Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Ultra Compact Digital Cameras category.
Panasonic Lumix TZ5
Editor's Review
The TZ5 is getting kind of old. There are plenty of new cameras with 10x zooms. Check out the ZS3, for example. Here's what we had to say about the TZ5 when it was released in January 2008:
With its 10x optical zoom, huge for its small frame, the Panasonic TZ5 is the brand's new best-in-class for compact superzooms. In addition to the lens, it features a 9.1 megapixel sensor paired with the new Venus IV image processing engine, which aims to significantly reduce image noise. A 28mm wide-angle lens means it's easy to get good shots of landscapes and large groups of people, and a big 3.0-inch LCD screen that adjusts to various lighting conditions makes it easy to review them. The camera does not feature any manual controls, meaning it's strictly a point and shoot affair, but Panasonic's Intelligent Auto mode makes the best of this. The icing on the cake is 720p HD video recording.
Specifications
- 9.1 megapixels
- 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom, 28mm wide-angle lens
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 30fps movie mode with sound
- 720p HD output
- Auto exposure
- Auto focus
- 3.0-inch self-adjusting LCD screen
- Secure Digital storage (with 50mb internal memory)
- Lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: DMC-TZ5S
- UPC: 5025232463367
- Release Date: Jan 30, 2008
Shop for TZ5 Accessories
Panasonic Lumix TZ5 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
the battery does not stay charged when in my camera even when it is off. canon's website says to send it to them for repairs costing over $100 - not worth it.
is there anything i can do to fix this issue?
thanks!
Any suggestions ?
When I went to panasonic website, I didn't find "TZ5" and I was afraid whether they will provide support for this model. Instead I found other TZ series cameras.
It seems that Panasonic is now reproducing this model with a different name like "TZ5S", "TZ5K" etc . My question is "Is there any difference between old TZ5 and new "TZ5S" or "TZ5K" ?
They have a firmware update-I am not sure of what all it does update however. I am looking into the update to see what it does-I know it helped with a searching AF in zoom.
I own this camera, and would describe it as a great camera that takes less than stellar pics. I have had success when I have been able to play with the controls. If you don't, you have to get lucky to get relly good pics. Or great light.
Thanks again
What's the set-up for this feature?
Thanks on advance!
1. HD Movies
2. Higher optical zoom..
If these two is not your need, then go for Canon..
The Rangefinder style camera. the first 3 mentioned, were extremely good designs for street shots, candid portraits, etc etc... Around the 1970s the "new" lighter SLR designs started to replace the rangefinder style for street shooting.
The Sigma camera is also very nice but only has a very high quality prime lens on it (Prime lenses are fixed focus).
To be serious with the recommendations the Ricoh CX1, Lumix Lx3, Fuji F200 EXR, and Nikon P60 are extremely good point and shoot cameras (In the 300-450 range).... The canon SD line, the SD1100 in particular, is a good choice for the money (under 200 bucks) if you want a more affordable option.
My confusion comes from the promo/reviews (and I also the manual I think) that states the camera has two levels of compression. But there is no "switchable" way to choose. This all stems from feedback I'm getting on some of my shots that states the compression ratio is too high. Is there some combination of variables that will result in the lowest compression, or is this just a camera "spec" and something I'm going to have to live with????
Thanks,
Dan
Others here say you can get some cheaper batteries, but if you do, you run the risk of voiding your warranty if he battery overheats and affects your camera.
there is none the only difference is that tz50 has wi-fi
tz5 is quite fast but for the best speed
the new lumix lx3 is your best bet.
the tz5 has a very good sports mode
flickr.com/photos/b-rphotos... tz5 has also the ability to record video in hd mode
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=PAe3...
But chances are, this is due to being a new camera and over relying on the flash to light your pictures. Remember that a point and shoot camera flash is largely designed around taking pictures of portraits and small groups. So, after about 6-10 feet, the flash is rather useless because it dissipates. But the camera itself has already picked a shutter/aperture combination that will accomodate a portrait or group. So you en dup with pictures that are underexposed and dark.
the tz5 has leica lens which have Extra Low Dispersion (ED)
this enables them to capture colors with very high accuracy
here is a link to my flickr album
flickr.com/photos/stevemcca...
Without flash image stabilization is strong enough to produce pretty sharp pictures but sometimes colors come out really bad, completely red.
Also reds are over-emphasized in comparison to all other colors, which might look slightly washed in almost all conditions.
Does anyone have any suggestions to correct the color situation? I am using the IA feature rather than choosing an auto-setting. Would the auto-setting improve anything?
Thank you.
try this
go into ia mode
press select
go white balance menu
scroll down to set white balance
According to the TZ5 manual there 3 limits for the video length:
- Available space on your memory card
- 2GB (even for larger cards)
- 15 minutes (for lower resolution)
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
THANKS
HAROLD
THANK YOU, MBRADY.
HAROLD
the panasonic lumix tz5 is the perfect camera for you
cameralabs.com/reviews/Pana... a a few links
concert:
flickr.com/photos/10875560@...
Other concert pictures with this camera:
farm4.static.flickr.com/301... ( flickr.com/photos/10875560@... )
farm3.static.flickr.com/211... ( flickr.com/photos/10875560@... )
This was very zoomed in, but still turned out well.
farm3.static.flickr.com/220... ( flickr.com/photos/10875560@... )
Some visible noise.
thanks,maggie
turn the dial on the top to the heart symbol
this will put the camera in auto mode
when you get used to it
you can use the other screen modes which means you set the camera for use in many ways
to use a video camera
turn the dial to the film symbol
Based on similar models, I can tell you though, that the SD790 will have a better macro than teh TZ5. In fact, just about any camera will have a better macro than the TZ5.
theb tz5 uses quick time .mov files so it is directly compatabile with iphoto
I suggest you take a look at the manual ( service.us.panasonic.com/OP... ) for the TZ5, particularly page 73. This fully explains the date stamp function, which does exist.
