Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Fuji FinePix S6000fd
Editor's Review
It looks like an SLR, but it isn't. The Fuji Finepix S6000 is a great, inexpensive alternative that would be more accurately described as an 'extended zoom' camera. The 10.7x wide-angle optical zoom is pretty great, and owners are nearly unanimous in their praise for this wonderful long-range zoom shooter.
Specifications
- 6 megapixels
- 10.7x optical zoom / 2x digital zoom
- JPEG and RAW file formats
- Auto and manual focus
- Auto and manual exposure
- ISO 100-3200
- Movie mode with sound
- xD-Picture Card storage (10MB internal memory)
- 2.5-inch LCD
- 4 AA Batteries
- Part Number: 15651024
- UPC: 074101471090
- Release Date: Aug 04, 2006
Shop for S6000fd Accessories
Fuji FinePix S6000fd Comments & Questions (write your own!)
What book or how-to video is available for dslr-like cameras? TKS!
Leslie
Derek Story has a great handbook by O’Reilly called Digital Photography Companion.
Some places to visit include Tips from the Top Floor ( tfttf.com ) and Short Courses in Digital Photography ( shortcourses.com/ ).
But I'd also look at your local community colleges, which offer great photo 101 and digital photography courses which will teach you how to get the most out of your camera and images. Can't be beat.
Otherwise, the only suggestion I can come up with is to try a Canon camera with the My Colors option. Be sure to try the camera out to see if it does what you need. What you are looking for is the Darker/Lighter Skin Tones setting under My Colors (Color Accent on some cameras). Some Canons only have a subset of these My Colors settings so be sure to check carefully to get the Skin Tones option. I'm sorry I have not been able to come up with a list of which cameras have this, so you'll either have to look camera by camera on the Canon website (www.canonusa.com) or go to a camera store which sells Canons and has good sales persons.
Don't use a stark white or really bright/reflective color as a background, the high contrast might cause problems.
and, don't use too dark a background either, it might cause a problem with not enough contrast.
Soft non-reflective mid-tones have worked best for me.
-under $350
-takes wonderful pictures in low lighting (concerts, formals, etc.)
-SD memory card, no other kind of storage
-very fast start up time and able to take pictures immediately
-a long zoom (6x or more)
-image stabilization
-wide angle lens would be nice
-uses AA batteries (although that's NOT a necessity)
-be able to record movies with sound
-6 megapixels or more
-some manual controls so I can experiment
-size of body doesn't matter, probably no ultra-compact, prefer more "chunky" style, but really just looking for the best camera so if the best one is ultra-compact, then that's just fine
I have been looking at the models listed in my question. What one would be best considering my specifics??
Thank you in advance to everyone who can give me some recommendations. I appreciate your time to help me out! Have a wonderful day!
I would personally go with a camera with image stabilization because you need it to work well in low light situations. If it is going to be really dark, I would also recommend getting a monopod or tripod to stabilize the camera even more. If a camera has a higher ISO setting, that would also help in lower light situations. Of the cameras you have listed, I would choose the Panasonic FZ8 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Its longer optical zoom (12x) and ISO 3200 capabilities would fit best for your needs. The 7.2MP resolution will get you great photos up to 8x10 and even larger at the finest resolution settings. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
The Fuji S6000fd ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) drops you down to 6 megapixel resolution, while the Fuji S8000fd ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) bumps you up to 8MP and boasts a 18x optical zoom both with ISO 3200 capabilities. This camera also has image stabilization. If it is in your budget, the Fuji S8000fd ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be the way to go.
Andrew
The S8000 features a full-resolution ISO equivalency of ISO 1600...this is rare and outstanding feature for this level digital camera, it can also reach ISO 3200 and ISO 6400 if you use 50% resolution settings, also rare for a digital camera at this level. The S6000 does reach ISO of 3200
The S8000 does have a very impresive contiuous shooting modes...you can shoot up to an AMAZING 15 frames per second (at 2M pixels or lower) So...you will get the IS as well as high continuous shot bursts.
The down sides are that it doesn't shoot RAW format and it has the power zoom, but if you can do without those then it is a better choice from what info you have given me!!
Good luck...and you might want to check out the newer version, the S6500! I hope that this helps you make your decision.
The S8000 features a full-resolution ISO equivalency of ISO 1600...this is rare and outstanding feature for this level digital camera, it can also reach ISO 3200 and ISO 6400 if you use 50% resolution settings, also rare for a digital camera at this level. The S6000 does reach ISO of 3200
The S8000 does have a very impressive continuous shooting modes...you can shoot up to an AMAZING 15 frames per second (at 2M pixels or lower) So...you will get the IS as well as high continuous shot bursts.
The down sides are that it doesn't shoot RAW format and it has the power zoom, but if you can do without those then it is a better choice from what info you have given me!!
