Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Ultra Compact Digital Cameras category.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2
Editor's Review
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2 improves on the popular LX1's widely-loved feature set, and is one of the first digital cameras to provide a widescreen LCD. Widescreen, 16:9 aspect ratios are all the rage these days, and digital cameras are no different. With a 28mm wide-angle Leica lens, a 16:9 CCD for capturing those extra-large images, and 16:9 LCD display so nothing is overlooked, the LX2 will offer stunning panoramas and ensure that nobody gets left out of the shot. The LX2's movie mode can also handle 16:9, capturing video in high definition (1280 x 720) resolution (though only at 15 frames per second). Settings are easily switched to allow for typical 4:3 or 3:2 aspects. Despite it's wide format ambitions, the LX2 is still and ultra-compact, and of course, features Panasonic's Mega O.I.S. image stabilization to reduce the shimmy and shake of natural hand movement. Oh, and did we mention its 10.2 megapixel sensor is perhaps the largest ever crammed into such a small camera?
Specifications
- 10.2 megapixels
- Movie mode with sound (in 4:3 [VGA] and 16:9 [1280x720 @ 15fps] "high definition" modes)
- 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- JPEG and RAW file formats
- ISO 100-3200
- Auto focus, auto and manual exposure
- Secure Digital memory
- Lithium-ion battery
- 2.8-inch LCD with 16:9 aspect ratio
- Part Number: DMC-LX2
- Release Date: Jul 30, 2006
Shop for LX2 Accessories
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Bracket? (Pat Pope — 12/13/2011)
how do I turn off the 3 exposure setting?
reply to this comment
Hellskiss (08/14/2010)
I have a Panasonic DMC-LX2 camera.
My settings: 16x9/10M/30fps/Quality - Fine(low compression).
My 4GB SDHC memory card (PNY OPTIMA) only held 30 pictures and 30 seconds worth of video last time I shot with it before becoming full. In the past it has held way more. I have not changed any settings.
Anyone have any ideas why this is?
Thanks in advance,
Hellskiss
reply to this comment
My settings: 16x9/10M/30fps/Quality - Fine(low compression).
My 4GB SDHC memory card (PNY OPTIMA) only held 30 pictures and 30 seconds worth of video last time I shot with it before becoming full. In the past it has held way more. I have not changed any settings.
Anyone have any ideas why this is?
Thanks in advance,
Hellskiss
by James DeRuvo (08/17/2010)
You may want to reformat the card from time to time. That will plow the ground, as it were reclaiming any sectors that may have become questionable to "junk" files not fully deleted. But I'd also each that card because it may be a sign it's beginning to fail.
reply to this comment
Holding the lens (Dave Prout — 06/06/2010)
This worked for me. Thanks !
reply to this comment
If all else fails (Wes — 02/07/2010)
I hsve a FS5 that was doing this and I searched high and low and tried all the tricks and it seems this is what the cameras do when something is wrong not always to do with the lens and sometimes happens after you have used the macro lens or zoomed in and out a lot. Now nothing worked until I saw someone on youtube throw his camera onto the sofa I had nothing to lose so I threw it on the floor with a rug and made sure it hit the lens and forced it close I then also threw it making sure I hit every corner and guess what? It now works perfectly lol no idea why.
reply to this comment
Do the new lens adaptor and Wide conversion lens work with the LX2 ? (bobstephenson — 08/30/2009)
I like my Panasonic DMC-LX2 a lot and use it almost daily. I would love to widen the angle further for city shots.
I see the new DMC-LX3 has accessories including a lens adaptor (DMW-LA4) and wide conversion lens (DMW-LW46). Is there a new fitting on the lens for this camera, or do the adaptor and conversion lens work with the DMC-LX2 as well ?
Thanks
reply to this comment
I see the new DMC-LX3 has accessories including a lens adaptor (DMW-LA4) and wide conversion lens (DMW-LW46). Is there a new fitting on the lens for this camera, or do the adaptor and conversion lens work with the DMC-LX2 as well ?
Thanks
by James DeRuvo (09/02/2009)
I'm not much of a fan of adapters and converters. 1) widening the angle with an adapter will only cause barreling (like shooting out of a barrel. In addition, because you have a lens on top of a lens, you end up with losing about a stop of light speed and some clarity issues.
And these days, most photo management software have stitching utilities to put more than one picture together. So instead of pushing your image with an adapter, just take two images side by side and stitch them together.
reply to this comment
And these days, most photo management software have stitching utilities to put more than one picture together. So instead of pushing your image with an adapter, just take two images side by side and stitch them together.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2, viewfinder display is black, other display info is working (tlc199 — 04/21/2009)
I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2, I have not used it for a couple months and the viewfinder display is black. It will display images (from another media card I put in to test). The shutter clicks, but the image is black, the camera does allow me to delete the "black" picture it just supposedly processed. The other display indicators (battery level, settings, appear to display normally). I have seen other postings on the internet for this same problem, occurring after the camera was not used for awhile, but no answers. I removed the battery, reset camera settings to factory defaults, no luck. Panasonic tech support says to send it in to their repair facility and they are not aware of any "known issues", which I don't believe based on the other issues I saw. Terry
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2009)
Well, I'd search Panasonic's website for service advisories. Sounds like a faulty CCD chip. I'm betting they'll just reflash the firmware and bring it back up to speed. I'd send it in and see what happens ...
reply to this comment
Guidelines/Grid (Jenk — 04/14/2008)
This is a very stupid question and I'm sure there's a simple answer but how do I switch off the grid lines/ guide on my LX2? I've toggled around with the buttons and looked through the manual but still can't figure it out!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/15/2008)
press menu/set, then <. Press V to select the [SETUP] menu icon [wrench ] and then press >. Select Guide line. pg. 21 manual
reply to this comment
The memory card has two folders for pictures. Should I delete the second one or not wory about it? (WNAbrams — 04/06/2008)
I am using a panasonic dmc-lx2 camera
reply to this comment
Aditya D (04/08/2008)
I would not worry about it, if its there, its probably something for configuration, I'm guessing one might be for videos, or maybe even for config files. Its not doing any harm, so your best option is leave it.
reply to this comment
Multiple overlaid images (RonMiel — 04/01/2008)
I've just got a DMC-LX2, part of a job lot, so no returns.
when I turn it on it has multiple overlaid images like this:
aycu19.webshots.com/image/4... a few seconds it produces an error message like this
aycu28.webshots.com/image/4... lens cap is in fact removed.
Is there anything that can be done about it? I guess the camera firmware is corrupted. Is it possible to download and re-install?
reply to this comment
when I turn it on it has multiple overlaid images like this:
aycu19.webshots.com/image/4... a few seconds it produces an error message like this
aycu28.webshots.com/image/4... lens cap is in fact removed.
Is there anything that can be done about it? I guess the camera firmware is corrupted. Is it possible to download and re-install?
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2008)
I tend to agree that the firmware isn't loading properly. However, I'd also check water damage there or even impact damage.
And if you could get the firmware, it would be here ( www2.panasonic.com/consumer... ). However, since it isn't there, I can only assume there isn't an update available. HOWEVER, if you contact Panasonic support directly and request that the firmware be sent to you, they may just email it to you. 1-800-211-PANA (7262)
reply to this comment
And if you could get the firmware, it would be here ( www2.panasonic.com/consumer... ). However, since it isn't there, I can only assume there isn't an update available. HOWEVER, if you contact Panasonic support directly and request that the firmware be sent to you, they may just email it to you. 1-800-211-PANA (7262)
RonMiel (04/01/2008)
Thanks for the suggestion.
That's a US freephone no, isn't it? I live in UK and such numbers are inacessible from over here. Would you know the UK equivalent number?
reply to this comment
That's a US freephone no, isn't it? I live in UK and such numbers are inacessible from over here. Would you know the UK equivalent number?
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2008)
Ask, and you shall receive ( panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/... ).
reply to this comment
Lumix LX2 Memory card need to reformat it but camear stuck (LHDowek — 03/17/2008)
I have had the Lumix LX2 for just over a monthand after downloading all the photos to my laptop and deleted them. I now have an error message saying 'Memory card error please check the card'. I tried what the manual said to reformat the card but I press the buttons and cannot access the menu for formating. Is it a fault in the camera ? could I reformat the card in some other way ? PLease advise.
I live in the UK. Isit true that these cameras have been recalled ?
reply to this comment
I live in the UK. Isit true that these cameras have been recalled ?
Aditya D (03/17/2008)
I looked on Panasonics site at there is no issued recall, meaning that it is probably just a rumor going around. Just a quick question, when you deleted your pictures, did you delete them via deleting files from the laptop, or did you delete them using the review in the camera? If you used the laptop, you may have deleted a necessary formatting file on the card, which also may be why you can't access it. If this is not a problem, then several cameras have this error, which occurs randomly, and usually have to have either the firmware upgraded (check the Panasonic site), or send it in for repair if its still under warranty. Since its only a month old it should definitely still be under warranty. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2008)
I'd try resetting your camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Even better, invest in a $10 USB memory card reader and simply take your card out and plug it in. The PC will read it as a drive and it's a simple drag and drop to get your pictures onto the PC for editing and printing. Much better than trying to trouble shoot driver issues.
But in the end, cards do get corrupted from time to time. Especially if you're using your camera to delete the files. If your card goes bad, you can use a utility like "F-Recovery" ( [url=filerecoverytools.com/produ... ) to get back your pictures and recover your card.
reply to this comment
Even better, invest in a $10 USB memory card reader and simply take your card out and plug it in. The PC will read it as a drive and it's a simple drag and drop to get your pictures onto the PC for editing and printing. Much better than trying to trouble shoot driver issues.
But in the end, cards do get corrupted from time to time. Especially if you're using your camera to delete the files. If your card goes bad, you can use a utility like "F-Recovery" ( [url=filerecoverytools.com/produ... ) to get back your pictures and recover your card.
LHDowek (03/26/2008)
i did finally get through to the Panasonic helpline and they advised to try a different SD card as the one I was using may be corrupted. I did that and it solved the problem but I am still unsure as to what is the best way to delete the pictures once downloaded without de running the risk of erasing the formatting.
reply to this comment
Aditya D (03/26/2008)
I've seen people use both the formatting method each time and also the deleting each picture method. Recent studies show, not conclusively, but that it is possible by constantly reformatting the card it puts it under more stress and is more likely to get corrupted. Whether thats true or whether thats rumor has not been proved. I would probably just delete all of the photos from the computer just to be safe.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/28/2008)
I transfer the pics via USB memory card reader and then just delete the card. So far, no problems and it's been about 6 years.
reply to this comment
alex (12/28/2008)
I can confirm this is not a rumour going around. I have the same problem with one of my SD cards. It is a 2GB one from integral. My card reader and the camera can not access the card. My computer does not access it.
reply to this comment
Ian (08/09/2009)
I have (2) 1 GB (older) SD cards that my computer accesses just fine, but my camera says "memory card error"
I have 1 8GB NEW SD card that my camera accesses just fine, but my computer won't see at all.
