Hey! You should know that Panasonic has released a newer version of this product: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.
Panasonic Lumix FZ100:
Hands On Review
We've eagerly awaited Panasonic's premier superzoom, the FZ100. Last year's FZ35 set the standard for the genre, so we put the FZ100 to the test for a few weeks to see if it could live up to its predecessor's strong reputation.
By Liam McCabe
- FZ100 Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
The Panasonic FZ35 has been the most popular superzoom on this website since its release in fall 2009, so we’ve been eager to get our hands on Panny’s latest, the FZ100. It’s not a replacement, per se (that would be the FZ40). The look and feel are familiar, but the working parts got a big upgrade, allowing for an astoundingly fast burst shooting rate, quick autofocus, and 1080i HD video, to name a few features.
To put it all out there at the top of the review, the FZ100 is the most impressive superzoom that money can buy right now. But speaking of money, its $500 asking price also makes it the most expensive superzoom by about $70. Some decent dSLR kits even sell for less. The FZ100 is an excellent camera, but read on to see if this premium superzoom is in your future.
Body and Design
Like any superzoom camera, the FZ100 looks roughly like a miniature dSLR, complete with a big lens out front, a contoured grip, a viewfinder (electronic, in this case), and a wealth of buttons, hotkeys and toggles. It’s an all-around well-built camera with an intuitive yet powerful control scheme.

The FZ100 is a tad heavier than most superzooms. It’s light enough to carry around your neck comfortably but solid enough to feel like it’s made to last. The battery door is sturdy, and the cavity accommodates a hefty lithium battery, with a reasonable battery life. A metal tripod threading sits to the left of the battery door.
The 24x (25-600mm) zoom lens looks large on the front of the camera and extends several inches from the body at the telephoto setting. Up on the crest of the camera, there’s a pop-up flash with a manual release, as well as a hot shoe and stereo microphone. A rubber plug-door on the left side of the camera covers an external microphone hook-up, mini-HDMI output, and USB connection.
The tilt-and-swivel 3-inch widescreen LCD is a great touch. It’s as vibrant as LCDs come and the hinge makes shooting from odd angles (like self-portraits or low-angle shots near the ground) especially convenient. Video buffs will appreciate that the high-def videos take up almost the entire screen, without the typical black-bar sandwich seen on standard 4:3 screens. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) is a welcome feature as always, especially on a camera with such a huge zoom range (holding it at eye-level minimizes hand-shake, so long range shots are crisper more often). The EVF is high-res and is free from the pixelation seen on cheaper EVFs.
As for the buttons, hotkeys, and toggles, the FZ100 has a few more than we’re used to seeing on a non-dSLR. On the rear, there’s the standard four-way pad, a quick-menu/delete button, toggles for playback mode and display info, an EVF/LCD toggle, an AF/AE lock, and a selection wheel. Up top, there’s a mode dial with 14 selections, the power switch, a burst-shooting hotkey, a video hotkey, and of course, a metal shutter release with the zoom tilter around the base. Rounding out the control scheme is a focus-mode selector on the left side of the lens, which switches between manual-focus and autofocus modes.
Performance and User Experience
The FZ100 performs like a $500 camera should: It’s snappy and intuitive, yet still chock-full of creative potential. Start-up is very quick, autofocus is fast and accurate (as it has been with all of the Panasonics I’ve seen this year), and shutter lag is barely noticeable once the focus is locked. The zoom extends and retracts quickly, though less so in video mode. Image stabilization is quite effective at the telephoto end, though blurriness due to hand-shake is inevitable every few shots.
Menus are responsive and easy enough to navigate. Canon’s interface still takes the cake as far as intuitiveness, but Panasonic is pretty good too. The hotkeys are useful, I never had to dig too deep in a menu to adjust what I wanted to, and the level of control is appropriate for a semi-intricate camera like this. The selection wheel in particular is a boon for adjusting settings in aperture and shutter priority modes, as well as controlling the manual-focus feature (which in itself is something you don’t see too often on a fixed-lens camera).
One of the FZ100’s marquee features is the 11-frame-per-second burst mode -- that’s with a mechanical shutter, not electronic, so these are full-quality shots. It’s a blast to use, and is exceptionally helpful for capturing fast moving subjects -- I captured small animals and hyperactive coworkers, but I think the most popular use would be to shoot sports. Though it doesn’t re-focus on every shot, it does re-focus five times per second, so if your object moves unpredictably (like a squirrel or youth soccer player), the shots are still relatively crisp and blur-free.
Image Quality
For those who are still unfamiliar with the superzoom genre, a crash course: These cameras might look like dSLRs, but they have more in common with compact point-and-shoots. The most important factor in any camera’s image quality is the size of its sensor. The sensor in a $500 superzoom is the same size as the one in a $120 ultracompact camera. It’s important to keep in mind that we measure a superzoom’s image quality against other superzooms and point-and-shoot cameras, not against dSLRs.