Good luck...and you might want to check out the newer version, the S6500! I hope that this helps you make your decision.
S6000 Pros
--------------
The Image quality is superb, just like DSLR.
The Body, Lens and overall build quality is Very good. Feels like a DSLR camera.
Very good Lowlight pics. Almost no noise until ISO 400.
Manual Zoom.
Can shoot in RAW.
6 Mega pixel on Super CCD 1/1.7 inch. (Bigger Super CCD)
Low Noise
S6000 Cons
---------------
No IS.
Zoom is limited to 10.7x
Images shot in Macro is not that great.
S8000 Pros
--------------
18x zoom
Images shot in Macro is superb
Double IS.
S8000 Cons
---------------
Pic Quality is Good not superb
Lot of noise in Lowlight.
Cannot use Pics shot above ISO 400, horrible quality.
Noticeable noise in Shaded areas of outdoor pics.
Camera Body build quality is very cheap plastic.
Lens cover is Flimsy
Battery compartment door is horrible, feels like it will break any time.
Horrible purple fringes.
8 Mega pixel crammed into small 1/2.35 CCD. (Small Normal CCD)
No Raw option.
DO NOT USE AUTO mode in S8000 always stick to P/A/S mode.
If you stick to lot of shooting in home and stay in Wide area of zoom S6000 is the best for you.
If you shot pics in daylight, stay in Tele Zoom area and do not view 100% zoom in computer monitor then S8000 is best.
Choose which is best based on your need.
I prefer S6000 over S8000, since I take lot of indoor pics.
But allow me to make an pitch for using several cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like "F-Recovery" to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one large one when several smaller ones can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
Both type H and type M are high capacity cards with Type H being more superior.
For speed recording, such as required in movie clips, you would go for type H because type H writes at a speed 2 to 3 times faster than type M.
So the best memory cards to use for Fuji S6000fd will be type H xD cards.
The only thing wrong I see with this camera is no optical image stabilization and a 3-shot continuous limit. Other than that, this camera will shoot great pictures, sharp and clear. And if you shoot in RAW mode, you can post-process afterward, making pictures that much better. I think this would be a good choice for not only extreme sports, but for casual shooting as well.
Push-pull used to be very popular at one time. It is fast and gives reporters more ' muscles ' to do their jobs. When digital age sets in, there is some worries that the push pull action sucks air into the camera and cause dust problems, although there are many who are not convinced.
You can read more discussions on push-pull zoom lens at<a href="photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fe... location</a> as well as an article on Canon FD Zoom 70-200mm at <a href="mir.com.my/rb/photography/c... location</a>
The S6000, S6000fd and S6500fd are all the same camera. Like many camera manufacturers, Fuji uses different naming schemes for different regions of the world. In the US the camera is known as the S6000fd (or just S6000, if the retailer/reviewer is lazy. Elsewhere it's the S6500fd.
Hope this helps!
That said, you do raise a good point as to what the "fd" indicates.
This site is very detailed in testing and reviewing cameras, I highly recommend visiting it and reading the reviews prior to purchasing. I have no association with the site and actually just stumbled onto it while doing research.
But just to clarify, my original reply is not wrong: the S6000, S6000fd and S6500fd are all the same camera. There is no S6000/S6500 without face detection technology. It's just a matter of which name the retailer/reviewer chooses to use.
se la vie say the old folks it goes to show you never can tell.
My solution is to use rechargeable NiMh batteries, and use lithiums as a backup, in case the rechargeables go while out shooting photos.
Now, if you are concern about your rechargeable batteries getting discharged when not used, there is a new generation of Batteries called ENELOOP which are designed to hold their charge for long time. You even don't need to charge them before the first use. They are made by Sanyo, cost the same as Nimh and are getting very good reviews. This is the site where you can find more:
eneloopusa.com/home.html
I am looking at a camera with atleast 7 MP and 6x Optical zoom...
The S6000 is threaded for 58mm filters, so you can theoretically use any IR filter with that diameter on yours. For example... ( amazon.com/Hoya-58mm-RM-72-... )
Since the S6000 is a digital camera, you don't have to worry about film--the image you get when you transfer it to your PC is what you get. It's all between the filter, the lens, and the camera's sensor.
Good luck!
shutter and shot to shot time (trying to capture an always moving 2 year old) and a longer zoom (for climbing and snowboarding shots). Anyone have any thoughts? We're pretty much point and shoot people who would like to learn and do more.
You may have made your choice already but here's my choice between the <A HREF="dpreview.com/reviews/compar... cameras</A> you mention.
I would go for the Sony H5 and the main reason being it has IS (image stabilisation) whereas the Fuji doesn't. This is really important for image quality especially at longer zoom lengths. It also has a larger sensor than the Fuji, which is so important for image quality.
The only thing is that it's maximum shutter speed is 1/1000th of a second compared to Fuji's 1/4000th of a second, which is a big difference although 1/1000 should be fast enough to capture your 2 year old.
