Panasonic Lumix TZ3
| Fetching our Best Offer… |
Read why: Editor's comments.
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the Panasonic Lumix TZ3
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|
|||
Editors' Comments
Panasonic's TZ "Travel Zoom" series has made a significant advance with the Lumix TZ3. The camera not only comes with a stunning 10x optical zoom, but also a 28mm wide-angle lens for a greater breadth of coverage. The TZ3 can handle 16:9 widescreen images, as well as standard 4:3 and 3:2 aspect ratios, and has a vivid 3-inch LCD to make viewing your high-resolution photos a pleasant experience. Panasonic has also released a companion model, the Lumix TZ2, which retains the zoom and wide-angle features while downgrading to a slightly smaller CCD (6MP) and LCD screen (2.5-inches).
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom
- 16:9 widescreen mode, 28mm wide-angle lens
- Movie mode
- JPEG file format
- Panasonic MEGA Optical Image Stabilization
- ISO 100-3200
- 3.0-inch LCD
- Secure Digital card storage (12.7MB internal)
- Lithium ion battery
Product Information
| Manufacturer | Panasonic |
|---|---|
| Part Number | DMCTZ3S/K2 |
| UPC | 843404007592 |
| Release Date | Jan 31, 2007 |
TZ3 Accessories:
Shop for TZ3 accessories.
Panasonic Lumix TZ3 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix TZ3 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 3.0 out of 5
This one went crazy after a year and a half. I have been buying lumix cameras in the past few years, but they quit working after 1 or 2 years. Initially they have attractive features, but they do not hold on in the long run. I am tired of "having" to buy another camera, going elsewhere.
- 5.0 out of 5
this camera has serious attitude
and band-for-your-buck quality!
I never thought I would buy anything other than Canon, and here I am...
amazing zoom
great night pics (something my canon could not do)
great image
face detection
vivid colours
you can simply shoot or get very technical (great as a family camera, whether used by the nerd techie junkie or the grandfather)
I bought it to take pictures AND videos of my nephews,
as well as my travel camera.
Never had a problem, and I'm quite picky AND am tough on my camera...sometimes i wish it was lighter/smaller, BUT its zoom/quality is comparable to an SLR and has a professional look too (comparable to Canon)....since it's pretty much everything i need, and was fairly priced, I'm absolutely happy with it and don't plan on buying a new one for a while.
:)
- 3.0 out of 5
Specs are great - 10x zoom and 7 megapixel sensor and Zeiss lens - but it's heavy, the lens remains fixed for video shooting, and the pictures just don't have the clarity and richness that a DSLR delivers. So the camera falls just short of a DSLR - kind of in limbo.
- 5.0 out of 5
I thought this camera would be a toy, but it's easy to use, takes
great pictures, has a fantastic lens, and is small enough to go
everywhere. Who knew Panasonic could make such good cameras?
- 2.0 out of 5
a lot a small trouble
- lens not closing proprely
- camera blocked with message not related
- sensor corrupted
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is wonderful and easy to use. The zoom and video are fantastic and it's easy to carry (I did use my shirt pocket). I lost it on the road and immediately purchased a second TZ3 because I liked the first one so much.
- 1.0 out of 5
I have had this camera 6 months, and keep saying to myself
I must be doing something wrong, this camera for the investment takes terrible pictures in low light, or natural indoor light conditions. I am very disappointed, and I am generally a big fan of Panasonic products. This camera is totally a thumbs down from me.
- 5.0 out of 5
All of the above features are available, first time, in a very compact body which can fit in to your pocket, ( need not to hang around your neck all the time..!!!). Superb picture quality even during low light shot with 10X zoom. Powerful Flash. 3 inch big display. Mega Optical Image Stabilization works perfact ( even my 10years old son can take shot at 10X zoom without `shaking' pictures). I am very much impressed.
- 3.0 out of 5
I tried to used single flash, double flash and no flash but it never gives be brighter pics as compare to other cameras.
At home, indoor too, it does not give good pics
- 4.0 out of 5
Amazing machine!
Best
Recording videos in 848x480 at 30 Fps with audio, IMPRESSIVE!, I still can believe that this little thing can do that so good!.
Worst:
First Manual SUCKS, almost 80% of the camera functions are not explained properly, they could, at least, include a full version of the manual in PDF in the CD, but no, they should learn from olympus.
The second thing I don't like is it's behavior in low light condition, a light turn to greenish color and images tend to be very blur even when taken with a tripod.
That aside, I love it, maybe not as good as my previous Olympus camera but the High resolution video recording worth every cent.
- 5.0 out of 5
Feature loaded and produces excellent color rendition in almost every situation I've encountered thus far. A touch on the heavy side but the ZOOM makes you forget about the weight. Had 2 Sony Cybershots before this one and am thoroughly enjoying the TZ3.
- 5.0 out of 5
Purchased for dream vacation to Hawaii and we weren't disappointed! I am no camera pro, but this one was great. My husband has large hands and could handle this with ease. It also took great pictures of the fireworks using the scene selection designated for that. Many of our pictures look like they could be postcards, the color and clarity are so good. We are very happy with this purchase.
- 3.0 out of 5
I traded this camera in twice to COSTCO. The first one had significant lint that got into the screen. The second and third one is leaving white circle of hallows (light that is circular) in my photos. Every setting does this. I don't know why my first camera didn't do it but the 2nd & 3rd one does it! It takes great photos but it's a hit & miss with the white hallows on circular light that is left in the photos! Has anyone else had that problem?
- 3.0 out of 5
I purchased this camera because of its high optical zoom power. However, I was very disappointed with the quality of indoor photos and videos. Panasonic DMC-TZ3 lacks the face recognition feature and does not reflect the true colour of the objects. Faces look too pale. Overall, I don't think the optical zoom is worth its poor image/video quality. Think twice before you purchase this product.
- 4.0 out of 5
+ Great camera
+ Easy to use
+ Takes nice shots
+ Brilliant Zoom
+ Very Compact for a 10x Optical Zoom
- No optical viewfinder
- 4.0 out of 5
I own a community journal, I had Canon SD300, but was not good for photo in big meeting, night, and distance photos. This is better, specially when using Optical and Digital Zoon, and Vivid color in a theatre, low light, with max Iso, and Stable with help satble hand, it's OK..
Problem with people who walk, move etc...
but for the size, and Auto, I think it's the best for it's size, extended zoon, and no SLR...
- 5.0 out of 5
I needed to replace my Fuji 3800 and am sold on power zoom cameras. But I needed stabilization too, and almost bought the new S8000 until the guy I was with mentioned that it would never fit in my pocket.
Short story is that I decided that the camera had all the capabilitites I needed and that 18x zoom was a bit much.
Also, the big LCD is an absolute joy. It's big enough I don't need to get my specs on to read it, and it provides a superior preview of what you just shot.
The user interface is excellent too, very simple, easy to use, and allows you to preset the camera and then concentrate on getting goods shots.
The battery is quite adequate for an entire day of flash shooting, although I bought a spare.
And SD cards are about the cheapest form of memory for cameras. 2GB are about $15, and that allows you to use the movie feature very freely.
This is a camera designed by people who know digital photography and enjoy taking pictures.
Highly recommended!
- 5.0 out of 5
excellent camera for the money. better than any SLR. macro alone is intense. very good camera, fits in a pocket, easy to manage, easy to hold and shoot. it really is an amazing camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
I have owned a dozen different digital cameras since they were invented in 1993, and none compares to the performance and ease-of-use of the Lumix DMC-TZ3. This camera is amazing.
For everyday, impule shooting of on-the-go snapshots, it produces crystal-clear wide-angle snaps at a moment's notice and without the slightest hint of blur, thanks to the amazing O.I.S. system.
When the picture is important and you operate the camera properly, it pays rich rewards in stunning photos under all types of lighting and in situations ranging from action to amazing macro still-lifes.
I have shot over 3,000 pix with the TZ3 in the weeks since I bought it and it still amazes me with every photo it captures. A fantastic lens, exceptional ease-of-use, a small form factor, and near-instant responsiveness make this camera the only one you need on the road. Hard to believe it sells for as little as it does.
Mike
Carrollton, TX
- 2.0 out of 5
I bought the camera for use of the high zoom and compact size so that i could take pictures of my friends being deployed to Iraq, I missed many shots,blurry even when guys were not moving. Day 2 read more on camera practice shots etc. same thing even tried different settings,almost all low light shots were awful. The camera does not seem to be consistent with its pictures and it seemed like there was no reason. I have had my nikon 4300 for over 3 years and it was never inconsistent like that, after more reviewing I found more(not all) consumers with similar problems. . Took the camera back after 5 days and over 200 photos so that i can do normal research and find another camera. Was not happy with the product at all and it was fairly costly for the quality that the camera was.
- 5.0 out of 5
Buy this camera basically for one word ...........ZOOM!The zoom is 10x optical which is great. You rarely see that in this kind of camera. All the rest of the features are typical. PQ is very good. Battery life very good. Construction is Solid. Ease of use Very Good. Menus are easily navigated.
CONCLUSION: Nice camera with a Superior Zoom which as we all know can be very useful in many situations.
- 4.0 out of 5
this is my 6th digicam - preceeded by a HP cheapie, a Kodak C-543, a olympus SD -350 , canon powershot 710a , and its up grade, a canon A710 is ,and finally this 10x zoom panasonic TZ-3.. Obvously a step up with each succeeding purchase- but not quite...each camera had some endearing virtues, and after being discarded by me have found new homes with some of our 10 grandchildren.-- 3 of the 6 are gone.. am now using the TZ-3 and canon A710is exclusively . both have their merits, let me compare the differances, that i have noted between the 2 of them,and hopefully you will see some major differenciations and you can judge for yourself—The canon A710is has a sharper lense than the Panasonic LIeca ( low end lieca)lens.. This is shown in all photo lengths...I tis obvious when you review phots, takn of the same subject under the same lighting conditions. The TZ-3 lens ,however, is acceptable, it it just that the canon product's lens is sharper.. The !0x useable optical zoom in the TZ-3 is seamless and w/ the image stablization feature in the ON mode, clarity and steadiness allows hand held shots at the max 10x optical zoom.. The canon is the same ,BUT only goes up to 6x optical zoom.. Th2 28mm wide angle feature in The TZ-3 is definately wider than the 36mm canon A710is lens. this is a big plus for the panasonic product.. The canonA710 is has a frontal date stamp capability ,and gyroscoping auto matic photo rotating feature.. Canon has both systems down pat and is very easy and user friendly , Not so the Panasonic TZ-3 which does neither well.. The flash distance is shorter in the TZ-3 than the A710is , and no auxillary flash can be attached for true TTL (thru the lense)shots can be used w/ the TZ-3 so far.. The canon product can accomidate a auxllliary flash , as well as filters,etc.. there is a treaded base around te lense , on the A710is allowing this ..really excells to the field and ads to the usfullness of the digicam—there are other nuances, BUT both are really nice digicams,and i feel lucky to be able to enterchange at will when using thes 2 little nifty beauties..both fit in a rather smallish camera bag- a big plus
- 3.0 out of 5
I purchased this camera because of the 10x zoom and large LCD screen. However, the quality in low light situations were very disappointing and it seemed more complicated to use. I probably would have enjoyed it if I wanted to dedicate many hours trying to learn how to use it most effectively. I returned it to Costco with hopes of purchasing another camera that is easier to use.
- 5.0 out of 5
After putting off buying a digital camera for a long time, it is a great suprise to have so many features in a small camera. I have taken collage courses in film. With digital it is a whole new world.This tz3 is beyond what I would expect from a small camera. Harleyman
- 5.0 out of 5
After using a spattering of Canon, Sony, Olympus, Nikon digital cameras it was time to upgrade. I wanted something that could take high quality pictures, be compatible with the newest SD memory cards, and be easy to pocket. It is a bit larger than the other cameras in it's class, but they don't have 10x optical zoom. I think for the extra volume and weight, it is far worth it. There is much less shutter lag than my prior cameras and the settings are good enough to keep me satisfied. All around a great camera and one I am recommending to friends.
- 5.0 out of 5
As simple like this, if you don´t have enough money to buy a Leica buy this one.
This one in all the extension is a Leica camera with a very, very different price.
I´m very very pleased with my camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
I needed to replace a lost SD600 and was at costco and saw the Panasonic TZ3 and was amazed by it's features to decided to go for it over a canon.
After using the TZ3 for a full weekend and about 250 pictures I am disappointed. The camera is fun and full of cool features, but I found it's image quality to be no where near my SD600 and previous canon compact cameras. I had high hopes for the TZ3 with the 10x optical zoom, but first and foremost I want a camera that achieves the quality of pictures I have become accustom to with the canon line.
To be specific, the TZ3 works good in proper light. However, the image quality deteriorates dramatically in lower light situations. The images seem dull and over exposed. I played with several scene modes and settings that helped a little but not enough to please me.
I gave it a "Good" rating for it's fun features. But I had a hard time even giving it that high of a rating as I am fairly dissapointed with about 1/2 the pictures I have taken so far.
I expect I will return the camera to costco and purchase another canon.
- 5.0 out of 5
I almost didn't consider this camera because of no manual control and reports of high noise. But when considered as a whole - a fast, pocketable, world class superzoom with a true wide screen sensor and the best IS made, a superbright 3" LCD, plus a luxurious feel - the TZ3 was a package of photographic capability, fun and convenience without peer.
- 4.0 out of 5
Though its a bit heavy comparing with average point and shoot DC, its 10X (28mm to 200mm for 35mm camera equivalent) Lecia lens would justify the weight. There is only limited manual control but lot of scene settings to compensate. It would be a nice DC for traveler for its zoom range and easy of use.
- 5.0 out of 5
Having owned several Panasonic digital cameras in the past I was hesitant about the claims for the new TZ3 and the supposed improvements where noise was concerned. However, now that I have used this camera for the past several days all I can say is, "Way to go Panasonic!" Compared to my last camera(FX01) the new TZ3 is incredible! No detectable noise at ISO 100 & 200, and very slight noise at ISO 400. The 800 & 1250 ISO pics are even very usable. Also - the purple fringing is slight to non-existant and I can detect no barrel distortion at the 28mm end of the zoom range.
In my opinion Panasonic should be shouting these improvements from the rooftops. I am sure their faithful fans soon will be!
- 4.4232995658466 out of 5
Panasonic Lumix TZ3 Ratings By Site
-
Circuit City0 User Reviews
-
Shopzilla40 User Reviews
-
CNET43 User Reviews
-
NexTag54 User Reviews
-
PriceGrabber22 User Reviews
-
Newegg46 User Reviews
-
Yahoo! Shopping8 User Reviews
-
Amazon439 User Reviews
-
Shopping.com9 User Reviews

Panasonic Lumix TZ3 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Do you reccomend buying a few of these batteries?
Approximately how long will the battery last on a single charge? Does this camera compare well with the Canon Powershot A640?
