Panasonic Lumix FX01
- 4.0 out of 5
- 4.0 out of 5
| Shop for FX01 accessories. | ||
| Loading… |
Research the Panasonic Lumix FX01
Editors' Comments
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01 is one of the world's smallest cameras with a 28mm wide angle lens, and with a price tag under $250, you can't go wrong here. The FX01's wide angle lens allows for larger photographs, whether they are wide, panoramic landscapes, or large clumps of your friends. It's a fairly good looking camera, with a nice 2.5 inch LCD and clean silver finish. Casual users should take a closer look.
Specifications
- 6 megapixels
- 3.6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- auto focus
- auto exposure
- ISO 80-1600
- JPEG file format
- movie mode w/sound
- lithium ion battery
- 2.5 inch LCD
- SD/MMC card storage
Comments on the Panasonic FX01
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the Panasonic Lumix FX01
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix FX01 Reviews
- 4.17527472527473 out of 5
Panasonic Lumix FX01 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
This little camera is just great: image clarity, battery life . . . has worked flawlessly and beyond expectations.
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera. I have actually gotten some very good shots out of it. It does better than lots of more expensive cameras in the same arena. I do have a few gripes but it is a great camera for the money
- 5.0 out of 5
I have owned this camera for just over a year and find it pretty close to flawless. The power up speed and battery life are particularly impressive, and the pictures are great. Fantastic value.
- 1.0 out of 5
After only 8 months, my Panasonic Lumix FX01 camera locked up and had what they call battery drain. I took it to a camera shop and they would not even look at it because Panasonic does not sell parts to the public. You have to send the camera back to a Panasonic Center at a cost of $102 to see what is wrong with the camera. Even though the camera took great pictures, I would never purchase another Panasonic camera or recommend the camera to any of my family or friends.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera good lookin small stylish camera can not beat this camera for the money and quality
- 5.0 out of 5
Excelent camera all around!
My only concern is indoor pictures. But If you learn to play with the ISO, you will get good pictures
- 5.0 out of 5
It's great, This camara is worth for the money. All the above reviews are correct. Very compact, yet fully loaded.
- 4.0 out of 5
I had this camera for about two weeks and I brought it to a friend's house. I had stuck it in my front pocket of my jeans. When I took out my camera, the whole screen had a gash in it.
Other than that, I love the camera, it still works, so I'm not going to buy a new one until it stops working.
Overall, great camera-good quality, long battery life, good shots.... but it scratches very easily.
- 4.0 out of 5
im not pro, but consider my selves as a amatur with some skill.... i have owend a Konica Minolta Dymax D5 for a long time and fun of it, but because of the size i needet a nice pocket cam, after been reading a lot of reviews i decided thisone...
Pro:
size fit into my jacket ....nize
starting at 28 mm good for group pic mostly start at 35 mm
easy to use
baterylife good.... not exelent
ok at low light
ok level of manual settings.. iso ect
Leica lens good and sharp pictures
video mode works just fine
Cons:
screen is not protectet easy to scratch
auto focus lamp just sucks, no idear why its there, works faster and better without
no view finder
software not to any good at all...
Over all...
i like it as my no2 cam, do not reget my purchase at all, has just given me more fun and pic to share with the world...
can recomende this one...
- 4.0 out of 5
This camera shot a fantastic picture during the day time, very clear and the fresh color, but not so well when shot in the dark place(i would prefer Sony because the ISO light are really bright enough), i don't know why, may be i am not a professional photographer, cause i just put the ISO light in the AUTO mode all the time. But overall it is great and a lot of my friend were so in love of this camera when they saw that i owned one. Lovely TFT LCD screen which display a good picture. Short Movie Mode are fabulous too, cause the mic function is so good that you can record the movie sound from few meters away from the camera. And worth to mention, the camera doesn't use much power, a fully charge battery enough for 2 day heavy use. Should go for it
- 5.0 out of 5
I am a semi-professional photographer shooting with Canon DLSRs. I wanted something light and small I could carry with me all the time to sate my photolust without risking my bulkier work camera and to spare me always ahving to heft it around. My pick after some research was the Lumix FX01. Picked it on holiday sale for under $200 and LOVE it. It offers me a great deal of the control I desire as a seasoned photographer but lets me play - I carry it with me almost all the time and can pull it out inconspicously at any time to catch a fun or fleeting image. Lens is lovely. Matte black finish is very sexy and the camera is weighty for its size - feels small but substantial. Very happy with the images off of it. Having a great time with it.
- 5.0 out of 5
Experience level: Point and shooter who occasionally will try some of the fancier settings, takes lots of videos.