Overall though, I think the H5 would deliver everything you need and it has a nice big 3 inch LCD for composing and playing back shots.
Hope this helps,
Mark
For Nina's requirements the H5 might be better only because it has better burst mode (7 shots Vs. 3) and longer zoom. Now, In the Burst mode area the Canon S3 will do better and for zoom range it will offer the same, but if is desired a camera with better image quality, better High ISO for stopping motion and for low light, better for learning photography and a good wide angle, the S6000fd is the one.
Thanks
It has RAW, manual controls and wide angle lens. Those features make the camera pretty universal and very flexible for you to practice all kind of different techniques.
the S6000 has several features that make this camera suitable for almost any type of picture taking. The features are: wide angle lens, super zoom, manual focus and RAW file format. So it is more lika an SLR type of camera. Of course, you will need to have much more knowledge in photography in order to use those extra features.
The 31fd is a simple point and shoot camera for general picture taking in good light conditions. So if you shoot mainly outdoors and don't want to spend time getting more deeply involved in photography, then the 31fd may be a good option as well.
How about this one from Kodak :
12X SCHNEIDER-KREUZNACH VARIOGON Optical Zoom Lens
Optical image stabilization
7.1 megapixels
Best-in-class* click-to-capture speed (0.26 sec.)
High ISO mode
High resolution 2.5 in. (6.4 cm) color display
It refers to Kodak EasyShare Z712is and sells for $299.95, just within your budget.
With that price range, your best bet is to move away from the Kodak line. You might try looking at the Fuji S6000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (on Amazon.com for $278.99 ( amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN... )). You can set it up to ISO3200, which makes it better in low light situations, and it boasts a 10.7x optical zoom, so you can zoom closer to the action.
If you need to have a Kodak, try the Kodak Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has more optical zoom at 12x, but the ISO setting only goes up to 800, so it won't let as much light into your photos. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Thanks for the help. I actually have been looking at the Kodak Z612, but haven't made a decision. I will definately check out the Fuji S6000.
Again, thanks for your help!
Kim
I think 4-5 MP is plenty for most shooters, so 6 or 9 MP is just gravy.
A few millimeters of difference at wide angle are much more significant than at telephoto. 95% of my landscape photos are between 24mm and 36mm so the wide portion of the lens is more important to me. The Fuji S9100 is the only one of the three that has a 28mm wide angle capability so it would be my choice. However, it is a large camera with many features a novice could find daunting. The S9100 has the largest sensor of your group and a large sensor means less noise at higher ISO's allowing faster shutter speeds. Both Fuji's have another advantage for photographers shooting in remote places: they use readily available AA batteries! Looking for a reliable electrical outlet to charge proprietary rechargeable batteries in the Himalayas could be a hassle. AA's are sold everywhere.
If size is a concern, I would still look for a lens with a 28mm capability and try to use the lowest ISO possible to minimize noise associated with small sensors.
I would use my DSLR but, considering your choices, I'd opt for the S9100.
The widest setting of the Canon S3 lens is 36mm (EFF) ---which admittedly is not much of a wide-angle. 24mm or 28mm would be a significant boost in the wide-angle. But (unless you are a purist)* the stitch-assist factor in the Powershots would probably be the equivalent of a super-wide angle lens, maybe 18-22mm.
All of the Canon Powershot A-series use AA batteries; I also feel that that format is quite handy.
* Some distortion of the view, although any wide-angle lens does distort anyway.
I would argue that stitch-assist is not a replacement for a good wide angle lens. It works well for a super-wide panorama but requires planning that many subjects don't allow enough time for. Requiring two exposures moves the sharpest and most distortion free area of the lens away from the center of the final photograph. The final dimension is also non-standard for photo prints or standard screens. I rarely ever use it. A true wide angle lens is indispensable for serious landscape photography.
There is a camera that may have been overlooked: the Olympus SP-550. It has IS (sensor shift), a 28-504mm f2.8 zoom, and uses AA batteries. It is also smaller than the Fuji S9100.
One suggestion would be to hold all these cameras and see how the controls suit your style of shooting. Consider the weight and feel of the camera because I find a "comfortable" camera is always with me when I need it, unlike one of my DSLRs that seems to either be in the hotel safe or in the trunk when a great photo presents itself. My DSLRs take fantastic pictures but I've taken many more with my small Canon G5 simply because it's always with me (and I really wish the G5 had a 28mm lens!).
If you ask me about the S9100 against the S6000, i will tell you the better things of it are the hotshoe, the tilt LCD, more resolution, dual card slot, more options buttons and Better view Finder, so it is a little closer to SRL. The S6000 has a newer Sensor that gives better ISO performance and has the new face detection feature.
