Olympus SP-560 UZ
Olympus SP-560 UZ
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Olympus SP-560 UZ
Editor's Review
Following up the Olympus SP-550 UZ, which became the first camera with 18x optical zoom and set off a long-range zoom arms rance between the major manufacturers, the SP-560 UZ looks to perfect the trend. There are a few more megapixels and a the camera's range is a little wider. The dual image stabilization is there to compensate for the extreme sensitivity of the 18x zoom, and hopefully will improve the overall picture quality over that of the SP-550 UZ.
Editor's Review
Following up the Olympus SP-550 UZ, which became the first camera with 18x optical zoom and set off a long-range zoom arms rance between the major manufacturers, the SP-560 UZ looks to perfect the trend. There are a few more megapixels and a the camera's range is a little wider. The dual image stabilization is there to compensate for the extreme sensitivity of the 18x zoom, and hopefully will improve the overall picture quality over that of the SP-550 UZ.
Specifications
- 8 megapixels
- 18x optical zoom / 5.6x digital zoom
- JPEG and RAW file formats
- Movie mode with sound
- Dual Image Stabilization
- ISO 50-3200
- Auto and manual exposure
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- xD-Picture Card storage (47MB internal)
- 4 'AA' batteries
- Part Number: SP560
- UPC: 718122691906
- Release Date: Sep 11, 2007
Shop for SP-560 Accessories
Olympus SP-560 UZ Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Olympus 560 UZ - 3 years on :) (Andrew — 03/09/2010)
I still have my SP 560 UZ after 3 years of being taken here and there, and its going strong!!! Sometimes i get lines through my LCD after not using it for ages but these dissapear. Overall its made some happy snaps!!! Underwater in its housing its unbeatable for the price and looks killer mean! I'd rate it 5/5 for pretty much everything, and a camera that uses AA's thats something else! How many of you can get recharged battery packs while out and about... See it was a good choice and still is! :)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/10/2010)
I shot the SP560 for about 6 months and really enjoyed it, so I can understand your joy with it.
reply to this comment
Got these choices... 560UZ, 570UZ and Nikon P80. Any idea which is the best? Some suggestions? (Jayaprakash — 07/02/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/09/2008)
I've owned the SP560UZ and found it to be a very good camera. So teh 570UZ should be an improvement from there, especially with that 20x zoom. But it gets bad marks for recording at 72dpi, which frankly I find rather baffling. The P80 is a solid camera though.
reply to this comment
Jayaprakash (07/12/2008)
thnk u James... i have felt both the 560 and p80 to be gud... i`m not interested in 570 coz of the manual zoom... can u just explain me abt the 72 dpi... i`m not able to understand that part... i`m also looking of ricoh gx100 and ricoh r8.. any idea on those two? as this is goin to be my first digi cam i want to get best out of the market... thnk u again..
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2008)
I like the SP560UZ. However, it's not perfect. And I believe that the P80 will have a better quality lens and as such, I would consider over it.
Ricoh? Never been much of a fan. Definitely a 2nd tier camera company.
reply to this comment
Ricoh? Never been much of a fan. Definitely a 2nd tier camera company.
Does it have an internal flash or should i go for an enternal one in the hot shoe? I'm interested in buying this nd any better suggestions? (Jayaprakash — 06/26/2008)
reply to this comment
TOZER (06/27/2008)
The SP 560 UZ does have an internal flash and it seems to fulfill all of the purposes i can imagine. I think that the camera is compatible with external flash units, but i can't see any major reason to get one unless you have a highly specialized purpose in mind.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/27/2008)
Actually, it isn't. It doesn't have a hot shoe for an external flash. But the SP570UZ does. And although the flash is pretty good, it still dissipates outside of about 20 feet. So anything landscapey you want to flash and shoot is going to be problematic.
reply to this comment
TOZER (07/01/2008)
As has been mentioned the SP 560 UZ does not have an attachment for an external flash however i was looking at the olympus website and i found out that there is a firmware upgarde which enables wireless flash connection.
"With the release of firmware version 3.1 for the Olympus SP-560 UZ, wireless flash control has been added to the capabilities of this high-performance 18x ultra-zoom camera. "
(from the olympus website [olympus.co.uk/consumer/29_S...
reply to this comment
"With the release of firmware version 3.1 for the Olympus SP-560 UZ, wireless flash control has been added to the capabilities of this high-performance 18x ultra-zoom camera. "
(from the olympus website [olympus.co.uk/consumer/29_S...
by James DeRuvo (07/01/2008)
Fantastic find, Tozer!
reply to this comment
Telephoto-conversion lens (TOZER — 06/16/2008)
Is it worth getting the conversion lens. I am soon going to Nepal up in the mountains and i think that the 1.7 X extra zoom would come in helpfull. If anyone has got the lens could you please tell me if it works
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/17/2008)
Not really. First off, the zoom on teh SP560 is pretty impressive, the 35mm equivalent of 27-486mm. I can't imagine needing more than that, even in Nepal. Then there's the fact that a teleconverter will magnify the images coming into your lens by about 2. The downside is, that this will cause your camera to have to be compensated in it's exposure settings because of the loss of light by 1-2 stops. And depending on the quality of the glass in your teleconverter, you may also run into clarity issues. You will certainly run into some "barrelling" issues at the extreme end of your focal length. this will make the image look like you're looking out of a barrel. This can also happen with wide angle converters as well.
To be honest, while you can purchase these options to screw onto your existing lens, I don't recommend them because the trade-offs involved simply outweigh the benefits in my mind.
reply to this comment
To be honest, while you can purchase these options to screw onto your existing lens, I don't recommend them because the trade-offs involved simply outweigh the benefits in my mind.
TOZER (08/17/2008)
Sorry for the lateness of my reply!
Yes that makes good sence, thankyou
reply to this comment
Yes that makes good sence, thankyou
I am a lay person who wants a good, quality camera that I can grow with. I have teenagers in sports, so it needs to shoot action and zoom quickly. (fgill1210 — 06/07/2008)
I would like some manual features, but not too complicated because I don't know what I'm doing. Can you suggest a camera for me? Thank you, Fran Gill
reply to this comment
steve mccall (06/07/2008)
my choice is the panasonic lumix tz3
cameralabs.com/reviews/Pana... is link to a photo of the tz3 in action
flickr.com/photos/siegelsda...
reply to this comment
cameralabs.com/reviews/Pana... is link to a photo of the tz3 in action
flickr.com/photos/siegelsda...
TOZER (06/08/2008)
I have got the Olympus SP 560 UZ, but it has got some auto focus problems and in sports that is not a good thing.
reply to this comment
what are best settings for photo of stars? (wtatrmt — 05/28/2008)
I have a once in a lifetime chance to take photos of the Milky Way from Antarctica, where the sky is really dark. What settings are going to work without a tracking platform? The camera is a Olymous 560 UZ.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/29/2008)
William,
I would first recommend getting a tri-pod. For the night settings, you are going to need a longer shutter opening with no flash, so the tri-pod will help eliminate camera shake issues.
For the camera's settings, I recommend turning your mode dial on the top of the camera to "A" for aperture priority mode and open the lens' aperture as wide as possible (the lowest f/# available) at the widest zoom you can. Set your focal length at infinity, and the shutter-speed will set automatically. Using an auto-white balance should be fine. I suggest moving the exposure compensation (brightness) up a notch to +0.5 EV. This will allow a little more light in.
I would also use the timer instead of manually pushing the shutter release button. The shutter opening will be a lot longer, so the slightest camera shake will be picked up. Using the timer gives the camera enough time to center after you hit the button, thereby reducing camera shake that much more and increasing your chances for a clear shot of the night sky.
I hope this has helped you. Please come back and let us know how your photos turned out and share them if you like. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I would first recommend getting a tri-pod. For the night settings, you are going to need a longer shutter opening with no flash, so the tri-pod will help eliminate camera shake issues.
For the camera's settings, I recommend turning your mode dial on the top of the camera to "A" for aperture priority mode and open the lens' aperture as wide as possible (the lowest f/# available) at the widest zoom you can. Set your focal length at infinity, and the shutter-speed will set automatically. Using an auto-white balance should be fine. I suggest moving the exposure compensation (brightness) up a notch to +0.5 EV. This will allow a little more light in.
I would also use the timer instead of manually pushing the shutter release button. The shutter opening will be a lot longer, so the slightest camera shake will be picked up. Using the timer gives the camera enough time to center after you hit the button, thereby reducing camera shake that much more and increasing your chances for a clear shot of the night sky.
I hope this has helped you. Please come back and let us know how your photos turned out and share them if you like. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
TOZER (05/30/2008)
The SP 560 UZ has a good ISO range so fiddle with that as well
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/01/2008)
Tozer,
I agree with you on this, but wouldn't go much higher than ISO 400 for this shot. The higher the ISO, the more "noise" or graininess you'll get in the image. To really bring out the detail of the night sky, I would opt for the longer shutter opening to bring the light in.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I agree with you on this, but wouldn't go much higher than ISO 400 for this shot. The higher the ISO, the more "noise" or graininess you'll get in the image. To really bring out the detail of the night sky, I would opt for the longer shutter opening to bring the light in.
Andrew
sp 560 compare with Fuji s8100fd (nichu777 — 05/08/2008)
can any one compare sp 560 and fuji s 8100 fd. am looking to buy a new camera with aditional zooming..and tel me which one is better and which is more user friendly..
reply to this comment
TOZER (05/08/2008)
Have you looked at the SP 570 UZ ?
reply to this comment
How to take panorama pictures with olympus sp 560 uz (muhannad — 04/13/2008)
I used olympus card and followed the instractions!I still get messege that photos were taken in a non panorama mode
reply to this comment
TOZER (04/14/2008)
Are you sure you put the camera into panarama mode?
reply to this comment
muhannad (04/14/2008)
No, I can not find how to put the camera into panorama mode.
Thank you
reply to this comment
Thank you
TOZER (04/15/2008)
Get your camera. Press the menu button, then select camera menu, go down the menu untill you see the PANARAMA option (this is on the 4th page of options).
Panarama mode enables you to take up to 10 pictures then a red hand symbol will appear on the screen. Press the OK button to exit PANARAMA mode.
Hope this helps
reply to this comment
Panarama mode enables you to take up to 10 pictures then a red hand symbol will appear on the screen. Press the OK button to exit PANARAMA mode.
