Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Nikon Coolpix L5
Editor's Review
The Nikon Coolpix L5 is a nice, easy shooter that brings high-powered features to normal users. The 7.2 megapixel sensor alone is enough to make this an appealing point-and-shoot camera, but Nikon throws in an impressive 5x optical zoom as well. Together, the sensor and lens will allow for highly detailed photos that are guaranteed to satisfy. The L5 also features an innovative form of image stabilization called "Lens-shift Vibration Reduction," which adjusts the position of the lens to make those 5x zoom images look crisp and clear.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Movie mode with sound
- Lens-shift vibration reduction
- Auto focus and exposure
- 2.5-inch LCD
- Secure Digital card storage (8MB internal)
- 2 AA batteries
- Part Number: Coolpix L5
- UPC: 018208255504
- Release Date: Sep 01, 2006
Shop for L5 Accessories
Nikon Coolpix L5 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
As for the Nikon L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), it was released in 2006 and has been replaced by the Nikon L12 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7.1 MP camera with slightly higher than average optical zoom (5x vs the normal 3x on most compact cameras). Users review it at about an average of 3.5 stars out of 5 and DCHQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) rates it at a C+ grade level. For the going price, I would say you were better off trying a newer camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
I would say your best bet is to contact Nikon Service & Support ( nikonusa.com/Service-And-Su... ). Have your receipt and purchase date info handy when you call for reference. Your camera comes with a one-year limited warranty, so you should be able to get a replacement for this. Good luck.
Andrew
send to tagaydosik@comcast.net
Sounds like this is the weak link on the camera
Many thanks in advance!
Thanks,
I have emailed a couple of you that left your addresses - thanks - to replace my broken battery door. What an epidemic. Dale, can you email to me your fix instructions? Thanks. segway@aol.com.
It looks like I've missed a string of helpful people here. If anyone is still out there and could email the instructions on how to replace the battery cover door, I would really appreciate it! (I've had it--embarrassingly--taped up for the last several months).
blj_18@hotmail.com
Thanks!
i would like the instructions to replace the battery door also.
i have a new door and i had unscrewed all the screws but this did now work. pics would be good as well
cbailey222@gmail.com
kev.delaney@gmail.com
Sandra
sandy_is_dandy@yahoo.com
btkeys1972@hotmail.com
My boyfriend is climbing Mt Kilimanjaro in 3 weeks and needs to take my Nikon Coolpix L5 with him, but a crucial piece of plastic on the battery door somehow snapped off. Where do i get a replacement door and HOW DO I FIX IT? Anyone that has the answer please email kdbakker@telus.net. Thanks!
Geritolgal2@Yahoo.com
Please e-mail them to me at sixbenders@integrity.com
atlc4@yahoo.com
Thanks!
CaMcGeHe@earthlink.net
Thanks for your help.
Thanks again!
Nikon Coolpix L5 or Sony DSC W55
Both are 7 megapixel cameras. However I was suggested to take an advice from some professional brains. Anyone who can help?
Given all this, why would anyone want to settle on SONY and pay the premium for that 4 letter word?
Get the Nikon, IMHO.
Consider this, the user of the camera is an amateur who has no thorough knowledge of cameras or photography?
Since sony has majority functions automated; does the manual settings of Nikon affect the photography which is done by an amateur?
How good quality of a photograph can an amateur photographer shoot using the nikon?
Is it very easy to use or its such that it can be used only by professionals who understand photography and its techniques thoroughly?
I would really appreciate a reply on these few questions.
Give me a camera company that makes cameras over an electronics company vying for market share anyday.
betterphoto.com/?kcalpesh
And as a photographer, tech reporter, and all around consumer, I don't like it that Sony forces their customers into a proprietary revenue stream. I think it limits choices and costs them more money in the long run. More open source options used, like SD cards for example, allow for much more flexibility and competition regarding pricing and innovation.
I am sure about two Sony Cameras. DSC W55 & DSC W80. However, I would now only like to check out a few Nikon Cameras.
Can anyone recommend me few of the latest models from NIKON, which would also be a little easy to use. I agree Nikon has a slight edge considering the cost factor, since there are more open options with accessories like SD Cards.
I like the P3/P4 for it's 8.1 MP and they come highly rated and have 3x zoom - which is a tad short for my likings.
