Hey! You should know that Panasonic has released a newer version of this product: the Panasonic Lumix F3.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX07
Editors' Comments
The Panasonic FX-07 has since been replaced and we recommend looking at the Panasonic F3. Here's what we had to say about the FX07 when it was released in August 2006:
The Panasonic FX07 is the less expensive version of their FX50, but still offers a superb photographic experience. Though the 7.2 megapixel sensor is a steal at around $350, this stylish, feature-laden camera is anything but cheap. The FX07 is available in silver, black, red, and blue, allowing proper coordination with outfits and ensembles. Beyond superficialities, the camera's 2.5-inch LCD and 3.6x optical zoom make it a fantastic option for mainstream users who are in the market for a sleek, easy-to-use ultracompact camera.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 3.6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- autofocus, auto and manual exposure
- ISO 100-3200
- JPEG file format
- Mega O.I.S. image stabilization
- movie mode with sound
- Secure Digital storage
- 2.5-inch LCD
- lithium-ion battery.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX07 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Canon a630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic Lumix fx07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
These are all great cameras that are capable of doing what you ask. Check them out and see which ones have the features you would use for other things and which is the best value for you.
Any opinions on whether the FX07 is better than the FX01?
Why do you need to override the camera's auto ISO/ASA settings?
The large ISO range as well as the 7.2 Megapixel resolution should be adequate for photographing paintings. I have blown up photos from a 3.2 megapixel camera to 20x30 without a loss in resolution, so you should be fine.
Andrew
The major differences to the three cameras are listed below. I've listed them in the same order that you have above.
Megapixels: 7.2 vs 7.2 vs 7.2
Optical Zoom: 3.6 vs 3.6 vs 3.0
ISO: 100-3200 vs 100-3200 vs 80-1000
Image Stabilization?: Yes vs Yes vs No
All have movie mode
LCD size: 2.5" vs 3.0" vs 2.5"
Best Price through Digital HQ: $248 vs $330 vs $305
Given the very similar options and prices, I would choose the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the wide ISO range and the IS capability (as well as the lowest price).
Andrew
Please help me as there are so many varied reviews it is hard to make a so called 'informed' choice. Open to all suggestions.
Many thanks Riaz
I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
You might try the Canon SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Fuji F20 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), or the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have an ISO setting of 1600 for lower light settings. They are all 6.3 megapixels and up and have over 3x optical zoom.
Andrew
Additionally, Canon's lens glass is superior. However the FX07 does get high marks, so I don't think you'd be disappointed with it.
an Image Stabilizer (on both), small camera that fits easily in her purse (both fit this criteria),
easy to use controls (the FX07 has the edge here), good for group photo's (the wide angle on the FX07 and the Lica lens has the edge), price is not all that important but the FX07 again has the edge. I believe I can purchase the F07 with 5 yr warranty from Best Buy, including 1 GB card, case, etc. for about the same price I'd pay for the SD800 without some of these items. However, price is not my main factor. I'll buy one of these camera's in the next two weeks.
I purchased a Lumix FX07 this morning and will be able to give you more feedback after I use it over Thanksgiving. I will be at my uncle's house is who is an electronics distributor and who knows a lot about digital cameras. I will post my feedback after Thanksgiving.
Andrew
The delay you're referring to is shutter lag, and it's tricky because it's not something typically advertised on cameras- you just have to listen to users and read reviews to find out which cameras perform better than others. There are certainly some out now that are pretty fast. The new Kodak Easyshares have all done well in timed tests, and the Panasonic Lumix FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a shutter lag of milliseconds, which is great, especially for the price. Of course, the camera you choose depends on what other features you're looking for.
Try this tip to reduce shutter lag no matter what camera you're using: Before you're ready to take the shot, push the shutter button down halfway, and keep your finger on it. The camera will frame and get ready to shoot, which is what takes up all the time and causes the delay. Then when you're ready for the actual photo, push the button down the rest of the way and it will fire almost instantly. This can be a drag (keeping your finger on the button) but it really, really helps capture fast shots even with a slow camera.
