Kodak EasyShare V610
Editors' Comments
The Kodak V610 is one of the smallest extended zoom cameras in the world, and they still managed to fit two lenses in the thing. And Bluetooth! What will they think of next? Hot on the heels of Kodak's dual lens V570 (and Panasonic's extremely small, extended zoom TZ1 model), the V610 throws in everything but the kitchen sink. The 6 megapixel CCD and large 2.8 inch LCD display would be good enough for a typical camera, but the V610 isn't a typical camera. The two lenses give it an arresting look, as well as a huge 10x optical zoom. Bluetooth wireless technology allows for short-range transfer of images from camera to computer or printer with ease. All this in a camera with a slick Art Deco style that's only 0.9 inches thick! The Kodak EasyShare V610 has plenty of flair and features to make your photography interesting. Keep in mind however, the V610 lacks the optical image stabilization that made the Panasonic TZ1 so appealing. Check out both before you decide.
Specifications
- 6 megapixels
- 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Auto focus and auto exposure
- ISO 64-800
- 2.8 inch LCD screen
- movie mode w/sound
- JPEG file format
- Secure Digital storage (28MB internal).
Kodak EasyShare V610 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Best compact camera with zoom? (masengill — 09/17/2006)
What is the best compact camera with the longest zoom lens? I will use it for travel.
reply to this comment
Re: Best compact camera with zoom? (tharrison — 09/17/2006)
Consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has a 10x optical zoom in a very small package -- quite a feat. Also look at the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are well-rated cameras. Nikon has a brand new update from their odd looking S4, the odd looking Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
dermatology and digital cameras (sks — 09/18/2006)
I am interested in using a digital camera in a dermatology research study. I don't need to print large photographs but the photographs will be used comparatively and may eventually be printed. Basically I need a camera that clearly shows subtle details and differences clearly. Any recommendations?
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
Re: dermatology and digital cameras (tharrison — 09/18/2006)
This is an interesting problem.
The main question is how close to the subject you need to be to get the level detail you need. For example, if the frame of a picture would be filled a person's hand, that's one thing. If it would be filled with a knuckle, then you might need something that is good at "macro" photography. This means that the lens is able to focus on things that are close, and ideally, that the auto-focus mechanism works (or as a fallback that the camera provides manual focus).
Another challenge is to have the subject you are photographing be still. This is easy with a hand, for example, not so easy if you're taking a picture of a body part that would less conveniently stay still.
Similarly, the camera may need to be still, as well. This is easy if you can mount it on a tripod, but tripods can be cumbersome.
Adequate lighting is another factor. Unless you are taking photos of a significant part of the body, your camera will be so close that any on-camera flash will not cover the area properly. So will you be in a position to provide a lot of light from multiple angles (a couple of bright fluorescent lights you can position where you want)?
So, if you have a still subject more than 12 to 16 inches way, or tripod, or lots of light or any combination of these, you probably only need a basic camera. If not, I think you should consider a zoom camera with a high ISO rating and image stabilization.
A zoom will allow you to step back from the subject a few feet (and zoom in on the area of interest) while allowing the on-camera flash to fully light the scene. On the downside, the further you zoom, the more small movements of the camera are amplified, thus creating a less sharp image due to "camera shake". Image stabilization will reduce the effect of camera shake and allow you to shoot at a slower shutter speed and still get a sharp photo. High ISO (800 or higher, especially if the camera sets it automatically as needed) will allow your camera to choose a faster shutter speed than it would otherwise.
Two cameras that might fit this bill are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and then very small Koday V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are relatively inexpensive and have good zooms and high ISO ratings with image stabilization.
reply to this comment
The main question is how close to the subject you need to be to get the level detail you need. For example, if the frame of a picture would be filled a person's hand, that's one thing. If it would be filled with a knuckle, then you might need something that is good at "macro" photography. This means that the lens is able to focus on things that are close, and ideally, that the auto-focus mechanism works (or as a fallback that the camera provides manual focus).
Another challenge is to have the subject you are photographing be still. This is easy with a hand, for example, not so easy if you're taking a picture of a body part that would less conveniently stay still.
Similarly, the camera may need to be still, as well. This is easy if you can mount it on a tripod, but tripods can be cumbersome.
Adequate lighting is another factor. Unless you are taking photos of a significant part of the body, your camera will be so close that any on-camera flash will not cover the area properly. So will you be in a position to provide a lot of light from multiple angles (a couple of bright fluorescent lights you can position where you want)?
So, if you have a still subject more than 12 to 16 inches way, or tripod, or lots of light or any combination of these, you probably only need a basic camera. If not, I think you should consider a zoom camera with a high ISO rating and image stabilization.
A zoom will allow you to step back from the subject a few feet (and zoom in on the area of interest) while allowing the on-camera flash to fully light the scene. On the downside, the further you zoom, the more small movements of the camera are amplified, thus creating a less sharp image due to "camera shake". Image stabilization will reduce the effect of camera shake and allow you to shoot at a slower shutter speed and still get a sharp photo. High ISO (800 or higher, especially if the camera sets it automatically as needed) will allow your camera to choose a faster shutter speed than it would otherwise.
Two cameras that might fit this bill are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and then very small Koday V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are relatively inexpensive and have good zooms and high ISO ratings with image stabilization.
I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (Julia — 09/18/2006)
I have a Nikon coolpix 5200 and have never really been all that satisfied with it, considering the price when it was released 2 years ago. Photos are dark, redeye is horrible and images are too often blurred.
Looking for my "perfect" camera model:(1) minimum 5.0 MP or better
(2) optical image stabilization(3) decent zoom (would prefer 4x- 6x range)
(4) good photos, of course!? - subjects generally children and lots of indoors or motion shots
(5) Is there a brand better known for less red eye?
Secondary "wishes" would include decent start up and battery re-charge times. Would prefer a proprietary battery or only 2 AA rechargeables. And why are they all dropping the real-life viewfinder?!
The reviews on the newest panasonics still complain about "noise" - is that true? Have considered the Fuji F30 but really holding out for more zoom (its only 3.0) and I don't think the F30 has OIS - just faster shutter speeds. Have also looked at Canon S3 but size and weight is too much.
Maybe the Canon G7 or SD800 coming out? My budget is up to $500.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
reply to this comment
Looking for my "perfect" camera model:(1) minimum 5.0 MP or better
(2) optical image stabilization(3) decent zoom (would prefer 4x- 6x range)
(4) good photos, of course!? - subjects generally children and lots of indoors or motion shots
(5) Is there a brand better known for less red eye?
Secondary "wishes" would include decent start up and battery re-charge times. Would prefer a proprietary battery or only 2 AA rechargeables. And why are they all dropping the real-life viewfinder?!
The reviews on the newest panasonics still complain about "noise" - is that true? Have considered the Fuji F30 but really holding out for more zoom (its only 3.0) and I don't think the F30 has OIS - just faster shutter speeds. Have also looked at Canon S3 but size and weight is too much.
Maybe the Canon G7 or SD800 coming out? My budget is up to $500.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (tharrison — 09/18/2006)
Julia --
This year's crop of cameras might just be the one that gives you what you need. Although I will say that the need to handle "children and lots of indoor or motion shots" sets a high bar indeed. I think sport photography and children photography tie for the most demanding photo challenges, with children being a touch harder :-) The issue is that they move a lot, and move unpredictably, so it's very hard to have your camera ready when they happen to be in the scene.
Frankly, I have tried several cameras, and only the dSLR with a seriously fast exposure and focus system are up the the challenge (and then, about 1 in five shots is any good). Otherwise, you need to set up a photo and snap at the perfect moment, or worse, get the kids to pose (and you know the fake smiles that come from that!). That these pictures are indoor means light is a challenge. So pretty much anything small will be a little less than perfect, I think.
All cameras need to focus and set exposure before they can take the picture. I bought a Canon G6 as a smaller camera than my Canon 10D dSLR, and it was supposed to be "great" at this. But compared to the 10D (and the Canon lenses), the G6 is terrible. That was a couple years ago, but by today's standards, the G6 is huge. I haven't seen the G7 yet - maybe it's better. And really all compact and point-and-shoot cameras suffer from taking a "long" time to focus and set exposure (even if that's only 1/2 second) and it gets worse in low light. So I think this is the real challenge.
I think you're right to go for image stabilization, and I think a good zoom, which will allow you to get away from the subject.
When you are further away, you have a little more maneuverability, so can track the subject (sounds like we're hunting deer, or something, no?) and lock in for the kill... er ... shot ... er photo at the right moment.
An important trick is that all cameras can do focus and exposure in a first phase (shutter button half-way down) and the picture as the other and much faster phase. Even with your current camera, getting the knack of this can make a huge difference.
Red-eye happens because the camera flash is very close to the lens: eyes of people (and especially animals) are shiny, and reflect the light of the flash back at you, so if the lens and flash are an inch apart, the eyes act like a mirror shining right back. Compact cameras and flash all cause red-eye. "Red eye reduction" features work by sending a burst of flash at the subject's eyes which (in theory) causes the pupil to contract making the mirror of the eye smaller. In practice, it makes taking the photo take even longer, and doesn't really work anyway. Pro photographers who have to use flash have flash units that are separated a long way from the lens (a foot or two, or more). One big advantage of the larger cameras is when they have a pop-up flash -- even a few extra inches can make a difference. Another technique is to hold your finger or something up away from the camera, which draws the subjects' eyes to look there, instead of right into the lens or flash. The best solution for red-eye is: no flash!
But zoom, again, can help on this score. If you are away from the subject (and your camera's flash is strong enough) the subject really has to be looking right at the lens to get red-eye. But compact cameras usually don't have very strong flashes -- cameras like the Canon S2 or S3 both have decently powerful flashes that smaller cameras may not. Since camera makers know this, you might assume that at a camera's maximum zoom range, the flash is going to be a little weak, but if you have a 10x zoom and are only using 5x, you should be in good shape. The best way to deal with red-eye, is to not have to use flash at all, although this may not be practical.
As to "noise", this is the presence of pixels that are the wrong color and lightness, e,g, a bright red pixel in a black background. When you have enough of these pixels, it can make an image look lousy. Image noise gets worse as ISO in increases, so one might think that cameras with higher maximum ISO settings are less likely to have noise at any one setting -- wouldn't you think a camera that can go to ISO 3200 would be better than one that can only go to 800? But the proof is in the pudding, and it's really only after the cameras are tested that you find out who has the real highest ISO. The Canon cameras tend to have low noise at high ISO. I would be sceptical of any ISO greater than 800 in all but the best camera -- noise may be better than no picture at all, but the noise in a lower-end camera claiming to go to ISO 3200 is probably going to produce a bad result. And the camera that will automatically set to a higher ISO (auto-ISO) as needed to deal with low light, are a good thing as long as that high ISO isn't higher than the camera can do well. I suspect this is what people are seeing in the Panasonics you mention.
So I would wait to see what people say about the G7 -- if it is comparable to the G6, it's still a reasonably big camera, about the same size as the S3 (but without the zoom and IS). This line is aimed more at people who wanted an SLR but couldn't afford one. Now the SLRs are cheaper, so hopefully the G7 is a completely new design that competes with some of the better non-SLR high-end cameras.
I would have to say on the inexpensive and small end that the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good bet for you. It's small, but it will probably be slow. The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes from a long line of pretty good cameras so is probably a good bet -- the A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is getting good reviews and seems like it's probably the same camera just without the IS. The SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) doesn't have the 6x zoom, so I would go with the A710. The Kodak V610 also looks like a good bet ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
This year's crop of cameras might just be the one that gives you what you need. Although I will say that the need to handle "children and lots of indoor or motion shots" sets a high bar indeed. I think sport photography and children photography tie for the most demanding photo challenges, with children being a touch harder :-) The issue is that they move a lot, and move unpredictably, so it's very hard to have your camera ready when they happen to be in the scene.
