Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Fuji FinePix S9100
Editor's Review
The Fuji FinePix S9100 is a big deal, coupling a high-powered 10x optical zoom with a hefty 9-megapixel sensor, allowing larger prints and a level of detail that would escape most other cameras. The S9100 is a great choice for curious photography enthusiasts and people looking to get superlative photographs from any distance.
Specifications
- 9 megapixels
- 10.7x optical zoom (wide-angle)
- Auto and manual focus
- ISO 80-1600
- JPEG and RAW file formats
- Movie mode with sound
- 2.0-inch LCD
- 4 AA batteries
- xD-Picture Card or Compact Flash storage
- Part Number: S9100
- UPC: 840356342382
- Release Date: Oct 13, 2006
Shop for S9100 Accessories
Fuji FinePix S9100 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
The photo that I see in the LCD isn't the quality of photo I get on my computer. Why is that??
I would write Fuji about this because I do not have it with mine as you do. However this could happen to anyone who is using the digital zoom more often than the optical zoom. Optical zoom provides clear and sharp image quality even when the subject is enlarged, regardless of the zoom scale. The digital zoom magnifies a part of the image by cropping some the original image. This results in a somewhat grainier image.
As far as the quality you see on the computer: When the image quality on the PC display is poor, change the colors setting for your PC display from "256 colors" to "High Color" or better.
<Setting the display colors to "High Color">
From the "Start" menu on the desktop, open "Settings" -> "Control Panel", double-click "Display" and click the "Settings" tab. In the "Color Palette" settings, change "256" to "High Color" or "True Color".
You can write them here at: fujifilm.com/mail/form.cgi?...
This has been the best camera I've owned since several Canon prosumers ago. I hope you get it worked out to your satisfaction.
'the photo that I see in the LCD isn't the quality of photo I get on my computer. '
Actually the reason is computer monitor has a higher resolution than that of camera LCD.
To explain this, you can reset the monitor at different resolutions and see the difference.
Go to Start>Settings>Control Panel>Display>Settings.
Under Screen Area, drag the pointer to the extreme left showing a resolution of 640 x 480, click OK
Open a picture on your computer and you will see a very grainy picture.
Repeat the process using a resolution of 1024 x 768 and open the same picture, you will see a big difference in quality.
Coming back to the camera LCD, the resolution of Fuji S9100 is only 235,000pixel. This is less than "640 by 480 display", which has 640 pixels from side to side and 480 from top to bottom (as in a VGA display), and therefore has a total number of 640 × 480 = 307,200 pixels
No doubt some camera has higher resolution LCD than your Fuji S9100, this does not change the quality of a picture.
I feel you should print the picture and see whether the black is actually grainy before deciding to dump your camera.
The first part of the question refers to ISO adjustment.
No doubt lower ISO gives you better picture, but low light situation often opens up the aperture.
Wider aperture gives grainy picture and smaller aperture makes it sharper.
I would also look into using flash to improve the quality of pictures.
If the lighting condition is really poor, with dim lights and so on, you will find synchronized multiple flash units
are better than single flash unit.
You may have also had it accidentally white balanced incorrectly for florescent light - there are three presets for this: Fluorescent light (daylight), Fluorescent light (cool white), Fluorescent light (warm white). The other three are Fine, Shade, Incandescent. You could try those or go manual in Custom.
The auto setting has worked very well in over a 1000 shots in the Baltic countries, Netherlands and airshows, in all kinds of weather and last but not least in Greece, where only 10 of my 350 shots had this problem. Elsewhere I read that underexposed shots would tend to blue. When walking in a deep narrow gorge the contrast between the sky and the ground could have been too much to handle.
I did not touch the white balance.
Thanks for your remarks.
