Kodak Easyshare Z981
Kodak Easyshare Z981
1
Hey! You should know that Kodak has released a newer version of this product: the Kodak EasyShare Max Z990.
Kodak Easyshare Z981
Editor's Review
The Z981 has been replaced by the Z990, which seems to be an improvement. Here's what we had to say about the Z981 when it came out last year:
Editor's Review
The Z981 has been replaced by the Z990, which seems to be an improvement. Here's what we had to say about the Z981 when it came out last year:
Specifications
- 14 megapixels
- 26x optical zoom
- Optical image stabilization
- 3-inch LCD display
- 720p HD video mode
- Vertical shutter release and detachable vertical grip
- Captures to SD/SDHC memory cards
- Rechargeable Ni-MH AA batteries included
- Release Date: Mar 15, 2010
Shop for Z981 Accessories
Kodak Easyshare Z981 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
HELP Please (Daniel — 01/16/2013)
hello everyone,
i have a "problem" with my z981 camera: it automatically chages modes. as an example i like to take pictures on manual, but from some time now it automatically swtches to aperture or shutter priority. what should i do?
reply to this comment
i have a "problem" with my z981 camera: it automatically chages modes. as an example i like to take pictures on manual, but from some time now it automatically swtches to aperture or shutter priority. what should i do?
Hillary Grigonis (01/17/2013)
Try restoring to the factory settings or resetting the camera and see if that helps.
reply to this comment
Too slow (Nancy — 10/11/2012)
My Z981 recycles way too slow. Miss so many shots while it processes. I am not at all pleased with it. Miss action shots at games. Batteries fully charged and still so slow. Kodak will not be my next camera.
reply to this comment
newbie (12/22/2012)
I'm curious, are you referring to the Recycling Time, for a camera to reset between flashing for one photo and the next, or the processing time of photos after each shot? Do you happen to know that you can press the "info (i)" button or the capture button to skip the review while the photo is processing. As for the recycling time, the time taken seems pretty close to most of the compact camera.
reply to this comment
Fei Chen (05/11/2012)
reply to this comment
LOVE IT (Debbie — 04/04/2012)
I LOVE LOVE LOVE this camera! I used to use a professional SLR Nikon where I worked and only had a small camera at home for my personal use. Now that I have this camera I am taking professional quality pictures at home! Did I say I LOVE this camera??? Not sure what these battery problems are... I use Kodak rechargeable and get plenty of pics from them. No problems with the card or with videos. No problems with oversaturated red (use the correct settings for the pics you take-read the book). I paid around $200 for this camera and my friend (who is a professional photographer) tried it out and is now looking for one for herself! LOVE IT
reply to this comment
compatability issues (Deb — 11/21/2011)
I wish I could get a answer whether you can use an old docking printer with a new easyshare camera.
I have a 7430CX and I would suppose the answer is probably NO
does anyone know for sure the answer or how to get the answer to this?
everything still works, but my camera software is not compatable with my new 64 bit computer
reply to this comment
I have a 7430CX and I would suppose the answer is probably NO
does anyone know for sure the answer or how to get the answer to this?
everything still works, but my camera software is not compatable with my new 64 bit computer
reducing red hues (t.Barrett — 10/27/2011)
Is there a way to reduce the amount of red saturation? I can't seen to shoot anything red in bright light without it being over saturated..i.e. flowers, foliage, esp. bluish cool reds..
reply to this comment
Cant hear video audio on computer...please help (^.^) (Michel Deslatte — 10/06/2011)
Hello...i bought my camera from a store off ebay that sells refurbished Z981's...everything is great about this camera except i cant seem to hear the sound on a video taken with this camera on my computer...i can hear it on the camera but not on my computer....i called Kodak support and i have the latest version of quick time and all that...and im completely stumped....all other videos play fine downloaded from my old kadak camera...just not this one...please please help :) thank you so much for your time :)
reply to this comment
I got mine to work (Hans — 10/10/2011)
I had the same issue. I could hear playback just fine on the camera for a video, but when I would upload it to my laptop I couldn't hear any audio via Quicktime.
I had success in playing it back with Window Media Player.
reply to this comment
I had success in playing it back with Window Media Player.
Cant hear video audio on computer...please help (^.^) (Michel Deslatte — 10/06/2011)
Hello...i bought my camera from a store off ebay that sells refurbished Z981's...everything is great about this camera except i cant seem to hear the sound on a video taken with this camera on my computer...i can hear it on the camera but not on my computer....i called Kodak support and i have the latest version of quick time and all that...and im completely stumped....all other videos play fine downloaded from my old kadak camera...just not this one...please please help :) thank you so much for your time :)
reply to this comment
Artist variable uses (Mary J. Gray — 09/22/2011)
I am an artist who works outdoors, indoors with low light focused on models and set ups. I don't work from photos, but sometimes need to go back for reference. Also need a good camera for easy shots of my paintings to download on the computer. An artist friend recommends Kodak Easy Share z981. Her photos are excellent on the website. As I see it, batteries are a problem here. I just bought a Canon Power shot SD1300, for a smaller camera to take along on painting excursions outdoors.Price $120 including case, battery charger and pack, AV cable,Interface Cable...at Costco. I would prefer a view finder.Decisions, Decisions...Any recommendations for my situation. Oh, also would love to be able to take quick shots of new grand baby. Mary J.
reply to this comment
Artist variable uses (Mary J. Gray — 09/22/2011)
I am an artist who works outdoors, indoors with low light focused on models and set ups. I don't work from photos, but sometimes need to go back for reference. Also need a good camera for easy shots of my paintings to download on the computer. An artist friend recommends Kodak Easy Share z981. Her photos are excellent on the website. As I see it, batteries are a problem here. I just bought a Canon Power shot SD1300, for a smaller camera to take along on painting excursions outdoors.Price $120 including case, battery charger and pack, AV cable,Interface Cable...at Costco. I would prefer a view finder.Decisions, Decisions...Any recommendations for my situation. Oh, also would love to be able to take quick shots of new grand baby. Mary J.
reply to this comment
Amanda DiGiacomo (09/06/2011)
i have pictures from my wedding that got taken in panoramic but they cut off the people in the pictures when it blended them together. Is there a way in the camera to pyhsically separate them and have the original picture unblended?
reply to this comment
Amanda DiGiacomo (09/06/2011)
i have pictures from my wedding that got taken in panoramic but they cut off the people in the pictures when it blended them together. Is there a way in the camera to pyhsically separate them and have the original picture unblended?
reply to this comment
JUNK (gail — 08/25/2011)
we got this machine last june to replace z980, which went faulty 3 times and could not be repaired and it took kodak nearly 6 months to replace. several months ago the memory cards stopped being usable so we kept buying new ones. at first they would work for a month, buy a new one they would work for a few weeks, then we would buy another which would work for a number of days then this would be unusable. now even brand new cards straight from the packaging does not work, it states it is unusable but they work in other cameras.
kodaks answer is to charge us for a reconditioned machine as it is now outside warranty. WE HAVE MISSED OUT ON PHOTOS FOR CHRISTMAS, 3 CHILDRENS BIRTHDAYS AND SUMMER HOLIDAYS, ONLY BUY IF YOU DONT WANT TO HAVE ANY PICTURES! ***** DO NOT BUY**********
reply to this comment
kodaks answer is to charge us for a reconditioned machine as it is now outside warranty. WE HAVE MISSED OUT ON PHOTOS FOR CHRISTMAS, 3 CHILDRENS BIRTHDAYS AND SUMMER HOLIDAYS, ONLY BUY IF YOU DONT WANT TO HAVE ANY PICTURES! ***** DO NOT BUY**********
Sall (08/17/2011)
I absolutely hate this camera. I wish I would have never purchased it. Majority of my indoor pictures have a red tint to them. I take my $50 camera with me when I take the Z981 and always get a better shot with my cheap camera.
reply to this comment
Viewfinder search (Betty T Osiek — 07/29/2011)
Is there a Kodak camera with a viewfinder?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/01/2011)
The new Z990 has a viewfinder. (It's electronic, not optical, but still an eye-level viewfinder). Other than that, no new Kodaks have a viewfinder.
reply to this comment
action shots? (Ciara — 06/21/2011)
I want to buy this camera for the specific reason of taking pictures at basketball games and other sporting events. Does this camera take decent action shots or am I wasting my money? I can't afford to spend a lot which is why I chose this camera, considering it's only around $200. Help me please.
reply to this comment
Terry (08/31/2012)
You can use this camera if you want, but leave the LCD off while using because it eats your battery life extremly quick. I watched mine go down in just a matter of minutes so have plenty of batteries available. You may also concider a cheap small camera as a back up like I did for those pictures up close enough. Other than that you are on your own also you may want to down load your manual just incase you loose the one you have.
reply to this comment
Camera battery life on an overseas trip (Jan Parkhill — 06/20/2011)
BATTERIES ARE IMPORTANT:
Recharging batteries every night is not a good option for a long trip...I recommend you purchase ENERGIZER "ULTIMATE LITHIUM" batteries for long, long life and to avoid battery charging every night. Sam's Club offers the batteries for about $19.00 for 12 batteries (3 SETS) - WELL WORTH THE MONEY.
