Olympus Stylus 740
Olympus Stylus 740
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the All-Weather Digital Cameras category.
Olympus Stylus 740
Editor's Review
The Olympus Stylus 740 is a great all-weather, splash, dust, and snow proof ultracompact. While it lacks the Dual Image Stabilization that the 750 has, the 740 is a perfect twin otherwise. The 7 megapixel sensor and 5x optical zoom make it a superior choice for consumers looking for big features in a small frame. The 750's IS features will give it a leg up on the 740, though, so check that model out before making a final decision.
Specifications
- 7 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom / 5.6x digital zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- ISO 80-1600
- JPEG file format
- Movie mode with sound
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- Lithium-ion battery
- xD-Picture Card Storage
- Part Number: Stylus 740
- UPC: 050332158382
- Release Date: Sep 01, 2006
Shop for Stylus 740 Accessories
Olympus Stylus 740 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Intermittent PINK Blurred photos (RxseeAnn — 02/27/2008)
The camera intermittently takes PINK BLURRED photos. I default all the options and turn it off and on, eventually it starts operating properly again. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (03/01/2008)
Ann,
Have you dropped this camera? What are the lighting conditions when you take the intermittent blurred photos? If it is a low lighting situation and there is a lot of movement by the subject or photographer, that can cause the issue too (if not using a flash). If this is not the case, I would contact Olympus service suppor ( olympusamerica.com/cpg_sect... ) for a repair or fix. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Have you dropped this camera? What are the lighting conditions when you take the intermittent blurred photos? If it is a low lighting situation and there is a lot of movement by the subject or photographer, that can cause the issue too (if not using a flash). If this is not the case, I would contact Olympus service suppor ( olympusamerica.com/cpg_sect... ) for a repair or fix. Good luck.
Andrew
RxseeAnn (03/05/2008)
Andrew,
The camera is over a year old, and has fallen on occasion, but no, it didn't start the pink thing at that time. Last Saturday the first photo I took was pink (outdoors in sunshine), I took the battery out for 10 seconds & it was fine for the rest of the day. I took your suggestion and looked on the Olympus website. They had no downloads or info about it. Thank you for your reply.
reply to this comment
The camera is over a year old, and has fallen on occasion, but no, it didn't start the pink thing at that time. Last Saturday the first photo I took was pink (outdoors in sunshine), I took the battery out for 10 seconds & it was fine for the rest of the day. I took your suggestion and looked on the Olympus website. They had no downloads or info about it. Thank you for your reply.
LCD Monitor does not come on (Dragula — 12/03/2007)
When I turn on my Stylus 740, the lcd monitor is not coming on. The camera can still take pics and video but the lcd remains off. What is the problem and what can I do?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/03/2007)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to Olympus' website ( olympusamerica.com/ ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
While you're at the site, you may also want to check service advisories for faulty CCD chips and if your camera is on that list. I'm not sure if it is, but if you contact Olympus, a representative will work with you to determine if your product requires service and
to provide you with complete product repair instructions if needed. Reach them at (888)
553-4448, or via e-mail at customersupport@olympus.com
reply to this comment
While you're at the site, you may also want to check service advisories for faulty CCD chips and if your camera is on that list. I'm not sure if it is, but if you contact Olympus, a representative will work with you to determine if your product requires service and
to provide you with complete product repair instructions if needed. Reach them at (888)
553-4448, or via e-mail at customersupport@olympus.com
Dragula (12/04/2007)
Thanks a million my friend. It worked. As soon as I reset the camera the LCD began working again!
Thanks again
reply to this comment
Thanks again
I'm trying to choose between the Stylus 770SW and Canon Powershot SD850 IS (JavaJinx — 09/24/2007)
I like the features of both cameras. The Stylus is more adaptable to my kind of rugged environments but the PowerShot has better picture quality. Which one should I go with?
reply to this comment
Matt (09/26/2007)
I can't believe the 770SW is $350. Am I seeing things correctly? The SD850IS has better picture quality (like you mentioned), is the same size for all purposes, has more resolution, generally better performance (continuous shooting not so much). I can't imagine an environment where suddenly the SD850IS will just break down while the 770SW keeps working. If the 770SW were a good deal cheaper, I'd consider that one but as it stands, the SD850IS is definitely my pick.
reply to this comment
My fiance has a 740. How do you reduce the size of the file when you are sending photos over the e-mail? (bob112 — 05/29/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/29/2007)
Hi Bob,
There are two options:
1. You can reduce the resolution the camera shoots at via the menus on the camera itself (1 megapixel or lower is good for email).
