Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Ultra Compact Digital Cameras category.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50
Editor's Review
The Panasonic DMC-FX50, and its twin, the DMC-FX07, have a lot in common. It would seem that the major difference between the two cameras is the LCD screen, which is 3.0 inches on this model, and 2.5 inches on the FX07. If that's worth an extra $50 or so, then this is the camera for you. The FX50 is still a very affordable ultracompact with a huge 7.2 megapixel sensor and 3.6x digital zoom. Such specs would have been unthinkable at this price just a year ago. The FX50 comes in four colors: red, silver, black, and blue, adding a sense of style and personality to an already appealing camera.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 3.6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- autofocus, auto and manual exposure
- ISO 100-3200
- JPEG file format
- Mega O.I.S. image stabilization
- movie mode with sound
- Secure Digital storage (16MB included)
- 3.0-inch LCD
- lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: DMCFX50K
- UPC: 037988985906
- Release Date: Aug 04, 2006
Shop for FX50 Accessories
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
How to get avi files out of the FX50, vs SD800 (Adrian — 04/18/2007)
Posts say the FX50 makes superior videos, which is important in my choice. My video editing software does not recognize mov files, just avi files. Is this a dealbreaker to considering the FX50 over the Canon SD800?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/19/2007)
Files are stored on SD cards. So it's a simple matter of using a card reader (or hooking your camera up, which is more tedious IMHO), and dragging and dropping.
What editor are you using? If you're simply relying on Windows Movie Maker, perhaps you need to graduate to a better piece of software that's also more flexible in formats - like Adobe Premiere Elements (about $100).
Given the choice though, I'd go with the SD800, but I think it relies on QT files as well.
reply to this comment
What editor are you using? If you're simply relying on Windows Movie Maker, perhaps you need to graduate to a better piece of software that's also more flexible in formats - like Adobe Premiere Elements (about $100).
Given the choice though, I'd go with the SD800, but I think it relies on QT files as well.
Adrian (05/02/2007)
Thanks for the reply - I got my SD800 today and it really is so much better than my old SD200.
I know how to transfer files, and how to edit them. My question was - can you transfer from the Panasonic in some way as avi files or convert the Panasonic mov files in some way to avi files, which is a much more widely recognized format. I had an older Panasonic Lumix and was very happy with it.
reply to this comment
I know how to transfer files, and how to edit them. My question was - can you transfer from the Panasonic in some way as avi files or convert the Panasonic mov files in some way to avi files, which is a much more widely recognized format. I had an older Panasonic Lumix and was very happy with it.
by James DeRuvo (05/03/2007)
Sure. There are dozens, if not hundreds of conversion apps out there. The best of which is Quicktime Pro itself. For $29 it's about the best bargain going software wise for this purpose. Though it may be easier to simply import the QT file into your editor.
reply to this comment
my cannon a75 bit the dust,lasted 24mths, looking at replacing with fx50,but unsure if this will preform as well as a cannon (dognet — 04/15/2007)
i use my camera for taking macro shots of the jewellery i make and every day snapshots.the slide button for going from camera to reveiw stopped working then the screen just went blank and the camera is now unusable.told not worth fixing.liked the macro results i saw on the fx50 screen in local store.
reply to this comment
mike (04/16/2007)
canon is better quality in my opinion and is worth the slightly higher price. The best macro camera out for canon is the sd 800 is and with take photos all the way down to 1.2 inches. IF u want cheaper but similar quality the a570 IS has image stabilization like the sd 800 and takes macro photos down to 2 inches. The new IS feature will help greatly with your macro shots.
reply to this comment
I am confused if I should buy the Panasonic FX-50 or the Canon SD800. Can anyone help? (robeyj — 01/31/2007)
I want a wide angle lens. I am an artist, a sculptor, and shoot my own work for my own purposes and also I do interior design so I shoot rooms. I need it all pretty simple too.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (01/31/2007)
My choice would be the SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) based on the fact that you're going to get better quality images. Panasonic, who has wonderful lenses and great easy to use cameras, has some issues with electronics, and their higher megapixel cameras are just plain noisier (grainier) than the competition. Particularly if you plan on shooting indoors or in relatively low light, you will notice a difference in quality and the Canon wins.
The downside to the Canon is that it basically doesn't offer any manual control, while the FX50 does offer some. But you mentioned that you wanted things simple, so as long as you're happy with point and shoot, I think the SD800 will give you much better results for your purposes.
reply to this comment
The downside to the Canon is that it basically doesn't offer any manual control, while the FX50 does offer some. But you mentioned that you wanted things simple, so as long as you're happy with point and shoot, I think the SD800 will give you much better results for your purposes.
Alan Schamber (02/02/2007)
Don't do what they say!!!
The SD 800 was rated as one of the worst digital cameras in the last year. The image quality is not as good as if I paint it!!!
Go right away for the Panasonic... or just buy the Canon SD 900. Go for some other camera, if not. I highly recomend Samsung NV7 OPS, or Ricoh Caplio R40 (which has a 28mm wide angle). If not... just pay some more and buy the Canon G7.
Hope this other point of view helps you,
Alan.
reply to this comment
The SD 800 was rated as one of the worst digital cameras in the last year. The image quality is not as good as if I paint it!!!
Go right away for the Panasonic... or just buy the Canon SD 900. Go for some other camera, if not. I highly recomend Samsung NV7 OPS, or Ricoh Caplio R40 (which has a 28mm wide angle). If not... just pay some more and buy the Canon G7.
Hope this other point of view helps you,
Alan.
camera? (02/02/2007)
Hey Alan, where did you see that the SD800 was rating one of the worst of last year? There are about 200 reviews on this page ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) where people have given it an average of 4 out of 5 stars.