Now the Olympus SP-550UZ looks like the camera that has all features, 18x zoom, wide angle, high ISO and IS (for extra $150 if comparing to S6000 or S3), but i have seem many bad reviews to this camera (except in amazon) so it's better to give it a try before buying.
I don't really need a hot shoe, flip LCD or more resolution (3.2MB has been adequate for years) and I have been stitching quite nicely thank you with free software, but the extra bucks for S9100 dual memory cards seem worthwhile.
Rog
(Robapatt)
Rog
(Robapatt)
The technical specifications are important to a point but a camera should not limit your photographic capabilities by being non-intuitive. Size is also important considering that larger sensors require larger and heavier optics so most of the cameras capable of producing the finest photographs are necessarily larger than the point-and-shoot variety. This means that there are places where venturing with a large camera is less than wise if you don't want it stolen. I always carry a small pocketable camera for those questionable areas where the best place for a DSLR is a secure trunk or hotel safe.
If you can instantly place a camera to your eye, position yourself for the best composition, quickly adjust settings to suit conditions, and press the shutter at the moment you feel is right, then you may have the perfect camera for you. It has to feel right, it has to be intuitive, it should not limit your creativity, and it should produce images that meet your needs.
I'm an old SLR photographer so only the Fuji S9100 will work for me (as would the Sony R1 if it was still available). For a second (smaller) camera, I have a Canon G5 but would consider the Canon SD800 since it is the only small digital with both an optical viewfinder and 28mm wide angle lens. That would work for me but you should go to a camera store and see which of the three feels best to you; all three are capable cameras.
If I made a mistake, I'll be happy to admit it in this forum...well. sort of happy. And if this digicam works out as I hope, you'll hear about that, too.
Thanks again,
Rog
(Robapatt)
dpreview.com/reviews/fujifi...
Sorry I didn't get to reply to your original thread in time...
I was going to type up another extensive list of differences, but I tried google and it turns out the job's already done for me. This message board thread ( stevesforums.com/forums/vie... ) includes an extensive discussion of the pros and cons of these two cameras, and should help you out immensely.
Good luck!
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is, I think, a better deal. Ben just linked to a thread that says everything I would have said here, so I will just add to his answer and say that I think the biggest advantage of the S6000 is the larger sensor- although it only has one more megapixel than the S5200, that larger sensor really does result in better image quality. The high ISO numbers are also helpful especially when using the zoom, although you will experience some graininess it's still nice to know you can shoot under almost any lighting conditions and get some sort of usable result. I think the extra control allowed by the S6000 makes it worth the price difference.
After I purchase the camera I may need your help again.
Do any of you know how reliable Buydig.com and ShopUSA.com are? They both have better prices than anyone else. Please let me know.
Thanks!
I used Buydig to buy my Canon A60 ages ago. They were good to me then, but I've heard that they often use the old call-to-confirm-order trick, wherein they give you the hard sell for accessories and whatnot. If you're good at telling people no when they try to sell you things you don't need, they might work out for you. ShopUSA.com is a new one to me, but a) they seem to be dedicated to shipping FROM the US TO northern Europe, so unless you're living in northern Europe they're probably not the site for you.
Good luck!
josephlancaster.com
Some key differences between these two cameras:
1. The S6000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) lacks a hotshoe, so you can't use an external flash.
2. The S6000 lacks a tilt & swivel LCD screen, though its screen is bigger than the S9000's.
3. The S6000's EVF is slightly lower resolution, but still quite usable.
4. The S6000 lacks the S9000's command dial, which allows you to change aperture and shutter speed without looking at the LCD. This means that on the S6000 you have to change these settings with the four-way control pad on the back of the camera.
5. The S6000 offers ISO settings up to 3200 (the S9000 only goes to ISO 1600), and also features the well-loved F30 CCD, which gets great marks for low noise.
6. The S6000's sensor captures 6MP images compared to the S9000's 9MP, and its sensor is physically smaller (though only slightly). This the combination of much lower MP and a slightly smaller CCD means that the noise levels should be lower on the S6000. On the flip-side, you'll be slightly more limited in terms of printing giant, poster-sized images (but how often do you do that?).
My recommendation between these two, especially for a beginner, is the S6000. It's cheaper, nearly as feature-packed, and better rated by users.
Good luck!
Do you think the S7000 would be a better bet between the 3 I'm considering?
If you are planning to make huge prints, the S9000's 9MP resolution will be a big help. The ability to use external flashes might also come in handy if you get more adventurous with your shooting. Also the S9000's command dial is a wonderful addition, since it lets you adjust important settings without looking up from the EVF. Of course, if you're a beginner you probably won't be messing with those settings too much, at least at first.
The S7000 is significantly inferior to both the S6000 and S9000 in several ways: shorter zoom (6x to the 6000/9000's 10x), low resolution at higher ISO settings, and a much smaller LCD than the S6000. It was a very, very good camera in its time, but its time was several years ago.