2. You can download a free image editing program like IrfanView ( irfanview.com/ ) and resize them after you've transferred the files to your computer. When you load the photos in IrfanView, simply go to the "Image" menu and then to "Resize/Resample." 640x480 is a pretty standard size to resize to, for email purposes.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
There are two options:
1. You can reduce the resolution the camera shoots at via the menus on the camera itself (1 megapixel or lower is good for email).
2. You can download a free image editing program like IrfanView ( irfanview.com/ ) and resize them after you've transferred the files to your computer. When you load the photos in IrfanView, simply go to the "Image" menu and then to "Resize/Resample." 640x480 is a pretty standard size to resize to, for email purposes.
Hope this helps!
a good camera for a soldier in Iraq (mnero0708 — 05/18/2007)
My boyfriend is a Marine and he is getting deployed to Iraq soon. He wants a digital camera to take with him, but I am afraid to spend too much on a camera that isn't going to last over there.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (05/22/2007)
Hi Michele,
This one is tricky to answer, because personally I'm not sure what cameras are put thru while in this type of service, so it's hard to tell what would survive and what wouldn't. Also, this is a silly question, but would he have access to chargers and all of that, or would a certain type of battery be more preferable to another?
If not, I can point you in two directions. The Canon A-series are nice and rugged and durable (I've dropped mine enough to vouch for that). Something like the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes great photos and is not as delicate as many of the ultracompacts. However, it's NOT an ultracompact, and I'm not sure if size is an issue.
Another thing to look into is the Olympus line. Olympus makes cameras that are waterproof (some can go totally underwater, others are just designed to keep out drips and drops) and shock proof, which can be great when they're getting slung around. Image quality may not be as high as Canon in low light situations, but in outdoor shots you should be happy, and the fact that the bodies are built to stand abuse may make these the best choice for you. The Stylus 770sw ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the most hardcore of these- it's freezeproof, waterproof, crush proof and claims you can drop it from five feet.
The other Olympus Stylus models, while they aren't as hardcore as the 770 (can't go underwater, etc.), have nice durable bodies as well and aren't so expensive- they are labeled as 'weatherproof' and can also stand some dings. The 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are both good choices.
reply to this comment
This one is tricky to answer, because personally I'm not sure what cameras are put thru while in this type of service, so it's hard to tell what would survive and what wouldn't. Also, this is a silly question, but would he have access to chargers and all of that, or would a certain type of battery be more preferable to another?
If not, I can point you in two directions. The Canon A-series are nice and rugged and durable (I've dropped mine enough to vouch for that). Something like the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes great photos and is not as delicate as many of the ultracompacts. However, it's NOT an ultracompact, and I'm not sure if size is an issue.
Another thing to look into is the Olympus line. Olympus makes cameras that are waterproof (some can go totally underwater, others are just designed to keep out drips and drops) and shock proof, which can be great when they're getting slung around. Image quality may not be as high as Canon in low light situations, but in outdoor shots you should be happy, and the fact that the bodies are built to stand abuse may make these the best choice for you. The Stylus 770sw ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the most hardcore of these- it's freezeproof, waterproof, crush proof and claims you can drop it from five feet.
The other Olympus Stylus models, while they aren't as hardcore as the 770 (can't go underwater, etc.), have nice durable bodies as well and aren't so expensive- they are labeled as 'weatherproof' and can also stand some dings. The 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are both good choices.
mnero0708 (05/24/2007)
thank you so much! He told mr charging a battery would be ok over there and regular batteries work too! so i am definitly going for one that can be dropped and kicked and if it can keep water out i think sand wouldn't be a problem either!!! thanks again!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (05/24/2007)
You're welcome. I bought the same one for my boyfriend, incidentally, because he drives semi trucks and his camera takes a beating. It has lived up to it so far. =)
reply to this comment
Dave (05/30/2007)
I carried the same little Minolta the last three trips, but the sand and dust finally killed it about half way through the last trip. I'm trying to decide between the Canon SD1000 and the Olympus 770SW myself. I like the Canon line better, and they have a steel body. But I'm thinking if the Olympus is waterproof it has to be sand proof, or at least I think that makes sense. It would be nice not to have to worry about the couple of rains you'll typically see in 7 months, and not having to worry about bumping into things would be good too!
