Hey! You should know that Olympus has released a newer version of this product: the Olympus Stylus TOUGH 8010.
Olympus Stylus 770 SW
Editor's Review
The Olympus 770 SW has now been replaced by the tougher Olympus Stylus TOUGH 8010. Here's what we said about the 770 SW when it first hit the shelves:
The Olympus Stylus 770 laughs at dangers that would cripple or damage other, weaker cameras. This masochistic model can endure a 5 foot drop, a 5 fathom dunk in the water, extreme cold up to negative 10 degrees Celcius, and up to 220 pounds of weight on top of it. The 770 can't be beat, battered, crushed, frozen, or otherwise mutilated (though it's hard to believe the LCD screen and lenses can stand up to such demands even if the body can). Perfect for the outdoorsy types, the 770 also has a special LCD that can operate well in bright sunlight. This camera is built to survive; just be sure not to test it in conditions where you might have difficultly sustaining your own life.
Specifications
- 7.1 megapixels
- Durable, weatherproof body
- 3x optical zoom / 5x digital zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- ISO 80-1600
- Movie mode with sound
- JPEG file format
- 2.5-inch "HyperCrystal" LCD
- xD-Picture Card storage
- Lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: STYLUS770SW
- UPC: 050332159600
- Release Date: Jan 29, 2007
Shop for 770 SW Accessories
Olympus Stylus 770 SW Comments & Questions (write your own!)
I would try this with the camera as well, and see if it works. The built in meter in the camera should tell you after a few hours, if you take a reading at the start and then later.
You may however find that the USB is only for data transfer, in which case you need to use your AC adapter to charge.
Both of these cameras are pretty comparible. While the 1030SW ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a higher resolution at 10.1 MP (vs 7.1 MP), the 770SW ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is going to be $50 to $100 less expensive. If you're looking at cost first, the 770SW ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will be the way to go.
Both cameras will perform comparibly, and I would recommend picking up an extra battery and a larger capacity memory card with it. The camera itself comes with a charger, so you won't need to do that. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Fellow buyers beware of companies that recommend many extras that are unnecessary!
Thanks Andrew.
Glad to be of assistance. Please come back with any other questions or issues.
Andrew
You can get it for about $5 plus shipping on Amazon.com ( amazon.com/Olympus-Camedia-... ).
Andrew
It appears to be a different cable from that used on previous E and C-series cameras.
Another tip is to go to Canon's website ( usa.canon.com/consumer/cont... ) and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Also, try these tips to improve your performance:
there are also other tips to speed up your performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
What do you think? What will give me a better print? I just want crisp, clean pics of my faily and friends
but for every day use, I think the Canon SD1000 has your olympus beat.
But if you like it, B, by all means - that's what's important.
I still think the olympus took better low light shots though and that is really bugging me :(
I am interested in purchasing a camera to take pictures of friends and family but also to take scuba diving.
You mentioned that there was an Olympus model that geared for "extreme stuff like snorkeling, rapelling, etc".
Could you tell me what model that is or suggest a camera that would meet these needs.
Thanks!
I think this could meet your needs, but it largely depends on how deep you're going and where your doing your SCUBA. I'm sure you're aware what salt water can do to a digital camera and as such, I'd still be considering a dive case for any camera I use if I was planning on going anywhere near that 33ft. limit.
Originally it was the dive case option that was steering me towards Canon as most of their cameras have waterproof cases - which I believe can go as deep as 130 ft.
I'm also looking into strobe lights (which I know nothing about) so if anyone has any useful information or can direct me to where I can read up on them it would be much appreciated.
What's your budget? Are you looking to stay in the SONY family or are you open to alternatives?
Also I like the Nikon s51 and Panasonic TZ3 I have only 24 hrs to decide my husband says so he can get it for xmas. Its hard as everyone complains about something on every camera. I want a camera that works and has a decent size screen I love the 3.0 but I want the battery not to die on me. What is your suggestion on these cameras. Help please. Signed, Dazed and Confused
I know that SONYs are popular, and certainly the W55 is a popular option. However, I have issues with them. My beef with SONY is that they tend to force their customers into proprietary technologies such as the memory stick, their own spin on formatting, and a host of others.