One feature I forgot to mention regarding the S6000 is its hardware face detection, which does a wonderful job of isolating and focusing on a subject's face in real time.
As for buying online, I'd recommend the major retailers' sites (like Best Buy, Circuit City, and so on). For internet-only retailers, I highly recommend newegg.com, amazon.com, and camera-specific stores like bhphotovideo.com and adorama.com. If you buy from a site other than the ones I've listed, be sure to check resellerratings.com's store reviews before you buy--there are tons of very sketchy "gray market" retailers out there.
Good luck!
go back to your PC, use the Wipe programme in Norton Utility to wipe the memory card.
Re-insert the card into your camera and format it.
Chances are it will work, although sometimes there are exceptions.
To me, this S6000fd camera seems to out-shoot all of the models I've put it up against. I realize that pixels aren't everything, because what is the point of having more pixels if the picture is bad in the first place. So that's another reason I'm leaning towards this camera.
However, I would like some third party advice from people who have USED THIS CAMERA out in the real world. The pictures I've seen and taken with this camera just astound me compared to others I've tried. Am I just being over zealous with this new camera, or is there really something to be said about this one?
I really love the manual zoon & focus rings, not only for the control but for the power conservation too. The Real Photo technology certainly comes into play for the pictures I'm sure, and the Face Detection seems to work pretty well as long as the subjects are facing the camera. The flash on this camera knocks my socks off for distant low-light shots. And the Natural Light + Flash mode is quite impressive for getting "just the right shot" when you don't have much time to fiddle with the camera.
Sorry for the long post/question/novel, but I really could use some advice from someone who has more experience with more cameras than I have used.
Much thanks in advance to any & all who can help!
If this isn't important to you, then I say go with what you like.
Anyone else care to give some insight or recommend another camera that I should look at before I go for the S6000fd?
Also, I guess I should mention that I found the S6000fd plus a 1GB Type-H xD card for around $300 shipped after the $50 mail in rebate.
I plan to use the Amazon.com Visa for this purchase only, then cancel the card. There is no time limit that the account/card have to be active so far as I can tell.
Anyway, wanted to say that my wife & I tried out both the Fuji s6000 and the Canon S3 IS at Ritz camera yesterday, and we both thought the s6000 is significantly better, though Ritz wanted $500... yeah right.
A few reasons why we liked the s6000:
- the manual zoom is easier to control, i'm sure its also lighter on the batteries
- the s6000 face detection really does work, it was very easy to focus on someone's face if they are looking at you. When auto focusing, it also seems to search throughout the image to determine what to focus on (if no face is detected), and usually guessed right
- to focus with the S3, you have to press the set button, and then use the d-pad to move the green focus box to the area you want to focus on, which is going to be impossible if your subject is moving
- the S3 has a "manual" flash, so if the light is low, the display says "Raise flash!" and you have to physically lift up the flash, not horrible, but annoying.
- the S3 needs a klunky adapter to be able to attach a filter to it
- the S3's flip-out screen is about half the size of the s6000 and hard to use, while with the s6000's screen you can easily tell if the picture was in focus, etc.
- the S6000 feels sturdier, though its definitely a bit larger
Having already a nice investment in XD cards (2.75g) did not really make a difference with SDs being so cheap. Battery usage with easy to find AAs was a big factor. I travel with two chargers (wall and auto) and three sets of Nimhs anyway. My prior experiance with an Olympus C750 convinced me that family had it together on image quality - and this was three generations ago. That cam did convince me that speed was a big problem that had to be overcome before I would get another long lens which is the perfect set for me. All three of these newer models seemed to have that solved to varying degrees.
Ergonomically the Fuji was a hands down winner. It just plain felt good to my size hands. A very natural fit. Just don't wrap your right index finger over the AF assist illuminator. So far after about 300 shots I just plain love the Fuji. Of course I've had my share of long shots blurred possibly due to the lack of mechanical stabilization but I was already used to that and travel with a monopod and chest strap system. This and the lower Meg count are what I beleive is the cause of superficial reviews slighting this unit.
The manual focus and zoom are a prayer answered. Manual focus is aided by a center magnifying focus square. For an good in depth review check out
dcresource.com/reviews/fuji... Get to know you dealer well and ask about using the camera awhile. In other words buy it with the understanding that if you find something you really hate about it you can return it for a known restocking fee. I would rather by far pay 10 percent than get something I feel stuck with because I didn't check further. And if you wait, something better always comes up.
After quite a bit of deliberation I found what I thought would be my dream camera..unfortunately straight outta the box it will not work! I have other cards from other fuji finepix cameras and tried the new card in my old camera..it doesnt seem to be a problem in my old camera! Does anyone know? The users manual is missing from the box as it was a closeout on Abe's of Maines web store..this camera was very hard to find for the price and I am very disapointed..please help before I just give up and send it back!!