On my 3 week trip to Europe this summer, I took over 2000 photos and did not have to change the batteries until I was back home...! Now I wonder how long this set of batteries is going to last...?
reply to this comment
Recharging batteries every night is not a good option for a long trip...I recommend you purchase ENERGIZER "ULTIMATE LITHIUM" batteries for long, long life and to avoid battery charging every night. Sam's Club offers the batteries for about $19.00 for 12 batteries (3 SETS) - WELL WORTH THE MONEY.
On my 3 week trip to Europe this summer, I took over 2000 photos and did not have to change the batteries until I was back home...! Now I wonder how long this set of batteries is going to last...?
Liam McCabe (06/21/2011)
Another good option is the Sanyo Eneloop brand.
reply to this comment
Batteries (Pam Whitaker — 05/24/2011)
Can you use any kind of battery packs instead of the rechargeables?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/24/2011)
Yeah you can use any AA batteries -- it's just nice of Kodak to include some rechargeables.
reply to this comment
Color setting (Ashwani Kumar — 03/11/2011)
how can i set color in my kodak z981 camera
reply to this comment
Kodak Z981 Flash (Alvaro Lopes — 03/10/2011)
I bought a Kodak Z981 and the flash is not working
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/12/2011)
If the flash is set to Auto and there is sufficient light to take a good picture, the flash does not fire. If the flash is set to Off, the flash does not fire. Check the flash setting. If you're still having trouble, see the steps below:
If any accessory devices (memory card, lens, USB cable, camera or printer dock, etc.) are connected to your camera, disconnect them.
Install new or fully charged battery/batteries into your camera. Follow the battery installation and charging instructions in your camera User Guide or Extended User Guide at KODAK Product Manuals.
Turn on the camera.
Set the flash to Auto.
Cover the lens with your hand.DO NOT STARE AT THE LENS!
Take a picture.
Does the flash fire? If not, it may need repair.
reply to this comment
If any accessory devices (memory card, lens, USB cable, camera or printer dock, etc.) are connected to your camera, disconnect them.
Install new or fully charged battery/batteries into your camera. Follow the battery installation and charging instructions in your camera User Guide or Extended User Guide at KODAK Product Manuals.
Turn on the camera.
Set the flash to Auto.
Cover the lens with your hand.DO NOT STARE AT THE LENS!
Take a picture.
Does the flash fire? If not, it may need repair.
mukund (03/10/2011)
How can i change manual settings of kodak z981?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/12/2011)
Select M for manual on the mode dial. Turn the Jog dial </> to choose a setting, then press it to edit the setting. Turn the Jog dial </> to change a setting, then press it to save it.
reply to this comment
tony demarco (03/09/2011)
Camera Lockup?
My Z981 locks up when shooting a brightly lit subject. It won't respond to shutter or zoom or review input. It is necessary to open the battery cover and reclose it to restore camera function?
WT-heck? Faulty camera or operator error? Anyone experiencing this?
reply to this comment
My Z981 locks up when shooting a brightly lit subject. It won't respond to shutter or zoom or review input. It is necessary to open the battery cover and reclose it to restore camera function?
WT-heck? Faulty camera or operator error? Anyone experiencing this?
by James DeRuvo (03/12/2011)
Sounds like an issue with the camera. Reset the camera back to factory default settings. This will reload the firmware as it was the first day you got it. Then, go to Kodak and download the latest firmware updates. Your camera's firmware is only as up to date as the day it was built, and an update can address bugs that have occurred in the software after you buy it. Lastly, if the issue persists, make sure you're using the properly recommended battery types. Kodak cameras are really finicky when it comes to power and using a weaker battery or a battery that isn't recommended can cause performance issues. Clean the contacts.
Outside of that, it may need to be serviced.
reply to this comment
Outside of that, it may need to be serviced.
z981 locks up! (tony demarco — 03/12/2011)
The camera really does just lock up.
I open the battery door, wait 2-3 seconds, close it and the camera works again.
???
thanks to James, will try the firmware update route.
I hope it works, the camera is a likeable little critter and does a god job at PGR missions!
reply to this comment
I open the battery door, wait 2-3 seconds, close it and the camera works again.
???
thanks to James, will try the firmware update route.
I hope it works, the camera is a likeable little critter and does a god job at PGR missions!
great camera (Hans Luebbert — 03/01/2011)
I have this camera and it takes great pictures ( photographs ) i mean lol. would recomend it to those that do not want to spend the big dollars on a DSLR . good compromise for sure
reply to this comment
HELP! (Logan Cunningham (logan@rocketshiplive.com) — 02/08/2011)
How does it do for concert photography? Like a sports mode or does it get move ment good?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/10/2011)
ultra zoom cameras are problematic for concert photography because they're so big. And on top of that, the Z981 really doesn't do well in low light. I think you can do better. Check out the Casio Fh100. With it's 10x zoom and good presets, it's an amazing compact camera that packs a punch. But also realize that a point and shoot camera has a flash that's built around small groups and portraits. So outside of about 10 feet, it's largely useless.
reply to this comment
WHAT ABOUT THE PICTURES? (Weihan Dong — 01/20/2011)
It would be so nice if reviewers of digital cameras could finally focus on the FRIGGIN IMAGE QUALITY instead of the camera's bells and whistles!!! As large format photographers know, it is the LENS - not the danged camera - that produces the images. If the quality of the pictures produced is brilliant, we'll go for it, so please focus on the essentials - LENS QUALITY and IMAGE QUALITY = resolution, color fidelity etc.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (01/20/2011)
These are, of course, the most important attributes to a large format shooter, but the average person actually places relatively little emphasis on these. Remember, the average buyer of a point and shoot wants it to take pictures quickly and painlessly. That is a far cry from large format, as you know :)
reply to this comment
Tonya Brown (01/02/2011)
Because the batteries take soooo long to charge, I am using Energizer Advance Lithium. I have been using them for about 5 weeks and they don't show any signs of stopping!!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/02/2011)
the more powerful the better, I say.
reply to this comment
noisty motor (Gil — 12/25/2010)
is anyone having problem with a lot of noise in this camera, just pict one up yesterday,the slightest movement of the camera and it seems as if the mootor just keep going
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/26/2010)
It's probably just the continuous autofocus working overtime to keep everything in focus. Not sure where exactly in the menu you can turn it off, but I'm sure there's a way to disable it.
reply to this comment
Camera firmware (666 — 01/01/2011)
I have one question to those who are using the new firmware (1.01)
I think the 1.01 causes the photo of red objects like pinkish red and lost its natural color. Please take a photo of reds and reply me soon....
Thank you!
reply to this comment
I think the 1.01 causes the photo of red objects like pinkish red and lost its natural color. Please take a photo of reds and reply me soon....
Thank you!
Firmware (LarryD — 12/24/2010)
I just purchased the Z981 and the box showed a manufacturing date of 11/2010. I went to Kodak.com to see if I had the latest firmware. They had a download of version 1.01. I checked the camera and it said version 1.02. Anyone know what this latest firmware fixed?
reply to this comment
Firmware (Jake — 01/01/2011)
Hi...Larry
The latest version is 1.01 and it would be better if you get the original version...
is there any problem with your camera. I mean the colors of photos are fine or correct? because some people accept me...complaining that the red is too red...
The tell me your firmware version presently you are using
reply to this comment
The latest version is 1.01 and it would be better if you get the original version...
is there any problem with your camera. I mean the colors of photos are fine or correct? because some people accept me...complaining that the red is too red...
The tell me your firmware version presently you are using
LarryD (01/01/2011)
I will inquire with Kodak to see what's going on with the firmware. I would not want to downgrade from 1.02 to 1.01. Perhaps the 1.02 is not available for download. Does not make sense.
reply to this comment
Jake (01/02/2011)
Well...its all up to you.....but there is no such thing like 1.02 it can be manufacturing error...but yes if everything is fine than no need to downgrade....
reply to this comment
Larry (01/03/2011)
Got a response from Kodak regarding the firmware. They said I have the latest version in my camera (1.02) but it is not yet available on Kodak's website. He also said that "The latest firmware version offers improved color fidelity in scenes captured under artificial lighting."
If anyone knows a way of extracting the firmware, I could make it available for others here to download.
reply to this comment
If anyone knows a way of extracting the firmware, I could make it available for others here to download.
Jake (01/04/2011)
Yes, that's the problem....the firmware can not be extracted from the camera...and the old version which is 1.01 does the same thing "improved color fidelity in scenes captured under artificial lighting."
Does your camera take nice photo of red objects? because this firmware causes the photo of red objects like pinkish red....I am not sure to this...but may be it takes....my car is dark type red but it show the color of car like red+pink.....
