Hey! You should know that Panasonic has released a newer version of this product: the Panasonic Lumix FH25.
Panasonic Lumix FH20:
Hands On Review
Panasonic's new FH20 packs 8x zoom, HD video, and great performance into a comfortable body. This should make just about any casual user very, very happy.
By Brenda Paro
- FH20 Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
It's been a few years since I played with a Panasonic. Back then, I personally felt that there was a risk in purchasing (or recommending for purchase) any camera made by a manufacturer that didn't begin with C or N. Brands like Panasonic made excellent cameras too, but they tended to be hit-or-miss. When in doubt, I always knew I could turn to a Powershot and expect a solid level of performance, and I still think this today. A Powershot may not always be perfect, but it'll get the major things right.
The Scene modes themselves are an interesting collection, with some slightly mystifying titles like Food and Soft Skin. I'm not 100 percent sure what all of them do in terms of changing the final effect, but they were fun to try out. I didn't happen to have any babies lying around to use for a true field test on the two -- count 'em, two -- Baby modes. The Film Grain mode was absolutely gorgeous. A large percentage of the scenes are geared towards super-darkness, like Starry Sky, Fireworks, Night Portrait, Night Scenery, and so on. I was hoping for something designed to handle dim situations, but not necessarily total darkness. Granted, there's a High Sensitivity mode that would probably do the job, but where was the regular old Indoor mode or its equivalent?
So, of course, I tested it. I set the camera to Auto, switched off the flash, and took it into a closet about as dim as a bar or a room after sunset without any lamps turned on. And man, if the snappy-fast performance, nice layout, and sharp photos I'd taken so far hadn't already convinced me, the low light performance of the FH20 would have done it: yes, yes, yes, Panasonic. Well done. The low light photos were even better than I expected, with crystal clarity, a super-low amount of graininess, true-to-life color, and perfectly defined focus.
But I think nearly anyone, regardless of skill level, age, camera abilities, or expectations, would be pretty satisfied with the FH20. It's almost ridiculously easy to use. Even if regular Auto isn't satisfactory, Intelligent Auto can help. It automatically sets and adjusts to adapt to different scenes -- and most importantly, it actually works and almost always offers better results than standard Auto. I even tested it in a deliberately tricky backlit situation and it worked. Sometimes I think that feature is just a marketing trick, but in this case you can see a difference between photos shot with regular and Intelligent Auto, and you have to kind of wonder why anyone would use the regular version in the first place.
Having said that, I've always had a soft spot for Panasonics. With perhaps an exception here and there, Panasonics have been consistently fast and intelligently designed, and most importantly, they tend to produce really great images, with a special strength when it comes to performing in low light.
I'm thrilled to report that even a few years since my last Panasonic, the new Lumix DMC-FH20 model lives up to my expectations -- and then some. I'm less thrilled to report that I'm kind of regretting my recent purchase of a Canon as my new "everyday" pocket camera after having tested this. There's nothing wrong with my Powershot. It's a great little performer. But dang, I had fun with the FH20. I loved this camera.
Body and Design
It seems like digital camera manufacturers recently went through a frenzy of seeing who could produce the tiniest camera body, resulting in a slew of credit card-sized units that are uncomfortable to hold and cause users stumble over their own fingers trying to push pinhead-sized buttons. I hope this trend is over, and the FH20 is a positive sign. The FH20 is slim and lightweight without feeling too fragile. Compact, but not too small. Some of the operational buttons are a bit undersized, but they're cleverly laid out. There's enough space between them to keep you from pushing more than one at the same time (although someone with larger hands than I have might run into that problem). The layout makes sense (as in, I didn't need the manual to figure out where everything was) and the 2.7-inch LCD screen, while not gigantic, is well-placed, bright, and responsive.Perhaps the only complaint I have in terms of design is the fact that you have to push Menu in order to get into the Scene modes. Here's where my Powershot comes out on top -- I'm used to turning a physical dial to reach multiple Scene modes. Having to click into a menu is an extra step that would probably cause me to leave the camera in regular Auto or Intelligent Auto mode more often than I would if the other options were more quickly accessible.
The Scene modes themselves are an interesting collection, with some slightly mystifying titles like Food and Soft Skin. I'm not 100 percent sure what all of them do in terms of changing the final effect, but they were fun to try out. I didn't happen to have any babies lying around to use for a true field test on the two -- count 'em, two -- Baby modes. The Film Grain mode was absolutely gorgeous. A large percentage of the scenes are geared towards super-darkness, like Starry Sky, Fireworks, Night Portrait, Night Scenery, and so on. I was hoping for something designed to handle dim situations, but not necessarily total darkness. Granted, there's a High Sensitivity mode that would probably do the job, but where was the regular old Indoor mode or its equivalent?
Performance and Image Quality
But then I remembered that this is a Panasonic, and if it's going to live up to its reputation, Auto mode should be perfectly capable of handling a low light scene without any help from special settings. Right?
So, of course, I tested it. I set the camera to Auto, switched off the flash, and took it into a closet about as dim as a bar or a room after sunset without any lamps turned on. And man, if the snappy-fast performance, nice layout, and sharp photos I'd taken so far hadn't already convinced me, the low light performance of the FH20 would have done it: yes, yes, yes, Panasonic. Well done. The low light photos were even better than I expected, with crystal clarity, a super-low amount of graininess, true-to-life color, and perfectly defined focus. Focus: This is a major point. Low-cost digital cameras often have trouble finding focus in low light, since objects tend to lose definition. But the FH20's Auto Focus wasn't even fazed by being in my closet. It didn't even have to hunt. It locked in just like I was shooting in broad daylight. What's more, performing this test with the flash off would be a recipe for blurry photos with most cameras (no flash + dark room = an open shutter for a good, long time). But shake wasn't even an issue here. Sure, I had to brace the camera against my knee a bit, but it took one shot -- one shot! -- to get a sharp photo. The shake warning on the screen lit up, but the photo itself wasn't blurred in the least. I mean, geez. One of the selling points of this model is what Panasonic calls Mega Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), and yes, it seems to work.
Speaking of selling points, the other major features of the FH20 (at least according to the hangey tag attached to the test unit) are the 14.1 megapixel sensor, 8x optical zoom, 28mm wide-angle lens, “Sonic Speed” Auto Focus, and 720p HD movie mode. They all work as they should and are pleasures to use. The zoom is particularly impressive. I didn't really realize how strong an 8x zoom is until I used this. It's super-fast to operate, and even when zoomed fully out the Auto Focus still comes through without stumbling.
Who Should Buy an FH20?
I'm typically reticent to recommend a camera to a huge variety of users. Most cameras, no matter how good they are, work best for certain niche groups. Some are gorgeously designed and take great pictures, but are confusing to operate and should be avoided by novices. Some are loaded with intimidating technical features that make them iffy gifts for older relatives or children. Others are so fragile that anyone who's slightly rough on their camera would break them.
But I think nearly anyone, regardless of skill level, age, camera abilities, or expectations, would be pretty satisfied with the FH20. It's almost ridiculously easy to use. Even if regular Auto isn't satisfactory, Intelligent Auto can help. It automatically sets and adjusts to adapt to different scenes -- and most importantly, it actually works and almost always offers better results than standard Auto. I even tested it in a deliberately tricky backlit situation and it worked. Sometimes I think that feature is just a marketing trick, but in this case you can see a difference between photos shot with regular and Intelligent Auto, and you have to kind of wonder why anyone would use the regular version in the first place.
The Verdict
The FH20 is easy to handle, designed in a way that makes sense, has quick enough operation to capture fast-moving things like children or pets (a shutter speed of just 0.006 seconds, according to the official spec sheet), handles most lighting situations smoothly, and has enough fun options to let you experiment without feeling like you're getting in over your head. I suppose the only caveat is that if you're someone looking for manual control over your camera, someone who likes to set exposure and other factors for yourself, the FH20 isn't going to give you what you want. But personally, when I want to play with manual settings, I turn to my dSLR. A camera like the FH20 is meant to be carried in your purse, or used to take snapshots of the kids, or at family picnics, or on vacation. It's a quick, capable snapper that offers high-quality results. It's meant to take good pictures without much effort on the user's part. And it does just that, and man, it does it well.
Panasonic Lumix FH20 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
How do I get pictures into my computer? (James Church — 04/10/2013)
I am unable to transfer pictures from my camera to my HP computer
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (04/18/2013)
Have you transferred photos before? Is this a new issue?
reply to this comment
Donna McNeely (01/09/2013)
How do I download photos from this camera to my mac photoshop program?
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (01/10/2013)
iPhoto is the program on Mac to download several images, typically it is set up to ask if you would like to load the photos when you plug the SD card into a reader attached to your computer, but you can also select File>Import to Library. To load photos into Adobe Photoshop, first drag the pictures from the SD card into a folder on your hard drive, then use File>open from Photoshop.
reply to this comment
problems and it's so new (barb — 01/01/2013)
the flash doesn't work any more. Any suggestions???
reply to this comment
ana (06/02/2012)
have the dmc-fh20 for a little over a year now and i'm getting a write error, check the card when i take a picture
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/04/2012)
Try formatting the memory card, or try a different memory card to see if the problem is the camera or the card.
reply to this comment
Albert (11/17/2011)
I just bought a Panasonic FH27, the latest version for $149 after a $30 manufacturer's rebate at Costco. FH27 is later version of FH20 which I also own and offer great praise.
reply to this comment
Hayley (11/06/2011)
im buying a camera for my mom and budget is <250. she will use it for taking pictures of my brother and sister and sports games and out playing, even football games. im not sure what camera would be best for her
reply to this comment
fh20 and ZS5 (Renee — 10/16/2011)
I am having trouble finding these 2 Panasonic cameras and would like to know where I can purchase them for the prices you mentioned. Thanks
reply to this comment
IR Camera (Crystal — 09/14/2011)
I am looking for a converted IR camera. I have one in hand, loaned from a friend - Canon G-10, which has seen some wear (cracked screen and the on/off button is a bit tilted which I understand can be a problem with these cameras in that it just stops working, so that concerns me). Then I am looking at a new Panasonic FH20, already converted. The Canon obviously has more manual features but I'm not sure I'd use those with IR anyway. She won't tell me what she wants for it but I was going to offer $250.00. The converted Panasonic I can get for $210.00. So, I guess price isn't an issue. Can you recommend one camera over the other? Have you worked with Infrared cameras? Can you recommend any other camera for IR conversion that's not too pricey? (Because if I don't buy one of these two cameras, just the conversion can run up to $250.00 or more)
reply to this comment
inside shots, lots of movement (Chris — 09/06/2011)
Im looking for a point and shoot camera that takes good shots inside of people that will be moving around at the time - would this camera suit? Less blurriness the better! Would FH 1 be any better? or any other suggestions - thanks!
reply to this comment
Help!!! (Anonamus — 08/23/2011)
Does it date the pictures?
reply to this comment
Help!!! (Anonamus — 08/23/2011)
Does it date the pictures?
reply to this comment
Bettina Tucker (07/19/2011)
Taking my Lumix FH 20 to Germany. Can I recharge the battery with just an adapter plug or will this cause problems? do I need a special adapter?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/20/2011)
You'll need a voltage adapter and a converter plug. Any electronics store -- radio shack, best buy, etc. -- will know what you need, and they generally don't cost much more than $10-15.
reply to this comment
joe lewis (06/13/2011)
can i play the video on my tv?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/15/2011)
Yes.
reply to this comment
I smell a plant (Thor — 05/30/2011)
1st and foremost I would like to say to everyone to avoid any advice from James Deruvo. I bought the FH20 because of his adamant praise that it was so great for low light bla bla blah and found it was not even close. Outdoors and with plenty of light it lives up to it's name but low light/indoors is pretty lame.
I don't know who this James DeRuvo is or if he's one of the reviewers of this site but I can only guess he's affiliated with Panasonic in some way and that I would only trust Liam's advice.
Thankfully the FH20 wasn't too hard to sell on craigslist and now I'm wiser and smarter and will get either canon s95, sx 230 or nikon s8100/9100 for good low light AND outdoors as well.
reply to this comment
I don't know who this James DeRuvo is or if he's one of the reviewers of this site but I can only guess he's affiliated with Panasonic in some way and that I would only trust Liam's advice.
Thankfully the FH20 wasn't too hard to sell on craigslist and now I'm wiser and smarter and will get either canon s95, sx 230 or nikon s8100/9100 for good low light AND outdoors as well.
Jillian (05/25/2011)
I've heard that Apple is going to release Mac OS X 10.7 sometime this summer, and I'm planning on buying a Macbook sometime this summer. In the manual for this camera, it says it works for OS X 10.1 to 10.6. Do you think it will also work if I buy a Macbook that uses 10.7?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/25/2011)
Yeah, it shouldn't be a problem. Even if the bundled software has trouble (which it shouldn't), you can just use iPhoto or Picasa or any one of the dozens of free photo programs instead. When you connect your camera, your computer recognizes it the same way it would recognize a flash drive -- you won't have any problem.
reply to this comment
Jillian (05/25/2011)
Great, thank you!
reply to this comment
Anderson (05/15/2011)
What a great site! I'm from Brazil and I'm in doubt about two point and shoot cameras with similar prices: Sony w350 and Panasonic FH20. I think Panasonic has a better image quality and Sony is more fun... but I don't know how much better is the IQ in panasonic and if worth to lose the Sony's sweep panorama/zoom while recording/small size combo.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/16/2011)
Thanks! I would agree with your assessment that the FH20 has better IQ, but the W350 is more fun. It sounds like you want the W350 -- its image quality isn't bad compared to the FH20. From what I remember, it has a bit more difficulty locking autofocus in dimmer lighting, and of course you lose the zoom range, but it's still quite a good point-and-shoot. Good luck.
reply to this comment
Anderson (05/16/2011)
Really thanks for the reply. I think I'm going with the w350 since you said it's IQ isn't bad compared to the FH20. About the zoom, I can live with 50% less zoom... otherwise I should be looking for a super-zoom instead of an ultra-compact camera. That's it, thank you.
reply to this comment
y (04/27/2011)
Hi I am trying to decide between the fh20 and fh25 I could get the fh20 for $50 dollars or more less
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/28/2011)
The FH25 is very slightly better in a few ways, but I mean very slightly. The FH20 is still a great value.
reply to this comment
nancy (04/18/2011)
my camera shows blur colors and wont give a clear picture what would the problem be
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/06/2011)
could need a reset. that'll reload the firmware. but also make sure you prefocus before takin a picture. this is where you press the shutter half way with your subject dead in the middle. it'll lock the focus. the decompose and press the shutterthe rest of the way to take the picture.
reply to this comment
battery (Jessica — 03/24/2011)
is the Lithium ion battery rechargable?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (03/25/2011)
Yep -- when it says lithium-ion on a spec sheet, it means rechargeable.
reply to this comment
Work (billy — 03/13/2011)
great work and a smart camera....
reply to this comment
Mark Rombstone (03/04/2011)
Hi,
I was thinking on buying a camera for a casual shooter like me that can make good indoor shots when I am at a basketball game or a party with a pretty good shutter speed. And preferably to have a longer zoom.
My budget is <350$.
Is there a camera like this or is it hard to find one that doesn't make blurry shots indoors for under 350$-400$?
Thx in advance!!!
reply to this comment
I was thinking on buying a camera for a casual shooter like me that can make good indoor shots when I am at a basketball game or a party with a pretty good shutter speed. And preferably to have a longer zoom.
My budget is <350$.
Is there a camera like this or is it hard to find one that doesn't make blurry shots indoors for under 350$-400$?
Thx in advance!!!
Liam McCabe (03/04/2011)
You'd want something with a decent burst speed -- a bunch of pictures per second, so you're bound to get at least one usable shot. There are a number of cameras like this right now, and many, many more to be released in the next six weeks or so. I'd say start with the Panasonic FZ100 or Fuji HS10. Also check out the Nikon S8100 or maybe Sony HX5V.
reply to this comment
Stuck on choice (Jaime — 02/25/2011)
I am looking for a camera that would be used mostly for snaps of my kids and family, holidays and general things but I want a crisp, clean picture (my mobile phone takes better photos then my current camera and I'm sick of having to delete photos of my children because of bad quality). Compact is preferred and video mode would be great but I guess not absolutely essential. The Panasonic Lumix FH20 sounds great but then so does the Canon Powershot S95, Canon Ixus 130, Sony Cybershot W530 and Panasonic LX5. How do I chose a camera? Thank you in advance.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/25/2011)
First, pick a budget. Then, decide which you prefer: zoom, or great pictures? The S95 and LX5 are expensive and have small zooms, but some of the best image quality you can get in a small camera. The SX130 and FH20 are very solid cameras for the price, with decent zooms too, and should be much better than your mobile phone camera.
reply to this comment
Jaime (02/25/2011)
Thanks Liam. I'm looking for a great picture, zoom isn't really a concern so I'll be leaning more towards S95 or LX5. I've had a look at prices and I'm happy to pay what they're going for, Thanks so much for your help!
reply to this comment
Camera for every day use + outdoors (Mark — 02/20/2011)
I'm buying my first digital camera in, wow a long time. I'm mostly looking for something simple and affordable (<$300) with good zoom and good image quality. I go backpacking a lot so one thing that is important is battery life (especially if it doesn't take AA). Toughness is a plus but I'm generally very careful so a tank isn't necessary. Think the FH20 is what i'm looking for? any other suggestions? Thanks!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/22/2011)
The FH20 is a good choice, as is the Panasonic ZS5.
reply to this comment
Mark (02/22/2011)
Oh, that is great. I just picked up the Panasonic ZS5 yesterday. So far I love it! Thanks.
reply to this comment
Recycle time (Herb — 02/19/2011)
What is the recycle time beween flash photos.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/24/2011)
On average, about 5.2 seconds w/ flash, half that without.
reply to this comment
amiee (02/15/2011)
hi..i am looking to buy pocket-sized digital camera immediately. Picture quality is my main concern.7x or more zoom would be preferable.ready to spend $150 to $250.Which one should I go for panasonic FH20, ZR3, tz8 or sony w370?What are the main differences among all 4? Or any other cam is recommneded?Please help.thanks.
reply to this comment
USB connection (Sally — 02/07/2011)
Does this camera have a USB connection for transferring photos to a computer?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/07/2011)
Yes, all cameras do.
reply to this comment
beat-rice (02/05/2011)
im kinda stuck between FH 20, FH 22 (because of touchscreen), Nikon coolpix S6000, and samsung ST 600 (for duelscreen), or should i just wait until march for FH 25 (for leica-lens)??
Which has better picture, overall camera, and is touchscreen even worth it? why please :) Thanks
reply to this comment
Which has better picture, overall camera, and is touchscreen even worth it? why please :) Thanks
Panasonic digital camera (Richard Marcus — 02/03/2011)
Is the Panasonic FH20 the same as the Panasonic FH20K and is the battery rechargeble and camera supplied with case and recharge cables
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/03/2011)
Yes (the 'K' means its the black color), yes, and yes to the cables, no to the case/bag.
reply to this comment
Paul (02/04/2011)
Ok,Please help me decide.
I can get a Fuji jx250 for $79.99 with a case & 4gb card
A Samsung PL200 for $99.00 with a 2g card & case
A coolpix 6000 for $129.00 with a 4gb card
A Lumix FP# with 2gb card for $99.00
A FH20 for around $125.00
A Kodack M530 for $79.99
A s4000 for around $95.00
PLEASE help,,,there is so much information my head spins..lol
reply to this comment
I can get a Fuji jx250 for $79.99 with a case & 4gb card
A Samsung PL200 for $99.00 with a 2g card & case
A coolpix 6000 for $129.00 with a 4gb card
A Lumix FP# with 2gb card for $99.00
A FH20 for around $125.00
A Kodack M530 for $79.99
A s4000 for around $95.00
PLEASE help,,,there is so much information my head spins..lol
paul (02/04/2011)
oops,thats a lumix fp3
reply to this comment
Help me decide please! (Tracy — 02/02/2011)
I have been sitting here for a week trying to order a camera. I can't decide between the Panasonic FH20 or the ZS5. Picture quality? Do both have the same video capabilities? One says it's JPEG motion format, but the FH20 does not say that...Does it matter? Is one touch screen and one not. Any help would be appreciated! Also how long does the video run? Does that depend on the camera or the SD card size? Sorry if that's a stupid question! Thanks Trey
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/03/2011)
Motion JPEG is pretty common, but H.264 is far preferable. The FH20 was last year's top model, but not without it's challenges in low light. This year, the ZS5 gets just as high marks.
As far as how long the video shoots, you are limited by card size, but most point and shoots do a limit of about 10 minutes due to writing speeds. But the shorter the clips, the better the overall video, IMHO.
reply to this comment
As far as how long the video shoots, you are limited by card size, but most point and shoots do a limit of about 10 minutes due to writing speeds. But the shorter the clips, the better the overall video, IMHO.
Wide Angle Lens - How good is it (Carla — 02/02/2011)
The info says it has a wide angle lens; does that make it suitable for taking shots of a room? For instance, if selling one's house, can it take shots more or less of an entire room in one go? Many thanks. Carla
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/02/2011)
It's a 28mm lens, which is pretty wide. I can't tell you whether or not it'll be perfect for your rooms, but it should be good enough. If you're particularly concerned about that, look for a camera with a lower number -- 24mm is the widest that they make, as far as I'm aware. Off the top of my head, I think the Sony W350 has a 26mm.
reply to this comment
Help (Peggy — 02/01/2011)
Im looking for a point and shoot for under $200. I know they have quit putting viewfinders on cameras but I love to take outside shots. I got a bridge camera for Christmas but returned it because the pics were always blurry. Is there a point and shoot that has some sort of setting to make it easier to see the screen in sunlight?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/01/2011)
No, it's pretty universally tough to see LCDs in sunlight. You could wait a few weeks until the Canon A1200 comes out -- it has a viewfinder, but is a pretty basic cameras otherwise.
reply to this comment
Paul (02/01/2011)
I am interested in 3 different cameras,but one does not have 720p recording,which I would like.
I have found these 3 cameras to be within 20 bucks of each other.
If all are around the same $ amount,what would be your choice & why?
Nikon cool pix s4000
Cannon sd1300
Panasonic FH20
I have not seen very good reviews on the Nikon
reply to this comment
I have found these 3 cameras to be within 20 bucks of each other.
If all are around the same $ amount,what would be your choice & why?
Nikon cool pix s4000
Cannon sd1300
Panasonic FH20
I have not seen very good reviews on the Nikon
Joanne Dunstan (02/01/2011)
We bought this camera 3 weeks ago from the above recommendation and used it on a trip around Europe. The photos are amazing. A fantastic easy to use camera. We love the intelligent auto setting - it works out what sort of photo you are taking i.e. self portrait, landscape etc. and the light - night, day, dull etc. and chooses the best mode to shoot the photo in!! Highly recommend to anyone. A great point & shoot camera leaving you with time to enjoy the experience rather than fiddling with the camera. Thank you Digital Camera HQ.
reply to this comment
Tom (01/30/2011)
What is the difference between the FH20 and the FH22?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/31/2011)
FH22 has a 3-inch touch screen, FH20 has 2.7-inch non-touch screen. Otherwise identical.
reply to this comment
Tom (01/31/2011)
thanks, that's what i thought when i did the research but i wanted to be sure i wasn't missing something. i went with the Canon SD1300 IS instead of this one and i'm very pleased with my decision so far!
reply to this comment
beat-rice (02/05/2011)
how is the touchscreen on the FH22? is it worth it, does it freeze?
reply to this comment
Confused (Shawn Campbell — 01/28/2011)
This is the best site I've found to get the most in-depth feedback. One question to add: My wife and I have had the Canon SD850IS for the past few years, loved it, and recently dropped it and now it's dead! I am in charge of finding a replacement. So far, I've narrowed down to the FH20 ($129), ZS5 ($176), SD1400 ($178), SD4000 ($239). Not super price sensitive but the SD4000 would really have to be worth it to spend the additional $50+ (even more in the case of the FH20). We are really happy with Canon's features and picture quality, but would love the additional zoom capabilities. Is ZS5 better value than the SD4000? What about the FH20 compared to the SD1400? Struggling here because it's tough to determine if the picture quality is truly noticeable. We use the camera frequently, but mainly point and shoot while traveling, family/friends pics, etc. The most sophisticated we've gotten is using the manual setting with slow synchro to take night shots and still capture the background scene. Thanks!!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/28/2011)
I think that you'll find the difference in the SD4000 to be noticeable, especially in dim settings. It gets compared favorably to the $350 Canon S95, which itself gets a whole lot of praise. The SD4000 will give you the best picture quality of any of those cameras.
Buuuuut, it may turn out that you're totally fine with the ZS5's image quality, which is still quite good. That extra zoom will come in handy many times.
The FH20 is a great cheap camera, but if you're willing to spend more, you should -- visible difference. SD1400 is also a very good camera, but I think $178 is maybe a little bit too much money -- I bought one as a gift for about $140 around Christmas.
reply to this comment
Buuuuut, it may turn out that you're totally fine with the ZS5's image quality, which is still quite good. That extra zoom will come in handy many times.
The FH20 is a great cheap camera, but if you're willing to spend more, you should -- visible difference. SD1400 is also a very good camera, but I think $178 is maybe a little bit too much money -- I bought one as a gift for about $140 around Christmas.
Shawn Campbell (01/28/2011)
Thanks Liam! I guess the prices on the SD4000 have increased post-Christmas. Other than the zoom advantage for the ZS5, and the better picture quality for the SD4000, any other meaningful differences between those two cameras?
reply to this comment
J Bower (01/27/2011)
My husband and I are planning a trip to Mexico and am looking at upgrading our camera before the trip. We also have a young son, so a camera with the ability to take short video clips would be a plus. I am just looking for nice point and shoot camera that isn't extremely expensive but can take great, quick pictures of our active boy and the occasional video to email to family and friends. At one point I considered getting a FlipHD video camera and keeping our current camera but now I am leaning toward upgrading our point and shoot so I only have to keep track of one device. Any suggestions on which camera to buy?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/27/2011)
You might want to look at what we call "travel zoom" cameras. They're point and shoots at heart, but have good video modes, long zooms (handy for getting shots of far-away landmarks/sites etc), and generally better image quality than standard point and shoots. I put a link to our travel zoom (aka compact zoom) roundup at the bottom of the post, any of the ones that we listed are a solid purchase, your choice beyond that based on the specs/features.
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
J Bower (01/27/2011)
Thanks for the input, this will be most helpful...I think am leaning towards the Lumix DMC-ZS5...this camera was also suggested to me by a collegue.
reply to this comment
Question (Mary Feldman — 01/25/2011)
I purchased the Panasonic FH20 today at Costco, and after reading your reviews, I am concerned about the camera not having a view finder. I live at the beach and with my old camera I can't see the screen because of the bright sun. Do you think I would be able to see the subject well enough to take the picture with the FH20? I'm thinking of taking the camera back because of that although it has great reviews. What camera would be comparable to the FH20 that has a view finder? Would appreciate your help. I gave $139 for the camera and would like something in that price range. Thanks, Mary
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/25/2011)
Unfortunately there are no cameras with viewfinders in production that price range anymore -- camera companies pretty much got rid of that feature, to the chagrin of many casual outdoor photographers.
You can step up a few hundred dollars to an extended zoom camera -- most have viewfinders -- or an advanced compact, but you're talking $350-$500.
Canon has one model coming out next month, and it will literally be the only low-cost camera with a viewfinder. It's called the A1200, will cost $100, runs on AA batteries. It should be pretty solid, though you'll give up the zoom range and HD video of the FH20.
reply to this comment
You can step up a few hundred dollars to an extended zoom camera -- most have viewfinders -- or an advanced compact, but you're talking $350-$500.
Canon has one model coming out next month, and it will literally be the only low-cost camera with a viewfinder. It's called the A1200, will cost $100, runs on AA batteries. It should be pretty solid, though you'll give up the zoom range and HD video of the FH20.
Thanks! and another Question (Mary Feldman — 01/25/2011)
Thanks so much for your quick reply! Since I live in HI where it's very bright and sunny, will I be able to see the screen at all outside to frame the subject of the picture? Or will it just be dark?
I would really love to keep this camera...
Thanks for your help,
Mary
reply to this comment
I would really love to keep this camera...
Thanks for your help,
Mary
Buy the FH20 or wait 'til the FH25 comes out? (Deb — 01/24/2011)
From what I've read, the FH20 is a great little camera, but the lack of a Leica lens is a possible drawback. The FH25 will include a Leica, right? Should I wait until it becomes affordable ($150 or so), or is it not that critical on a camera in this range?
I found a ZR3 for less than $150 if I don't mind buying the display model, and the store's web site says it is 14.1 mp and has a Leica lens. Does anyone know if this correct?
FYI, I'm replacing a PowerShot A1100 (I returned it due to reliability issues), and I can use my old PowerShot A70 in the meantime, so I don't have to purchase a new camera ASAP.
reply to this comment
I found a ZR3 for less than $150 if I don't mind buying the display model, and the store's web site says it is 14.1 mp and has a Leica lens. Does anyone know if this correct?
FYI, I'm replacing a PowerShot A1100 (I returned it due to reliability issues), and I can use my old PowerShot A70 in the meantime, so I don't have to purchase a new camera ASAP.
Liam McCabe (01/24/2011)
We certainly have high hopes for the FH25. The upgrades absolutely sound worthwhile on paper, but we do have to wait to see if they're really notable. The Leica name is certainly attractive and they make great lenses, but it is just a name -- might not translate to real-world improvement, who knows? The one thing that worries us about the FH25 is the 16 MP count -- that's a ridiculous number, might end up hurting image quality compared to the FH20.
Those are correct specs regarding the ZR3 -- when you break it down, it actually looks pretty similar to the FH25 on paper, though again, not sure how they'll compare in practice. We reviewed the ZR3 last year, it's a fine camera, though something about it felt a bit incomplete, and it wasn't worth the MSRP in our opinion ($150 is a strong deal though).
reply to this comment
Those are correct specs regarding the ZR3 -- when you break it down, it actually looks pretty similar to the FH25 on paper, though again, not sure how they'll compare in practice. We reviewed the ZR3 last year, it's a fine camera, though something about it felt a bit incomplete, and it wasn't worth the MSRP in our opinion ($150 is a strong deal though).
Deb (01/24/2011)
Thanks! I took a trip to the store to see about the ZR3. If they had a new one for that price, I'd have snatched it up, but the thought of buying a display model made me antsy. As it turned out, they didn't have it at all. I did take some time to look at the FH20, but since it's not citical for me to buy a new camera right now, I'll wait. When the FH25 has been out a while, I'll check back here to see what everyone thinks. In the meantime, I'll keep my eye out for a bargain.
reply to this comment
? ref/ Panasonic fh20, zs5, etc (Stephen N McKinney — 01/21/2011)
I am ready to buy and really like the reviews on the Panasonic ZS5 (which seems to match what I want with what I can pay with me being an amateur) but while reading the 'Con' reviews they seemed to jell down to poor customer service and proprietary batteries - what do you think? is this a minor point or not (I owned an HP laptop that was great but when it came to customer service I was so put-out that when I upgraded I steered clear of HP) and I don't know what to think about the batteries - thanks in advance for any guidance on this. Steve
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/21/2011)
I think those are minor points. The ZS5's battery, as far as I remember, is entirely middle of the road. You'll get about 200-220 shots out of a charge. I really don't think it's a problem.
As for customer service reviews, I really haven't heard anything that makes Panasonic stick out as particularly bad compared to other manufacturers. Canon seems to be the best, Fuji the worst, Panasonic in the middle, probably closer to Canon. Just keep in mind that people usually write on this kind of site to complain about bad experiences 10 times as often as they'll write about a good one. People also don't like to be told that they're wrong or that nothing can be done to help them, regardless of fault. I've also seen some consumer reports indicating that Panasonics have the lowest rate of failure in the $200-300 camera bracket (the ZS5 was originally around $250) compared to any other brand. Also, HP is famous for having perhaps the worst customer service of any brand in the entire consumer electronics industry, so I don't think you're going to have as bad of an experience as that no matter what.
reply to this comment
As for customer service reviews, I really haven't heard anything that makes Panasonic stick out as particularly bad compared to other manufacturers. Canon seems to be the best, Fuji the worst, Panasonic in the middle, probably closer to Canon. Just keep in mind that people usually write on this kind of site to complain about bad experiences 10 times as often as they'll write about a good one. People also don't like to be told that they're wrong or that nothing can be done to help them, regardless of fault. I've also seen some consumer reports indicating that Panasonics have the lowest rate of failure in the $200-300 camera bracket (the ZS5 was originally around $250) compared to any other brand. Also, HP is famous for having perhaps the worst customer service of any brand in the entire consumer electronics industry, so I don't think you're going to have as bad of an experience as that no matter what.
thanks (Stephen McKinney — 01/22/2011)
thanks for the quick reply and even handed comments on customer service and batteries. I will use customer reviews (when they have knowledgeable replies) more often in the future. Steve.
p.s. I think I'll get the FS5 and will write you later after a couple months use
reply to this comment
p.s. I think I'll get the FS5 and will write you later after a couple months use
Viewfinder (Bob Anderson — 01/20/2011)
What do you recommend if one wants a similiar camera but with a through the lens virewfinder
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (01/20/2011)
Unfortunately, you really don't have any options. Since LCDs are pretty cheap these days, viewfinders have fallen out of fashion -- they're expensive, bulky, and not very effective for framing shots, since they only cover about 50% of the field of view. But as I'm sure you know, they help keep the camera steady, and they're the only way you'll be able to frame a shot in direct sunlight.
Currently, there are no low-cost compacts with viewfinders. If you can wait a few weeks, Canon is releasing one for old times' sake, the Canon A1200. It's only $100, but you don't get HD video, the zoom is much shorter, and it runs on AA batteries. Or you could try to track down a discontinued model, like the A1100 IS or SD1200, but the prices on those are a bit too high these days to justify a purchase.
Or, you can pay $200-400 to get a superzoom with an electronic viewfinder; pay $300-500 and get an advanced compact with a viewfinder; or $500+ for a dSLR or mirrorless camera (the mirrorless models use electronic viewfinders).
Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Currently, there are no low-cost compacts with viewfinders. If you can wait a few weeks, Canon is releasing one for old times' sake, the Canon A1200. It's only $100, but you don't get HD video, the zoom is much shorter, and it runs on AA batteries. Or you could try to track down a discontinued model, like the A1100 IS or SD1200, but the prices on those are a bit too high these days to justify a purchase.
Or, you can pay $200-400 to get a superzoom with an electronic viewfinder; pay $300-500 and get an advanced compact with a viewfinder; or $500+ for a dSLR or mirrorless camera (the mirrorless models use electronic viewfinders).
Hope this helps.
? ref/ Panasonic fh20, zs5, etc (Stephen N McKinney — 01/21/2011)
I am ready to buy and really like the reviews on the Panasonic ZS5 (which seems to match what I want with what I can pay with me being an amateur) but while reading the 'Con' reviews they seemed to jell down to poor customer service and proprietary batteries - what do you think? is this a minor point or not (I owned an HP laptop that was great but when it came to customer service I was so put-out that when I upgraded I steered clear of HP) and I don't know what to think about the batteries - thanks in advance for any guidance on this. Steve
reply to this comment
Need imput on camera to buy. (lucille zabel — 01/19/2011)
I lost a Canon SD850 IS and am trying to replace it and am shopping around. I looked at a Canon SD1300 but don't like it's flimsy feel, especially when you put in the memory stick and battery. I would like to know how this Lumix compares with the 2 cameras. I really liked the Canon 850. But I am open to new adventure as I am a young 72 years.
reply to this comment
Laurel (01/19/2011)
I need a new camera and I am really torn between the Lumix fh-20/22 and the Samsung PL200. Are there differences between the two besides the fh20 has 8 times zoom while the samsung has 7x's?
reply to this comment
chinese instructions (dean knapp — 01/16/2011)
does this come with any manual or built-in Chinese instructions like Kodak has?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/18/2011)
Yes. But if you didn't get one, you can download a PDF copy from Panasonic.com under support. But if you didn't get a manual with it, that could mean you bought a camera that's considered "gray merchandise," and that could mean you have no honorable warranty.
reply to this comment
zexi (01/16/2011)
Is it compulsory for a new camera to have a warranty card? I am Asian and wanted to buy this camera but the warranty card that was included in the package is only for USA.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (01/16/2011)
Well it definitely doesn't have to have a warranty that applies to you. There are a lot of gray market items out there with varying warranties. I believe you can send the camera to the US to get it fixed, but you'll need to check the terms on the card.
reply to this comment
macro? (bob talong — 01/16/2011)
does it do macro? I wanted a camera to use to take snaps of coins.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (01/16/2011)
It does, and I'd suggest you take a look at close-up diopters to get even closer. Raynox makes some good ones for compact cameras.
reply to this comment
Tammy (01/15/2011)
Trying to figure out which digital camera would be best for me... Panasonic FH20, Fugi JZ300, or Fugi S2500. I have a child who plays ball and runs in track, grandchildren, pets, and we vacation. I have a cheap point and shoot Casio- it does not fill my needs. What would you suggest. Thinking about spending around $200.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (01/16/2011)
For taking pictures of outdoors sports the S2500 has the zoom you'll want. The lens isn't all that fast, though, so you'll be limited to outdoor sports in bright conditions. It is definitely the most versatile of those you list, if a bit larger.
reply to this comment
advice please ( — 01/09/2011)
hi,im new to photography,so i started with the fh20 based on ur review,and it was such an experience,its an amazing camera for beginners who wanna do it with no complicated settings and still get some real nice images,but now i wanna move into another camera,something with changeable lenses,more zoom and more manual than the fh20 for a budget of 650$ or less,can u recommend anything for me? thanks
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/11/2011)
The Canon T1i recently underwent and update and a price cut, so check that out. The XSi and XS are also in that budget range, but without video.
reply to this comment
Nikon S6000 or Panasonic FH20 ? ( — 01/09/2011)
I am also confused between these two Panasonic Lumix FH20 & Nikon S6000 ... which one to go for ?
I only need good picture quality with 6 - 8 X optical zoom ...
Does not bother much about the "movie mode".
Powershot series seems no midway zoom range ... from 3.3/4X to straight 10/12X !
Any suggestion please ?
reply to this comment
I only need good picture quality with 6 - 8 X optical zoom ...
Does not bother much about the "movie mode".
Powershot series seems no midway zoom range ... from 3.3/4X to straight 10/12X !
Any suggestion please ?
by James DeRuvo (01/11/2011)
Both are rated about the same, with the edge given to the FH20. And even though it was DHQs camera of the year last year, it had it's issues in low light. May I suggest another Panasonic the ZS7? About the same, better in low light, IIRC. But the S6000 is pretty good. Better than previous Nikon's in the category, IMHO.
reply to this comment
URGENT!! ( — 01/02/2011)
Hello, I was wondering whether I should by this camera or the Sony DSC-W380 or the W350. Many thanks in advance!
reply to this comment
fh20 camara ( — 01/01/2011)
does this camarasupports panaormic photography
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (01/01/2011)
Yes the FH20 has a panorama mode.
reply to this comment
Disappointed and confused ( — 12/31/2010)
I bought this camera based on your review. I took indoor shots using intelligent auto, had them printed at Walgreen's, liked the results. (Although I had to hit the "enhance" color adjustment to get more contrast on every shot.) In St.Louis over the holidays I only used IA because I didn't have time before traveling to explore the other options. Indoor shot results were BAD! Two photos of the same person, no external changes, no camera changes, had one looking color-correct and one looking yellow. Same with a group shot, and the second one had a gray blob in the middle of my sister's dark green shirt. The yellow-orange hue was present in more than 3/4 of the indoor shots. I've read reviews since that advise that you should turn off the flash, but what does "intelligent auto" mean then? The manufacturers review states that the camera will choose the best settings in that mode. Obviously not. Why did you get such good results and I didn't? Why were my first shots at home so good? Two days later, not good. Frustrated! And no response from Panasonic to my email.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/31/2010)
Intelligent auto is one of the better auto modes out there, but it's not perfect -- it still can't account for all the tiny variations in settings that can throw off the final results. Yellow tinting is a common problem with indoor shots, especially when the flash is on. Basically, auto modes like iAuto do a reasonably good job of getting good shots most of the time. In tough situations, like poorly lit indoor settings, it's going to have a harder time getting those good shots. You should try experimenting with turning the flash on/off, adjusting the white balance (this will fix your yellow hue problem), and toying with ISO (light sensitivity) settings. Any $150 camera is going to run into issues -- we just think that this one was the best value this year.
reply to this comment
Tyler (12/28/2010)
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE if your going to review cameras. Put up some portraits taken with and without flash. Basically the most important thing in judging a camera and I hardly see any on this site
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/29/2010)
I'd check imaging-resource.com under sample images, and then I'd look on FLickr, tagging your search for the FH20.
reply to this comment
Customer352 (12/28/2010)
How does this camera do in fluorescent lighting? Or in gymnasiums? Terrible. the picture quality is very bad and yellowish.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/28/2010)
You should try adjusting the white balance setting -- it's a simple fix and you'll probably be satisfied. There is a setting specifically for fluorescent lights. If that doesn't work, you can set a custom white balance that suits your needs.
reply to this comment
Stephanie (12/27/2010)
How does this camera do in fluorescent lighting? Or in gymnasiums?
reply to this comment
Sparky (12/24/2010)
Comparing quality of photo;s even in low light .. which will be better option.