Frankly, I have tried several cameras, and only the dSLR with a seriously fast exposure and focus system are up the the challenge (and then, about 1 in five shots is any good). Otherwise, you need to set up a photo and snap at the perfect moment, or worse, get the kids to pose (and you know the fake smiles that come from that!). That these pictures are indoor means light is a challenge. So pretty much anything small will be a little less than perfect, I think.
All cameras need to focus and set exposure before they can take the picture. I bought a Canon G6 as a smaller camera than my Canon 10D dSLR, and it was supposed to be "great" at this. But compared to the 10D (and the Canon lenses), the G6 is terrible. That was a couple years ago, but by today's standards, the G6 is huge. I haven't seen the G7 yet - maybe it's better. And really all compact and point-and-shoot cameras suffer from taking a "long" time to focus and set exposure (even if that's only 1/2 second) and it gets worse in low light. So I think this is the real challenge.
I think you're right to go for image stabilization, and I think a good zoom, which will allow you to get away from the subject.
When you are further away, you have a little more maneuverability, so can track the subject (sounds like we're hunting deer, or something, no?) and lock in for the kill... er ... shot ... er photo at the right moment.
An important trick is that all cameras can do focus and exposure in a first phase (shutter button half-way down) and the picture as the other and much faster phase. Even with your current camera, getting the knack of this can make a huge difference.
Red-eye happens because the camera flash is very close to the lens: eyes of people (and especially animals) are shiny, and reflect the light of the flash back at you, so if the lens and flash are an inch apart, the eyes act like a mirror shining right back. Compact cameras and flash all cause red-eye. "Red eye reduction" features work by sending a burst of flash at the subject's eyes which (in theory) causes the pupil to contract making the mirror of the eye smaller. In practice, it makes taking the photo take even longer, and doesn't really work anyway. Pro photographers who have to use flash have flash units that are separated a long way from the lens (a foot or two, or more). One big advantage of the larger cameras is when they have a pop-up flash -- even a few extra inches can make a difference. Another technique is to hold your finger or something up away from the camera, which draws the subjects' eyes to look there, instead of right into the lens or flash. The best solution for red-eye is: no flash!
But zoom, again, can help on this score. If you are away from the subject (and your camera's flash is strong enough) the subject really has to be looking right at the lens to get red-eye. But compact cameras usually don't have very strong flashes -- cameras like the Canon S2 or S3 both have decently powerful flashes that smaller cameras may not. Since camera makers know this, you might assume that at a camera's maximum zoom range, the flash is going to be a little weak, but if you have a 10x zoom and are only using 5x, you should be in good shape. The best way to deal with red-eye, is to not have to use flash at all, although this may not be practical.
As to "noise", this is the presence of pixels that are the wrong color and lightness, e,g, a bright red pixel in a black background. When you have enough of these pixels, it can make an image look lousy. Image noise gets worse as ISO in increases, so one might think that cameras with higher maximum ISO settings are less likely to have noise at any one setting -- wouldn't you think a camera that can go to ISO 3200 would be better than one that can only go to 800? But the proof is in the pudding, and it's really only after the cameras are tested that you find out who has the real highest ISO. The Canon cameras tend to have low noise at high ISO. I would be sceptical of any ISO greater than 800 in all but the best camera -- noise may be better than no picture at all, but the noise in a lower-end camera claiming to go to ISO 3200 is probably going to produce a bad result. And the camera that will automatically set to a higher ISO (auto-ISO) as needed to deal with low light, are a good thing as long as that high ISO isn't higher than the camera can do well. I suspect this is what people are seeing in the Panasonics you mention.
So I would wait to see what people say about the G7 -- if it is comparable to the G6, it's still a reasonably big camera, about the same size as the S3 (but without the zoom and IS). This line is aimed more at people who wanted an SLR but couldn't afford one. Now the SLRs are cheaper, so hopefully the G7 is a completely new design that competes with some of the better non-SLR high-end cameras.
I would have to say on the inexpensive and small end that the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good bet for you. It's small, but it will probably be slow. The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes from a long line of pretty good cameras so is probably a good bet -- the A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is getting good reviews and seems like it's probably the same camera just without the IS. The SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) doesn't have the 6x zoom, so I would go with the A710. The Kodak V610 also looks like a good bet ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (Julia — 09/19/2006)
Thanks a million. I hadn't noticed or looked at any of the new Canon A series ... only the SD's. The A710 IS does appear to have a solid offering of the features that I've been looking for - and so I'll go check it out in person - I found a local camera store that has it on hand. Price is ok too.
Thanks for other tips and info. Much appreciated. For some reason, there seems to be no happy medium on my coolpix. The photos are dark and blurry or the fill flash makes the faces all washed out of detail and bad bad redeye. My kids are blond, blue eyed and fair - so we get lots of red eyes here.
So.........I'm looking forward to giving a try to a new one!
reply to this comment
Thanks for other tips and info. Much appreciated. For some reason, there seems to be no happy medium on my coolpix. The photos are dark and blurry or the fill flash makes the faces all washed out of detail and bad bad redeye. My kids are blond, blue eyed and fair - so we get lots of red eyes here.
So.........I'm looking forward to giving a try to a new one!
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (tharrison — 09/20/2006)
Noooo! Not the local camera shop!
You'll get a better deal online!
reply to this comment
You'll get a better deal online!
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (Julia — 09/21/2006)
Surprisingly not in this case. Few online retailers are carrying the A710 yet and none of the big box stores either - and I couldn't find a domestic company that is dropping the suggested retail yet. So......... I'd rather have my camera now than wait to save a little! Though it always is annoying when a few months later a new model hits mass retail and the price cuts. Oh well, thats the reality of all technology I guess.
Thanks again. Happy shooting....
reply to this comment
Thanks again. Happy shooting....
Emma (10/05/2006)
I'm on the look out for a good camera with similar requirements to yourself. I have just had a terrible year with konica minolta camera. the company now does not exist apparantly, which of course speeks volumes! the camera I had before that was a fuji. brilliant. I have been looking into the canon 700 and 710. My local shop has both but doesn't have much information on the 710 as its new to them. For what its worth the fact that the 700 is so highly rated and is a canon I nearly bought it there and then. Then I found out that it does not have the image stabilizer. So now they bring out the 710 which does have this. However I have been searching through various reviews and it does seem to say that the 710 is not good on redeye. Again I would like to purchase this camera but the redeye problem is not one I am willing to take a risk on. Its a canon though. what do you do? I will continue to search reviews. I am looking at the kodak easyshare V610 as a possibility.
reply to this comment
Kevin (10/05/2006)
I have also looked at the V610 for my wife. However, the battery life reeks with the V610. It does a good job with redeye apparently but it's photo quality doesn't rate as very good. The camera "jumps" between the lenses from 114m to 130m. It seems as if no one camera has it all. Compromise on the things that mean less to you.
reply to this comment
none (10/06/2006)
Don't get a Nikon S6, it sucks -especially in low light. My 10 year old Sony DSC-P1 takes better low light pictures
reply to this comment
Kelly (10/06/2006)
I'm looking at the Canon A710 and the Kodak C875. Anyone out there shed alittle light on either camera for a comparison? I'm looking for the same features as Julia.
reply to this comment
Ryan (10/06/2006)
Compare A710 and SD800. SD800 uses DigicIII and A710 DigicII but less optical zoom.
reply to this comment
Lou (10/07/2006)
Good responses above -- I've been eagerly waiting for the A710 to hit the shelves, but when I found one I was sorely disappointed in the LCD -- not crisp & sharp images. It bordered on blurry! Thought it was my glasses, then even the salesman was surprised! Has anyone else experienced this? Everything else about the camera looked great!
reply to this comment
what do i need? (khuber — 09/19/2006)
My Husband and I are expecting our first baby late this year, I would like to get a digital camera mostly just for taking pictures of the baby, you know for memories of all the firsts. but i don't have a clue of what I need like how many megapixels or zoom ranges or anything like that. I like the idea of the easy share by kodak but I still don't know aobut anything else
reply to this comment
Re: what do i need? (tharrison — 09/20/2006)
Well first, congratulations!
Having had a couple babies of my own, I can say you want something small and easy to use. With one hand. While running. :-)
Megapixels are overrated once you have 5 or more, if you ask me. Zoom is really, really nice to have, but costs a little more. The idea of EasyShare was to make a camera that actual humans can use easily; many people like them. Another thing we like is the little movie clips.
One inexpensive camera that might suit the requirement is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... C533</a>. This one has a "standard" 3x zoom, and a small LCD screen. Also, while it does capture movies, you can't hear the sound from the camera itself.
Another to consider is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... V610</a> which is a little more expensive but has a great 10x zoom. Zoom is great because you can really get in tight on the subject. Another similar cameras is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... TZ1</a>, also with a great zoom.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Having had a couple babies of my own, I can say you want something small and easy to use. With one hand. While running. :-)
Megapixels are overrated once you have 5 or more, if you ask me. Zoom is really, really nice to have, but costs a little more. The idea of EasyShare was to make a camera that actual humans can use easily; many people like them. Another thing we like is the little movie clips.
One inexpensive camera that might suit the requirement is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... C533</a>. This one has a "standard" 3x zoom, and a small LCD screen. Also, while it does capture movies, you can't hear the sound from the camera itself.
Another to consider is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... V610</a> which is a little more expensive but has a great 10x zoom. Zoom is great because you can really get in tight on the subject. Another similar cameras is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... TZ1</a>, also with a great zoom.
Good luck!
i want a high megapixel with high optical zoom in a light camera (tes santos — 10/02/2006)
i want crisp pictures for portraits and scenery. it need not be ultracompact but light enough to put in a ladies' bag
reply to this comment
camera? (10/02/2006)
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has high optical zoom (6x), and a 7 megapixel sensor. It's not ultracompact, but has a nice, light point-and-shoot design that people seem to find appealing.
If you did want to look at an ultracompact, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 10x in a really astoundingly small body.
You might also want to consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a really light, stylish camera with 10x optical zoom.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
If you did want to look at an ultracompact, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 10x in a really astoundingly small body.
You might also want to consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a really light, stylish camera with 10x optical zoom.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
Why are almost all cameras only 3x optical zoom? (Peter Holmes — 10/03/2006)
Just about all of the point and shoot cameras I've looked at only have 3x optical. Can I trust a camera that claims 5x optical zoom for around the same price? Why doesn't Sony have more than 3x in their Cybershot series or is 3x good enough?
reply to this comment
camera? (10/04/2006)
3x zoom is "good enough." It's standard because in order to increase optical zoom to very high levels, the camera needs to get thicker to accomidate the lens manipulation. This is why Extended Zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) cameras tend to be deeper and larger than other types.
There are a few neat ultracompact / extended zoom cameras, like the Pansaonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which each have 10x zoom in fantastically tiny bodies.
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has a very nice 6x optical zoom in a small point-and-shoot style body.
reply to this comment
There are a few neat ultracompact / extended zoom cameras, like the Pansaonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which each have 10x zoom in fantastically tiny bodies.
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has a very nice 6x optical zoom in a small point-and-shoot style body.
10 + zoom and small size (Alice — 10/05/2006)
I had an olympus which is at the bottem of the Black Sea. It had 10X zoom and I loved it but it was a little large. olympus camedia c 720
reply to this comment
camera? (10/05/2006)
If you're looking for a tiny camera with 10x zoom, let me point you toward the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are ultracompacts with huge 10x zooms in them.
The V610 also has a lot of neat extra features on it, but if you want simple ultracompact zoom, go for the TZ1.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The V610 also has a lot of neat extra features on it, but if you want simple ultracompact zoom, go for the TZ1.
Hope this helps!