I had this camera for about four months, and the autofocus stopped working. I bought an extended warranty with it to, so I was no bothered at all by that happening - am getting the newer FX50 to replace it. Only reason why is the slightly bigger screen - very nice for reviewing photos and videos.
As for videos, since we bought it we have stopped using our camcorder. This takes GREAT video, very easy to see and hear. Love the pictures, was supprised when one photo that had a seals head peaking out of the water at a distance could be zoomed in so close that I could see its nostrels! Was nothing but impressed.
Pros: Everything I wanted in a camera
Con: Easy to accidentally flip the power switch on while it's in your pocket.
- 5.0 out of 5
I shot pictures for a living in the 70s and 80s with Nikon F3s, Hasselblad,RB67 & more and figured that after a lot of study and hard work I was pretty good. (had a few runs on the board so that helped) Man, if I could have had my Lumix FX-01 back then I would have cleaned up big time! (As long as could have given the magazines the output on 120 roll film) It is a constant joy to use. So easy to carry, starts up in a flash, fabulous lense. My wish list for it would be a larger sensor, 24mm equivalent wide angle and RAW files. Think I might buy it's 10meg big brother too! This little camera, and mine is sleek silver, but I lust after a Black one has totally re-ignited my joy in image making. Now if I could just figure out the technical bits......
- 5.0 out of 5
I could go on for ages but instead I'll tell you the other cameras I have used or owned; Nikon D200, Fuji S2 pro, Canon S70, Casio EX750, Canon G2, etc. None of these I kept long, I was never truly satisfied with the handling or the results. The Panasonic will be staying in my pocket for a long time to come, the results defy it's price and certainly size and it is a joy to hold and use. I ordered it without realising there was no optical finder but it really made no difference, I realised I never used it anyway. The 28mm lens makes a world of difference but you don't appreciate this until you have used it, 35mm is ok but 38mm (the norm) is pretty useless if you are in a tight space.
- 4.0 out of 5
When eating a gastronomic delight we only know how good it is by comparing it to other meals we've eaten. This analogy is most pertinent when relating to Panasonic's FX01. The camera has to be compared with what is generally available in the market place.
Firstly the build quality is truly superb. I've recently looked carefully at most of the Sony range which in terms of build quality is the FX01's nearest competitor. Fuji is way down on the build quality league.
The reason we buy any camera is to take photos, the reason we don't all rush out to buy Nikon's beautiful D200 is cost. So compromise continues, but lets be realistic, for a price tag of less than '190 there is very little on the market to compare to the FX01's features. The Leica lens produces a constant barrage of high quality images making the most if the 6 million little sensors hidden in the metal case. The shutter lag I've experienced with most compact digital camera does not seem to be present with the FX01.
When turned on the camera is up and running before you can say 'shutter lag?' ensuring that the photo you planed on taking is still there. The tiny controls on the back of the camera are one it's only shortcomings although this is due to the large LCD screen. The overall dimensions make the FX01 able to fit in the palm of your hand and the ergonomics (I hate that word) make it easy to hold and operate.
The camera boasts an x3.6 zoom, this is technically correct, but as the starting point is 28mm, x3.6 means it will get as close as most other x3.0 zoom compacts. The starting point of 28mm means that it is one of the only compact cameras that have a wide angle option.
Battery life is on a par with similar cameras, I managed to take over 380 photos on one charge (without flash).
Noise (slight blur/haze) is apparent on most of the indoor shots, the level varied slightly dependent on the lighting conditions. Even with this slight niggle the overall performance of this camera is bound to impress.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera, it was a returned model so great price also. We have a FZ-10 and while we love it. Its to big for every day use. The Lumix FX01 does almost everything it does, except the wide angle ability of the FX01 makes group photos much easier. Especially impressed with the movie mode. Much easier to use than my DVD camcorder. You will want a 1GB or maybe 2GB SD memory card. The battery lasts all day, but if you were traveling you may want an extra battery. If you combine the zoom features and are willing to lose some resolution it zooms to 10X +. Be careful with the battery/SD card door. It seems very flimsy
- 5.0 out of 5
I did my research on this camera and glad I did. My daughter has thoroughly enjoyed this camera and it takes great pictures. Very easy to use and downloading pictures to the computer was a breeze.For the price and ease, I feel like I got a winner!
- 5.0 out of 5
I have had this camera for about 3 weeks and love it!!! It is easy to use and makes up for all the mistakes that i make in settings. I no longer have blurred pictures even if i try. love it.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've been looking for a sub-compact camera with a 28 mm lens for over a year now, and this is the first model to fit the bill. I've had it for 4 days now and am thrilled. It fits in your shirt pocket, sets up quickly (about 1-2 seconds by my reckoning), and takes shots with no noticeable shutter lag. The zoom is also quick and quiet. The black model has a great retro look, and the body is metallic throughout and seems to be very durable. The 2.5" screen is very bright and can be adjusted appropriately for high- or low-light conditions, thus compensating for the lack of a viewfinder (which worried me at first). The documentation is excellent.
