Panasonic Lumix TZ1
Panasonic Lumix TZ1
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Panasonic Lumix TZ1
Editor's Review
Look out for the Panasonic TZ1; this remarkable compact camera looks too small to contain the long-range 10x optical zoom that's hiding inside of it, but it does. With Panasonic's MEGA Optical Image Stabilization, you won't have to worry about the shakiness of typical ultra compacts; your long-range and regular shots will come out looking pristine. The TZ1 is a really stunning match of functionality and style, and will be far more of a pleasure to tote around than the larger, bulkier extended zoom models that dominate the market.
Specifications
- 5 megapixels
- 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- auto focus
- auto exposure
- ISO 80-1600
- JPEG file format
- movie mode w/sound
- lithium ion battery
- 2.5 inch LCD
- SD/MMC card storage (13.4MB internal)
- Part Number: DMC-TZ1
- UPC: 840356380810
- Release Date: Mar 03, 2006
Shop for TZ1 Accessories
Panasonic Lumix TZ1 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
how can I set the camera to produce a resolution of 300 or 600 (eileenpd26 — 06/17/2009)
when I download my photos they all show as 72 pt resolution. I cannot find a way to increase the resolution manually
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/18/2009)
That's not your camera, Eileen. That's the photo viewer on your PC. it's selecting 72 dpi based on your monitor. You can resize it in a photo editor to 200, but you really don't want to get much better than that as most printers can't print better than that.
reply to this comment
Camera turns off when operating the Zoom (gdavis44 — 06/09/2008)
When I operate the zoom (t), the lens goes all the way out then comes all the way back in and I get the message" Please turn Camera Off..."
I have done the set-up reset, taken out the battery, taken out the SD card, blown on the lens. There does not appear to be any abnormal sound from the lens. The camera is 2 .5 years old and out of warranty. Any ideas?
reply to this comment
I have done the set-up reset, taken out the battery, taken out the SD card, blown on the lens. There does not appear to be any abnormal sound from the lens. The camera is 2 .5 years old and out of warranty. Any ideas?
Aditya D (06/12/2008)
It sounds to me like a lens problem, more specifically something is wrong with the zooming mechanism in the camera. Usually if a camera cannot function with the zoom because there is something that is stopping the mechanics from working correctly, the lens will retract or it will tell you to reset the camera, or clean the camera, to avoid damaging any of the parts. Try blowing compressed air into the lens, and if that doesn't work try taking in to a repair shop to see if they can take it apart and clean the inside, again most likely with compressed air.
reply to this comment
I own a TZ1 and am having a terrible time taking indoor low light pictures. They are all dark. Can someone who owns this camera please help?!? (jfbrens — 07/03/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/03/2007)
Well first office, can you be more specific about the dark pictures you're taking? Are they portraits? Group photos?
Secondly, a common problem is an over reliance on the weak flash that comes with your average point and shoot. This flash is mostly meant for portrait pictures - say within a range of 6-8 feet. After which, the light begins to fan out too far to be effective. As such, one ends up with underexposed or dark pictures.
Have you tried shooting in Night Scenery or Night Portrait modes?
reply to this comment
Secondly, a common problem is an over reliance on the weak flash that comes with your average point and shoot. This flash is mostly meant for portrait pictures - say within a range of 6-8 feet. After which, the light begins to fan out too far to be effective. As such, one ends up with underexposed or dark pictures.
Have you tried shooting in Night Scenery or Night Portrait modes?
by James DeRuvo (08/03/2007)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
pjw (09/11/2007)
I recently got a TZ1 and have occasionally seen low-light problems. Here are some suggestions:
First, if you're in a low-light situation and have the sensitivity set to "auto", re-set it to iso 400 or 800. The "auto" setting tops out at iso 200 and this is inadequate for low-light situations. Notice that I didn't recommend the "high sensitivity" scene mode, which allows the camera to select either iso 800 or 1600. This is because I personally don't like the performance at 1600 so wouldn't recommend it, and prefer to take it out of the equation. Also, note that you ought to re-set the iso to 400-800 even if you are using the flash. The flash will only go out to 10-12 feet in "auto" (remember, that setting tops out at iso 200), but can go out to 15+ feet at iso 800. This can make a real difference. Also along these same lines, consider exclusively using the camera at its wide angle setting, rather than zooming out to telephoto. Like most cameras these days, the max aperture on this camera's lense varies as you zoom out. It's best low-light performance will come when it is at it's widest angle setting, where the aperture is f/2.8.
Second, and this is assuming that you are not using the flash, be aware that the light meter in the TZ1 seems to be easily fooled by bright light sources anywhere in the frame. The TZ1 has three metering options: heavily center-weighted (the default), plain center-weighted, and spot. I've tried to take indoor night pictures using the heavily center-weighted meter pattern where there was a lamp or television off to the side, and that extra light managed to cause severe under-exposure for my pictures. The solution was to instead set the light meter to spot metering, which gave me very nicely exposed pictures. If you routinely "pre-focus" your pictures, then you will not have any problems using the spot meter. Just "pre-focus" like you would normally do, and the camera will simultaneously spot meter on whatever you're pointed at. Both focus and meter settings will be locked into the computer as long as you hold the shutter release button down halfway.
Third, and this is assuming that you are in extreme low-light conditions but still do not want to use the flash, consider setting the max exposure to one second (I think the default is 1/8 second). If the camera meter looks over a scene and thinks it needs a really long exposure, say 1/2 second, but you've got the camera set to max out at 1/8 second, well, the camera is not going to override your setting, so it'll give you the 1/8 second exposure, even though the resulting picture will be dark. Of course, if you need exposures this long, you might want to consider using a tripod (even though the TZ1's image stabilizing is pretty good).
Hope this is helpful.
reply to this comment
First, if you're in a low-light situation and have the sensitivity set to "auto", re-set it to iso 400 or 800. The "auto" setting tops out at iso 200 and this is inadequate for low-light situations. Notice that I didn't recommend the "high sensitivity" scene mode, which allows the camera to select either iso 800 or 1600. This is because I personally don't like the performance at 1600 so wouldn't recommend it, and prefer to take it out of the equation. Also, note that you ought to re-set the iso to 400-800 even if you are using the flash. The flash will only go out to 10-12 feet in "auto" (remember, that setting tops out at iso 200), but can go out to 15+ feet at iso 800. This can make a real difference. Also along these same lines, consider exclusively using the camera at its wide angle setting, rather than zooming out to telephoto. Like most cameras these days, the max aperture on this camera's lense varies as you zoom out. It's best low-light performance will come when it is at it's widest angle setting, where the aperture is f/2.8.
Second, and this is assuming that you are not using the flash, be aware that the light meter in the TZ1 seems to be easily fooled by bright light sources anywhere in the frame. The TZ1 has three metering options: heavily center-weighted (the default), plain center-weighted, and spot. I've tried to take indoor night pictures using the heavily center-weighted meter pattern where there was a lamp or television off to the side, and that extra light managed to cause severe under-exposure for my pictures. The solution was to instead set the light meter to spot metering, which gave me very nicely exposed pictures. If you routinely "pre-focus" your pictures, then you will not have any problems using the spot meter. Just "pre-focus" like you would normally do, and the camera will simultaneously spot meter on whatever you're pointed at. Both focus and meter settings will be locked into the computer as long as you hold the shutter release button down halfway.
Third, and this is assuming that you are in extreme low-light conditions but still do not want to use the flash, consider setting the max exposure to one second (I think the default is 1/8 second). If the camera meter looks over a scene and thinks it needs a really long exposure, say 1/2 second, but you've got the camera set to max out at 1/8 second, well, the camera is not going to override your setting, so it'll give you the 1/8 second exposure, even though the resulting picture will be dark. Of course, if you need exposures this long, you might want to consider using a tripod (even though the TZ1's image stabilizing is pretty good).
Hope this is helpful.
camera useful for intraoral dental photography (drdatta123 — 06/19/2007)
camera can be used to focus indidual tooh and can obtain exact details of shade colour of tooth.surface characterization.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (06/19/2007)
Kodak has developed and marketed a Dental Photography System which enables you to take intra-oral photographs.
You probably would be interested in the system which can be found at <a href="kodakdental.com/en/digitalI... location</a>
reply to this comment
You probably would be interested in the system which can be found at <a href="kodakdental.com/en/digitalI... location</a>
thedigitaldentist (06/28/2007)
Best option for this type of pecise dental work is to use a Digital SLR with a ringflash, can be expensive but will give consistent results time after time.
Check out thedigitaldentist-site.org....
reply to this comment
Check out thedigitaldentist-site.org....
What would your pick be for a 28-100mm+, good in low light, compact? (JM2007 — 06/18/2007)
reply to this comment
Joe (06/19/2007)
Although this does not fulfill all your requirement I would suggest the Canon Powershot sd1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it is the best priced new camera that has all the features to get a really great image. But if you are looking for a camera with more zoom options I would take a look at the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Good Luck
reply to this comment
Good Luck
JM2007 (06/19/2007)
According to my research these cameras aren't good in low light and they haven't got 28mm either!
Thanks for the suggestion though.
reply to this comment
Thanks for the suggestion though.
The Lumix TZ1 or the Kodak C875? Which is better? (clf67 — 04/26/2007)
I'm trying to decide between a Lumix TZ1 and a Kodak C875. They are both similar in price and both have high optical zoom with the ability to zoom during movie mode, which is very important to me. It also appears that kodak would be more user friendly with better software. And the kodak is a bit smaller, which is good. I wish they had optical viewfinders. On my old canon elph it was very hard to see anything on the lcd in a dark night setting. You had to use the optical viewfinder to see your subject. Has this problem been improved on in the last few years? They both have pros and cons. I'm really tempted by the 10x optical zoom on the tz1, but then I like that the kodak might be simpler to use and it's a little smaller. Any advise?
reply to this comment
China Mark (04/27/2007)
Hi,
<A HREF="dpreview.com/reviews/compar... a link that compares the two cameras side-by-side for an easier comparison of the two.
I must admit I have never used a Kodak, but I have had a Lumix before, the FZ5, which was great and had amazing image quality. Personally I prefer a longer zoom because it gives you so much more versatility and the TZ1 has a larger sensor which will give you better image quality. The Kodak may have 8MP but with a smaller sensor the image quality won't be any better than on a camera with the TZ1's 5MP with its larger sensor.
A key thing here is IS (image stabilisation). The TZ1 has it and the Kodak doesn't. IS really does make such a difference, especially with a longer focal length.
Don't be put off by the Lumix being a little more complicated. You can start off using all the auto functions and then start incorporating little features bit by bit. You don't have to use them but it's always nice to know they're there for when you are ready to play around.
I helps this helps a bit and good luck with your decision making.
Mark
reply to this comment
<A HREF="dpreview.com/reviews/compar... a link that compares the two cameras side-by-side for an easier comparison of the two.
I must admit I have never used a Kodak, but I have had a Lumix before, the FZ5, which was great and had amazing image quality. Personally I prefer a longer zoom because it gives you so much more versatility and the TZ1 has a larger sensor which will give you better image quality. The Kodak may have 8MP but with a smaller sensor the image quality won't be any better than on a camera with the TZ1's 5MP with its larger sensor.
A key thing here is IS (image stabilisation). The TZ1 has it and the Kodak doesn't. IS really does make such a difference, especially with a longer focal length.
Don't be put off by the Lumix being a little more complicated. You can start off using all the auto functions and then start incorporating little features bit by bit. You don't have to use them but it's always nice to know they're there for when you are ready to play around.
I helps this helps a bit and good luck with your decision making.
Mark
TZ1 Fanatic (05/14/2007)
We own a Tz1 and the picture quality is excellent. In sunny conditions you can brighten the LCD screen by 40% with the push of a button. I would go with Panasonic, hands down a better camera. The 10X zoom is really cool.
reply to this comment
Which one is beter TZ1 and Canon A710 IS? (shankar123 — 04/13/2007)
I am looking for a compact cam with a good zoom.
reply to this comment
Varun (04/13/2007)
Well i just got a A710 IS and its awesome for the price it comes for. It has good features, all that you can understand easily and use them as well. IS provides a very good snap click on the move. The camera is robust, although it is not slim, but it has a good look with nice zoom upto 24x(optical*digital).
reply to this comment
shankar123 (04/14/2007)
Thank you, Varun. But i am looking for a better zoom so is TZ1 better with 10x?
reply to this comment
Varun (04/16/2007)
Well if you are looking for Zoom, then surely TZ1 has 10x optical zoom and 4x digital zoom (that makes 40x goes upto 50x with extended optical zoom), which is far more than A710IS. Although, i dont have any dislike for Panasonic, but i rely more on Canon and Nikon for digital cameras. Moreover, TZ1 is for 5 mega pixel(effective) but A710IS is for 7.1. So, even if you have a better zoom but bad resolution, you wont be able to get a clear picture with higher zoom.
Some details, for you to compare, besides Zoom, i would also recommend to see other features as well so you get the worth for the money you spent.
dpreview.com/news/0602/0602... of the day, its your call buddy. Good luck.
reply to this comment
Some details, for you to compare, besides Zoom, i would also recommend to see other features as well so you get the worth for the money you spent.
dpreview.com/news/0602/0602... of the day, its your call buddy. Good luck.
shankar123 (04/18/2007)
Thanks so much Varun..I will let u know when I get one...and if you could suggest some others with gud zoom and compact one, i would be considering them also....
reply to this comment
How do you minimize the noise during indoor shots? (zenjp2 — 04/11/2007)
I just got the TZ1 and have started testing it. The indoor shots look grainy when magnified in the computer at 100%. Is there a way to minimize that? Thanks for the help.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (04/12/2007)
Hi Zennel,
Panasonic often gets derided for its high image noise levels when shooting in low light, but the fact of the matter is that nearly all non-SLR digitals have issues with low light shooting. Panasonics might have it worse than most, but all will have it to some degree.
Anyhow, on to your question...
The main factor that causes image noise is high ISO setting. Reducing ISO to the lowest possible level (usually 50 or 100, sometimes 80) will drastically reduce noise. Unfortunately, the lower your ISO setting, the less light-sensitive the camera's sensor is. Since the sensor is catching less light, you have to slow the shutter speed to compensate, and that introduces blur. So, what you have to do is find a ISO/shutter combination where the shutter is quick enough to get rid of blur but the ISO is low enough to prevent excessive noise. Sometimes this balance can't be found, and then you have to either find a tripod or deal with the noise.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Panasonic often gets derided for its high image noise levels when shooting in low light, but the fact of the matter is that nearly all non-SLR digitals have issues with low light shooting. Panasonics might have it worse than most, but all will have it to some degree.
Anyhow, on to your question...
The main factor that causes image noise is high ISO setting. Reducing ISO to the lowest possible level (usually 50 or 100, sometimes 80) will drastically reduce noise. Unfortunately, the lower your ISO setting, the less light-sensitive the camera's sensor is. Since the sensor is catching less light, you have to slow the shutter speed to compensate, and that introduces blur. So, what you have to do is find a ISO/shutter combination where the shutter is quick enough to get rid of blur but the ISO is low enough to prevent excessive noise. Sometimes this balance can't be found, and then you have to either find a tripod or deal with the noise.
Hope this helps!
Small feature-rich camera for a road warror (that won't break if the TSA people "fondle" it a bit too much:) ) (aidacra — 01/24/2007)
I have been looking for a smaller camera which can be basically point-and-click for a long while that I can take with me on my business trips. On the wish list is one with good/great zoom abilities (I visit a lot of botanical gardens and with my previous digital cameras, getting a good picture of a flower from ANY distance is really tough; perhaps the issue is more with me and less with the camera, but I take a lot of outdoor shots of tourist-y things like the world's largest peanut :) ), and once my ability grows a bit, a camera that has a few advanced settings that I am play with would be nice.
I think the Lumix TZ1 fits the bill, but after looking at the Canon Powershot line I was thinking that in the long run choosing an S2/S3, though more than I was wishing to spend (~$200) would be a better choice for a feature-rich point , click camera that appears to be more rugged for daily airport travel.
Any help would be very much appreciated - I have a trip to see the Corn Palace in Mitchell, SD in a few weeks and I wish to have a camera up to the task :)
reply to this comment
I think the Lumix TZ1 fits the bill, but after looking at the Canon Powershot line I was thinking that in the long run choosing an S2/S3, though more than I was wishing to spend (~$200) would be a better choice for a feature-rich point , click camera that appears to be more rugged for daily airport travel.
Any help would be very much appreciated - I have a trip to see the Corn Palace in Mitchell, SD in a few weeks and I wish to have a camera up to the task :)
Rich Watson (01/24/2007)
I understand that the entire Panasonic line has Image Stabilization (IS), certainly a nice feature. I lam very fond of the Canon line, particularly the S3IS. However, it is not a small camera---I suggest you hold one first if you haven't already. I went with the Canon A710, although I was tempted to get the S3IS.
I enjoy getting a good shot of a flower too. I've found what works for me is to set the camera on PORTRAIT mode (the large F-stop throws the background out-of-focus) and then stand about 5 feet away, and zoom in. This telephoto method increases the risk of movement on your part. Hence, the IS technology would help minimize that.
I've read a lot of websites about digital cameras, and the consensus is that the best power source is to use rechargeable NiCad AA batteries. The really small cameras HAVE to use Lithium-Ion batteries (since there isn't enough room for AA's). On the surface, the Lithium battery seems ideal: Charge it up, and away you go. But then it runs out of juice in the middle of a tourist day---and you can't take any photos until you get back to the hotel, and charge it up for a few hours. Not so convenient now. And then maybe 2 or 3 years later, the Lithium battery is worn out, and you have possibly a headache trying to replace it.
With AA cells, you can carry an extra set with you, and you won't be stranded.
reply to this comment
I enjoy getting a good shot of a flower too. I've found what works for me is to set the camera on PORTRAIT mode (the large F-stop throws the background out-of-focus) and then stand about 5 feet away, and zoom in. This telephoto method increases the risk of movement on your part. Hence, the IS technology would help minimize that.
I've read a lot of websites about digital cameras, and the consensus is that the best power source is to use rechargeable NiCad AA batteries. The really small cameras HAVE to use Lithium-Ion batteries (since there isn't enough room for AA's). On the surface, the Lithium battery seems ideal: Charge it up, and away you go. But then it runs out of juice in the middle of a tourist day---and you can't take any photos until you get back to the hotel, and charge it up for a few hours. Not so convenient now. And then maybe 2 or 3 years later, the Lithium battery is worn out, and you have possibly a headache trying to replace it.