For one thing, the FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) DOES have image stabilization (something the DCHQ page for it fails to mention). All cameras in the FX line have had image stabilization as far back as the FX7 (not to be confused with the FX07), which is this camera's direct predecessor. But what does the FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) brings to the table in terms of new features? Well, not that much, but maybe enough to sway some people. For one thing, it tacks on another megapixel, albeit on the same size sensor chip. For another, it gives you greater manual control over shutter speed and other important adjustments. Finally, it is equipped with the newest version of Panasonic's Venus engine, the Venus III. This should theoretically mean shorter shutter lag, shorter lag between shots, and generally quicker operation from power up to power down, hopefully with less power usage. Frankly, though, for a point and shoot user, these differences are minor, and the $50 to $100 difference in price tag might be enough to sway them toward the older model.
As to the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), it's a fine camera and it outclasses both Panasonics in most departments, but it's also a little pricier. I personally lean toward Canon in most areas of photography, and I think it's the winner here too, but really all three are great machines and you'd be served well by any of them. Good luck in your decision.
This is a gift for my wife's birthday, mid-December. I'll post our satisfaction after a few weeks of useage. The FX07 has a "baby mode" which stamps photo with the age of the baby, once you enter the starting age. This may be a useful feature since our first grandchild is due late December, 2006.
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice. If you like that, you might want to look at the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Canon SD40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have very similar capabilities and are priced the same or lower than the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would recommend going in to a retailer and holding the cameras to see what you're comfortable with in your hand before purchasing. This will ensure a good fit for you.
Andrew
The FX07 doesn't have an option to automatically put a date stamp on photos, but you can print them with a date stamp if you're printing to a DPOF printer. So the date stamp wouldn't show up if you're viewing the pics on the camera or on your computer, but they would in print form. Hope this helps!
Long story short: the camera won't do it but you can make it happen. =)
Thanks for your help. Mike
In order to really capture movement you would need something fancy like a DSLR- those are the best cameras for adjusting shutter speed so that the camera can catch moving objects without creating blur. But you said you want something compact, so that's probably not the direction you want to go in.
The Panasonic Lumix FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good place to start. This camera has image stabilization as well as what's called Intelligent ISO control, which is a feature that detects subject movement and automatically adjusts the ISO and shutter speed to best fit the movement and the light conditions, resulting in fewer blurred photos. It's also nice and compact and easy to use, plus has a big LCD and 7.2 megapixels.
Canon's SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) fits all of your considerations except the AA batteries (it uses Lithium Ion batteries). Frankly, it's pretty much impossible to find a slimline camera that uses AAs, simply because they take up so much space in comparison to other battery types.
Some other cameras that fit your needs are the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The Canon and Panasonic models are all 28mm wide angle, while the Kodak is 23mm (wider angle). Each camera has at least a 3.8x zoom. They're all in roughly the same price ballpark, at $275-$325.
Hope this helps!
Ben has made an excellent recommendation in the Canon SD800 IS. 7mp 3.8x len 28-105 and Image Stablization. Dimensions are 3.5 x 2.3 x 1
However, I believe the battary issue is critical. I have been in similar situation as your son and the availability of batteries will be critical. Therefore, I am recommending the Canon A710 IS. 7mp 6x (35-210) and image stablization. dimension are 3.8 x 2.6 x 1.6.
Yes, its a little larger but you have a bigger zoom which can be a big plus.
Godspeed.
The A710 IS takes AAs. You can get him both AA alkalines (the normal disposables) or AA NiMH batteries with a charger. It might be a good idea to get both, just in case. The NiMH rechargeables will last much, much longer than the alkalines, but as you say the chances to recharge them are scarce. Getting both means he can take advantage of the NiMHs when he has access to electricity, and he'll have the disposables for backup.