Since this is a very new camera, there's not a lot of info out on it yet, but let me see if I can help you...
Proprietary LiIon batteries are usually charged either via a docking cradle or with an external charger (i.e. you take the battery out and put it in a charger).
It's always good to have a spare, but proprietary batteries can be pretty expensive (one of the advantages of cameras that takZe AA-sized batteries is that NiMH AA rechargeables are quite cheap). If you can afford to do so, there's no reason not to carry a spare.
There aren't any stats out yet on the TZ3's battery life, but the TZ1 (its predecessor) was rated for 250 shots with the LCD live preview on. That should be a good gauge for what to expect.
The TZ3 and the A640 are sort of in different classes. The TZ3's biggest features are its huge 10x zoom, its image stabilization, and its wide angle lens (28mm). The A640 doesn't have features to match any of these (not stabilized, 4x zoom, no wide angle), but it's a very solid camera, and based on the TZ1, I feel pretty comfortable predicting that its image quality is probably higher overall. The A640 is also a little bulkier (but not much).
Hope this helps!
I can tell you that it takes really great shots -- I never realized how much of a difference that 28mm (35mm equivalent) wide-angle lens was going to make until I started taking pictures of my kids with my new TZ3. Combine that with the really impressive 10x optical zoom with optical image stabilization, and you've got a great camera.
Battery life was very important to me as well. I bought a spare generic battery and that is all I've needed. When one goes low, I swap in the other that was previously charged, then charge the low one and put it into storage. These batteries last along time even just waiting to be used. During heavy shooting times, like our kids birthday parties, the other battery is recharged by the time it needs to be swapped. I do not miss being able to use store bought batteries at all.
One thing I would recommend - buy an extended warrantee. I love the camera's I've had, but I managed to break both.
As for the Panasonic TZ3... I hope you plan to use it in bright light, because Panasonic's noise-reduction is way overdone and can ruin even smaller pictures. Great for in the light, though.
Sam
I needed to replace a lost SD600 and was at costco and saw the Panasonic TZ3 and was amazed by it's features to decided to go for it over a canon.
After using the TZ3 for a full weekend I am disappointed. The camera is fun and full of cool features, but I found it's image quality to be no where near my SD600 and previous canon compact cameras. I had high hopes for the TZ3 with the 10x optical zoom, but first and foremost I want a camera that achieves the quality of pictures I have become accustom to with the canon line.
To be specific, the TZ3 works good in proper light. However, the image quality deteriorates dramatically in lower light situations. The images seem dull and over exposed. I played with several scene modes and settings that helped a little but not enough to please me.
I expect I will return the camera to costco and purchase another canon.
The extra zoom power of TZ3 is supported by image stabilization and will not sacrifice qualities of picture.
There is a very good review of TZ3 at <a href="dpreview.com/reviews/Panaso... site</a>.
A couple of observations to make about battery life. First, The TZ3's numbers are about 8% better than the TZ1's, despite the former's power-hungry LCD. In the compact ultra zoom category, the TZ3's battery life is well above average. If you add in midsize models, it falls below average, though buying one of those sort of defeats the purpose of having a compact ultra.
so best way is 2700 mah nihm.. it worth shot and longer
cheers
revhead227
revhead227
Thanks!
This means the fastest speed memory card that Tz3 can handle will be about 10 mb/sec sequential read speed and 9 mb/sec sequential write speed.
DPI refers to the "dots per inch" printing or scanning capability of printers or scanners. There is no DPI number for cameras because that all depends on the printer you use to print your photographs.
Hope this helps,
Mark
Here's a link to a more "mathematical" answer that was offered to someone querying the same thing:
<A HREF="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... How high a printing resolution/dpi can this camera offer?</A>
Unfortunately, what you hear is true. Right now, zooming during video recording is unavailable on the TZ3. There's some speculation that the feature could be unlocked in a firmware upgrade, but it's probably a remote possibility that it'll actually happen.
The earlier TZ1 allows zoom during video recording, and it's apparently very quiet and smooth. You might want to look into that model (can probably be had on the cheap, too).
Good luck!
If the firmware thing could unlock zoom during movie on the TZ3, that would be AWESOME, though!!!
I know this is an old question, but just wondering if you have found a camera yet. There are a few I'm thinking of that might suit you; nowadays (thankfully) things are speeding up and there are some compacts available that could suit your needs in terms of response time, etc. Let me know if you're still in the market and I'll try to make some suggestions!
Sorry it took me a few days to reply- we are swamped with questions over here! =) Let me run over a few things and then make some recommendations:
-As far as resizing/ enlarging photos for scrapbooking purposes, the best thing you can do is make sure the camera offers a few different resolutions (all of them do; low to high quality) and that there are enough megapixels for you to be able to blow up the photo decently. The rest of the work you can do with editing software (<a href="picasa.google.com/">... is a great free tool if you don't own something like Photoshop). Unless you want to blow photos up very, very large, you should be just fine with something 6 megapixels or more.
-For speed, you obviously want something without much lag time, both between photos (shot to shot time) and from when you push the button to when the shot fires (shutter lag). Having an SLR, you are probably used to super-fast response; a smaller point & shoot is going to be a little slower than that, but luckily most of the cameras on the market today are still good and fast and should suit you well enough.
There are a LOT of great cameras in this price range that offer all these options.
Here are a few possibles:
Canon SD750 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) - This is the camera I want for my birthday (I hope my boyfriend is listening. =)) It's super speedy, compact, takes great photos and has all the options you'd need. The SD1000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is basically the same camera with a slightly smaller screen but a super skinny body.
Maybe you want more zoom than these have? While it won't be as small, you can check out the Panasonic Lumix TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), just as speedy but perhaps slightly less total image quality than the Canons.
I tend to point people towards Canons. Not because I'm biased but because I think they truly give you the best shot for your money. Although the zoom is attractive, though, avoid the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) unless you never shoot with a flash. This camera has a very slow shot-to-shot time when flash is used.
Does this help at all? The ones I threw at you are mainly new models which tend to be faster in operation (technology is speeding along!) Let me know if you need further advice.
With all that being said - if you are looking to shoot soccer games or other sporting events or auditorium events - then you need either a long zoom (for distance) or an SLR (for speed of focus and shooting). I suggest getting the Nikon D40 (not the D40x, as you can save money and don't need the 10MP of the "x") and if money is not an issue - get a VR lens, like the 18-200 VR. Otherwise if you don't want SLR, then maybe the Panasonic TZ3, Sony H5, H7 or H9.
Good luck
Adam
thanks!
p.s.- anyone find a genuine panasonic tz3 battery for less than $50?
Good Luck
thanks!
I'd vote for the SD750.
Depends what you are using the camera for? If you are an amatuer and don't mind a slightly less quality in photo, the Lumix TZ3 wins hands down. Unfortunately, it doesn't have much in the way of manual control settings though like the Canon does.
For me, I prefer the Lumix only because of the 10X zoom (which virtually NO other point and shoot camera has), coupled with the CCD and the awesome 28 mm lens vs. the standard 35 in most all other point and shoots. This means more panoramic shots and the distortion is quite minimal (almost non existent).
I agree with Jaems that the Canon will have better color and sharpness, but it is mox nix for me who is an amatuer photographer (hobby). I have taken some outstanding vibrant photos with my Lumix and I think only a truly discerning eye would be able to catch the difference. The zoom though is hands down a Lumix winner. Plus a really big 3" LCD!
I thought the features in the TZ3 -LCD, CCD size, zoom (YEAH!) and the 28 mm lens (SUPER YEAH!) were worth the marginal difference in photo quality.
It is a point and shoot with 23 scene modes....check it out on the Kodak.com site and give us your opinion...
Nikon Coolpix S4 it has a unique swiveling lens
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm testing one right now and am really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
However, you need not limit yourself to lenses with a minimum zoom of 28mm. If you need shorter wide angles, there are 24-85mm ,18-35mm and 17-35mm zoom lenses. Nikon, for example, makes quite a number of them and can be found at <a href="nikonimaging.com/global/pro... page</a>
I don't think I need that much zoom.
The "pocket" ability of the Lumix is what sold me.
Hope this helps, oh and BTW I was able to find the TZ3 at an awesome price at Costco, so that helped too.
Val
www2.panasonic.com/webapp/w...
Advantages (and differences) of the TZ3 - better lens (sharp edge to edge), significantly better menu system, ease of use is much better, speed of shooting is very fast up to 3 frames per second is SLR speed. This is a stunning outdoor good lighting camera. Super stunning huge LCD - Canon is no comparison, not even close.
Issues of the TZ3 - very poor flash, not great indoor shots, no manual control of shutter speed or aperture, no zoom during movie shooting, noise in movie mode.
The bottom line is the TZ3 is VERY fun to shoot - it is the better cam if you shoot outdoors at least 50%. If most shooting is indoors then the sd800 may be the way to go. I suggest looking at www.dpreview.com for details on each camera.
good luck!
Val
When I first read your question I thought it was about image quality, so I might as well mention this anyhow: this cam is great outdoors and in natural light, but if you shoot indoors, you may want to rethink it. Panasonic's low-light shots tend to be noisy/ grainy, and while their new processors have improved that somewhat, they've also added some heavy-handed noise reduction that makes the image look a little doctored. So, outdoor/ sun shooting= fantastic, indoor shooting= might lose some image quality.
To see a sample of the video, you can log on to <a href="dcresource.com/reviews/pana... location</a> and look for the picture of the train.
Thanks in advance
But what it just may come down to is what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Personaly I think that you gain a lot more with the 28mm than what you loose with "only" the 280mm (as opposed to the 380mm on the Nikon).
So if you also want wide-angle: go for the Pana, if it's only tele you want: go for the Nikon.
As for SDHC cards.... I'm not sure if the 8GB cards will work, but the 4GB will. Even the official website doesn't have capacity. I would assume, with the TZ3 being so new, that it would handle it, but I can't guarantee it. Best bet would be to call the Panasonic customer service center just to verify.
Yes. I have this exact combination. Speed is equal to a 150X 2GB (limited by the TZ3). I used the TZ3/8GB to shoot over 6GB of pics and movs during a helicopter flight over the Big Island last week. The big card allowed me to shoot dozens of pics of subjects very quickly without regard to space, bracketing exposures and holding the camera steady against the copter's turbulence.
For a good SDHC card reader, check out Kingston's MobileLite, which can mount SD(HC), miniSD, and microSD cards simultaneously, showing as three drives on your PC. I also carry the tiny Sandisk MobileMate when traveling, just in case. Avoid the cheapies, or at least carry a handful of spares.
Thanks all guys for your help
SDHC (Secure Digital High-Capacity) is a new Flash memory card based on the SDA (Secure Digital Association) 2.00 specification.
SDHC Specifications Ver. 2.00
• Capacities* 4 GB–32 GB
• Dimensions** 0.94" X 1.26" X 0.08"
( 24mm X 32mm X 2.1mm)
• No. of pins 9 pins
• Voltage 2.7 to 3.6V
• File System FAT32
**Same as the current SD Memory Card size standard.
So If TZ-3 card reader is standard SDHC card reader it support up to 32 GB SDHC card
Thank you
The lack of manual options and the high noise levels everybody talks about worry me though. I am by no means a seasoned photographer but am scared that I'll be left with a camera that has a lack of options and takes blurry pictures in low light.
In a similar price range is the canon A640 which sounds as if it takes really clear pictures. And the Sony cybershot N2 also looks and sounds pretty nifty. These however don't have the amazing 10x optical zoom.
Does anyone have any info that may clear things up a bit for me? or any suggestions for similar priced, large zoom, good image stabilisationed alternatives?
Cheers.
The TZ3 has a lot to recommend it. It's got a great zoom, image stabilization, a goodly amount of megapixels, and a nice screen as you mentioned. The real problem with it, from what I can gather, is the software noise reduction that it employs, which apparently tends to massacre fine detail in the images it produces.
Unfortunately, the TZ3 is kind of in a class of its own. The only other cameras that match its features are the Nikon S10 and the Canon TX1, but they each have their drawbacks as well.
You might consider moving up a bit to these cameras' big brothers, the full superzoom class. These include models like the Canon S5 IS, the Panasonic FZ50, and the Sony H7/H9. These are bigger, but offer huge zoom (up to 15x) and great manual control options.
Hope this helps!
These are two interesting cameras. The TZ3's biggest draw, of course, is its awesome 10x zoom lens (also 28mm wide angle!) in a very compact body. The S700 is notable for stuffing a lot of features from bigger superzooms like the Sony H9 and Canon S5 IS into a camera that's entry-level priced.
The S700 isn't one of Fuji's "SuperCCD" cameras, which means the upper ISO settings (what you'd use in low light) aren't going to be very good. That said, they'll probably be just as bad or worse on the TZ3 (Panasonics have notorious image noise issues). The TZ3 has also been slammed for its overaggressive noise reduction software, which tends to blot out details in an attempt at smoothness.
Each has its shortcomings and each has very good points to recommend it. I'd recommend taking a look at these two reviews from DCRP: TZ3 ( dcresource.com/reviews/pana... ), S700 ( dcresource.com/reviews/fuji... ).
His reviews are generally very comprehensive and lay out the pros and cons of each camera very well. In addition, he has a photo gallery for each camera, and he usually shoots the same subjects every time, which makes it very easy to compare the two.
Hope this helps!
It's a lot bigger than the Pana, but if I were you I would pay a little more and go for the Fuji 6500. That one makes incredible photo's and has a Super ccd, so very good low light abilities (the Pana has not).
But the smallest package with the biggest zoom still is the TZ3, and I think it is a beauty!
Select ' Setup ' on the left hand column.- the logo that looks like a spanner.
Scroll down the list and select ' Language '. Choose the language display and press 'Menu/Set' button
What am I doing wrong?
Some samples are at:
stevewoznicki.com/new%20cam...
I did think that the shots of your dog without the zoom were quite sharp. The office shots seemed underexposed a tad due to the limited range of the flash, so that could play into it as well.
So, it seems to me that as you get used to using the new camera, your technique will improve as the learning curve lessens.
Other things you can do are:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
- Page 66
I think we might be a bit confused by what you want. If you want to see the full picture that you shot vertically, then turn off the auto rotate and just turn the camera. When the auto rotate is on in the display menu then your picture will be rotated but obviously seem smaller since it has to now fit within the heigth of the screen. If you don't mind it being smaller then, in display mode, scroll down to 'Rotate Disp' and select on and press menu set button. Now you won't ever have to do anymore hand motions. If the picture is a bit small for detail, use the zoom to get a better look.
hope it helps,
Val
I just checked my TZ3 and found that my display is rotating the pictures. With camera on display mode, press menu button, scroll down to Rotate Disp look to the right and see that it is "on." Even if it is go ahead and toggle switch over to right then down to ON and press menu set button. close menu and view pics again. There really isn't anything else to do. If your pictures are not rotated it might be that you have the 'protect' setting on. Again, while in display mode, scroll down untill you see protect, and make sure there isn't anything to the right of it. If there is, undo it. The manual did say that some pictures just won't rotate, but it didn't give any reason, so some of your pictures should do it. Hope this helps.
