Hey! You should know that Nikon has released a newer version of this product: the Nikon Coolpix S4100.
Nikon Coolpix S4000:
Hands On Review
The Nikon S230 was a dismal camera, but the S4000 features commendable improvements in picture quality and user interface. This might actually be worth a buy.
By TJ Donegan.
- S4000 Big Picture
-
This product is ranked:
10th of 25 in $100 - $150 26th of 44 in Nikon Digital Cameras 7th of 19 in Ultra Compact Digital Cameras 29th of 50 in 11 & 12 MP 32nd of 66 in 10-12 Megapixels Digital Cameras - User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
There was one hitch, however: the S220 and S230 sold well, but left a lot to be desired in terms of picture quality. Read customer reviews of either camera and you'll understand [Ed. Note: We rated the S220 of of the worst cameras of 2009]. While an affordable touchscreen camera and a bevy of color choices are desirable traits, at the end of the day a camera has to be able to take good, in-focus pictures even when light isn't perfect.
Enter the Nikon S4000. As the direct replacement for the S230, the S4000 looks like an exact clone when not in operation. Its controls are nearly identical to the S230, as well. What isn't identical is the quality of the images the S4000 produces.
Picture Quality
As someone who hated the S230's picture quality, I think the S4000 is a steal of a camera when applied in the right settings. The key is to rein in the camera's ISO setting, which determines how sensitive the camera will be to light. Higher ISO allows for faster shutter speeds to prevent blur in low-light situations but those higher ISOs also create dull, degraded colors and grainy images.
Interface
The
S4000's best feature may be its touchscreen control. While many cameras
tend to go all-or-nothing with touchscreen control, even in Nikon's own
product lineup, the S4000, like the S230 before it, retains two buttons
on the rear of the camera for accessing playback and shooting modes, as
well as a shutter button and zoom toggle on the top of the camera.
The LCD itself is designed to handle the task. It's a big three-incher with double the pixel count of the S230 (and what is typically found in small digital cameras -- 460,000 pixels vs. 230,000). Those extra pixels make it much easier to see details and to determine color balance, focus, and whether a shot came out as expected.
The extra real estate also allows plenty of space for the thumb on the rear of the camera, making one-handed shooting more comfortable than with other touchscreen cameras. One can also choose the focal point by touch, which is useful, or, in place of the shutter button, to take the photo, which is not useful.
Performance
As
we'd expect from a mid-tier point-and-shoot, the S4000 doesn't have the
ability to manually adjust shutter speed or aperture. It does have 18
scene modes including panoramic and “draw” modes, a 4x zoom range at
27-108mm equivelant for outdoor and group photos. ISO can be boosted as
high as 3200 for when quality isn't a concern but light is limited.
Users
will find the time between shots frustrating, only getting a continuous
shot off about once per second. It's about on par with other cameras in
this price range in that regard. It does support a “Best Shot Selector”
that takes a host of shots and then chooses what it thinks is the best
one, though I found that mode to be less useful than it sounds.
The
main drawback is the lack of optical image stabilization. The camera
has to rely on its “Electronic Vibration Reduction” and ability to
boost its own ISO to counteract camera shake when light is limited. As
such the camera is best suited for use in average and ideal lighting
conditions. For its price, it really should have optical stabilization,
but it still performs quite well outdoors.
Battery
life is typically short on touchscreen cameras because the high-powered
screen is on so much of the time. The S4000's life was a little bit
shorter than the average non-touchscreen, around 200 shots with a full
charge. The tiny flash doesn't draw too much power, which helps
compensate for the screen. Overall, it's better than expected, but
still not very good.
The S4000 does lack some of the color and editing options found in higher-end cameras such as those offered by Canon and even Nikon itself, but it does support a surprisingly good high-definition (720p) video recording mode with good audio quality (though the mic does suffer from the typical wind-muffling when outdoors). That's all for about $50 less than touchscreen cameras typical retail for.
Conclusion
The S4000, despite the price bump over the S230, still sits at a very interesting position in the market. It's still one of the most affordable touchscreen cameras around, and its picture quality is now on par with most of its competitors in the market, especially in good, outdoor light, though low-light shooting remains hairy. The lack of optical image stabilization is troubling and some other performance issues are irritating. But in the end, the S4000 features one of the best touchscreen interfaces I've seen, and the image and video quality are pretty good for $200. It's a vast improvement over Nikon's previous offering, and if you're sold on the touchscreen craze, this camera could be the best value for you.
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the
Nikon Coolpix S4000
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|
|||
| Fetching our Best Offer… |
Nikon Coolpix S4000 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
If you're trying to get good shots at a concert, a camera like this runs into limitations. Low-light shooting is always tough, so shots in dark nightclubs/arenas/wherever will probably come out blurry pretty often. You could try to get close to the stage and use the flash, but that's generally frowned upon. Not to sound discouraging, but concert photography is one of the hardest things to pull off without a more serious camera.
If anything, assuming you're limited by price, try to invest in something with at least a little bit more zoom than this model so you can get better shots from further away from the stage, maybe the Panasonic FH20 or even Nikon S6000.
I am Buying Digital camera for 1st time. Friend suggested for Nikon s4000 or Sony W350. but S4000 cost Rs 9500 and Sony W350 cost Rs 12000. Plz suggest better option in the two.
Also let me know if video recording in both r same ( ex zoom during shooting ).
Kindly suggest
suggest in S4000 or W350...
Bobby
HD video looks a lot better than standard def, but if you don't shoot video much, then you probably won't care. I'm personally unfamiliar with the W320 because I don't think its commonly sold in the US, so can't give you a recommendation between that or the S4000.
Thanks
Rory
It uses digital (electronic) image stabilization -- the software tries to stabilize the image, rather than the hardware, so it's inherently inferior.
I took a closer look at what the four ways were:
1. Electronic VR image stabilization (helpful, but as mentioned, not as good as optical/hardware image stabilization).
2. Motion Detection (not sure how this helps, but I think it works in concert with the electronic stabilization).
3. ISO 3200 capability at any image size (smells like malarkey to me -- yes, it allows for quicker shutter speeds, but it ruins image quality, and in general, boosting the ISO is not considered a form of image stabilization)
4. Best Shot Selector (also not considered a form of true image stabilization).
Long story short, it's just digital image stabilization -- Nikon just did a clever job of marketing it as something more. I'll edit the specs to reflect this.
i bought this camera yesterday bt today it displays lens error: and lens sometime hangs stuck in midle and camera doesnt shows any display....and first of all i thought it 2nd quality as the finishing of these Cameras are nt good as compare to canon.. anyhow i hope its genuine and i will replace it 2maro.. because i dnt need 18 mega pixels i just need 6 Mega pixel but with HD movie: 720p :(
u better off the camera and start charing it by power. it iwll blink the green yellow light and continues. or chek the peripheral of the plug..
And frankly, a video is better taken in short bursts.
Outside of that, where's it out of sync, in the camera or on your PC? If on your PC, it may be the video player you're using. Try VLC Media Player at videolan.org
i am also looking at ixus 100is.
now the choice is 100is vs w350
also had a look at canon a3100is but thst does not has hd video recording and no touchscreen and even the wide angle is more in this, this seems to be better than the canon one for its price
If its HD video and a better lens you're after, this is OK. For what it's worth, I don't like touchscreens on cameras (I hit too much stuff by accident), but I haven't tried the one on the S4000. In this price range, for these specs, my pick is the Panasonic FH20.
Nikon Coolpix S4000 Reviews
Nikon Coolpix S4000 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 3.0 out of 5
- 2.0 out of 5
- 1.0 out of 5
- 5.0 out of 5