By shirt is red but again red+pink and orange objects looks red if using flash... :S I want to change my firmware version try to extract from you camera please.... :D
reply to this comment
Does your camera take nice photo of red objects? because this firmware causes the photo of red objects like pinkish red....I am not sure to this...but may be it takes....my car is dark type red but it show the color of car like red+pink.....
By shirt is red but again red+pink and orange objects looks red if using flash... :S I want to change my firmware version try to extract from you camera please.... :D
john (12/20/2010)
does this camera have digital zoom ?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/20/2010)
I believe so. Digital zoom is not a noteworthy feature though -- it basically just enlarges a section of the picture, so you end up losing lots and lots of details.
reply to this comment
S. Jacob (12/17/2010)
the icon for the battery looks like it is half charged eventhough I charged the batteries for 14 hours.
So, how do I find out how much charge is left in the batteries?? It is a brand new camera and hasn't been used much. Just to be on the safe side I will definitely keep some AA batteries with me!!
reply to this comment
So, how do I find out how much charge is left in the batteries?? It is a brand new camera and hasn't been used much. Just to be on the safe side I will definitely keep some AA batteries with me!!
by James DeRuvo (12/17/2010)
Reset your camera. See if the battery icon gets more accurate. I'd also update your firmware.
reply to this comment
find out who answered (Debbie Murphy — 12/15/2010)
Just bought the Z981 - charged the batteries for over 24 hrs. - put in camera - and I don't even have 1/4 charge. Any ideas? I returned the one I bought 2 days before for the same reason.
Debbie Murphy
reply to this comment
Debbie Murphy
by James DeRuvo (12/16/2010)
Those batteries are rated at 500 images, but that's under controlled testing conditions. So, I'd cut that by 20% as your mileage will vary. if you're not getting anywhere near that, charge the batteries, discharge them, and repeat. Reset your camera. Clean your contacts. If you're still getting limited time, then it could be a defective camera or battery. You'd have to talk to Kodak about that.
reply to this comment
Batteries (Debbie Murphy — 12/14/2010)
Just bought the Z981 - charged the batteries for over 24 hrs. - put in camera - and I don't even have 1/4 charge. Any ideas? I returned the one I bought 2 days before for the same reason.
Debbie Murphy
reply to this comment
Debbie Murphy
Liam McCabe (12/14/2010)
Sounds fishy, but sometimes you need to "break in" the batteries a bit. Run them down again (it may be that you actually have a full charge, but it's just not displaying correctly), and then re-charge once more.
reply to this comment
Shutter Lag Q (Paul Leon — 12/12/2010)
How does the Z981 shutter lag compare to comparable cameras?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/13/2010)
Compared to lower-cost extended zoom cameras (like the Olympus SP-600UZ or Fuji S8100 to name a few), it's about the same. But compared extended zooms from Canon, Panasonic, or even Nikon, it's notably slower.
reply to this comment
Z981 is junk (Larry C — 12/11/2010)
Cannot get a working Z981 and cannot get it repaired. Camera was purchased in April 2010 and I have contacted Kodak now 4 times. They will not repair and they will not replace and they will not refund. So now I own an expensive piece of junk.
reply to this comment
You call this a camera? (Chris — 12/07/2010)
My cell phone takes better pics!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/07/2010)
Your cell phone doesn't have a 24x zoom lens.
reply to this comment
Waterproof (Matt — 11/28/2010)
Does Waterproof mean that you can take pix underwater???
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/29/2010)
Yes but the Z981 is not a waterproof camera.
reply to this comment
Shelbeigh (11/26/2010)
Does it have a macro lens setting in it? or would I have to purchase that seperatly? And if there is a macro setting, how would I access it?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/29/2010)
It does have a macro setting, yes. To get to macro mode, it's usually the button with the flower symbol.
reply to this comment
Jake (11/20/2010)
hey guys.... :D i am also using this camera but the photo quality is not good with mine :( :S i don't know why.... and the focus of this camera is not good too...maybe my camera is defective or maybe i am new with it...
please tell me some setting for taking photos in low light, in high light and inside the room
the pic. quality is bad than the old Kodak C533 or Kodak Z1015 :S :(( em not happy with it...please help as soon as possible...thanks
reply to this comment
please tell me some setting for taking photos in low light, in high light and inside the room
the pic. quality is bad than the old Kodak C533 or Kodak Z1015 :S :(( em not happy with it...please help as soon as possible...thanks
by James DeRuvo (11/23/2010)
Most likely, you're just new to it. I would recommend you give the camera manual a good read cover to cover. It really is the best way to understand how your model works.
Next, get in the habit of prefocusing. This is where you place your subject in the middle of the frame, press the shutter half way and then recompose the picture. Then shoot the picture. Getting into the habit of this will not only improve your images, but will cut shutter lag by as much as 50% or more.
Next, you want to use a different shooting or scene mode :
Shooting modes
Smart Capture, sport, portrait, A (aperture priority AE), S (shutter priority AE), M (manual exposure), SCN (scene modes)
Scene modes
high ISO (i wouldn't let it go above 800), night portrait, night landscape, sunset, backlight, candlelight, manner/museum, beach, snow, fireworks, children, self-portrait, stage
Course, which one you choose depends on the conditions.
reply to this comment
Next, get in the habit of prefocusing. This is where you place your subject in the middle of the frame, press the shutter half way and then recompose the picture. Then shoot the picture. Getting into the habit of this will not only improve your images, but will cut shutter lag by as much as 50% or more.
Next, you want to use a different shooting or scene mode :
Shooting modes
Smart Capture, sport, portrait, A (aperture priority AE), S (shutter priority AE), M (manual exposure), SCN (scene modes)
Scene modes
high ISO (i wouldn't let it go above 800), night portrait, night landscape, sunset, backlight, candlelight, manner/museum, beach, snow, fireworks, children, self-portrait, stage
Course, which one you choose depends on the conditions.
Carlee (01/05/2011)
Do you think this would be a good camera to shoot live bands and their light shows with?
reply to this comment
Should I choose a Z981 ?? (MIchele — 11/09/2010)
I have a z1275 and I love it, no one can believe the pictures I take come from this camera. I'm thinking of getting a new camera with more mega pixels.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/11/2010)
More megapixels doesn't mean better images. In fact, unless you increase the chip size, all you end up doing is adding more noise to the image. In fact, with 95% or more of images snapshots, you won't even see any benefit of additional MP after around 7 or 8. It's kinda like trading the family sedan for a Porche. Sure, you can do it, but that doesn't mean you will get the benefit from it every day as you drive around town.
reply to this comment
Problem with camera (Jo Ann Pilcher — 11/07/2010)
I had a Z710 and it was wonderful. Unfortunately, it was stolen. It was so easy to adjust to night mode, which I used quite a lot. The book on this z981 says this has a night mode but does not explain how to set it there. All those little images tell you nothing. In fact, when you turn the knob on top, only a few images show. This camera is more confusing than the z710. I sure wish I still had it because it really took wonderful pictures and was easy to operate. Jo Ann
reply to this comment
Yellow Peril (Larry McGrew — 11/05/2010)
Yellow Peril (Larry McGrew — 10/27/2010)
HELP! Just got back from an extended vacation ( no, not prison) and have found an anomaly with my 981, and now, 2000 pictures later, and the time to go through them I have found that I have yellow splotches or, mottleing, in the pictures! I don't know if this is noise but it sure as hell has messed up some fine portraits. If I could figure out how to send one of these pictures to this site I would do so but i'm not that up to date with all this new fangled stuff! I see this usually in the flat background of walls, and usually indoors and sometimes on the faces. Okay, I eagerly await your answer!
reply to this comment
HELP! Just got back from an extended vacation ( no, not prison) and have found an anomaly with my 981, and now, 2000 pictures later, and the time to go through them I have found that I have yellow splotches or, mottleing, in the pictures! I don't know if this is noise but it sure as hell has messed up some fine portraits. If I could figure out how to send one of these pictures to this site I would do so but i'm not that up to date with all this new fangled stuff! I see this usually in the flat background of walls, and usually indoors and sometimes on the faces. Okay, I eagerly await your answer!
by James DeRuvo (11/10/2010)
It may be noise but that is usually indicative of artifacting and great loss of detail. If the camera chose a high ISO, it may be underexposing the image, that can be similar to mottling. Hard to tell without seeing examples.
Try resetting your camera and updating your firmware. This can bring the camera up to date and solve any bugs that have cropped up since it was built.
reply to this comment
Try resetting your camera and updating your firmware. This can bring the camera up to date and solve any bugs that have cropped up since it was built.