Hope this helps
Andrew (06/21/2009)
I know this might sound crazy, but does the camera then crop the photos together so all the pictures create an panoramic photo?
reply to this comment
panos (08/02/2009)
after to take panorama shot use olympus software to connect the foto , and use only olympus memory for that!!!
bye
reply to this comment
bye
Summer Camp Quality??? (rlynn886 — 04/01/2008)
I work at a summer camp and need a camera with the ability to capture great pictures in many many different settings, including pictures of kids, outdoors, at night and on a water front. I am in charge of the yearbook and I need to be able to capture quality pictures. Is the Olympus Sp-560 the right camera?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (04/01/2008)
I think that this is one of your better choices, I would also take a look at the Canon S5 and the Sony H9, which are more expensive, but tend to produce better picture quality. The H9 also has a ton of features (like the detachable multi-angle screen and burst mode), plus nightshot mode which can help with your night photos because I doubt you'll take close up shots to use the flash. The S5 has great daylight pictures and is probably the best in terms of contrast. If you go with the SP560 you won't be disappointed, but I also think considering upgrading for a higher price should be considered. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2008)
At the prices of the S5 and H9, I'd be looking for a Digital Rebel XT for about the same price. The MP won't be as great, but for year book photos, it'll be ideal. Don't get caught up in the megapixel arms race. More isn't necessarily better ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ).
So think practical. The SP560 is a great camera. I have one. But if you do your shopping, you can probably find a Digital Rebel XT ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) with a decent lens for not that much more.
reply to this comment
So think practical. The SP560 is a great camera. I have one. But if you do your shopping, you can probably find a Digital Rebel XT ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) with a decent lens for not that much more.
Sarah (09/07/2008)
I just joined my yearbook staff and I am looking to take off the hook yearbook quality photographs with a variety of different backgrounds and settings. I want to be able to put the best pictures in this yearbook, but I am unsure which camera would get the job done. I need to be able to take action shots, shots in dim school lighting, close-ups of the student body and night photographs for some of the sporting events. Any idea what camera would best suit me?
reply to this comment
How do I upload time lapse sequence to computor? (wtatrmt — 03/30/2008)
The Olympus 2 software seems to just think it has 90 more individual photos.
How do I upload them as a sequence? They are numbered as a group, there just seems to be no way to stack them and view them the same way the camera does. The Camera is an Olympus Sp 560 UZ.
reply to this comment
How do I upload them as a sequence? They are numbered as a group, there just seems to be no way to stack them and view them the same way the camera does. The Camera is an Olympus Sp 560 UZ.
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2008)
Well, according to page 33, 99 is the maximum number of shots it can take anyway. They should be saved in sequence. When you say "stack them" what do you mean exactly? You can order them according to time saved. Did you properly set value?
reply to this comment
wtatrmt (04/02/2008)
Hello James Thank you for your response. Perhaps, I can clarify: When I view the sequence in the camera, it runs them as a group so quickly that it looks like a movie, perhaps ten seconds long. When I load the card into the computor, it just shows 90 new photos. Although they have little numbers up in the right corner so I can tell which thay are, there seems to be no way to handle them as a sequence to be run as a "movie" as in the camera. As I am a machinist which little computor experience, I am somewhat at a loss as to how to proceed. I have had no luck reacihng Olympus about this so I am very greatful for your help. William
reply to this comment
wtatrmt (04/02/2008)
reply to this comment
wtatrmt (04/02/2008)
Hello James Thank you for your response. Perhaps, I can clarify: When I view the sequence in the camera, it runs them as a group so quickly that it looks like a movie, perhaps ten seconds long. When I load the card into the computor, it just shows 90 new photos. Although they have little numbers up in the right corner so I can tell which thay are, there seems to be no way to handle them as a sequence to be run as a "movie" as in the camera. As I am a machinist which little computor experience, I am somewhat at a loss as to how to proceed. I have had no luck reacihng Olympus about this so I am very greatful for your help. William
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/04/2008)
What you would have to do is use something like Photoshop or Illustrator to create an animated "GIF" file that would run through each one at key frames and turn it into an animated little movie. There are also several slide show programs out there that do something similar.
reply to this comment
looking o a camera for my sons soccer games but dont want another for birthday parties. Can you point me in the right direction? (chopper210 — 03/24/2008)
reply to this comment
steve mccall (03/24/2008)
hello frank,
go for the tz3
here is a video guide.
cameras.co.uk/videoguides/p... is a link to some photos of kids soccer practice by Sarah Brueck Stallings.
flickr.com/photos/3catnite/...
reply to this comment
go for the tz3
here is a video guide.
cameras.co.uk/videoguides/p... is a link to some photos of kids soccer practice by Sarah Brueck Stallings.
flickr.com/photos/3catnite/...
Aditya D (03/25/2008)
It really depends how much you want to spend. If you're looking to grow in photography later on, I'd recommend getting a DSLR, such as the Nikon D40x. If you're not looking to get too into it and just want a simple camera, I'd recommending taking a look at the Canon G9, the Canon S5, and the Sony H7/H9. These will be definitely good for taking sports shots and can still be used for indoor quality. The Panasonic tz3 may not be enough camera for your needs. The Sony H9 is the favorite of mine from this set of cameras, because of the 15x optical zoom, the one touch burst (good for sports and action shots). Hope this helps, if you have any other questions feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/25/2008)
I'd recommend the Olympus SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or SP-570UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )if you're not going to take the plunge into DSLR. Rely on the sports presets and practice prefocus and panning with the action and you'll be taking some nice action shots.
Frankly, I think the G9 is overkill.
reply to this comment
Frankly, I think the G9 is overkill.
Keith (06/30/2008)
The SP570 can take up to 13 shots per second. So - set it at 3 meg pixles; hold down the shutter and just point at the action.
I have only used it for a week, but the rapid shot rate allows you to capture many styles of action shot - birds landing; sports etc.
it also enables you to capture frames from the video.
This camera has many good points, and only a few short comings - the LCD is fixed, where as the Canon S5 rotates; the auto time exposure is limited to 1/2 sec, unless you go to full manual - but even there it is only 15 sec. You can get 8 minutes,on Bulb setting, but you must hold down the shutter button!!! Crazy since any movement will cause the image to blur. The S5 has 15 sec in S mode and M mode. The 570 uses a non-standard memory card . As you can see, none of these are major, and the 20X zoom will attract many sales.
A DSLR requires a bag with 3 lenses to equal what this has in one - a macro; a standard 35 and a zoom.
If you need poster sized prints (eg A3 or larger), or you really want to shoot in low light often, then buy a DSLR, extra lenses and a carry bag. Otherwise the 570 (or the S5) will exercise most of your creative ability for many years.
reply to this comment
I have only used it for a week, but the rapid shot rate allows you to capture many styles of action shot - birds landing; sports etc.
it also enables you to capture frames from the video.
This camera has many good points, and only a few short comings - the LCD is fixed, where as the Canon S5 rotates; the auto time exposure is limited to 1/2 sec, unless you go to full manual - but even there it is only 15 sec. You can get 8 minutes,on Bulb setting, but you must hold down the shutter button!!! Crazy since any movement will cause the image to blur. The S5 has 15 sec in S mode and M mode. The 570 uses a non-standard memory card . As you can see, none of these are major, and the 20X zoom will attract many sales.
A DSLR requires a bag with 3 lenses to equal what this has in one - a macro; a standard 35 and a zoom.
If you need poster sized prints (eg A3 or larger), or you really want to shoot in low light often, then buy a DSLR, extra lenses and a carry bag. Otherwise the 570 (or the S5) will exercise most of your creative ability for many years.
Extended Zoom with Better Low Light Shots - (MarieK — 03/07/2008)
I currently have an Olympus C-750 digital which has been a great camera, but is in need of major repairs which would probably cost more than a new camera. One of the things I liked best about my C-750 was it's ability to take great pictures without a flash in low light situations. I have beautiful pictures inside buildings all over Europe that were taken without flash and came out sharp and clear.
I have tested the Olympus UZ-550 and found the pictures were not as sharp and clear as with my C-750 and it was not quite as good in low light. It seems strange that the newer model would be lower quality, but I have numerous pictures to prove it.
I also tested the Panasonic FZ18 and found it terrible in low light and was also not very happy with pictures taken in bright light (it made the subjects overly dark).
My main qualifications are 1) at least 10X zoom, 2) reasonable quality in low light situations, 3) fast shutter speed.
Any recommendations? Anyone have experience with both the UZ-550 and UZ-560 that could tell me if the UZ-560 produces sharper pictures than the UZ-550?
reply to this comment
I have tested the Olympus UZ-550 and found the pictures were not as sharp and clear as with my C-750 and it was not quite as good in low light. It seems strange that the newer model would be lower quality, but I have numerous pictures to prove it.
I also tested the Panasonic FZ18 and found it terrible in low light and was also not very happy with pictures taken in bright light (it made the subjects overly dark).
My main qualifications are 1) at least 10X zoom, 2) reasonable quality in low light situations, 3) fast shutter speed.
Any recommendations? Anyone have experience with both the UZ-550 and UZ-560 that could tell me if the UZ-560 produces sharper pictures than the UZ-550?
Braves (03/07/2008)
Hello
I also own a C-750 model and can't believe the quality I get from this camera. I have owned it for about 5
years.I also ran a photo lab for 10 years except for the last two years which I have been unemployed. People
that would bring their 6 and 8 megaipixel cannons and nikons in 3 to 5 years ago to get their photos printied
and my digital photos from my 4 megapixel camera C-750 would match any I would print for my customers.
I did drop my camera about 3 years ago and it dosen't focus quite as well as it did especially in lower light.
And especially when I zoom in. But still a good camera. I know this dose not answer your question just
wanted to share my experience with you.
Thanks,
Wayne
reply to this comment
I also own a C-750 model and can't believe the quality I get from this camera. I have owned it for about 5
years.I also ran a photo lab for 10 years except for the last two years which I have been unemployed. People
that would bring their 6 and 8 megaipixel cannons and nikons in 3 to 5 years ago to get their photos printied
and my digital photos from my 4 megapixel camera C-750 would match any I would print for my customers.
I did drop my camera about 3 years ago and it dosen't focus quite as well as it did especially in lower light.
And especially when I zoom in. But still a good camera. I know this dose not answer your question just
wanted to share my experience with you.
Thanks,
Wayne
MarieK (03/08/2008)
Thanks for your comments, Wayne. I do love my C-750 and would even consider having it repaired, but mine has been dropped a couple times and now seems to be sucking up battery usage to the point where I only get about 10 pictures per charge. Not acceptable.
The other advantage of a newer camera would be a larger screen and faster shutter speed. Other than that, considering my frustration with trying to find a newer camera with equal quality, I'd either pay to get the old one repaired or look for a used one to buy.
Wish me luck on finding a new model and I'll let you know if I do.
reply to this comment
The other advantage of a newer camera would be a larger screen and faster shutter speed. Other than that, considering my frustration with trying to find a newer camera with equal quality, I'd either pay to get the old one repaired or look for a used one to buy.