By and far, my favorite camera was my old coolpix 600, despite the fact that it was only a 1.2 megapixel camera. The Nikor lense has an advantage over most other cameras, as its made of glass. The image quality is really that much better. It does an excellent job of picking up different color tones and shades, and produces realistic colors. Prints from the camera will knock your socks off, and to my prosumer eye (not professional, mind you), I think the prints from the Coolpix cameras are well comparable with some of the prints that come from some of the nicer slr film cameras. Just turn off the digital zoom feature.
The newer Kodak cameras produce the second-best quality pictures for a point and shoot camera. They are extreamely easy to use, and throw in a lot of fun features. However, when you go to print out photos, you start to notice unrealistic black levels. The older Kodak cameras are junk, producing some weird colors.
The Sonys I would not recommend to anyone. While Sonys do excellent in low-level lighting, there tends to be noise in the pictures. In better lighting conditions, the Sony tends to over-saturate color. Some people like this, but it seems to be unrealistic photos. The upside of them is that they are fairly easy to use.
The cannon point and shoot cameras probably tie for third place with Olympus. They produce good pictures, excellent color reproduction, and with a steady hand, will give you some amazing pictures in low-level lighting. The reason I am putting these as third place, though, is that they are not as stupid-proof as the Kodaks, and while the image quality is exceptional, is not as good as the Nikons.
I am not at all happy with Fuji point and shoot cameras, particually the A series. These are just cheap cameras, and with the cheap Nikons going for about $120 MSRP, I cannot see a reason to recommend one. Not that they are bad, its just that there are better choices. Most of the Fujis I have seen use the xD memory card, which is quite annoying. These things are so tiny, that I am always misplacing them, and the only thing that uses xD is Fuji and Olympus. Stick with a camera that uses SD or Compact Flash.
The Poloroid that I have now is one that someone gave me, and is absolute junk. While it gets the job done, there are absolutely no advanced features, colors are muted, and even in excellent lighting conditions, pictures tend to blur.
There is not a single other brand I would recommend, every one else seems to be playing the "Me too" game.
Conclusion - get a Nikon. They are cheap enough that in many cases they underprice the competition, for the most part give a better picture quality than the competition of comparable price, and most have both easy and advanced features, so while you can use it straight out of the box, you will have a camera that can grow with you.
Of course, with any camera, I suggest reading reviews, searching for sample pics on the internet, go to the store and physically put your hands on a camera and see if you like it, and, most importantly, knowing what you will be using your camera for.
Can anyone help with this model, as to how good it is....??
Often times, it's holding the actual camera which eliminates alot of the confusion.
All in all, this is an excellent camera. My only annoyance with the thing is that it does not have a view finder, you must use the lcd. However, this is okay with me as its quite bright, even in direct sunlight, and has an amazingly good battery life.
Canon Powershot A570is - 4x Optical Zoom
Canon Powershot A710is - 6x Optical Zoom
How does this affect my photography? Does 710 hold any major advantage over here?
Canon Powershot A570is - Macro Focus Range - 30cm
Canon Powershot A710is - Macro Focus Range - 1cm
Macro Focus helps to shoot objects from very very close. Does 710 holds any major advantage over here?
Canon Powershot A570is
Minimum Aperture Wide - f2.8
Canon Powershot A710is
Minimum Aperture Wide - f2.6
I have no idea what is Minimum Aperture Wide? Can anyone suggest?
Video fps -
Canon Powershot A570is - 60fps
Canon Powershot A710is - 30fps
60fps is a major improvement for video shooting?
Tele Zoom (mm)
Canon Powershot A570is - 140mm
Canon Powershot A710is - 210mm
Major difference, but what is Tele zoom and which of the above is better?
ISO ratings
Canon Powershot A570is - auto, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
Canon Powershot A710is - auto
Can anyone advice on the above comparision?
That is an amazing macro. the 30cm vs the 1cm I believe would be the focal length. I would assume this is saying that you can focus on something as close as 30cm away from the camera (that is 2 and a half feet, which kinda defeats the purpose of having a macro lense in my opinion). Now focusing at 1cm is amazing. The quesiton is, do you want to take close-up pictures of flowers and bugs?