France (11/04/2010)
can I find a dock for kodak Z981?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/10/2010)
reply to this comment
Kodak Z981 (Art — 11/03/2010)
How many frames per second (FPS)?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/04/2010)
Typical shot-to-shot time - One shot every 3.2 seconds.
reply to this comment
M (10/31/2010)
When I depress the button half way to get a picture in focus, the camera continues to make a sound. I am just wondering if this is normal. Thank you
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/01/2010)
I wouldn't worry about it -- that's probably the sound of the motor working to keep the shot in focus. If it gets worse, you might have a problem, but it doesn't sound like anything is out of line.
reply to this comment
Jackson (10/20/2010)
I just recieved my camera z981 today, and when i turned it on, part of the outside lense obscured the shot. you can see the roundness of the lens on part of the left side of the screen. it shows in both the viewfinder and the screen, and it shows up on the pictures too. is there any way to fix this, or do i have to return it?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/21/2010)
That's a barreling issue and if it's not due to being jarred due to shipping (unlikely) it's some sort of defect either by design or manufacture. I'd return it.
reply to this comment
shutter release (randy — 10/12/2010)
is the shutter release delayed
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/12/2010)
Yes, there's always a degree of delay on a non-dSLR.
reply to this comment
Best of the Bunch (Janet — 09/26/2010)
I have a Z981 and I love it except for inside people shots. It seems so slow that my kids make jokes about how long they have to stand still. But we went to Yukon Territory the first 2 weeks of Sept and took hundreds of pictures. Magnificent shots and the zoom was phenomenal! I stick to a small point and shoot camera for inside shots except for ones in a gym or theater. The charger with the Z981 is a joke but batteries do seem to hold a charge for a while. The lens cover on all my older Kodak Easyshares were horrible and would never stay on but this camera seems to have fixed that problem because the cover does stay put.
reply to this comment
Quality of inside shots (Peter R Johnston — 09/16/2010)
How to improve quality of inside shots? Even when I choose f2.8, it wants to use ISO 64, hence a dark photo. Do I need an improved software that better judges the amount of light?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (09/16/2010)
It sounds like you have the camera set on manual ISO. Change the mode to auto ISO and your problems should be solved. Just beware that raising the ISO does decrease image quality.
reply to this comment
Viewfinder on this (dianne — 09/14/2010)
Does this camera have a viewfinder? Can't do without one in bright sunlight. My Fuji S2500 you can either use the viewfinder or the screen.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/14/2010)
Yes, electronic viewfinder.
reply to this comment
William Robbins (09/06/2010)
Is the inage sharp on big prints
I am trying to decide which camera I need. Is the 26 MM same as a film 35 or does it have a factor?
reply to this comment
I am trying to decide which camera I need. Is the 26 MM same as a film 35 or does it have a factor?
Liam McCabe (09/07/2010)
The 26mm is the equivalent to what it would be in 35mm, so no need to do any more math. Haven't tested this camera, so can't really comment on sharpness on big prints.
reply to this comment
Comparing Kodak Easyshare (Mary Cadwell — 08/01/2010)
How does the Kodak Easyshare Z981 compare to the Kodak Easyshare Z710?
reply to this comment
Commentaires Kodak Z981 (Jacques Levasseur — 07/19/2010)
Je viens d'acheter l'appareil mentionné. Il déclasse beaucoup de ses concurrents.
Je suis satisfait du Z981. Pour le chargeur de batteries, on peut toujours s'en pro-
curer de plus efficace à prix très abordable. Je remarque que beaucoup de commen-
taires exigent beaucoup de performance alors que le Z981 donne déjà beaucoup, compte tenu du prix offert!
reply to this comment
Je suis satisfait du Z981. Pour le chargeur de batteries, on peut toujours s'en pro-
curer de plus efficace à prix très abordable. Je remarque que beaucoup de commen-
taires exigent beaucoup de performance alors que le Z981 donne déjà beaucoup, compte tenu du prix offert!
showing video on tv (Allen — 07/16/2010)
How can I show videos or photos on my tv without the computer help, is there a cable i can buy. A. Moore Jr. (7/15/2010)
reply to this comment
Viewing Video witjout a cable (Robbo — 10/27/2010)
Yes this can be done, as long as the video and picture files are asved as the right format you would need to buy a mutliledia reader/player which will run vids off an sd card or most similar storage devices.
reply to this comment
Osiris (01/02/2011)
Well....all you need to do is to but an AUDIO/VIDEO cable for this camera. It must be easily available at your nearby kodak store....or you can buy it from kodak's website...
reply to this comment
showing video on tv (Allen — 07/16/2010)
How can I show videos or photos on my tv without the computer help, is there a cable i can buy. A. Moore Jr. (7/15/2010)
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/16/2010)
Unfortunately, the Z981 doesn't have an HDMI port to stream videos or photos to the TV.
reply to this comment
Faith (07/08/2010)
Will this camera make the backgroud blurry and the subject clear?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/08/2010)
The effect you're referring to comes from having a shallow depth of field, with an attractive bokeh (the aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus portions of the image).
Short answer: Not really.
Long answer: It's a tough effect to achieve. You need a dSLR with a big sensor and a nice lens to pull it off. As much as the Z981 looks like a dSLR, it has more in common with a point-and-shoot: small sensor, fixed lens. With such a huge lens, the depth of field is deep, so that everything in the photo appears to be in focus.
Here's a workaround that sort of works: Lock focus on an object. Hold the focus and then move the camera to a different position. You'll sort of get the effect you're looking for, but not quite as refined as you're probably hoping for.
reply to this comment
Short answer: Not really.
Long answer: It's a tough effect to achieve. You need a dSLR with a big sensor and a nice lens to pull it off. As much as the Z981 looks like a dSLR, it has more in common with a point-and-shoot: small sensor, fixed lens. With such a huge lens, the depth of field is deep, so that everything in the photo appears to be in focus.
Here's a workaround that sort of works: Lock focus on an object. Hold the focus and then move the camera to a different position. You'll sort of get the effect you're looking for, but not quite as refined as you're probably hoping for.
Michele (11/09/2010)
You can also edit the picture and blurr the background. I've done it and it looks great. I"ve used the wrinkle remover and it does the job
reply to this comment
Rosy (06/29/2010)
Can the KLIC-8000 batteries be used in the Z981? If not, what kind do? I really don't want to use the nimh unless I am stuck with having to use them.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/29/2010)
Well, the KLIC8K isn't listed in the accessories for the Z981, I think they really want you to use NIMH and Kodak is pretty particular that if you don't use recommended batteries you'll run into performance issues.
reply to this comment
easy use ? (yuni Triono — 06/23/2010)
that,s camera easy use for bigenner ?
thankyou your, advised
reply to this comment
thankyou your, advised
Liam McCabe (06/23/2010)
It's a Kodak, so it should be pretty easy to use in automatic mode, yes.
reply to this comment
zoom z981 (tasch — 06/22/2010)
Is it normal that i can only use the 26x zoom in sportmode? I can zoom in in the normal mode but not as far. sorry my english is not so good i hope you understand the question thank you
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/23/2010)
Hmm, not sure what to make of that. It is a 26x optical zoom, no digital enhancement despite what a previous comment said, so that's weird...anybody else have this experience?
reply to this comment
Kodak Z981 - Lenses (Dorothy Purge — 06/22/2010)
Does the Z981 carry lenses which can be changed accordingly? .......As the Cannon and Nikon can do?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/23/2010)
No it's a fixed-lens camera. If you want an interchangeable lens camera, it needs to be a dSLR or Micro Four Thirds format camera. Micro Four Thirds by Panasonic and Olympus are about the same size as this Kodak, maybe even smaller, but you can change the lens. The zoom won't be nearly as large unless you buy an extremely expensive lens, but the image quality will be much better.
reply to this comment
Question Z981 digital (Dorothy Purge — 06/17/2010)
where can I get this camera to buy while in Georgia, Atlanta City, or New York (Queens) ?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/18/2010)
My suggestion is Amazon. You'll get a great price and they have a very fair return policy if you don't like it. And it doesn't matter where you are.
reply to this comment
Danny S (06/21/2010)
They sell it at Sam's Club for $270 and Office Depot as well. You can check Office Depot's web site to see if the specific location has them in stock.
reply to this comment
ania (01/01/2011)
check kodak.com and walmart.com 199$
reply to this comment
Kodak Z981 review (Don0992 — 06/12/2010)
This is the best digital camera I have ever owned. I bought it at Sam's in Sanford Florida for $249 and after reading some not to good reviews since I had 90 days to check it out I though I would give it a try. When I got home and unboxed the camer I put in regular AA batt. and proceed to set it up. Amazing easy. The 3" axreen was exceptionally sharp. Am looking forward to vacation and the great pics I expect to take. If not like Arnold said. "I'll be back."
reply to this comment
Danny S (06/03/2010)
Thanks for your help. It is focusing on the background. I still have not figured a way to get it to stop besides backing away and using the zoom, but I guess thats why I got a camera with a high optical zoom in the first place.
Thank you again.
reply to this comment
Thank you again.