With AA cells, you can carry an extra set with you, and you won't be stranded.
aidacra (01/25/2007)
Thanks Richio, your advice on how to take a good shot of a flower was really helpful (and the best part is that I was able to understand it :) So, what you are saying is that perhaps the S2/S3 is a tad too bulky for my travel needs, but is the TZ1 really what I am looking for or is something in this type a better match?
Thanks :)
reply to this comment
Thanks :)
Rich Watson (01/25/2007)
Isn't the TZ1 basically automatic, i.e., not much manual control? If so, and that is what you want, then that might be the way to go. The Powershot lineup (except for the Elph line) has completely manual control, if you so desire. So you can be 'creative', if that is your style.
Rich
reply to this comment
Rich
trying to decide between Canon Powershot S2IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1K, what do you recomend? (smiley — 01/20/2007)
I am a real beginner in this matter (this will be my first camera), and after a lot of research, I think I would go either with one or the other (because of the image stabilized zoom), but I would really like to know which one is better (I found more good reviews for Canon than for Panasonic)...
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/22/2007)
Hi Sandy,
The S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a far better camera than the TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's much fuller-featured (full manual controls available, unlike on the TZ1), has a longer zoom (12x vs 10x), a far better macro mode, a flipping/rotating LCD, and runs on AA batteries, which means that you can use AA NiMH rechargeables (a cheap and easy form of power compared to the Panasonic's proprietary lithium ion battery).
You should be aware, however, that these two cameras aren't really of the same class. The TZ1 is much smaller and lighter than the S2 IS--about half the weight and half the thickness. The S2 IS could never fit in a pocket, unlike the TZ1.
If all you're concerned with is image quality and features, there's no question that you should choose the S2 IS here.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a far better camera than the TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's much fuller-featured (full manual controls available, unlike on the TZ1), has a longer zoom (12x vs 10x), a far better macro mode, a flipping/rotating LCD, and runs on AA batteries, which means that you can use AA NiMH rechargeables (a cheap and easy form of power compared to the Panasonic's proprietary lithium ion battery).
You should be aware, however, that these two cameras aren't really of the same class. The TZ1 is much smaller and lighter than the S2 IS--about half the weight and half the thickness. The S2 IS could never fit in a pocket, unlike the TZ1.
If all you're concerned with is image quality and features, there's no question that you should choose the S2 IS here.
Good luck!
smiley (01/23/2007)
Thank you!!.. I am really looking for a camera that takes good, clear, quick pictures as I still cannot convince my 1 year old kid to stay still... and although I don't understand ANYTHING about cameras technical issues, i think you convinced me to buy the Canon...
reply to this comment
Alison (01/23/2007)
Hi Sandy, I was in the same boat. Novice who wants to take great family pictures.
The cool thing about the S2 IS (or newer model S3 IS) and the TZ1 is that they both zoom during filming! This is pretty rare in smaller cameras because the zoom tends to make so much noise. The movie mode was important to me because I didn't want to get a camera and a camcorder (for family movies), and was looking for a combo. I wanted to capture the sledding down the hill and zoom in on that great smile at the end! I want to film my son getting a special presentation next month. But I also just want to take good photos.
I went with with TZ1 over the S2/S3 because: (1) it is more point-and-shoot - I had read that you need to know something about settings to get the S2/S3 to take good pictures and I didn't feel experienced enough to cope with those photo complexities - yet, (2) it is small enough to put in a a jacket pocket and so more available to capture those special moments, (3) I thought that I would look pretty silly with a super-macho camera when I wouldn't know an f-stop if I fell over one :)
The S2/S3 is a great camera (although movie mode is limited to 1gb ~ 8 minutes at a time, but you can take as many 8 minutes movies as you want), it has a separate movie button, and you have way more control - if you are prepared to put in the time and effort to learn more photo skills.
From want you appear to be looking for - an easy-to-use camera that will capture those special fleeting memories, and is fast enough to capture a running child - the TZ1 sounds like a better choice than the S2/S3.
This is if you also want movie mode with sound and zoom. Note: both shoot VGA (640 x 480 pixels) at 30fps rate. The TZ1 also shots movies at wide-aspect (848 x 480 pixels) - not sure about the S2/S3. BOTH also have image stabilization, which is vital to make this sort of thing work. BUT, if movie mode with sound and zoom is NOT important to you, then you have a whole range of other cameras that would be better for the job you describe.
reply to this comment
The cool thing about the S2 IS (or newer model S3 IS) and the TZ1 is that they both zoom during filming! This is pretty rare in smaller cameras because the zoom tends to make so much noise. The movie mode was important to me because I didn't want to get a camera and a camcorder (for family movies), and was looking for a combo. I wanted to capture the sledding down the hill and zoom in on that great smile at the end! I want to film my son getting a special presentation next month. But I also just want to take good photos.
I went with with TZ1 over the S2/S3 because: (1) it is more point-and-shoot - I had read that you need to know something about settings to get the S2/S3 to take good pictures and I didn't feel experienced enough to cope with those photo complexities - yet, (2) it is small enough to put in a a jacket pocket and so more available to capture those special moments, (3) I thought that I would look pretty silly with a super-macho camera when I wouldn't know an f-stop if I fell over one :)
The S2/S3 is a great camera (although movie mode is limited to 1gb ~ 8 minutes at a time, but you can take as many 8 minutes movies as you want), it has a separate movie button, and you have way more control - if you are prepared to put in the time and effort to learn more photo skills.
From want you appear to be looking for - an easy-to-use camera that will capture those special fleeting memories, and is fast enough to capture a running child - the TZ1 sounds like a better choice than the S2/S3.
This is if you also want movie mode with sound and zoom. Note: both shoot VGA (640 x 480 pixels) at 30fps rate. The TZ1 also shots movies at wide-aspect (848 x 480 pixels) - not sure about the S2/S3. BOTH also have image stabilization, which is vital to make this sort of thing work. BUT, if movie mode with sound and zoom is NOT important to you, then you have a whole range of other cameras that would be better for the job you describe.
smiley (01/23/2007)
Wow... thanks Alison!.. In fact, the movie mode is NOT important, because I did everything upside down: I already have a camcorder (with which I take horrible photos!!!, but great movies..) so I really need something that gets great pictures and that's it.
I thought I needed something with stabilization zoom, because I recently took several pictures of my kid with a Sony DSCw50 and several came out blurry.. Didn't want to spend too much money and found in Amazon two (or three) great values: the Canon S2 for U$ 303 (including a 1 GB SD memory card and battery charger), and the TZ1 or the DMC-FX01 (both about 235 U$), but the FX01 has 6 MB and 3,6x OIS zoom versus 5MP and 10x OIS of the TZ1.
Now my husbands says he preferes the Panasonic for it's size.. so i'm still wondering
reply to this comment
I thought I needed something with stabilization zoom, because I recently took several pictures of my kid with a Sony DSCw50 and several came out blurry.. Didn't want to spend too much money and found in Amazon two (or three) great values: the Canon S2 for U$ 303 (including a 1 GB SD memory card and battery charger), and the TZ1 or the DMC-FX01 (both about 235 U$), but the FX01 has 6 MB and 3,6x OIS zoom versus 5MP and 10x OIS of the TZ1.
Now my husbands says he preferes the Panasonic for it's size.. so i'm still wondering
Ben Keough (01/23/2007)
Here's the thing, Sandy...
The Canon is going to produce superior photo quality in pretty much all conditions, particularly in low light, where the Panasonic really struggles with image noise (or at least that's what nearly every review I've read tells me--maybe Alison can give you a hands-on report here). The Panasonic, however, is undoubtedly handier--pocket sized and it's got a great auto mode. The S2 IS does have a fantastic automatic mode, though; it works just as well as a point and shoot as it does as a full manual machine. If you can handle the extra bulk, the Canon has a lot more features and produces a better image. If you want to go slim and don't want to slim down your wallet too much, the Panasonic will be a step down, but not a huuuge one.
I suppose I should say at this point that I own the S2 IS and love it, so you've got a hands-on advocate for each camera here. :)
reply to this comment
The Canon is going to produce superior photo quality in pretty much all conditions, particularly in low light, where the Panasonic really struggles with image noise (or at least that's what nearly every review I've read tells me--maybe Alison can give you a hands-on report here). The Panasonic, however, is undoubtedly handier--pocket sized and it's got a great auto mode. The S2 IS does have a fantastic automatic mode, though; it works just as well as a point and shoot as it does as a full manual machine. If you can handle the extra bulk, the Canon has a lot more features and produces a better image. If you want to go slim and don't want to slim down your wallet too much, the Panasonic will be a step down, but not a huuuge one.
I suppose I should say at this point that I own the S2 IS and love it, so you've got a hands-on advocate for each camera here. :)
Alison (01/23/2007)
Sandy,
Look at the Canon PowerShot A710 IS 7.1MP Digital Camera with 6x Image-Stabilized Optical Zoom. This sounds like it would fit the bill for your specific needs! And it takes AA batteries, too.
amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-...
reply to this comment
Look at the Canon PowerShot A710 IS 7.1MP Digital Camera with 6x Image-Stabilized Optical Zoom. This sounds like it would fit the bill for your specific needs! And it takes AA batteries, too.
amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-...
aprilallard (01/23/2007)
Sandy,
I have a 7 1/2-month old who also will not sit still (he just started crawling!) and I purchased the S2 last month and love it. It takes great quality pictures. I am not a technical camera person, but I this is my honest personal opinion.
reply to this comment
I have a 7 1/2-month old who also will not sit still (he just started crawling!) and I purchased the S2 last month and love it. It takes great quality pictures. I am not a technical camera person, but I this is my honest personal opinion.
smiley (01/24/2007)
Thanks to everyone!! All you comments where very helpful. After a lot of thinking.. I'll stay with the Canon, regardless of it's size and weight.
reply to this comment
Alison (01/24/2007)
It is a great camera and you will enjoy it.
For his birthday, get your husband a tiny ultra-compact (maybe a Casio Exilim?) that fits in a trouser pocket so that you ... I mean he, can ALWAYS have a camera along to catch those unexpected special moments. :)
reply to this comment
For his birthday, get your husband a tiny ultra-compact (maybe a Casio Exilim?) that fits in a trouser pocket so that you ... I mean he, can ALWAYS have a camera along to catch those unexpected special moments. :)
Rich Watson (01/24/2007)
I bought a Casio Exilim about three years ago, and got a lot of use out of it. It is indeed the same size as a credit card, but about 1/4 thick.
It was very liberating being able to put that in my pants pocket (no bulge) ---I even took it to a black-tie event, and kept the camera in my tux pocket all night. Photo quality??? Not great (only 2 megapixels) but very convenient, fine for 'fun' snapshots.
reply to this comment
It was very liberating being able to put that in my pants pocket (no bulge) ---I even took it to a black-tie event, and kept the camera in my tux pocket all night. Photo quality??? Not great (only 2 megapixels) but very convenient, fine for 'fun' snapshots.
need to find 6mp and up digital camera with 10x optic zoom and up (nikihani — 01/16/2007)
I need something that is also affordable, nice looking and something easy to use. As well as takes great picturs especially if your dancing!!!
reply to this comment
Joe (01/17/2007)
The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) furfills all of your requirements. Plus it s a great price and small in size.
reply to this comment
Josh-Pollock (01/18/2007)
even though the tz1 is only 5 MP i highly recomend it. I owned it. It seemed to have good image quality and a perfect 10x zoom and OIS. You might want to wait for the TZ3 to come out. it has 7.2 MP and a wide angle lens.
reply to this comment
Which camera do you recommend? (rockinrobin — 01/15/2007)
I have a Kodak CX7330 digital camera and it works great for taking everyday pics however, its horrible for taking event pics. Concert pics look horrible even if your on the front row, they all blurred. I recently took some pics at a school Christmas play and it was not dark at all but yet they all blurred even when the subjects were standing still. I am wanting to buy a new camera but I am stumped on which one I should buy. I want to be able to get good pics at concerts, school events and all other shots I may take. Which is the best one to buy? I would prefer to stay under the $200, less if possible. I'm not sure what the difference is in the point & shoot versus the SLR but if one is better and not too complicated to use it doesn't make a difference to me. I've heard you can adjust the ISO settings to the highest help with blurred pics but I do not know how to that on my current camera. I would really appreciate your camera recommendations. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Joe (01/17/2007)
It will tough to make a major upgrade for $200 but I have a great suggestion for $220. The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great compact camera with many improvements over your kodak, for a reasonable price. The 10x Optical Zoom is great with what you are looking to do, plus an ISO rating up to 1600. It is a great all around camera for a cheap price. Check out the user reviews as well, they are very high.
Good Luck!
reply to this comment
Good Luck!
rockinrobin (01/19/2007)
I may be willing to pay as high as $300 if I know it will take good concert pics. I'm hoping I may be able to find a good camera on Ebay. Thank you so much for your help, I absolutely don't know anything about cameras. Thanks again!
reply to this comment
want best supercompact digital with big optical zoom (regortalp — 01/15/2007)
going on safari, and want a large LCD 2.5 min., good optical zoom, and very small..suggestions?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Hi Judy,
The smallest cameras you'll find with a huge zoom are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The problem here is that the smaller you make the cameras, the harder it is to make their big zooms function well. The smallest of these, the V610, is also the worst-rated, and that's no coincidence. Smaller cameras have slower zooms, a harder time focusing when zoomed in, and tend to have much more shutter lag. All three of these cameras get bad marks from pro reviewers like dpreview.com for their shutter lag and slow/poor-focusing zooms. This is exactly the kind of problem you don't want when you're trying to shoot animals in motion on safari.
I think that you'd be much better served by choosing a slightly larger camera with better performance. If you'd like further assistance selecting a larger, better camera, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The smallest cameras you'll find with a huge zoom are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The problem here is that the smaller you make the cameras, the harder it is to make their big zooms function well. The smallest of these, the V610, is also the worst-rated, and that's no coincidence. Smaller cameras have slower zooms, a harder time focusing when zoomed in, and tend to have much more shutter lag. All three of these cameras get bad marks from pro reviewers like dpreview.com for their shutter lag and slow/poor-focusing zooms. This is exactly the kind of problem you don't want when you're trying to shoot animals in motion on safari.
I think that you'd be much better served by choosing a slightly larger camera with better performance. If you'd like further assistance selecting a larger, better camera, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Good luck!
regortalp (01/16/2007)
Thanks....that was what i was afraid i would hear. What are the recommendations for the next level up?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Judy,
The cameras I listed above all feature 10x optical zooms. Strangely, the cameras of the next level up in size tend to be 6x zooms. Of these, there are several very good options available. The best of these is the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 6x optical zoom with a very good image stabilization system (compensates for shakiness in your hands) and a nice 2.5" LCD. It's got a very good 7.1MP sensor, too, so you'll have plenty of room for cropping if need be. Most importantly, it's a very quick performer. It's quick to focus and quick to shoot. The A710 IS is probably the best compromise between size and power.
Larger compact digitals like the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offer 12x stabilized zooms and very quick operation, but they cost quite a bit more and are much heavier and larger.
Hope this helps a bit.
reply to this comment
The cameras I listed above all feature 10x optical zooms. Strangely, the cameras of the next level up in size tend to be 6x zooms. Of these, there are several very good options available. The best of these is the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 6x optical zoom with a very good image stabilization system (compensates for shakiness in your hands) and a nice 2.5" LCD. It's got a very good 7.1MP sensor, too, so you'll have plenty of room for cropping if need be. Most importantly, it's a very quick performer. It's quick to focus and quick to shoot. The A710 IS is probably the best compromise between size and power.
Larger compact digitals like the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offer 12x stabilized zooms and very quick operation, but they cost quite a bit more and are much heavier and larger.
Hope this helps a bit.
donna (01/17/2007)
how come it breaks. this camera went out after six months and it cost fifty dollars less then what i paid for it. it is the main computer board in it. went black all at once and quit. i am so discourged cause i loved this camera. now i can't even get it fixed
reply to this comment
Is the Kadak C875 a good camera? (dgmann — 01/14/2007)
I am shopping for my first digital camera. I want a long zoom and a lot of pixels. I am considering the Kodak C875, Fujifilm F650, and Panasonic LZ5SE. Like so many new cameras they have no viewfinder. That might be good since I have trouble using a viewfinder with eyeglasses. Also it would be good to see just what your picture is going to be like, assuming the picture will be what you see on the display. On the other I am concerned about using the LCD screen in bright sunlight. I am told the Kodak 875 is hard on batteries. I don't know if that should be a consideration or not. Is anyone familiar with these cameras?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/15/2007)
Hi Justin,
The C875's user reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) here at DCHQ seem to indicate that it's a reasonably good performer in most situations. Battery life is indeed a common concern, and several users have also reported that their cameras simply stopped working after a few days. Now, you're bound to hear more reviews from dissatisfied customers than from satisfied ones, but when this many people report total failure, it's something to take into consideration.
If your specifications are long zoom and high megapixels, and (as it seems) you want to keep the budget under or around $200, I'd recommend the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's a 5MP (which is plenty for most users, unless they want to make poster-sized prints), 10x optical zoom camera with image stabilization. It's a little pricier than the others you listed (~$225 at Amazon right now), but the feature set can't be beat at that price. The only down side is that it's not the greatest in low light situations, so if you're looking for a party camera this probably isn't your best bet.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The C875's user reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) here at DCHQ seem to indicate that it's a reasonably good performer in most situations. Battery life is indeed a common concern, and several users have also reported that their cameras simply stopped working after a few days. Now, you're bound to hear more reviews from dissatisfied customers than from satisfied ones, but when this many people report total failure, it's something to take into consideration.
If your specifications are long zoom and high megapixels, and (as it seems) you want to keep the budget under or around $200, I'd recommend the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's a 5MP (which is plenty for most users, unless they want to make poster-sized prints), 10x optical zoom camera with image stabilization. It's a little pricier than the others you listed (~$225 at Amazon right now), but the feature set can't be beat at that price. The only down side is that it's not the greatest in low light situations, so if you're looking for a party camera this probably isn't your best bet.
Hope this helps!
small camera w optical zoom in movie mode (Alison — 01/12/2007)
I would like to find the smallest digital camera that will allow optical zoom (even just 2x or 3x) in movie mode. Canon Powershot S2 IS, Sony Cybershot DSC-H2 and Kodak EasyShare Z612 look pretty bulky - and I don't need super zoom for photos.
It should be able to take photos in typical low-light indoor settings, like parties, etc.
Would be thrilled to find one that takes AA batteries, but I know I can't have everything. :)
reply to this comment
It should be able to take photos in typical low-light indoor settings, like parties, etc.
Would be thrilled to find one that takes AA batteries, but I know I can't have everything. :)
Brenda Paro (01/12/2007)
This is tricky, because (as you probably know) the problem is that during recording the camera tends to pick up the sound of the lens moving, so most cameras disable optical zoom during movie recording. Moreso with small cameras, where the lens is closer to the microphone. I even know of one camera that disables sound if you zoom during movie recording!