With that in mind, the FZ100 takes very good photos all around. It’s easy to point the camera and snap a crisp, well-exposed shot on the first try. Most shots are keepers. Colors seem a bit blueish to me, but it’s nothing that a little post-processing can’t correct. Shots at ISO 100 and 200 are very clear. Shots at 400 are still almost noise-free, though there’s a little bit of smearing at edges that can make colorful shots look a bit like a painting. This will irritate some pixel-peepers, or at least folks who like to regularly make prints larger than 8x10 inches, but it shouldn’t be a dealbreaker for most folks. Noise really creeps in at ISO 800 and shots at ISO 1600 are quite messy.
Shots get a little bit soft at the tips of the corners, but it’s barely noticeable, and I couldn’t discern any barrel distortion along the edges. Softness also shows a bit toward the telephoto end, but that’s not a big surprise. I didn’t notice any purple or green fringing in my shots, though I've seen other sample photos where this seemed to occur.
Despite the Live MOS sensor, I don’t get the impression that low-light performance is particularly notable. I got some solid shots indoors and in dim lighting, though it wasn't a guarantee and the darkest-set photos were almost always marred by noise. In any case, the MOS sensor doesn’t hurt, and like the overall image quality, the FZ100’s low-light shots are among the best you’ll get from a superzoom.
While I’m generally happy with the IQ, two things do bother me: One, the FZ35 took better photos. It maintained details better at higher ISOs, not by a huge margin, but it’s still frustrating to see a step backward for the sake of a higher megapixel count. Two, it’s expensive relative to the image quality. It’s quite good for having such a small sensor, and the extensive feature set justifies the price, but again, a few dSLRs go for less than the FZ100 and take significantly better shots.
Video is another one of the FZ100’s attention-grabbing features, with AVCHD 1080i capabilities. That’s a mouthful, but it basically means it shoots very high-res video in relatively compact file sizes. The videos looked quite good on the camera’s LCD, but my Core 2 Duo Mac Mini running OS X 10.5 and iLife ‘07 can’t play the videos back without a ton of stuttering (keep this in mind if you’re running an older Mac -- you may want to throttle down videos to 720p motion JPEG -- but most PCs don’t have this issue once Panasonic’s software is installed). I can tell you that the zoom works during video and the motor noise is barely noticeable, and that the stereo microphone does a nice job picking up ambient noises without too much wind noise. For all else, I honestly have to defer to other video tests around the Web, which look quite impressive.
Conclusion
As far as superzooms go, this is among the best, if not the best one we’ve seen, all things considered. It’s a well-built camera and the performance is top-notch. Anyone could pick this up and snap away in auto mode, but discovering all the high-end capabilities is where the fun lies, and that’s even a straightforward adventure thanks to an intuitive layout and menu system. The image quality is quite good too, the best in its class this year from what I’ve seen, edging out the Canon SX30. I can grudgingly forgive that last year’s model controlled noise a tiny bit better, since the FZ100’s longer zoom and wealth of high-end features are a fair trade. Panasonic really paid close attention to the details on this one.
Since a superzoom provides unmatched out-of-the-box versatility, the FZ100 could work for many, many types of photographers. Wildlife enthusiasts, tourists (though the bulk does make it more difficult to travel with), and most obviously, any amateur sports photographer. This is a perfect camera for parents of children in youth sports. The zoom lens is powerful enough to get close-ups from the stands, and the speedy burst mode combined with the equally quick autofocus should help capture great action shots with ease -- just point it down-field, hold down the shutter, and you’re bound to snap at least one or two keepers, even in difficult conditions.
If image quality is your main concern, you’re better off spending your $500 on an entry-level dSLR kit, like the Canon XS or Pentax K-x. The zoom range on a kit lens is very limited and entry-level feature sets are relatively light, but there’s no substitute for dSLR photo quality.
As for other superzooms, Canon’s SX line is always worth a look. Its latest, the SX30, has an absurd 35x zoom range and strong image quality for a lower price, though the FZ100 is more full-featured. Panasonic’s FZ40, which keeps the 24x zoom but strips a number of the bells and whistles, is also a strong choice for much less money. But overall, if money isn’t a consideration, the FZ100 is arguably the best superzoom you can buy this year.
Similar Products
Panasonic Lumix FZ100 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Any help is appreciated
........ Joe Prete
Does anyone have any thoughts on how the "soon to be released" FZ47 will compare to the FZ100??
BUT, I'm willing to wager that the FZ47 takes better photos than the FZ100. The 12 megapixel CCD sensor in the FZ47 might be like the one that was used in the widely adored FZ35 from a few years back, which is a good thing. We shall see.