I was also considering a Canon S8, which is currently the only other compact or below with a 28 mm lens. But the Canon is much bulkier and considerably more expensive (currently over $400 to start)—it looks like you're buying the brand name here. I wasn't sure about Panasonic, but after 4 days I am confident that this little puppy is going to meet my needs and perform well.
You can now find FX 01 for under $300. Currently there is nothing close to this price with these features on the market. I enthusiastically recommend this model for anybody looking for portability, wide angle capability, a great look, excellent performance, and a low price. It doesn't get any better than this!
- 5.0 out of 5
I just bought this camera, and I am very impressed. The power switch keeps it from turning on in your pocket and the easy-to-use buttons make it simple and uncomplicated. The movie mode is convienient and very fun to use. The optical zoom maintains perfect clearity, and the additional digital zoom helps bring those far away objects a good bit closer. The protected screen was a much needed plus over the traditional LCD screens. The extra wide screen is really cool and makes group pictures a bit easier to capture. It has settings for fireworks, starry nights, and even pitch black. pictures taken in complete darkness still turn out like they would in a lighted atmosphere. The vibration sensor is great for those shots you make while you are moving around (or jumping around at a rock concert!) You get a bunch for the money you pay. with the new LEICA lens, panasonic produced a very good camera; light, easy to hold and user friendly, it is a good option for anyone who wants a great camera under $400.
- 4.0 out of 5
I bought this for my daughter. assume purse or pocket camera. controls are small and hard for large handes to operate. we also have not been able to down load to computer yet. contacting Panasonic about this.
Panasonic Lumix FX01 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Thanks, Cheryl
Any chance you could try out the camera your husband uses at work? Maybe bring him lunch and fiddle around with it while he eats? :)
The Canon Powershot SD630 is a great camera, but there are a few things you should keep in mind before switching from your Casio EX-Z850.
The SD630, like the Z850, is an ultra-compact camera, but unlike the Z850, it does not have an optical viewfinder. This means that all of your photos will be taken using the LCD screen as a preview. The SD630 also does not have Image Stabilization, which makes it susceptible to shaky hands.
With these things in mind, a more suitable camera to switch to might be the Canon Powershot SD700 IS. It's very similar to the SD630, but has Image Stabilization, which should help resolve some of your issues with blurry photos. I would also suggest that you take a look at Panasonic's line of ultra-compact cameras, particularly the Panasonic DMC-FX01. The FX01 also features Image Stabilization, but at a much lower price than the Canon cameras.
I will link to the cameras below. Hope this helps you out.
Canon PowerShot SD700
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Panasonic Lumix FX01
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
The Kodak V603 is a little more money, but in reading user reviews, people have been generally happier with Kodak digital cameras than the Nikon point-and-shoots. Nikon is a world leader in photography, but they seen to have missed the consumer market. Neither of these is a stellar camera, though.
For about the same money, you might want to consider either the
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon PowerShot A540</a>, or the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Panasonic DMC FX01</a>. Another option is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Canon SD600</a>. The Panasonic cameras are getting lots of good reviews; Canon also generally does a good job.
Regarding shooting documents: you should consider a camera with image stabilization and a decent zoom (4x or better), and ideally a small tabletop tripod. It's important to get sharp pictures, and because you'll almost always be using flash, it's good to be able to step a few feet away from the page and then zoom in -- this lets the flash more evenly light the paper. All of these are small and capable cameras. If you want to consider another option, look at the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Fuji S5200</a> which has a pop-up flash, which might help. It's a bit bigger, but well rated.
Hope this helps!
Hey Martha,
I believe the delay period you mention for the SP-350 is for the internal flash. An external flash, which the SP-350 can accept, would recharge much more quickly because it has its own batteries.
<p>
If you're interested in wide-angle lenses, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... target="_blank">Panasonic FX01</a> would be a great choice, and I think it'd fit what you're looking for quite well.
Thanks
Mark Lewis
Market Realty, Inc.
Message was edited by: Mark Lewis
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
I personally like the Kodak models, they're very stylish looking, but the Panasonic FX01 is pretty great too.
Price range: up to 250$
Can someone help me find something like this?
Thanks!