Val
Most digital cameras these days don't include an automatic date/time stamp feature. As far as I know the TZ3 is no different here. There's simply not a way to do this kind of imprinting within the camera.
Sorry!
I think I may have to return it and buy her the old fashioned film camera that can have the date printed on the prints.
Thanks again.
Ann
I will tell her about the camera you recommended. Why did this camera only get a B- grade from this website? Is this the only model that offers the automatic date stamp on the prints?
reviews.cnet.com/digital-ca...
I would like to ask how well you can see the LCD screen outdoors? I went to the store to see this camera and I liked everything except the LCD screen looked like it would be hard to see outdoors compared to the smaller 2.5 screens on some of the other cameras. They wouldn't let me take it outside to try it and they charge a 15% restocking fee, so I didn't want to buy it just to try it .
Well, we can very well see the LCD screen outdoors as it has 3 brightness options to choose from. There is a button just beneath the main button which when pressed for 2 seconds shows 3 brightness modes.By default it is on '0'.
I do not remember well what it says, but it's a good feature. It is there.
And regarding the question to Ann posted way back in Aug 2007, the date stamp feature is very much there in TZ3 and I love it. And this is the first reason I bought it besides 28mm lens and 10x Zoom
Believe me, I am writing this after reading everybody's answers. And I think by now, you must have got rid of your beautiful TZ3. But I differ from most of the views who have advised you to go for Canon.
You just need to take 1 min out of your time after the photo session is over. Press the Main Menu Round button in the middle. Go to second page using down arrow. Select Date Stamp. Select Yes.
Then it will give you the menu of 9 pics in one screen. Using down arrow you need to mark the pics. Then push the Menu button again. It will ask you whether you wish to put the time as well. Select Yes or No.
Press the Menu button again, which also acts as OK all this while. Then push OK again and wait for a minute to complete date stamping.
I love this feature. And I cannot compromise with TZ3 for something else, as there are far more better features in this which I will lose if I switch just for a easy/auto date stamp optipn...
Thanks for reading.
Step 1:
Go to this link.
<microsoft.com/windowsxp/dow...
Start from the bottom right of this window.
Download and Run the Image Resizer
===================================================================
Step 2:
Now go back to your pictures folder.
Right click on any picture.
Left click on Resize Picture.
The next screens are self-explanatory.
=========================================================================
However, the best and simplest software I have seen is Microsoft Office Picture Manager.
It's a part of MS Office 2003.
Right click on the image you want to resize.
Left click on Open with.
Left click on Microsoft Office Picture Manager.
Top of this new window, click on Edit Pictures.
In this page, you will see easy and simple tools like Resize, Crop (Cutting from borders), Red Eye Removal etc.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Haneef
My favourite size for pictures is 1024 by 768 pixels.
We not only get the best size (read weight), {just 300 kb to 500 kb} but also the quality of colours and depth is not lost if you plan to print them out in 4x6 format.
Add .mspx at the end.
Now the camera lens acts all stiff and when turned on moves out for a few millimeters and back in and makes grinding noises and after about 7 seconds a message appears that says 'PLEASE TURN CAMERA OFF AND THEN ON AGAIN'
I'm getting very desperate and I'm do not have warranty.
Please help!
Thanks
Ann
Thanks
Ann
However, AA batteries offer the convenience of easy availability - almost any store anywhere sells it. So if you run out of battery power, AA saves the day.
For experienced users who are well prepared for the day, either one works well. In fact Lithium serves better due to it's size and high capacity. For those who want to be free, sort of don't want to be tied down to the routine of recharging the batteries the night before, AAs seems to fit in well.
Probably there are large enough followers in either camp that prompt Canon to continue offering models that use AA batteries as well as models that use Lithium ion batteries.
TZ3 has a meter to measure the exposure but sometimes user wants to slightly under expose the picture or over expose it. The camera caters for this by allowing 1 or 2 EV steps under exposed pictures and 1 or 2 EV steps over exposed pictures. An EV step may be whole number or fractions of it such as 0.3EV.
So there will be a series of 3 to 5 pictures taken of the same scene but with different exposures with the correct one in the middle of it, hence the term bracketing. TZ3 does this automatically if you set it to auto bracket.
The term is very well explained in the DPReview Glossary which you can read at the following site :
dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossa...
I'm interested in some HDR imaging applications where at least 5 frames would be required.
Thanks for any help.
simplistic automatic use. It is extremely user friendly.. The" IS "in the A710 is stands for" image stablization "and it really works..The A710 is also has a threaded lense feature which will allow the use of filters,etc, with the purchase of a axiliary tube. Very few point and shoot, closed gate lense protected,pocketable ,digicams have this feature.. Your particular brand of shooting needs and research ==are the keys to buying the digicam that best suits you == hal5141
tere are many choices out there for digicams.
color pictures with an easy to use camera i am worried about blurry results and wondering if i should have gone with a canon thanks b
you have to choose between high speed, 9-pt, 3-pt or pinhole mode
hold the shutter button halfway to get a good lock... you can see the focus working(if its not working, release, and try again)
Does anyone know if there is some other setting I can try or do I have a dud camera? Thanks.
Autofocus is just handing over controls of manual focus to the camera. As long as you or the camera is controlling it, you're fine. Granted, autofocus does a generally great job, and is a LOT faster than manual. But if you're referring to the Panasonic Lumix TZ3, this camera does have autofocus, and it works completely fine (a little slower at the far-end zoom and in lower light, but that's typical of all cameras).
2. I want the audio recording option strictly for help in identifying the picture. I don't want the audio to be heard when I display the picture on my computer monitor or in a slide show. Can I turn it off for such displays?
Question #2, is a little more involved and may not be totally correctable. The TZ3 does allow audio dubbing and therein may be your answer. Once you've identified the picture and organized or manipulated it as desired, you can overwrite the recording (silence?) by following the steps on page 70, "Audio Dub".
I had set the scene mode to sports and enabled the anti shake to mode 2 but i still can't freeze the motion without flash.However it works pretty with the flash.White balance was set to the maximum.it seems the sports scene selection does not work with other adjustments.
I have the same problem with the intelligent setting as well.Is there a way to set a fast shutter speed?
plse advise.
I've had nothing but wonderful pictures with this camera.
Another option is SkinIt ( skinit.com/ ) which creates adhesive skins for all kinds of gadgets. If they don't currently offer the option for your model, they do take suggestions.
These days, you don't have to settle for the colors they offer. You can simply have them changed.
6th Ave. clearly states that they are.
Thanks,
Julie
You can treat Amazon.com and BuyDig.com just like any WalMart, Meijer, Best Buy, etc that you may shop at.
**Of course, we're assuming there are U.S. manufacturers these days. Most likely you're getting a Chinese, Taiwanese or Malayasian manufacturer now :P**
Life isn't black and white. Why should your camera settings be?
These guys have really said it all.
I think the few neg. reviews I've seen reflect operator error. The camera can't overcome an incompetent user.
I am trying to decide on which camera to choose: Canon SX100IS, Sony DSC-H3 or Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3. I want a small camera that has zooming as well since I travel a lot and that would be handy. Any other choice out there besides those three and what is the difference in features between them? I love small details, besides the major ones, so any features that you think will make a difference please let me know. Any help to make a choice is greatly appreciated.
Sail on - KC
also how does Li and AA battery differ in duration, which do u prefer..
Once again thanks for ur answer.
thats y i m thinking of canon SX 100 IS or SD 870 IS .. which one do u recommend?? for me the photos in the dim light or indoor like museum or acquariums should come nice.. ne camera will take a nice decent outdoor pictures.. so ne suggestions on this.. i m not going to bug u too much , this would be my last question .... thanks once again gor ur reviews..
I have noticed in several stores the many-layered shutter-like cover jammed partially open. The clerk's explanation was always..."Well, this is a demo with hundreds of hands handling this camera...it happens"
I want to buy this camera!
Is there any other digital with this 10x-Zoom, a 7+ Pixel count and the small size with the lens as good as this Leica?
Question: How will this do with macro. I need to take pictures up close of butterflies, etc. I use these and other little 'animals' in children's books I write. The TZ3 is larger than I would want, having seen some of the sony products, as a example on their "pocket size' for impromptu photo ops...but its features, we have discussed, out-weigh (no pun intended) a larger than life pocket-full ,
thanks again Lou
Question: How will this do with macro. I need to take pictures up close of butterflies, etc. I use these and other little 'animals' in children's books I write. The TZ3 is larger than I would want, having seen some of the sony products, as a example on their "pocket size' for impromptu photo ops...but its features, we have discussed, out-weigh (no pun intended) a larger than life pocket-full ,
thanks again Lou
camerarepair.blogspot.com/2...
It might not be the card reader, but the card. Check the compatibility of the card. You might need to upgrade your OS to be compatible with the newer equipment.
Andrew
By OS, I was talking about your computer's operating system (OS). Your card may not be compatible with your OS or possibly your card reader. The ScanDisk site ( sandisk.com/Products/Produc... ) will allow you to check the compatability of your device with your product. Ensure that you are on the right sized memory card on the site. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
finally got it to work, I am using Picasa. Now I was wondering if there is a way to put pictures in my email messages without sending them as an attachment? I have received emails from other people where the pictures are right in the message, without having to open an attachment, is this possible for me?
You should be able to copy them directly from Picasa and paste them into your email as an image. If not, you might be able to insert the image from the edit drop down box (depending on what email program you're using). Are you using Outlook?
Andrew
I am trying to give you your 2 points, but can't seem to find the place to do it.
Thanks for marking the best answer. It look like you got it on your own. Please come back with any other questions. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
the Canon G -9 has loads of virtues, too numserous to relate in a narritive of this kind.. .. It has a total MANUAL control capability and its auto settings are concise and user friendly to impliment // Low light photo ops w/o a flash--- (the Flash range is 17 feet max )are a pleasure because of the HI ASA capability and you can double the flash range to about 34 feet w/ a Speedlite canon flasH ( or generic copy) in place on the hot shoe on the G-9 -- great feature, and the auxiliary flash is matched to the on board flash w/ TTL technology ( thru the lens) / The G-9 stands at the top of the heap , with its excellent optics, face detection qualities, Image stabilization feature that really works, easy to hold for both vertical and horizontal shooting( many digicams are NOT easy to hold in the Vertical shooting position) and its full manual control modes..IT IS POCKETABLE( GET RID OF THE SHOULDER STRAP SUPPLIED W/ THE G -9 AND OPT FOR A WRIST STRAP)...tHE LENS IS PROTECTED WHEN IT RETREATS SAFELY BEHING A RETRACTABLE GATE..Many digicams use a tethered lens cap to guard the lens.. This is a throw back to film plane photograph, and not nearly as practical as auto protected behind the gate retreating lens... When set on aUTO the G 9 performs as a thinking and realiable machine. It is worth every cent of the $443 .. The panasonic TZ-3 does not have viewfinder, hot shoe, face dectection, digilogicadvanced optics , 12 MP ( only 8 mp) or the manual control the G-9 has.. It is comparing apples to oranges.. Amazon.com price..Hal5141
I would have to recommend the Panasonic Lumix TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Its higher ISO settings and image stabilization will make your photos that much better in low light situations. The 7.2 megapixel resolution will also ensure sharp, color photos that are easily printable up to 8x10" and larger at the finest resolution settings.
Andrew
I called customer service, was very polite, and stated my problem. My issue is that Theresa tried to help me troubleshoot it, and tried to get me to format it which you can't do with a locked card. She was no better help than myself. So, I got the standard fare of "send it in and we estimate the repair at $127" - oh of course don't forget to remove everything and put it in 2 inches of bubble wrap and a box of peanuts...etc.
Has anyone else had this problem? You all seem to very helpful and knowledgeable on the black screen issue. I have been a loyal customer of Canon for 17 years now with first an EOS rebel in 1991 (film SLR), then an Elan 7 (film - broke this year and too much to repair, but I figured I had my S2 IS), and the S2 IS - plus a videocamera. I expected better...
Thanks for your help in advance!
Stephanie
Thanks!
Stephanie
Don't worry about the points. Have you checked the toggle on the SD card to see if you're locking them when you put them in? There should be a small toggle on the side of the SD card that when switched to a certain position will lock the card. Check this before putting the card in. If this doesn't work, you might have a camera problem. When did you purchase the S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? If it was within a year, you should have warranty support for this issue.
Andrew
My cards are in the unlocked position - I even tried switching to locked and back. I thank you for the thought though, because if it were true, case would be solved. I do believe you are right though, it is most likely a camera problem. I just don't think it's worth the $127 to fix it, or Canon's idea of a "loyalty program" to give me a refurbished S3 IS, or was it S5 IS for $185. For 100 more, I could get a new S5 IS. My camera is 2 and 1/2 years old so it is well out of warranty. It's just that my Elan 7 (film) and my S2 IS have both quit on me within the last 5 months! You are telling me what I most suspect, that it is most likely a camera problem! I am going to call Canon and see, since locking memory cards and memory card errors seem to be quite a pattern for these cameras, if they will do better for me. I have been a loyal Canon user, but if I can't trust them to work more than 2 years, I need to switch to a more reliable company. It's too bad, because I had my eye on a smaller compact camera - the SD870 IS with only 4x optical zoom, but so small for my pocket. However, I like my 12x optical zoom on the S2 IS, that I would instead go with the SX100 IS with the 10x optical zoom, just a little bulkier. I may have to look at another camera brand to see if I can get what I want instead.
Thanks for the help!
Stephanie
If you're looking for a different brand extended zoom camera that is a little less bulky, you might try the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has 10x (28-280mm equivalent) optical zoom and fits into the compact camera category. Other features included are a widescreen shooting mode, a much larger ISO setting range (100-3200), image stabilization, and its an 8.5MP resolution camera. It measures only 4.2" wide, 2.37" high, and 1.47" deep. This is much smaller than your S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It might be worth a look.
Andrew
It sounds like you want an affordable, compact camera that works extremely well in low light that has a decent zoom too. I would recommend the Panasonic Lumiz TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The ISO 3200 and image stabilization settings will make your low light shots easier, it will easily fit in your pocket, and it has a 10x optical zoom, which will help you get "closer" to the stage for your band shots. The price starts at $239, making it reasonably priced for these capabilities.