Cameras like Panasonic or Canon rely on more standardized SD cards, which are pretty much the standard in point and shoot for memory cards. This means you can use any you happen to currently have and they are much cheaper than memory sticks. You can also use them in other technologies like PDAs, DMPs, and even mp3 players, whereas that memory stick is only going to be used in another SONY.
This may not be a big deal for you. But I still like the TZ3 because of it's better optical zoom for a compact camera. That's nice.
You might try the Olympus 770SW ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's spec'ed for a 5 foot drop, a dunk in the water, extreme cold, and 220 lbs sitting on it. The 7MP resolution will give great photos too. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
you can snorkle with it, as it goes down 10M!!
you can bring it skiing, as it functions down to -10C /14Fahrenhet..
you can drop it from 5 feet 1.5 m without causing damage..
All in all, great camera for playing around and having fun..
on the minus side, the zoom is ok, not fantastic..
My wife and I bought the 770 to have a a 2nd camera that she could put in her purse and wouldn't get smashes by out 2 small children. For out main camera we have a Nikon SLR.
The optical zoom is only 3x, but it's obviously designed with extreme sports in mind.
As for the 770SW, I was merely trying to find a camera that would address the adverse conditions you're planning on taking it through. Here's what Imaging Resource says:
The Olympus 770 SW's shockproof, waterproof, freezeproof, and crushproof attributes are its most distinguishing features, and there's no other camera like it on the market. However, without the camera's ability to survive in conditions that would render other models useless, the Olympus 770 SW would be just another decent, but not outstanding, snapshot camera. But as the only totally amphibious camera on the market--with the exception of used Nikonos models--it may well be worth its $379.99 price tag for those who need a camera that can handle whatever conditions you can throw at it...
... This point-and-shoot camera's rugged body, which is sealed against the elements and capable of withstanding rough handling, is otherwise fairly standard for its class. But the fact that the Olympus 770 SW is water/freeze/crush/shock-proof makes it stand out from the rest. Outdoor enthusiasts may well be able to overlook some of its performance and image quality shortcomings, as well as its basic feature set, knowing that the Olympus Stylus 770 SW can handle whatever physical challenges are thrown its way. Caution when using Digital Image Stabilization, the Available Light Scene mode, and high ISOs should help prevent most image noise, giving snapshooters a way to capture decent -- albeit not great -- images of their outdoor adventures.
Cnet: The good: Camera is waterproof to 32 feet; shock resistant to short drops and mild impact.
The bad: No manual exposure controls; slightly soft images
The bottom line: Olympus' Stylus 770SW might not produce perfect images, but you'd be hard pressed to find a compact camera as tough as this one.
The issue to me is the same you brought up ... what camera is rugged enough? Or am I wrong about yoru emphasis?
When I copy the pictures back to \DCIM\100OLYMP on the card via USB, I can see them on the PC and through the Olympus Master software but not on the camera. Is there a way or "trick" to have the camera recognize the pictures that have been copied back?
Thank you for your time.
Z
Have you done anything to the pictures since you initially downloaded them (edited them, resized, etc)?
Thank you for your interest in helping with this issue.!!!
I'm afraid I'm unable to find documentation on this from Olympus or from any user reports on web forums, etc. It's sort of a tricky thing to Google for, though, so it's not surprising that not much is coming up.
It does seem very strange that they wouldn't show, but it could have something to do with the way the camera indexes the files when they're created on the memory card, that copying them back doesn't recreate.
Sorry I can't be of more help here. :[
If that doesn't work, I can't think of anything else. Good luck.
