Panasonic Lumix LZ7
| Fetching our Best Offer… |
Read why: Editor's comments.
| 14th | of 27 | in 6 - 8 Megapixels |
| 31st | of 33 | in Panasonic |
| 54th | of 61 | in $200 - $300 |
| 59th | of 67 | in Point and Shoot |
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the Panasonic Lumix LZ7
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|
|||
Editors' Comments
The Panasonic LZ7 is an affordable easy-to-use entry-level camera that's got plenty of kick. The 7-megapizel sensor is the new mid-range benchmark, and will provide for high-resolution photos and larger prints. Panasonic's MEGA Optical Image Stabilization will reduce blurs and jitters so you get the best possible shot every time. The LZ7 also features a unique 'Baby Mode,' which allows you to record the age of your child directly onto the photo. The camera also allows for normal timestamping as well.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- JPEG file format
- ISO 100-3200
- Movie mode
- Panasonic MEGA Optical Image Stabilization
- 2.5-inch LCD
- Secure Digital card memory (27MB internal)
- 2 AA Batteries
Product Information
| Manufacturer | Panasonic |
|---|---|
| Part Number | DMC-LZ7 |
| UPC | 037988986187 |
| Release Date | Jan 31, 2007 |
LZ7 Accessories:
Shop for LZ7 accessories.
Panasonic Lumix LZ7 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix LZ7 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
At the time I got it, it was the cheapest camera on the market with the best zoom. I did have a little trouble with the zoom sticking, like some other people I see have. I just fiddled around with it and it worked eventually (I think I grabbed the lens when it was trying to go back in, held it and then let go).
I only wish it had more megapixels, and a manual zoom.
- 2.0 out of 5
Around the time the warranty expired, the zoom stopped working. Or should I say, went nuts. If I try to use the zoom, the lens goes in and out and in and out—even for a while after I turn the camera off. I finally figured out that, for all practical purposes, what I've got is a single focus camera. The troubleshooting guide says I need to return the camera to the factory. I see that as throwing good money after bad. There's the postage and the inability to get an estimate of the cost of repair. I loved this camera while it was working, but not now. If anyone knows how to fix this without sending it to the factory, please let me know.
- 4.0 out of 5
I shoot a lot of pictures and I play a lot of golf. (type my name in any search engines to see my videos). This little camera is excellent for the price. It is great to shoot stills (and panoramic photos), and, when you need a shoot a video it will do very nicely, too. Great pocket camera!
- 3.0 out of 5
The Panasonic LZ7 was really my first digital camera (the prior being a Fuiji camera that I borrowed on occasion from my parents). I bought this summer 2007 when it was on sale at Futureshop for little over $300 CDN after taxes. I must admit that the prices now listed are much more reasonable given the camera's performance.
Background:
I've taken this camera on both a europe and egypt trip lasting about two weeks each.
While the LZ7 was by no means a bad experience, I will be focusing my review on the two issues with this camera which bothered me the most.
Battery:
- Convenient - I have always gone for AA cameras due to convenience. If you're like me, and forget to charge your batteries the night before, the LZ7 uses 2 AA batteries which is just great.
- Battery life-sucker - You need to buy special rechargable batteries for this camera cause if you don't, you won't make it even through half the day of clicking. I had to buy batteries half way through my Europe and brought an extra 6 batteries for my two week trip in Egypt in fear I couldn't find a place to recharge or buy batteries.
Trully there is nothing worst than being unable to capture that once-in-a-lifetime shot and you don't want to be caught unprepared because your camera conks out.
Low-light/Night Shots:
During these sitautions, it really a question of luck on how well these pictures well turn out. My trips allowed me to to see the extent of this when visiting museums/galleries/landmarks during the evening/night but which were floodlit where flash was either not allowed or unhelpful. By no means was it disasterous but I frequently found myself fustrated when I compared a camera shot with a friend under the same conditions only to find theirs that much better.
Despite these points don't forget that Panasonic LZ7 is a decent camera with 6x optical zoom, an easy/intitutive menu at a decent 7.2MP. Not to mention that a much reduced price of $200 approx.
If you are looking for a camera for more of a day-to-day use, I do believe this can be an excellent camera where you have easy access to batteries and better controlled lighting. However if you're a traveller like me, you may want to invest in something that lasts longer under dim-lighting circumstances.
- 5.0 out of 5
I had to choose a replacement cam after my daughter dropped my HP with objectives down and... well... I had to choose another. And I had to choose one I could currently afford.