The catch is that turning it on reduces all of the stamped photos to 3 megapixels.
Hope this helps!
* Share your photos with family and friends with location mapping in PhotoTrackr™ software. (With integrated Google Maps.)
* Integrated with Flickr™ / locr / Picasa Web Album / SmugMug for easy online photo sharing.
* Keep track of your digital photos with satellite precision.
* Display or playback trip routes with the PhotoTrackr software.
* Compatible with ALL digital cameras
* Light weight & low power consumption.
* Power saving with build-in vibration sensor.
* Automated photo slideshow function.
* Geo-tagged function enables image-sharing in 3rd party Geo-photo sharing websites.
* Capable of writing GPS info to the pictures and exporting NMEA and GPX info from the GPS log files
* Google Earth support (PhotoTrackr program is able to export GPS log files and pictures to google earth format)
* Multi-language support (PhotoTrackr software now supports Chinese, Dutch, English, French, German, Japanese, and Spanish.)
There are a number of EXIF readers available, that will automatically catalog your photos by date/time using the EXIF data.
Or, if you like the date stamp, keep using it. Different strokes, y'know?
:)
This camera sounds perfect, 3x optical is too little.
Would this camera fit those requirements?
the tz5 is great camera for outdoor sports events
here is a link to a flickr album shot by a tz5
flickr.com/photos/snakeface...
Gary
I'm not 100% sure. I will never understand why manufacturers don't print huge compatibility lists for memory cards, but I've never found any. :) But I Googled a bit and this camera is being sold everywhere with Extreme III cards as accessories, so I am going to assume they are supposed to work together.
Check your user's manual, too; that might have information. But yeah, I'd try returning the card. Try the new one in the store, if possible!
• Face
• 9-point
• 3-point high speed
• 1-point high speed
• 1-point
• Spot
Provided you can deal with those various modes, you could definitely do a successful off-center composition.
Thanks a lot for providing all the details on the TZ5 autofocus system. They should have asked you to write the manual!
I ended up ordering a Canon 850 sw instead... opted for ruggedness over optics. Anyway, thanks again for your help.
Best regards,
Mark
here are some examples
flickr.com/photos/23810317@...
//////////
Regards
André
amazon.com/gp/product/B000G... one above is sold by an affiliate. This one is sold by Amazon. You will get it faster. Also, I don't believe that Amazon would sell a bad battery. But if you get a DOA item they'll deal with.
I think you can do better. But if given just this choice, I liked the color and clarity of the TZ5 better.
Is there an "Image Bracketing" feature on the Z1285 like on the TZ5? Also, what is the HD video on the Z1285 recorded in (format-wise)? Is it Quicktime (MOV) like the Panny, or another format? Is there a size limitation to the video? (I think there is a 2GB file size limit for the TZ5)
Also, I heard the case of the Z1285 is cheap to the touch (ie: plastic) whereas the Panny is not. And that the Kodak may not display the amount of space/pictures remaining?? Can anyone confirm?
Please let me know which you think of the two is a better buy...
Thanks!
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
I recently purchased both; I first bought the Fuji and after having some issues with trying to manually adjust the exposure on the unit (couldn't really figure it out) and realizing it was lacking the image "bracketing" feature (which is also found on the TZ5), I returned it and actually ended up paying a little more ($20) for the TZ5, which all and all I felt is worth it, given it's advantages compared to the Fuji.
But I though I'd post this question and see what others may think. The only downside that I have issues with really is the lack of MP (9.1 vs 12) but does this *really* make a huge difference? What is your opinion of the two?
Thanks!
Who knows, maybe with a firmware update in the future (and enough request from TZ5 users!) there just might be some of these features included!
Let's keep our eyes and ears open and see where the digital world has in store for us in the near future.
Ideally they would incorporate the low light performance of say a Fuji F31 and have decent sound quality during video mode with better microphone(s) (possibly 2 mic inputs?) then they would have close to a perfect design in the compact digital category.
Great pics. I am bumped around a lot in mosh pits; I don't want to drop it. Stabilization required. I have bad eyes, so big LCD. Easy to use; I don't have much experience with cameras. Want video on it too. It would be great if music wasn't muffled. Lots of memory. I take a lot of pics and videos. Which camera should I get? Not really worried about price. Will also be taking family pictures with it but mostly concerts.
But at 9mp, it's rapidly swallowing the myth that "more MP is better." It isn't. I came across an interesting article today about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. Particularly in low light at higher ISOs. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures.
The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better." In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
And sinc 99% of your shots are going to be snapshots anyway, the larger MP is largely lost because you won't even see the extra MP at that size.
That Powershot SD870 is closer to that 6mp sweet spot and is quite small. Highly rated, it's a fine camera for your purpose.
You might have a tricky time finding a slim camera with a good zoom, as you probably know already. Most slim cameras tend to be in the 3-4x zoom range, and after that they jump into extended zooms and the bodies get a lot bigger. But I do want to suggest the Olympus Stylus 840 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I have an earlier model of this camera and have been very happy with it; speedy, nice color reproduction, dependable, very easy to use.
In terms of batteries, cameras either come with their own batteries (often lithium-ion) or they call for AAs. If they call for AAs, definitely buy rechargeable AAs rather than using regular ones; camera life will be much better. Comparing lithium-ion vs. rechargeable AAs is often a toss-up, but in general, the ones that come with the camera (lithium-ion) are longer lasting, it seems.
Thanks for your answer, but I misspelled a word. I should have said "at least 5 optical zoom" not "less". Sorry! :-( Any more ideals?