Sounds like people really like the SD800 to me.
reply to this comment
Sounds like people really like the SD800 to me.
robeyj (02/02/2007)
This is what's so confusing about making this choice. So many opinions. I also have read some unfavorable reviews about the Canon, but also many about the Panasonic. I will check out more reviews and am open to more comments. Thanks.
reply to this comment
camera? (02/02/2007)
Personally, I think Brenda's right on about the SD800. It's a really nice camera.
reply to this comment
Alan Schamber (02/02/2007)
Enter www.dpreview.com
Buy the SD900 instead, or even the A710 IS.
The SD 800 has a lot of noise despite the strong noise reduction... and because of this, it has not that sharp or contrasty images either.
My opinion is to look for the best image quality posible for the money, but also features, versatility and camera size.
In my opinion, buy the G7... if that's too much money, go for the SD900, or the A710 IS. In my opinion, I like more Panasonic cameras... but I would go fot the DMC-LX2 (but it's also much more expensive).
Keep on reading reviews, and comparing models. That's the way to know what you are buying, and why you are doing it.
Alan.
reply to this comment
Buy the SD900 instead, or even the A710 IS.
The SD 800 has a lot of noise despite the strong noise reduction... and because of this, it has not that sharp or contrasty images either.
My opinion is to look for the best image quality posible for the money, but also features, versatility and camera size.
In my opinion, buy the G7... if that's too much money, go for the SD900, or the A710 IS. In my opinion, I like more Panasonic cameras... but I would go fot the DMC-LX2 (but it's also much more expensive).
Keep on reading reviews, and comparing models. That's the way to know what you are buying, and why you are doing it.
Alan.
Dannon (02/03/2007)
dpreview rates the Canon PowerShot SD800 IS as a "Recommended" Buy!
The SD800 IS has a lot of nice features and takes high quality photographs. Very high quality photographs for a camera you carry comfortably in your pocket.
Yes, its image isn't as sharp as the highly-acclaimed-for-its-sharpness SD700.
But that's only noticeable if you are printing out two poster sized printouts and comparing them side by side. Its a slight difference - not a huge difference.
The kind of person who can appreciate this difference is also the kind of person who knows what 20 seconds worth of work with an unsharp mask filter can do.
As for the slight barrel distortion and some of the edge problems, again, the kind of person who this matters to, knows how to adjust for it in seconds in post production.
To ninety five percent of the population, they wouldn't be able to see these things if you pointed to them!
The SD800 IS takes exceptionally nice photos for a point and shoot.
To joe citizen, it takes absolutely gorgeous pictures.
the "Image Flaws" which I consider technology limitations at the time of manufacture, which are discussed in the trade reviews are professional observations which need to be reported. Non are reported as huge problems though.
It depends on what you are shopping for.
But few people will tell you the SD800 takes anything less than great photographs.
Look at the sample pictures at the various testing sites.
Just look at those pictures!
Then go to a store and spend some time with the actual camera.
So, no, its not the very sharpest camera on the market.
But the photos it produces are sharp. To me - Very Sharp!
Its got a wider angle lens than the others
Its got image stabilization
It shoots in low light (ever see 400ASA film pushed to 1600ASA? - its grainy!)
it has all sorts of features which most people find extremely easy to use.
Its a quality product. The people in the stores will point to other brands when you ask which cameras come back the most?
Its got a great metering system.
Decide what you need from a camera
Then look at the samples at the sites that test all these cameras using the same set ups.
But don't "read all the reviews"
Reviews are hundreds of words - Pictures are worth thousands words.
If absolute sharpness is your priority - than seek out a camera that is the sharpest on the market. Of course people will be complaining that that one has too much contrast and produces harsh photographs.
A Cannon PowerShot SD800 IS takes beautiful photographs a professional will appreciate. No, its not a studio camera, its a fit in the pocket point and shoot, and its one of the best ones out there.. ..this week.
Hey - even dpreview rates it a "Recommended" Buy!
reply to this comment
The SD800 IS has a lot of nice features and takes high quality photographs. Very high quality photographs for a camera you carry comfortably in your pocket.
Yes, its image isn't as sharp as the highly-acclaimed-for-its-sharpness SD700.
But that's only noticeable if you are printing out two poster sized printouts and comparing them side by side. Its a slight difference - not a huge difference.
The kind of person who can appreciate this difference is also the kind of person who knows what 20 seconds worth of work with an unsharp mask filter can do.
As for the slight barrel distortion and some of the edge problems, again, the kind of person who this matters to, knows how to adjust for it in seconds in post production.
To ninety five percent of the population, they wouldn't be able to see these things if you pointed to them!
The SD800 IS takes exceptionally nice photos for a point and shoot.
To joe citizen, it takes absolutely gorgeous pictures.
the "Image Flaws" which I consider technology limitations at the time of manufacture, which are discussed in the trade reviews are professional observations which need to be reported. Non are reported as huge problems though.
It depends on what you are shopping for.
But few people will tell you the SD800 takes anything less than great photographs.
Look at the sample pictures at the various testing sites.
Just look at those pictures!
Then go to a store and spend some time with the actual camera.
So, no, its not the very sharpest camera on the market.
But the photos it produces are sharp. To me - Very Sharp!
Its got a wider angle lens than the others
Its got image stabilization
It shoots in low light (ever see 400ASA film pushed to 1600ASA? - its grainy!)
it has all sorts of features which most people find extremely easy to use.
Its a quality product. The people in the stores will point to other brands when you ask which cameras come back the most?
Its got a great metering system.
Decide what you need from a camera
Then look at the samples at the sites that test all these cameras using the same set ups.
But don't "read all the reviews"
Reviews are hundreds of words - Pictures are worth thousands words.
If absolute sharpness is your priority - than seek out a camera that is the sharpest on the market. Of course people will be complaining that that one has too much contrast and produces harsh photographs.
A Cannon PowerShot SD800 IS takes beautiful photographs a professional will appreciate. No, its not a studio camera, its a fit in the pocket point and shoot, and its one of the best ones out there.. ..this week.