Wish me luck on finding a new model and I'll let you know if I do.
TOZER (03/13/2008)
There is no longer any point in getting the 550UZ as the 570UZ has been released (10MP and 20X optical zoom as well as many other upgraded features). The 570UZ is expencive but shops will soon be selling the older obsoliete 560UZ slightly cheeper. On the other hand any shops that are still stocking the 550UZ will be selling it dirt cheep. Personally i would say you can only but the camera once and you will be kicking yourself for not getting the right one so it is probably worth the extra money to get something good...
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (09/30/2008)
It's been six months since the last reply, but... I had the 550, sold it and got the 560. TThe 560 has shorter shutter lag is shorter and focuses better in low light and low contrast settings. It also has face detection, and "perfect fix" in camera post processing ability.
If I were going to buy an Olympus ultra-zoom now, it would probably be the SP-565. The main reason is that it can use micro-SD cards, most of which are cheaper and faster than xD cards.
If I wanted to buy another brand, it would probably be the Fuji S100fs, which is much better in low light, though it's big, expensive, and has images with significant chromatic aberratios.
reply to this comment
If I were going to buy an Olympus ultra-zoom now, it would probably be the SP-565. The main reason is that it can use micro-SD cards, most of which are cheaper and faster than xD cards.
If I wanted to buy another brand, it would probably be the Fuji S100fs, which is much better in low light, though it's big, expensive, and has images with significant chromatic aberratios.
I have an Olympus 725 and it doesn't take a good night shot. Which Olympus camera in the $200 price range do that effectively. (vegas92 — 02/21/2008)
I've changed my settings but the camera isn't capable. It also takes a lousy inside shot when using the flash. I'm not a beginner but I'm also not overly experienced in manual settings.
reply to this comment
TOZER (02/25/2008)
as far as i can tell the Olympus 725 is a compact camera. compact cameras being notoriously bad at night shots.
The SP 560 UZ is not perfect at night shots, however, it has an avaliable light mode which takes quick bright photos in the darkest of places in a reduced quality.
There is also a night mode although not masses of use
The SP 560 UZ has an aperture range from 50 - 6400 which means you can take fast shots evenwhen it is dark, however, this effects the quality of your pictures.
the main feature of the SP 560 UZ over compact cameras for night shots is that you can adjust shutter speed and aperture, so if you have a tripod you can get great night shots on long exposures
reply to this comment
The SP 560 UZ is not perfect at night shots, however, it has an avaliable light mode which takes quick bright photos in the darkest of places in a reduced quality.
There is also a night mode although not masses of use
The SP 560 UZ has an aperture range from 50 - 6400 which means you can take fast shots evenwhen it is dark, however, this effects the quality of your pictures.
the main feature of the SP 560 UZ over compact cameras for night shots is that you can adjust shutter speed and aperture, so if you have a tripod you can get great night shots on long exposures
vegas92 (02/27/2008)
Thanks for your help. I've been researching cameras for 2 weeks and the Nikon 560 was one of my picks to examine closely when I go camera shopping.
reply to this comment
vegas92 (02/27/2008)
Oops, I meant Olympus. At least w/ this one I can use my same cards
reply to this comment
Joseph A Kraipovich (03/13/2008)
Does Vivitar offer a night vision camera?
reply to this comment
What is the video quality? Maximum duration of a video? clarity? (gsacamera — 02/18/2008)
I am unable to understand the video quality. Can u please send me complete details of video- maximun duration, modes, pixels and zoom info ? How good is it ? what are the number of frames per second? On a scale of 10 with photo quality as 10, what do you rate video quality in comparison?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (02/20/2008)
The video quality is pretty good, especially with the newer processor in this camera. It has high quality video which is 640 x 480 with sound, and also lower quality which is 320 x 240 with sound. As far as the quality... you can't really compare the video quality to photo quality of any point and shoot camera, but with most cameras you will see about a 6 on a scale of 1-10. It shoots at a rate of 30 frames per second. I think that answers all of your questions, if you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
TOZER (02/25/2008)
Video quality is not brilliant. The SP 560 UZ is a camera not a camcorder. The zoom and focus are stuttery along with the lighting, however, for what it is the video is OK.
In terms of capacity a 1 GB memory stick will hold... (Hours:Mins:Seconds)
@ 30 FPS (640 X 480) 9:28
@ 15 FPS (320 X 240) 51:38
@ 15 FPS (160 X 120) 3:46:31
reply to this comment
In terms of capacity a 1 GB memory stick will hold... (Hours:Mins:Seconds)
@ 30 FPS (640 X 480) 9:28
@ 15 FPS (320 X 240) 51:38
@ 15 FPS (160 X 120) 3:46:31
sp-560's movies model is in 40-sec section, how can I deleted it (eg. take moives time more than 40 sec)? (dongfu — 02/13/2008)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/14/2008)
If your image stabilizer is on while shooting movies, it can many times turn your movie recording off to avoid overheating the camera. You can try turning the IS function off to shoot movies for longer time periods. I do know that some cameras come with a time limitation on the movies that they shoot. There is nothing in the usermanual or specs that mentions this though. You might want to take the movie with a blank memory card and see how long you can record as well. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
How can put date and time on picture by using sp-560? (dongfu — 01/29/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/29/2008)
We're getting this question alot and frankly, date print isn't something that is popular much in digital cameras. As such, it's a feature that isn't available in any model I know. This could be due to the desire to have larger lcd screens, face detection, and image stabilization, or that the digital photo file is marked with a date/time as it's saved and as such, it isn't thought to be needed to imprint on the file.
In film cameras, date backs would expose light the film in the form of date and time so it was literally burned into the negative image.
As the digital file is marked by a date and time when it's saved, the use of a date stamp feature in digital cameras has lost popularity amongst camera manufacturers as a feature.
Check out MAGTIME - filedudes.com/MagiTime-down... it's an application which adds date/time to the picture. But beware, once you do it, it can't be undone.
reply to this comment
In film cameras, date backs would expose light the film in the form of date and time so it was literally burned into the negative image.
As the digital file is marked by a date and time when it's saved, the use of a date stamp feature in digital cameras has lost popularity amongst camera manufacturers as a feature.
Check out MAGTIME - filedudes.com/MagiTime-down... it's an application which adds date/time to the picture. But beware, once you do it, it can't be undone.
Mattias Bredberg, Sweden (04/10/2008)
This can be done manually using the software that is supplied with the camera. Obviously you will have to do it picture by piciture, but it is quite easy.
reply to this comment
Is this the best option if I'm willing to invest a point-and-shoot camera? (the23floor — 01/27/2008)
I'm only 16, but I really enjoy photography. I already have an olympus [an FE-200], and I like the programming and few features, but it does focus slowly compared to some of my friends' cameras.
I feel like I've outgrown that camera though, and I'm very willing to invest in a $500 camera, IF it's worth my money. I like using the super macro mode a lot. I was wondering if anyone had any advice on whether or not I should buy this camera. I have read some reviews saying this camera isn't all that great, and others praising it.
While I like this camera a lot from what I've seen, the reviews persuade me and I'm wondering if there are other cameras which are just as good that I should consider first.
reply to this comment
I feel like I've outgrown that camera though, and I'm very willing to invest in a $500 camera, IF it's worth my money. I like using the super macro mode a lot. I was wondering if anyone had any advice on whether or not I should buy this camera. I have read some reviews saying this camera isn't all that great, and others praising it.
While I like this camera a lot from what I've seen, the reviews persuade me and I'm wondering if there are other cameras which are just as good that I should consider first.
by James DeRuvo (01/29/2008)
All I can tell you is that I have one and I really enjoy it. But if I had to do it over again, I'd probably take that $500 and invest in a Digital SLR. For your age, you're more willing to experiment and to use it for pictures other than snapshots. You're willing to invest $500, I'd be looking at the Canon Digital Rebel XTi which just experienced a dramatic price reduction. And fitting it with a macro lens is by far much better than using the macro mode on any point and shoot.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/02/2008)
I agree with James. I have an XTi and have found that it is a great all around camera. You can get a decent 50mm, f/1.8 ( amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-C... ) lens for about $80 that will work for macro shots.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
Add 0n 2x lens (Braves — 01/16/2008)
I have an Olympus C-750 Camera.I was told I could purchace a 2x add
on lens and it would double my 10x optical zoom to 20x optical zoom
When I did this the camera would not focus if I zoomed in half
way or more with the built in zoom lens.Will I have the same problem with this camera if I try to double the 18x optical zoom to 36x optical on the Olympus SZ 560
Thanks
reply to this comment
on lens and it would double my 10x optical zoom to 20x optical zoom
When I did this the camera would not focus if I zoomed in half
way or more with the built in zoom lens.Will I have the same problem with this camera if I try to double the 18x optical zoom to 36x optical on the Olympus SZ 560
Thanks
Larry (01/17/2008)
Just a suggestion of an alternative possibility to consider: Try taking the photos you are wanting at 18X optical, download to your computer, crop and enlarge to the desired level of zoom, and see how you like it. Unless you are printing poster size images and especially if you are only looking at the image on the computer screen, I think you can save yourself the trouble of buying the 2X multiplier lens.
If you need software to do the cropping and enlarging, get it free from Google by downloading Picasa2 for free. Just Google picasa2 and go to download. It's great.
If still not sure then you will have to actually compare both systems -- crop and enlarge vs 2X multiplier lens. Soooooooo, be certain to purchase it from a company that takes returns with no questions asked.
reply to this comment
If you need software to do the cropping and enlarging, get it free from Google by downloading Picasa2 for free. Just Google picasa2 and go to download. It's great.
If still not sure then you will have to actually compare both systems -- crop and enlarge vs 2X multiplier lens. Soooooooo, be certain to purchase it from a company that takes returns with no questions asked.
I have purchased a 560 UZ, after using the 500 UZ, I was convinced to buy another...Great camera!!! (matybishop — 01/10/2008)
The question that I have is, with the 500 UZ, the digital zoom activation button was also the anti-shake button. The new 560, doesnt seem to have that option, or I cant locate it? Does any one know how to activate the digital zoom for the 560?? Cheers Mat
reply to this comment
Larry (01/15/2008)
In your users manual the top of page 22 describes how to get to the digital zoom function. First go to the Top Menu, then the Camera Menu. Scroll down to digital zoom and change it from off to on. See also page 28.
The anti-shake button can be customized on this camera as can other buttons. See pages 47 and 72.
There is also a fine zoom function described on the bottom of page 27.