All cards are FAT 32 format
computer is 3 y.o. w/ xp
camera is Lumix DMC LZ10
Ian
reply to this comment
I have 1 8GB NEW SD card that my camera accesses just fine, but my computer won't see at all.
All cards are FAT 32 format
computer is 3 y.o. w/ xp
camera is Lumix DMC LZ10
Ian
Lost Lizard (08/23/2009)
I have a Lumix DMC FZ7 and have been using it for about 2 years. In the last several months I was getting progressively more frequent memory card errors which appeared to resolve themselves by removing and reseating the card. Eventually, I could not do that and assumed the card was corrupt. I now have a new card and still the same problems.
reply to this comment
chris (12/15/2009)
i have the same problem with an 8gb kingston. there doesnt seem to be a firmware upgrade and i keep getting card err randomly.
Once you eject the card and reset it it works again. i bought another of these cards and am having the same problem still.
reply to this comment
Once you eject the card and reset it it works again. i bought another of these cards and am having the same problem still.
Now my question is it necessary to format card at all? (ckemp2141 — 02/20/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/22/2008)
Absolutely. You need to format the card before taking pictures much like you need to plow a field before planting crops. The settings menu should have a format command.
reply to this comment
t00nz (02/26/2008)
Yes, although your card may work in the near term, many people have experienced eventual corruption of their cards due to not formatting them. Recommend it at least once. Also recommend formatting the card in the camera that it is to be used. If your menus allow, select "full" or "low level" format, and not "quick" format. Remember that this will erase any existing pictures on the card, so download them beforehand.
reply to this comment
The screen is black, and the light meter is always on -2. (Eno — 09/15/2007)
I have the Lumix DMC-LX2, and I believe there is something wrong with the light meter. The camera won't take any pictures, and the screen won't display anything either. It is as if it is set on the highest shutter speed all the time. I've tried changing the shutter speed, but nothing changes! The power and everything else is fine.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/17/2007)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. After which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to Panasonic's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them. Sometimes, firmware can get corrupted when loading. Resetting the camera and updating the firmware can often address a great deal of issues.
reply to this comment
Eno (09/20/2007)
It still doesn't work. Nothing changes when i reset it. I also tried taking the battery out for a few minutes. Nothing. Also, there are no firmware updates for the camera, that I came across.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/20/2007)
I'd recommend then that you contact Panasonic support on this. It may need servicing. While you're at it, check their website for any service advisories or recalls.
reply to this comment
Eno (09/26/2007)
I took it into a qualified dealer's service department and they are sending it into Panasonic to have it checked. The person said it may be something with the CCD??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/27/2007)
It may. Both Canon and SONY have run into CCD issues of late prompting recalls for repair. Panasonic may be dealing with a similar issue. Check their website for a service advisory on faulty CCDs.
reply to this comment
please turn camera off and then on again: (chuckerr — 07/25/2007)
My camera work but I get this message after I take more than 5 pictures..than it work for 5 to8 pictures but the message come back
**please turn camera off and then on again**
any suggestions?
reply to this comment
**please turn camera off and then on again**
any suggestions?
Ben Keough (08/03/2007)
Hi Charles,
This seems to be a pretty common error with Panasonic (and Sony, I believe) cameras, as you can see here ( fixya.com/support/t120272-c... ) and here ( dcresource.com/forums/showt... ).
The issue appears to be that something has gotten lodged in the lens housing--possibly a grain of sand or something--or the lens has been banged and knocked off-kilter and it's giving the computer some kind of warning. I'd recommend doing one of the two following things:
1. Bang one corner of the camera firmly but gently against a padded surface once or twice. This may knock loose whatever's blocking it.
2. Get a can of compressed air (the kind that's used to clean keyboards) and spray it around the lens housing.
If neither of these help, check with Panasonic's repair department and see what it'd cost to get sent in and fixed.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
This seems to be a pretty common error with Panasonic (and Sony, I believe) cameras, as you can see here ( fixya.com/support/t120272-c... ) and here ( dcresource.com/forums/showt... ).
The issue appears to be that something has gotten lodged in the lens housing--possibly a grain of sand or something--or the lens has been banged and knocked off-kilter and it's giving the computer some kind of warning. I'd recommend doing one of the two following things:
1. Bang one corner of the camera firmly but gently against a padded surface once or twice. This may knock loose whatever's blocking it.
2. Get a can of compressed air (the kind that's used to clean keyboards) and spray it around the lens housing.
If neither of these help, check with Panasonic's repair department and see what it'd cost to get sent in and fixed.
Good luck!
Panasonic Error (Kat — 03/17/2010)
The Solution worked for me! Took all the screws out, blew in it a bit, did the holding the lens thing, and eventually we got it working - such a relief with such an expensive camera!
reply to this comment
Jas (01/15/2008)
Thanks alot Ben. My camera fell harshly on the concrete and i thought it was a gonner, but #2 worked. I just tapped it on my mousepad and the lens opened!
reply to this comment
Silly Jilly (05/24/2008)
This is how I fixed my DMC-FZ20 when I had the same problem: When the camera is off take a cloth and press against the lens then while you continue to press turn camera on.
reply to this comment
Alan Fagg (05/28/2008)
My daughter dropped her Lumix and this problem then occurred, I researched it on the Internet, and found various suggestions. e.g. apply slight pressure to the lens when the camera starts, wipe outside of lens, remove batteries etc. etc. etc. etc..
I tried everything - every time the camera was turned on the message appeared.
So I took out the batteries and sd card and stuck the camera in a drawer and bought a new camera.
Now the interesting bit - one month later, out of interest, I got out the camera, stuck in the battery and an old SD card (I used the Lumix card in my new camera) - AND it started up with no problems!! The problem had gone away - why - different SD card? Some internal memory finally "forgot" it had a problem?, perhaps it just had a long rest? - no idea.
Anyway its OK now, and I now have 2 cameras.
Weird - thank goodness I did not bin it!
So don't despair - try it - it may work for you.
ps. With the original sd card in, it still works ok.
reply to this comment
I tried everything - every time the camera was turned on the message appeared.
So I took out the batteries and sd card and stuck the camera in a drawer and bought a new camera.
Now the interesting bit - one month later, out of interest, I got out the camera, stuck in the battery and an old SD card (I used the Lumix card in my new camera) - AND it started up with no problems!! The problem had gone away - why - different SD card? Some internal memory finally "forgot" it had a problem?, perhaps it just had a long rest? - no idea.
Anyway its OK now, and I now have 2 cameras.
Weird - thank goodness I did not bin it!
So don't despair - try it - it may work for you.
ps. With the original sd card in, it still works ok.
kadushi (06/25/2008)
First number 1. After that the image was blurry, pressing the lens and turning it on fixed it for me!
reply to this comment
Chuck K. (08/10/2008)
My problem with the camera is this-I shoot in the I/A mode , mostly when using the zoom I use the 18x . Sometimes the camera will not take a picture no matter how the button is pressed. I have to shut the camera off then restart it to continue. This seems to occur mostly in landscape shots for some reason. I called the Panasonic service line twice but they could not help me. Does anyone have similar problems or any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Tony Soprano (10/30/2008)
Silly Jilly has the right answer if you've dropped your camera. I dropped our Lumix accidentally a few days ago. Googled it. Took the most prevalent advice and tried dropping mine again and again and it wasn't working. Then I turned it on and held the lens barrel when it came out. It stayed out when I turned on and off a few more times. I gave it a gentle push and, and...works like it's brand new.
reply to this comment
Nemrac (11/24/2008)
Had this same problem after my 1 year old dropped my Panasonic Lumix. I waited for the lense to poke out, then held it so it couldn't return. Then shut the camera off and back on again and it's working just great. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Glen (12/16/2008)
Got the message about turning the camera off then on again. Tried taking the battery out, fully charging it; taking the memory card out and restarting; held every button down while restarting; holding the lens in while restarting.
Thanks Nemrac---------> I took out the memory card as suggested by Alan, replaced it with another then held the lens out, shut the camera off then on and it came back with a memory card error. I put the original memory cad back in, turned it on and it reset itself. I can't confirm that it was the combination of both replacing memory card and holding lens out but it worked. So far no problems but we are off to Mexico where it will get some use. Thanks to all who posted. Glen
reply to this comment
Thanks Nemrac---------> I took out the memory card as suggested by Alan, replaced it with another then held the lens out, shut the camera off then on and it came back with a memory card error. I put the original memory cad back in, turned it on and it reset itself. I can't confirm that it was the combination of both replacing memory card and holding lens out but it worked. So far no problems but we are off to Mexico where it will get some use. Thanks to all who posted. Glen
Nathan Mcginty (01/04/2009)
Hey guys - just wanted to jump in and say thanks. Same thing - had the "please turn camera off" message. Held onto the lens a few times & also did some gentle tapping.
Seems to be working fine now.
Overall seems to be a pretty nice camera and take nice snaps. too bad about the lens thing.
reply to this comment
Seems to be working fine now.
Overall seems to be a pretty nice camera and take nice snaps. too bad about the lens thing.
Wouter Loch (01/23/2009)
I had this very same issue, but then I turned on my camera, gently pushed the lens back inside and turn it off and on again.
Now it works again!
Thank you digitalcamera-hq members!
reply to this comment
Now it works again!
Thank you digitalcamera-hq members!
Amateur (02/27/2009)
I just wanted to thank everyone for helping solve the same problem I had with my fz20, which kept saying "please turn camera off..." : I held onto the lens and turned it off, then powered it back on. Camera's working well again! And to think that I worried so much about needing to have it repaired and all. I am just so glad to have stumbled onto this site. Thank you, thank you, guys!
reply to this comment
Reid (05/10/2009)
Yep. I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX55 . I had the same "Please turn camera off and then on again.
I have an easy chair with well padded arms.
I pointed the lens vaguely downward and tapped gently on the side of the lens housing as it came out. After a couple of times, whatever was stuck in there must have fallen out or the lens got put back onto its track correctly, because this worked great. Gently was the key term here. Agains something soft. It was just enough to coax the lens back into correct functioning.
reply to this comment
I have an easy chair with well padded arms.
I pointed the lens vaguely downward and tapped gently on the side of the lens housing as it came out. After a couple of times, whatever was stuck in there must have fallen out or the lens got put back onto its track correctly, because this worked great. Gently was the key term here. Agains something soft. It was just enough to coax the lens back into correct functioning.