As a side note, make sure you have permission to take photos of the band you're shooting. A lot of times, bands and/or venues do not allow photography. Make sure you know the rules, because they can confiscate your camera or not allow you in. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Any hand held camera like this is going to have some issues in low light if you don't use the settings correctly. Look at the overall ratings (an A) as well as these ranks from 391 reviews:
This camera is ranked
6th of 63 in 7 Megapixel
1st of 26 in Panasonic
4th of 55 in $200 - $300
7th of 88 in Ultra Compact
3rd of 38 in Extended Zoom
While Canon is a good camera, you're not going to get the higher ISO settings. These will really help your low light, and I own 3 Canons (two are dSLR's so you can buy lenses to deal with low light). The other is a PowerShot and doesn't do as well in low light unless you set it differently and have a tripod or monopod to avoid camera shake. I am still sticking with the recommendation for the TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
thank you so much for the quick response. you really helped me in the middle of crisis. and also thanks for the advise as well about photo shooting of the bands. very much appreciate it.
lalaine
1. Pocketable or un pocketable ( some larger Pand S digicams have nice features but are not pocketable due to their bulk. Pocketable is better -for true flexability and fast operation..
2. Automatic lens retraction behind a thin diaphram like plastic gate or the old SLR film plane carry over of a tethered lens cap tp cover over the lens when not in use... Naturally the auto gate retracting lens is more useful. faster and less hand motions. BUT it is fragile and must be protected against bumping in to other objects in bag or pocket. should be isolated when not in use.
3..The MP count. Of course the more the better. BUT within reason. A bottom number to accept is 6 MP.. This will illiminate some of the vast market choices in the P and S digicam offerings at the market place.
4. A viewfinder is most helpful in composing photo op situations where the LCD readout is not easily optained( too bright and too dark lighting). Of course you can do w/o it, BUT it is a nice tool to have on board.. Many P and S digicams have no view finders, so if you illiminate them your choices are again narrowed
5. Optical zoom capability- this is a deliniating factor in many digicams, and will further reduce your field of choices once you say this is the amount of tele zoom power I want as a MINIMUM--- 3 X - 4X- 5 x -6x- 10x - 12X- 15x and 18x all are available ---. a medial number seems to be a good choice. One trouble w/ long zooms is they go way past the flash capabilities of the digicam. example. Your flash range is 13 feet ( about average for most P and S digicams), that means in low lite situation , using maximum optical zoom power ,you are photographicing OUTSIDE the flash capacity to light up your snap. not good...so a long zoom thou on paper seems very nice, practically does not alway perform up to snuff.. The more you zoom the more there is light fall off ,w/o the flash.. so, long zooms can not always be applied depending on the nearness of the photo op.. The digital zoom is IFFY and not nearly as concise as the optical zoom. so it really is not a heavy duty factor in deciding on a P and S digicam..
6..Manual controls as well as automatic controls. if you are a creative photographer who likes to play w/ mode choices to produce photos w/ impact . and IS differant than the cut dry stuff that AUTO settings give, In this case consider only digicams w/ manual as well as auto controls.... This too narrows the playing field some what.
7.The size of the LCD readout. 21/2 inches seems like a minimum. screen LCD read out at this juncture.. 3 inches is a brilliant addition to a P and S digicam . This is found along w/ a optical view finder in very few advanced digicams.. To have a view finder and a 3 inch readout LCD. is a photog's blessing..Bigger is better,especially for those w/ poorer eye sight- the younguns don't care about this as much as their seniors..
8.. Battery power.-- AA batteries can be relplaced easily.also only two AA batteries is much better than 4 AA which some so called ADVANCED P and S digicams use. LITHIUM in all batteries is a key to long life in a digicam and less problems arise Indeed ,when- lithium is used..alkaline batteries can cause blow outs.Cheap generics run hotter than name brands The Other battery power choice IS , lithium reghargeable batteries which is the choice of many- photogs . A recharger is supplied w/ p and S digicams that use rechargeable battery packs (usually 2 batteries industrally joined to gether)... Always have spares whether they bE NEW lithium only A A s or a fully cxharged lithium base battery PACKS, whiCh may go about 200 snaps , with reviewing and HALF AND HALF flash w/ REGULAR SHOTS---playBACK mODE TIME and deltions all taking valueable battery power from the task at hand . OF field shoOTING. bOTH TYPE BATTERies have roughly the same life,--slide shows and erassing shorten battery life in a digicam ( variences do occur among the many models ,please keep in mind)in the long run , do you want to keep buying replacement AA batteries, or make the one time investment of a spare rechargeable battery pack?? depending on how convenient it is to recharge or not. this would be your main consern in choosing.----Many digicam P and S buyers, find the specs they want ,then the battery power running counter to what they THOUGHT they wanted- so compramise here, may be a must--which is better is entirely subjective..
9.. The type of digital card used. ---it can vary, Sony uses its own, no other digicam has this.--- universally there are three other choices.. the S/D ( secure digital) is the most previlent and probaBly the best choice due to its being available in Higher GB cards -- all the way up to 4gb is pretty comman now a Days in the static digicam marketplace,-- HI SPEED ONES ARE READILY AVAILABLE IN THE s/d FORMAT-- Not so easily found in other styles.. SO CONSIDER UNIVERSITALLITY OF YOUR READ OUT DISC AS A IMPORTANT FACTOR.
10..fLASH RANGE . MOST P AND S digiacams have limited flash range, so the addition of a auxiliary so called slave flash usually doubles the flash range--- average 13 ft. flash range doubled to 26 ft. flash range is pretty standard w/ the addition either by hot shoe on top of the digicam or bracket held on the bottom thru tripod coonnection hole ,w/ auxiliary flash on the side of the P and S digicam -- not all P and S digicams can synscronize w/ additional flash units, so this is a research point...also some P and S digicams can thru the use of a tube and a thread around the perimeter of the lens use a extra tele or wide angle booster lens plus accept filters.. a real nice addition, giving the P and S some of the qualities of a DSLR and more compactly and flexable .,thou really not as efficient optically.. .
there are more considerations, naturally, but these 10 items are sort of major in ferreting out the right digicam-- remember what PRESIDENT Abraham LincoLn said AND YOU CANT GO WRONG. ---' YOU CAN PLEASE all OF THE PEOPLE some OF THE TIME , AND some OF THE PEOPLE all OF THE TIME ,BUT YOU CAN'T PLEASE ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME--- choices have to be made..hal5141
As for date stamps, as the digital file is marked by a date and time when it's saved, the use of a date stamp feature in digital cameras has lost popularity amongst camera manufacturers as a feature. And I don't think it's a big deal as a result of that. One thing I like is the GisTeq Photo tracker. It's a GPS device that fits in your pocket that can "synch" with the pictures your take and not only show you when they were taken, but allow you to map them using google or flickr. Very cool and useful.
But one can add a date/stamp in post using a utility like MAGTIME - filedudes.com/MagiTime-down... But beware, once you do it, it can't be undone.
Another problem is the pictures I take with the zoom (optical) are really grainy & dark. I took pictures at my daughters school - the room was very brightly lit, yet when I zoomed in - even just a little - the pictures are dark. I took ones without the zoom, and while they're brighter, they're grainy.
I'm thinking of returning this one and trying the Canon SX100IS, even though the battery life is a drawback.
I really want a point & shoot camera that does most everything on the Auto mode, as my Canon A70 did. And I certainly don't want to have to take kleenex over the flash of a brand new camera. I'm gonna do some playing around & research some more, but I'm thinking I'll go back to Canon.
If you like the feel of the Canon's shooting capabilities, I would recommend moving to the Digital ELPH line. The Canon SD850 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) fits into your specifications decently. It has 8MP, is under $300, and also comes with Image Stabilization, which will help reduce camera shake issues in low light photos. It does lack a little in the optical zoom department (only 4x).
If you're willing to move away from Canon's you might try the Panasonice TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also under $300 with image stabilization, has 7.2MP, but boasts a 10x optical zoom. This will get you that much closer to your shots. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
You can open the lens barrel up to fiix the covers, but only as a very last resort. The above procedures normally work if you try them enough. But for those particularly nasty stuck mechanisms, here's an example repair on a Canon Powershot A400 (do this at your own risk, and it will void your warranty):
camerarepair.blogspot.com/2...
#1----THE TZ-3 USES A AUTO LENS RETRACTION GATE ,SHIELDING THE LENS BEHIND A THIN PLASTIC DIAPHRAM WHEN THE tz-3 IS NOT IN USE.. THIS IS PREFERABLE TO THE TEETHERED LENS CAP, A THROW BACK TO FILM PLANE CAMERA. Helps the TZ -3 to be less bulky and more pocketable than the Sony H -3..
#2----The LCD screen is on the TZ -3 is 3 inches, the LCD screen on the SZony h-3 only 21/2 inches. This is a major diferance, especially w/ those having weaker eye sight. The TZ- 3 LCD screen is brilliant and like ALL LCD screens conks out in real bright light -- Then you use a guess or by god system of framing your subject. Neither the sony H -3 or the panasonic TZ-3 have viewfinders...
#3------The wide angle capability is greater in the TZ-3 , it is 28mm, while the sony H-3 starts at 35mm. This wide angle edge comes in handy when shooting groups of people or scenes that you want to encompas more on the sides
Overall , the TZ -3 is more user friendly. Less work to get to a desired setrting. The Tz-3 has a full 22 scene modes and you can set any two , simply dial betwween them- a great feature. The Sony H-3 has considerabvly less scene mode settings-- The TZ -3 is has a liieca lens which is a excellent one. The Sony H-3 uses a special memory card peculiar only to SONY and not nearily as available as the more ubiquitous S/D memory disc.. The S/D memory card is universaLY AVAILABLE AT MANY OUTLETS. . iT IS A LITTLE EASIER TO HANDLE THAN THE SONY MEMORY CARD ,WHICH IS SMALLER.. sO, what do we have?? A close race , but overall the Panasonic TZ-3 is more user friendly, is quicker to get off a shot, and is pocketable w/o strain ---other finiter differnaces are prensent also, but the ones i have MENTIONED ARE the major differances as a subjective opinion, the Tz-3 seems that would satisfy more photogs ,more of the time and give more user satisfaction. hal5141
I mean what format I should try to reformat it.
Any one has any experience so far?
My sd is non SDHC 4 GB sd card. Connect3D is the maker.
This is the link if you need to see what card it is.
anitec.ca/product/9673/conn...
The card you purchased does not have the SDHC standards on it. This camera will only work if a larger format SD card has the SDHC standards. See page 96 of the camera's instruction manual ( service.us.panasonic.com/OP... ) for an explanation. Sorry it won't work for you.
Andrew
It explain every thing.
Glad we could help. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Larry
I have the following questions about the TZ3:
- I regularly go to VERY loud rave-parties and need the camera not only to perform well in those very specific lighting-conditions but also the sound of the movies is going to have to be really good.
I don't mean stereo-soundquality or something, but rather some kind of dB-cut so that its still very audible and at least recognisable. The previous two digicams I've had were useless: the bass just blew away the hyper sensitive mike untill only heavy noise remained with almost no discernable melody left... I know the Sony camera's are excellent but there I don't like limited zoom and overall image quality.
Is the TZ3 the cam for me I wonder? I'm also considering the Ricoh Caplio R7 btw, just to let you know;).
it has a mono microphone <-- you listen to stereo speakers/headphones...... theres quite a big difference imo....... still, the TZ3 mike should be good enough... go to a local electronics store and test it out(record it to your own SD card and take it home)
the TZ3 doesnt do very well in low-light conditions...
This first movie is made using a Canon Powershot A710is:
youtube.com/watch?v=brbMYt4...
The sound is cr*p especially as soon as any kind of bass sets in.
This second movie is filmed using a Sony DSC point & shoot compact cam (not the newest model either). As you can see we're quite up close to the booth as in the first clip (which was filmed zoomed in) so the noiselevels are about equal, yet the Sony has absolutely no problem processing the sound: it's all clear and buzz-free and this is all without any kind of processing or post-editing of any of the movies. Even the older Sony's are like this.
youtube.com/watch?v=JsRdr9v...
I want to know if the TZ3 (or Caplio R6/7 for that matter) has this kind of sound or more like the Canon?
heres two sample videos, the first one is quite clear, but theres no ambient or other background noises like people screaming....
sendspace.com/file/26mteu
the second one is a video of your second movie... not the best comparison though, but i dont have a video of a concert on my TZ3 and i dont my speakers can replicate the type of music or decibel of those concerts.......think Sony's sound might be better than the TZ3's
sendspace.com/file/6s2me8
can't really test the bass ....
the sample movie @ photographyblog.com/reviews... probably not as good...
wats the model of the Sony P n S?
The Sony is the DSC W55 (called my friend to check:P). But also the earlier models have this kind of great sound-quality.
And you're right with not being able to test the bass in any kind of situation aside from actually standing in the middle of it. There's just no comparison and thus no way to tell how a camera performs untill you've tried it out "in situ" as it were...
The reason my hopes are so high for anything Panny is this:
youtube.com/watch?v=6NQhia1...
As you can see in the comments that movie was filmed with a "Panasonic Digital Camera SDR-S150" and I was hoping all Panasonic movie- and photocamera's had more or less the same technology applied with regards to their sound-recording...
amazon.com/TZ3-audio-OK/for...
keep in mind that the TZ3 cannot zoom while recording in movie mode.... this kinda sucks
btw, google shows SDR-S150 as a video camcorder with a stereo mike
Interesting... Hadn't read about this before.
Yeah I know the S150 is a moviecam, so kinda expected the stereo mike thing:P. Found a bit of trance/rave-footage filmed using one of the FZ-series and the audio there was good also so I think I might just risk it and buy TZ3 as soon as my Canon's sold...
If that happens in the very near future (like, within a month or two) then I'll post back here to let y'all know how this little cam performs under such extreme conditions, hopefully with some good footage to boot.
Thanx so far for all the comments and so on!
Ah well... I've kind of made up my mind to get it anyway and just see (and hear) where it gets me. I thought I might have picked up on it sooner if it indeed did have those audio-settings, what with all the reviews I've read the past year or so...:P
before you get TZ3.... maybe you should look at Casio V8's Stereo quality...
forums.steves-digicams.com/...
sample video: megaupload.com/?d=QA0VLWKF
much clearer than the Tz3, and there's ZOOM!
You're confusing me now..:P The options sound great on the Casio, specially since there's the possibility of a manual mode so more room to experiment (thought that's done me no good with the Canon and it's not a priority). There's one partticular fireworks pic that impressed me, thinking pix taken at parties might be usable after all, despite the bad reviews about some massive colour-shift and noise at anything above 200 ISO... I loathe this kind of lens-design though, but on the other hand it should all be about the image quality in the end and if this delivers then why not? Price here in Holland is about the same as the TZ3 so it's worth considering.
Just not sure about the audio again as I've seen/heard movies filmed on other exilim-models that were worse than the Canon as soon as the bass comes in... Stereo or mono is not the issue, the speaker/recording/processingsystem is.
The slim "pocketability" of the Casio is attractive though... I'll read some more reviews and see if I can find some more samples (preferably movies filmed at raves or something;)).
Thnx again!
[EDIT:] youtube.com/watch?v=2emT-8c...
Seems even the loud noise in the bar was too much for the mike... :( So based on this vid I can only conclude that although its got stereo-sound, the mike is too sensitive for my purposes. There's a Sony out there much like this one which might be worth considering after all but so far my mind is still set on the TZ3 untill I find a vid like this to make me reconsider;). FYI!