Lumix FH20 or Nikon Coolpix S6000
reply to this comment
Lumix FH20 or Nikon Coolpix S6000
Liam McCabe (12/26/2010)
We prefer the FH20.
reply to this comment
Date stamp (Cliff Pilcher — 12/24/2010)
Liam,
I am planning to print pictures at a retail store (Walmart, Walgreens, etc). Will the date print on pictures processed at retail stores? If so, how do you set the camera to do this?
THanks for your advice.
reply to this comment
I am planning to print pictures at a retail store (Walmart, Walgreens, etc). Will the date print on pictures processed at retail stores? If so, how do you set the camera to do this?
THanks for your advice.
by James DeRuvo (12/24/2010)
Thats most likely a question at the retail store. the FH20 supports PICTBRIDGE, which takes the date data from the image file.
reply to this comment
kelly quarles (12/23/2010)
does this camera put the dat on the pict when you print it
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/23/2010)
You can have it do that, sure.
reply to this comment
how long does it last (yini — 12/23/2010)
i am seriously considering buying this camera, but i have been reading reviews that say that the fh20 doesnt even last a month, meaning there are errors when turning it on etc. i was wondering if there has been anyone who has had this camera for longer than a month and if so does it still perform as good as it did the first day it was used?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/23/2010)
I have not heard anything about widespread errors. Even so, if it breaks within a month, it's well within the warranty period so you can exchange it.
reply to this comment
Mary (12/18/2010)
I just received my Panasonic Lumix fh20 last night and today was the first time I used it. The
outdoor pictures look great. The indoor pictures with a cream wall all look very yellow/orange tinted. The entire picture is this way, including the people. I had it on the auto intelligence setting. Is there something to change to make indoor pictures look better? Thanks.
reply to this comment
outdoor pictures look great. The indoor pictures with a cream wall all look very yellow/orange tinted. The entire picture is this way, including the people. I had it on the auto intelligence setting. Is there something to change to make indoor pictures look better? Thanks.
by James DeRuvo (12/18/2010)
Change you white balance settings to indoor lighting. Usually a light bulb icon. That'll give you a cooler look. Temperature wise.
reply to this comment
(12/31/2010)
If you change your white balance settings for indoor shots, does that mean that if you see a bird on the patio and you step outside to take a quick shot, you have to change settings so that the outdoor shot will be a good one? That seems problematic.
reply to this comment
additional note to yellow issue ( — 12/31/2010)
Most perplexing is why two shots of the same indoor scene - my sister sitting in a chair - has one colored correctly and one colored yellow. . . less than a minute between shots - no lighting changes at all - just a second shot. Why is the camera inconsistent in this way? A defect?
reply to this comment
400 plus pics change batteries (Lin — 12/16/2010)
What type of camera did you get and are you happy with it.
The Panasonic FH 20 had good reviews, but it has a rechargable battery, and I like you need to replace batteries on the fly, take lots of sports pics of kids, so need good zoom and very fast shutter speed. Bought a fuji in May, SR1800 as the SR700 was great, but unless I have it set wrong, this one does not measure up at all.
Any suggestions. We can go 250, but not much higher.
reply to this comment
The Panasonic FH 20 had good reviews, but it has a rechargable battery, and I like you need to replace batteries on the fly, take lots of sports pics of kids, so need good zoom and very fast shutter speed. Bought a fuji in May, SR1800 as the SR700 was great, but unless I have it set wrong, this one does not measure up at all.
Any suggestions. We can go 250, but not much higher.
Video & zoom together?? (Carolyn — 12/15/2010)
Can I use the zoom while filming in video mode?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/15/2010)
No, not on this camera. It's not a common feature on most cameras under $175.
reply to this comment
Crop feature with in the Camera? (Robin — 12/15/2010)
Does this camera have a feature in the camera to crop your photos after you take the picture? My Kodak camera had that, but unfortunately lens broke twice and was very noisy...
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/16/2010)
Any type of photo editing, even cropping, is best done in software as it gives you far more control and better choices than the limited options that in camera will provide.
reply to this comment
Cliff Pilcher (12/14/2010)
Will it print the date only on the picture without the travel destination or baby info or pet info?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/16/2010)
If your printer is PICTBRIDGE compatible, and most are these days, then you can. The printer will pick up the date EXIF data embedded in the image.
To make a short story long, yes. But IF...
reply to this comment
To make a short story long, yes. But IF...
Date Stamp (Cliff Pilcher — 12/17/2010)
Thanks James. This is my first digital camera, and I have never printed pictures from one. I expect I will go to Walmart or Walgreens and print them there. Can those pictures be processed with only the date stamped? I have already ordered the FH20 camera, but it was with the expectation that I could process pictures at a local retailer with only the date stamped on them. My current film camera Pentax 115v does this. I really appreciate your taking the time to respond to my inquiries.
reply to this comment
Date Stamp only (Cliff Pilcher — 12/20/2010)
Thanks James. At this time, I will not be printing pictures at home. I plan to go to Walmart or Walgreens to process my pictures. When processing the pictures at a retail store, will I be able to print the pictures with just the date showing on them?
reply to this comment
Date Stamp (Cliff Pilcher — 12/20/2010)
Sorry for doubling up on my response.
reply to this comment
Help! I can't decide!! (DeniLau — 12/12/2010)
I'm trying to decide which of these cameras to purchase:
Powershot Canon SD4500 IS or
Powershot Canon S95
Coolpix Nikon S80 100 1080i or
Coolpix Nikon P7000
Panasonic Lumix FH20 or
Panasonic ZS3
I'm really interested in the low light shooting and fast, clear multiple pictures as well as high quality HD Video. I need a camera to shoot my babies and my current canon point and shoot just gives me blurry images. Price is not a concern for me. Please help me decide! Thank you for your help in advance.
reply to this comment
Powershot Canon SD4500 IS or
Powershot Canon S95
Coolpix Nikon S80 100 1080i or
Coolpix Nikon P7000
Panasonic Lumix FH20 or
Panasonic ZS3
I'm really interested in the low light shooting and fast, clear multiple pictures as well as high quality HD Video. I need a camera to shoot my babies and my current canon point and shoot just gives me blurry images. Price is not a concern for me. Please help me decide! Thank you for your help in advance.
Liam McCabe (12/13/2010)
If price is not a consideration, the Canon S95 is probably the best bet on that list. Great all around camera.
reply to this comment
Becky (12/10/2010)
Can you please compare the FH20 to the Sony Cyber Shot W370 and the Nikon S8100? I take just about any type of photo from Houses for Real Estate to wildlife photos while kayaking to still photos. Far too much info out there, it just keeps getting more confusing.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/13/2010)
If you're shooting indoor real estate shots, the S8100 takes the best indoor pictures. It's also close to $100 more expensive than either the Sony or Panny, so tough to do a head-to-head comparison. If you're willing to spend the money, the S8100 is the best bet. The FH20 is the best cheap camera you can get, but if you're thinking about going for more, the S8100 is a better camera.
reply to this comment
Indy Mom (12/09/2010)
I was planning to buy a Flip for our 12 year old. Salesman talked me out of it and suggested purchasing a point and shoot with video capability. Does the FH20 take decent video (will it basically do what the Flip can do as far as video is concerned)?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/09/2010)
Roughly, yes (and I agree with the salesman, to a point). The Flip shoots 720p HD video with image stabilization, as does the FH20.
The Flip is a fine pocket camera, and the interface and uploading/sharing are really, really easy to use. But it's not like you need a PhD to work the FH20 either.
reply to this comment
The Flip is a fine pocket camera, and the interface and uploading/sharing are really, really easy to use. But it's not like you need a PhD to work the FH20 either.
help (Jeannette Cook — 12/08/2010)
Hello,
I am wondering if this camera will be good for taking action shots of my kids playing basketball as well as for close ups of free throw shooting, etc?
reply to this comment
I am wondering if this camera will be good for taking action shots of my kids playing basketball as well as for close ups of free throw shooting, etc?
Liam McCabe (12/13/2010)
It's not ideal for those things, but for the money, it's about as good as you can get.
reply to this comment
macro mode (ann kendrick — 12/08/2010)
Could you tell me if the flash mode has a manual setting for macro shots? I need to take macro pictures of jewelry for sale. thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/08/2010)
You can turn the flash on or off in macro mode, sure.
reply to this comment
Why not a Kodak w similar mps and op zoom? (Paula Roberts — 12/08/2010)
Hello - This may be a dumb question, but why chose the Panasonic FH20 over the Kodak M580? I am looking for a Christmas present for my elderly mother. I need an easy to use camera which takes good pictures. I probably won't need the video modes. The Kodak is significantly less expensive. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/08/2010)
The Kodak is slower, does not focus as quickly/accurately, the image quality is not as clear, and does not feel as well built.
reply to this comment
Sheila (12/08/2010)
My daughter is in pageants. I'm can't always sit close to the stage. Most of the time the pictures come out dark and the contestants eyes are shining. The lightening is pretty dark. Will I have the same issues with the FH20? Or could you recommend another camera?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/08/2010)
You'll likely have the same problem with the FH20 -- the setting you described is one of the most difficult settings to get good pictures. Very tough to avoid unless you're willing to spend $500+ on a dSLR. The Fuji F80EXR, Nikon S8100, or Canon SD4500 should be decent compromises.
reply to this comment
Sheila (12/09/2010)
Thank you.
reply to this comment
FH20/22 Comparison (Renee — 12/06/2010)
What is the difference between the FH20 & the FH22? Is one recommended more than the other for a casual user?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/07/2010)
FH22 -- touchscreen. FH20 -- no touchscreen. Completely identical otherwise.
reply to this comment
query about shipment (Kumar Prashant — 12/06/2010)
can it be shipped to my location -
Pilibhit, UP, India
reply to me at percy2100@sify.com
reply to this comment
Pilibhit, UP, India
reply to me at percy2100@sify.com
Liam McCabe (12/06/2010)
We don't sell cameras. I do know that Amazon.com offers worldwide shipping, but that's really a question for the merchant.
reply to this comment
disturbing again (kumar prashant — 12/06/2010)
sorry for disturbing again but i am new to this type of shopping and will be thankful if you let me know how to know exactly that it can be shipped to me or not
reply to this comment
zoom concerns (leslei fisher — 12/02/2010)
I have a 3 year old Lumix DZT...I love EXCEPT it Sucks at zoom. Any thing over 2X is very soft and grainy. I am afraid to buy another Panasonic because I use zoom a lot (especially for landscapes)...How do the 2010 Panasonics perform at full optical (not digital) zoom?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/02/2010)
The FH20 was our camera of the year last year. Good focus, even in low light. The ZS5 and 7 are this year's champs so far. But remember, the larger the zoom, the slower the lens at the extreme ends of the focal length.
reply to this comment
zoom concerns (leslei fisher — 12/02/2010)
Thanks for the input! I've decided to go with the ZS5, I think overall it fits me best...hopefully 4 years newer technology will resolve the zoom issue for me :)
reply to this comment
(12/04/2010)
I wasn't sure how to post this or where to post this... But...Hi, I'd love some advice on buying a new camera. I currently have an old Sony Cybershot DCS-W50. It has served its purpose and has even taken some great pictures, but I am in the market for a much better camera. Honestly, my most important goal with a camera is excellent picture quality, really sharp, beautiful pictures. I also would like a camera that that doesnt have a long shutter lag. Not sure if that's the correct way of putting it? But want something QUICK from when you press the button to when it takes the picture. I do not want to miss moments and with my current camera I am. I am also interested in learning more about photography. I guess you could say I am a hobbyist. I take pictures constantly, often blow them up to 8 X 10 size or larger and use them throughout the house as "art.". Though I am not ready for a DSLR, I would like something with some options, something I can learn with and from. Want to mainly take pictures of family, my new daughter, and outside nature pictures, especially of the beach. My price range is up to $400. Would the Panasonic FZ100 or FZ40 be a good option? Or the Sony HX1? I heard the Nikon P100 doesnt have good image quality? Are these cameras good for my needs? Or would I want something more compact? What are the benefits of these superzooms? Would they take a better pictures? I understand you can't get the same picture quality of a DSLR with a point and shoot, but I want the best picture quality possible that I can get. Any suggestions? Much thanks in advance.
reply to this comment
shutter lag on lumix (jackie — 11/29/2010)
what is the shutter lag on the lumix? my daughter wants a camera that takes a picture quickly. i'm having a hard time finding shutter lag speeds on any camera.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/30/2010)
It's pretty quick, as long as you pre-focus -- hold the shutter halfway down while you're framing the shot, then fully press. Shutter lag is less of an issue than it was a few years ago. Any camera we recommend here, shutter lag is barely an issue.
reply to this comment
Nicole (11/29/2010)
I am shopping for a compact and am not sure if i should get this one or spend $70 more and buy the ZS5 with a Leica lens?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/30/2010)
Those are two very good options, but it seems like you're just debating how much you want to spend, can't decide that for you. If you think you'll end up pursuing photography as a bit of a hobby, the ZS5 is a better option for the lens and for the manual control that it offers. If you just want to have a solid shooter around for casual use, you'll probably be fine with the FH20.
reply to this comment
Lumix FH20 equivalent that uses AA batteries? (Nikki — 11/29/2010)
I usually much prefer using AA batteries to rechargeable batteries. Is there a Lumix equivalent to this FH20 that uses AA batteries? I've read that cameras that use AA batteries are much slower than those that use rechargeable lithium ion. Is this true? Would I really be losing that much speed and performance by choosing a model that uses AA batteries?
Thanks in advance for your help!
reply to this comment
Thanks in advance for your help!
Liam McCabe (11/29/2010)
There aren't any current Panasonic/Lumix cameras that run on AA batteries unfortunately -- there aren't many AA-powered cameras, period, and only a couple worth buying, unfortunately.
As for AA cameras being slower than rechargeable lithium, I don't imagine that has anything to do with the type of battery -- it's more because the absolute cheapest models in a company's lineup run on AAs, while the more able cameras run on Li Ion. I just tested one of Canon's rare mid-range cameras with AA batteries, and it was decently fast.
We do have a roundup of good AA-powered cameras here:
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
reply to this comment
As for AA cameras being slower than rechargeable lithium, I don't imagine that has anything to do with the type of battery -- it's more because the absolute cheapest models in a company's lineup run on AAs, while the more able cameras run on Li Ion. I just tested one of Canon's rare mid-range cameras with AA batteries, and it was decently fast.
We do have a roundup of good AA-powered cameras here:
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
Nikki (11/29/2010)
Thanks for your quick response, Liam. If manufacturers really are moving away from AA batteries, maybe I'll have to suck it up and get used to the rechargeables. It just seems like rechargeables die just when you need them the most. I looked at reviews for the Canon SX130IS, but somehow that one's not as interesting to me as the Panasonic.
A lot of my photo-taking involves chasing my 4 year-old around, and with my old Nikon Coolpix all I usually get is the back of his head as he runs out of the frame. I HATE a slow camera. I've taken to using a Flip video camera and isolating still shots from there. Other photos are often indoors at family events.
I'm currently your average point-and-shoot photographer -- I normally just want to get good pictures without fussing with lots of controls. But, I do have an interest in learning more and maybe shooting landscapes, close-ups of flowers, etc, down the road. I want a camera that can grow with me as I learn more.
So, knowing more about my needs, would you recommend the Panasonic FH20 or the Canon SX130IS? I'm willing to let go of my attachment to AA batteries if the Panasonic is truly the better camera. Plus, the Panasonic is much cheaper -- currently $139.99 on Amazon.
Thanks so much!
reply to this comment
A lot of my photo-taking involves chasing my 4 year-old around, and with my old Nikon Coolpix all I usually get is the back of his head as he runs out of the frame. I HATE a slow camera. I've taken to using a Flip video camera and isolating still shots from there. Other photos are often indoors at family events.
I'm currently your average point-and-shoot photographer -- I normally just want to get good pictures without fussing with lots of controls. But, I do have an interest in learning more and maybe shooting landscapes, close-ups of flowers, etc, down the road. I want a camera that can grow with me as I learn more.
So, knowing more about my needs, would you recommend the Panasonic FH20 or the Canon SX130IS? I'm willing to let go of my attachment to AA batteries if the Panasonic is truly the better camera. Plus, the Panasonic is much cheaper -- currently $139.99 on Amazon.
Thanks so much!
panoramic pictures (Eric — 11/29/2010)
Does the FH20 have a panoramic option?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/30/2010)
Pano isn't that big an option anymore since most photo programs have stitching as a feature. So any camera will do. The key is to frame from shot to shot with a bit of overlap.
But the FH20 is a pretty good option, a bit spotty in low light though.
reply to this comment
But the FH20 is a pretty good option, a bit spotty in low light though.
View finding (Chris Gardiner — 11/29/2010)
We take photos in very bright light and need a convenient camera on which we can see the framed shot on the LCD screen. The camera we have now is impossible to see the shot on the screen.
reply to this comment
Samantha (11/28/2010)
Can you set the camera to automatically show the date EVERY time you take a photo without manually setting it each time?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/01/2010)
If your printer is PICT BRIDGE compatible, you can just plug in the camera and print directly from there. one of the options you can select is to print the date.
reply to this comment
FH20 or FH22 (artista11 — 11/26/2010)
I'm deciding between the FH20 and the FH22. What are the biggest difference? I believe the FH22 has a touch screen which i'm not crazy about. Thoughts? You prefer one over the other?
great website!!
thanks a million!
reply to this comment
great website!!
thanks a million!
Liam McCabe (11/29/2010)
Thanks -- right, the only difference is the touchscreen, which we are not crazy about either.
reply to this comment
artista11 (11/30/2010)
Thanks again for such a thorough website. Bought a FH20 via Costco yesterday. A woman mentioned in a prior post she couldn't find any to purchase. Not sure if that helps anyone. Thnx!!
reply to this comment
Advice (Joshua — 11/26/2010)
First off, grat site for people like me who dont know much about cameras. I am going to buy my girlfriend a camera for christmas and I am trying to choose between the FH20 and the Lumix FP8. She will take about 75% of her pictures indoors at parties and during holidays and the other 25% outside in the yard or camping. They both are the exact same price and she is also a camera rookie. Which one should I choose? Also, are there better choices than the two I've singled out?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/01/2010)
The FH20 was our camera of the year last year, but in low light conditions it wasn't without it's challenges. The FP8 though, is even worse as noise is noticeable at ISO400, which is a very common ISO speed. So given between the two, I'd go with the FH20. But check out the ZS7 as well.
reply to this comment
Joshua (12/01/2010)
Thanks for the advice, now I have another question. What is ISO and do I need to adjust it or does the camera (FH20) do it automatically?
reply to this comment
Battery Life (Jim Corkery — 11/26/2010)
Is battery life acceptable?
Any idea of how many shots can be taken on a set of batteries?
Thanks
Jim
reply to this comment
Any idea of how many shots can be taken on a set of batteries?
Thanks
Jim
Liam McCabe (11/29/2010)
About 200-220 shots on a charge (runs on a proprietary lithium battery, so no 'sets' per se). Par for the course, nothing to complain about.
reply to this comment
gail t (11/25/2010)
How does this camera work on flowers?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/29/2010)
Macro shots are decent -- I think the Canon SD1300 or SD1400 have a slight edge, but the FH20 can still do them pretty well, for what the camera is.
reply to this comment
Zoom feature (Doug — 11/23/2010)
Received conflicting reviews regarding the zoom capability. Will zoom work during video recording on the FH20?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/24/2010)
No it doesnt. And the reason is the the omnidirectional mic can pic up the noise ofthe lens zooming in/out. It's an overused feature anyway.
reply to this comment
Doug (11/24/2010)
James, you confirmed our initial understanding. Thanks for the quick response.
reply to this comment
Great 'little' camera (Matthias — 11/23/2010)
I am using a Nikon D80 for my photography of weddings etc, but I wanted a compact camera for vacations etc, when I don't want to pack my DSLR. I bought the Lumix FH-20 a while ago and I must say I am very surprised about the image quality of this 'little' camera. For most situations and everyday use it absolutely matches my DSLR. Plus it takes HD video, which is a good thing, because some scenes can not be captured fully with only one picture. The Ai (intelligent)is a great feature. In the beginning I tried to use different camera settings, but found that the Ai is the most reliable. Great point and shoot. Highly recommend this camera.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/23/2010)
How's theow light performance for you? I was DHQ's camera of re year in that price range but we found it's low light performance a challenge.
reply to this comment
Which is the better buy, FH-20 or Casio EX-H5? (Quaternion — 11/23/2010)
Both have about the same list price, but the H5 has a wider zoom (24mm --- 240mm), receives a higher rating from Consumer Reports, and receives an excellent review in steves-digicams.com . Are the any direct comparisons between these cams available? steves-digicams.com reviews the H5 but not the FH-20.
reply to this comment
quaternion (11/23/2010)
The title got omitted from the comment. That should read: Which is the better buy, the Casio XF-H5 or the FH20?
reply to this comment
Cathy Badoux (11/22/2010)
I am looking at buying this camera, or the Fuji S1800 18Xzoom 12 MP camera, or the Panasonic DMC ZR3. Which camera would you recommend for an everything camera? My budget is around $150. I have kids and we travel and camp alot, have horses, so we need something that can capture alot of outdoor and indoor and action! I can't find any stores in the area that carry these cameras (except the fuji) so I can't try them out : ( I like the photo quality on the panasonics, but I like the flash on the fuji. I need to know the differences between the two panasonics since they weren't very clear in the descriptions. Please help, I need to decide this week. Thanks!!!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/22/2010)
If you have $150, the FH20 is the best deal. ZR3 has a few features on the FH20 ("intelligent" zoom goes a bit longer than the FH20, and it has a nicer video format), but in my opinion it's not really worth the extra money unless you can get it for the same price, or plan to shoot a lot of video. I would not recommend that you buy the S1800. The big zoom looks cool, but it's a cheap camera with a big zoom attached -- often frustrating to use, and a lot of buyers ended up with lemons.
reply to this comment
Mary Kriebel (11/23/2010)
Can you obtain still photos from the videos that can be taken with this camera? I know it would need to be done on the computer, but is it possible to get a photo from a video segment? Also, does the red eye reduction in this camera do a good job? Thanks!
reply to this comment
Tom (11/16/2010)
is there a huge difference between the fh20 and the Kodak m580? Which is better for macro shots.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/16/2010)
I like to compare shots at flickr.com. Just input the model as a keyword, along with "macro" and you'll get a few examples. They're pretty similar color wise, but the M580 may have the edge macro wise.
reply to this comment
GT (11/15/2010)
A very high priority for me is the ease of getting photo's out of the camera and onto a computer. Does anyone know if the interface s/w provided is "very" user friendly? A previous Panasonic I had required a full dump of every photo on the SD card everytme I wanted to get a photo out.
reply to this comment
Debora McFearin (11/14/2010)
I am waiting on delivery of the FH20 and have a question on the SDHC card compatibitly with the emachine E525 laptop running 64bit windows 7 home. Can I use the SDHC card in my card reader without a problem.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/15/2010)
It should be fine, yeah. That's a relatively new system you're running, and SDHC cards have been in wide use for several years. Any decent card reader should be able to read one, no problem. Enjoy the camera!
reply to this comment
How about action shots? (Rhonda — 11/13/2010)
This camera sounds too good to be true! One question though...how does it do with action shots? My son plays sports and I want a camera that can capture him running without any problems. Thanks for any info you can give me!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/16/2010)
Well, it's a point and shoot, so it'll have some shutter lag. It's just the nature of the beast and it affects all other point and shoots as well. But there are ways to minimize it:
1. Prefocus. Push down the shutter half way to lock in the focus and when you're ready to take the picture, press it the rest of the way. If your subject moves farther away or closer in, re-prefocus.
2. Pan with the action. While doing #1, since your son is running, pan with him. That way you can keep him in focus.
3. Use the Sports preset. This will give you the fastest shutter and aperture settings, as well as boost the ISO a bit so you can capture the action faster.
4. Set your ISO to 400.
Doing these things and making them habits will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
reply to this comment
1. Prefocus. Push down the shutter half way to lock in the focus and when you're ready to take the picture, press it the rest of the way. If your subject moves farther away or closer in, re-prefocus.
2. Pan with the action. While doing #1, since your son is running, pan with him. That way you can keep him in focus.
3. Use the Sports preset. This will give you the fastest shutter and aperture settings, as well as boost the ISO a bit so you can capture the action faster.
4. Set your ISO to 400.
Doing these things and making them habits will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
Thanks! (Rhonda — 11/27/2010)
Thank you SO much for all the great information! Happy Holidays!
reply to this comment
Pat M (11/09/2010)
How does the FH20 cmpare with the newer FH22. I read some reviews indicating the 3" touchscreen was slow.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/10/2010)
They actually came out at the same time -- the FH22 was just released in brick-and-mortar stores only. We haven't tested it, but I can tell you why I'm not a fan of touchscreens. They drain the battery faster, it's easy to hit the wrong command on the screen (especially if it's unresponsive, as you've heard that it is), and it's much harder to use in a cold climate, where we have to wear gloves 3-4 months out of the year. Obviously if you're in Florida that won't matter, but it's something to think about.
Aside from the touchscreen, the performance (focus and lens speed, really) and image quality should be the same.
reply to this comment
Aside from the touchscreen, the performance (focus and lens speed, really) and image quality should be the same.
suranga (11/09/2010)
what is the difference between fh20 and fh22 ?
what is the better one?
reply to this comment
what is the better one?
Liam McCabe (11/09/2010)
The FH22 is an in-store-only version of the FH20. The only difference is that the FH22 has a 3-inch touchscreen as opposed to the 2.7-inch standard LCD on the FH20. Otherwise, they're the same -- same image quality. Touchscreens are flashy and everything, but they drain the battery quicker, and if you live in a cold climate, they're very difficult to operate with gloves on. It's a matter of personal taste.
reply to this comment
Too costly in India (Rachit — 11/08/2010)
Its too costly in India. Nearly $250. Not with this but all panasonic products. ZS5 (here TZ8) is about $380. This is making me to buy other brand. :(
reply to this comment
FH20 computer compatibility (L. Guinn — 11/07/2010)
Does the FH20 have computer hookup capability?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/08/2010)
Yes, all digital cameras hook up to computers.
reply to this comment
Social Media (Barb — 11/06/2010)
What about up-load to social media. Does the software have easy up-load
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/10/2010)
Not really necessary. Twitter and Facebook both have uploading utilities. If you're going with YouTube for video, same thing.
reply to this comment
Pamela (11/04/2010)
I am looking got the best little camera I can find. I don't care the price. I want one super camera that does it all! I travel often on Motorcycles and take alot of action shots while on the bike. (I'm the passenger... don't worry) I also take shots in low light and bright light. Video is a plus. Guess I need it all and still want it to fit in my pocket. What is the over all BEST smaller camera on the market?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/04/2010)
I think the FH20 would be great on the road. But low light is a tad spotty. But it's a good compact option.
reply to this comment
Pamela (11/04/2010)
Thank you for your prompt response. :) I really need something that is good with low light shots as well. Alot of my pictures are taken at night. I also need it to have a fast shutter speed and really good image stabilizer. In saying that the FH20 would not be good for me due to low light situations . What other camera do you think would fit my needs. Budget is not a problem. I would rather spend a pretty penny and be thrilled with my purchase than to regret not getting a better quality camera.
reply to this comment
Laurel (11/03/2010)
Can I choose to save to Raw format?? Thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/03/2010)
No, not on a camera like this. You only really start to see RAW on advanced compact cameras, up around the $400 range.
reply to this comment
Battery Life (Marlene — 11/03/2010)
I would like to know what the battery life on the FH20 is like prior to purchasing...and if there is a rechargable replacement battery you would recommend??
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/03/2010)
It takes about 200-225 shots on a charge, which is pretty average for this kind of camera. Not familiar with specific batteries, but Amazon usually has good batteries for a good price -- just search "Panasonic FH20 battery" and some results will pop up.
reply to this comment
Price not valid on Buydig (Ramona McCay — 11/03/2010)
You list the camera at $139.00 at BuyDig - It's listed at $199 - What gives?!!!!!
reply to this comment
List Price (Marlene — 11/03/2010)
You have to add it to your cart to see the price. It says suggested retail is 199.95...
reply to this comment
Ann Ho (11/02/2010)
Thank You! I will try it.
reply to this comment
Ann Hq (11/03/2010)
I formatted my SDHC card successfully yesterday. I am glad to discover this website while researching to purchase my new camera. Your site is very informative and helpful. Thanks for your prompt response. Ann
reply to this comment
Ann Ho (11/01/2010)
I just bought the Panasonic FH20. In the User's Guide, I do not find any instruction to format my SDHC card. Please help! Ann
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/02/2010)
It'll be in the camera setup menu.
reply to this comment
Kathie McCullough (11/01/2010)
does it control red-eye??
reply to this comment
Trying to decide?? (Janis — 11/01/2010)
I am trying to buy a new camera under $200. Between Nikon S4000 and the Panasonic Lumix FH20, which would you recommend? Or maybe there is something better?? I want a camera that has decent image quality and doesn't take forever to snap several photos at a time. I had a Canon Powershot A2100 and it was horrible, didn't last a year.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/01/2010)
We prefer the FH20. The S4000 is a solid little camera, but we're not big fans of touchscreens (drains the battery, easy to hit the wrong thing, and tough to use in cold weather) and we feel that the FH20 has a very well-balanced feature set.
reply to this comment
220V CHARGING (John McDonald — 10/30/2010)
Can the camera be recharged on both 120 and 220V or will I need a voltage convertor?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/30/2010)
most AC adapters are designed to handle up to 220v, but to be safe, I'd pick up a voltage converter. It's cheap insurance.
reply to this comment
Action shots (Callum — 10/29/2010)
Hi Guys,
Loved the review and your responses. I am a coach and have a young, active family that I want to take action shots of playing soccer, golf, tennis, skiing etc....is there anything comparable to the FH20 that I should consider? Is DSLR a huge enough improvement to warrant the extra $$ ? If so, which would you recommend ?
Thanks,
Callum
reply to this comment
Loved the review and your responses. I am a coach and have a young, active family that I want to take action shots of playing soccer, golf, tennis, skiing etc....is there anything comparable to the FH20 that I should consider? Is DSLR a huge enough improvement to warrant the extra $$ ? If so, which would you recommend ?
Thanks,
Callum
Liam McCabe (10/29/2010)
A dSLR is absolutely a huge improvement over a camera like this. The FH20 is a great camera for the money, but there's no comparison to the speed, image quality, and versatility of a dSLR. Check out our affordable dSLR roundup:
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
want to buy new (Divyesh — 10/28/2010)
Hi I wnat to purchase a new Point to shoot camera qith budget @ $150 not more.I need to take pictures in low light & night scenes.@ 12 to 14 MP. is FH20 good for me.....any of my friend didnt recommended to me as no one owns panasonic , most of them have Cannon ,Nikkon & sony. your answer will help me to buy one thanx
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/29/2010)
The FH20 is a good option, but low light can be it's Achilles heal in certain situations. But all around, it's a good option. Canon, however, is my platform of choice.
reply to this comment
Carol Bently (10/25/2010)
I'm looking for a nice basic simple, but good ditgial camera and really like what I read about this one...does this camera have a date mode? I want a camera that dates my pictures. Does it also come with the Lithium ion battery or do you have to purchase it separately? I'd love to see one up close, but it doesn't look like I have that option. Thanks for any info on this camera..much apreciated! Carol
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/25/2010)
Yes it has a date stamp, and yes it comes with a battery. Panasonic's website has higher-resolution images of the camera too.
reply to this comment
Considering buying the lumix fh20 and new iPad user. (Janet Bush — 10/24/2010)
Is the panasonic lumix fh20 compatible with my iPad?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/25/2010)
The iPad doesn't have an SD slot or USB port, so it's not directly compatible with any camera at all. There is no way to get the images/videos from any camera directly onto the iPad -- you still need a full-function computer to do that.
reply to this comment
Calder (10/29/2010)
You can buy an adapter for the iPad which will plug into the connector at the bottom which allows either for an SD card or USB direct connection.
reply to this comment
Pansonic FH20 vs Pansonic FP3 vs Sony W370 (Jacky — 10/23/2010)
Thanx for the good info. I need a point and shoot for video as well as pics. I currently have a Sony W120 which no longer does it for the shots I need. Looking at Sony W370 vs Pansonic FH20 vs Pansonic FP3 with Touch Screen. Would appreciate your thoughts. Even though I do lots of pics for websites and ebooks, I'd say I'm still a beginner with cameras. Thank you! Jacky
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/25/2010)
We think the FH20 is the best value for a point-and-shoot this year. The W370 is certainly a good option, but it costs a bit more than the FH20, and you don't get too much more from it aside from the sweep-panorama ability (pictures are a bit softer too). As for the FP3, touch-screen cameras from any manufacturer aren't all they're cracked up to be. They're flashy, but it's easy to mis-touch options on the screen, they drain the battery big time, and they're impossible to use with gloves, if you live in a cold climate. I'd say of those three, go with the FH20.
reply to this comment
Jacky (11/14/2010)
Thank you for you feed back. I ended up going to a camera shop and checking out all 3 cameras plus the Cannon PowerShot SX130 IS. In talking with the salesman and explaining exactly what I wanted to do and his explaining and showing all the features of each one, I decided on the Cannon PowerShot SX130 IS. It was more expensive but is twice the camera of the others, the video, and pics, especially the zoom feature appears to be sharper, and its easier to learn. Thank you again, J
reply to this comment
WendyW (Wendy Whelan — 10/22/2010)
My last two cameras were the panasonic Lumix TZ5 and ZS3. Both took great shots, i get tons of compliments on my photos. My problem is that the Zoom and focus went on the fritz on both of them. I went out and bought a little Nikon Coolpix S6000, but the pictures aren't nearly as clear and precise. My question, is this a common problem with the Panasonics? The FH20 sounds perfect for me, but i don't want to have to replace it 6-8 months down the line!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/22/2010)
I've heard some reports that Panasonic zoomers can break down, usually when dust gets into the lens. I agree with your assessment of the S6000 as well.
I guess it's a little bit too early to tell with the FH20 -- only been out for about 8 months at this point, but I personally haven't heard any complaints yet. It's a different model year than the ZS3 so hopefully Panasonic addressed the issue. Also FYI, the FH20 would be a bit of a step down from the ZS3 -- the shots are still very good for the price, but the ZS5 is more like the ZS3 in terms of picture quality.
reply to this comment
I guess it's a little bit too early to tell with the FH20 -- only been out for about 8 months at this point, but I personally haven't heard any complaints yet. It's a different model year than the ZS3 so hopefully Panasonic addressed the issue. Also FYI, the FH20 would be a bit of a step down from the ZS3 -- the shots are still very good for the price, but the ZS5 is more like the ZS3 in terms of picture quality.
John Cwynar (10/21/2010)
I am in the process of purchasing a Lumix FH20. Does a battery recharger usually come with the unit, or must I purchase this separately?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/21/2010)
It comes with a Battery Charger, no worries.
reply to this comment
Wendy Whelan (10/22/2010)
It's always a good idea to buy a second battery. You can have one in the camera and one in the charger. You don't want your battery to die on you during a special occasion or on vacation, this way you always have a back-up!
reply to this comment
camera for a beginner (Anu — 10/15/2010)
am a beginner and am all set to buy my first cam..
most of the pics that i take will be indoor and in mediocre lighting conditions..
i would prefer the ones that deliver crisp images,with good auto settings and battery life and am not very much into videos..
most of the time i would jus view the pics on my comp screen ,printing s very rare..
could u suggest me a camera under $200?
reply to this comment
most of the pics that i take will be indoor and in mediocre lighting conditions..
i would prefer the ones that deliver crisp images,with good auto settings and battery life and am not very much into videos..
most of the time i would jus view the pics on my comp screen ,printing s very rare..
could u suggest me a camera under $200?
Liam McCabe (10/15/2010)
Hate to break it to you, but you can't get a camera that consistently delivers crisp images indoors/in mediocre lighting conditions for under $200. They cost closer to $300, like the Canon SD4000.
The FH20 does well for the price point, we can say that, but it's still just OK at best. And of course, you can always turn on the flash.
reply to this comment
The FH20 does well for the price point, we can say that, but it's still just OK at best. And of course, you can always turn on the flash.
Lynn H (10/13/2010)
Ok, help me choose between the Nikon Coolpix s8000, Canon Powershot sd1400 and the Panasonic FH20!!! Thanks
reply to this comment
russ (10/11/2010)
older PC card readers are not cabable of reading the 4G format and tends to cause the PC to hang until removed
reply to this comment
kids sports pics (Renee — 10/10/2010)
take many photos of son's football games and basketball games...dm lighting. will this work?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/12/2010)
Well, football games under Friday night lights are far from "dim," and it should work fine. But in limited lighting with action, I think that's too much to ask of any point and shoot. So it depends on the lighting conditions.
reply to this comment
panasonic fh20 vs sony wx1 (sweet — 10/09/2010)
Which is better camera panasonic fh20 or the sony wx1. I understand that sony one is 50 bucks more expensive and has only 5x opitcal zoom and 10.2 megapixel camera. But which camera functions better in low light? Thanks,
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/12/2010)
The FH20 has truer color, I think, but at a cost. When you get to higher ISOs above 400, the noise really kicks in. So if you can keep the ISO below 1600, I give the edge to the FH20. The Sony isn't worth the extra $50. That's a nameplate premium, IMHO.
reply to this comment
Which one? (Alexandra — 10/09/2010)
I am debating between a few cameras; the panasonic lumix fh20, the canon powershot 940. 960, and 980. Any thoughts? I'm looking for an all around good camera with good picture quality. I thought I wanted the lumix, but canon seems to be a bit better quality...
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/12/2010)
We picked the FH20 as best camera in it's class last year, but it isn't without it's flaws as in low light it gets to be a bit of a challenge. Having said that, it's pretty much neck and neck with the SD 900 cameras. Check them out side by side here - imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP...
reply to this comment
Dates? (Jaimie K — 10/07/2010)
Can you set this camera to include the date on the photos?
If you were to choose between the Panasonic FH20, Canon Powershot A3100, and Canon Powershot SD1200 or 1300, which would you get?
Thanks!
reply to this comment
If you were to choose between the Panasonic FH20, Canon Powershot A3100, and Canon Powershot SD1200 or 1300, which would you get?