It's okay; I did actually figure that was what you meant. :) The Stylus I linked has 5x zoom, and really anything with more zoom than that would be a bulkier camera. I guess the question is if you can sacrifice a bit of size for more zoom?
I'm not so sure about the Olympus brand cameras. I've heard that they are good and I've seen them in stores. What advice do you have for these brands: Canons, Pentax and Sony? Is Kodak or Nikon good? (Kodak is not to high on my list either). My old camera is a HP Photosmart 945. It has a 5.3 MP, 8x optical zoom and 7x digital zoom. (I don't use the digital zoom). It measures about 4 1/2" x 3 1/2" x 3 1/4" and weights 9.6 oz. w/o batteries. I use 4 Photo lithium batteries with it. It's a wonderful camera, takes great pictures. But............. We went on vacation in May to Disney World and I carried it around for 5 days. Too BIG AND HEAVY, so on day 6 I left it at the resort. I missed out on alot of good pictures! So now I'm looking for a smaller camera to carry in my purse (or pocket) and not have to have a special bag just for the camera. The camera bag I have now is about half the size of my purse I carry. :-)
Thanks for taking the time to help me find a good camera.
Jane
In my opinion, Canon is the best point and shoot. Obviously that's just my opinion, and other people's mileage may vary, but I've developed it after testing and playing with numerous cameras. They have a pretty big customer base in basic consumers, and they are providing what seem to be really reliable cameras that are easy to use and produce good results. I usually look at it this way: basically every other manufacturer has made a point and shoot camera that I advise people to avoid. All of them have one or more "duds" in their lineup.... except for Canon.
On the other hand, the good news is that a lot of them make good cameras, too, so provided you're buying something you've researched, your chances of being happy are pretty good. As long as you're not buying a "known dud," you know?
The issue is really going to be that zoom. All of the Canon pockets I would point you towards tend to have zooms in the 3x-4x range. My current favorite is probably the SD870 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ); however, it has a 3.8 optical zoom which will probably disappoint you.
I do suggest taking a look at the Panasonic Lumix TZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Panasonic cameras in the past have maybe had a reputation for not performing very well in low light, but I haven't heard that complaint in many years, and in fact considering the good reviews (click on that link to read some) I'm seriously considering this camera myself. It's pretty much the only pocket model I'm aware of with a zoom that strong.
There are other cams with good zooms - here's a nice list:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... the bodies tend NOT to be pocket-sized!
Thanks for all your help. I can now go into stores knowing alittle more about the different cameras. Thanks again!
Jane
It's me again, Jane. While I was looking at some cameras yesterday, I took another look at the olympus cameras. I have to change my thoughts on them. Now I'm leaning more for either the Olympus Stylus 1010 or the 840. The question I have now is about the memory card. The 1010 is compatible with the microSD/xD-Picture card and the 840 is compatible with the xD-picture card. Which is better? The only card I've used is the SD memory card (512 MB). Also, which camera would you recommend?
Thanks again for all your help!!!!!!
Jane
I think it's pretty much a wash between these two memory cards; either one, as long as it's functioning properly, will do fine for you. I would make your purchase based on which camera seems best to you; and really, since you've mentioned zoom being an issue, the 1010 seems like a really great deal. It is getting excellent reviews and has a lot of great features like image stabilization, face detection, et al. If that 7x zoom speaks to you, I'd feel perfectly comfortable pointing you towards the 1010. The 840 is also excellent; I've used it and loved it. So I'd choose based on specs; I think you'll be happy in either situation!
I finally got around and bought a Canon 890. I tried it and didn't like it. I took it back today and got a Sony Cybershot 170. I'm waiting on the battery to charge to try it out. It was a toss up between the 170 and the Olympus Stylus 1010. I guess if I don't like the 170 I'll try the 1010. Thanks for all your help!
Secondly, the thing I don't like about the TZ5 is that it has no viewfinder. It has a larger LCD, which will drain your batteries alot quicker. As for microphone not being very good, that's pretty prevalent in point and shoot cameras in general since video is largely an afterthought and secondary to the still image capability.
If video is your hot button, you may want to look for a video camera that shoots digital stills to a flash card. These days, they're up to over 6MP.
Some Canon models do it through Postcard mode and Kodak's current models have it. But as the digital file is marked by a date and time when it's saved, the use of a date stamp feature in digital cameras has lost popularity amongst camera manufacturers as a feature in favor or making the camera smaller/lighter and adding features like image stabilization, face detection, and others.
i had the same problem
tz5 japanese version is only in japanese language
any solutions???
mayby some firmware can change language?
It would be nice if someone tried what was suggested above....
Full procedure:
Press MENU. left arrow, down arrow (setup menu), right arrow, down arrow to picture of man blowing bubble, right arrow (Displays Japanese), up arrow (see if other languages English? are displayed), if so, select english and hit menu to exit.
So I haven't found the man with the bubble yet :) Nor any other place which would say anything about language settings... Update the firmware?
I bought an International version from the duty free shop thing at the top of DenDen town.
Yes the international version has the man with the speech bubble, the version in the other shops doesn't.
SDHC Card Capacity* Video***
Extended*** 9Mbps HD Standard*** 13 Mbps HD High***
4GB* 68 min. 45 min. 31 min.
8GB* 135 min. 90 min. 63 min.
16GB* 271 min 181 min. 125 min.
*** Actual recording time will vary based upon camera model, selected resolution, compression settings and the content being recorded. Some host devices may not support all of the Flash storage capacities listed. Consult your device's owner's manual for supported capacities.