Hope it works for you-
DParker
Here are some 'extended zoom' cameras with high optical zooms, usually between 10x and 12x:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Since the newer cameras have a higher pixel count, the "cropped" extended zoom will still be between 3 and 5 megapixels, which is plenty for a 5X7 or even an 8X 10
Panasonic Lumix FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon PowerShot A610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Olympus SP-320 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
All are well under $250, and allow you to exert some degree of control over the camera's functions.
[url=][/url]
That said, I went with an FX-01 recently for a pocket sized "point and shoot". I really liked the look, feel and solid, metal body construction. The controls are well laid out and the optics are wonderful, paired up with a really, really sharp, rich coloured LCD screen. This screen is much nicer than the Canons if you are prone to review your snapshots right on the camera with your friends. The macro function is not as "macro" as the Canons due to the wide angle lens. And that is another thing I liked about the FX-01: for a pocket camera, to get 3.6 optical zoom and 28mm wide angle lens is a great blend of features for landscapes, group shots, etc. You do lose out on an visual viewfinder. And I like that Canons take standard batteries, which makes purchasing more power a little cheaper than with the Panasonic.
The picture quality on the FX-01 is very good. Not as much control over JPEG compression choices like you get with the Canons, but a really nice picture, though slightly slower response time and slightly more chromatic noise than you get with Canon. Both of these small shortcomings are supposedly addressed in the FX-07. The retailer from whom I bought my FX-01 didn't have the FX-07 or I would have ponied up the extra $50 or so to address these little points. (And you also pick up another megapixel for that cost.)
So, for me, to my surprise, the Panasonic/Lumix FX-01 won my favor in its blend of features for a "point and shoot" compared to equivalently priced Canons--though Canon is still "the brand", in my opinion, for the versatility and quality it features across it's wide range.
FX3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ): standard lens, 13.5mb internal storage, ISO up to 1600, auto focus/ auto & manual exposure, panoramic options.
FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ): wide angle lens, no internal storage, auto focus & exposure.
Apparently the FX03 also has a newer image processor, but I wasn't able to find any info at all to back that up, so honestly I'm not sure.
As far as # of recharges you can get out of AA rechargables, that depends on the different brands. I'd suggest check out their respective sites.
Thanks.
Elaine
I took this to america along with a d200 and you have to look hard to tell the difference on the pics, such a little difference that i sold the d200 on returning to the uk. I can't vouch for the canon, i have never seen it but the panasonic is great in every way
The proprietary battery in the F20 is a 5 V battery. It could be expected to recharge quickly, too.
Additionally, as there is no viewfinder with this model, and as such, the online screen also creates a drain as it competes with the flash for battery power. My suggestion would be to only use the fill flash when necessary if you know you're taking a lot of photographs that day. If not, then by all means, flash away. Just make sure you charge that Lithium Ion Battery before you head out to the park with the kiddies, so it's good and fresh.
As an fyi, the source of my question is that I'm having a baby and want to have video capabilities (the best possible) for a small digial camera. I don't want a camcorder as it is just too big to carry around 24x7. Therefore, I'm prepared to sacrifice video quality for convenience and opportunity. If you have any other recommendations, suggested cameras, I'd be very grateful.
I noticed that you haven't marked a reply as "Best Answer. Are you still looking for responses? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question on digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
Dimensions 94.1 x 51.1 x 24.2 mm (3.7 x 2.01 x 0.95 in)
Ciao!
Do you need a special Panasonic battery charger charger?
A warranty will not cover loss of equipment. If you have renters or property insurance, you can usually make a claim for something like this based on the terms of your policy.
Andrew
You are correct with the capabilities of the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) with the large ISO range as well as the wide angle option. Since this camera goes down to ISO80, it is terrific in high light situations as well. You just have to either keep the light metering mode on "Auto" or remember to change your settings as the lighting changes around you. To make the right choice, you may want to look at Digital Camera HQ's Digital Camera Gift Guide ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It can help you narrow down your search based on the your lifestyle and how you want the camera to fit into it.
Andrew
In bright sunlight, this camera takes some truly excellent pictures.
I am thinking of purchasing a digital camera from QVC a Panasonic DMCFX01S Luminix for $299.96 + 6.97 S&H. What is your feedback? Am I paying too much?
Thanks,
I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it has tons of great features for a very acceptable price of around $200. Plus it is one of the highest reviewed cameras on the market. Fits in your pocket and takes great colorful stills. Check out the reivews yourself on the link above. Amazing camera.
Thanks!!!
In unlimited mode, burst speed is 1.5 pictures per second for as long as you like until the memory card is full.
In low speed mode, burst speed is 2 pictures per second, for up to 6 pictures in high quality, 8 pictures in low quality.
In high speed mode, burst speed is 3 pictures per second, for up to 6 pictures in high quality, 8 pictures in low quality.