Thanks!
by James DeRuvo (10/08/2010)
If your printer is PICTBRIDGE compatible, you shouldn't have a problem with any of them. The PictBridge standard lets you print directly on a compatible digital printer. Print size, layout, date and other settings can be made with the camera.
reply to this comment
compared to canon (jaydden — 10/06/2010)
which is better this FH20 or the cannon A1300 ? in terms of image quality , video and all that?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/06/2010)
I think the FH20 has the advantage thanks to it's longer zoom, but it has sketchy performance in low light. Both take good pictures overall though so I'd still consider it.
reply to this comment
Need video zoom (J Parsons — 10/03/2010)
Hi, I was sold on the FH20 until I saw it could not zoom during video. I want to keep the camera small and love all you wrote in the review, just need the video zoom. I can spend @ $400-would you have a "hands-down" recommendation? Thank you.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/04/2010)
If you can go up to $400 then you have many, many options. We like the Panasonic ZS7 for video (and yes, it can zoom) and solid image quality too -- goes for about $270 these days.
The lack of video zoom on the FH20 is disappointing, yes, but it's a rare feature on a camera at this price, and very few still cameras had zoom during video at all even just 18 months ago. Maybe this time next year, a camera like the FH20 will have video zoom.
reply to this comment
The lack of video zoom on the FH20 is disappointing, yes, but it's a rare feature on a camera at this price, and very few still cameras had zoom during video at all even just 18 months ago. Maybe this time next year, a camera like the FH20 will have video zoom.
How to buy FH20 in Nigeria (Manuel Okiri — 10/03/2010)
How can i get this camera in my country Nigeria? Have tried severally but to no avail.Would be glad if i can own one.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/04/2010)
Amazon.com does worldwide shipping, if I'm not mistaken. Aside from that, I'm not really familiar with any Nigerian merchants, sorry.
reply to this comment
Manuel Okiri (10/07/2010)
Thanks for your effort. I now thinking of getting a dslr camera since i can't get the fh20. Would need your suggestion a good indoor and outdoor camera between $350 and $400 of either Nikon, Sony or Lumix made.
reply to this comment
Beware zoom (Ann McCombe — 10/01/2010)
I have now purchased two Lumix(the updated version and my original).the reason for the second was that the first had zoom problems and eventually stopped working.The new one has now had exactly the same zoom problem and a friend in the trade said they are known for their computerised technology breaking down on zooming! I am now going to buy the Canon3100 as I'm hoping it will not have this problem.Wonderful camera but poor stickability re zoom component.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/01/2010)
You may want to keep checking back for a service advisory on the Panasonic website. It may be that they will cowboy up and take responsibility for repairing them. IN fact, I would contact Panasonic and request and RMA repair for a design flaw. Be respectful and make sure you mention both cameras have the fault. Could work.
reply to this comment
Torn between FH20 & Cannon SD1400 (Steve G. — 09/28/2010)
Hi Guys great site & informative thread.I'm a newbie & this will be my 1st dig. cam.Doing lots of homework for perfect cam.FH20 seemed great at beginning of this thread but am cautious now.Better zoom over cannon for sure.Too many people on various sites giving negative comments on this panny.I was jacked up on this camera after reading Brendas review.I read that Fh20 has quicker lens,better zoom than SD1400 with maby less image quality.I did compare image on both & it wasn't a big deal.The cannon 1400 has only 4X zoom but better image quality.Price is not a factor on there 2,Cannon about $30-$40 more.Sd1300 has no HD video & Sd1200 has viewfinder but small 2.5" LCD.I know u guys like this panny alot,but I have to ask which 1 would u recommend to a novice like me?Sorry for long post guys!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/28/2010)
We think that the FH20 is extremely well rounded -- Canon definitely has better image quality, but not to a huge extent. It really depends on what you're looking for, but the FH20 is more versatile than the Canons and is a great all-arounder.
A bunch of people have left less than stellar comments about the FH20, yes, but when you get as many people coming to this page as we do, it's to be expected (plenty of good comments too). Keep in mind that this is a $160 camera, so it won't be perfect, but it's a heck of a value for the price and works very well for a lot of people, which is why we recommend it so frequently. It basically comes down to whether or not you want that zoom lens. You can't find an 8x for this cheap anywhere else, and it just so happens that the performance is speedy and the image quality solid as well. The Canon SD1400 costs a chunk more, doesn't have the bigger zoom, but the image quality is better. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
A bunch of people have left less than stellar comments about the FH20, yes, but when you get as many people coming to this page as we do, it's to be expected (plenty of good comments too). Keep in mind that this is a $160 camera, so it won't be perfect, but it's a heck of a value for the price and works very well for a lot of people, which is why we recommend it so frequently. It basically comes down to whether or not you want that zoom lens. You can't find an 8x for this cheap anywhere else, and it just so happens that the performance is speedy and the image quality solid as well. The Canon SD1400 costs a chunk more, doesn't have the bigger zoom, but the image quality is better. Hope this helps.
Shaun (10/05/2010)
I'm a novice and bought the FH20 for a recent family trip to Hong Kong and found it had everything I needed. The quality of photos and videos is great and it's easy to use. The intelligent auto mode means that the camera will do the thinking for you in most situations but choosing and changing modes is easy once you work out the basic navigation functions on the camera. The only downside was not being able to zoom in video mode but with a bit of forethought that wasn't a problem most of the time.
reply to this comment
Bad experience (Leon Masseus — 09/27/2010)
Outdoor pictures are ok but indoor this camera is not performing lots of red color and images not sharp. My older Cannon SD600 performed better indoors. Not sure how they can pick this as best camera. Just bought at Costco but will bring it back. Not sure what to buy now.
reply to this comment
danika (09/26/2010)
Does this camera has an SLR quality camera? and dos take good picture brightness at low light?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/27/2010)
No it is not close to dSLR quality. Low light performance is nothing special. This is a very good low-cost camera, but definitely nowhere near as good as a dSLR.
reply to this comment
Videos? (Robert — 09/25/2010)
I enjoy shooting and editing videos and making spoof of movies. Would this be a good camera to use for that? Or is this strictly aim towards taking good quality pictures?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (09/26/2010)
You'd be much better served with a dedicated camcorder. On most cameras the video isn't up to the quality of a camcorder and many times is in a hard to edit format. Remember, these are cameras for photography not videography. The exception is DSLRs with video, which produce fantastic quality rivaling that of camcorders costing many thousands of dollars. Of course, you'll have to spend more to get a DSLR with video.
reply to this comment
warranty? (Steve — 09/23/2010)
Hi,Is their any warranty on FH20? If so does it cover if it stops working or you drop it? What do you think about the extended 2-4 year warrantys offered at stores,are they worth it? Please give us your thoughts on this.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/23/2010)
One year parts and labor is standard. But impact damage is usually never covered. As for buying warranties, I used to sell cameras and I can tell you they are a cash cow for the camera stores. If a camera is going to fail it will usually do so in the first year. Also, many are from third party companies and who's to say if they'll be in business when you need it? Also, many credit card companies offer extended warranties free as a perk of membership. So buying one outright doesn't make sense.
reply to this comment
Can you see the screen in bright sun? (Bob Witt — 09/18/2010)
At a sunny beach area the viewing screen is nearly unseeable on most compacts. how is this FH20?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (09/18/2010)
You're going to have some difficulty no matter what camera. Screens are getting better, but none are up to the harsh conditions found at a beach. You'll want to look into getting a camera with an optical viewfinder.
reply to this comment
FH1 or FH20 (devendra — 09/21/2010)
Hi people,
please help me with the choice- FH20 or FH1.
The FH1 has less zoom 5X vs 8X of the FH20.But the FH1 is a lot cheaper and 5X zoom is sufficient for me.But picture quality is the topmost concern, and with the same CCD size, the FH20 has 2MPs more squeezed in ( 14 MPs vs 12 MPs in the FH1, which means higher noise in images from the FH20 than the fH1 ? Plus, even 10 MPs is sufficient for me as most of my photos are 5' x7' prints.
reply to this comment
please help me with the choice- FH20 or FH1.
The FH1 has less zoom 5X vs 8X of the FH20.But the FH1 is a lot cheaper and 5X zoom is sufficient for me.But picture quality is the topmost concern, and with the same CCD size, the FH20 has 2MPs more squeezed in ( 14 MPs vs 12 MPs in the FH1, which means higher noise in images from the FH20 than the fH1 ? Plus, even 10 MPs is sufficient for me as most of my photos are 5' x7' prints.
Fiona (09/16/2010)
it sucks!
reply to this comment
Memory card (Kelly — 09/16/2010)
What do you think the best memory card for this camera? 4GB and what brand? I heard it makes a difference.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (09/16/2010)
A 4GB card should be more than enough. I've had good experiences with Ridata, Kingston, Lexmark and Sandisk. The first two are a bit cheaper.
reply to this comment
Tamy (09/15/2010)
I am looking for a point and shoot camera with a good zoom to take photos of my son's high school football game. I like to take a few videos and also still shots. The lighting is usually very good at these games. I tried the Canon IS20 but do not want something that big and had a hard time with the location of the video button. Do you think the FH20 would be a good camera for this type of shooting?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/16/2010)
Well, as long as the lighting it really good. In low light it's really hit and miss. But remember that point and shoot cameras also have to deal with shutter lag, so anticipate a good play and read up on how to shoot sports photography with a point and shoot camera.
reply to this comment
settings (natalie — 09/14/2010)
I just bought the panasonic fh20 and all my pictures are yellow..is there a setting to change that?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/14/2010)
Yes it sounds like the white balance is screwy. The auto white balance is pretty good on this camera, so set it to that if it's not there. Otherwise, you can manually select it depending on the type of lighting -- sun, cloudy, incandescent, fluorescent, etc -- or set your own white balance. Check out our guide to white balancing:
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
Panasonic FH20 most popular (lynn parker — 09/12/2010)
does this camera come with attachment to plug into computer and then to be able to print out and are the colors bright
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/13/2010)
Cameras usually come with a USB cable that you can use to connect to your PC in order to download your pictures. As for colors, they are pretty accurate, but brightness depends greatly on format you're viewing them on. Colors will appear differently from LCD on your camera to the Computer screen on your PC to the printed medium. And rarely, are all three calibrated accurately. So while a camera may be accurate in it's color, much of that can be lost if your monitor and printer aren't properly calibrated.
reply to this comment
FH20 memory card choice? (Rog Patterson — 09/10/2010)
After formatting a NYC brand SDHC 4GB card in my FH20, I took a few pictures and put it in my card reader for a look. My computer shut down and all my fiddling showed only that it was either on or off. Fortunately, it was in the "on" mode when I pulled the memory card from the reader...and the computer came to life again. Replaced the NYC card with a SDHC 4GB Sandisk card and, while it didn't shut me down, the computer refused to respond to it?
Have been using a Sandisk SD 2GB Ultra II with no such problems. Any ideas why my computer rejects the 4GB SDHC cards?
Rog Patterson
rpatterson98@cfl.rr.com
reply to this comment
Have been using a Sandisk SD 2GB Ultra II with no such problems. Any ideas why my computer rejects the 4GB SDHC cards?
Rog Patterson
rpatterson98@cfl.rr.com
by James DeRuvo (09/11/2010)
I'd say your card reader isn't SDHC compatible.
reply to this comment
Tony (09/07/2010)
is the camera waterproof?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/08/2010)
No.
reply to this comment
Canon-Panny decision (Al — 09/06/2010)
Great site. I learned a lot just by wandering through the posts and responses. I'm looking for something that suits someone who's just beyond a novice but not a serious photographer. And something easy. The Canon PShot A1000 (or 1100) or the FH20?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/07/2010)
Both are very good options. You can probably tell that we think the FH20 is a great deal, very easy to use and versatile, with the 8x zoom. The Canon image quality is probably a touch better, but the build quality is somewhat cheap-feeling on those models.
It's also worth noting that it's getting harder to find the A1100 for a low price. It's a discontinued model, so the stock must be running low. With that in mind, take a look at the A3000/A3100. Equally as solid as the A1000/A1100, so if you've settled on Canon and can find the newer ones for less money, go for those.
reply to this comment
It's also worth noting that it's getting harder to find the A1100 for a low price. It's a discontinued model, so the stock must be running low. With that in mind, take a look at the A3000/A3100. Equally as solid as the A1000/A1100, so if you've settled on Canon and can find the newer ones for less money, go for those.
Lee (09/06/2010)
Hello- I have been researching panasonic P&S cameras and can't decide between the ZS7 and the ZR1. Which one do you recommend, or is their another one you recommend? Thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/07/2010)
Definitely the ZS7 over the ZR1. You should also look at the ZS5 -- pretty much the same camera as the ZS7, but without the GPS, AVCHD Lite movie mode (though there still is HD video on the ZS5), or the 3-inch screen (2.7-inch instead). It costs less as a result, and works out to be a great deal.
reply to this comment
Speed shoot? (Matt — 09/05/2010)
So I was looking at the S8000, and I saw that it had a mode to shoot many pictures in a few seconds or over a set time, anyways something like that. Does the FH20 have this feature?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/07/2010)
Yeah, you're talking about continuous drive/burst mode. Most digital cameras have some sort of feature like this where you hold down the shutter and take a bunch of pictures in a row. The FH20 does have this capability, 4.6 pictures per second. It's actually faster than the S8000, which does 3 pictures per second.
reply to this comment
Video features (Karl Zick — 09/03/2010)
My only objection is the movie mode does not have zoom capability.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/03/2010)
Yes, this seems to be one of the main complaints about this camera -- but to keep it in perspective, last year, not too many compact cameras had HD video, and very, very few had zoom at all. It seems to be that only in 2010 has this become sort of a standard feature on compact cameras.
reply to this comment
christine (08/31/2010)
Hi I take a lot of concert pictures and I'm looking for a really good camera that takes good pictures I don't care for video because I would rather have pictures. I'm debating between this one and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. I guess there's a difference (not too good with camera's). Anyways I want good quality in dim or red/blue/purple lighting and no blurring. Is this a good camera for that?
reply to this comment
worth the money (avery — 08/31/2010)
i just got it and im pleased my only concern is the video. there is no zoom. but ither than that the camera is good quality
reply to this comment
China or Japan? (blumonster — 08/28/2010)
Is it made in China or Japan?I noticed nothing good comes out of China.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/30/2010)
I believe Panasonic's cameras are made in Japan, although either way the cameras function just the same. There's no difference between the cameras made in one or the other.
reply to this comment
Advice - please? (Kelly — 08/28/2010)
Hi. I am new to the whole camera thing, and now more confused from my research than when I started. Price point is $200 or under, mostly used for friends, family, maybe some vacation shots (if I take a vacation again!), etc. Would like it to work well in low light since when I am social it is usually in the evening.
What am I looking for? Is the FH20 my best bet? A salesman at a local store also showed me a Canon SD940 and Olympus Stylus 9000 (both at $200). But now I'm so lost not sure where to turn. HELP!?!? Thank you!
reply to this comment
What am I looking for? Is the FH20 my best bet? A salesman at a local store also showed me a Canon SD940 and Olympus Stylus 9000 (both at $200). But now I'm so lost not sure where to turn. HELP!?!? Thank you!
Chris Weigl (08/30/2010)
Only you can make the final call. The FH20 has a great zoom:size ratio. You could also look at the ZX3, which is even smaller and more versatile. The Canon is another good bet, with slightly better image quality but a shorter zoom range. Either will do great but I'd avoid the Olympus.
reply to this comment
Kelly (08/30/2010)
Thank you. He was pushing the Olympus. I was looking at this, and heard good things about the Canon SD1300 (but now see SD1200 may be a better bet?) - just had no idea where to start.
I appreciate the guidance.
reply to this comment
I appreciate the guidance.
Linda (08/28/2010)
How is the FH20 in low light situations? (ex. indoor) Also, what is the battery life?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/30/2010)
It's OK in low-light -- despite some comments above, it's nothing special, but it's pretty good for the price. Battery life is about 180-200 shots on a charge.
reply to this comment
mac (meryl — 08/28/2010)
is the camera Mac compatible?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/30/2010)
Yes it is, should work no problem.
reply to this comment
Michelle (08/26/2010)
Can you zoom in/out while you recording?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/26/2010)
No. And not many do. The reason is that the audio usually picks up the zoom motor as the mics are pretty omnidirectional.
reply to this comment
Jon (08/26/2010)
I am a Fire Investigator. I need a compact camera that takes good pictures in low light. I would also like to be able to take good pictures close up. I have looked at rugged digital cameras but the picture quality is lacking. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Mary Ross (08/25/2010)
Which camera gives better/sharper imagaes, with less graininess, when used indoors for wedding receptions, birthday parties etc-- Canon 3100 or Panasonic FH20?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/26/2010)
Head over to imaging-resource.com and click on check sample images. You can compare the two. My opinion is that the FH20 is slightly sharper at higher ISOs, but with flash, I think the A3100 has a more natural look.
reply to this comment
Best camera FH20 or Nikon s4000 (Camcam — 08/24/2010)
Please suggest me best choice in regards to picture quality / HD movie and lens quality also Budget.... as getting confused in finalising out of this 3 camera's
Lumix FH20 or Sony W350 or Nikon s4000.
reply to this comment
Lumix FH20 or Sony W350 or Nikon s4000.
FH20 vs ZS7 (Teen — 08/24/2010)
Hi I just wanted to ask FH20 VS ZS7? Which is better in terms of print quality of pictures. Thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/24/2010)
ZS7 for sure. FH20 is a great for being so cheap, ZS7 is great for any compact.
reply to this comment
vs Zs7 (Megan P — 09/05/2010)
I bought a zs7 after reading good reviews on it but the inside photos are horrible! Outside colors are beautiful and it does really well with dark, dark photos but ask it to take a pic in a restaurant or indoors on a sunny day...with or without flash it just doesn't do well
reply to this comment
A Ringgold (08/23/2010)
Does it have a rechargeable battery?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/23/2010)
Yes it does.
reply to this comment
Birthday present (Jenn — 08/23/2010)
I'm looking for a camera for my daughter's 14th birthday present. She isn't a photo buff, but she is a perfectionist and will be annoyed if it doesn't take reliably good pictures in a wide range of settings (soccer games, school functions, at the lake, indoors, etc). This panasonic sounds pretty good, but was wondering about other options, too. I'm pretty bewildered by the vast number of point-and-shoots out there!! I'd like to keep it under $300 (and preferably under $250). thanks for your help!
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/23/2010)
The FH20, or even better the Panasonic ZS1/ZS3, is a really good option for her needs. The ZX1 is an older model but is even smaller and has a better zoom range. You can probably get it for less than the FH20 now.
reply to this comment
more info? (jenn — 08/24/2010)
How do these compare to the Canon SD3500? (other than price) Also, do you know any brick and mortar stores that carry the Panasonics? Call me old-fashioned, but I'd really like to see and try one before I buy it! Thanks for your help.
reply to this comment
Software (Ken Katzen — 08/23/2010)
If you have Windows Vista - the Windows Photo Gallery program is the default when you download your pictures. The software has all the features you are looking for and very easy to use.
reply to this comment
Tough zoom lever (Leo — 08/22/2010)
OK, FH20 fans! I bought this Lumix FH20 and found the zoom lever was very tough! I couldn't choose needed zoom! I was very disappointed and astonished nobody noticed that.
reply to this comment
Best and Cheapest? (mom pics — 08/22/2010)
I'm looking to replace my Kodak easyshare 4.0mp, 10x zoom and the FH20 looks promising. I'm wondering if I will miss the extra zoom? I am just looking for family pic taking and wondered if there was anything cheaper out there that is still as good? From what I have read I shouldn't be concerned with mp so much as zoom.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/23/2010)
Only you can know if you'll miss the zoom. Do you actually use full telephoto much? I don't know which Kodak model you currently own, but is probably missing wide-angle. You won't know what you're missing till you try out the FH20. Do the upgrade.
reply to this comment
mom pics (08/24/2010)
After all the prep research I found that no one in our area carried the panasonic fh20. (I had to store purchase to have it for back-to-school) I ended up getting the fuji finepix jv300. Based on availability and price it was between the fuji and the cannon sx120, I chose the fuji for size and lithium battery, all other aspects seemed to be the same. All that said, I am a little unsure of my purchase, is the fuji a good camera too? I want something to fit in my purse, easy to use, takes video, sd card, 10x zoom, and good quality pics for under $200. (I know that's a lot, they laughed at Best Buy!) Oh, and my Kodak was a dx6490, about 6yrs old. Thanks for your time :)
reply to this comment
Lumix vs. Powershot (Alexandra — 08/21/2010)
Im currently debating between purchasing one of two cameras...the panasonic lumix fh20 and the canon powershot sd940. What are your thoughts? Im looking for good picture quality of course. I love the 8x optical zoom on the lumix but I also love the features on the powershot. What do you recommend?! Thanks!
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/23/2010)
What features do you love on the sd940? The fh20, other than being a larger and heavier camera, is equal in every way to the 940 other than it's 8x zoom.
reply to this comment
Squid (08/21/2010)
I've owned two Panasonics before: the DMC-TZ3 and the DMC-FX3. I've been ridiculously satisfied with both of them, but they both had Leica lenses and it appears that FH20 does not. I'm a bit of a photography novice and don't quite know how this would affect picture quiality, or what it would even affect. Please clarify, and thanks!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/21/2010)
Technically, it could and if you have "golden eyes," you may notice. But most won't. I wouldn't be all that concerned with nameplates.
Although to be fair in low light, the FH20s performance is average at best. But with an 8x optical zoom in a compact package, it's pretty darn good.
reply to this comment
Although to be fair in low light, the FH20s performance is average at best. But with an 8x optical zoom in a compact package, it's pretty darn good.
So the L does not mean Leicha (SteveB — 08/21/2010)
I saw the picture of the FH20 and assumed it had a high quality leica lens given it had the little L at the bottom right. Seems not right? So what does the little L mean Lumix?
Shame, I shall see what the camera is like versus my Canon of which i have had several.
reply to this comment
Shame, I shall see what the camera is like versus my Canon of which i have had several.
by James DeRuvo (08/21/2010)
It is not a Leica lens. It is a Lumix design. But I've heard it may have been designed for Panasonic by Leica.
reply to this comment
elizabeth Baker (08/20/2010)
The Panasonic FH-20 has a 2.0 Full (Slow) USB Port rather than the more common 2.0 Fast. What does this mean in terms of performance?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/21/2010)
It'll only matter in terms of uploading your images to the computer. Nothing more. And that can be mitigated by avoiding it altogether and using a fast USB card reader.
reply to this comment
Searching for the right camera (Jennifer Stern — 08/19/2010)
I am going on an African Safari. I want a camera that will shoot close up and far away in all kinds of light. I'm also going on a hot air balloon ride and want to photograph from the balloon. I also want as lightweight a camera as possible as our luggage weight is strictly limited. Can the FH20 handle these requirements? Is there another camera that would be better? Ideally, I only need 8 megapixels but I'd like at least a 7 or 8X telephoto. Thanks in advance3-
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/19/2010)
The FH20 is extremely versatile due to it's small size and relatively large zoom ratio. 8x zoom is good, but you may want something even more than that for the best safari photos. Take a look at the Panasonic ZS5 too-it has a wider and longer zoom.
reply to this comment
macro ability of FH20 (Sue — 08/18/2010)
I need a camera for work to document rare plants--pictures of less than 5 inches tall plants (often smaller) under the tree canopy, so lower light. Would you recommend the FH20 for that? I was using a Sony Cybershot DSC-W5. It took great close up photos. It broke and I got a Canon A1000 IS. It tends to focus on the wrong part of the plant or on the plant behind it. So I am looking to try a different camera. Any to recommend (for under $250-300)? Thanks.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/19/2010)
The FH20 should be just fine for your needs. You may also want to look in to getting a small, lightweight tripod.
reply to this comment
LUMIX FH20 - COMPUTER SOFTWARE (BEN COHEN — 08/17/2010)
Does the computer software used to download and store the camera images allow one to modify, crop and fix images?. Is the software easy to use?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/18/2010)
It's OK, but your best bet is to go with third-party photo software, most of which is free. Picasa by Google is my personal favorite. Check out this guide we posted:
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
CF (08/16/2010)
I have a general technical question I'd like Liam or someone to help me with. Does setting your camera to a lower MP setting help its low-light performance?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/17/2010)
Sure. No, it doesn't help. I know why you ask -- you've probably heard that the more megapixels you cram onto a small sensor, the more image noise results (after a certain threshold anyway). It's particularly problematic in low-light shooting. So it would stand to reason that fewer megapixels on a small sensor lessens the noise.
However, as I understand it, when you set a 14 megapixel camera down to 5 megapixels, for example, all that's happening is that the camera shoots its regular 14 megapixel image, and then compresses it down to 5 megapixels. So if it does anything, it hurts the picture quality.
reply to this comment
However, as I understand it, when you set a 14 megapixel camera down to 5 megapixels, for example, all that's happening is that the camera shoots its regular 14 megapixel image, and then compresses it down to 5 megapixels. So if it does anything, it hurts the picture quality.
CF (08/18/2010)
thanx for the info...i appreciate the reply
reply to this comment
anon89 (08/16/2010)
is the battery rechargeble?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/16/2010)
Yes.
reply to this comment
CF (08/15/2010)
Does the FH1 & FH20 perform the same in low light? In short, I'm wondering if all FH models come with the same size sensor, etc., & give the same low-light performance?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/16/2010)
Yep, they're the same camera except for the lens. Realistically, I think the low-light performance will be very close to identical (we have not tested the FH1). In theory, however the FH1 might even perform better in low light because a) the lens is shorter, and as such accommodates a wider aperture, which is helpful in low light and b) it maxes out at 12 megapixels, which should keep noise in check. But all FH models have the same size sensor and image processor.
reply to this comment
CF (08/16/2010)
Thanks.
reply to this comment
Carol Singleton (08/14/2010)
I am trying to compare the FH20 and ZS6 Why would I choose the FH20 (aside from price) Does the ZS6 produce better pictures?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/16/2010)
Yes the ZS series produces better pictures than the FH20. The FH20 is a great camera for the price, but the ZS series takes better shots and videos, just a much more powerful camera overall.
reply to this comment
Recommendation? (MauriceS — 08/12/2010)
Like so many others, completely confused as to what to buy, but here's what I'm looking for. Camera is for my daughter going overseas for a university year, in a Mediterranean country, so she'll take outdoors pics in bright sunlight, indoor pics of her friends at the dorm...and would like a camera with decent-quality video of both. Price..~ $300 US or less. Would the FH20 fit the bill vs. ZS3 or 5, or another brand? She's also looked at the Pany FP3, but your remarks on touch screens have put me off a bit. Also want something durable, but realistic that dropping a camera on concrete is not a good idea! Also Realistic that there is no perfection at these prices!) what would be good recommendations for what I described? She's leaving soon, so any quick reply appreciated!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/13/2010)
The FH20 was camera of the year, but it did have it's short comings in low light situations which taxed it's flash (10' max) and brought some noise into the mix. I think if you understand your limitations in that regard, it could be a pretty good option. Check out our review for image samples. The other two Panny's are also pretty good. I recommend going over to Imaging-resource.com and compare sample images.
Also take a look at the Canon SX line.
reply to this comment
Also take a look at the Canon SX line.
Monica (08/11/2010)
I am shopping for a compact camera and this is one of my choices. But should I spend more to buy the Canon Powershot S90?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/11/2010)
It's like comparing apples and oranges. The FH20 is a great cheap camera. The S90 is an excellent compact camera, but costs more than twice as much, it's not a fair comparison.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/11/2010)
They're very different cameras. What are you buying the camera for? The FH20 is fine for most casual use but falls apart when you want to do low light or manual shooting. It does have a more versatile zoom range than the s90, however, and is smaller.
reply to this comment
Does it have video capabilities along with zoom? (Nicole — 08/10/2010)
Can you take videos with it and if so, can you use the zoom?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/10/2010)
Yes (HD videos, as described in the review and specifications above) and yes.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/11/2010)
Sorry sorry! Mis-typed -- it can take videos, but cannot zoom during videos. My apologies!
reply to this comment
Phil Reusswig (08/10/2010)
Everything I have is Kodak and I was wondering if I purchased the Lumix FH20, would it be possible to import the pictures from the FH@0 into the Kodak gallery of pictures
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/11/2010)
Yes, the Kodak program will recognize the FH20 files and treat them as if they were taken by a Kodak.
reply to this comment
Jason (08/09/2010)
Thanks Liam ...
Well, I got her the FH-20 in violet, we went shopping yesterday and I told her that I would get my mother a camera since her b-day is coming up as well, so I asked her to help me pick out one ... this time she took a closer look and tried all the cameras I mentioned above, she thought they were all good but it was pretty obvious to me she fell for the violet FH-20, so later I went back and bought it.
It all worked out for the best as she's now convinced I'm getting her a new i-pod, instead of a camera ... she'll get a nice surprise come thursday.
Thanks guys, this is a very nice site and I will be telling people about it, keep up the good work.
Oh, almost forgot, can anyone recommend a good memory card for the FH-20, I got her a Sandisk SD 4GB just to get started, but it seems pretty low end, any suggestions?.
reply to this comment
Well, I got her the FH-20 in violet, we went shopping yesterday and I told her that I would get my mother a camera since her b-day is coming up as well, so I asked her to help me pick out one ... this time she took a closer look and tried all the cameras I mentioned above, she thought they were all good but it was pretty obvious to me she fell for the violet FH-20, so later I went back and bought it.
It all worked out for the best as she's now convinced I'm getting her a new i-pod, instead of a camera ... she'll get a nice surprise come thursday.
Thanks guys, this is a very nice site and I will be telling people about it, keep up the good work.
Oh, almost forgot, can anyone recommend a good memory card for the FH-20, I got her a Sandisk SD 4GB just to get started, but it seems pretty low end, any suggestions?.
Help needed (Jason — 08/07/2010)
HELP, please...
I need to buy a camera for my girlfriend's birhtday, it's next thursday (august 12) so I don't have much time and I know close to nothing about cameras but thanks to this site, I've picked up a few things.
Here's where I stand, I'll decide between Panasonic FH20, Sony W35O and CANON SD1300 or 1400 ...Ok, now just so you know our needs... my girl loves to take pictures but she's not an expert by any means, she just likes to take her camera along when we go out and get some nice pictures.
Anyway, I like the FH20 because of this and other good reviews but recently a coworker brought a Sony W50 to a party and my girl really liked it (she just took a look at it didn't even try it) so I need to know which one is best, she trusts me enough to be happy with whatever I get her because she knows I do my "research", so I want to get her a good one ....
Which one is it? Panansonic FH20, Sony W50 or Cannon 1300 or 1400, I don't care about the price variation within that range ... Thank you.
reply to this comment
I need to buy a camera for my girlfriend's birhtday, it's next thursday (august 12) so I don't have much time and I know close to nothing about cameras but thanks to this site, I've picked up a few things.
Here's where I stand, I'll decide between Panasonic FH20, Sony W35O and CANON SD1300 or 1400 ...Ok, now just so you know our needs... my girl loves to take pictures but she's not an expert by any means, she just likes to take her camera along when we go out and get some nice pictures.
Anyway, I like the FH20 because of this and other good reviews but recently a coworker brought a Sony W50 to a party and my girl really liked it (she just took a look at it didn't even try it) so I need to know which one is best, she trusts me enough to be happy with whatever I get her because she knows I do my "research", so I want to get her a good one ....
Which one is it? Panansonic FH20, Sony W50 or Cannon 1300 or 1400, I don't care about the price variation within that range ... Thank you.
Liam McCabe (08/09/2010)
Can't really answer the question for you because there are too many factors (and we don't want to be held responsible if your girl doesn't like it ;-) ). We think the FH20 is the best value for the money for most people. The W350 is a fun little camera, and if she likes the way that it looks and you think she probably won't miss the better image quality and extra features of the FH20, you could score some points with her. Canons are very stylish as well, and offer better image quality. If price doesn't matter to you, the SD1400 is the most capable camera, but if she likes the W350, that might be a good choice.
reply to this comment
UK version of FH20 (Rog Patterson — 08/05/2010)
According to a TechRadar UK review, our FH20 is known as the FS30 over in Old Blighty.
reply to this comment
NISAR (08/04/2010)
IN PAKISTAN MARKET HOW MUCH WILL BE THE PRICE OF dmc-fh20
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/05/2010)
It's not easy keeping track of prices all over the world, much less exchange rates. Therefore it's probably best you contact Panasonic India or in Pakistan it seems to be ShopHive - shophive.com/shophive/Panas... They can tell you a price. I'd also recommend contacting a Panasonic dealer in your area.
reply to this comment
how to get camera to use sd card (Mary — 08/04/2010)
how do I get the camera to use the sd card - it will only use the small amount of built in memory
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/09/2010)
Format and/or unlock the card (small white slide on the card itself)
reply to this comment
Patricia richard (08/03/2010)
does it have a charger
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/03/2010)
Yes.
reply to this comment
Picture quality, zoom auto focus and low light shots are important!!! (Confused in Memphis... — 08/02/2010)
Reading the comments here and trying to narrow the choices to get the right camera. A lot of the early comments mentioned the ZR1 and LX3 models as a step up from the FH20 in picture quality and low light shots and zoom auto focus, but later comments mention the ZS3, ZS5 and ZS7 models as the better choices. What happened to the ZR1 and LX3? I am comparing to a Cannon S90 but would like to save a little $$$. Help please...
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/03/2010)
The ZR1 is an older model, replaced by the ZR3, so that's what happened there. The LX3 is an excellent camera, but it's in a class and price bracket waaaay beyond the FH20, so it probably stopped getting mentioned because it's not a very useful comparison for most purposes.
As for S90 vs FH20, there's also no comparison. Takes much, much better photos. It's the kind of compact that pros use as a backup to their dSLRs. The zoom is shorter, but that's the tradeoff.
The FH20 is, in our opinion, an excellent value for the price, but all the other cameras you mentioned are a step above it in terms of performance, and along with that, cost. We're fans of the ZS5/ZS7 models as well -- they take equally strong photos, though the ZS7 has a bigger screen, better video, and a GPS unit attached. You won't get the same low-light image quality as an S90 (or Canon SD4000), but it'll be pretty good, well-lit shots still look excellent, and they have much bigger zooms.
reply to this comment
As for S90 vs FH20, there's also no comparison. Takes much, much better photos. It's the kind of compact that pros use as a backup to their dSLRs. The zoom is shorter, but that's the tradeoff.
The FH20 is, in our opinion, an excellent value for the price, but all the other cameras you mentioned are a step above it in terms of performance, and along with that, cost. We're fans of the ZS5/ZS7 models as well -- they take equally strong photos, though the ZS7 has a bigger screen, better video, and a GPS unit attached. You won't get the same low-light image quality as an S90 (or Canon SD4000), but it'll be pretty good, well-lit shots still look excellent, and they have much bigger zooms.
More educated now in Memphis... (08/04/2010)
After a few hours more of research, it looks like the ZR3 might be the best choice for me ($227 best price found). I read that it has a little better picture quality than the ZS7 ($279 best price found). Is that true? I don't need the GPS and both have HDMI connect.
Also, does anyone know much about the Panasonic FX75? It appears to have great specs, but not much info available on reviews.
reply to this comment
Also, does anyone know much about the Panasonic FX75? It appears to have great specs, but not much info available on reviews.
Liam McCabe (08/09/2010)
In my opinion, the ZR3 does not have better image quality than the ZS5/ZS7.
The FX75 is an interesting model -- it was released as a competitor to the Canon SD4000 -- a stylish compact with strong low-light abilities, but judging by the specs (I haven't read many reviews either), it's not as good in low-lighting as the SD4000 because it uses a CCD sensor rather than a CMOS sensor. Not sure that I'd buy that, but the upcoming FX700 does have that CMOS sensor, so it's a more interesting model, in my opinion.
reply to this comment
The FX75 is an interesting model -- it was released as a competitor to the Canon SD4000 -- a stylish compact with strong low-light abilities, but judging by the specs (I haven't read many reviews either), it's not as good in low-lighting as the SD4000 because it uses a CCD sensor rather than a CMOS sensor. Not sure that I'd buy that, but the upcoming FX700 does have that CMOS sensor, so it's a more interesting model, in my opinion.
Panasonic Lumix FH20 vs Sony W370 (Andre — 08/01/2010)
I don't really know much about cameras. But i need one for my european vacation coming up and these are the 2 cameras I have it narrowed down too. WHich would be better to get???????
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/03/2010)
We prefer the FH20.
reply to this comment
Pat Barce (07/31/2010)
Somewhere I read that you can only open Panasonic cameras on your computer in their photo catalog. I like Photoshop and Picasa. Will Panasonic cameras work with them without a lot of bother?
reply to this comment
Kathy (07/31/2010)
Having 3 adults in the house with 3 different brands of cameras made me go out and buy a media card reader. They're under $20 & allows us to view our photos in whatever program we choose. No more downloading camera software.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/09/2010)
Yeah Kathy's card reader suggestion is a good one, but you can absolutely use any of their cameras without their software, and they work perfectly well in Picasa, Photoshop, etc.
reply to this comment
Can we have a picture with Blurred background? (rejivs — 07/31/2010)
Thanks for the recommendations, I bought an FH20 last week and its works well to my satisfaction.
How can I take picture with blurred background? I tried by reducing the "Exposure" but did not succeed. Is there any way out? Experts pls help.
reply to this comment
How can I take picture with blurred background? I tried by reducing the "Exposure" but did not succeed. Is there any way out? Experts pls help.
Liam McCabe (08/02/2010)
Exposure controls the brightness of the image, so that wouldn't have an effect. Honestly, you can't pull it off the same way you would be able to with a dSLR for various reasons.
But to do it sometimes, you need to switch to macro mode (the button with the flower symbol), and then take a close-up shot of your subject. If it works right, the camera will focus only on the close-up object, and the rest of the shot will be pleasantly blurry.
reply to this comment
But to do it sometimes, you need to switch to macro mode (the button with the flower symbol), and then take a close-up shot of your subject. If it works right, the camera will focus only on the close-up object, and the rest of the shot will be pleasantly blurry.
FH20 computer software (Liz Smith — 07/30/2010)
I think you've convinced me to buy the Panasonic FH20 over Canon's SD100 or 1200. I've had Canon's and like their software, ease of downloading pictures, erasing pictures, etc. How does the FH20's computer software compare? Thanks - graet info on this site.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/30/2010)
I don't even recommend the software bundled with a camera. There are much better options out there from Adobe Photoshop Elements (about $60, IIRC) to Google Picasa (free at picasa.com).
reply to this comment
Liz Smith (07/30/2010)
Thanks. I recently downloaded Picassa for my other photos. I'll just use that.
reply to this comment
Steve (08/01/2010)
Can't speak to Canon's software but I am quite pleased with Panasonic's PhotoFunStudio 5.0. It is eally easy to use and somewhat intuitive. It a allows you to do batch processing, panoramic stitching,and a host of other functions. Only complaint are the annoying "confirmation" windows, i.e., "Are you sure you want to exit?".
Doesn't assert iteslf as the greatest imaging software on the planet nor does it try to take over your PC ala Picassa, and much easier to use than Photoshop, albeit without its massive image processing power.
reply to this comment
Doesn't assert iteslf as the greatest imaging software on the planet nor does it try to take over your PC ala Picassa, and much easier to use than Photoshop, albeit without its massive image processing power.
