Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Nikon Coolpix S550
Editor's Review
The Nikon Coolpix S550 packs 10-megapixels and a 5x optical zoom into a small, easy to use point and shoot. A 2.5-inch high-resolution LCD and Electronic Viewfinder makes reviewing images easy. The In-Camera Red-Eye Fix and the enhanced Face Priority Auto Focus ensures that every image comes out clear and crisp, while Electronic VR image stabilization reduces the affects of shutter drag.
Specifications
- 10 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom
- Vibration reduction image stabilization
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- Secure Digital memory card storage (50MB internal)
- ISO 64-2000
- Lithium-ion battery
- Release Date: Jan 31, 2008
Shop for S550 Accessories
Nikon Coolpix S550 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
1 Press < or > to choose the desired picture.
Press ^ or v (up or down) to select on or off.
When ON is selected, a check mark is displayed in the top left corner of the current picture. Repeat steps 1 and 2 to select additional pictures.
Hit the delete button.
3 Press the OK button
We purchased a camera for our trip out west and we were very pleased with the pictures. We would like to attach one or two for you viewing pleasure, but can't figure out how to do that. We would do it with an email or facebook account, but not sure if you have them - let us know.
And for that kind of picture, you'll need a tripod. I'd also look to your scene modes. Try: Scene Modes
Night Landscape
Fireworks Show
s550?
Night Portrait, Sunset, Dusk/Dawn, Night Landscape, and many others.
To enter scene mode press the [MODE] button, then selecting the [SCENE] options from the multi selector. Press OK.
Press MENU to display the scene menu screen and choose the desired scene and press OK.
Frame the subject and shoot.
- page 34 of your manual
In addition, any front USB ports away from the main USB ports in the back do not carry enough electrical power to charge the Kodak camera. You must plug the USB into your rear ports.
Thanks for your help.
But if you really want one, I believe it's a basic 4 pin - 9 pin USB cable. But to be sure, you should probably get it from Nikon directly. But I'd also try Cables4Less.com. You'll save some money there.
or you can slove this by consulting the person who knows this language.
- page 34 of your guide to photography.
If you like the looks, the S550 looks very similar, and is well-reviewed and about half as expensive:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Seriously. Nikon, hands down. If for no other reason, the superior lenses it enjoys. Casios are trouble laden. This board is filled with frustrated Casio users who have problems with them.
Nikons are far superior. It isnt' even close.
Then, go to Nikon's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them. Lastly, make sure you have fresh high capacity (mAh) batteries in it. Often undercharged or depleted batteries can easily affect camera performance.
Read the comments here. digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
I have been in to photography for over 40 years, and have a suit case full of 35mm camera's and lenses. My wife wanted a digital camera and I bought her a Canon Elph 2mp which took nice pictures. After using it for a while I bought a Digital Rebel and upgraded her to a Canon A540 which she loved. I took the A540 on a trip and broke the LCD. For a replacement I bought the s550 when they first came out. After she used it one weekend taking pictures of the grand kids, she got upset because the pictures were not very good. I tried it out and got mixed results and then send it back to Nikon for repair. The camera was returned from repair with a note that nothing was wrong with the camera. I bought my wife a Canon SD950 and she is quite happy with the camera. I use the Nikon some when I travel and I can promise you that it will not take 5x7 pictures as good as the old 2mp Canon. I get some good shots with the camera but over all pictures are below average compared with other camera's on the market.
I use Photo Shop and fix most of the pictures I take with the camera before printing. Unless you own a full blown version of PS and an image sharpening utility, I would avoid this camera like the plague.
Most every camera out there gets 4 or 5 stars from customer reviews, so you have to look at the 3,2,1 star reviews and see if there is a common problem discussed. There are reviews that mention the same short comings of the Nikon that I have talked about.
I sent the Camera back to Nikon within a couple of weeks because I felt sure the camera was defective. It was returned and noted that the lens was cleaned and the camera was with in specifications.
If you work for Nikon I will be happy to send it back for a second try. However until then I will stick by my assessment that it is an inferior choice for the buyer. Nikon should be ashamed to put their name on this camera.
