Kodak EasyShare V705
Kodak EasyShare V705
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Kodak EasyShare V705
Editor's Review
The wide-angle wars continue with the introduction of the Kodak Easyshare V705. It was only a few months ago that the V512 duked it out with Panasonic's FX01 for the title of "world's smallest wide-angle camera," but now Kodak is pushing it even further with the V705. This camera is cast in the same sleek style that the V512 and V610, and also has the same dual-lens configuration. The first lens provides 5x optical zoom, the second, a wide-angle 23mm scope, can be used to take wider panoramas and more-inclusive group shots. We at DCHQ love this series of cameras; they're very attractive, and the V705 is a nice intermediate camera, not nearly as expensive as the Bluetooth-enabled V610, and without the extra bells and whistles that might dissuade less-adventurous consumers.
Specifications
- 7.3 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom / 23mm wide-angle lens
- auto focus and exposure
- JPEG file format
- ISO 50-800
- Movie mode with sound
- 2.5-inch LCD
- Secure Digital storage (32MB internal)
- lithium-ion battery.
- Release Date: Aug 12, 2006
Shop for V705 Accessories
Kodak EasyShare V705 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Rita (02/28/2010)
My Kodak v705 has an error E45. Been looking for user guide to fix. Can you help?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/03/2010)
1. If your camera is on, turn it off.
2. Remove the memory card from your camera.
3. Reinsert the memory card, then push down on the card until you hear a click. Verify that the memory card is firmly seated in your camera.
4. Turn on your camera.
If the error still appears:
Do the following:
1. If any accessory devices are connected to your camera, disconnect them.
2. Turn off your camera, then remove the memory card.
3. Remove the battery/batteries from your camera, then wipe the contacts on the battery/batteries with a soft, lint-free, clean cloth.
IMPORTANT: Verify that the battery/batteries are installed correctly.
4. Reinstall the battery/batteries, then turn on your camera.
Absent that, a repair is required.
reply to this comment
2. Remove the memory card from your camera.
3. Reinsert the memory card, then push down on the card until you hear a click. Verify that the memory card is firmly seated in your camera.
4. Turn on your camera.
If the error still appears:
Do the following:
1. If any accessory devices are connected to your camera, disconnect them.
2. Turn off your camera, then remove the memory card.
3. Remove the battery/batteries from your camera, then wipe the contacts on the battery/batteries with a soft, lint-free, clean cloth.
IMPORTANT: Verify that the battery/batteries are installed correctly.
4. Reinstall the battery/batteries, then turn on your camera.
Absent that, a repair is required.
how come my camera v705 says error 45? (crystal2603 — 09/29/2009)
I turn it own and it shows nothing. It says see guide error 45
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/30/2009)
According to Kodak, the e45 error denotes that it's time to repair your camera. It's also indicative of a lens retraction. It could be that your battery is long in the tooth and doesn't have enough capacity anymore to adequately power the camera. Lithium Ion batteries do lose capacity over time and going on 3 years, a simple replacement of the battery could solve the issue.
reply to this comment
What similar Kodak product can I replace my V705 with? (EllenR — 12/30/2007)
I am not happy with the pic quality on my V705 (especially indoors) but do like the small size, video feature and Easy Share System. Can anyone recommend another tiny Kodak camera that I could purchase (Kodak has a trade-in program), preferably one that would use the same memory card and dock system?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (01/02/2008)
Well there are also the V610 and the V570 which are very similar to the V705. Both to my knowledge use the same docking system, and all Kodak cameras use the same memory card (SD). Honestly, despite the fact that you get trade in, the picture quality may not improve by getting a different camera, and you may want to consider switching to a different camera that is similar, for example the Nikon S9, though it may cost extra money, it may be worth it in the end.
reply to this comment
I have had this camera for a few months now and I can't figure out if it can be used as a webcam. Anybody know? Thanks I appreciate it! (blocpartygirl — 08/06/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/07/2007)
We get this question alot. Not very many digital still cameras can actually be used as a webcam. This is mostly due to the lack of drivers for it.
SONY does have a tutorial for using some of their models as a webcam ( esupport.sony.com/perl/tuto... ), but my question is, with the fact that these cameras aren't autofocusing, why would you?