Nicole P. (07/30/2010)
I found out that the FH20 doesn't allow you to zoom when shooting video. Do you know of any digital cameras out there comparable to the FH20 that have the capability to zoom during video shooting?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/30/2010)
It's a rare feature because of the omnidirectional microphones pick up the zoom motor as it moves. I know Kodak has a few models, but the feature really hasn't caught on.
reply to this comment
Willa (07/29/2010)
After reading this review, the FH20 sounded like the perfect replacement camera for my recently broken Canon SD1000, which I loved. The zoom capabilities sound amazing, but after reading all the comments I am worried about low light and lack of zooming in video mode. Is this going to be an improvement on my old camera, or should I spend more money and find another camera? I really love being able to take professional looking pictures even though I'm only an amatur photagrapher. Help, anyone?
reply to this comment
Menu settings (Sydney Aronson — 07/29/2010)
Are there default settings or what settings are recommended for general point and shoot use?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/30/2010)
Full auto settings, sure. All cameras do. They also have scene settings are are customized for specific lighting conditions.
reply to this comment
Nalini (07/29/2010)
Is this waterproof camera?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
No, you'll need to look at the Panasonic TS2 for that.
reply to this comment
Jason (07/28/2010)
Are you sure that it is thinner? Everything I have read is saying that the SD1300 IS is thinner by about .5". That is the only thing I am struggling with since it is for my girlfriend who likes to carry only a small clutch. Is the .5" worth the performance upgrade?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
Yes the SD1300 is noticeably slimmer. The two cameras are nearly identical otherwise if you don't need the extra zoom range or HD video of the FH20.
reply to this comment
Windsome designs (07/27/2010)
I am an interior designer like to take pictures of window treatments that I make and install. Shots are from inside looking out window with bright light shining in. Is this a good camera to use to take these shots?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
Frankly, there's no camera on the planet that will take good photos with such a brightly lit background. The FH20 will do as well as most, but you still may not be happy with the photos you get.
reply to this comment
Sydney Aronson (07/27/2010)
I need to take a photo of a person with close to a 1 MB file for publishing. Is this something that this camera can do and how. Thanks from a novice.
Syd
reply to this comment
Syd
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
You can reduce the resolution or quality in the camera. You could also take the picture and then resize it afterwards.
reply to this comment
Need help!! (sat8116 — 07/24/2010)
I just bought a new Panasonic Lumic F20. I started to take pictures and it looks like the pictures are seamed together on different colors in each strip. What is wrong?
reply to this comment
FH20 vs. ZS7 (or ZS5) (JP — 07/23/2010)
FH20 v. ZS7 (or 5). What qualities make it worth the investment dollar wise in the ZS7. The GPS isn't important to me and neither is the video capabilities - I use my Flip for that. Image quality is important. At $100 more I am trying to discern the major differences and evaluate if I should go to the ZS. We take a lot of vacations and take a lot of kids sports pix as well.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/28/2010)
I think the FH20 has better color accuracy at higher ISOs. However, it pays the price with more noise, meaning in low light, it won't really help you as well.
For $100, there had better be a serious difference in quality. And I just don't see it.
reply to this comment
For $100, there had better be a serious difference in quality. And I just don't see it.
Loretta Kimmick (07/23/2010)
I bought this based on you recommendations - when I take the picture it looks great on the camera and on my computer but when I order copies from Costco they all come out resolution warning i have tried different settings and IA but it still comes out low resolution. Help!!!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/28/2010)
If your uploading the images to the Costco website, that may be your issue. Also, make sure you're taking images at the highest possible resolution. Don't mess with settings below that just to "save space."
reply to this comment
Camera illiterate but looking for specific needs. (Rhonda, from Wyoming — 07/22/2010)
This will be a first camera buy in many years so I definately need help. My fiance' plays in a band so we are talking bar room light which sucks, plus we have a nightly rodeo in town so depending on weather we get either bright sunshine, clouds or dark with arena lights. I also want to take mountain scenery pics of flowers and of course the big fish he pulls in off the boat before he releases it. So it's various lighting situations. Also with the band it would be nice to video tape and hear what is being sung,but rarely, mostly just want the pics, lol. I am completely camera illiterate, I like the reviews on the FH20 but was wondering with my various situations if you would recommend something different. I'm looking more at compact so it will be easier to carry around. Simpler use without a lot of messing around with it would be a great thing too. Help please???
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/26/2010)
If videoing a band I wouldn't use a point and shoot. The sound wounldnt be good enough. Check out the Kodak Zi8. It has an external mic minijack, which means you can plug in an external mic source like the band's audio board or a better mic to get really good sound.
reply to this comment
FH20 vs FH3 in low light? (John D — 07/21/2010)
The review mentions that the FH20 does well in low light. I noticed that the FH3 has a larger aperture: f2.8 at the minimum (28mm) zoom for the FH3, vs. f3.3 at the same zoom for the FH20. Would you expect the FH3 to do even better in low light than the FH20? Has anyone compared images to test this? The two cameras look similar on paper, except for this aperture difference and a smaller zoom range for the FH3. If the FH3 did have better low-light performance, I think I would choose that over the FH20's better zoom range. Or are there other differences that I'm missing?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/22/2010)
Well, to be fair, the review gives mentions is does well in some low light situations, not all. And yes, a faster lens of the FH3 will help.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/09/2010)
The FH3 has a wider aperture because it has a smaller zoom -- longer zooms always end up with shrunken apertures. But yes, that would mean theoretically, the FH3 does better in iffy lighting. If that matters more to you than zoom, have at it.
reply to this comment
Panasonic FH20 or Nikon S600?? (Emily — 07/20/2010)
I'm trying to find a camera for my husband to use while we travel, at home and when we go out at night. I have it narrowed down to the Nikon S6000 and the Panasonic FH20 but I'm having a really hard time deciding. The price difference is not a big deal because I was originally planning on spending around $250 for a camera. I just want to make sure I get him the best camera for the $$ and that will take great pictures and video any time of day. Can anyone help?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/20/2010)
We prefer the FH20, as you might have noticed. The 8x zoom is good for travel, and it does OK in poor lighting, but just bear in mind that cameras at this price range can't take truly great low-light shots. Use the flash and they'll be pretty good.
reply to this comment
Help!!! ( — 07/20/2010)
Hi!! I'm in a bit of dilemma here. Initially, I thought of buying Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 but very soon, i'll be furthering my studies in Poland. And i found out that Panasonic Global Warranty Does not cover certain countries in Europe such as Poland. So i was wondering whether should I purchase another different model. Can you please suggest me any camera that is in the range below $150( like FH20), 7-8 times optical zoom, 14 MP, has superb low light performance, good Video quality where i can also zoom while recording if possible(is it really necessary?) and can take great shots like FH20, in short ,something similar to FH20 but has a warranty that is valid in Poland. thanks in advance.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/20/2010)
I don't know much about international warranties but you're asking for a lot, and you probably won't find the camera that you're describing.
We like the FH20 because it's one of the few cameras that covers most of those marks at its price range, and it's very hard to find among other models. I know you may have read James' comments above that the FH20 is superb in low-light, but that's an exaggeration -- it's quite good for the price, but you need to get up in the $300 range for cameras that are actually great or superb in low light.
Also, just as a note, more megapixels does not mean better photos -- in fact, with compact cameras, above 10 megapixels it usually results in worse photos. You don't really have much of a choice because manufacturers insist on releasing cameras with more and more MP, but don't let the difference between 12 megapixels and 14 megapixels make or break your decision.
So again, the FH20 is the camera that best fits your description, aside from the warranty. Also look into the Kodak M580, though it's more likely to break than the Panasonic, and maybe the Sony W370, which costs a touch more but I'd say is more likely to be covered in Poland. Good luck.
reply to this comment
We like the FH20 because it's one of the few cameras that covers most of those marks at its price range, and it's very hard to find among other models. I know you may have read James' comments above that the FH20 is superb in low-light, but that's an exaggeration -- it's quite good for the price, but you need to get up in the $300 range for cameras that are actually great or superb in low light.
Also, just as a note, more megapixels does not mean better photos -- in fact, with compact cameras, above 10 megapixels it usually results in worse photos. You don't really have much of a choice because manufacturers insist on releasing cameras with more and more MP, but don't let the difference between 12 megapixels and 14 megapixels make or break your decision.
So again, the FH20 is the camera that best fits your description, aside from the warranty. Also look into the Kodak M580, though it's more likely to break than the Panasonic, and maybe the Sony W370, which costs a touch more but I'd say is more likely to be covered in Poland. Good luck.
Strong Light (D-Lighting) (CreativeKris — 07/20/2010)
How FH20 performs with strong light behind the subject? I want to shoot a flower/potrait with noon sun behind the subject?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/20/2010)
It's pretty good for the price, but I don't know if it's ideal. Check out the picture of the backlit cat in the review above.
reply to this comment
rejivs (07/19/2010)
I'm a bit confused on which one shuld I gor for, FH 20 or Canon IXUS 130/SD1400. Reviews are in favour of FH 2, but it does not have HDMI port. I'm looking for a camera for family pictures and a bit confused. Someone pls help me.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
If you plan to view pictures/videos on your HDTV frequently, then yes, you'll want that HDMI output. The SD1400 is a strong camera -- picture quality will be a touch better than the FH20, but it costs significantly more and the zoom isn't as large. If you're willing to pay more and you don't mind losing some zoom, you'll be happy with the Canon.
reply to this comment
Need a replacement camera QUICK! (Bren — 07/18/2010)
My Kodak EasyShare Z760 just bit the dust last night. I loved its ease & quality & video capabilities along with the Kodak docking station for recharging the lithium battery. I'm leaning toward a Panasonic replacement. Which model will most closely fit what I'm used to but give me better wide-angle capabilities for real estate purposes (ie. interior room shots) Thanks!
reply to this comment
Aimee (08/11/2010)
I am in the EXACT same predicament. I bought the Z760 in 2005 and I loved it, but recently I spilled juice on it and it hasn't been the same since. I paid around $270 for it at the time but my budget is a little smaller for my next camera. Hopefully someone is familiar with this particular Kodak and can give us some good advice.
reply to this comment
Biswas (07/18/2010)
I want to buy any of the following camera.
1. Panasonic LUMIX FH20
2. Canon A3100 IS
3. Cannon SD 1200 IS
reply to this comment
1. Panasonic LUMIX FH20
2. Canon A3100 IS
3. Cannon SD 1200 IS
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
All solid choices. Go for it.
reply to this comment
FH20 vs Canon SD780 (Andrea — 07/17/2010)
Hi I'm trying to decide between the Panasonic FH20 and the Canon SD780. I don't know anything about cameras, I just need something that takes clear, crisp pictures with good color.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/21/2010)
In bright light, both can handle the job quite nicely. But in low light, the FH20 starts to give mixed results. Go with the SD780.
reply to this comment
FH20 vs FS15 (zaolon — 07/17/2010)
if it is fh20 vs fs15?
should get leica lens or get the lumix lens?
which 1 is better?
reply to this comment
should get leica lens or get the lumix lens?
which 1 is better?
by James DeRuvo (07/21/2010)
Leica is a better lens. Hands down.
reply to this comment
Erika (07/14/2010)
Is this camera better than Canon's 4000 or 3500??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/15/2010)
Not really. Although it has an optical zoom that's twice as large (not bad for the money), it doesn't perform as well in low light and has a lesser macro than the 4000. But better macro than the 3500. The FH20 is comparable to the 3500.
I'd go with the SD4000. But between the FH20 and the SD3500, I'd go with the FH20 for it's optical zoom. Just understand that in low light, it's pretty spotty.
reply to this comment
I'd go with the SD4000. But between the FH20 and the SD3500, I'd go with the FH20 for it's optical zoom. Just understand that in low light, it's pretty spotty.
Really super fast auto focus (George — 07/14/2010)
Really super fast auto focus. Beats other cameras that cost more. Tried several at Costco
reply to this comment
FH20 or Sony W370 (Su Siri — 07/12/2010)
Hi!
I am looking to replace my old olympus digital. I like the panoramic feature in the w370. I have read that the lag time can be an issue. FH 20 sounds great if it only had te panoramic feature. Could you help me decide with your camera wisdom?
thanks!
reply to this comment
I am looking to replace my old olympus digital. I like the panoramic feature in the w370. I have read that the lag time can be an issue. FH 20 sounds great if it only had te panoramic feature. Could you help me decide with your camera wisdom?
thanks!
Liam McCabe (07/13/2010)
You can use software to "stitch" together panoramas from pictures taken by any camera, though Sony's iSweep certainly makes it easier. In any case, it's still possible with the FH20, just not as seamless.
reply to this comment
FH20 or Sony W370 (S — 07/13/2010)
Hi Liam,
Thank you for your quick response. So, other than the panoramic feature, how would these two cameras compare? I guess what I am asking is would you choose the FH20 over the W370?
Su
reply to this comment
Thank you for your quick response. So, other than the panoramic feature, how would these two cameras compare? I guess what I am asking is would you choose the FH20 over the W370?
Su
Liam McCabe (07/15/2010)
Yes, I would. The FH20 focuses faster, has a wider angle at the short end (better for group shots) and more zoom, and it also costs less. The W370 is a decent camera as well, but I've read multiple reviews that indicate the images are a bit "soft." The iSweep panorama is certainly very cool though.
reply to this comment
Third Party Batteries for the FH-20 (Rich Sasserath — 07/12/2010)
Hi - excellent site. I just ordered the FH-20. As I usually do with all of my cameras, I would like ot buy generic batteries for it. Can you recommend a site from which to buy these batteries, please? Also, in searching for this camera's battery, I came up short. Is/are there other Panny digicams which use the same battery which I can reference to search for generic batteries?
Thanks in advance.
Rich
reply to this comment
Thanks in advance.
Rich
Liam McCabe (07/13/2010)
reply to this comment
Alternate to Panasonic batteries (Rog Patterson — 08/05/2010)
Thomas Distributing offers a supplier's battery for the FM20 at under $28.
reply to this comment
Panasonic Lumix FH20 (April — 07/12/2010)
Does this camera have a panoramic setting?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2010)
I don't really think this is a big deal since photo editors have advanced to the point where their panoramic stiching options are pretty seemless. I use Photoshop's photomerge feature and you simply can't tell.
reply to this comment
I Can't decide between FH20 and kodak m580 (Ken — 07/12/2010)
I Can't decide between FH20 and kodak m580 what would you recommend? Which one is easy to use and that has good picture quility?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/12/2010)
The M580 is OK, but we definitely recommend the FH20. Just as easy as the Kodak, slightly better image quality, and faster performance.
reply to this comment
zoom (ken — 07/12/2010)
after you take a picture can you crop It meaning can you zoom in on the picture and save it
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2010)
I don't see it in the specs, however, I prefer using software for any post processing anyway since a) you have greater control and b) if you don't like it, you can just select undo.
reply to this comment
Coolpix comparison (Steve — 07/11/2010)
Hi, how does this camera compare to the newer coolpix models s4000, s6000 and s8000 models? I am looking for a good camera mainly for taking shots of my kids but will also need it for work (taking pictures of houses we have built to put on a web site). i had purchased the nikon coolpix s570 but returned it due to lag time and vibration in the pictures. The FH20 has good review but just wondering how it compares to the newer coolpix.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/12/2010)
Better image quality, better zoom, and in my opinion, a better interface than than the S4000 for about the same price. I say that the Panasonic has a better interface than the S4000 because the S4000 has a touch screen, which I personally hate -- big drag on the battery life, and since LCDs are impossible to view in the sun, the camera is basically impossible to use in the sun. I will say that our reviewer thought the S4000 touch interface was among the better he's seen, but my points still stand. I'd personally cross the S4000 off the list.
Have not tried the S6000.
S8000 is OK, but overpriced in my opinion. The zoom is nice and the image quality is solid, but I think you can do better for your money.
In general, we prefer low to mid-cost Panasonics over low to mid-cost Nikons at this site. Better performance, better image quality, more versatile, and generally cheaper. Hope this helps. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Have not tried the S6000.
S8000 is OK, but overpriced in my opinion. The zoom is nice and the image quality is solid, but I think you can do better for your money.
In general, we prefer low to mid-cost Panasonics over low to mid-cost Nikons at this site. Better performance, better image quality, more versatile, and generally cheaper. Hope this helps. Hope this helps.
video (Steve — 07/13/2010)
Hi Liam, thank you for the reply. I definitly get the sence that this is one of your favorite camera's in this price range and am starting to believe. One last question is about video quality with this camera. I understand that this is not a video camera, but can definitly see my wife wanting to take some video recordings of the kids. I did not see much written or anything in the review about the video so i am just wondering how the camera will do with video, also understanding that i would have to put a good memory card in it to help.
I am willing to increase my range to $300 if i need to. The over all use will be getting good quality pictures in all conditions as well as some video but would like the video quality to be good as well. I have no need to play around with manual settings so point and shoot is great.
After reading more reviews on the coolpix i think the only one in contention is the S8000 and I have checked out the lumix ZS5? to many damn choices!
Thoughts?
reply to this comment
I am willing to increase my range to $300 if i need to. The over all use will be getting good quality pictures in all conditions as well as some video but would like the video quality to be good as well. I have no need to play around with manual settings so point and shoot is great.
After reading more reviews on the coolpix i think the only one in contention is the S8000 and I have checked out the lumix ZS5? to many damn choices!
Thoughts?
FH20 or Canon SD1300... Tough Decision (Neal — 07/10/2010)
I'm having such a hard time deciding between this Panasonic FH20, and the Canon PowerShot sd1300. Love this review, but I've heard others say that the flash is inadequate, and low light performance is sub-par. But at the same time, I love the idea of an 8x lens, even though that other reviewer says it loses clarity at full zoom. What a decision...
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/12/2010)
The SD1300 has better image quality. The FH20 is much more versatile. Think of it that way.
I think that a lot of review sites are pretty harsh in their assessments of low-cost cameras -- you're paying well under $200 for either one of these cameras, so you have to make some sacrifices somewhere. With the Canon, you sacrifice the versatility of a big zoom. With the Panasonic, you sacrifice a bit of sharpness in the images. Good luck choosing.
reply to this comment
I think that a lot of review sites are pretty harsh in their assessments of low-cost cameras -- you're paying well under $200 for either one of these cameras, so you have to make some sacrifices somewhere. With the Canon, you sacrifice the versatility of a big zoom. With the Panasonic, you sacrifice a bit of sharpness in the images. Good luck choosing.
dennis (07/09/2010)
Can't answer the 2nd half of the question but as for FH20, no, it can't zoom in the middle of a video recording.
reply to this comment
The FH20 or the ZS3? (psch29 — 07/08/2010)
Please help. I'm trying to decide between the ZS3 and the FH20. I want to take great photos without having to go into the manual modes. I literally want to "point and shoot" Which camera would be better for me?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/08/2010)
Well, the ZS3 is a better camera, hands down. Better lens, better processor, better video, bigger zoom, much more manual control if you want it. It's also more expensive. But you literally can just point and shoot with either one -- they both have intelligent Auto mode, which does an excellent job of automatically selecting good settings for whatever scene you're shooting.
The ZS3 is considerably more expensive however. If you're willing to pay for it, I'd recommend the ZS3. You'll have room to grow with it as a photographer too, should you choose to do so. The FH20 is a fine camera as well, no doubt, but it's more of a budget-minded model.
reply to this comment
The ZS3 is considerably more expensive however. If you're willing to pay for it, I'd recommend the ZS3. You'll have room to grow with it as a photographer too, should you choose to do so. The FH20 is a fine camera as well, no doubt, but it's more of a budget-minded model.
psch29 (07/08/2010)
Thank you so much for your quick response. Based on your recommendation, I am leaning towards the ZS3, but now there's a monkey wrench thrown in. If you don't mind, would you answer on how the ZS3 compares to the ZS7? If it comes down to those 2 (again, simplicity and great photos are the priority), which would you recommend?
Thanks again for your help!
reply to this comment
Thanks again for your help!
Liam McCabe (07/12/2010)
The ZS7 is this year's update to the ZS3 (and the ZS5 replaces the ZS1, just for your reference). Improvements include a GPS unit (a niche feature, not sure how useful this will be for most people) and full manual controls (aperture priority, shutter priority, and full manual). I was mistaken when I said that the ZS3 has plenty of manual controls, as it's still basically an automatic camera.
I've read that the ZS3 has ever so slightly better image quality compared to the ZS7, but it's not something that most users will notice. So basically, if manual controls are a big selling point, the ZS7 is the way to go. Otherwise, save yourself a few bucks and try to find a ZS3.
reply to this comment
I've read that the ZS3 has ever so slightly better image quality compared to the ZS7, but it's not something that most users will notice. So basically, if manual controls are a big selling point, the ZS7 is the way to go. Otherwise, save yourself a few bucks and try to find a ZS3.
Is the Panasonic Lumix FH20 good enough to take pics for a web site? (Kris Scotts — 07/08/2010)
Hello. I'm looking for a camera that is easy to use, and one that takes sharp, clear photos. I know nothing about cameras but the pics I take will be displayed on someone's web site. They need to be clear. Will the Panasonic Lumix FH20 fit the bill for my needs? Thank you for your help.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/08/2010)
Yes the FH20 is a great choice if you'll be taking shots for the web.
reply to this comment
Memory card advice (Randal Max — 07/08/2010)
SD vs SDHC vs SDXC - what's the difference and which one performs best with the FH20?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/08/2010)
Size. SD goes up to 2GB, SDHC - above -32GB. SDXC - above 32GB to 2TB. Thing is, for still images, you really don't need anything above 4GB. However, if you're into HD video, then perhaps using up to 16 or even 32GB is a good idea. I do both and haven't ever needed anything above 8GB.
reply to this comment
Lynn (07/08/2010)
Thank you for this site- it has beenn very helpful. I am almost at the point of purchasing the FH20 after reading all of the comments.
One more piece of info I would llike- what would you choose and why, the Sony coolpix 3000 or the Panasonic FH20? My children own the Coolpix 3000 and love it. But the reviews here seem to lean towards the Panasonic FH20? I did notice that the back of the FH20 is easier to see than the coolpix 3000 buttons on the back.
Thanks.
reply to this comment
One more piece of info I would llike- what would you choose and why, the Sony coolpix 3000 or the Panasonic FH20? My children own the Coolpix 3000 and love it. But the reviews here seem to lean towards the Panasonic FH20? I did notice that the back of the FH20 is easier to see than the coolpix 3000 buttons on the back.
Thanks.
Enlargements? (Ruth C. — 07/06/2010)
Is the FH20 good for making enlargements? I am looking for an inexpensive camera for photographing my artwork and making prints. How big can I go with this camera?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/06/2010)
Enlargements depend on megapixels, and at 14 megapixels, I'd say that yes, the FH20 should be fine for enlargements. It's as many megapixels as you can get form a compact camera. You'll be comfortable up to at least A4 paper.
I'd avoid getting too too big. It's an inexpensive camera and when you blow it up too large, you'll start to see some graininess and fudgy details -- just can't avoid it at this price point.
Since it doesn't sound like you really need zoom, you might consider a Canon, like the SD1200 or SD1300, maybe even as cheap as the A1100 or A3100. They don't have as many "features" but the image quality is better. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
I'd avoid getting too too big. It's an inexpensive camera and when you blow it up too large, you'll start to see some graininess and fudgy details -- just can't avoid it at this price point.
Since it doesn't sound like you really need zoom, you might consider a Canon, like the SD1200 or SD1300, maybe even as cheap as the A1100 or A3100. They don't have as many "features" but the image quality is better. Hope this helps.
double A batteries? (Michelle — 07/03/2010)
what wld u suggest as th best camera to buy around the $150-$250 price range with double A batteries, rather than a battery pack? Thanks :)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/06/2010)
If AAs is a deal breaker, then I'd go with the Canon A1100IS. It's actually cheaper at around $130. Pocket camera. If you want something larger, then you may want to look at the Panasonic FZ35. It's a tad more at $300.
reply to this comment
Purchased FH20 at Costco with Case (Ginny — 07/03/2010)
Just want to let everyone know that Costco has a decent price on the FH20 in black and it comes with a nice leather case as well as a 2 GB card. Everything included for $189. My only complaint thus far is there is only a VERY basic manual included - you have to use the instructional dvd included to download onto your PC. I want a manual - wish Panasonic would add this....
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/04/2010)
That one way to keep costs down. But there's probably a better on online at panasonic.com in PDF form which is also searchable.
reply to this comment
Great advice (Myra — 07/02/2010)
I absolutely love this site and am so glad I stumbled across it. I just busted my older Panasonic (which I loved) and am in the market for a new camera. My friends all have Canons and Nikons, so I was leaning towards those cameras. But after reading all of the comments below I am definitely sticking with Panasonic and getting the FH20. Thanks again for the incredible advice!
reply to this comment
Great camera - one complaint (Steve — 07/01/2010)
I purchased this camera about 10 days ago and like it a lot. It weighs the right amount and has a good feel in the hand. I have large hands, but have no problem handling the camera.
Zoom is great, and wide angle shots are adequate for my needs. Easy to configure the camera for special shooting situations.
One complaint however: The is not a white balance mode to accomodate the increasingly popular compact flourescent bulbs such as I use in my home. Probably 1/3 to 1/2 of my shots are taken indoors with a flash, however, in AWB mode the pics all have a yellowish hue to them. They turn out best if I set the white balance to daylight, but even then the pics have a kind of unnatural look to them. Maybe Panasonic will come up with a fix for this. Seems like an oversight on their part. I contacted Panasonic's tech support, and they came back with a response very quickly. Haven't had a chance to try it yet. I'll update this post if it fixes anything.
Otherwise, great camera.
reply to this comment
Zoom is great, and wide angle shots are adequate for my needs. Easy to configure the camera for special shooting situations.
One complaint however: The is not a white balance mode to accomodate the increasingly popular compact flourescent bulbs such as I use in my home. Probably 1/3 to 1/2 of my shots are taken indoors with a flash, however, in AWB mode the pics all have a yellowish hue to them. They turn out best if I set the white balance to daylight, but even then the pics have a kind of unnatural look to them. Maybe Panasonic will come up with a fix for this. Seems like an oversight on their part. I contacted Panasonic's tech support, and they came back with a response very quickly. Haven't had a chance to try it yet. I'll update this post if it fixes anything.
Otherwise, great camera.
Liam McCabe (07/01/2010)
That's an interesting point, thanks for the comment, let us know if Panasonic gets back to you about that. Glad you like the camera as well.
reply to this comment
No flourescent WB setting on FM20 (Rog Patterson — 08/05/2010)
I wondered about the lack of any flourescent WB setting in FH20 specs myself, Steve...so, what did Panasonic techies suggest you do?
Thanks,
Rog
reply to this comment
Thanks,
Rog
Great camera (M. Maurello — 07/01/2010)
We bought this camera a few months ago and wanted to wait to really figure out if we liked it or not. WE LOVE IT!!!! The pics are fantastic, the zoom is amazing, the video was clear, and the camera, overall, is easy to work with. The absolute best part is the delay - or lack or delay- when taking a picture. I was so used to other digitals and their delay that I generally missed the shot. NOT WITH THIS ONE! The response is immediate and I get the shot everytime!!
reply to this comment
INTERNATIONAL WARRANTY ( — 07/01/2010)
I am from India. After seeing this site i decided to buy this camera panasonic FH20. Thank you very much for the reviews and comments. But the problem is that the price of the camera is 14,000 rupees in India which is about $310. So I decided to buy it in US. I just want to know about the INTERNATIONAL WARRANTY they are offering with panasonic. Can anybody please help me out?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/02/2010)
You can find out more about the international warranty here: panasonic.net/support/gener...
reply to this comment
Jill (07/01/2010)
So with sales and stuff, I've managed to find a Sony Cyber-shot DSC W350 and a Panasonic Lumix FH20 for basically the same price. Both seem to be getting fairly positive reviews, so I'm wondering which would be the better deal in this case? It's a little unfortunate that there's no panorama on the Panasonic, but it sounds like image quality is better though?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/02/2010)
IMHO I think the Panasonic will work better in low light. As for panoramas, you can do that with software now and it's seamless. So I think thats a non issue, personally.
reply to this comment
Letter difference in model (Katherine — 06/30/2010)
After reading comments about this camera, I started a local store research for it. But one store had it identified as FH20S and another had it as DMCFH20K. What's the difference? You only identify the model as FH20>
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/30/2010)
The letter at the end refers to the color -- I believe K stands for black, S stands for silver. Otherwise, they're the same camera.
reply to this comment
David (06/29/2010)
I went to the store to buy the Nikon S6000 and was talked into the Sony W370. I have not tried this camera yet but the reviews say it is slooow between pictures. I looked at the FH20 but the the thing I didn't like was you can't play back pictures on a TV. Is there a way to do this and is this a better choice than the previous mentioned? Is there a Canon you would recommend that has at least 5x optical zoom?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/29/2010)
There is no HDMI output on the FH20, but there is a standard A/V output. You will be able to view it on a TV using the old-school RCA cables, but the quality will not be as crisp as it would through a high-definition interface like HDMI. Of course, this presupposes you have an HDTV -- if not, you can't use HDMI cables anyway. But yes, this is a shortcoming of the FH20.
There are a few Canons with 5x zoom or bigger. The SX210 has a 14x zoom, though it's $300. The SD3500 has a 5x zoom, though it's also about $300. And there's also the SX120, but it's not a compact camera. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
There are a few Canons with 5x zoom or bigger. The SX210 has a 14x zoom, though it's $300. The SD3500 has a 5x zoom, though it's also about $300. And there's also the SX120, but it's not a compact camera. Hope this helps.
David (06/29/2010)
I just asked a question above and wondered what the difference is between the fh20 & fh22? Is it only the touch screen? Is the performance the same?
reply to this comment
SVK (06/27/2010)
Which will be better- panasonic fh20 or canon sx120 ?
And also tell me, can we call the 36mm lens in canon sx120 as wide angle?
reply to this comment
And also tell me, can we call the 36mm lens in canon sx120 as wide angle?
Liam McCabe (06/28/2010)
We prefer the FH20 because it's much smaller, has a comparable zoom, and costs less -- and as you mention, has a wider lens.
"Wide angle" just means the shortest range, as opposed to telephoto. I suppose the term does get mangled for marketing purposes quite a bit. 36mm is definitely very narrow though.
reply to this comment
"Wide angle" just means the shortest range, as opposed to telephoto. I suppose the term does get mangled for marketing purposes quite a bit. 36mm is definitely very narrow though.
Interior Shots for Interior Designer (R Williams — 06/26/2010)
Another indoor light question- I am an interior designer and shoot my own "before" photos to work off of. Truest color possible is important. I am almost always in homes during the day and often have to shoot window treatments with the sun coming in. I can sometimes get ok shots with my flash on, but not usually. I use my old camera (Canon A540) for very little else so I am focused on this. I also am looking at the Canon S90 and will spend the $ if I absolutely have to, to get the better shots. I always print, but rarely over the 5x7 size, usually smaller. Can you help me make the right choice? I will consider any camera.
Thanks so much, in advance!
reply to this comment
Thanks so much, in advance!
Jinwons (06/27/2010)
For your needs, you should be looking at 300 or more in price. Small travel zoom camera like this one won't cut it. Canon S90 should do very decent indoor shots for you. The other good ones are Canon SD4000, Samsung TL500.
reply to this comment
"Lens error" problem? (Robert Kittle — 06/24/2010)
Do you know how susceptible the FH20 may be to the "lens error; restart camera" problem? I had never heard of it until last week when it happened to my Canon SD1100IS. I was very happy with the camera until the lens froze while extended. I had not dropped it or anything. The camera is now useless so I'm looking for a replacement. When I looked up the problem online, I found that it's a very common problem with Canons and some others, so I'd like to buy something that's not as likely to have that problem.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/25/2010)
There aren't many reports of lens errors occurring with the fh20 so you may be safe. This can happen to any camera though.
reply to this comment
ZS-3 compared to FH-20 (Roberto Laracuente — 06/23/2010)
Botj are very good Cameras for high Optical Zoom but the ZS-3 is a 50% better Camera because of the 4X difference in optical Zoom and the ZS-3 has what makes Panasonic known for a great Camera which is the LEICA LENS. LEICA makes a big difference in picture quality and makes a better Camera for very low light photos. The FH-20 is a great Camera don't get me wrong but for $100 or $75 more the ZS-3 is a Better choice
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/24/2010)
Well, just because the lens doesn't have Leica on it, doesn't mean it isn't a great lens. In fact, the Lumix lens gets high marks. Look for the results, not the nameplate.
reply to this comment
Anna (06/23/2010)
I love all of the information that has been given. I'm about ready to pull the trigger, but I can't decide between the Samsung TL110 or the FH20! Costco has a good price on both. Anyone know which is going to be better?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/24/2010)
Go with the FH20. With an 8x optical zoom and great low light performance, you'll be sitting pretty.
reply to this comment
Gayle Bell (06/23/2010)
I want point and shoot primarily for taking nature scenes and zooming in on animals...also taking small videos of animals and children. I just bought the Canon powershot but am having second thoughts ( because of the zoom) now that I have read this review and I haven't opened the package yet . Any advice considering my uses? I presently own a Power Shot so I was sticking with what I know.
Gayle
reply to this comment
Gayle
Chris Weigl (06/23/2010)
You don't say which Powershot you own, as that has a huge bearing upon the features that are included. If you feel like you'll be wanting the extra zoom then yes, I'd say drop whatever you have and go for something else. If you still want to stick with Canon look at the SX120IS
reply to this comment
Gayle Bell (06/24/2010)
I just bought the SD1300 IS because it is so portable and lightweight but I'm worried about the zoom. I am not amrried to a Canon
reply to this comment
Susan (06/21/2010)
Please say it isn't so... My trusty Minalta just died yestrday. It did live to a ripe age and served me well. But today, after spending an entire afternoon researching several different cameras and especially after finding this wonderful site, I was all set on the FH20. However, I am moving to Israel in about one year and noticed from the helpful link offered by Chris Weigl (06/09/2010) that Israel- one of the most technically advanced countries- is left out regarding sales and warranty. This is so disappointing on several levels, although I should be getting used to it. So, Panasonic must be scratched. Surprising, since Leica is involved with them. Unless someone has a helpful comment, I guess it is back to the drawing board. So, NOW what do you suggest?
reply to this comment
Susan (06/22/2010)
OK. A new day and I'm a lot calmer. Couldn't believe I spent so many hours checking out cameras yesterday, and I'm at it again. But, I don't know much more about them other than my wish list: high megapixels (10), high zoom (at least 5, prefer more), speed for continuous shots, good low light performance, and - of course - sharp pictures. Am I asking too much? Oh, and less than $400. Someone please suggest- other than Panasonic since I won't be able to repair it. I know for sure Canon, Casio, and Fugi have authorized service there.
reply to this comment
uk name (Andy — 06/21/2010)
Andy
hi guys what do they call this model in the uk please?
reply to this comment
hi guys what do they call this model in the uk please?
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2010)
IIRC, it's the same model.
reply to this comment
Maccompatibility (Emily — 06/21/2010)
Does this camera work with Mac computers?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2010)
With a USB card reader, it doesn't matter. But it should.
reply to this comment
FH20 VS FH22 (Gary — 06/20/2010)
Whats the difference between FH20 & FH22?...and is FH22 equally good?
reply to this comment
tkcham (06/21/2010)
FH20/FS30 = non-touch-screen 2.7"
FH22/FS33 = touch-screen 3"
reply to this comment
FH22/FS33 = touch-screen 3"
FH20 vs ZS1 (Victor — 06/20/2010)
Hello. I'm thinking about buying a camera (it will be my first one) to go to a cruise ship trip and I don't have much more than $200, so I'm in doubt between ZS1 and FH20, which reviews looked pretty good.
I'm probably going to take a few low-light pictures in the parties or at night in the ship.
I would love a fast answer since I have around 1 week to decide which one I'll buy.
reply to this comment
I'm probably going to take a few low-light pictures in the parties or at night in the ship.
I would love a fast answer since I have around 1 week to decide which one I'll buy.
(06/20/2010)
I am going on a cruise this fall. I have a older point and shoot Canon A570 that I rarely use. I would like to take a newer point and shoot camera that would also take decent video. I am getting confused with all the options. Should I look for a mini camcorder that only takes video or can you recommend a camera that can do both for less than $200.00 Would the FH20 be a good option.
reply to this comment
Adriana (06/20/2010)
I hve been to the store and can't decide between the zs3 and the zs5 the salesperson was not very helpful. The only difference I could see is that the zs5 can "smart" zoom durind video. Video features are neither here nor there to me, my bigger interest is low light pictures and the 10 plus zoom. The fh20 amd zr1 was not for me wanted larger zoom and leica lens.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2010)
I don't think zooming during video is really that big a deal, frankly. If you pay close attention to what you watch on TV, you rarely see zoom being used. It's mostly composed shots before actually recording the scene.
reply to this comment
Battery life and how to charge it (Cindy Frakes — 06/20/2010)
How do you charge the battery on this camera? How long is the battery life? Do you have to take the battery out of the camera to charge it?
Thank you Cindy June 19, 2010
reply to this comment
Thank you Cindy June 19, 2010
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2010)
It comes with a Battery Charger. It's benchmarks claims a battery life of up to 300 pictures before recharging. Your mileage may vary depending on how you use your camera.
reply to this comment
The Panasonic - FH20 , ZS5 , or ZS7 ? (Craig — 06/19/2010)
Hi I am looking at 3 different Panasonics (I bought all 3 but will take 2 of them back).
I was leaning toward the FH20 (mainly because it is i/2 the price of the ZS7 & $ 100 less than the ZS5) until I discovered it would not zoom when taking movies the other cameras will the ZS5 & ZS7. Is there a certain setting on the FH20 that will allow me to zoom ?. I will not be taking a lot of movies but liked the burst speed of the FH20.
Any feedback on any of these cameras would be great.
Thanks Craig
reply to this comment
Hi I am looking at 3 different Panasonics (I bought all 3 but will take 2 of them back).
I was leaning toward the FH20 (mainly because it is i/2 the price of the ZS7 & $ 100 less than the ZS5) until I discovered it would not zoom when taking movies the other cameras will the ZS5 & ZS7. Is there a certain setting on the FH20 that will allow me to zoom ?. I will not be taking a lot of movies but liked the burst speed of the FH20.
Any feedback on any of these cameras would be great.
Thanks Craig
FH1 value for money? (mark robinson — 06/18/2010)
hi , i am a casual user and dont understand much about manual settings etc. i am getting the FH1 which has basically similar specs as FH20 but lesser MP and zoom for 120$ whereas the FH20 is for 160$ . is it worth spending the extra 40$ for bit more MP and zoom ? is the image quality and performance noticeably different between the two?thanks all.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/18/2010)
Not for the mp but for the zoom, you betcha.
reply to this comment
Teri (06/17/2010)
I am travelling to Egypt this fall and want to take a P&S instead of my dSLR. I am looking at the FH20 and the ZS5. Would the FH20 be okay or would i be happier with the 12x zoom and the 25mm lens?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/17/2010)
Hmm...well, we like the FH20 (as you can probably tell), but I think a special trip like one to Egypt deserves a great camera. You should consider taking your dSLR, but if you have your heart set on taking a point-and-shoot, the ZS5 will give you better pictures, no doubt, if you can swing the extra few dollars. FH20 will do fine if that's all you can afford, but I'd go with the ZS5 if I had my choice.
reply to this comment
Initial impressions of FH20 (Henry Smith — 06/17/2010)
I purchased the FH20 at Costco for $170 ($190 less $20 discount [not in coupon book]) a week ago. Because I was replacing an aging but still working Canon A70, I initially looked at Powershots (780, 940, 1300 - could not find 1200). Based on reviews (not just at this site), I decided to try the FH20 especially for the Costco for 90 day return. Costco's price is a bit higher than some others since the package includes a 2G card and case.
- Size is fine with me even if a bit larger than Powershots mentioned above. Fingers do not tend to cover the flash. I would not put in shirtpocket anyway; probably would come out if leaning forward. Large enough not to need wrist strap to hold it. It weighs about half the A70 (w/ batteries).
- Has a quality-feel to it for a lower-end camera.
- Can see LCD screen in bright sun with sunglasses on, maybe not perfectly, but still usable. LCD screen was not viewable at all on my A70 in bright light w/ or w/o sunglasses, but it has a viewfinder. Previously I went to a full-line, not discount, camera store hopefully to try out the LCD screen of the FH20 and Powershot 1300 & 1400 in full sun. Salesperson would not let me take one out the door onto the street - maybe 20 feet - to try them out. Response was if I buy it and can cannot see LCD, return it. He really wanted me to buy the 1400 since it cost more and their primary lines are Canon and Nikon.
