggestions?
The SanDisk 2gb xD picture card is indeed compatible with the S5200. You shouldn't have any issues. Good luck!
Sorry... sorta new at this.
Don't be sorry, it's not a problem and memory cards can be very confusing. It is a problem, however, that the box says SD memory. SD = Secure Digital, which is one of several types of storage media for digital cameras. Others include xD, CompactFlash, and Sony's Memory Sticks. This page ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memor... ) will give you a quick look at the differences between the formats and a picture of all of them side by side, so you know what you're looking for.
Your camera takes xD cards, so you'll need to return the SanDisk SD card you have and look for a similar one in xD format.
It looks like your question got cut off, but based on the number of questions I've gotten on this topic, I'm going to guess that the three you were going to mention were the Panasonic FZ7, the Canon S3 IS, and the Sony H5. I suppose the FZ50 might sneak in there, or maybe a wildcard Olympus or Kodak, but these are essentially the big competitors.
And, honestly, they're all very good cameras. Each has its little quirks, and one might have a slight edge over the others in one performance category (the H5 has the highest resolution, for example), but really they're all pretty comparable.
Can you give me a more specific set of criteria for what you're looking for in your camera (and tell me if I'm right or wrong on my guesses--hah)? If you don't have any more exact wants/needs, my best recommendation is to go to your closest retailer (Best Buy is a good bet) and try each model out in your hands. It's usually the best way to figure out for sure which model is right for you. Good luck!
Actually the three i'm looking at are the fuji s5200, kodak z612 and the FZ7. The most important feature is picture quality. Obviously, by my choices, I want an extened zoom.
Ease of use and the ability to take action pics would also be nice. I appeciate any advice or other suggestion for cameras in the same price range.
thanks again
Okay, let's see... this is still difficult. All are extremely well-rated by pro reviewers and users alike. The FZ7 has the most "cred" by far, sharing its bloodline with its much-loved big brothers FZ30 and FZ50. It's even got a perfect 5-star rating over at Amazon after 37 reviews. But the other two have over 4.5 star ratings themselves.
On a tech level, they're all very comparable. The S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) loses the most here as it has the fewest megapixels (by one), the smallest zoom (by 2x), and the smallest LCD (by 0.7"). Perhaps most importantly, it lacks optical image stabilization (which the other two feature), which means that at the long end of the zoom it's going to be very difficult to get clear shots without resorting to a tripod.
My personal instinct is to go with the FZ7, but honestly you should try to get your hands on both it and the Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) before making a purchase. Both cameras will give you great shots and both are easy to use, so ultimately it'll be the way the camera feels in your hand that will seal the deal. I'd also recommend giving the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a look. They both stack up well against these two, in terms of both features and price. Good luck!
I will try to get hands all of them.
This is a simple mistake that a lot of people make: 5 megapixels is no the same as 5 megabytes. 2.5mb is a perfectly reasonable size for a 5MP image. The size of your image files will actually fluctuate based on how complex the image is (how much data the camera has to store), but they'll generally be somewhere around that 2.5mb mark.
Of course, someone will probably have the opposite opinion and more mixed recommendations for you, but I think the Canon wins on paper (megapixels & zoom) and the performance backs that up. My two cents.
Yes, it is. You shouldn't have any problems.
Good luck!
I'm not sure what you really mean by 'the ccd chip in this camera needed to be changed in many cases'. Normally if you buy this camera, you won't need to change the chip.Honestly, I can't imagine this was said by the other sites!!!
I have been using this camera for 7 months now and I have NOT encountered any problem at all.
This is a very good camera.
Once a device is released, it typically doesn't undergo much of a hardware transformation during its life cycle. There are of course some exceptions--there have been something like six revisions of the original xbox--but cameras seem to be pretty static once they hit the market. The only significant change most manufacturers make is in terms of the cameras' firmware--the onboard software that dictates how the camera behaves--but new firmware revisions can typically be downloaded from the manufacturer's site and flashed to the camera via a memory card.
On top of that, I don't know of any way to find out from vendors which batch a camera is from. The only instance of something similar that I've heard of involved newegg.com letting customers know which production batch their blank DVD-Rs came from (as some batches were higher quality than others). This doesn't seem to be the case with cameras. You might try contacting the store you'd like to buy from, though, to see if they can tell you.
Good luck!
It may work, but since the S5200 isn't on the chart, I'd contact tech support to verify.
Andrew
The settings you use will depend on a lot of things. Can you be a little more detailed about what you are shooting? Do you mean 32x40 inches? Also, where will you be shooting it- are you indoors, outdoors, etc? And finally, do you have a camera already and if so, which one is it?