1 Megabyte(MB) = 1,000,000 bytes; 1 Gigabyte (GB) = 1,000,000,000 bytes
Also, can anyone recommend an aftermarket battery or tell me where to find a good price on one? I see knockoffs on ebay for only $8.00 vs. $35-40 for the "real thing." Any advice?
there is no difference in crispness between ratios
4:3 is for portraits
3:2 is used to simulate the look of a 35mm film camera
16:9 is used for landscapes and wide angle shots
I prefer 16:9 as it gives the whole picturqe
below is a link of a 16:9 wide angle shot
flickr.com/photos/mmorelli/...
Because these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and battery chargers are often not equipped with certain protective devices meeting the industry's basic quality standards, using or recharging these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs could cause your camera to malfunction, or lead these battery packs to overheat, leak liquids, ignite, or explode. In the worst case, this could not only damage your camera or camcorder, but also result in fire, burns and/or injuries (including loss of eyesight). Accordingly, these counterfeit lithium-ion battery packs and/or battery chargers should not be used.
Also - I understand what you are saying about the battery James - can you recommend something or is it worth it to just spend the $40 on the actual Panasonic one?
Thank you.
For what it is worth, I find photo-stitching tedious and results in a picture that won't fit on my screen in such a way as to see any detail. Disappointing, however it impressed by friends.
Buy the brand name batts. The only safe way nowadays.
Thank you.
no only a lcd screen
tz4 is 8.1 MP, whereas tz5 is 9.1 MP...
in continuous drive, in tz4 you can have 3 fps with 7 images whereas in tz5 you have 2.5 fps, 5 images
the sensor size in tz4 is 1/2.5" , whereas in tz5 1/2.33"
LCD size in tz4 is 2.5"(230,000 pixels) whereas in tz5 is 3.0"(460,000 pixels)
tz5 can capture video in HD mode, i.e. 1280x720 at 30fps in a 16:9 format , and tz4 cant
So, if your budget is not too tight, I would suggest tz5, just for its bigger and sharper LCD only...
All told... the larger and crisper LCD display and the ability to shoot HD video are the two biggest differences.
Here's the link to the Panasonic page comparing the specs on both:
www2.panasonic.com/webapp/w...
Another option is the Canon S5IS and the Pansonic FZ18 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All are highly rated.
since 2003 there have been great improvments in digital cameras
the panasonic tz5 has a 10times optical zoom which can be extended to 13x
Raphael Winters' has an album of bird pictutres which he took with a lumix tz3
wwwc.flickr.com/photos/raph...
When you say "TZ5 isnt exactly a fit in every pocket size camera," as opposed to which camera that fits in your pocket.
I am looking for one I can carry everywhere. Someone already advised to consider the TZ5. I did some research and will head towards buying that camera but if there are smaller camera that can do more or less the same job, I might consider it
Thank you
Zoulou
Actually see, TZ5 is a high zoom camera, i.e. 10x optical, and these super zoom cameras arent like Sony or Nikon ultra thin cameras, but still it goes in my jeans pocket, in my trouser pocket, etc. , but if you are wearing a slim fit jeans, then maybe it'll be a bit bigger for your pocket (it'll still go in though) ... IMO you can go for TZ5, as it offers you a lot ( except , Alas, the manual settings ), and at a reasonable rate (Canon SX100 IS is much cheaper, but then again, it doesnt come in the ultra compact category at all)... It's a great buy, and even I take it everywhere I go, something i couldnt do with my Canon A720 IS..
Asheesh
How do you like TZ5 compared to your Canon in lowlight performance and IQ? Any other differences? I am thinking of getting TZ5 but not sure yet what to buy. i need a 10x zoom but like the wide angle to go with it like 28mm.
Harana
- Good picture quality in low light.
- Small, compact, lightweight, easy to carry.
- Easy to hold onto. (I have a small hand.)
- Long zoom, so I can focus on my child on stage.
- Good focus for zooming in to take photo of a flower.
- Quick start up time and quick time lapse in between pics.
With my limited research abilities, I've narrowed it down to the Panasonic TZ5 versus the Can SD1100, but maybe there is an even better choice that I haven't uncovered...? I'm open for any help or ideas. Thank you so much!
Here is why...
The LZ5 has great zoom, is sturdy built, takes good pictures (I took an SD card with me and took pictures), it has many options for different scene settings but one great feature is the Intelligent Auto mode where it adjusts itself for the conditions you are shooting. And, it has a large 3 inch screen that doesn't seem to smudge up too badly.
The Canon SD1100, my first opinion on this one was that it looked cheap. The back buttons and the body material looks cheap to me on this one. It takes great pictures, quick shot to shot time. I don't like the zoom button, it is small and has a pointy tip that digs into your finger when you zoom (not the case on the tz5). The LCD is smaller and smudges up easily (same for the SD870 except bigger LCD)
Go to the store, pick them up, see how they feel in your hand, see how they take pictures, play with them for a while. use the features and see how you like the buttons, the menu layout, etc.
They both take good pictures. The LZ5 is larger but I like the way it handles. It is not too large but not real small either but a decent size. Everyone has different things they like in a camera so it really does come down to what feels best and easiest for you.
Good luck in your camera hunting.
Richard is mostly correct on this. While some point and shoot cameras can be outfitted with a tube adapter around the lens that filters can be connected to, this camera does not have that capability. His idea for the setting changes would be a decent fix though. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
And for comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side. The TZ5 isn't there, but you can compare the SD850 with the TZ3 to give you a "ballpark" comparison.
with aa batterys always go for rechargables
you will get about 200 shots on a full charge
look for ni mh of 2500 mah rating
This camera will travel very well due to its size, but will it have the features you're looking for on a European vacation? If you want to zoom in close to anything, the 3x optical zoom might leave you wanting more. You wil be able to get some brilliant landscape photos, and fit everyone in for a group picture, but will that be enough?