The first thing you need to do is make sure that the memory card you're using is an xD card (the kind your S7000 takes) and not some other flavor of removable storage (Secure Digital [SD], MMC, or anything else). Second, if it is indeed an xD card, see if you can use your computer, a card reader, or another camera to format the card. Then try it in your S7000 again.
Finally, I doubt this applies in your case, but another S7000 user had this to say:
"I recently bought a 2.2GB CF Type II Microdrive for the Finepix S7000 and I had an error "Card not initialized". I googled and found OnBelay by CompuApps Inc to format the card using a card reader. It worked, terrific! But, then, when I set the camera back to use my 512MB XD card which never gave me a problem, the XD card now said "card error". Even after formatting this card, it still gave me the "card error". When I physically took out the 2.2GB CF, the card error on the XD was gone. When I inserted the 2.2GB CF and took out the XD card, it behaved. Conclusion? A Type II CF microdrive and an XD card can not be present in the camera at the same time. A regular CF poses no problem."
Good luck, and let us know what you find.
Thanks so much for the quick response!!
Jill
Thanks for your great answer to my problem with my camera....
therfore it works in either camera
Here is a link to the FujiFilm website that has a table showing the compatability of all Fuji cameras and the media they take.
<a href="fujifilm.com/products/digit... Camera and Memory Compatability Table</a>
The Finepix S6000 has a great macro mode--two of them, actually. With standard macro, you can focus on an object as close as 10cm from the lens in full wide angle. In super macro mode, you can get as close as 1cm, which is pretty great.
Some other cameras with very good macro modes include the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which both feature a normal macro mode at 10cm and a super macro mode that allows you to basically touch the glass of the lens to the object you're photographing. That's right, 0in, 0cm, 0mm from the lens. It's pretty amazing. These cameras also toss on the added feature of image stabilization, which eliminates much of the blurriness from shaky hands. They're generally in the same ballpark as the S6000, price-wise.
Good luck!
Kodak EasyShare Z650 IS0 80-800, cost $230
Also Fuji says is has auto and manual exposure, is this important?
Thanks
ISO stands for International Organization for Standardization. There is a great article on it on <a href="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_... In terms of a cameras, the designation came directly from the ASA (American Standards Association) settings. The rest of the world didn't appreciate using American standards, and the designation was switched to ISO. The numbers correspond to the film for a film-in camera's sensitivitiy to light. The higher the number, the more sensitive it is. They are also linearly related: ISO400 is twice as sensitive as ISO200. The higher the ISO setting, the easier it is to take a picture in lower light. Be warned that you will see more graininess with the higher ISO settings.
With these two cameras, its not just the ISO settings you are paying for. The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... S6000</a> comes with manual focus, shoots in RAW format, and has a larger LCD screen while the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Z650</a> does not (both come with manual exposure). Manual focus can be used for more artistic shots using selective focus, or focusing on different subjects that are not in the middle of your shot.
When placed side by side though, I would still choose the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Z650</a>, if they were my only two choices.
Andrew
If you still need assistance, I have a few recommendations for you:
Fuji Finepix S6000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- 6 megapixels is plenty for printing reasonable-sized photos. This camera has auto and manual focus and exposure modes, super speedy reactions/ lag times and is all-around easy to use. I am not sure about its close-ups as I haven't seen any samples, but it's definitely one to look at.
You may also like the Kodak Easyshare P880 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good macros, fast operation, full manual controls and user-friendly.
What price range are you looking for?
The idea "very good zoom" means different things to different people. For example the Canon Powershot S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) came to mind as I was reading your question (that might be a good one to check out), but 12x zoom may be rather heavy-duty for your needs. It also makes the camera bulkier. It does have good battery life and a good movie mode, though. Is that the kind of camera you are thinking of or did you have something different in mind?
Thanks for pointing out things that I should have inculded in the question...
Ideally, the price range I`m looking for is below $300. But if I find a camera that is worth it, I`d be willing to pay more.
As for the "very good zoom," I have been through the entire DC-hq website and could not find a zoom other than 4, 6 or 12x. I was wondering if someone else would know more about it, or if someone could point out that there are no other zooms.
I was considering the Canon S3 IS for a while, yet I find it looks more like a professional camera (i.e. too bulky). I am currently looking into the A710 IS, since Canon PowerShot A-series are the kind of cameras I am interested in.
The A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) may be a good choice for you, but the one caveat is that it can only hold 1GB of movie which is about 8 minutes' worth depending on what resolution you're at.
The SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 4GB of movie storage and is another one you should consider- it does have a wide angle lens, but some people really like that. It also has fewer manual controls, so if you like to adjust aperture, focus etc. you may want to look elsewhere. The A710 allows you to manually set everything but focus, I believe.
amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-TZ...