With that said, the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) may work for you. It moves the lens during zoom slowly so that there's less of a noise problem in movies, although you might still experience it. It might have issues shooting in low light at times, but overall it's an excellent camera.
reply to this comment
With that said, the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) may work for you. It moves the lens during zoom slowly so that there's less of a noise problem in movies, although you might still experience it. It might have issues shooting in low light at times, but overall it's an excellent camera.
Alison (01/16/2007)
Thanks, Brenda! The perfect answer. Imaging-Resource.com's review noted that the TZ1 goes into "purple flare" overload at 5x to 10x, so I would need to avoid that realm - which should be fine if I can control myself with all that zoom power.
Of course, while googling around, I discoved they have just announced that the Casio EXILIM Hi-ZOOM EX-V7 Digital Camera will be coming out in a couple months....
I am sorely tempted to just go for the Canon PowerShot S2/S3 IS now (I read that the CW is that Canon beats the Sony Cybershot DSC-H2/H5) and then get an ultracompact Casio Exilim for my birthday:) Apparently, having two cameras - one more hefty, serious and heavy-duty and the other a tiny thing to always carry around - is considered quite normal.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on just sticking with the TZ1 (which would be my only camera) ORr going for the bigger and more versatile S2/S3, and then maybe picking up an ultacompact later on (when I can affort it).
BTW, no prizes for guessing that I am a novice in the digital camera arena.
reply to this comment
Of course, while googling around, I discoved they have just announced that the Casio EXILIM Hi-ZOOM EX-V7 Digital Camera will be coming out in a couple months....
I am sorely tempted to just go for the Canon PowerShot S2/S3 IS now (I read that the CW is that Canon beats the Sony Cybershot DSC-H2/H5) and then get an ultracompact Casio Exilim for my birthday:) Apparently, having two cameras - one more hefty, serious and heavy-duty and the other a tiny thing to always carry around - is considered quite normal.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on just sticking with the TZ1 (which would be my only camera) ORr going for the bigger and more versatile S2/S3, and then maybe picking up an ultacompact later on (when I can affort it).
BTW, no prizes for guessing that I am a novice in the digital camera arena.
Alison (01/18/2007)
UPDATE: I am going withthe TZ1. I had a brief look at the Nikon S10, which is the cutest little thing, but does not seem to do as well as the TZ1 in poor light situations. Thanks again.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (01/20/2007)
Hi Alison,
Sorry I did not get back to you sooner, but it looks like you ironed this out on your own pretty well. Kudos for doing what looks like some hardcore research on this.
I am with you on the TZ1 vs. the Nikon (which is adorable). While the Panasonics do suffer in low light conditions, it is mostly the higher-megapixel Panasonics that you really have to worry about. This one at 5mp doesn't have the same problem with image noise that I see at the higher levels. And it's my opinion that the TZ1 still does better than this particular Nikon. It's also more user friendly in my opinion and I think you'll be happier with overall image quality.
If you do decide down the road to invest in something a little more heavy-duty, the Canons you mentioned are amazing. I can't say enough good things about the S3 when it comes to creative control and image quality. In the meantime the TZ1 is a nice solid choice to get you through the basics and I think you'll be satisfied.
reply to this comment
Sorry I did not get back to you sooner, but it looks like you ironed this out on your own pretty well. Kudos for doing what looks like some hardcore research on this.
I am with you on the TZ1 vs. the Nikon (which is adorable). While the Panasonics do suffer in low light conditions, it is mostly the higher-megapixel Panasonics that you really have to worry about. This one at 5mp doesn't have the same problem with image noise that I see at the higher levels. And it's my opinion that the TZ1 still does better than this particular Nikon. It's also more user friendly in my opinion and I think you'll be happier with overall image quality.
If you do decide down the road to invest in something a little more heavy-duty, the Canons you mentioned are amazing. I can't say enough good things about the S3 when it comes to creative control and image quality. In the meantime the TZ1 is a nice solid choice to get you through the basics and I think you'll be satisfied.
What camera's compare to the Ricoh Caplio R4 and would be a better buy (Brand — 01/08/2007)
Need to buy compact digital camera with good zoom and good megapics. Had a Caplio R4 for 5 days and broke the LCD screen. Need to replace this camera asap. What will be a better or good buy
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/08/2007)
Hi Deon,
The only camera I can think of that comes close to matching the R4's feature set is the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but it is different in several key respects. To begin with, its max wide angle is 35mm, compared to the R4's 28mm. This means it will not be able to capture landscapes/crowd shots in quite the same way. Second, it has 1MP less of resolution (5MP to the R4's 6MP), but this won't make much of a difference except when printing poster-sized images (and how often do you do that?). It does, however, have a 10x optical zoom, which is quite a bit longer than the R4's 7x. To fit that 10x lens, the body is a bit bigger than the R4's, but it's still a very small camera. You can see a direct comparison of the cameras' vital stats here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The only camera I can think of that comes close to matching the R4's feature set is the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but it is different in several key respects. To begin with, its max wide angle is 35mm, compared to the R4's 28mm. This means it will not be able to capture landscapes/crowd shots in quite the same way. Second, it has 1MP less of resolution (5MP to the R4's 6MP), but this won't make much of a difference except when printing poster-sized images (and how often do you do that?). It does, however, have a 10x optical zoom, which is quite a bit longer than the R4's 7x. To fit that 10x lens, the body is a bit bigger than the R4's, but it's still a very small camera. You can see a direct comparison of the cameras' vital stats here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
Hope this helps!
Brand (02/05/2007)
Thanks. Still a bit hesitant. Would you say it better to buy the new Caplio R6 or still go gor the Panasonic TZ1.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/05/2007)
Deon,
I haven't been able to find much information on the R6, and obviously I've never used one, so I'd have a little trouble comparing it to the TZ1 or any other camera. Have you been able to find a spec sheet for it?
I think that perhaps we're limiting you to too few choices here, though. How much zoom do you actually think you need? Do you need all 7x of the optical zoom, or would you be ok with 3x or 5x? Similarly, how many megapixels do you actually need? Are you going to be making a lot of big prints, or are you mainly going to be manipulating/displaying your photos on the computer? If we expand your search a bit, there are very many very good cameras waiting out there.
reply to this comment
I haven't been able to find much information on the R6, and obviously I've never used one, so I'd have a little trouble comparing it to the TZ1 or any other camera. Have you been able to find a spec sheet for it?
I think that perhaps we're limiting you to too few choices here, though. How much zoom do you actually think you need? Do you need all 7x of the optical zoom, or would you be ok with 3x or 5x? Similarly, how many megapixels do you actually need? Are you going to be making a lot of big prints, or are you mainly going to be manipulating/displaying your photos on the computer? If we expand your search a bit, there are very many very good cameras waiting out there.
Brand (02/05/2007)
Ben,
Agreed I did not explain my needs. What I need is a fast, compact, wide(28mm) lenced camera with at least 7x optical zoom with a minimum of 6 meg pics. I mainly use the computer but do have the need to print a series of photo's to make landscape frames etc.
The caplio R4 worked for me as it was fast wide lenced and pick quality not bad. The use of a camera in my work has become a big thing and i still need a lot of experience before i will be able to make the right choice with camera's. It will be great if I could use your experience to help with this
reply to this comment
Agreed I did not explain my needs. What I need is a fast, compact, wide(28mm) lenced camera with at least 7x optical zoom with a minimum of 6 meg pics. I mainly use the computer but do have the need to print a series of photo's to make landscape frames etc.
The caplio R4 worked for me as it was fast wide lenced and pick quality not bad. The use of a camera in my work has become a big thing and i still need a lot of experience before i will be able to make the right choice with camera's. It will be great if I could use your experience to help with this
Ben Keough (02/06/2007)
Well, with those specs the Caplio series is really the only option. If you drop the 28mm requirement, another option is the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's got a unique (well, unique to Kodak, anyway) design that involves two different lenses (and two different CCDs), one for telephoto (10x) and one for wide(r) angle shooting. It's very, very small and pretty stylish, but reviews regarding its image quality and performance are pretty sketchy, particularly complaining about slow zoom response and so-so overall images.
It seems to me that you're probably best sticking with the Ricohs, particularly if you liked your R4 for the short time you had it. With the R6 coming out soon, the R5s will probably be dropping in price and it might be a good time to pick one up. Sorry I couldn't offer more suggestions, but the field of high zoom, wide angle ultracompacts is pretty slim.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
It seems to me that you're probably best sticking with the Ricohs, particularly if you liked your R4 for the short time you had it. With the R6 coming out soon, the R5s will probably be dropping in price and it might be a good time to pick one up. Sorry I couldn't offer more suggestions, but the field of high zoom, wide angle ultracompacts is pretty slim.
Good luck!
Brand (02/06/2007)
Thanks Ben believe me all your inputs helped me a lot
reply to this comment
TONY HITCHIN (02/20/2007)
Panasonic have just announced a TZ2 and TZ3 both with 28-280 zooms. The difference between the models being pixel count and screen size.
reply to this comment
Panasonuc TZ1 vs FX01? (airsea — 01/07/2007)
Received both for Xmas and can't decide which is better. Real estate agent, Want wide angle and my husband likes the zoom feature for vacation? Paid 50.00 less for TZ1.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/07/2007)
Hi,
These are both very nice cameras. The FX01 is rated slightly better by users, but only slightly. The FX01 has a 28mm wide angle lens and a couple of additional megapixels on its side, while the TZ1 has an incredible 10x zoom lens. Both offer Panasonic's default "Mega O.I.S." image stabilization system. Personally, I'd lean toward the FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as it seems to be a more versatile camera all around. The 4x zoom isn't great, but it's sufficient for most needs, and the wide angle lens is a great addition, particularly for the kind of landscape shots you'll probably be taking on vacation.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
These are both very nice cameras. The FX01 is rated slightly better by users, but only slightly. The FX01 has a 28mm wide angle lens and a couple of additional megapixels on its side, while the TZ1 has an incredible 10x zoom lens. Both offer Panasonic's default "Mega O.I.S." image stabilization system. Personally, I'd lean toward the FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as it seems to be a more versatile camera all around. The 4x zoom isn't great, but it's sufficient for most needs, and the wide angle lens is a great addition, particularly for the kind of landscape shots you'll probably be taking on vacation.
Hope this helps!
Does memory card come with this camera. how many pictures on card? (Sam70Iam — 12/31/2006)
Does memory card comewith this camera,how many pictures on card?
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (12/31/2006)
Sammye, it often depends on where you buy it from. But if it comes with a memory card then the card's size is almost always very small- more for just advertising purposes. So you will always need to get a good memory card for your camera- big enough size and high speed one. Depending on your camera settings the size of a picture file can be very different. Therefore it is hard to say how many pictures can fit on a particular card. I would get a 500MB or 1GB card first. It is usually big enough to take far over 100 pictures
reply to this comment
What is the difference between optical zoom and digital zoom ? (haelsiep — 12/27/2006)
I'm trying to determine how to rate the zoom on digital cameras and I'm unclear how the digital and optical zooms work together.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/27/2006)
The short answer is ... marketing. Optical zoom is the actual zoom along the focal length of the lens. Wheras, digital zoom is actually a process of "blowing up" the image digitally. This causes a myriad of problems including light loss, artifacting, camera shake. In short, you create the illusion of getting closer to an image, but in reality, you've only blown up the image past the operable focal length and usually end up with blurry, pixelated image.
reply to this comment
schoolteacher (12/29/2006)
If you are new to digi-photo (as your question allows me to assume), this may be a better "layman's" definition. Optical zoom is the true enlargement of an image: this is what your non-digital camera has always done, and uses the same process as a microscope to make images seem larger. Digital zoom is the computer taking the optical pictures and translating it into a binary formula (pixels) that it then tries to compress. If you want to be able to zoom in on an image (i.e. long-range nature shots, close-ups of Johnny at the school concert), you need a higher optical zoom. Digital zoom can also increase the image enlargement, but because it is pixelated (converted to small individual squares), the picture will eventually become blurry and "blocky," as if constructed out of Legos. If you want a camera that will always take clear pictures, look for optical zoom and at least 6.0 megapixels (1000s of those small individual squares: 6.0 megapixels = 6000 little squares / frame). If you want to do more creative manipulation, I would recommend freeware to download (I personally like Picasa; see more info on this site).
Hope this helps; best of luck with your new camera!
reply to this comment
Hope this helps; best of luck with your new camera!
Freda (01/02/2008)
That exactly what I want to do; take long-range nature shots and close-up shots of my sax player and his band while in concert. Very helpful. thank you. Please offer more informaton on how to obtain freeware. Thank you Freda
reply to this comment
Hi, we're going to Haiti for a month and need a digital camera that has a strong zoom, costs $150-$200 and has great memory and re-chargability. (haiti — 12/22/2006)
This will be our first digitital camera and, again, the main focus points are a strong zoom, memory storage and re-chargability. We're not interested in any other functions but pictures (i.e. movies, etc.).
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/22/2006)
Sid,
You might try the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) at $199.99. The 10x optical zoom, long lasting lithium ion rechargeable battery and ability to expand the memory into memory sticks (I would get at least a 1G or 2G stick for the trip) all fit in nicely to your specs. Other niceties of the camera are the ISO 80-1600 range for bright to low light settings, as well as the 4.41 x 2.29 x 1.58 inch dimensions for easy portability in a pocket. The 5 megapixel resolution make it just fine for prints up to 13x17 inches. Good luck and have a safe trip.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You might try the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) at $199.99. The 10x optical zoom, long lasting lithium ion rechargeable battery and ability to expand the memory into memory sticks (I would get at least a 1G or 2G stick for the trip) all fit in nicely to your specs. Other niceties of the camera are the ISO 80-1600 range for bright to low light settings, as well as the 4.41 x 2.29 x 1.58 inch dimensions for easy portability in a pocket. The 5 megapixel resolution make it just fine for prints up to 13x17 inches. Good luck and have a safe trip.
Andrew
camy (02/18/2008)
digital cameras v/s. camcorder,which to buy in terms quality&price.
reply to this comment
Recommendations for compact real estate appraisal digital camera??? (hanes123 — 12/21/2006)
Features needed include: wide angle lens, zoom, view finder, decent flash and compact design to fit into a pocket.
reply to this comment
Joe (12/21/2006)
I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it is small and powerful. Excellent zoom too.
reply to this comment
K75rider (12/21/2006)
My experience with Real Estate photos is trying to get everything in the photo. Normally you have a 3x lens which is 36 by 110mm or you get a big 10x zoom lens which is 38 by 300mm. The problem is not getting close to the subject but rather you have to get back so far away from the property in order to get the complete photo.
Well, you are in luck as Panasonic has just released the Lumix DMC-LX2. LX2 has Optical image stabilization, 10mp and 4x zoom (28-112). Thats wide angle but the real feature of this camera is that it is a wide-screen 16:9 format for photos and movies and it will fit in your pocket or purse. Dimensions are 4.2 x 2.2 x 1.0in
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not high definition.
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Another option is the Canon SD800. Image stabilization, 7.1mp and 3.8x lens (28 - 105mm) Another wide angle and besides its a Canon. Great in low light and will take movies with sound. Picture quality is GREAT. On-line price under $375
You can not go wrong with either. I am a Canon fan but for your use I recommend the LX2.
Happy movie and picture taking.
reply to this comment
Well, you are in luck as Panasonic has just released the Lumix DMC-LX2. LX2 has Optical image stabilization, 10mp and 4x zoom (28-112). Thats wide angle but the real feature of this camera is that it is a wide-screen 16:9 format for photos and movies and it will fit in your pocket or purse. Dimensions are 4.2 x 2.2 x 1.0in
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not high definition.
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Another option is the Canon SD800. Image stabilization, 7.1mp and 3.8x lens (28 - 105mm) Another wide angle and besides its a Canon. Great in low light and will take movies with sound. Picture quality is GREAT. On-line price under $375
You can not go wrong with either. I am a Canon fan but for your use I recommend the LX2.
Happy movie and picture taking.
Huge doubt buying pentax T10 or Canon A540... (sgstyla — 12/17/2006)
I`m going on a holiday to Egypt, so a lot of pictures are going to be taken. I don`t know much about digital camera`s... so maybe somebody could help me out !
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
reply to this comment
There are just to many to choose from. (Maybe someone could give me an another good advise for an another camera other than the T10/A540)
Ben Keough (12/18/2006)
Hi Steven,
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
If you don't mind spending a few dollars more, the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8 megapixel) and A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10 megapixel) would be a better choice than either of these. They're similar in size but far more powerful and much better handling. They're pretty much crowd favorites around here, and you can't do much better in the compact digital range.
Good luck!
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Thank you for answering Ben. I`ve checked them but they both need 4x AA.... I don`t find this very convenient. Today i went to the store to check some other ones.... The olympus MJU740 what is your opinion about this one ?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Steven,
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The Olympus 740 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a pretty mediocre camera. It has issues with glare on the LCD screen, which makes taking pictures very difficult outdoors, and its build quality and picture quality are only so-so.
Just out of curiosity, why are you anti-AA batteries? Most people find them incredibly convenient, as you can buy NiMH AA rechargeables, which have a longer life than most kinds of batteries, and can be recharged up to 1000 times in their lifetime. I use them in my Canon S2 IS and get about 450 pictures out of each charge. You can get 4 AA rechargeables and a rapid charger for ~$15, and if for some reason you don't have the NiMH batteries around, you can always sub in alkalines in a pinch. Can't do that with a proprietary battery pack.
Let me know if this doesn't change your mind and I'll try and point out a few good cameras similar in price/features to the ones we've already talked about, that have battery packs.
Good luck!
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Ey Ben,
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
reply to this comment
First of all thanks for helping me out ! Because it seems to get more confusing everytime i'm reading reviews, go to sellingpoints and other stuff....
I`m not anti AA-batts but I think 4 is a lot, kinda need 8 then to back yourself up on a trip. A camera with two AA's is the limit for me.
my Cam facts: - Good pictures (night and day) ofcourse....
- about $270 max
- 6 or more Mp
- prefer SD card
- Easy to handle
- min. 3x optical zoom
This should be it...
I hope you can name a few good cameras....
I want to buy one tonight on the internet, because ì'm leaving pretty soon :)
Steve
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Steven,
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
reply to this comment
I feel you on the 4 batteries thing. There's a reason for the 4 instead of 2, though--much longer battery life. ;)
Ok... within your specs...