I am not sure what this telezoom is.
on the iso settings, are you sure you do not have the two reversed? With all the features you have listed on the 710 over the 570, it really surprises me that the 710 does not have a manual mode. Most modern digital cameras that are of any quality have both manual and automatic iso settings. The question also goes, does the camera do the iso settings in optics, or digitally? Many digital cameras now days do the higher iso modes in digital mode, which amplifies the light. The plus is, you can take pictures without a flash in low-light settings, the bad thing is is that you tend to get a lot of noise in the picture. This should depend on how you want to use your camera. Taking pictures in night clubs and at parties, the noise really is not THAT bad on most cameras I have played with, and are great for memories, but if you want to take photos professionally, probably not the best thing
Canon Powershot A570is, uses a DIGIC III processor, which enables the improved face detection and advanced noise reduction technologies. By applying new algorithms, faces can be detected at a greater distance. DIGIC III also allows for a high ISO speed, up to 1600.
How big is this as an advantage over the Canon Powershot A710is which has 6x optical zoom.
As far noise reduction in the processor, this is digital noise reduction then, in which case it may be reducing noise by running a "soften" or a "blur" filter on the image. I would play with the camera some in low lighting at the store and see what happens
So this means I can already count the 6x Optical zoom or Canon Powershot A710is a better advantage than the Face detection of Canon Powershot A570is. Also the the Macro Focus Range is better in the Canon powershot A710is.
However, you also described the Auto ISO mode for Canon Powershot A710is to be a slight drawback?
I played with the face detection thing on mine at the lake today. It makes so much more sense in direct sunlight, especially if you try taking picture after picture after picture. In this case, on mine, you line up a face, or even two (some you can have up to 8 points of focus), then I can snap, move, snap, move, snap zoom in, snap, and so forth, and not have to refocus as the camera is following the face and doing it for you. That is cool, I thought I would have to resetup the face feature for each pic, but that's not the case. Now, I do not know if that is how it is on all cameras, but that is how it is on the nikon coolpix l12. I imagine this feature varies from one company to another.
I just really like the 6x optical zoom, i have not seen a consumer level camera with that high of a zoom level. I LIKE using my zoom, however, with the l12, it takes such high resolution pictues, i can zoom in on my computer and crop, and still have pretty freakin high quality pictures.
Its really up to you.
However, theres one important aspect I need to know before buying. What exactly is a gray-market Camera? How reliable could the product be? Why such huge price difference between the gray market product and the product that the authorized dealers sell?
Can anyone realy help?
Product that authorized dealers sell offer in country warranties and local repair options.
In addition, the menus and manuals may not even be in your language!
More information can be found here ( mycamera.com/index_graymark... ).
I am now looking to buy one more Camera with a slightly higher configuration, considering the optical zoom or Megapixels.
Have checked the following two:
Canon Powershot S3 IS
6.00 Mpixel
12x Optical Zoom
Macro Focus Range: 0cm
(Seems strange to me, does this mean there is no macro function at all? or that you can almost touch the object while shooting?)
Maximum Video Resoultion: 640x480
Canon PowerShot G7
10.00 Mpixel
6x Optical Zoom
Macro Focus Range: 1cm
Maximum Video Resoultion: 1024x768
Digic III Processor with Face detection feature.
I personally feel, G7 has a definite edge over S3 because of being 10Mpixel camera with Face detection and almost similar macro focus range as S3 and a higher video resolution. Is the 12x Optical Zoom more preferrable?? Any user having knowledge about these to cameras?
The question is on video resolution is not just the resolution, but how many frames you can shoot a second. The Nikon at 640x480 at 30fps looks amazing, and it has sound, and I can continue to record until the memory card runs out (this is something important to me. Can you continue to record, or are limited to like 20 and 30 second clips). Also, when you buy your camera, don't skimp on memory card. I got a 60x SD card for my camera, so it writes really fast to the memory card, which means I can take a shot every two or three seconds. My old memory card I would have to wait about 10-15 seconds between shots.
Remember to configure the camera when you get it. Most cameras, for some odd reason, are not set out of the package to take pictures at the maximum resolution.
Keep in mind that a 10 megapixel picture with little or no compression is going to be about 3-5 meg, depending on the camera. Would suggest picking up a memory card no smaller than 2 gig if you really like to take pictures.
Truthfully, If I had to pick between the two, while the 12x optical zoom is really tempting, I would go for the g7. the 6x is still better than what I got on my camera. Also, now that I am mostly photographing people, I like to get closer to them rather than use a zoom. If you do not have a steady hand, than probably anything over 8x is going to blur unless you have image stabalization or a tripod or an incredibly steady hand.