[another EDIT:]
youtube.com/watch?v=EwFG4EQ...
:D If this is the quality of the TZ1 then I think I should be ok with the TZ3...
[/EDIT]
1) took out optical zoom during movie mode
2) took out folded optics and now the lens extends more <--- could be forward, could be backward
anyways, post a video of the TZ3 if you get it...
I hestiate to pick it because of for one thing: the lens opening is square instead of round. This prevents attaching a wide-angle magnetic lens to compensate for the somewhat "tight" 38mm built-in lens. While the V8 is a great cam, some digicams have a 28mm lens, giving a better wide angle view. Makes a huge difference, I think. You might sacrifice a little quality putting on a magnetic lens, but for video it looked good enough for me. For examples, do a Google search "site:vimeo.com 0.45x".
I currently have a Kodak EasyShare v1253, which I may return for a V8 despite that. Does movies in stereo also, but only captures at 16kHz, which gives a bit of a muted, muffled sound. It also allows optical zoom during movie recording, but the optical zoom is (1) clearly audible in the resulting movie file when you use it, and (2) limited to five fixed positions that the motor will move to. The V8 has a silent or barely audible zoom, -and- it's 7x vs 3x, -and- it seems to have more than one speed setting. One review I read said there were at least 30 "stops" of the zoom.
Thanx for the info, although I'm not considering the V8 at all anymore because of the high sensitivity of the mike as I mentioned before (see also the clip filmed using the V8 in the bar).
It's either a TZ3 or maybe a Sony after all if the Tizzy's gone down in (audio-)quality from the TZ1 which was used to film the last clip...
Cheerioz!
Your best bet will probably to go with the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is an ultra-compact camera (pocket sized), and it has 10x optical zoom. Another helpful feature is the ISO 3200 capability of the camera. It will allow brighter pictures in low light settings (perfect for the low auditorium lights during your kids' concerts). Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Hi.
I fully agree with Andrew's recommendation of the Panasonic TZ3. Just don't expect miracles when using the ISO 3200 setting since higher ISO setting always cause more noise (graininess) in the picture.
Unless the auditorium is small, a 5X zoom may not allow you to zoom in as much as you want. However, the 10X on this Lumix TZ3 should do the job and with 7 megapixels, you'll have room to crop in your computer OR use the digital zoom in real time. Just realize that using the digital zoom (or cropping in your computer) means you are giving up pixels which just means you won't be able to enlarge the picture as large. (usually no big deal).
This is a fine camera which should do well for your stated purposes. Be sure to get it well before the safari and practice a lot before the big trip. You'll want at least two extra memory cards and one (or even two) extra battery(ies). The battery is good for at least 200 shots and is CIPA rated at 270 using the Lithium battery which comes with the camera.
You will want to research this camera yourself. Try this URL for a start.
digitalcamerareview.com/def...
Larry
1. It is difficult to hand hold STEADY , there is no firm place to grip the little things. Especially when shooting VERTICALLY - it seems to be a challange to the digicam as well as the photog to get a grip on things.
2. The dials and buttons are made for wee people with tiny fingers. The on / off button is usually miniscule. The dials hard to not override the intents ( especialy in the samsungs and sony offerings) there is a overlap of your hand possibly turning on and off your desired settings.
3. The flash range is limited, usually 8 ft at the worst and possibly 11 + feet at best. Not a very useful range and you can not add a auxiliary flash to aide the on board flash.. There is a new ultra thin digicam out that claims a 20 ft.+ flash range, but it has been tested ,and the "white out" of subjects w/i 6 ft of the flash is horrendous ,killing any decent balanced exposure. I won't even mention the name as it is not worth researching..
4. Some new ultra thin p and s digicams have newer higher tele zoom optical lens.. Again the further out you zoom, the steadier platform you need to get a none blurred photo .. Less light is let in as the zoom extends and you are way out of your flash range at the longest zoom ranges( say 10x at a new casio ultra thin offers) so forget flash fill in w/ long shots. makes for gousts and shadows..THere usually will be NO viewfinder to help you locate subjects when sun and darkness preclude the use of the LCD readout..
5. finally-- The TZ -3 and its ilk will fit into the smallest of pockets , mens and ladies alike- the bulge is there on tight clothes in its case as well as a ultra thin digicam .. Ladies, can just carry a handbag to accomidate a p and s digicam of choice. Thats easy.. What is not easy ,is getting decent photographic results that will satisfy viewers of your snaps With a ultra thin digicam, especially action ones..You will miss MOVING photo ops much more easily than w/ a good pocketable P and S digicam--- MOVEMENT of the digicam and photog can kill the best of action shots..You are one smart lady , figure it out - too small is TOO small- unless you are a spy and want to hide your digicam, and the ultra thins will HIDE w/ alactrity , just misplace it somewheres once and you will know full well the meaning of TOO small.. Read my review of the TZ-3 over (above) and you will see , the major attributes of a slightly larger package, may lead you to change your thinking on ULTRATHINS-- and finally ---Your photographic needs seem to be made mainly of action and moving photo ops , not stationary posed photos.. The ultra thin meets the needs of the latter, but not the former hal 5141
Here is the ONLY camera I could find fitting two criteria as you stated: zoom at least 5X and ultra-compact (here defined as no more that 0.8 inches in depth)---
Samsung L77 --- I could only find limited reviews
picturecorrect.com/camerare...
steves-digicams.com/2007_re...
ephotozine.com/article/Sams...
review.zdnet.com/digital-ca...
I am not familiar with this camera so can not advise, but at least some of the user reviews really liked it. It is NOT perfect by any means (some purple fringing, poor macro?, ) I did see a low price of $200 at Circuit City but I don't know if that is a limited time sale price. You should be able to get it for less than $300 at other places too.
Risa, you must check this camera out carefully yourself. I am not recommending it (nor recommending against it).
Good luck and I hope this does it for you.
Larry
cameratown.com/reviews/revi...
Larry
TZ3 -- wide angle equals good group photos or landscape photos, 10x zoom, different aspect ratios :hint widescreen, kind-of pocketable
V8 -- much smaller (but this means less light hitting the smller lens, but im not sure about the low light capabilities), 7x zoom, records in H.264 (good quality in small video, but might mean compression artificats), VERY Pocketable
the thing that i like about the V8 is that you can ZOOM during video mode (good for backrow concert), something you can't with TZ3
also, V8 has stereo sound, better than TZ3's mono
TZ3 says Travel-Zoom 3.... its easier to use zoom on Tz3 because of its size(V8's rectangular box is hard to hold)
i like the Tz3 better than the V8, but i think V8 suits you better
(for those with V7 and those lens alignment issues, Casio's fixed the problem in the V8, hopefully wont have the same problem again)
(you probably wont go higher than ISO 800 on Tz3 or on any camera because of the noise issue)
marc.merlins.org/perso/revi...
Larry
Larry
I am looking at these cameras. The Sony T70, Canon 870, and the Canon 950. The 950 is a little out of my price range, but I just want opinions. I want to know which has the better image quality, more zoom, I basically just want an opinion on these cameras. Have you used them before? Which is better and in what ways?? Please explain your answers. This is worth 15 points. Please help quickly. Thank you!
I'm outlining the major specifications for the three cameras in the following order: Canon SD950 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), Canon SD 870 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), Sony T70.
- Megapixels:
12.1 vs 8 vs 8
The extra resolution will be noticable in large poster print sizes, if you're not printing over 8x10" or just placing the photos online, you won't see much difference between the 12 and 8 MP.
- Optical zoom:
3.7x vs 3.8x vs 3x
I'm a big fan of optical zoom. The more you can get the better. Digital zoom will cause you to lose resolution, so I try not to use it at all. In the case of these cameras, the difference in optical zoom isn't that big.
- ISO Range:
80-1600 vs 80-1600 vs 80-3200
There is a bit of an argument about the pros and cons for a higher ISO setting. While you do get more noise or "graininess" with a higher ISO setting, you get a lot better performance in low light settings. I like the higher settings and just use some software, PaintShopPro, for noise removal after transferring to my computer.
- Manual Exposure Capability
yes vs no vs maybe
The Sony gets a maybe because it is not specifically called out on camera's specification site ( sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/st... ) but it does site step increments for exposure control. This leads me to think you can control the exposure level manually. I like this because you can adjust the camera to do what you want it instead of just auto settings.
- Image Stabilization:
yes vs yes vs yes
This is a great feature to have in low light settings and/or if you have shaky hands.
- Face detection technology
no vs no vs yes
While this may sound neat, I've heard some issues with this. If your subject isn't smiling, the technology doesn't work as well.
All in all, I like the Sony T70 the best. The ISO 3200 setting really does it for me. I also like some of the other features that come with the camera like widescreen capability and the smile technology sounds very interesting (takes pics automatically when the subject smiles or laughs). I'd be interested to see how that works, but the camera seems pretty functional beyond the tech stuff as well. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Tyler
I'm glad we could be of assistance. Please come back to DCHQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) with any more issues or questions. Happy Holidays.
Andrew
You chose the Sony T70 because of the ISO setting.
I have no idea what ISO is or what it does for your pictures.
Could you please explain why a higher setting is good to have.
Thanks!
ISO settings are comparable to film ISO settings. These numbers refer to how much light is exposed on film in a certain amount of time. The higher the number, the more light. They actually have a one to one ratio. For instance, ISO 1600 will allow twice as much light in as ISO 800. In film, its how fast the silver halides change when exposed to light. The settings in digital cameras were made similar for an easier translation from traditional film photography.
One thing to be aware of with higher ISO settings is the increased "noise" issue. Higher ISO settings do cause a greater amount of graininess in the photos. This can be reduced with noise reduction options in photo software like Paint Shop Pro and Photoshop.
To sum it up, higher ISO settings let you take more visible pictures in low light situations.
Andrew
So you told Sony T70 will be the best choice from compacts? What will be the best choice now from compact cameras?
From the choice of the three cameras outlined below, I liked the Sony T70. What are you trying to do with your camera? You can see some differences in top rated compact cameras here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) for a better idea.
Andrew
Some of the Canons have face recognition technology, but not all. Thank you for pointing out my error above though. The Canon SD950 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the SD870 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) both have Canon face detection technology. I have heard its not the best when people don't have a big, teethy smile either.
The Canon SD950 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does have manual exposure control, not focusing though.
I need a camera to take a good picture, it has to be small enough to put it into the pocket. That's basically everything what I expect. Pictures I'm taking during the trip, party with friends/family. And if I want to take a picture of nice view (mountains, architecture), it will allows me to do that and everything will be visible on the photo. Price, I don't really want to pay more than $300-$350, but to be honest I have no clue how expensive is the camera, which will satisfy my "huge" expectations. What would you recomend me? I am a photo amateur.
Sebi
You should be able to get all of that and more. Something like the Panasonic Lumix TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a great option for you. It is small enough to fit in your pocket, has an amazing 10x optical zoom for better close ups, and a wide angle lens (28mm equivalent) that will help with your landscape type photos. It also has some settings that enhance low light photos without a flash (image stabilization and higher ISO functionality). You can also pick it up for around $200 right now, so that is well below your budget, but still has all the functionality you're looking for.
Andrew
Maybe there is different equal option, because I hate this design of camera....:P and I don't think I will be using so big zoom. btw, do you know how does look like photo in 10x zoom made by this panasonic?? is it quality the same like without zoom?
sebi
I have a plan of buying a camera and for some reason i hold canon as better compared to sony,as snaps out of canon are really good, can you suggest me the best one in the canon brand,major features which i look for are :
1. good amount of optical zoom with IS
2. More Pixels
3. manually configurable
4. pretty good memory slot
more over my craze for camera being good is, when i zoom on to the picture on my PC, the pixel should be clear and the picture should not get blurred for a good fare amount of zooming
I have an eye on A570 IS , A590 IS, SD870 IS and SD1100 IS.
Kindly suggest me the best one,as this camera is one i am looking for from long time.
Will look on for your valuable reply
While the cameras you have listed are decent, they won't have the zoom you are looking for. I would recommend the Canon S5 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to suit your needs better. It has 12x optical zoom with image stabilization. This camera also has a shoe for an external flash and can accept extender lenses with an adapter tube. This will give you even more flexibility. At 8 mega-pixels of resolution, you'll find it more than capable for large size prints.
If you feel this camera is too large or too much (around $300), you can try the Canon SX 100 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It also has a 8MP resolution and 10x optical zoom, but is a bit smaller in size and runs around $200.
Both cameras have manual controls for focus and exposure. They also use SD memory cards and AA sized batteries. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
I go for canon 870 due to it is wide angle, and better image quality, also partly becos of its large lcd screen.
You pretty much hit the nail on the head. If you want high quality pictures buy a Canon.
Also for the people buying a camera based solely on the Mega Pixels read this. 6mpixel.org/en/?
first, I appreciate your work.
I own a t70 and im unable to capture an image with more than 2.5 mb of size.
could u help me in taking a image with more size (which increases the picture quality) so that image wont get distorted when zoomed.im worried for this since last 4 months.i shoot in day light and my maximum pictures contains faces..plz help
The image size will depend on how much detail there is in your picture. If you take a shot of a blank wall the size will be much smaller than if you take a picture of grass. If you take 10 pictures of with different subject matter, they will all be different sizes on your computer.
btw, in auto settings with flash on, and shot with a distance of 1 to 2 meters from the object(with face detection ON), the image is good but when zoomed in, the image is getting distorted. How to get rid of this. though the image dimensions are 3072*2304 in 8 mega pixel setting.
And can u plz explain the term NOISE in photography.
tnx once again.
Digital noise comes from two main sources. The first being the inherent noise in the camera's sensor. This is exacerbated by heat buildup on the chip from multiple exposures or long exposures, or by having many photosites clustered onto a small chip. Digital SLR's have less noise than point and shoots cameras because the image sensors are much larger. The second source of noise is from the ISO rating. The ISO setting amplifies the signal through the chip, much like turning up the volume on your stereo. With the volume at 3, you can't hear the noise in your stereo, at 10 you hear the hiss through the speakers. This is amplification noise.
Noise Ninja and Neat Image do a good job of making it less noticeable, and in some cases almost eliminate it altogether.
what about this PHIL
Thank You,
Rosh
I usually do research on cameras. To my knowledge one should always look in to Megapixels, Optical Zoom (dont even worry about digital) and aperture (especially when used for indoor shooting). and ISO range
8-10 Mepapixels is really good
3x is ok , 4X is good and 5X optical zoom is better
coming to the aperature , It should always be high. For instance say f/2.0 is better that f/4.0
let me define few terms
Focal lenght: the distance between the camera lens and the sensor is called focal lenth. For a good camera the focal length should
be always less. f is the focal lenght
Aperature : is the maximum opening of the lens. say if aperature is f/2 , then the lens gets opened by half of the
focal length which enables to gather more light and thus avoids the use of flash. Now a days we can get a maximum aperature of f/2.8.