Dick
White balance really can ruin or make a picture so I recommend taking any new digital camera out for a white balance test run asap. Look at the names of the white balance options on your camera. Go to as many of those types of lighting as you can and take the same picture repeatedly using each of the white balance settings on your camera. Compare and see which setting you prefer for each of those lighting situations. Now you are ready for most lighting situations to get optimum colors. For bonus points, read the manual and learn how to use the custom/manual white balance setting and you are approaching expert level and are ready to read kenrockwell.com for further fine tuning your white balance skills.
Larry
It will revert the signal to the external flash unit instead.
Have fun,
Steve
www.totalqualityphoto.com
Jannette
i'd consider the 9000 to be closest to the panasonic lumix fz30 (i haven't used the 50) but with a few more features including that wonderful manual zoom.
i have read great things about the sony but if you're looking for a very full featured digicam, the S9100 can't be beat unless you're looking for robust performance with burst mode or other fast shooting - then you might want to look elsewhere.
9M N, ISO: Auto, STD, CCD-RAW: Off, 30fps
asqcincinnati.org/ASQImages... memory card, I'm using a SanDisk Extreme III 8.0GB in CompactFlash format
pictureline.com/products/13... rechargeable batteries are made by Maha. They're Powerex 2700mAh minimum capacity.
digitaldingus.com/reviews/m...
Rog
Yes, I have an S9100 and the auto focus performance is great. Better than with my previous two Canon Powershot Pro models.
Have been unable to enjoy other people's Power Point stuff, so guess yours is right in there...sorry.
Ability to use Compact Flash cards as alternative to xD is a big plus for the S9100 in my calculations.
Thanks for coming back again,
Rog
Set the Beep and set the shutter volume to inaudible.
As far as the autofocus beam, that will still happen with any camera.
Rog
I have this camera and was very anxious about it when it was delivered. i have done commercial art since 1969 until present and a camera and photoshop are a big part of my work. I am a perfectionism to the level of it being a fault.
I think your camera may need some fine tuning as mine is a pleasure to use in all situations except low light and then a use a flash and a monopod. I learned via research that some cards are faster so I bought three 1.0 gig sandisk Extreme III CompactFlash cards for my more professional work.
My camera paid for itself just doing a wedding for a friend at a very discounted price. BTW i never like to do weddings.
Good luck, and if I can help by posting some jpeps of macro shots let me know.
If you like S9100/9600, do not let the lack of image stabilization worry you because you may not be taking pictures under subdue light or extreme zoom that frequently, and if you do, there is always the tripod and the flash to save the day.
I have had my camera about a month or so now and the difference from my Canon Powershot Pro is so great I'm just happy that I was able to spend less for better quality pictures, ease of use with the Fuji S9100.
Also the manual zoom is very easy turning the lens barrel rather than pushing down on a little button like on some other cameras.
In fact I'm so happy that I've recommended it to my friend who is a real-estate agent and needs to take quick but high quality pictures without having to learn a lot of how-to. The S9100 does just that in its automatic mode and when time is available, you can learn and do much more with the other functions the camera provides.
I just bought a Handstands screen protector sheet to prevent scratches to the LCD screen. I found that with my Canon; myself and others would touch the screen, dirty it up with their fingers and even scratch it. Hopefully now, this won't happen with the Fuji. You can get these protectors for about $10.
I hope it is my error as I like everything else about the camera. Is something wrong with this camera or is it me? I need help.
Any suggestions appreciated as the 5200 was only 5 mega pixels but the color photos of people were just great in the N mode. I may need to buy another 5200 as I am a portrait artist. .
john
The one thing that has really impressed me is the Natural light photos. This is the first digital camera of a professional quality that i have ever owned. Have you read the manual or talked with anyone on the tech support desk?
It is true that more practice makes the difference.
The key in low light was keeping the camera steady.
As it turns out the is the best camera I have ever owned. I don't think for can get more camera unless you spend 3000.00 dollars for a SLR and even then it would be over kill and i would be afraid to use it on a boat or damp days for fear of damaging it.
I have a nikon FM2 and other cameras but never use them.