Burst mode doesn't work when the flash has to fire.
Thanks,
BJ
You might try the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is well within your budget, has 3.6 optical zoom, and has received good reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as well. Even a comment stating: "The shutter lag I've experienced with most compact digital camera does not seem to be present with the FX01." Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
There is a camera around $215 that should suit your needs just fine. The Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) rates highly and gets good comments on shutter lag and power up time. It even has a nice wide angle lens for good family shots and landscape shots. It also comes in with 6 megapixels, making the resolution good enough to print photos easily up to 8x10's. Its ability to go up to ISO 1600 also makes it good for lower light settings. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Without an external flash (which can cost up to $200 for some expensive dSLR cameras), every camera needs to recharge its flash again. You might want to look at a camera that has a higher ISO setting for lower light situations. Something around ISO 1600 would be good. You won't need a flash that way. The Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) gets good comments on its shutter lag stating that it has "no noticeable shutter lag" and "the camera is up and running before you can say shutter lag." It also has an ISO range up to 1600 as well as auto focus and exposure settings, so it can do the thinking for you. It also retails for about $215 online. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
You might try the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It gets great comments on the time it powers up before you can take a picture, as well as the shutter lag time (time between pushing the shutter button and when the camera takes the photo). Its $215 price tag is below that of the $350 Stylus 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), so it won't take as big a bite out of your budget. The 6 megapixels will be more than enough to blow photos up to a huge 20x30 poster print without loss of resolution. It has image stabilization for lower light settings and measures at 3.70 x 2.01 x 0.95 inches (WxHxD), weighing 0.29 pounds, so it should be easy to tote anywhere in a pocket or purse. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Casio 270 - 7.2 MP
Both cameras are good for photography. Outside of the megapixels, the Nikon S9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) markets as a gadgetless camera. The Casio Z70 has manual capabilities for its white balance and various exposure settings to use. There are not a lot of big differences between the two though.
Andrew
I am looking for picture's quality. Thanks
For one thing, the FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) DOES have image stabilization (something the DCHQ page for it fails to mention). All cameras in the FX line have had image stabilization as far back as the FX7 (not to be confused with the FX07), which is this camera's direct predecessor. But what does the FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) brings to the table in terms of new features? Well, not that much, but maybe enough to sway some people. For one thing, it tacks on another megapixel, albeit on the same size sensor chip. For another, it gives you greater manual control over shutter speed and other important adjustments. Finally, it is equipped with the newest version of Panasonic's Venus engine, the Venus III. This should theoretically mean shorter shutter lag, shorter lag between shots, and generally quicker operation from power up to power down, hopefully with less power usage. Frankly, though, for a point and shoot user, these differences are minor, and the $50 to $100 difference in price tag might be enough to sway them toward the older model.
As to the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), it's a fine camera and it outclasses both Panasonics in most departments, but it's also a little pricier. I personally lean toward Canon in most areas of photography, and I think it's the winner here too, but really all three are great machines and you'd be served well by any of them. Good luck in your decision.
This is a gift for my wife's birthday, mid-December. I'll post our satisfaction after a few weeks of useage. The FX07 has a "baby mode" which stamps photo with the age of the baby, once you enter the starting age. This may be a useful feature since our first grandchild is due late December, 2006.
I don't know which one is better thought, the Panasonic got image stabilization and optics starts of at 28mm, but the Fuji takes better and more crisp photos due to a better CCD, it have awesome batterylife, better flash and better LCD.
I think the Fuji has better low light performance than the Panasonic. It also nice clear sharp photos, a big LCD, easy-to-use menus and a comfortable grip. It has limited manual controls, but if you're just using Auto anyhow you should be totally fine with that. The one major drawback I've found on it is that the LCD can be hard to see in bright light... but that's a problem with practically every camera on the market, so it's not like it's a huge issue with this one.
The FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great little camera, but it can be somewhat grainy in low light conditions- this is just plain a problem with Panasonics, so if you shoot indoors without flash you may sometimes be disappointed. Also, the body is pretty small and flat, and it's sort of easy to push multiple buttons if you try to shoot using just one hand. It's more awkward to hold than the Fuji.
Ardi is right on the image stabilization of the Panasonic; the Panasonic may also do a little better outdoors in bright light. But I think the F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will suit your needs better. Just another opinion to ponder. =)
I would choose the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I think. Panasonic has done an outstanding job in this camera. Like the Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it's nice and small, but it has a slightly wider telephoto range, and uses SD cards, not memory stick; SD is the clear standard these days. The Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera, too from a good pedigree, and would be the choice if you like AA batteries -- they are bigger, but widely available.