In case you don't have a manual, here is the website page for it
olympusamerica.com/files/SP... me know if I can be of further help.
reply to this comment
The anti-shake button can be customized on this camera as can other buttons. See pages 47 and 72.
There is also a fine zoom function described on the bottom of page 27.
In case you don't have a manual, here is the website page for it
olympusamerica.com/files/SP... me know if I can be of further help.
TOZER (02/25/2008)
Press menu
Select Camera Menu
FINE + DIGITAL zoom are the 4th + 6th options
Other focusing options are on the 2nd page
To activate a focusing function at the push of a button go into the sett-up and on page five the last option is custom button, this is the button with the camera shake symbol on top of the camera. you can program this button to practically any function.
reply to this comment
Select Camera Menu
FINE + DIGITAL zoom are the 4th + 6th options
Other focusing options are on the 2nd page
To activate a focusing function at the push of a button go into the sett-up and on page five the last option is custom button, this is the button with the camera shake symbol on top of the camera. you can program this button to practically any function.
olympus c-3030 expired ... now an SP-550, or 560 - ? (madbrookz — 01/06/2008)
greetings! a friend loaned me her olympus c-3030 for the past several years. it's been a fantastic camera for my uses. it recently expired, and olympus no longer repairs this model, and the C-series is also defunct. olympus suggested i look to the SP series for a replacement model for the C-3030.
the SP-510 is not a contender, based on the reviews i've read.
the SP-560 gets better reviews than the SP-550, but i am not sure if - for my very utilitarian purposes - it is worth the cost of the upgrade.
when i return the camera to my friend, it will become a third-camera alternative to her higher quality SLR cameras - hence, top-of-the-line features are not essential.
could someone comment on key distinctions between the 550 and 560 models, and (more importantly) whether you consider these distinctions significant for recreational / utility camera use?
for the sake of returning an Olympus camera to my friend, i am inclined to trade-up to an Olympus model.
all opinions are welcome!
many thanks, kavita
reply to this comment
the SP-510 is not a contender, based on the reviews i've read.
the SP-560 gets better reviews than the SP-550, but i am not sure if - for my very utilitarian purposes - it is worth the cost of the upgrade.
when i return the camera to my friend, it will become a third-camera alternative to her higher quality SLR cameras - hence, top-of-the-line features are not essential.
could someone comment on key distinctions between the 550 and 560 models, and (more importantly) whether you consider these distinctions significant for recreational / utility camera use?
for the sake of returning an Olympus camera to my friend, i am inclined to trade-up to an Olympus model.
all opinions are welcome!
many thanks, kavita
Aditya D (01/08/2008)
It seems that the SP560 has a new better sensor, a new, better processor, and a couple of extraneous features. Depending on the price difference, the SP560 is definitely worth the upgrade, because the sensor and the processor make a big difference when it comes to quality of the pictures. You probably won't use the additional features, which aren't even clearly listed in any Olympus review or on the Olympus site just (even more features than the SP550). You won't notice much difference between the cameras, but you probably will between the picture quality if you compared them side by side.
reply to this comment
madbrookz (01/09/2008)
thanks a lot for your input, aditya,
i'm curious - what are the 'big differences' that a 'better' sensor and processor offer?
specifically i am trying to assess the benefit when it comes to my own camera use - which is elementary and infrequent. the camera's owner has two Olympus SLR cameras, so this camera will receive little use in her care, as well.
the price of the 560 is about $100 more than the 550. if there are good reasons to pay $100 more for a camera that will receive minimal use, then i'll pay the extra. that's what i am weighing.
all responses welcomed!
best wishes, kavita
reply to this comment
i'm curious - what are the 'big differences' that a 'better' sensor and processor offer?
specifically i am trying to assess the benefit when it comes to my own camera use - which is elementary and infrequent. the camera's owner has two Olympus SLR cameras, so this camera will receive little use in her care, as well.
the price of the 560 is about $100 more than the 550. if there are good reasons to pay $100 more for a camera that will receive minimal use, then i'll pay the extra. that's what i am weighing.
all responses welcomed!
best wishes, kavita
beverly (01/29/2008)
I am looking for a good Olympus , point and shoot that does 2 things: takes good pics in low light, and second, takes clear, clean action shots. Which Olympus would you recommend, or would a Canon SI 15 or Panasonic TZ1 be a better choice than this SP560? When I go to Best Buy and Circuit City and Cord Camera, no one seems to know much about the cameras. I need your expertise, all you photographers, out there in the real world. I am in awe of your knowledge and expertise and I need your help!
Thanks -
Confused first time digital shopper!
reply to this comment
Thanks -
Confused first time digital shopper!
TOZER (02/25/2008)
The SP 570 UZ has now been released, so any shops that still have the SP 550 UZ in stock will be begging you to buy them at low low prices and you can expect the SP 560 UZ to be significantly reduced in price.
I Have the SP 560 UZ and i would be quite willing now to pay and extra £50 for the SP 570 UZ mainly because it is 10MP and 20X zoom but no matter what you but it will be obsolete in a few months.
JUST LOOK FOR A GOOD VALUE BUY!
reply to this comment
I Have the SP 560 UZ and i would be quite willing now to pay and extra £50 for the SP 570 UZ mainly because it is 10MP and 20X zoom but no matter what you but it will be obsolete in a few months.
JUST LOOK FOR A GOOD VALUE BUY!
madbrookz (02/25/2008)
thanks tozer and all,
clearly the answer is simply, do it ... and forget about the details!
i'm off to order the camera.
best wishes,
kavita
reply to this comment
clearly the answer is simply, do it ... and forget about the details!
i'm off to order the camera.
best wishes,
kavita
Lcd screen shows horizontal stripe effect that fades somewhat when I go to the review . (ltward — 01/01/2008)
I have had the Kodak Z612 camera for about 18 months with no problems. I have printed a few of the new pictures and the light backgrounds show stripes of very thin lines. Darker prints appear normal, but I think the general picture quality seems a bit poorer. I am guessing I am out of luck since it is no longer under warranty. Anyone else having this problem?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/03/2008)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Kodak's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Kodak's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
nadja2 (01/03/2008)
Linda,
I am having the same problem that you are having. Sorry I don't have an answer but I tried what James suggested and I don't see a diffrerence when I reset the camera. I also went online and did not find a firmware upgrade for the camera. I have called kodak about the problem. And like you I am out of my warranty. They want over $100 to repair it. So I think I am in the market for a new camera. I am not too happy about that!
reply to this comment
I am having the same problem that you are having. Sorry I don't have an answer but I tried what James suggested and I don't see a diffrerence when I reset the camera. I also went online and did not find a firmware upgrade for the camera. I have called kodak about the problem. And like you I am out of my warranty. They want over $100 to repair it. So I think I am in the market for a new camera. I am not too happy about that!
ltward (01/03/2008)
Thanks to both of you. I did talk to Kodak after posting this and got the same "over 100 dollar repair" news. They had me try the reboot idea that james suggested, no luck. Talked to a local camera shop and was told that it had to do with the main imaging component and wasn't worth repairing. Now I am ready to look for another camera and need to decide if I should make the jump to an SLR model. I'd like to invest in something that doesn't self destruct in the first 18 months! Thanks again
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/04/2008)
Robyn and Linda, Well, if you purchased it with a credit card, contact them and ask if they can get involved in helping you to return a defective electronics item. Additionally, if the camera's warranty is expired, you may have extended warranty time as a perk of the credit card you used. Ask them about that as well.
Then, contact KODAK about an RMA return for a defective product. Most don't know about the RMA programs electronics have. Tell them what you've told us and request a replacement unit. I woudn't give up simply because some tech gave you the stock spiel out of a handbook.
In the end though, if you're going to invest in a new camera, you may want to consider the Olympus SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or for an SLR the Canon Digital Rebel XTi.
reply to this comment
Then, contact KODAK about an RMA return for a defective product. Most don't know about the RMA programs electronics have. Tell them what you've told us and request a replacement unit. I woudn't give up simply because some tech gave you the stock spiel out of a handbook.
In the end though, if you're going to invest in a new camera, you may want to consider the Olympus SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or for an SLR the Canon Digital Rebel XTi.
nadja2 (01/04/2008)
James thanks for the info. I recieved the camera for a christmas present in 06. So I am not sure if I can get access to the credit card receipt or if the person even paid with a credit card. But thanks for that info. I was upset because when I called Kodak and sat on hold waiting for a support person for 30 minutes, I got someone whose first language was not English. I have no problem but it made it frustrating because he could not understand me and I could not understand him. I could tell he was just reading quesiton from a script and really had no insight on how to help me fix the problem.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/04/2008)
Which is why the first thing I do when I call tech support is ask what country they are in. If they refuse to say, you demand to be transfered to someone in the US. Request a manager. Move up the chain of command. Just because "Ricky" from Jakarta is reading from a script, doesn't mean that's the final word.
reply to this comment
nadja2 (01/04/2008)
James you are so funny! Ricky from Jakarta LOL!!! Maybe I will try to call again but the hold time is frustrating too.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/04/2008)
Well I don't mean to be belittling of the techs overseas, but you'd be amazed how many outsourced tech support guys I've talked to in India that really go by the name Ricky. No kidding!
Kodak has a chat feature on their website, you may get faster replies there.
reply to this comment
Kodak has a chat feature on their website, you may get faster replies there.
ltward (01/04/2008)
Actually, the camera shop guy I talked to recommended the Canon Rebbel xti also. Thanks for the interst.
Funny...the tech i talked to from Kodak also sounded Indian but I think I got most of the info straight! He did tell me about a program whereby I could get a 15% off coupon/code for a new Kodak camera if I mailed them my old camera. Prices look to be better if I just watch for a sale. I'm thinking I don't want another Kodak anyway!
reply to this comment
Funny...the tech i talked to from Kodak also sounded Indian but I think I got most of the info straight! He did tell me about a program whereby I could get a 15% off coupon/code for a new Kodak camera if I mailed them my old camera. Prices look to be better if I just watch for a sale. I'm thinking I don't want another Kodak anyway!
nadja2 (01/04/2008)
Linda, the rep from Kodak told me that too about the 15% off. I thought it was not worth it. By the time I pay for shipping my old camera back and pay for shipping on a new camera, that would equal the 15% off they were offering. I am with you...I am not getting another Kodak. I am acutually thinking FUJI. my first digital camera was a FUJI and I loved it. I still have it and am using it until I get a newer camera. I only replaced it because the Kodak was a gift. However I would have replaced it simply for the fact that newer technology is available and not because I did not like it. But I will look into the Canon you mentioned also. I have a friend who mentioned she really like Canon products.
reply to this comment
ltward (01/04/2008)
Hey Robyn Have you looked at Cnet.com ? My husband found the site today and it has lots of info..video too, about all different makes and models. Very interesting and they point out pros and cons about each one. He said FUJIs were rated very high. Good luck in your search!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/07/2008)
I know several people who LOVE their Fuji's. Particularly the super zooms. I've seen pictures shot with the FinePix S5200 that are outstanding ... and it's only at 5.1 MP. They've gotten much better sinc then.