- iA mode seems to work fine for most shots. I will have to work on difficult indoor shots taking stained-glass windows in cathedrals. Some that I took at Wash. National Cathedral yesterday were fine for me considering taken at angle, etc. Some were better than others alternating between iA and normal. Will have to take notes on settings when I take more pictures there. I was esp. interested in the stained glass images since the ones I took with the A70 were too blurred although other images were clear. Other indoor shots at the Cathedral seemed fine with me although I am not an expert.
- Bought second Panasonic battery at B&H ($32); was in upper $40s at Panasonic site, but was on backorder. Did not want to try a 3rd party battery due to warnings on Panasonic site.
- From the CD with the camera, loaded only the manual. I have not heard of the photo software program Photo fun Studio on the CD. Probably use my 10 yr old PaintShop Pro.
- I cannot comment on video mode since I doubt that I will ever use it very much for that.
Those are my comments after several days of use. Unless a mechanical problem develops in the next 90 days, it will not be returned.
reply to this comment
- Size is fine with me even if a bit larger than Powershots mentioned above. Fingers do not tend to cover the flash. I would not put in shirtpocket anyway; probably would come out if leaning forward. Large enough not to need wrist strap to hold it. It weighs about half the A70 (w/ batteries).
- Has a quality-feel to it for a lower-end camera.
- Can see LCD screen in bright sun with sunglasses on, maybe not perfectly, but still usable. LCD screen was not viewable at all on my A70 in bright light w/ or w/o sunglasses, but it has a viewfinder. Previously I went to a full-line, not discount, camera store hopefully to try out the LCD screen of the FH20 and Powershot 1300 & 1400 in full sun. Salesperson would not let me take one out the door onto the street - maybe 20 feet - to try them out. Response was if I buy it and can cannot see LCD, return it. He really wanted me to buy the 1400 since it cost more and their primary lines are Canon and Nikon.
- iA mode seems to work fine for most shots. I will have to work on difficult indoor shots taking stained-glass windows in cathedrals. Some that I took at Wash. National Cathedral yesterday were fine for me considering taken at angle, etc. Some were better than others alternating between iA and normal. Will have to take notes on settings when I take more pictures there. I was esp. interested in the stained glass images since the ones I took with the A70 were too blurred although other images were clear. Other indoor shots at the Cathedral seemed fine with me although I am not an expert.
- Bought second Panasonic battery at B&H ($32); was in upper $40s at Panasonic site, but was on backorder. Did not want to try a 3rd party battery due to warnings on Panasonic site.
- From the CD with the camera, loaded only the manual. I have not heard of the photo software program Photo fun Studio on the CD. Probably use my 10 yr old PaintShop Pro.
- I cannot comment on video mode since I doubt that I will ever use it very much for that.
Those are my comments after several days of use. Unless a mechanical problem develops in the next 90 days, it will not be returned.
Liam McCabe (06/17/2010)
Thanks for your notes. Please do let us know if you run into any mechanical problems -- we have no way of knowing about these problems without reader feedback, so check back in if you run into any problems.
reply to this comment
amanda (06/17/2010)
I've recently been looking at camera's and so far the Panasonic FH20 has seemed by far the best compared to the Canon Powershot 12.1, the Casio Exilim H-10 and the Sony Cyber Shot 14.1 and the Nikon Colorpix. The reviews I read for the Nikon suggested poor quality in pictures, slow shutter time and dirty touch screen. From all the research I've been doing, I'm planning to buy this Panasonic. Hope that helps.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/17/2010)
Good choice. Unfortunately, it's Nikon's turn to put out a series of badly designed cameras. They all seem to hit a slump and now it's their turn. Sony's are overpriced and don't perform well in low light, IMHO. The Casio's actually are pretty good. I have a few. But given a choice between the Casio and Canon, I'd buy the Canon.
reply to this comment
Night shots (Tourist — 06/15/2010)
How does the FH20 cope with shots of fireworks or lit buildings (yes, Disney and Vegas!)? I would ideally like a camera that we can point and shoot at both day and night images without having to fumble around changing settings. Will the FH20 do the job for us?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/15/2010)
Well, a camera in this price range is never ideal for those kinds of settings, but we think this is pretty good for the price. The intelligent auto (iAuto) setting was quite good at recognizing scenes, our reviewer said, so you'll probably do pretty well with this if you're not looking to spend too much money. You'll also appreciate the 8x zoom on this camera for stuff that's further away, travelers tend to appreciate that feature on a small camera.
reply to this comment
FH20 or ZR3? (alissa — 06/15/2010)
FH20 or ZR3? Looking for something I can take on vacation, but is good at taking night pictures as well. Which of these two do you think would be best?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/15/2010)
Of the two, I'd say the ZR3 is probably slightly better in the dark, just because it has a better lens, but not sure if it's that much better to justify the extra cost. The ZR3 does have much better quality video if that's of concern to you. I'd personally save the cash, go with the FH20, and buy some extra souvenirs.
reply to this comment
Ed (06/14/2010)
What does anybody think of the Nikon S6000 or the Canon SX120? I was looking at the Fh20 but can't find one unless I get it online and I'd rather buy from a store. I can get the Nikon for $199 which includes a 2GB memory and a case.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/16/2010)
Both are fine, the Canon is probably the better choice.
reply to this comment
Adriana (06/14/2010)
fh20 vs zr1 I cant't decide.
If price point was not the problem which is better?
Important to me
low light pics and zoom. I have a lumix tz1 with 10 zoom I use zoom quite often for kids games thought my new camera should have same or more zoom but the reviews for the fh20 low light pics are so good i'm wondering if 8 zoom would be enough.
reply to this comment
If price point was not the problem which is better?
Important to me
low light pics and zoom. I have a lumix tz1 with 10 zoom I use zoom quite often for kids games thought my new camera should have same or more zoom but the reviews for the fh20 low light pics are so good i'm wondering if 8 zoom would be enough.
by James DeRuvo (06/17/2010)
Very similar. Same sensor, Except the Fh20 has 14mp vs. 12.1 of the ZR1. Which you won't even notice. Also, the ZR1 has a Leica lens, while the Fh20, though heard to be designed by Leica isn't a true Leica lens. And similar focal length. But it gets good marks for low light performance so that isn't all bad.
Frankly, I think it's a tossup.
reply to this comment
Frankly, I think it's a tossup.
FH20 vs. Nikon S600 (Angela — 06/12/2010)
I would like to know your opinion of the FH20 compared to the Nikon Coolpix S6000. I'm trying to decide which of these two cameras to purchase. I am replacing a Canon SD600 and I'm looking for a larger optical zoom and megapixels, with quick shutter speed. Which one is better? Thank you in advance for your input on these two.....
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/14/2010)
Well, we haven't tried the S6000, though we have tried every other S series Nikon this year. The image quality on those has been OK. I'd bet that the FH20 has slightly better image quality than the Nikon -- that's a hunch I have from testing a bunch of these cameras. I'd say save yourself a few bucks and go with the FH20. It's extremely well rounded.
reply to this comment
FH20 software ( — 06/11/2010)
Can you recommend a software package for editing photos and/or video? I ordered my FH20 today and have read that the included software is not very good.
Thanks, Mike
reply to this comment
Thanks, Mike
by James DeRuvo (06/11/2010)
Well, Google's Picasa is free, doesn't get much better than that. Pay options - Adobe's Photoshop Elements.
reply to this comment
Questions.. (Judy March — 06/10/2010)
1)I really like the FH20 but the fact that it does not connect directly to a TV for a slideshow or movies is a concern. Is there another way, besides burning a CD, to do this? Also, would I get the HD quality?
2)I'm looking at the ZS6 at Costco which has the HDMI port, but how do the photo and video quality compare with the FH 20. Can't find many reviews for the ZS6.
3)Is the ZS6 good in low light photos and does it have IA as the FH20 does-specs say no direct IA button on ZS6 but not sure it has IA at all.
4) How are both LCD screens in bright sun?
5) Lastly, how short is the time between shots..I have young grandsons and too long a delay means I may lose a great photo opportunity.
Thank you in advance!
Judy
reply to this comment
2)I'm looking at the ZS6 at Costco which has the HDMI port, but how do the photo and video quality compare with the FH 20. Can't find many reviews for the ZS6.
3)Is the ZS6 good in low light photos and does it have IA as the FH20 does-specs say no direct IA button on ZS6 but not sure it has IA at all.
4) How are both LCD screens in bright sun?
5) Lastly, how short is the time between shots..I have young grandsons and too long a delay means I may lose a great photo opportunity.
Thank you in advance!
Judy
(06/11/2010)
ZS6 is far better camera than FH20 in almost every way. It's actually a little brother of their top end ZS model ZS7, specifically made for sales at Costco. It only lacks GPS, AVCHD video of ZS7, but it has Motion JPEG HD video. Otherwise it's the same as ZS7, and sells for $239 with $50 rebate right now.
Of course it has iAuto mode and a lot more features than FH20. It should do better than FH20 in dim indoor as well because it has larger lens aperture.
reply to this comment
Of course it has iAuto mode and a lot more features than FH20. It should do better than FH20 in dim indoor as well because it has larger lens aperture.
Panasonic Lumix ZS6 (Mia — 06/27/2010)
So piggybacking onto this thread (there is soooo little review info on the ZS6 model), am strongly leaning towards picking up this deal at Costco even with the extra $. Again regarding the Lumix ZS6 model:
-- Is there a setting for the iA mode or is this feature activated on a shot-by-shot basis?
-- Is there a panoramic feature on this model? (Not critical, just a nice-to-have feature).
-- Assumption that the FH20 is better choice for a novice, but that said, is the ZS6 laid out easily enough for the average photographer?
At this price range, $ amount is smallest of issues ($50 difference right now between these two models - come on!). But as this would be used initially by my daughter going to college abroad for a semester, wanted to make sure the ZS6 wouldn't be too much camera (i.e. would be fairly easy to use as point-and-shoot).
Would love response to above Q's. This site has been so helpful -- thanks!
reply to this comment
-- Is there a setting for the iA mode or is this feature activated on a shot-by-shot basis?
-- Is there a panoramic feature on this model? (Not critical, just a nice-to-have feature).
-- Assumption that the FH20 is better choice for a novice, but that said, is the ZS6 laid out easily enough for the average photographer?
At this price range, $ amount is smallest of issues ($50 difference right now between these two models - come on!). But as this would be used initially by my daughter going to college abroad for a semester, wanted to make sure the ZS6 wouldn't be too much camera (i.e. would be fairly easy to use as point-and-shoot).
Would love response to above Q's. This site has been so helpful -- thanks!
(06/09/2010)
I read some comments on Amazon regarding the 14MP photos being noisy. Is there a concern with the sensor not being strong enough to shoot at 14mp ?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/09/2010)
Yeah, I mean that's a bit of a sore spot with cameras in this price range. The MP count gets boosted for marketing purposes and the sensor doesn't necessarily follow. We didn't really notice a problem below ISO 800, but after that, yeah, it gets as noisy as you'd expect -- pretty much in line with most cameras in this price range.
reply to this comment
What will I have to purchase in addition to the camera? (Trish Kobbeman — 06/08/2010)
What will I have to purchase for this camera to get started? Does it come with the cable, charging station, battery etc?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/09/2010)
It comes with everything but a memory card and case. But yes, there's a wrist strap, battery, battery charger, USB cable, and CD ROM with photo software and electronic manual.
You can get away without having a case (though we recommend that you get one), but you definitely need an SD/SDHC memory card.
reply to this comment
You can get away without having a case (though we recommend that you get one), but you definitely need an SD/SDHC memory card.
What comes in the box? (Patricia Lorenz — 06/08/2010)
What comes in the box of the Panasonic Lumix FH20?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/09/2010)
Wrist strap, battery, charger, USB cable, I believe an A/V cable, CD with photo software and electronic manual, and of course the camera. I might be missing something, but that's the important stuff. Note that there is no case or memory card included.
reply to this comment
global waranty? (lin chao choo — 06/07/2010)
does panasonic camera have global warranty as standard? if i buy in usa and take to china will warranty be valid ? thanking you .
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/09/2010)
According to this list it will be:
panasonic.net/support/gener...
reply to this comment
panasonic.net/support/gener...
Regarding FH20's Low-Light Performance (Liam McCabe — 06/07/2010)
I'm seeing a lot of comments regarding the FH20's low-light performance or lack thereof. Here's the deal:
- No pocket camera in this price range actually does well in poor lighting.
- The FH20 does better than most, especially when you consider that it's $160, already cheaper than comparable cameras, and it has other strong features like an 8x zoom and HD video.
- Many of you claim you have not read a review backing up our claim that the FH20 does pretty well in poor lighting. Read the review at the top of the page. Brenda has been writing reviews for us for more than three years, has seen dozens of cheap pocket cameras in that time, and believes that the FH20 is one of the best she's come across. I think that speaks for itself.
reply to this comment
- No pocket camera in this price range actually does well in poor lighting.
- The FH20 does better than most, especially when you consider that it's $160, already cheaper than comparable cameras, and it has other strong features like an 8x zoom and HD video.
- Many of you claim you have not read a review backing up our claim that the FH20 does pretty well in poor lighting. Read the review at the top of the page. Brenda has been writing reviews for us for more than three years, has seen dozens of cheap pocket cameras in that time, and believes that the FH20 is one of the best she's come across. I think that speaks for itself.
Jinwons (06/08/2010)
If that's the best answer you can provide regarding proof of light light capability of FH20, I'm disappointed. The review on this site is not so scientific but rather emotional. There is no objective comparison with comparable models like Nikon S6000, Sony W370, Fujifilm JZ300 under well defined procedure such as IQ comparison for various ISO values, lighting conditions, etc. So there is no way to know how FH20 stacks up against such models from review here.
I got ZR3 a few weeks ago. Though it works well for close objects indoors, it gets worse fast for farther object beyond 12ft indoors. The optics, sensor specs between FH20 and ZR3 is very similar. So I would think FH20 would be very similar too, which puts it at just mediocre indoor performance at best.
reply to this comment
I got ZR3 a few weeks ago. Though it works well for close objects indoors, it gets worse fast for farther object beyond 12ft indoors. The optics, sensor specs between FH20 and ZR3 is very similar. So I would think FH20 would be very similar too, which puts it at just mediocre indoor performance at best.
Brian (06/07/2010)
FH20, ZR1, Canon SD1300, Sony W370, Sony H55 or is there a Nikon similar to these that you might recommend? I have narrowed the way too many choices to these cameras. I like the 8x optical zoom on the FH20 and the 7x on the SonyW370. Does the FH20 have the optical image stabilizer and can the Sony use a SC card? I trust your reviews and your opinions and hope you can help me out. Thanks
reply to this comment
Brian again (06/07/2010)
Which of the above cameras have the best processor?
reply to this comment
Quality in smallest package (Linda C — 06/06/2010)
Will be traveling abroad and want the smallest as well as best quality camera to put in a purse. Comparing the Pan FH20 with the Cannon 1300IS right now. Thoughts????
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/08/2010)
Get the FH20, with that extra zoom, you'll wish you had it when you need it.
reply to this comment
Panasonic Lumix FH20 vs. Canon SD780 (June P. — 06/05/2010)
Trying to decide between Canon SD780 and Panasonic Lumix FH20. For my 14 YO daughter who wants to "get into" photography. Any thoughts?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/08/2010)
Get the FH20. It's worth it for the 8x optical zoom.
reply to this comment
fh20 vs canon powershot SD750 (Andrea L — 06/10/2010)
I read glowing reviews of the fh20 - and am considering supplementing my Canon SD750 (which I use w/ its underwater case for diving point and shoot) but- frustrated by its poor quality of zoomed in pics and low light situs - am I in for the same w. the fh20 and if so, should I go one level up in the Panasonic Lumix series eg the ZR3 ?
reply to this comment
Brimp (06/18/2010)
We bought the cannon and it was horrible!
reply to this comment
Greg S (06/05/2010)
First I want to thank Brenda for a very informative review and starting a great thread here. I'm ready to replace my Sony DSC-575. It has been a good P&S with a 1/1.8 CCD and a F2.0 lens. But it only has 3MP and is bulky compared to newer models. I've become convinced that the FH-20 is the class of the under $200 compacts. Can you confirm that the technology has lept far enough ahead that I'll get better quality even though the FH20's CCD is smaller overall size and the FH20's max f-stop is less? I don't want to take a step backward. The 575 was very highly rated in it's day (8 years ago)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/05/2010)
Absolutely. They key though is to have a CCD that isn't so stuffed with MP that it becomes less sensitive to light, not more. Luckily, the FH20 has a great lens and it performs well in low light. I don't think you'll be taking a step backwards with it.
reply to this comment
Tom (06/04/2010)
Does anybody like the Nikon S570?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
Nikon is having design challenges of late that have caused many cameras to perform poorly in low light. That's probably why.
reply to this comment
Tom (06/05/2010)
Thanks for the reply Jim. Is there a Canon product comparable to the S570? With so many models out there it's hard to choose. I am looking for something under $200 that has at least 5x optical zoom. I see everybody is praising the Panasonics but I'd like to hear about others.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/07/2010)
You might be able to find some 2009 model-year Canons with those specs at that price. This page might be helpful:
digitalcamera-hq.com/search...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/search...
Sandy Porter (06/04/2010)
I just bought this camera based on your recommendations. It is my first digital camera and I was looking forward to learning all about it. I got a basic operating book and that was it. If I want a more detailed user book, it costs $35. Seriously? I am 62 yrs old, not at all techie and I wasn't too thrilled about switching from film to digital anyway. Thanks, Panasonic, for making me glad I did. Are all manuals on CD-ROM these days?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
Yes. You can download a PDF copy online and print it up if that's more convenient for you. But there's plenty of online sites which can teach you all you need to know to get the most out of your camera, like digital-photography-school....
reply to this comment
Quick question (Alex — 06/04/2010)
does it have a panorama view
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
No, it doesn't. But I say so what? These days, it doesn't really matter since most photo editors have gotten pretty sophisticated and can put panorama's together pretty seamlessly. Photoshop does a great job at this.
reply to this comment
sony w370 vs fh20 (alex — 06/04/2010)
I'm going on a vacation to germany, most of the time will be spent in the alps, so what camera would you choose this or the w370...btw I am just an amateur photographer, so image quality isn't a quintessential must, I don't plan on doing a lot of printing
reply to this comment
em (06/03/2010)
Okay I'm debating between purchasing a Panasonic FH20 (great review, btw!) or a Canon Powershot. I've look at both the Canon SD780 and SD1300. So i'm between these three cameras. I just want this to be a general use camera. I'm planning to buy a dSLR in the next few years, but i need a camera to subsitute in the meantime. So which camera would be best for any and all conditions? Assuming i'd use all the options/controls available for each?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
I'd go with the Fh20. It has a nice 8x optical zoom, over twice that of the other two.
reply to this comment
Ashley (06/03/2010)
How fast does this camera take pictures, and how long does it take for the camera to be ready for the next picture? I'm not really sure how to compare.
reply to this comment
FH20 vs SD1300 (Tyler — 06/02/2010)
I mainly like to take pictures of other musicians in their most energetic state. I want to capture all of the detail and motion while maintaining a crisp and clear result. I'm in between the Lumix FH20 and the Canon SD1300. Which would be more sufficient in a low - light, fast paced environment? Suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/03/2010)
I've read great reviews about the FH20s great low light performance. I've read that the SD1300 isn't up to snuff. Lastly, I recommend you remember that point and shoots have limited speed options and do suffer from shutter delay. And when it reaches the max of it's lens speed, it'll start amping up the ISO to compensate and that will mess with your "crisp and clear result." So make sure you employ the low light scene settings when necessary, and prefocus!
reply to this comment
(06/03/2010)
Hi James.
Again please show us where are those reviews giving FH20 high mark for low light shooting. So far I couldn't find any. But Aaron on this site and other user reviews on amazon.com are telling that it's not so great for indoor shootings, espeically for low light indoors. Technically it doesn't have any advantages to be great low light performer. It got aperture of F/3.3 (wide) to F/5.9 (telephoto), which is just normal for this class. And I believe its sensor size is 1/2.3", again just normal.
Did you see any real proof that shows it's got superior indoor performance over the same class competitors from Canon, Nikon, Sony? If you did, where is it?
reply to this comment
Again please show us where are those reviews giving FH20 high mark for low light shooting. So far I couldn't find any. But Aaron on this site and other user reviews on amazon.com are telling that it's not so great for indoor shootings, espeically for low light indoors. Technically it doesn't have any advantages to be great low light performer. It got aperture of F/3.3 (wide) to F/5.9 (telephoto), which is just normal for this class. And I believe its sensor size is 1/2.3", again just normal.
Did you see any real proof that shows it's got superior indoor performance over the same class competitors from Canon, Nikon, Sony? If you did, where is it?
Best image stabilization? (Buzz Waterston — 06/02/2010)
Would the FH20 have the best image stabilization for cameras in the under-$250 price range. My wife has a hand tremor and is very frustrated with her entry-level Canon 480. If the Panasonic isn't best at image stabilization, what would you recommend?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/02/2010)
Absolutely. It's getting great reviews for low light and it's Leica 8x optical zoom lens.
reply to this comment
Liz (06/02/2010)
I'm starting a plastic surgery residency this July and as part of my training I'll need to take pictures of patients in the clinics (fluorescent lighting) and operating rooms (fluorescent and LED lighting) at distances of 12-60" from my subject. The size of subjects range from full body down to small vessels and nerves. I'm considering this FH20 vs. FP1 vs. Sony W370 vs. Nikon S6000. Which of these do you think will be best for my purposes? Thank you for your guidance!
reply to this comment
Kathy (06/03/2010)
I thought it was previously stated that the FH20 does not have a Leica lens..and in the picture of it I do not see "LEICA" as I do with other Lumix models?
reply to this comment
One week in (Denny — 06/07/2010)
I just bought the FH20 a week ago and it does not have the leica lens. FYI I took about 150 photos on a motorcycle trip over the weekend, I think 148 were good to very good. I haven't read the manual and am far from an expert but compared to my previous camera which took good to very good photos only about 66% of the time the fh20 is amazing.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/08/2010)
Lumix-branded lens. It may be designed by Leica, but there's probably a reason they don't put their name on it.
reply to this comment
Snowfire (06/01/2010)
What are the cons to this camera?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/02/2010)
Well, some give it the bad rap of not shooting in HD. But I've also read a review or two that compare the video quality to that of the Flip Mino HD - which shoots at 720p. So, even though it shoots just 640x480, if it's as good as that, they're doing something right.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/08/2010)
James, it does shoot in HD. It even says so at the top of this page!
reply to this comment
viewfinder vs. lcd in bright sun (kellen — 06/01/2010)
I have a 2 year old Panasonic Lumix TZ4, and it is impossible to see the image in the LCD on a sunny day. I want to replace it with viewfinder. But you think the FH20 will be OK in bright sun? Or is the Cannon SD 850 still available with viewfinder? I read the SD 1200 takes less sharp photos than Canon SD 850. Please help and clarify if the viewfinder is critical instead of LCD on FH20 ?
reply to this comment
shahbaz (06/01/2010)
i want to purchase the camera at the earliest i have three options which u recommend is best H55, W350, ZS3 and FH20...waiting for good suggestion...my preference is to have good low light/indoor/outdoor pictures
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/02/2010)
I'm in the FH20 camp. Great low light performance, which is what you need. And that Leica lens, much less it's 8x optical zoom.
reply to this comment
comparison (nancy — 06/01/2010)
debating between Lumix FH20 and Olympus 7010. What do you think?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/01/2010)
Have not tried that Olympus model. We do really like the Panasonic FH20 though.
reply to this comment
Nancy (06/01/2010)
Thanks, Liam. Have you looked at the Olympus 7030 or 7040? How do those compare to the Panasonic FH 20?
reply to this comment
Outdoor samples.. full res (Ravi — 05/31/2010)
Hows the Outdoor picture qualities under normal light? I mean, can some one link me to any real resolutions samples taken with FH20 so that I can decide. I want to know the outdoor pic quality w.r.t portrait/ focused objects 7 landscape scenery etc
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/01/2010)
It's quite good for a compact -- sorry we don't have any full res here. Try the Imaging Resource comparometer: imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP...
reply to this comment
Ravi (06/01/2010)
but I didnt think its sharp enough.. I mean the bushes & grass are not separted enough. The colors are like spread over each other.. is it normal?
I own a Motorola ZN5 which has a 5 MP Kodak camera & I think its pictures looks more real & natural..
I am really attracted to this camera for its 8X Zoom & DH Video recording.. So please someone link me to some real high res. outdoor & portrait pics taken with FH20 so that I can finalise
reply to this comment
I own a Motorola ZN5 which has a 5 MP Kodak camera & I think its pictures looks more real & natural..
I am really attracted to this camera for its 8X Zoom & DH Video recording.. So please someone link me to some real high res. outdoor & portrait pics taken with FH20 so that I can finalise
help I still can't decide (harriet — 05/31/2010)
I am trying out both the FH20 and the FY8-I've heard contradictory remarks about both.
Which is a better camera in general -the FY8 or the FH20? I have read reviews that say the FY8 is a better camera because it has the Leica Lens-also Consumer Reports rated it #1 in pt and shoot when it came out.
I want to take fine quality still photos of scenery, animals, plants, sunsets and look for light, textures, details.
I like the qualities of both, what is you opinion.
I enjoy reading your reviews and it's great that you answer questions personally.
reply to this comment
Which is a better camera in general -the FY8 or the FH20? I have read reviews that say the FY8 is a better camera because it has the Leica Lens-also Consumer Reports rated it #1 in pt and shoot when it came out.
I want to take fine quality still photos of scenery, animals, plants, sunsets and look for light, textures, details.
I like the qualities of both, what is you opinion.
I enjoy reading your reviews and it's great that you answer questions personally.
Outdoor Picture quality (Ravi — 05/31/2010)
Hi.. Great review, but I am a bit confused about its outdoor picture quality. Can anyone who owns this camera confirm about its natiral ness & Sharpness in normal daylight conditions?
I mean I have seen one outdoor pic at Image resource: below is the link:
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... I didnt think its sharp enough.. I mean the bushes & grass are not separted enough. The colors are like spread over each other.. is it normal?
I ow a Motorola ZN5 which has a 5 MP Kodak camera & I think its pictures looks more real & natural..
I am really attracted to this camera for its 8X Zoom & DH Video recording.. So please someone link me to some real outdoor & portrait pics taken with FH20 so that I can finalise
reply to this comment
I mean I have seen one outdoor pic at Image resource: below is the link:
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... I didnt think its sharp enough.. I mean the bushes & grass are not separted enough. The colors are like spread over each other.. is it normal?
I ow a Motorola ZN5 which has a 5 MP Kodak camera & I think its pictures looks more real & natural..
I am really attracted to this camera for its 8X Zoom & DH Video recording.. So please someone link me to some real outdoor & portrait pics taken with FH20 so that I can finalise
Kathy (05/31/2010)
Right now I'm very confused. We are looking for an ultracompact with great zoom, since we go canoe camping and want to catch wildlife shots up close but don't want to move too close. We need low light shots to be clear too when it's sunset time. It sounded like the FH20 was perfect although maybe larger than we want to carry, but now the latest review says the spare battery needed is expensive and the Intelligent Auto doesn't work well. I suppose it's possible her camera was defective in that respect? Any comments on the battery issue? Are other cameras, such as Samsung HZ30W and Panasonic LX3 more of an ultracompact and meet our needs? Or Sony W370? Or Panasonic ZR3 or Sony DSCV1? It is truly a daunting task to choose the right camera...
reply to this comment
(05/31/2010)
Hi, I would suggest HZ30W for your needs. It's got great 15X optical zoom and one touch start/stop for HD video shooting in MP4 format. Samsung does well for indoor colors as well. In Panasonic, I would suggest ZS7 which is their best P&S. But it would cost almost 100 more than HZ30W.
reply to this comment
Kathy (06/01/2010)
Those aren't exactly ultracompact, but I know I am asking too much. Somehow I want it very small and thin but with the zoom, that would likely not be possible...have never looked into good photography much so don't really need any manual features..the gps feature on the ZS7 does sound interesting though!:)
reply to this comment
(06/01/2010)
If HZ30W, ZS7 are too big for you, you are looking at the ones like FH20, ZR3 and Fuji JZ300, mostly below $200. Then you need to understand that you cannot really expect good low light shooting from these cameras. Their small sensor and lens aperture size are fundamentally limiting good low light image capture with small noise.
Although this site seems to favor FH20 even for low light, technically there is nothing to make it great for low light shooting and there is no real proof in the reviews either. I would grab slightly bigger ones like HZ30W, ZS7 or Fuji F80EXR and be happier with their better performance overall.
reply to this comment
Although this site seems to favor FH20 even for low light, technically there is nothing to make it great for low light shooting and there is no real proof in the reviews either. I would grab slightly bigger ones like HZ30W, ZS7 or Fuji F80EXR and be happier with their better performance overall.
BEWARE! Consider another camera :( (Susan Boyd — 05/30/2010)
BEWARE! If you want a spare battery, this camera ONLY uses Panasonic Lumix batteries (expensive). Also, you can't adjust the flash feature very easily. I bought this based on above reviews, and I'm really quite disappointed. Auto iA feature isn't very satisfactory. Pick something else.
reply to this comment
I need help please (Julien — 05/30/2010)
So I have had my FH20 for abotu 2 weeks and have been taking very good care of it. Thus far, it has really been a great camera however today when I turned it on, the lens would not open fully, (like the plasticy things over the lens only opened half way and needed to be pushed back manually?) I am pretty sure this is not normal? does anyone have advice please? Should i just return it?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/01/2010)
Yeah that sounds like a problem, manufacturing defect of some sort. Try exchanging it where you bought it, or call Panasonic for a repair -- it should be covered this early in the life span.
reply to this comment
harriet (05/28/2010)
The FH20 has a Lumex lens-isn't a Leica lens the best? Also, how do you like the FYP8
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/29/2010)
Lumix is the model name. Leica is the lens.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/08/2010)
The lens is a Lumix DC Vario. It is not a Leica-branded lens -- it may be designed by Leica, but I guess they didn't want to put their name on it.
reply to this comment
Carolyn Blackmon (05/26/2010)
My daughter is a competitive gymnast and I am looking for a point and shoot that can not only take pictures inside a gymn without the use of a flash and also be able to take a still shot of her while in motion. I would also like for it to serve as a great video camera for her routines at times. Am I looking for a needle in a haystack? Any suggestions, anyone? Thanks so very much!
reply to this comment
(05/26/2010)
Thatt's pretty tall order for P&S camera. Since you want dim indoor shots without flash and also video recording. I would suggest Sony HX5V. That would be at least +150 above FH20 here.
reply to this comment
Carolyn Blackmon (05/26/2010)
Wow! What a quick response! Thank you!!! When I received your message, I had just left Target and was actually looking at the Sony dsch55. I was really impressed with the 10x zoom ability. I'm thinking your recommendation might be a newer model with more bells and whistles. I will check it out. I have had several cameras in the past, but never really used or knew what many of the features were! (They were gifts!) I must say that I am becoming overwhelmed in this process. Thank you so much for your response and many thanks, again. :)
reply to this comment
(05/27/2010)
I would avoid dsc-h55 due to its poor low light ability. Another one to consdier in addition to HX5V is Panasonic ZS7. It's got good HD video working well even in dim lighting condition. But for dim lighting photos, HX5V would be better.
reply to this comment
Carolyn Blackmon (05/27/2010)
Ok, thanks for those recommendations. What are your thoughts on the Samsung H230W? This one has the 15x zoom and I saw it at Costco last night for $233.00 w/case and card. Their website might have had it for $219. I LOVE the major zoom feature, since most of the video will be from the spectator stands in a gymnasium. No lights are allowed, so I am not sure what this camera's video quality would be under those conditions. Same conditions with the still shots during gymnastics competitions....I've never even considered Samsung. Thoughts? Thanks SO much! :)
reply to this comment
Jinwons (05/28/2010)
I guess you meant HZ30W (right?) available on Costco. Wow, you picked one of my favorite super-zoom! I don't have it yet, but I think it's a good one too. Unlike HX5V, ZS7, it's not going to be very excellent at particular things, but it won't be performing poorly at anything either. It's got wides angle and longest zoom lens.
It also has one touch HD video recording button and writes to more common MP4 file format. The other two cameras write video to AVCHD format, which is still a bit tricky to handle and requires the latest good video editing software. Unless you are a video guru, MP4 files would be easier to use.
reply to this comment
It also has one touch HD video recording button and writes to more common MP4 file format. The other two cameras write video to AVCHD format, which is still a bit tricky to handle and requires the latest good video editing software. Unless you are a video guru, MP4 files would be easier to use.
Yan (05/26/2010)
I am debating which to buy: Panasonic FH20 or Nikon Coolpix S8000. I know they vary in price and some functions. My question is which is a better bang for the bucks.
reply to this comment
(05/26/2010)
Those two are cameras in different classes. S8000 is one level up from FH20 in terms of features. Beter comparison would be FH20 vs S4000 or ZS7 vs S8000.
You need to identify your needs and how you will use it. "Which one is better bang for buck" depends on that.
reply to this comment
You need to identify your needs and how you will use it. "Which one is better bang for buck" depends on that.
Yan (05/26/2010)
I simply want to have a pocket-size camera that have good quality shots, 8x or higher optical zoom, and good shutter speed so that I won't miss small kids' actions. I like Nikon coolpix style. Though it has 10x opitcal zoom, I am not sure whether I should spend $100 more for it. Currently the cameras that are comparable to Panasonic FH20 like what you recommended have less than 8x optical zoom. FH20 has good reviews. I was told Nikon is good in picture quality as it specializes in cameras than Panasonic. Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
reply to this comment
(05/27/2010)
Well, then go ahead for FH20 unless you care about videos. It's got HD video recording too, but it won't zoom in video and writes in huge Motion JPEG files (.mov). Another good one in this class is Fujifilm JZ300 to let you know.
reply to this comment
Yan (05/28/2010)
I see that Costco has Casio Exilim EX-H10 package sale including 2GB card and case for $179 with $20 manufacture rebate. Since its price is about the same as Panasonic FH20, which is better in your opinion? Thanks.
reply to this comment
Jinwons (05/29/2010)
I know it's in Costco. At that price point, it's better featured camera per price than FH20. But I never tried it since I'm not a fan of Casio. So I don't know how it would stack up on IQ compared to FH20. User reviews are mostly positive though.
reply to this comment
Mac (John in Cleveland — 05/26/2010)
Also, is the AVCHD video now usable with a Mac computer?
reply to this comment
Lumix FH 20 vs SD 1200 (John in Cleveland — 05/26/2010)
I would like a comparison between the Lumix FH 20 and the Canon SD 1200. I like the features of the FH-20, the SD-1200 is a reference point as I purchased one for a friend overseas and had the opportunity to use it a little. I need at least the low light capability of the SD 1200 in both still and video, and am attracted to the HD video and larger zoom. Is the FH 20 at least as good or better than the SD 1200 in these regards, and also am I limited to 7-10 minute video clips with the FH-20 like i am with the SD 1200 ? Purchasing this as a stopgap video and still camera for my wife and I to use as a point and shoot, with the expected purchase of a DSLR later this year.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/27/2010)
Well the FH20 has a larger optical zoom. The SD1200 has a ho hum 3x while the FH20 has a huge 8x for a compact. And it's got great low light performance. So I'd go there.
And when you go DSLR, I'd look at the Canon T2i.
reply to this comment
And when you go DSLR, I'd look at the Canon T2i.
kathy cale (05/25/2010)
which camera would you recommend between the FH20 or the Nikon coolpix S4000? I like the Nikon's 3" touch screen display but dont want to give up any picture quality.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/25/2010)
S4000 is a pretty good camera, but the FH20 is one of our favorites this year. Nikon's point and shoots struggle in low light, while the Panasonic FH20 seems to do admirably well in dim situations.
I personally dislike touchscreens because they suck up more battery life than they need to, they get dirty faster, and nobody has really come out with touchscreen interface that's better than tactile buttons (though our reviewer thinks that the S4000 comes close). Just because it's possible to make a touchscreen camera doesn't mean it's a good idea. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
I personally dislike touchscreens because they suck up more battery life than they need to, they get dirty faster, and nobody has really come out with touchscreen interface that's better than tactile buttons (though our reviewer thinks that the S4000 comes close). Just because it's possible to make a touchscreen camera doesn't mean it's a good idea. Hope this helps.
Lens for the Panasonic FH20 (Irvino — 05/24/2010)
DOES IT HAVE A 'LEICA' LENS
reply to this comment
(05/24/2010)
No, it doesn't have Leica brand lens, though other more expensive Lumix cameras have Leica lenses. That's why I doubt its IQ would be as goo as ZR or ZS line of cameras.
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/25/2010)
True, it doesn't have a Leica-branded lens, but it's Lumix lens is razor sharp! Actually, I compared 8 x 10's taken with the FH20 to those with the ZR1 (exact same exposure, etc.), and was hard pressed to detect a difference in image quality. Although in theory, the ZR1 should auto-focus faster because of its Venus V processor, I couldn't discern a noticeable difference. Imho, the ZR advantage is in its wider-angle lens and better video, but that's it.
reply to this comment
(05/25/2010)
It looks like lenses of two cameras are very similar. So you are probably right and I take back on the lens. However, ZR3 has better OIS, AF, wider angle, and better HD video.
I am not saying that FH20 is bad camera. But James's repeated assertion here that it's superb camera for low light and video is just laughable and baseless. He was saying it's got F/2.0 aperture for a while until I pointed out its false. In the last comment, he even said it has larger CCD sensor and excellent optics for low light. That's not true at all, and he didn't show single source or review to back up his claim. I just hope that people won't be misled and have unrealistic expectation on FH20.
reply to this comment
I am not saying that FH20 is bad camera. But James's repeated assertion here that it's superb camera for low light and video is just laughable and baseless. He was saying it's got F/2.0 aperture for a while until I pointed out its false. In the last comment, he even said it has larger CCD sensor and excellent optics for low light. That's not true at all, and he didn't show single source or review to back up his claim. I just hope that people won't be misled and have unrealistic expectation on FH20.
CONFUSING INFO HERE... (Page — 06/27/2010)
I agree this entire long list of questions & answers has totally confused me! got about 2/3 down this entire page b4 I found out the great in low light was not so, after it had been said over & over... now back to try again from square 1 to find a great camera :( thanks sincerely to those who have pointed out that these statements are incorrect.
reply to this comment
Donna (05/23/2010)
I am so confused with so many camera options. Everybody is toting the new Panasonic FH20. Is this comparable to the ZR1, Samsung SL420 or the Canon powershot SD1200? All of the low light issues are confusing also. Which is the best for indoor pictures under incadesant light? Overall, what is the best camera for under $200? Thank you
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/24/2010)
The FH20 is somewhere between the SD1200 and ZR1 in terms of features. I do not recommend the ZR1 though. For a cheap camera that takes better than average shots indoors, the FH20 is one of the best you can get right now. Our reviewer loved it, the majority of people who comment on it love it, and it's cheap. Really hard to beat.
reply to this comment
Jinwons (05/24/2010)
FH20 is a good camera for its price surely. But I don't think it's better than ZR1 let alone its current version ZR3. ZR1/ZR3 simply has better lens, better AF, OIS performance than FH20 and it also has some more features in the normal mode than FH20. So image quality wise ZR1 should be better if not by much. ZR1 should be close to FH20's price now, though ZR3 is a bit above 200.
And despite Jame's repeated claim here on its superb low light performance, there is no basis, review to back up that. Quite contrary its users are already finding that it's not really a camera for dim indoor shoots.
reply to this comment
And despite Jame's repeated claim here on its superb low light performance, there is no basis, review to back up that. Quite contrary its users are already finding that it's not really a camera for dim indoor shoots.