Better to try getting your camcorder to perform that function.
Or pick up the Creative's LiveCam Optica AF webcam.
Sensor: 2 megapixel sensor
Lens: High quality precision lens
Microphone: Built-in adaptive array microphones
Highest Still Image Resolution: 8 megapixels 3200 x 2400
Highest Video Resolution: 1600 x 1200
Focus: Auto
Interface: High-Speed USB 2.0 (bkwd compatible with USB 1.1)
$129.99
reply to this comment
SONY does have a tutorial for using some of their models as a webcam ( esupport.sony.com/perl/tuto... ), but my question is, with the fact that these cameras aren't autofocusing, why would you?
Better to try getting your camcorder to perform that function.
Or pick up the Creative's LiveCam Optica AF webcam.
Sensor: 2 megapixel sensor
Lens: High quality precision lens
Microphone: Built-in adaptive array microphones
Highest Still Image Resolution: 8 megapixels 3200 x 2400
Highest Video Resolution: 1600 x 1200
Focus: Auto
Interface: High-Speed USB 2.0 (bkwd compatible with USB 1.1)
$129.99
How does the video perform in low light conditions and night time? does this camera take low light video as well as it takes stills? (artistx — 04/14/2007)
Kodak EasyShare V705
I'm looking for a decent portable camera/camcorder that I can take with me when I when I got our with my friends and record our antics for my blog or even youtube....something I can fit in my pocket....I've tried cheap mpeg4 camcorders but their low light performance is horrible...completely unusable.... they only seem to work outdoors under direct sunlight... so I'm wondering if this camera's decent low light performance extends to it's video as well as it's stills...
reply to this comment
I'm looking for a decent portable camera/camcorder that I can take with me when I when I got our with my friends and record our antics for my blog or even youtube....something I can fit in my pocket....I've tried cheap mpeg4 camcorders but their low light performance is horrible...completely unusable.... they only seem to work outdoors under direct sunlight... so I'm wondering if this camera's decent low light performance extends to it's video as well as it's stills...
by James DeRuvo (05/08/2007)
The low light performance in video won't be that great, I hate to tell you. Video on still cameras is more an afterthought than any solid competitive feature with the primary focus (pardon the pun) of a still camera. You can compensate, however, with attachable LED lights that screw into the tripod mount. But if you think you'll get comparable Lux ratings than a regular camcorder, you'll be rather mistaken.
reply to this comment
Hi, i want to ask how long should be for the first time original battery to be charged?my camera is Kodak v705. I'm affraid false.Thank you very much. (tommy73545 — 01/18/2007)
My camera is Kodak v705, and the battery is standard from the package.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (01/18/2007)
Charge it until the light turns green. But no more than 4 hours.
reply to this comment
rrosel2952 (01/25/2007)
On new rechargable batteries is printed on the package that they should be recharged for the amount of time stated on the package.
reply to this comment
Why is the Kodak C875 less expensive than the V705 which has lower MPs? (StanC07 — 01/16/2007)
The V705 is rated at 7.3 MP, the C875 at 8 MPs. Does the V705 have features that the C875 doens't?
S Cohen
reply to this comment
S Cohen
Joe (01/17/2007)
These are similar cameras, the V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has an extra wide prime lens that you can switch to (28mm), it also does not take AA batts but a lithium ino pack. The C875 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a bulkier cameras that takes AA batts and has some internal memory (32mb) built in.
If I had to chose I would go with the V705 because of the variable lens and size. The C875 is no long worth its price.
reply to this comment
If I had to chose I would go with the V705 because of the variable lens and size. The C875 is no long worth its price.
StanC07 (01/17/2007)
Joe
Thanks for that - I show a low price for the C875 at $168 and for the V705 at $238. Do you still say the C875 is not worth the price?
StanC
reply to this comment
Thanks for that - I show a low price for the C875 at $168 and for the V705 at $238. Do you still say the C875 is not worth the price?
StanC
Does anyone know a wide angle camera with zoom from 24mm? (LookingforIDEAL — 01/04/2007)
It must be an ultracompact or a small poit and shoot. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/04/2007)
Hi Step,
The Kodak V705, V610, and V570 all feature a unique-to-Kodak dual lens construction with a 23mm wide angle lens and a longer zoom lens.