I also take photos of my art. I have found the best solution for me is to go on the front porch (which has a concrete floor) and lay the art on the concrete. The daylight pours all over the art, and I just stand above, and snap. I just let the camera do it's job on automatic (I keep the flash turned off)
Richio
Not sure why they stated that this digital zoom is more effective; in my opinion the 10x optical zoom is what sells this particular camera.
Sorry I didn't get to reply to your original thread in time...
I was going to type up another extensive list of differences, but I tried google and it turns out the job's already done for me. This message board thread ( stevesforums.com/forums/vie... ) includes an extensive discussion of the pros and cons of these two cameras, and should help you out immensely.
Good luck!
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is, I think, a better deal. Ben just linked to a thread that says everything I would have said here, so I will just add to his answer and say that I think the biggest advantage of the S6000 is the larger sensor- although it only has one more megapixel than the S5200, that larger sensor really does result in better image quality. The high ISO numbers are also helpful especially when using the zoom, although you will experience some graininess it's still nice to know you can shoot under almost any lighting conditions and get some sort of usable result. I think the extra control allowed by the S6000 makes it worth the price difference.
After I purchase the camera I may need your help again.
Do any of you know how reliable Buydig.com and ShopUSA.com are? They both have better prices than anyone else. Please let me know.
Thanks!
I used Buydig to buy my Canon A60 ages ago. They were good to me then, but I've heard that they often use the old call-to-confirm-order trick, wherein they give you the hard sell for accessories and whatnot. If you're good at telling people no when they try to sell you things you don't need, they might work out for you. ShopUSA.com is a new one to me, but a) they seem to be dedicated to shipping FROM the US TO northern Europe, so unless you're living in northern Europe they're probably not the site for you.
Good luck!
josephlancaster.com
All shots prior to the dounut hole are shot with my new SD630, the dounut and after where shot with the fuji.
There are many cameras these days that match or exceed the specs of the HP 945. The Fuji S5200 you've selected above is one of them. Others include the Canon S3 IS, the Sony H5, the Panasonic FZ50, and the Kodak P712.
The Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6MP camera with a 12x optically-stabilized zoom. It features a nice flip-out & swivel LCD screen, a great macro mode (can focus on things actually touching the lens), and an absolutely beautiful video mode, along with signature smooth and accurate Canon picture quality. It uses AA batteries, which means you can use rechargeable AA NiMHs.
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7MP camera with a 12x optically-stabilized zoom. Its LCD is fixed, but also huge and of great resolution (3" at 230,000px). Like the Canon, it uses AA batteries (though only 2, where the Canon uses 4). It uses Sony's proprietary memory stick, which might be a turnoff to some.
The Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 10MP camera with a 12x optically-stabilized zoom. It's the only one of these cameras to use a 1/1.8" CCD sensor, though it needs the extra space for all those pixels (the others use a 1/2.5" sensor). It has the feel that's closest to a SLR, and size and weight to match, about 8oz heavier than the next closest. Like most Panasonics, it has issues with excessive image noise in low light, but in good conditions it can produce amazing images. It uses a proprietary lithium ion battery pack.
The Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is nearly identical in its specs to the Sony H5. Users seem to love it, and it's the smallest and lightest of the cameras here. It has a very ergonomic design, and trademark Kodak ease of use. Like all of the cameras here, it's capable of producing very, very good pictures. Like the Panasonic, this camera uses a proprietary battery pack.
You can get a full rundown of these cameras' specs side by side here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
There's really no clear recommendation between these cameras. I personally love my Canon S2 IS and would recommend the S3 IS based on that alone, but the truth is that all four of these models are very comparable. I'd recommend going to your local mega-electronics store and trying as many of these as possible in your hands.
Good luck!
I did as you suggested and visited one of our mega-stores prior to posting my question...I intend on returning with your specific suggestions and trying both the Panasonic and Kodak. I tried the other two on my first visit. One thing I noticed right off was the smaller physical size than my HP. I am a man with man hands and both the Cannon and Sony you mention above felt like little toy cameras. Navigating between all the dinky little buttons and controls felt a bit awkward, a condition I suppose I could eventually learn to live with.
Can you shed any light on the Pentax K100D? I haven't found one yet to try it on for size-n-feel but all the other published characteristics seem to fit what I'm looking for.
Thanks again for you help.
The K100D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a very good camera--probably the best value-oriented entry-level SLR out these days (along with the K110D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is exactly the same minus the in-camera image stabilization). Being an SLR, you'll be able to buy additional lenses for it, as well as external flashes and other accessories that (with a few exceptions) you couldn't use with the above cameras. The down side is, of course, price. The camera itself is more expensive than the cameras above, and then you factor in the price of additional lenses (the kit lens is good, but you'll eventually want to upgrade) and it's much, much more expensive.