So yeah, go with the G7 is my opinion.
Once again, check the resolution on both your pictures and your video mode when you get it out of the box. Oh, and at 1024x768, your video is going to be HUGE! 640x480 should be good enough for most people, expecially if exporting to a tv or the web (hdtv you may want to go higher). At 640x480, a one and a half minute clip for me is around 60 meg.
And yeah, Video resolution doesn't really matter. A 640X480 video at 30fps is good enough, which G7 has.
Yet there is something that you mentioned above. Its the Speed of Memory Card, you said you had to wait for 10-15 seconds before taking the next shot. Are the memory cards categorized according the the speed? or they come with standard function? If there are different types of memory cards available then can you please list the best one?
Canon Powershot S5 IS.
8 Mpixel Camera,
12x Zoom
Digic III Processor with Face detection feature.
However I checked the sample images but found it a lesser better than the G7. But where people rave about 6x Zoom, 12x Optical zoom must be...... WOW.....
shop3.outpost.com/product/4... a 60x:
shop3.outpost.com/product/5... the first one is a 2 gig and the second a 4 gig)
And here is a 2 gig at 150x:
shop3.outpost.com/product/4... 150x is the fastest of all of these. And 20 bucks for a 2 gig at 150x is a killer price, I may pick up one of these. I paid $18 for my 60x at Fry's two weeks ago, I would gladly pay the extra 2 bucks for a 150x.
I am still fairly new to the whole speed thing, so I am not sure if that means that the 150x is 2 1/2 times faster than the 50x or not, but I would assume that is what it means.
Canon Powershot S5 IS.
8 Mpixel Camera,
12x Zoom
Digic III Processor with Face detection feature.
However I checked the sample images but found it a lesser better than the G7. But where people rave about 6x Zoom, 12x Optical zoom must be...... WOW.....
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
But allow me to make an pitch for using several smaller cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like F-recover to get back your pictures and recover your card.
& yh 1 more thing.........i cant gt ma nikon L5 to connect wit ma laptop n work as a web cam......it does connects but doesnt works as a web cam.......any suggestionz abt dat.....plz tell me.......!
It is pretty easy to use and it's also light and easy to manage.
It has 6 megapixels and a 12x optical zoom with image stabilization.
You mentioned the Canon Powershot S2... I have heard that it is also a good camera.
However, if you are interested in that one, I might also recommend checking out the newer model (the S3 IS).
Best regards,
LK
Thanks.
If you're concerned with the size of the camera, the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) measures only 3.8 x 2.6 x 1.6 inches (excluding protrusions). It should fit easily into a day pack, or even the pocket of a ski jacket. The Nikon L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) measures 3.6 x 2.4 x 1.8 inches, so there is barely any difference in size. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
There are a couple of cameras that might suit your needs: the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Nikon Coolpix L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I have used both a Nikon Coolpix and a Canon Powershot in the past. Their user interfaces are easy and can do various different functions. Personally I prefer the Canon UI, but that is just my preference. As for the protection and deletion questions, both cameras have the ability to protect the pictures you have taken as well as delete one by one on the unit themselves.
To further prevent bluriness, you might look at purchasing an inexpensive mono-pod. I picked one up at a Wal-Mart for under $20. They are lightweight and easy to carry, and add that extra stability to taking photos.
I'd recommend going into a retailer to see how the cameras feel in your hands before you purchase. A place like Circuit City or Best Buy would be good to get a feel for the cameras. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
looking for simple and reliable
we travel to various destinations
There are a few differences between the two cameras. Both will be simple and reliable, but you just have to ask what is more important to you. The differences below list the Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) first.
-Megapixels: 6 vs 8.1
The larger number will allow for clearer photos
-The Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers manual exposure settings for more advanced photo taking, and custom light levels while the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not.
-ISO Settings: 80-800 vs 100-1000
A higher ISO setting is more ideal for low light settings. The difference between the two cameras is minimal though.
-LCD Display: 3.0" vs 2.5"
This is only if you want a larger display on the back of the camera.
The Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does cost less, but the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will have the greater resolution. Its really a toss up for what you want to do with your pictures. I hope the comparison has helped.
Andrew
We appreciate the feedback but have since come up with new issues
How much value is there to antishake and a little more Zoom.
A nikon coolpix L5 is now a comparable price contender.