The Canon Ixus 65 goes to an ISO setting of 800 while the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a range up to ISO 1600, which is twice as sensitive to light as a ISO 800. For low lights alone, I would recommend the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
The Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) isn't a bad choice, but you have to know what the camera is going to be taking pictures of as well. This camera will travel well due to its size, perform decently in low light situations when set at ISO1600, and be good for group shots or landscape shots with its wide angle lens capability. It is great for a casual camera user.
If the user is more serious about their photography, you might want to look at your budget, then look at an extended zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or even a dSLR ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera. Good luck.
Andrew
Making the assumption that you just want a simple point and shoot, might I recommend the Canon Powershot A520 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? Cheap and ridiculously easy to use. Of course, if you want to print photos rather than just post them online, and particularly if you want to print larger than 4x6 or so, then you may want to upgrade the megapixels.
If you need further info let us know what you'll be taking photos of, as Andrew said, and a few more details, and we'll try to point you in the right direction.
HAVING TROUBLE TO DECIDE WHICH ONE SHOULD I GO FOR ? Canon SD600/SD630 or panasonic DMC-FX01/FX07 OR OLYMPUS MJU810/MJU700 OR FUJI F30 PLS HELP.
Outside of Canon, the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) deserves a look.
If you are a first-time Google checkout user, they knock $10 off your order.
Mitch
I believe that might be a coding error. As for the overall quality of the camera, it gets mixed reviews. Its low ISO range make it not a good fit for low light situations, and the lack of a viewfinder can make it difficult to see your subjects in bright light. If you're looking to stay in the same price range and like the Panasonic cameras, I would recommend something like the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a much higher ISO range (100-1600) making it better in low light situations. It also gets better, more consistent reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
There are several models in your range that are worth recommending, though each has its own standout features. You can get a full listing of cameras in this price range here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (I've sorted them by user rating, so the most popular/best rated cameras are at the top of the list).
Of those on that list, I'd have to recommend Panasonic's FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) above the others. It's got a great 28mm wide angle lens (which will allow you to capture landscape/group portrait shots much better than the standard 35 or 38mm wide lenses) that also has a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom (which will help you take zoomed in shots without blur). Users generally love it, with the caveat that in lower light settings it has some issues with excessive image noise.
Hope this helps a bit!
I was looking at the Panasonic FX3 before and I reviewed the FX01. That looks like a good camera and deal. I only concern I have is in some reviews (steves-digicam.com and a few users) is they talk about the noise or poor picture quality of pictures indoors especially in low light. Do you know anything about this and if so is there another camera that is comparable?
Thanks again,
Michael
You might also consider the Sony W50, which DCHQ lacks a page for. You can read an in-depth review of it here ( dcresource.com/reviews/sony... ). It's a 6MP, 3x zoom camera that lacks both the Panansonic's wide angle lens and its image stabilization, but it produces much less noisy images. I suppose you have to decide what's the best trade-off for you. If you're going to be shooting mostly in good light/outdoor settings, I'd recommend the Panasonic no question. If you're going to be indoors/shooting at night a lot... you might have some pondering to do.
Good luck!
These are both very nice cameras. The FX01 is rated slightly better by users, but only slightly. The FX01 has a 28mm wide angle lens and a couple of additional megapixels on its side, while the TZ1 has an incredible 10x zoom lens. Both offer Panasonic's default "Mega O.I.S." image stabilization system. Personally, I'd lean toward the FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as it seems to be a more versatile camera all around. The 4x zoom isn't great, but it's sufficient for most needs, and the wide angle lens is a great addition, particularly for the kind of landscape shots you'll probably be taking on vacation.
Hope this helps!
It is quite compact and easy to carry around, in comparison to a bulky DSLR.
Other benefits are the cost which for a camera with these features is a great deal.
First camera users shouldn't be overloaded with features, and fancy bells and whistles. This camera has a P mode (program mode) which essentially allows you to literally point and shoot images. This is good to use until they become more familiar and can then begin learning about the various camera features.
As far as purchase locations, I personally purchase all gear from name brand outlets (this includes Best Buy, Circuit City, B&H Photo, Adorama, and COMPUSA). As these are electronic devices, I am more comfortable purchasing from somwhere with a little backing for warranty.
If you really did want to shoot long clips, then you might be better off with a dedicated camcorder. Said camcorder might double as a still camera, or you might simply carry a separate digital camera.
You can do this with pretty much any digital camera. All you need to do is take the picture, transfer it from the camera to the computer via the included USB cable, and resize it to an appropriate size for the internet (usually about 640 x 480 pixels). Most cameras come with proprietary software, but I'd recommend using a less bloated freeware program like Google's Picasa ( picasa.google.com/ ) or irfanview ( irfanview.com/ ). You can then upload the photos to a free photo hosting solution like imageshack ( imageshack.us/ ) or photobucket ( photobucket.com/ ).