The less than great reviews given the the 9100 were most likely a result of the lack of trial and error. I would not sell mine for a thousand dollars if there were no others to buy. What would you replace it with?????
When collapsed it also made it nice to hold the camera above the heads of the crowd while taking video and enabled me to get shots that would not have been possible by merely holding it up at arms length. I found that positioning the end which normally would be on the ground against my body much like a flag pole carrier worked well to help keep it steady.
Also for action shots the mono-pod and a higher ISO captured great photos which normally would be blurred.
I may not ever buy a D-SLR as long as I can get reasonably close to the subject in person. The only benefit I see with a D-SLR over this Fuji pro-sumer digital is that I won't be able to use a very long lenses like I saw a man use at the zoo with his tripod. The shots of the lions must have appeared as it he was whispering into their ears. Otherwise the Fuji with its fixed lenses was exceptional even at distances approaching 75 feet.
I shot from 11 AM to 5 PM and got just under 300 photos.
I practiced anxiously for several hours/days related to trying to please so many people, especially the 2 mother-in laws.
I tried RAW and got some interesting bridal portraits.
Has anyone tried RAW with any success???
john, haven't tried raw yet - plan to take the camera out again on wednesday and do that. why were yours "interesting"?
The 5VX power adapter made by Fuji is a 100V to 240V adapter with 50-60Hz. The 5V adapter will not work for it. The input plug for the camera is also made specifically for the Fuji line of cameras too. Other plugs might fit, but you have to make sure.
Andrew
It has, like you said, the little 'cylindrical box' which many believe to be the surge protector. It protects your camera from sudden surge of current, something that Walmart DC power supply don't have.
Other features include accurate and steady supply of current. This means the voltage fluctuations stay within the tolerance limit set by the Camera manufacturer.
In short, the Camera manufacturer ensures that the AC -5VX lives up to it's reputation and provides an unsaid 'guaranty' that the camera will function properly.
The last reason probably is good enough to justify paying a little more to protect your camera and let you enjoy using it for a long time to come.
To reduce the investment on additional lens, you have to buy Pentax K100D, K110D or K10D which accept all old Pentax lenses.
Do remember though that there are additional steps to take before the lens can be used in the new body and the instructions for the steps can be found in the manual.
Andrew
A replacement on a sensor can get quite expensive. You might look at the Fuji S9100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has similar functionalities, and upgrades to 9MP. It would be a great replacement.
Andrew
Fuji FinePix S9100 Reviews
Fuji FinePix S9100 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is a great fixed lens camera, the focus is fast and sharp, the glass is an amazine 28-300 fujinon zoom lens that produces great shots at any focus range, the macro funtion is also producing amazine ultra close up shots, it a little slow to buffer RAW files but it is worth the wait, over all if you are looking for a first time DSLR camera this fixed lens Fuji S 9100 will do any thing you want and at a great price for all the features you will receive.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is a great camera if you grew up with a 35mmSLR, like me. The controls are intuitive, and it's great to get back to a manual zoom. The 10X optical zoom is fantastic, especially witht he built in acro mode. It'll take years to learn all the features, but a couple days will have you taking pictures like a pro.
- 1.0 out of 5
Like a previous reviewer I had a s90009not s9100) for 12 days before it died. Beach Camera iniyially refused to have me return it to them, and sent me to Fuji for a warranty repair...AFTER 12 DAYS ?!!! Fuji 'repaired it' and returned it to me. It was DoA !!! Beach have sent me an RMA but with the camera at Fuji a second time for the same issue...I am at a loss. BE WARNED !!!!
- 5.0 out of 5
This is by far the best camera i've ever owned. After price and feature comparing for several months, and major --- kissing my wife, I mean sweet talking, this camera is still wowing me with every use. As an amerature photographer the manual settings this camera offers will keep me occupied for years learning. The auto settings do very well for me also. No regrets here.
- 1.0 out of 5
only had camera 4 weeks and camera DIED. Total
power loss. Had to send back to have repaired.
