Hey! You should know that Olympus has released a newer version of this product: the Olympus PEN E-PL3.
Olympus PEN E-PL1:
Hands On Review
We spent a month with the Olympus PEN E-PL1 Micro Four Thirds-format camera. It's positioned as a high-quality compact, meant to appeal to the casual and hobbyist crowds that want excellent image quality, but don't need all the bells, whistles, or bulky design that a dSLR brings to the table. Read on to see how it fares.
By Liam McCabe
- E-PL1 Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
It's been two years since the Micro Four Thirds format debuted, and the mirrorless genre is finally maturing.
For those that are still unfamiliar, mirrorless cameras like the Olympus PEN E-PL1 take the most important part of a dSLR (its big sensor) and do away with its least-desirable aspect (the bulky size, which is a result of the pentaprism mirror). These hybrid shooters tend to appeal to the enthusiast set, but Olympus is clearly taking a shot at the casual-compact crowd with the E-PL1. It looks and feels like a compact, but shoots dSLR-quality photos. Olympus made a few design compromises to pull it off, but on the whole, the E-PL1 is a success.
Body and Design

The throwback rangefinder look of the E-PL1 is a refreshing alternative to the standard dSLR shape. It’s boxier than the pricier E-P1 and E-P2 models, and predominantly plastic, but those are acceptable cost-cutting trade-offs, considering the price. In general, the weight and dimensions are midway between a compact camera and a dSLR, leaning toward the smaller end of the spectrum, like a chunky travel zoom.
The interface, too, has more in common with a compact camera than a dSLR. The rear has a simple button-based interface that should make casual point-and-shoot-users feel at home (though serious dSLR-users will scoff). Highlights include a dedicated video recording button, two function buttons (which come in handy for choosing a focal point and magnifying the live view), a pop-up flash, and accessory port.
Like the body, the 14-42mm kit lens is made from decent-quality plastic. It’s collapsible, and even quite small when fully extended (by interchangeable lens standards). It’s a nice complement to the design, if not particularly exciting.
It seems like the mirrorless market is splitting into two camps: small dSLR-type systems, and high-quality compact shooters. The E-PL1 is most definitely in the latter category. It was the smallest mirrorless camera available when it was released in February 2010, but has since lost the title to Sony’s NEX-series shooters. Panasonic’s G10 is also lighter, though the dimensions are not as compact.
User Experience and Performance
The E-PL1 looks like a compact, and handles like a compact too. It’s easy to just pick up, set to iAuto, and shoot to your heart’s content. There are also the usual adjustable settings, shutter and aperture priority, and a full manual mode, but it’s a bit harder to fiddle with those since it’s a menu-based interface -- no control dials or direct-access keys. To bring up the comparison again, the E-PL1 interface has a lot in common with that of a travel zoom. That's perfect for users moving up from a camera like that, but a definite downgrade from the nimble navigation of a dSLR, or even higher-end mirrorless cameras like the E-P2.
In general, responsiveness is satisfactory. Startup time is snappy (though not stellar) and menus respond to inputs quickly. Continuous shooting churns out a modest but effective 3 frames per second, though for RAW shooting, it maxes out at 10 frames. A handful of art filters apply cool effects like saturated colors or a pinhole effect, which can save some post-processing time, but definitely hinders in-camera performance.
Autofocus, at least with the kit lens, is on par with a compact camera, but a few notches below a dSLR (I used firmware version 1.1 for the review). This lag is pretty much unavoidable without a mirror and remains one of the big downsides of the mirrorless genre, though if your expectations are calibrated to the speed of a point-and-shoot, it should feel quick. To be clear, auto-focus in bright, outdoor situations is very fast. As the light decreases, so does the autofocus speed, at a pretty significant ratio.
The LCD is a bit of a shortcoming, at an unimpressive 2.7-inches and 230,000 dots. That’s average for a $180 camera, but comes across as an obvious cost-cutting measure here. It’s still visible indoors and in the shade, but pretty worthless in the sun. There’s a port for an optional electronic viewfinder, which should alleviate this problem, though Olympus did not include one for review. There’s also a curious lack of an orientation sensor, so any portrait shots have to be manually rotated in your photo software of choice.
Image Quality
The E-PL1 takes excellent pictures. Photo quality is the strongest feature on this camera. It far surpasses compact-camera quality and competes on the same level as entry-level and consumer dSLRs. Point-and-shooters who step up to the E-PL1 will be extremely pleased with still images, and enthusiasts and dSLR users will likely find that the quality makes up for some qualms that they have about the interface and performance.
