Hey! You should know that Panasonic has released a newer version of this product: the Panasonic Lumix ZS10.
Panasonic Lumix ZS7:
Hands On Review
We put the Panasonic ZS7 through the paces for a few weeks and found that it's perhaps the best travel zoom that money can buy this year.
By Liam McCabe
- ZS7 Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
Update July 27, 2011: The ZS7 is still a fantastic compact zoom camera, but the going rate is far too expensive. The lowest street price we've seen recently is $400 (up from an average of $225 in its heyday), so it's no longer a good value for buyers. All the great things we said about the ZS7 still ring true, but we have to downgrade it, based on its inflated price tag.
Panasonic literally invented the travel zoom category. Practice makes perfect, and their ZS series (TZ series overseas) cameras have consistently been the best pocket-sized, big-zoom, sharp-shooting cameras year after year. Anytime they release a new model, it’s bound to get consumer attention.
This year, the electronics giant gave the world the ZS7 (TZ10 in some territories), an impressive specimen of a camera: 12 megapixels, 12x optical zoom, 25 mm at the wide angle, 720p AVCHD Lite video, manual control, a host of imaging features, and integrated GPS. It replaces last year’s popular ZS3, which rose to the top of the travel-zoom pack on the shoulders of casual-shooting tourists and enthusiasts who wanted a powerful compact to complement their dSLR setup.
Nine out of the ten major manufacturers have thrown their hat into the travel-zoom ring this year, so the ZS7 has some stiff competition. But you can’t mess with an original, and Panasonic’s offering comes out close to the top of the heap once again.
Design
As a travel zoom camera should be, a compact body belies the huge zoom within. As long as you’re not wearing skinny jeans, the ZS7 could fit in your pants-pocket, though would be much more comfortable in a jacket pocket or purse. It has a nice confidence-inspiring heft to it despite the mostly plastic construction, and the lens actually doesn’t extend all that far at the telephoto end.
Nothing stands out about the controls, which is fine -- the less noticeable they are, the better. If you’ve used a digital camera in the past five years, the scheme should look familiar. On the back, the three-inch, 460,000-dot LCD is bright, crisp and visible anywhere but direct sunlight (a downfall of all LCDs). The buttons back there are small metal dots -- they get the job done, although they could be slightly larger. There’s a slide in the top-right corner to switch between capture and playback modes as well as a dedicated video capture button.
Up top, a mode dial allows for easy access to iAuto, the manual modes, a scene mode menu, two custom preset scene settings, video, and notepad mode. The metal shutter button has a nice resistance, as does the zoom tilter around its base. The battery and memory-card compartment door feels sturdy, and the slot for the USB and mini-HDMI/A/V output is easy to access. Everything’s just dandy.
Interface and User Experience
The ZS7's menus are pretty straightforward as well. There’s a “quick menu” for making common parameter changes like ISO, white balance, image size and the like, without leaving the LCD viewfinder. In manual modes, a dedicated exposure button allows for shutter and aperture adjustments. There’s a full menu for the more in-depth changes too.
I’m pretty familiar with Panasonic menus at this point, so I guess it might seem easier to me than it would for first-timers, but the interface should be easy to figure out with a day or two of practice. Novice photographers might not know what most of the settings do (intelligent exposure, intelligent ISO and the like), and the display can look overly busy if those settings are activated, but there’s always the option to just ignore all of it. I’ll put it this way: I rarely had to fumble for settings, and I never got frustrated looking for something in the menu. If I couldn’t find it on the first try, I found it on the second.
Operation should be fast enough for most users, and is on par, if not slightly ahead of other cameras in this class. The ZS7 starts up quickly, locks focus quickly and reliably, and has a barely-noticeable shutter lag. The zoom extends and retracts smoothly in still image mode. It’s sluggish while shooting video, but hey, it zooms during video and the motor noise is inaudible.
My chief complaints are about the battery and the GPS. The battery drained much faster than what I'm used to, I think because of the GPS. It’s constantly checking location while the camera is on, and even checks in every few minutes while the camera is off. With that said, I’m not sure how well the GPS worked; I loaded all the geotagged pictures on Picasa and I think they were mapped accurately but I’m not sure the location displayed on the camera while I was shooting was correct. It named landmarks that were a significant distance away from my actual location. I think it’s fine, but manufacturers need to find a better way to integrate the GPS into the cameras (see: Samsung HZ35W review).
Image and Video Quality
The ZS7’s predecessor, the ZS3, was lauded for it’s excellent image quality. I can’t personally say how the two compare because I never seriously tested the ZS3, but I can say, as somebody who has tested a number of this year’s travel zoom cameras, that it takes better photos than most.