First of all, there's the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's very nearly as good as the A630 and A640, and has some extra features those cameras don't have--optical image stabilization being the most important of these. It's got a very nice 7.1MP sensor, can shoot in 16:9 widescreen, has a great 6x optical zoom, and does use a SD card. It uses 2 AA batteries. As you might have determined by this point I'm a fairly staunch Canon supporter, but I assure you it's solely due to my admiration of their image quality. This one is very slightly out of your price range (~$300), but I believe it's worth the extra cash.
Another you might want to consider is the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's equipped with a 7.2MP sensor, a 3.6x optically stabilized zoom, uses SD cards, and it uses a LiIon rechargeable battery. Users seem to like it a lot, and the only difference between it and the more expensive FX50 is a slightly smaller LCD screen (2.5" to the FX50's 3.0").
Finally, there's the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 5MP sensor (below your spec, I know) but a great 10x optical zoom in a very compact package. It also uses SD cards and a LiIon battery and has the same optical image stabilization as the FX07. Some pro reviewers have complained about high image noise even at low ISO settings, but most users seem quite pleased with the camera.
These are the only three I really feel comfortable recommending under your specifications. I think you'd be happy with any of them, but my pick is the A710 IS.
Hope this helps you make a choice. :)
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
Ben,
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
reply to this comment
In the meantime I was checking a site, which gave a good summery.
The panasonics score was good !
I think it`s going to be this one, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, FX 07 or A710 IS :)
Can I ask for your last opinion please ?
Hahhahah you are definately going make a serious point now...
After this... i'm buying the piece of S*#T ;)
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Yo Steven,
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
reply to this comment
Ok... between those three, if you're prepared to spend the money it's really between the FZ7 and the A710 IS.
The FZ7 is of a different class than the A710 IS and the FX07--it's quite a bit larger and heavier (about twice as heavy, actually), and this might factor into your choice if you have a problem with carrying the camera somewhere other than your pocket (i.e., a camera bag).
It is, however, a very powerful camera, with a nice 12x stabilized zoom (twice that of the A710, three or four times that of the FX07) and a good 6MP sensor. Panasonic has had some complaints in general regarding high image noise and excessive noise reduction (which smears away some fine detail in an effort to get rid of graininess), but users seem to not have nearly as much trouble with this as pro reviewers do. But hey, it's their business to scrutinize everything, right?
The A710 IS is not an ultracompact, but it's small enough to fit in your average jeans pocket. Its lens is top quality, and while its 6x zoom isn't a match for the 12x of the FZ7, it's still quite impressive. Canon's image stabilization is as good as or better than Panasonic's, and their image quality is quite frankly second to none.
Honestly, my gut is still leaning toward the A710 IS, though its feature set doesn't match the FZ7's. If the longer zoom matters to you, and if you can deal with the larger size, the FZ7 may be a better choice for you. If not, I'd definitely go for the A710.
sgstyla (12/20/2006)
OK ! You made a point here.... Thanks for helping me out and probably a lot more people too !
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
reply to this comment
Continue what you`re doing, A +
Steve
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
No problem. Hope whichever one you choose works out for you. Let us know how it goes!
reply to this comment
sgstyla (12/21/2006)
The A710 IS has been ordered, I`ll definately share my experiences after my holiday !
reply to this comment
Val (02/17/2007)
Hi ! I was actually just looking at those cameras myself ! I was wondering how it went with the canon (Steven !) and Ben, is there any other cameras that came out since that could be added to the list ?
Thanks heaps
Val
reply to this comment
Thanks heaps
Val
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
Hi Val,
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
reply to this comment
Not to beat a dead horse, but the A540 DOES have 6MP, not bad. And now the new A550 has 7.1MP, just like the A710.
I have the A710, I looked at the A630-640 and the S3. These last three were a bit bulky when I went to Best Buy to try them out. I was spoiled by the compact A520, and the A710 is just slightly bigger.
When people camera-shop, I don't think that they realize that the longer the optical zoom, the thicker the camera. It's strictly a matter of physics.
Val (02/17/2007)
Hi Richio !
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
reply to this comment
I was actually more thinking about a bigger zoom, aka the Panasonic DMC FZ7 ; we've tried to work out which one would be the best between this one, the Sony DSC H2, and the Olympus SP 500. My heart goes to the FZ7 :) but i am open to any other hint !!
Thanks for the help :)
Val
Rich Watson (02/17/2007)
Hi Val,
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
reply to this comment
Tip: Sony uses memory sticks (yuk!) and Olympus uses Xd memory, correct? The most popular, hence economical---memory cards are SD. (Panasonic uses SD). So the SD will probably be the standard for a long time. If you buy another camera in 2-3 years, you would most likely be able to use your current (SD) memory cards.
Rich
sgstyla (02/18/2007)
Hi Val,
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
reply to this comment
I`m actually very happy with my canon a710s ! I`ve made 350 pictures on my holiday and they`ve been shot on the highest conditions on a 1gb SD card. Egypt came out very clear and almost fake (positive thing !) on the pictures. You can see all details and stuff when zooming the pictures on your pc. I think it`s worth the money ! The only thing which could be a turning point for your decision is the durability caused by the 2x AA.
You have to make sure the AA`s you`re using are strong because the camera uses a lot of energy. But on the other hand, 2x AA is always handy because you can always buy them practically in every store (just in case). To back up Richio, SD is definately the easiest way to use and to have with an eye on future buyings !!!
Steve
Rich Watson (02/18/2007)
Hi Steve,
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
reply to this comment
Thanks for getting back to the crowd. Glad to hear your A710 is working great.
However, it sounds like you are buying alkaline AA batteries!! You should run, not walk, to pick up NiMH batteries somewhere. (See Ben's second comment.) Once you go NiMH, you won't ever go back.
Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for nice package deals on batts and chargers.
Val (02/18/2007)
Hello guys !
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
reply to this comment
We opted for the panasonic, it has been ordered, that and a 2GB card. The only thing that I feared was the lack of battery time as this model have one of its own and not AAs 'that you can buy anywhere', so we bought a pack of 2 extra batteries with it !! (Should I say we want to go to Europe for 2 months to explain why we bought extra mem and batt ???) Steve, just be aware that you have different qualities of rechargeable AAs and that the 2500mAh are WAY better than the smaller ones. ;)
Thanks again for the help and we'll tell you how it turned out as soon as we get the whole lot and we have time to try it !!
sgstyla (02/21/2007)
Hahahaha.... I think I have the good batteries but not the best charger ;) It's an old one.... the batteries are 3200mAh NI-MH. Val Good luck with the Panasonic. Hope the camera will provide your wishes. Where in Europe are you heading too ? I`m from Holland, maybe you`ll need some tips ?!
StevoOo...
reply to this comment
StevoOo...
Rich Watson (02/21/2007)
Who made the 3200 mAh? I mean, the brand? I haven't seen any that large.
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
reply to this comment
One problem with rechargeables is that the charger is soooo 20th century. The new chargers analyze the condition of the batteries with sophisticated electronics, and adjust the current as needed. Then, when the batteries are 'full up' these new chargers will apply a little current every 10 seconds or so, to keep the batteries fully charged.
You can buy a battery kit (batts + charger) at your local discount store, but that will probably come with mediocre batteries (like 2000 mAh, or less!) and a charger that sucks. Spend $50 and get a nice setup. Check out thomas-distributing.com/ind... for great batteries and chargers. (No, I don't work there, no, I am not the owner's bro, etc.)
I bought their charger---Maha C204W 18 months ago. Best money I spent in a long, long time. This charger does AA's, AAA's, has a 're-conditioning' button, has a top-off routine, works internationally on voltages from 100 to 240 automatically, will charge up to 4 batteries 'in pairs'---which means that 2 batteries can be in the charger indefinitely, while YOU ADD two depleted batteries which then start charging with a different program, etc.
Defines STATE OF THE ART
Val (02/21/2007)
Hihi :o) No thanks Steven, I am from France (and Switzerland) myself... Should be better to visit our friends first before they kill us (it's been 4 years we are in Australia, and they've never seen the 2 kids we got since) !! Thanks Richio for the tip about the battery charger. We have an old camera that takes AAs, we may purchase one !!
Val
reply to this comment
Val
WiccaMan (NZ) (02/22/2007)
Well I knew nothing about cameras when I got mine. The only things I knew were
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
reply to this comment
1 - Need 4 Batteries - rechargable
2 - Don't even look at the digital zoom figures - Only consider the optical zoom
3 - What type/size card was in use (prefer SD/1gig myself)
4 - Main Stream manufacturer
Result - Canon Powershot S3 IS - - Got it in November and over 6000 shots later I still think its the best thing since beer and pretzels.
Cheers Jon
The Happy Amateur from New Zealand
grace (03/25/2007)
well after reading all of your comments i am confused as to where to go from here. I was nearly sold on the panasonic fx07 till now. The main features that i am concerned with are macro lens, i photograph lots of small gemstones and need crispness and acurate color. I also want a fast burst feature as i always seem to miss the shots with my now very outdated canon A300. But i am traveller and on the road heaps so i need small and convenient. I am going to look up this canon a710 now but after how my a300 deteriorated after a few years i am a bit skeptical. I want a good price, but can spend a bit more if all these features are top notch of one. If anyone can recommend something for me it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
grace
reply to this comment
Thanks
grace
Tracey (03/25/2007)
Help! Going on vacation and looking for a great compact easy to use camera. Was told the Casio EX Z75 was the best but also looked at some Canons. Now confused. Want great pictures of grandbaby, mountains etc. Have a Canon Powershot S2 IS but have never liked it. I don't really know much and just like to point and shoot. The Canon I have always seems to blur pictures exp if baby moves etc. So need easier but like quality and small size so I can take easily on trips. Can anyone help?
Thanks! Tracey
reply to this comment
Thanks! Tracey
Do the Panasonic TZ1 & L23 allow for previewing shot BEFORE storing? (achastain68 — 12/17/2006)
My Fuji did and I assumed it was typical. But I bought a Canon with all the bells & whistles only to be extremely disappointed by its 1/2 second preview before auto-storing the photo. I actually had to click over to Playback mode to view the picture to decide whether it was okay, or whether to take another--which of course required re-posing people! What a joke! I really, really want to preview the shot in freeze mode at once, press a button to keep--or delete and reshoot. Do the Panasonics allow for this?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/17/2006)
Anne,
You can actually adjust the display time on the Canons to last longer. The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a default 1 second preview, and can be changed to off or 3 seconds. The Panasonic LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has a default review time of 1 second. It can also be set to 3 seconds or off. Both cameras also have a zoom review option, where the photo is displayed for 1 second, then is enlarged 4 times for another second. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can actually adjust the display time on the Canons to last longer. The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a default 1 second preview, and can be changed to off or 3 seconds. The Panasonic LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has a default review time of 1 second. It can also be set to 3 seconds or off. Both cameras also have a zoom review option, where the photo is displayed for 1 second, then is enlarged 4 times for another second. I hope this helps.
Andrew
achastain68 (12/18/2006)
Thanks very much!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/21/2006)
Anne,
Anytime, please come back if you have any more questions.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Anytime, please come back if you have any more questions.
Andrew
I want an affordable point and shoot digital camera that is small, easy to use, and great for travel. (blemaire — 12/12/2006)
Things that are important to me: easy to use, lots of zoom, small size, high ISO, do NOT want a recessed lens
I never print pictures larger than 4x6 so I do not need many megapixels.
reply to this comment
I never print pictures larger than 4x6 so I do not need many megapixels.
Brenda Paro (12/12/2006)
You might like the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's not an ultracompact, but it has a fairly decent zoom (not sure what you consider lots of zoom) and high ISO. It's also easy to use and carry.
reply to this comment
which is better Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ5S or Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1 (jaywh01 — 12/11/2006)
i really would like to know which of these would be better i have done research and noted that one has better optical range but im really wondering about not only the zoom but quality of pictures such as blurry, redeye, and very importantly difference in low light situations if anyone can help id really appreciate it
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/11/2006)
Hi Josh,
According to user and pro reviews, in most respects the image quality is pretty similar between these two cameras. The main differences are the 1MP difference (6MP for the LZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), 5MP for the TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) and the ultra zoom on the TZ1 (10x optical to the LZ5's 6x). Both zooms are stabilized, as Panasonic offers image stabilization on all of its Lumix cameras. The TZ1 costs a little more (about $30 higher at Amazon right now), but I think it's worth it. The 1MP difference won't make much of a difference in any respect, but the extra 4x zoom certainly will. Both cameras are going to have issues in low light, but that's common to all lower-end consumer digital cameras. You can do the usual things to alleviate low-light weakness (higher ISO, longer shutter speed, and, of course, flash).
My verdict is to go for the TZ1. Good luck!
reply to this comment
According to user and pro reviews, in most respects the image quality is pretty similar between these two cameras. The main differences are the 1MP difference (6MP for the LZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), 5MP for the TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) and the ultra zoom on the TZ1 (10x optical to the LZ5's 6x). Both zooms are stabilized, as Panasonic offers image stabilization on all of its Lumix cameras. The TZ1 costs a little more (about $30 higher at Amazon right now), but I think it's worth it. The 1MP difference won't make much of a difference in any respect, but the extra 4x zoom certainly will. Both cameras are going to have issues in low light, but that's common to all lower-end consumer digital cameras. You can do the usual things to alleviate low-light weakness (higher ISO, longer shutter speed, and, of course, flash).
My verdict is to go for the TZ1. Good luck!
8x10 quality with Panansonic TZ1 (lkmann16 — 12/10/2006)
I have been told 5 megapixal will print an 8x10 fine and and other say it won't. Help!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/10/2006)
Hi,
You can print pictures from any camera at any size--the problem is doing so without a significant reduction in quality.
At 300dpi (which is "standard" for high quality prints), a 5MP picture will print at 8.64 x 6.48". However, with today's printers you can print at as low as 180dpi (sometimes 150dpi) without a significant reduction in visible image quality. At 180dpi, a 5MP picture will print at 14.4 x 10.8", so you should have no trouble getting nice 8x10" prints out of a 5MP camera.
There's a nice resolution/print size chart here ( design215.com/toolbox/megap... ) that might help you out a bit.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
You can print pictures from any camera at any size--the problem is doing so without a significant reduction in quality.
At 300dpi (which is "standard" for high quality prints), a 5MP picture will print at 8.64 x 6.48". However, with today's printers you can print at as low as 180dpi (sometimes 150dpi) without a significant reduction in visible image quality. At 180dpi, a 5MP picture will print at 14.4 x 10.8", so you should have no trouble getting nice 8x10" prints out of a 5MP camera.
There's a nice resolution/print size chart here ( design215.com/toolbox/megap... ) that might help you out a bit.
Good luck!
I need recommendation for an inexpensive p & s with great video - audio capabilities, esp. in low light situations. (susanbegood — 11/26/2006)
I want to video my musician friends playing in clubs. Would like a P&S digital camera that would be great video recorder too. Can't afford over $200. Any chance I can find one?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/26/2006)
Susan,
Staying under $200 for a low light situation camera that has "great" audio video qualities too is going to be tough. I would say your best bet would be the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a 10x optical zoom, and goes up to ISO 1600 (better for low light situations). You might try looking for used cameras on eBay as well. This can be a good alternative to get a better performing camera for less. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Staying under $200 for a low light situation camera that has "great" audio video qualities too is going to be tough. I would say your best bet would be the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a 10x optical zoom, and goes up to ISO 1600 (better for low light situations). You might try looking for used cameras on eBay as well. This can be a good alternative to get a better performing camera for less. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Brenda Paro (11/27/2006)
I'm wondering if you might be better off investing in two separate pieces of equipment- a low-end (but effective) video recorder and a simple point and shoot camera. It will still run you more than $200, but you don't have to buy them at the same time- and you will get better performance out of a low-end camcorder than you will out of a camera that is also expected to take still photos.
reply to this comment
Which is better..NIKON S10 or Panasonic TZ1? (pranjal — 11/25/2006)
reply to this comment
tharrison (11/25/2006)
The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has gotten much better reviews than the Nikon, and it's much less expensive, and has better specs. You might also take a look at the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is an outstanding camera as well.
reply to this comment
does panasonictz1 comes with any other colour (india — 11/21/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/21/2006)
Hi Konti,
The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 comes in both silver and black, as you can see here ( dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... ). These are the only available colors, and it's not guaranteed that both color options will be available at every store in every country. You might have to hunt around a bit.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 comes in both silver and black, as you can see here ( dpreview.com/reviews/panaso... ). These are the only available colors, and it's not guaranteed that both color options will be available at every store in every country. You might have to hunt around a bit.
Hope this helps!
can some body plz help me ,which is the best model to shot log distance photos? (villa — 11/20/2006)
i would like to tack pictures from long distance like mountains , so what i need to concentrate like mega pix or zoom ?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/20/2006)
In this case, both megapixels and zoom are important for different reasons. Let me break it down:
Megapixels are often used sort of unscrupulously by advertisers to hook consumers. While it's true in general that more megapixels is better, they aren't the end-all-be-all of digital photography. First of all, in recent model years many manufacturers have turned to a practice called "pixel cramming." This means that when they release a new model, they simply force more pixels onto the same size sensor chip, which results in higher digital "noise" in the pictures. However, the right resolution paired with a correctly-sized chip will of course result in beautiful pictures. The principal advantage of higher-megapixel cameras is the ability to make large prints of photos while retaining fine detail, and this is crucial for the kind of landscape photography you're talking about.
I think that zoom is more important than megapixels here, though. Mega-zoom cameras (generally 10x optical or greater) truly allow you to get up close and capture that detail that the megapixels will eventually record. You want to make sure that you stay away from digital zoom, as it will distort your pictures far more badly than any pixel cramming ever could. Look for cameras with large optical zooms paired with quality lenses. Additionally, many manufacturers offer cameras with stabilized zooms, meaning they compensate for your hands shaking or other environmental issues in order to produce a sharper image. I myself own a Canon Powershot S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features this kind of technology, and I can tell you that it works spectacularly well.
I'm going to assume that you're not interested in going pro with a digital SLR. Outside of the pro realm, there are really three main options for high-MP, stabilized long zoom:
the Canon S line (S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Panasonic FZ line (FZ4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Sony H line (H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
All of these cameras have their minor pluses and minuses, but in truth they're all fine machines and all of them would suit your purpose. These are all semi-bulky, SLR-like cameras. You haven't stated here whether you have a preference as to size, but there are also smaller cameras that have similar megapixel and zoom ratings. The reduction in size usually comes at the cost of a reduction in features (fine control over camera settings, etc). Some of these smaller cameras include the Nikon Coolpix S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
Megapixels are often used sort of unscrupulously by advertisers to hook consumers. While it's true in general that more megapixels is better, they aren't the end-all-be-all of digital photography. First of all, in recent model years many manufacturers have turned to a practice called "pixel cramming." This means that when they release a new model, they simply force more pixels onto the same size sensor chip, which results in higher digital "noise" in the pictures. However, the right resolution paired with a correctly-sized chip will of course result in beautiful pictures. The principal advantage of higher-megapixel cameras is the ability to make large prints of photos while retaining fine detail, and this is crucial for the kind of landscape photography you're talking about.