I had the same problem. It's actually quite easy to fix. If your xD card is empty and you load pictures onto it from your computer - you will not be able to view them. However - if you actually take a new picture of anything - the camera opens a DCIM file on the card. In that DCIM file is another file - showing the photo you just took. Now - load the pictures from your computer into that file and once you're finished you can view them all just as you would normally.
It works perfectly everytime.
I don't know about the Kodak because my mind is totally blank right now and I can't think of what camera you're referring to. You don't mean the Z885, do you?
The Z885 is intriguing, it may be the only Kodak available where my first reaction isn't "choose the other brand instead," frankly. In fact, I've seen sample images of this little camera and I think they did a really good job on the sensor. Low light images are actually decent (not impossibly grainy) all the way up to ISO 1600 or so. It's a better low light handler than the T100. So if that's a major factor in your decision, I think the Kodak wins that one.
This doesn't work if the file is a video shot, pressing the centre button in this instance pauses the playback.
Incidentally, you can press this centre navigator key to instantly get back to the full image if using the zoom-in button during playback, instead of repeatedly pressing the zoom-out key
It is particularly annoying becauase this is supposed to be a point and shoot! My dig SLR doesnt even annoy me with settings information until I ask it to, so Ive no idea why olympus chose this method - I wish they would bring out a firmware update that removed it!
I, along with 2 of my friends own the 770, and love it, EXCEPT for that annoying file info..
I wish they'd atleast give us an option to turn it off..
Thanks.
Good Luck
the 770 is fool proof, point and click, can be left out in the rain and is small enough to put in a breastpocket...easy..
no wide screens for website
needs to take being stored in hot boat for when they catch fish
Bright sunlight- what is a good camera?
As with most digital cameras, the USB cable for the 770 SW is only for data transfer. According to Olympus's site, the camera comes with a "AC Adapter (D-7AC) with optional CB-MA1 DC coupler" for charging the proprietary battery.
Hope this helps!
Let me know the soon
I don't know why it is too hard to make the batteries 5Vish (most are anyway) and compatible with USB charging. It would make them so compatible with other things, and mean less carting around unecessary kit or being stuck when you forget the charger / cable / etc. Bring on some common sense!!!!
This one is tricky to answer, because personally I'm not sure what cameras are put thru while in this type of service, so it's hard to tell what would survive and what wouldn't. Also, this is a silly question, but would he have access to chargers and all of that, or would a certain type of battery be more preferable to another?
If not, I can point you in two directions. The Canon A-series are nice and rugged and durable (I've dropped mine enough to vouch for that). Something like the A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes great photos and is not as delicate as many of the ultracompacts. However, it's NOT an ultracompact, and I'm not sure if size is an issue.
Another thing to look into is the Olympus line. Olympus makes cameras that are waterproof (some can go totally underwater, others are just designed to keep out drips and drops) and shock proof, which can be great when they're getting slung around. Image quality may not be as high as Canon in low light situations, but in outdoor shots you should be happy, and the fact that the bodies are built to stand abuse may make these the best choice for you. The Stylus 770sw ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the most hardcore of these- it's freezeproof, waterproof, crush proof and claims you can drop it from five feet.
The other Olympus Stylus models, while they aren't as hardcore as the 770 (can't go underwater, etc.), have nice durable bodies as well and aren't so expensive- they are labeled as 'weatherproof' and can also stand some dings. The 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and 810 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are both good choices.
As soon as I read your post, I thought of the Olympus Stylus line, because (although the 770W is the toughest of the group by far) all of them are designed to be extra-rugged, water-resistant, etc. (Not all of the Stylus can go underwater, but they're designed to keep out moisture, protect against shocks, etc.) Unfortunately I don't believe any of them offer an electronic viewfinder. Also unfortunately, I can't think of any other compact digitals at the moment that are quite as tough as these. So I guess the question is, what's more important- the viewfinder or the durability? Let me know if the viewfinder is integral, and I'll try to help you find some other models that, while not as tough as these, may do the job...
Lastly, and I assume most cameras are now this way, no delay in shutter...my good old Coolpix 5000 got good pictures but the shutter delay just does not cut it..