Note . a camera with aperature f/2.8 is far better than a camera with f/3.5 and also this will be little expensive than the later one.
Coming to the ISO setting .
Usually it is recomemded to take picture on low iso when there is enough light and vice versa.
This really doesnt matter when you have good aperature
CONCLUSION
i would go with canon sd 950 among those three.
with regards
sundeep
1...The TZ-3 has a 3 inch LCD screen vs. the 21/2 inch LCDscreen on the SX100is.. Neither digicam has a optical viewfinder, so the 3inch LCD screen is a definate plus in the TZ-3 , but that is bascially the only advantage the TZ-3 has over the SX100is
2...The TZ-3 uses a rechargeable battery-- The Sx100 uses only 2 AA batteries , Use only LITHIUM for the best results and longer lasting durability.-- Replaceable AA batteries are boon if you are away from electrical hook up ( in other countries you may need a low voltage converter to recharge the TZ-3 battery) AA batteries are ubiquitous and so so easy to replace.
3.The SX -100 has manual overrides, so the photographer can control TOTALLY what the digicam sees- Its AUTO mode works as well ,if not better than the TZ-3's, BUT the TZ-3 has NO manual controls that you can set..Creativity in shooting is not as easy w/ only AUTO mode availability.
4.The flash output on the SX100is is slightly greater than that of the TZ-3
5. The SX100is has FACE DETECTION , the TZ-3 doesa not. This works to brighten a face or faces in a group- making facial features stand out especially with lots of distracting other eliments that may be in the snap..
6. The SX100is has POSTCARDS feature which allows you to automatically imprint the date on the lower right hand corner of print. It is a 4x6 print format, but ,if you are like most tyrols (would be ,wanna be photogs) shooting 4x6 's, will be your main effort. The TZ -3 does not have this feature.
7. Canon Digic II technology is a far advanced Digicam technology ,that all their rivals ( including Panasonic) can not currently duplicate.. Canon research teams do original research to get to this vaunted place. the TOP - Panasonic research consists of testing their competitor's products and culling the info to improve by comparisons with them. A vast differnace than original research. Canonis the number one digicam seller, and this is one of the reasons.
8.The canon sx100 is is easier to hold for Vertical shots, it has a small grip which allows a firm grasp. The TZ-3 when held in the vertical position is sort of our sinc with the holder. Bracing has to be the order of the day ,when shooting Vertically w/ the TZ-3. It is the placement of the shutter button,which makes all the differance..
9. The iso ratings for the TZ-3 do not match up to that of the SX 100 is - Regardless of what the specs say, the iso ratings usually fall somewhere beneith the stated figures. Not alot ,but none the less ,lower. The Canon Iso ratings are RIGHT on target for almost all their models , the SX100is should bemefit from this fact.
10. AND finally , both digicams are user friendly, but considering the fact the SX100 is has the added complexity of manual control ,not available in the TZ-3 , the user friendly portion is not deminished in any way. Simple straight forward steps allow the manual overides to be used., with alacrity in the SX-100is
In conclusion, both are really nice 10X optical zoom P and S digicams- The TZ-3 also has a wide angle lens capability greater than the Sx100is , but not by much --You must be careful w/ the TZ-3 when shooting closeups of pets and people to get out of ther Total wide angle mode, or you get some wide angle distorsion -- 28mm vs. 35mm. The TZ-3 has the 28mm wideangle capability, but 35mm ( the SX100 is wide angle is a distorsionless) is the most used of all lens setting for the familiar photo ops such as kids, portraits,pets, groups,still lifes. Only if you are paparezzi, a voyeur, on safari, or a spy then 35mm is no longer your lens setting of choice...You get the picture!!! .. hal5141
I've also heard that the canon drains it's batteries quicker, which to me isn't good no matter what the style of battery is.
Thanks in advance on any help!
"The TZ-3 has the 28mm wideangle capability, but 35mm ( the SX100 is wide angle is a distorsionless) is the most used of all lens setting for the familiar photo ops such as kids, portraits,pets, groups,still lifes. Only if you are paparezzi, a voyeur, on safari, or a spy then 35mm is no longer your lens setting of choice...You get the picture!!! "
28mm means it can capture a WIDER image. What does that have to do with paparazzi and voyeurs? I don't think papparazi are out there trying to get great shots of the New York skyline.
That entire list is bizarre. There are lots of comparisons of these cameras out there (google it) from people who have actually used both. The TZ3's lens is a huge difference between the cameras.
I'm not sure which camera is better as I only own the TZ3, however I wanted to point out that the comparison post above is wrong on a few things. The TZ3 does have auto face detection and it can imprint the date on a picture. You do not need a voltage converter to charge the TZ3s battery. You just need a plug adapter to physically be able to plug the charger into a European outlet.
As far as the wideangle, I found it to be extremely useful when I was vacationing in Europe this past year. It was great to be able to take pictures on the street without having to keep stepping back like with my old camera. I have not noticed the problem of distortion, but I am not an expert so cannot say. Maybe it is more of a problem with that Nikon camera? I know different manufacturers use different technology for processing the image so perhaps the TZ3 is better at compensating for the distortion than the Nikon.
Also, no one mentioned this, but the TZ3 actually has a larger sensor than its megapixel count indicates. It is actually an 8.5 megapixel sensor so that you can take pictures and videos in widescreen mode without them being cut down. I view a lot of pictures on my computer and I have a widescreen monitor so this is a great feature for me. I have read elsewhere that when shooting in 16:9 mode, the camera can capture even wider scenes than 28mm. I don't know if the SX100 has an oversized sensor.
Hope this is helpful.
"Best" is very subjective; it really depends on what you want to do with the camera. The Canon is a very well known brand that lasts. I've had an SD230 Elph for almost 6 years and it still works great. The TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes with a lot of great features though. The 10x optical zoom, ISO 3200 setting and wider 28mm lens choice are all very appealing. I would go with that camera because of those options. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
These are both really nice cameras, but there are slight differences you should know about. (It is never about best, it is about pros and cons and what do YOU prefer).
SD870is has macro down to 2cm vs TZ3 with macro down to 5cm distance from front of lens.
SD870is zooms from 28 to 105mm vs TZ3 from 28 to 280 --MAJOR difference in telephoto function.
SD870is continuous shoot at 1.3 fps until your card is full vs TZ3 at 2 fps OR 3 fps maximum of 5 shots in a burst.
SD870is has slightly faster lens at widest setting f2.8 vs TZ3 at f3.3 (VERY minor difference unless you are in low light).
SD870is shoots video at 640 X 480 (standard VGA) vs TZ3 at 848 X 480 (16:9 ratio which is "wide screen").
Size wise the TZ3 is about 1/3 thicker and more than 50% heavier than the SD870is. (Not that either one is beyond pocket size, just that the SD870is is easier in the pocket and that might make a difference to you).
This information comes to you complements of dpreview.com.
Enjoy, Larry
#1. anticpate the action and hold shutter button down 1/2 way before shooting - This gets you a fast reaction
#2. use fill in flash, again w/ Shutter button held 1/2 way down in anticipation of action shot. The flash mode insures a rapid responce by giving a fast shutter speed.
#3. Use SPORTS or KIDSand PETS MODES in your SCENES groups. Either one quickens the shutter responce.. Holding thew shutter 1/2 way down in ancipation of photo op particularily works well in the SCENE modes.
#4. Try shooting at the 28mm Wide angle Station , wide angle is more forgiving , than tele , and less chance for blurring in most cases..
#5.Increase the ISO settings to give faster shutter speeds to capture ACTION
#6. USE only the FINE (versus regular) mode for your shooting . It increases finite resolution of the snap
#7...The trick is to get fast shutter speed exactly at the time your best photo op is available..
#8. Turn off infra red assist beam in good lighting situations for action shots. This beam searches out subject, and micro seconds are involved for it to be operational.. Do w/o it at well lit photo ops.
9. Make sure you are at peak battery performance level , BEFORE your photo op - batteries w/ part of their power drained, slow down shutter responce and increase the probability of real shutter lag.
#10 Make sure your Lens is CLEAN, any type of haze,film, or smudge on the lens slows down the ACTION process..
#11.. Use a ultra fast S/D card, not necessarily a hi capacity one . They are usually marked "HS" for high speed.. It can't hurt.
#12.. Turn off the Image stabilization feature ( 1 and/or 2). micro seconds are involved in setting this feature. If the TZ-3 is braced well, this will speed up things , and you will still avoid blurring.
In conclusion, even though there are no manual controls, per say on the TZ-3-- there are lots of ways of increasing Shutter speeds, as shown above. if you experiment w/ White balance ans EV settings( exposure changes by 1/3 incriments) you will come w/ some ideal settings to match your photo op closely. The very best way to confound the shutter lag is to ANTCIPATE the action,and have your shutter half way down , and ready to shoot. The TZ-3 is really a fun camera to use from a subjective point of view. Its SHUTTER LAG inconsistancy is inherent to most P and S digicams. The challenge is there, and even the greenest of tyrols ( would be ,wanna be photogs ) can figure ways around SHUTTER LAG -- believe it or not, a digicam that makes you use your brain in snapping away is your PARTNER and you are combining talents w/ it... Hal5141
Also, is it the shutter speed or teh time it takes to complete the taking of the picture taht bothers you?
The LCD automatically brigtens photos for easier viewing from the LCD screen. You can either adjust the brightness on the camera for the photos you are taking, or use software to brighten the photos once you transfer them. Microsoft Office Picture Manager has some basic options to edit picutres, including brightness and contrast fixes. These should make the basic corrections you want. If you want a more comprehensive software package, Adobe Photoshop and Correl PaintShop Pro offer a lot more functionality. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Gerald
I'm glad we could. Thank you for visiting DCHQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ); we look forward to you coming back.
Andrew
On this particular camera there are a couple things that you can do:
First you can increase the ISO setting. When you double the ISO number you effectively double the amount of light let into the photo. While this is very effective, you do increase the noise or "graininess" in the photo.
Another way to change around the lighting is to play with the exposure control settings. Instead of just using the auto setting, try one of the other settings based on the environment you're in. If you're outside on a sunny day, use the daylight setting. If you're inside use the shade or halogen setting. Play around with it to see what works best.
As always, adding lights to the photo will always help. Direct them towards your subjects. You can even tilt a lampshade to allow more light to reach what you're photographing to add more light. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
If you want a pocket sized camera with a lot of zoom, the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be a great choice. While its slightly larger than the Canon listed above, the zoom capability is much better at 10x (28-280mm equivalent).
While you might find some of the automatic settings less flexible than you're used to with your SLR, it will suit your other specifications. The 7.2MP resolution will be great for prints at 8x10 and even 20x30 at the finest resolution settings (with minimal to no cropping done). It also takes movies in Quicktime, motion JPEG format with a built in microphone. The camera also has a built in speaker for reviewing the movies you take.
Other nice features are the image stabilization, wide screen capabilities, and the ability to accept the new, larger format HCSD cards which will store more pictures with 4GB capacity and more. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting on your upcoming trip.
Andrew
1. Be sure to purchase your camera well in advance of the trip and practice lots. Especially get familiar with the results of the different resolution settings and picture sizes including the wide screen setting. Load the test/sample pictures in your computer and compare. You may find that less than the maximum pixel number looks just as good on your computer screen and takes less storage space on your memory cards. You may also find that the wide screen format looks better (or worse). Also, consider whether you plan to print your pictures to paper and, if so, try some on your printer and/or at your local stores for quality/results. This is a big trip so some checkout procedures such as these can save major headaches later.
2. Make sure you have proper adapters for your battery charger. You might even want to get an extra battery and take it with you just in case.
3. Plenty of memory cards are a necessity. The speed is judged by Class and the capacity by GB. The cheaper Class 2 cards will do fine for taking the usual shots. You only need the faster Class 4 for video and the Class 6 for continuous/burst mode shooting. Large capacity 8GB cards are needed only if you are going to video long sequences (30 minutes and more). Except for video, you are better off to have 4 of the 2GB cards rather than 2 of the 4GB cards because that provides insurance against a card failure. Even if a card fails, don't throw it away. The pictures can almost always be retrieved with software. (Don't even worry about it unless it actually happens).
4. IF you manage to fill up all your cards, you can find local camera shops that will burn your photos onto CD's so you can reformat your card and go again. (or go to an internet cafe and do it yourself if your are tech savvy).
5. Some of your most dramatic photo ops in Italy will be early morning and late in the day. Take a nap during the day if you have to in order to get up early and get some of those gorgeous shots everyone will oooh and ahhh over when you get home.
6. Practice taking indoor photos WITHOUT flash. This is so you will be ready to take photos in the museums and cathedrals without flash and get the best results you can. Try lots of different settings so you are familiar with your cameras capabilities.
Enjoy to the fullest, Larry
Sandy
Irwin
Just my impression from reading lots and lots of reviews -- I doubt that the TZ3 will ever match up to your SD700 in sharpness. Panasonic just uses too much noise reduction and it softens the whole picture up. Most folks don't print their images to paper and those who do mostly just print 4X6 and never notice the difference. I just looked it up again and there is no option to adjust sharpness, saturation or contrast in camera for the TZ3.
Thanks for the quick - and reassuring response. Now that you mentioned it, I realize that my kids all simply keep photos on their computers, smart phones, etc. We like to actually print ours on at least 5x7, if not 8x10 photo paper. So the quality and sharpness is great concern to us. Because I am also intrigued by a true wide-angle capability, I think I'm headed toward the Canon sd870. Make sense to you? Anything else in the ultracompact range to look at?
Irwin
A wide angle camera might keep you occupied for quite a while from what I have read. It's not just for wide group photos and scenic panoramas. You might want to read some at kenrockwell.com on wide angle lens photography. Here's a sample photo of his showing how really wide angle shots can allow you to look absolutely straight into a very close object (fan) and the far horizon (to the right). kenrockwell.com/trips/2007-... Totally wild. Of course, he was using 14mm lens to get that effect, but that's the idea. The wider angle lens allow you to get closer to the foreground while maintaining the distant background as an important part of the picture. Of course, it is also wonderful for the panoramic shots and wide group photos (kids baseball teams, etc).
I would like to buy a compact digital camera, which can serve longer and should be around $200, any sugg?
Gopal.
You have given me a very broad category to work with and not any specifics of how you intend to use the camera. So I'll try to make some suggestions for you to research.
Canon A720is, A650is, A570is, S3is, SD800is and SD850is
Panasonic TZ3
Olympus SP-550UZ and 560UZ
You might check these out by clicking on the "Research" button found at the bottom right hand corner of this page.
Good Hunting.
the question:
some cameras have an active orientation sensor during playback mode(meaning a portrait photo would remain right-side up regardless of landscape hold or portrait hold, i.e. it truly auto-rotates based on orientation sensor during playback... is there a way for this to work on the TZ3?