I think that zoom is more important than megapixels here, though. Mega-zoom cameras (generally 10x optical or greater) truly allow you to get up close and capture that detail that the megapixels will eventually record. You want to make sure that you stay away from digital zoom, as it will distort your pictures far more badly than any pixel cramming ever could. Look for cameras with large optical zooms paired with quality lenses. Additionally, many manufacturers offer cameras with stabilized zooms, meaning they compensate for your hands shaking or other environmental issues in order to produce a sharper image. I myself own a Canon Powershot S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features this kind of technology, and I can tell you that it works spectacularly well.
I'm going to assume that you're not interested in going pro with a digital SLR. Outside of the pro realm, there are really three main options for high-MP, stabilized long zoom:
the Canon S line (S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Panasonic FZ line (FZ4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Sony H line (H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
All of these cameras have their minor pluses and minuses, but in truth they're all fine machines and all of them would suit your purpose. These are all semi-bulky, SLR-like cameras. You haven't stated here whether you have a preference as to size, but there are also smaller cameras that have similar megapixel and zoom ratings. The reduction in size usually comes at the cost of a reduction in features (fine control over camera settings, etc). Some of these smaller cameras include the Nikon Coolpix S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
what is the best digital camera for a starter camera? (lgcrawford — 11/15/2006)
I am wanting to get my 17 yr old son a digital camera for his birthday, and want to get the best camera at a reasonable price.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/15/2006)
The Panasonic Lumix tz1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great low price camera that still have many nice features. Most notably it has an excellent 10x zoom. It is nice and small and takes high quality images. This is a perfect starter camera because it is easy to use but still has power.
reply to this comment
RE: Panasonic Lumix TZ1...What's the best setting(s) for indoor shots w/poor lighting (e.g. at a dinner)? So far I've got lots of noise. (mkawada — 11/15/2006)
All the indoor pics w/ poor lighting I've taken have a bit of noise in them. I've tried adjusting the ISO, the slowest shutter speed, the EV...nothing has worked. Even with the flash some of the pictures come out noisy. On the contrary, pics in good lighting are AWESOME. Anyway, please help regarding the indoor pics!! Thanks.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/15/2006)
There really isn't much you can do now other than getting more lights on your setting. Noise is a result of having a high ISO setting and it is really distracting to a photo, digital cameras have troube with low light stiuations and really the only way to get a really nice picture is to brighten the enviorment.
Sorry there isn't just a new camera setting that ill fix your pictures :)
Good Luck.
reply to this comment
Sorry there isn't just a new camera setting that ill fix your pictures :)
Good Luck.
M. Kawada (11/15/2006)
What can I do to reduce noise other than lower the ISO? It seems if I slow the shutter speed (like from 1/8s to 1/4s) there's more light, but it's STILL just as noisy. This camera doesn't have aperture control, either. :(
reply to this comment
What size lens cap to buy tz1. I lost the original cap. (Oscar — 11/14/2006)
I lost the original lens cap for my Panasonic TZ1, and the company website charges $15 for a replacement, shipping included. Whereas this store, camerafilters.com/pages/len... , charges $5. All i need to know is the right size to choose that would fit over the TZ1 lens. Thank You!!!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/15/2006)
Panasonic's website doesn't say how large the lens cap is needed. But it would be in millimeters. If you can't go to a nearby camera shop to get a replacement, you can always measure and then if you're off, you can send it back. Or, you can call Panasonic support and simply ask them.
reply to this comment
Looking for a camera for distance and low light conditions. (christine — 11/13/2006)
I am looking for a camera to shoot school events for my kids. There would be a distance and low light conditons. I would like to stay around $300.thanx
reply to this comment
Joe (11/14/2006)
I would highly recommend the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it has 12x optical zoom and a high ISO of 1600 which is good for low light (but don't expect noiseless photos at the high of an ISO). Plus over all it is a great camera that is jam packed for the price. Easy to use and highly reviewed too.
reply to this comment
Which camera is better? Panasonic DMCTZ1A or the Nikon Coolpix S10? (Evelyn — 11/13/2006)
I am trying to decide between these two cameras. I have narrowed it down to these two based on two criteria, a decent optical zoom (as I currently have the Konica Minolta Z1 with the 12x zoom but it is VERY bulky) and size. Both fit the bill. I have tried the S4 but was disappointed by the increased red eye in the photos despite their claim to have red eye reduction. I have not tried the Panasonic or the newer Nikon model. I am not a "professional" photographer by any means but am not satisfied with point and shoot models. Price range between the two are more or less negligeable and one good feature is that the Nikon has a 2 yr manufacturer's warranty vs Panasonic's one. HELP!
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (11/21/2006)
There are only few specifications that are slightly different if we compare those 2 cameras. TZ1 lens is a little bit more wide and has better aperture- 2.8 versus S10's 3.5. Please read also our reviews and ratings: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... for the Nikon and digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... for the Panasonic one.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/21/2006)
Hi,
I noticed you haven't marked a Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
what kind of memory card I should take to get fast performance with video shooting ? (Sanket — 11/11/2006)
reply to this comment
Kevin Greggain (11/13/2006)
There is a fairly simple answer to this.. With camera memory prices falling I would recommend getting the fastest card possible. These cards are usually measured in units like 133X 100X etc..
One of things to look at is the mb/sec transfer rate for writing.. A lot of cards can read faster than they can write, so watch the mb/sec rating to see which is truly faster in write mode. Advertisers will always lead with the read speed of the card.. I have been stung by this before.
The second catch will be your camera itself. In my older cameras, even using a faster card did not speed up the write process much because the camera itself could not write any quicker to the card. I looked up the TZ1 and tried to find out the write speeds, but could not locate the specification. Perhaps your user manual will have that information in there (look again for the mb/sec rating on the card write speed).
reply to this comment
One of things to look at is the mb/sec transfer rate for writing.. A lot of cards can read faster than they can write, so watch the mb/sec rating to see which is truly faster in write mode. Advertisers will always lead with the read speed of the card.. I have been stung by this before.
The second catch will be your camera itself. In my older cameras, even using a faster card did not speed up the write process much because the camera itself could not write any quicker to the card. I looked up the TZ1 and tried to find out the write speeds, but could not locate the specification. Perhaps your user manual will have that information in there (look again for the mb/sec rating on the card write speed).
what type of digital camera for dental photography (cindy — 11/06/2006)
need a camera that will take excellent intra-oral photographs of teeth, not necessarily of individual teeth, rather a half or whole arch, similar to orthodontic photographs
reply to this comment
Joe (11/07/2006)
What you want is a camera with a good zoom so that you dont have to stick the whole camera in someones mouth as I remember happening when I got my braces back in the day. For this I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Small camera, easy to use, quality images, 10x optical zoom. Ideal for your job!
reply to this comment
Should I be concerned there is no automatic lense cap? (Pat — 11/04/2006)
I will be using whatever camera I buy on vacation. I don't see me putting a lense cap on during the day, in fear I may not capture a shot. Should I not get the TZ1 because of this?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
This is really up to you. It is not really a good idea to leave a lens exposed; there are lens caps for a reason, and that is to keep your lens safe. The plastic cap is attached to the camera, so maybe you could get into the habit of snapping it on and off? Think of it this way: the time the camera takes to open an auto lens cover is about the same amount of time it would take you to pull off the plastic cap, so you probably won't miss any more pictures because of it.
reply to this comment
Pat (11/05/2006)
Thanks Brenda. The only thing is that the lens cap "screws" on this camera. So, it would take more time than to just pop the cap on and off.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
Hmm. I wonder if the lens isn't a standard size and you could find a poppable cap for it? If not, yes I definitely see how a screw-on lens could be a major cause of frustration.
reply to this comment
Pat (11/07/2006)
Hi Brenda P -- just leting you know. I just received a response from Panasonic. They said the DMC-TZ1S Lens Cap does not screw on and off. It pops on and off by pressing two spring loaded levers on the lens cap. The camera also comes with a lens cap string which allows attachment of the lens cap to the camera body to prevent loss of the lens cap.
Thank you for your support!
reply to this comment
Thank you for your support!
Brenda Paro (11/07/2006)
Wonderful! I knew about the string (saw it in the photos) but couldn't tell how the lens attached. I have some spring-loaded lens caps for my film cameras and they are fantastically easy to use. Glad you figured it out!
reply to this comment
what are the best two cameras with 5 megapixel (Christina — 11/03/2006)
4x digital zoom
reply to this comment
Joe (11/03/2006)
You have two options, one Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which as 5MP a great 10x optical zoom and it is a great price and small.
The other 5MP camera that is both great quality and price is the Canon a530 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) don't let the fact that this camera is a bit past its prime both you. It is still amazing and for only $120 at most locations. Great buy.
reply to this comment
The other 5MP camera that is both great quality and price is the Canon a530 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) don't let the fact that this camera is a bit past its prime both you. It is still amazing and for only $120 at most locations. Great buy.
Does camera have viewq finder? (H Rosenthal — 11/02/2006)
I am not referring to the lcd screen.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/02/2006)
It's interesting that you asked this, because I have seen multiple sites selling and reviewing this camera that claim that it does have an electronic viewfinder. I looked it up on Panasonic's website and according to them (and some other reviews) it does not. I would tend to believe Panasonic. Here's the link:
<a href="www2.panasonic.com/webapp/w...
reply to this comment
<a href="www2.panasonic.com/webapp/w...
I want to take photos of my son playing baseball (HS). What camera and zoom would you recommend. P.S.: I'm a novice when it comes to taking pics : ) (Frank Lazzaro — 10/31/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/31/2006)
I would suggest the Panasonic Tz1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it has a great 12x optical zoom, image stablzation, and it is very compact. On top of all this it is cheap in comparison to other cameras of its style without sacrificing quality.
reply to this comment
Add a closeup or Fisheye or macro lense (Dr. K. A. Rasheed — 10/29/2006)
I will greatful if anybody can give me enough information as to the possibiliteis of adding a Macro, fish eye or close up lense with this kind of small cmeras
reply to this comment
Joe (11/11/2006)
Hi, I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com ( DigitalCamera-HQ.com ), so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Best Camera for taking concert pictures (saladdshooter33 — 10/26/2006)
I'm looking for a compact camera to take to concerts with a lot of zoom and a video camera mode that incorporated the zoom and sound. I have it down to the Panasonic DCM-TZ1 and Nikon coolpix s10 because they both have 10x optical zoom. Are there any other suggestions for good cameras for taking to concerts and capturing the moments?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Addie,
Both of these cameras are great for the type of shots that you want. I would be careful taking photos at a concert without the bands' permission though (especially movies). This can violate copyright laws, and I have heard about people losing their cameras to security. Before you take the camera to a concert, call the venue and ask what the rules are for taking your camera in.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Both of these cameras are great for the type of shots that you want. I would be careful taking photos at a concert without the bands' permission though (especially movies). This can violate copyright laws, and I have heard about people losing their cameras to security. Before you take the camera to a concert, call the venue and ask what the rules are for taking your camera in.
Andrew
saladdshooter33 (10/29/2006)
thank you, i always check with the venues before hand so i dont get my camera sniped. however, do you think that the extra hundred to hundred fifty is worth it for the extra mega pixel?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/30/2006)
Addie,
For indoor shots, I would be more concerned with the ISO settings. You will have a much higher setting (better for low light) with the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
reply to this comment
For indoor shots, I would be more concerned with the ISO settings. You will have a much higher setting (better for low light) with the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Andrew
saladdshooter33 (10/31/2006)
Andrew,
Thank you so much!
I just ordered my Panasonic after about a month of self-debating.
Can't wait to try it out.
Addie
reply to this comment
Thank you so much!
I just ordered my Panasonic after about a month of self-debating.
Can't wait to try it out.
Addie
love this camera (11/03/2006)
you won't be disappointed with this camera. It will become your best friend. I bought it and liked it so much i bout 2 more for myself and some for gifts.
reply to this comment
Best Ultra Compact that takes "fast" pictures with stablilization (BartManSr — 10/24/2006)
Needs to be thin enough to slip in your jean pocket. High pix and optical are nice but not as important as thin, speed and Stabilization. Note: my need for speed is because I hate waiting and waiting before the cambra takes the picture (kids won't stand still!). I would like to be able to take two or three pictures in a row without falling asleep.
It would be nice to take a closeup without being close (Zoom).
Price is not important.
Thin is king!
reply to this comment
It would be nice to take a closeup without being close (Zoom).
Price is not important.
Thin is king!
arichakra (10/26/2006)
Use burst mode
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/07/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
best camera for sports (Judy — 10/24/2006)
I need a camera that is good at taking football, basketball and baseball and softball pictures.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/24/2006)
Well I don;t know your price range but the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is my favorite sports camera. It has a great 12x optical zoom, 7.2 megapixels, image stablization, and great shutter speed options. I has everything you could want in a consumer camera. It is pricy though around $375, but you are getting a lot for your money.
A cheaper camera that is also great for sports photography but lacks many of the customizable options of the Sony is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has 10x optical zoom and image stablization as well, but will not perform as well with high speed shots and low light situations, so that must be taken into consideration.
Both great images come from these cameras. You can't really go wrong with either one. Check out the reviews yourself on the individual camera pages.
reply to this comment
A cheaper camera that is also great for sports photography but lacks many of the customizable options of the Sony is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has 10x optical zoom and image stablization as well, but will not perform as well with high speed shots and low light situations, so that must be taken into consideration.
Both great images come from these cameras. You can't really go wrong with either one. Check out the reviews yourself on the individual camera pages.
Canon A710 Vs Panasonic DMC-TZ1...which is better? (Paul — 10/20/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/24/2006)
Paul,
Both cameras have great qualities. I've listed the main differences below (note that the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is listed before the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )):
- Megapixels: 7.1 VS 5.0
- Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Exposure: Auto and Manual VS Auto only
- ISO Setting: 80-800 VS 80-1600
- Memory Storage: Secure Digital storage (16MB SD card included) VS SD/MMC card storage (13.4MB internal)
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more resolution while the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more optical zoom and a wider ISO range, which is better for lower light settings.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Both cameras have great qualities. I've listed the main differences below (note that the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is listed before the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )):
- Megapixels: 7.1 VS 5.0
- Optical Zoom: 6x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom VS 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- Exposure: Auto and Manual VS Auto only
- ISO Setting: 80-800 VS 80-1600
- Memory Storage: Secure Digital storage (16MB SD card included) VS SD/MMC card storage (13.4MB internal)
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more resolution while the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more optical zoom and a wider ISO range, which is better for lower light settings.
Andrew
Is the Fz50 a good option for a novice to take pics of houses. Looking at Panasonic FZ50, FZ7 or Sony DCH5. (Rod — 10/19/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
The Panasonic FZ 50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an amazing camera but it seems to be a bit of an overkill for what you would be using it for, especially for a novice. Something smaller and a bit easier to use might be better. For this I would recommend the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it takes quality pictures like the FZ50 without the large size and high price. Of course the FZ50 has many more customizable features and takes 10MP as compared to the TZ1 which has 5MP. But if you aren't print your images out to over 8x10inches it isn't really an issue. You will still get large high quality images. The 10x optical zoom is very key too. It is great for getting those close up house details and the lens is wide enough to get the whole house.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/06/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
What digital camera would you recommend for taking exterior architectural photos for use in brochures and ads? (chofu67 — 10/19/2006)
We want to equip our field sales and technical people with digital cameras. These employees have various levels of photography experience and ability. We want them to keep the cameras ready in their brief cases, so size is important. Cost of up to $400 or slightly higher will be okay. It must be easy for them to e-mail or burn to disk the images so that we in the home office can use them.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/19/2006)
I would recommend the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it take large high resolution pictures. The stills can be printed to poster size when shoot on 10+ Megapixels. I would also recommend this camera because the 12x optical zoom will help you get detailed pictures of your exteriors without having the physically closer which might be impossible at times. Plus it pulls out wide enough to get those great full house shoots.
The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has all these same features but it can't print as high quality images. But this is a great camera and much better for a brief case size you say is so important. It is probably your safest best.
Both great cameras though!!
reply to this comment
The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has all these same features but it can't print as high quality images. But this is a great camera and much better for a brief case size you say is so important. It is probably your safest best.
Both great cameras though!!
anonymous (10/20/2006)
i am an architect and i know the value of good photography. i want to say only that this camera with excellent zoom, 7.2 megapixel and superior lence make my pics more sharper than ever also big on size which allows me easy print on plotter.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/06/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Is it better to have AA batteries or lithium ion battery for the camera (gireesh narayanan — 10/19/2006)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/19/2006)
Well, yes, and no. If you use rechargable AAs, I don't think the lithium ion advantage for the price is all that great. NiCads which can be switched out and recharged are better for the environment and do just as good a job as higher priced Lithium ion batteries. LiIons dont' come in AA size either.
Either one does the job quite nicely, but I give the personal edge to rechargable AAs.
reply to this comment
Either one does the job quite nicely, but I give the personal edge to rechargable AAs.
Rafe (10/19/2006)
The SD400 has its own battery. It can't use AAs.
reply to this comment
Farnaz (10/22/2006)
what is best camera for take pictures from assembly part of equipment (for high power lab.)?
reply to this comment
Dr.K. A. Rasheed (10/28/2006)
But NiMh or Lithium polymer batteries carries more Ah. That means linger duration for use
reply to this comment
What is the shutter delay on this camera? (KiwiGirl — 10/16/2006)
Driven nuts by present camera and looking to replace with an idiot proof camera that will take decent amateur photos to inclde and african safari experience. Any recommendations?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/18/2006)
The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is clocked at about .5 seconds shutter lag in high contrast, and about 1.2 seconds in low contrast. This is OK but not the speediest on the market.
A user-friendly camera that's a little speedier that you might like is the Kodak EasyShare DX6440 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). If you need further advice/ recommendations let us know.
reply to this comment
A user-friendly camera that's a little speedier that you might like is the Kodak EasyShare DX6440 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). If you need further advice/ recommendations let us know.
cjk (10/24/2007)
I never asked this question. I need a digital camera with a time delay
Will appreciate anything you can tell me
reply to this comment
Will appreciate anything you can tell me
Can you have sound with still pictures (Mo — 10/15/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/22/2006)
Mo,
You can record a sound file for the digital images on the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Other specs on the camera can be found at the Panasonic site ( www2.panasonic.com/webapp/w... ).