reply to this comment
Kelli (05/20/2008)
Thanks for the info, Brenda. I am in a similar situation as Michele. I think I'll buy him the Olympus. I would think by now, the digital camera industry would catch on to this dilemma and start marketing a camera to suit all situations that troops my find themselves in while deployed.
reply to this comment
Lightest Backpacking Camera (PaddyKevin — 04/11/2007)
I am looking for a light weigth water resistant digital camera to use on hiking trips where every ounce counts. Do you have a recommendation?
reply to this comment
Joe (04/12/2007)
I would have to recommend this hot new camera the Olympus Stylus 770 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has great durability and a waterproof body. It is a bit bigger than some other tiny point and shoot cameras (at 155g (5.5 oz) without a battery) but it makes up for it in durability. It takes great pictures too. Plus it has the new Hypercrystal LCD making it easier to see in sun lit exterior situations. A big plus. If you are looking for something a nig cheaper i would suggest taking a look at the digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... 740 aka the older model of this new camera.
Good luck.
reply to this comment
Good luck.
Nadz (03/11/2008)
5.5 is heavy. There are several cameras under 5 oz, including the totally waterproof pentax cameras.
reply to this comment
Ranger G (08/13/2008)
I have one of these and it is the worst of 4 cameras I've had of the point n shoot variety. I consistently had to stop down the exposure in normal daylight and after about 15 months, it flat crapped out, turning all pictures into a slushy pink mess. Carrying it in an exterior pocket of a high quality goretex raincoat during rainstorms proved that it is not really water resistant. All in all, a mediocre camera. Have had much better luck with Nikon Coolpix although they are not touted as being weather resistant. This Olympus is my LAST Olympus.
reply to this comment
RxseeAnn (08/13/2008)
I sent my Stylus 740 back to Olympus for repair. They gave no information on what was done, but the pink blurred photo trouble has cleared up. Reading another question about unable to see the display outdoors, well I did buy a hood for it, but it does not help. While talking to a Rep at a camera store he said nothing will help because the display is just not bright enough.
reply to this comment
Rickshaw (08/18/2008)
I have been using mine in the ocean, not at depth, and so far it is superb. At $200 it is a bargain!
reply to this comment
is there a hood for viewfinder to see images under daylight conditions? (photohappy — 02/28/2007)
I can't see the image to be photographed in the screen when shooting in bright daylight. It is too dim to see on the stylus 740.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (02/28/2007)
Nope.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (03/02/2007)
If you can't find a hood that is made specially for this, you can tape a piece of light cardboard over the screen in a hood shape. Ghetto, but it does work!
reply to this comment
bakhtin (03/23/2007)
Delkin makes a screen shade/protector. Haven't tried it, but it's out there.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/22/2007)
Try these guys ... ( hoodman.com )
reply to this comment
Huge doubt buying pentax T10 or Canon A540... (sgstyla — 12/17/2006)
I`m going on a holiday to Egypt, so a lot of pictures are going to be taken. I don`t know much about digital camera`s... so maybe somebody could help me out !
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
reply to this comment
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
Ben Keough (12/18/2006)
Hi Steven,
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Thank you for answering Ben. I`ve checked them but they both need 4x AA.... I don`t find this very convenient. Today i went to the store to check some other ones.... The olympus MJU740 what is your opinion about this one ?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Steven,
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Ey Ben,
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
reply to this comment
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Steven,
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
reply to this comment
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Ben,
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
reply to this comment
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Yo Steven,
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
reply to this comment
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
OK ! You made a point here.... Thanks for helping me out and probably a lot more people too !
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
reply to this comment
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
No problem. Hope whichever one you choose works out for you. Let us know how it goes!
reply to this comment
sgstyla (12/21/2006)
The A710 IS has been ordered, I`ll definately share my experiences after my holiday !
reply to this comment
Val (02/17/2007)
Hi ! I was actually just looking at those cameras myself ! I was wondering how it went with the canon (Steven !) and Ben, is there any other cameras that came out since that could be added to the list ?