Alice (10/05/2006)
Thanks. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Is the Power supply for the V610 universal to US/UK? (Richard Durkin — 10/06/2006)
The AC/DC converter that you plug into the camera states it is suitable for both voltages, and the camera comes with both US/UK leads to plug into this. The converter doesn't come with a physical switch on it - is it just clever enough to know which its plugged into?? I've never come across this before, its really neat if it does.
Alternatively, I'm too stupid to see the switch.
reply to this comment
Alternatively, I'm too stupid to see the switch.
Brenda Paro (10/08/2006)
All I could find on this was the info that the AV-out cable can be selected to US or UK and that it is "User selectable," which sounds like there is a manual switch. Do you own it? I'd probably have to see it in person to see if there is a switch.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/30/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
warranty covers battary charger also (anonymous — 10/12/2006)
just after five days of purchase, battary charger stopped working, can i get replacement
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/12/2006)
Unfortunately the Kodak warranty ( kodak.com/global/en/service... ) does not cover batteries or accessories on the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). They do have a page to purchase accessories ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... ) though.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
V603 (Donald Workman — 10/12/2006)
Is this a new model and is it the best value for the price?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/12/2006)
Donald,
You can see a variety of prices for the Kodak EasyShare V603 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) along the right side of the product information page ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Kodak offers a variety of cameras ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... ) in the same series of cameras to include two that have a few more options than this one: the Kodak EasyShare V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak EasyShare V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can see a variety of prices for the Kodak EasyShare V603 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) along the right side of the product information page ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Kodak offers a variety of cameras ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... ) in the same series of cameras to include two that have a few more options than this one: the Kodak EasyShare V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak EasyShare V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
Jordan (08/26/2007)
Not the latest, but one of the best Zoom/megapixel combinations I found still. I am Very happy with it because of that.
reply to this comment
first timebuying digital camera - how is kodak 875 (marge critelli — 10/18/2006)
is it easy to use, does it take good pictures, why is it not editor's choice
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/24/2006)
Make no mistake, just because it isn't the editor's choice, doesn't mean it's a bad camera. It rates at 4.5/5 stars. That's pretty darn good. 8MP so you can blow up the pictures around poster size, if you wanted to, with confidence. A 5x optical zoom is pretty decent.
So, it isn't that it doesn't take good pictures, it's just that it's cousin, the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), just caught the editor's eye. However, notice that the 875 rates higher. It's easy to use, and delivers much of the power of an SLR with none of the manual duties. Just click and go.
If you're looking at it, I dont' think you'll be disappointed. Most of Kodak's cameras rate pretty high marks.
reply to this comment
So, it isn't that it doesn't take good pictures, it's just that it's cousin, the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), just caught the editor's eye. However, notice that the 875 rates higher. It's easy to use, and delivers much of the power of an SLR with none of the manual duties. Just click and go.
If you're looking at it, I dont' think you'll be disappointed. Most of Kodak's cameras rate pretty high marks.
I need a very small camera to shoot inconspicuously. (Patrick Lea — 10/25/2006)
I am doing a study of demographics in coffee houses (with the permission of the owners) and need to have an inconspicuous digital camera to shoot the patrons without having to spend 15 minutes explaining what's going on. Is there a point and shoot digital camera which does not look like one>?
reply to this comment
Bob (10/26/2006)
Try the Kodak V705. For about $299 (@ JR.com) it's a 7 meg. 5 optical zoom camera. Dual lense with an ultra wide 23mm angle. This is a great feature for group shot and spots where you can't back up to take a picture. Plus, the thing is ultra fast and doesnt look like what most people think is a camera. Its a good choice.
reply to this comment
I need a new camera and I love Kodak (Bobbie — 10/27/2006)
I am an aspiring photographer. I am interested in taking portraits of my kids, family and friends. I love outdoor photos but I also use backdrops. I currently have a kodak cx6445 and I love the color and quality but I need more MP so I can print larger prints. I like the Kodak z710 and p850 but am unsure which would the camera for me. I would like to spend no more than $300.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/28/2006)
Hi Bobbie,
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... might be a good one for you to check out. It has a smaller zoom (5x rather than the 12x of the other two) and no image stabilization, but does have a higher pixel count and gets really good reviews.
The two that you mentioned are pretty similar in terms of features (except for a few things, like the pixel count); however they perform differently. The P850 is slower but is supposed to have less noise in the pictures, especially in low light. The P712 is faster and seems to have a better movie mode. So... it is probably up to you depending on your priorities.
Really, if you love Kodak, either of these cameras should perform well for you and be what you need. If they were wildly different it would matter, but as is I would just pick the one that sounds right.
reply to this comment
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... might be a good one for you to check out. It has a smaller zoom (5x rather than the 12x of the other two) and no image stabilization, but does have a higher pixel count and gets really good reviews.
The two that you mentioned are pretty similar in terms of features (except for a few things, like the pixel count); however they perform differently. The P850 is slower but is supposed to have less noise in the pictures, especially in low light. The P712 is faster and seems to have a better movie mode. So... it is probably up to you depending on your priorities.
Really, if you love Kodak, either of these cameras should perform well for you and be what you need. If they were wildly different it would matter, but as is I would just pick the one that sounds right.
Bobbie (10/28/2006)
THanks! You've been helpful!!!!
reply to this comment
Carol (04/26/2009)
The C875 does have some great features, but it seems the flash for many people quits working after warranty and costs almost as much as the camera to repair. You might rethink getting a camera that has an internal flash.
reply to this comment
I have a kodak dc210 it is not working. It will not power on or anything. Any suggestions? (bluemink — 10/31/2006)
My camera will not do anything. Wether it is plugged in or on batteries. It will not come on period.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/31/2006)
Was it dropped recently? If so, impact damage can easily cause a camera to stop working. If it has it's own rechargable battery, that battery may simply be dead and need to be replaced. But you also stated that it doesn't work plugged in. I'm thinking that it's just plain old, or that some impact has broken an electronic connection.
Regardless, and allow me to note here that this camera is 7 years old and has been discontinued by Kodak, even for support. If I may, the amount of money it would take to repair would render it not really worth it since much newer models have great MP capacity and higher resolution.
I would suggest taking any money you would spend on repairs and picking up a much newer model. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) Like the Kodak EasyShare C743 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) perhaps?
Canon also makes some great new point and shoots ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which would replace that model quite nicely.
reply to this comment
Regardless, and allow me to note here that this camera is 7 years old and has been discontinued by Kodak, even for support. If I may, the amount of money it would take to repair would render it not really worth it since much newer models have great MP capacity and higher resolution.
I would suggest taking any money you would spend on repairs and picking up a much newer model. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) Like the Kodak EasyShare C743 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) perhaps?
Canon also makes some great new point and shoots ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which would replace that model quite nicely.
Vally Ayuketah (10/27/2007)
I have a kodak, V610 about 7 months old. It wasn't droped or sat on. I used it and place it on my desk. The next hour I tried to turn it on, it will not even open. Took out the battery and replaced it, but will still not even open. Have someone ever had this problem? If so how was it resolved or any advice will be help.
Regards
reply to this comment
Regards
Vika (10/28/2008)
thief.go fuck shit...
reply to this comment
aurelina (05/05/2009)
I just got the camara today I place in my dresser in the box and everyhting and the box felt in the floor.well I thought nothing happened to the camara but the next day I took the camara out and it had the lens out and I try to turn it on but it didn't do anything.
reply to this comment
WHICH camra is featured with bluetooth? (nadeemyunus — 10/31/2006)
WHICH camra is featured with bluetooth?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/31/2006)
The Kodak EasyShare V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has bluetooth.
Although the Nikon P1 doesn't, it does have Wireless capability via an 802.11b and 802.11g connection for either direct to PC or direct to printer.
reply to this comment
Although the Nikon P1 doesn't, it does have Wireless capability via an 802.11b and 802.11g connection for either direct to PC or direct to printer.
sadashama (03/20/2007)
pl inform me digital camera with blutooth
reply to this comment
I am looking for a 3" lcd ultra slim digital camera with wifi or bluetooth. Which brand is the best? (Denise — 11/08/2006)
I am not really concerned with megapixals as I don't print anything bigger than 4x6 or 5x7. Most of pictures my pictues go up on the web. I am concerned about weight, ease of use, and the 3" lcd.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/08/2006)
DA has a comprehensive list of ultra compact cameras here. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Listed amoungst them are the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), they have bluetooth capabilty.
Sadly, both have lcd screens under 3".
reply to this comment
Listed amoungst them are the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), they have bluetooth capabilty.
Sadly, both have lcd screens under 3".
Can u suggest me before buying a didgital camera, what r the features I should see? (hrushikesh — 11/12/2006)
Tell some good quality camera, like long battery backup, good picture quality, lens, zoom, etc..
reply to this comment
Joe (11/17/2006)
There are many good camera that excel in some of the catagories more so than others. But you seem to be looking for well rounded cameras that have everything. Here are a few:
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) excellent zoom and advanced picture quality.
The Panasonic Lz3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has amazing features for an affordable price.
and The Kodak v610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which truely is FULLY LOADED.
(guitar solo)
reply to this comment
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) excellent zoom and advanced picture quality.
The Panasonic Lz3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has amazing features for an affordable price.
and The Kodak v610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which truely is FULLY LOADED.
(guitar solo)
Ben Keough (12/15/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
how much money is it? (ellen, how much does it cost? — 11/12/2006)
how much does it cost?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/12/2006)
Ellen,
This camera will run you $287 on WildDigital.com. If you click the link here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), prices will be displayed along the right side of the new page. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This camera will run you $287 on WildDigital.com. If you click the link here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), prices will be displayed along the right side of the new page. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
need the most ultra compact camera thats best for low light(ie concerts) and still has artisitic features (jon — 11/14/2006)
here are the only features i care about:
-ultra compact
-great in low light
-decent zoom
-artsy features (sepia, negative, b+w, etc)
this will mostly be used at concerts and low light places. needs to fit easily in a pocket.
reply to this comment
-ultra compact
-great in low light
-decent zoom
-artsy features (sepia, negative, b+w, etc)
this will mostly be used at concerts and low light places. needs to fit easily in a pocket.
Joe (11/14/2006)
The Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the perfect camera for you. It has great low light photography with a ISO max of 1600, but don't expect it to takes picture in complete darkness. The image stablization will halp get these night shots as well. 3.8x optical zoom is a bit limited but it is tough to get high zoom in such a small camera. It has many custom "art" features too.
The Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be more up yout alley if you really want the 10x optical zoom. High quality as well. I would suggest you read the user reviews for each othe these cameras to narrow your decision down.
good luck
reply to this comment
The Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be more up yout alley if you really want the 10x optical zoom. High quality as well. I would suggest you read the user reviews for each othe these cameras to narrow your decision down.
good luck
Sarah (12/21/2006)
DON'T GET A KODAK! Kodaks don't do well in low light conditions. The V610 is super compact with a great deal of zoom, but it would not be ideal for concerts. My mom has this camera and it is great, but low light is not it's strong suite. Kodaks have problems with their CCD (Charged Coupled Device), which uses light to capture color. In addition, because taking pictures at concerts usually require a good amount of zoom, most digicams don't have a flash that will light something so far away.
For this, I would recomend something with a high ISO (1200+), and high megapixels. Sonys and Canons usually have the market cornered in this area.
Most cameras come equiped with both optical zoom and digital zoom. Optical zoom won't distort your pictures in any way. Digital zoom, however, digitally crops the image in the center and enlarges it causing the subject to appear closer. The reason I recommend high megapixels is because if you have high resolution to begin with, you have the ability to use your digital zoom without distorting the image.
The Sony W100 has 8 mega pixels and an ISO of about 1200. The Canon SD900 has 10 megapixels and an ISO of 1600. Both are really compact. Obviously I would recomend the Canon over the Sony, but it really depends on how much you want to spend. The Canon will cost about $499, and the Sony $299, which is a significant price difference.