It would be nice to take a closeup without being close (Zoom).
Price is not important.
Thin is king!
I'd recommend the Panasonic Lumix FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )/FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). (These two are essentially the same camera, except that the FX50 has a larger LCD, so if that doesn't make a big difference to you, go for the FX07 and save a bundle.) It's a 7 megapixel, 3.5x optical zoom ultracompact with very good optical image stabilization and a nice size (3.7 x 2 x 0.9 in). Users rate it pretty well in terms of speed, especially for an ultracompact (ultracompacts often sacrifice speed in their effort to cram everything into such a small shell). Finally, it has a nice 28mm wide-angle lens, which is a feature not offered by many other ultracompacts.
You mentioned that you would like to take several features in a row without falling asleep. One other camera you might want to consider is the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which also features a nice optically-stabilized wide-angle lens, 7 megapixels, and a 3.8x zoom. What sets the SD800 IS apart from its competition is its burst mode shooting (continuous drive), which will let you shoot at 1.7 frames per second continuously until you run out of space on your memory card. The SD800 IS isn't rated quite as well by users as the FX07 is, but it might be worth a look anyway.
Good luck!
Having just bought a new camera, my short list was Sony T10, & your choices for the same reasons - I've got 3 kids under 3!!.
The only noticable dif between the FX07 & 50 is the size due the the 50 having a 3" LCD.
Sony T10 looks great, it really does, starts up v fast, is the smallest by far & the lens is housed within the camera.....but had poor reviews for indoor pictures - mainly red eye probs - so unfortunately it was out for me. I know you can correct red eye but I don't have time - I needed a camera that takes good pictures full stop - with no farting about.
There was little in it between the Canon & panasonics - but the genuine wide angle lens on the FX07 / 50 was a real incentive. Reviews I read also suggested that the Canon had red eye probs too.
In the end I went for the FX07 - it's the next smallest after the Sony (the canon is the biggest) & I prefered the aesthetics - Canon's are so boring! (personal opinion!)
I,ve only had it 3 days & haven't had a chance to play with it much but so far I'm very happy - the menu's very user friendly, is very solidly built and looks great (it is a gadget after all!). I've only taken about 30 pictures so far - all indoors, with flash & of family - only ONE image has any noticable red eye - v impressive!
I had a Minolta XG before & the pictures already look much better - more natural. Can't wait to try it in daylight. Didn't realise it before but wide angle is great - no back against the wall or cutting Aunt Prue out of the picture at Christmas (not Thanksgiving, I'm in the UK!)
Oh, it's a lot cheaper that the Canon too.
Have fun!
Slim , fast , better pic quality and even a wide angle lens. it is rated at 1.7 fps.
Even faster is the older sd 700 IS which shoots at 2.1 fps.
Its simple go with the above cameras (sd 800) and you'll make a great choice.
Lissen to Mike. :)
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
Thanks heaps
Val
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
StevoOo...
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
Val
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
Thanks
grace
Thanks! Tracey
I would recommend the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) for movie capture. It captures frames at a variety of speeds, up to 60fps, and various resolutions.
Andrew
With that said, though, the FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is not the worst offender, not by a long shot. Among the Panasonics, I think the problem really creeps in in the higher-megapixel cameras- 5mp or above- and while this one is above five, it's not THAT far above five.
If you're really drawn to the Panasonic, then I wouldn't worry terribly much about the image noise. I did find some sample photos (<a href="cameras.co.uk/html/sample-i... unfortunately they don't say what ISO they were taken at, but a few of those could be considered low light, so you can judge the image noise for yourself.