Turn the mode dial to ' Auto ' and try again. Most probably the camera is set to one of the manual modes and it did not appear to be correct in the low light situation.
Setting the ISO to a higher value, eg 400 will also give you a better picture, though you might find the picture to be a bit grainy.
Finally excuse for my bad English and thank you agian.
I went to a camera shop and was sold on the Nikon S550, however, in reading your reviews it sounds like the stabilization is not very good. I have not used it yet and can probably take it back. I also checked the link to compare photos (very cool), but not all were on that site.
In addition, lightweight/small and sturdy are important.
Which one should I buy? Or if there is another camera that is better I am open to suggestions. Thanks much!
the tz5 is your best bet as a travel camera.
it has the best stabilization in the business and a great zoom 10x .
it also very well made in japan
cameralabs.com/reviews/Pana... are some examples of a tz5 in use in the real world
flickr.com/photos/98474349@...
no karin i do not know of any camera which combines the tz5's combination of zoom ,features and portability.
on the noise issues unless you want to photograph in near total darkness it is not a problem
have a look at this photo
flickr.com/photos/thatrock/...
on image quality,colour, my view is with its leica lens the tz5 gives superior quality
flickr.com/photos/thatrock/...
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
I bought the S550 when they first came out and thought it would be a good camera because of the name and pixel count. I did no research, and ended up with a replacement for the wife's old Canon A540 that she immediately complained about because of the picture quality. I now use it as a travel camera.
Most people giving the camera rave reviews are probably upgrading from a really old digital camera or they are first time buyers that have no benchmark for comparing picture quality. Most users primarily take pictures of people, and the skin tones of the Nikon does not even come close to the quality of a Canon.
And yes, the IS in the Canon is better because it's optical IS.
The camera build and layout is also better on the Canon. The one good thing that the Nikon has is the 5x optical zoom, but on the otherhand, the SD870IS has a wider lens so you can shoot landscapes better. The Nikon has a bunch of cool features though, but it isn't that great. The price is also a key factor, as the MSRP on the S550 is $100 less than the SD870IS. Maybe look at the S600, that would be a better comparison to the SD870IS. They both have optical Image stabilization and both have 4x zoom. I haven't tested the S600 yet though.
Here's my review of the Canon PowerShot SD870IS ( camandcheese.com/index.php/... )
Here's my Nikon Coolpix S550 Review ( camandcheese.com/index.php/... )
There are some noticable differences between the Nikon S550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Nikon S600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). While both are 10MP cameras, I will list the differences in with the Nikon S550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) listed first:
- Optical zoom: 5x vs. 4x: While the difference may seem small, the effective lengths of these cameras is 26-180mm vs. 28-112mm. Having the ability to go to 180mm is a big difference in my opinion.
- Image stabilization: Electronic vs. Optical: Optical image stabilization is much more effective in that it adjusts the position of the lens and/or sensor vs electrical, which only adjusts the ISO setting and shutter speeds of the camera.
- ISO Range: 64-2000 vs. 100-3200;: The higher the ISO the more light you can bring in to the photo and use the camera in lower lit situations. Note that with a higher ISO, the grainier your photos will appear. This can be adjusted with software though.
- LCD Size: 2.5" vs. 2.7": This is only a marginal difference that will hardly be noticed.
My overall chioce would vary based on what you want to use the camera for. If you want to get good indoor photos, go with the Nikon S600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). If you're looking to take pictures in better light and want some zoom, the Nikon S550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be a better choice.
Personally, if I was picking an ultra-compact camera for around $200, I would go with the Olympus 840 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has an 8MP resolution, which is still very good for prints up to 20x30", it has 5x optical zoom (36-180mm) and dual image stabilization that combines optical and digital settings. It will only run you about $183 too. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
The S600 with a better lens and Optical Image Stabilization would be your best choice. To add to the confusion, I would go for a Sony W150 or W170. steves-digicams.com/
Optical or Sensor shift image stabilization are both more effective than electronic image stabilization. They both adjust the position of either the lens or the sensor respectfully to accomodate lens shake. Electronic image stabilization only adjusts the ISO setting and shutter speed which can still cause blurring and increased photo "noise" or graininess. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Both Canon and Nikon make great cameras, it just depends on what you want to do with them.