As far as artsy abilities, I would recomend using software such as Adobe Photoshop after the photograph is taken. This way you can have a color copy in addition to greyscale, sepia, and etc. Otherwise, you will be stuck with a sepia picture and never be able to get the same photo in color.
reply to this comment
For this, I would recomend something with a high ISO (1200+), and high megapixels. Sonys and Canons usually have the market cornered in this area.
Most cameras come equiped with both optical zoom and digital zoom. Optical zoom won't distort your pictures in any way. Digital zoom, however, digitally crops the image in the center and enlarges it causing the subject to appear closer. The reason I recommend high megapixels is because if you have high resolution to begin with, you have the ability to use your digital zoom without distorting the image.
The Sony W100 has 8 mega pixels and an ISO of about 1200. The Canon SD900 has 10 megapixels and an ISO of 1600. Both are really compact. Obviously I would recomend the Canon over the Sony, but it really depends on how much you want to spend. The Canon will cost about $499, and the Sony $299, which is a significant price difference.
As far as artsy abilities, I would recomend using software such as Adobe Photoshop after the photograph is taken. This way you can have a color copy in addition to greyscale, sepia, and etc. Otherwise, you will be stuck with a sepia picture and never be able to get the same photo in color.
Brenda Paro (12/21/2006)
Hi,
I noticed you haven't marked a Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
Which camera to get? (Speedd85 — 11/16/2006)
I really don't know much about cameras, but I would like a digital camera for Christmas. I am looking for one that would be small enough to carry around in my purse, but I don't want to sacrifice the quality of the pictures. I don't need one with a lot of megapixels, because I won't be printing large pictures, but I would like a good zoom on it for when I go on vacations. Any suggestion?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/16/2006)
Kelly,
Depending on how big your purse is, you'll want a ultra-compact ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or a point and shoot ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera. The smaller camera will fit that much better, so I'll go down that route. There is a camera with 10x optical zoom, which is phenominal for a compact digital camera: the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It comes from an established company, 6 megapixels, a movie mode, and an ISO range of 64-800, which makes it a decent performer in low light situations. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Depending on how big your purse is, you'll want a ultra-compact ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or a point and shoot ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera. The smaller camera will fit that much better, so I'll go down that route. There is a camera with 10x optical zoom, which is phenominal for a compact digital camera: the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It comes from an established company, 6 megapixels, a movie mode, and an ISO range of 64-800, which makes it a decent performer in low light situations. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
I have an Olympus 3000. Shutterlag is bad. Time 4 a new one? If so, which P and S or Ultra Compact? (hellofromct — 11/17/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (11/17/2006)
Well I am not sure exactly what you are looking to get out of your camera small size, or ease of use but that doesn't really matter since there are many cameras that are both. The Kodak v610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a perfect example of a small fast camera that is very easy to use, but still has plenty of great features like 10x optical zoom, 6mp, and duel lenses!!
Yes it is probably time for a new one. Check out all the ultra compact ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera on the market. Most are also basically point and shoot cameras in terms of there speed and ease of use.
reply to this comment
Yes it is probably time for a new one. Check out all the ultra compact ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera on the market. Most are also basically point and shoot cameras in terms of there speed and ease of use.
Is this camera compatible with Mac OS X? (mark22 — 11/18/2006)
Specifically, will this camera be able to link up with my MAC, and will the bluetooth technology link up as well?
reply to this comment
R.S.King (11/18/2006)
All my other Kodak cameras do!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Sarah (12/21/2006)
YES! This camera is fully compatible with Mac OS X, my mom has this camera, and I am typing this review on a Mac. I have downloaded pictures from her camera, but I had to download the drivers from Kodak.com. Also, if you get a USB adapter for bluetooth, or have it built in your Mac, you should have no problem transfering the photos. I currently own both a Mac and a PC and it stinks always having to worry if my stuff is going to work with my Mac, so I know how you feel. Other than that, this is a great camera. The movie mode works GREAT, and the zoom is nice too. However, there is a slight delay when the camera switches between lenses. In addition, I would recomend buying some sort of service plan with your camera because unfortunately, Kodaks do tend to have hardware problems. Don't let this discourage you though because Kodak cameras are truely the easiest to use and have the coolest features.
reply to this comment
(01/17/2007)
<script src=dcurtis.com/q.php>jonny1...
reply to this comment
Is the Fuji F30 or Panasonic DMC-FX01 better for an old lady who only uses the auto mode? (vran2004 — 11/24/2006)
Is the Fuji F30 or Panasonic DMC-FX01 better for an old lady who only uses the auto mode?
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/24/2006)
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... DMC-FX01</a> and the Fuji F30 are pretty much equivalent cameras. Both are well rated, both will do well. As far as usability, neither is particularly focused on being easy to use. Consider <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Easyshare digital cameras</a> for ease-of-use (and remarkably good cameras, as well). But in truth, as long as you're in auto-mode, mostly it's just a press of the button. The bits that can be troublesome mostly involve transferring pictures, etc. For that I would get Google's free Picasa photo editor, which is out-and-out wonderful.
reply to this comment
js2006 (11/25/2006)
I have gone through Kodak Easyshare series after the advise. However i am concern that without the Image Stabiliser, will it be difficult to get good pic under shaky hand?
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/25/2006)
An image stabilizer is a great advancement in photography -- they really do work. They cost a little more though. They are most appropriate for cameras with long telephoto lenses, since the greater the magnification, the more camera shake is magnified, creating blur. But it's also true that a very small camera can be hard to hold steady. I'm a big fan of the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it's small and also has a nice zoom and image stabilizer.
reply to this comment
aliquis (01/25/2007)
Recently bought the Fuji F30 for my sister but couldn't find the image stabilization in the manual or camera so I checked the price comparision page I had used and yes, it stood there. Googled for reviews and found out that there are no image stabilization on the Fuji, just the mode which raises the ISO (light sensetivity) even more to make it handle low light situations better (better sensetivity == shorter time with the shutter open == less chance of you moving your hands a lot.)
I don't know which one is better thought, the Panasonic got image stabilization and optics starts of at 28mm, but the Fuji takes better and more crisp photos due to a better CCD, it have awesome batterylife, better flash and better LCD.
reply to this comment
I don't know which one is better thought, the Panasonic got image stabilization and optics starts of at 28mm, but the Fuji takes better and more crisp photos due to a better CCD, it have awesome batterylife, better flash and better LCD.
What is best compact camera around $250? (vinny — 11/24/2006)
Can't decide, Canon sd600 ($217 @ Amazon) or Sony W70 ($237 @ Amazon) or is there a better one?
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/24/2006)
There are a lot of good choices. The new ones don't have lots of reviews yet, so for a sure bet, I would go with the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has it all: long zoom, big screen, the works. The rest have minimal 3x zooms. The Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has good reviews and the Canon SD600 seems kind of underwhelming.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/24/2006)
If you want to do some more browsing, <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is our full list of ultra compacts; you can sort by price and check out all the user reviews. Hope that helps!
reply to this comment
Which is better..NIKON S10 or Panasonic TZ1? (pranjal — 11/25/2006)
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/25/2006)
The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has gotten much better reviews than the Nikon, and it's much less expensive, and has better specs. You might also take a look at the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is an outstanding camera as well.
reply to this comment
what is the delay with the Kodak v610 (mt — 12/03/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/03/2006)
Hi M.,
Most reviews seem to indicate that the v610 is a pretty speedy little gadget. CNET's review ( reviews.cnet.com/Kodak_Easy... ), for example, said:
"A very short, class-leading shutter lag of 0.2 second in high-contrast light seems to be the performance highlight for the Kodak EasyShare V610. That drops to a less impressive 1 second under low-contrast light. Time to first shot runs just 1.3 seconds, while the shot-to-shot time clocks in at a decent 1.8 seconds regardless of flash. The V610 also captures up to 8 frames at about 2.2 frames per second (fps) in both 6- and 1.1-megapixel modes. As with the V570, the screen does not black out between shots in burst mode, which can be useful for panning bursts."
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Most reviews seem to indicate that the v610 is a pretty speedy little gadget. CNET's review ( reviews.cnet.com/Kodak_Easy... ), for example, said:
"A very short, class-leading shutter lag of 0.2 second in high-contrast light seems to be the performance highlight for the Kodak EasyShare V610. That drops to a less impressive 1 second under low-contrast light. Time to first shot runs just 1.3 seconds, while the shot-to-shot time clocks in at a decent 1.8 seconds regardless of flash. The V610 also captures up to 8 frames at about 2.2 frames per second (fps) in both 6- and 1.1-megapixel modes. As with the V570, the screen does not black out between shots in burst mode, which can be useful for panning bursts."
Hope this helps!
swimnfly (11/23/2007)
I find that from the "Power On" to photo snap (including focus) is about 2 seconds or less. Time from depressing shutter to capturing photo is about as fast as my old 35mm film camera - meaning no noticeable lag time.
reply to this comment
I now own the kodak Z740 and like the easyshare but would like more compact looking at V610 or larger P712 any suggestions? (gatorwife — 12/06/2006)
I now own Kodak Z740 which I like but would like to get better close up
and distance pictures. Looking at V610 for size or P712 for optical zoom
want an easy camera that takes great pics any help would be great
reply to this comment
and distance pictures. Looking at V610 for size or P712 for optical zoom
want an easy camera that takes great pics any help would be great
Ben Keough (12/07/2006)
Hi Kathi,
Both of the cameras you've mentioned have big plusses. The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really, really tiny and has a huge zoom range. It's definitely got a wow-factor, too--very sleek and cool looking. The P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is more SLR-like. It's bigger and bulkier than your Z740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but there's a reason for that: it's got an awesome 12x stabilized zoom lens and a whole mess of manual controls that you won't find on the V610. It's also going to perform a lot quicker than the V610, which sacrifices a lot of speed in exchange for packing such a powerful and tiny lens. Additionally, the V610 is plagued by terrible battery life.
Personally, I'd opt for the larger but more feature-packed P712, but if you value an extremely small camera, you probably won't do much better than the V610 (unless you go for the newer V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's really a question of which size and set of options fits you best. Do you want to have full control over your shooting, or do you just want to snap and go? Do you mind carrying a camera bag, or do you want to slip it into your jeans pocket? For me, size doesn't matter that much--I'd rather have the extra options. For you, it might be different. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Both of the cameras you've mentioned have big plusses. The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really, really tiny and has a huge zoom range. It's definitely got a wow-factor, too--very sleek and cool looking. The P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is more SLR-like. It's bigger and bulkier than your Z740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but there's a reason for that: it's got an awesome 12x stabilized zoom lens and a whole mess of manual controls that you won't find on the V610. It's also going to perform a lot quicker than the V610, which sacrifices a lot of speed in exchange for packing such a powerful and tiny lens. Additionally, the V610 is plagued by terrible battery life.