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
Reset your camera first. And update it's firmware. Then, get into the habit of putting your subject square in the middle of the frame and pressing your shutter half way. This is called prefocusing. Then recompose your image where you want the subject and press the shutter the rest of the way. Once you get into the habit of it, you'll hardly notice you're doing it, and your camera will focus where it counts, on your subject.
reply to this comment
Walt (06/03/2010)
Best to buy a good charger which will do the discharge/recharge cycle for you. I use a LaCrosse charger.
amazon.com/Crosse-Technolog...
reply to this comment
amazon.com/Crosse-Technolog...
Danny S (05/28/2010)
Am I doing something wrong? When I get physically close to an object, the picture starts out in focus, but when I am about to take the picture the auto focus take the picture way out of focus.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/29/2010)
You're probably on the wrong focus setting or the camera is focusing in the background. Put your subject in the middle and prefocus (push the shutter half way). Then recompose and press the shutter down the rest of the way. Getting in that habit will make your images much better than just trying to shoot it all at once. It'll also help combat the shutter lag.
reply to this comment
Judi (10/01/2010)
Any more updated commments on this? I just bought my 14 year old who is very much into taking pics but seems just as the above comment. we will try your suggestions but anyone else having the same problems still. Seems like most people have high regard for the Z981 but seems like it does not take the clearest pictures?? Help?? Is there certain settings just for a normal pic??
reply to this comment
Dissatisfied Customer (05/25/2010)
The online manual for the Z981 has incorrect information on pages 41, 42, 43 and 45. The manual indicated the cameras has settings for Color mode; Picture Quality; Face Detect; AF Zone; AF Control; Sharpness; and Image Stabilizer. This is incorrect per Kodak Tech Support changes to the manual are forthcoming. When they don't know.
reply to this comment
Deplete the battery without consume it (Vince Wang — 05/14/2010)
How do you deplete the battery fast without consume it?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
You may not have. Your battery contacts may simply be dirty. the more you handle a battery, the more skin oil gets on it. Then, being exposed to dirt/dust, the contacts can actually get dirty. A pencil eraser can clean them lickety split. Also, over time, a Lithium Ion battery can lose capacity. So an old battery may not have enough capacity left to power your camera even though you think it's fully charged.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/18/2010)
I really doubt this is the case James, because the Z981 is a brand new camera. I don't quite understand what the original question was though, could you rephrase?
reply to this comment
Heather (05/14/2010)
Does this camera have self timer options and burst drives? My (dying) P712 has those features and I want to make sure my replacement camera has them as well.
reply to this comment
Danny S (05/28/2010)
Yes it does. It has both self timer and burst modes (.9 per sec and 8 per sec)
reply to this comment
I want your opinion and redcommendations, not specifications (Edward S. Rusky — 05/08/2010)
So far all of the revfiews are not reviews at all. The give me the specifications of the camera which I could learn on my own. I want your opinion and recommendations.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/10/2010)
Unfortunately, we simply can't review every camera that comes out. We get the ones that the manufacturers want to send our way -- we review 3-4 every month, a solid 40 or so cameras a year, so we're pretty proud of that.
But even when we can't do a full hands-on review, we try to leave a bit of commentary on each camera based on the specs, company reputation, and any early reports/reviews we've heard about the particular model. Sorry we're not able to provide a full review on the Z981 yet -- Kodak hasn't sent one out. I do hear pretty good things about this particular model.
We do have a list of hands-on reviews that we've done (on the left navigation bar) for your reading pleasure. Thanks for visiting.
reply to this comment
But even when we can't do a full hands-on review, we try to leave a bit of commentary on each camera based on the specs, company reputation, and any early reports/reviews we've heard about the particular model. Sorry we're not able to provide a full review on the Z981 yet -- Kodak hasn't sent one out. I do hear pretty good things about this particular model.
We do have a list of hands-on reviews that we've done (on the left navigation bar) for your reading pleasure. Thanks for visiting.
Cheap junk (Dave Win — 04/29/2010)
we got one and sent it back a day later. cheap junk. focus was horrible. wouldn't zoom and maintain focus while shooting video. major shake issues when shooting stills. compared to our other P&S (Canon Powershot) this is a plastic toy. Would be better priced at about $100, which is all it's worth.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/30/2010)
Well, very few point and shoots zoom while videoing due to really cheap omnidirectional microphones that pick up the noise of the motors moving the lens in and out. Given the choice of losing audio and zooming while taping, you can understand which choice, was made. There are a few models which do, IIRC Panasonic makes one, I think. Check out the FH20.
reply to this comment
Candice G (04/29/2010)
I currently have a Kodak that is 3 years old. The biggest problem I have is when taking pics indoors of my kids. If the flash is on, the pictures are dark, but if I turn the flash off, the pictures are blurry. Would I have that problem with this z981?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/30/2010)
Well I think it's important to be mindful of your flash's limitations. Point and shoot flashes were designed around small groups and portraits. As such, the light dissipates outside of about 10 feet max. This is pretty much true with any point and shoot.
reply to this comment
Z980 close-up (Nick Pisani — 04/23/2010)
I have the previous model the Easyshare Z980, which is pretty similar to the Z981.
I did a closeup of a rose and had an 11x14 print made at Costco. Result sharp as a tack! I am very pleased overall.
reply to this comment
I did a closeup of a rose and had an 11x14 print made at Costco. Result sharp as a tack! I am very pleased overall.
Can't Permanently Shut Off Quickview (Mike Winnick — 04/15/2010)
One bummer of a design I just found in the Quickview. Though the web manual (there is no usable manual except on the web) says you can use the menus to turn off Quickview, you can't. I called Kodak and they confirmed the manuals and web, even their help desk, are wrong. This is a problem because when you take a shot the camera locks up for 3 to 4 seconds while the display shows the shot just taken. So you can't immediately shoot again. But, they offered this way to shut Quickview. After you take the shot, and the Quickview comes on, just lightly tap the shutter button and it will clear the view and enable you to shoot your next shot. Sounds great until you see an animal running and you want to follow him (or some other sports event) and just keep hitting the shutter button. You'll have to lightly tap the button again before you can press it for real for the next shot. Bummer. Someone who never used a camera before must have designed that. I'll have to use it a while to see just how annoying this becomes. Also there's no diopter on the viewfinder, but I can see well enough that it probably won't be an issue.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/16/2010)
Well, that 3/4 seconds is also used to write the image to the card. That does take time.
reply to this comment
Mike Winnick (04/16/2010)
I had a P712 before and had the ability to shut off Quickview. I never noticed any delay in writing to the card (I do agree it has to write to it but it is not a long time). The issue here is that keeping the Quickview up for 4 seconds is too long and not allowing me to shut it off is consumer unfriendly. In addition, the method they have put in place to allow you to clear it, the second press of the button, still means that the view finder or LCD is blacked out and you cannot follow the action to say nothing of the movement of the camera that is inevitable as you force your self to remember until it becomes rote that you must immediately push the button again, but only a tap or no more than 1/2 way, and thus in your haste cause the camera to move. The effect of that move is that when the view is then available you are pointed in the wrong place and need to recenter your image. If you are at any telephoto setting you will find that takes time.
I'm going to work with the camera over the next two weeks and hopefully I will get used to it. But, when I use a camera it becomes an extension of my eye and hand and I do not want to constantly have to deal with non-picture related issues and workarounds are not what I bargained for. But, we'll see.
reply to this comment
I'm going to work with the camera over the next two weeks and hopefully I will get used to it. But, when I use a camera it becomes an extension of my eye and hand and I do not want to constantly have to deal with non-picture related issues and workarounds are not what I bargained for. But, we'll see.
Disappointed/Don't Buy (Marsha B. — 04/14/2010)
I am very, very disappointed in the Kodak Z981. While it has the same features as older Z series cameras, it is awkward and difficult to turn On/Off; it is a hassle to remove the 4 batteries in order to recharge them. No longer can you set the camera in dock at computer and have it recharge while connected to the computer. The Z981 DOES NOT recharge unless batteries are out of camera and in recharger plug into an AC outlet. Also, the door entry to the batteries and memory card is extremely difficult to close. I'm always worried it is going to break! I think Kodak issued this new Z series camera just to have something new on the market. The only improvement is the increased optical lens and the increased pixels. Shame on Kodak for putting out something less than stellar.
reply to this comment
Video zoom capability? (lorraine schild — 04/13/2010)
Can you zoom while shooting video?