Something like the Panasonic TZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) might be a better option. It is in the same price range as the Nikon S52 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but it has a 10x optical zoom instead of 3 (and it still lets you get the wide angle group and landscape shots without a problem). The cameras both have 9MP resolution and fall in the the ultra-compact class for easy portability. I hope this helps; have a good vacation.
Andrew
the camera she was asking about was the TZ5 i think you should understand what you are responding to before giving rubbish answers!
Meanwhile, there are ways to combat it.
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
The good news is that according to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
Go and try both and check which one feels the best for your hands and needs. But I'd definitely go for the TZ5, I am even thinking of buying one for myself even if the Panasonic is almost 50% more expensive than the Canon; quality has it's price to pay.
Good luck with your choice George.
somewhere in spain i do not speak spanish
Julie
i hope you may be able to help....
i just purchased the Panasonic TZ5 (marketed as TZ 15 in Australia) and the language settings are in Thai (from what i can see).
How do i change this?
Do i need a certain program?
Even after playing around, i cannot find an answer.
many thanks in advance if you can be of some assistance,
danielle
What you may want to try is resetting your camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. With any luck, that will return your camera to your preferred language (which I assume is the King's English).
Absent that, what I would recommend is contacting Panasonic immediately ( www2.panasonic.com/consumer... ). Give them your serial number and ask them what you can do. They may be able to walk you through resetting the language settings.
I fear that you may have bought a so-called "grayt market" camera. If you bought this camera new and it didn't come with software, was it also missing the manual, warranty card, and other important accessories, and if it's default language isn't in English, you may have bought something that is considered "grey market" ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_... ) merchandise.
If something is gray market, it means that - although you may have gotten a great deal on it - it doesn't come with a warranty that will be honored here in this country. Which means if something goes wrong with the camera, you'll either have to send it to where it was manufacturered to repair or pay to have it fixed yourself.
It may be that if you just purchased it, you may need to return it. If that's a problem, get your credit card company involved.
thanks again for your time in answering the question, now i can work out what i am doing !
answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or,
you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
I lost my last camera, a Kodak 712 IS. I'm looking for a step up. I loved that camera, however, the screen was not a good representation of the shots I was taking, pics sometimes came out grainy, and I could never find the right setting for taking pictures in a theatre. I'm a director and writer and like to moving shots of the shows I'm working on.
Here is what I'm looking for in a camera.
-at least 7 MPs
-2.5-3.5 LCD Screen with proper representation of of the shots I'm taking.
-a mode that will take action shots in a theatrical setting. (Flash is ok, but if I can do with out that would be awesome)
-Extended zoom. Z712 has 12X, I loved that, but would sacrifice a couple Xs for better quality over all.
-I've got big hands so the tiny pocket cameras don't really work for me.
-"Trying" not to spend over $250.
I'm looking at the:
Cannon SD1100
Cannon SX100 IS
Panasonic TZ5
Any thoughts? Feelings? Gut reactions?
AN ARGUMENT FOR LESS MP, NOT MORE
6mpixel.org/en/?
<...> picture quality, I think there's too much MP here to work with. Let me explain. I came across an interesting article today about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
As for LCD size, all LCD size does is eat up battery power. You're much better off with a viewfinder and a smaller LCD than having a 3" or larger LCD eating up precious battery power. In addition, when you're on location, that LCD only screen will be a bear to see in ambient light. So you'll end up with the same problems.
I'd look for a solid "available light" preset like on the Olympus SP560UZ. Great preset. But it's a tad more than $250. Canon's also have these.
The Panny is a decent camera, don't get me wrong. But I think that the signal - noise issues of a larger MP will come back to bite you.
As a director, you should be using DSLRs, Brett.
The cannon sd1100 is ok but many say the older version (the sd1000) took better photos and was faster. Also the sd1100 is much smaller than the other 2 so it may not do well for larger hands.
The sx100 has a larger zoom than the sd1100 but it cannot compete with the panasonic tz5 in terms of speed. Also the tz5 shoots in high def.
Hope this helps
One fo the main themes you'll see if that more megapixel resolution isn't necessarily a good thing. In fact, it can be worse. Let me explain. I came across an interesting article today about how more mega pixels is not necessarily a good thing. According to Image Engineering ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) – a company that does testing of digital cameras for photo magazines in Germany – the quality of digital pictures has steadily decreased since the state of the art was six megapixels back in 2004. And because they don’t have a “dog in this hunt,” they put forth a compelling argument for buying new digital cameras with less mega pixels and not more.
The argument is essentially this: CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality. In addition, the more megapixels a camera has, the larger the lens it needs to provide the clarity it deserves and prevent diffraction due to a loss of detail with smaller apertures. But since we’re talking portable point and shoots here, those large lenses simply aren’t being made.
Finally, with larger mega pixels comes longer saving time due to their requires huge storage capacity, or more compression if not storing images in RAW format. The result is a noisier image and a dissatisfied camera user who thirsts for high quality and speed but fell into the trap of "more must mean better."
In the end, relying on a smaller MP that can balance all these needs may indeed be a better answer.
I don't understand the concept of "noise" I'm not sure if that is literally a sound, or has another meaning.
I am left handed and held a number of cameras in the shop and the TZ series, for me, felt the most comfortable to hold. So if I ignore the extra megapixels in the TZ5, then are there other features that make it worth buying over the TZ3 or TZ4 if I'm only interested in taking photos. Also I have seen reference to a DMC - TZ3 and a TZ3 as would love to know the difference.
I'm so thrilled to have found this digital camera site.
Now, we're in the digital era, but the concept is essentially the same. The higher the ISO, the noisier the image looks. It'll be grainy and slightly fuzzier. Make sense?
As for how a camera feels in your hand, that's just as important as anything else. Feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other on any model I'm considering.
I bought a second hand TZ1 and have started snapping. I just want to have fun with the camera and have been taking photos of my 86 year old Mum. We don't have many photos her and feel it is important at this stage of her life to take some photos.