One more thing though. If you haven't already, I would seriously take a glance at the Fuji Finepix F30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is calibrated for low light shots and has the best performance I've seen in low light situations out of anything short of a DSLR.
and the Fuji Finepix F30. I wanted the camera to perform well in fairly low-light conditions. I also didn't want the shutter lag to be too bad. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
These are all great cameras, but for what you want to do, I would go with the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The high ISO range (100-3200), larger 7.2 MP resolution, and the image stabilization make it a great camera. As for the shutter lag, you'll find that in most lower light situations, but can combat it by holding the shutter button half way down to lock the camera's settings. In low light, you can also set the camera at ISO 3200 for a faster shutter speed, and the IS will help too. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
As for the IS differences, I'm not completely sure. When deciding between these two, I would still go with the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and I currently own 3 Canon's.
Andrew
Reasons -
1. Price is less than Canon for the same set or features.
2. Images are crisper.
3. Better features - IS, battery life.
4. This Canon doesn't support SDHC cards. Not sure at this point.
5. What else? My Pana is made in Japan. Great built quality and performance.
6. Plenty of settings to achieve good picture quality in all lightning conditions.
Now, if low-light is your main type of shooting, the Fuji 31FD is probably your best bet. But between the Panasonic and Canon, I'd choose the Canon.
I personally prefer the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because, frankly, I haven't found a brand that produces pictures as smooth, well-exposed, and sharp as Canon. However, these are both fine, fine cameras and I doubt you'd be going wrong with either of them. You've clearly already researched them and know they're very similar cameras, but you can get a side by side comparison of their specs here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
The truth is, both of these cameras have some issues with image quality. The Canon has problems with corner softness at full 28mm wide angle, while the Panasonic (like all non-SLR Panasonics) has very high image noise levels, particularly in low light conditions. You can see side-by-side images taken with both cameras here ( picasaweb.google.com/chiend... ). The photographer has carefully staged and cropped photos taken with both so that you can directly compare their results in different lighting conditions.
Hope this helps!
This camera doesn't have an option that will print the date and time on the photos automatically. Many cameras actually don't offer this option- but what does happen is, the camera saves the date and time data along with the photo. Then there are certain photo softwares you can use on your computer that go into the photo file and pull out this info, and you can choose to print it on the photos that way.
So what I'm saying is, although the camera doesn't offer this option, you shouldn't base your buying decision on that, since you can still get the date and time to print on the photos by using software when you download the photos to your computer. I hope that makes sense- I'm tired. =) Let me know if you need further details.
I have an SD1000 and I have the same problem. My camera can print date if I select wide or post card. Use post card size or option reduce definition. NOT GOOD !
Some time, not always, get the time/date displaying on picture could be funny.
In this way, can you give us names of software comes with this famous option '' print date/time on the pictures'' ?
thanks.
The smallest cameras you'll find with a huge zoom are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The problem here is that the smaller you make the cameras, the harder it is to make their big zooms function well. The smallest of these, the V610, is also the worst-rated, and that's no coincidence. Smaller cameras have slower zooms, a harder time focusing when zoomed in, and tend to have much more shutter lag. All three of these cameras get bad marks from pro reviewers like dpreview.com for their shutter lag and slow/poor-focusing zooms. This is exactly the kind of problem you don't want when you're trying to shoot animals in motion on safari.
I think that you'd be much better served by choosing a slightly larger camera with better performance. If you'd like further assistance selecting a larger, better camera, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Good luck!
The cameras I listed above all feature 10x optical zooms. Strangely, the cameras of the next level up in size tend to be 6x zooms. Of these, there are several very good options available. The best of these is the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 6x optical zoom with a very good image stabilization system (compensates for shakiness in your hands) and a nice 2.5" LCD. It's got a very good 7.1MP sensor, too, so you'll have plenty of room for cropping if need be. Most importantly, it's a very quick performer. It's quick to focus and quick to shoot. The A710 IS is probably the best compromise between size and power.
Larger compact digitals like the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offer 12x stabilized zooms and very quick operation, but they cost quite a bit more and are much heavier and larger.
Hope this helps a bit.