Mongo (05/11/2009)
Great advice! I was just about to buy a new camera when I googled my problem, found this board and after a few slight taps and holding the lens in place as it was coming out of the camera, the problem has been solved!
reply to this comment
Carrie (05/27/2009)
THANK YOU! I also held the lens as it came out so it could not retract, turned the camera off, then back on. Works! THANK YOU! My husband bought this for Christmas for me. I would hate to think I broke it 5 months later!
reply to this comment
Djxiii (06/09/2009)
Thanks for this great tip! I was getting this error as well on my DSC-S950. It took a few tries but my camera has started working again. I could see each time I turned my camera on that the lense was just not coming out all the way. Once I could coax it all the way out and hold it out I was able to get somewhere. After that all it took was to turn it off and on a couple more times and it has been consistently working fine ever since.
reply to this comment
shaban (07/04/2009)
dear Ben Keough
i follow your advices and my error release
very thanks
reply to this comment
i follow your advices and my error release
very thanks
shelby (07/24/2009)
i've tried allll of these things and nothing is working. im pretty sure the lense is just fine. i didnt drop it. i tried switching memory cards, tapping it, pressing the lense. and nothing works. i turn it on and off, take the battery pack out. but after about 5 seconds that message pops up. and it makes this noise like the lense is moving, but its not. idk im really confused and my dad bought it for me for christmas because my last one broke so hed be really made if its broken. please help!
reply to this comment
shelby (07/24/2009)
wooo nevermind. i fixed it!
reply to this comment
Jordan (08/04/2009)
i have a Lumix DMC LC50. I tapped on the sides of the lens housing every which way with 2 fingers while it was extended out. I must have knocked it back in place because after about 3 tries it stayed open and works again.
reply to this comment
Pmac (08/20/2009)
Hello I used some of the trouble shooting methods, and at least it turns on without the error message. The image is still blurry, however. When I zoom in there is blatantly 2 black specs (I'm almost certain it is sand,) but I cannot dislodge them or get them to move at all. What should I do?
Thanks.
reply to this comment
Thanks.
Whask (09/15/2009)
A lot of the solutions are are assuming that your lens is extending are you are able to grab it, what if it is not extending at all and you are getting the "please turnthe camera off and on" meassage?
Appreciate any tips, I was just really gettting into photography when this camera broke and now I'm back to a pocket point and shoot. :(
reply to this comment
Appreciate any tips, I was just really gettting into photography when this camera broke and now I'm back to a pocket point and shoot. :(
steveo (10/06/2009)
Cheers guys - solved my problem with Panasonic TZ5.
BUT - I tried all of the 'gentle' suggestions and nothing worked, so in the end I turned camera on, waited till the lens fully extended itself , gripped it, and after a second or two it stops attempting to retract, and then quite forcefully rotated the end lens chamber (it will only turn in one direction. When I done this i heard a grinding sand like noise as if there was sand stuck in there. I switched off & then back on & it was fixed!
reply to this comment
BUT - I tried all of the 'gentle' suggestions and nothing worked, so in the end I turned camera on, waited till the lens fully extended itself , gripped it, and after a second or two it stops attempting to retract, and then quite forcefully rotated the end lens chamber (it will only turn in one direction. When I done this i heard a grinding sand like noise as if there was sand stuck in there. I switched off & then back on & it was fixed!
Danny Delahunty (01/22/2010)
Hi, I also found that nothing was working and was starting to get stressed out!.. I must have turned it off and on again about 50 times before I found this forum, and then none of these methods were working until I tried the "not gentle" method of forcing the lens out by turning it manually until it was fully extended. I could finally see the grain of sand stuck in it! A lot of tapping and the damn thing finally came out.
reply to this comment
Lumix DMC FX30 (Kingstonian — 02/24/2010)
Have also been stuck in the "turn camera off then on again" mode for months now. None of the suggestions posted here seem to work. The only one I haven't tried is to get a can of compressed air. Please help! Thank you!
reply to this comment
Maria (06/25/2010)
This worked for me!
Gripped the lense when it came out. When it stopped trying to force itself back in, I forced it myself, pushing it back harshly. Something snapped, and I thought it was broken, but then I turned it on and off and it worked! AH!
reply to this comment
Gripped the lense when it came out. When it stopped trying to force itself back in, I forced it myself, pushing it back harshly. Something snapped, and I thought it was broken, but then I turned it on and off and it worked! AH!
you guys are the best!!!!! (Mblanco — 04/07/2011)
after 6 months with my camera in drawer, i decide to findout a solution for this problem and after a few tries (well i took me a while, dont give up at the first 50 tries lol and do not forget keep been gentile with the camera), of all your suggestions it worked.... you guys saved me of taking it to a chinese service centre.......thank you very much
reply to this comment
My LX2 Is Destroying My SD Cards! (dougunderscorenelson — 05/12/2007)
I was using Kingston SD 2GB card in both cases. When I attach the camera to the computer through USB, no drive/disk shows up, so I can't even attempt to scrape the disc for the images. Camera also refused to "Delete All" or "Format" the disc.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/16/2007)
Doug,
That's very strange. Have you tried viewing the cards through any other kind of reader (i.e., a mulitcard reader, a printer with card slots, etc)? Are you sure the slider on the side of the SD card isn't in the LOCK position?
-Ben
reply to this comment
That's very strange. Have you tried viewing the cards through any other kind of reader (i.e., a mulitcard reader, a printer with card slots, etc)? Are you sure the slider on the side of the SD card isn't in the LOCK position?
-Ben
dougunderscorenelson (05/16/2007)
Ben, I'm sure they're not locked (although it was tricky figuring out which position was the lock position, hehe), and I used a third-party reader to attempt to read them. The third-party reader couldn't see either filesystem, so it didn't even show up on my desktop or list of mounted drives. When I plug the camera in (with card in it), it at least shows up as a "disk with errors." I'm able to see it with disk utility programs, but not attempt a filesystem repair.
I've purchased a different brand of card and taken a few hundred test shots to see if the error repeats itself, but nothing so far. I'm attempting to use PhotoRec to get my old shots back, but it says it'll take 1420 hours, hehe.
reply to this comment
I've purchased a different brand of card and taken a few hundred test shots to see if the error repeats itself, but nothing so far. I'm attempting to use PhotoRec to get my old shots back, but it says it'll take 1420 hours, hehe.
Ben Keough (05/16/2007)
Hmm, well, my fingers are crossed for you with the new card. Let us know if the problem recurs.
reply to this comment
dougunderscorenelson (05/21/2007)
Ben, I contacted Panasonic and they asked if I formatted the card before using it in the camera. My answer was no; the manual says it's not necessary and the cards worked right out of the box. My previous cameras never had a problem with this, but; should I be formatting cards with the camera before use? Any ideas?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/23/2007)
I've seen some people recommend it (hard to say whether Panasonic was--sort of ambiguous there) but like you I've always just used them straight out of the box, so to speak.
reply to this comment
Leo (10/25/2007)
Does anyone have a good solution for viewing a subject on a bright day (beach) with a Lumix DMC-LX2 especially
with low angle shots.
reply to this comment
with low angle shots.
LX2 HELP! I cannot turn off burst mode... (llesser — 05/06/2007)
I just got my Lumix DMC-LX2. I takes great shots, but i cannot take it out of burst mode. I pressed the button as it directs in the manual, but the burst mode menu never comes up. Anyone ever have this happen?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/08/2007)
You may want to check your manual on how to perform a reset of the camera. That will turn it off. It should be in the setup menu.
reply to this comment
I Tomadini (09/04/2007)
It might be that you are "BRAKETING", in that case, press the +/- button tiil you see "auto braket" then adjust it to "0" (mid-point)<\>.
that should work.
I/T
reply to this comment
that should work.
I/T
Arni (01/26/2008)
THANK YOU I TOMADINI! Had the same problem.
reply to this comment
ERIC (11/26/2008)
I HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM THE BURST IS ON EVERY SETTING. I CANT TURN IT OFF. THE BUTTON DOSENT SEEM TO WORK. WORKS ONLY IN AUTO MODE.
reply to this comment
Can you edit pictures and captions on the camera ?? (johnm99 — 04/16/2007)
We are looking for a digital camera that can edit captions or titles right from the camera itself. We currently use a Kodak DC265.
reply to this comment
revhead227 (04/24/2007)
Hi John
yes you can do but only the way is in computer program photoshop if you have one .. if not you can go start,paint there .
your ditigal should had one like hoilday, birthday , edit inside program
there is softkey on left side to pick album setting or Camera name .
you can click copy and paste it in your internat
here is kodak.com/global/plugins/ac... wish you good luck
revhead227
reply to this comment
yes you can do but only the way is in computer program photoshop if you have one .. if not you can go start,paint there .
your ditigal should had one like hoilday, birthday , edit inside program
there is softkey on left side to pick album setting or Camera name .
you can click copy and paste it in your internat
here is kodak.com/global/plugins/ac... wish you good luck
revhead227
Where are the Leicas? (SallyMaria — 04/15/2007)
I'm a novice. Why are no Leica cameras listed and a search brings me to Panasonic?
reply to this comment
steve mccall (04/16/2007)
leica make lenses for panasonic under the lumix brand
same camera but at a quarter of the price
but if you must have the "leica" brand
leica-camera.co.uk/photogra...
reply to this comment
same camera but at a quarter of the price
but if you must have the "leica" brand
leica-camera.co.uk/photogra...
SallyMaria (04/16/2007)
No, I don't have to have a Leica. But I'm researching, trying to find the right camera on a budget, and while it may sound odd, the Cannon's haven't felt right in my hand. I have a $800 Fuji which I can't use because most everything blurs, so I don't want to go there again. I'm not a professional, but need to photograph my art which has a lot of detail that has to be captured.
reply to this comment
steve mccall (04/16/2007)
hello sally
yes, the feel of a camera is very important it is like a pair of shoes.
it is a very personal experience
my choice would be the panasonic lumix range
if you are on a budget try
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is a photo taken with the lumix lz3 showing its mastery of detail.
flickr.com/photos/andreas_h...
reply to this comment
yes, the feel of a camera is very important it is like a pair of shoes.
it is a very personal experience
my choice would be the panasonic lumix range
if you are on a budget try
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is a photo taken with the lumix lz3 showing its mastery of detail.
flickr.com/photos/andreas_h...
SallyMaria (04/16/2007)
It looks good, but since I'm taking photos that may have to translate into large, framable prints, does it have enough MP's? LOL I think I have run out of points - and I don't have enough knowledge to earn any.
reply to this comment
steve mccall (04/16/2007)
the numbers of mega pixels is not the only factor in prints.
other factors are :
1.the quality of the lens .
2. the type of paper used.
3.. the sharpness of the original photo.
4. the type of printer used.
the lz3 produces pictures that are 2560 x1712 pixels in 3:2 mode which similar to normal 35mm film size
this will give you a 16in x 12 in print
if you need bigger try the lz7 or the new lz8
reply to this comment
other factors are :
1.the quality of the lens .