Now, as to which camera you should get... what sort of merchandise are you shooting? Do you need to do close ups, or are you generally selling larger items? What's your price range for the camera?
What is a USB cable and how does it hook to the computer. Are Picasa, irganvanview, imageshake or photobucket complicated. I'm really new at this as you can tell.
All of the sites and programs I listed above are fairly easy to navigate. You shouldn't have much trouble.
As far as cameras under $200, there's really only one I can recommend--the Panasonic LZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's got a nice 6 megapixel sensor, a 6x optical zoom, and it can focus on objects as close as 5cm from the lens. It's pretty user-friendly, and you shouldn't have much trouble figuring out how to work it. To be honest, though, the sub-$200 range is kind of the shallow end of the digital pool. If you can spend another $30 or so, you'll get slightly better cameras like the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and FX3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which have similar specs but better build quality, better LCDs, etc.
Hope this helps!
sandisk.com
The answer to your question is Yes, the cards are compatible to FX01.
The conclusion is drawn from
a. Panasonic FX01 recommendation : In motion image mode, when you set the picture quality to [30 fps VGA], we recommend using a high speed SD Memory Card with "10 MB/s" or greater displayed on the package
see : panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global...
b. If you check with Sandisk, all the
SanDisk Ultra II and SDHC Cards
writes in a " Minimum of 10MB/second** sequential read speed for ultra-fast image viewing and data transfer "
see : sandisk.com/Products/Catalo...
I want a digicam that can provide me sharp and clear pictures.
Shoot, I blew up a 4MP photo to 11x14, and it sold in an art show; no pixels visible.
Canon is the most popular brand.... but that doesn't mean "best".
There are two nice cameras from Nikon: the L1 and L5... both being affordable, 5x optical zoom, 6 and 7 mp, and really nice pictures (my best friend has the L5, which takes really great pics).
If not... you may love the Panasonic LZ serie... affordable, nice cameras.
I'd recomend Panasonic, but they are bigger cameras (not pocket size)... but Nikon are... and they are really nice.
It just depend on what you need, and would like.
Hope to be helpful,
Alan.
Note: I've only said x5 optical zoom cameras, because with the common 3x at least in my case, is not enough.
I've seen no problems with the Canon's, but if you want something different, you might try the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is highlighted by our editors as the "Best Camera Under $250." The 1600 ISO setting should reduce the darkness of the shots, but might increase the graininess. You can get free photo-editing software online that has "noise reduction" functions that will get rid of that though. I hope this helps.
Andrew
I donot want to get involved in changing settings when taking pictures. So, I am looking for a digicam that can provide me with this facility (clear and crisp pics) under $250. Some good digicams have viewfinder and some have don't . I want viewfinder as it helps in saving battery. Hope I have made my requirement more clear.
On the other hand, if you want an AUTOMATIC camera with limited manual control, then the Canon Elphs would work too.
The truth of the matter is, ANY BRAND-NAME DIGITAL CAMERA WITH AT LEAST 4MP IS GOING TO PROVIDE CLEAR AND CRISP PICTURES.* This is NOT 1999!!!
* And many of these are WAY under your $250 price point.
So, my worry is that after spending $200, I should atleast be able to see 95% of what I am in my snaps. Given the reviews on web for different digicams and like u said any 4MP camera will give sharp pics, I am looking for atleast perfect digicam.
Thanks again for your response.
You can get a thorough report and numerous tests and photos from the A540 at imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
That site does mention that the A540 photos might be a little contrasty, but that is different than constantly dark photos.
Be that as it may, I suggest you look around the above site, as it has in-depth reports and tests of many cameras.
I'm taking it on vacation, and the instructions say to remove the battery between uses. Is it safe to leave it in for several weeks? I can't be taking it out and putting it back constantly.
Also, is a plug adapter sufficient in Europe, or do I need a current converter?
The instruction you read is meant more for ordinary batteries that leaks, as a result the ' juices ' that come out of the battery will corrode the metallic parts of the camera and spoil it.
b. The power supply in Europe will have a different voltage and you need a current converter, unless your plug adapter has a built in voltage converter.
Check the label on the battery charger. If it mentions both 120 and 240V, it works in both, and you don't need a converter, only need a plug adapter. This camera's battery charger works in both, so you don't need a converter.
What is a good +6MP ultracompact?
First of all, I'd recommend staying far, far away from SVP's products. If you'd never heard of them before you started looking at cameras, that's because their cameras are cheap knockoffs that no major sites/retailers carry and no major review sites would consider reviewing. You'd be much better off saving your money and buying something from a known brand name.