I came across an interesting article today about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed.
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be an answer as well.
reply to this comment
I came across an interesting article today about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed.
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be an answer as well.
I just got the SP560 UZ and it's a terrible camera! (ibanez1 — 01/01/2008)
I bought it to take photos of the grandchildren and even with the "so-called" image stabilization my photos are terrible!
Any suggestions?
I have tried sports mode but even when the kids are sitting still there seems to be a lag in the shutter speed and the photo is blurred?
Would it help to use the burst mode? Thanks Van
reply to this comment
Any suggestions?
I have tried sports mode but even when the kids are sitting still there seems to be a lag in the shutter speed and the photo is blurred?
Would it help to use the burst mode? Thanks Van
Andrew Skinner (01/01/2008)
Van,
You might try pushing the shutter button half way to lock the focal length, then when you want to snap the photo, go for it. That might help the shutter lag. Sports mode will only speed up your actual shutter opening time. Sports mode works better in daylight and high-lit situations. The burst mode will only let you hold down the shutter for "rapid-fire" shots in sequence.
I would switch from sports mode to shutter priority mode (marked with an S on the shooting mode dial). I wouldn't let the shutter go slower than 1/100th of a second to catch non-blurred photos. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You might try pushing the shutter button half way to lock the focal length, then when you want to snap the photo, go for it. That might help the shutter lag. Sports mode will only speed up your actual shutter opening time. Sports mode works better in daylight and high-lit situations. The burst mode will only let you hold down the shutter for "rapid-fire" shots in sequence.
I would switch from sports mode to shutter priority mode (marked with an S on the shooting mode dial). I wouldn't let the shutter go slower than 1/100th of a second to catch non-blurred photos. I hope this helps.
Andrew
What size filter does it take? (billhkline — 12/30/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/31/2007)
As stunning as it is, this simply isn't mentioned in the manual, nor on the website. In fact, it's been rather difficult to find anywhere online. But aside from a 1A skylight filter to protect the lens elements (a must for any camera that can take one) I recommend doing anything a filter can do in photo editing software. You'll get far better control and won't have an unalterable original image.
reply to this comment
billhkline (12/31/2007)
This is helpful, but I still find a polarizer best used on the camera. Thanks!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/03/2008)
Fair enough. YMMV.
reply to this comment
TOZER (02/20/2008)
contact this address, they are very helpfull and fast.
di.support@olympus-europa.com
reply to this comment
di.support@olympus-europa.com
TOZER (02/22/2008)
I have contacted OLYMPUS and as far as they are concerned you cannot fit a filter to the SP 560 UZ or any other cameras in that range.
This seems stupid as the camera definitely does have a screw thread to fit a filter to.
OLYMPUS, however, recommended this (nextphoto.net/SP550.htm)
I personally am going to try and get a filter fitted, i will inform you if i succeed
reply to this comment
This seems stupid as the camera definitely does have a screw thread to fit a filter to.
OLYMPUS, however, recommended this (nextphoto.net/SP550.htm)
I personally am going to try and get a filter fitted, i will inform you if i succeed
by James DeRuvo (02/22/2008)
I'm just curious, Tozzer, why do you want to fit a filter to it anyway? Aside from the protection benefits of a good 1A skylight, any filters effects can be done in photo editing software like Photoshop. Only it won't be permanent.
reply to this comment
TOZER (02/25/2008)
I mostly want one for protection as i like to take close ups.
anyway i have now found out from OLYMPUS that the SP 560 UZ definitely does not take filters and the only way to fit a filter is to purchase an adapter. specialist filters can then be connected to the adapter
product can be found at (nextphoto.net/SP550.htm) {adapter is designed for 550 UZ but will work for 560 UZ}
reply to this comment
anyway i have now found out from OLYMPUS that the SP 560 UZ definitely does not take filters and the only way to fit a filter is to purchase an adapter. specialist filters can then be connected to the adapter
product can be found at (nextphoto.net/SP550.htm) {adapter is designed for 550 UZ but will work for 560 UZ}
by James DeRuvo (02/25/2008)
Definitely worth getting then. I can't tell you many times I have thrashed a 1A filter and saved my camera lens over the years.
reply to this comment
billhkline (02/25/2008)
Thanks to all for participating, especially Tozer. I think this is finally put to rest. By the way, I tried one of these cameras out in a store and found the quality of the pictures very poor, indeed.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/25/2008)
That's too bad you had that experience. I guess it's a case of "your mileage may vary," because I quite enjoy the SP560UZ and the quality it provides. But any camera can lay an egg from time to time, depending on what you're shooting and in what conditions. What you really need to do is try it out for a weekend - shooting in different conditions.
reply to this comment
Sony H9 or Olympus 560UZ?? (pepper — 12/29/2007)
Greetings. Since i'm a compact camera user, i would need some advice, cuz im looking to buy one of these two: SONY H9 or Olympus 560UZ! I read pretty much of reviews for both of them, but i still cant figure out which of them is better. Always been convinced of Sony's quality and performance, but something pulls me the to Oly 560UZ. The only thing that bothers me about H9 is that it has a expensive battery, in case i need to buy a new one. The 560UZ has standard AA batteries which are cheap and seem more practical to replace. I'm looking for brilliant pic quality, good flash for lowlight pics, camera durability and PC compability. So help me out please, if anyone can tell me anything useful, i would appreciate it. Thank you:)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/30/2007)
Pepper,
I'm going to outline the major points of both cameras below with the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) listed first in each case.
- Resolution
8 vs 8.1: no real noticable difference here
- Optical zoom
18x vs 15x: That extra zoom always gets you closer to the subject
- Manual exposure?
Yes vs Yes: Another tie
- ISO Range
50-3200 vs 80-3200: No real difference
The biggest difference in these cameras is the optical zoom. Personally, I like as much optical zoom as I can get in these cameras. Its a great feature and does not deteriorate the resolution like digital zoom does. Other factors I'd consider are the price of replacement batteries, if I already have the correct memory card format, the price of new memory cards, and the price of the camera. The Olympus is less expensive and has the batteries you like. While regular AA batteries will not last as long, you can get rechargeable NiMH batteries with a charger for around $20 at most retail stores like Best Buy or even Target. I'd opt for the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the price of the camera and accessories. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I'm going to outline the major points of both cameras below with the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) listed first in each case.
- Resolution
8 vs 8.1: no real noticable difference here
- Optical zoom
18x vs 15x: That extra zoom always gets you closer to the subject
- Manual exposure?
Yes vs Yes: Another tie
- ISO Range
50-3200 vs 80-3200: No real difference
The biggest difference in these cameras is the optical zoom. Personally, I like as much optical zoom as I can get in these cameras. Its a great feature and does not deteriorate the resolution like digital zoom does. Other factors I'd consider are the price of replacement batteries, if I already have the correct memory card format, the price of new memory cards, and the price of the camera. The Olympus is less expensive and has the batteries you like. While regular AA batteries will not last as long, you can get rechargeable NiMH batteries with a charger for around $20 at most retail stores like Best Buy or even Target. I'd opt for the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the price of the camera and accessories. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Roy (01/11/2008)
I am considering both of these too along with the Cannon S5. I too like the Oly 560 with its additional zoom and great looks and feel. But I also like the Sony H9 for its IR feature for dark room shots and its tilting LCD screen (so you can get those over-the-heads-of-the-crowd shots). The Cannon S5 only has 12x zoom and only goes down to 1600 iso but I like its higher res video (that even allows you to snap pictures while video taping), ease of use and a LCD screen that flips out to the side and twist so it can be seen up high, low or even from in front of the camera. As for the batteries, I too like the AA size batteries as I can swipe them out of my emergency flashlight in the car if needed.
reply to this comment
TOZER (03/13/2008)
There is no longer any point in getting the 550UZ as the 570UZ has been released (10MP and 20X optical zoom as well as many other upgraded features). The 570UZ is expencive but shops will soon be selling the older obsoliete 560UZ slightly cheeper. On the other hand any shops that are still stocking the 550UZ will be selling it dirt cheep.
To sumarise the price of the SP560UZ should go down
reply to this comment
To sumarise the price of the SP560UZ should go down
Olympus? Canon? or Panasonic? (dakotamom85 — 12/14/2007)
I like shooting my kids in motion - many times on a playing field/court of one type of sport or another. Had the Canon S2IS and was not pleased with the results. I'm not a professional photographer, just a mom w/an interest in her kids. I am looking at the Canon S5, the Panasonic Lumix F18 and the Olympus SP-560. Which would you recommend would be the easist to use in the sports mode?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/15/2007)
Well, of the three, I've shot with the SP560UZ and once you get your sea legs with it, it's a hell of a camera. You just have prefocus and pan with the action, but nothing new there. that 18x zoom is aces. Presets are the strength of it. Work holding and firing off a few frames.
reply to this comment
have a coolpix now and sports shots are always blurred. how is the h7 in this respect? (warrior6 — 12/14/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/14/2007)
I don't know if it's the camera so much as it is your technique to be honest. Let me explain. Yes, you're dealing with shutter lag. But that isn't going to change with the H7. Shutter delay is a way of life in point and shoot digital cameras. But the good news is that the delay is lessening as the technology matures. And what's interesting is, that DSLRs dont' have a lag issue at all. Or, it's nearly non existent.
The good news is that according to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
Meantime, there are also other tips to speed up your performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Make these a habitual part of your technique and you'll cut your shutter lag by as much as 80% no matter what camera you use (except for DSLRs, of course, since they don't have the lag).
Now, if you want greater zoom range. Then we can talk the H7. Course, I'd rather talk the SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
The good news is that according to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
Meantime, there are also other tips to speed up your performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Make these a habitual part of your technique and you'll cut your shutter lag by as much as 80% no matter what camera you use (except for DSLRs, of course, since they don't have the lag).
Now, if you want greater zoom range. Then we can talk the H7. Course, I'd rather talk the SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
warrior6 (12/20/2007)
James, What a great rundown! I appreciate your expertise and response. I probably missstated my question so let me clarify. My Coolpix has no image stab. I do shoot in the sports mode and any subject movement blurs even if the camera is on a tripod. I liked Nikon products as I still have my old FE SLR which I purchased while stationed in Germany and while it is excellent I had hoped to move to a digital 'advanced' or SLR and give the L1 to my wife for pics of the grandkids etc. I have researched quite a bit and am leaning toward the Canon G9. I can't seem to find a reasonably priced Nikon with image stabilization. I truly appreciate the depth and candor of your response and look forward to your thoughts on my dilema and planned purchase.