Thanks heaps
Val
reply to this comment
Thanks heaps
Val
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
Hi Val,
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
reply to this comment
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
Val (02/17/2007)
Hi Richio !
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
reply to this comment
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
Hi Val,
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
reply to this comment
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
sgstyla (02/18/2007)
Hi Val,
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
reply to this comment
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
Rich Watson (02/18/2007)
Hi Steve,
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
reply to this comment
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
Val (02/18/2007)
Hello guys !
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
reply to this comment
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
sgstyla (02/21/2007)
Hahahaha.... I think I have the good batteries but not the best charger ;) It's an old one.... the batteries are 3200mAh NI-MH. Val Good luck with the Panasonic. Hope the camera will provide your wishes. Where in Europe are you heading too ? I`m from Holland, maybe you`ll need some tips ?!
StevoOo...
reply to this comment
StevoOo...
Rich Watson (02/21/2007)
Who made the 3200 mAh? I mean, the brand? I haven't seen any that large.
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
reply to this comment
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
Val (02/21/2007)
Hihi :o) No thanks Steven, I am from France (and Switzerland) myself... Should be better to visit our friends first before they kill us (it's been 4 years we are in Australia, and they've never seen the 2 kids we got since) !! Thanks Richio for the tip about the battery charger. We have an old camera that takes AAs, we may purchase one !!
Val
reply to this comment
Val
WiccaMan (NZ) (02/22/2007)
Well I knew nothing about cameras when I got mine. The only things I knew were
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
reply to this comment
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
grace (03/25/2007)
well after reading all of your comments i am confused as to where to go from here. I was nearly sold on the panasonic fx07 till now. The main features that i am concerned with are macro lens, i photograph lots of small gemstones and need crispness and acurate color. I also want a fast burst feature as i always seem to miss the shots with my now very outdated canon A300. But i am traveller and on the road heaps so i need small and convenient. I am going to look up this canon a710 now but after how my a300 deteriorated after a few years i am a bit skeptical. I want a good price, but can spend a bit more if all these features are top notch of one. If anyone can recommend something for me it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
grace
reply to this comment
Thanks
grace
Tracey (03/25/2007)
Help! Going on vacation and looking for a great compact easy to use camera. Was told the Casio EX Z75 was the best but also looked at some Canons. Now confused. Want great pictures of grandbaby, mountains etc. Have a Canon Powershot S2 IS but have never liked it. I don't really know much and just like to point and shoot. The Canon I have always seems to blur pictures exp if baby moves etc. So need easier but like quality and small size so I can take easily on trips. Can anyone help?
Thanks! Tracey
reply to this comment
Thanks! Tracey
Looking for a tough camera for hiking (Fly — 10/20/2006)
Was looking at the Pentax Optio W20 or the Olympus Stylus (mju) 720 as they are obviously waterproof and am willing to compromise image quality to a certain degree. However both have received some very poor reviews for image quality.
I don't want to take professional grade picks but it would be nice to blow up a view nice landscape prints if i fluke a view good ones.
Also any advice on battery life would be appreciate if im away from power for weeks.
reply to this comment
I don't want to take professional grade picks but it would be nice to blow up a view nice landscape prints if i fluke a view good ones.
Also any advice on battery life would be appreciate if im away from power for weeks.
Joe (10/20/2006)
The Olympus Stylus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera because of its ability to resist water (up to 3m) and take spills (up to 1.5m falls). It is an incredibly robust camera. Other than this is a great because it is light weight has a nice zoom and takes great stills. The battery life is an issue though because it takes a special lithium Ion battery and not AAs. I find this annoying because it is hard to get a new Ion batt when you are out in the wilderness. But i would recommend this camera, you just might have to spring for 2 extra batts, (which wouldnt be very expensive) to make sure you have enough juice for a long trip. Of course if you get to an outlet you can always recharge. The battery life is quite good.
reply to this comment
What waterproof camera would you recomend? (Natalie — 10/20/2006)
Going only 10 feet under water and would like to have those pictures.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
The Olympus Stylus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great new camera that is waterproof up to 3meters. Besides that feature it also has 5x optical zoom and a nice 7+megapixel sensor. This makes it an all around great camera for the price whether it went underwater or not. But luckily it does it all.