Liam McCabe (06/07/2010)
Read the review above! Look, any pocket camera at this price is not going to have very good low-light quality, but we've found that this model does a better job than most, particularly at this price point, and especially considering the rest of the feature set. To get actually decent indoor/low-light quality pictures, you're going to need to drop about $300. At half that price, the FH20 is a great all-around performer.
reply to this comment
Phil (05/22/2010)
Fwiw, the FH20 is available from Amazon today for $156.45 with free shipping and no sales tax.
amazon.com/dp/B003962DXE/?t... price is about as good as it gets (and probably won't be there for very long)!
reply to this comment
amazon.com/dp/B003962DXE/?t... price is about as good as it gets (and probably won't be there for very long)!
daylight indoor photos (Jan Ross — 05/22/2010)
I would appreciate any feed back regarding the "image quality" of daylight indoor photos taken with the FH20. Also, what constitutes a "low light" environment, aside from the closet? Thanks.
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/22/2010)
Hi Jan,
Addressing your 2nd question first, low light photography generally refers to outdoor photo situations other than in broad-daylight (e.g., after sunset) or dimly-lit indoor photos - without the use of flash.
I don't mean to hedge my answer to your 1st question, but it really depends on how much daylight is illuminating the indoor area where you're shooting. If the room is relatively well-lit, you can expect the image quality from the FH20 (with flash off) to be pretty darn good because the iso setting won't so high as to produce excessive noise and you will likely be close enough to the subject where you can shoot with the lens 'wide-open'. My wife has captured some very nice indoor shots under those conditions, whereas most of her nightime indoor shots turned out very noisy (grainy), unless she used flash.
Hth,
Aaron
reply to this comment
Addressing your 2nd question first, low light photography generally refers to outdoor photo situations other than in broad-daylight (e.g., after sunset) or dimly-lit indoor photos - without the use of flash.
I don't mean to hedge my answer to your 1st question, but it really depends on how much daylight is illuminating the indoor area where you're shooting. If the room is relatively well-lit, you can expect the image quality from the FH20 (with flash off) to be pretty darn good because the iso setting won't so high as to produce excessive noise and you will likely be close enough to the subject where you can shoot with the lens 'wide-open'. My wife has captured some very nice indoor shots under those conditions, whereas most of her nightime indoor shots turned out very noisy (grainy), unless she used flash.
Hth,
Aaron
Jan Ross (05/22/2010)
Aaron, I am learning so much from your comments and suggestions. Much appreciated.
reply to this comment
Low light vs. Low Light (Rog — 08/05/2010)
Thanks for your helpful clarification of what constitutes low light, Aaron.
I'm expecting UPS to deliver my FH20 some time today, but have continued to read and re-read reviews trying to justify my choice. Forgetting the half dozen alternative I've researched, my needs are mainly for obtaining reasonably crisp images of retirement community indoor activities (dinners, award presentations, guest speakers or artists, etc.) in a well-lit (ISO200-400) clubhouse atmosphere, as well as activity shots in our "semi-dim" bowling alleys (ISO400-800) and in the blazing sun around our swimming pool for my newspaper column. I'm just tired of either lugging my barely pocketable Olumpus C-740 or too-bulky Fuji s6000fd around or missing photo ops I'm hoping this tiny FH20 can better prepare me for. So I have no plans to photograph black cats in coal mines. But the plus and minus reports on FH20 "low light" still have me looking forward to the adventures of finding out for myself. My research and helpful comments from this and other websites does suggest there are a lot more FH20 exposure/focus/shutter options than I had expected.
Maybe more after I've played with my FH20 for a while.
reply to this comment
I'm expecting UPS to deliver my FH20 some time today, but have continued to read and re-read reviews trying to justify my choice. Forgetting the half dozen alternative I've researched, my needs are mainly for obtaining reasonably crisp images of retirement community indoor activities (dinners, award presentations, guest speakers or artists, etc.) in a well-lit (ISO200-400) clubhouse atmosphere, as well as activity shots in our "semi-dim" bowling alleys (ISO400-800) and in the blazing sun around our swimming pool for my newspaper column. I'm just tired of either lugging my barely pocketable Olumpus C-740 or too-bulky Fuji s6000fd around or missing photo ops I'm hoping this tiny FH20 can better prepare me for. So I have no plans to photograph black cats in coal mines. But the plus and minus reports on FH20 "low light" still have me looking forward to the adventures of finding out for myself. My research and helpful comments from this and other websites does suggest there are a lot more FH20 exposure/focus/shutter options than I had expected.
Maybe more after I've played with my FH20 for a while.
Tom (05/22/2010)
What is the difference between the FH20 and the ZR1? Is it only the lens? I have read many reviews and I can't decide which one to purchase. Is there another camera with the same options that is better? Thanks
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/22/2010)
Not to take anything away from the FH20, at or near the same price, the ZR1 is the better buy imho. It has a wider (25mm) Leica-branded lens whereas the FH20 has a Lumix lens (probably of Leica design) that starts out at 28mm. The ZR1 can also zoom while shooting video (without first having to turn-off the sound).
When I compared them I didn't see a discernable difference between them as far as image-quality and shooting in low-light goes and in that regard I don't think you can do better with any other small digicam unless you can move up in price to the Lumix LX3, or Canon S90.
reply to this comment
When I compared them I didn't see a discernable difference between them as far as image-quality and shooting in low-light goes and in that regard I don't think you can do better with any other small digicam unless you can move up in price to the Lumix LX3, or Canon S90.
FH20 ( — 05/21/2010)
OK I'm just about ready to buy this but a couple of question yet one is the video how good or bad is it and how would you compare it to my Lumix DMC-127 would you call this a step up and if I wanted to take a step up from the FH20 what would you suggest.
reply to this comment
FH20 ( — 05/21/2010)
OK I'm just about ready to buy this but a couple of question yet one is the video how good or bad is it and how would you compare the FH20 to my Lumix DMC-127 would you call this a step up and if I wanted to take a step up from the FH20 what would you suggest.
reply to this comment
FN20 ( — 05/21/2010)
OK I'm just about ready to buy this but a couple of question yet one is the video how good or bad is it and how would you compare the FH20 to my Lumix DMC-127 would you call this a step up and if I wanted to take a step up from the FH20 what would you suggest.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/22/2010)
All I can tell you is that reviews of the video quality for the FH20 are quite positive, especially considering their not HD. THis is probably due to the superior optics and a larger CCD chip.
reply to this comment
Video fh20 ( — 05/22/2010)
I still not sure about the FH20 one of the reason I want a new camera is to get better video than my old L-27 I would willing to spend a little more if I could get what the FH20 has plus better video what do you think would be better or is the FH20 as good as I can get in this range I don't take lots of video but what I do I'd like to get as best as I can. P.S. you have a great site! How do you folks do it's seem you must go crazy answering all our dumb question and doing review on top of it. Thanks
reply to this comment
(05/25/2010)
Hi, if you look for a P&S step up from FH20, I recommend Lumix dmc-ZS7. It has excellent lens, fast AF, fast IS, great manual features and superb HD video including zooming, stereo mic. It's simply superior to FH20 in almost every way. But it would cost more than 100 than FH20.
reply to this comment
FH 20 vs EX-Z 2000 (morris smith — 05/21/2010)
I'm trying to decide between the Panasonic FH20 and the Casio EX-Z2000. Which one gets the edge?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/21/2010)
We haven't tried the Casio, but the FH20 is a great little camera.
reply to this comment
casio FX Z2000 (morris smith — 05/22/2010)
Anyone who has tried the Casio FX Z2000, I would very much like to get your comments.
reply to this comment
MLB (05/20/2010)
I have been doing a lot of research and have decided I definitely want the FH20...however I am confused as to what the difference is between what i am finding as i compare prices online..is the dmc-fh20a the same or different than the dmc-fh20r, as found on the Target.com website? Just want to be sure I get the camera you all are raving about!
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Thanks!
Jeff (05/21/2010)
Same camera - just different color (FH20R is Red, FH20K is Black, etc, etc.).
Be sure to check out Amazon.com as their prices usually beat Target's prices and for the FH20 it includes free shipping with no sales tax!
reply to this comment
Be sure to check out Amazon.com as their prices usually beat Target's prices and for the FH20 it includes free shipping with no sales tax!
Best Price (Nic — 05/21/2010)
Costco.com has the Panasonic Lumix FH20 for $189.99 with a 2 GB SDHC card and a camera case, shipping and handling is included in the price.
In our local Costco it is $169.99 (after a $20 instant rebate) for the FH20, 2 GB SDHC card and a camera case.
Costco also has a 90 day return policy on electronics and free tech support.
I am very impressed with this site. Thanks for such an in-depth review, it made the very overwhelming job of trying to find a new camera much easier.
reply to this comment
In our local Costco it is $169.99 (after a $20 instant rebate) for the FH20, 2 GB SDHC card and a camera case.
Costco also has a 90 day return policy on electronics and free tech support.
I am very impressed with this site. Thanks for such an in-depth review, it made the very overwhelming job of trying to find a new camera much easier.
FH 20 vs FH 20K (Ron — 05/28/2010)
Is there a difference? Costco says it's the FH 20K?
reply to this comment
Jeremy (08/19/2010)
The K on the end means that it comes in the color black.
reply to this comment
MLB (05/20/2010)
I have been doing a lot of research and have decided I definitely want the FH20...however I am confused as to what the difference is between what i am finding as i compare prices online..is the dmc-fh20a the same or different than the dmc-fh20r, as found on the Target.com website? Just want to be sure I get the camera you all are raving about!
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Thanks!
by James DeRuvo (05/21/2010)
Sometimes manufacturers make special variants that are only sold at places like Target. This could be a cheaper lens or a different feature set. But they're basically the same camera. IIRC, you can compare the two at panasonicusa.com.
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/20/2010)
To those of you finding fault with the FH20 I just want to point out a few things (which should go without saying):
As with any camera, you really need to spend some time learning what the FH20's settings are all about and how to best use them to your advantage for various situations. Learning how to use a film-camera years ago was not only expensive, by the time you got the film developed, it was difficult to remember the settings that corresponded to each specific frame! Digital cameras make doing this easy, quick and free! So experiment, shooting a variety of situations at various settings. Using Normal Mode, try the various Scene selections and immediately see the effects produced (the FH20's IA Mode attempts to match the appropriate Scene to your shooting situation automatically and while it's accurate most of the time, it can and does gets fooled).
Remember that even with more expensive cameras auto-focusing takes some time, especially the FH20's default 9-points mode. so if you want your images to be in focus, depress the shutter half-way for a second before continuing to press it all the way for the shot. If you are shooting moving subjects, try changing the auto-focus mode to 1-point, where it will center-focus and respond much quicker!
For those of you interested in capturing decent shot in low (natural) light, you shouldn't expect too much from relatively inexpensive digicams with smaller (slower) lens-apertures and tiny sensors (such as the FH20). That said, my wife captured some surprising good natural-light family shots at our dinner table this past weekend by setting the flash to Forced-Off and the Manual Mode Scene to 'Candlelight'. So this little guy can be surprisingly capable in low-light - as long as you shoot at the FH20's max f/3.3 aperture (28mm wide-angle) while keeping the camera steady (tripod if possible).
Hth,
Aaron
reply to this comment
As with any camera, you really need to spend some time learning what the FH20's settings are all about and how to best use them to your advantage for various situations. Learning how to use a film-camera years ago was not only expensive, by the time you got the film developed, it was difficult to remember the settings that corresponded to each specific frame! Digital cameras make doing this easy, quick and free! So experiment, shooting a variety of situations at various settings. Using Normal Mode, try the various Scene selections and immediately see the effects produced (the FH20's IA Mode attempts to match the appropriate Scene to your shooting situation automatically and while it's accurate most of the time, it can and does gets fooled).
Remember that even with more expensive cameras auto-focusing takes some time, especially the FH20's default 9-points mode. so if you want your images to be in focus, depress the shutter half-way for a second before continuing to press it all the way for the shot. If you are shooting moving subjects, try changing the auto-focus mode to 1-point, where it will center-focus and respond much quicker!
For those of you interested in capturing decent shot in low (natural) light, you shouldn't expect too much from relatively inexpensive digicams with smaller (slower) lens-apertures and tiny sensors (such as the FH20). That said, my wife captured some surprising good natural-light family shots at our dinner table this past weekend by setting the flash to Forced-Off and the Manual Mode Scene to 'Candlelight'. So this little guy can be surprisingly capable in low-light - as long as you shoot at the FH20's max f/3.3 aperture (28mm wide-angle) while keeping the camera steady (tripod if possible).
Hth,
Aaron
Aaron (05/20/2010)
I forgot one very basic, but important practice - learn to hold the camera properly. You want to support the camera as best you can without allowing your fingers to get in the way of the AF Assist (it's quite easy to wrap your finger around that), flash, and of course, the lens. ;)
reply to this comment
Grainy/out of focus pics (Robert D. — 05/18/2010)
Okay so I have had the FH 20 for about a week and took it on a trip to the Bahamas to test it out. The 8X zoom is great and took some great pics. However the close shot or standard distant pics all came out grainy or looked out of focus or color was totally off. Do I need to adjust some settings maybe? I had to take pics 3 times just to get one to come out okay. I am a bit disappointed at the picture quality based on reviews I have seen on HQ so I am thinking it may be my settings needing adjustment. I am pretty much a novice at this so any help will be appreciated. If nothing helps I will have to return back to amazon and try another camera.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/18/2010)
It sounds like you need to turn down the ISO settings, and try to hold the camera more steady. You also might be in a less-than-ideal mode for the scene at hand? Are you in program mode? Or in a scene setting that isn't appropriate for the scene at hand? If you're getting unsatisfactory results in those modes, snap it back into intelligent Auto, and you should start to see some improvement without having to mess with too many settings. And then there's the inevitable fact that no compact point-and-shoot is perfect indoors. Most aren't even that good, but we found the FH20 to be better than most for its price. It sounds like blasphemy, but sometimes using the flash really helps with indoor photos. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Robert D. (05/18/2010)
Thanks for the suggestions I will give them a try and see if I see improved results. I appreciate the advice
reply to this comment
(05/18/2010)
I don't know how you use it with what setting. I have ZS3, not FH30 but I have pretty much the same advice as Liam. If you are novice, just keep it in the iAuto mode and don't mess with focus, ISO, WB, etc. settings. Also try to hold the camera as steady as possible, and press the shutter half way down for focus first and then press completely for taking shot. Some people seem to just point and press the shutter roughly and complain about picture quality. No P&S would give good photos if not used properly.
reply to this comment
L Clark (05/17/2010)
does this camera's software work with a Mac computer?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/20/2010)
Nothing much better than iPhoto,LC.
reply to this comment
Lumix FH20 vs Finepix JZ300? ( — 05/17/2010)
Looks like these two cameras are in the similar price with similar spec. I wonder which one is better for indoor? Does FH20 zoom while recording video?
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/18/2010)
Sorry to say I have not been impressed with the optics on Fuji digicams, so between the two, I'd go with the Lumix FH20 even though it does not zoom while shooting movies.
And as Aaron has clearly pointed out, you should not expect good low light performance from any of these pocketable digicams. If you do, your will be very disappointed. That said, the FH20 delivers much better daylight photos than its price would suggest.
reply to this comment
And as Aaron has clearly pointed out, you should not expect good low light performance from any of these pocketable digicams. If you do, your will be very disappointed. That said, the FH20 delivers much better daylight photos than its price would suggest.
Limited HD Video (Alain Dore — 05/16/2010)
This camera is everything you said it would be but it has at least one flaw that will make me return it to the store. It only allows shooting video up to 2GB - about 8 minutes in HD mode. A first I thought my 4 GB card was the problem (no I didn't read the manual - that's one of the good things about this camera, it's very easy to use) so I put in my 16GB card from my dSLR. Same thing. Turns out the 2GB limit is a hard cap by Panasonic. Very disappointed in this.
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/18/2010)
That's just the way it is ...no camera is perfect (esp low-price digicams)!
reply to this comment
Cal (05/25/2010)
I was concerned about the recording time also until I discovered that the time resets each time you complete a scene and start another. That first reading is the max for a single FAT32 file(2G), but it will increment in steps until the maximum card capacity is reached.
reply to this comment
Help me find a camera for work? (Melissa — 05/16/2010)
I use a camera for work and take about 1500 pics a day. I walk and take photo's and they have to be in focus - The faster my camera take's the photo's the more work I can do.
I use a Kodak EasyShare M320 - I love the shutter speed - I can take photo's one right after the other - I can usually get two photo's in per 1 second - Extremely quick - I have tested countless camera's and can't get close to that fast. The specs are 4-1/1400 whatever that means. Also This camera has 3x optical zoon & 5x digital zoom - Love that too. However my camera after 37 days just died - I have been reading reviews about how unrealiable Kodak's are and the only problem I have with this camera is I need a smalled VGA MP size picture. Kodak has small but not small enough for e-mailing 1500 pics a day.
I need a fast shutter speed - smallest VGA siz picture - Digital zoom - Good warranty? Please help me.
reply to this comment
I use a Kodak EasyShare M320 - I love the shutter speed - I can take photo's one right after the other - I can usually get two photo's in per 1 second - Extremely quick - I have tested countless camera's and can't get close to that fast. The specs are 4-1/1400 whatever that means. Also This camera has 3x optical zoon & 5x digital zoom - Love that too. However my camera after 37 days just died - I have been reading reviews about how unrealiable Kodak's are and the only problem I have with this camera is I need a smalled VGA MP size picture. Kodak has small but not small enough for e-mailing 1500 pics a day.
I need a fast shutter speed - smallest VGA siz picture - Digital zoom - Good warranty? Please help me.
Jeff (05/16/2010)
Melissa,
Your post is off-topic here, but I believe this is your best bet (short of a DSLR):
amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-D...
reply to this comment
Your post is off-topic here, but I believe this is your best bet (short of a DSLR):
amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-D...
Thank You for your help (Melissa — 05/16/2010)
I know it was off topic but I was desperate - Nobody seems to know camera's like you do and I am very grateful for your reply. Sorry again for being off topic.
reply to this comment
FH 20 vs. Nikon Coolpix S640? (Peggy Meyer — 05/14/2010)
How does the FH 20 compare to the Nikon Coolpix S640? I was going to buy the FH 20 on Amazon and have it shipped to a US address I soon will visit; but I live in Canada, was told that the warranty wouldn't cover me there so considering buying the Nikon at a local store. I'm looking for an easy to use, foolproof camera to take photos of children, grandchildren, fast moving objects. Peggy
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/15/2010)
It is only for the US and Puerto Rico. However, the FH20 is available in Canada.
panasonic.ca/english/audiov... costs a little more in Canada, but you'll have a proper warranty.
reply to this comment
panasonic.ca/english/audiov... costs a little more in Canada, but you'll have a proper warranty.
Panasonic vs. Nikon (Peggy Meyer — 05/15/2010)
Thanks. But I don't know much about cameras. Are there reasons why I should prefer the Panasonic over the Nikon?
reply to this comment
kathe (05/14/2010)
does this camera have the non glare coating on the lcd?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
Even if it does, my experience has been that in bright ambient light it doesn't make that much of a difference.
reply to this comment
LCD (Kathe — 05/13/2010)
does the LCD show clearly, or does it have a special coating that makes it hazy looking?
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/14/2010)
The FH20's LCD is very clear and sharp, even in broad daylight...
reply to this comment
Panasonic FH20 vs Nikon S4000 (Jenny A — 05/13/2010)
How does this compare to the new Nikon S4000? I'm wanting an inexpensive, easy to use camera for my 7 year old - but want something I can use too when my larger cannon is too much to carry around. I bought the Nikon for $139 including a case and 2 GB on a Mothers Day special, but haven't opened it yet. Reveiws I read said it doesn't have Optical Image Stabilization. Is the Panasonic FH20 a better camera for a child, then?
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/14/2010)
Set to IA, the FH20 is very easy to use - just point & shoot. But I'm not sure a 7-yr old is quite ready to care for a camera like this, at least not my 7-yr old ! ;)
reply to this comment
SUSANA (06/27/2010)
I bought my grandson an Olympus C-2100 UZ camera when he was 7 years old. It's a lot more complicated than a small point and shoot. I taught him how to take care of it. We would go and take pictures of everything, really enjoying our time together. We have a large annual Fall Festival photo contest that is open to amateurs and pros. The second year, my grandson entered at age 8 and took first place in his division and Best of Show in both kid age divisions. He has had many victories with that camera and recently received a newer camera this past Christmas. He is now 13 years old and still shooting and the old Oly is still going strong.
reply to this comment
Mary (05/14/2010)
I got this camera also, and I am not very impressed with the indoor pictures. I used it at my sons karate practice. This was indoors with flouresent lighting (very bright). In the auto mode, the camera made the flash go off and the picture turned out with this yellow tint and slightly blurry. I switched it to the action scene mode, the flash did not go off in this mode, so the colors looked more natural, but the shot was very blurry. I like the functionality of the camera, and the touch screen is very responsive. I usually do not like touch screens, and I liked this one. I will be returning this camera because I want the pictures to come out a little better than they did. Outside pics are great. But for a 7 year old, check out some of panasonic's shock resistant line of cameras. That way if they accidentally drop (up to 4 ft I think it is) you are more likely the camera will still work.
reply to this comment
Fh20 vs sony h20 in picture quality (sandeep — 05/13/2010)
can u compare panasonic fh20 picture quality with sony h20 ..which one is better only in terms of picture quality
reply to this comment
Phil (05/13/2010)
The Sony H20 is a $300+ camera and is much too bulky to fit in your pocket. That said, my friend has one and it does take nice photos.
reply to this comment
price of H20 (sandeep — 05/14/2010)
Hi ..In india Sony h20 is much cheaper .here the price is 200 dollar with 2 years warranty and 4 gb card .Actually panasonic is costly in india .Here Panasonic ZS3 price is approximately 450 dollar
reply to this comment
cara (05/12/2010)
do you think this camera would be good to take pictures at a concert?
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/13/2010)
Although I'm too old to pretend to know much about modern-day concert environments, my best guess is not likely. This is again probably a low-light (no flash allowed) situation and most small cameras are not suited for this. However, if you are lucky enough to be in the first several rows, so that you can leave the zoom lens at wide-angle (max aperture) you could get lucky!
As discussed in another recent post, about the only non-SLR cameras that stand a good chance at this venue are the Canon S90 and Panasonic LX3, but they are in the $360 - $420 neighborhood.
reply to this comment
As discussed in another recent post, about the only non-SLR cameras that stand a good chance at this venue are the Canon S90 and Panasonic LX3, but they are in the $360 - $420 neighborhood.
Good for action shots? (JazzDancer — 05/12/2010)
I shoot a lot of action shots of ballet dancers (nothing professional - just recitals). Is the lumix fh20 for me? Would you recommend another camera in the lumix line? My budget is $200. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Jazz Dancer or Ballet, which is it. :) (Aaron — 05/12/2010)
JD, re action shots with the FH20, checkout my replies to Michelle (a few posts up). However, if this is indoors (as I suspect), hopefully the dancers are not more than 15 ft from you - so that flash-shots can be effective!
reply to this comment
thanks! (JazzDancer — 05/12/2010)
thanks, yep, it's indoor. And I'll also probably buy a better memory card than the one that comes with the camera. (and it's jazz, ballet and sometimes gymnastics too!)
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/12/2010)
Fwiw you don't get any SD card with the camera, just built-in 40MB memory, which is enough for little more than 6 shots, so I suggest getting a Class 6 SDHC card (which will minimize image write-time).
To capture your indoor dancers, I suggest using Normal Mode, Scene=Sports, set Flash to Auto On (Red-Eye Off), and set Auto Focus to 1.
Flash shots will capture the dancers without blurs, but try to get within 12 feet of the dancers as the flash's intensity falls off quite a bit beyond that.
Good luck,
Aaron
reply to this comment
To capture your indoor dancers, I suggest using Normal Mode, Scene=Sports, set Flash to Auto On (Red-Eye Off), and set Auto Focus to 1.
Flash shots will capture the dancers without blurs, but try to get within 12 feet of the dancers as the flash's intensity falls off quite a bit beyond that.
Good luck,
Aaron
ZS5 versus FH20 (Mary — 05/11/2010)
I too would like to know which camera would be better. I know the ZS5 is more $ has the better lens, more zoom and such. Is the picture quality the same or better with the ZS5? Do you think the ZS5 would do better in low light(we take a lot of indoor pics)? I am going to go check them both out at the store, but as I have already returned 2 cameras that performed well in the store, but failed in low light and fast motion, I would like to make a final purchase. Please any thoughts would be GREATLY appreciated!!! Have you heard any bad things with the ZS5?
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/11/2010)
Whoa, yet another low-light enthusiast (I can't believe the obsession around here with low-light photography)!!!
Mary, the ZS5 is quite new and I haven't seen reviews on it yet, but I really doubt that it will do any better in low-light situations than the FH20 because it has the same size sensor as the FH20 and its lens isn't any faster. The ZS5 would be a better choice if you prefer its 12x zoom and enhanced movie capabilities.
If I were into low-light photography, the only digicam I would buy for that purpose would be the Canon S90. It not only has a fast f/2.0 lens, it has a larger sensor than you will find on most other digicams, as well as a host of advanced features typically found only on DSLRs - but you have to pony-up about $375 for it.
Aaron
reply to this comment
Mary, the ZS5 is quite new and I haven't seen reviews on it yet, but I really doubt that it will do any better in low-light situations than the FH20 because it has the same size sensor as the FH20 and its lens isn't any faster. The ZS5 would be a better choice if you prefer its 12x zoom and enhanced movie capabilities.
If I were into low-light photography, the only digicam I would buy for that purpose would be the Canon S90. It not only has a fast f/2.0 lens, it has a larger sensor than you will find on most other digicams, as well as a host of advanced features typically found only on DSLRs - but you have to pony-up about $375 for it.
Aaron
Ben (05/11/2010)
Aaron, from what you've said and from what I've read elsewhere, the fastest lens opening on the FH20 and other compact cameras by Panasonic is F3.3. You seem to suggest that F2.0 is much better for shooting in low light than F3.3 - is it that much better? While I'm not obsessed with low light photography, I have to admit it would a nice feature!
Ben
reply to this comment
Ben
Phil (05/11/2010)
Aaron said: "If I were into low-light photography, the only digicam I would buy for that purpose would be the Canon S90. It not only has a fast f/2.0 lens, it has a larger sensor than you will find on most other digicams"
I believe the Panasonic Lumix LX3 belongs in that category as well.
Phil
reply to this comment
I believe the Panasonic Lumix LX3 belongs in that category as well.
Phil
Aaron (05/12/2010)
@Ben: All other settings being equal, an f/2.0 lens (wide open) will deliver about 3 times more light to the sensor than an f/3.3 will (wide open)! So I'd say that's a big advantage for low (natural) light photography. Other important factors are the S90's larger sensor, its manual shutter-aperture control capability, and that it can produce raw images.
@Phil: You are probable right about the Lumix LX3 being as capable for low (natural) light shots. Like the S90 it has an f/2.0 lens and a relatively large sensor, but between the two I'd go for the S90 as its more compact, has a more versatile zoom-range and a less expensive street price.
All of the above notwithstanding, I still think the FH20 is a very good little digicam (and a real bargain) for those who don't expect to do much low (natural) light shooting.
Aaron
reply to this comment
@Phil: You are probable right about the Lumix LX3 being as capable for low (natural) light shots. Like the S90 it has an f/2.0 lens and a relatively large sensor, but between the two I'd go for the S90 as its more compact, has a more versatile zoom-range and a less expensive street price.
All of the above notwithstanding, I still think the FH20 is a very good little digicam (and a real bargain) for those who don't expect to do much low (natural) light shooting.
Aaron
Mary (05/12/2010)
Thank you for your insight. I know it seems as though everyone harps on the poor lighting shots. But, I already returned a fuji for blurry shots with a flash. And now I am returning a Nikon s4000 because the pics were coming out really yellow with flash, and really blurry (even in "action" scene) without flash in an indoor situation. I don't expect the same quality as an SLR of course, but I think my ancient Canon A85 took way better indoor and action shots. I am just trying to figure out a good solid camera to take pics of the kids, and it needs to be able to handle inside shots and action, because they never slow down. I just would like my next camera purchase to be a good camera.
reply to this comment
Jinwons (05/13/2010)
Hi Mary,
It appears that it's hard to find P&S camera good for indoor flash shots, especially under $300. I think bridge cameras like Panasonic FZ-35 or Sony HX1 would work better.
But if you wish to stay with P&S, I suggest you to try Samsung TL models. I have two years old L830 (8MP, 3X) and bought SL720 (12MP, 5X) four months ago. They perform pretty nicely for indoors than my old Nikon Cookpix L3 and Panasonic ZS3. Much brighter, sharper and closer to real colors. SL720 looks like less noisy than L830 in low light. Recent Samsung P&S has image adjust option in the program mode, and which gives nice sharp indoor images if sharpness, saturation setting is increased.
reply to this comment
It appears that it's hard to find P&S camera good for indoor flash shots, especially under $300. I think bridge cameras like Panasonic FZ-35 or Sony HX1 would work better.
But if you wish to stay with P&S, I suggest you to try Samsung TL models. I have two years old L830 (8MP, 3X) and bought SL720 (12MP, 5X) four months ago. They perform pretty nicely for indoors than my old Nikon Cookpix L3 and Panasonic ZS3. Much brighter, sharper and closer to real colors. SL720 looks like less noisy than L830 in low light. Recent Samsung P&S has image adjust option in the program mode, and which gives nice sharp indoor images if sharpness, saturation setting is increased.
Mary (05/14/2010)
Thank you for your response, I will check out that Samsung camera you mentioned. I know you can't expect much from P&S cameras, but I wanted something that is a little easier to carry around in my purse for everyday events, rather than the big SLR. I will rely on the SLR for the better shots. It's just that it's not convenient especially with kids. I really appreciate your helpfulness!
reply to this comment
also 'obessed' with low-light indoor photos! (Leslie Fox — 07/11/2010)
I've been reading this comment thread for 2 nights - the pros and cons about the low-light. Like Mary, over many years, I've had several film SLRs w multiple lenses, the Kodak DX6490 which has a lovely lens for outdoor shots..and several P&S cameras..but I, too, am unhappy of late with the results of indoor shots of the grandchidren/perpetual motion machines! I was hopeful I'd found a good pick in the FH20 - now, it appears that it is likely no better than any other P&S unless I move up to dslr..again, like Mary, I'm resistant because I like being able to have the small-size camera in my purse or pocket. Sigh. Are we all 'doomed' to either getting the larger-body camera? or accepting that we're just not going to be able to get great photos indoors in low-light? drats!! frustrating!
reply to this comment
touch screen review by owner (matt — 05/11/2010)
HI Folks. I bought an HF22 (slightly larger lcd screen) last week. I bought it primarily for the low light pictures. I am not thrilled with the performance in low light. otherwise it takes very nice pictures. There is a big draw back which I have not seen much mention of. The TOUCH SCREEN. It sucks. It is so so while taking pictures. But play back of pictures is slow (at least for my patience) and often I have to touch the screen more than once for an action to happen.
We have not made the decision to return it yet, but we re on our way. Its dissapointing because the pictures are quite good, and I like the size (not too big not too small) and metal case seems durable
reply to this comment
We have not made the decision to return it yet, but we re on our way. Its dissapointing because the pictures are quite good, and I like the size (not too big not too small) and metal case seems durable
(05/11/2010)
You have not seen anyone mention the touch screen because you have a different model. You have the fh22 and most of the comments are for the fh20. Many users state that touch screen cameras are a pain because of the same issues you mentioned (freezing and not responsive).
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/11/2010)
Yeah touchscreens are hit or miss -- you might consider swapping it for this FH20 model, which is just a regular touch screen. And I hear you on the point that the low light performance isn't amazing, but it is quite good for the price, compared to similar cameras. Thanks for your feedback.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/27/2010)
Sorry ! meant regular LCD screen, not touch screen.
reply to this comment
Jeff (05/11/2010)
If you had read Aaron's reply to Jinwons on May 7th (as well as his mini-review), you would have been prepared for the camera's less than stellar low light capabilities.
This past Sunday I gave my wife an FH20 for Mother's Day and she loves it. After checking-out several digicams with 'street prices' under $200 I consider the FH20 a winner. It's very small, easily fitting into a pocket or purse, simple to use and it takes remarkable photos (in daylight). Btw, did look at the FH22 for its touch screen, but after trying it out I didn't find it convenient to use at all.
Re low light photography, small digicams don't do well shooting at iso's above 400 or so. As Aaron pointed-out, you need a camera with a larger sensor and faster lens, that is unless you use a tripod and keep the shutter open longer. ;)
reply to this comment
This past Sunday I gave my wife an FH20 for Mother's Day and she loves it. After checking-out several digicams with 'street prices' under $200 I consider the FH20 a winner. It's very small, easily fitting into a pocket or purse, simple to use and it takes remarkable photos (in daylight). Btw, did look at the FH22 for its touch screen, but after trying it out I didn't find it convenient to use at all.
Re low light photography, small digicams don't do well shooting at iso's above 400 or so. As Aaron pointed-out, you need a camera with a larger sensor and faster lens, that is unless you use a tripod and keep the shutter open longer. ;)
frustrating (matt — 05/13/2010)
The Panasonic website seems to indicate that the Fh20 and FH22 are the same other than the larger touch screen and maybe one or two other minor features.
Anyway we purchased a sony Dfc H55. sony style store and Best Buy both recommended it. The lcd screen isn't as good, but its fast.
The current problem is that we feel the pictures of both cameras are subpar. each does some things better than the other, but neither is great for what we consider normal everyday use. pictures indoors. pictures outdoors. we just want clear vacation style pictures. the sony does seem much more likely to have blurry pictures.
I was so excited to get a new camera. now I don't want a new one.
reply to this comment
Anyway we purchased a sony Dfc H55. sony style store and Best Buy both recommended it. The lcd screen isn't as good, but its fast.
The current problem is that we feel the pictures of both cameras are subpar. each does some things better than the other, but neither is great for what we consider normal everyday use. pictures indoors. pictures outdoors. we just want clear vacation style pictures. the sony does seem much more likely to have blurry pictures.
I was so excited to get a new camera. now I don't want a new one.
Liam McCabe (05/27/2010)
Few things to consider -- of course the Sony Style store recommended the H55, it's a Sony! Best Buy also likely recommended it because it's more expensive, so they get a bigger cut, and the salesman gets a bigger commission.
reply to this comment
ZR1 vs FH20? What are the differences? (Nicol — 05/09/2010)
I tried the Panasonic ZR1 and the FH20. I noticed that the video on the ZR1 allowed zoom while recording, but the FH20 does not. Does anyone know if all of the cool features mentioned in the review are also on the ZR1? I already returned the ZR1 but will go back to it if it is as good as the FH20 w/ the extra benefit of zoom while video recording.
thanks!
reply to this comment
thanks!
Phil (05/09/2010)
Nicol, I went through the same agonizing decision. Here's the way I saw it...
In favor of the ZR1:
Its lens is somewhat wider than the FH20's (25mm v. 28mm) but not as long (200 v. 224) than the FH20's. It can also zoom in video mode, which is nice IF you plan to shoot lots of video.
It has Panasonic's Venus V engine which auto-focuses somewhat faster than the Venus IV engine on the FH20.
However, reviews of the ZR1 have been quite mixed.
In favor of the FH20:
It's smaller in size and perhaps a little simpler to use.
It's $50 - $80 less than the ZR1.
It has better battery-life than the ZR1 (more shots/charge).
It has received rave reviews by just about every reviewer including Brenda's review on this site. Also, Aaron's posts here on the FH20 are very positive.
Since video isn't big on my list, I'm going to save some $ and go for the FH20, but both seem to be good cameras.
reply to this comment
In favor of the ZR1:
Its lens is somewhat wider than the FH20's (25mm v. 28mm) but not as long (200 v. 224) than the FH20's. It can also zoom in video mode, which is nice IF you plan to shoot lots of video.
It has Panasonic's Venus V engine which auto-focuses somewhat faster than the Venus IV engine on the FH20.
However, reviews of the ZR1 have been quite mixed.
In favor of the FH20:
It's smaller in size and perhaps a little simpler to use.
It's $50 - $80 less than the ZR1.
It has better battery-life than the ZR1 (more shots/charge).
It has received rave reviews by just about every reviewer including Brenda's review on this site. Also, Aaron's posts here on the FH20 are very positive.
Since video isn't big on my list, I'm going to save some $ and go for the FH20, but both seem to be good cameras.
Action shots. (Michelle — 05/09/2010)
Thank you for the reply :)
It's good to hear that it goes well, and that you were able to use it to your advantage :)
I have plans to get the camera in a few days (ordering online) and am very exited at a I have a show jumping comp coming up :) I look forwards to testing it out!
Thanks!
reply to this comment
It's good to hear that it goes well, and that you were able to use it to your advantage :)
I have plans to get the camera in a few days (ordering online) and am very exited at a I have a show jumping comp coming up :) I look forwards to testing it out!
Thanks!
Aaron (05/09/2010)
Michelle,
I discovered an FH20 adjustment that speeds-up the FH20's Auto Focus (because it's important to minimize AF-lag for capturing action shots).
The FH20's AF is usually set to "9-points", which is beneficial under normal shooting conditions, but it comes at the cost of delaying the exposure from the time you press the shutter button. You can appreciably minimize this delay by changing the AF mode to 1-point (beforehand) - then the camera will focus faster on the jumping horse and in-turn, your shutter will trigger faster!
Good luck,
Aaron
reply to this comment
I discovered an FH20 adjustment that speeds-up the FH20's Auto Focus (because it's important to minimize AF-lag for capturing action shots).
The FH20's AF is usually set to "9-points", which is beneficial under normal shooting conditions, but it comes at the cost of delaying the exposure from the time you press the shutter button. You can appreciably minimize this delay by changing the AF mode to 1-point (beforehand) - then the camera will focus faster on the jumping horse and in-turn, your shutter will trigger faster!
Good luck,
Aaron
equestrian jumping shots (Claudia — 09/02/2010)
Hi, Michele, thanks for asking that question-I read the posts from the beginning and was about to submit my own-but you nailed it! Have you used it yet? What do you think? I have had two Casios-the 7.2 mp was great-I bought it for $400 at Costco years ago, but the zoom stopped working so I upgraded to the 10.5MP EX-Z300 which was slow, blurry, hard to use, and has now broken. I LOVED the earlier model, but the newer model(at $200) just didn't measure up. So I hesitate to go with another Casio. The next question I have is for Aaron-what do you think of this Panasonic compared to the Casios?
reply to this comment
A- Equestrian Jumping photos (Michelle — 09/02/2010)
Hi Claudia!
I bought this camera around 6 months ago and i'm in love with it! It accompanies me almost everytime i go riding, and has taken some great shots of my friends and I! One of my favourite things is the video recorder, so when you record in HD you can just upload it to your computer, and using a progrem like Picasa (availible for free download on Google) where you can just pause at the perfect second, and get the screen shot! From personal experiences,I have found that the camera takes photos a LOT better outdoors then indoor, so not too great for the indoor arena when there is a back window that stuffs up the lighting.
A friend of mine recently bought a sony camera, which we also found to be excellent at takig these photos, but i'm not too sure about the model.
Good luck camera hunting!
reply to this comment
I bought this camera around 6 months ago and i'm in love with it! It accompanies me almost everytime i go riding, and has taken some great shots of my friends and I! One of my favourite things is the video recorder, so when you record in HD you can just upload it to your computer, and using a progrem like Picasa (availible for free download on Google) where you can just pause at the perfect second, and get the screen shot! From personal experiences,I have found that the camera takes photos a LOT better outdoors then indoor, so not too great for the indoor arena when there is a back window that stuffs up the lighting.
A friend of mine recently bought a sony camera, which we also found to be excellent at takig these photos, but i'm not too sure about the model.
Good luck camera hunting!
Phil (05/08/2010)
Sounds to me like the FH20's movie mode would handle that well.
reply to this comment
Action shots? (Michelle — 05/08/2010)
I'm looking for something that would take good action shots (clear and crisp) as i am in equestrian. Wondering if this would do a good job?