- 1.0 out of 5
1. DO NOT buy this camera if you want a point and shoot camera. It is a horrible point and shoot camera.
2. DO NOT buy this camera if you want a camera that can shoot in lower or low light situations.
3. DO NOT buy this camera if you ever want to manually shoot faster than ISO 200.
This camera is very noisy. Images shot faster than ISO 400 are noisier than a $10 junk kids digital camera. I read all the reviews about how if you wanted to shoot good pictures you needed to do everything manually, so I spent the three months reading the manual again and again and kept trying to get better lower light or faster pictures. It just isn't going to happen.
I am now finding many more reviews to support what I have found out the hard way. If you are shooting ISO 80 or 100 your going to have some pretty good pictures. ISO 200 is still not too bad. ISO 400 is as noisy as some other cameras ISO 1600 shots. ISO 800 shots are unacceptably noisy and anything shot at 1600 is completely useless and unusable.
This camera uses a faster shot instead of image stabilization and while that in itself is not such a bad thing the noise present in those faster shots is not acceptable. One of the big reasons this cameras auto mode is useless is that it will often use ISO 400 or faster which makes the auto mode useless if you want a good picture.
One of the main reasons I bought this camera was that it had a manual focus option to use in my low light situations. The manual focus is still direct linked to the auto focus and is not a true manual. If you run it out to infinity in hopes of getting focused on those far shots your in for a cruel surprise. The manual focus at infinity goes past infinity and back out of focus. Even when you back up a bit your at the mercy of the autofocus motor to start and stop moving when it wants as it lags behind your actual moving of the manual focus ring.
Macro modes do not focus well up close at all where they should, and forget manual focus for macros because the auto focus will take over and take the picture back out of focus even on manual mode when clicking the shutter.
The video quality is not too bad on this camera but the auto focusing while in video mode is very bad. It focuses too slow and has to keep trying to refocus. The auto focus does not work well in many cases. Some times it will show a good focus lock and after you look at the pictures you will often find that it was not in focus at all.
This camera has got plenty of bells and whistles and had a great potential but things like the manual focus which is a great idea fails because it was poorly implemented.
The bottom line is that this type of camera is supposed to make it easy to take good pictures while allowing you the options to go manual and change things but it should not be so hard to get 10 out of 1000 pictures to be worth keeping.
This camera is not worth this kind of money to get a few good shots. The camera looks good and has plenty of features but in the end it's about what kind of pictures it takes on on that note it fails miserably
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is easier for someone who has used a fully manual camera. Knowing how to set the f stops, shutter speed and the ISO is the only way to make this camera work more than a $100.00 point and shoot camera.
I think it gets a bad review by most people until you learn how to fly and first you must learn how to fall, if a may borrow a line from Paul Simon.
It just needs some fine tuning for your desired results.
- 3.0 out of 5
If you are like me, You want to be able to take pictures like a professional by using NOTHING but the auto focus RIGHT! Well...................
do a little more research. I picked this camera
because I read good reviews and thought with a little luck and reading the book that comes with it I could tackle just about anything and come out with a great picture. Not so fast, I have gone on several "photo shoots" and some of the pictures were really blurry!!! I mean like, shakey blurry I thought.. "man I must really be bad at this" Then I let some one else try it and the same thing happened. The whole time it was set on auto focus. Now to be fair, some of my pictures did turn out crisp and clear but, learn how to use the other settings! If I had known this I would have bought something else. I may try the Cannon D40 I hear SouthCarolina had good results.