2. the type of paper used.
3.. the sharpness of the original photo.
4. the type of printer used.
the lz3 produces pictures that are 2560 x1712 pixels in 3:2 mode which similar to normal 35mm film size
this will give you a 16in x 12 in print
if you need bigger try the lz7 or the new lz8
LX2 image recording trouble (jpl — 04/13/2007)
I just bought and LX2 and the LCD doesn't show anything and I don't seem to be able to record images. The troubleshooting guide in the manual is not helpful, and I'm starting to think the camera may be defective. Any advice out there?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (04/20/2007)
Jeff,
Have you tried pressing the 'display' button on the back of the camera? I don't know if this works on the LX2, but on many other cameras this toggles the screen on and off (or cycles between the screen and the viewfinder, which I gather the LX2 lacks).
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Have you tried pressing the 'display' button on the back of the camera? I don't know if this works on the LX2, but on many other cameras this toggles the screen on and off (or cycles between the screen and the viewfinder, which I gather the LX2 lacks).
Hope this helps!
Tony (06/11/2007)
My lumix lx2 just stopped displaying images and recording; no amount of menu juggling helped; I returned the product to the vendor. I wonder if this is a problem with this model -- I heard in Europe that they are withdrawing it, and that others had reported problems with the lens/shutter/lcd connection.
reply to this comment
jpl (06/11/2007)
Tony,
I'm actually on my second Lumix LX2 now, which worked for about 2 months, and now has the same problem as the first unit I got - that one was broke right out of the box. In a nutshell, the issue is with the ccd burning out on the camera. Considering this is the second one in a row for me, and it's generally very uncommon for a ccd to burn out, I have to believe they are on the cusp of a recall and have a serious problem with the 2006/2007 batch. I'm about to ship out my camera to the service center in Illinois, but am certainly not pleased with losing it for several weeks this time of year. Where did you hear about the recall in Europe?
Jeff
reply to this comment
I'm actually on my second Lumix LX2 now, which worked for about 2 months, and now has the same problem as the first unit I got - that one was broke right out of the box. In a nutshell, the issue is with the ccd burning out on the camera. Considering this is the second one in a row for me, and it's generally very uncommon for a ccd to burn out, I have to believe they are on the cusp of a recall and have a serious problem with the 2006/2007 batch. I'm about to ship out my camera to the service center in Illinois, but am certainly not pleased with losing it for several weeks this time of year. Where did you hear about the recall in Europe?
Jeff
Can anyone suggest which camera is better between Sony DSC-T100 and Canon Ixus 850IS... (bidepzai1107 — 03/17/2007)
I want to ask about the capture speed, quality of the image , the zoom and flash and so on... , thank you very much for your help.
By the way.. do you have any other good selection for pocket digital camera in US$300 --> US$300 price range.
reply to this comment
By the way.. do you have any other good selection for pocket digital camera in US$300 --> US$300 price range.
Andrew Skinner (03/18/2007)
Phan,
Between the two cameras, I would go for the Sony DSC-T100 ( amazon.com/o/ASIN/B000M4J2O... ). It has more optical zoom (5x), more resolution (8megapixels) and a higher ISO setting (better in low light situations). Although it costs about $50 - $100 more, it's well worth it.
As for other cameras in that price range, the only camera that seems to come close is the Panasonic DMC-LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has more resolution (10MP) but less optical zoom (4x).
Andrew
reply to this comment
Between the two cameras, I would go for the Sony DSC-T100 ( amazon.com/o/ASIN/B000M4J2O... ). It has more optical zoom (5x), more resolution (8megapixels) and a higher ISO setting (better in low light situations). Although it costs about $50 - $100 more, it's well worth it.
As for other cameras in that price range, the only camera that seems to come close is the Panasonic DMC-LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has more resolution (10MP) but less optical zoom (4x).
Andrew
bidepzai1107 (03/19/2007)
Thanks very much for your helpful suggestion..I think i might choose the Sony one.. I have tested it.. really cool and impressive....
reply to this comment
theranman (03/21/2007)
I've read on dpreview that when using flash, the camera automatically boosts the ISO to ISO400...which seems kinda silly. If the subject is within the flash's 12ft range, ISO100-200 should be max. This could be a problem...unless you don't mind setting the ISO manually on each and every flash shot. Let us know if you find this to be true.
Otherwise, the camera seems to be good.
reply to this comment
Otherwise, the camera seems to be good.
Panasonic Luminix DMC-LX2, Panasonic Luminix DMC-FZ50 or Canon SD800? (thekoaman — 03/08/2007)
I am a proffesional photographer and have many expensive SLR cameras, lenses and assesories. I want a compact camera with a wide angle capability. I want the best quality images I can capture. And I would like it to be consistant. I have narrowed my search down to these three cameras. I have looked at the images online and still am hesitant on which camera to purchase. I feel the lenses on the panasonic might have an advantage. However, the reviews on the canon are very simular. Also, I did have a kodak V570 that had a 23mm wide angle. I loved this, as well as most of the images I captured with it. I have the normal gripes about noise in low level lighting, but I realize that is to be expected with small digital cameras. Lastly, I see that the LX2 can only shoot at 28mm in the 16:9 ratio. Do the other two cameras shoot in 28mm always? PLEASE HELP?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (03/21/2007)
Renea,
If you're looking for a compact camera, I would not recommend the Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It will be closer in size to your SLR cameras. The Canon SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does stay at 28mm at the widest angle, so that may be an advantage for you. It is also slightly smaller. I love the ELPH that I have (S230 thats 5 years old), and it still captures great images. I'm sure you'll find the 7.1 megapixels compliment the 28mm lens just fine. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
If you're looking for a compact camera, I would not recommend the Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It will be closer in size to your SLR cameras. The Canon SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does stay at 28mm at the widest angle, so that may be an advantage for you. It is also slightly smaller. I love the ELPH that I have (S230 thats 5 years old), and it still captures great images. I'm sure you'll find the 7.1 megapixels compliment the 28mm lens just fine. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Too many cameras are making the buyers confused. What is THE camera? (bosspublic — 02/24/2007)
I have researching on the net for a couple of weeks to get the best knowledge of the pros and cons of all the available digital cameras within my budget of $500 MAX. But even after an extensive research I still ask myself "WHICH ONE THEN?". Unless you are a big bucks earner or rich daddy's son, it becomes little too much on the wallet to afford a second camera, so most buyers are looking for one single camera for all purpose, be it a person who takes photos only on trips and family occasions, or be it a person like me, who developed a bad habit of taking photos all the time (mostly due to the fact that I own a camera mobile).
For some reason I have fallen in blind love with the design and features of Panasonic (before I was an Olympus fan until my Olympus C 725 died on me). If I were to self assess myself I would say I am someone who has recently developed a passion for photography without much expert knowledge, which I soon would like to develop further after buying the right camera. [Please do correct me if I am being unjustifiably biased with Panasonic cameras).
My purpose is to take every day pics starting from random objects in the street to formal weddings and vacations. So could you please advise me if LX 2 which offers 16:9 aspect is better a buy (for me) or FZ 50 is the ideal choice. Since none of camera stores near me has these two models, I cannot actually hold the cameras to get the feel of it. Is the FZ 50 really bulky that I wouldn't feel like carrying it all the time? I wouldn't mind carrying a reasonable size camera bag with me, even though I would prefer a pocket camera which I can actually carry in my pocket all the time. The question is will I be really sacrificing much on the quality and functionality if I choose the LX 2? Since I am a new photo enthusiastic I want a camera with which I can develop my skill, and how effective/realisitic is the 12X zoom?
I am really lost here chosing between these two, so can someone please help me chose? Or do you suggest I look into another brand/model for my objective?
::HELP HELP::
reply to this comment
For some reason I have fallen in blind love with the design and features of Panasonic (before I was an Olympus fan until my Olympus C 725 died on me). If I were to self assess myself I would say I am someone who has recently developed a passion for photography without much expert knowledge, which I soon would like to develop further after buying the right camera. [Please do correct me if I am being unjustifiably biased with Panasonic cameras).
My purpose is to take every day pics starting from random objects in the street to formal weddings and vacations. So could you please advise me if LX 2 which offers 16:9 aspect is better a buy (for me) or FZ 50 is the ideal choice. Since none of camera stores near me has these two models, I cannot actually hold the cameras to get the feel of it. Is the FZ 50 really bulky that I wouldn't feel like carrying it all the time? I wouldn't mind carrying a reasonable size camera bag with me, even though I would prefer a pocket camera which I can actually carry in my pocket all the time. The question is will I be really sacrificing much on the quality and functionality if I choose the LX 2? Since I am a new photo enthusiastic I want a camera with which I can develop my skill, and how effective/realisitic is the 12X zoom?
I am really lost here chosing between these two, so can someone please help me chose? Or do you suggest I look into another brand/model for my objective?
::HELP HELP::
Ardi Ounapuu (02/24/2007)
Hello,
Since your question is really BIG, I am not intending to recommend you a particular camera. But I will try to give you some points that may help you to find the right camera.
Since you mentioned that you take pictures all the time, means that you do a lot of picture taking indoors as well. Therefore you need a camera that has wide angle lens. 28mm or even better. This requirement will instantly limit the selection to only few models. Those wide angle lens attachments don't really work.
Next thing- make sure that the lens has wide aperture like 2.8 or even better at it's wide end.
Another feature to look for next- try to find a camera that has as many manual controls as possible. Like aperture and shutter priority and manual focus.
You may also want the lens to have macro feature as well.
If you still need a super zoom too then I would probably go for Samsung Pro815. It may cost a little bit more than $500. But it would be more expensive to buy another camera later...
reply to this comment
Since your question is really BIG, I am not intending to recommend you a particular camera. But I will try to give you some points that may help you to find the right camera.
Since you mentioned that you take pictures all the time, means that you do a lot of picture taking indoors as well. Therefore you need a camera that has wide angle lens. 28mm or even better. This requirement will instantly limit the selection to only few models. Those wide angle lens attachments don't really work.
Next thing- make sure that the lens has wide aperture like 2.8 or even better at it's wide end.
Another feature to look for next- try to find a camera that has as many manual controls as possible. Like aperture and shutter priority and manual focus.
You may also want the lens to have macro feature as well.
If you still need a super zoom too then I would probably go for Samsung Pro815. It may cost a little bit more than $500. But it would be more expensive to buy another camera later...
bosspublic (02/24/2007)
Ardi:
Thanks for your reply, though it has given me better ideas of what to look for in a camera for my type of preference, but still left me confused. Pro815 is a great camera, but it lacks any IS and also shutter lag is considerably slower than most cameras of its type. According to dpreview, it is in competition with Panasnonic FZ 30, but I was looking at the possibilties of owning a FZ 50 which does overcome some of the lackings of the FZ 30.