The Nikon L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 7.2 megapixels, 5x optical zoom (the other two have 3) and vibration reduction. These are great options, but you do not have the manual exposure and focus (for more advanced shots). This camera might actually better for what you're looking for.
Andrew
Thanks
shutter lag ( i hate the long shutter lag on my current camera).
I would like more than the 3x optical zoom on most smaller digital cameras
Size- it doesn't need to be ultrasmall, but the size of the 10x smaller cameras I looked at is too big for me.
good quality pictures - standard famiy pictures - indoor and outdoor. picnics, weddings, park, hiking etc.
it would be great to have reasonable panoramic pictures too.
Hardy -with a young kid, I can't always be as gentle with the camera as I would like.
relatively easy to use, and to change settings that are frequently used.
video - would like to take more videos, and a little worried about the 15fps on the stylus 750, does this really matter?
things that don't matter ( or matter less)
price (up to a point - this is going to be a present :) )
megapixels - we have been very happy with the 3 megapixels in our current camera
no viewfinder
few manual controls ( although I may like this eventually - whenever I grab the camera, its to capture a moment so probably won't get to use manual controls).
Thanks for the help
It sounds like you know what you want, which is good. But let me throw this out there- don't let the E18 error scare you off Canon entirely. Canon is so great at many of the things you want (auto controls, ease of use, video etc.) and honestly, I've owned a Canon for years and never gotten the error. And I drop my camera off things a lot. It doesn't always happen.
Anyhow, based on what you mentioned here I had a few thoughts that might help you:
-I think the 15fps on the Stylus ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) DOES matter. Shoot for 30 fps if you can; most cameras have it, and the 15 has been reviewed as 'choppy and sluggish.'
-Photosmart R817 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good choice for you. It is speedy and has a shot-to-shot speed of about half a second, plus very little camera lag (unless you're using flash which happens with all digitals). Has a ton of auto settings/ scene settings, and a 30 fps movie mode that lets you zoom optically while you film (although beware the sound of the zoom gets picked up by the mike so you might not want to!). Reviewed as having good image quality/ movie quality. You'll need a memory card for storing movies of course, but it offers plenty of options as to size/ resolution to store them at.
Coolpix L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another Maybe... nice and compact, easy to use (PictBridge capable) and full auto modes, plus nice LCD screen.
This is in english and you can print it.
or the link below should take you directly to it.
nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com...
I have a Nikon D50 when I take apicture my LCD sreen flashes with black patches can you help?
Nikon Coolpix L5 Reviews
Nikon Coolpix L5 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
this is a exellent camera
- 1.0 out of 5
I enjoyed this camera for the first week. Took most pictures outside in the daytime, filling up the memory card. At the end of the week I decided to download the pictures - about 75% good shots. I decided to experiment a bit. Took a bunch of pictures inside, at night in a normal lit room. I like a simple point and shoot - I do not like changing settings. This camera proved about only 20% good pictures when indoors - dark and grainy. This is not good enough. Anytime the zoom is used, the picture darkens to the point that it is not an accurate representation of the real shot. I also sampled with a picture of my kitchen, from the same chair at all different ranges of the zoom (digital zoom turned off). You could not recognize the kitchen as because the color in all 5 pictures was so different. I decided to return this camera and purchase a Canon A710IS, what a difference. I burned up about 100 shots today to prove my camera is good and 95% were good (all on auto). This is what I demand from a camera. Hope I save you some grief.
- 2.0 out of 5
My boyfriend bought this cammera for me and at first i loved it i am used to using a nikon slr... i have used digital before and am formilar with them but the modes on this camera are just an annoance you MUST change them for every picture and there is no auto mode the focus sucks and the vibration reduction is awful.. the pictures are all blurry!
- 5.0 out of 5
what a great camera. I replaced my Canon A80 with this after much searching around. I wanted a camera with a longer zoom. This ticks all the boxes and is so understated. The image stabilization in the lens is amazing and the face recognition really works. All this in a camera that fits in your pocket. In November light it is great. Hand held in low light at full zoom with VR switched on it gives amazingly clear shots long after my old canon even with full manual control would have given up. All in all a lot of camera in a small package.
- 4.0 out of 5
I like this camera. It takes very nice pictures. The macro setting is amazing. The only problem I have with it is, you can not get a good auto focus when using the zoom . it's hit and miss. If you are in the digital zoom range, forget it.