The V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7.3MP camera with a 5x optical zoom.
The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6MP camera with a 10x optical zoom.
The V570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 5MP camera with a 3x optical zoom.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The Kodak V705, V610, and V570 all feature a unique-to-Kodak dual lens construction with a 23mm wide angle lens and a longer zoom lens.
The V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7.3MP camera with a 5x optical zoom.
The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6MP camera with a 10x optical zoom.
The V570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 5MP camera with a 3x optical zoom.
Hope this helps!
LookingforIDEAL (01/04/2007)
Anything other than Kodak?
reply to this comment
LookingforIDEAL (01/04/2007)
Why according what I read in V610 specs its zoom is from 38-114mm and 130-380mm? Where is the 23mm?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/04/2007)
Step,
I'm sorry, I messed up. Of the cameras I listed, only the V705 has a 23mm wide angle. I got confused and thought that all of the dual-lens models featured the wide angle lens. Apologies!
I can't think of any other super compact cameras with a 24mm or wider lens, but there are several 28mm models. The Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for example, has a 28mm wide angle with a 3.8x zoom, and also features optical image stabilization. Something to consider...
reply to this comment
I'm sorry, I messed up. Of the cameras I listed, only the V705 has a 23mm wide angle. I got confused and thought that all of the dual-lens models featured the wide angle lens. Apologies!
I can't think of any other super compact cameras with a 24mm or wider lens, but there are several 28mm models. The Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for example, has a 28mm wide angle with a 3.8x zoom, and also features optical image stabilization. Something to consider...
K75rider (01/05/2007)
Step, I have not find any point and shot cameras with a 24mm lens. There are specialty cameras but you are in luck as Panasonic has just released the Lumix DMC-LX2. LX2 has Optical image stabilization, 10mp and 4x zoom (28-112). That’s wide angle but the real feature of this camera is that it is a wide-screen 16:9 format for photos and movies and it will fit in your pocket or purse. Dimensions are 4.2 x 2.2 x 1.0in
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not “high definition".
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Another option is the Canon SD800. Image stabilization, 7.1mp and 3.8x lens (28 – 105mm) Another wide angle and besides it’s a Canon. Great in low light and will take movies with sound. Picture quality is GREAT. On-line price under $375
You can not go wrong with either. I am a Canon fan but for your use I recommend the LX2.
Happy movie and picture taking.
reply to this comment
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not “high definition".
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Another option is the Canon SD800. Image stabilization, 7.1mp and 3.8x lens (28 – 105mm) Another wide angle and besides it’s a Canon. Great in low light and will take movies with sound. Picture quality is GREAT. On-line price under $375
You can not go wrong with either. I am a Canon fan but for your use I recommend the LX2.
Happy movie and picture taking.
LookingforIDEAL (01/05/2007)
Thanks Ben and K75rider for your recommendations.
For a wide angle at 28mm I have already one model in mind: Olympus FE-200. Its 5x optical zoom is from 28-140mm, longer than both Canon SD800 IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2. It has almost all the good features such as IS and movies, and it costs substantialy less ($175 at J&R). The only downsides are: 1. It uses xD cards which cost more and not interchangeable with other more common memory cards; 2. It is slow according to some reviews. Any other reasons that I should not buy Olympus FE-200?
reply to this comment
For a wide angle at 28mm I have already one model in mind: Olympus FE-200. Its 5x optical zoom is from 28-140mm, longer than both Canon SD800 IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2. It has almost all the good features such as IS and movies, and it costs substantialy less ($175 at J&R). The only downsides are: 1. It uses xD cards which cost more and not interchangeable with other more common memory cards; 2. It is slow according to some reviews. Any other reasons that I should not buy Olympus FE-200?