Hey - even dpreview rates it a "Recommended" Buy!
Dannon (02/03/2007)
To Answer Joan's Question...
There isn't the kind of sample material for the Panasonic available on the internet yet, as there it for the Canon. So it is a bit difficult to compare the image quality of the two cameras.
Both these cameras are in the same price range and both these cameras offer a 28mm lens.
For you Joan,
My thoughts are to suggest you going to a store that caries both of these cameras
Take a picture of the same thing (whether it be cameras on the counter or the sales person in the same spot) (you could even bring in something protable that is similar in nature to your sculptures) using both cameras.
Do the same with the room or a part of a display area in the store.
There, you have your sculpture and your interior design.
Then, compare the two after they print the pictures out for you.
They should, without hesitation, print out the pictures for you on one of the printers they are trying to sell.
If there is something you see in one of the photos that bothers you (like shadow detail loss, or color shift, or burned out highlights, or etc...) ask the salesperson to adjust for that -- and watch and see if that is easily adjusted for.
For you Joan, I would think now that you narrowed it down to two fit-in-the-pocket point-and-shoot cameras, both with 28mm. and both at the same price point - it comes down to taking the pictures and looking at the pictures!
Good luck to you!
reply to this comment
There isn't the kind of sample material for the Panasonic available on the internet yet, as there it for the Canon. So it is a bit difficult to compare the image quality of the two cameras.
Both these cameras are in the same price range and both these cameras offer a 28mm lens.
For you Joan,
My thoughts are to suggest you going to a store that caries both of these cameras
Take a picture of the same thing (whether it be cameras on the counter or the sales person in the same spot) (you could even bring in something protable that is similar in nature to your sculptures) using both cameras.
Do the same with the room or a part of a display area in the store.
There, you have your sculpture and your interior design.
Then, compare the two after they print the pictures out for you.
They should, without hesitation, print out the pictures for you on one of the printers they are trying to sell.
If there is something you see in one of the photos that bothers you (like shadow detail loss, or color shift, or burned out highlights, or etc...) ask the salesperson to adjust for that -- and watch and see if that is easily adjusted for.
For you Joan, I would think now that you narrowed it down to two fit-in-the-pocket point-and-shoot cameras, both with 28mm. and both at the same price point - it comes down to taking the pictures and looking at the pictures!
Good luck to you!
What is the best digital camera for under $300 that would be best for pics of a 6-month old baby? (aprilallard — 12/14/2006)
I am looking for the best under $300 for capturing lots of pictures of my always-moving 6-month old...indoor and outdoor shots, although focused right now mostly on indoor. I have an HP with 4.0 or 4.1 MP and I am EXTREMELY disappointed with the quality of pictures this camera takes. Everything is blurry, I've already had to send it back once, and I think my husband purchased it for me a couple years ago because the commercials looked cool (remember "picture pages, pictures pages..."?). Anyway, I also have a 35mm Olympus that I really, really like, but I don't have to stick with that brand. I do like what I hear about the Canons. I am mostly looking for awesome quality pictures, limited blurriness and help when the baby moves (is this the image stabilization I see mentioned?) under $300, or maybe a little bit above. Thanks to all!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/14/2006)
April,
Just to let you know about image stabilization. It works only with the photo taker/camera itself, not the subject. If the baby moves, the camera won't stop the blurriness if it has a longer shutter time. On auto settings in low light, the camera will automatically keep the shutter open longer to adjust for the lower light. If you want to take a better indoor photo, you'll want a higher ISO range (over 1000). Something like the Nikon S7c ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Olympus 730 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) both go up to ISO 1600. The Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) goes up to ISO 3200, and will allow twice as much light in, creating a shutter speed that is twice as fast as the 1600 setting in similar situations. This might even be a better option for what you're looking for. All of these cameras are under $300 and should provide enough resolution for sharp pictures. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Just to let you know about image stabilization. It works only with the photo taker/camera itself, not the subject. If the baby moves, the camera won't stop the blurriness if it has a longer shutter time. On auto settings in low light, the camera will automatically keep the shutter open longer to adjust for the lower light. If you want to take a better indoor photo, you'll want a higher ISO range (over 1000). Something like the Nikon S7c ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Olympus 730 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) both go up to ISO 1600. The Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) goes up to ISO 3200, and will allow twice as much light in, creating a shutter speed that is twice as fast as the 1600 setting in similar situations. This might even be a better option for what you're looking for. All of these cameras are under $300 and should provide enough resolution for sharp pictures. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Best Ultra Compact that takes "fast" pictures with stablilization Needs to be thin enough to slip in your jean pocket. (BartManSr — 12/10/2006)
Needs to be thin enough to slip in your jean pocket. High pix and optical are nice but not as important as thin, speed and Stabilization. Note: my need for speed is because I hate waiting and waiting before the cambra takes the picture (kids won't stand still!). I would like to be able to take two or three pictures in a row without falling asleep.
It would be nice to take a closeup without being close (Zoom).
Price is not important.
Thin is king!
reply to this comment
It would be nice to take a closeup without being close (Zoom).
Price is not important.
Thin is king!
Ben Keough (12/10/2006)
Hi,
I'd recommend the Panasonic Lumix FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )/FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). (These two are essentially the same camera, except that the FX50 has a larger LCD, so if that doesn't make a big difference to you, go for the FX07 and save a bundle.) It's a 7 megapixel, 3.5x optical zoom ultracompact with very good optical image stabilization and a nice size (3.7 x 2 x 0.9 in). Users rate it pretty well in terms of speed, especially for an ultracompact (ultracompacts often sacrifice speed in their effort to cram everything into such a small shell). Finally, it has a nice 28mm wide-angle lens, which is a feature not offered by many other ultracompacts.