There is another scuba camera that I have heard of but it doesnt come very highly recommend. The Sealife DC500 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) great concept sadly it seems to leave something to be desired. Check out the reviews though. Clearly the Olympus is the best route. Powerful camera, small waterproof package.
reply to this comment
There is another scuba camera that I have heard of but it doesnt come very highly recommend. The Sealife DC500 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) great concept sadly it seems to leave something to be desired. Check out the reviews though. Clearly the Olympus is the best route. Powerful camera, small waterproof package.
Kevin (10/21/2006)
There are 3 choices when buying an underwater camera. Option 1 is spend $100, and get a cheap 35mm. Option 2 is to go with a mid-range digital, like the DC500. Option 3 is to buy a high-end digital SLR, a housing and a strobe. Option 3 will run you about $2500. Regardless, make sure to get an external strobe. Any built-in flashs will not be strong enough to give good results.
reply to this comment
I need a very durable camera - not too expensive (sharon — 10/19/2006)
dropped my canon so many times its dead. any ideas
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
The Panasonic DMC LZ# ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an amazing camera for the price. It is highly reviewed and highly recommended. It will not take a bunch of drops like most cameras. I recommend getting a small case for it or a wrist tie so you won't drop it so much. There are some "drop resistance" cameras like the Plympus Stylus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which can take a drop up to 1.5 meters. But it will cost you twice as much. Maybe you should just buy 2 Panasonics if you think you are going to drop it a bunch, so you will always have a back up.
reply to this comment
Which camera would your advisors choose between the Olympus 740 or 750? (Texas — 10/16/2006)
I like the weatherproof and durablility of the cameras and just want to buy the right one. Understand the 750 has problems with the screen washing out does the 740 have the same problem?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/16/2006)
Between the two I'd go with the 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) just on the basis of the stabilization features, which work really well. Interestingly though, the 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is said to have a slightly faster cycle time when the flash is on. With that said, these cameras reportedly have the same body, so I am assuming that it's the same LCD screen too and might come with the same issues of washing out.
reply to this comment
What is better overall? Digital image stabilization or ultra high ISO for low light situations? (Mark B. — 10/09/2006)
New Olympus cameras offer "digital image stabilization for low light conditions while Fuji offers a very high ISO of about 1200 to address the same problem, working without a flash either because the flash is too weak for the subject, or you want to use available light for effect or avoid blinding your subject and/or bistanders while still coming out with a sharp image free of motion blur. Which of the two solutions work best?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/09/2006)
Mark,
Both methods offer a viable solution. Higher ISO can create "graininess" in a picture though. I have experimented with both and have found that either solution works well. I have worked with ISO speeds up to 1600 where you can correct the slight graininess with noise reduction options with photo software like PaintShop Pro and Photoshop.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Both methods offer a viable solution. Higher ISO can create "graininess" in a picture though. I have experimented with both and have found that either solution works well. I have worked with ISO speeds up to 1600 where you can correct the slight graininess with noise reduction options with photo software like PaintShop Pro and Photoshop.
Andrew
Need help! Am torn between the Olympus stylus 740 or Canon SD 800. What do you think? Have concerts in mind. (Felicia — 10/08/2006)
I am going to buy it today hopefully. Need something with good image shake control and great color!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) all the way. Canons are good in low light (for concerts) and the anti-shake is fantastic. Check out the reviews for the Stylus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ); people don't seem too happy with it.
reply to this comment
Help me choose! SD700 vs Stylus 750. Really like the all weather of the 750, but concerned about early reviews indicating viewing screeen washout. (matt — 10/05/2006)
Will be taking alot of indoor low light photo's of kids. Will also need outdoor "all weather" photo's. I guess ranking of most important needs are:
Low light photos
Quick cycle between photo's
all weather conditions
outdoor photos (without view screen washing out)
durable camera, ie: kids
decent video clips
ultra compact
Is one a clear winner?
reply to this comment
Low light photos
Quick cycle between photo's
all weather conditions
outdoor photos (without view screen washing out)
durable camera, ie: kids
decent video clips
ultra compact
Is one a clear winner?
Brenda Paro (10/06/2006)
Hi Matt,
I think the Olympus Stylus 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) wins out in this one. Here are a few things I found about it that make me think it is better suited to your needs than the Canon Powershot SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ):
-The Olympus has ISO 80-1600 available, while the Canon has 80-800. The high ISO on the Olympus would come in handy in low light situations and is also supported by what Olympus calls BrightCapture technology, which makes for better pictures in very low light.