I now own the kodak Z740 and like the easyshare but would like more compact looking at V610 or larger P712 any suggestions? (gatorwife — 12/06/2006)
I now own Kodak Z740 which I like but would like to get better close up
and distance pictures. Looking at V610 for size or P712 for optical zoom
want an easy camera that takes great pics any help would be great
reply to this comment
and distance pictures. Looking at V610 for size or P712 for optical zoom
want an easy camera that takes great pics any help would be great
Ben Keough (12/07/2006)
Hi Kathi,
Both of the cameras you've mentioned have big plusses. The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really, really tiny and has a huge zoom range. It's definitely got a wow-factor, too--very sleek and cool looking. The P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is more SLR-like. It's bigger and bulkier than your Z740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but there's a reason for that: it's got an awesome 12x stabilized zoom lens and a whole mess of manual controls that you won't find on the V610. It's also going to perform a lot quicker than the V610, which sacrifices a lot of speed in exchange for packing such a powerful and tiny lens. Additionally, the V610 is plagued by terrible battery life.
Personally, I'd opt for the larger but more feature-packed P712, but if you value an extremely small camera, you probably won't do much better than the V610 (unless you go for the newer V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's really a question of which size and set of options fits you best. Do you want to have full control over your shooting, or do you just want to snap and go? Do you mind carrying a camera bag, or do you want to slip it into your jeans pocket? For me, size doesn't matter that much--I'd rather have the extra options. For you, it might be different. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Both of the cameras you've mentioned have big plusses. The V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really, really tiny and has a huge zoom range. It's definitely got a wow-factor, too--very sleek and cool looking. The P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is more SLR-like. It's bigger and bulkier than your Z740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but there's a reason for that: it's got an awesome 12x stabilized zoom lens and a whole mess of manual controls that you won't find on the V610. It's also going to perform a lot quicker than the V610, which sacrifices a lot of speed in exchange for packing such a powerful and tiny lens. Additionally, the V610 is plagued by terrible battery life.
Personally, I'd opt for the larger but more feature-packed P712, but if you value an extremely small camera, you probably won't do much better than the V610 (unless you go for the newer V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's really a question of which size and set of options fits you best. Do you want to have full control over your shooting, or do you just want to snap and go? Do you mind carrying a camera bag, or do you want to slip it into your jeans pocket? For me, size doesn't matter that much--I'd rather have the extra options. For you, it might be different. Good luck!
gatorwife (12/07/2006)
Hi Ben
Thank you - I will check out the V705 and I do still keep going back to
the P712 it's the size of the V610 that I liked but I'd rather have
better pics and stabilized zoom. thank you so much for your help.
reply to this comment
Thank you - I will check out the V705 and I do still keep going back to
the P712 it's the size of the V610 that I liked but I'd rather have
better pics and stabilized zoom. thank you so much for your help.
Recommendations for soldier son going to Afghanistan for year's deployment for a slim, wide angle, zoom lens with AA batteries digital camera??? (AirborneMama — 12/05/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/05/2006)
Hi GA,
Canon's SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) fits all of your considerations except the AA batteries (it uses Lithium Ion batteries). Frankly, it's pretty much impossible to find a slimline camera that uses AAs, simply because they take up so much space in comparison to other battery types.
Some other cameras that fit your needs are the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The Canon and Panasonic models are all 28mm wide angle, while the Kodak is 23mm (wider angle). Each camera has at least a 3.8x zoom. They're all in roughly the same price ballpark, at $275-$325.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Canon's SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) fits all of your considerations except the AA batteries (it uses Lithium Ion batteries). Frankly, it's pretty much impossible to find a slimline camera that uses AAs, simply because they take up so much space in comparison to other battery types.
Some other cameras that fit your needs are the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The Canon and Panasonic models are all 28mm wide angle, while the Kodak is 23mm (wider angle). Each camera has at least a 3.8x zoom. They're all in roughly the same price ballpark, at $275-$325.
Hope this helps!
K75rider (12/06/2006)
Hi GA,
Ben has made an excellent recommendation in the Canon SD800 IS. 7mp 3.8x len 28-105 and Image Stablization. Dimensions are 3.5 x 2.3 x 1
However, I believe the battary issue is critical. I have been in similar situation as your son and the availability of batteries will be critical. Therefore, I am recommending the Canon A710 IS. 7mp 6x (35-210) and image stablization. dimension are 3.8 x 2.6 x 1.6.
Yes, its a little larger but you have a bigger zoom which can be a big plus.