Can you name a few other models which I can look into?
reply to this comment
Thanks for your reply, though it has given me better ideas of what to look for in a camera for my type of preference, but still left me confused. Pro815 is a great camera, but it lacks any IS and also shutter lag is considerably slower than most cameras of its type. According to dpreview, it is in competition with Panasnonic FZ 30, but I was looking at the possibilties of owning a FZ 50 which does overcome some of the lackings of the FZ 30.
Can you name a few other models which I can look into?
WHAT CAMERA HAS THE SHAREST FOCUSED PHOTOS? (prcmabest72 — 02/05/2007)
I WANT A SMALL CAMERA AND I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE PRICE, I JUST WANT SHARPER PHOTOS.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/05/2007)
C.
You might try the Panasonic DMC-LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has the highest resolution (10.2 Megapixels) of the ultra compact cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) reviewed on this site. That will allow for ultra crisp photos. The high ISO settings and image stability functions of the camera will make it that much better in low light settings. This camera should fit your needs just fine.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You might try the Panasonic DMC-LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has the highest resolution (10.2 Megapixels) of the ultra compact cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) reviewed on this site. That will allow for ultra crisp photos. The high ISO settings and image stability functions of the camera will make it that much better in low light settings. This camera should fit your needs just fine.
Andrew
prcmabest72 (02/05/2007)
Thanks for your good idea/ I'll look up the camera tonight/
thanks.
reply to this comment
thanks.
Andrew Skinner (02/05/2007)
Glad to be of assistance.
reply to this comment
Help choosing a Digital Camera Please (mgoblue1 — 12/15/2006)
I am trying to choose a digital camera. I want it for all around purposes. I am looking between several cameras and have no clue which is the best.
My choices are the Canon SD 900, Canon Powershot G7, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50, Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2.
I do want the camera to be around 8+ MP, be able to shoot video (I seem to be fond of the ones that do the 'HD' videos), it seems RAW format may be important? I also perhaps may want to keep my options open in terms of getting add ons if I choose to pursue this further, yet I don't know if some of these cameras are too big if I plan on traveling quite a bit, especially places that are rainy.
I am open to other suggestions as well for digital cameras. My price range is around ~600 maximum for now.
reply to this comment
My choices are the Canon SD 900, Canon Powershot G7, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50, Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2.
I do want the camera to be around 8+ MP, be able to shoot video (I seem to be fond of the ones that do the 'HD' videos), it seems RAW format may be important? I also perhaps may want to keep my options open in terms of getting add ons if I choose to pursue this further, yet I don't know if some of these cameras are too big if I plan on traveling quite a bit, especially places that are rainy.
I am open to other suggestions as well for digital cameras. My price range is around ~600 maximum for now.
Ben Keough (12/15/2006)
Hi John,
The cameras you've chosen are all very good machines, but they're also sort of all over the digital camera map. The SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an ultracompact camera--very tiny, very powerful, but lacking in some of the manual controls/settings that the other, larger cameras you've selected have.
The LX2 is an interesting choice. It's a pretty unique camera, in that it offers both a 16:9 aspect ratio widescreen sensor (the only camera that does so) and a HD video recording mode. You should be aware, though, that the HD recording mode can only shoot at 15 frames per second (as opposed to the standard 30fps), which means that the HD video, while huge, will also be jerky. Furthermore, the LX2 has questionable image quality, despite its slick design and great features.
The G7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a mid-sized, semi-bulky digital that packs a whole lot of punch, but that punch comes at what many consider to be too much cost. As a successor to the much-loved G5 and G6 models, it falls a little short, but it's a fine camera for sure.
The FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a member of what's known as the ultrazoom class of digitals--it features SLR-like styling (a large, bulky body with a SLR-like but fixed external lens casing) and a 12x image-stabilized zoom. It also offers a 10 megapixel sensor, but as the dpreview.com review ( dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... ) of the camera put it, it "stretches its sensor to almost breaking point and compensates for the lack of sensitivity in anything but the brightest conditions by using excessive noise reduction." In other words, while it's the most feature-packed of the cameras you've selected, it might not produce the best image.
Really, which camera is best for you will depend much on what you want and how you want to use it. I don't think any of these cameras are too big for travel, assuming you don't mind carrying a small bag. None of them offer a very usable HD video mode, but most have very nice 640x480, 30fps modes. One thing you should consider is whether you're planning to simply point and shoot, or if you want to mess with manual settings and get artsy with your photography. If you're looking for simple point and shoot photography, the SD900 or LX2 may be the better choices; if you want to really get into manual photography, the G7 and FZ50 are more in line with your needs.
If you can develop a more specific idea of what you want, I can try to help you further. Let me know, and good luck!
reply to this comment
The cameras you've chosen are all very good machines, but they're also sort of all over the digital camera map. The SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an ultracompact camera--very tiny, very powerful, but lacking in some of the manual controls/settings that the other, larger cameras you've selected have.
The LX2 is an interesting choice. It's a pretty unique camera, in that it offers both a 16:9 aspect ratio widescreen sensor (the only camera that does so) and a HD video recording mode. You should be aware, though, that the HD recording mode can only shoot at 15 frames per second (as opposed to the standard 30fps), which means that the HD video, while huge, will also be jerky. Furthermore, the LX2 has questionable image quality, despite its slick design and great features.
The G7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a mid-sized, semi-bulky digital that packs a whole lot of punch, but that punch comes at what many consider to be too much cost. As a successor to the much-loved G5 and G6 models, it falls a little short, but it's a fine camera for sure.
The FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a member of what's known as the ultrazoom class of digitals--it features SLR-like styling (a large, bulky body with a SLR-like but fixed external lens casing) and a 12x image-stabilized zoom. It also offers a 10 megapixel sensor, but as the dpreview.com review ( dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... ) of the camera put it, it "stretches its sensor to almost breaking point and compensates for the lack of sensitivity in anything but the brightest conditions by using excessive noise reduction." In other words, while it's the most feature-packed of the cameras you've selected, it might not produce the best image.
Really, which camera is best for you will depend much on what you want and how you want to use it. I don't think any of these cameras are too big for travel, assuming you don't mind carrying a small bag. None of them offer a very usable HD video mode, but most have very nice 640x480, 30fps modes. One thing you should consider is whether you're planning to simply point and shoot, or if you want to mess with manual settings and get artsy with your photography. If you're looking for simple point and shoot photography, the SD900 or LX2 may be the better choices; if you want to really get into manual photography, the G7 and FZ50 are more in line with your needs.
If you can develop a more specific idea of what you want, I can try to help you further. Let me know, and good luck!
Ardi Ounapuu (12/15/2006)
The FZ50 seems to be technically most advanced model if we compare it with the other 3 cameras. RAW format is helpful if you like to edit your pictures using image processing software that is compatible with the specific RAW. The video you can take with those cameras is not really HD. If you need HD video option then you have to purchase HD camcorder that costs over $1000.
reply to this comment
mgoblue1 (12/15/2006)
Hey,
Thanks for the responses. The video taking ability is the least important feature for me I guess.
In the past I have just used point and shoot. I would like to have some manual control. The LX2 is the one I am most leaning towards, but the questions about its image quality is making me hesitant.
The main point on the SD 900 for me is that there is no image stabilization plus the LX2 has a much wider angle capabilities, thus seems better to me atleast from just looking at features.
The FZ50 is one I just saw today and seemed like an interesting option.
The G7 seemed like a good option because it was not as big as the FZ50, but still I could purchase the add on to get wide angle etc if I wanted to later, but I have read that it may be a bit expensive for what I am getting. Also, it does not have RAW, and I am a pretty techincal person when it comes to computer so I probably would wnt to edit pictures etc so having this mode may be helpful? Plus this model would be easier for me to take traveling to places like India.
My goal would be to get a camera that could perhaps grow as I start getting more into photography and one that could last.
Thus as of now I am leaning towards the LX2 and have researched so many cameras that I think I am confusing myself now with all the reviews out there.
I don't know how important MP but any suggestions would be great on these or other cameras which I have overlooked.
reply to this comment
Thanks for the responses. The video taking ability is the least important feature for me I guess.
In the past I have just used point and shoot. I would like to have some manual control. The LX2 is the one I am most leaning towards, but the questions about its image quality is making me hesitant.
The main point on the SD 900 for me is that there is no image stabilization plus the LX2 has a much wider angle capabilities, thus seems better to me atleast from just looking at features.
The FZ50 is one I just saw today and seemed like an interesting option.
The G7 seemed like a good option because it was not as big as the FZ50, but still I could purchase the add on to get wide angle etc if I wanted to later, but I have read that it may be a bit expensive for what I am getting. Also, it does not have RAW, and I am a pretty techincal person when it comes to computer so I probably would wnt to edit pictures etc so having this mode may be helpful? Plus this model would be easier for me to take traveling to places like India.
My goal would be to get a camera that could perhaps grow as I start getting more into photography and one that could last.
Thus as of now I am leaning towards the LX2 and have researched so many cameras that I think I am confusing myself now with all the reviews out there.
I don't know how important MP but any suggestions would be great on these or other cameras which I have overlooked.
Ben Keough (12/15/2006)
John,
Personally, I think the LX2 has the most interesting feature set, and I like both its widescreen sensor and its wide-angle lens. You can take a look at some sample images taken with the camera [url=dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... and see if you can see the problems with the image quality that the reviewers are talking about. I have to say it looks fine to me for the average user, but of course at full size the problems with noise reduction and image smear might be more apparent.
If you're already leaning toward the LX2, I'd recommend buying it from a reputable retailer with a return policy you can trust, try it out and see if you like it. If you do, keep it. If you don't, return it and try something else. That way at least you'll know.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Personally, I think the LX2 has the most interesting feature set, and I like both its widescreen sensor and its wide-angle lens. You can take a look at some sample images taken with the camera [url=dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... and see if you can see the problems with the image quality that the reviewers are talking about. I have to say it looks fine to me for the average user, but of course at full size the problems with noise reduction and image smear might be more apparent.
If you're already leaning toward the LX2, I'd recommend buying it from a reputable retailer with a return policy you can trust, try it out and see if you like it. If you do, keep it. If you don't, return it and try something else. That way at least you'll know.
Good luck!
For Info (01/21/2007)
Cheers for the info.
One problem with wide screen photos is the amount of distortion that appears.
The lamp post and Westminster Clock bends heavily.
Another is that humans FOCUS their BRAINS on one central subject and wide screen pictures attempt to bring too much information into the frame.
Photography is an art form and other artists will have different preferences and ideals which are just as correct.
reply to this comment
One problem with wide screen photos is the amount of distortion that appears.
The lamp post and Westminster Clock bends heavily.
Another is that humans FOCUS their BRAINS on one central subject and wide screen pictures attempt to bring too much information into the frame.