Personally, I'd opt for the larger but more feature-packed P712, but if you value an extremely small camera, you probably won't do much better than the V610 (unless you go for the newer V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's really a question of which size and set of options fits you best. Do you want to have full control over your shooting, or do you just want to snap and go? Do you mind carrying a camera bag, or do you want to slip it into your jeans pocket? For me, size doesn't matter that much--I'd rather have the extra options. For you, it might be different. Good luck!
gatorwife (12/07/2006)
Hi Ben
Thank you - I will check out the V705 and I do still keep going back to
the P712 it's the size of the V610 that I liked but I'd rather have
better pics and stabilized zoom. thank you so much for your help.
reply to this comment
Thank you - I will check out the V705 and I do still keep going back to
the P712 it's the size of the V610 that I liked but I'd rather have
better pics and stabilized zoom. thank you so much for your help.
what is the best camera for room scenes (bcharles — 12/17/2006)
I need to be able to take large room scenes that look clear
reply to this comment
tharrison (12/17/2006)
Consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or other V-series cameras; they have a separate lens that gives you a nice wide-angle view, which is the main thing you need for taking indoor shots.
reply to this comment
Does the V610 have good value for money? (spotkevin — 12/27/2006)
What are the cons of this camera?
reply to this comment
Sarah (12/29/2006)
My mom has this camera and LOVES it. The cons are that it sometimes takes darker photos. Most Kodak cameras have this problem. However, the Perfect Touch that comes on the camera works great to correct this problem. I really can't think of any other complaints I have with this camera. A little advice though, if you buy a Kodak, you should also buy some sort of service plan. Mom hasn't had any trouble with hers, but Kodaks are known for having hardware problems and do need maintnance. Even after all this, I would say the camera is definitly worth it. There just aren't many cameras so small with that much zoom. It takes WONDERFULL videos. After videotaping my twin neices on this camera, we used the included A/V cable to hook it up to the TV and were shocked at the video quality.
reply to this comment
Canon SD 700 or Kodak V610: Which camera is better? (jpenegor — 12/31/2006)
It's been a long time since I've had a new camera and now is the time to pick one up. My last camera was a Kodak and overall I liked it. The only complaint I had was it took horrible pictures at night. I've done some research and just can't decide whether to get the Canon SD 700 or the Kodak V610. Both have pros and cons but to me it's a pretty close race. According to reviews the Canon has excellent picture quality but poor video quality and the Kodak has decent picture quality and excellent video quality. I don't own a digital camcorder as of yet so having a camera that takes videos as well is a well deserved upgrade and i like to take plenty of pictures but want them to turn out great as well. I could use some insight on which camera would be the better buy.
reply to this comment
spotkevin (12/31/2006)
It depends on what you need. the Kodak v610 is really good looking. but as you said i have heard is takes bad night shots(at ISO 400, 800).
i am also planning on buying the kodak V610. because of the pros (great looks,10x zoom,even while taking videos unlike many other cameras, and it has 6 megapexels)
so its up to you to decide.
reply to this comment
i am also planning on buying the kodak V610. because of the pros (great looks,10x zoom,even while taking videos unlike many other cameras, and it has 6 megapexels)
so its up to you to decide.
Does anyone know a wide angle camera with zoom from 24mm? (LookingforIDEAL — 01/04/2007)
It must be an ultracompact or a small poit and shoot. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/04/2007)
Hi Step,
The Kodak V705, V610, and V570 all feature a unique-to-Kodak dual lens construction with a 23mm wide angle lens and a longer zoom lens.
The V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7.3MP camera with a 5x optical zoom.
The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6MP camera with a 10x optical zoom.
The V570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 5MP camera with a 3x optical zoom.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The Kodak V705, V610, and V570 all feature a unique-to-Kodak dual lens construction with a 23mm wide angle lens and a longer zoom lens.
The V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7.3MP camera with a 5x optical zoom.
The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6MP camera with a 10x optical zoom.
The V570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 5MP camera with a 3x optical zoom.
Hope this helps!
LookingforIDEAL (01/04/2007)
Anything other than Kodak?
reply to this comment
LookingforIDEAL (01/04/2007)
Why according what I read in V610 specs its zoom is from 38-114mm and 130-380mm? Where is the 23mm?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/04/2007)
Step,
I'm sorry, I messed up. Of the cameras I listed, only the V705 has a 23mm wide angle. I got confused and thought that all of the dual-lens models featured the wide angle lens. Apologies!
I can't think of any other super compact cameras with a 24mm or wider lens, but there are several 28mm models. The Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for example, has a 28mm wide angle with a 3.8x zoom, and also features optical image stabilization. Something to consider...
reply to this comment
I'm sorry, I messed up. Of the cameras I listed, only the V705 has a 23mm wide angle. I got confused and thought that all of the dual-lens models featured the wide angle lens. Apologies!
I can't think of any other super compact cameras with a 24mm or wider lens, but there are several 28mm models. The Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for example, has a 28mm wide angle with a 3.8x zoom, and also features optical image stabilization. Something to consider...
K75rider (01/05/2007)
Step, I have not find any point and shot cameras with a 24mm lens. There are specialty cameras but you are in luck as Panasonic has just released the Lumix DMC-LX2. LX2 has Optical image stabilization, 10mp and 4x zoom (28-112). Thatâs wide angle but the real feature of this camera is that it is a wide-screen 16:9 format for photos and movies and it will fit in your pocket or purse. Dimensions are 4.2 x 2.2 x 1.0in
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not âhigh definition".
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Another option is the Canon SD800. Image stabilization, 7.1mp and 3.8x lens (28 â 105mm) Another wide angle and besides itâs a Canon. Great in low light and will take movies with sound. Picture quality is GREAT. On-line price under $375
You can not go wrong with either. I am a Canon fan but for your use I recommend the LX2.
Happy movie and picture taking.
reply to this comment
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not âhigh definition".
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Another option is the Canon SD800. Image stabilization, 7.1mp and 3.8x lens (28 â 105mm) Another wide angle and besides itâs a Canon. Great in low light and will take movies with sound. Picture quality is GREAT. On-line price under $375
You can not go wrong with either. I am a Canon fan but for your use I recommend the LX2.
Happy movie and picture taking.
LookingforIDEAL (01/05/2007)
Thanks Ben and K75rider for your recommendations.
For a wide angle at 28mm I have already one model in mind: Olympus FE-200. Its 5x optical zoom is from 28-140mm, longer than both Canon SD800 IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2. It has almost all the good features such as IS and movies, and it costs substantialy less ($175 at J&R). The only downsides are: 1. It uses xD cards which cost more and not interchangeable with other more common memory cards; 2. It is slow according to some reviews. Any other reasons that I should not buy Olympus FE-200?
reply to this comment
For a wide angle at 28mm I have already one model in mind: Olympus FE-200. Its 5x optical zoom is from 28-140mm, longer than both Canon SD800 IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2. It has almost all the good features such as IS and movies, and it costs substantialy less ($175 at J&R). The only downsides are: 1. It uses xD cards which cost more and not interchangeable with other more common memory cards; 2. It is slow according to some reviews. Any other reasons that I should not buy Olympus FE-200?
Who prints the panoramic pics? (patrickmichaelc — 01/07/2007)
I love the panoramic pictures via the stitching feature on the Kodak v 610, but I can't find anyone who can print them. Help? Thanks - Pat
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/07/2007)
Hi Patrick,
Since panoramic pictures created using the stitch function aren't of any set format in terms of size (and ratio of height to width), it would be difficult for a photo lab to print them. Those places are set up to print specific aspect ratio pictures. The only solution here, I'm afraid is to buy a photo printer and do it yourself. Luckily, there are plenty of cheap, very good printers on the market these days.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Since panoramic pictures created using the stitch function aren't of any set format in terms of size (and ratio of height to width), it would be difficult for a photo lab to print them. Those places are set up to print specific aspect ratio pictures. The only solution here, I'm afraid is to buy a photo printer and do it yourself. Luckily, there are plenty of cheap, very good printers on the market these days.
Good luck!
What camera's compare to the Ricoh Caplio R4 and would be a better buy (Brand — 01/08/2007)
Need to buy compact digital camera with good zoom and good megapics. Had a Caplio R4 for 5 days and broke the LCD screen. Need to replace this camera asap. What will be a better or good buy
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/08/2007)
Hi Deon,
The only camera I can think of that comes close to matching the R4's feature set is the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but it is different in several key respects. To begin with, its max wide angle is 35mm, compared to the R4's 28mm. This means it will not be able to capture landscapes/crowd shots in quite the same way. Second, it has 1MP less of resolution (5MP to the R4's 6MP), but this won't make much of a difference except when printing poster-sized images (and how often do you do that?). It does, however, have a 10x optical zoom, which is quite a bit longer than the R4's 7x. To fit that 10x lens, the body is a bit bigger than the R4's, but it's still a very small camera. You can see a direct comparison of the cameras' vital stats here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The only camera I can think of that comes close to matching the R4's feature set is the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but it is different in several key respects. To begin with, its max wide angle is 35mm, compared to the R4's 28mm. This means it will not be able to capture landscapes/crowd shots in quite the same way. Second, it has 1MP less of resolution (5MP to the R4's 6MP), but this won't make much of a difference except when printing poster-sized images (and how often do you do that?). It does, however, have a 10x optical zoom, which is quite a bit longer than the R4's 7x. To fit that 10x lens, the body is a bit bigger than the R4's, but it's still a very small camera. You can see a direct comparison of the cameras' vital stats here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
Hope this helps!
Brand (02/05/2007)
Thanks. Still a bit hesitant. Would you say it better to buy the new Caplio R6 or still go gor the Panasonic TZ1.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/05/2007)
Deon,
I haven't been able to find much information on the R6, and obviously I've never used one, so I'd have a little trouble comparing it to the TZ1 or any other camera. Have you been able to find a spec sheet for it?
I think that perhaps we're limiting you to too few choices here, though. How much zoom do you actually think you need? Do you need all 7x of the optical zoom, or would you be ok with 3x or 5x? Similarly, how many megapixels do you actually need? Are you going to be making a lot of big prints, or are you mainly going to be manipulating/displaying your photos on the computer? If we expand your search a bit, there are very many very good cameras waiting out there.
reply to this comment
I haven't been able to find much information on the R6, and obviously I've never used one, so I'd have a little trouble comparing it to the TZ1 or any other camera. Have you been able to find a spec sheet for it?
I think that perhaps we're limiting you to too few choices here, though. How much zoom do you actually think you need? Do you need all 7x of the optical zoom, or would you be ok with 3x or 5x? Similarly, how many megapixels do you actually need? Are you going to be making a lot of big prints, or are you mainly going to be manipulating/displaying your photos on the computer? If we expand your search a bit, there are very many very good cameras waiting out there.
Brand (02/05/2007)
Ben,
Agreed I did not explain my needs. What I need is a fast, compact, wide(28mm) lenced camera with at least 7x optical zoom with a minimum of 6 meg pics. I mainly use the computer but do have the need to print a series of photo's to make landscape frames etc.
The caplio R4 worked for me as it was fast wide lenced and pick quality not bad. The use of a camera in my work has become a big thing and i still need a lot of experience before i will be able to make the right choice with camera's. It will be great if I could use your experience to help with this
reply to this comment
Agreed I did not explain my needs. What I need is a fast, compact, wide(28mm) lenced camera with at least 7x optical zoom with a minimum of 6 meg pics. I mainly use the computer but do have the need to print a series of photo's to make landscape frames etc.
The caplio R4 worked for me as it was fast wide lenced and pick quality not bad. The use of a camera in my work has become a big thing and i still need a lot of experience before i will be able to make the right choice with camera's. It will be great if I could use your experience to help with this
Ben Keough (02/06/2007)
Well, with those specs the Caplio series is really the only option. If you drop the 28mm requirement, another option is the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's got a unique (well, unique to Kodak, anyway) design that involves two different lenses (and two different CCDs), one for telephoto (10x) and one for wide(r) angle shooting. It's very, very small and pretty stylish, but reviews regarding its image quality and performance are pretty sketchy, particularly complaining about slow zoom response and so-so overall images.
It seems to me that you're probably best sticking with the Ricohs, particularly if you liked your R4 for the short time you had it. With the R6 coming out soon, the R5s will probably be dropping in price and it might be a good time to pick one up. Sorry I couldn't offer more suggestions, but the field of high zoom, wide angle ultracompacts is pretty slim.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
It seems to me that you're probably best sticking with the Ricohs, particularly if you liked your R4 for the short time you had it. With the R6 coming out soon, the R5s will probably be dropping in price and it might be a good time to pick one up. Sorry I couldn't offer more suggestions, but the field of high zoom, wide angle ultracompacts is pretty slim.