Later on when I'm ready to upgrade to another camera I'll know just where to come to receive sage advice. I've told a number of people about this website and will look at picasa as suggested in one of the articles you referred me to. My brother in law says he uses it and it is so easy.
Wonderful that people all over the world can connect through the internet. I live in New Zealand a couple of hours drive from where Lord of the Rings was made, although must confess I've not seen the movie. It is autumn here and I feel that I am becoming more aware of the visual images in our world now that I am interested in photography.
All the best. My thanks Gail
I'd also like to share this last tip ... learn to shoot your photographs according to the rule of thirds ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_... ). As Wiki states:
The rule states that an image can be divided into nine equal parts by two equally-spaced horizontal lines and two equally-spaced vertical lines. The four points formed by the intersections of these lines can be used to align features in the photograph. Proponents of this technique claim that aligning a photograph with these points creates more tension, energy and interest in the photo than simply centering the feature would.
If you look in your settings menu, you may find a grid for this until you're used to it. All too often people stick their subject in the middle of the frame and click. But I guarantee you it will make your photographs more interesting if you compose pictures according to it.
Good luck and say "hi" to Frodo for me.
Do you have any of your photos on a website that I could have a look at. Having been the recipient of your sage advice I would enjoy to be able to look at some of your photos.
Hope you don't mind me asking. If you would rather not, that is fine too. I really appreciate your help - you are a very kind man.
All the best.
Gail
Looking out the window barely a leaf is moving. The sun is shining and my cat is soaking up the sun sitting on the ballastrade. Not sure what country you are in, but in NZ it is 9.15am on Saturday, while in USA it is still Friday. That always feels rather strange to me.
Have a good day, James. Thank you. Gail
Also, is it possible to put a shade over the screen on the tz5?
auto brightening means when you use the camera in bright light, the camera senses this and makes the screen brighter.
i do not know of any shades available for the tz5
Same review says the Canon S5is without HD results in better video and audio.
But I think that 5s limit is meant for STILL images with audio. How much can 27MB hold anyway?
See the "convenience features" here:
www2.panasonic.com/consumer... this cam has quite a few attractive features, the noisy (grains) images and bad quality sound with the videos are putting me off. At least cd quality stereo sound is a must for me.
Hope this helps.
But if you lessen the frame rate (from 30fps to 15fps), you essentially get double the recording time. This is also the case if you use a lower (non-hd) recording rate. I found the following on another website that reviewed the TZ5:
"One of the TZ5's biggest selling points is its movie mode. It allows you to record video at 720p -- that's 1280 x 720 -- with full use of the optical zoom and image stabilizer. Naturally, sound is recorded as well. The camera will keep recording until the file size hits 2GB. That takes approximately 8 minutes at the highest quality setting, so your memory card (high speed, please) fills up quickly.
There are many other resolutions available. If you want to stick with 1280 x 720, you can drop the frame rate to 15 fps, for double the recording time. You can also select resolutions of 848 x 480 (16:9), 640 x 480, and 320 x 240, with a frame rate of either 10 or 30 fps. As you might imagine, the 10 fps frame rate results in very choppy videos, so I'd pass on that option.
As I mentioned, you can use the optical zoom while you're recording a movie. The lens moves slowly, to keep the motor noise from being picked up by the microphone. The image stabilizer is available as well, for "smoother" movies.
Movies are saved in QuickTime format, using the M-JPEG codec. It would've been nice had Panasonic chosen a more efficient codec, which would've allowed for much longer recording times."
Here is a couple links to some videos catured in HD 720p mode on the TZ5:
dcresource.com/reviews/pana... (full size Quicktime sample)
lundman.net/albums/tz5/P100... (185MB full size Quicktime sample -- large download!!)
vimeo.com/968058 (flash-based smaller aspect sample)
vimeo.com/978250 (another flash-based smaller aspect sample)
panasonic.net/pavc/lumix/tz... (same video as above but full size version on Panasonic's website)
What you can do though, is play back the video with a video player that has image capture and capture the image as it plays.
Enjoy.
I also love the Canon G9, but seem out of the pocket size category.
Shutter Lag, Full AF: 0.380 (W) - 0.420 (T) seconds
Pansasonic TZ5
Shutter Lag, Full AF: 0.008 seconds (blazin')
digitalcamerareview.com/def...
This camera is available now.
Andrew
The TZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will perform just fine in low light, but uses higher ISO settings (as would the TZ5K ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or any other point-and-shoot camera). The higher ISO settings allow more light in, so you can see what is in your photo, but you will notice some graininess in the photograph (as result of the higher ISO). This is going to happen with any point and shoot camera in lower light. The camera will either adjust to a higher ISO, or leave the shutter open longer (causing blurs from movement or camera shake). On a dSLR, this can be combatted with a wider aperture setting, but the point and shoots aren't that advanced. If your budget calls for it, you could pick up a dSLR camera with a "fast" lens, or stick with a point-and-shoot at a lower price.
Andrew
img215.imageshack.us/img215... (evening, no flash, kinda dark.....but i only went to ISO 200 and you can see the noise, therefore the slow shutter speed..... not that bad if you only print to 4x6)
img215.imageshack.us/img215...
As far as the other point and shoots are concerned my observation is (and I am by no means an expert) that the longer the zooming range of the camera , the more it struggles in low light (they have to sacrifice the sensor size to accoomodate the lens) - bearing in mind that the TZ5 is 10x optical zoom and at the same time quite compact in size .
Of course lens quality etc. might make a difference but the general rule remains .
No manual settings on these cameras. Is that much of a problem for someone who likes custom exposures?
Does the TZ5K have GPS (lat/long) capabilities to be able
to reconstruct where the picture(s) were taken?