To start off, I'm going to count the Nikon S550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) out right away. While the camera does have the most optical zoom at 5x, the image stabilization is electronically based, so it only adjusts the shutter speed and ISO setting. It does not shift with the lens or sensor to balance any camera shake.
The big differences between the Canon SD770 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the SD790 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are that the SD770 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is about $50 less expensive, it has an optical viewfinder and a smaller LCD screen (2.5" vs 3.0"). In my opinion, the optical viewfinder is handy in bright light, the LCD size difference isn't that big of a deal, and $50 can go towards a larger capacity memory card.
When compared to the Nikon S600 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it is a closer call. This camera has about the same price tag as the Canon SD770 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), comes with sensor shift image stabilization (the Canons both have lens shift/optical IS, which is just as good), and both cameras have 10MP resolution photos. This camera also has more optical zoom (4x vs 3x) and comes with a larger ISO range (up to ISO 3200). Larger ISO settings will cause your photos to have a grainier look to them though.
While these features are nice, I would still pick the SD770 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Where the SD770 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes out ahead in my book is the manual exposure settings. Having the ability to adjust settings manually (when and if you get to that level) lets you manipulate the photos that much more at the point of taking them to achieve the exact exposure level you're looking for. While its not to the level of a dSLR, it is still a nice feature to have. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
If you've narrowed it down to those two cameras, I would go with the [digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... SD790[/url]. While it costs a little more, the manual features are still a good thing to have. I have personally used both Canon and Nikon cameras and like the user interface on the Canons a lot more. I find it more intuitive than that on the Nikon. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
The 5x zoom is nice however the pictures go soft and appear to have noise at max optical zoom. Nikon uses electronic image stabilization instead of optical stabilization on this camera so this may be part of the problem. In any event the sub-compact cameras are hard to hold still when shooting because of their small size and light weight. Don't let the zoom feature or 10mp influence your decision, picture quality is what matters most; there are many 6mp-8mp cameras that will put the S550 to shame.
The flash range of the camera is rather limited, and as James mentioned it has difficulty focusing in low light. If I were you I would opt for a compact instead of a sub-compact and read some of the camera reviews for Canon, Panasonic, and Sony. Here is a good place to start. imaging-resource.com/WB/WB.HTM
The optical zoom on these small cameras are not that great. In order to get good pictures, walk up to the subject and use the zoom to frame your picture, especially when taking pictures inside. Unless you absolutely have to have a sub-compact camera I would go for the Canon A720, it will take better pictures than any of the Nikon or Canon sub-compacts.
The 10mp Nikon will not give you sharper pictures than the 8mp Canon. What the Canon has that the Nikon lacks: Optical Image Stabilization, and Motion Detection Technology that reduces blur caused by subject movement. Skin tones and color accuracy on the Canon are superior to those of the Nikon. This a good site to read camera reviews and you should check the section on "Dave's Picks". imaging-resource.com/WB/WB....
But it is a good idea to have a backup battery. I'd just recommend you buy it from a reputable location. As for AC adapter, it comes with AV/USB Cable UC-E12, Strap AN-CP14, Rechargeable Battery EN-EL11, Battery Charger.
For an AC adapter, you can get EH-62E AC adapter optionally.
This camera does take videos with sound. You can find a full set of tech specifications on the Nikon product site ( nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Niko... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
You have to understand that a video feature in a digital still camera is a convenience marketing feature and as such, will be fairly limited to basic video functions only. No matter how long you wait, video cameras will always have the edge on a digital still camera with video option.
If video is where you're mind is, then you may want to look for a video camera that has digital still features that save to an SD card. Some are up to 6mp now.
Sorry I can't be more specific but each camera model has its individual methods and I'm not familiar with this particular one.