Like most cameras in this price range, the general, everyday shots from auto mode will make most users happy almost all of the time. Panasonic’s iAuto mode has a similar “hit” rate as Canon’s Smart Auto. Shots in dim lighting are above average for the class, and the noise is bearable up to ISO 800 and usable at ISO 1600 (there’s also a low-res ISO 3200 setting, for what it’s worth). The default noise reduction (it is adjustable) doesn’t smudge away too many details and, even at full telephoto, the images are pretty crisp. The proof is in the pudding, so take a look at the shots on this page.

ISO 100 (left), 800 (center), and 3200
(right)
Video quality is above average shooting in 720p HD (AVCHD Lite or Motion JPEG) or standard definition. The stereo microphone did a decent job picking up my dulcet tones in the video you see on this page, though it also picked up plenty of wind (I was on a windy bridge).
A note for Mac users: AVCHD Lite does not play nice with Macs. The video you see here is completely unedited because I shot in AVCHD Lite and there’s no easy way to edit that format on Apple products. Shoot in motion JPEG.
How It Stacks Up To The Competition
The travel zoom field is crowded this year. In addition to the ZS7, I’ve been able to test the Canon SX210 IS and the Samsung HZ35W personally, and our contributors have tested the Casio FH100 and Nikon S8000.
Of the three that I’ve tried, the ZS7 is my clear favorite. I had a number of issues with the HZ35W, mainly that the GPS barely worked and I wasn’t happy with the image quality. It certainly is not worth the $350 price tag. Perhaps on a related note, Samsung is discontinuing the HZ35W in August.
25mm wide angle (left) vs 300mm telephoto (right)
As for the SX210, it’s a closer call. The ZS7 is not as pretty as the SX210, which has a very classy, streamlined physique for a reasonably powerful camera. But in terms of the usability the ZS7 wins by a long shot. The SX210’s pop-up flash is endlessly irritating, as is the drumhead-tight mode dial and unlabelled scroll wheel. The ZS7 doesn’t bother with any of that fancy stuff, and comes out ahead as a result. The image quality is a touch better as well: sharper around the edges and a bit less noisy.
Our reviewers panned the Nikon S8000 and praised the Casio FH100, which has garnered strong reviews from other sites as well. I’d put the Casio and Panasonic at the top of the heap, with a bit of an edge toward the Panny.
Then there’s the issue of the ZS7 versus the ZS5, one notch down the product lineup. The ZS5 lacks GPS, the LCD is smaller and lower-resolution, and shoots lower-quality video. They use the same imaging system, so still photos from both cameras are identical. Most of this ZS7 review applies to the ZS5, so if you can live without the extra features in the ZS7 and want to save a few dollars, the ZS5 is worthy of your purchase as well.
Conclusion
Panasonic did the travel zoom first and they still do it best. The ZS7 shoots great images and video. Operation is foolproof if you want it to be, though there’s plenty of room for manual experimentation. It’s also small enough to bring anywhere. Despite a few flaws, I can confidently recommend this camera to a wide variety of photographers, from casual shooters to enthusiasts to travelers (the GPS is a nice touch for that last group), and even advanced shooters who need a backup to their dSLR. Anyone who wants a versatile yet high-quality camera should take a close look at the ZS7.
Similar Products
Panasonic Lumix ZS7 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Dont' recommend ZS10 and F550EXR plz.
Thanks!
Thanks for the well-written review of the ZS-7.
I've been weighting various cameras in the ZS-7 price-range, and now finally zoomed in on it.
However, given the latest releases of new cameras by Panasonic (and other manufacturers) - do you see any worthy competitor that I should also consider?
You might consider the Panasonic ZS8, which should be pretty similar to the ZS7 (similar sensor). Maybe take a look at the Sony HX7V and possibly Fujifilm F500EXR or F550EXR, but I think that the ZS7 is a very solid bet -- nothing sticks out to me as a huge improvement. A lot of these newer models, like the ZS10 are a bit quicker, have longer zooms and more "features," but from what I'm reading, the ZS7 seems to hold its own with some very consistent picture quality. Good luck.
I am a total newbie when it comes to cameras and their possibilities. So, it was a pleasant surprise to see your website like a treasure trove of reviews written for people like me !! I was trying to compare this Panasonic (Lumix ZS7) with Nikon Coolpix S8100 and your review rules richly in favour of the Lumix ZS7. The motor zoom sound pickup during video shoot with the S8100 is quite apparent. But, I was wondering about your take on the night / low light shot capabilties of S8100 compared to ZS7. After all your article on "The Best And Worst Digital Camera Trends of 2011" does say that the CMOS sensor cameras are good for night / low light shooting.