Godspeed.
reply to this comment
Ben has made an excellent recommendation in the Canon SD800 IS. 7mp 3.8x len 28-105 and Image Stablization. Dimensions are 3.5 x 2.3 x 1
However, I believe the battary issue is critical. I have been in similar situation as your son and the availability of batteries will be critical. Therefore, I am recommending the Canon A710 IS. 7mp 6x (35-210) and image stablization. dimension are 3.8 x 2.6 x 1.6.
Yes, its a little larger but you have a bigger zoom which can be a big plus.
Godspeed.
AirborneMama (12/06/2006)
Thanks, Guys...for your help! This is one of my Christmas present to Jon. As you mentioned, K75rider, the battery issue is critical, since he will be out on missions much of the time and not somewhere that he can recharge a battery. He would be willing to give up the slimness of the camera a bit, if he is still able to have batteries and take some pics of the landscape there. If you're a vet, than you totally understand. He only used disposables in Iraq when he was there, and I just hope he can come home with the camera (and Himself) in one piece. It will be a long deployment. Should I buy him Lithium batteries? Don't know much about this stuff, so any advice you have is appreciated. He pretty much will be carrying all his stuff with him everywhere he goes there. He's with the 82nd.....Airborne All the Way!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/06/2006)
GA,
The A710 IS takes AAs. You can get him both AA alkalines (the normal disposables) or AA NiMH batteries with a charger. It might be a good idea to get both, just in case. The NiMH rechargeables will last much, much longer than the alkalines, but as you say the chances to recharge them are scarce. Getting both means he can take advantage of the NiMHs when he has access to electricity, and he'll have the disposables for backup.
reply to this comment
The A710 IS takes AAs. You can get him both AA alkalines (the normal disposables) or AA NiMH batteries with a charger. It might be a good idea to get both, just in case. The NiMH rechargeables will last much, much longer than the alkalines, but as you say the chances to recharge them are scarce. Getting both means he can take advantage of the NiMHs when he has access to electricity, and he'll have the disposables for backup.
AirborneMama (12/06/2006)
Thank you, Ben! I truly appreciate your help. He knows I'm getting a camera for him and is thrilled. He has a pretty good eye, when it comes to composition, so I'm thrilled to be able to give him this for Christmas. Now....to find a good deal somewhere. Hope I can get this all for under 300.
reply to this comment
What is the best point and shoot type camera with wide angle lens (>28 or 24mm)? (CSPerry — 11/23/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (11/24/2006)
The best simple camera with an excellent wide angle lens is the Kodak v705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Easy to use, great lenses, and great quality.
reply to this comment
I am looking for a 3" lcd ultra slim digital camera with wifi or bluetooth. Which brand is the best? (Denise — 11/08/2006)
I am not really concerned with megapixals as I don't print anything bigger than 4x6 or 5x7. Most of pictures my pictues go up on the web. I am concerned about weight, ease of use, and the 3" lcd.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/08/2006)
DA has a comprehensive list of ultra compact cameras here. ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Listed amoungst them are the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), they have bluetooth capabilty.
Sadly, both have lcd screens under 3".
reply to this comment
Listed amoungst them are the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), they have bluetooth capabilty.
Sadly, both have lcd screens under 3".
Which camera will give me the widest lens variable and still be compact (Claudia Olson — 11/02/2006)
I am looking for a digital camera that is compact but gives me the lens variation that I currently have with my 35 millimeter camera, which is 28-200
reply to this comment
Joe (11/03/2006)
The Kodak v705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the best camera around for compactiblity and wide angle. This baby has a fixed 23mm wide angle as well as a 39-117mm zoom lens, attached right to the front of the camera no less. Plus it has a sleek style.
reply to this comment
Picture Quality- Kodak V705 (eboy — 10/24/2006)
I'm interested in the kodak V705, but some reviews said that the picture quality was grainy/blurry/all around bad. Opinions?
reply to this comment
Mike McKinney (10/28/2006)
They are Great, I just shot a couple homes check my site www.mikemckinney.com I have a house on there $1,595,000 all pictures taken with the V705 and I printed them all and there are great, customer loved them.