From personal experience I would avoid the S550, I bought my wife one to replace her Canon PowerShot A540 that I broke, and she was not at all happy with the S550 pictures. I'm reading some great user reviews of the Nikon, but I am also reading a few reviews that support my opinion of the camera. Taking pictures outside it does an adequate job (not great), however indoors is another story. The camera constantly gives soft or blurred images, and does not deliver the sharp pictures of a Canon. Wife's old 2 Mega Pixel Elph actually takes better pictures. Needless to say I bought my wife another Canon and have sent the Nikon back to see if there is a fix, and then its off to ebay.
With a compact camera image stabilization is very important, and the S550 uses electronic image stabilization which is not as effective as the optical stabilization used by Canon.
After my experience with the Nikon I did a little reading on the Mega Pixel hype and learned that there is a lot more to achieving sharp clear pictures than Pixels. If you do not have to have a compact camera, you might do well to look at the Canon PowerShort A series. The prices are more reasonable considering the features you get and with any Canon you are going to get great pictures.
In the event you do not like Canon, check out the various camera reviews and find another brand that meets your needs and pocketbook.
Forget ebay, do a search on Amazon or one of the companies on this site. If you see a company selling for substantially less than other companies steer clear of them because they want to sell you substandard over priced accessories, and if you refuse to purchase accessories, the camera will be out of stock. What ever company you decide on, try a google search "reviews +company name" and see what customers say about the company. To save a lot of time I just call the company advertising the camera I want and ask them if the camera is in stock and if the Box is factory sealed and includes the warranty, original battery and charger. Then I tell them I do not want to buy any accessories and can they sell me the camera at the advertised price.
To save a few dollars ($30-$50) you will probably want to order your SD card from a different company than the one you buy the camera from. For best performance get either a "Transcend 150x" or a "SanDisk Extreme III or IV SD" card. Depending on how many pictures you will want to leave in the camera a 1GB to 4GB will probably work for you. These cards will make a substantial difference in how your camera performs. Buy.com has a "SanDisk 2GB Extreme III SD Card" on sale for $30 and free shipping and a Transcend 150x 4GB for $50 + shipping.
Good Luck
Why don't you compare the Canon A720 @ 8mp and the Canon SD950 @ 12mp. Go to this page pick the cameras and then scroll down to the picture with the bottles, thread, etc. and click on them a couple of times to enlarge the images.
imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... am not familiar with the Casio line.
plz. suggest me which is better.. i want buy urgent
Thx
Yogesh
i will buy through Amazon in US and someone will courier me to India.
as compare between SD890 and Nikon s550, i understand that most of the features are same (i am not sure what’s most IMP diff. :) ) price diff. is near about $100.
Is it worth that I will pay more for canon?
Ultimately I won’t any problem with my camera :)
Hey I could not found my cameras on
imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... :(
waiting for your reply
thx & regards
Yogesh
i will go for canon SD890 :)
regards
Yogesh
Thanks for the information. I wondered if the extra $30-$40 was worth it for the Canon, since the Nikon has a few extra features (more optical zoom). I can't find in any reviews if either has a battery meter, something I heard lots of gripes about on the Canon 750.
When I receive the camera back from Nikon Service, I will re post in the event the camera was in need of repair and it functions satisfactorily. If you buy the S550 be sure it is from a company that will allow hassle free returns.
Thanx a lot
If you want a nice camera that will deliver great pictures, you need to move up in size to something like the Canon A720. The camera is a little larger, less expensive and the picture quality is much better than the 3 cameras that you are considering.
If you are sticking with your original 3 go for the Canon.
Thanks Much
You will get much better pictures with the Canon. The skin colors are much more accurate plus the Image Stabilization is much better. The cameras are small and light they are somewhat difficult to hold still while snapping shots at random so the IS feature is very important.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
And the simple fact is, that if you factor out the noise issue at higher ISOs, that extra MP won't even be seen in pictures 8x10 and below. So in reality, buying that S700 is like buying a Ferrari and driving it only on city streets. Sure, it looks pretty, but you don't really experience the added benefit of all that horsepower under the hood.
Pick up the S550, if you like it. You'll save money and never miss that added MP, I guarantee you.