...which is not to say that every model from the big names is a winner.
The NV3 is a very nice camera. It has superior build quality (feels "like it was carved from a block of metal," as one review put it), takes very good shots, and has lots of extra features like mp3 and video capability, and can view text files as well. It has a huge, sharp LCD screen and a handy anti-shake feature (which does slow down shot-to-shot time quite a bit, unfortunately).
Other 6MP+ ultracompacts you might want to consider:
Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Hope this helps!
Both cameras have 6MP resolution, so your photos should have the same quality. Personally, I would go with the Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it has more optical zoom and higher ISO capabilities (better in low light situations). I hope this helps.
Andrew
Both Canon and Panasonic make good cameras. When choosing between these two, you really have to ask what you want to do with the camera. I will outline the major differences below (The Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will be listed first).
Optical Zoom: 3.6x VS 4x
- This will let you zoom in more for better close-ups. Digital zoom will lower the quality of the photos, so I generally don't use it.
Manual Exposure Settings: No VS Yes
- Having the option to set your exposure manually is great as your photography skills advance. You can play with the exposure for different light settings, yielding better pictures at times.
ISO Range: 80-1600 VS 80-800
- A higher ISO setting will let you take sharper photos in lower light settings. Note that the higher ISO setting will also cause "graininess" in photos. This graininess or noise can be reduced with photo editing software.
Based on the differences, I would personally go with the Canon SD700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The more powerful zoom and manual exposure settings are features that I prefer to have. I have also had great luck with the 3 Canon cameras I already own. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Good Luck!
I am wondering about the specifics of the camera's movie mode.
1. What quality are the clips recorded at?
2. What quality is the sound recorded at?
3. Is there a maximum time limit of 15 seconds or something silly?
4. What type of file do the clips come out in (can I easily post my videos to youtube to share them with family while I'm away)?
5. How much storage space would say, 5 minutes of video take on this camera?
I'm not looking for this to replace a camcorder, but I would like some video functionality.
I'm going to send you here:
dpreview.com/reviews/panaso...
That link is a very detailed review of this camera's movie mode, along with some sample movies you can watch to get an idea of the quality. It also lists the specifications in terms of quality, etc. It looks like there is no limit on duration (except mem card capacity). Since I haven't used this camera, I think that link will help you out much more than I can!
The FX10 (I am assuming that's what you meant, even though this question is under the FX01; let me know if you meant FX01) seems to be very speedy according to tests. Shutter lag is fractions of a second (about .005 seconds under best conditions, which means no flash, etc.) Start-up time has been clocked at 1.8 seconds. While those numbers may not be exact, those are the ones being thrown around by the manufacturers and that most reviewers have used in their descriptions of the FX10, and according to everything I've read about it, this is definitely one of the speedier cameras, so those numbers are probably pretty accurate.
Jim
How can I convert the format to something that Microsoft Movie Maker can read?
you need a mov to wmv converter
try
riverpast.com/
I haven't personally used the FX01, but there's a brief discussion of the same topic here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) on DCHQ, and it links to a detailed review of the camera's movie mode. From what I gather, it's quite good. :]
Good luck!
Hope that makes sense...
If you know of another camera that might better serve my needs, I'd certainly appreciate the name and I'll research it, too.
THANKS!
A good option, if you can still find it, is the Panasonic GS500 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/camcor... ). 3CCD camera with both firewire and USB 2.0 for transfer, image stabilization, and recording on miniDV. The image resolution is 3x1.5 MP, and the still camera would be the same. And you can zoom in the process and capture straight to an SD card.
Word on the street though, is that the GS500 has been discontinued to make ready for a new model. You can still find it available as vendors sell out their existing stock to make ready. And support will still be available for it.
It's followup is the GS320, it's area is 3x800K. Still pretty good, but the still resolution is only 2MP. But an option if video is the priority over still shots.
My thinking though is that with what may be a once in a lifetime trip, why not just bite the bullet and get both a still camera and a video camera.
If not, I still like the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I'm testing it and have so far been quite pleased with the results. 7.1 MP, 18x zoom, image stabilization and some great scene based program features including a 15fps burst mode, editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alterations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
It's video resolution is AVI Movie with Sound: 640x480/30fps and it only limited by the size of your xD card.
The downside, like the FX01, you can't zoom while shooting in video. What is seriously up with that limitation?
I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly, but other than that, it's a top notch camera.
But just to be sure, I'd reset your camera back to it's factory default settings and download and install any available firmware updates. If that doesn't solve it you may need to contact Panasonic for a repair estimate.
But understand that without warranty coverage the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
But let's hope it doesn't come to that.