Could you also let me know whether the Lumix ZS7 has face detection, smile timer, wink timer, in-camera red-eye fix, in-camera editing like the S8100??
Thanks and keep up the good work !!
V R, India
Also I tested a ZS6 and found that it does not seem to get great sunset shots. The sky seemed a bit gray blue, instead of a nice "pure blue like the Canon took. and then the "sunset colors" only seemed to be orange to yellow and then "overexposed white, down low. Instead of the canons Red, to orange to Yellow down low.
And I just took a shot of some purple tinsle, and some lavender paper, on a different ZS6 (same guts as a ZS7 as far as picture taking goes.) And the tinsle came out blue instead of purple, or maybe a deep BLUE violet.
does anybody know what is up with the sunsets being NOT RED orange and yellow, and instead being orange yellow and :over exposed white" with grey blue sky? on both auto and scene sunset?
what about purple being "blue"?
And what about having the ability to turn OFF the GPS feature, so it does not drain the battery? and have it Remain Off after the camera is repeatedly turned off and on?
Does that AVCHD LITE have any problem operating or being worked with on older NON apple / PC's?
I picked up the ZS7 in a kit (includes case, 2gb memory card, all cables, etc) from Costco for $199.99 - black model only. Great price probably has something to do with the ZS8 and ZS10 coming out next month ($399.99 for ZS10). I am extremely happy with this purchase. No debate - run to Costco & get this now - hard to imagine anyone being disappointed with the ZS7 at this price.
I am a professional scuba diver and have also purchased the underwater housing (dmw-mctz10) from B&H for $196.95.
The ZS7 is a good solid camera, but you have to know it's limitations. I'd test it out locally first to make sure it'll handle the kind of images you expect overseas.
From what I remember, it's basically the ZS5 with a larger LCD.
We still think that the ZS5 or ZS7 are better-rounded overall, but if you do a lot of indoor shooting, we'd recommend the S8100 (also Canon SD4500, or even Sony HX5V, but the Nikon above them).
a) what is the recording time limit when using AVCHD Lite
b) what is the recording limit when using MOTION JPEG
C) any differences between the TZ10 and ZS7 on this issue?
d) can you please explain a) and b) in both time and GB?
This case has a shoulder or neck strap and also a belt loop, seems to be made of nylon and has a soft fabric lining so your camera doesn't get scratched up.
During my research I found another case also by Lowepro called the Rezo 30 but I do not know how it fits since I couldn't find one in the store, most people claimed it fit perfectly but a few reviews on amazon said the Rezo was a tight fit.
Both of these cases are a bit too large to put in your pants pocket, although a jacket pocket should hold them ok. Since they have the extra pouch for accesories this makes them a little bit larger than the camera would have been alone but this isn't an issue for me since they have the strap and belt loop. Now I can throw the camera in my coat pocket or backpack and not have to worry about scratches.
Hopefully this helps anyone else out there looking for a case for the ZS7/6/5 cameras.
2. Low-lite HD Video compare to nikon s8100 and canon s95?
3. Quality of images taken in digital zoom compare to nikon s8100 and canon s95?
4. Quality of HD Videos taken in digital zoom compare to nikon s8100 and canon s95?
Really appreciate it for your time & thoughts. Thanks.
With so many choices out there I am not sure what the best fit would be.
Your comment on image quality is pushing me towards ZS7.
I am also interested in taking good pics indoors in average/low lighting. Steve's forums say that both ZR and ZS have a weak flash/small sensor so low light quality is not good. I hear that the larger sensor of Canon S9O or the Cmos lens of Sony HX5V/H55/TX7, Casio FH100, Canon 4000IS can do a better job. S90 is above my budget. Your thoughts on the other 5 cameras when compared to ZS7 in low light as well as outdoor image quality, video quality, sound etc?
S95 – good but too costly, reject
H55 – not even in same class, shutter lag, not good in low light, CCD, reject
Hh5v – has all requirements, poorer night videos at mikes
Tx7 – touch screen new camera technology - unsure about durability, poor exterior images at some website when compared to ZS7, reject
Casio FH100 – don’t care for the high speed photo, some reviewers complained that controls may be difficult to learn, loses focus during video, dpreviews ranks this #1 better than ZS7, unsure about durability as Casio is known for cameras, but low light should be better than ZS7
Canon SD4000 – low light should be good, some complained that it focus hunts, small zoom
So for overall features I am leaning towards ZS7 even though some others like FH100, SD4000 may be better indoors for pics, and video (low/average light) - thoughts?
The CASIO FH100 does take good low-light pictures, but the goodness comes from a combination of highly-filtering and highly-sharpening the image. This filtering tends to wash out the colors, and what's worse, the washout happens even in GOOD LIGHT, so you will pay a high price for the low-light photos on the FH100.