Photography is an art form and other artists will have different preferences and ideals which are just as correct.
sandi-hey (01/21/2007)
Hi John,
LX2 looks to be good camera but I purchased the FZ50 about 3 weeks back and believe me the pictures that I have clicked are 80% very good..I would suggest you FZ50 if you dont want to go to the SLR group - the Zoom and the picture clarity are its plus points, If you can provide me your email address I can send you a few photos Ive clicked with it....and Im still a learner
reply to this comment
LX2 looks to be good camera but I purchased the FZ50 about 3 weeks back and believe me the pictures that I have clicked are 80% very good..I would suggest you FZ50 if you dont want to go to the SLR group - the Zoom and the picture clarity are its plus points, If you can provide me your email address I can send you a few photos Ive clicked with it....and Im still a learner
vahid (02/17/2007)
Just G7 !!!
reply to this comment
Extreme III memory card (camera lover — 12/10/2006)
Is it worth it to purchase an Extreme III memory card instead of an Ultra II card for the Panasonic DMC--LX2 despite the significant difference in price?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/11/2006)
Hi,
The Extreme III SecureDigital card does read and write significantly quicker than the Ultra II card, but the real question is whether the LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) can take advantage of this difference. I've read dozens of message board threads on the subject and most of them seem to agree that on a bigger, more high performace camera like a dSLR the difference might be noticeable, but that a more mid-range camera like the LX2 might not take enough advantage of its extra speed to be worth the extra $$$. This isn't really a clear-cut answer, I know, but I hope it'll help somewhat. Good luck!
reply to this comment
The Extreme III SecureDigital card does read and write significantly quicker than the Ultra II card, but the real question is whether the LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) can take advantage of this difference. I've read dozens of message board threads on the subject and most of them seem to agree that on a bigger, more high performace camera like a dSLR the difference might be noticeable, but that a more mid-range camera like the LX2 might not take enough advantage of its extra speed to be worth the extra $$$. This isn't really a clear-cut answer, I know, but I hope it'll help somewhat. Good luck!
Fuji Finepix F31 FD - best option? (bluenote — 12/09/2006)
i have a Canon 20D, but I find I carry it less and less on my daily travels for work.
I want something small to keep in my bag or pocket, BUT...it needs to be a great camera:
- must have decent low light shooting....this is VERY important.
- I would like it to have some manual controls if possible, other than the typical "scene modes", unless scene modes are awesome.
- must have image stabilizing..or something of that effect
- must capture good color since I will be shooting mostly in bright hazy flat weather, or low light shadowed areas.
- would REALLY like it to be able to capture to raw file for editing in CS2 or Aperture
reply to this comment
I want something small to keep in my bag or pocket, BUT...it needs to be a great camera:
- must have decent low light shooting....this is VERY important.
- I would like it to have some manual controls if possible, other than the typical "scene modes", unless scene modes are awesome.
- must have image stabilizing..or something of that effect
- must capture good color since I will be shooting mostly in bright hazy flat weather, or low light shadowed areas.
- would REALLY like it to be able to capture to raw file for editing in CS2 or Aperture
by James DeRuvo (12/12/2006)
There's one reason I would say "no" to the Fuji. It uses a proprietary xD media card. That means you would end up having two separate media cards for both your cameras. That's a hassle. Course, your 20D uses compact flash, so that's largely a wash, I guess.
My recommendation is another Canon, either the S3IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), or the A710IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both have some manual control, good low light, IS. Sadly, they don't capture RAW.
RAW options include the Kodak EasyShare P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) that also has manual control.
reply to this comment
My recommendation is another Canon, either the S3IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), or the A710IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both have some manual control, good low light, IS. Sadly, they don't capture RAW.
RAW options include the Kodak EasyShare P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) that also has manual control.
Bell (12/15/2006)
Fuji has great sensor, it is one of the best in shooting in low light. Fuji have said that their F30/F31FD is close to vision like human eye. The only weakest the that it has lots of purple fringing.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/18/2006)
Bell, that's a good marketing line, but is it true?
reply to this comment
gadgetster (12/18/2006)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/19/2006)
Well, that's certainly putting the proof in the pudding! Well done Gadgetster.
reply to this comment
Can't decide between Samsung NV10 and Canon A710 IS (camera lover — 12/03/2006)
I like the large, high-quality 6x optical zoom with optical image stabilization on the Canon. However, i like the higher mega-pixel count, considerably thinner size, and smart-touch system on the Samsung. In addition, i'm not really sure which has better features or which has a better image processor(or whether that even really matters much).
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/04/2006)
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has actual optical image stabilization, while the Samsung has CCD shift stabilization. So if the IS is an important factor for you, the A710's system is more effective. The Samsung's IS system doesn't do a whole lot (in my opinion) aside from slow the camera down.
I've heard of some image quality issues with the Samsung in that the photos can be very contrasty and 'punchy' in color... there is no way to adjust this inside the camera, you'd have to do it with photo editing software afterwards.
On the other hand, the Samsung doesn't have the problem that the A710 IS is lately getting slammed for- a very slow shot to shot time with the flash on. The A710 can take a very long time between shots at full flash, but the Samsung takes about 1.5 seconds, which is fairly fast.
In terms of the sensor, the one on the Samsung is bigger but that makes perfect sense considering it's got more megapixels. To me, the photos this camera produces just don't look as good as I would expect from 10 megapixels. So unless you use full flash a lot and the occasional slowness of the A710 is really going to drive you nuts, I'd lean towards the Canon.
<a href="dpreview.com/reviews/samsun... is a great review of the Samsung (since we don't have this camera profiled on our site). On the last page it offers some sample images that should help you a lot. My other advice is to go to a camera store if possible and actually try these cameras out in person to see which one feels better in terms of operation, speed etc.
reply to this comment
I've heard of some image quality issues with the Samsung in that the photos can be very contrasty and 'punchy' in color... there is no way to adjust this inside the camera, you'd have to do it with photo editing software afterwards.
On the other hand, the Samsung doesn't have the problem that the A710 IS is lately getting slammed for- a very slow shot to shot time with the flash on. The A710 can take a very long time between shots at full flash, but the Samsung takes about 1.5 seconds, which is fairly fast.
In terms of the sensor, the one on the Samsung is bigger but that makes perfect sense considering it's got more megapixels. To me, the photos this camera produces just don't look as good as I would expect from 10 megapixels. So unless you use full flash a lot and the occasional slowness of the A710 is really going to drive you nuts, I'd lean towards the Canon.
<a href="dpreview.com/reviews/samsun... is a great review of the Samsung (since we don't have this camera profiled on our site). On the last page it offers some sample images that should help you a lot. My other advice is to go to a camera store if possible and actually try these cameras out in person to see which one feels better in terms of operation, speed etc.
camera lover (12/04/2006)
thanks. you've made some good points about these two cameras. when reading an online review at www.dpreview.com about the nv-10, it mentioned this punchy factor when it comes to the color red, and the peculiar occurence of the nv-10 having only digital stabilization while its big brother, the nv-7 has both digital and optical. Also, in some of the circuit city websites, people mentioned the slow flash problem in the canon, most likely do to the decreased amount of batteries from four aa-cells to two aa-cells. I think im leaning toward the canon, but as usual, as soon as i think that i have decided on a camera, i discovery another and then come to a conflict between them. This time it is the canon and the Panasonic DMC-LX2. Despite being a little more expensive, not really a problem, just means that it will take longer to save up for, a number of things about the Panasonic intriqued me, such as it 16:9 ccd sensor and its high-def, although a little shaky due to a maximum of 15 fps, video mode.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/04/2006)
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is a great camera... for certain things. The one catch on this one is that many people say the Panasonics that have more than 5 or 6 megapixels are excessively noisy/ grainy at ISOs above 200 or so. Not sure why this is, as they have quality lenses and good sized sensors- it just seems to be a drawback of the Panasonic sensor. The LX2 has a built-in noise reduction system, but sometimes it goes overboard and results in images that look excessively 'blotchy' or 'painted.' DPReview calls it "sledgehammer" noise reduction.
I would check out some sample images of the LX2 at higher ISOs, compared to any other camera you're considering. About halfway down <a href="dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... page</a> is an example of the Noise Reduction in action. Do note that it does print much better than it looks on the computer, and some people like the way this looks, so it's not necessarily bad- but definitely something you should examine.
reply to this comment
I would check out some sample images of the LX2 at higher ISOs, compared to any other camera you're considering. About halfway down <a href="dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... page</a> is an example of the Noise Reduction in action. Do note that it does print much better than it looks on the computer, and some people like the way this looks, so it's not necessarily bad- but definitely something you should examine.
Are there any digital cameras that have widescreen LCDs? (camera? — 11/22/2006)
I like panoramic shots. What's out there that will display previews that aren't cropped or squished?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/22/2006)
Hi,
There are a few manufacturers that currently offer digital cameras with widescreen LCDs. Most of these have an aspect ratio of 16:9, and allow for widescreen video and still image capture so that the clips and photos can be shown seamlessly on widescreen TVs. Casio's Exilim series offers many models with this capability--the EX-S770 and EX-Z1000 are the most cutting edge of these. Panasonic also produces some models with widescreen LCDs, most notably the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... LX2</a>. There's also the fairly old Fujifilm FinePix F810, which was an early adopter in the widescreen LCD market.
Your question, however, is about panoramic still photographs. Since the aspect ratio on these shots is rarely locked at 16:9 ("panoramic" is generally defined as an aspect ratio of 2:1 or greater but can cover a lot of ground), I'm not sure that these kinds of LCDs will completely eliminate the cropping and squishing you're experiencing with standard 4:3 screens, especially if you're creating panoramas with a "stitch" function. If you're simply shooting 16:9 widescreen shots, on the other hand, these models will work just fine.
I hope this answers your question, but feel free to reply if not, and I'll try to help you out.
reply to this comment
There are a few manufacturers that currently offer digital cameras with widescreen LCDs. Most of these have an aspect ratio of 16:9, and allow for widescreen video and still image capture so that the clips and photos can be shown seamlessly on widescreen TVs. Casio's Exilim series offers many models with this capability--the EX-S770 and EX-Z1000 are the most cutting edge of these. Panasonic also produces some models with widescreen LCDs, most notably the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... LX2</a>. There's also the fairly old Fujifilm FinePix F810, which was an early adopter in the widescreen LCD market.
Your question, however, is about panoramic still photographs. Since the aspect ratio on these shots is rarely locked at 16:9 ("panoramic" is generally defined as an aspect ratio of 2:1 or greater but can cover a lot of ground), I'm not sure that these kinds of LCDs will completely eliminate the cropping and squishing you're experiencing with standard 4:3 screens, especially if you're creating panoramas with a "stitch" function. If you're simply shooting 16:9 widescreen shots, on the other hand, these models will work just fine.
I hope this answers your question, but feel free to reply if not, and I'll try to help you out.