Dave
reply to this comment
Dave
by James DeRuvo (12/21/2007)
Thanks Colonel. The G9 is a great camera, but if you're only shooting snapshots it may be overkill for the price. It has 12MP resolution, but for snapshots you'll never really see the benefit of those 12 MP unless you're enlarging to above 8x10. It's kinda like having a Lamborghini and driving on US freeways. It's cool to have, but you never really experience the benefit. Great camera though.
Nikon has several models ( nikonusa.com/announcement_c... ) which incorporate optical image stabilization. The G9 equivalent is the P5100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). But there's also the S510, S700, S51 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the L15 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to name a few.
reply to this comment
Nikon has several models ( nikonusa.com/announcement_c... ) which incorporate optical image stabilization. The G9 equivalent is the P5100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). But there's also the S510, S700, S51 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the L15 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to name a few.
warrior6 (12/31/2007)
Thanks for your help James, I am going to continue my search and have included the Lumix FZ 18, Sony H7 etc...have a great New Year.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/03/2008)
One thing, Colonel, unless your camera has a larger CCD, 12 MP may give you more noise than you bargain for. Check out this article ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) which puts forth the argument that more MP in a point and shoot camera is not necessarily better. The argument stems from dividing the chip into smaller and smaller pixels making it less sensitive to light and as such, inviting more noise.
reply to this comment
FZ 18 Vs. the Olympus 560? (gwbryson — 12/09/2007)
I am going to purchase a new digital extended zoom camera and I am considering the FZ-18 or the Olympus 560. Which is the better camera? I have also looked at the Canon S5IS, but it only has 12X zoom. Suggestions? Comments?
I am currently using an Olympus 740.
Thanks!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
reply to this comment
I am currently using an Olympus 740.
Thanks!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Andrew Skinner (12/11/2007)
Greg,
I would go with the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The 18x zoom will make a huge difference over a 12x zoom camera, and it also has an amazing ISO range. Being able to shoot down to 50 for amazing contrast, and up to 3200 for low light settings is a great option. The manual exposure ability is also a great feature. This camera will give you great flexibility and you should be used to the user interface since it should be similar to your current camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I would go with the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The 18x zoom will make a huge difference over a 12x zoom camera, and it also has an amazing ISO range. Being able to shoot down to 50 for amazing contrast, and up to 3200 for low light settings is a great option. The manual exposure ability is also a great feature. This camera will give you great flexibility and you should be used to the user interface since it should be similar to your current camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
gwbryson (12/15/2007)
Andrew,
How does the Olympus SP-560 compare to the Panasonic FZ-18?
Thanks
Greg
reply to this comment
How does the Olympus SP-560 compare to the Panasonic FZ-18?
Thanks
Greg
Andrew Skinner (12/17/2007)
Greg,
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough in my first answer. I feel that the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a better choice over the Panasonic FZ18 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for what I would use it for. The wider range of ISO settings (50-3200 vs 100-1600) makes the camera more versatile in low light settings (higher ISO), as well as capturing great color contrast (lower ISO). Please let us know if you have any other questions.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough in my first answer. I feel that the Olympus SP-560 UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a better choice over the Panasonic FZ18 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for what I would use it for. The wider range of ISO settings (50-3200 vs 100-1600) makes the camera more versatile in low light settings (higher ISO), as well as capturing great color contrast (lower ISO). Please let us know if you have any other questions.
Andrew
gwbryson (12/18/2007)
Andrew,
Thanks for your input.
I have not been able to locate a Panasonic FZ-18 to lay hands on. But , I have had a chance to hold and play with a 560 and the S5IS.
Greg
reply to this comment
Thanks for your input.
I have not been able to locate a Panasonic FZ-18 to lay hands on. But , I have had a chance to hold and play with a 560 and the S5IS.
Greg
Andrew Skinner (12/18/2007)
Greg,
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any more questions.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any more questions.
Andrew
bob (03/14/2008)
Hi the panasonic is better i sold my sp550 as it was rubbish in low light and over all the panasonic has the best over all zoom out of any digital camera. I wish i never got the sp550
reply to this comment
bob (03/14/2008)
Right im going to say what i think about the two cameras the panasonic fz18 and the olympus sp550uz same as the 560uz just one is 7.1mp an the other is 8.1. I use to have a panasonic fz10 12 optical 4mp so i thought i was upgrading to the olympus sp 550 but the old fz10 took better pictures and it was way better at night shots. I had the sp550 for 11months and i was never really happy with the photo quality so i just got the new panasonic fz18 so i sold the sp550 and used that money to get fz18 so before i sent it away the sp550 i took some photos standing at a point that i would remember so i could compare when i got the new camera now the new fz18 has 115x zoom and the sp550 has 100x zoom and the fz 18 wins on zoom with photos side by side, the picture quality i would have thought the sp550 would be better but the fz 18 had better colour and looked less pixelated which suprise me as to use the extend zoom on the fz18 it drops down to 3mp but even still it was better photo quality than the sp550. The flash is much more powerful on the fz 18 so if you want a camera that takes good pictures anytime then go for the fz18 if you just want a camera that looks pretty but takes more bad photos most of the time go for the sp550. one more thing the manual focuss on the sp550 was just a waste of time on the fz18 this has a joy stick and the manual focuss works and you can switch from mf to af at a press of a button. Now there is pros and cons with both cameras but that another story so dont be fooled by the olympus name like i was if you want good photos easy features go for the Panasonic fz18. i hopes this helps people trying to decide and end up saving you some money thanks for your time.
reply to this comment
dyeo66 (04/24/2008)
I agree with Bob, both cameras have their own highs and lows....i opted for the lumix fz18.....am enjoying every moment with it and m still discovering different ways to improve my picture quality though i can safely use the iA which works very well. I m toying with the manual function and testing it out on the various apertures and shutter speed.....simply wonderful....the macro is fantastic.....the zoom works well and fast....less noise on the motor....i like the strong flash as well though i hardly need to use it as my pix comes out beautifully without the flash unless i need to take some shots in the dark.....and the big plus here is the movie function...wow....thats what i can say about it!
reply to this comment
I am in desperate need of a new digital camera, but my expectations are higher now than with my last camera. (byrne1998 — 12/05/2007)
My old camera (now broken) was a Fujifilm FinePix E550. I liked it just fine when I first got it years ago but now I need more. First, I need a camera that takes great pictures from a distance inside (no more dark pictures). Second, I need better zoom. Third, I would like to be able to take a picture of my kids jumping off the blocks at swim meets and actually get them jumping off the block not when they land in the water. I've have been looking now for weeks - can't figure out which one would fit me best. I do have a telephoto and wideangle lens for the E550. It would be nice to be able to use them on my new camera (if possible - but not a necessity). I am pretty sure I have considered every camera under the sun. Really need some help!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/08/2007)
Well, if you have higher expectations, perhaps you should be looking at a better quality camera. Fujis are fine for your average shutter bug, but it sounds to me like you may be ready to make the leap away from an entry level SLR. Take a look at the Canon 40D. I know, you want to use those same lenses, but trust me, you're better off selling them on eBay and getting the superior glass that Canon's opticss provide. If you have the budget.
For sports, there's nothing better than that Canon. It's why it's the camera of choice on the sidelines.
reply to this comment
For sports, there's nothing better than that Canon. It's why it's the camera of choice on the sidelines.
byrne1998 (12/08/2007)
I am just not ready to go there - Canon 40D. At some point I would love to buy one, but right now my kids are 6, 4 and 2. They are the ones that broke the last camera. I am looking more at the point and shoot with some manual settings. There are just so many to choose from. I have considered the Sony Cybershot S5, Canon Powershot H9. I just tried my friends Panasonic Lumix. I didn't like the image stabilization, but liked the fact I could use the camera inside without a flash. I would kind of like the choice of keeping it simple with a point and shoot, but still have the ability to play around with shots when I have the extra time (which is not a a lot). Any other suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/11/2007)
I appreciate that. Can I toss one more into the mix? Check out the Olympus SP 560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's a fun camera and has a great 18x super zoom, IS, and a myriad of functions.
reply to this comment
byrne1998 (12/11/2007)
Thank you again for your response. But...I just tried a Nikon D40 and I loved it. How would you compare the Nikon D40 to the Olympus SP560? My major problem with the Panasonic was I couldn't seem to get a clear picture when using the zoom feature. Would I have this same problem with the Olympus? Do you have to worry about image stabilization when purchasing a SLR camera? One would think this would be an easy process!!! It's not. Do you know of any camera shops that would let you try before you buy? While waiting for a response to this question I will read more about the Olympus camera. I just read some more about the Olympus. I like the bright capture feature and the blur feature (can't remember what it is called). The Olympus might be just what I am looking for. I would still like to hear your thoughts about the Nikon. Would you ever consider buying a camera on ebay?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/12/2007)
Oh there is no comparison. The D40 (or it's newer brother the D80) is a much better choice. DSLRs always are. But some shy away from the price tag and still want a good long zoom range. As such, the 560UZ is a great middle choice between the point and shoot world and the DSLR world. But if you have the opportunity and the budget to go "all in" on SLR photography, Nikon is a superior option simply because of the lenses they offer and that the camera is backwards compatible with older lenses on manual (there are some lenses professionals have used for 40 years or longer and they refuse to get rid of them that's how good Nikon's glass is).
As for IS, it's a great feature. But cameras have taken great pictures without it for 100 years. Don't let it be a deal breaker. Buying a camera on eBay can be a great option. But you have to watch the feedback ratings to be safe or you can get taken.
As for trying before you buy, many mom and pop stores will rent you a camera and then take the rental fee off the purchase price if you buy from them.
reply to this comment
As for IS, it's a great feature. But cameras have taken great pictures without it for 100 years. Don't let it be a deal breaker. Buying a camera on eBay can be a great option. But you have to watch the feedback ratings to be safe or you can get taken.