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can record a sound file for the digital images on the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Other specs on the camera can be found at the Panasonic site ( www2.panasonic.com/webapp/w... ).
Andrew
What is the best digital camera i can by for a price range of $250-$300, (Shriram — 10/13/2006)
i am specifically look on amazon.com, so it becomes easier to compare prices. I am looking for something with a min of 10 to 12x optical zoom and above 5 mega pixel?
I have looked at Sony, Nikon, Cannon S3, Kodak and Panasonic, but i am totally confused.
Thanks for your help
reply to this comment
I have looked at Sony, Nikon, Cannon S3, Kodak and Panasonic, but i am totally confused.
Thanks for your help
Joe (10/13/2006)
If you don't mind spending a bit more I would recommend the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it takes quality high color stills, plus it has 6MP and 12x optical zoom that you are looking for.
If you are set on keeping it under $300 and especially if you want a more compact camera than the Sony H5 I would recommend the Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has all the features you are looking for and then some, plus a cool funky design.
There is one other camera that fits your specific needs and that is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) very compact, great price, amazing zoom for its size.
These are all great cameras that have similar features, you can't go wrong with any of them.
reply to this comment
If you are set on keeping it under $300 and especially if you want a more compact camera than the Sony H5 I would recommend the Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has all the features you are looking for and then some, plus a cool funky design.
There is one other camera that fits your specific needs and that is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) very compact, great price, amazing zoom for its size.
These are all great cameras that have similar features, you can't go wrong with any of them.
camera? (10/13/2006)
Keep in mind that the Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not have Image Stabilization, while the nearly identical Coolpix S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does.
reply to this comment
Kodak Z650 or Fuji finepix S5600? (Donna Smith — 10/13/2006)
About to buy my first digital camera, had Nikon SLR in the past but never used it much. Love taking pics of nature, animals and sports. What would be the best out of the Kodak Z650 or the Finepix S5600?? Or is there any other camera's in the prize range which is better????
reply to this comment
Joe (10/13/2006)
I would recommend the Kodak z650 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) over the Fuji but I feel that there are better cameras in this price range for what you are looking for which is basically a nice zoom, quality color stills, various shutter speeds or action modes, and a high amount of megapixels. The Panasonic Lumix tz1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) gives you all this a much more. A bit high amount of MP would be nice but everything else is spot. And it is compact. Quality camera.
reply to this comment
Glen (12/08/2006)
If you still have the lens from you nikon SLR get a nikon DSLR at least a D50 you will loose metering on non chip lens ie those that don't auto focus but other wise they work fine. Also most accessories you had for the nikon will work(some older flashes can overload the newer cameras). if you want to take nature shots you need a good telephoto lens and that will not happen on a point and shoot period.
reply to this comment
African Safari Digital Camera needed (Amy — 10/13/2006)
I'm going on a once in a lifetime trip to So Africa. I'm looking for a good quality digital camera...must be weather resistant and compact to discretely fit into a pocket. Many tourists have been mugged in So Africa w/"fancy" obvious cameras. Therefore, compact size is a must! However, I want at least 7 megapixels and the most zoom available, must have image stabilization and preferably with regular AA batteries. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/13/2006)
The first small camera that comes to mind is the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has 10x optical zoom, image stablization, and it is amazingly compact for such a great zoom capability. But it only has 5 megapixels so I will suggest another camera incase you had your heart set on over 7MP. The Canon a710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) It has 6x optical zoom, and 7.1 megapixels, and 4 AA batts. Great camera but still a bit large and "fancy" looking. The Panasonic is much more discreet but you do lose some megapixels, but still a great camera.
reply to this comment
Lea Schultz, Charlottesville, VA (10/23/2006)
In most listings and reviews for the Canon PowerShot
A710 IS, I have found that it uses for power TWO (2) AA size bateries. In one rewiew it even shows a photo of the bottom of the camea with the two batteries in place. Some reviews indicate the flash is slow to recharge and maybe this is the reason. Hope you have a great Safari.
reply to this comment
A710 IS, I have found that it uses for power TWO (2) AA size bateries. In one rewiew it even shows a photo of the bottom of the camea with the two batteries in place. Some reviews indicate the flash is slow to recharge and maybe this is the reason. Hope you have a great Safari.
Brenda Paro (11/29/2006)
Hello,
I noticed that you haven't marked a reply as "Best Answer. Are you still looking for responses? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question on digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed that you haven't marked a reply as "Best Answer. Are you still looking for responses? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question on digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like questions are being answered within just a day or two. Good luck!
I am confused between a Panasonic TZ1 and FX01 (Anirudh — 10/13/2006)
.Please suggest the advantages and disadvantages of each against each other.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/13/2006)
These cameras are actually very similar so it isnt unusual that you are a bit confused. The major difference is that the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a 10x optical zoom which is amazing and practically unheard of in such a compact camera, for this reason alone I would recommend the TZ1 over the FX01 which has only 3.6x optical zoom. The TZ! has only 5.0 effective megapixels where as the FX01 has 6.0 MP. They both have almost exactly the same shooting mode options, ISO options, and image stablization systems, no noticable difference in image quality. So go for the TZ1 and get the extra zoom power.
reply to this comment
Are there "color accent/swap" features? (Silverkae — 10/12/2006)
The Canon A710 offers "color accent & color swap" features. The Color Accent feature lets you select a color to highlight, and then all the other colors are turned to black and white. Color Swap, it swaps one color for another. Does Panasonic TZ1offer a similar feature?
reply to this comment
kristen (10/29/2006)
No, there isnt.
reply to this comment
During video mode, can you zoom while recording? (Jeff — 10/11/2006)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
Zooms usually work for video as well as still modes. What you really need to key on though, however, is the speed of your media card if you're going to shoot in full 30 fps mode. Resist the temptation in settling for cheaper cards and pick up a few high speed high capacity SD cards.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
Also, the FX01 has wide aspect video recording for new wide screen TV viewing. Sweet feature.
reply to this comment
Jeff (10/11/2006)
I'm not sure you fully answered the question? Can you use zoom while recording video at the same time?
As an fyi, the source of my question is that I'm having a baby and want to have video capabilities (the best possible) for a small digial camera. I don't want a camcorder as it is just too big to carry around 24x7. Therefore, I'm prepared to sacrifice video quality for convenience and opportunity. If you have any other recommendations, suggested cameras, I'd be very grateful.
reply to this comment
As an fyi, the source of my question is that I'm having a baby and want to have video capabilities (the best possible) for a small digial camera. I don't want a camcorder as it is just too big to carry around 24x7. Therefore, I'm prepared to sacrifice video quality for convenience and opportunity. If you have any other recommendations, suggested cameras, I'd be very grateful.
Jennifer Grucza (10/11/2006)
According to the reviewer at the bottom of <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... page</a>, you <em>can</em> use zoom in movie mode.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
Jeff, I understand your concerns. As Jennifer states, you can with this model. I would also like to suggest you consider Pure Digital's Handheld Digital Camcorder. It will digitally record 30 minutes of video on it's built in flash memory, has a good zoom and will plug directly into your PC via it's built in USB jack. It's the same size as a digital still camera and sells for about $129.00.
reply to this comment
digital cameras (Ann Wiles — 10/11/2006)
I am looking at 4 different cameras--The Panasonic DMC-TZ1--Canon S2 IS--Nikon Coolpix S4--FujiFilm FinePix S5200, which of these would you recommend and which would be the easiest to use.
Thank you
Ann
reply to this comment
Thank you
Ann
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
First thing you should ask yourself is, what am I going to use this for? Then take a look at the specs to see if they even are capable of doing what you want. Next is, what's your budget. You may find that for a few bucks more, one model has 90% of what you want, but larger MP, while one has 100% of what you want but doens't have that MP boost and as such, it may be worth it to choose more higher resolution over whistles and bells.
Digital HQ has a great breakdown for each here:
Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
FujiFilm FinePix S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Buyer's Guides ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are great ideas as well as they can help with comparison.
reply to this comment
Digital HQ has a great breakdown for each here:
Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
FujiFilm FinePix S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Buyer's Guides ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are great ideas as well as they can help with comparison.
SubSlr08 (10/14/2006)
Actually, I'd opt for the Canon S3 IS over the S2 model. It has an extra 1 megapixel and really looks cool in black! The S2 price is a bit better, however.
reply to this comment
can you print date on picture with TZ1 (Viren Tailor — 10/11/2006)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2006)
Yes, you can. But I'm betting that it's default setting is set to off. Go into the camera settings and you should be able to turn it on with a click of a button.
reply to this comment
best camera for close up work (cheriese — 10/11/2006)
I design dolls and puppets to sell. The pictures must pick up detail, color, fabric and 3d depth plus be sharp and clear.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/11/2006)
The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera for getting close up details. It has nice macro settings and auto focus plus if you need to it has the 10X optical zoom. These are great feature for the price. The color quality is beautiful too. Perfect for dolls!
reply to this comment
cheriese (10/12/2006)
thank you. I'll look into it.
reply to this comment
cheriese (10/12/2006)
Additional question concerning Panasonic Lumix TZ1. Concerning how to download...how compatible is the TZ1 to a Mac computer? Has anyone had any problems? Though I prefer to work on Macs, Macs can be wonky as to what they accept and how.
reply to this comment
cheriese (10/13/2006)
question withdrawn.
reply to this comment
Best 8 to 10 x zoom with 4 to 5 mega pixel for around $200.00 (Cathy Wallace — 10/07/2006)
reply to this comment
tharrison (10/07/2006)
How about these extended zoom camereas in the $200 price range ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). They are all well liked. Still can't choose? If you want a smaller camera, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is really a hot number.
reply to this comment
Why are almost all cameras only 3x optical zoom? (Peter Holmes — 10/03/2006)
Just about all of the point and shoot cameras I've looked at only have 3x optical. Can I trust a camera that claims 5x optical zoom for around the same price? Why doesn't Sony have more than 3x in their Cybershot series or is 3x good enough?
reply to this comment
camera? (10/04/2006)
3x zoom is "good enough." It's standard because in order to increase optical zoom to very high levels, the camera needs to get thicker to accomidate the lens manipulation. This is why Extended Zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) cameras tend to be deeper and larger than other types.
There are a few neat ultracompact / extended zoom cameras, like the Pansaonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which each have 10x zoom in fantastically tiny bodies.
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has a very nice 6x optical zoom in a small point-and-shoot style body.
reply to this comment
There are a few neat ultracompact / extended zoom cameras, like the Pansaonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which each have 10x zoom in fantastically tiny bodies.
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also has a very nice 6x optical zoom in a small point-and-shoot style body.
a point and shoot camera with the best "lag shutter" time (least amount) (Keith — 10/02/2006)
The 2 things that are most important to me are:
zoom - at least 8-10, and...
a "fast" camera - one that allows me to snap pic after pic, w/o having to wait for it to refresh itself.
All of this combined into a small compact design. Any ideas?
reply to this comment
zoom - at least 8-10, and...
a "fast" camera - one that allows me to snap pic after pic, w/o having to wait for it to refresh itself.
All of this combined into a small compact design. Any ideas?
David Parker (10/03/2006)
Keith,
Someone else posted a similar message recently and the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) was recommended - take a look at the answers on shutter lag and extended zoom options ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Good luck-
reply to this comment
Someone else posted a similar message recently and the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) was recommended - take a look at the answers on shutter lag and extended zoom options ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Good luck-
Allie (06/29/2007)
Is there an alternative to tha Panasonic rec. above for Keith? I have the same concern about lag time but am concerned about the reviews with the panasonic camera.
reply to this comment
i want a high megapixel with high optical zoom in a light camera (tes santos — 10/02/2006)
i want crisp pictures for portraits and scenery. it need not be ultracompact but light enough to put in a ladies' bag
reply to this comment
camera? (10/02/2006)
The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has high optical zoom (6x), and a 7 megapixel sensor. It's not ultracompact, but has a nice, light point-and-shoot design that people seem to find appealing.
If you did want to look at an ultracompact, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 10x in a really astoundingly small body.
You might also want to consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a really light, stylish camera with 10x optical zoom.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
If you did want to look at an ultracompact, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 10x in a really astoundingly small body.
You might also want to consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a really light, stylish camera with 10x optical zoom.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
Am looking for best camera for $. Need to take quality stills & movies. (kidhouston — 09/30/2006)
Getting ready to take trip to China. Need camera which takes stills & movies. What is best camera for $ with best quality? Is Nikon coolpix 5900 a good camera for what I need?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/04/2006)
The Nikon S&c is a great sleek little camera which is super for travelling because of its compact size. It has all the features that cameras of its size and in its price range should have but I am concerned with the lack of zoom. When travelling it is nice to be able to have a quality zoom to get in close for those pictures of famous large things. This does have 'vibration reduction' which I don't have experience with but I can only guess that it doesn't reduce the blurriness attributed to a shaky hand all that much, and a camera like this can be hard to hold. If you do go for this model be sure to buy an extra memory card and small protective case because those 3 inch LCDs don't like inside of a backpack all that much.
The Nikon Coolpix 5900 is a better choice but it still suffers from the lack of zoom.
The camera I would go with is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The price is right it has image stablization and it is small, plus an amazing 10x optical zoom. Surely your best bet.
reply to this comment
The Nikon Coolpix 5900 is a better choice but it still suffers from the lack of zoom.
The camera I would go with is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The price is right it has image stablization and it is small, plus an amazing 10x optical zoom. Surely your best bet.
Joe (11/28/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you havent marked any replies as the best answer. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on Digitalcamera-hq.com ( digitalcamera-hq.com ) so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck
reply to this comment
Is there any digital camera producer offering extendind (3y) warrenty? (MM — 09/30/2006)
I have bad experience with 1y warrenty period for digital cameras. This is my 3rd camera (1st was Trust, 2nd was Canon and 3rd was Nikon) in little over 3 years that failed just month or two after warrenty expired. And it was not any use to repaire since service and parts cost were to high or even it was not possible to repair (Trust, Canon).
I'd like to by a new digital camera that would last at least 3-4 years and have that unit secured from failure by extended warenty at least .
Almost the same happened with two Siemens GSM i bought to my daughter in 2004 and 2005. Main boards failed. One was replaced with a newer whhic failed after three months and now my daughter has to fill the battery each day. Now she is tired and want to get rid of it.
reply to this comment
I'd like to by a new digital camera that would last at least 3-4 years and have that unit secured from failure by extended warenty at least .
Almost the same happened with two Siemens GSM i bought to my daughter in 2004 and 2005. Main boards failed. One was replaced with a newer whhic failed after three months and now my daughter has to fill the battery each day. Now she is tired and want to get rid of it.
Brenda Paro (10/31/2006)
Ouch, sorry you have had bad luck. Nowadays it seems that getting a camera to last three years is a good thing so warranties for them aren't that common. But I think Samsung offers them. Also, I believe you can purchase extended warranties can be sold by the retailer where you're buying the camera. <a href="digicamhelp.com/buying-guid... some more info.
reply to this comment
I want an ultra compact that shoots quickly and has a decent zoom (Nonnie — 09/28/2006)
I'm looking for as small a camera as possible that I can use to take pictures at kids ball games, particularly basketball. Zoom is also imiportant.
reply to this comment
camera? (09/28/2006)
Well, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the smallest extended zoom camera you'll ever find. It's got a tiny ultracompact body and a really amazing 10x optical zoom. It's also got Image Stabilization, which will help prevent blurring.
reply to this comment
Nonnie (09/29/2006)
Thanks! Does it have a sports setting or continious setting for getting a little faster shutter speed?
reply to this comment
David Parker (09/30/2006)
The TZ1 has a burst shooting mode which allows three shots per second - that's certainly good for sports; there's also a High Sensitivity mode which increases the shutter speed to decrease blurry pictures of moving subjects. So you should be all set for taking sports shots with the TZ1.
Good luck-
reply to this comment
Good luck-
burst mode (Jim — 09/27/2006)
What 5 MPixel camera has best Burst mode?
reply to this comment
Updated (tharrison — 09/28/2006)
I'm a little unsure of this answer, but my guess would be that cameras with more internal memory would be able to take more picutres in a row. I know with the higher-end dSLRs, they use this internal memory to hold pictures while they are being processed and written to the memory card, but in that case, the memory is temporary. More cameras now seem to have a reasonable amount of internal memory, which you can actually use to keep pictures on. So maybe they're not the same. If so, consider the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Nikon L3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak C533 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would be happy to hear from anyone in the community that knows how well these lower-end cameras do in taking pictures one after the other.
Edited to correct url
Message was edited by: TomH
reply to this comment
Edited to correct url
Message was edited by: TomH
What is the best camera for concerts? I was considering the kodak P712. Can someone tell me if that would be a good camera for concerts? (anonymous — 09/26/2006)
reply to this comment
camera? (09/26/2006)
Let's think about what potential circumstances you might encounter at a concert:
1. Low-light (obviously)
2. Distance (unless you can score front-row tickets!)
3. Crowds (don't want to be holding a big bulky camera while sandwiched in between people)
4. Movement (both the band on stage and your own swaying in the crowd)
Distance can be solved by an extended zoom camera. You're looking at the P712 so I can see that you're concerned about this. The P712 definitly lives up to this criteria with 12x optical zoom *plus* image stabilization (which solves the movement problem on your end)
For low light conditions, you're going to want a camera with a high ISO, like ISO 1600. This setting allows the camera to capture more light in very dark situations. It also covers action shots, where your subject is moving, very well. The P712 does not have an ISO 1600 setting, and maxes out at ISO 800. This may not be a dealbreaker, though.
I know some venues won't let you bring cameras in, so in that case, the P712 may be too big to escape the gaze of alert bouncers and security guards. It won't fit snugly in your pocket, but it's not exactly a huge camera (just by digicam standards).
In my opinion, the Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a pretty good choice for what you're looking to do, the only drawback potentially being the relatively low ISO setting.
You may also want to consider:
The Panasonic TZ1 ( .digitalcamera-hq.com/digit... ) -- It's an ultracompact, has 10x optical zoom, ISO 1600, and optical image stabilization.
The Olympus Stylus 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) -- Another ultracompact, it only has 5x optical zoom (still decent), ISO 1600, and two different forms of image stabilization, mechanical CCD-shift and digital.
reply to this comment
1. Low-light (obviously)
2. Distance (unless you can score front-row tickets!)
3. Crowds (don't want to be holding a big bulky camera while sandwiched in between people)
4. Movement (both the band on stage and your own swaying in the crowd)
Distance can be solved by an extended zoom camera. You're looking at the P712 so I can see that you're concerned about this. The P712 definitly lives up to this criteria with 12x optical zoom *plus* image stabilization (which solves the movement problem on your end)
For low light conditions, you're going to want a camera with a high ISO, like ISO 1600. This setting allows the camera to capture more light in very dark situations. It also covers action shots, where your subject is moving, very well. The P712 does not have an ISO 1600 setting, and maxes out at ISO 800. This may not be a dealbreaker, though.