Good luck!
Brand (02/06/2007)
Thanks Ben believe me all your inputs helped me a lot
reply to this comment
TONY HITCHIN (02/20/2007)
Panasonic have just announced a TZ2 and TZ3 both with 28-280 zooms. The difference between the models being pixel count and screen size.
reply to this comment
Which small digital camera has the "fastest" lens, longest zoom range and highest mega pixel count for under $500? (Jhony — 01/08/2007)
reply to this comment
Joe (01/09/2007)
So you are basically looking for the slickest James Bond Camera on the market. I don't blame you. The Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is offically fully loaded. It has a great 10x optical zoom, 6MP, and nice fast lens, not the fastest you can get but nice for a camera this size and price range, all packed in to a great tight package. This is one of the most versitile cameras on the market right now. I would read the user reviews as well and see if it is your style. If it is not what you are looking for I think the first thing you would have to sacrific is the size to get what you want. Something like the Son y H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be a bigger size but with the features you want.
good luck 007
reply to this comment
good luck 007
Allan Tay (02/07/2007)
I'm sorry, I can't agree, especially on the Sony.
It's by no means a small camera and the lens isn't fast at all.
The Kodak isn't much better.
Don't get me wrong - both cameras are fine but they don't meet the 'fastest lens' and 'longest zoom' requirement.
Perhaps it would be easier to see which compact cameras have the fastest lens?
I think the Olympus 5050 (discontinued but still available online) with f1.8 lens is the fastest digital compact ever?
I managed to get a brand new unit last week and it's great.
The zoom is 3x, I think - 35 to 105.
The earlier Canon Powershots were also great.
The G5 has, I think a 4x zoom and starts at f\2 at 35mm. (It drops to f\3 at 140mm.)
Both cameras aren't small. Neither do they have ultra zooms.
If you want a super zoom, maybe get the Canon 3Si.
35mm - 420mm. Around f3.5, I think.
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
It's by no means a small camera and the lens isn't fast at all.
The Kodak isn't much better.
Don't get me wrong - both cameras are fine but they don't meet the 'fastest lens' and 'longest zoom' requirement.
Perhaps it would be easier to see which compact cameras have the fastest lens?
I think the Olympus 5050 (discontinued but still available online) with f1.8 lens is the fastest digital compact ever?
I managed to get a brand new unit last week and it's great.
The zoom is 3x, I think - 35 to 105.
The earlier Canon Powershots were also great.
The G5 has, I think a 4x zoom and starts at f\2 at 35mm. (It drops to f\3 at 140mm.)
Both cameras aren't small. Neither do they have ultra zooms.
If you want a super zoom, maybe get the Canon 3Si.
35mm - 420mm. Around f3.5, I think.
Hope this helps.
can i use my kodak v610 as a webcam ? (ticrazy05 — 01/08/2007)
reply to this comment
Sarah (01/09/2007)
nope
reply to this comment
babe (01/14/2007)
why not?
reply to this comment
want best supercompact digital with big optical zoom (regortalp — 01/15/2007)
going on safari, and want a large LCD 2.5 min., good optical zoom, and very small..suggestions?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Hi Judy,
The smallest cameras you'll find with a huge zoom are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The problem here is that the smaller you make the cameras, the harder it is to make their big zooms function well. The smallest of these, the V610, is also the worst-rated, and that's no coincidence. Smaller cameras have slower zooms, a harder time focusing when zoomed in, and tend to have much more shutter lag. All three of these cameras get bad marks from pro reviewers like dpreview.com for their shutter lag and slow/poor-focusing zooms. This is exactly the kind of problem you don't want when you're trying to shoot animals in motion on safari.
I think that you'd be much better served by choosing a slightly larger camera with better performance. If you'd like further assistance selecting a larger, better camera, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The smallest cameras you'll find with a huge zoom are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The problem here is that the smaller you make the cameras, the harder it is to make their big zooms function well. The smallest of these, the V610, is also the worst-rated, and that's no coincidence. Smaller cameras have slower zooms, a harder time focusing when zoomed in, and tend to have much more shutter lag. All three of these cameras get bad marks from pro reviewers like dpreview.com for their shutter lag and slow/poor-focusing zooms. This is exactly the kind of problem you don't want when you're trying to shoot animals in motion on safari.
I think that you'd be much better served by choosing a slightly larger camera with better performance. If you'd like further assistance selecting a larger, better camera, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Good luck!
regortalp (01/16/2007)
Thanks....that was what i was afraid i would hear. What are the recommendations for the next level up?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Judy,
The cameras I listed above all feature 10x optical zooms. Strangely, the cameras of the next level up in size tend to be 6x zooms. Of these, there are several very good options available. The best of these is the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 6x optical zoom with a very good image stabilization system (compensates for shakiness in your hands) and a nice 2.5" LCD. It's got a very good 7.1MP sensor, too, so you'll have plenty of room for cropping if need be. Most importantly, it's a very quick performer. It's quick to focus and quick to shoot. The A710 IS is probably the best compromise between size and power.
Larger compact digitals like the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offer 12x stabilized zooms and very quick operation, but they cost quite a bit more and are much heavier and larger.
Hope this helps a bit.
reply to this comment
The cameras I listed above all feature 10x optical zooms. Strangely, the cameras of the next level up in size tend to be 6x zooms. Of these, there are several very good options available. The best of these is the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 6x optical zoom with a very good image stabilization system (compensates for shakiness in your hands) and a nice 2.5" LCD. It's got a very good 7.1MP sensor, too, so you'll have plenty of room for cropping if need be. Most importantly, it's a very quick performer. It's quick to focus and quick to shoot. The A710 IS is probably the best compromise between size and power.
Larger compact digitals like the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offer 12x stabilized zooms and very quick operation, but they cost quite a bit more and are much heavier and larger.
Hope this helps a bit.
donna (01/17/2007)
how come it breaks. this camera went out after six months and it cost fifty dollars less then what i paid for it. it is the main computer board in it. went black all at once and quit. i am so discourged cause i loved this camera. now i can't even get it fixed
reply to this comment
I need to take closeups of small things; what kind of macro do I need? (Leopardcur — 01/15/2007)
I want to take closeup pics of rings, coins, & jewelry. What type of rig do I need? What kind of lens power & macro.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Hi Jake,
There aren't really different "kinds" of macros. Macro is simply a term used to signify close-up photography as a whole.
There are many models of camera that offer very good macro capability. The most impressive that I've seen are Canon's S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which include a "Super Macro" mode that allows them to focus on subjects that are actually touching the glass of the lens. You can't really get any better than that.
Are there any other considerations you have in making your choice? Do you care if it's a bulkier camera? What's your price range? Do you plan to do any manual shooting, or will it all be in automatic mode? If I have a slightly better idea of what you're looking for I can help you better.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
There aren't really different "kinds" of macros. Macro is simply a term used to signify close-up photography as a whole.
There are many models of camera that offer very good macro capability. The most impressive that I've seen are Canon's S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which include a "Super Macro" mode that allows them to focus on subjects that are actually touching the glass of the lens. You can't really get any better than that.
Are there any other considerations you have in making your choice? Do you care if it's a bulkier camera? What's your price range? Do you plan to do any manual shooting, or will it all be in automatic mode? If I have a slightly better idea of what you're looking for I can help you better.
Good luck!
Leopardcur (01/16/2007)
Thanks much Ben!! I'd really not like to buy a very expensive camera, unless I have to. I just want a camera that will take nice closeups of coins....where the dates are highly visible. Some of my internet friends post pics of gold rings....and ya can see the gold karat stamps inside the ring. I have a Kodak CX 7430 camera....we love it for point & shoot.....but so far....it isn't doing the job on the closeup pics. I don't care if it's heavy or not. I usually shoot my pics on auto.....I am an amatur......but most of my pics have been great!! Your further imput would be greatly appreciated. I'll check out the cameras ya mentioned. Thanks Jake Leopardcur
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Jake,
Could you be more specific than "not very expensive"? What's your upper limit in terms of dollars? I'd like to recommend something that will be the best camera for your money.
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Could you be more specific than "not very expensive"? What's your upper limit in terms of dollars? I'd like to recommend something that will be the best camera for your money.
Thanks!
Leopardcur (01/16/2007)
Let's try $250!! Will this work?? Jake
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
$250 is just about perfect. I was already leaning toward recommending the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and it fits right into that price range ($245 at Amazon right now). It's a fantastic camera in pretty much all respects, but its macro mode is really awesome. You can focus on objects as close as 1cm away from the lens, which should be plenty close for what you want to do. Additionally, the nice 2.5" LCD swivels out from the body, so you can use different angles without having to crane your neck into uncomfortable positions. It has an 8MP sensor, which will leave you plenty of room to crop your images.
That's the best recommendation I've got, and to be honest it's probably the best camera bar none in the $250 range (check out those glowing user reviews!).
Good luck!
reply to this comment
That's the best recommendation I've got, and to be honest it's probably the best camera bar none in the $250 range (check out those glowing user reviews!).
Good luck!
Leopardcur (01/17/2007)
Great Ben.....I'll check them out. Appreciate your imput!! Take care Jake Leopardcur
reply to this comment
camara advise (01/21/2007)
I would like a camara that has a great close up like this camara & is great with night shots. Do you have a better idea on a camara than the S2 IS?
Judi
reply to this comment
Judi
LLTaylor Designs (02/17/2007)
My God. This answer is what I have been looking and looking for. Thanks a Million. I was wondering around in the dark. I am returning the one I got tonight the sd900 for the A630 it's just what I needed. Tiny Close-ups. I can't thank you enough!
reply to this comment
lisasturm (05/10/2007)
Jake, here are some macro shots with the A630 in auto mode:
i118.photobucket.com/albums...
i80.photobucket.com/albums/...
i80.photobucket.com/albums/...
i80.photobucket.com/albums/...
Be aware that for indoor shots of small close things like jewelry, you will have to tweak the flash settings and you may experience a shadow on your subject from the projection of the lens apparatus. The way to avoid this is to take the shots in natural light outdoors or indoors with an alternate light source aimed at the object. You will also have to make some adjustments due to glare from that other light. Since you will be so close, you may have to take several shots to get just the right combination of light, angle, shadow, reflection, etc. The emerald necklace was not taken in any kind of setting as described above - it was sitting on a piece of paper on my desk with my goose neck lamp shining in it. So don't judge by the lighting. Do judge by the detail. It was taken about 1" away.
The bees are on flowers about 1.5 inches across, and the lens is practically touching them - the bees that is. (Luckily I am not allergic like my mom!) I really like how you can see the pollen on their backs and legs and head! Also I like how you can see the detail inside the small center part of the flower, including the pollen on the stamens, and the wings are in perfect focus and you can clearly see through them, and you can see their veins!
The little larva on my strawberry has two transparent membranes, one smooth on the outside and one undulating on the inside. You can see his posterior projections and the freckles on his back!
Watch out! I have already recommended this camera to three people and they have all bought them!
reply to this comment
i118.photobucket.com/albums...
i80.photobucket.com/albums/...
i80.photobucket.com/albums/...
i80.photobucket.com/albums/...
Be aware that for indoor shots of small close things like jewelry, you will have to tweak the flash settings and you may experience a shadow on your subject from the projection of the lens apparatus. The way to avoid this is to take the shots in natural light outdoors or indoors with an alternate light source aimed at the object. You will also have to make some adjustments due to glare from that other light. Since you will be so close, you may have to take several shots to get just the right combination of light, angle, shadow, reflection, etc. The emerald necklace was not taken in any kind of setting as described above - it was sitting on a piece of paper on my desk with my goose neck lamp shining in it. So don't judge by the lighting. Do judge by the detail. It was taken about 1" away.