As for trying before you buy, many mom and pop stores will rent you a camera and then take the rental fee off the purchase price if you buy from them.
byrne1998 (12/12/2007)
Thank you for the information. I think I am just going to bite the bullet and go for the Nikon. After I tried one this past Saturday - I really think this is the best route for me. Thank you.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/12/2007)
Sounds like a great idea. Make sure that whatever lens(es) you get with it, that you also buy a 1A skylight filter for each one you get. Reason being? Insurance. They will take any impact damage and spare your lens. I can't tell you many times I have thrashed a 1A filter and saved my camera lens. It's well worth the $20 or so, believe me.
reply to this comment
need a wide-angle 28mm to 210mm, do you have any digital cameras with these specifications, or close to it? (priceinteriors — 11/28/2007)
I am an interior designer and need the wide angle for interior shots, but want the versatility of a zoom for vacation outdoor shots.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/28/2007)
Well, the SP560UZ that you reference uses an 18x zoom which is the equivalent to 28-504mm. Another option is Canon's 12x S5IS which has the optical equivalent of 36-432mm.
reply to this comment
priceinteriors (11/28/2007)
What are the costs of both cameras?
reply to this comment
priceinteriors (11/28/2007)
Thanks, I got the prices.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/29/2007)
Good. BTW if you got the answer you needed, could you use the mark as best answer icon to move this question to the answered pile? That helps keep the site updated.
reply to this comment
Olympus sp-560 vs. Canon S5IS? (ianski — 11/27/2007)
I like the feel and look of the SP-560 but will I miss the stereo video and flash hotshoe of the Canon? Does the difference between 12 x and 18x zoom make a real impact? Cannot decide!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/27/2007)
Well, you're talking about having about 50% more focal length with that SP560. That's quite a difference, IMHO. I have the SP560UZ and so far I've been quite pleased with it.
But if having the stereo video and flash hotshoe is an important feature for you, then I would look in that direction, personally.
reply to this comment
But if having the stereo video and flash hotshoe is an important feature for you, then I would look in that direction, personally.
ianski (11/28/2007)
Thanks James...I am leaning the way of the Olympus. Tell me, do you find the inbuilt flash of the SP560 adequate?
Cheers,
ianski
reply to this comment
Cheers,
ianski
by James DeRuvo (11/28/2007)
So far. But with the understanding going in that even a superzoom flash has a fairly limited range. You're not going to be taking flash shots from 30 feet away without compensating for it.
reply to this comment
the camera is switched on but the screen is completely blank. What should i do??? (harrypotter — 11/27/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/27/2007)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Also, you may want to contact Canon to see if there's a service advisory for this issue. Although your model is not included in it, it sounds alot like what one of a host of cameras have suffered from a faulty CCD chip. Check out this ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) from Canon regarding it.
Affected products:
- Camcorders: ZR60, ZR65 MC, ZR70 MC, ZR80, ZR85, ZR90, ELURA 40 MC, ELURA 50
- Digital Cameras A60, A70, A75, A300, A310, S230, SD100, SD110, A40(*), A80(*), A85(*), A95(*), S1 IS(*), S60(*), S200(*), S330(*), S400(*), S410(*), S500(*)
Malfunction:
It has been confirmed that the connecting parts of the internal wiring of the CCD used in affected products may become disconnected, especially if the affected products are stored or used in high-temperature and high-humidity environments. If this occurs, the signal is not output from the CCD normally in Shooting Mode, which may cause a distorted image or the absence of an image. This malfunction can be confirmed on the LCD monitor screen during shooting. The same malfunction also appears on the recorded image.
Canon's Response:
Effective immediately, and regardless of warranty status, Canon will repair, free of charge, the products listed above exhibiting the above-mentioned malfunction if Canon determines that the malfunction is caused by the CCD image sensor. Canon will also cover the cost of shipping and handling in connection with this repair.
So the good news is that Canon will fix it for FREE:
U.S. residents are kindly directed to contact the Canon Customer Support Center for further assistance at 1-800-828-4040. Support hours are Monday thru Friday - 8:00 AM to 12:00 midnight; and Saturday 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM (all times EST). Alternatively, if electronic support is preferred, please send your email to carecenter@cits.canon.com
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Also, you may want to contact Canon to see if there's a service advisory for this issue. Although your model is not included in it, it sounds alot like what one of a host of cameras have suffered from a faulty CCD chip. Check out this ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) from Canon regarding it.
Affected products:
- Camcorders: ZR60, ZR65 MC, ZR70 MC, ZR80, ZR85, ZR90, ELURA 40 MC, ELURA 50
- Digital Cameras A60, A70, A75, A300, A310, S230, SD100, SD110, A40(*), A80(*), A85(*), A95(*), S1 IS(*), S60(*), S200(*), S330(*), S400(*), S410(*), S500(*)
Malfunction:
It has been confirmed that the connecting parts of the internal wiring of the CCD used in affected products may become disconnected, especially if the affected products are stored or used in high-temperature and high-humidity environments. If this occurs, the signal is not output from the CCD normally in Shooting Mode, which may cause a distorted image or the absence of an image. This malfunction can be confirmed on the LCD monitor screen during shooting. The same malfunction also appears on the recorded image.
Canon's Response:
Effective immediately, and regardless of warranty status, Canon will repair, free of charge, the products listed above exhibiting the above-mentioned malfunction if Canon determines that the malfunction is caused by the CCD image sensor. Canon will also cover the cost of shipping and handling in connection with this repair.
So the good news is that Canon will fix it for FREE:
U.S. residents are kindly directed to contact the Canon Customer Support Center for further assistance at 1-800-828-4040. Support hours are Monday thru Friday - 8:00 AM to 12:00 midnight; and Saturday 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM (all times EST). Alternatively, if electronic support is preferred, please send your email to carecenter@cits.canon.com
Kirk (12/06/2007)
I have the Black Screen of death. Tech Support does not care. Pay to fix it or throw it in the junk and avoid the PowerShot. Beware.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/08/2007)
Well, from their perspective, the warranty is expired. However, if you bought this camera with a credit card, all may not be lost. Contact your credit card company and see if there is an extended warranty benefit for using the card for the purchase. If so, you may still be able to have it fixed on their dime, not yours.
reply to this comment
Grisel Alfaro (12/29/2007)
I have the same problem, black screen! I just called the company and gave me two options: send back for repairs (won't know the cost until they see it) or exchange for a refurbished S3 which it will cost me $185. Anyone has any opinion on what will be better. Is the refurbished S3 worth the money?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/31/2007)
GO WITH THE S3. Or better yet, take that $185 and invest toward either the S5 or another model like perhaps the Olympus SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
Am I better getting the Olympus sp-560 camera over the Canon S5IS? (ianski — 11/26/2007)
I like the feel and look of the SP-560 but will I miss the stereo video and flash hotshoe of the Canon? Does the difference between 12 x and 18x zoom make a real impact? Cannot decide!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/27/2007)
I don't think so, and I own the SP560. But if you would miss the stereo video and need the flash hotshoe, then even I would sacrifice the SP in favor of the S5. And I like my 560.
reply to this comment
TOZER (02/25/2008)
the SP 570 UZ has just been released so the SP 560 UZ will be dirt cheep soon
reply to this comment
How does the image quality on this compare to the Canon A720 IS? (Thomas S. — 11/12/2007)
I am trying to decide which camera to buy. I like the optical viewfinder on the A720 IS, but I can live without it on the SX100 IS, because it has a long zoom. How does the image quality compare on these cameras (in low light, good light, etc.)?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/13/2007)
They're about equal up to 8x10s size photos. It's only when you go above 8x10 that you'll see that extra MP assert itself. The benefit, however, of the SX100 is the greater focal length. 36-300 vs. 35-210 respectively. It's also a faster lens at the extreme range. But only slightly.
reply to this comment
Thomas S. (11/13/2007)
I thought they were both 8 megapixels. And I thought the SX100 IS had a focal length of 36-360 (10x).
How does the colored fringing and noise compare in these cameras?
reply to this comment
How does the colored fringing and noise compare in these cameras?
Donna111 (12/28/2007)
Can anyone tell me which is best in low or fire/candle light and fast moving horses? Thanks!
reply to this comment
Thomas S. (01/02/2008)
Actually, once I've done more research, I think the SX100 IS is better in low light. Plus, the extra zoom will help with shooting far away action.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/03/2008)
You think that's good, check out the 18x on Olympus' SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I've been using one for about 3 months now and have gotten some great shots from far off. Took some shots at the San Diego Wild Animal Park that look like I was on Safari in the Kalahari.
reply to this comment
Donna111 (01/03/2008)
Thanks Thomas !!!
reply to this comment
Thanks Thomas !!!
Is this the best 18x zoom? What about lens quality. (bernz24 — 11/03/2007)
I'm ready to buy this camera. Is it better than the Fuji s8000? Is there any other fixed lens I should consider?
reply to this comment
marc850 (11/04/2007)
I think that when you compare the features and mode settings to the competition you'll find that 560 is superior. The wide angle(27mm) to full zoom(486) lens provides more usefullness. The wider lens is great for those using this camera for indoor photography as you won't leave Aunt Sally out of the picture anymore. Since the 560 has only been in the stores for a few weeks there aren't many useful reviews using production models(most reviewed the pre-production models). Also, you'll see reviews focused on the previous modes deficiencies which this model has cured. I compared all the available super-zoom models and quickly narrowed the field without regard for price - which always fluctuates and eventually falls anyway. The Olympus SP-560 came away as the best of the pack in my book. The number of super-zooms is growing quickly but you will find that some may not stand the test of time. There are several sites out there in which you can enter cameras that you want to compare head-to-head. It is very important that you touch and feel each model during your selection process to get a good idea of both quality and ease of use. Remember though, you will become accustomed to every function and feature after ownership so don't worry too much about the foreignness of the programs and button array. For best selection of a super-zoom write down any important features that you are looking for and go compare in person the few models that meet your demands. Lastly, look for the best deal wherever. Good luck!
reply to this comment
bernz24 (11/05/2007)
Thank you. It's good to get corroboration plus very good reasoning. Just one bit of advice please. I was going to go for the lowest online price but I'm wavering toward my local mom and pop store which took time to advise me and will phone when the 560 arrives. My local chain just said they don't have it and hung up! At least I can feel the camera at mom and pop. I figure to go with them if they are anywhere near in price. Any thoughts?