I had nothing against other cameras, I though they were all good. But when I started using the L7Z, I realized that I had not good cams. I really loved it, besides it does not have all the Leica lenses and accessories built in, the software and the image processing is really superior for its price range. Will choose another Lumix if I had to replace again, and will recommend anyone who asks me.
- 5.0 out of 5
Needed a camera on short notice when my Power Shot was accidently drowned. The LZ7 is an easy point and shoot that gives great pictures for the money. I do miss a view finder when shooting outside. I use Batteries Plus NMHi AA's with charger and am very pleased with their performance and price.
- 5.0 out of 5
Excellent camera
- 5.0 out of 5
I had just got this camera for my birthday after long contemplating which camera to buy. I wanted to find a camera that had high megapixels and an exeptional optical zoom.... ohh and one more thing I had a small budget! After searching the web I finally found this camera and for the the price there really is no better camera
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my first digital camera - I came from the APS world. It was an excellent selection. It has lots of options, but you do not have to use all of them. I have taken over 300 pictures, and I like the ability to dispose of the less desireable ones. LOTS of features! I really like the AA battery usage. Go Panasonic!
- 4.0 out of 5
Nice photos. Everyone else summed it up.
Download a free program called Noiseware Community Edition. This is a "one click" photo noise removal program. It is amazing. Compare the same photo at 200%. This will make our inexpensive "point and shoots" provide cleaner photos. Thus, better prints.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've only had the camera a day, but compared to what I had before this one is excellent! It's nice and compact and takes very vivid, great quality pics. I love all the different scenes you can choose from as well.
- 5.0 out of 5
I normally don't write reviews, but the Lumix LZ7 is such a great little camera that I just had to share it. It takes extremely sharp and detailed pictures and the compensation for lighting and motion is excellent. My main camera is a Fuji FinePix S2 Pro and the quality of pictures of the LZ7 is right up there.
It is a great little camera for the price and I highly recommend it for its ease of use and quality of pictures. It also has a movie mode which I have not tried yet, but I read that it is excellent.
- 5.0 out of 5
I found this product easy to use! Ive taken so many nice pictures of my family! I love it!
- 4.41847826086957 out of 5
Panasonic Lumix LZ7 Ratings By Site
-
CNET0 User Reviews
-
Circuit City0 User Reviews
-
Amazon175 User Reviews
-
NexTag37 User Reviews
-
Yahoo! Shopping15 User Reviews
-
Newegg14 User Reviews
-
PriceGrabber12 User Reviews
-
Shopping.com10 User Reviews

Panasonic Lumix LZ7 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Andrew
Thanks for your reply. I do not like any specific line or brand. What I am interested in is a good decent camera (6-7mp and between $150-$200) that can take good sharp quality pictures without any problem. I have seen canon A540 and canon A550 results. I am not much happy with the performance of them as pictures some times get blurry and have snow.So , considering these i found this panasonic camera. If you could suggest any other brand's best camera as per my needs.
Sunil
As for the camera, if you want 6X zoom, the Lumix LZ7 is indeed a fine camera. You can also get the SD600 for $200 now, which is a great Canon camera, but it's only 3x zoom.
If you want to stay under $200, the LZ7 is probably your best bet.
has 8 reviews, all giving 5/5 stars
There aren't really many others, like you said, similar to the Canon SD750, oddly enough.
2. use set white balance mode
3. use hi sensitivity mode
push set
scroll down to
turn af assist mode to on
in af mode
set .H
set pict adj to vivid
Regards
the cannon has no optical stabilizer
the cannon has only 4x optical zoom
it has no auto focus assist
it has no af spot mode
it has a 2.5 inch screen the cannon only has a 2 inch
my lz3 performs very well and is easy to use but any judgment is subjective
flickr.com/photos/stevemcca...
here is a review picture of a image taken by a cannon a550
pocket-lint.co.uk/gallery/i...
compare and contrast
Regards,
Sunil
the best camera for a novice is a camera fron the lumix range
panasonic.co.uk/technology/...
if you have alot of money go for the new fz8 if not go for the fz3
Here are some personal shots taken with a FZ3, FZ20, and FZ5:
family.webshots.com/album/3...
And here are some from mainly a FZ5 from my backyard:
outdoors.webshots.com/album...
Hope this helps you and anyone else. Will post shots from this camera once I get it.
"The auto focus, zoom, and aperture value are fixed to the same status as they were at the start of motion-picture recording. Note that, when recording a subject that moves toward the camera from far away, the subject gradually goes out of focus, except for the DMC-FZ30 and DMC-FZ20, which operate as follows during motion-picture recording.