You mentioned that you would like to take several features in a row without falling asleep. One other camera you might want to consider is the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which also features a nice optically-stabilized wide-angle lens, 7 megapixels, and a 3.8x zoom. What sets the SD800 IS apart from its competition is its burst mode shooting (continuous drive), which will let you shoot at 1.7 frames per second continuously until you run out of space on your memory card. The SD800 IS isn't rated quite as well by users as the FX07 is, but it might be worth a look anyway.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
I'd recommend the Panasonic Lumix FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )/FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). (These two are essentially the same camera, except that the FX50 has a larger LCD, so if that doesn't make a big difference to you, go for the FX07 and save a bundle.) It's a 7 megapixel, 3.5x optical zoom ultracompact with very good optical image stabilization and a nice size (3.7 x 2 x 0.9 in). Users rate it pretty well in terms of speed, especially for an ultracompact (ultracompacts often sacrifice speed in their effort to cram everything into such a small shell). Finally, it has a nice 28mm wide-angle lens, which is a feature not offered by many other ultracompacts.
You mentioned that you would like to take several features in a row without falling asleep. One other camera you might want to consider is the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which also features a nice optically-stabilized wide-angle lens, 7 megapixels, and a 3.8x zoom. What sets the SD800 IS apart from its competition is its burst mode shooting (continuous drive), which will let you shoot at 1.7 frames per second continuously until you run out of space on your memory card. The SD800 IS isn't rated quite as well by users as the FX07 is, but it might be worth a look anyway.
Good luck!
chrisjj0686 (12/12/2006)
Hello,
Having just bought a new camera, my short list was Sony T10, & your choices for the same reasons - I've got 3 kids under 3!!.
The only noticable dif between the FX07 & 50 is the size due the the 50 having a 3" LCD.
Sony T10 looks great, it really does, starts up v fast, is the smallest by far & the lens is housed within the camera.....but had poor reviews for indoor pictures - mainly red eye probs - so unfortunately it was out for me. I know you can correct red eye but I don't have time - I needed a camera that takes good pictures full stop - with no farting about.
There was little in it between the Canon & panasonics - but the genuine wide angle lens on the FX07 / 50 was a real incentive. Reviews I read also suggested that the Canon had red eye probs too.
In the end I went for the FX07 - it's the next smallest after the Sony (the canon is the biggest) & I prefered the aesthetics - Canon's are so boring! (personal opinion!)
I,ve only had it 3 days & haven't had a chance to play with it much but so far I'm very happy - the menu's very user friendly, is very solidly built and looks great (it is a gadget after all!). I've only taken about 30 pictures so far - all indoors, with flash & of family - only ONE image has any noticable red eye - v impressive!
I had a Minolta XG before & the pictures already look much better - more natural. Can't wait to try it in daylight. Didn't realise it before but wide angle is great - no back against the wall or cutting Aunt Prue out of the picture at Christmas (not Thanksgiving, I'm in the UK!)
Oh, it's a lot cheaper that the Canon too.
Have fun!
reply to this comment
Having just bought a new camera, my short list was Sony T10, & your choices for the same reasons - I've got 3 kids under 3!!.
The only noticable dif between the FX07 & 50 is the size due the the 50 having a 3" LCD.
Sony T10 looks great, it really does, starts up v fast, is the smallest by far & the lens is housed within the camera.....but had poor reviews for indoor pictures - mainly red eye probs - so unfortunately it was out for me. I know you can correct red eye but I don't have time - I needed a camera that takes good pictures full stop - with no farting about.
There was little in it between the Canon & panasonics - but the genuine wide angle lens on the FX07 / 50 was a real incentive. Reviews I read also suggested that the Canon had red eye probs too.
In the end I went for the FX07 - it's the next smallest after the Sony (the canon is the biggest) & I prefered the aesthetics - Canon's are so boring! (personal opinion!)
I,ve only had it 3 days & haven't had a chance to play with it much but so far I'm very happy - the menu's very user friendly, is very solidly built and looks great (it is a gadget after all!). I've only taken about 30 pictures so far - all indoors, with flash & of family - only ONE image has any noticable red eye - v impressive!
I had a Minolta XG before & the pictures already look much better - more natural. Can't wait to try it in daylight. Didn't realise it before but wide angle is great - no back against the wall or cutting Aunt Prue out of the picture at Christmas (not Thanksgiving, I'm in the UK!)
Oh, it's a lot cheaper that the Canon too.
Have fun!
mike (04/16/2007)
I wouldnt go with the above two guys, instead go with canon superior SD 800 IS.
Slim , fast , better pic quality and even a wide angle lens. it is rated at 1.7 fps.
Even faster is the older sd 700 IS which shoots at 2.1 fps.
Its simple go with the above cameras (sd 800) and you'll make a great choice.
reply to this comment
Slim , fast , better pic quality and even a wide angle lens. it is rated at 1.7 fps.
Even faster is the older sd 700 IS which shoots at 2.1 fps.
Its simple go with the above cameras (sd 800) and you'll make a great choice.
RC Antolina (04/16/2007)
I spent a great deal of time evaluating the compact cameras available. I settled on the canon SD800 for one reason. It's simply the finest camera of it's kind. Other mfgrs offer decent cameras but if you want the best, the choice is clear and as thin goes... it doesn't get any better.
Lissen to Mike. :)
reply to this comment
Lissen to Mike. :)
Recommendations for soldier son going to Afghanistan for year's deployment for a slim, wide angle, zoom lens with AA batteries digital camera??? (AirborneMama — 12/05/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/05/2006)
Hi GA,
Canon's SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) fits all of your considerations except the AA batteries (it uses Lithium Ion batteries). Frankly, it's pretty much impossible to find a slimline camera that uses AAs, simply because they take up so much space in comparison to other battery types.
Some other cameras that fit your needs are the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The Canon and Panasonic models are all 28mm wide angle, while the Kodak is 23mm (wider angle). Each camera has at least a 3.8x zoom. They're all in roughly the same price ballpark, at $275-$325.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Canon's SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) fits all of your considerations except the AA batteries (it uses Lithium Ion batteries). Frankly, it's pretty much impossible to find a slimline camera that uses AAs, simply because they take up so much space in comparison to other battery types.