IMHO, the Panasonic takes just as good pictures, but it does some of the least processing of the image in this class of cameras (you can see this from the dpreview.com comparative review of "Travel Zooms".) The long zoom on the ZS-7 makes it incomparable to the SD4500, S90, and S95, which are short-zoom cameras and so they have more light to work with on the sensor, and still, the ZS-7 takes arguably superior photos in low light, (see for yourself on dpreview.com).
The ZS-7 also has a high-iso / low light setting where it can take photos at ISO 3200-6400, and this works pretty well with a 3 Mpixel resolution (plenty for most applications.)
Add to this one of the most useful zooms in the travel zoom class (a quite-wide 25mm to an excellent 300mm equivalent), a TRUE movie mode with high-quality 720p AND motorized optical zoom AND refocusing during movie-taking (all 3 of which are something that Canon seems reluctant to add to their low-cost cameras), and you have a class-dominating camera in the ZS-7.
I have read many reviews and have shortlisted to a ZR3 vs ZS7. As far as I see the difference between the two is that ZS7 has
1. GPS - I dont care for it
2. Manual controls - I dont think I will use it much
3. Video - Stereo vs Mono audio - Does that make a lot of difference?
4. Image quality - Your reviews state that ZS7 is much better. Isnt the lens, sensors same in both cameras and so the pics should be similar?
Please advise
1. Since you don't care for GPS, I'd look at the ZS5 instead of the ZS7. Same image quality, very similar cameras, just fewer bells and whistles.
2. The ZR3, ZS5, and ZS7 all have manual controls.
3. ZR3 and ZS7 have the same video codec (AVCHD Lite) which the ZS5 does not have, for your reference. Mono vs. Stereo sound does make a bit of a difference, gives the sound a bit more nuance. Personally, I don't hear a huge difference, since the mics on these cameras are pretty ho-hum anyway.
4. I get what you're thinking here, but the ZR3's lens is inferior -- it is still a Leica, but not the same as the one on the ZS5/ZS7. Not as crisp, more likely to kick down to a narrower aperture (which limits the amount of light that gets to the sensor) and cannot zoom as far.
In short, I'm not a huge fan of the ZR3, mainly because of the lens. It's still a good deal for the price (well, Amazon's $169 is a good deal -- everyone else seems to be overcharging).
If you can bear to part with the AVCHD Lite video and 3-inch screen, I think the ZS5 might be your best bet here. The ZS7 is an equally good choice, just costs a bit more. Good luck.
Thanks
Rick
the Samsung cost $149.990$199.99 the Canon $179.99 the Panasonic $210-$260 Does the Canon SX130 take noticeably better pictures/prints than the SX120 that has less MP and "narrower wide lens"?
I'm afraid I don't know too much about cameras, although being on this site is really teaching me a lot. I'm looking for a camera that has good zoom, but takes good quality low-light images. After reading your comments, I realize that one tends to sacrifice the other... however there was mention that a CMOS sensor type helped to counteract the effects of a longer zoom. So my question is:
The Panasonic ZS7 doesn't have the CMOS sensor, but it's wide angle is 25mm. The Nikon S8100 does have the CMOS sensor, but it's wide angle is 30mm... which is better? Does the CMOS sensor make up for the 5mm difference in the lens? (and yes I realize there are a lot of other factors to take into consideration, but looking primarily at low-light quality and zoom, which is better?). I really appreciate any help I could get.
Thanks
If your primary concern is low-light shooting, the S8100 is a better option. The 30mm wide-angle is pretty narrow, but it shouldn't be a deal-breaker. Overall, the ZS7 is better-rounded -- has more manual control, an easier interface and better daylight images -- but low-light shooting is average, compared to the S8100.
Kudos, to DC-HQ....!!!
However, one thing that slightly disappointed me is that certain reviews seem to be a little bit adamant.
Most of us here, just as myself, searching for a wide angle portable digital camera,supporting HD-video, good image quality under poor lighting conditions and preferably high zoom abilities in the price range of around 250-350$,I believe have narrowed their searches down to the Panasonic Lumix ZS7, Sony HX5V and the Canon SX210.
After an extensive research and user comments and reviews, I found the Sony HX5V/B to slightly outperform the ZS7 and by a huge margin, SX210,
especially in terms of FullHD video rec., responsiveness and low light performance.
However, I wonder why some gentlemen here seem to be unable to take their eyes off the ZS7 !!
I am submitting herewith the links to support my views and request the administrators and visitors to point out my mistakes (if any)
Open for ur feedback and appreciate ur time and concern.
snapsort.com/compare/Canon_...