And as I stated above, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. So in the end, smaller lenses means you lose detail, not gain it.
Let me give an example ... I compared shots with my Olympus SP560UZ at 8MP with the 7.1 Widescreen setting on the 1085IS, I found the 7.1MP sharper in the same conditions. As such, even the longer lens on the SP wasn't enough to make a clearer image.
Sure, you have the MP and you can do the math to get poster sizes, but if it's filled with noise, what's the point?
The other thing that those numbers tell me is that once you get up to 8 X 10 inches, the MP required for a really nice poster size skyrockets such that even with 12 good MP you can't print much larger than 11 X 13 without beginning to see pixels. And 12 X 16 needs 17MP for a sharp image. Anyway, in my mind that gets me back to the 6-7MP range at most, and even 5MP being enough for ALMOST everything.
The last conclusion I come to is that we shouldn't kid ourselves that we can get decent true poster size images from any current P&S camera.
Sorry for just throwing the numbers out there without any explanation of their meaning.
My English is not so good I hope you understand. (*-*)
i would suggest the panasonic fz8 it has 12x optical zoom
it also has great indoor auto modes
here is a link to a school play photographed with a fz8
flickr.com/photos/cursedthi...
If you don't mind the larger size you should look at the Canon PowerShot series, something like the A720.
You're not going to see a huge difference in the image stabilization between the two cameras (just different names they can copyright). If you do a lot of cropping to your photos, I would recommend the higher resolution of the Nikon S550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You're also going to get more optical zoom out of it at 5x vs. 3x on the other two cameras. It seems like the better choice for what you want to do.
Andrew
Thanks for the insight. I have also looked into the optical versus digital image stabilization and agree with you.
Andrew
I brought new nikon s550 and from starting only i m getting flash even if i m using it in daylight mode, i m not getting how to turn off the flash mode ..................can somebody help me out.
You can turn the flash off by pushing the scroll button up where it has a picture of a lightning bolt. This will toggle your flash settings.
Andrew
I am thinking of buying a 2gb memory card..........so can i know if i use 2gb mem card ,then at the max how many photos can i take...............
Is it better to have 2gb or even more than that?
A 2GB card will work with this camera. The more memory you have, the more pictures you can take. I would suggest getting a card with a faster write speed. While these do cost more, they are worth it when trying to take photos in faster succession.
If you get larger than a 2GB card, make sure it is a SDHC card and not SD. The larger SD cards might not work without the SDHC specification on this camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Right now PCrichard.com has the SS50 with 1gb memory and case for 199 if you decided on it. I prefer optical image stabilization over electronic version. that being said if you are shooting just the basics i dont think its going to matter.
I am a photoshop artist too, and I could not get a photo to look good. It looks like a painting.
I really wanted ths to work so I kept it for 3 months (thinking that was my return cut off date) trying different conditions and settings but as it turned out I only had 30 days. so now I am stuck with this. I plan to call Nikon so if I learn anything I will come back.
While Nikon releases the shutter lag time on some of their cameras, they don't seem to do it with this one. If I were to venture a guess, the lag would be just as good/bad as most compact cameras in this range. Your lag will really depend on the amount of lighting available, and if you push the shutter half way before your shot to lock your focal length.
Andrew
This item will be released on May 10th, 2008. You can pre-order it on Amazon.com ( amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN... ) though. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Nikon Coolpix S550 Reviews
Nikon Coolpix S550 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
I have purchased this camera in thought of Nikon a big name. But my all big image is collapsed. The picture quality is so poor I cannot imagine. Actually i am good photographer so I know how to use the camera but this camera is totally crazy. I have Sony W series but this one is thin in comparison of Sony so I thought lets go for this one. But its a big mistake. Now I am using this paperweight to try to fix the problem.
Dont go with Nikon. Sony will give you perfect result....
- 2.0 out of 5
I'm getting not sharp images with this camera. Don't know why this is happening.