It would'nt have to be amazing like an SLR, just something that wouldnt come up as a blur..
(Sorry, dont know too much about Camera :S)
reply to this comment
It would'nt have to be amazing like an SLR, just something that wouldnt come up as a blur..
(Sorry, dont know too much about Camera :S)
Aaron (05/08/2010)
Hi Michelle,
We took some pictures of our grandson playing baseball and they came out great using the camera's Sports Mode, which I imagine sets fast shutter speeds. Furthermore, the camera also has a burst-mode where you can take about 3 or 4 pictures in little more than a second!
Btw, I would recommend buying a high speed SD memory card, at least class 4 and better yet class 6.
reply to this comment
We took some pictures of our grandson playing baseball and they came out great using the camera's Sports Mode, which I imagine sets fast shutter speeds. Furthermore, the camera also has a burst-mode where you can take about 3 or 4 pictures in little more than a second!
Btw, I would recommend buying a high speed SD memory card, at least class 4 and better yet class 6.
pv (05/06/2010)
Just wanted to thank Aaron for adding his Mini-Review of the FH20. It was quite informative (and I was glad to read that I'm not the only one who still has and likes his Sony DSC-V1)!
Aaron, I may also get an FH20 for my wife - where did you buy yours?
pv
reply to this comment
Aaron, I may also get an FH20 for my wife - where did you buy yours?
pv
Aaron (05/07/2010)
Yeah, the DSC-V1 produces high quality images, which I attribute to its excellent Carl Zeiss lens and larger than typical sensor. Actually, under daylight conditions I'm finding the FH20 does a surprisingly good job, and it's a heck of a lot easier to use!
I bought the FH20 from Amazon for $155 delivered (that was the best deal I could find at the time). At the same time I got a 4MB SDHC (Class 6) and a small case to tote and protect the camera - all 3 items ran me a little over $180.
Hth,
Aaron
reply to this comment
I bought the FH20 from Amazon for $155 delivered (that was the best deal I could find at the time). At the same time I got a 4MB SDHC (Class 6) and a small case to tote and protect the camera - all 3 items ran me a little over $180.
Hth,
Aaron
Picture preview (Rob D — 05/09/2010)
Hey Aaron,
I just got the FH20 yesterday and trying to figure out if the preview of most recent picture taken can be done in one step. The only way I have found to do it is by having to select the playback drop down and then review that way which is 2 step process. My old SONY DSC W5 you just had to tab back and it would show last picture taken. This way you can decide quickly if you wanted to delete. I had the DSC W5 for years and loved the camera because always got compliments on how great pics looked. Hoping this Panasonic can achieve same great picture quality.
reply to this comment
I just got the FH20 yesterday and trying to figure out if the preview of most recent picture taken can be done in one step. The only way I have found to do it is by having to select the playback drop down and then review that way which is 2 step process. My old SONY DSC W5 you just had to tab back and it would show last picture taken. This way you can decide quickly if you wanted to delete. I had the DSC W5 for years and loved the camera because always got compliments on how great pics looked. Hoping this Panasonic can achieve same great picture quality.
Aaron (05/10/2010)
Hey Rob,
I don't see any shortcut for displaying your images on the LCD. You have to flip that little switch on the back of the camera to the down position and then use the L/R of the Navigation aray. But imho that's a very minor inconvenience, so I wouldn't give it a second thought. The FH20 is a lot of camera for the money!
reply to this comment
I don't see any shortcut for displaying your images on the LCD. You have to flip that little switch on the back of the camera to the down position and then use the L/R of the Navigation aray. But imho that's a very minor inconvenience, so I wouldn't give it a second thought. The FH20 is a lot of camera for the money!
Typo correction (Aaron — 05/11/2010)
I bought a 4GB SDHC - not 4MB...
reply to this comment
Cait (05/05/2010)
Hi. I'm currently on a last-minute hunt for a camera to purchase for an upcoming trip to Australia. I leave on Friday 5/14 and would like to have the camera at least a few days beforehand so as to learn its features. Yesterday, prior to doing any research, I picked up a Sony W330 as a package deal at Best Buy - $149.99 for the camera, a 2 GB memory card, and a case. However, upon reading the reviews on this site, I'm not too impressed. Similar deals are running at stores in my area (Target, Best Buy, Walmart) for the Nikon CoolPix S4000, but I'm wary of the touch screen - reviews of the camera seem to justify this concern, if only for the fact that the touch screen is still new. It sounds like the Lumix FH20 is the perfect camera, but I'm a bit frustrated that it's looking like it will run about $180/190 to buy from a reputable retailer - I'm nervous about using 6ave, J&R, etc., where I've found good deals. I'm being indecisive because I don't really use my camera all that much anymore - I'm in my mid-20s, so I'm out of college, and don't yet have have children to take pictures of! Any advice in making a final decision so that I can just 'bite the bullet' and either a) order the Lumix, or b) stay with the Sony/switch it for the S4000? I'll also be honest - I'd love to end up with a bright aqua or bright pink camera, even though I know this is NOT a purchase to make based on appearance!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/06/2010)
You're right to be pensive over those sites. Often they advertise deals that are "too good to be true."
Amazon is selling the FH20 for $155 right now, and they're quite quick in shipping it. And you should get free super saver shipping to boot.
reply to this comment
Amazon is selling the FH20 for $155 right now, and they're quite quick in shipping it. And you should get free super saver shipping to boot.
Cait (05/06/2010)
Thanks James. I actually checked out Amazon one last time yesterday afternoon and found the $155 price. So thanks for the input, and this site - it's great!
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/04/2010)
Andrew, the FH20's Lumix Vario lens has a zoom range that equates to 28-224mm based on 35mm standards. We have found the LCD to be surprisingly good in bright daylight, but you do have to block the Sun if it's shining directly into the LCD. ;)
As I mention in my mini-review (wherever they placed it) we don't use the FH20 for video, nor have we used TV to view stills (yet), but I've seen card-readers for that purpose, so you might check those out.
Finally, a battery charger to recharge the lithium battery is included, so no problem there.
reply to this comment
As I mention in my mini-review (wherever they placed it) we don't use the FH20 for video, nor have we used TV to view stills (yet), but I've seen card-readers for that purpose, so you might check those out.
Finally, a battery charger to recharge the lithium battery is included, so no problem there.
Liam McCabe (05/05/2010)
Mini review just published, at the bottom of the page. Thanks for your notes!
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/05/2010)
Your most welcome, and my thanks goes to Brenda Paro of Digital Camera HQ for her positive review of the Lumix FH20, which swayed me to buy it for my wife! I completely agree with just about all of her findings except for the FH20's low-light capabilities (as noted in my mini-review).
reply to this comment
Jinwons (05/06/2010)
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your mini review of FH20. Your find seems to counter James's assertion here that it's the best compact camera for low light. I understand that you felt the high auto ISO images too noisy. You might want to try manually setting ISO a little lower. Other than that, how was it like for brightness, color? My biggest gripe with Panasonic P&S is that color accuracy seems to go way off under low lighting.
reply to this comment
Thanks for your mini review of FH20. Your find seems to counter James's assertion here that it's the best compact camera for low light. I understand that you felt the high auto ISO images too noisy. You might want to try manually setting ISO a little lower. Other than that, how was it like for brightness, color? My biggest gripe with Panasonic P&S is that color accuracy seems to go way off under low lighting.
Aaron (05/07/2010)
You're welcome Jinwons. I assume that James has been touting the FH20's low-light capabilities based on his (mistaken) notion that the FH20 has an f/2.0 aperture at its widest angle. whereas in fact, iIt's max aperture is f/3.3 and that's a stop and a half slower!
I'm afraid there's no 'magic' to be had here - sure if you (could) lower the iso you would get less noise, but you would also get less light to the sensor (at the same shutter speed)! For whatever reason, there seems to be an obsession in this topic with low light photography. With the exception of the Canon S90 or perhaps a Fuji F200EXR, you can't reasonably expect good low light performance from point and shoots digicams with tiny sensors and slower lenses (period).
My wife will mostly use her new FH20 under daylight conditions, but if she finds herself in a low-light photo situation, I'm sure she will use flash (if the subject isn't too far away). ;)
reply to this comment
I'm afraid there's no 'magic' to be had here - sure if you (could) lower the iso you would get less noise, but you would also get less light to the sensor (at the same shutter speed)! For whatever reason, there seems to be an obsession in this topic with low light photography. With the exception of the Canon S90 or perhaps a Fuji F200EXR, you can't reasonably expect good low light performance from point and shoots digicams with tiny sensors and slower lenses (period).
My wife will mostly use her new FH20 under daylight conditions, but if she finds herself in a low-light photo situation, I'm sure she will use flash (if the subject isn't too far away). ;)
thx (Andrew Beckerman — 05/06/2010)
dear aaron, thanks for ur help
cheers
andrew
reply to this comment
cheers
andrew
more FH 20 questions (Andrew Beckerman — 05/04/2010)
hi there , also considering the FH20. for me issues are wanting a greater zoom as i'm currently using a kodak w/ a 3x optical. weight: as i stick it in a pocket @ 138 grams for body this seems light but don't know what the battery and memory card add? since non of these ultra smalls have view finders, how is the visibility of what you are pointing at on the LCD in sunlight? i read the comment about no hook up to tv for video can you expain what the old RCA ??? connection is and where can one get one . also if one just wants to look @ still photos can camera be connected to TV. how does one recharge the battery?
thanks for your help
cheers
andrew (victoria BC)
reply to this comment
thanks for your help
cheers
andrew (victoria BC)
confused (Cassie Schmidt — 05/04/2010)
I thought in your above review of the FH20 you said it had an Intellgent Auto Mode("...you can see a difference between photos shot with regular and Intelligent Auto, and you have to kind of wonder why anyone would use the regular version in the first place."). Then below your answer to Lubica on 3/23/10 about the differences between the FH20 and the ZR1 is the "ZR1 has IntelligentAutoMode and the FH20 doesn't."
So, now I am confused, which is it? Does the FH20 have IntellgentAuto or not?
Thankyou,Cassie
reply to this comment
So, now I am confused, which is it? Does the FH20 have IntellgentAuto or not?
Thankyou,Cassie
Aaron (05/04/2010)
i now own the FH20 and I can factually tell you it does have IA.
reply to this comment
See my Mini-Review (Aaron — 05/04/2010)
Fwiw, having had the opportunity to 'play' with this fascinating digicam over the past several days, my wife and I just submitted a mini-review here (but I'm not sure where it appears)!
reply to this comment
Elizabeth Schoepf (05/04/2010)
Does the FH20 come with a battery and a media card? ....and a battery charger
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/04/2010)
Battery - yes ....but no flash mem..card (you can buy a fast 4GB card for well under $20).
reply to this comment
FH20 Or ZR1 (matt — 05/02/2010)
HI I pretty much sold on a panni-lumix. Thinking between the FH20 and the ZR1. My wife wants the best low light quality. I am more interested in zoom (8 seems enough) and true color. I don't care too much about mp. I am confused, I would like a better lens. It seems like the cameras are very similar otherwise. However the reviews of the ZR1 say its pretty rough in low light. The FH20 seems great in low light.
thanks
reply to this comment
thanks
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2010)
Yeah, the FH20 is getting high marks for low light performance, I'd choose it.
reply to this comment
(05/03/2010)
I also agree about the low light performance. I just bought this camera last week based on the reviews on this site and it has excellent low light performance. I could not be happier about my purchase.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/03/2010)
I'll also add that the ZR3, the newer model of the ZR1, isn't particularly strong in low-light either, and it costs about $100 more than the FH20. Bizarre.
reply to this comment
ZS5 or FH20 (Steve M — 05/04/2010)
Could you give me your opinion what camera is better between the FH20 and the ZS5? I cannot find much information on the ZS5 at this time but would like to know if it is worth the additional money. At the very least, please provide the pros and cons of each. Thank you!!!!
reply to this comment
(05/05/2010)
ZS5 is in higher league than FH20. It has better OIS (power vs mega), higher optical zoom (12X vs 8X), and has more manual controls (A, S, P modes). It's up to you whether those features are important or not for you.
reply to this comment
ZS5 versus FH20 (Mary — 05/11/2010)
I too would like to know which camera would be better. I know the ZS5 is more $ has the better lens, more zoom and such. Is the picture quality the same or better with the ZS5? Do you think the ZS5 would do better in low light(we take a lot of indoor pics)? I am going to go check them both out, but as I have already returned 2 cameras that performed well in the store, but failed in low light and fast motion, I would like to make a final purchase. Please any thoughts would be GREATLY appreciated!!! Have you heard any bad things with the ZS5?
reply to this comment
@James DeRuvo (bhavya — 05/02/2010)
hey did u get in contact with indias panasonic tech support?? if not pls make is fast ... my cousin is coming with in a week.....
pls....
reply to this comment
pls....
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2010)
Here's the contact link - panasonic.co.in/web/cid/Mai... luck!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/30/2010)
Just to clarify, as there's been some confusion. The aperture range is f3.3-5.9 . It does not begin at f2.0 as has been suggested on this site. Sorry for the confusion, hope that clears this up.
reply to this comment
SUMIT CHOURASIA (04/30/2010)
I would like to make a announcement to my fellow Indian people that PANASONIC FH20 is available in Mumbai (India) at Rs 14,700 , shop name is prerna , mumbai - 1. But the price should be Rs 10,000 as compare to $200.
reply to this comment
Price in India (Ravi (Mumbai) — 06/04/2010)
Its really shocking to see that much high price in Indian market....Actually in sites like naaptol & compareindia its mentioned as 7,800INR but when checked with shopkeepers they are quoting 14,700INR (290$) for FH20.. still cant believe why so high price...
reply to this comment
Jewel Hinson (04/28/2010)
I'm looking for a reasonably priced camera with a viewefinder and lcd screen. Is there any such thing anymore? Can't see anything in sunlight on a lcd screen. Thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/28/2010)
The Canon SD1200 does have a viewfinder, but it's one of the last.
reply to this comment
question about video on FH20 (Amy — 04/28/2010)
I went to a store all set to get the FH20, based on your reviews. However, the salesperson told me that there is no HDMI output and that the video on this camera can only be viewed on the computer and not the TV. Is this true?
At the store I was also looking at the panasonic ZR3 but it's new and can't find alot of comments on the web. Read that the old ZR1 didn't do so hot in low-light and that indoor pics tend to be grainy. Do you know if Panasonic improved picture quality on the ZR3?
I am looking for a compact, lightweight, point and shoot with a 7x or 8x zoom, that has video you can view on the TV. Don't care about pixels or price. Would the Sony W370 be a better choice for me? Primary uses: vacation, and taking pics/video of kids/pets.
reply to this comment
At the store I was also looking at the panasonic ZR3 but it's new and can't find alot of comments on the web. Read that the old ZR1 didn't do so hot in low-light and that indoor pics tend to be grainy. Do you know if Panasonic improved picture quality on the ZR3?
I am looking for a compact, lightweight, point and shoot with a 7x or 8x zoom, that has video you can view on the TV. Don't care about pixels or price. Would the Sony W370 be a better choice for me? Primary uses: vacation, and taking pics/video of kids/pets.
Liam McCabe (04/28/2010)
It's true that the FH20 does not have an HDMI output, but it can connect to a TV via the old RCA inputs. The quality won't be up to snuff, but it is an option. If hooking your camera up to the TV with a hi-def connection is a big deal to you, I don't think the FH20 is the camera for you. (You could also hook your computer up to the TV.)
I just finished writing a review of the ZR3, it should be up on this site in about an hour and a half. It does have an HDMI output, so you can watch it on your TV.
I didn't try the ZR1, but I was pleased with what I saw on the ZR3. It didn't blow me away, but it met my expectations for the price. Very few point and shoots have good quality in low light, and the ZR3 was no worse than other models I've tried. You can check out the images when they're up.
I would rank the ZR3 above the W370, for sure. The video is especially smooth on the ZR3, because it uses the AVCHD Lite codec. It's also faster, and with the "intelligent" zoom, it actually goes out to 10x (8x optical -- the extra telephoto comes from a little digital trickery, but it looks fine).
It's up to you to decide if you think it's worth the extra $50-60. It sounds like video is important to you, and the ZR3 has better video than the W370. We have reviews of both cameras for your shopping pleasure. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
I just finished writing a review of the ZR3, it should be up on this site in about an hour and a half. It does have an HDMI output, so you can watch it on your TV.
I didn't try the ZR1, but I was pleased with what I saw on the ZR3. It didn't blow me away, but it met my expectations for the price. Very few point and shoots have good quality in low light, and the ZR3 was no worse than other models I've tried. You can check out the images when they're up.
I would rank the ZR3 above the W370, for sure. The video is especially smooth on the ZR3, because it uses the AVCHD Lite codec. It's also faster, and with the "intelligent" zoom, it actually goes out to 10x (8x optical -- the extra telephoto comes from a little digital trickery, but it looks fine).
It's up to you to decide if you think it's worth the extra $50-60. It sounds like video is important to you, and the ZR3 has better video than the W370. We have reviews of both cameras for your shopping pleasure. Hope this helps.
Amy (04/29/2010)
Thank you for your input and quick response.
reply to this comment
Debra (08/14/2010)
So you can't connect directly, but you can make a dvd and play back on tv? Is the quality the same as watching from the pc?
reply to this comment
TG6 vs FH20 vs sony w350 vs canon sd1300IS (kewlbuddy — 04/28/2010)
In my city, we have an offer for TG6 for 188€ and this FH20 for 199€. Im in dilemma, which one to choose? FH20 is sleek n looks gud, whereas TG6 has more optical zoom(12x)
Also Im confused which one to buy among FH20 vs
sony w350 vs canon sd1300?
Thanks in advance.
reply to this comment
Also Im confused which one to buy among FH20 vs
sony w350 vs canon sd1300?
Thanks in advance.
Liam McCabe (04/28/2010)
Not familiar with the TG6 camera, sorry. But I would go with the FH20 over the W350 or SD1300. Bigger zoom, better price, equal image quality, pretty much.
reply to this comment
kewlbuddy (04/29/2010)
Thanks for the reply. TG6 is lumix ZS1 in USA.
reply to this comment
OK for beginners? (Elizabeth — 04/28/2010)
Would this be suitable for a true novice? I am close to retirement and I am interested in taking of nature pics while out trekking plus birds at the feeder.
Appreciate any feedback you might give me.
reply to this comment
Appreciate any feedback you might give me.
Liam McCabe (04/28/2010)
Yeah this is a solid camera for novices. It's mostly just point and shoot, and it does have a long zoom to capture shots of wildlife from afar without scaring them as you walk up.
reply to this comment
Which Canon Powershot is this compared to in the review? ( — 04/27/2010)
Brenda, you mention liking this better than your Canon Powershot, but what model of Canon Powershot?
reply to this comment
Canon 210 (Zita — 04/27/2010)
Thanks for replying to my question, I have one more question. I would like to know your opinion on Canon sx 210. I am looking for a user friendly camera, something with a good zoom in, something that I can take a picture of long distance.
reply to this comment
(04/27/2010)
Hi Zita,
SX210 is in the higher league than FH20. ZS7, HX5V are the comparable cameras to that. From the reviews I saw, it looks like a good one. But I prefer Panasonic or Sony because of better HD video capability.
reply to this comment
SX210 is in the higher league than FH20. ZS7, HX5V are the comparable cameras to that. From the reviews I saw, it looks like a good one. But I prefer Panasonic or Sony because of better HD video capability.
FH20 vs FH22 (Angela — 04/27/2010)
Is the only difference between the FH20 and FH22 the touch screen? Do I want a touch screen? What are the benefits? Do you like the 22 as much as you like the 20?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/28/2010)
Yes the touch screen (and size of the screen) is the only difference. Personally, I think touch screens are a waste of money and battery power. I've always been frustrated by touch screen response -- too often, I trigger the wrong function by accident, or I get no response at all. I just prefer the tactile response of real buttons. Also, since the screen is on all the time, the battery goes dead considerably faster. Also, fingerprint smudges.
Bottom line, I don't see any benefits from the touch screen interface. It's always been a source of frustration rather than convenience.
That said, we haven't tested the FH22, and maybe Panasonic came up with an awesome interface (doubtful). But all other things being equal, go with the FH20.
reply to this comment
Bottom line, I don't see any benefits from the touch screen interface. It's always been a source of frustration rather than convenience.
That said, we haven't tested the FH22, and maybe Panasonic came up with an awesome interface (doubtful). But all other things being equal, go with the FH20.
Angela (04/28/2010)
Thanks for the advice Liam! I think I'll stick with the FH20.
reply to this comment
pics (cassey — 04/25/2010)
hye james.
this may sound silly question to u,but it still bother me.im very interested wif this camera to make it as my first camera.but one thing that bother me is that, as a teenager, i do have pimples and dull skins.i used to own SE w810 which i think it took sharp pictures for a camera phone and clearly shown my pimples. anyway, my real question is that, Will it shows too much of the pimples and dullness?i dunno much bout photoshop or cs. thankss before hand!!
reply to this comment
this may sound silly question to u,but it still bother me.im very interested wif this camera to make it as my first camera.but one thing that bother me is that, as a teenager, i do have pimples and dull skins.i used to own SE w810 which i think it took sharp pictures for a camera phone and clearly shown my pimples. anyway, my real question is that, Will it shows too much of the pimples and dullness?i dunno much bout photoshop or cs. thankss before hand!!
by James DeRuvo (04/27/2010)
Well any camera is going to show that, unfortunately ... you'll grow out of it. Meanwhile, learn some basic photo retouching with software like Photoshop Elements and you can minimize what you don't like.
reply to this comment
FH 20 (zita — 04/25/2010)
I am just wondering whether it has ''image stabilizer ''or ''AF illuminator'' ? is it a good camera for geting long distance picture?
Thanks,
reply to this comment
Thanks,
B. M (04/24/2010)
So is the only difference between the FH20 and the others in the FH series the MP and zoom? I'm a first time buyer and trying to decide which of the FH series I should get
reply to this comment
Help :) (claire lee — 04/24/2010)
How would you compare the FH20 to the Nikon s8000?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/26/2010)
The FH20 doesn't have some of the bells and whistles that the S8000 has. I think it's better compared to the S4000, price-wise, in which case I'd take the FH20 hands down.
The S8000 has some cool extras, can't say for sure how the image quality holds up -- we should be getting a review to post any day now.
reply to this comment
The S8000 has some cool extras, can't say for sure how the image quality holds up -- we should be getting a review to post any day now.
What to purchase (ES — 04/24/2010)
I am thinking of buying one of the 3 point and shoot cameras: SONY W370, Panasonic ZR3 or NIKON S8000. which are all in a similar price range. The FH20 is cheaper.
Can you recomand me what to do?
reply to this comment
Can you recomand me what to do?
I'd go with ZR3 ( — 04/26/2010)
They are all decent P&S camera. But I think ZR3 is the best of them. It has good zoom, focus speed, sharp images and very good HD video in AVCHD format.
reply to this comment
Not the W370? (ES — 04/28/2010)
The W370 is ~ 50$ cheaper, and has the panoramic view
reply to this comment
bhavya (04/23/2010)
hi ..i am from India...fh20 is not available here...
one of my relative from us is coming here...
i asked her to bring it.... but if some thing goes wrong with it..
there will not be any service for it here...
so what should i do???
But sony dsc-h55 is available here so shall i go for h55...or stay with fh-20??
reply to this comment
one of my relative from us is coming here...
i asked her to bring it.... but if some thing goes wrong with it..
there will not be any service for it here...
so what should i do???
But sony dsc-h55 is available here so shall i go for h55...or stay with fh-20??
by James DeRuvo (04/27/2010)
I'd get in touch with Panasonic India's tech support and explain to them you're getting the camera from the states and want to know if it has an international warranty. If it does, you're fine.
reply to this comment
FH-22,FS-33 (show — 04/23/2010)
is fh-22/fs-33 available in us market?
and what is the cost of it??
if available can you tell me where it is?
reply to this comment
and what is the cost of it??
if available can you tell me where it is?
by James DeRuvo (04/23/2010)
Well, Amazon is always a great choice ...
reply to this comment
Thinking between FH20 and Sony H55 ( — 04/23/2010)
I keep seeing here that FH20 has the fastest lens in this class. Is that true? I just checked Panasonic site on this camera and it says max lens aperture is F/3.3. Then it's similar to others in this class, I think.
I thinking of this one and sony dsc-h55. I am leaning to H55 due to its a little higher zoom and HD video in MP4 format. But if low lighting performance of FH20 is a lot better indeed, I will get it.
reply to this comment
I thinking of this one and sony dsc-h55. I am leaning to H55 due to its a little higher zoom and HD video in MP4 format. But if low lighting performance of FH20 is a lot better indeed, I will get it.
by James DeRuvo (04/23/2010)
It's is a lot better. And here's something interesting ... reviews say that the SD video of the FH20 is better, sharper and more colorful than the 720p HD video of the Flip Mino HD. This is due to it's real fast 8x zoom lens.
reply to this comment
Really Fast Lens? (Phil — 04/23/2010)
James, please tell us why you consider the FH20 Lumix lens (F3.3 - 5.9) to be "really fast"?
reply to this comment
Please clarify the lens speed ( — 04/23/2010)
James, you didn't answer my question on the lens speed. What's the max lens aperture of both camera? You seem to like FH20 very much. I just like to see some objective data to compare it with Sony H55.
And regarding video, you are saying it's better than flip camcorder? But what about compared to H55? I saw some Youtube videos of H55, and it looks very crisp and focusing fast. Also H55 makes MP4 files, but FH20 makes only MOV files I think. I don't think FH20 makes better video than H55.
reply to this comment
And regarding video, you are saying it's better than flip camcorder? But what about compared to H55? I saw some Youtube videos of H55, and it looks very crisp and focusing fast. Also H55 makes MP4 files, but FH20 makes only MOV files I think. I don't think FH20 makes better video than H55.
vandy (04/22/2010)
I am confused between the following -->PowerShot SX120 IS ,Kodak EasyShare Z915,Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Panasonic FH20.
I want to take a camera which does not make much time to start and not much time between pictures as I have kids at home .Also I want to take mostly indoor pictures ..
which of these is best ??
reply to this comment
I want to take a camera which does not make much time to start and not much time between pictures as I have kids at home .Also I want to take mostly indoor pictures ..
which of these is best ??
FH20 compared with kodak M580 and 950 (Kathie — 05/20/2010)
I, too, would like to know how these compare. I need something really easy to use to capture quick moments of my grandchildren. Also, which one is best for regarding video of boating and sporting events?
reply to this comment
Lisa (06/02/2010)
Don't buy a Kodak for indoor/kid pics. I have the Kodak Z1085IS and I get nothing but blurry pics. I'm on here to find something else!!!
reply to this comment
vamsi (04/22/2010)
which would you choose in FH20 and sony dsc-h55??
and why??
reply to this comment
and why??
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
The FH20. It has the fastest lens in it's class. Better low light performance.
reply to this comment
vamsi (04/23/2010)
thanku very much..but i will miss sweep panorama in fh 20 ?? what do u say??
reply to this comment
Polina (04/21/2010)
Can't decide between FH20 and Powershot sd940 IS, what would you recommend?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
The FH20 has a much faster lens. Larger zoom range. I'd go with the FH20. But the SD940 is a good choice as well.
reply to this comment
Polina (04/22/2010)
Thank you, that helps!
reply to this comment
FH20 or ZR1? (Daniele D — 04/21/2010)
Trying to decide between ZR1 or FH20 for a megazoom camera. The things that are important to me are :
Excellent photo quality
Ease of Use
Good low light quality for indoor pics of kids
Good pics for action shots.....
Which would you recommend?
reply to this comment
Excellent photo quality
Ease of Use
Good low light quality for indoor pics of kids
Good pics for action shots.....
Which would you recommend?
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
Get the FH20. IT has the fastest lens in the class and that equates to great low light quality.
reply to this comment
Additional question (Daniele D. — 04/22/2010)
Is there any feature on the ZR1 that the FH20 is missing or lacking that I need to take in consideration as well? I know as I look across the web the ZR1 received excellent reviews as well across the board from publications.
Thanks again for expertise
reply to this comment
Thanks again for expertise
Phil (04/23/2010)
"Is there any feature on the ZR1 that the FH20 is missing or lacking that I need to take in consideration as well?"
For starters, the Leica lens! ...not only is it a higher quality lens than that of the FH20's, it's capable of wider angle shots, which is very nice in close quarters (btw, both lenses have the same light-gathering ability at their widest angle)!
reply to this comment
For starters, the Leica lens! ...not only is it a higher quality lens than that of the FH20's, it's capable of wider angle shots, which is very nice in close quarters (btw, both lenses have the same light-gathering ability at their widest angle)!
Lack of optical viewfinder a problem? (Aaron — 04/20/2010)
I'm considering upgrading from a 5MP Sony CyberShot to this Lumix FH20. The only thing that really concerns me is that this Lumix doesn't have an optical viewfinder.
On a bright day my CyberShot's LCD washes out to where it's useless and I have to resort to its viewfinder, so I'd like to know if the FH20's LCD is still usable in a bright environment?
Thanks,
Aaron
reply to this comment
On a bright day my CyberShot's LCD washes out to where it's useless and I have to resort to its viewfinder, so I'd like to know if the FH20's LCD is still usable in a bright environment?
Thanks,
Aaron
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
Ordinarily, I'd be on your side on the viewfinder issue, but the FH20 has the fastest lens in it's class and it's getting spankin' results and reviews for it's superior low light performance.
reply to this comment
Thanks, but..... (Aaron — 04/22/2010)
...I still need to know if the FH20's LCD is usable on a bright day?
reply to this comment
LCD Screen in bright light (Eunice — 05/03/2010)
I, too, would like to know if you can see the picture you are taking in the LCD screen in bright light. There have been so many times in bright light that I have had to just aim and shoot hoping I'm getting what I want because I can't see much in the screen or through the view finder.
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/06/2010)
Eunice, I wound up getting the FH20 for my wife and (as I mention in my mini-review below) I was pleasantly surprised as to how visible its LCD is in typical daylight use!
Aaron
reply to this comment
Aaron
Iviewfinder needed (teresa — 07/08/2010)
I need a viefinder, because I am finding too much trouble with the "new screen", I wa interedsted in the FH20 for all of its pluses, could you reccomend a panosonc or cannon that has has at least 10 or more mp and about 8 or more zoom that has a manual viwfinder along with the led, first camera bought since my minolta digital, thanks
reply to this comment
FH20, SD960, SD780, or Coolpix S3000? (Justin — 04/20/2010)
I'm having a very tough time deciding which one of these to get my wife...FH20, Canon SD960 or SD780, or Nikon coolpix s3000? been leaning toward the FH20...Please Help! Thanks
reply to this comment
Krista (04/20/2010)
HI. You've got me sold with this revie but we bought a Sony W350 on sale tonihgt. I'm bringing it back after reading the reviews and comparing. My only question is regarding the life of the battery? Do you recommend a second one? Thanks (KT in Canada)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/21/2010)
A second battery is always a good wise move. Especially if you take a lot of pictures. But I have 4 cameras and all use just one battery. In the end it comes down to your camera taking style.
reply to this comment
Sony H20 vs FH20 (Rob D. — 04/18/2010)
I have been waiting to get an inexpensive megazoom camera. I was pretty sold on getting the SONY H20 based on reviews until I saw the review on the Panasonic lumix FH20 here. So FH20 vs Sony H20 which is a better camera for picture quality indoor and outdoor with zoom?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/21/2010)
Panasonic's FH20 hands down. It's getting fantastic reviews for not only all around performance, but especially low light situations. This is largely thanks to it's fast 8x optical zoom. That's where I'd plop down the cash.
reply to this comment
Question (SunnyHuny1 — 04/17/2010)
We're trying to decide bewteen this and the Coolpix S4000...any thoughts?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/19/2010)
Go with this one. It doesn't have some of the "cool" features that the S4000 does -- namely the touchscreen -- but it's a bit cheaper, has a bigger zoom, and takes clearer pictures, especially in low light situations. For our money, this is one of the best mid-cost point and shoots this year.
reply to this comment
Lisa (04/16/2010)
Hi,I'm wondering if there is an option to always have the camera in IA mode or will I have to press the IA button before every picture? Thanks.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/21/2010)
I don't think so. You engage it and it takes over for the shot.
reply to this comment
Edward Jackson (04/22/2010)
The iA button is best thought of as a shortcut, the idea being that you can *instantly* fall back to iA if you're in the wrong preset and need to take a photo quickly.
iA in every respect is like any other the other scene modes and is remembered by the camera.
reply to this comment
iA in every respect is like any other the other scene modes and is remembered by the camera.
IA button before every shot or no? (Page — 06/27/2010)
not sure I know what the answer to this question is still...do you have to press a button to use the IA before every shot or no? please someone clarify, as this sounds like a pain to have to do before every pic I take... thanks
reply to this comment
iA on Panasonic (Rog Patterson — 07/29/2010)
In one or more of the many, many reviews I've been reading during the past few days, the iA button is pressed once for "on" and pressed again for "off", so sounds to me like the feature functions picture-after-picture until you turn it off.
reply to this comment
Jeff (07/24/2010)
I play with one of these the other day at the camera store. It did stay in the iA mode until toggled out of.
reply to this comment
Does it have Panoramic Mode - not addressed at all in their official specs (Barbara — 04/14/2010)
I searched Specs of this camera on Panasonic web page and it doesn't address Panoramic Shots at all (let alone stitching/there's no excuse having to use a separate program to stitch pics together in todays market) but DOES IT EVEN SHOOT PANORAMIC SHOTS?? We do loads of outdoor pics (mountains, beach, sporting venues and Panoramic is important for us)
www2.panasonic.com/consumer...
reply to this comment
www2.panasonic.com/consumer...
by James DeRuvo (04/15/2010)
that's because most photo editors have sophisticated photo stitcher utilities now, so it doesn't really matter if it has a specific shot or not. You can put them together in software and hardly, if ever, notice the different. The Fh20 is a great camera. I'd get it.
reply to this comment
thanks.. it doens't have ANY Panorama Assist at all.. (Barbara — 04/16/2010)
Thanks for responding..
On Panasonic camera link I listed above, I did "Compare" cameras and when you do that it does come up w/complete charts of what they have.
SADLY Panasonic didn't include Panarama Assist AT ALL on this camera. Nothing to help line up shots to even be able to "stitch" them together with another program.
WHAT AN OVERSITE on what appears to be a great camera. It is a very important feature to me due to all the spectacular outdoor vista shots we take.
May still purchase... but not sure. SO DISAPPOINTED they chose to leave that off. The ZR3S does have the feature... but will cost additional $100. I keep a camera for at least 10 yrs so may be worth it.
Need to find a store near me that actually has the FH20 and ZR3S in stock for me to hold/use them to compare.
reply to this comment
On Panasonic camera link I listed above, I did "Compare" cameras and when you do that it does come up w/complete charts of what they have.
SADLY Panasonic didn't include Panarama Assist AT ALL on this camera. Nothing to help line up shots to even be able to "stitch" them together with another program.
WHAT AN OVERSITE on what appears to be a great camera. It is a very important feature to me due to all the spectacular outdoor vista shots we take.
May still purchase... but not sure. SO DISAPPOINTED they chose to leave that off. The ZR3S does have the feature... but will cost additional $100. I keep a camera for at least 10 yrs so may be worth it.
Need to find a store near me that actually has the FH20 and ZR3S in stock for me to hold/use them to compare.
Edward Jackson (04/22/2010)
As James has pointed out above, most people prefer to do their panorama stitching in software as it's usually far more flexible. More importantly, I've always found a good tripod to be a FAR better option than any guide or panorama mode on every camera I've owned.
reply to this comment
I like to use tripod when I can.. but can't always use it (Barbara — 04/22/2010)
I totally understand it's not am important feature to some folks. But it is for me.
I can't always have tripod (in a stadium at games for example, or if I'm some place and happen upon a great Panoramic shot but don't have the tripod with me. Or when I climbed tree on shore of an island over looking grassland to get a better perspective that would include the bay view beyond the grassland. (that was pictures from our Fla property to show what our view will be once the house is built. Raised on stilts, the view from main living area will be 17' above the flat view just standing on the ground level. Hard to use the tripod in some situations.
The Panaroma Assist shows me exactly where to line up the shots in difficult situations. I have always been off a little when having to guess (when don't have tripod), but with lining up visual aid built into camera, my shots have lined up perfectly. Then I've used a software program to stitch them because my current camera has Panarama Assist but doesn't have stitch. I hope the new one will also have stitch included so it saves me the step of doing it in a program, but the main thing is having Panarama Assist to provide quick easy line up markings.
Think I'm leaning toward ZS3 or the FH22 which both have that option. FH22 is touch screen which I'm not accustomed to using and not sure if I'd prefer.
Still looking for a store in my area that has these cameras in stock for me to actually be able to handle/play with them/compare in person. Don't want to buy any of them on line, sight unseen and personally untried. Since they are so new, haven't found a local store yet. I'll keep looking.
Reading all the opinions, info, and comparing sure does help in the personal choice decision!
Thanks to everyone who's rated them, asked questions and for the responses! Always best to be armed w/info before you shop or decide what works best for you.
reply to this comment
I can't always have tripod (in a stadium at games for example, or if I'm some place and happen upon a great Panoramic shot but don't have the tripod with me. Or when I climbed tree on shore of an island over looking grassland to get a better perspective that would include the bay view beyond the grassland. (that was pictures from our Fla property to show what our view will be once the house is built. Raised on stilts, the view from main living area will be 17' above the flat view just standing on the ground level. Hard to use the tripod in some situations.
The Panaroma Assist shows me exactly where to line up the shots in difficult situations. I have always been off a little when having to guess (when don't have tripod), but with lining up visual aid built into camera, my shots have lined up perfectly. Then I've used a software program to stitch them because my current camera has Panarama Assist but doesn't have stitch. I hope the new one will also have stitch included so it saves me the step of doing it in a program, but the main thing is having Panarama Assist to provide quick easy line up markings.
Think I'm leaning toward ZS3 or the FH22 which both have that option. FH22 is touch screen which I'm not accustomed to using and not sure if I'd prefer.
Still looking for a store in my area that has these cameras in stock for me to actually be able to handle/play with them/compare in person. Don't want to buy any of them on line, sight unseen and personally untried. Since they are so new, haven't found a local store yet. I'll keep looking.
Reading all the opinions, info, and comparing sure does help in the personal choice decision!
Thanks to everyone who's rated them, asked questions and for the responses! Always best to be armed w/info before you shop or decide what works best for you.
Kara (04/24/2010)
I too have been looking at the FH20 and would have liked panorama assist. I have looked through the online user manuals for the FH20 and FH22 and they both do offer recording guidelines which break the scren up into 9 grids for shooting purpses. You could probably turn that option on and leave it on. Whilst is might not be panorama assit mode it should help.
reply to this comment
Store that has these (Sue — 04/28/2010)
Barbara: 6th Ave Electronics has both of these cameras, so you can see them side-by-side and they will let you take some pics with both so you can compare them.
reply to this comment
more questions on the FH20 ( — 04/14/2010)
I have a few more questions to further clarify a couple of things on the Lumix FH20 that I'm considering. I've been reading that the lower-end digitals with such high megapixels as this are not such a great thing? Any feedback on that aspect? Also, is transferring photos to my I-Mac going to present any challenges? What photo card should I pick up for a good amount of storage, and to enhance the recovery time between shots? Does a SDHC card work in this camera? Would you recommend picking up a spare battery? If my husband takes it on a trip, he may not be reliable about recharging. What about a case for protection, but not a lot of bulk, and lastly is BuyDig.com a reliable source for purchase? Sorry for so many amateur questions, but you've been great with suggestions so far.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/14/2010)
Ok I'll go through one by one
- Small cameras with lots of megapixels can be a very bad thing, but it doesn't always means that they are. This is an example of a very good compact camera with a high megapixel count. When the manufacturer includes a better processor to deal with the extra pixels, it's OK. When they shove 14 megapixels onto a tiny sensor with a cheap processor, that produces lots of noise, not a good thing. But you don't have to worry about that here.