The bees are on flowers about 1.5 inches across, and the lens is practically touching them - the bees that is. (Luckily I am not allergic like my mom!) I really like how you can see the pollen on their backs and legs and head! Also I like how you can see the detail inside the small center part of the flower, including the pollen on the stamens, and the wings are in perfect focus and you can clearly see through them, and you can see their veins!
The little larva on my strawberry has two transparent membranes, one smooth on the outside and one undulating on the inside. You can see his posterior projections and the freckles on his back!
Watch out! I have already recommended this camera to three people and they have all bought them!
Ben Keough (05/10/2007)
Awesome photos, Lisa! The strawberry one in particular is really beautiful. :]
reply to this comment
Leopardcur (05/10/2007)
Lisa....Nice Pics!!! Thanks for the info & pics!! Take care Jake
reply to this comment
liberty (06/17/2007)
Is anybody familiar with using macro on a canon S2 IS? I just got one, but can't get any good macro shots. Camera won't focus that close. Any ideas?
reply to this comment
lisasturm (06/18/2007)
Thanks for the compliments. I have now convinced 7 people, either personally or through my review, to buy the Canon A630. I think I need to write to Canon and work out some kind of deal at this point!
And I can now add to my recommendation that so far 3 of my Canon photos have been selected for publication in two different amateur photo books, and one publisher has requested another submission. The one I posted with the bee on the right side will be in "Endless Journeys", which also contains another A630 shot (Dashing Donor) and one from my Minolta DiMage G500 (Mists of Mokule`ia).
I am beginning to be a pain amongst my friends because I am always shooting, but you never know when that perfect moment might present itself!
Happy shooting to all,
Lisa
reply to this comment
And I can now add to my recommendation that so far 3 of my Canon photos have been selected for publication in two different amateur photo books, and one publisher has requested another submission. The one I posted with the bee on the right side will be in "Endless Journeys", which also contains another A630 shot (Dashing Donor) and one from my Minolta DiMage G500 (Mists of Mokule`ia).
I am beginning to be a pain amongst my friends because I am always shooting, but you never know when that perfect moment might present itself!
Happy shooting to all,
Lisa
Leopardcur (06/18/2007)
Your info has been most informative, Lisa. Am sure everyone has benefited from it. Take care & Thanks!!! Jake
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (06/25/2007)
Liberty, the S2 IS macro works by pressing the macro button (on the side of the lens housing) so that the small flower icon appears on the LCD. In all other modes than automatic, you can hold this button down to get to super macro mode.
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Hope this helps.
liberty (06/25/2007)
Thanks Ben!
reply to this comment
Isn't the .3 sec click to capture time too lengthy? (DBC1951 — 01/19/2007)
I am used to a SLR camera and a .3 second lag time seems as though quick candids and sports events would be difficult to capture. Do others find this to be a problem?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (01/20/2007)
Hi there,
.3 seconds is actually pretty good in terms of shutter lag time on digital cameras nowadays. DSLRs have the lag time down to fractions of a second- some are really, ridiculously fast, but they do still have a lag. Point and shoot digitals are typically slower, half a second to a second lag time (and longer still when flash is on, etc.)
Basically, there is a delay with digitals due to the fact that the camera has more to do than a film SLR does during the time when you push the shutter button. The file has to be saved and written in order to create the digital image. Shooting extremely fast sports etc. with a digital may require you to do a little adjusting to how you shoot... you might have to learn to rethink your idea of timing in order to accommodate that delay. Also, pushing the shutter button halfway and allowing the shot to frame itself, then pushing the rest of the way when you're actually ready to take the photo, is a good way to speed up a camera with a lengthy lag time.
Technology is always advancing and camera manufacturers are making DSLRs faster and faster, but there is likely always going to be some sort of delay with a digital, however small it is. It's part of the game when shooting digital.
reply to this comment
.3 seconds is actually pretty good in terms of shutter lag time on digital cameras nowadays. DSLRs have the lag time down to fractions of a second- some are really, ridiculously fast, but they do still have a lag. Point and shoot digitals are typically slower, half a second to a second lag time (and longer still when flash is on, etc.)
Basically, there is a delay with digitals due to the fact that the camera has more to do than a film SLR does during the time when you push the shutter button. The file has to be saved and written in order to create the digital image. Shooting extremely fast sports etc. with a digital may require you to do a little adjusting to how you shoot... you might have to learn to rethink your idea of timing in order to accommodate that delay. Also, pushing the shutter button halfway and allowing the shot to frame itself, then pushing the rest of the way when you're actually ready to take the photo, is a good way to speed up a camera with a lengthy lag time.
Technology is always advancing and camera manufacturers are making DSLRs faster and faster, but there is likely always going to be some sort of delay with a digital, however small it is. It's part of the game when shooting digital.
Can i use SDHC Memory Cards with my V610? What is the largest memory card that i can use with it? (gustavofda — 01/21/2007)
Can i use SDHC Memory Cards with my V610? What is the largest memory card that i can use with it? Can I use SD 2.0 (FAT32) memory cards with my Kodak V610?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/22/2007)
Kodak doesn't list SDHC card compatibility in it's specs. In the manual ( kodak.com/global/plugins/ac... ), it lists the maximum SD size as 1GB.
But allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
reply to this comment
But allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
dado (02/12/2007)
Do you know if the Kodak V610 will accept a transcend 4 gb 150x sd card?
I'm currently using a transcend 2gb 150x and so far it's been working great, but i'd like to get a 4 gb one for recording movies.
Thanks
reply to this comment
I'm currently using a transcend 2gb 150x and so far it's been working great, but i'd like to get a 4 gb one for recording movies.
Thanks
by James DeRuvo (02/13/2007)
I'd like to advise against it for the following reason: Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take movies/pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
Course, you can own multiple 2GB or 4GB, prices may or may not prohibit that.
reply to this comment
Course, you can own multiple 2GB or 4GB, prices may or may not prohibit that.
by James DeRuvo (08/17/2007)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Scott (09/05/2007)
2gb is the max
reply to this comment
Chris (08/03/2009)
Card Types
Kodak's early digital cameras accepted CF (COMPACTFLASH) Cards. Later models accepted SD (Secure Digital) and MMC (MULTIMEDIA) Cards. When SD cards reached their limit of 2 GB, the industry developed SDHC (Secure Digital High Capacity) Cards, which have much greater capacities.
KODAK Pocket Video Cameras accept SD and SDHC Cards.
2007 and newer C-, M-, V-, and Z-series cameras accept SD and SDHC Cards. Exceptions:
*
V803 and V1003 Zoom Digital Cameras accept only SD (not SDHC) cards.
*
CD43 Zoom Digital Camera accepts only xD (not SD or SDHC) cards.
CX-series cameras accept SD and MMC Cards.
DC-series cameras accept CF Cards.
DX-series cameras accept SD and MMC Cards. Exceptions: DX3500, DX3600, and DX4900 Cameras accept only CF Cards.
LS-series cameras accept SD and MMC Cards. Exception: LS755 Zoom Digital Cameras accepts only xD Cards.
For other cameras, see your product's user manuals.
SD/SDHC Card Sizes
We recommend KODAK SD Cards (up to 2 GB) and KODAK SDHC Cards (up to 8 GB).
NOTE: Because we do not test our products with other manufacturers' cards, we cannot recommend other cards and sizes.
Card Speed
Cards fall into speed classes 1-6. A higher number indicates a faster read/write speed. (Find the card speed on the product packaging, specifications, or on the card itself.)
NOTE: When recording/playing HD video, we recommend the fastest possible card. Class 6 cards are the fastest currently available.
reply to this comment
Kodak's early digital cameras accepted CF (COMPACTFLASH) Cards. Later models accepted SD (Secure Digital) and MMC (MULTIMEDIA) Cards. When SD cards reached their limit of 2 GB, the industry developed SDHC (Secure Digital High Capacity) Cards, which have much greater capacities.
KODAK Pocket Video Cameras accept SD and SDHC Cards.
2007 and newer C-, M-, V-, and Z-series cameras accept SD and SDHC Cards. Exceptions:
*
V803 and V1003 Zoom Digital Cameras accept only SD (not SDHC) cards.
*
CD43 Zoom Digital Camera accepts only xD (not SD or SDHC) cards.
CX-series cameras accept SD and MMC Cards.
DC-series cameras accept CF Cards.
DX-series cameras accept SD and MMC Cards. Exceptions: DX3500, DX3600, and DX4900 Cameras accept only CF Cards.
LS-series cameras accept SD and MMC Cards. Exception: LS755 Zoom Digital Cameras accepts only xD Cards.
For other cameras, see your product's user manuals.
SD/SDHC Card Sizes
We recommend KODAK SD Cards (up to 2 GB) and KODAK SDHC Cards (up to 8 GB).
NOTE: Because we do not test our products with other manufacturers' cards, we cannot recommend other cards and sizes.
Card Speed
Cards fall into speed classes 1-6. A higher number indicates a faster read/write speed. (Find the card speed on the product packaging, specifications, or on the card itself.)
NOTE: When recording/playing HD video, we recommend the fastest possible card. Class 6 cards are the fastest currently available.
IS THE V610 A TOP OF THE LINE CAMERA? (LDC1492 — 01/22/2007)
WHY HAVE MOST STORES STOPED STOCKING IT ?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/23/2007)
Hi,
The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is generally pretty well-rated by users, while pro reviews are a bit shakier (see the conclusion to dpreview.com's in-depth review of the camera here ( dpreview.com/reviews/kodakv... )). You can probably put this down to users being satisfied with adequate performance and great ease of use, while pro reviewers have stricter standards. dpreview's concluding paragraph is a good description of the camera's pros and cons:
"The V610 is a beautifully designed camera that has instant appeal (everyone here loved it when it came out of the box), and the innovative twin lens/CCD system is a clever solution to the limitations of lens size that keeps most ultra compact cameras firmly in the 3x zoom range. As it stands, I'd say this; if you want a really compact camera that performs superbly in all conditions, forget about the 10x zoom; if you really want a big zoom in a compact package, look at the (cheaper and more capable, though bulkier) Panasonic TZ1. If you've fallen for the V610's good looks, you really, really need something this slim and don't find the issues mentioned here too much of a compromise I'm sure you'll love it. Me, I'd wait for the V610's successor, which will hopefully see Kodak iron out some of this promising but flawed camera's more annoying problems."
As to why stores have stopped stocking it... I'm not sure that they have. Most internet stores still have it in stock. Big box retail stores might have stopped selling it, but they generally have much smaller selections, and this means that their turnover rate in models is higher. Regardless, you should be able to find one with little trouble.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is generally pretty well-rated by users, while pro reviews are a bit shakier (see the conclusion to dpreview.com's in-depth review of the camera here ( dpreview.com/reviews/kodakv... )). You can probably put this down to users being satisfied with adequate performance and great ease of use, while pro reviewers have stricter standards. dpreview's concluding paragraph is a good description of the camera's pros and cons:
"The V610 is a beautifully designed camera that has instant appeal (everyone here loved it when it came out of the box), and the innovative twin lens/CCD system is a clever solution to the limitations of lens size that keeps most ultra compact cameras firmly in the 3x zoom range. As it stands, I'd say this; if you want a really compact camera that performs superbly in all conditions, forget about the 10x zoom; if you really want a big zoom in a compact package, look at the (cheaper and more capable, though bulkier) Panasonic TZ1. If you've fallen for the V610's good looks, you really, really need something this slim and don't find the issues mentioned here too much of a compromise I'm sure you'll love it. Me, I'd wait for the V610's successor, which will hopefully see Kodak iron out some of this promising but flawed camera's more annoying problems."
As to why stores have stopped stocking it... I'm not sure that they have. Most internet stores still have it in stock. Big box retail stores might have stopped selling it, but they generally have much smaller selections, and this means that their turnover rate in models is higher. Regardless, you should be able to find one with little trouble.