Looking for Best Compact Camera (eamitk — 11/20/2006)
Hi All, I need a compact camera with good battery life, optical zoom should be 4X or above and I should be weather proof.
Can anyone guide me to the right model?
Thanks in advance.
reply to this comment
Can anyone guide me to the right model?
Thanks in advance.
Brenda Paro (11/21/2006)
I typically lean towards a Panasonic for compact, and the Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good choice. For a slightly longer zoom there is also the Fuji Finepix F650 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both have really good ratings, I can vouch for the Panasonic having good image quality, haven't seen samples from the Fuji but judging from the reviews people are satisfied with it. As far as weatherproof, that's kind of tricky- I don't know of any digital cameras that can withstand weather (rain etc.) without possible damage.
reply to this comment
Please help me decide between the Canon G7 and the Lumix LX2?? (Sarah — 11/11/2006)
I am going to use it to take shots of my artwork which is mixed media and for general use. I see that the G7 does not have RAW option, which the LX2 does. I am planning on manipulating the shots on photoshop and want the images to be as clean and clear as possible. Thanks.
reply to this comment
Alejandro (11/14/2006)
If you are focusing almost soley on still life shots, than go with the panasonic. It has the raw format which will give you the higher quality pictures and more ability to edit them in photoshop, as well as shooting in 16:9 and a slightly larger (2.8") LCD. However, if you plan on using the camera for any other types of shots, i.e. candid shots, etc. you may want to go with the canon G7. The canon features an optical viewfinder (becoming very rare in non dslr cameras), a higher zoom capability, the option of an external flash and lens. A very interesting and extremely useful feature the canon has over almost any digital camera out there is an ISO dial on top of the camera. Being able to switch from ISO 200 all the way to 1600 almost instantaneously facilitates better light levels in candid shots. Overall, the canon is much more more versatile in everything except picture format (RAW), but if you are taking still pictures you might as well splurge for a slightly older dslr. As far as portability and function, the Canon wins hands down.
reply to this comment
Card for the LX2, plug and shoot ? Need help please ! (MARTY — 11/10/2006)
I just bought the LX2 with a Lexar 1 Gb high speed card, is the card plug and shoot or do I have to format the card or something ?? I am a little confused with this, on the outside of the card package is says has to be formatted. Do I put the card in the camera and the camera will format this or am I missunderstanding the instructions ???
reply to this comment
MARTY (11/11/2006)
Well I figured out for myself that it was a "plug & play" scenario. I just bought it and am now shooting pictures and learning about the camera as I go along. I am looking forward to learning this new camera.
reply to this comment
George W Bush (11/12/2006)
Its Plug and Shoot every time.STUPID!!! You just know I cant be wrong.
reply to this comment
Quality of movie recorded using S3 IS (Rakesh — 11/07/2006)
Can i get some feed back on the quality of movie recorded using S3 IS- especially in low lux conditions. Is some graining observed in low lux conditions. Can the QUALITY movie from S3 IS and a standard camcorder be compared ...except for storage limit!!!!
reply to this comment
Joe (11/07/2006)
You get the best you are going to get from a digital camera, for the most part, there are some digis that shoot HD and 16:9 like the Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
But the Canon S3 IS has a video image size of 640 x 480 at 30 / 15fps, with picture in movie mode, aka you can take a picture while recording, at high quality.
reply to this comment
But the Canon S3 IS has a video image size of 640 x 480 at 30 / 15fps, with picture in movie mode, aka you can take a picture while recording, at high quality.
Rakesh (11/08/2006)
But what about picture quality in LOW LUX conditions!!!
reply to this comment
hi, everyone , i got this LX2, i lost my manu booklet , who can help me to get one? thanx! daisongxinyu@163.com Sunny (sunny — 10/28/2006)
hi, everyone , i got this LX2, i lost my manu booklet , who can help me to get one? thanx! daisongxinyu@163.com
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Sunny,
You can find the manual for the Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) at the Panasonic site ( service.us.panasonic.com/OP... ).
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can find the manual for the Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) at the Panasonic site ( service.us.panasonic.com/OP... ).
Andrew
Edwin (11/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Underwater housing? (Kristi — 10/25/2006)
Is there an underwater housing case to fit the Panasonic LX2?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/27/2006)
Last I heard, there was not one yet. Do some browsing at www.digideep.com; they would know, and they have a thing where you can sign up to receive an email if the housing you need becomes available on the market.
reply to this comment
kristi (10/27/2006)
Thanks. After more searching, I also found underwater cases at www.keepitdrycase.com
reply to this comment
ckk238 (01/17/2007)
I still cannot find an underwater hosuing for LX2.
reply to this comment
Carrie (08/07/2007)
Ebay has some dicapac cases but Im not sure how well they work.
reply to this comment
Bob (11/13/2007)
I checked with DICAPAC. THe LX2 lens diameter is too wide to fit any of their cases.
reply to this comment
dude (03/27/2009)
dicapac now has one. it's the wp-610
reply to this comment
Is combined optical and digital zoom on a high MP camera better than plain optical zoom of a mid MP camera? (Don — 10/20/2006)
Would the optical zoom of 4 on the Panasonic DMC-LX2 (MP of 10) combined with some digital zoom to produce a zoom of 10 give me the same or better resolution than using just the optical zoom of 10 0n the Panasonic DMC -TZ1A (MP of 5)?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
You seem to be a bit off. The digital zoom and the optical zoom are not combined. The optical zoom is an actualy mechnical movement of the lens where as the digital zoom is a data trasformation, falsely making the object appear closer by magnifying the pixels equaling lesser quality. If you use digital zoom on a 10 MP and you are printing it out then it will be fine but it is not very useful other wise. The degeneration is usually considerable. You will not tell the difference resolution wise between a 10MP and a 5MP unless you are planning on printing out massive images. If you are looking for a camera with great zoom aka 10x optical then i would go with the DMC-TZ1A, but if you are planning on doing some high quality printing of your images to sizes over 8X10 I would go with the LX2.
reply to this comment
Don (10/20/2006)
Thx. Joe. Let me put the question anpther way: If I used the TZ1 with an optical zoom of 10 to frame a distant object and printed the picture, would it be sharper than using the optical zoom of 4 on the LX2 and then getting the same "closeness" by digital means?
Thanks for your help.
Don
reply to this comment
Thanks for your help.
Don
camera? (10/20/2006)
This is a really great question, Don.
My answer is that the 5MP 10x optical zoom camera will still be superior to the 10MP camera using digital zoom.
Though it would seem that the high megapixel count of the LX2 would be able to compensate for the degredation and resolution-loss typically associated with digital zoom, the drop off is going to be very steep. The TZ1 would give you images with a much truer and higher quality zoom.
In fact, the LX2's zoom rating at 5 megapixels is only 5.5x, well below the 10x you're looking for. (They call it "extra optical zoom," which is totally lame! It's digital, don't fall for marketing fakery!)
Also, large MP cameras sometimes cram pixels onto tiny chips, occasionally resulting in image noise that will only be exacerbated by digital zooming.
Basically, if what you want to do is zoom, then don't take the chance with digital.
reply to this comment
My answer is that the 5MP 10x optical zoom camera will still be superior to the 10MP camera using digital zoom.
Though it would seem that the high megapixel count of the LX2 would be able to compensate for the degredation and resolution-loss typically associated with digital zoom, the drop off is going to be very steep. The TZ1 would give you images with a much truer and higher quality zoom.
In fact, the LX2's zoom rating at 5 megapixels is only 5.5x, well below the 10x you're looking for. (They call it "extra optical zoom," which is totally lame! It's digital, don't fall for marketing fakery!)
Also, large MP cameras sometimes cram pixels onto tiny chips, occasionally resulting in image noise that will only be exacerbated by digital zooming.
Basically, if what you want to do is zoom, then don't take the chance with digital.
Ricoh GR vs Lumix LX2 - Which camera is better? Can someone help? thanks in advance. (richard — 10/18/2006)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/24/2006)
Well, the first thing the LX2 has over the GR is widescreen capability, which is ideal for panoramas and group shots. As such, the movie mode can also shoot in widescreen. I don't know of very many digital cameras that can make that claim. It also tops out at just north of 10 megapixels, wheras the Ricoh GR is 8MP. Now, you probably won't notice that advantage for snapshots, but if you're planning on blowing up pictures to larger than 5x7 or 8x10, you will begin to see the difference.
Those are the two standout features which the Lumix excels, and for my money, makes it worth picking over the GR.
reply to this comment
Those are the two standout features which the Lumix excels, and for my money, makes it worth picking over the GR.
richard (10/24/2006)
Hmmm...I'm still in a dilemma but thanks James.
Appreciate your suggestion.
I totally agree with you over the widescree/angle and the 10mp advantage but...I guess I will have to put my hands on them later. Again, thanks for your help.
reply to this comment
Appreciate your suggestion.
I totally agree with you over the widescree/angle and the 10mp advantage but...I guess I will have to put my hands on them later. Again, thanks for your help.
Which Movie format is best, AVI; Mpeg; MOV; Mpeg4; and minimum fps frame rate? what HDSD capacity is "enough"? by Tan, Malaysia (Tan A H from Malaysia — 10/17/2006)
I prefer still and movie taking in one DigiCamera. So pls confine to Digital camera
reply to this comment
camera? (10/17/2006)
Hi there, can you provide a little more information?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/17/2006)
Well, it largely depends. What are you going to be using it for? Will you be editing it after you shoot it? Will you be emailing it to friends and family? Burning to DVD?
AVI and MOV are largely still the easiest ones for everyone to watch online. I give the edge to MOV since quicktime is a much better image and AVI makes the file way too large by comparison. MPEG is alright, but by comparison to MOV or even MPEG you will less likely want to use it.
MPEG4 looks great and is even smaller. But to use it for a recording format, you are compressing the original footage. It's great for an end user format, but if you plan to edit the footage, you're much better off leaving it in MOV or AVI and then outputting to MPEG4. It's ideal for that.
FPS frame rate? If you're emailing the video or posting it online, 15fps is very doable. However, I suggest you shoot it at a full 30fps and then you can output it to a smaller frame rate from your PC. That way you have it good enough to burn to DVD and yet, you can downshift it for emailing or posting online.
reply to this comment
AVI and MOV are largely still the easiest ones for everyone to watch online. I give the edge to MOV since quicktime is a much better image and AVI makes the file way too large by comparison. MPEG is alright, but by comparison to MOV or even MPEG you will less likely want to use it.
MPEG4 looks great and is even smaller. But to use it for a recording format, you are compressing the original footage. It's great for an end user format, but if you plan to edit the footage, you're much better off leaving it in MOV or AVI and then outputting to MPEG4. It's ideal for that.