Thanks for the help! Oh yes, I believe only Canon has viewfinders and they said they do not have even a water resistent sub/compact digital...Phil::
I totally understand your need for the viewfinder. On the plus side, I've owned a Canon A-series camera for quite a few years, and although it's not advertised as being rugged, waterproof, or otherwise, the thing is an absolute tank. I've dropped it, stepped on it, dropped it again, taken it out in the snow, left it in my car, and it still runs like a workhorse. By comparison, other cameras I've owned would break if I looked at them sideways. What I'm saying is, if the Olympus that is advertised as durable doesn't suit your needs, I'm wondering if you couldn't get away with purchasing a Canon and having it live up to some rough handling.
Unfortunately, though, most of the Canon ultra compacts are the Elphs (the SD-series), and although they're fantastic cameras, the earlier ones had a problem with very delicate LCD screens. I've heard about this problem enough to be wary of them when people ask for durable cameras, and although the newer Elphs (the SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is fantastic) do have improved LCDs in terms of view, I have not heard it said that they've improved in terms of durability. The camera does have an optical viewfinder, so I suppose a broken LCD wouldn't be the end of the world, but I doubt you want to let the screen break and continue using the camera. It might be worth looking into whether the screen really is more durable in the newer ones; I haven't heard that it is, however.
I might suggest for you, since my old A-series is so rugged and the new ones haven't changed much, something like the A550 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This camera does have a plastic body, and apparently the switch cover is somewhat flimsy, but in terms of overall durability the bodies of these models tend to be resilient (and they do have optical viewfinders). With a little bit of care it would likely hold up to quite a bit of handling. Not so sure about waterproof, though.
Also, in terms of delay/ lag, you're right- most newer models are doing just fine on this. The Canons are now using a faster processor that has reduced shutter lag quite a bit, and while no camera eliminates it completely (the big fancy DSLRs come the closest to doing so), you should be much happier with the new ones in terms of this problem; they have really sped up.
Thanks again...this is my first time posting and appreciate the help!
Phil::
The LCD problem with the Elphs was an actual physical break, with the screen cracking or blobbing on many users. Most complaints were that it took a minimal amount of pressure (like carrying it in a pocket or purse) to make this happen. What's more, it wasn't covered under warranty since it counted as mis-handling.
I did a little bit more reading on it, and found something interesting. Someone has stated that the problem with the screens breaking on earlier Elphs was a manufacturing error. I don't necessarily buy that, but this person does claim that the newer screens (2.5-inch vs. 2-inch) are clear of this error and more durable. <a href="reviews.cnet.com/Canon_Powe... the link... take from it what you will. I will add to that, that while I haven't heard a ton of people talking about the newer Elphs, so far I haven't heard the amount of complaints that I heard immediately about the LCD problems with the older models. I would hope that if the new ones were just as bad as the old ones, there would have been a deluge of complaints about it by now. Just a theory.
I didn't think of this before, but of course, if you do want an Elph, there are screen protectors available, and that might help even if the new cameras have the same delicate screen. You can also buy a hard case for it and just take it out when you're ready to shoot.
In terms of image quality, I honestly think that there's not really a difference between the A-series and the SDs. Provided you choose a camera with comparable megapixels and all of that, I think both have excellent quality. A few years ago, the main difference was that the A-series were larger while the SDs were the compacts that lacked the manual controls of the A-series, but with some of the new A-series coming out as ultracompacts, that doesn't really apply anymore. But in terms of factors that affect image quality, there really isn't anything that puts one of them ahead of the other. The A-series runs on AA rather than the lithium-ion of the SD; the lens on the A-series tends to stick out while the SD retracts all the way in; etc.
For shutter lag, you should be safe if you're buying one of the new models. Look for something with the Digic III processor (as opposed to the older Digic II) for absolute fastest response; you should have no problem getting a lag that's under 1 second with these.