It has 7 .1 megapixel sensor, 6x zoom giving an impressive range of 35-210mm zoom ), 2.5 " LCD and a real- image optical view finder.
Most important of all is the image stabilizer that helps you to avoid blur pictures and of course the reliable Canon lens.
If you add a set of 4 Ni MH rechargeable batteries, you will have a lot of photography hours without the same problem of AA batteries.
It kind of depends on how hard you are on your cameras... some are more durable than others, but all of them can be broken if you're rough with them. If durability is your main concern, some of the Olympus models have waterproof/ ding-resistant cases, which might suit you well; but all cameras are kind of delicate when it comes to the lens mechanism and the LCD. That doesn't mean they'll break if you look at them funny, though... just that you should be kind of gentle.
Answering questions on here, I do tend to hear about it when cameras have repeating problems- for example, the Canon Elphs tend to have really delicate LCDs, at least judging from what users say. In terms of this particular camera, I can't recall any specific complaints about it breaking or being too delicate, if that helps at all.
Let me know if you need further guidance. =)
Stay away from Casios... they can't hold up to any abuse whatsoever.
3fps or 2fps, max 8 images (standard) max 6 images (fine)
The camera can take 3 shots per second (in standard mode) for a total of 8 images. It would then not take anymore until it could write those out (or at least free up space for new images)
If you are in fine mode (higher resolution), the maximum buffer will hold 6 images.
Not sure how many shots you need, but hope that helps in your decision.
Where did you hear this rumor? I can't find any official word on it from Panasonic or from any photography sites/blogs, which leads me to question its truthfulness. Got a link?
Regards,
Ben
I want to take pictures that are decent since this will be my first digi camera...
I am planning to buy a digital camera for the college experience, is this the ONE?
Ignoring the technical sides of photoshooting such as ISO level and all that, how is the picture quality?
For an ultra-compact camera, is this FX07 good enough to take picutres with?
Thanks for answering if you did =)
Aside from noise level, it's a very nice camera with a great lense. Image quality is great, it does really well outdoors. I've had one since it came out. The battery life in it is a little poor too, but most cameras in this size are not that great on battery and it's cheap to get spares for this one.
dpreview.com/reviews/read_o...
You can also read some more reviews and see other people's pictures here:
amazon.com/gp/product/custo...
Overall, I think it's easy to say this is not the camera to get. At only 3.6X zoom, there are a lot of cameras that do better. You can get the Canon SD800IS for about $300 (slightly more than this Lumix model), or the Canon SD750 for about $250 (slightly less than this model, although the SD750 doesn't have IS).
If you want low light ability, look into the Fuji FinePix F31D, which should easily run you <$300.
The FX07 does allow you to disable the flast and then use Slow Shutter Mode to select 1/8, 1/4, 1/2 or 1 second shutter speed. Assuming you hold very still while shooting and assuming the thing you're shooting doesn't move, this should work. The image stabilization will help a bit, but over a longer exposure time, there's only so much it can do.
The FX07, as best as I can tell, doesn't have a full manual control mode, so doing more advanced shooting might be difficult.
Hope this helps!
there you may see if your shutter is faulty, mine was, I took the camera appart (this took a whole afternoon and lots of patience and care) I activated the shutter manually so to dislodge it and then put the camera back together again.
I know it's not the same camera model but it's mostly the same (I have a Casio Exilim Z70)
I don't know if hitting it slightly might do the same job just faster... but it might damage other components.
Taking it apart takes much patience and care, so if possible best take it to a clocksmith or place it somewhere you can take a long while to take apart each piece and keep tabs on where each little screw goes. I found my camera to be a bit of a puzzle for each piece I took apart.
You can also try exposure compensation settings as well.
Andrew
But understand that without warranty coverage the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
You can easily make things worse by forcing the lens back in. Turning it on and off repeatdly won't hurt anything. Also removing and replacing batteries repeatedly to try and get the motor going again.
Please help!