Definitely agree with you that both the Sony and ZS7 outperform the SX210. Not a particularly big fan of the SX210. I'd like to add that some newer models should be considered -- Canon SD4500, which seems to be slightly disappointing to users, and the Nikon S8100 (I'm currently reviewing), which pleases some users because of its good low-light results, but frustrates others because of a lack of manual control. It doesn't even have a dedicated Program mode!
Not quite sure what you mean by adamant -- but the way that we think our site is most helpful to the most people is if we make an authoritative call, ranking one camera over another, for anyone that just wants to make a quick purchase. Certainly, many many people prefer to spend extra time researching the intricacies of al the different cameras, and we do our best to try to take the grey areas into account and give people the resources to shop around for many different cameras -- including the comments section here, where folks like you can post your own opinions and link out to your own reviews.
But for the most part, we like to keep it short and sweet here at DCHQ. There are several forums around the web that publish much longer, more detailed reviews with graphs and charts and other scientific measurements. While we certainly take all that into account, that's not our style, basically. That's the great thing about the internet -- if our style doesn't work for you, you have tons of other options.
That said, we do rank the HX5V well. Pound for pound, it's a close match with the ZS7 (and ZS5), but when it comes down to it, the HX5V costs significantly more for a notable but not particularly huge performance improvement. Also unlike many sites, a camera's value per dollar is a major factor in our grading.
So as for not taking our eyes off the ZS7/ZS5 -- when people ask us for our opinion regarding the best camera in this class, those are the two that we list. It's up to anyone to browse through all of our pages/archives and decide for themselves, but if you're asking our opinion, the ZS7 is our favorite, and tons of user feedback backs that up. If we liked it and everybody else hated it, we'd change our grade -- and we are constantly re-evaluating grades.
Thanks very much for sharing the face-off, I'm sure many of our more numbers-inclined readers will appreciate the comparison.
I totally agree with your view on the Canon SD4500 and like most of your daily visitor fans, am anxious to read your review of the Nikon 8100.
I also understand your love for the Panny ZS7/ 3; It is indeed an engineering chef-d'oeuvre and guess what, neither am I a fan of the SX210 (beg your pardon i it does antagonize Mr. James DeRuvo)
Now as far as my comment is concerned,it ws only to ensure that despite the tons of other options that the internet provides, regular visitors of this website continue to get what they are here for viz. comprehensive views and unbiased opinions and healthy debates on topics of their interest.
Having said that I wish people of similar interests and yourself, Mr.Editor kindly analyze the low-light performance characteristics of these giants i.e Panny ZS7, Canon SX210IS and the Sony HX5V/B.
It would be really kind enough if you guys could also incorporate some more of best deals online for all our visitors
For instance, though today the prices have changed considerably, exactly two days ago, the following link offerered the ZS 7 for a mere 219$ deal.
fumfie.com/search.php?q=pan... DCHQ loyalists like myself, I also recommend visiting:
logicbuy.com/
as the above has a plethora of some really cool discount coupons on various products.
Hoping that discussions like these only take our HQ to a whole new level.
From my fellow East Indians and myself
a whole hearted..............Thankyou,
to
Liam and James.
Keep up the good work guys !!!!!!!!
and the prospect of being able to take shots and "film" while snorkeling is intriguing. but I can't do much of that around here, or should I say essential No snorkeling around here. :-(
Do you know if there are any really "Still Photo Quality" Differences between the PANASONIC ZS6 , ZS7 or ZS 5? Besides the Global positioning, are there any real differences? Do some have screens that are visible when you are out in full bright sun, and others that are not? How about the ZS1? ( I saw one for $119.99) Any reason to get one over the other? considering the ZS 6 is available "on sale" for $229.99 right now.( i think if not $249 or $279?)
Fuji S2800 $199.00
Canon EX130 is sometimes $229.99
Any reasons to get one over the other, or Not to get one?
( like to try and keep the cost under $200 ( but I would I guess I might pay $20 or so dollars more if it is going to get me noticeably better shots/ prints, or a noticeably better camera.) I don't have money to "burn" and I get nervous Taking cameras out doors hiking to get potentially damaged or lost. I would Freak out If I accidentally broke or lost a $300 or more camera while backpacking. And I don’t have the space, or time to mess with extra hassle of SLR, and the weight.. Hmmm but those rugged water proof things... :-? OR are those waterproof cams just and Extra expense for noticeable lower quality pictures? and limited/not useful zoom? in a camera that you wont break... Do you think that the Olympus rugged, or the pentax water proof cameras would produce, Good enough prints compared to the other cameras?