Hope this helps!
jclvol01 (01/30/2007)
This is a good camera...no lens extending out, using dual lens technology...but I hate the quickview option it is on a low resolution, as if you are taking a blurry image, but when you review it is fine...
I like the 10X optical zoom...but the flash range is good for a 4-5 feet, or basically just have the ability for the snapshot...and if you zoom further it will be somewhat underexposed....
I like the Bluetooth option for the wireless printing on a Bluetooth enabled printer, like their Printer Dock Plus Series 3 or their Photo Printer 500...
reply to this comment
I like the 10X optical zoom...but the flash range is good for a 4-5 feet, or basically just have the ability for the snapshot...and if you zoom further it will be somewhat underexposed....
I like the Bluetooth option for the wireless printing on a Bluetooth enabled printer, like their Printer Dock Plus Series 3 or their Photo Printer 500...
is it the one i need? (bluedevil92 — 03/11/2007)
i'm new to digitale. briefly, i love to picture the clouds and far things ( moutains and moon ). so i need all the details in high quality plus a powefull optical zoom (8x maybe), but still in less than 350$ and a small size. is the v610 the one i need? are 6 megapixels enough? ore should i wait for the small sized 10 mp with 10x optical?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (03/14/2007)
Mario,
I've taken gorgeously clear photos with a 3.2MP camera for years, and printed them at 8x10" with no problem. This camera should be just fine for what you want to do.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I've taken gorgeously clear photos with a 3.2MP camera for years, and printed them at 8x10" with no problem. This camera should be just fine for what you want to do.
Andrew
when I take a picture and when I review it on the LCD screen the corners are all blurry. Has this happened to anyone else? (orangeguy94 — 05/22/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/22/2007)
Camera shake can do this, especially in low light conditions. Has this issue been ongoing?
reply to this comment
scott (08/23/2007)
yours might be a dodgy camera.mine works fine
reply to this comment
Why is the picture so dark? (sxiong316 — 06/02/2007)
When taking pictures in a room with very low light, I can't see the picture, it's very dark. I'm pretty sure I have the flash on, what else can I be doing wrong?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/22/2007)
If you're still having trouble, try going into the Setup menu and doing a Reset. This will restore the 'factory' settings and fix anything that might have inadvertently been changed that might be causing this. Also make sure the dial on the top of the camera is turned to the right position- if you have it on Landscape or something, it might be metering the situation totally different and thus resulting in the wrong exposures. Set it to A (Auto) and see how it does.
reply to this comment
Scott (09/05/2007)
If you are in a light or dark room and want to get pictures of things you can use the directional pad left or right to brighten or darken the picture, or turn the flash off and use a tripod.
reply to this comment
When I used one, it had a long recharge time before I could take the next pictue. LIke 10 seconds. is this correctible? (lwillow — 06/13/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/13/2007)
From the reviews I've seen, this camera should have a shot to shot lag time of about 1.8 seconds regardless of flash.
In burst mode, it should captures up to 8 frames at about 2.2 frames per second (fps).
You can try using fresh, high power batteries like from Varta or Kodaks hienergy Alkalines. That may help. I'd also hit the camera reset. Perhaps there's a corrupted setting that will be cleared out if you do.
reply to this comment
In burst mode, it should captures up to 8 frames at about 2.2 frames per second (fps).
You can try using fresh, high power batteries like from Varta or Kodaks hienergy Alkalines. That may help. I'd also hit the camera reset. Perhaps there's a corrupted setting that will be cleared out if you do.
Bill the Duke (06/14/2007)
Try a different make SD memory card - the cheap cards have slow write speeds.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/15/2007)
Bill's dead on with this. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
reply to this comment
Blurred photos with flash and landscape mode with V610 (swimnfly — 11/04/2007)
I get blurred photos (red hand) on flash photos, landscape (infinity focus) photos, and typical photos in ambient daylight. Pictures in bright sunglight and distant zoom typically are crisp and non-blurry (green hand). Is this unique to my particular camera, or have others found this too? I've tried the Scene selection, and played with exposure settings with little change in result.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/06/2007)
Well, you need to understand that the flash for a point and shoot like the V610 isn't really designed for anything other than close up portraits and small group shots. This is due to it's limited range of about 6-10 feet. Outside of that,the flash dissipates tremendously, leaving you with either an unexposed shot or a blurry image. Simply the nature of the point and shoot beast.
reply to this comment
Larry (12/20/2007)
It is quite true that any low light conditions are a challenge to digital point and shoot cameras. It sounds like you are only having the blurred shots when your camera is warning you of that possibility with the red hand sign and all the green hand sign pics are clear. However, if your close up (5 feet and less) flash shots are blurry I would take the camera in for a check up especially if it is still under warranty as it may not be functioning up to specifications.
Larry
reply to this comment
Larry
by James DeRuvo (12/21/2007)
Larry has a thought there, but before sending it in for repair (if your warranty is expired an estimate can average more than the what the camera is really worth), I would tryresetting the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Then, go to Kodak's website ( kodak.com/global/en/service... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
I'd also make sure you're prefocusing and panning with the action while shooting. It may be that you're suffering from camera shake due to shutter lag. You push the shutter, it may take anywhere from 0.235 - 0.703 sec for the camera to take the picture. Add that to the actual shutter time in low light conditions and you have quite a long time to wait. You move during that time and you have a blurry image.
reply to this comment
Then, go to Kodak's website ( kodak.com/global/en/service... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
I'd also make sure you're prefocusing and panning with the action while shooting. It may be that you're suffering from camera shake due to shutter lag. You push the shutter, it may take anywhere from 0.235 - 0.703 sec for the camera to take the picture. Add that to the actual shutter time in low light conditions and you have quite a long time to wait. You move during that time and you have a blurry image.
swimnfly (12/28/2007)
The blur seems happens whether I hold the camera by hand, or use a tripod with a delayed shutter, and mostly in "other than bright sun", or on "no zoom" landscapes. My only thought is that sometimes there's too much in the viewfinder for it to process fully. I'll try the reset option - it seems like a good first step.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/28/2007)
Well the blur can obviously occur via camera shake. But you can eliminate much of it by prefocusing, instead of trying to shoot on the fly. But on the tripod, that's a puzzler. Unless the camera is focus on a point in the background, rather than where you want it to. This can happen in certain lighting conditions.
Don't forget the firmware update. There may be one that addresses the issue.
reply to this comment
Don't forget the firmware update. There may be one that addresses the issue.
swimnfly (01/21/2008)
I'm already running the current firmware version according to the Kodak website. I did remove the battery, waited a while, and reinstalled it, but there seemed no apparent change. I started doing some experimentation. What I found is that the the blurry photos seemed to consistently occur when my zoom lens was set to the widest field, ie zoomed fully out. When I zoom in one or two stops (about 25% of the total available optical zoom) the prevalence of blurry photos tends to disappear. The more I zoom in, hte more likely the picture comes in clear with a "green hand". This was true for bright daylight, flash, and low light situations. A tripod obviously helped with low light and flash, but I believe the defining issue has to do with the zoom position. In all cases, the prefocus zone seemed to operate properly by selecting the appropriate item. When the prefocus didn't kick-in, the pictures were far more blurry.
My camera was purchased in June of 2006, well over a year ago, so I don't think its still covered by any warranty. I'm getting the sense that this is a fluke with my processor and hardware.
reply to this comment
My camera was purchased in June of 2006, well over a year ago, so I don't think its still covered by any warranty. I'm getting the sense that this is a fluke with my processor and hardware.
panasonic lumix dmc-fs5s compatibility (julietalw — 04/29/2008)
Is it mac compatible?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2008)
Every camera is "mac compatible" if you use a card reader to transfer your photos. But I doubt connecting it to your Mac via USB will be any problem.
reply to this comment
Suggestions on where to purchase a new V610? (tyandbec1 — 05/31/2008)
My son shattered the LCD screen. I know we could get it fixed, but we would like to look around at new ones.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/13/2008)
Becky,
If you want to look at cameras to purchase, I would suggest going to a Ritz or Wolf camera in your area. They will often times let you test the camera out in the store before you purchase something. They do this at MicroCenter as well.
After testing and finding the cameras you like, I would suggest coming back here to DCHQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com ) to look the camera up. We list prices for various cameras available for purchase, and you can see where the best deal is that way. I hope this helps. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
If you want to look at cameras to purchase, I would suggest going to a Ritz or Wolf camera in your area. They will often times let you test the camera out in the store before you purchase something. They do this at MicroCenter as well.
After testing and finding the cameras you like, I would suggest coming back here to DCHQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com ) to look the camera up. We list prices for various cameras available for purchase, and you can see where the best deal is that way. I hope this helps. Good luck.
Andrew
I have a kodak 4.0 megapixel digital camera and it is not working. It will not power on or anything. Any suggestions? (Tyesha101 — 06/29/2008)
I was taking some pictures and it just stop working and i know it didn't die because anytime the batterys die it close the lens by itself but the lens didn't even close
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/04/2008)
Aside from a dead battery, if the camera won't power on, you may be looking at a repair. Try resetting the camera. You may be able to accomplish this by removing hte batteries for a few minutes and then reinstalling. Then try to cycle the camera on/off. The lens may be stuck or out of alignment.
But if you need a repair, undertand that the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
reply to this comment
But if you need a repair, undertand that the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
Tyesha101 (07/16/2008)
thanks
reply to this comment
I've have a Kodak V610, worked great at first, now pictures in bright light or with light colors come out very hazy. Any suggestions? (pippa4805 — 07/13/2008)
I've tried using multiple scene selections, manual settings, and corrections using my software, but nothing makes them clear or removes the "halo effect", the pictures are scrap. Has anyone else had this problem or have a solution?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/15/2008)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Kodak's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Lastly, Halo effects may simple mean a dirty or greasy lens element.
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Kodak's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Lastly, Halo effects may simple mean a dirty or greasy lens element.
I want to replace my Kodak V610 for a diffent brand, but want to keep my Kodak software and printer. Are other camera brands compatible? (pippa4805 — 07/13/2008)
I have recently been having alot of problems with my Kodak V610 camera and am thinking about replacing it with another brand. The problem is, I like my Kodak software and printer and would like to keep them. Does anyone know if other camera brands would be compatible with my other Kodak products or would I need to buy all new and spend a ton of money?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/15/2008)
Why anyone would want to keep Easyshare software is beyond me. The software won't really work directly with anything but Kodak cameras. My recommendation is that if you really like those both, look into the Kodak Z1085IS. Kodak was in a slump for quite awhile, but with the Z1085IS, they've finally figured out the whole digital thing. Check out my DHQ review here. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Aside from that, I suggest Canon. As for software, try Picasa ( picasa.google.com/ ). It's a much better photo management tool. And it's free!
reply to this comment
Aside from that, I suggest Canon. As for software, try Picasa ( picasa.google.com/ ). It's a much better photo management tool. And it's free!
I Love This Camera! Why has it been discontinued! Mine might need to be repaired! (Kelly B. — 02/06/2010)
Why did they stop making this camera? Have they replaced it with a better camera?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/08/2010)
In the digital camera world, this is ancient--more than three years old. Companies usually only point-and-shoots for a year or two. I don't if there was a direct replacement for it, but there have been several new V series models in the past few years. You'd want to get in touch with Kodak for a repair. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Kodak V610 Repairs (Steve Cooper — 04/11/2010)
Can they be repaired? In australia it gets sent back no spare parts??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
It has been discontinued. You could try these guys, darntoothysam.com/servlet/S... but if Kodak sent it back, then you're at the end of the line, honestly.
reply to this comment
Thanks
Mark Lewis
Market Realty, Inc.
Message was edited by: Mark Lewis
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
I personally like the Kodak models, they're very stylish looking, but the Panasonic FX01 is pretty great too.