- No.
- Any SD or SDHC card should do fine, class 4 or 6 is all you'll need. As for storage size (the number of GB), my colleague James has good advice: buy a couple of small cards, rather than one large one. If the large one breaks or fails, you have no cards. If one small one breaks, you still have more kicking around. A 4GB card is about as large as you'll want to get -- if you find yourself filling it up regularly, buy another 4GB card.
- Another battery is usually a worthy investment, but try this out for a while to see how the one battery works for you.
- A little bag is also usually a good investment. No need for a hard case, just a soft bag will be fine.
- BuyDig.com has a reputation of 4.5 / 5 stars, so yes, it sounds reputable to me. Feel free to check out some of the other merchants on our page too.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
- Small cameras with lots of megapixels can be a very bad thing, but it doesn't always means that they are. This is an example of a very good compact camera with a high megapixel count. When the manufacturer includes a better processor to deal with the extra pixels, it's OK. When they shove 14 megapixels onto a tiny sensor with a cheap processor, that produces lots of noise, not a good thing. But you don't have to worry about that here.
- No.
- Any SD or SDHC card should do fine, class 4 or 6 is all you'll need. As for storage size (the number of GB), my colleague James has good advice: buy a couple of small cards, rather than one large one. If the large one breaks or fails, you have no cards. If one small one breaks, you still have more kicking around. A 4GB card is about as large as you'll want to get -- if you find yourself filling it up regularly, buy another 4GB card.
- Another battery is usually a worthy investment, but try this out for a while to see how the one battery works for you.
- A little bag is also usually a good investment. No need for a hard case, just a soft bag will be fine.
- BuyDig.com has a reputation of 4.5 / 5 stars, so yes, it sounds reputable to me. Feel free to check out some of the other merchants on our page too.
Hope this helps!
re: more questions on the FH20 ( — 04/14/2010)
You're a gem! Thanks for responding so quickly. I was looking at BuyDigs as having the lowest listed price, but don't want to sacrifice reliability for a few dollars difference.
reply to this comment
BuyDig reliability (Miriam Rubinoff — 05/21/2010)
I made a purchase from BuyDig and they came through with no problem. It's always a good idea to look up the BBB rating first - they have a good one, as I remember.
I think I'm going with the FH20. I got a Nikon S700 not long ago, thinking Nikon had to be good, and I'm a little disappointed. And I would like something with more zoom. The low-light capabilities sound wonderful - I like to shoot with available light whenever possible. The pictures in the article are very helpful, as they are obviously shot by someone who knows what they are doing, but without any fancy lighting or other effects. I just wish the photos were labeled with the setting that was used to take them.
reply to this comment
I think I'm going with the FH20. I got a Nikon S700 not long ago, thinking Nikon had to be good, and I'm a little disappointed. And I would like something with more zoom. The low-light capabilities sound wonderful - I like to shoot with available light whenever possible. The pictures in the article are very helpful, as they are obviously shot by someone who knows what they are doing, but without any fancy lighting or other effects. I just wish the photos were labeled with the setting that was used to take them.
BBB Ratings (Mack — 12/03/2010)
DO NOT go buy BBB ratings. It was all over the news that those ratings mean nothing. If a company PAYS the BBB they will get a good rating. It is a huge scam. There were even PHONY non-existant companies with A ratings from the BBB because the people who set up the phony companies paid the BBB. There were companies that had A ratings but as soon as they stopped being a paid member the BBB dropped them down to C or D ratings. Sad to say but the BBB needs a real BBB to monitor THEM.
reply to this comment
FH 20 (Chad — 11/20/2010)
I just picked up this camera from Amazon for $139 and I cannot wait to get it in. I will be using it mainly when I go on backpacking trips. I was impressed with the zoom and the quality of pictures that the camera takes, especially in low light as well as the fact that it records in HD and will also zoom while doing so. All of these things will come in very handy for me to properly capture great shots for gear reports while also being lightweight! As for accessories, I picked up an extra battery, a Transcend 8 GB Class 6 SDHC card and a Mountainsmith camera bag.
reply to this comment
Listen to Mack (Sandi — 12/21/2010)
A good Better Business Bureau rating means nothing more than the company paid for it. A bad rating means they didn't. The BBB is one of the biggest scams that has been perpetrated on American consumers ever!
TO ALL: Thanks for all the good information! I've been trying to decide which camera I'll ultimately be happy with once I break down and spend money I shouldn't on one. The Panasonic Lumiox FH20 is looking pretty good for when I take the plunge And, since it's likely to be another month orf two, there will be more time for any complaints to emerge. I'll definitely be checking back.
reply to this comment
TO ALL: Thanks for all the good information! I've been trying to decide which camera I'll ultimately be happy with once I break down and spend money I shouldn't on one. The Panasonic Lumiox FH20 is looking pretty good for when I take the plunge And, since it's likely to be another month orf two, there will be more time for any complaints to emerge. I'll definitely be checking back.
Trying to decide (Emily — 04/12/2010)
Hello, would you please compare the FH20 to the Olympus 7040 and the Sony W370? I'm between those 3 right now. Thanks...
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/12/2010)
It's a toss up between the FH20 and W370, depending on what you're looking for. The FH20 offers fantastic bang for the buck -- big 8x zoom, HD video, a great picture quality even in low light. The W370 has more "cool" features like the press and sweep panorama and maybe slightly better image quality in good lighting conditions, roughly equal zoom. I would go with the FH20 personally, but I still think the W370 is a very good camera. Can't say much about the Olympus -- they haven't sent that one to us for review, but regular point and shoots aren't really their forte anyway. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Emily (04/13/2010)
Thanks you so much!!! Considering the price and everything I've read online, I will take a leap of faith with the Panasonic. Thanks again! :)
reply to this comment
Emily (04/13/2010)
Thanks again Liam...While I have your attention, is there any other camera you'd recommend that is a similar size and has the same amount of zoom--7x or more? Thanks!!
reply to this comment
Panorma Shots (Kara — 04/11/2010)
Does this camera handle panorama shots ?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
With photo editing software, any camera can handle panoramic shots. That's because stitching programs have gotten so good that they're practically seamless. And the FH20 is a fantastic, high performing camera. So if that's your deal breaker, fear not. Adobe Photoshop Elements or a few others can easily handle the stitching.
reply to this comment
Kara (04/14/2010)
Cheers - thanks for the response. I guess I was just a little lost as I was also looking at the Panasonic ZR1 which has a panorama assist mode (I believe). So basically any digital camera will either come with that function or I can get software to do this. Now I just need to decide FH20 or ZR1.
reply to this comment
b (06/18/2010)
Kara = What did you go with??? And how do you like it?? Asking the same question myself.
Thank you.
B.
reply to this comment
Thank you.
B.
FP8 vs. FH20 (Spencer R. — 04/10/2010)
I'm trying to compare the FP8 to the FH20. The fp8 has a leica lens and is cheaper but the FH20 has better optical zoom. What is the better camera here? Does the leica lens make a difference?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/10/2010)
Get the FH20. It's getting great reviews for low light performance thanks to a faster lens.
reply to this comment
Another ? (Spencer R. — 04/10/2010)
Does the FH20 have optical zoom while shooting video. I noticed a few others asked this question but haven't found an answer yet. Thanks for all the help.
reply to this comment
Kshitiz (11/01/2010)
Yes, FH20 has optical zoom while shooting video.
reply to this comment
FH20 doesn't zoom while shooting video!!! (Lora — 01/09/2011)
I received this for Christmas and am returning it because I absolutely must have the zoom feature during the time I am shooting video. I use this feature a lot when at my daughter's cheer comps... not being able to zoom in on her at parts of the routine and then out for a whole team stunt makes this camera a bad fit for me. I would LOVE the same camera, but with zoom during video. I was shocked when I tried to take video on Christmas and realized it wouldn't zoom in on her outside on the trampoline... I didn't believe they would actually leave this feature out... but apparently it's not important to include? I am still surprised. I think I will go with one of the Z versions and spend more money.
reply to this comment
Nice (Jack — 02/10/2011)
You are right. I also need a zoom feature while using a video recording feature. I know Sony H20 has a zoom while video recording also Olympus stylus 710 has it. You might find some more on Testfreaks well i guess. thanks.
reply to this comment
Need help deciding among FH20, SD1300, SD780, JZ300 (Jimmy — 04/09/2010)
Great website. I'm looking to buy a new camera for everyday and travel use. What would you guys recommend among the models mentioned (unless something better comes to mind)? Also, I understand that the FH20 doesn't have a HDMI output, is that a big issue? Thank you very much guys for your feedback.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/09/2010)
You'll be happy with either Canon (can't say the same for the Fuji), but I'd spend my money on the FH20. Big zoom in a small camera, very good picture quality and performance for the price, and nice HD video. HDMI port is no big deal in my opinion -- unless you plan to hook it up to your HDTV to view pictures/videos on a regular basis, you won't miss it, and there are workarounds in case you do decide to hook it up. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
cannot play in AVI mode (Geetha Gowda — 10/18/2010)
I am looking for a camera that plays my old SD memory card videos taken with my old Canon SD 1100 IS. I just purchased a Canon SD 1400 but it is all high def. and doesn't play my old memory card videos since they are not HD. I am looking into the Panasonice fh20 0 would this play in both HD and AVI mode - in other words would I still be able to play back video from my old SD memory cards.
thanks
reply to this comment
thanks
RJPiot (12/03/2010)
What are the workarounds to show pic's and video directly on my HDTV? My tv has HDMI connections but no USB ports. What is the best way to accomplish this? Appreciate any advice you can offer. Thank You!!
reply to this comment
linda (04/08/2010)
zr1 or fh20? same price.which one is best?which one i should buy between the two.
reply to this comment
Phil (04/23/2010)
I'd go with the ZR1 If the price differential is of no concern, the main reason being its higher quality Leica-lens vs the FH20's Lumix-lens. In addition the Leica lens offers a somewhat wider 'bottom-end'.
reply to this comment
comparison (Don Andrew — 04/05/2010)
Can you tell me how this camera compares with a Leica C-LUX3 which has now been discontinued?
Thanks very much.
I really wanted the Leica but can no longer find it
reply to this comment
Thanks very much.
I really wanted the Leica but can no longer find it
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
The FH20 is getting spanking reviews for excellent performance. I'd be laying down the cash for it right now because Panny is making some great point and shoots right now and the Fh20 is definitely one of them.
reply to this comment
Great explanations. Help for choosing FH 20 or sony H55 or ZR1 (Vivek — 04/07/2010)
I have followed this thread and it has been really very instructive. I wish to buy an ultrazoom ( even 8 x is fine though) with a tag around 200 USD. Have zeroed on FH 20/ panny ZR1/ panny ZS3 or canon SX 120 or sony H55? Any views on this? Could you also please specifically comment on the low light capabilities of these as i gather all of them give tremendous photos outside. Thanks. Vivek
reply to this comment
does it optical zoom during video (Vivek — 04/07/2010)
I saw that ZR1 does optical zoom while in HD video. Does H 20 does the same as well? Thanks Vivek
reply to this comment
D.Mandal (04/04/2010)
Please compare panasonic FH20 & sony W370. Which one you recomend ? Mail me at debasis_rkmv@yahoo.com
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/05/2010)
They are similar. The W370 has more "cool" features like the press and sweep panorama, and slightly better picture quality from what I've seen. But the FH20 is also a great camera, and as much as $50 cheaper than the W370. Up to you to decide which one suits your needs better, as the price difference is significant.
reply to this comment
Lisa G. (04/03/2010)
What's the better bang for my buck - the Panasonic FH20 or the new Nikon Coolpix S4000?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/05/2010)
We're working on a review of the S4000 as we speak -- we're not done with it yet, but I like the Panasonic a bit more from what I've seen so far.
reply to this comment
k.j (07/18/2010)
i think the panasonic is a way better choice,then the nikon coolpix's images are awful.you should stick with the panasonic lumix FH20
reply to this comment
Coolpix S6000 (Virginia — 09/10/2010)
I bought the Coolpix S6000 to take pix of my kids. I am going to take it back because the camera is too slow - I push the button down half-way, so it can focus per the instructions, but when I push the button the remainder of the way to take the picture, the camera waits..lags.. the shot is missed. Very frustrating. I'm going to try the FH20 to see if it is faster (it sounds like it will be) Fingers crossed. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
FH20 vs LX-3 (SL Finland — 04/01/2010)
I travel a lot and take touristic pictures, which I show at home using a HD video projector. So, my Panasonic LX series camera with a 16:9 cell should be perfect for the purpose. I, however, find it bulky and have been looking for a thinner one. The other compact cameras seem to have a 4:3 cell and using the 16:9 mask a lot of pixels will be lost. Could you, please, recommend another camera to suit best for my purpose. FH20?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2010)
Well the FH20 is getting some glowing reviews. Excellent low light performance, fantastic image quality. It's a contender.
reply to this comment
I want to know (mobinokhi — 04/01/2010)
is it take great photo both indoor and outdoor ? is it take great photo in low light? how much video quality i can expect from this camera? plz help me..........
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2010)
You can see the glowing review here - digitalcamera-hq.com/produc... line, good, solid low light performance. And since it records HD video you've got yet another excellent performer from Panasonic.
reply to this comment
William Jameson (03/31/2010)
The FH20 does indeed have intelligent auto.
reply to this comment
what is image compresion and/or RAW available?? (Dragon — 03/31/2010)
I have a Kodak m1033 = great pocket camera
BUT
my 10M pixel images are jpeg compress to 1MB!!!!!!!!!!
need less compression for my sunset shots
what is compression for this camera?
does it have RAW?
great review !
reply to this comment
BUT
my 10M pixel images are jpeg compress to 1MB!!!!!!!!!!
need less compression for my sunset shots
what is compression for this camera?
does it have RAW?
great review !
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2010)
No, it doesn't have RAW, sorry. But unless you're doing some serious photo processing, it's really not going to help you.
You can change the resolution:
1. Press the Menu button.
2. Select Picture Quality, and then press the OK button.
3. Select the Picture Quality setting you want to use, and then press the OK button.
4. Press the Menu button to exit the menu.
reply to this comment
You can change the resolution:
1. Press the Menu button.
2. Select Picture Quality, and then press the OK button.
3. Select the Picture Quality setting you want to use, and then press the OK button.
4. Press the Menu button to exit the menu.
Anthony (11/19/2010)
you don't know what you are talking about. There are many benefits to shooting RAW. Learn what you are talking about before you give false or incorrect info.
reply to this comment
sarah (03/29/2010)
panasonic fh20,....fp3...fp8...zr1...whats the best choice......fh20 and zr1 are competent.zr1 has wider lens25mm..and leica...whereas fh20 has 28mm lumix vario lens.but theres a price differnce of 50-60 bucks....what r ur suggestions guys....more differnces you know please mention.what would be the wise choice for casual outdoor and indoor daily life photographs.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/30/2010)
Go with the models with the Leica lenses. The quality makes a real difference. Also go to imaging-resource.com where you can view sample images side by side in a variety of situations. Lastly if need be head to a brick and mortar and hold them in your hands. That usually sells me one way or another.
reply to this comment
Lumix vs Canon (Vernice — 03/27/2010)
Which is better in terms of image quality, the Lumix FH20 or the Canon SD1200 IS?
Also, is there a noticeable difference with the FH20 using a non-Leica lens?
reply to this comment
Also, is there a noticeable difference with the FH20 using a non-Leica lens?
by James DeRuvo (03/29/2010)
Check out imaging-resource.com under compare sample images. You'll see the differences side by side. As for quality of the non Leica lens, it is worth it to pay extra for actual glass lens elements. It's a guard against image distortion.
reply to this comment
FH20 vs ZR1 (Lubica — 03/23/2010)
Could you explain the major differences between ZR1 and FH20? The new FH20 is cheaper, but I can't seem to figure out why.
Also, do you know if they both zoom with the optical zoom while shooting a video?
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Also, do you know if they both zoom with the optical zoom while shooting a video?
Thanks!
by James DeRuvo (03/25/2010)
The ZR1 has IntelligentAutoMode. The FH20 doesn't.
FH20 is 14MP, the ZR1 is 12 MP - this is not a big deal because in snapshots you won't see the difference.
Outside of that, they're basically the same camera. Althought I think the ZR1 has a better quality lens.
reply to this comment
FH20 is 14MP, the ZR1 is 12 MP - this is not a big deal because in snapshots you won't see the difference.
Outside of that, they're basically the same camera. Althought I think the ZR1 has a better quality lens.
Kelly (04/24/2010)
Your article says the FH20 DOES have IntelligentAuto. So it does, or it doesn't?
reply to this comment
Ira (04/28/2010)
I just bought an FH20 and I haven't unpacked it yet. The box says it has Intelligent Auto (IA).
reply to this comment
ZR1 versus Z20 (helene — 06/18/2010)
I am also trying to decide between both.
So far the differences I found are:
It seems that the ZR1 is assembled in Japan and the FH20 in China
The ZR1 has the Leica lense. So this explains I think why the FH20 is cheaper.
But from your article it seems that the FH20 does not have the problem of low light shooting like the ZR1??
The ZR1 has also the burst option.
The ZR1 does not have the HDMI connection.
I think I may go for the ZR1...because it is an older model there are also great reductions in price...
reply to this comment
So far the differences I found are:
It seems that the ZR1 is assembled in Japan and the FH20 in China
The ZR1 has the Leica lense. So this explains I think why the FH20 is cheaper.
But from your article it seems that the FH20 does not have the problem of low light shooting like the ZR1??
The ZR1 has also the burst option.
The ZR1 does not have the HDMI connection.
I think I may go for the ZR1...because it is an older model there are also great reductions in price...
Camera suggestions (Judith — 03/22/2010)
Am looking for a camera for my son who is traveling to Nepal and doing a lot of hiking. Want something that will travel well, have good zoom, easy to use, great pictures. Looking at Pan FH20, ZS3 or Canon SD1200 IS...any thoughts in comparing these or any other suggestions?Want to stay under $250 for sure.
reply to this comment
FH-20 versus ZS3 and Canon SD-1200 (Sarah Joyce — 03/22/2010)
The ZR1, FH20 and ZS3 can all be used a "travel cameras." They do vary however in both physical size and zoom power. The ZR1 and FH20 are the smallest size-wise and have 8X optical zoom. The ZS3 is easily twice the physical size of the ZR! and FH20, but it have 12X optical zoom.
I shoot with all four of the cameras mentioned. I much prefer the size of the ZR1 and FH20 for travel and find 8X optical zoom quite sufficient and effective.
reply to this comment
I shoot with all four of the cameras mentioned. I much prefer the size of the ZR1 and FH20 for travel and find 8X optical zoom quite sufficient and effective.
Judith (03/23/2010)
Thanks much for the feedback. So the 8xzoom is definately a worthwhile factor to consider for the extra price, along with picture quality and ease ...compared to the Canon SD 1200is? I am feeling this may be the one to get...
reply to this comment
FH20 or ZR1 (Karen — 03/20/2010)
I can't decide between FH20 or ZR1. The camera will mostly be used for taking pictures of our kids...and vacation photos. I will also Macro sometimes to take photos of items I sell. thanks!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/23/2010)
Panasonic is making such good cameras right now, I think you'd be happy with either one, quite frankly. I'd also recommend looking at the LX3.
reply to this comment
Code Enforcement (Victor Fernandez — 03/19/2010)
I am a Building Inspector for a local county and city gov, and during my inspections I need to take photos, quickly, keep others optacles coming into the picture been taken due to the shutter speed. Can someone guide me to the right place.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (03/19/2010)
These days, a new $200 camera from a top manufacturer should be fine to cover what you're doing. This here FH20 has a quick shutter speed, I just tested a new Canon with very fast shutter speed as well -- basically, point and shoots are getting pretty speedy. If you want really, really fast speeds, dSLR is the only way to go. But I'm sure budget is a consideration, so I'd say check out one of the newest Panasonics or Canons for starters.
reply to this comment
Penny (03/15/2010)
I take a lot of concert videos for my friends' bands. Is the audio quality on this decent in loud situations?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2010)
No. Unfortunately point and shoots come with cheap omnidirectional mics which record everything and it'll sound like the band is in a fishbowl.
Here's my recommendation. Get a Kodak Zi8. It has an external mic jack which you could then plug into the band's mixing board. Then you get the best of both worlds.
reply to this comment
Here's my recommendation. Get a Kodak Zi8. It has an external mic jack which you could then plug into the band's mixing board. Then you get the best of both worlds.
Penny (03/17/2010)
They're small bands, they just want stuff they can throw up on their social networking sites. My Canon was perfect for it when I wasn't allowed to take my Flip or camcorder in. I wish I hadn't lost it.
Thanks for your help :)
reply to this comment
Thanks for your help :)
Kat (06/25/2010)
I do a LOT of this kind of work, and you'd be surprised what you can achieve audio-wise in a loud little room if you just anchor some padding over the microphone... holding your finger over it works in a pinch too :)
reply to this comment
Page (06/27/2010)
I take lots of concert pics/video, but not professionally, can you explain what you mean about covering the mikes? and what is a great P & S camera for concerts? I want at least 8x zoom, video of good quality that zooms while in video mode, good low light/concert mode(which can also mean pyro & lots of reds and diff color lighting. Usually shoot from front row or occasionally back a few rows. usually post pics online but also want option to print decent pics as well(especially for after concert shots when meeting the bands:) any help would be appreciated!! I also want batteries that can be changed if needed mid-show with battery(ies) I have in my pocket with me since I typically take 400+ pictures. Thanks for all help in advance, as I have been struggling with which camera to buy for the past 2 wks now:)
reply to this comment
Kodak Zi8 (DL Moore — 12/29/2010)
You know, my b/f and I have been looking for a decent video camera for the past two years that has an external mic jack. After deciding that $2500 was too much money to spend to achieve any type of decent audio for his band demos, I started thinking about just getting another digital camera and a Red Man. Well, having read this ONE LITTLE BLURB, sent us on our Kodak odyssey. OH MY GOD (yes, I'm yelling) is that Kodak a godsend?!?!?! Wow...bought him one for Christmas and he ended up getting some adapters for the mic/soundboard and jeeze Louise...what a happy camper! Brought everything in (including the remote cuz you know, you HAVE to have the remote!) for about $180.
Some friends have the elaborate $700 Sony camcorders and the sound is just poo-poo--this little Kodak Z-i8, to put it simply, ROCKS.
Thank you for posting this and bless you...you made our Christmas and probably did a really nice jump-start for his career (and the careers of his band mates)!
reply to this comment
Some friends have the elaborate $700 Sony camcorders and the sound is just poo-poo--this little Kodak Z-i8, to put it simply, ROCKS.
Thank you for posting this and bless you...you made our Christmas and probably did a really nice jump-start for his career (and the careers of his band mates)!
Z-i8 (DL Moore — 12/29/2010)
Forgot to mention, I'm buying MYSELF this Panasonic....
reply to this comment
Naomi (03/14/2010)
I'm a jewelry designer/maker and am looking for a digital camera primarily to take pictures of my jewelry to post and sell online. I'm a bit of a camera idiot, so ease of use is important, and I'd like to get my feet wet with a lower to mid-range priced camera. After reading the review, this camera sounds great, but I'd like some confirmation from someone who knows more than I do. I'm assuming that "macro" means "very close," which is what I need. I know I'm not going to get professional quality images, but I'm hoping this will give strong and attractive enough pics for the purpose. Thoughts? Anyone?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/16/2010)
If you go [url=panasonic.net/avc/lumix/gal... you can see sample images including a very nice macro shot of a flower. But understand that these images are shot by professionals in ideal controlled conditions. But the image sure shows that in the right hands, the FH20 can take a hell of a macro shot.
reply to this comment
FH20 vs FH3 (mark matheson — 03/13/2010)
what is the difference in features between the new panasonic FH3 and FH20 ? Is one smaller in actual size ? Thanks.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (03/15/2010)
Hi Mark, they're pretty much the same size, but the FH3 has a smaller zoom lens. FH3 has a 5x, FH20 has an 8x. That's a significantly larger zoom for only $20 extra, I think it's a great deal. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
Can effective is the auto red eye fix? (Lisa G — 03/06/2010)
Hi, How effective is the in camera red eye fix? I have grey blue eyes that always photograph red and I'm looking for a camera that will automatically fix red eye without having to half press the shutter button.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/08/2010)
Well I wouldn't worry about it. Today's software does a great job correcting for red eye. Google Picasa does it w a touch of a button.
reply to this comment
Lisa (03/08/2010)
Yes I am aware about the programs to fix red eye but I want a camera that will do it automatically so that I don't have to waste my time manually fixing photos once uploaded. Is this camera good at the auto eye correction or is it like other cameras where I have to half press the shutter button, to activate the strobe like flashes?
reply to this comment
Kristin (03/01/2010)
I too would like to know how this compares to the ZS3 that I'm thinking of purchasing.??
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (03/02/2010)
Hi Kristin -- Both are great cameras. The shutter speed, according to what I've read, is basically the same (FH20 is .0006, ZS3 is .0005, so you won't notice a difference). Two other notable differences:
Zoom: FH20 has "only" an 8x zoom, ZS3 has a 12x zoom.
HD video: Both record in 720p HD, but FH20 records in the lower quality, motion JPEG format; ZS3 records in a high-quality AVCHD format.
The price difference is about $50. You just have to ask yourself if the 50% extra zoom and better video quality is worth it. It's worth noting that the ZS3 also has time on its side -- been out for the better part of a year, and reviews are overwhelmingly positive. FH20 literally came out last week, reviews are good so far but there's always the chance that there's some sort of manufacturing defect (though Panasonic has an excellent track record). They're both very good cameras, hard to go wrong with either. Hope that this helps.
reply to this comment
Zoom: FH20 has "only" an 8x zoom, ZS3 has a 12x zoom.
HD video: Both record in 720p HD, but FH20 records in the lower quality, motion JPEG format; ZS3 records in a high-quality AVCHD format.
The price difference is about $50. You just have to ask yourself if the 50% extra zoom and better video quality is worth it. It's worth noting that the ZS3 also has time on its side -- been out for the better part of a year, and reviews are overwhelmingly positive. FH20 literally came out last week, reviews are good so far but there's always the chance that there's some sort of manufacturing defect (though Panasonic has an excellent track record). They're both very good cameras, hard to go wrong with either. Hope that this helps.
Kristin (03/02/2010)
Thank you so much for your reply. It's been challenging to compare all the camera options and decide. The extra zoom is important to me, but I was reading the low light photographs are poor w/ the ZS3 and the reviews on this camera seem better in those conditions.
What determines how fast a picture takes and how fast you can take two in a row? Is that shutter speed or some sort of lag?
reply to this comment
What determines how fast a picture takes and how fast you can take two in a row? Is that shutter speed or some sort of lag?
Liam McCabe (03/03/2010)
There are a few factors that determine how fast a camera can take two pictures in a row -- shutter lag is one (the delay between when you press the 'shoot' button and when it captures the picture), and how quickly the camera can save the image is another. That part you can control by using a faster SD/SDHC memory card. The higher the "class" the faster that the camera can save to the card. Some cameras just seem to take forever to recharge for the next shot, but it's tough to tell without trying it yourself/reading reviews. Hope that this helps.
reply to this comment
Zooming while recording video (Alex — 03/16/2010)
Hi, Do you know if Zoom in/out functionallity can be used while recording video with FH20? If not which one of super zoom panasonic cameras has this feature? thanks in advance.
reply to this comment
Gary (02/03/2011)
I have read that you can't zoom while shooting video with this camera.
reply to this comment
(05/01/2010)
I have also been making comparisons and trying to decide...there is more than a $50 difference. The ZS3 goes for $299 & up while the FHso can be had for $169. Also, the ZS5 is cheaper than the ZS3 as well at $259...food for thought, I still can't decide if it's worth spending the extra$
reply to this comment
Aaron (05/06/2010)
If you will be shooting much video, I would suggest pulling the trigger for the ZS3. If not, imho it's not worth $100 more!
Just my $.02 worth. ;)
reply to this comment
Just my $.02 worth. ;)
by James DeRuvo (by James DeRuvo — 01/22/2010)
The format used is motion JPEG, which is rather counter productive for HD. But then again, it's a point and shoot camera, where video is more an afterthought.
reply to this comment
Reefguy (06/14/2010)
The video downloaded to my computer as .MOV not video JPEG
reply to this comment
Queequeg (07/07/2010)
.MOV is just the container type. The videos do utilize the motion-jpeg codec in an .mov container.
reply to this comment
COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR LUMIX FH20 (BEN COHEN — 08/17/2010)
IS THE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE FH20 EASY TO USE? DOES IT ALLOW TO CROP, MODIFY, FIX AND STORE IMAGES?
reply to this comment
Software (Ken Katzen — 08/23/2010)
If you have Windows Vista - the Windows Photo Gallery program is the default when you download your pictures. The software has all the features you are looking for and very easy to use.
reply to this comment
Use Live Version (Andy — 08/25/2010)
If you run Windows Update, go to the "Optional Updates" there's an option to install Windows Live Essentials. Select that only, install it and during the update it'll ask you what you want to install, the Windows Live Photo Gallery program has some added features that I'd really recommend (Photo stitching is my favorite)
reply to this comment
? (Annoyed — 08/30/2010)
Why the Fk are you shouting?
reply to this comment
Steve P. (09/26/2010)
We're talking about the FH series! Not FK..tks.
reply to this comment
grow up (jim — 11/24/2010)
While email etiquette generally calls "all-caps" shouting, some computer users are always in upper case mode because of the software they use on a daily basis (eg, most commercial or government dedicated database applications) and think nothing of it to leave the caps lock on all the time. Others need the slightly larger, more uniform characters to help them read the screen. IN ANY EVENT, just ignore it ... unless you and the other fellow are engaging in a shouting match over some obsequious point ... in which case you should both BUGGER OFF. ;-)
reply to this comment
Caps 0N in dig camera or other discussions (Will Babbitt — 12/05/2010)
I pray for the day that something such as wording or reviews of some item is one of the more critical events I have to worry with, or spend energy on.
I often see a comment here and there concerning capital letters, some one is all flustered and correcting another on the same page and or even expressing their opinion on someone typing in caps, in a much worse manner than someone with caps locks on, on purpose or left by the days work which requires, most all entries to be in caps, a forgivable mistake. I wonder, do the complainers simply decide how others type, some self appointed case monitor, or did they read or hear cap locks are shouting, and once they see caps, they scramble for the phone both to become Upper Case Man [or woman] and fly back to their self assessed correct examples and begin the scoldings as good Super Upper Case heroes do, saving the struggling and innocent from such things as capital letters? Or is it more likely they simply did hear somewhere that upper case communication is a horrible example of shouting and put a stop to it, as they are not in charge of one thing, person or trusted to be responsible for anything all day, everyday of their lives, so this is the only venue they can actually be someone in their little world and pronounce such an insignificant event as shouting and demand an answer for such a harmful and destructive act? Saving the rest of us from the horrid pain and suffering we are subjected to by capital letters typed to communicate a point? I just want to be able to say the worst thing that happened to me in a day, most days, was some horrid creature put capital letters on a discussion board, but by golly honey, I gave them what FER ABOUT SHOUTING A MODEL NUMBER.
I want to know what living with nothing between my ears feels like and having capital letters be the most offending breach of courtesy I feel the need to defend. After all someone made up this connection between upper case and shouting and they must be correct. I want to worry about capital letters, because I have nothing else anyone will let me be in charge of, so I correct these horrible blunders before innocent people are harmed by such rude actions that back down the road somewhere, someone said "Hey let's tell everyone that typing in upper case is yelling and see if it sticks" and the lemmings all walked off that cliff like most anything else these days. But good to know we have Capital LETTER DEFENDERS on the job, just jealous I can't go through life with nothing more to worry with.
reply to this comment
I often see a comment here and there concerning capital letters, some one is all flustered and correcting another on the same page and or even expressing their opinion on someone typing in caps, in a much worse manner than someone with caps locks on, on purpose or left by the days work which requires, most all entries to be in caps, a forgivable mistake. I wonder, do the complainers simply decide how others type, some self appointed case monitor, or did they read or hear cap locks are shouting, and once they see caps, they scramble for the phone both to become Upper Case Man [or woman] and fly back to their self assessed correct examples and begin the scoldings as good Super Upper Case heroes do, saving the struggling and innocent from such things as capital letters? Or is it more likely they simply did hear somewhere that upper case communication is a horrible example of shouting and put a stop to it, as they are not in charge of one thing, person or trusted to be responsible for anything all day, everyday of their lives, so this is the only venue they can actually be someone in their little world and pronounce such an insignificant event as shouting and demand an answer for such a harmful and destructive act? Saving the rest of us from the horrid pain and suffering we are subjected to by capital letters typed to communicate a point? I just want to be able to say the worst thing that happened to me in a day, most days, was some horrid creature put capital letters on a discussion board, but by golly honey, I gave them what FER ABOUT SHOUTING A MODEL NUMBER.
I want to know what living with nothing between my ears feels like and having capital letters be the most offending breach of courtesy I feel the need to defend. After all someone made up this connection between upper case and shouting and they must be correct. I want to worry about capital letters, because I have nothing else anyone will let me be in charge of, so I correct these horrible blunders before innocent people are harmed by such rude actions that back down the road somewhere, someone said "Hey let's tell everyone that typing in upper case is yelling and see if it sticks" and the lemmings all walked off that cliff like most anything else these days. But good to know we have Capital LETTER DEFENDERS on the job, just jealous I can't go through life with nothing more to worry with.
A CAPITAL OFFENSE (DreamVoyager — 12/13/2010)
A MOST excellent comment, Will Babbitt, thank you for that, really. REALLY. You made my day with wit and style absent in most forums. Perhaps you are an author? I could enjoy reading your work, I'm sure. The 'Anonymous' little people of this world are a bore.
reply to this comment
Will Babbitt/ DreamVoyager (Ryan — 01/07/2011)
Get a room you two...and leave your camera's behind.
reply to this comment
Miss Breaks Alot (01/20/2011)
Come on seriously? Your going to get all serious and throw a fit over some thing like typing in ALL CAPS "yelling" which is considered at most a "webtiquette" nicety and often isn't even known as that, and in responce to this minor error your going to lash out using a simulation of language that is universally considered poor form?! What sort of psycopath are you?
reply to this comment
Mac users need to beware? (Bob Witt — 09/18/2010)
I run Mac laptop and wonder if the FH20 software is completely compatible or are there difficulties? I am older and look for ease for use. Thnks
reply to this comment
Macs Are Cool (Ian Hinkle — 10/17/2010)
No sir. You don't need to worry. Things like that will work fine without any drivers or programs. Just plug the camera in and iPhoto should open and you can import from there. Or if you have a newer Macbook Pro, you can plug the SD card straight in to the computer.
reply to this comment
Mike V (05/16/2011)
I shoot with Canon Cameras and have noticed the video has been better on my Kodak point and shoots than the Canon Powershot...I'm interested in this Lumix but leery about the Panasonic name....anyway I still use the Free Kodak EasyShare program for my photos even though they are coming from 2 Canon cameras...it doesn't matter what kind of camera ya have for these programs...you're computer will find the camera and then you just have to go to the program!
reply to this comment
FH20 vs ZS3 (Jay Gooden — 01/18/2010)
Does this camera still utilize AVCHD Lite for shooting video? The shutter lag speed sounds incredible, how much faster is it than the ZS3?
reply to this comment
FH20 vs Zs5 (Rick — 08/05/2010)
I am shopping for a compact and the Lumix has me interested. Your comments are very helpful. But should I spend $70 more and buy the ZS5 with a Leica lens?
reply to this comment
Panasonic Lumix FH20 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix FH20 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
Very poor indoor flash pictures
(George — 01/03/2011)
The flash seems woefully in adequate and I go very poor indoor flash pictures. Even at just 4 feet or so the flash is not strong enough and it gets worse if one uses the telephoto end. Also with IA (Intelligent Auto mode, the default, which is what I used) I found several blurry pictures and I was not shooting sports action
Since it is too late to return the camera, I would really appreciate if users can guide me on how I can overcome these drawbacks (better technicque and/or additional equipment)
- 5.0 out of 5
Awesome camera!!!
(Loretta Bike — 11/22/2010)
I first used this camera on our 2-week trip through Europe and was excited at how easy and portable it was to use. I really loved the quality of the pictures that came out and feel even some of the pictures turned out better than my husband's Sony Digital Single Lens Reflex camera with a large lens. The battery lasted for about 300 shots so if you are going to take more pictures than that in a day, I strongly suggest you get another battery for a back-up. I previously had a Canon digital camera that used of 4-AAA batteries and boy did I go through batteries with that camera. I hated the clunckyness of that camera and the hassle of always changing batteries and carrying them along. I loved the ease of changing settings on the Panasonic as it was very easy to understand with words of explanations over the icons. I love the color of the camera too (violet) other than the normal basic black or silver. I loved the zoom feature too and large display window. I have no negative feedback about this camera it is perfect in my book!
- 4.0 out of 5
best came in low price
(faheem — 08/14/2010)
Best D-camra in low price
- 4.0 out of 5
Why is formatting of SD card needed to record video? States card not formatted at startup
(David — 06/30/2010)
I am using a 4GB SDHC Class 6 card in the DMC-FH20. When I first turn on the camera it states that card is not formatted for video. I can take pictures fine. Do I just use the format option in the camera menu to format the card? Does this formatting change the amount of still pictures I can save and will it affect what is transferred to my computer? I use Picasa 3 for picture software.
Camera looks like it is going to be great. Reviews on this camera were very good from all the websites I found and price for features beat all others I found. Traveling for the 4th of July and plan on taking lots of pictures. Will let you know how we do.
- 4.0 out of 5
Mini-Review: Very nice small digicam, but don't buy it for its low-light image quality!
(Aaron — 05/04/2010)
I should start out by telling you that I'm an old amateur photographer, who still uses a film SLR. Well, about 6 years ago I decided to buy my first (and only) digicam, a Sony CyberShot DSC-V1. This little fellow has traveled around the world with me a few times, usually producing surprisingly good quality images!
Based largely on Brenda Paro's review (above), I decided to buy the FH20 for my wife (as a birthday gift) as she finds my two cameras bewildering to use. She has only had this digicam for about a week, but has already taken a couple hundred shots under all sorts of conditions. As her interests are in 'stills' she has not yet attempted any videos (and based on its mediocre video specs, I would not have bought this for that purpose).
I must say that under normal daylight conditions, most of her photos are pretty good. While its image-quality doesn't come close to that of the Sony DSC-V1 it is far easier to use and more forgiving, largely due to its image-stabilization (that wonderful feature wasn't around 6-years ago)! Unfortunately, the FH20's image-quality falls way off when taking low (natural) light shots. In that respect, Brenda's closet shot is (unintentionally) misleading as it doesn't come close to indicating my wife's results; extremely noisy family shots in our average-lit living room (after Sun-down). Not even the noise-reduction in my photo-editor could work its magic to produce satisfactory images from those (imho it's simply a matter of too high of an (automatic) iso selection and way too many pixels on a tiny sensor)! Btw, my wife took similar shots with flash and they indeed were much better.
Since my Sony's 1.5" LCD (yes you read that right) strains my eyes on a dark/hazy day and becomes totally useless on a bright day I have always relied on its optical viewfinder, so I was very concerned about buying any digicam without an optical viewfinder. Well I guess LCD's have come a long way because the FH20's 2.7" LCD works great, even on a bright day.
To address some of the mistaken remarks by James DeRuvo, the maximum aperture of the FH20 is NOT f/2.0, it is f/3.3. However, the 'Lumix' lens (it isn't Pany's usual Leica lens) does appear capable of producing relatively sharp images for the most part. Furthermore, this digicam does have Intelligent Automatic (IA) mode, which seems to work very well by automatically using the most appropriate scene selection.
That's about all I have for now, but if I can answer any questions you may have, just post them and I'll do my best (based on our very short 'exposure' (pardon the pun) with the FH20.