11” x 14”
are the new cameras I am looking at ( PANASONIC ZS6 or zs5, CANON SX130 is, FUJI S2800 Samsung HZ30W Etc. going to be able to produce Obviously better prints Then my 5 or so year old Kodak 6 MP 3x zoom Z760 camera ? ? ?
a couple of years ago before going On a trip, I wanted to up grade my picture print quality, and get some More Zoom. so I compared a then new Canon (720?) I can't remember the model. but it was a point and shoot 8 MP camera with 6x zoom, and it still had a View Finder. (They need to put those back on cameras that will really retail for $150 or more! unless there has been some massive improvement on LCD screens and then can be relied upon to be usable out in the sun.)
I thought the Canon would produce obviously better picture when taking the Same Picture as the Kodak..(taken with “same zoom” same composition at the same time, and on LANSCAPE or auto?) When printed. Unfortunately the Canon’s print was Obviously NOT as good as the older lower MP Kodak. a confusing let down. I though since it was a Canon, and had 8 MP instead of 6 MP it would have produced a Better picture than the Kodak.
I ended up returning the canon, and taking my old Kodak.
What is up with that???
I don't want to spend more money on a new camera, and end up with lower quality prints. Does canons SX130 IS smart flash, flash at multiple different intensities? or is just "exposure/processing settings" that are changed?
Does it work any differently Or Noticeably better than Panasonics ZS6 flash, Fuji s2800 flash. or Samsung hz30w ... etc, flashes?
Any thoughts on other cameras that would “beat” these. Or be contenders with a much cheaper price?
Thank You for your assistance. And I welcome hearing from people with first hand experience with these types of cameras. Remember that I am interested in the quality of PRINTS ( and blown up prints) and and I would like to blow up and frame the pics I Like. not really concerned so much how the pictures will look on a computer screen or on the back of a camera. Of course reliability , speed/and ease of use count too...
The bottom line for me when it comes to a "still camera" is the final, unadulterated , straight from the camera printable picture quality is what counts. ( I Kind of don't have the time and patience for photo shop. And there are other things I would rather spend the money on. My opinion with all equipment is, get equipment that works 'right" and don't waste your time trying to "fix" the "product" of equipment that doesn't. remember I have no patience ;-) ) Video would be nice, but not the issue. And I don't want more than 720 hi def.
"toy features" are cute but not really relevant. I want Good photo quality, in outdoor high contrast conditions, and in a wide range of lighting conditions/brightness levels. A wide angle would be great since many of my " panoramic outdoor shots" have been limited by my current "34MM or 36 MM equivalent 3x zoom lens now. And I would really like some good Zoom to get in on things that I can not get to , or not take an extra hour or 2 to hike to get close enough for a good pic with only 3x zoom. Oh and of course I do like Macro.
Sure it would be nice if it took good pictures indoors, for birthday party or Christmas present opening. but that is not really that critical, and probably would not, or rarely get a photo that way, that I would want to blow up, and put on the wall. . Those always seem like 4"x6" or maybe 5"x8" photo album type pics to me, and not that critical? What I want is a good , Primarily outdoor Scenery ( and hopefully wild life if I can find it/"catch it) camera. to take hiking and get good scenery pics. Hopefully to frame. And I need the "best" quality I can get in that price range. As I may never be able to get to the location to take the pic ever again. No trying again the next day or week. And of course it would be nice it it could be relied upon to take good looking/printing indoor shots, and video if possible. but it seems the video will just eat up your memory card. So it looks like those 2 concerns are definitely secondary. although it would be nice to be able to get good video, and not have to bring my non hi def camcorder along. but the dang camera memory devouring of video... So I think I have narrowed my choices down to . the Pansonic ZS6 (global positioning in the ZS7 sounds cute, but I don't think it is important enough to rationalize the extra cost. And faster battery draining? ) the Canon SX130 is or the Fuji finepix S2800 (or maybe S1800 they are the same price this month.) or the Samsung HZ35W What I have noticed on my 5 or 6 year old Kodak Z760 is that the screen is un-viewable often when hiking now. but it has a viewfinder.
only one of the cameras I was trying to narrow things down from had a view finder of any kind. I was almost thinking of getting the Fuji to "punish" everyone else for not bothering to put a view finder on the cameras. then I started thinking, maybe the screens are much better now so they can be used out in the Desert, or Hawaii or any bright light situations. Is this now the case???
I am very confused. First I think I’ll go for the Samsung HZ30W, I hear its “great” then I hear that is has only a mediocre lens and sensor, and only produces so so prints, or bad “wrinkly” prints. Same type of deal with Fuji. Then I start getting led to believe the Panasonic ZS6 is by by far better.. Then who knows.. Then I find out pansaonic will supposedly only work with panasoinc batteries. Not after market batteries. Like ultra last? I really hate that, and proprietary connectors or memory.. That usually get me P.O. enough to make me Not buy something.