-The Olympus has a larger sensor which results in clearer photos all around.
-Olympus offers QuickTime Motion JPG with sound; higher quality video clips.
-Olympus is lighter (114grams) while Canon is 165grams (without batteries).
-The Olympus has many more scene modes- 27 of them, I think, compared to the Canon's 9.
I could not find info on the exact speeds, but did find plenty of reviews saying that the Turbo technology of the Olympus makes it very fast. Also, the Olympus is weather-proof and durable. Unfortunately I did find a few places where they said the screen washing out is a problem. Still, this camera seems better suited to what you're looking for in my opinion.
Hope that helps somewhat.
reply to this comment
I think the Olympus Stylus 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) wins out in this one. Here are a few things I found about it that make me think it is better suited to your needs than the Canon Powershot SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ):
-The Olympus has ISO 80-1600 available, while the Canon has 80-800. The high ISO on the Olympus would come in handy in low light situations and is also supported by what Olympus calls BrightCapture technology, which makes for better pictures in very low light.
-The Olympus has a larger sensor which results in clearer photos all around.
-Olympus offers QuickTime Motion JPG with sound; higher quality video clips.
-Olympus is lighter (114grams) while Canon is 165grams (without batteries).
-The Olympus has many more scene modes- 27 of them, I think, compared to the Canon's 9.
I could not find info on the exact speeds, but did find plenty of reviews saying that the Turbo technology of the Olympus makes it very fast. Also, the Olympus is weather-proof and durable. Unfortunately I did find a few places where they said the screen washing out is a problem. Still, this camera seems better suited to what you're looking for in my opinion.
Hope that helps somewhat.
Matt (10/06/2006)
I think the Olympus will be a great camera. Have been trying to delay purchase until a few "real life" reviews come in. Thanks for the knowledgeable perspective.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/06/2006)
Good thinking! And good luck.
reply to this comment
buyer (10/09/2006)
I also feel olympus 750 is better than canon sd 700. those expert's reviews are biased. They are picky on some trivial disadvantages of 750 and ignore those obvious strength provided by 750 compared with sd 700.
reply to this comment
Steve (10/15/2006)
1. There is some noticable lag time, both noted in my experience and documented on a review I read recently.
2. There is severe lcd washout and reflection in bright sun. Needed baseball cap or hand cupping to see screen. No classical viewfinder to overcome problem. Perhaps Delkin will offer custom shade screen before long.
3. Otherwise, camera is light, small, stylish. Should appreciate weatherization, dual stabilazation and nice megapixel/optical zoom numbers. Also a good combination of simple point and shoot and multiple scene settings for those who want more specific use settings.
reply to this comment
2. There is severe lcd washout and reflection in bright sun. Needed baseball cap or hand cupping to see screen. No classical viewfinder to overcome problem. Perhaps Delkin will offer custom shade screen before long.
3. Otherwise, camera is light, small, stylish. Should appreciate weatherization, dual stabilazation and nice megapixel/optical zoom numbers. Also a good combination of simple point and shoot and multiple scene settings for those who want more specific use settings.
How does the olympus stylus 740 overcome not having a view finder. (Tracy — 09/28/2006)
Many LCD screens do not show up well with lots of sunlight, making it difficult to see what you are looking at.
reply to this comment
David Parker (09/28/2006)
I have a two year old Pentax digital camera, and even with a flat 1.5 inch sceen, I never use the viewfinder. There are a few occasions when I have trouble seeing the image, mostly due to sunlight - but I try not to shoot with the sun behind me anyway, because the shadows are always so bad! So I find the viewfinder is wasted space on the camera, and I guess Olympus must have decided the same thing.
I wouldn't worry too much about it.
reply to this comment
I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Tom (12/31/2006)
Problem with no viewfinder ... LCD screens eat up battery power, and the Stylus 740 has a big screen and a proprietary battery. If it took plain ol' double AA cells I may overlook the lack of viewfinder, but carrying a spare Olympus special battery is expensive.
reply to this comment
Looking for a digital with 4X or greater optical zoom, a "bulb" shutter setting, and ability to set the focus on "infinity". Trying to get under or close to $300. Suggestions? (Gene Leis — 09/27/2006)
End goal here is a cheap astrophotography tool.
reply to this comment
David Parker (09/28/2006)
It's four years old, but still being sold: The Nikon 4500. I found it on Google, someone recommended it for astrophotoghy. Bulb up to 5 minutes, infinity manual on lens, 4x optical zoom. I'm sure you can find one on EBay under $300.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Good luck!