Some other cameras that fit your needs are the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak V705 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The Canon and Panasonic models are all 28mm wide angle, while the Kodak is 23mm (wider angle). Each camera has at least a 3.8x zoom. They're all in roughly the same price ballpark, at $275-$325.
Hope this helps!
K75rider (12/06/2006)
Hi GA,
Ben has made an excellent recommendation in the Canon SD800 IS. 7mp 3.8x len 28-105 and Image Stablization. Dimensions are 3.5 x 2.3 x 1
However, I believe the battary issue is critical. I have been in similar situation as your son and the availability of batteries will be critical. Therefore, I am recommending the Canon A710 IS. 7mp 6x (35-210) and image stablization. dimension are 3.8 x 2.6 x 1.6.
Yes, its a little larger but you have a bigger zoom which can be a big plus.
Godspeed.
reply to this comment
Ben has made an excellent recommendation in the Canon SD800 IS. 7mp 3.8x len 28-105 and Image Stablization. Dimensions are 3.5 x 2.3 x 1
However, I believe the battary issue is critical. I have been in similar situation as your son and the availability of batteries will be critical. Therefore, I am recommending the Canon A710 IS. 7mp 6x (35-210) and image stablization. dimension are 3.8 x 2.6 x 1.6.
Yes, its a little larger but you have a bigger zoom which can be a big plus.
Godspeed.
AirborneMama (12/06/2006)
Thanks, Guys...for your help! This is one of my Christmas present to Jon. As you mentioned, K75rider, the battery issue is critical, since he will be out on missions much of the time and not somewhere that he can recharge a battery. He would be willing to give up the slimness of the camera a bit, if he is still able to have batteries and take some pics of the landscape there. If you're a vet, than you totally understand. He only used disposables in Iraq when he was there, and I just hope he can come home with the camera (and Himself) in one piece. It will be a long deployment. Should I buy him Lithium batteries? Don't know much about this stuff, so any advice you have is appreciated. He pretty much will be carrying all his stuff with him everywhere he goes there. He's with the 82nd.....Airborne All the Way!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/06/2006)
GA,
The A710 IS takes AAs. You can get him both AA alkalines (the normal disposables) or AA NiMH batteries with a charger. It might be a good idea to get both, just in case. The NiMH rechargeables will last much, much longer than the alkalines, but as you say the chances to recharge them are scarce. Getting both means he can take advantage of the NiMHs when he has access to electricity, and he'll have the disposables for backup.
reply to this comment
The A710 IS takes AAs. You can get him both AA alkalines (the normal disposables) or AA NiMH batteries with a charger. It might be a good idea to get both, just in case. The NiMH rechargeables will last much, much longer than the alkalines, but as you say the chances to recharge them are scarce. Getting both means he can take advantage of the NiMHs when he has access to electricity, and he'll have the disposables for backup.
AirborneMama (12/06/2006)
Thank you, Ben! I truly appreciate your help. He knows I'm getting a camera for him and is thrilled. He has a pretty good eye, when it comes to composition, so I'm thrilled to be able to give him this for Christmas. Now....to find a good deal somewhere. Hope I can get this all for under 300.
reply to this comment
I would like to buy a camera which are small, reasonable and high resolution as well as best photo. Any suggestion? (Shirley — 11/27/2006)
I am looking for a camera which will have a good result of photo. My main point are small, good quality of photo and reasonable. I dont mind if the camera are not the latest edition, as far as the camera is always a best choice for camera seekers. Finally, i think i personally more prefer sony, panasonic and canon without any reason.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/28/2006)
Shirley,
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice. If you like that, you might want to look at the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Canon SD40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have very similar capabilities and are priced the same or lower than the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would recommend going in to a retailer and holding the cameras to see what you're comfortable with in your hand before purchasing. This will ensure a good fit for you.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice. If you like that, you might want to look at the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Canon SD40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have very similar capabilities and are priced the same or lower than the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would recommend going in to a retailer and holding the cameras to see what you're comfortable with in your hand before purchasing. This will ensure a good fit for you.
Andrew
no seal for lens and batttery compartment? (david — 11/09/2006)
I saw one user review on pricegrabber.com, saying that this camera does not have seal on lens and battery compartment. is it possible?
reply to this comment
saronian (11/20/2006)
True, there is not a direct seal around the battery/memory door, as in a rubber or foam liner. But the door has a precision fit which is both tight and well made. There is also a formed metal plate inside the door which presses against the memory card. It's hard to imagine dirt or dust reaching the contacts of the battery or SD card.
reply to this comment
Canon SD800IS not getting great reviews. How is SD850 IS different? Didn't know it was out. (Candice — 10/31/2006)
Currently shopping for a camera. Want small but largest possible optical zoom. Want to zoom in video mode. Also like a viewfinder.
reply to this comment
Janski (10/31/2006)
The 850 is the European equivalent of the 800.
reply to this comment
Candice (10/31/2006)
Thank you
reply to this comment
Rob (03/29/2007)
The main diference betwen these two models is ccd resolution. 850 IS has 7.1 and 800 IS has 6.0
reply to this comment
Skid (04/28/2007)
Rob,
Please don't answer if you are a retard.
reply to this comment
Please don't answer if you are a retard.
Rachel (05/04/2007)
850 IS is actually the newer version of the 800 it'll be out mid june 07. has 8 megapixels, supposedly better face detection, red eye reduction, and such
reply to this comment
Robby (05/07/2007)
Apparently the SD850 is 8MP, but the SD800 has a wider angle lens.
reply to this comment
Tony (05/08/2007)
They just announced the SD850 and is on Canon's website. It has image stabalization and face detection.
reply to this comment
Doug (05/11/2007)
I have an SD800 IS, which I bought after extensive research. Almost every expert review that I found raved about the camera, so your statement that the camera is not getting great reviews took me by surprise, since it runs counter to the research that I did. Here are a few of the major photo sites who gave the SD800 IS great reviews and recommended it:
Imaging Resource
dcresource
dcviews
Steve's Digicams
The worst that I found was dppreview, which preferred the image quality of the SD700, but still recommended the SD800.