* DMC-FZ30: Exposure (in case of ISO/AUTO) and white balance change according to the movement of the subject to be recorded. The zoom and manual focus can be manually adjusted. However, they are adjusted by turning a ring, which makes a sound that may be recorded.
* DMC-FZ20: Exposure (in case of ISO/AUTO) and white balance change according to the movement of the subject to be recorded.
For the models with a jitter prevention function, the function is effective when it is turned on before the start of recording static or motion pictures. For camera models with two modes, this function is available in MODE 1 only."
easy of use is the most important factor for a novice
so go for the lz7
panasonic.co.uk/technology/...
Ease of use is one thing. How about performance ? How can a Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ7 be compared to Canon Powershot A710 IS technically ? Which camera is better ? Thanks !
* 7.1 Megapixels
* 6x optical zoom with optical Image Stabilizer
* DIGIC II and iSAPS
* 9-point AiAF and FlexiZone AF/AE
* 20 shooting modes and My Colors
* 2.5" LCD screen
* Safety Zoom
* High-speed ISO 800
* 30fps VGA and 60fps QVGA movies
* Wide range of accessories
the lz7
has
better lens
better iso range
better aspect ratio
higher standard of video
panasonic.co.uk/high-zoom/d...
Casio's record in Mpeg4.
dpreview.com/news/0701/0701...
panasonic.co.uk/high-zoom/d...
or should I pick the panasonic Lumix DMC-F07???
however i just researched this Lumix LZ7 and like it alot. is there any camera that comes close to this one but uses lithium ion batteries instead of AA batteries?
is tehre any camera that is close to this one that has the panasonic O.I.S. similarity?
Most (maybe even all) cameras should work with Lithium Ion batteries. So you can just buy AA size Li batteries and stick them in the camera...
i want to get a camera similar in feature with this one that uses the Li-ion battery as the main power source
Now lets say your on vacation and forget your charger, take a few shots and your battery dies, well if you can use AA just buy a pack at the store to hold you over... But your kinda screwed if you have to buy a $50 proprietary battery...
Digital camera manufacturers seem to make it policy not to provide a list of known compatible cards for their cameras. Usually, the user is left to assume that whatever cards existed at the time the camera was manufactured will work with the camera. The SD standard is pretty well defined by now, and 2gb cards are sort of old hat, so I'd say you're almost certainly safe using the card you described with the LZ7 (though I have to admit I'm not familiar with that particular model--can you link to it on a merchant's page?).
Hope this helps!
From the few Leica/Panasonic lenses I own, I know them to be pretty amazing, so without a true Leica to compare to, I'd bet money to say they are of great quality.
And, as it would appear Panasonic itself would be the only source for an absolutely "for sure" answer, I am satisfied with the answer provided.
Stanley Christopher
honspc@bellsouth.net
Formating the card only erases what is on the card. We also tried resetting camera preferances via set up menu and this did not help.
I did buy another SD card and it works perfectly.
I am sending the card back to them for replacement.
Check to see if camera writes to internal memory, this is a good indicator as to source of problem.
I tried going through setup to format camera and i did; seeing as my card didn't have any pictures i was surprised at how long it took to format, but now; it's works perfectly again!
Only, i missed the sunrise i got up for... =[
Bon Chance!
Hello. On page 22 of your manual, it gives the procedure for changing the langauge settings on your camera. Basically, you press the MENU SET button to display setup. Select the item to set. Set language to French. Press okay/Select and you're done. Good Luck!
(translated via Google Translate)
Amazon page ( amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-TZ... ).
(If you look at the pictures, disregard the "reviewer" who tries bashing the camera by taking a horrible picture and enlarging it to 100% crop. Very amateur). A better, professional review, is below:
dpreview.com review ( dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... ).
5 shots in 25 seconds could be very good, if you factor in the time it takes to pre-focus and to review the image you've shot. It really depends on what the statistic you're looking at actually means.
The pro reviews I've read mostly indicate that the lag time is very small. User reviews like this one ( dpreview.com/reviews/read_o... ) specifically point out that the shot-to-shot time is very quick.
My gut reaction is that this camera is NOT 20sec slower than comparable cameras on the market. It seems more likely that you misinterpreted the statistics you found elsewhere, which is easy to do.
Hope this helps!