It is under the cons of "no orientation sensor!"
in EZ-Mode, (lets say u use the 3-mpix-EZ mode that gives you 15x zoom)when you use it past 10x zoom, the camera automatically crops the image sensor.... u'll only use the center part of the image sensor, and u'll only get a picture of 3 megapixel
so essentially digital zoom is interpolation to give you the resolution you want(and the pic usually isnt that good)(its like taking a 7 mpix picture, and zooming it 200% using a computer)
EZ-zoom makes sure the picture in your memory card is exactly what you get from your image sensor(its like taking a 7mpix picture of the same thing and using your computer to crop the middle portion and discarding the rest)... thee are benefits to using EZ-zoom -> you get more control over focus and metering
sorry about the delay in response.. just got back from BVI.. got some great underwater pics w/ the tz3.. wish i had more time w/ the cam before i went would have done more underwater videos.
Second - consider the card speed for your needs as follows: Class 2 (the slowest) is fine for regular snap shots even at the highest resolution and picture size; Class 4 is needed for shooting the best video on this camera; and Class 6 will give the best results when you are shooting in the continuous mode (taking shots as fast as possible). The difficulty is how do you know in advance when you are going to want to shoot continuous mode so you can change cards before going out that morning. If you don't know, then just buy all Class 6 cards and don't worry about it. Compared to the cost of the trip.......
Third - Buy trusted brands from a trusted dealer. There are lots of counterfeit cards floating around that say 2GB Class 6 on them and may even have a well know brand name printed on them, but inside they are not the real deal and don't do what they should.
Fourth - You'll need a plan for what to do when you fill all your cards!!! Are you taking a laptop with you to off load them? If not, you can 1) take more cards than you could ever use, 2) have them transfered onto CD's at a local camera shop for a fee, or 3) purchase one of the new devices that is basically a hard drive that will off load your card's contents so you can reformat and keep shooting.
Bonus Free Advice - Start now practicing taking indoor pictures without your flash so you'll be ready for all those museums and cathedrals where they don't let you use flash photos. Try out every possible mode on the camera in low light conditions and be really familiar with what works best in what situations. You'll be glad you did.
Reminder - Get that second battery before you go and charge it up. While you have your charger out look at the specifications printed or embossed right on it and see the voltage and frequency ranges. Some chargers nowadays will work from 100 to 240 volts and 50-60 Hz which means all you'll need for Italy is an adaptor to change the USA prongs to Italian prongs. (If your charger only accepts 110 volts you'll need a transformer and the adaptor).
Enjoy your trip, Larry
they may say 1000mAh, but may be fake, or the test is not accurate, or the battery doesnt last as long, and they dont use quality cell to make the batteries
the TZ3 has the S007 battery.... its a fixed size, meaning you can only fit a certain amount of cells in the battery before it overheats and die out....... 1000 mAh should be a good highest-estimate for a battery of such a size
if you want a higher rating, either carry out an extra battery or those portable battery chargers
I have a panasonic TZ3 and i wanted to know if any has problems with it mine it takes a few photos and then it saya memory card error wht does this mean and it says this whenever i charge the battery and replace it can anyone tell me how i can sovle this
thanks in advance
sree
I need to buy one or two new batteries, but if I get them into the same state after a few months of use, I'd almost rather switch cameras to something that takes regular rechargeables...
Any tips?
//ata
anything above that, its really hard to use as a good photo
theres a "HIGH sensitivity" scene mode that uses ISO 3200, but its almost useless as the noise would kill you
the higher ISO (ISO = sensor sensitivity), the more light the sensor takes in, but you get image noise
digitalcamerainfo.com/conte...
scrolll down to the "still life scene" and compare the different ISO photos. the higher ISO, the more unwanted noise you see
therefore, try not to go above ISO 800..... otherwise you will have to reduce the image size to hide the noise, and u'll probably get a maximum 4x6 good photo. there are photoshop filters that try to remove the noise, but you reduce the detail/sharpness of the picture. in fact, some TZ3 reviews dislike the algorithm used by the TZ3 image processor to remove noise in high ISO modes as it takes away too much detail
Hope that does.
Good luck!
TZ1 (older version of TZ3, but no wide angle, and need a lens cap)
Casio EX-V8 (smaller size, ~ same price as TZ3)
pre-order, available in April 2008:
TZ4 $300, VGA video recording
TZ5 (HD 720p video recording, $350)
for TZ4/5, would recommend you to wait at least a few months after being available for reviews/image quality
the wide angle, though, is a great feature that I love
go to a nearby camera store/electronics store like BestBuy, bring a memory card and test the camera.... the large electronics store and indoor-conditions should be a good test condition for your home
To be honest, the best types of cameras for interior phtography are a dSLR with a wider angle lens 15 to 17mm or even a view camera (flim type). You will be able to see a lot more of the space that way. I've done some interior photography and use a 17mm lens for it (see pics below). Any point and shoot with the wider 28mm lens would be ok, but I would recommend using the timer and a tripod to make sure you get the steadiest shot possible.
Andrew
Interior Photography Examples ( gallery.blackdoorphotos.com... )
You might try the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has an amazing 10x optical zoom for a mid-sized camera, and up to 3200 ISO which helps in low light photo taking (it will add some noise to your photos, but it will get the photos to begin with). Based on over 430 reviews, this camera scores at 4.5 out of 5 stars. You may see some reviews on poor indoor quality, but they don't sound like they used the correct lighting balance for the situations they were in. I would still recommend this camera.
Andrew
For the extended zoom that will give you good performance indoors, I would try the Panasonic FZ8 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It offers 12x optical zoom to get those long range shots, a high ISO setting for lower light situations (this will add more noise to your photos though), and Image Stabilization which helps for both the long range shots and low light situations. The 7MP (+) resolution will make this a great camera to print photos from. You can also manually focus the camera, giving you the ability to take some selected focus shots. The shutter speed ranges from 1/2000 of a second to a full minute of opening time to allow more light in. You can also find it for just a little more than the TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) above. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Again, thank you for your input and suggestion. I have looked at the FZ8 and really thought about purchasing it. It sure sounds like a good starting place for me. This size camera is what I am more interested in, just because I think they will take better photos with more zoom and features. A happy medium?? I hope so! Thanks again. TT
Its not a problem at all. Good luck in your search. Also, please try to direct your questions to the site here at DCHQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/ ). Happy shooting.
Andrew
Is the TZ 5 a huge improvement?
though the pre-production pictures doesn't seem that much of an improvement from the TZ3
if you can put off purchasing a camera til may/june, wait til then, reviews of TZ5 would come out and you can decide, or wait until TZ5's price drops or snatch up a cheap TZ3
Thanks for your reply. There are so many choices in cameras filled with more features than the average person needs. The more research I did, the more confused I became. Ultimately, I went with the Panasonic TZ3 because of the 10x zoom and it was the one that felt most comfortable even though I felt that some features were not on a par with the Canon 870 IS. Then again, neither one of these cameras is perfect so I simply made the best decison for my photography needs. Thanks for your help and input.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
If, however, you take a lot of 8x10s and above, that extra boost of MP will begin to show up and be noticeable. So, going with snapshots, I'm not really too thrilled with the 6mp cameras out there. So let's go up a little larger to 7.1 mp ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Still very good for the job and you have lots of options, including:
The top ranked Fuji Finepix S700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a 10x optical zoom which is pretty darn good. Then, there's the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has a 10x zoom and optical image stabilization. Both are under $200. And although it has a slighly smaller zoom at 4x, there's the Canon A570 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which makes up for it's lack of zoom with image stabilization. And at under $75.00, you can't beat the price.
Lastly there's my personal favorite in this class, but it's a tad bulky ... the Olympus SP550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has a whopping 18x optical zoom, image stabilization and still weighs in at around $160!
Lots of options and all WELL below $299.
I had purchased a kodak two years ago (5 megapixels and 4x zoom) and do not like the quality of pictures I get from it (especially when I try to zoom in on my kids at sports events and concerts) so I do not want to make a bad choice again-
As an aside, I have seen and tried the Olympus 1010 in a local store For about $269 (Sam's Club), and I will PROBABLY be buying that camera for my wife and not one like the W170 or the original camera, the T300, I was thinking of getting for her before I confirmed that its pictures were basically crap.
But I will give you that nobody is selling it for cheaper. I'm simply skeptical of those "get our card and we'll give you a steal of a deal" deals.
I did buy the Olympus camera (because of all its other great features and apparent quality-I hope) DESPITE being a Canon/Fuji person and the one big thing I hated about it and that was its proprietary XD memory card. Olympus looks like it might be ready to give up on it because it included a Micro SD to XD card adaptor. Now, all I have to find out is if, in addition to the lower price and higher GIGs available for Micro SDs, does the adaptor allow the faster SD card processing or is the internal camera electronics going to forestall that? Any ideas on that one? Haven't bought an XD card yet but, if I do, it will be the somewhat faster "H" series.
I would think that at this stage, an adapter would handle the faster cards. But if it's not the case, it will be a few month's down the line. Moore's law being what it is.
Thank you-
Once again that you for all your help- Don't want to invest in another camera that I regret buying-
BTW - I recommend you put the picture on flickr and just point a link to it. That way everyone can see it.
HAL - there is an argument out there about being over overburdened with technology. It's the multiple remote control syndrome. Why not have one that does it all and does it well? I, for one, will welcome the day when I don't have to bring a camcorder, still camera and cell phone to Disneyland and still get the same great quality.
I agree- if I want to not bring a camcorder and a camera to a school play where my child will only be on for about 2 minutes why can't I just bring a camera take pictures and get a quick video of the play? I don't think that is asking to much in this day and age of technology- And I would love to see the picture however maybe you could do a picture on flickr and a link-
Bye!
I had to reduce the size because Picasa Albums was going Bananas with the original 4.3 MBs for one picture.
thanks for all the input-
hal5141
The Olympus cameras 840, 1010, etc have a firmware upgrade. If you use the Olympus brand M+ XD card you can get unlimited video length when combined with the firmware upgrade. Found more info on the olympus site.
Good luck - I'm trying to decide between Sony W170 and Olympus 840 or 1010 too and this discussion was helpful.
carol
S700 camera has firmware updates too, from fuji´s official page. It´s standard to have a non limited video length (just limited due to card capacity). With upgrades, this units can use up to 8GB SD cards, on where you can store about 145 minute video. It´s amazing, not?
The TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will perform just fine in low light, but uses higher ISO settings (as would the TZ5K ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or any other point-and-shoot camera). The higher ISO settings allow more light in, so you can see what is in your photo, but you will notice some graininess in the photograph (as result of the higher ISO). This is going to happen with any point and shoot camera in lower light. The camera will either adjust to a higher ISO, or leave the shutter open longer (causing blurs from movement or camera shake). On a dSLR, this can be combatted with a wider aperture setting, but the point and shoots aren't that advanced. If your budget calls for it, you could pick up a dSLR camera with a "fast" lens, or stick with a point-and-shoot at a lower price.
Andrew
img215.imageshack.us/img215...
img220.imageshack.us/img220...
img220.imageshack.us/img220...
low-light (evening, no flash, kinda dark.....but i only went to ISO 200 and you can see the noise, therefore the slow shutter speed..... not that bad if you only print to 4x6)
img215.imageshack.us/img215...
As far as the other point and shoots are concerned my observation is (and I am by no means an expert) that the longer the zooming range of the camera , the more it struggles in low light (they have to sacrifice the sensor size to accoomodate the lens) - bearing in mind that the TZ5 is 10x optical zoom and at the same time quite compact in size .
Of course lens quality etc. might make a difference but the general rule remains .
Where did you read that the TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not photo well in low lighting? If you use a higher ISO (which the camera has the capability of), the photos will not come out as blurred as with a lower setting. Given, this may cause more "noise" (a grainy look to the photo), that is the case with any camera on a higher ISO. A better way to combat this is the use of a wider aperture on the camera's lens, but that is not adjustable on a point-and-shoot camera (only on more expensive dSLR cameras). With the right settings, the TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will perform just fine in lower lighting situations, and I suspect the TZ4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would also.
Andrew
Thank you so much for your response! I read a review by someone that said the TZ3 did not do well indoors and that is one of the reasons I am looking for a new camera. I have a point and shot, sony cybershot that is a few years old. It takes nice pictures as long as there is plenty of light but, indoors , it does a terrible job. I love to take pictures (and video with the camera) of family, friends, pets and action shots. I'm looking for a new camera, small with a good zoom lens but, simple to use for someone who knows little about cameras. I have been doinga little research and I think the Lumix TZ4 would be a good one for me. The shop where I am buying the camera offers classes so, that will be helpful. I'm just wwant to make sure I am making the right choice! Any suggestions? I thought the Sony H7 or there was a Lumix with 12x lens would be neat to have, but it might be too much camera for me and maybe too bulky. THank you for your help!
One more thing. I notice that the TZ4 does not rank very high compared to the other cameras. Is that because it is new of should I be looking at another camera?
THank you,Suzie
You might also want to consider the Canon SD800is which has about the same low light function as the TZ3 plus adds a viewfinder and keeps the wide angle lens same as the TZ3 and 4 and about the same small size.
Really any of the point and shoot cameras are going to be less than ideal in low light conditions simply because they all have the small size CCD light sensors and lots of pixels crammed onto them. Any more than about 5-6 megapixels and the light sensitivity starts going down.
Solutions for the low light situation includes -- Use the flash (some do better than others); add an external flash unit (generics are available which fire when they see the built in flash fire); increase the ISO setting and put up with the graininess of the pictures; get a camera with manual control and learn how to use the aperture setting for maximum light input; get a camera with manual control and a tripod and learn how to use the shutter time setting; Wait a few years and hope they come out with small cameras with larger CCD's; get a digital SLR (already has the larger CCD's) but they are much larger cameras than what you are considering.
If you like everything else about the TZ4 except the low light problem, then I would suggest giving it a try hopefully buying it someplace you can return/exchange it within 60 or 90 days.
Best Wishes
Andrew
THank you so much for your response. I really appreciate your response and the detailed instructions you gave me. That was very helpful (you deserve a best response too but, it only let me add that once!). I am going to study your email so t hat when i make my purchase, I will know what to do in low light situations. The salesman said Panasonic no longer makes the TZ3 but, I see that there are still some available for sale online. I was thinking about going with the TZ4 simply because it is the latest model and it sounds like it is pretty much the same (right?!) with a little extra, to it. But then again, maybe I should go with the TZ5?! I don't know if the 4 & 5 came out at teh same time or if the TZ5 is newer than the TZ4?
THAnk you, Suzie
Thanks for your suggestion on the TZ3. I just posted the following on the response from Hal: The salesman said Panasonic no longer makes the TZ3 but, I see that there are still some available for sale online. I was thinking about going with the TZ4 simply because it is the latest model and it sounds like it is pretty much the same (right?!) with a little extra, to it. But then again, maybe I should go with the TZ5?! I don't know if the 4 & 5 came out at teh same time or if the TZ5 is newer than the TZ4? Buying a new camera can be overwhelming for someone like me who does not know much about cameras!