And expert reviews aside, I love the camera... it takes great photos, comparable in most cases to those from my EOS Rebel XT SLR. And it's the easiest to use camera that I've ever owned, and I've owned lots of them.
reply to this comment
Imaging Resource
dcresource
dcviews
Steve's Digicams
The worst that I found was dppreview, which preferred the image quality of the SD700, but still recommended the SD800.
And expert reviews aside, I love the camera... it takes great photos, comparable in most cases to those from my EOS Rebel XT SLR. And it's the easiest to use camera that I've ever owned, and I've owned lots of them.
oz (05/18/2007)
sd850 is not a new version of the sd800. its a new version of the sd700...
reply to this comment
Jezza (05/23/2007)
The sd850 (Ixus 950 IS in europe) has a 1/2.5 ccd instead of the 1/1.7" ccd found on the older canon and most other compacts. This seems to be the major difference, though canon don't seem to be advertising it much.
Should make it far better in low light and at the higher ISO speeds. Hopefully better than the Fuji F30/31.
reply to this comment
Should make it far better in low light and at the higher ISO speeds. Hopefully better than the Fuji F30/31.
Ro (06/07/2007)
The 850 is the follow up to the 700. It is the only new one with 4X optical zoom. I am waiting for Bestbuy to get them!
reply to this comment
Gloria (06/07/2007)
Does anyone know when they are releasing it? I'm debating if i should wait for the sd850 or just get the sd800? Are the new extra features worth the extra $$?
reply to this comment
nencm (06/08/2007)
The sd850is is an uprade to sd750is not the sd800...
reply to this comment
rmb (06/09/2007)
Wow a lot of people on here don't know what their talking about. I saw one person correct about the 850.
The SD850 IS is an upgrade to the SD700 IS.
The 700 was known to have sharper images than the 800 IS but this was because you have to make sacrifices when gaining extra features like the wide angle lense in the 800. The images of the 800 are great, but sometimes have softness around the edges. www.dpreview.com is the best place to go for reviews. On this website they'll show you comparisons b/t the 800 and 700 as well as with other cameras. Dpreview does not have a review of the 850 up yet. I am waiting on the dpreview before deciding if I want the 800 or the 850. I am wondering if the 850 has the sharpness of the 700 and the features of the 800, that would rock.
reply to this comment
The SD850 IS is an upgrade to the SD700 IS.
The 700 was known to have sharper images than the 800 IS but this was because you have to make sacrifices when gaining extra features like the wide angle lense in the 800. The images of the 800 are great, but sometimes have softness around the edges. www.dpreview.com is the best place to go for reviews. On this website they'll show you comparisons b/t the 800 and 700 as well as with other cameras. Dpreview does not have a review of the 850 up yet. I am waiting on the dpreview before deciding if I want the 800 or the 850. I am wondering if the 850 has the sharpness of the 700 and the features of the 800, that would rock.
rmb (06/09/2007)
Also, the SD850 is currently shipping. However, all stores don't have it yet. Amazon has just started selling it. Just last week they still had it available for pre-order so I am not sure when they started shipping.
amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-... as someone else mentioned, the SD850 is 8 MP and the SD800 is 7 MP and the SD700 is 6 MP.
reply to this comment
amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-... as someone else mentioned, the SD850 is 8 MP and the SD800 is 7 MP and the SD700 is 6 MP.
rmb (06/09/2007)
dpreview.com for the Best online camera reviews!
reply to this comment
Soupy Specs (06/21/2007)
Wow there really IS an amazing amount of people not knowing what they're talking about.. I made it simple, specs in a row--look for yourself:
dpreview.com/reviews/compar...
reply to this comment
dpreview.com/reviews/compar...
NTH (06/29/2007)
i think only RMB is correct. the Best answer was totally wrong.
SD700=IXUS 800(6mp),
SD800=IXUS 850(7.1mp)
SD850=IXUS950(8mp)
SD900=IXUS900(10mp)
Actually i myself is debating over SD850 or SD900. sd850's advantage is the image stabalizer, but i have also the 700 and 800, both have image stabalizer but i dont see mush use of it. SD900 has more megapixels, and a larger resolution Video option even tho at 15fps. IS or 10mp?....
reply to this comment
SD700=IXUS 800(6mp),
SD800=IXUS 850(7.1mp)
SD850=IXUS950(8mp)
SD900=IXUS900(10mp)
Actually i myself is debating over SD850 or SD900. sd850's advantage is the image stabalizer, but i have also the 700 and 800, both have image stabalizer but i dont see mush use of it. SD900 has more megapixels, and a larger resolution Video option even tho at 15fps. IS or 10mp?....
TWD (07/17/2007)
I have an S500 and it has problems with blurriness, shakiness, and dark images. Now I am ready to upgrade, but I am not sure what to get. I take a lot of pictures of computer parts and also tourist type pictures when I travel.
What are the opinions on the SD900 vs the SD 850?
Thanks
reply to this comment
What are the opinions on the SD900 vs the SD 850?