I know I'm throwing a ton of info at you here, so if you're looking at a few different cameras and are unsure how to decide, let me know which ones they are and I'll try to help narrow it down.
Regarding your problem, it is true that it takes about a second to take a picture for 720 under full auto focus. But if you pre-focus the subject by half pressing the button, the actual shutter lag is 0.0087 sec., faster than you can say 'cheese'.
So the trick is to half-press the button to pre-focus on your subject, be it children or zoo animals, wait for the right moment and press fully. The 0.0087 shutter lag makes sure you get the picture you want.
Alternatively, the camera has a continuous mode of 3.74 frames per second. Make use of the continuous mode, like most professionals do, and one of the pictures will be the one you want.
Third party batteries are even more of a concern as often times they come from "counterfeit" manufacturers and often overheat or even explode.
You're much better getting the batteries from an authorized Olympus provider and picking up an AC adapter off eBay.
there are hundreds of different batteries and chargers available. So I would like to just give you some basic ideas here.
At first- one major difference between rechargeable and regular batteries. Rechargeable batteries can not keep their energy. Means that after you charge them then they start loosing the charge even if you don't use them. Therefore you always need to charge them just before going to use them. Regular batteries keep their full energy and capacity for many years if they are not in use.
Second. When you buy rechargeables then the main thing is to look for the capacity. AA batteries usually have text: xxxx mAh. So try to find batteries that have the highest number.
Third. The chargers are known by the charging speed. So you can get a one that charge your rechargeables in one hour for example. It depends on your needs. It is also good idea to have at least 2 sets of batteries for your camera. So if you are outdoors and shooting then you have an extra set of charged batteries ready when needed.
If you do not want to buy Olympus, for any reason, the next best option is to buy Energizer ER-D530 Li-Ion battery which is a replacement for Li-40B and Li-42B.
Energizer ER-D530 carries a life time warranty and you will not have to worry about the quality and longevity. See <a href="batteries.com/productprofil... location for further information</a>
There will be many other makes of Li-42B equivalents in the market but probably you should just stick to Energizer because of the life time warranty.
Li-42B also needs specific chargers available at Energizer. Do not use generic chargers or else it voids the warranty.
Good luck.
Good Luck
Good Luck
I am going to purchase the 770SW
Olympus Stylus 770 SW Reviews
Olympus Stylus 770 SW Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this camera when it first came out about 2 years ago. It has gone to the river, the beach & everywhere I go. My grandkids use it. It's been underwater many, many times. I've dropped it. Still does a great job. I keep it in may purse for those times when you say "I wish I had my camera". I am always recommending it to people. Sorry so many have had bad experiences but my has been great!
- 1.0 out of 5
I bought this camera as a graduation present for my daughter in June 2007. January 2008 we took it on holiday and when we returned water had made it's way into a supposedly waterproof camera. When taken back to Future Shop they replaced it. January 2009 taken on vacation again. This time the camera totally stopped working. Will not power on. Customer Service absolutely of no use. This is now thrown in the garbage
- 5.0 out of 5
I have been snorkeling in Belize; St. Thomas, USVI; Samana, DR; and at Coco Cay in the Bahamas since I purchased this camera; and the only thing I have done beyond the initial purchase is to supply it with 2Gig memory cards and to purchase two additional batteries so that I could continue photographing without having to wait to recharge a battery. I increasingly use it for land photography, as it is so easy to use, light, and portable, and takes such excellent photographs that my older "professional" cameras aren't so much fun to carry around and set up anymore.
I did also get a supplementary underwater flash from Olympus, and this helps with light levels and modeling in most situations; but in fact "as is" the camera performs very well underwater. MOST of the time I would recommend leaving the camera in "P" mode rather than attempting to use the preset underwater modes, as they have a way of taking control in ways you may not expect.
This is an automatic camera, intended for "point and shoot," and overriding the automation is somewhat complex. But of course that makes it pretty easy for almost everyone to use every day and under all conditions!