Precision, control, and just plain ease of shooting are all because of barrel zoom. If a photographer (hobbiest) wants quick point and shoot the 6000 is probably not for him or her. Very pleased indeed
[url=digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony Cybershot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
I'm sure there are others too. If you want, you can go to our list of extended zoom cameras:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... just check each one individually for a viewfinder. But the ones I've mentioned are a good place to start.
Olympus SP510 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Hope this helps
Regards
Steve
Nikon Coolpix S1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (up to 20 seconds of voice recording per image)
<a href="usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... Powershot S330</a> (60 seconds per image)
Fuji Finepix S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (30 seconds per image)
That's really just a sampling of what's out there, but that gives you some decent cameras with which to start your search.
Andrew
But I assume the 60in screen is wide screen so if that is the case you might want to get a camera that shoots widesceen stills s there won't be any cropping, resizeing, zoom-in distortion. I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) amazing camera.
Seriously, the problem was my burning the shots from my Kodak in Nero as ''data' files instead of 'slide show' mode.
They now look great but I have that 60 wide screen 1080 I and the Lumix is calling me. Thanks again.
Thanks
Mark Lewis
Market Realty, Inc.
Message was edited by: Mark Lewis
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... personally like the Kodak models, they're very stylish looking, but the Panasonic FX01 is pretty great too.
Fuji FinePix S6000fd Reviews
Fuji FinePix S6000fd Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
This is one of the best super zoom compact cameras on the market it kills the competition in high ISO output. Does it have a weakness yes for me it would be the lack of optical stabilization, but with the excellent high iso output you can live with it. The other issue is the write time of a raw file. Other than those issues this camera still today out performs the competition, it is on par with most lower end dslr's in IQ and maybe better than some.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is one versatile piece of kit.Superb but as mentioned in other review,forget auto.I only use mine in A S M modes.
- 5.0 out of 5
Started with an Olympus D490 2.1MB with 3X zoom in 2001 and graduated to an Olympus C-740UZ 3.2MB with 10X zoom in 2004. By this year, it was apparent I wanted 28mm WA focal length (35mm equivilent) more than I needed 380mm tele and, after researching six P&S options, settled on Fuji's 28>300mm package.
No, first of all, it doesn't offer sophisticated stability control, other than boosting ISO...but I've taken satisfactory race car photos at 300mm with 35mm film Nikons, never realizing how handicapped I was. Have had no movement problems to date.
My main problem is learning to graduate from auto setting to taking advantage of the Fuji S6000's many, many optional settings for better photos. I've weaned myself away from the auto to P and am now experimenting with S and A preferences. Hey, it's exciting and it's getting better and better. What the hell more can I ask from a digicam that cost $258.00 after Fuji's generous rebate.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've found the camera to be great for the price (I got it for $250 after $50 rebate, which is no longer available). I found that if I set it to auto, it always uses a high ISO unless I'm in bright sunlight. I set it to P mode and set the ISO to 100 or 200 and that solved that issue (but make sure to force the flash indoors or the pictures will almost always have movement in them). I've printed several 8x10 prints, and they came out very well. The 4x6 prints and 5x6 almost always come out great, but most any modern camera can make good 4x6 prints. Outdoors in bright sunlight is excellent also, but all cameras do great in bright sunlight. I needed a big zoom for sports, and have kids that like to take pictures with the camera, so this suits my needs very well. I really don't have any dislikes for the camera, except that I would like optical image stabilization for when I'm not using the flash. Bottom line, I would have preferred to buy a Nikon D40x, but I couldn't justify spending $1,500 to get one of those cameras plus a 300mm lens when this camera produces pictures that are great for as big a printout as I will ever use (8x10).
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera.I get crystal clear pictures in low light.Having fun learning all the features.
- 5.0 out of 5
this camera takes great pictures.it is easy to operate to get great pictures. has a zoom ring that is very smooth to operate. this was one of the first to have the face detection feature and it works real well. i sometimes wish the lag time was a little less but i can live with it. i would recommend this camera. some are making a big deal about the fact that it does not have image stabilization but i have been having excellent results even at full zoom and using digital zoom as well which lets you reach out a long ways. i don't know how you could ask for more.
- 5.0 out of 5
The first time a must fully disagree with the Editor's opinion. Where are these many ultracompact with 28 mm in this quality? Where do you find a camera with this resolution (or do you still only simply count pixels mechanically??)? Where did you find a comparable camera with this excellent noise reduction until 400ISO? And all for 300 Dollar?
- 4.0 out of 5
i have had this camera for just about 1 year and i recently took it to niagra falls where i took the best pictures with my family in all settings day and night the pictures allways came out just right in fact better then that with all the digital options it carry's like auto light filtering and the ability to freeze the background settings when objects are moving just a little to quickly makes every picture turn out perfect.