Thanks
SMcD (09/06/2007)
Just wanted to point out to Jezza that a 1/2.5 sensor is actually SMALLER than a 1/1.7 and therefore won't help take better high ISO photos.
reply to this comment
Canon SD850IS Vs. Panasonic FX50 (Eamon — 10/16/2006)
Both cameras have similar specs but which is better in terms of picture quality? The panasonic has more scene modes but can it zoom in video mode? Confused shopper!!!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/18/2006)
Nope, you can't zoom in movie mode on the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) unfortunately. Be warned, the movie mode's also gotten poor reviews on sound.
reply to this comment
David Glasgow (10/21/2006)
The panasonic has a 3 inch LCD, is poor in lowlight, but good alround M.I.S (stabilization)
However the Canon with 2.5 inch screen is Great in low light without a Flash + has image stabilization. I have the Canon SD800IS + the FX50, and they are each good in their own little department.... I have yet to buy the Canon SD850IS, but have read many interesting reviews!
both super cameras, both real solid design and camera build...
reply to this comment
However the Canon with 2.5 inch screen is Great in low light without a Flash + has image stabilization. I have the Canon SD800IS + the FX50, and they are each good in their own little department.... I have yet to buy the Canon SD850IS, but have read many interesting reviews!
both super cameras, both real solid design and camera build...
Ronald Weaver (10/27/2006)
how do you compare the 1/2.5 inch sensor size of the 850 to the 1.18 sensor of the 900.
is sensor size important? realizing trhere is also a difference in resolution of the two cameras.
also, is sensor size or resolution most important?
Ron Weaver (rweaver100@msn.com)
reply to this comment
is sensor size important? realizing trhere is also a difference in resolution of the two cameras.
also, is sensor size or resolution most important?
Ron Weaver (rweaver100@msn.com)
gg007 (11/08/2006)
Leica lens is much much better than Canon lens
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/09/2006)
Ronald,
Sensor size and resolution are both important. They sort of work together to produce a quality image. This can get pretty complicated, but basically a high megapixel camera with a small sensor will not perform as well, and vice versa. You need to find a good balance between the two. If you're interested in the science behind it, <a href="cambridgeincolour.com/tutor... is the best tutorial I've found on it so far.
reply to this comment
Sensor size and resolution are both important. They sort of work together to produce a quality image. This can get pretty complicated, but basically a high megapixel camera with a small sensor will not perform as well, and vice versa. You need to find a good balance between the two. If you're interested in the science behind it, <a href="cambridgeincolour.com/tutor... is the best tutorial I've found on it so far.
saronian (11/20/2006)
I also spent a lot of time trying to decide between the SD800 & FX50. I found the FX50's 3" LCD to be very tempting and it's operation suited my shooting style. I detest the noise reduction used at ISO400 and above but after spending time using the camera, I found it possible to shoot at ISO100 about 80% of the time and use ISO200 for the rest. This is made possible with the MEGA O.I.S stabilization system.
The SD800 takes images with less noise for any given ISO speed, but this is compromised by mediocre lens performance. By contrast the FX50's Leica DC Vario-Elmarit lens is outstanding for a point-and-shoot camera.
The FX50 does not zoom while shooting movies. This is unfortunate, but the video quality of the FX50 is higher and more versatile when editing. The FX50 records at 848x480 which is a 16:9 HDTV format. Panasonic records their movies with the Photo-JPEG codec and can be edited with QuickTime on both Windows and Mac OS X. The movie audio format is 8-bit/8kHz on the FX50 and 8-bit/11.024kHz on the SD800.
reply to this comment
The SD800 takes images with less noise for any given ISO speed, but this is compromised by mediocre lens performance. By contrast the FX50's Leica DC Vario-Elmarit lens is outstanding for a point-and-shoot camera.
The FX50 does not zoom while shooting movies. This is unfortunate, but the video quality of the FX50 is higher and more versatile when editing. The FX50 records at 848x480 which is a 16:9 HDTV format. Panasonic records their movies with the Photo-JPEG codec and can be edited with QuickTime on both Windows and Mac OS X. The movie audio format is 8-bit/8kHz on the FX50 and 8-bit/11.024kHz on the SD800.
Ronald Weaver (11/21/2006)
Brenda
why are pansonic cameras subject to noise since they have great leica lens, high iso ratings and sensors that are better the average 1/2.5 ?
Ron
reply to this comment
why are pansonic cameras subject to noise since they have great leica lens, high iso ratings and sensors that are better the average 1/2.5 ?
Ron
Brenda Paro (11/21/2006)
This is a really good question Ron. Part of it is that I believe some of the Panasonics used the same sensor and upped the megapixels, resulting in a few image quality issues (more megapixels 'crammed' in with the same sensor doesn't improve quality like people assume it does; as I said, megapixels and sensor must work together). Part of it- from the reading I've done about this- is that it's just plain old manufacturing and design differences. That's really the best answer I could find, and it's certainly not a satisfactory one. The general rule seems to be that below 5 or 6 megapixels Panasonic is comparable, but their higher pixel cameras are the ones that really struggle in comparison with others in terms of noise.
In their most recent cameras, Panasonic is using what they call the Venus III engine processor, which has noise reduction that some people swear finally fixes the problem- others say it results in blotchy painty-looking images and that it isn't a viable fix. It's open to interpretation.
reply to this comment
In their most recent cameras, Panasonic is using what they call the Venus III engine processor, which has noise reduction that some people swear finally fixes the problem- others say it results in blotchy painty-looking images and that it isn't a viable fix. It's open to interpretation.
jaly2k (05/22/2007)
Thanks for great responses. I'm debating between the canon sd700is or waiting for the update with the new canon sd850is. Because the 850 and the 700 are using the same sensor but the 850 has more megapixels I think I may be going with the 700. It has received consistently good reviews and the test photos I've viewed on the web from it are great! It also appears to do really well with macro and low light, both of which are important to me. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! I love this forum.
reply to this comment
ED (06/22/2007)
I HAVE THE SD850 IS NEED TO SIMPLIFY THE OWNERS MANUAL RUNS U BACK AND FORTH INSTEAD OF FLOW CHART GREAT PICS WHY NO SPORTS/ ACTION MODE ON OFF BUTTON A BIT TO TINY . SCN / CREATIVE LIGHTING NEEDS SOME WORK ANYONE HAD LUCK GETTING IT TO WORK ?WHY NO CONTROL OVER TIME /DATE IN ALL MODES . BUT OVERALL VERY GOOD P/S CAMERA
EASY TO USE .