One option for brightening up the subjects you're shooting is an LCD camera light. Check out Camera Bright ( camerabright.com/ ) which makes brilliant LCD lights that can compensate for underpowered flashes.
i am in need of a travel camera with GREAT macro capability. i need very close macros of insects/toys etc and sharp pictures.
will this LZ7 fit the bill? or should i go for Nikon L12 over panasonic?
plz help.
I experienced this symptom with 2 of my >50 cameras. If you doubted your batteries are good and the camera is bad, try to perform this test.
You mentioned that you got one minute before 'Battery Low' warning shown. Now, turn the camera on at shooting mode, quickly switch the flash mode to supressed flash/no flash mode. Check it out if you can shoot a lot of pictures without the flash on. If this is the case, then the problem is possibly caused by a deteriorated built-in rechargeable battery used to supply power to the flash. It is being recharged every time you start the camera which is set at modes other than suppressed flash, but it is not charging properly to the ready state, thus the programmed circuitry is telling the camera to show the 'Low Battery' warning.
I performed the test due to I believed my batteries were all good. Before the above mentioned test, I took out the same batteries and put them in another camera to find out that I could shoot over fifty pictures with flash.
I researched a bit on the web and found out some newly rechargeable (good) batteries could be depleted very quickly due to the followings:
- Some soldering points got in contact after camera being used for a long time at the higest power drain usage mode which produced higher temperature inside the camera. These soldered points are so close to each other, a slight melt of the soldering can change the shape of the point and possibly get in touch with the neighbour point. In some cases, the power circuit board could be toasted. In a case like yours, the batteries are drained.
- One case was a design flaw.The spring at the door hindge used to keep the battery door up after it's opened is too long and got in touch with one of the battery terminals when the door is closed. It provided a ground for the circuitry, and drained the batteries faster than you can imagine.
Okay, all I can say is this kind of fix is not easy for an oridinary people to do. A service of the camera is recommended to get it back to work properly if your finding of the test is positive. But, another recommendiation is better buy a new one than to send it in to service. Todays labour charges are so high that totally make it not worth to pay for the fix.
PS
Have you regularly cleaned the terminals of the batteries and the terminal contact plates in the battery compartment?
Dirty contact can downgrade the performance of batteries.
My bet is on dirty contacts. Thanks, Larry
As far as I know, it's going to show the wrong reading of battery strength indication but won't shut down the camera. It's behaving like that on my LZ1 when I used it the first time without setting up the battery type in use and had a wrong match.
This is a good reference for some other users though, as they don't know well the cameras before using them, so as the instruction manuals.
Image Stabilization really does help with the LCD technique of holding the camera away from your face. At least I can say that about the Canon G9. Not all IS systems are equally effective. Check your reviews by clicking on "Resources" at the bottom right hand corner of this page.
The optical viewfinder still comes in handy in situations where the LCD just doesn't work such as bright daylight mentioned by Aditya D and when you are tracking a fast moving object such as a race car especially when trying to take shots in rapid succession. If you want a camera to cover as many eventualities as possible, get one with a viewfinder. If your photography is more casual, family gatherings and tourist scenes of things that stay still and are not at the beach or snowy mountains on sunny days, then you'll be fine without it.
Larry
LCD screens these days have great performance - with true-to-life colours and are brightly light. They are today's main method of taking pictures due to their convinence and viewing size (no need to squint those eyes!). Many viewfinders today aren't actually that good, being too small for comfortable use and blurry around the edges. Also zooming changes what image is taken from what is actually seen. (Note: These comments are directed to a smaller point & shoot camera as larger SLR cameras do have viewfinders which are good).
Viewfinders are however good for photo taking under bright lighting conditions. I really wished I had one when I was in Egypt taking pictures of the desert. However these experiences were limited and I didn't feel at a disadvantage by not having one.
Image stablization is, as you said, used to counter the small movements of our hands when holding a camera. These small movements may be when the camera is close to or away from our face. Thus it doesn't impact the decision of whether or not to have a view finder. I would *always* recommend the use of an IS because it really does work, particularlly when you're zooming in for a picture and hand movements become more noticable.
Conclusion: If you are looking for a simple point & shoot camera, a viewfinder is not necessary unless you're gonna be under bright outside weather conditions alot. IS is highly recommended for any camera purchase.
If you're looking for indoor capability, the IS functions on both cameras are a big plus. The next thing to look for is the ability to manually set your exposure (the LZ7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) only has auto exposure while the Canon A720 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has both manual and auto). The manual exposure ability lets you set the camera for better indoor shots based on the type of light and how much you want the camera to let in. These techniques take practice and are bettered with a tripod or monopod to avoid camera shake issues.