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (11/16/2007)
I had the SP-550. It is a good camera, but focuses slowly, especially in dim light. Now I have the SP-560. It focuses faster. It also has face detection, which is useful for getting properly exposed portrait shots. The Fuji S8000fd is slightly cheaper, but doesn't have RAW mode, and doesn't take filters or teleconverters. It looks and feels a lot like the SP-560, though. The Panasonic FZ-18 has a very good lens with outstanding resolution (better than the SP-560), but doesn't do quite as well in low light and isn't built as sturdily. It also seems to be harder to get. I handled it yesterday at a local Costco. It does focus fast, but I like the feel of the SP-560 better. You can go to www.dcresource.com or www.steves-digicams.com for full reviews of the SP-560 and FZ-18.
reply to this comment
bernz24 (11/16/2007)
Thank you so much for the info. Much appreciated. Will check out reviews but it looks like the 560.
reply to this comment
seamus (11/30/2007)
can anyone tell me what advantage an additional telephoto lens is? im confused with this. thanks
reply to this comment
Tigervyh (12/23/2007)
Additional telephoto lens is just what it is. It gives you additional focal length on the telephoto end! Say with a 1.7x telephoto converter attached, you'll get 1.7x the original focal length of your lens, say the max. telephoto end of the 560 is 486mm, you'll be able to get 1.7 x 486mm = 826mm equivalent! (And that's optical Zoom, not digital!)
reply to this comment
pepper (12/29/2007)
Greetings. Since i'm a compact camera user, i would need some advice, cuz im looking to buy one of these two: SONY H9 or Olympus UZ 560! I read pretty much of reviews for both of them, but i still cant figure out which of them is better. Always been convinced of Sony's quality and performance, but something pulls me the to Oly UZ 560. The only thing that bothers me about H9 is that it has a expensive battery, in case i need to buy a new one. The UZ 560 has standard AA batteries which are cheap and seem more practical to replace. I'm looking for brilliant pic quality, good flash for lowlight pics, camera durability and PC compability. So help me out, if anyone can tell me anything useful, i would appreciate it. Thank you:)
reply to this comment
JonBoy (01/18/2008)
i have it for two days and took 400 pictures on it already with a 2 gig xd card. amazing pics! you'll never be dissappointed with this camera.
reply to this comment
camera for family photos (anonymous — 11/03/2007)
looking for a good camera for both photos & videos for a family
Simple to use
any price
reply to this comment
Simple to use
any price
by James DeRuvo (11/06/2007)
Do you want a compact one? One with a large zoom to shoot sporting events? I think that Canon's SD ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) line is a great option for compact cameras. I like the SuperZoom of the Olympus SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) line for shooting good solid zoom sports shots - but it's a tad on the hefty side.
reply to this comment
TOZER (02/25/2008)
if you really just want a camera for family pics then you are probably best off with a compact camera, get one you can trial run to see how easy it is to use.
WARNING: compact cameras often have rediculasly complicated menu systems and are impossable to use
if you want a camera for more than just family pictures and are a compatant user you could get a bridge camera (£120 - £350). Bridge cameras produce better quality images then compact cameras. Bridge cameras also have better zoom as we all know what it is like pointing a compact camera at a subject and the image produced looks like its miles away. Most bridge cameras will have an electronic view finder, usefull for taking pictures on bright summer days etc.
The OLYMPUS SP 560 UZ is about £200 if you know where to go (the 570 has just been released so bargins might be obtainable)
Fujifilm make a cheep model £140
reply to this comment
WARNING: compact cameras often have rediculasly complicated menu systems and are impossable to use
if you want a camera for more than just family pictures and are a compatant user you could get a bridge camera (£120 - £350). Bridge cameras produce better quality images then compact cameras. Bridge cameras also have better zoom as we all know what it is like pointing a compact camera at a subject and the image produced looks like its miles away. Most bridge cameras will have an electronic view finder, usefull for taking pictures on bright summer days etc.
The OLYMPUS SP 560 UZ is about £200 if you know where to go (the 570 has just been released so bargins might be obtainable)
Fujifilm make a cheep model £140
TOZER (02/25/2008)
In terms of video...
get a camcorder if you really want video, otherwise don't bother with a normal camera.
the SP 560 UZ produces ok movies but they are not that satisfying to watch. (if you want to see a sample e-mail me s.o.u.r.i@hotmail.com)
Compact cameras typically produce naff videos with appalling sound
better off with pictures...
reply to this comment
get a camcorder if you really want video, otherwise don't bother with a normal camera.
the SP 560 UZ produces ok movies but they are not that satisfying to watch. (if you want to see a sample e-mail me s.o.u.r.i@hotmail.com)
Compact cameras typically produce naff videos with appalling sound
better off with pictures...
IS THERE ANOTHER MODEL THAT REPLACES THE C-770 MODEL (OLLEE7 — 10/24/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/26/2007)
You bet. Two. The Olympus SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Olympus SP550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The 560 is the upgrade of the 550, going from 7.1 to 8.0 MP. I have both, just starting to use the 560. I've been very happy with my 550UZ, once I passed the learning curve. Good long zoom, nice, sharp pictures, and great action settings.
reply to this comment
OLLEE7 (10/26/2007)
which one replaces the olympus c-770? that is comprable to it ?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/29/2007)
I just mentioned them.
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (10/29/2007)
The C-770 was 4 megapixels, proprietary battery, 10X optical zoom and kind of small, I think. Since that time, Olympus has put out other superzooms, the SP series. The first two, the SP-500 and SP-510, were 6 and 7 megapixels, with unstabilized images. The last two, the SP-550 and SP-560, were both 18X optical zoom with optically and digitally stabilized images. All of them use AA batteries. What's the big deal about optical image stabilization? It lets you get sharp images despite camera shake due to shaky hands or slow shutter speed. The SP-550 is now selling cheaply, close to $300 online. It was the pioneer 18X superzoom. The newest model, the 560 is a slight upgrade to the 550. It has face detection and another megapixel and maybe faster focusing. All these cameras are bigger than the C-770.
reply to this comment
OLLEE7 (10/30/2007)
THANKS FOR THE INFO
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/30/2007)
Gee, Rob, I thought I said that. :P
reply to this comment
Rob Fieser (10/30/2007)
You did. Thanks.
reply to this comment
OLLEE7 (10/31/2007)
i know you mention them but rob's answer clarified for me better .. but thanks for your help too
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/01/2007)
Glad we could, Colleen. We're all here to help. That Rob's explaination further clarified for you makes it worthy of the points. The bottom line is answering the question to your satisfaction.
Well done, Rob. I was just being playful.
reply to this comment
Well done, Rob. I was just being playful.
Same lens & sensor as Fuji S8000fd and does it zoom in movie mode? (Psmith30 — 10/22/2007)
Looking at specifications the lens and sensor seem like the same as in the Fuji S8000fd. The few reviews I have seen of the Fuji S8000fd say the picture quality is good, if lens and sensor are the same then hoping for similar results with the Olympus 560.
Does the optical zoom work (with or without sound) in the movie mode? Don't believe the optical zoom works in movie mode on the Fuji S800fd.
reply to this comment
Does the optical zoom work (with or without sound) in the movie mode? Don't believe the optical zoom works in movie mode on the Fuji S800fd.
by James DeRuvo (10/26/2007)
The manual ( olympusamerica.com/files/SP... ) states:
"When [R] (movies) is set to [ON], optical zoom cannot be used during the shooting.
g “R (movies) Recording sound with movies” (P.33)
• To zoom in when [R] (movies) is set to [ON], set [DIGITAL ZOOM] to [ON].
g “DIGITAL ZOOM Zooming in on your subject” (P.28)"
So, you can't really zoom while you are shooting with sound. Only digitally, which isn't really zooming at all, it's simply blowing up the pixels in the image - badly distorting the quality and making the camera shake more pronounced.
reply to this comment
"When [R] (movies) is set to [ON], optical zoom cannot be used during the shooting.
g “R (movies) Recording sound with movies” (P.33)
• To zoom in when [R] (movies) is set to [ON], set [DIGITAL ZOOM] to [ON].
g “DIGITAL ZOOM Zooming in on your subject” (P.28)"
So, you can't really zoom while you are shooting with sound. Only digitally, which isn't really zooming at all, it's simply blowing up the pixels in the image - badly distorting the quality and making the camera shake more pronounced.
Olympus SP-560 UZ Reviews
Olympus SP-560 UZ Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
Poorly Engineered - ZOOM ERROR!!!
(John — 11/26/2009)
Barely used this camera and in no time got the dreaded "zoom error". This was second Olympus, and last. Wasn't two weeks past the warranty when it died and of course, NOlympus won't stand by its product. There's no reason whatsover a camera going through LIGHT use, a wedding here, a school even there, should be a piece of trash after a year. Bought a Canon and have been happy since.
- 2.0 out of 5
Zoom error
(John — 11/02/2009)
Did a lot of research and the SP-560 was highly rated. The camera did well initially, eats batteries like it's going out of style. New rechargeables only last about 20 pictures before needs recharging. Now, I am getting the dreaded "Zoom Error" which seems to plague most of the Nolympus cameras. I don't use my camera that much and it has not been roughed up or used in harsh weather. For the money I spent it should last a very long time... Don't buy it.
- 4.0 out of 5
very nice
(sanjeev — 10/20/2009)
Iam very happy with the photo printers taken from it value for money
- 5.0 out of 5
A good Value for Money !!!
(Amitabh Sharma — 02/07/2009)
I am an Olympus fan basically as they always launch models with AA batteries and this is the most important thing I always look into in any Camera and suggest all my friends to take care of this feature when finalizing any Camera as this is the most useful thing if you don't want to miss any photos of your special occasions and incidents.
Second most important thing for me in any Camera is its optical Zoom (Actual Zoom) and that too with image stabilization feature.
The third and final most important thing for me its wide angel lens (26mm) it is very useful when you have to take a group photo or Landscape photos.
The last but not the least, I give little importance to the resolution as 8 mega pixels is more than sufficient for any person who wants a Camera for his personal and normal use.
I am very happy with the overall performance of Olympus SP-560Z and recommend it to all those people who are looking for some PRICE performance product.
- 5.0 out of 5
Amazing zoom, i love it
(TOZER — 06/18/2008)
The SP 560 UZ is a truely versitile camera. The amazing 18X zoom is, well amazing. You don't have to worry about using a tripod when using that zoom as the image stabilisation is quite incredable. This camera somehow manages to provide some of the highlights of an entry level DSLR with the convenience of a compact camera. Ths SP 560 UZ is extremely convient, it is light wieght, small and fast.
The only problems i can find with the camera are:
Firstly the video. I can't really see the point of video on a camera (get a camcorder), but anyway the video is not too amazing. Its still pretty god but a bit stuttery when adjusting to light and at the end of the day not much use.
Secondly the camera has a great ISO range but anything above 400 ISO is not much use due to grain.
Thirdly the auto focus can be a bit of a pig, a bit slow, touchy etc. There are a few modes of auto focus so you can manipulate it with a bit of patience. The manual focus is not worth mentioning as it is an after thaught and impossabe to use.
Fourthly wideangle pictures are poor reselution
Thease faults would not stick out so much if the camera wasn't such a good all rounder.
My conclusion: A good camera for anyone who gets fed up with the limiations of the compact camera but cannot afford a DSLR or for those who just appreaciate the convience.