reply to this comment
EASY TO USE .
blessed (11/03/2008)
I too am deciding on canon vs. panasonic. The e18 errors that canon is known to have is what is stopping me in my tracks. Any information on if that problem has been fixed, or any panasonic known problems down the line?
reply to this comment
Can I use the card from my FZ10 on the FZ50 (anonymous — 09/29/2006)
I have an FZ10 but not an FZ50
reply to this comment
camera? (09/29/2006)
Yes, both use Secure Digital memory cards, and I believe you should be able to use them in both cameras.
reply to this comment
saronian (11/20/2006)
Both use the same SD Memory cards. It is important to note that new SD memory may be faster than what you're using in your FZ10. This increased speed allows capturing the full 30fps 848x480 movies that are available in the newer FX50 (FZ50). I'm able to get 10MB/s file transfer from my 2GB SanDisk Extreme III SD card.
reply to this comment
digital cam w/large LCD? (stacey — 08/25/2006)
looking for a digital camera for my father - he needs one with a huge LCD (going blind). Easy to use, and perferably with some kind of stabilizer. He tends to shake when snapping pictures. Any suggestions on which brand/type?
reply to this comment
Re: digital cam w/large LCD? (camera? — 08/25/2006)
Right now, the biggest LCD you can get on a Digital Camera is about 3 inches. Because of your father's shakiness, you definitely want a camera with image stabilization .
Here are a few choices:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
reply to this comment
Here are a few choices:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
Huge LED screen, easy to understand commands and modes, and allover great
(Jim — 02/24/2007)
I am now on my 3rd digital camera. I had an early Nikon Coolpix that took forever to startup and focus, and delivered just ok shots. Then a had a Canon SD400 that was just ok. Never did understand the camera modes..and it took just ok pictures.
Out of the box this was pretty easy to use. Once I read through the manual ( something you need to do for cameras these days), it became very clear that I mwould love this camera. The modes are in SIMPLE English....although the Manual could use some translation. The day, night, outdoor and indoor pictures I took the first two weeks were great. The huge LED screen replaces a viewfinder which is ok with me. I recommend heartily.
- 4.0 out of 5
Normal mode is over exposing
(Pat O'Daniels — 02/22/2007)
I really enjoy my Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1 for it's optical stabilizer. I can hand hold the camera and copy pages from historic newspapers, even getting down to close-ups using the macro mode.
But just two weeks ago the normal mode started over-exposing all images, whether indoors (shooting my keyboard) or outdoors at a golf tournament at Pebble Beach.
Luckily, I was able to switch to Simple mode and capture those images. As with most simple digital cameras, there is a slight delay when shooting sports. When I give my camera to someone else, they hold down the shutter too long and get two images. I guess that's good for sports photography, as you can always go back and erase the image you don't want to keep.
I don't plan to go back to a Single Lens Reflex camera, as this Lumix with a 10X optical zoom does a good job of capturing what golf shots I need. Besides, I can carry it around in my pants pocket.
I do recommend buying an additional battery, which I keep in the portable battery charger. No cord needed, the plug collapses and folds into the back of the small charger. That way you'll never be without a full battery.
If anyone knows what caused my normal mode to over-expose, please let this site know.
- 2.0 out of 5
Quite dissapointing
(Michael Wilson — 01/24/2007)
The Panasonic Lumix DMC FX50 is the latest upgrade to the quite successful FX07, with the addition of a big, beautiful 3 inch screen. The menu functions are well laid out and easy to use, and the camera feels comfortable to hold and fits easily in the pocket. The Image Stabilisation (OIS) works very well even at long focal lengths, and is great for quick "one handed" snaps when on the move.
Recording video works quite well, however zooming is NOT available as mentioned previously and sound quality is quite poor, to the point of being unable to pick up audible conversation from anyone but yourself. And now..on the subject of poor.
Where this camera fails miserably is picture quality. Panasonic I believe have made a big mistake with this lens, as at its widest angle (and default start-up focal length), barrel distortion is quite noticeable with horrible blurring at the edges. This is most disappointing, considering it is quite sharp towards the centre of the image.
Initially I thought I'd been sold a lemon, but after browsing hundreds of photos from other FX50 owners on Flickr I, it is just as noticeable, especially when the images are viewed at larger size. Indoor photography is equally horrible as the FX50 struggles to auto-focus in even the most gracious indoor lighting conditions. Flash performance is not too bad considering the small size of the flash window, but flash-less photography using high ISO is also very poor, even when using a tripod.
In summary, I am very disappointed with this camera and would not recommend it to anyone wishing to take good quality pictures at sizes larger than 1024 X 765, and especially significant indoor shots. Such a pity though, that big beautiful bright screen is a wonder to look at!!
- 4.0 out of 5
Mighty competitior to Canon IXUS 850
(Lalit Chawathe — 12/14/2006)
I bought this Lumi recently after a lot of reviews and comparison. Firstly it is good value to money (Canon IXUS 850 is expensive and provides less accessories).
The OIS works like a magic. I don't hesitate to Lumi it to any person, even after knowing that the person might shake the hand during the photo! OIS works even the hand movement itself is very big.
The quality of shots is quite acceptable. Thought I got most of pics during daytime, few of pics taken in night are also good.
Most of features which Canon explicitly advertises (like grid mode in LCD) have been silently included by Panasonic! Oh yes...3" LCD is just awesome and I didn't have any display problem even on sunny days.
Also one thing that I noticed is the pictures are being taken very quickly. I didn't notice much of shutter-lag.
Few more advantages:
The live-histogram feature helps in adjusting the picture perspective.
The current zoom has been shown on LCD so can adjust the span.
I could shoot a movie with Zooming. And the movie was quite fluent.
Overall skipping Canon's face-detection technologys, then I think LUMIX DMC FX50 is simply unbeatable!