- 5.0 out of 5
I am an amateur photographer and have until recently used traditional point and shoot digital cameras. I have owned Sony Cybershots (2 of them) and have really enjoyed them. I have 3 kids and both cameras have made it through alot, even being sunk in 4 feet of water after a canoe accident! But this review isn't for Sony Cybershots, it's for this Fuji S9100 (S9600 if you're overseas). Thinking that my Cybershot was ruined after the unfortunate canoe incident, I finally pulled the trigger on a more expensive DSLR and after tedious research chose the Fujifilm S9100. If you buy it, go ahead and get at least a 1G xd Memory card, as 512mb doesn't hold as many pictures at 9 megapixels each. This camera truly gives me what I expected and more from a DSLR. The auto setting takes beautiful pictures and the other wheel settings are well adjusted for their specific uses. The pictures are clear, and even the video mode is above average on playback. I take this camera everywhere with me and have used the macro and super macro modes extensively and have truly been amazed at the color and clarity this camera produces. If you are looking for a DSLR, whether you've had one in the past and are looking for more mega pixels, or whether you're doing what I did, and are upgrading from your beginning point and shoot, it is truly a top of the line camera. Again, I have compared it to many other similar DSLRs including Pentax, Nikon and Canon and this camera is as good, if not better than the others. I highly recommend this camera for anyone. Good luck in your search!
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera almost has it all. The S9100 has lots of pro's and I'll list them first:
1) High quality 28-300 mm manual-zoom lens
2) Excellent build-quality and control layout, has an almost professional feel
3) Bright and clear 235,000 pixel EVF with undetectable lag when set to 60 fps
4) 235,000 pixel multi-angle LCD
5) External-flash hot shoe
6) Fast operation, fast auto-focus
7) Lots of options and a full set of manual controls including focus
8) Uses both Compact Flash and xD cards
9) Cable-release socket built in!
10) DSLR-like picture quality, with very low noise up to ISO 800
11) Incredible Macro modes
12) Uses easily available AA batteries, very good battery life with 2500 mAh NIMH batteries.
If Fuji would fix the following problems, the S9100 would be perfect:
1) Focus ring should be mechanical instead of electronic
2) No focus distance-scale in viewfinder
3) There should be 2 command dials for adjusting shutter speed and aperture in Manual mode
4) No quick-review or delete buttons
5) Flash compensation buried in menus, should have dedicated button
6) RAW mode is interpolated to 4864 x 3648, making for huge, almost unworkable files. Why??
7) Useless HyperUtility software
8) Non-dedicated hot shoe, no TTL external flash capability
That's all, folks! Don't let my list of admittedly minor niggles stop you from buying the S9100. Compared to other cameras in it's price range, it really is in a field of it's own. Great camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
Twenty years ago I had a 35MM manual with several interchangeable lenses. Since then I have had several different point&shoot digital cameras and have enjoyed them for what they were. This camera takes me back to the joy and creativity of that old 35mm. I can set it to be a point&shoot or I can be as creative as I want. It gets my creative juices flowing. I keep this camera with me and take pictures everyday and I have taken over 2000 pictures since I got it. Don't buy this camera if you don't want to read the manual.
- 5.0 out of 5
Unlike the previous reviewer,I've had no problems with my S9100's auto-focus at all. Focus is very fast and accurate even with the lens zoomed out, something I can't say for my 'old' S5200. The only time I've needed to use manual focus is for very close macro shots with narrow DOF. So far,I've found the S9100 to be an excellent camera with loads of features and options, and an excellent, almost professional feel and build quality. The S9100 comes with a very good 28-300mm low-distortion lens; equivalent glass for a DSLR would probably cost more than the camera body! It's shutter button is threaded to accept a cable release, an important feature missing from every other camera in this class, and from most entry-level DSLRs too. The only negative is the lack of TTL capability for an external flash, otherwise I wouldn't change a thing.
- 4.0 out of 5
I'd like to rate this as an excellent camera but cannot as Autofocus is not good & probably shouldn't be used. It doesn't have Image Stabilization but the poor Autofocus is the real culprit in taking otherwise great pictures. This camera should have come w/ AC-5VX adapter to help in saving battery life which is poor. That said; I love this camera for its solid build & many available features. Use a tripod (IS replacement) when necessary & manually focus for great pictures