Replacement camera that uses XD picture cards? (ard — 09/21/2006)
I am a foster parent for 8 BOYS...we spend lots of time in/near
water and sand. I take lots of pics of the boys. My Olympus
must have gotten wet and does not work.
I am looking to replace the camera, but would like to be able
to use the XD card. Also, any suggestion for reasonably inexpensive
waterproof digital? Thanks.
reply to this comment
water and sand. I take lots of pics of the boys. My Olympus
must have gotten wet and does not work.
I am looking to replace the camera, but would like to be able
to use the XD card. Also, any suggestion for reasonably inexpensive
waterproof digital? Thanks.
camera? (09/26/2006)
You might be interested in the Olympus Stylus 740. It takes xD-Pictured Cards and is splash, dust, and snow proof.
Click here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to see a search for all cameras that use xD-Picture Cards.
You can also check all our "all-weather" cameras here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
Click here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to see a search for all cameras that use xD-Picture Cards.
You can also check all our "all-weather" cameras here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
camera? (09/26/2006)
reply to this comment
Olympus Stylus 740 Reviews
Olympus Stylus 740 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
outside pictures
(east belfast — 06/04/2007)
i bought the 740 a few months ago and although at first i found it awkward to use both inside and outside. i invested in an lcd cover hood which is great for outside picture as it shades the lcd screen. it is a compact little camera but i do feel that olympus should have fitted a view finder for ease of use. but overall i have no regrets..........
- 1.0 out of 5
Blurry pictures
(tetek13 — 03/19/2007)
I have always owned Olympus cameras and have had great success until I purchased this one.
I wanted a small "pocket" camera for convenience. I had two choices. The Panasonic Lumix series or the Olympus Stylus 740.I settled on this one because of the 5X optical zoom and most importantly the digital image stabilization.
I thought the digital image stabilization was on all the time and was basically the same technology that the Panasonic Lumix had.
It is not! The results are blurry images in portrait mode. I should of bought a Panasonic Lumix. I am very disappointed in this camera and you will be too if you get one.
- 2.0 out of 5
Impossible to use outside
(Bridget — 01/02/2007)
This is a really nice camera except for one major problem. You can't take photos outside, the screen is very bright & reflective and there is no viewfinder.
If you are going to only use indoors you will be ok but if you are going to use it in daylight, keep in mind it will be hard to take photos outside.
- 3.0 out of 5
Use discretion
(Chuck Sylvester — 12/03/2006)
Absence of viewfinder is major shortcoming due to glare or difficulty viewing screen. Difficult if not impossible to utilize multiple options concurrently for better pictures. Handy features and user friendly escept as noted above.
- 5.0 out of 5
Love it!
(Elena — 12/01/2006)
It's my first digital camera and it's everything i wanted- i have taken some great photos and the battery lasts forever
:)
- 1.0 out of 5
EXTREME FLAW
(Dana Dane — 11/05/2006)
Outdoor picture taking is VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE because the glare on the screen makes the image barely viewable. If only there was a viewfinder. HOW COULD DESIGNERS OVERLOOK THIS?!
- 2.0 out of 5
Blurry
(Hope — 10/17/2006)
Unless you hold your hand completely still, your pictures will come out very blurry. On top of that, distance pictures almost never come out and I'm left with a faceless mob. If it's a close up picture, with decent light the pictures can be very clear. I would not recommend this.
- 5.0 out of 5
<<Dream camera OLYMPUS 740>>
(Muge Ferris — 10/07/2006)
I owned many years ago, ( there was no digital camera in those days ) 2 1/2 inch Screen, an excellent menu (you need go there and get used to how it works. "Anti shake mechanism" Even in night it automatically adjusts the light. You can take pictures under any weather condition. Rainy, shaky, windy and snowy. Even under the water with a purchase of water proof case.!!! I recommend to everyone, who wants to get stylish easy to use and the camera that gives you so many opportunities to become your own photographer"...