- 1.0 out of 5
Camera consistently overexposed so I always had to dial exposure down for outside shots in normal daylight. Carrying in goretex parka during rainstorm left it full of condensation. And about 15 months after I bought it, all my photos turned out as pink smears. I've had far better luck with low-end Nikon CoolPix and that's what I'm going back to. This is my first and LAST Olympus; if this is typical thent his company is wayyyyyyyyyyy overrated.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have several Nikon and Olympus slr cameras, digital and film, but needed a small camera for easy carrying and rough conditions.
I am very happy with this camera: the picture quality is very good and I found the macro settings to be excellent and easy to get in and out of. I have taken some of my favorite small flower photographs with it. It has not been in the water yet but that will happen soon....
- 5.0 out of 5
We bought this camera for our sailing trip in the Grenadines and found this camera to be easy and fun to use. We took this camera snorkeling with us everyday, twice a day, for 7 days and our pictures are phenomenal. We have shots of huge schools of fish and colorful coral reefs that are super tight and sunset/sunrise pictures that will make you weep.
Just so everyone knows, there is a learning curve to using this camera. The more you shoot, the better your pictures come out. READ THE DIRECTIONS first (critical for underwater use) and use the appropriate setting for your pictures. Some pictures came out crappy at first, but we found it to be user error rather than camera technology.
This is also an amazing, lightweight camera to use backpacking.
- 1.0 out of 5
I got this camera for my birthday last year and i thought it worked really well. I took it underwater in swimming pools and at the beach and had no problems with it leaking. Then I went on Vacation and half way through my trip it leaked, the lens fogged up and the corners of the screen fogged up too, and it wouldn't turn off. I looked in the Battery compartment and there was no water, and I checked the USP port and there was no water there either. Needless to say I was very angry about not having a camera for the rest of my vacation. Also the camera didn't take the greatest quality pictures. I got faded white circles on a lot of my photos. I have sent it back to be repaired so we'll see how good the customer service is. All in all I wouldn't recommend this camera.
- 2.0 out of 5
I bought this camera for under a year, and I went to Bora Bora with it. Its water pictures weren't really good but they satisfied me until I took it onto land....trust me you cant take any pictures on land aswell the processer is SO SLOW that I can even look at all of the pictures in slideshow mode some are just BLACK. My son has a sony L1 thats a old sony 4.1 mp and this the olympus is almost 2x its megapix and the old sony's pictures are 10x as nice. But if you need a underwater camera here it is... just dont expect anything else
- 3.0 out of 5
The camera was great until i dropped about 5 inches off the ground. Olympus customer service has been horrible to me. They want me to pay for shipping and insurance so I did, still under warranty. Got camera back today sounds like a garbage disposal, something on the inside sounds horrible. It's having hard time focusing not sure what the problem is, neither do they. They want me to send it back more $ out of my pocket. The girl on the phone said they are hand made and they all sound different, never heard of that one. By the way the shutter is the only moving part it's a digital camera why would it make noise when i take a pic? Over all I love the camera would buy another one if I didn't have to deal with Olympus.
- 5.0 out of 5
There is nothing more gratifying than wading out into the ocean with your camera in your hand to snap pictures while on vacation, without having to worry about ruining a $300 piece of equipment. It's not the camera I would use for portraits or still lives, but it's unbeatable for grabbing and throwing in your bag while doing sporty stuff where any other camera would likely get damaged beyond repair. I don't have any kids but if I did I imagine you could let them go to town on this thing, I don't think they'd be able to break it. You just don't have to worry about this thing. Amazing.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is the first Olympus Ihave owned in a while. My camera LCD was not functioning properly. It was easy to return, I mailed it with receipt and it was returned within 15 days. Hassle free! For the record, I also own a Pentax and was given the run around and did not feel Pentax stands by its product.
If you are looking for a company who stands by their product, I highly recommend Olympus.