HD Video(720p) vs 640x480
Optical zoom in movie mode vs none at all
More megapixels(though this might not be a big plus due to image quality)
is $120 worth these features?
TZ5 doesn't have built-in GPS, but you have an external GPS that logs data points, its not that hard to compare time stamps(make sure the camera's time is in sync)
I would like to know if the TZ5S and TS5K cameras used as a video recorder records with stereo sound or Mono could this be changed if it is edited with software to Stereo once a movie is edited what format is it recorded in, Also if you zoom up to 10x Zoom with this recording moving people will it come out clear as if you were taking a still shot at full zoom?would you maintain the clarity.I notice the mic is very small and doesn't look like much at all.How could this record any decent sound they fail to mention that in the reviews i want to know what the difference with sound on some of the earlier models are to this one with HD format.I would have thought the sound would be better as well?
Also of example recording concerts and loud open air noises how would this handle that.would this be distorted due to the Large speakers and frequencies just curious as some cameras can not handle loud noises.
Thanks
Panasonic Lumix TZ5 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix TZ5 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
Had it for two months in anticipation of my DDay trip. Have tried most types of shots and it performs better than I expected. It's hard to believe that you can buy so much camera for so little money.
- 2.0 out of 5
While on vacation in Sedona, AZ I received an error message "PLEASE TURN CAMERA OFF AND THEN ON AGAIN".
While researching, there are many instances of this issue with Panasonic camera's including my model.
I would recommend researching camera problems prior to purchasing. This was my first and ONLY Panasonic camera I will purchase since it barely lasted 1 year...
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is compact, easy to use, has many very useful features such as HD movies, image stabilization, powerful zoom and a reasonably wide angle lens. It is likely the ONLY camera one needs to take on a vacation.
Carol
- 1.0 out of 5
this camera broke twice in six months. First time the lens cover broke and was fixed next time it stopped altogether and was not fixed due to corrosion damage. The camera was only 6 months old and very well taken care of because it was expensive! Due to the POOR customer care, will not invest in a camera with this company again.
- 5.0 out of 5
I've had the TZ-5 for several months and like any camera it has it's good points and bad. I had to learn how to use it to it's best ability. Since then I have worked out all the problems such as dark pictures and over exposure. I am very pleased with this camera and continue to use it almost on a daily basis. The first thing you must do is read the book from cover to cover and refer to it until you understand the how to really use it. Most people never read the instruction book. It made all the difference. My flickr site will attest to what I'm talking about. I've received best wildlife pics from nature sites all with the TZ-5.
- 2.0 out of 5
I bought this camera as a replacement to my old Minolta Dimage Z2. I replaced my first TZ5 (I thought it was somewhat defective, because of poor picture quality) with another one. Unfortunately I was too slow to test the second camera fast in various conditions, to return it completely. So I use it as second, "pocketable" camera.
Good:
DMC-TZ5 is small, fits well into the pocket.
Good zoom.
Relatively good movies.
Attractive look.
However if you need camera TO TAKE GOOD PICTURES, this camera is not for you.
Bad: Poor color, even if pictures are taken at daylight.
Difficult to take pictures of moving objects (this camera is inappropriate to take pictures of kids playing sports).
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this camera just couples of weeks and the result is amazing. Its a digital camera with a lot of manual setting. What i like about the camera is the bright and sharp LCD (Of course with its 3 inch 400k++ pixels)
Another feature i like is the manual setting for the shutter speed. There are many selections, from 1/200 to 60 seconds. And the result is brilliant.
The still image is really sharp. However, the picture in low light condition will not be that sharp. Sometimes I take blurry images without the flash. so make sure the object is not moving coz the image stabilizer is not working well in low light condition.
Overall,, i love this camera!!!
- 5.0 out of 5
My wife gave me a Kodak z1285 for christmas. Right out of the package it did not work after inserting new batteries. Upon returning the Kodak, I purchased the Sony T77. After using this camera for about a week I found that more that half of the pictures were out of focus. On the Sony T77 if you depress the shutter button completely down it will take the picture right away without focusing. Also the coloring of skin tones was not correct. When I returned the Sony I got a Samsung tl34HD 14,7 megapixel camera that also shoots hd video. I found the pictures to be a bit grainy even in good lighting conditions. The pictures could be tweaked in Adobe photoshop so they looked ok, Not great! However the video was horrible. When I took back this camera to Circut City they had the Panasonic TZ5 on sale for 259.99. After exchanging the Samsung for the Panasonic (and getting 42.00 back) I must say that this camera is incredable. I have shot pictures and video in all lighting conditions including a candle lit cake scene for my wifes birthday. I haven't found any signs of noise as others have stated. The exposure and focus couldn't be better. Also the software supplied with the camera is amazing, including panarama maker 4. I am totaly amazed by this camera and highly recomend this camera for any shooting situation.
- 1.0 out of 5
I too wanted to like this camera but what a dissappoinment. I even had the salesman convinced after I took it back. You can't get the lighting correct....all pic turn out dark or redish in color. I believe it has something to do with the flash...I called panisonic and they were no help at all. Don't waste your time with this one.
- 3.0 out of 5
Used for 10 days and had to return it. The sound during video was horrible. I could barely hear myself, anything a foot away was not picked up. I did not have a finger over the top mounted speaker and was playing it back over a laptop. I know it can't be a camcorder repalcement, but wanted to get quick videos of the kids with sound. It's a waste to be able to take HD videos if you can't capture any sound.
The display was too reflective to use outside. It was point and hope so you couldn't set up a shot. Loved the display indoors. The scenery mode caused all of the pictures to have a blue tint so could not see the different colors of the Grand Canyon. Got maybe three good shots where I used the exposure bracket manual settings.