reply to this comment
ksmith (01/06/2007)
I bought my Kodak v705 in October and have already sent it in for repairs. The LCD screen was 'fuzzy' and I thought the picture quality was grainy, definitely not as clear as my previous Easyshare version. Even back from being repaired (by Kodak), I don't think they fixed a thing. I hate this camera and wish I never bought it, and kodak is pretty unconcerned.
reply to this comment
Endre (03/01/2007)
I too think, that the picture quality is not particularly good. The reason probably is that the JPEG compression is too high (and there is no way to change it), judging from the average picture size. My older Sony dsc-f707 has 5 Mp and makes in average 2.2 Mb pictures. The V705's pictures at 7Mp are between 800 Kb and 1.5Mb. The Sony's picture quality is by lightyears better than the Kodak's.
I would say the Kodak's picture quality is between below average and average, it's fine for my wife to make point and shoot pictures, but no more than that.
I asked Kodak Support about this but they failed to give a useful answer.
reply to this comment
I would say the Kodak's picture quality is between below average and average, it's fine for my wife to make point and shoot pictures, but no more than that.
I asked Kodak Support about this but they failed to give a useful answer.
sonycypber-shotDSC ,KodakV705 or KodakV610 which is better (dianna purvis — 10/19/2006)
reply to this comment
eboy (10/24/2006)
I went to a website and found a review by CNET.(www.cnet.com) here it is
'The Kodak EasyShare V705 is, without a doubt, a snapshooter's camera. With its fast performance and decent feature set, lots of casual shooters will probably like it. The one problem is that the dual-lens/dual-sensor design comes with a price tag that makes this camera compete with cameras such as Sony's Cyber Shot DSC-T9, which has one fewer megapixel but offers slightly less noise at comparable ISOs. The Sony doesn't offer the V705's ultrawide lens, but its 3X optical zoom is similar to the V705's zoom lens. Canon's PowerShot SD630, another 6-megapixel with speedy performance, can be found for about the same price as the V705, it didn't exhibit the JPEG artifacts we saw in this Kodak, and it has equivalent, if not less, noise than the V705. Again, if you value the wide angle of the extra lens, you'll probably want to stick with the Kodak EasyShare V705.'
reply to this comment
'The Kodak EasyShare V705 is, without a doubt, a snapshooter's camera. With its fast performance and decent feature set, lots of casual shooters will probably like it. The one problem is that the dual-lens/dual-sensor design comes with a price tag that makes this camera compete with cameras such as Sony's Cyber Shot DSC-T9, which has one fewer megapixel but offers slightly less noise at comparable ISOs. The Sony doesn't offer the V705's ultrawide lens, but its 3X optical zoom is similar to the V705's zoom lens. Canon's PowerShot SD630, another 6-megapixel with speedy performance, can be found for about the same price as the V705, it didn't exhibit the JPEG artifacts we saw in this Kodak, and it has equivalent, if not less, noise than the V705. Again, if you value the wide angle of the extra lens, you'll probably want to stick with the Kodak EasyShare V705.'
V603 (Donald Workman — 10/12/2006)
Is this a new model and is it the best value for the price?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/12/2006)
Donald,
You can see a variety of prices for the Kodak EasyShare V603 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) along the right side of the product information page ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Kodak offers a variety of cameras ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... ) in the same series of cameras to include two that have a few more options than this one: the Kodak EasyShare V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak EasyShare V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can see a variety of prices for the Kodak EasyShare V603 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) along the right side of the product information page ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Kodak offers a variety of cameras ( kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier... ) in the same series of cameras to include two that have a few more options than this one: the Kodak EasyShare V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak EasyShare V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
Jordan (08/26/2007)
Not the latest, but one of the best Zoom/megapixel combinations I found still. I am Very happy with it because of that.
reply to this comment
I want a camera that is good, but small, and able to be whipped out and take a picture fast. I also want a camera that is pretty durable, is this a durable, good, camera at an affordable price? (Mike — 10/10/2006)
I would like a good, durable, small, and affordable camera.
reply to this comment
eboy (10/24/2006)
That is a tall demand! But I would reccomend checking out the
Canon PowerShot SD300.It's mostly what you want; small, durable, cool looking, good quality... Here's a page of lots of reviews.
shopping.com/xPW-PowerShot_...
reply to this comment
Canon PowerShot SD300.It's mostly what you want; small, durable, cool looking, good quality... Here's a page of lots of reviews.
shopping.com/xPW-PowerShot_...