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is very durable. If you're crazy enough to throw it around, the SW 770 can take it. It's 7.1 MP so pictures look real GOOD. Also, it has a super macro feature with light. I can take pictures real close and it's so clear that i can see dusts! GREAT CAMERA/
- 4.0 out of 5
It's worked great for me so far. I take it on me every time I go scuba diving (in it's protective case of course) and it takes EXCELLENT macro pictures underwater. I saw some pictures some of my friends took during a recent boat dive we went on and theirs seemed so much more colorful, the only reason I can't give this a 5/5. Overall amazing camera just wish the underwater color would show up more on non-macro pictures.
- 5.0 out of 5
If you're expecting slr-like quality pictues from this camera(seems that some of the reviewers here were expecting it), don't. This camera was meant as to be a 'go everywhere and abuse me' type of camera. Those are who very active will app-riciate this thing so much. I've used it to go scuba diving in Hawaii and it held up like a champ. If you're not that active and want to take better quality pictures, look somewhere else.
- 1.0 out of 5
Do not buy this camera. The picture quality is horrible. A representative at Olympus actually said, "This camera is meant for underwater pitcures so the lenses are great out of water." They keep on trying to repair the camera and it turns out the same every time. Just buy a disposable whenever it might get wet and save a ton of money.
- 4.0 out of 5
I love this camera due to its unprecedented durability; I used it to film myself playing paintball, sonwboarding on snowy hillsides, and swimming underwater in my pool. I dropped my first digital camera just inches above the ground and it got screwed up, but this baby can be dropped, thrown, and drowned and it will eat it all! The only thing I am not fond of this camera is that it is complicated to prepare the perfect shots (many nice ones I have missed because the shutter speed was too slow or the camera just acts wierd sometimes). Funny thing is that when I need to take a really good shot it does ok clarity wise indoors, but the camera is AwESOME outdoors. Overall, this is the coolest cameras out there on the market which I love and recommed to thrill seekers and adventurers alike!
- 1.0 out of 5
I studied the book and thought I had it all figured out but I have not had any luck getting nice pictures from this camera. One of the main problems with it is there is not view finder and when you are taking pictures outdoors the bright light prevents you from being able to view what you are taking a picture of. Also it seems like you have to change the men for any different kind of picture taken. I also have had problems with the zoom as it doesn't always zoom in or out when I want it to. Of all the pictures I have taken in the few months I have had it only a handful have actually turned out, which is very disappointing since I lost all those pictures. It is very hard to tell by looking at the screen if the picture actually turned out, so you need to load it on the computer to tell for sure, and that is too late.
I am hoping the store will allow me return it.
I do like the size and he thought that if I drop it or get it wet it won't hurt it. but that is not worth losing all my pictures!
- 5.0 out of 5
After a few days of using this little guy, I have a good feel for it. The menu is easy enuf to learn. Not as fast to learn as a Cannon, but once you get it you are in control of a great camera. I did a series of hi speed burst shots at party recently. On a dance floor. It caught the light & action beautifully. I dropped it 3x that nite, stepped on it 1x... Still working great. I dropped it into a cocktail, for a laugh &... of course, still working great. I plan on freezing it next season in Colorado. Its a great all around knock about camera, that takes a good picture. IF you are wanting to take portraits, I am sure there are lots of other pieces to evaluate.
- 4.0 out of 5
I bought it 3 days ago and as soon as I got home immediately started reading the users manual. For me, a person that is not too savvy when it comes to technical terms the users manual was confusing, too confusing. For some reason i could not just get the breakdown of it. I was able to learn more from actually using the camera on trial and error tactics. I do agree with most of the professional reviews and say that the image qualtiy is not what a camera this price should be putting out, BUT, it has everything an outdoor, theme park, roller coaster, adventure loving enthusiast could ever dream of!! I have the annual passes to several theme parks in Orlando and I will be putting it to the ultimate test. I know i will enjoy this camera more than anything in the world and suggest it to anybody with children, and that travel to the beach/theme parks/scuba diving, mt. climbing, etc...