I know some venues won't let you bring cameras in, so in that case, the P712 may be too big to escape the gaze of alert bouncers and security guards. It won't fit snugly in your pocket, but it's not exactly a huge camera (just by digicam standards).
In my opinion, the Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a pretty good choice for what you're looking to do, the only drawback potentially being the relatively low ISO setting.
You may also want to consider:
The Panasonic TZ1 ( .digitalcamera-hq.com/digit... ) -- It's an ultracompact, has 10x optical zoom, ISO 1600, and optical image stabilization.
The Olympus Stylus 750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) -- Another ultracompact, it only has 5x optical zoom (still decent), ISO 1600, and two different forms of image stabilization, mechanical CCD-shift and digital.
what do i need? (khuber — 09/19/2006)
My Husband and I are expecting our first baby late this year, I would like to get a digital camera mostly just for taking pictures of the baby, you know for memories of all the firsts. but i don't have a clue of what I need like how many megapixels or zoom ranges or anything like that. I like the idea of the easy share by kodak but I still don't know aobut anything else
reply to this comment
Re: what do i need? (tharrison — 09/20/2006)
Well first, congratulations!
Having had a couple babies of my own, I can say you want something small and easy to use. With one hand. While running. :-)
Megapixels are overrated once you have 5 or more, if you ask me. Zoom is really, really nice to have, but costs a little more. The idea of EasyShare was to make a camera that actual humans can use easily; many people like them. Another thing we like is the little movie clips.
One inexpensive camera that might suit the requirement is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... C533</a>. This one has a "standard" 3x zoom, and a small LCD screen. Also, while it does capture movies, you can't hear the sound from the camera itself.
Another to consider is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... V610</a> which is a little more expensive but has a great 10x zoom. Zoom is great because you can really get in tight on the subject. Another similar cameras is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... TZ1</a>, also with a great zoom.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Having had a couple babies of my own, I can say you want something small and easy to use. With one hand. While running. :-)
Megapixels are overrated once you have 5 or more, if you ask me. Zoom is really, really nice to have, but costs a little more. The idea of EasyShare was to make a camera that actual humans can use easily; many people like them. Another thing we like is the little movie clips.
One inexpensive camera that might suit the requirement is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... C533</a>. This one has a "standard" 3x zoom, and a small LCD screen. Also, while it does capture movies, you can't hear the sound from the camera itself.
Another to consider is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... V610</a> which is a little more expensive but has a great 10x zoom. Zoom is great because you can really get in tight on the subject. Another similar cameras is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... TZ1</a>, also with a great zoom.
Good luck!
I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (Julia — 09/18/2006)
I have a Nikon coolpix 5200 and have never really been all that satisfied with it, considering the price when it was released 2 years ago. Photos are dark, redeye is horrible and images are too often blurred.
Looking for my "perfect" camera model:(1) minimum 5.0 MP or better
(2) optical image stabilization(3) decent zoom (would prefer 4x- 6x range)
(4) good photos, of course!? - subjects generally children and lots of indoors or motion shots
(5) Is there a brand better known for less red eye?
Secondary "wishes" would include decent start up and battery re-charge times. Would prefer a proprietary battery or only 2 AA rechargeables. And why are they all dropping the real-life viewfinder?!
The reviews on the newest panasonics still complain about "noise" - is that true? Have considered the Fuji F30 but really holding out for more zoom (its only 3.0) and I don't think the F30 has OIS - just faster shutter speeds. Have also looked at Canon S3 but size and weight is too much.
Maybe the Canon G7 or SD800 coming out? My budget is up to $500.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
reply to this comment
Looking for my "perfect" camera model:(1) minimum 5.0 MP or better
(2) optical image stabilization(3) decent zoom (would prefer 4x- 6x range)
(4) good photos, of course!? - subjects generally children and lots of indoors or motion shots
(5) Is there a brand better known for less red eye?
Secondary "wishes" would include decent start up and battery re-charge times. Would prefer a proprietary battery or only 2 AA rechargeables. And why are they all dropping the real-life viewfinder?!
The reviews on the newest panasonics still complain about "noise" - is that true? Have considered the Fuji F30 but really holding out for more zoom (its only 3.0) and I don't think the F30 has OIS - just faster shutter speeds. Have also looked at Canon S3 but size and weight is too much.
Maybe the Canon G7 or SD800 coming out? My budget is up to $500.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (tharrison — 09/18/2006)
Julia --
This year's crop of cameras might just be the one that gives you what you need. Although I will say that the need to handle "children and lots of indoor or motion shots" sets a high bar indeed. I think sport photography and children photography tie for the most demanding photo challenges, with children being a touch harder :-) The issue is that they move a lot, and move unpredictably, so it's very hard to have your camera ready when they happen to be in the scene.
Frankly, I have tried several cameras, and only the dSLR with a seriously fast exposure and focus system are up the the challenge (and then, about 1 in five shots is any good). Otherwise, you need to set up a photo and snap at the perfect moment, or worse, get the kids to pose (and you know the fake smiles that come from that!). That these pictures are indoor means light is a challenge. So pretty much anything small will be a little less than perfect, I think.
All cameras need to focus and set exposure before they can take the picture. I bought a Canon G6 as a smaller camera than my Canon 10D dSLR, and it was supposed to be "great" at this. But compared to the 10D (and the Canon lenses), the G6 is terrible. That was a couple years ago, but by today's standards, the G6 is huge. I haven't seen the G7 yet - maybe it's better. And really all compact and point-and-shoot cameras suffer from taking a "long" time to focus and set exposure (even if that's only 1/2 second) and it gets worse in low light. So I think this is the real challenge.
I think you're right to go for image stabilization, and I think a good zoom, which will allow you to get away from the subject.
When you are further away, you have a little more maneuverability, so can track the subject (sounds like we're hunting deer, or something, no?) and lock in for the kill... er ... shot ... er photo at the right moment.
An important trick is that all cameras can do focus and exposure in a first phase (shutter button half-way down) and the picture as the other and much faster phase. Even with your current camera, getting the knack of this can make a huge difference.
Red-eye happens because the camera flash is very close to the lens: eyes of people (and especially animals) are shiny, and reflect the light of the flash back at you, so if the lens and flash are an inch apart, the eyes act like a mirror shining right back. Compact cameras and flash all cause red-eye. "Red eye reduction" features work by sending a burst of flash at the subject's eyes which (in theory) causes the pupil to contract making the mirror of the eye smaller. In practice, it makes taking the photo take even longer, and doesn't really work anyway. Pro photographers who have to use flash have flash units that are separated a long way from the lens (a foot or two, or more). One big advantage of the larger cameras is when they have a pop-up flash -- even a few extra inches can make a difference. Another technique is to hold your finger or something up away from the camera, which draws the subjects' eyes to look there, instead of right into the lens or flash. The best solution for red-eye is: no flash!
But zoom, again, can help on this score. If you are away from the subject (and your camera's flash is strong enough) the subject really has to be looking right at the lens to get red-eye. But compact cameras usually don't have very strong flashes -- cameras like the Canon S2 or S3 both have decently powerful flashes that smaller cameras may not. Since camera makers know this, you might assume that at a camera's maximum zoom range, the flash is going to be a little weak, but if you have a 10x zoom and are only using 5x, you should be in good shape. The best way to deal with red-eye, is to not have to use flash at all, although this may not be practical.
As to "noise", this is the presence of pixels that are the wrong color and lightness, e,g, a bright red pixel in a black background. When you have enough of these pixels, it can make an image look lousy. Image noise gets worse as ISO in increases, so one might think that cameras with higher maximum ISO settings are less likely to have noise at any one setting -- wouldn't you think a camera that can go to ISO 3200 would be better than one that can only go to 800? But the proof is in the pudding, and it's really only after the cameras are tested that you find out who has the real highest ISO. The Canon cameras tend to have low noise at high ISO. I would be sceptical of any ISO greater than 800 in all but the best camera -- noise may be better than no picture at all, but the noise in a lower-end camera claiming to go to ISO 3200 is probably going to produce a bad result. And the camera that will automatically set to a higher ISO (auto-ISO) as needed to deal with low light, are a good thing as long as that high ISO isn't higher than the camera can do well. I suspect this is what people are seeing in the Panasonics you mention.
So I would wait to see what people say about the G7 -- if it is comparable to the G6, it's still a reasonably big camera, about the same size as the S3 (but without the zoom and IS). This line is aimed more at people who wanted an SLR but couldn't afford one. Now the SLRs are cheaper, so hopefully the G7 is a completely new design that competes with some of the better non-SLR high-end cameras.
I would have to say on the inexpensive and small end that the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good bet for you. It's small, but it will probably be slow. The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes from a long line of pretty good cameras so is probably a good bet -- the A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is getting good reviews and seems like it's probably the same camera just without the IS. The SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) doesn't have the 6x zoom, so I would go with the A710. The Kodak V610 also looks like a good bet ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
This year's crop of cameras might just be the one that gives you what you need. Although I will say that the need to handle "children and lots of indoor or motion shots" sets a high bar indeed. I think sport photography and children photography tie for the most demanding photo challenges, with children being a touch harder :-) The issue is that they move a lot, and move unpredictably, so it's very hard to have your camera ready when they happen to be in the scene.
Frankly, I have tried several cameras, and only the dSLR with a seriously fast exposure and focus system are up the the challenge (and then, about 1 in five shots is any good). Otherwise, you need to set up a photo and snap at the perfect moment, or worse, get the kids to pose (and you know the fake smiles that come from that!). That these pictures are indoor means light is a challenge. So pretty much anything small will be a little less than perfect, I think.
All cameras need to focus and set exposure before they can take the picture. I bought a Canon G6 as a smaller camera than my Canon 10D dSLR, and it was supposed to be "great" at this. But compared to the 10D (and the Canon lenses), the G6 is terrible. That was a couple years ago, but by today's standards, the G6 is huge. I haven't seen the G7 yet - maybe it's better. And really all compact and point-and-shoot cameras suffer from taking a "long" time to focus and set exposure (even if that's only 1/2 second) and it gets worse in low light. So I think this is the real challenge.
I think you're right to go for image stabilization, and I think a good zoom, which will allow you to get away from the subject.
When you are further away, you have a little more maneuverability, so can track the subject (sounds like we're hunting deer, or something, no?) and lock in for the kill... er ... shot ... er photo at the right moment.
An important trick is that all cameras can do focus and exposure in a first phase (shutter button half-way down) and the picture as the other and much faster phase. Even with your current camera, getting the knack of this can make a huge difference.
Red-eye happens because the camera flash is very close to the lens: eyes of people (and especially animals) are shiny, and reflect the light of the flash back at you, so if the lens and flash are an inch apart, the eyes act like a mirror shining right back. Compact cameras and flash all cause red-eye. "Red eye reduction" features work by sending a burst of flash at the subject's eyes which (in theory) causes the pupil to contract making the mirror of the eye smaller. In practice, it makes taking the photo take even longer, and doesn't really work anyway. Pro photographers who have to use flash have flash units that are separated a long way from the lens (a foot or two, or more). One big advantage of the larger cameras is when they have a pop-up flash -- even a few extra inches can make a difference. Another technique is to hold your finger or something up away from the camera, which draws the subjects' eyes to look there, instead of right into the lens or flash. The best solution for red-eye is: no flash!
But zoom, again, can help on this score. If you are away from the subject (and your camera's flash is strong enough) the subject really has to be looking right at the lens to get red-eye. But compact cameras usually don't have very strong flashes -- cameras like the Canon S2 or S3 both have decently powerful flashes that smaller cameras may not. Since camera makers know this, you might assume that at a camera's maximum zoom range, the flash is going to be a little weak, but if you have a 10x zoom and are only using 5x, you should be in good shape. The best way to deal with red-eye, is to not have to use flash at all, although this may not be practical.
As to "noise", this is the presence of pixels that are the wrong color and lightness, e,g, a bright red pixel in a black background. When you have enough of these pixels, it can make an image look lousy. Image noise gets worse as ISO in increases, so one might think that cameras with higher maximum ISO settings are less likely to have noise at any one setting -- wouldn't you think a camera that can go to ISO 3200 would be better than one that can only go to 800? But the proof is in the pudding, and it's really only after the cameras are tested that you find out who has the real highest ISO. The Canon cameras tend to have low noise at high ISO. I would be sceptical of any ISO greater than 800 in all but the best camera -- noise may be better than no picture at all, but the noise in a lower-end camera claiming to go to ISO 3200 is probably going to produce a bad result. And the camera that will automatically set to a higher ISO (auto-ISO) as needed to deal with low light, are a good thing as long as that high ISO isn't higher than the camera can do well. I suspect this is what people are seeing in the Panasonics you mention.
So I would wait to see what people say about the G7 -- if it is comparable to the G6, it's still a reasonably big camera, about the same size as the S3 (but without the zoom and IS). This line is aimed more at people who wanted an SLR but couldn't afford one. Now the SLRs are cheaper, so hopefully the G7 is a completely new design that competes with some of the better non-SLR high-end cameras.
I would have to say on the inexpensive and small end that the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a good bet for you. It's small, but it will probably be slow. The Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes from a long line of pretty good cameras so is probably a good bet -- the A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is getting good reviews and seems like it's probably the same camera just without the IS. The SD800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) doesn't have the 6x zoom, so I would go with the A710. The Kodak V610 also looks like a good bet ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (Julia — 09/19/2006)
Thanks a million. I hadn't noticed or looked at any of the new Canon A series ... only the SD's. The A710 IS does appear to have a solid offering of the features that I've been looking for - and so I'll go check it out in person - I found a local camera store that has it on hand. Price is ok too.
Thanks for other tips and info. Much appreciated. For some reason, there seems to be no happy medium on my coolpix. The photos are dark and blurry or the fill flash makes the faces all washed out of detail and bad bad redeye. My kids are blond, blue eyed and fair - so we get lots of red eyes here.
So.........I'm looking forward to giving a try to a new one!
reply to this comment
Thanks for other tips and info. Much appreciated. For some reason, there seems to be no happy medium on my coolpix. The photos are dark and blurry or the fill flash makes the faces all washed out of detail and bad bad redeye. My kids are blond, blue eyed and fair - so we get lots of red eyes here.
So.........I'm looking forward to giving a try to a new one!
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (tharrison — 09/20/2006)
Noooo! Not the local camera shop!
You'll get a better deal online!
reply to this comment
You'll get a better deal online!
Re: I need a new P&S - hate my coolpix! (Julia — 09/21/2006)
Surprisingly not in this case. Few online retailers are carrying the A710 yet and none of the big box stores either - and I couldn't find a domestic company that is dropping the suggested retail yet. So......... I'd rather have my camera now than wait to save a little! Though it always is annoying when a few months later a new model hits mass retail and the price cuts. Oh well, thats the reality of all technology I guess.
Thanks again. Happy shooting....
reply to this comment
Thanks again. Happy shooting....
Emma (10/05/2006)
I'm on the look out for a good camera with similar requirements to yourself. I have just had a terrible year with konica minolta camera. the company now does not exist apparantly, which of course speeks volumes! the camera I had before that was a fuji. brilliant. I have been looking into the canon 700 and 710. My local shop has both but doesn't have much information on the 710 as its new to them. For what its worth the fact that the 700 is so highly rated and is a canon I nearly bought it there and then. Then I found out that it does not have the image stabilizer. So now they bring out the 710 which does have this. However I have been searching through various reviews and it does seem to say that the 710 is not good on redeye. Again I would like to purchase this camera but the redeye problem is not one I am willing to take a risk on. Its a canon though. what do you do? I will continue to search reviews. I am looking at the kodak easyshare V610 as a possibility.
reply to this comment
Kevin (10/05/2006)
I have also looked at the V610 for my wife. However, the battery life reeks with the V610. It does a good job with redeye apparently but it's photo quality doesn't rate as very good. The camera "jumps" between the lenses from 114m to 130m. It seems as if no one camera has it all. Compromise on the things that mean less to you.
reply to this comment
none (10/06/2006)
Don't get a Nikon S6, it sucks -especially in low light. My 10 year old Sony DSC-P1 takes better low light pictures
reply to this comment
Kelly (10/06/2006)
I'm looking at the Canon A710 and the Kodak C875. Anyone out there shed alittle light on either camera for a comparison? I'm looking for the same features as Julia.
reply to this comment
Ryan (10/06/2006)
Compare A710 and SD800. SD800 uses DigicIII and A710 DigicII but less optical zoom.
reply to this comment
Lou (10/07/2006)
Good responses above -- I've been eagerly waiting for the A710 to hit the shelves, but when I found one I was sorely disappointed in the LCD -- not crisp & sharp images. It bordered on blurry! Thought it was my glasses, then even the salesman was surprised! Has anyone else experienced this? Everything else about the camera looked great!
reply to this comment
dermatology and digital cameras (sks — 09/18/2006)
I am interested in using a digital camera in a dermatology research study. I don't need to print large photographs but the photographs will be used comparatively and may eventually be printed. Basically I need a camera that clearly shows subtle details and differences clearly. Any recommendations?
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
Re: dermatology and digital cameras (tharrison — 09/18/2006)
This is an interesting problem.
The main question is how close to the subject you need to be to get the level detail you need. For example, if the frame of a picture would be filled a person's hand, that's one thing. If it would be filled with a knuckle, then you might need something that is good at "macro" photography. This means that the lens is able to focus on things that are close, and ideally, that the auto-focus mechanism works (or as a fallback that the camera provides manual focus).
Another challenge is to have the subject you are photographing be still. This is easy with a hand, for example, not so easy if you're taking a picture of a body part that would less conveniently stay still.
Similarly, the camera may need to be still, as well. This is easy if you can mount it on a tripod, but tripods can be cumbersome.
Adequate lighting is another factor. Unless you are taking photos of a significant part of the body, your camera will be so close that any on-camera flash will not cover the area properly. So will you be in a position to provide a lot of light from multiple angles (a couple of bright fluorescent lights you can position where you want)?
So, if you have a still subject more than 12 to 16 inches way, or tripod, or lots of light or any combination of these, you probably only need a basic camera. If not, I think you should consider a zoom camera with a high ISO rating and image stabilization.