What is the delay time on kodak v705? (An — 10/08/2006)
reply to this comment
eboy (10/24/2006)
I believe the delay time is 1 second. You can find out more at kodaks website, search for V705 and when you find it click on "specifications."
reply to this comment
I am a beginner when it comes to digital cameras. can you recommend any that are easy to shoot (ilene — 09/26/2006)
i want a light weight one.
reply to this comment
tharrison (09/26/2006)
We think Kodak has done it again, focusing on typical people. Two models we recommend highly for people who don't want a lot of fuss are the Kodak C-743 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Kodak C875 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). While their V-Series cameras are pretty cool, we probably wouldn't recommend products like the the V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) for users who really just want to shoot pictures with no hassles.
reply to this comment
What some good wide angle digital cameras? (market — 08/22/2006)
Could you list some top wide angle lens digital cameras. I have a canon s60 and it freezes up once in awhile. It would cost more to fix than buy a new one. I am a real estate broker and use it for taking pictures of homes. The Canon S60 is two years old. What canon would be a good replacement or another brand? I need 28mm wide angle or greater. I would like to keep expense below $600. Could you list 2 or 3 that would fit my criteria.
Thanks
Mark Lewis
Market Realty, Inc.
Message was edited by: Mark Lewis
reply to this comment
Thanks
Mark Lewis
Market Realty, Inc.
Message was edited by: Mark Lewis
Re: What some good wide angle digital cameras? (camera? — 08/23/2006)
Sure thing! There are a whole bunch of really cool wide-angle cameras that have just come out:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... personally like the Kodak models, they're very stylish looking, but the Panasonic FX01 is pretty great too.
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... personally like the Kodak models, they're very stylish looking, but the Panasonic FX01 is pretty great too.
Bob (10/26/2006)
Note- Kodak V610 is not a wide angle camera. Dual lense is used for the 10X optical zoom. V570 and V705 are wide angles.
reply to this comment
Kodak EasyShare V705 Reviews
Kodak EasyShare V705 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
pretty looks, pics are not pretty
(phil — 09/13/2007)
This camera is a good camera if you want to take landscape (ultra wide and stiched pics.) If you want pics that are at a distance, this is good. If you want a camera that fits into almost any container: pockets, small purse, etc. This will serve you adequately.
But if you want to take "portrait" pics at a relatively short distance, then you will be very disappointed with the clarity. This also means that you cannot crop the pics and produce any clear pics.
- 3.0 out of 5
Nice, but only average
(Endre — 03/02/2007)
The Kodak V705 is a good looking, full featured, nice compact digital camera. Most interesting detail obviously is the wide angle lens set, it makes a lot of fun. The camera is quick, although it depends also on the speed of the SD card you are using. It saves the pictures in the background, though, so it is possible to make shots in a rapid succession. It has a lot of features, I personally liked and used the panorama picture the most. From 3 shots it makes a 180 degrees panorama picture and if you are careful enough you really can't see any edges. The only drawback of this camera is the picture quality. I think simply the JPEG compression is too high, based on the image size, and unfortunately there is no way to change it. It makes pictures between 800Kb and 1.5Mb at 7Mp, which is very small. My older 5Mp camera makes around 2.2Mb pictures and the picture quality is way much better, crystal clear and sharp. It's a pity that this, otherwise nice, camera has such a flaw. Hopefully they make a new firmware sometime which corrects this problem.
- 5.0 out of 5
Kodak on the way back
(Buzz — 09/28/2006)
This is one slick camera. It seems like less than a second from a push of the "on" button to the first picture. The shutter lag is neglible even with flash. The power supply plug is reasonably sized, not the minis of the past that would easly bend. There is plenty of sophistication in the camera but it doesn't get in the way of taking good pictures and fast pictures. The flash is easily disabled allowing shots out the, eg, plane window at the turbulence I endured recently. One feature I am concerned about is the cover for the SD card being so small it might be a problem for some hands. Its going to be hard to justify taking the D2X on anythinhg less than serious shoots in the future. Thanks Kodak!!