Any dSLR will outclass any non-SLR digital in terms of image quality--it's just a question of how much you want to spend to get that quality.
(You might also want to check out the Nikon D50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which should be in a similar price range with the K100D.)
Hope this helps.
To stop action, flash and a good fast shutter speed are going to be needed. Without flash, 1/500th of a second and quicker is required to freeze frame and that (at night) is going to be hard (if not impossible to get without flash or lots of ambient light).
If you don't mind blurring, you can shoot slower shutter speeds.
The S5200 can increase the ISO sensitivity to help attain that shutter speed. You can increase the ISO up to 1600, but I will warn you, each increase in ISO sensitivity will mean more noise in the image (less image quality). 1600 is going to be fairly noisy to unusable..
The zoom on the S5200 is 10X, but the on-camera flash isn't going to work too hot at the full zoom range. An external or larger flash would be recommended if you are zooming out..
Keep in mind however, that action photos taken with flash might be prohibited in some sports events.
The S5200 also has image stabilization features that will help you in lower light shots where you have to zoom out to capture the action.
From this PDF file, you need to make sure that you have the correct sequencing chosen on the camera. Review this .pdf and try a few variations of the setting to see if this corrects the situation.
fujifilm.com/products/digit...
Go to Page 50 & 51 of the PDF to make sure the setting is in Long Period, and then turn to Page 39 of the .pdf and verify that the setting you have chosen actually works in that mode because it appears that the camera only accepts that mode in AUTO or Portrait.
To do this, look at the top of the camera.
Set the mode dial to 'Auto'
Turn the camera on to picture taking mode.
Press the ' Continuous mode ' button below it .
While the button is down, use the *right or left arrow to select ' Long Period Continuous Shooting '
Release the continous mode button.
* the arrow buttons are located beside the LCD screen.
PLEASE HELP ME CUZ im gettin confused with all this stuff
and i really need to learn this sequence shot or continuous shooting
mode cuz i think i just f-n wasted my money!
This is all that Fuji offers to help ( not much actually )
search.fujifilm.co.jp/suppo...
I've also noticed that the PDF file I linked to has been yanked from Fujifilm's site, that's great for customer relations !!
We tried to help.
fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/ep...
Here's where they proclaim it will need to be in Long Period Mode:
Continuous Shooting Modes
1. Top-3 (max. 2 frames/sec., up to 3 frames,
2. Final-3 (max. 2 frames/sec., up to 3 frames ),
3. Long-period ( max. 0.9 frames/sec., up to 40 frames),
4. Auto bracketing (2 frames/sec., 3 frames @ +-1/3 EV, +-2/3EV, +-1EV)
Here's the quickstart guide:
fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/ep...
Here the Support & Contact page:
fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/ep...
...so I have to ask, Do you have a big enough card to hold the sequenced images?
the continous shot only saves the 3 pix
i need it to save all of them
till i let go of shutter button
and the frames per second
should be like 2frames per second
for a long period of time
You need to have the camera in LONG PERIOD to save or capture more than 3 images of the sequence.
but it will take a picture after like .9 seconds :(
i need it to be quickerr mannnn :(
If you have been using Auto white balance and getting wrong colors, you may need to re-set the white balance manually.
For further reading on the subject, you will probably find some useful tips from the following article :
Indoor close ups technique
ephotozine.com/techniques/v...
forums.dpreview.com/forums/...
Hope it helps.
At the very least, make sure you are using Alkalines.
Should I take it to a camera shop, or is it a lost cause? :(
Thanks in advance.
Reader Chris writes in to say:
There's a grain of truth (punny, huh?) to this in that rice quickly sucks up the surrounding moisture. Make sure the environment is free from excess humidity, drop the wet device in a container of rice and let it sit. For a better desiccant, it'd be a good idea to store all those little silica gel packets that come in anything from shoe boxes to moisture-sensitive gadgets.
What do you have to lose?
I took the back off and looked for corrosion.. I found a battery ( small like a hearing aid battery ) corroded. I took it out, cleaned all around it. Can or should I get another battery. That is the only place I found corrosion.
Thanks again for your help.
Thanks again for all your help!
Thanks so much!! :)
That's my 2 cents.
Any recommendations for the best/longest lasting power sources?
But in particular, Fuji recommends NiMH batteries that can be recharged and are AA size. They'll easily last twice as long as alkalines and can be recharged over 1000 times (rated).