Ls 4/12/10
reply to this comment
Ls 4/12/10
Kodak Z981 or Nikon P100 which is better (Gaurav — 04/14/2010)
I was just wondering Which one is Better Z981 or Nikon P100, in terms of Picture Quality, Video, Noise Supperssion!??
reply to this comment
bought & returned a Nikon P100-- hated it!! (kristy — 09/20/2010)
i've always had kodak easyshares, always had incredible pics, but thought i'd try the nikon because they didn't have any kodaks instock. i was impressed by the supposed capabilities of the nikon, but bottom line is: it does NOT take pics anywhere NEAR the quality i've got with my old easyshare that had only 5.1 megapixels & a 10x zoom. i took identical pics from both cameras to compare, & the detail, color saturation, & clarity of the kodak surpassed the nikon by MILES!! i read the manual cover to cover, practiced several options, but just couldn't get the performance of my dx650 kodak. i returned the nikon p100 & used my refund for the kodak z981-- wish i'd bought it in the 1st place!
reply to this comment
Madeline Bucherich (04/09/2010)
What stores are sell this camera. Z981
reply to this comment
samplerman (04/10/2010)
I got mine at the Kodak store. free shipping and its the same price as Amazon. PLUS they have them in stock.
reply to this comment
Z981 juice eater (samplerman — 04/09/2010)
Kodak includes 4 2000mAh NiMH batteries which may get you 200 shots if charged properly and you change certain settings like auto-focus and screen brightness. The flash recharges extremely fast, BTW. However the charger they include is a joke...go buy a 1 hour charger instead and some 2700 mAh NiMHs and you're ready to rock. Remember NiMHs need to be fully discharged a couple of times before they work to full capacity.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/10/2010)
Agreed. Charge over night, deplete, charge overnight, deplete, repeat. After 2 or 3 times they should charge to full capacity in a few hours. But be sure they're recommended types or it could cause performance issues.
reply to this comment
Max (01/13/2011)
NiMH don't need discharging (NiCd need), i tested this batteries on BC-700 and trey have from 2140mAh to 2170mAh (chargint to full @700mA, dischargint to 0,9V @ 350mA).
reply to this comment
oh YESSS (samplerman — 04/09/2010)
The super macro is just that. I put my lens up against a flower and got shots that were so focused it is like a microscope. Great detail
reply to this comment
Wrong (Samplerman — 04/09/2010)
The video format is Quicktime .mov H264!
reply to this comment
help (rejul — 04/08/2010)
which one s good?? panasonic fz35 or kodak z981... if comparing features quality and performance and negelcting zoom????
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/08/2010)
We love the FZ35. Haven't seen the Z981 yet, but I'd say it'll be hard to top the FZ35.
reply to this comment
thanx (rejul — 04/08/2010)
thanx for the suggestion... waiting for feedbak on performance wise
reply to this comment
which is better? (samplerman — 04/09/2010)
I previously owned a 12 megapixel Panasonic Lumix point and shoot camera but sold it due to dust getting under the lens elements. I just got the Z981 and have to say the 12mp lumix has a sharper, more detailed image quality than the Kodak. However the Kodak has the beat with the lens sharpness.
The lumix has better color interpretation...the kodak greens are a bit over the top and lack detail.
reply to this comment
The lumix has better color interpretation...the kodak greens are a bit over the top and lack detail.
please help (rejul — 04/08/2010)
which one is good?? kodak z981 or panasonic fz35??? according to performance and clarity nd features...neglect zoom...
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/08/2010)
We love the FZ35. Haven't seen the Z981 yet, but I'd say it'll be hard to top the FZ35.
reply to this comment
Stupid Camera Noob comment/question (Danielle — 03/31/2010)
My favorite old Kodak was just stolen and so I'm looking for a new one...my old one was a Z model from 4 years ago and had 12X optical zoom and 6.1 MP. I was wondering what the digital zoom was for the Z981 because (stupid comment time) I want to be sure the 26 optical zoom doesn't mean 12 optical plus 14 digital zoom....I hate digital zoom it distorts everything. I loved my camera and despite being old it let me take some amazing animal photos. 26X optical zoom sounds amazing to me and now that I'm back in the camera market I'm coming back to Kodak again and looking for something new and less than $400.
Thanks.
reply to this comment
Thanks.
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2010)
You don't want to use the digital zoom. Some thing that DZoom has improved, and maybe it has. But at the end of the day, it's essentially an enlargement of the optical image after reaching the extreme end of the optical zoom. That explodes the pixels, making the image less sharp and washed out. Then there's the camera shake which gets even more pronounced as you use more digital zoom. Not worth it. You can enlarge it in a computer and get a better close up image. Less than $400, I like the Canon SX series. Panasonic.
reply to this comment
Cost?? (Jason — 04/04/2010)
I would like to get some input on why last year's Kodak Z980 retails for about $400, yet the new Kodak Z981 with increased MP and better zoom retails for about $330??
reply to this comment
Richard (04/04/2010)
I was curious about the price difference as well. I'm new to more higher end camera's over the basic point and shoot ones and don't know much about camera's. I've been reading all I can and thought about buying an entry level SLR but some of these megazoom camera's seem to have better spec's for less cost. I went out today and bought the Z980 and straight out of the box it's easy to use and takes great pictures and the Kodak PC software is really good for me, although the crop function is crap. I just saw this Z981 and it has 2 mor MP's and 2 more optical zoom for a full $100 less but no attachment for the extra flash. Anyone have an opinion on if I should stay with what I got for the extra flash option which I guess would only be good for further away images or go with the Z981 for the better MP's and zoom and cheaper price?
reply to this comment
stay with the 980 (samplerman — 04/09/2010)
I'm sure you wont see much difference in MP size. I'm afraid of bumping or dropping the 981 as it is all plastic. The lens rattles if you lightly shake it. I'm not sure if the 980 has a diopter focus on it, but the 981 does not. This is a major problem for most people. You get what you pay for.
reply to this comment
lens rattles (rmp — 05/20/2010)
I had to send my z981 back to kodak - lens rattled and as a result zoom and focus noise was unacceptable in movie mode (like really loud)- when they fix the lens suspension system I will buy another - kodak tech support told me to wait 6 months before purchase.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/19/2011)
Late to the party here, but there's an interesting phenomenon at work: When a model goes out of production, the price increases over time. Most new cameras are announced in Jan/Feb and come out between Feb-Apr. That's prime time to scoop up last year's models for a good price. After April 1, last year's cameras start to get more expensive as the stocks dwindle. Not really sure why it works this way, but we see it time after time for most products.
reply to this comment
Richard (04/04/2010)
One more thing. Would an entry level DSLR which would have less megapixel's, probably around 10 or so and less zoom, but I guess additional lenses would do that, I don't know for sure; take noticably better pictures than the Z980 or Z981? I know some diehard photographers might say the entry level DSLR would be better but is that just being overly picky. I want to take crisp and clear photograph's, mostly close up shot's at this point in my life, but have an easy time to so and not break the bank. Thanks for any help
reply to this comment
Kodak Easyshare Z981 (Warren Lyons — 07/12/2010)
For the 100th time, we are pitting an extended zoom camera, in this case, the Kodak Z981, against entry level DSLRs. An apt analogy would be comparing a 35k Camaro SS to a 50k BMW 530I with one having higher horsepower and top speed; the other costing more and not going as fast, but having a better quality feel, better handling, and better resale.
reply to this comment
Macro detail question (Robin — 03/20/2010)
I have a Kodak with 6.1 megapixel Z612. The macro setting doesn't get sharp detail and I typically have to stand further back to get a picture in macro.
Does this Z981 get sharp detail in macro and super macro--comparable to others like-cameras from Sony and Cannon?
reply to this comment
Does this Z981 get sharp detail in macro and super macro--comparable to others like-cameras from Sony and Cannon?
by James DeRuvo (03/20/2010)
For macro to be really effective,you need a tripod this is because you're in so tight that even the slightey quiver will translate into pronounced camera movement and blurry images.
reply to this comment
macro test (Samplerman — 04/11/2010)
to see a great macro shot with the z981, go to flickr.com and type in Irin Smith (as spelled) and look at her iris shots. She is just getting started and the results are thrilling.
reply to this comment
z981 super macro (rmp — 05/20/2010)
my z981 focuses at 0 (zero) mm - just like my canon s5
reply to this comment
John Hassenstein (03/20/2010)
What is the format for the HD video, and does the camera come with software to edit this HD? Is it the Apple format, or can Windows movie maker edit it?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/20/2010)
H.264 apple format. If I recal correctly, adobe premiere elements supports it. But you'll need to convert your files to avi to edit in movie maker.
reply to this comment
Need to know (Mike Ogden — 03/16/2010)
As an owner of a Kodak z1012is who purchased a few add on lenses I contacted Kodak and found out that it has the same 49mm threading as the z712, z812, z1012 and z980. The person I talked to however could not tell me how far the lens extends out of the camera beyond the housing? I am also curious as to if this camera/lens suffers from the same edge distortion as the z1012 when fully zoomed. I am a bit disappointed at Kodak for not keeping the hot shoe on the z980 and I was also wondering if it has the same quality issues as the z1012 with HD video and the higher iso noise issues. This all being said I do own and am happy with a z712is & z1012is and despite the shortcomings am quite happy with both cameras.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2010)
I'm not much of a fan of using add-on lenses with point and shoot cameras. You have to compromise too much image quality as the camera will lose 1-2 stops of speed as well as image clarity that suffers. So that could also add to the noise problems as the slower lens speed will cause the camera to choose a higher ISO which will invite the noise. In the end, these cameras aren't really designed to add more glass to them.
reply to this comment
Gridbald (04/21/2010)
James, an accessory lens only causes a loss of lens speed when it is placed BETWEEN the camera lens and body such as on a DSLR.