Shots have a high level of detail, often crisp down to the pixel level. JPEG noise is very well controlled all the way through ISO 800. Shots at 1600 are usable, and even 3200 isn’t terrible. I found the colors to be pretty accurate too, though the brightest spots in some shots came out a bit flat. Overall, almost any photographer should be happy with the image quality coming from this $600 kit.
Video quality is solid as well, though well short of a defining feature. The 720p Motion JPEG movies are crisp, smooth, and relatively noise-free with little barrel distortion. The lack of full 1080p recording holds it back from greatness, but it’s a nice feature to complement the still shooting.
Bottom Line
The E-PL1 feels like a high-powered compact rather than a crippled dSLR, making it an effective hybrid. It also has a little bit of retro charm that not many cameras of any genre possess these days. Though the performance and plastic design come up a little bit short of what I’d expected from a $600 kit, the image quality, ease-of-use, and portability swayed me fully in favor of this camera. Had I been able to test the electronic viewfinder, I probably would have liked it even more. And, it's worth noting, the street price has dropped down closer to $500, so it's really quite a deal.
The type of buyer that will be most satisfied with the E-PL1 is the casual or hobbyist photographer, somebody who has gotten a lot of mileage from his or her compact camera and wants to step up to something that will feel familiar, but with more power. The manual control leaves room to grow, but the interface keeps in squarely in casual-user territory. I don’t mean this as a slight, but people who haven’t used a dSLR and don’t know what they’re missing in terms of performance will love this camera. Enthusiasts, too, might find something to love here, as the JPEG quality is simply fantastic, even compared to some entry-level dSLRs with larger sensors.
Olympus PEN E-PL1 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Thank you and more power!
It's essential that I have image stabiliser in the body of the camera due to the vintage glass I have - OM, Leica, Voigtlander, Canon FD... the list goes on - using them is one of my key reasons for uprgading. Am I right in thinking only Oly is offering this presently?
Shooting portraits, no having automatic rotation is going to be an issue but apparently unavoidable since that's Panasonic teritory and the stabiliser is more important, the built-in flash I can live without thanks to the hotshoe, though this will mean sacrificing the optional viewfinder.
I also fear that it will feel a litle mickey mouse coming from a dLSR design ot what is essentially a souped up P&S design. I don't have to look like an over-eager "pro" with a CaNikon over each shoulder, carry a grand's worth of kit on my belt, wearing a beige jacket with special pockets for tucking extra bits and pieces away, but I do need to feel I'm in control of the camera.
Is the image quality enough to justify? I'm strugling to find somewhere I can try on out in the UK.
I know this is starting to look like a recipe for my perfect MFT but ay advice you can guve is much appreciated!
- If control is an issue for you, check out the E-P2 instead -- laid out more like a dSLR, though still more like a point-and-shoot. Even the E-PL2 has a stronger control scheme -- at least there's one wheel for scrolling through settings. But still, definitely a lack of hotkeys, which is a problem with any affordable MFT camera.
- The image quality is allllmost on par with a consumer dSLR, really quite close, only an issue at the pixel level and at ISO above 3200. Olympus definitely bests Panasonic's JPEG IQ, especially when it comes to processing the dynamic range.
I think handling will be your biggest hangup, honestly, and a) you can only really decide what works or not in person with some hands-on time and b) the difference from one camera to another in the affordable MFT range is a button or two. None can really match a dSLR, but you'll learn to live with it.
To confuse matters more, there are very, very strong rumors about a whole 'nother batch of Oly MFT due to come out pretty soon. The E-P3 will be the top of the line, the E-PL3 will be an update to the still-new E-PL2, and E-PM3 will be totally tiny, size of a compact camera. We'll have to wait to see what they offer, but I'm guessing that the E-P3 will give you the best control scheme.
The FZ100 is an extended zoom camera -- tons of features, huge zoom lens, manual control, etc etc, but it's still basically a gussied-up point-and-shoot. In bright conditions, images are very good, but it gets challenging beyond that.
The E-PL1 is a "mirrorless" interchangeable lens camera -- it's much more of a "serious" camera than the FZ100. While it looks more like a compact camera than the FZ100, its image quality is much, much better, especially in more challenging shooting conditions. Not as many "features," but it's a great camera for the money. The downside is that the lens that comes with it only has a zoom factor of 3x (vs. the FZ100's 24x) starting from a very wide perspective. You might be perfectly happy with the standard E-PL1 lens -- it wasn't until the past few years that enormous zoom ranges suddenly became "necessary" -- but it's a difference that's important to keep in mind. You can always buy another lens to supplement the kit one as well.