Another way to allow more light in is with a higher ISO setting. The LZ7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has an ISO 3200 setting, which will allow twice as much light in as the ISO 1600 of the A720 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The drawback of a higher ISO setting is the amount of "noise" or graininess you will see in the photos. If this is acceptable to you, then I would go with the The Panasonic LZ7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
I would actually disagree with that. While both should function similarly in the landscape photos, the LZ7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the only one of the two with Macro functions. You will find it easier to focus on your close-ups with this camera a little easier.
Andrew
1) Does this camera also record sound?
2) What memory cards can I use that would be compatible with my HP dv6000 laptop. It has a card port which is labeled: SD MS/Pro MMc XD.
I just want to be sure the camera I get will take memory that I already have a port for. Thank you
2) LZ7 accepts SD, SDHC, and MMC cards for memory.
3) Use AA size Nickel Metal Hydride rechargeable batteries typically around 2500 mAh (miliAmperehour) capacity.
Larry
i have this model and makes beautiful videos with sound! so do not worry about this.
what would be the best camera for the buck for me? i'm looking at the reviews here and considering the lumix LZ7 and the canon a720 but would consider other suggestions.
the lz7 is a very good camera for a novice .
it has great optical stabilization system (mega ois)
a great zoom ,top quality lens and best of all it is easy to use
i have a panasonic lz3 .
i have had digital cameras from hp, cannon ,hitachi
all were of sub standard built quality.
my panasonic on the hand is very well built . i have taken hundreds of photos with it ,even dropped it afew times.
here is link to a recent photo of a hockey match taken with a lz7.
flickr.com/photos/brianblev...
This camera won't be too bad for what you want to do. You might find its zoom a little lacking though (only 4x optical). I would go for something with at least 10x like the Canon 100sx IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The range of shutter speeds and longer zoom will be great for all you want to do. The manual focus option is also nice for extreme closeups, making sure you have just the right focal length. Good luck and happy shooting on your trip.
Andrew
Vallii
I think the Panasonic LZ7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great option for a beginning photographer. The 7(+) MP resolution will render great prints, and the 6x optical zoom will still get you decent zoom capability on your trip. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Cheers.
Valli
Andrew
I'm looking for a mid-range camera to suit my needs. I'm quite interested in photography, but never had the chance to buy a digicam previously. I'll be going backpacking in a few months' time, and would like to have a good camera to capture the sights along the way.
In particular, I'm looking for something that's good with night shots, and can get the vibrancy of the scenery. Also, a good amount of zoom will be good, since I'll be going to the outdoors, e.g. the Scottish highlands and the Norwegian fjords.
I was looking at the Panasonic Lumix LZ7, which offers 6x optical zoom. I've heard a bit about it being very noisy, so is that a valid concern? Canon's A720 was another alternative, but it's about 33% more costly where I'm from. The A570 is alright too, except for the 4x zoom which I'm afraid may disappoint.
Would love to hear any other recommendations you guys may have!
Any of these cameras should be good. I love the quality of my Canon cameras (I've had my SD230 for over 6 years, and it still works great!). I've heard good things about the Panasonics too. If budget is one of your concerns, I would feel more than comfortable recommending this camera. I would also suggest picking up extra batteries, memory cards, and a mini or full size tripod. This flexible mini-tri-pod ( amazon.com/Joby-GP1-01EN-Go... ) would be perfect for backpacking. It will allow you to set it up in odd locations for the most stable of shots. You should also use something like this to stabilize shots of the night sky. Your camera will automatically adjust for a longer shutter opening, so any shake or waver in your hand will be picked up as blur in the photo. Using the timer and a tripod will steady the shot and make it much more clear. Good luck on your trip and happy shooting!
Andrew
Thank you for answreing-- I am very impressed with this website & forum so far.
josh
for comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
I'm looking at it and the image quality of the lenses is quite comparable. Although I think that when you look real close, the tones and colors for the SD1000 and the A560 are more natural. And sharper too. It's not a case of the LZ7's lenses being bad, just Canon's being that much better, IMHO.
the panasonic tz3 is a thin camera with 3 inch screen . 10 x optical zoom
it will go up to 13 x optical im 3.5 mp mode
cameralabs.com/reviews/Pana...
If not, you may want to check out the SX100IS by Canon. It has some manual features and a nice zoom.
But understand that the cost of the repair may be more than it's worth to fix. Rule of thumb says that if it costs north of 50% what you paid, you're better off buying a new camera.
But I'm betting you'll be able to work it's way free if you're patient.