Don't forget, as you look for the reviews, you'll be looking at last years reviews. This camera will grow on you fast. it's comfortable, well balanced and very precision. Look for my comments (they may be with HS20, HX100V or here at the FZ100. (I just wrote this advice to someone-look for my name & the date. Yes, make a gasket for the battery door, it's the only weak spot. The body is a little smaller than Fuji, but it should fit you fine. Get an extra Battery if you can PANASONIC BRAND, they do have a sensor and you could void your warranty, But the batteries go a long way. An extra is nice, but it can wait. Get SDHC cards, two 4GB or 8GB instead of one bigger card. Try to get it rated 10, or the best you can do. The FZ100 doesn't have the EXR (HDR) option that takes control of your camera and blacks out too like the Fuji (Save the headache too) But it does have all the other Bells & Whistles you may want. If you're only comparing, you have a long, hard journey ahead of you and you may miss the Fall colors. If you have any questions, just write in and someone will respond. If you want a lower priced option though, you should ask for Liam McCabe Good Luck.
.... Jprete755@gmail.com ..... Joe Prete
Can I also use any of these for professional work?
I am totally amateur and am trying to improve my skills with the help of those who are already more accustomed. I hope we can exchange information.
I decided not to throw out it because:
- it can save RAW
- have avesome LCD
- have full manual controls
- have extra zoom at 10MP and less
I shoot at ISO100, RAW+JPEG, NR -1, 10MP.
This save my card space without loosing IQ (RAW saves at 14MP), give me extra zoom bonus and capability to postprocess most valuable pictures with SILKIPIX.
WYPIWYG (What You Pay Is What You Get).
My question is, why are you itching for a new one if you're happy with what you have?
Two, most people who visit/read this site and even this page are inexperienced photographers, and they think that they're actually getting a dSLR when they buy a bulky camera with a big lens like this. $400 later, they're disappointed with grainy/splotchy/blurry images.
As to your all-in-one point, I say that in the full review, as well as the editor's comments. We try to make that point regularly. I agree this is an excellent all-in-one camera.
As for RAW processing, again, that's intimidating to a lot of folks -- a good chunk don't know how to do it, don't have the capability (ancient computer) or they're just not interested in doing all that to get a decent picture. But good point, and thanks for sharing, and thanks for spotting our oversight of the RAW + JPEG, I'll add it to the specs momentarily. Cheers.
Looking for a camera with a good zoom cant decide between Panasonic Lumix Fz100 and Cannon SX30
The FZ100 is a fine camera for what it is, and there are features you won't be able to get on a similarly priced dSLR. You definitely won't be able to afford a lens to match the FZ100, because a telephoto like that runs a few thousand bucks, but you probably won't miss the length at the long end -- cameras with such ridiculous 20x+ zooms didn't exist until last year, but people still took telephoto shots. Don't worry about it, in other words.
There's really no substitute for a dSLR when it comes to image quality. I'd always recommend a dSLR if you're planning to take photography seriously enough to sell shots. If it's more as a hobby or for fun, the FZ100 is a blast to use.
I am looking to purchase either the FZ100 or FZ40. I am confuse on which one I want to get. I am a hobbyist photographer who enjoys taking photo's on my spare time. Most of the time I enjoy taking pictures of landscape view and nature photos and find both these camera will work well for what I am looking for.
Anyone who owns the Panasonic Lumix DMC- FZ100 or FZ40 can give me some tips or more specifics of what both camera's are capable of doing.
Thank you.
If you're doing landscape shots, you probably don't need the high-speed burst shooting, so I'd say the FZ40 is fine for your needs.
I was really only had my eye on the FZ40 but then I saw the FZ100 I became really interested. I will be taking photos of architecture and interiors as well and would like to know if staying with the FZ40 would be best fit overall for those additional features.
I currently own a Panasonic ZS7( which is the best compact camera I've own) and want to upgrade to a DSLR that can give me the best possible photos, another thing, I am making a photo journal is another thing I am looking at these two cameras.
Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
There's been responses about some good comparisons like the Canon SX30 - how about with the Fuji HS10?
Thank you again for your assistance.
Here's the study.
wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/03...
Remember this is a bridge camera and that is what you get.
For what it is, it is about the best you can get and if you want more you need to get your hands in your pockets and pay for it.
This camera tries to be all things to all people and as an enthusiastic amateur and family man this is perfect.
Of coarse there will be noise at higher vooms but its amazing what you can do on your computers.
As I said before if you want absolute crystal clear high zoom images pay for it, and boy will you !!!!!
This is an excellent camera and does what it says on the tin
The good: Great burst, quick, no waiting. Great hinged LCD viewer for shooting things at otherwise very uncomfortable angles. Great zoom capability; you can photograph things you can't even see from half a mile a way. Easy to use. The color was very drab and flat "out of the box" but was easily adjusted to become very vivid.
The bad: High contrast scenes (a speeding boat leaving a white wake on the ocean, a white church tower against dark trees) end up blown out with pixellation along the contrast edge, even after adjusting and readjusting white balance. Even tree leaves under bright sunlight are covered with little blown-out highlights that look like talcum powder. Highly zoomed distance shots (that's why I got the superzoom in the first place) are smudgy (foliage) or look like they were painted on with a wide, flat brush (shake roof). Just too many IQ defects for a camera of this price. It really hurt to send it back, but what's the point of all the glamour if there's nothing underneath?
digitalcamera-hq.com/produc...
Panasonic Lumix FZ100 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix FZ100 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
- 2.0 out of 5