- 4.0 out of 5
I really like the camera, I choose this camera as a stepping stone before I enter the SLR world. It takes great pictures and if you take your time to understand the setting, other than "Auto", you'll find that this camera takes very good pictures in its price range.
The low noise from 100 to 400 ISO is what sold me over the SONY H5.
- 5.0 out of 5
absolutely the best camera for the buck , it has all the qualities of an slr camera. and the results are amazing. this camera has the manual optical zoom and focus that only SLR kits that are double the price can do.
the color and contrast is truly mind boggling.
NO other camera at this price looks and acts this good.all Canon,Nikon,Sony,Panasonic,etc camera s can compete with this camera .
Try avoid buying form resellers in NY( buydig,adorama,BH,etc) they are cheap but a hassle for your brain .
its better to spend more and get the peace of mind than to get an unbelievable deal and loose your money on these scammers
- 5.0 out of 5
My wife and I (mostly my wife) exhaustively researched the hybrid market segment (SLR style but with fixed lens). You name the brand, we looked at it. We fully expected to end up buying a Sony, Canon, Nikon, or other Big Name, so it was a bit of a surprise to find that the overall best value for us was the Fujifilm Finepix S6000. Actually, we started zeroing in on the S5200, but were quickly pulled to the S6000. I won't go into the technical detail, but for under $500 you simply cannot go wrong with this camera. Here are the main pros: 1) SLR body size - this is a much bigger deal than you think, but you will appreciate the hand-comfort every time you use it. 2) Manual zoom — there's nothing, and I mean nothing, that compares with the ability to turn that zoom ring by hand to any tiny adjustment you want, versus the thumb-on-the-little-toggle-back-and-forth-till-you-get-it-right silliness. 3) The photo lag time and refresh rates, while not quite as good as the Sony, are better than most and very good. 4) Low light sensitivity is excellent — in fact, I often find myself switching to manual mode because I want the effect of lower exposure, which brings me to...5) Manual mode - Okay, so I learned to shoot on a Pentax K1000 (manual everything), but this camera has a great manual mode. Unfortunately, you can't avoid fiddling with some menu junk, but every other digital camera out there either doesn't have m-mode or is just as fiddly. 5) One word...RAW. For the uninitiated, shooting in RAW format allows huge flexibility in editing shots. To get this feature you're usually into a thousand-dollar camera. Lots of other features, and they're fine, but they're on par with the other products out there in the range. But overall, this camera is a gem to shoot with, and beats all the others hands-down in the ergonomics department, and I know this doesn't sound like a big deal but trust me, you'll thank me later: it's easy and natural to hold onto, with a black rubberized grip etc instead of that slippery metal style (whose design idea was that anyway??).
- 4.0 out of 5
I just bought this camera 2 days ago. I've found only one user review of it at amazon so I thought I shoukd contribute.
First off, about me, so you'll have point of reference. I'm 32 years old, programmer. So, I'm more of a technical person. I owned a Cassio Q8000, Minolta DiMage 7i and now own a Nikon D70.
This camera is a gift for a friend.
About this Fuji. The lens is very nice and smooth. The zoom ring feels even better than on the D70's kit lens. The LCD is really big and bright. The viewfinder is also really big. The colors in the viewfinder are shifted a little to the blue side.
The camera is surprisingly light, but feels sturdy - not cheep by any standard.
It has a green light to help focus in low light. It's kind of nice - usually the light is read or white. There's a dedicated button to turn on/off the face detection feature. The FD really does work. Although it seems that the algorithm expects there to me 2 eyes and a mouth, so if the objects turns sideways, the camera looses the face;)
I don't have the memory for it yet - it uses xD cards. In the internal 10mb buffer it takes 6 pictures. About 1.5mb each.
The images are very decent - the colors and saturation are very true. I did notice some noise (at ISO100), but I'm used to the images from my DSLR.
The focusing is acceptably fast in the daylight. When the lighting is poor the focusing is still fast with the green light, but when you move the camera, the picture on the screen kind of lags behind the motion. So it gives the impression of being slow. When you press the shutter and the objects are turning yellow-green on the screen because of the focusing light, it looks a bit wierd.
I haven't read the manual - I don't want to breack the wrapping. So I might have failed to find some feature. Consider the below part questionable.
There's no button the set the white ballance. You have to press Menu button and then scroll there. You can't set WB for the auto mode - only for one of the PASM modes. There's no quick view button - you have to flip the record/playback switch. There's no delete button in playback mode - to delete you have to go through menu. Very nive playback mode otherwise. There's no wheel (on the D70 there are 2 wheels) so I don't know how to change the apperture/shutter in the PASM modes.
There doesn't seem to be a autoswitch between viewfinder and the screen.
The mode selector switch has a sequence off-play-record. So to get to the taking pictures (that's where you usually are going) you need to click trough the play. That's not a big issue.
Otherwise, a very goodlooking, well thoughtout, functional camera.