Then I read on Panasonics site that there are some after market batteries that will work on there cameras, then I write to ask them, and they say no..
Then I read the Canon SX130 IS is good, or above average. Then I read “they are the best” Then I read not so good and noisy, and unreliable.
Endless confusion and frustration. !
Do you have any Good ;-) thoughts on which of those three camera's would be "noticeably better than the others. for a one camera person, that wants to be able to blow up good SCENERY, macro, & wildlife pics? Hiking, backpacking, camping, picnicking pics?
Also, do you know if all three of those cameras will remember that you do not want the flash to automatically go of after turning the camera off, and the restarting? My current one does Not. When I turn the camera back on to take a pic after having set the flash off.. It will flash again after restarting it, usually messing up the picture, and draining the battery. Sometimes causing me to miss the shot.
And Do you know if that Canon ex130 is intelligent contrast feature that can "detect areas in the scene that are too bright or dark and automatically adjust them to the optimum brightness when shooting." is just a marketing gimmick, and the other cameras have the same feature/exposure settings, listed as something else, or are just Automatic?
Do you know if the other cameras have setting like canons "Positive Film" color setting? (Canon also has a Vivid color setting) setting, it looks interesting/promising.
Oh and do you know if cameras with the SUSNET scene setting will actually end up getting better sunset pictures than a camera without a specifically listed. Under “auto intelligent, or some other setting?
Do you off hand remember if any of these cameras have the feature that lets you compose a picture then it holds a "ghost" image on the screen, and you can hand the camera to someone to take the picture after you get in it. and all they have to do is line up the ghost image over what the see on the screen, they can then take the composition that you wanted?
she has been having some intermittent problems get sharp photos both in an outside (lens has recently been cleaned)
Can you share any pros and cons.
I am a bit confused between three camera's : Panasonic ZS5, ZS7 and Canon Powershot SX210 IS.
I am looking for a good travelling camera with a good zoom for safari, as well as taking photos at night.
Which one do you recommend me to get?
* Pocketable
* Longer zoom (prefer 10x +)
* Good image quality
* 720p min video with stereo and zoom
* Reasonable wide angle
* Decent low light
The Canon s95 seems to be almost there. Excels at almost everything except video. Average quality video and no autofocus or zoom while recording. And the price is a bit hefty.
So after research, I've narrowed it down to to ZS7, SX210 and HX5V. So based on my requirements, which would anyone recommend?
Now, to throw a wrench in this, I got my hands on a Nikon S8100 at Best Buy yesterday which had just arrived. I was very impressed playing with it in the store. Specs are better than the older S8000. The S8100 seems to be pretty much on par with the 3 I originally mentioned. The two notable differences are wide angle goes only to 30 (not bad) and there are no manual modes. I'm thinking I may need to check into this one more. Anyone seen it yet? Any comments on this one compared to the other three?
BTW. Really enjoying this site.
Keilup
Would love to get the opinion of a more seasoned camera person than myself on the s8100 so I could decide if this one is it for me or if I need to go back to the other three.
Seems the ZS7 would be the best of the other three though I haven't been able to locate it yet in a store to try it out. Need to do that.
Finally got my hands on a ZS7 at a store. Was impressed. So decided to return the S8100 and have the ZS7 on order. It helped that the ZS7 cost me $75 less than the S8100 as well. Hopefully this will be the right camera for me.
Now if someone could just combine all the great features across some of this different models we'd finally have the perfect camera......
Now today my sister has the same exact problem (3 dark spots) on her Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 - different camera, less zoom, owned about 7 months.
So this DOES seem to be a major headache and common problem with digital zoom cameras, or at least Panasonic Lumix cameras.
Hopefully Panasonic will fix this problem with a new design in the near future (and hopefully they will TELL the public when they have fixed this dust problem).
Between the ZS7 and F300EXR -- have not tried the Fuji, so not really sure about that, but I have seen reviews that are lukewarm on the performance. In theory, it should be solid because it has a larger sensor, but that didn't necessarily translate into real-world results.
I can definitely say that the ZS7 is the best compact zoom I personally tested this year, and many reviews on other sites generally back this up. I'd guess that the F300EXR might have a slight edge in lowlight shooting because of that sensor, but the ZS7 likely has it beat in every other setting. Also, if you don't need the GPS function of the ZS7, take a look at the ZS5 -- exact same photo quality, a few less "features" and a few less dollars too.
The FH20 enjoyed that accolade last year. Go with the latest if you can afford it.
I usually like to shoot landscape scenes and macro pics in daylight and pics are needed to be natural as they appear in real world and also video clarity is a must.
Your answer will be very useful. Im planning to buy one of them...or can you recommend me another one in same price range not among above ones? Thank you for everything.