- 1.0 out of 5
Blurry, grainy pictures no matter what you do. I bought a Nikon COOLPIX S550 and the pictures are blurry and grainy. There is nothing that you can do to fix this and Nikon wont acknowledge this problem on their website. This is not my first digital camera and I am not a novice photographer. I have had digital Canons, Kodaks, Minoltas, and Samsungs all of which take excellent clear sharp pictures. I thought I try Nikon as a birthday present for a friend who already had a very nice but old Canon digital camera that he purchased in 2001. My friend likes up scale brand name items so I thought a Nikon would complement his old Canon. I was very disappointed to see most of the pictures turn out grainy and blurred. Nikon will not acknowledge this problem but it is clearly a problem with the camera. Just do a Google on Nikon blurry picture and you will find many people having the same problem. My friend has now given the S550 back to me saying thanks for the thought but I cannot use it. It is a Shame that Nikon will not acknowledge the blurry, noisy picture taken by its Nikon Coolpix S550.
- 3.0 out of 5
This camera takes amazing pictures if you are outside. If you are indoors and it isn't very bright, it takes blurry poor quality pictures unless you get within about 5 feet from what you are taking a picture of and use the flash and then they are awesome. There are a lot of modes you can use like Night Portrait, Sport, Indoor etc. but most of them end up grainy or they use the annoying red eye reduction flash which flashes 3 times and takes longer to shutter when you can just remove red eye on the computer. Any ISO setting over 200 starts taking pictures with a lot of noise (grainy).
- 2.0 out of 5
this camera doesn't take great pictures and is hard to hang onto, and it easily can fall out of your hands.
- 4.0 out of 5
Well to me its a good cam, i felt bad when i just got the cam , but later i sat down and reset to the best Quality, and i can compare some of the shots with Sony CCD, yes, its a good one, The cam performs better on Auto, Set the colour to Vivid colour, u can reduce the whitebalance, and ISO aroud 300-500 will give u good Shot, u need to get to know the cam as if u are getting to know your Spouse. Thank You
- 1.0 out of 5
Worst camera I have used. Lacklustre color in all settings and modes unless under really BRIGHT conditions, flat grainy images, poor focus, slow shutter speed. LCD screen must boost image quality because they look OK on the camera, but awful elsewhere or when printed. Perhaps reviewers who like it don't look at pics off the camera. Dealer won't accept it as a return and Nikon deny responsibility.
- 2.0 out of 5
Camera is handy but picture quality and sharpness is not good. My 3MPixel coolpixel is much better than this camera
- 5.0 out of 5
I have owned this camera for a while now, and there are many positive aspects:
-The lens is of an excellent quality, and enables clear and focussed images.
-The LCD screen is large and does not scratch easily.
-It is very user friendly, and very light and compact.
-The shutter speed is the quickest I have had on a digital camera.
-It has many different features, and the macro is excellent as it enables me to take extremely closeup shots.
I am not a professional photographer, but the Nikon S550 has all the features and quality of a much more expensive camera, and (from what I have seen) has everything anyone could need.
- 5.0 out of 5
I recomend this camera to people who are not good with technical stuff.Because it is so easy to use yet it works fantasticly.I think that it should be ranked best easyest yet fantastic camera of 2008 because of its spectacular use.
by Rayla Jacobs-Kea
- 1.0 out of 5
the pictures are not at all clear. I had around a 7 mp camera and the pictures were awesome, then i got this and its terrible.
- 2.0 out of 5
This camera does not take clear pictures as expected from a 10mp camera. I would say at best its a 3-4mp..no where near 10. Extremely disappointed. I have an 18 month old and the pictures are terrible, whether they are action photos or ones where I carefully steady the camera. Not worth the money, spend a little more and buy a Canon, you will be much happier!
- 5.0 out of 5
Excellent clarity, good zoom and easy handling and its lovely. User friendly.Look is good. Easy handy. Nice camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
Ok im 21 im not a experienced photographer but I have two boys and want to have NICE pictures of them.. i like how easy it is you can just pick it up a shool pretty self explanatory.. it took me a little to get use to where the flash is but thats no big deal.. over all i really like the camera it fells good in your hands and it fell like it is made very well