reply to this comment
NO - z1012 add on lens adapter won't work - (rmp — 05/20/2010)
the adapter is larger than z1012 - different threads ( don't listen to kodak help) - with a doubler you will get a higher f# (f5.6 - f11) = significant loss of low light usefulness . My z1012 adapter was not even close to fitting my z981
reply to this comment
threading? where? (samplerman — 04/10/2010)
I'm looking at my Z981 and there is NO threading. Really no need with a 26x optical zoom. The lens extends a good 4 to 5 inches when zoomed all the way. So adding a lens would just jam the camera.
reply to this comment
how do I get one? (ssrobes — 04/18/2010)
I see that you have a z981 where did you get it and for how much? All the places I look it is not available yet. so how do you like it so far?
reply to this comment
kodak Z981 (carrie — 04/20/2010)
Crutchfield has it..but limited supplies..if interested order FAST!
reply to this comment
Meg (04/22/2010)
I bought mine through Abes of Maine. It was $299.95 with no tax and free shipping. I received it the next day (yesterday).
reply to this comment
Susan (05/02/2010)
I found the Kodak Z981 at Sams Club for $279.00
reply to this comment
Amanda (05/13/2010)
Costco has the Kodak Z981 on sale until June 6, 2010. If ordered online the total is $249.99 (price includes s/h but not taxes). Might be less if purchased at the store.
reply to this comment
Costco Store Price (Clippercargo — 05/22/2010)
I just bought one at the store. Its $249.00 after an instant rebate of $50.
reply to this comment
Sai (10/27/2010)
I just bought on eBay and it is @204.95 + 18.88 for 3 day shipping
reply to this comment
Amazon (Rob — 12/08/2010)
I just bought it on Amazon for 199.00. Dec. 8, 2010
reply to this comment
Peniann (12/12/2010)
I just bought one on ebay for $178.95
reply to this comment
Rick (12/20/2010)
$199 + Free shipping
reply to this comment
ania (01/01/2011)
just got it at Kodak .com for $170 + free shipping + 2G free card
reply to this comment
CAN_I_ADJUST_ZOOM_SPEED? (kbone — 02/04/2011)
The zoom feature on the Z981 is fast, and that's nice. But what if I want to slow it down for zooming in on tweety birds? Can it be adjusted?
reply to this comment
Z981 cost (Hans Luebbert — 03/01/2011)
I bought this camera on Amazon 9 refurbished ) for $149.00 lol / so far so good its been a great camera for me thus far / took some great baloon pics here last October at the ballon fiestival / will be taking a lot more this year
reply to this comment
Marsha H. (05/26/2010)
I just bought one at Amazon.com for $265.99 with free shipping and no tax.
reply to this comment
Where you can purchase A981 (Shirley Lopez — 08/01/2010)
I bought mine through QVC for $249.96 on a special and believe it is around $260 now.
reply to this comment
Price and Where Purchased (Karen — 12/05/2010)
I just bought mine at Wal-Mart for 199.00
Love it...Great camera
reply to this comment
Love it...Great camera
NANCY BALDWIN (12/08/2010)
WHAT WALMART? I live in Prince George BC and they don't have this product
do you like the camera
reply to this comment
do you like the camera
Did you buy the Z981 (Patricia — 02/23/2011)
Did you buy it and if you did do you like it?
reply to this comment
Melissa (12/09/2010)
www.costco.com has it for 189.99 with a 2 gig SD CARD for $189.99 thru 12/12/10
reply to this comment
David Kiel (12/17/2010)
I bought mine at Costco online for $189.99 with a 2gb sdhc card.
reply to this comment
Price and Where Purchased (Karen — 12/05/2010)
I just bought mine at Wal-Mart for 199.00
Love it...Great camera
reply to this comment
Love it...Great camera
Alonzo (12/17/2010)
Just bought mine at Newegg for 179.00
reply to this comment
John (12/20/2010)
Amazon has it for 197.50
reply to this comment
John (12/20/2010)
Amazon has it for 179.00
reply to this comment
Dock (Carmen — 03/13/2010)
Will it connect to an already existing dock?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (03/15/2010)
I think it should. I couldn't find a definite answer for you, but Kodak does a reasonably good job of keeping compatibility between new cameras and older docks. Check out this page from their site, might offer some insight: kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier...
reply to this comment
answer to docks (Doug D — 11/09/2010)
Kodak told me that it would not fit any docks already out. I asked them personally on phone.....
reply to this comment
Yes You can dock (Stan Astra — 11/18/2010)
Not sure if it charges, but you can plg into usb on G600 dock and print thru PicBridge
reply to this comment
Z981 dock compatability (Bob D — 07/17/2010)
Neither the Z981 or the Z980 can be connected to a dock- bummer.
reply to this comment
Battery efficience (Mario Galvão — 03/11/2010)
I have a doubt about the battery Ni-mH efficience in this camera.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/12/2010)
A few things. In cold weather, batteries can lose their charge. So keep them warm in your pocket until you are using the camera. Also, they can lose their capacity if not used for long periods of time.
Lastly, when you first get rechargeables like the Ni-MH Batteries, you should charge them overnight, deplete them, charge them overnight, deplete and then you can charge them in about an hour and a half. If you didn't do this initially, your batteries may not be charging at their fullest capacity.
reply to this comment
Lastly, when you first get rechargeables like the Ni-MH Batteries, you should charge them overnight, deplete them, charge them overnight, deplete and then you can charge them in about an hour and a half. If you didn't do this initially, your batteries may not be charging at their fullest capacity.
Dee (04/29/2010)
what is the fastest way to deplete the battery
reply to this comment
Ken (02/24/2011)
I put them in a flashlight. Not sure if this is technically the best way, but its safe and fast
reply to this comment
sujit ghosal (02/20/2010)
what is the performance?
reply to this comment
KODAK EASYSHARE Z981 Digital Camera video format (john sweet — 02/16/2010)
what format is the video recorded in
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/20/2010)
MPEG4 with MJPEG codec.
reply to this comment
Wrong (Samplerman — 04/09/2010)
The video format is Quicktime .mov H264!
reply to this comment
Mihalis (02/15/2010)
And...what about macro?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/18/2010)
Every camera has a macro setting. What do you mean exactly?
reply to this comment
Bill (04/05/2010)
The 980 and 981 both have a super macro. you can put the lens against what you are taking a picture of and still get it!
reply to this comment
Z980 close-up (Nick Pisani — 04/23/2010)
I have the previous model the Easyshare Z980, which is pretty similar to the Z981.
I did a closeup of a rose and had an 11x14 print made at Costco. Result sharp as a tack! I am very pleased overall.
reply to this comment
I did a closeup of a rose and had an 11x14 print made at Costco. Result sharp as a tack! I am very pleased overall.
z981 (ronaldo balde — 06/29/2010)
i'm curious if the zoom works while taking video?
reply to this comment
Swizz (07/01/2010)
Zoom works while taking the video.
reply to this comment
Matt (11/28/2010)
Yes, yes it does
reply to this comment
Jackdaniels (02/05/2010)
good
reply to this comment
laurence j lang (02/02/2010)
what is the flash disant at 20feet?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/09/2010)
I wouldn't even bank on 20 feet. Point and shoot flashes are designed around small group and portrait shots. So outside of maybe 15', the flash dissipates pretty exponentially.
reply to this comment
flash illumination dropoff as a function of distance (jeff simpson — 09/17/2010)
flash intensity will drop off as the cube of the distance. Double the distance and you get eight times less light...
reply to this comment
Flash power (Bill — 12/13/2010)
light dimishes by the square of the distance not cube.
reply to this comment
Here's the answer (Charlie Gosh — 08/03/2011)
Light falls off as the inverse of the square. So, 4 times the distance equals 1/16 as much light. Twice the distance equals one-fourth as much light. Five times as far away yields one-twenty-fifth as much light on the same size area.
Bottom line? Take lots of random photos, then study them to see your results. You'll find that a flash subject more than 10 feet away is too dark UNLESS some other light is available or you have a very powerful off-camera flash. Flash photos closer than 5 feet will usually be washed out.
IF your subject is over 10 feet away, AND there is some natural light available, you may get much BETTER results by turning the flash OFF. This will enable the camera to expose for a darker scene, rather than expose for the bright flash. Hold the camera very still, or prop it against any stationary object (chair, wall). You can even try activating the 10-second timer and set the camera down to eliminate all jiggle. A tiny tripod comes in very handy here ($5 on eBay).
Best bet? For the most natural looking portraits that soften wrinkles and have good flesh tones, practice taking steady shots with no flash, modest room lighting, move your subject so they don't have shadows on their faces, and change your camera's White Balance setting (it's in your manual, available online -- just Google it) to match the room lighting (fluorescent cool, fluorescent warm, incandescent lamps, etc.). With a little practice, this will give you the best results of all.
reply to this comment
Bottom line? Take lots of random photos, then study them to see your results. You'll find that a flash subject more than 10 feet away is too dark UNLESS some other light is available or you have a very powerful off-camera flash. Flash photos closer than 5 feet will usually be washed out.