A zoom will allow you to step back from the subject a few feet (and zoom in on the area of interest) while allowing the on-camera flash to fully light the scene. On the downside, the further you zoom, the more small movements of the camera are amplified, thus creating a less sharp image due to "camera shake". Image stabilization will reduce the effect of camera shake and allow you to shoot at a slower shutter speed and still get a sharp photo. High ISO (800 or higher, especially if the camera sets it automatically as needed) will allow your camera to choose a faster shutter speed than it would otherwise.
Two cameras that might fit this bill are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and then very small Koday V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are relatively inexpensive and have good zooms and high ISO ratings with image stabilization.
reply to this comment
The main question is how close to the subject you need to be to get the level detail you need. For example, if the frame of a picture would be filled a person's hand, that's one thing. If it would be filled with a knuckle, then you might need something that is good at "macro" photography. This means that the lens is able to focus on things that are close, and ideally, that the auto-focus mechanism works (or as a fallback that the camera provides manual focus).
Another challenge is to have the subject you are photographing be still. This is easy with a hand, for example, not so easy if you're taking a picture of a body part that would less conveniently stay still.
Similarly, the camera may need to be still, as well. This is easy if you can mount it on a tripod, but tripods can be cumbersome.
Adequate lighting is another factor. Unless you are taking photos of a significant part of the body, your camera will be so close that any on-camera flash will not cover the area properly. So will you be in a position to provide a lot of light from multiple angles (a couple of bright fluorescent lights you can position where you want)?
So, if you have a still subject more than 12 to 16 inches way, or tripod, or lots of light or any combination of these, you probably only need a basic camera. If not, I think you should consider a zoom camera with a high ISO rating and image stabilization.
A zoom will allow you to step back from the subject a few feet (and zoom in on the area of interest) while allowing the on-camera flash to fully light the scene. On the downside, the further you zoom, the more small movements of the camera are amplified, thus creating a less sharp image due to "camera shake". Image stabilization will reduce the effect of camera shake and allow you to shoot at a slower shutter speed and still get a sharp photo. High ISO (800 or higher, especially if the camera sets it automatically as needed) will allow your camera to choose a faster shutter speed than it would otherwise.
Two cameras that might fit this bill are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and then very small Koday V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are relatively inexpensive and have good zooms and high ISO ratings with image stabilization.
Best compact camera with zoom? (masengill — 09/17/2006)
What is the best compact camera with the longest zoom lens? I will use it for travel.
reply to this comment
Re: Best compact camera with zoom? (tharrison — 09/17/2006)
Consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has a 10x optical zoom in a very small package -- quite a feat. Also look at the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Both are well-rated cameras. Nikon has a brand new update from their odd looking S4, the odd looking Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
camcorder vs. digital camera? (emuoio — 08/25/2006)
I have a decent digital camera that I've been happy with but it takes horrible pictures from far away especially in low lighting. I've been exploring whether or not I should buy a new digital camera with a better zoom or switch to a camcorder that will take stills and movies. I would like to spend less than $400 but I wanted to know a few options and what you think the best buy for the money is for what I'm looking for. Thanks
reply to this comment
Re: camcorder vs. digital camera? (camera? — 08/25/2006)
While camcorders do offer superior zoom in most cases, they really can't match the quality (i.e. megapixels) for still photos in digital cameras. There are a few newer camcorders that almost approach the still-photo level of digital cameras, but they are well above $400 at this point in time.
You might like to check out the Panasonic TZ1, an ultracompact camera with a 10x optical zoom. Panasonic has a great selection of extended zoom cameras.
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
The Kodak Z612 is pretty nice, too, with 12x optical zoom: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Both of these cameras are affordable and very capable.
reply to this comment
You might like to check out the Panasonic TZ1, an ultracompact camera with a 10x optical zoom. Panasonic has a great selection of extended zoom cameras.
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
The Kodak Z612 is pretty nice, too, with 12x optical zoom: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Both of these cameras are affordable and very capable.
Whats a samall digital camera good megapixa;s great zoom? (mima — 08/22/2006)
i would like a new digital for great zoom ability , good megapixals , moderate price
reply to this comment
Re: Whats a samall digital camera good megapixa;s great zoom? (tharrison — 08/22/2006)
How about this one: good ratings, from a respected company, 5 megapixels is plenty for most people, and it has a 10x zoom in a small package: Panasonic TZ1: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
reply to this comment
Which digial camera should I get that has fast shutter speed? (Rita — 06/07/2006)
Looking for a digital camera with a fast shutter speed, great picture, uses double a batteries, maybe some kind of stablilization, a nice zoom if possible and uses an sd card. Is there anything like that that is economical. Doesn't have to be ultra compact but not the big ones.
Thanks!
have a happy and healthy!
reply to this comment
Thanks!
have a happy and healthy!
pepakennel (12/07/2006)
I need a fast shutter release to do pictures of moving things.
reply to this comment
Panasonic Lumix TZ1 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix TZ1 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Best camera for traveller. Buy online.
(tandavakrishna_tungala — 03/10/2009)
I bought Panasonic Lumix TZ1 through ebay india for Rs.5,995/- only. I purchased this camera after careful study of several users rewiews on several compact digital cameras. I used several cameras for last 30 year. I took several photos and videos with this TZ1. The pictures taken in good light are excellent in quality. Not only 10x optical zoom but also 4x digital zoom perferly working and no need to buy a seperate binacular. Iam satisfied for the working condition of this camera except the performance of the flash in low light. If any body offers for low price, grab it immediately.
- 4.0 out of 5
great camera! do buy one!
(chicagoan — 07/15/2008)
technology improves vastly every day. i think a used tz1 camera is worth the purchase. the zoom is fantastic and the huge lcd screen is great compared to cameras sold a year before this one came out.
ebay has a few for sale for a good deal.
- 1.0 out of 5
Do not buy
(Mary — 07/17/2007)
I purchased this camera in December of 06, 7 months ago. I did not drop it but noticed a crack in the LCD on the right side and the camera would not come on. I contacted Panasonic and even with a warranty, Panasonic repair said I had to pay for the repair and if I did not pay for the repair, they would still charge me in excess of 60.00 for the diagnostic fee. The repair cost is about as much as a new camera. I won't be looking at Panasonic again for my next camera purchase. And to think I purchased the extended warranty for nothing.
- 2.0 out of 5
poor
(hllewellyn — 07/07/2007)
nice features but with only 72 dpi no use.
- 1.0 out of 5
Do not buy this camera unless you plan to float it on a pillow all day long
(Eric — 05/08/2007)
To be honest, this was the best camera I'd purchased to date...for about 2 months. Great, clear pictures, a huge LCD on the back, image stabilization. I took over 1,000 images on a 2-week trip, and for the most part, they came out perfectly clear. The 10x zoom was wonderful.
Then, out of the blue, a crack appeared on the LCD screen. I had used the camera to take some publicity shots for work, without any problems. The camera was left in a locked office on a desk for a couple of hours, and when I turned it back on, there was a bluish smudge on the right side of the LCD, and the screen was white. No matter what I did or what mode I set it in, the screen would not change. I shipped the camera to Panasonic's repair facilty, and they tell me I will need to pay $187 to repair the camera. If not, they will charge me a $52.50 diagnostic fee to return the borken camera to me, or they will throw it out if I don't get back to them in 10 business days. If you check other reviews online, this is a fairly common problem. Buyer, most definitely beware.
- 3.0 out of 5
Great for outdoors-not so much for indoors. :(
(Carrie — 04/02/2007)
We bought this camera after reading all of the wonderful reviews AND hearing the salesperson rave about it. We were impressed with the price and really looking forward to using it —-until we took pictures of our little girl. The reason we need a camera is mainly for pictures of our children indoors. It is a great camera for zoom, easy to use and a great value. But, I warn against using it primarily for indoor use. If you are looking for a camera to snap shots around the house I advise against it. The picture quality just isn't there. We returned it after one day and went back to our good old standby-Canon.
- 2.0 out of 5
Buy an extended warranty for the TZ1
(Elton Sherwin — 12/11/2006)
Make sure you buy this a long extended warranty for this item.
Great zoom. Great battery life, but can be tricky to get a good picture. Not really point and shoot. Weak low light performance.
But the real killer is that it just stopped working 5 months after purchase.
- 5.0 out of 5
GREAT "snapshot" camera. Easy for Beginners
(Kaye Albe — 12/01/2006)
We bought this camera for my mother. On a recent vacation it out-shot our Canon 20D for the quick snapshot that you don't want to miss- and also for tricky lighting. Although it has a great menu of scene selections to be explored it also has a couple of pretty much no-fail "simple" modes. The 10x zoom in a camera this size is extraordinary and the anti-shake technology makes the 10x zoom usable quickly. We couldn't be happier with this camera for size, ease of use, flexibility. No, you would not compare the finished photo with that of an SLR... but who would think that you should? To us, the portability and the ability to take a quick, successful shot- even at a distance makes this camera fantastic. Even my elderly parents were able to just pick up the camera and use it- making it worth more to them than the most expensive SLR ! We love it !
- 5.0 out of 5
Best Photocompanion for Travelling
(Otto Grubl — 11/28/2006)
The best camera I have ever had, with the 10x optical zoom it is marvelous to do wildlife photos an videos as well as other details;with the different modes you have a creative choice, also night photos and photos inside of f.ex.cathedrals with ISO 800/1600 are getting well,however getting sometimes grainy;it is very flexible and compact enough for quick snapshots too,ideal for travelling and parties, also the videos are fun, though the volume of the micro is on the low side.
- 4.0 out of 5
TZ1 great camera, but...
(Bert Phillips — 11/21/2006)
Small size, 10x zoom and rave reviews on this website were the factors that sold me on the TZ1. The ease of use and picture quality have left me and others highly impressed with it.
I am short on patients for complex electronics. For this reason I don't have a cell phone or PDA and was slow to go digital. This camera was extremely easy to learn and has taken some awesome pictures. In some settings it does not compare to my old SLRs, but because it is so convenient, I use it much more than the SLRs were getting used. I have loaned it to several others and all have been impressed by ease of use, flexibility, picture quality, size and the 10x zoom.
My only complaint is the camera does not have an eyepiece viewer, it only has the LCD screen. As good as the screen is, I cannot see its image in bright sunshine. In bright conditions, pictures are taken by aiming the camera in the general direction and hoping that what I want is properly framed. Only later, when I am in low light and can see the screen, can I check for picture quality and composition. Amazingly this method results in some good pictures, but not always. As I do a lot of outdoors photography, this has been a problem.
- 4.0 out of 5
amazing camera
(Josh — 11/13/2006)
i just got the camera today (11/12/06). ilove it already. Even though it only has 5 megapixels the pictures are very clear. ilove the 10x optical zoom. Only one bad thing, sometimes when you turn on the camera you have to hold the shutter button down for it to get into focus. Overall this camera is a must in digital photography
- 5.0 out of 5
best camera on earth
(bestcamera — 10/19/2006)
Its one of the best cameras i have seen.
- 5.0 out of 5
terrific TZ1
(zac coupland — 10/10/2006)
Very happy so far having taken over 1000 pict of a now 4 month old! Great outdoors, though indoors under low light distance from the lense becomes an issue. Zoom is awesome and the antivibration technology is second to none. LCD is great though I would have preferred if it came with a viewfinder as well.
I was shopping for a compact, high zoom, moderate mega-pixel camera with a lithium battery! I didn't think my wish would come true but panasonic came through!
- 5.0 out of 5
Best Dam Camera Around, Especially for the Price!
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
I have owned digital cameras since they started. I can honestly say this is the best camera I have ever owned. The complements don't stop. Pictures are lifelike and clear clear. Everything about this camera is a plus, but owning one and showing the pictures is the best. Panasonic stand up and take a bow. What a GREAT product. Thanks!!!
- 4.0 out of 5
Panasonic TZ1
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
After shooting more than 4Gb of pictures I have come to conclusion that the TZ1 doesn't earn more than Good. It's not the Leitz lens but the software and the electronics.
The results is a combination of Lens and the electronics/Software in the camera.
Same as a mechanical camera its a combination of Lens and the camera/film combination.
With digital camera the electronics + software is responsible for the quality of the picture.
My negative experiences are;
1. Camera does not react fast enough, especially in weak lighting.
2. Never try to use the flash in bad lighting as colors and sharpness is just poor.
3. Macro is not by far to what I have expected.
4. Electronics is not fast enough to do fast shooting, especially at weak lighting.
I wish there is a similar size camera with the same lens quality (10x zoom) but with a manual aperture or shutter speed choice.
I get the idea that the maker of all these camera's aren't fanatic Photographers.
I will keep my eyes on a few camera makers based on their lens quality which is, Canon, Nikon and Leitz.
- 5.0 out of 5
Third and best
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
Have been in photography since the mid-forties.graduating from Speed Graphics, Linhofs Rolleis, Contax To digitals-Minolta to Panasonic FZ3, FZ5, Tz1, the cream of the crop! 10X zoom,Image stabilization and numerous bells and whistles plus a Leica lens with prismatic
light path give incredible capabilities in an unbelievably small package - what next?
10X zoom plus
- 5.0 out of 5
Lumix TZ 1
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
Excellent zoom- I've had the Canon Powershot D50 which sadly was dropped. This is my replacement camera and I'm very pleased, the 10X zoom with the 4X optical is really a surprise. I've just started to experiment with the video mode and so far am thrilled.
- 2.0 out of 5
What happened to real resolution?
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
I truly enjoyed several things about this camera - the 10x zoom is fun, the interface is easy to use and easy to learn. But am I the only one who cares that these 5 megapixels are at 72dpi? Who needs an image that in its raw form is a printable 35 x 23 inches at 72 dpi? I went though two manuals, one customer service rep and finally had customer service by email to determine that if I wanted anything more than 72,I would have to use somebody's interpolation algorithms - either Panasonic's or Photoshop. I took my best shot with this camera - and it's going back to the store. Leica lens - check. Lots of other great features- check. Picture quality? Nope.
- 5.0 out of 5
Very nice camera
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
I bought this camera to use as a vacation point and shoot. It has over exceeded my expectations. This camera allowed me to take really nice pictures through the window of my hotel room, daylight, night and indoor shots. I went to Las Vegas and neon lighting was no problem for this camera. Dancing water shows at the Bellagio came out great too. At a car show I snapped off shots that later made me wonder which I liked better, the live look or the picture later. Overall this is a really nice camera for me.
- 4.0 out of 5
Great camera but watch out!
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
I waited patiently to receive my TZ1 and finally it arrived. It was very simple to understand and use even though it was a brand that I had not normally been accustomed to. It took great quality pictures with very few pictures not looking great. But watch out! This camera is very fragile, it warns you that this is a Precision instrument and not to expose it to shock. They weren't kidding...after a fall from waist level still while in a protective case the shutter button and zoom lever became displaced and broke when I moved it back into place. I am attempting to get it looked at, but I am afraid that I might just have to eat this one. It was my fault that it was dropped, but I sure didn't think that given the small distance that it fell that it should have been damaged like it was. Will let you know what became of my service request.
- 5.0 out of 5
Love the pics - hate the lens cap
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
Best in class - small compact 10x zoom with great crisp photos at low ISO and good lighting. Some caveats - "high intensity" using ISO 800-1600 autoset by the camera produces brilliant small photos but any enlargement is hopeless - patches of blurry colors with no resolution...another caveat is that you have to use an external lens cap which if you attach to the camera with a string gets in the way, BUT THERE IS NO WAY TO FIX A UV FILTER onto this camera - so the lens is always at risk.
Food photos are brilliant!
Telephoto to 10x zoom are excellent, and even with digital zoom to 40x in daylight produces usable detail...
No regrets buying this - I have used many digital cameras including my Olympus E-1 and this is one of the BEST.
- 4.0 out of 5
Excellent Compromise to a Digital SLR
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
This is my third digital camera, after using several SLRs over 20+ years and taking pictures around the world. Overall, I feel this camera was a great purchase for the price ($300 + 99 for an Extreme III 1GB SD Card) and would buy another one as a gift without hesitation. Using the natural (ISO consideration) setting, noise is a minor issue. The menus, and menu numbering system (1/6, 2/6, etc.) are easy to use and logical after you get accustomed to them. Potential settings (Pre-selected scene menus (20)+, flash options, white balance/EV on-the-fly-adjustment (-2 to +2) plus auto-bracketing (-1 to +1) allows the serious amateur (or someone willing to read the manual and has a good grasp of photography) to take great photos without too much fuss. Buttons are positioned well, but the he feel (depth and click) is really great (!) and the particular selection of actions they programmed into the (few) buttons is awesome��some great thinking here. My setup (EIII 1GB Card) allows really fast cycles. As you would expect, the lens (Leica) works flawlessly when one of the 5 metering functions is correctly used.
PROS. Once you get used to the various (and somewhat complex) menus and their impacts to your photo composition (every shot has so many variables), you can really get some great photos (@5mp density) without pulling your hair out. The histogram/white saturation indicator is too much! Almost all of my photos are taken of scenery, people, or wildlife��bright sunlight, difficult backlighting, total shade with white saturations, etc.��the whole range of outdoor compositions including flight and quick movements) and I was able to quickly pick the correct setting or use that auto bracket for a great result. I personally don��t believe that many of the non-SLR digitals take very good indoor pictures, so I didn��t and won��t go there. The LCD is super sharp, top-tier, and the power LCD setting beats them all for picture composition in bright sunlight.
CONS. This camera can��t compete with a fully manual / auto digital SLR for those times you want a specific EV/Speed or depth-of-field setting. (Although the exceptional range of fixed scene settings will allow you to control these settings to a degree) so don��t expect it to. Because the camera does have advanced features and (maybe too many) numerous menus for us amateurs, you really have to understand how photography works and take time to study the manual to get consistently great photos��which this camera seems to do time after time (poor pictures are cited in too many camera reviews because the USER had selected (or not selected) the proper settings for the intended picture. The battery life is very good (rated at 250 pictures against the standard), but I felt like I needed an extra battery so I plunked down over $50 for another (these just came out). To be fair, this is true of most inexpensive digitals. If it broke, and I had about $500 to spend on one digital, I would buy this one again.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great Buy
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
This is my first Panasonic camera, I have had for a few weeks and am very happy with the photos and the features. The zoom feature is great, the interface is simple and easy to use. The stabilization works as advertised. The construction seems very solid, controls are well designed and easily accessible. Having previously owned and operated Canon and Pentax digital cameras I feel that this unit compares very favorably both in photo ability and quality. I will update this review once I put more 'miles' on this camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
Good sized, great quality pics, and super quick especially with high speed sd card
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
So far I like what I see, super quick start up time and nice burst mode you've come to expect from Panasonic. You can actually use the zoom in the movie mode now too. They come out looking great even better in 16:9 ratio. Overall very solid camera, glad I bought it. Looks of great quality too unlike the LZ series, at least the body.