I'm not trying to disparage the FZ100 -- it's great for what it is -- but folks who take the plunge into more serious camera territory rarely regret it. But I hear from frustrated extended zoom owners all the time. Your mileage may vary. I've reviewed both cameras -- check out the sample images at full resolution to really get an appreciation for how different the quality is. Good luck.
You guys are great and so helpful (not mention gracious) to us newbies.
As for using old lenses with a micro 4/3s camera, the problem there is with an adapter you lose speed and clarity. Usually about a stop worth. Then there's the lens conversion which will cut down your focal length. You can do it, but I think the tradeoffs far out weigh the benefits.
An EVF is just a tiny LCD. It mimmicks a viewfinder, but it also drains your battery faster.
In that range, you could look at something like a Canon Rebel XS.
Other option the Panasonic ZX3 Canons SX line.
And since you need macro id compare camera images over at imaging-resource.com you see which have better macros.
With Picture tones for Sepia, Blue, Purple or Green tone available for Monotone.
It takes pretty amazing images from the samples I've seen on Flickr. As for motion images, the photographer is as much a factor.
With Picture tones for Sepia, Blue, Purple or Green tone available for Monotone
As for lenses, the E-PL1 uses the same lenses that the E-P1, E-P2, or any Micro Four Thirds camera uses. It's still a newish format, so there aren't a ton of lenses available, but we are at the point where you'll be able to find one for any use you might need. I'm not intimately familiar with the lens lineup, but I know that most Micro Four Thirds users have been pretty pleased with how many lenses are now available. And anything that you can film with an E-P1, you can also film with an E-PL1.
Audio is not usually good with the built-in microphone on any camera, but you can connect an external microphone to the E-PL1.
Zoom during video also only depends on the lens. If you just use the lens that comes with the camera, it's only about 3x anyway, so that won't do much for you at a concert whether or no you want to zoom during video. You either need a big telephoto lens, or you might be better served by a pocket-sized fixed lens camera like the Panasonic ZS5.
In my opinion, you shouldn't let one concert be the deciding factor for whether or not you buy a camera. The E-PL1 is probably more advanced than any camera you've used, from the sound of it, but it's actually a pretty good one (and affordable too) with which a novice like yourself can make a step up to a more advanced model that should give you many years of solid performance.
PROS: Fantastic photo quality, fabulous colours, great tonal range, very adjustable.
CONS: VERY complex, not intuitive user interface. No swivel screen, has a slight tendency to over expose.
This IS THE camera I have been looking for for years, wonderful wonderful photos.
I paid CAN$579+Tx @Henrys.
1) Ability to manually focus
2) For the camera to take the picture I see in the viewfinder. My existing camera decides on its own to change the exposure and color balance, so the picture I tried to take is not the one I got.
But if you just want a point and shoot, the Canon G11 (and S90, IIRC) and Panasonic G1 allow you to manually set the shutter speed and aperture. But focusing is still auto. That's usually the way it is in the point and shoot world.
I hear great things about the PEN though. I also think that Panasonic has a similar model.
All of these seem like very cool cameras, though I hear the best things about the Olympus model.
John
The E-PL1 is in the Micro Four Thirds format, which means it doesn't have a mirror inside like traditional dSLRs do, so they're much more compact. Purists/traditionalists have mixed feelings on the format, but if you're a casual user, you probably won't care as long as you can live without an optical viewfinder (the E-PL1 does use an electronic viewfinder, so you don't have to rely on the LCD).
The E-PL1 is the smallest interchangeable lens camera you can buy right now. The photo quality is almost as good as a true dSLR, and you'll pay a little less than you would for an amateur dSLR, a little more than a true bottom-end dSLR.
Comparable cameras in this price range would include the Panasonic G10 (not yet available just yet, a few more weeks, and it's also a Micro Four Thirds format), something like the Nikon D3000 (low-end dSLR), Canon XS (ditto), or Pentax K-x (ditto). Each has their pros and cons. The E-PL1's biggest pro is the small size. If you like the look of it, I think you'll be happy with it as a hobbyist/casual user. Hope this helps.
Shutter Lag, Autofocus 0.897 - 0.926 sec
Shutter Lag, Prefocused 0.070 sec
Shot to Shot time 1.60 sec
Continuous Speed 3.04 fps
(15 shots)
- imaging-resource.com
Olympus PEN E-PL1 Reviews
Olympus PEN E-PL1 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