It took some nice night shots of Las Vegas even though I was riding in a car so the stabalization feature and focus were tops. It is the smallest ultra zoom and easy to carry on trips. It was quick, only a small delay when using the flash a lot. Battery ran out with no warning at 138 shots. Should have lasted a lot longer. Thank goodness I had bought a spare.
Inside in low light the pics were generally good. I tried a lot of different settings, with/without flash, etc. You need to experiment to find the settings that do best for you.
The display was clear and easy to use indoors. Menu and settings easy to use and location great. Zoom feature easy to use. Great wide angle and close up pictures.
I was impressed with customer service. They even had loaner cameras and were easy to talk with. Since it was new and the sound and display issues looked to me to be more design flaw than a faulty product, I decided to return to the store.
- 5.0 out of 5
I own the TZ5 and a sony T200. I only take the TZ5 with me now. I also own a nikon d300 and usually take my TZ5 over the nikon. Although, the size is not as slim as the T200, I know I will get the best photo in any situation with this fantastic camera. I get a lot of positive compliments on it and it is incredibly easy to use. Highly recomended.
- 4.0 out of 5
i shall keep this short it an excellent camera for the travelers who prefer to take pix instantly grt pic quality, what can i say more yes few drawbacks
mic is in wrong place so voice cant be dat clear
some issues with the balance
rest a grt camera
- 5.0 out of 5
What can I say, completely thrilled with this purchase, given my need for an extended zoom will all the features and need for great pictures within a reasonable budget, this offered it all.
I spend hours researching this before buying and having done my research, am extremely pleased with it. Oh and incidentally, don't buy the bit on ' not great for indoor and child' it does both superbly and I love the child 1 & 2 modes ( have 2 kids and so this is great)
Heavily recommend to anyone who wants, good technology, image stabilisation and overall great pics
- 2.0 out of 5
My Canon SD700 broke, so I had to get a new one.
After reading various reviews on different forums, I decided to get the TZ5.
I was reaaly disapointed, since I liked the 10X optical and some other functions. But when I was trying to catch by little 1 year old always moving around .... I was unable to get great pictures.
In iA mode... Focus and face detection too slow
In Baby Mode 1/2 same focus slow issue
In Normal Mode... after setting some configs based on recommendations... still difficult to get great pictures.
So I decided to return the TZ5 to the store...
Im now sure that I will get a Canon, but did decided whcih model yet...
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is the best I've ever owned. Completely worth the price, this is such a smart camera. Doesn't wash you out with the flash and has an intelligent mode that creates the perfect portrait without fiddling around to different modes just to get the right picture. The 10x zoom with telephoto macro is as good as it sounds. You can actually use the zoom while recording video, although the lens is a bit noisy and slow.
- 5.0 out of 5
I did a lot of research before buying the TZ5, and it seemed to be overwhelmingly the best option for my price range. The picture quality is amazing—I've had several shots blown up into posters and they came out perfectly. The battery lasts for around 300 pictures, just like they claim—although I have so much fun taking pictures I kill the battery before I know it! So I would recommend a spare battery.
The menu is for the most part very intelligent and easy to navigate. Of course, it helps that the screen is one of the best ones you'll find today—my sister has the TZ4, and the difference in screen quality (and size!) is amazing. The menu gives you enough manual control, but there are plenty of intelligent/auto features that will speed things up for you.
The 10x zoom with telephoto macro is as good as it sounds. You can actually use the zoom while recording video, although the lens is a bit noisy and slow. Only with video, though—when you're in picture mode, the lens is fast. When you turn the camera on or off, the lens is fast. When you capture a shot, the flash reloads fast. Everything about this camera is fast.
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera is a dream come true for all those people who want to take phemnomenal pictures but are a bit nervous about paying $2000 for the "professional camera". I have the older Lumix LZ5 and now the TZ5. These camera are both rugged and take some of the best pictures. I'm still apprehensive about paying a big camera because I dont know anything about buying lenses and ISO's and all that jazz. This little point and shoot camera makes it easy and takes astonishing photos.
- 1.0 out of 5
I really wanted to like this camera, but I don't. All the pictures come out dark and I have tried everything to make the pictures come out better but they don't. Also I seem to have a spot in the pictures. I am now going to look for another camera. What a waste of money. I also bought into the hype of this camera and I am so disappointed.
- 3.0 out of 5
1. Weak flash
2. Close up photos overexposed when using flash
3. Lag time too long after using flash.
4. Flimsy lens cover
- 5.0 out of 5
I had to decide between the TZ5 and the Canon SD870. After using them both side by side for a few weeks, the Panasonic is the easy winner by a landslide. Looks sleeker, MUCH easier user menu, better zoom, and the pictures are of better quality than the Canon SD870. I really like the low light pictures that this camera takes of my three little ones! The ease of use and quality of this camera at this price point is unbelievable. Complements my Nikon D60 very well when I want to carry something a little smaller around for taking pictures.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is great anyone that says it's not has never owned one, remember most people have a biast opinion on what they see as "the best camera" this one is just plain great. Amazing picture quality and color, highly recommend.
- 1.0 out of 5
I have owned many cameras and this has by far been the biggest disappointment ever. Waste of money!
Photos are poor quality. Color is terrible.
I have a Fuji Finepix6000 that I love but the batteries lose their charge after 10 min. I've sent the camera to Fuji twice and they say it's fine. Yes - it is for the 1st 10 min. but I would take it (if working) over this any day!
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera, the best I've ever owned. Completely worth the price, this is such a smart camera. Doesn't wash you out with the flash and has an intelligent mode that creates the perfect portrait without fiddling around to different modes just to get the right picture. You can even crop your own pictures right on the camera. Only warning is that you won't wanna stop taking pictures, they're all gonna turn out nice. Thanx Panasonic!!