FPS frame rate? If you're emailing the video or posting it online, 15fps is very doable. However, I suggest you shoot it at a full 30fps and then you can output it to a smaller frame rate from your PC. That way you have it good enough to burn to DVD and yet, you can downshift it for emailing or posting online.
what is its capacity for optical zoom (franky — 10/09/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/09/2006)
Franky,
The optical zoom on the Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is 4x. The digital zoom is another 4x for a total of 16x.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The optical zoom on the Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is 4x. The digital zoom is another 4x for a total of 16x.
Andrew
best camera for photos to see on 60 inch screen (mickey — 10/09/2006)
I want to see my photos after burning to disc and playing on DVD to my 60 Sony screen. So far they don't look so good. I use Kodak C533 camera
reply to this comment
Joe (10/10/2006)
Ok well you are looking for the high possible megapixels then so I would recommend the Canon a640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it takes 10 MP and is a great camera.
But I assume the 60in screen is wide screen so if that is the case you might want to get a camera that shoots widesceen stills s there won't be any cropping, resizeing, zoom-in distortion. I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) amazing camera.
reply to this comment
But I assume the 60in screen is wide screen so if that is the case you might want to get a camera that shoots widesceen stills s there won't be any cropping, resizeing, zoom-in distortion. I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) amazing camera.
mickey (10/10/2006)
Thanks Joe. Your suggesting the Lumix LX2 may just have changed my life!
Seriously, the problem was my burning the shots from my Kodak in Nero as ''data' files instead of 'slide show' mode.
They now look great but I have that 60 wide screen 1080 I and the Lumix is calling me. Thanks again.
reply to this comment
Seriously, the problem was my burning the shots from my Kodak in Nero as ''data' files instead of 'slide show' mode.
They now look great but I have that 60 wide screen 1080 I and the Lumix is calling me. Thanks again.
Which cameras make the best movies? (4 — 10/09/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/10/2006)
The Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great still camera that also takes amazing video footage. It takes the highest resolution. The LX2's movie mode can also handle 16:9, capturing video in high definition (1280 x 720) resolution (though only at 15 frames per second). Settings are easily switched to allow for typical 4:3 or 3:2 aspects. Despite it's wide format ambitions, the LX2 is still and ultra-compact, and of course, features Panasonic's Mega O.I.S. image stabilization to reduce the shimmy and shake of natural hand movement.
By far the best that I have seen.
reply to this comment
By far the best that I have seen.
small compact lightweight that shoots in RAW format (belle — 10/05/2006)
i want a small camera that is lightweight for travel, but i must have RAW capability
reply to this comment
camera? (10/05/2006)
The Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an ultracompact with support for RAW shooting.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/06/2006)
You can also check out the Fuji Finepix E900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/30/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I'm travelling by backpack, can you recommend a point and shoot camera to give the best quality image for both landscapes and people? are the canon's A640 or 710 IS or panasonics LX2 or TZ1 better? (sunshine — 10/03/2006)
reply to this comment
camera? (10/04/2006)
Good question.
All of these are great cameras, but I think the one that will best suit your need for landscape photography is the Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The other cameras you mention match the LX2 in many respects, the 10MP sensor (A640), the image stabilization (A710 IS), and compact size (TZ1), but only the LX2 has a wide-angle lens (f2.8 28mm wide angle Leica DC lens) that will faithfully capture large panoramas with little problem.
The LX2 also provides 16:9 widescreen videos and images. It's a really remarkable camera. The price tag is up there, and if you're looking to save money, you might find the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) slightly more agreeable, but for the superior photographic experience on your trip, the LX2 is the way to go.
reply to this comment
All of these are great cameras, but I think the one that will best suit your need for landscape photography is the Panasonic LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The other cameras you mention match the LX2 in many respects, the 10MP sensor (A640), the image stabilization (A710 IS), and compact size (TZ1), but only the LX2 has a wide-angle lens (f2.8 28mm wide angle Leica DC lens) that will faithfully capture large panoramas with little problem.
The LX2 also provides 16:9 widescreen videos and images. It's a really remarkable camera. The price tag is up there, and if you're looking to save money, you might find the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) slightly more agreeable, but for the superior photographic experience on your trip, the LX2 is the way to go.
best image quality, point and shoot camera recommendation (sunshine — 10/03/2006)
reply to this comment
camera? (10/04/2006)
If you're looking for a great point and shoot camera, check out this helpful guide ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to the best/hottest mainstream digital cameras available right now.
reply to this comment
I want a camera that has AWESOME video capabilities...movie mode. Im in the military and high quality filming from a compact digital camera is a must. Any suggestions... (Brian — 09/30/2006)
Digital Cameras dont rate their movie mode capabilities. I make hundreds of short movies with music in the background. Slideshows. I had a 6.1 Mp Kodak (the sand ruined it) and the movie quality SUCKED. my dad has a canon and it looks pretty good. Any suggestions
reply to this comment
Joe (10/04/2006)
Ok there are two cameras I would suggest the Sony Cybershot DSC M2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This takes decent qualtiy movies, better than most and it is an overall great camera.
But I find the best buy would be the Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a great zoom, it is very compact, and it takes good video (in 16:9 aspect ratio none-the-less, which is wide screen!) for around $250.
Unfortunately none of these cameras are sand proof so buy a protective case.
Good Luck
reply to this comment
But I find the best buy would be the Panasonic Lumix LX2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a great zoom, it is very compact, and it takes good video (in 16:9 aspect ratio none-the-less, which is wide screen!) for around $250.
Unfortunately none of these cameras are sand proof so buy a protective case.
Good Luck
Brian (10/05/2006)
Thank you Joe. I went ahead a bought the canon poweshot s3 IS. after many reviews I read from sites CNET and so on. I picked this one up. Thanks for the suggestions.
reply to this comment
Ernestoman (12/24/2006)
I own Canon cameras and I like them. My main gripe is that you cannot zoom in movie mode nor is there auto adjusting for exposure in movie mode. So if you are taking a vid of a scene the exposure and focal length locks at the beginning of the take. Now in any shooting situation you're likely to want to pan, tilt or zoom. The exposure element is the biggest problem here because you can't go from the established shot to a darker area or lighter one. Sony cams seem to have solved the issue and uses the mpeg rather than the avi file format (although I feel the avi produces a better image) Finally, size is a factor if you want to lug it around with you to capture those Kodak moments on a day to day bases.
reply to this comment
how does the dmc lx2 compare in size to the new lx50k (vince — 09/29/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/03/2006)
You must mean the FX50 from panasonic whose dimensions are 97.7 x 57.1 x 25.1 mm (3.85 x 2.25 x 0.99 in), weighting in at 151 grams (no batt).
The LX2 dimensions are 105.7 x 55.8 x 26.3 mm (4.16 x 2.20 x 1.04 in), weighting in at 187 grams (no batt).
The LX2 is a bit bigger, that extra 36 grams can really weigh you down too :)
Hope this helped,
Ciao!
reply to this comment
The LX2 dimensions are 105.7 x 55.8 x 26.3 mm (4.16 x 2.20 x 1.04 in), weighting in at 187 grams (no batt).
The LX2 is a bit bigger, that extra 36 grams can really weigh you down too :)
Hope this helped,
Ciao!
What are similar cameras to Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1? (Marco Vianna — 08/22/2006)
Can you indicate similar cameras to Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1 including good quality lens, 4X optical zoom with 28mmm capability and RAW File Format.
Tks
reply to this comment
Tks
Re: What are similar cameras to Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1? (tharrison — 08/22/2006)
reply to this comment
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Definitely a P&S on Steroids-Not for the Non-Post-Processor Types for Sure!
(Jerry Brendle — 02/07/2007)
In my ongoing search for the perfect little carry-it-with-me 2nd camera, I've finally settled on this one (reluctantly) after going through Sony's N2 and Canon's SD900 (both of which were decent but without adequate manual controls).
I was really needing RAW capability, image stabilization & complete manual over-ridability.
This solid little box pretty much does all that but surely has its share of image noise. I was getting far smoother results with both the other cameras!
If you're willing to always shoot at ISO 100 or 200 at the max, use RAW mode exclusively, tweak each image extensively & individually with Panasonic's included SilkyPix RAW developer software (which is really awesome for sure), Then take the image back into Photoshop for the functions that SilkyPix can't do, you can end up with a pretty incredible picture. I even sometimes run the final edited PhotoShop image through yet another good noise reduction program called Neat Image using a specific noise reduction profile created specifically for the LX2 to really polish it! If you're a real tech weenie with lots of time to tweak, you can make this little camera look good! It's definitely "high-maintenance" though!
- 5.0 out of 5
Best P/S camera on the market!!!
(Douglas Dubler — 12/05/2006)
I am a seasoned professional with more than 30 years in the business. The Panasonic DMC-LX2 to my knowledge is the only compact P/S 10 MP camera on the market that offers the raw file capture option. This affords the user the opportunity to adjust processing parameters in Adobe Camera Raw (Photoshop CS2) and end up with a 16 bit final file. This is probably lost on the amateur but of great importance to the advanced amateur or professional. I only use the camera on ISO 100 and further reduce the noise with Noise Ninja. I have made prints on my Epson 9800 up to 24"x36" which are quite remarkable considering they were shot with a camera that costs less than $500. The overall design is great; quick autofocus with close macro capability; a huge (2 3/4") LCD screen and image stabilization make it my constant companion. This camera deserves serious consideration if you are looking for superb quality in a minimalist form factor.
- 4.0 out of 5
Excellent camera, but good for point and shoot...
(Jack Schneider — 11/27/2006)
I'll start this by saying I'm not a seasoned photographer. I enjoy learning and this camera has presented me with the opportunity to do so. I have been playing around with the manual settings as I go and find that often I can get a better shot when I take control of the picture. This is not a point and shoot if you don't want to learn how cameras work or do not already possess this knowledge. I love this camera, but I do feel the need to learn how to be better as a photographer to use it to it's potential. I think this camera is geared more towards the serious amateur. (I do run most of my pics through photoshop elements which I think cleans up pictures wonderfully.)
- 5.0 out of 5
Many improvements over my LX1
(Jeff Greene — 09/22/2006)
In all fairness this is a superb camera. All of the issues others cited in its predecessor(me as well)have been more than adequately addressed. The new Venus III engine now allows low light work to ISO 1600. Images produced are not noise- free, but compared to the LX1, which I also own, are easily addressed by Noise Ninja. And the quality of the images are truly striking. I also own a Canon DSLR and an Epson RD1 and honestly feel that this little camera is a great back-up given its small sensor drawbacks. Bokeh, of course, is not comparable, but the crispness of the lens will win you over.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great little camera!
(Scott Marshall — 09/20/2006)
I've taken just under a hundred shots so far and even though there is no manual available yet have had little problem understanding anything. The switches and buttons are arranged about the camera in a manner that lessens the chance of mistaking one or its' function from another. I work in the graphic arts/design field and often don't need a large camera and lens system for my work.