IF your subject is over 10 feet away, AND there is some natural light available, you may get much BETTER results by turning the flash OFF. This will enable the camera to expose for a darker scene, rather than expose for the bright flash. Hold the camera very still, or prop it against any stationary object (chair, wall). You can even try activating the 10-second timer and set the camera down to eliminate all jiggle. A tiny tripod comes in very handy here ($5 on eBay).
Best bet? For the most natural looking portraits that soften wrinkles and have good flesh tones, practice taking steady shots with no flash, modest room lighting, move your subject so they don't have shadows on their faces, and change your camera's White Balance setting (it's in your manual, available online -- just Google it) to match the room lighting (fluorescent cool, fluorescent warm, incandescent lamps, etc.). With a little practice, this will give you the best results of all.
Kodak Easyshare Z981 Reviews
Kodak Easyshare Z981 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Kodak z981
(fred fabel — 07/20/2011)
It’s been over a year that I have lived with my Z981. I still feel much of the camera’s lack of features is detrimental to the relationship. As the song goes, “you don’t know what you miss til it’s gone” rings true.
On the plus side, the lens is fantastic, everything anyone could want in a lens. The simplicity of controls and menu are a novice’s dream come true. I should say at this point I use the camera probably beyond its designed means. I shoot stage /theater available light. I shoot air shows but I also take nature and people pictures.
Now onto that slippery slope. The batteries are still a problem. Most folks go for AA batteries in their cameras because if the need arises batteries are readily available. Not so, they have to be the pre-charged type. I tried regular rechargeable and the camera rejected them. I never did try just plain old alkaline batteries. I use a national brand pre-charged and the Kodak batteries that came with the camera. A little over a year on the batteries and several thousand pictures and so far so good. I can’t complain about longevity with the ones I have. I do miss the diopter adjustment more than I thought I would. I also find I miss the ability to put a UV filter on the camera to protect its lens. I read in one of the comments about the camera and red and I thought it was just me. Large amounts of red color in the picture and you lose all detail. I shoot a lot of stage shows and they often use red or warm lighting much to my dismay. I gave up on the burst shooting, it will never match what I had in my old Nikon coolpix 4800. The stitching works but it has a long way to go before it can compete with the Sony system. There are many features I’ve not used and probably never will. This would be with any camera.
The camera hit the market at $400 and within a short period of time dropped in price. I paid $279 and had to buy it on line because it was unavailable in stores. The point I am trying to make is it was in price competition way over its head. When Kodak dropped the price to $200 it was a leader in a competitive range.
- 5.0 out of 5
Love It
(Tonya Brown — 12/05/2010)
I have wanted the Z981 ever since it came out, just waited for the price to come down. I reviewed your site with comments and recommendations and seriously thought about purchasing a different camera. However, I LOVE the Z981. I am by no means an expert, just like taking pics of family and friends. I fully agree that the baterry charger is not worth the money it cost to produce, but I used 4 AA extended life batteries and after two weeks of frequent use they are still "going strong". The pictures have turned out beautifully with awesome color. I have no idea what a diopter is, so I can't comment on that. I am very satisfied and would strongly recommend this camera to anyone.
- 4.0 out of 5
Yellow Peril
(Larry McGrew — 10/27/2010)
HELP! Just got back from an extended vacation ( no, not prison) and have found an anomaly with my 981, and now, 2000 pictures later, and the time to go through them I have found that I have yellow splotches in the pictures! I don't know if this is noise but it sure as hell has messed up some fine portraits. If I could figure out how to send one of these pictures to this site I would do so but i'm not that up to date with all this new fangled stuff!
I see this usually in the flat background of walls, and usually indoors and sometimes on the faces. Okay, I eagerly await your answer!
- 4.0 out of 5
Red is too RED!
(Sandra — 09/23/2010)
I love and hate this camera at the same time. While I'm not the most experienced photographer, I do know what I expect out of a camera... Three years as a portrait photographer (using point and clicks with fantastic results), this one is great (mostly) for everything EXCEPT what I need it for.
This is a great camera for outside shots, action shots come out good with burst mode. Flowers,butterflies, birds, squirrels, I've gotten fantastic shots of all of these. However, the red is too red, to the point of looking like it's neon marker, not a photo. All detail is gone on anything that I shoot that is red because of how bright the red is. And as a portrait photographer, this has been lousy, lousy, lousy no matter my lighting set up or camera settings.
If I was only using this for outside nature shots with no reds in them, I'd keep it. However after having 2 portrait jobs go horribly wrong, I will be returning this camera before the weekend.
Also, the batteries drain too quickly, takes forever to recharge, and unless you have unnaturally steady hands or a tripod, many of your scene selections are useless and will only result in blurry or very noisy pictures.
- 4.0 out of 5
The Kodak Z 981
(fred fabel — 07/19/2010)
I have had my Z981 for about two months or about 2,000 pictures ranging from beach scenes to boxing matches to theater. In my opinion you get what you pay for, maybe a little less then you paid for.
First off there wasn’t a unit to be had in my area so I had to read up on the camera and I order it through a box store’s online site. Based on the online price’s the price seemed pretty good. They have since dropped about $25 or so, there again “if you can find one”.
My observations: The lens is fantastic. I sometimes question if the IS is working but from short to long the lens is sharp. I even will overlook the vignetting, which is not sever. The camera is very simple to use compared to many I have looked at. The basic menu does not contain a lot of jargon that the layperson will not understand. The average person can pick it up and in a half hour be shooting good pictures. The turn on to ready to shoot speed is fantastic. From there it slides down a shallow slope. The more I handled it the more it reminded me of the post war plastic 127 roll film camera’s that flooded the market. The Z981 is sturdy enough it just feels that way. I can live without the diopter lens in the viewfinder. I can live without the burst shooting I knew in my old Nikon. These are built-ins. Lack of a good concise manual except going on line and downloading is not expected from a name like Kodak. I found out the other day it would not take just any rechargeable AA battery. Kodak’s play on that is we didn’t test it for that brand so they probably won’t work. I have since found a major brand that will work besides the Kodak batteries, which cost more. Another battery issue is the charger that comes with the camera. It doesn’t turn off when the batteries are charged. They do give you a time chart to go by. My main concern is the charger gets so hot it is hard to handle so I will continue to use my old charger which doesn’t get hot and turns itself off. While on the battery topic, the compartment door is a sever butt pain to open and close. I can see duct tape in it ‘s future, sometime shortly after the warranty runs out. The time delay between shots even using the tap the shutter button method is a bummer. I’ve lost pictures because even when I tapped the shutter and I got a live view it still would not take the next shot, it was still writing.
So in my opinion you are buying a good camera design that didn’t pass the bean counters paring knife.
- 1.0 out of 5
Battery Charger
(Lemlakit — 06/12/2010)
The slow battery charger is total blunder for this camera, just got started to shoot and batteries run down> it takes 16 to 18 hours to recharge> Antiquated time to recharge, Not interested to review this camera if the manufactor thinks I should pay for an efficient charger > well the camera's performance will be is suspect.
Lemlakit
- 1.0 out of 5
'No Diopter' Means 'No Good!'
(Rebecca Winchester — 04/13/2010)
I eagerly anticipated receiving my pre-ordered Kodak Z981 after owning a Kodak 6490 for four great years. But the day I got it, I turned it on and saw there was no diopter control for the LCD screen. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? Did some 23- year-old Kodak marketing wiseguy with perfect eyes decide to ditch the diopter control in order to save a few bucks? Without a diopter, the camera is useless to me and I reluctantly returned it the next day. Too bad for Kodak. They've lost a loyal and longtime customer and I bet there are a few more like me out there. A 26x optical zoom with an LCD screen is simply useless to the vast majority of users over 30 years old without a diopter control. Shame on you, Kodak!
- 4.0 out of 5
Not bad for $330.00
(Samplerman — 04/09/2010)
I was one of the first to receive the Z981. In fact I bought 2. At first I thought the camera was a fake...real light. Not made of metal but of hi-tech plastics. The lens is awesome and the images are good to excellent. The LCD screen is very large and easy to read, however the EVF viewfinder HAS NO DIOPTER focus adjustment!!! I think this is a grand mistake on Kodak's part as not everyone sees the same. I can almost focus through it, but my GF cannot and is very frustrated. Also there is no flash shoe at all. The camera is a battery eater and the NIMHs they include are only 2000mAh and the charger takes 15 hours to charge them. Not good. On the good side, there are tons of settings you can choose and the 1/2 inch imager does a good job in low light. I was blown away at how fast you can go from "ON" to "zoom" to "shoot". Beware, the zoom is ultra-fast and has no speed adjust. A great camera to capture birds or UFOs!! All in all it's really worth the money but dont buy it if these shortcomings bother you.