THanks,Suzie
What do you want to spend on this camera? What size are you looking for? If you're looking for a compact, multi-function camera for under $200, I would recommend the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has a wide range of capabilities to include image stabilization, and a 28mm wide lens. It also has over 3 times the optical zoom capabilities of most cameras in its class (10x vs. a normal 3x). Unfortunately, most cameras under $200 aren't going to give you the best "rapid fire" functionality for taking one picture after the next. This camera does have a sports function mode that will allow you to take 3 photos per second, so that might work for you. Good luck.
Andrew
the panasonic lz7 is a very good camera for a novice .
it has great optical stabilization system (mega ois)
a great zoom ,top quality lens and best of all it is easy to use
i have a panasonic lz3 .
i have had digital cameras from hp, nikon ,hitachi
all were of sub standard built quality.
my panasonic , is very well built . i have taken hundreds of photos with it ,even dropped it afew times.
here is a link to to a photo of some glasswear taken using a lz7
flickr.com/photos/smeegol/5...
There is no manual control persay, but you have at least 4 differant options for low light photo ops.. !. you can push your ASA all the way up to 3200 - very considerable, 2. you can alter the white balance to incorporate low light shooting, 3. you can use various SCENE modes ( and you have 22 choices) to adapt to the subject at hand. 4. you can adjust the EV settings in increments of 1/2 stop (up to 3+) and open the lens wider to let more light in. Make sure you are on #2 image stabilzation mode and also that TZ-3 is well braced for any of these low light shots.. There are other methods of coaksing the TZ -3 to allow more light in to lens for low light shots. experimentation is fun and the desired results can be optained . I shot a very low light sun set in naples ,Florida a while back w/ the TZ-3. Shot at 1600ASA , had camera set on self timer on a rail, so there was no movement, adjusted WHITE BALANCE for natural low light , and was very pleasantly suprised w/ some decent photos w/ good resulution . The 28mm wide angle feature works really well, and remember to move it up a bit to at least 35mm if you want close ups of people- otherwise you get some distortion, which is inherinent to wide angle shooting. The edges of 28mm close ups tend to be elongated when viewing.. For landscape shots and still lifes the 28mm feature is really a nice bonus in the TZ -3 . many digicams in this price range have a wide angle capability starting at 35 mm-- The extra 7mm of wideandle ability is very evident ,in the special situations you want wide angle capability.. all in all the TZ-3 with its 10x optical zoom is extremely versitile, especially for a digicam w/ NO manual controls such as APITURE or SHUTTER preferred modes. You really do not miss them , after becoming familiar with all the little tricks you can do for action and low light shots. These two photo ops ,being the acid tests for a decent digicam. Doubt very much if the casio sliver thins can beat the TZ-3 in adaptability and flexability.. hal5141
Each of you provided very useful, unbiased information. I appreciate the time you took to answer my questions. Steve, your photos are great and I hope I can do as well. I wish I had half the knowledge of you guys. Thanks for the hint on using the sports fucntion mode...sounds like that would work for the kids' photos. And Hal, your many suggestions to address the low light issues will give me challenges to work onLooks like I will be buying the Panasonic and doing a lot of practicing.
Thanks to all of you for your insights.
Martie
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any other questions or issues. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
May I know where can I buy TZ3 below $200?
I found it at Circuit City for $229.99 That is the least expensive place locally I could find. I put put in Panasonic tz3 in my Google browser and it came up with a site called Robo Shopper where you can see local stores that carry it. I checked the Sears option and their website even has a short video that gives a virtual tour of some of the camera features. I am not sure from my research if you can find it cheaper. From some of the reviews I have seen on other websites the camera is sold out in a lot of places...which leads me to believe that Steve, Hal and Andrew know what they are talking about. Hope that helps.
Martie
one point the photos are not mine i just linked to them
here is a link to one of my photos.
flickr.com/photos/stevemcca...
The Fuji S5700 (also known as the S700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) is a great value for your money. It has good optical zoom at 10x and a very wide ISO range with manual exposure settings to get the exposure you want for your shots.
You might also try the Panasonic TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has very similar capabilities (10x optical zoom, 7MP resolution) to the Fuji, but it is a bit more compact and might travel easier.
Have fun on your trip!
Andrew
Fuji FinePix S700
Canon Powershot SD1000
Canon Powershot SD750
Canon Powershot A570 IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ3
automatic retractable lens.. . There are little form fitting hard plasctic cases available for about $5.00 after market , if your TZ-3 can not be isolated in your gear.. The only one word you have to remember is ISOLATION ---So, in conclusion, your TZ-3 lens cover should not stick, providing you protect from other objects in a sack of any kind. Keys,nail files, and objects with edges can do irreprable damage to the TZ-3 lens cover mechanism. The simple answer is to isolate the TZ-3-- in so doing you prevent any contact w/ this operating mechanism, in so doing ,allowing it to perform its task of opening and closing flawlessly.. I have had my TZ-3 for almost a year- I carry it in a front trouser pocket ( don't want to sit on it) with absolutely NOTHING else in that pocket -- The TZ -3 has performed tirelessly, reliably, and unscathed with no problem.. One last caviat-- water and or moisture in any form can do a job on any Digicam lens and lens housing. Care to dry the moist surfaces w/ a Lens cleaning cloth or non abrasive
similar material, if moisture has been a factor at a photo op. ...Again, do not EVER apply downward or inward pressure on the lens housing-- and be GENTLE--- If you should have a problem with a lens retractable gate that will not budge , take it to a reliable CAMERA SPECIALITY shop and ask for the digicam technician to look at it. ------The best settings for indoor activities, especially moving ones like a dance recital would be CHILDREN and PETS scene mode, with the WHITE BALANCE set to the indoor lighting that prevails ( tungston or florescent), in so doing you avoid the yellow cast tungston light causes and the bluishness florescent lighting causes in the finished print.. With the TZ-3 this is most easy to do, as the menu mode choices are very easily ascertained-- THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO GO ALSO - your choice of 22 scenes modes IS the ultimate key to get the saturation and resolution the TZ -3 is capable of producing.. .. hal5141
generally, the quality of generic batteries is as good as a panasonic OEM battery, but of course u have to be careful
Because these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and battery chargers are often not equipped with certain protective devices meeting the industry's basic quality standards, using or recharging these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs could cause your camera to malfunction, or lead these battery packs to overheat, leak liquids, ignite, or explode. In the worst case, this could not only damage your camera or camcorder, but also result in fire, burns and/or injuries (including loss of eyesight). Accordingly, these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and/or battery chargers should not be used.
Of course, with the TZ3 you can just zoom in camera and get the shot you want IF you have enough light to work with.
this is a very good concert camera it has a long zoom and good low light functions
it is also small and light
take a look at techwiz photo set on flickr
flickr.com/photos/tecwiz/17...
Low light conditions is one of the weak points of virtually all P&S digital cameras. The other weak point being "shutter lag".
For sneaking cameras into concerts you do need something in the UltraCompact size range.
Alternative to the very nice Panasonic TZ3 would be the Canon A710is which is a little bit larger but still "sneaky" size. It only has 6X zoom.
As a general rule, to keep the low light capability as good as possible, keep the MP down. 4MP is plenty for a 5 X 7 inch print. 7MP is plenty for 8 x 10 inch prints. You only need more MP for two things: 1) larger prints and 2) more cropping.
The other factor which affects low light capability is the aperture size. The smaller NUMBER apertures are bigger openings and so let in more light. For concert photo purposes you'll need to compare aperture size at the telephoto end of the zoom. Most point and shoot cameras are around 5-6, and remember smaller number aperture is better for letting more light in.
Go to this panasonic website and enter your zip code for a local store to purchase Panasonic CGA-S007A battery
www2.panasonic.com/consumer...
Having looked on the internet at length I can see your frustration. I did find a non-Panasonic brand battery at eBatts.com. Panasonic website indicates this battery is not available directly from Panasonic yet they quote a price!
Let us know if you find a genuine Panasonic battery for the TZ3 (fits TZ models 1-5) so we can pass it on.
Best wishes and let me know how it works out for you.
Thanks again. I will definitely post feedback if I can get my hands on TZ5 to test it at least.
I hope we get comments from others on this topic.
cameras.co.uk/reviews/panas...
here is a link to Scott Beveridge's photos of his grand children photographed using a tz3
flickr.com/photos/scott_bev...
The specs for the CGA-S005A is 3.7V, 1150mAh while the replacement battery for the TZ3 is a CGA-S007A, 3.7V, 1000mAh.
If the size and battery polarity of the S005A matches the S700A, can I use it?
Would appreciate your response. Thanks!
The replacement battery you found will work , but it won't last as long because your mAh is lower.
You can go directly to the Panasonic site ( pstc.panasonic.com/Epartr/P... ) to order parts, but you might find a better deal through an online retailer.
Andrew
I'm glad I could help. What other feedback are you looking for?
Andrew
No worries, but I've had similar issues with different batteries. It isn't necessarily the camera, but the specifications of the battery. I hope this helps.
Andrew
It is 3.7V and 1000mAh li-ion
I bought a spare battery (not panasonic) on ebay which says 3.7V and 1000mAh but has the code CGA-S007E. Is it ok to use this battery in the camera, despite the slight difference in codes? I only intend to use it as a spare, in case the other runs out unexpectedly.
Can you get more powerful batteries that last longer that would work in this camera?
Thanks in advance
Sarah
Stick with the recommended models.
Tried googling the problem at your hand. And here is what I found.
fixya.com/support/t443024-b...
Seems to be a common with others makes too!
Very sorrry about the situation.
Next - do you have a separate SD card-reader? If not I recommend yo use one instead of the transfer cable. Provided you get one that it SDHC compatible you nearly always get a faster transfer to your PC from a dedicated card reader and you may also be able to see the missing files (but not necessarily)
Last resort is to recover the data from the SD Card.
The best software I have found for this is from a company that recovers hard disks and lets you have a cut-down copy of some of their recovery software but only works on recovery of photos from memory cards. Others have recovered some but this one always seems to get the most:
mjm.co.uk/freephotorecovery...
HTH
Neil
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
panasonic.net/pavc/lumix/tz...
Thanks for reading.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
Thanks to you all for your help! Cheers!
Good blees Croatian football team!
I have a panasonic TZ3 and i wanted to know if any has problems with it mine it takes a few photos and then it saya memory card error wht does this mean and it says this whenever i charge the battery and replace it can anyone tell me how i can sovle this
thanks in advance
sree
I am not used to 'SMS kinda lingo'. Don't know, whether it's a question or information...
Also, does not get in my brain without any punctuations, spellings, grammar or whatsoever. This kind of question would fit on Yahoo Q&A. Yes!
everyone is not an expert in the english u would understand and i have not asked u to correct my english paper so back off if u could not understand my question u should not have bothered to reply
-Put camera in a bowl of uncooked rice to draw out moisture
-Gently clean the battery connectors inside with a q-tip; use rubbing alcohol (a TINY bit) to get the connectors clean of any water residue
-Point a vacuum cleaner at your camera (from what feels like a safe distance away) and gently move it over the areas you think moisture might have hidden.
An ultra-fast memory card speeds up the time it takes the memory to "write" to the camera. This is a process that you're probably not even aware of as you shoot. Some people say that faster memory cards will improve your camera's shot-to-shot time (the time before you're ready to take another photo) and this isn't really true. What determines that is how your camera is performing. The main times I recommend a high-speed card to anyone are 1. When they are using a pro camera, 2. When they shoot in RAW (a professional image format that is very large and only available on dSLR cameras, and 3. when they often use the "burst mode" which takes multiple photos in quick succession. The thing is that your mem card can never move faster than your camera; having the fastest mem card in a camera that isn't capable of going that fast won't do you a bit of good.
I'm fairly sure the TZ3 can take advantage of high speed cards; it's a speedy little camera. But whether you would see any notable difference kind of depends on how you shoot, and there are times when a professional using a dSLR doesn't even "need" the high speed cards. So my guess is that it wouldn't necessarily give you any benefits, unless you can foresee situations where file sizes might be huge and speed might be a factor.
I personally think you'd be fine with the card you have. But can I make a recommendation? For the trip of a lifetime, go with a couple of cards; if you want 4gb of storage, buy two 2gb cards. That way if one fails you don't lose all of your photos!
I appreciate your time and detailed answers.
And you're right, the card won't affect your picture quality at all. The only way a memory card would play into picture quality is this: if you set your camera to high resolution (better quality) photos, then a larger mem card will hold more of them. But the card itself won't affect your quality in any way.
Even if the card reader doesn't work, it's a worthwhile investment because it saves wear and tear on your camera when downloading photos, and tends to have a lot less errors and problems. Definitely worth trying to read your card in one of those.
and i just wanted to mention that, both original and third party battery seem to heat up the same amount.
As for photo management software, Google's Picasa 3 ( picasa.com ) is one of the best photo management utilities going and it's free.
also how do i garentee im buying genuine panasonic batteries online and not cheapy imitations
charger is not out of the relm of reality-- again , let panasonic guide you, they have excellent serve reps on the phone that are very Panasonic knowledgeable hal5141
I would suggest getting a card reader for $10-20 and a copy of Picasa3 available free from Google. By using these two you will overcome all obstacles to the transfer and organized storage of your images in your computer. Picasa3 will detect the photos already in your computer and be happy to add a gazillion more as you take them for years in the future. This is a very low cost and virtually fool-proof solution to your dilemma.
I've also tried loading the newer photos on the card with Picasa 3 but my response is "A file error has occurred while importing files. Canceling import."
I guess my next steps will be do manually delete the photos on the card that are already in one of the new folders and see what happens to "Easter and beyond."
Would a card reader make a difference over the USB connection?
I tried loading with Picasa 3. It looked hopeful but I got the message "An error has occurred during importing. Either the source in unavailable or the destination is full or readonly (10)" A second attempt gave me the message "An error has occurred while importing files. Cancelling import."
The moral of the story here? Get your pictures off as soon as your done that day. And carry a spare card. Any card can fail, and to have a backup will enable you to keep taking pictures.
Thanks & will reply again soon!
Now it appears I need a way to get the photos and videos off the old card. So in a way, both James and Larry helped with a solution. I'm not sure if this is the time where I assign points or if the problem is solved once I've retrieved my photos.
Do I need to post a new question? Thanks!
James's advice to use F-Recovery (or similar software) to retrieve whatever remains on the old card is the way to go.
There is no rush to award points. You may do so at any time you feel appropriate.
I would suggest posting a new question only if you are unable to completely resolve your problem through this thread, and so far, it looks like you are doing great. Keep up the good work and hopefully all will come out right.
Just let us know how we might be of further assistance.
Thanks to James and Larry! Love this site!
-clip boards, and scene 2 is not recognized but movie mode when turned off and then re started in "I" mode sometimes(rarely) will take still pics. I love this camera but need all of it to work. Help please, thanks so much.
Thank you very much for your help.
Lorraine