Seriously considering the ZS7 but had a previous Lumix and had issues with the flimsy lens covering. Any comments on how sturdy this one is or isn't? As much as I try to prevent it my children are usually getting their hands on it somehow!
Unfortunately, all we can do is tell them to fix it, we can't do anything about it ourselves. Usually falls on deaf ears though. Sorry for the confusion, but we're not intentionally trying to mislead anybody.
I have read discussions on other sites about the "breathtaking videos" on HD tv's, and I can seem to figure it out.
Is this format so new that there is no solution?
How does the HD video in motion JPEG compare to the AVCHD Lite formate? Will/does the quaility of the video differ much? (will the qauility be sacrificed?) Other than taking up more space, i assume, on a memory card.
No I have not installed the software onto my computer because I didn't think that I would use the editing software that came with it. I had heard that it wasn't all that good.
A rule of thumb that I read a few times: Use AVCHD Lite if you plan to mostly play videos back on your HDTV. Use motion JPEG if you plan to view or edit on your computer. Hope this helps.
dpreview.com/reviews/panaso...
What I am not sure of is what kind of a memory card should I use with this camera. I had bought a 4gb class 4 card when I bought the coolpix s570 but have been told that i should buy a "bigger and better" memory card like the scan disk 8gb class 6. The problem I have is that the scan disk card is $100. Seems crazy to me but if i will get morre out of the camera it might be worth it.
Any insight on this would help!
kb.sandisk.com/app/answers/...
Thanks for your help.
The ZS5/6 are capable of manual control, but the iAuto works just as seamlessly as it would on the FH20 (and as easily as Smart Auto on Canon cameras). Canon cameras are slightly more user friendly, but after a day or two with your Panasonic, especially if you just use Auto mode, you'll be up to speed. The ZS certainly takes better pictures than the FH series and seems to be a little better than the Canon SX series (I tested the Canon SX210 recently, and am currently testing the ZS7, which should have the same image quality as ZS5/6).
Long story short, of the models you listed, if you can afford a Panasonic ZS camera, I'd say go for one of those, followed very closely by the Canon SX210. Casio FH100 is also worth a look for its image quality.
I'm a pro photographer. I've used my TZ5 for a few years and decided on something a bit faster (it's glacial, especially when shooting with a flash). I tried the FH20 and found the pics to be very uneven - some over exposed or under exposed when shooting in the same setting and lighting. I took it back because I got what looked like chemical circles all over many of my pics from a party I was covering . . . It took hours in photoshop to make them passable.
I've just purchased the ZS6 and hope that the low light pics are less grainy than my TZ5 and that it recycles faster all around.
I'll let y'all know!
I have been looking at a few cameras but I cannot decide which is the best overall – I have narrowed my choice down to 2 cameras the Sony HX5 & the Panasonic ZS7.
I will list all that is important to me & then ask any of you who have some knowledge of these cameras & the features of cameras in general to give me any opinions you may have. I should mention I have a Canon SX1 IS but I am looking a smaller /lighter camera to carry around in my pocket or briefcase. If there is another small camera that you can recommend , please do.
The main features I am looking for are.
- Good image quality
- Good in low light
- The burst rate is a so/so of importance– (I am not as concerned as long as the other features are there)
- Good Zoom & wide angle (both cameras seem to have that.
- Macro focus (I have heard that the Panasonics is the better one).
- The movie function is of lesser importance to me , but it is always nice to have a reasonable one with good sound.
- The GPS is of even lesser importance to me (I would only use that when traveling which I only do once every 1-3 years).
- My hands are of medium to large in size (I mention this as holding cameras in the shop is NOT the same as actually using them day to day) as most of you know.
This is one of the review websites that I have looked at.
dpreview.com/reviews/compar... Craig
And another question. Is 36 mm lens
(present in Canon sx120) can be called wide angle?
I just put in another request to Panasonic for a ZS5/ZS7 for review, based on all the questions/requests we've been getting regarding these cameras. Hopefully they will be able to accommodate us.
Hi I am looking at 3 different Panasonics (I bought all 3 but will take 2 of them back).
I was leaning toward the FH20 (mainly because it is i/2 the price of the ZS7 & $ 100 less than the ZS5) until I discovered it would not zoom when taking movies the other cameras will the ZS5 & ZS7. Is there a certain setting on the FH20 that will allow me to zoom ?. I will not be taking a lot of movies but liked the burst speed of the FH20.
Any feedback on any of these cameras would be great.
Thanks Craig
This will be used simply as a convenient point and shot for stills and HD video. My primary camera is the new Pentax K7, WHICH IS PHENOMENAL!!!
1. If I turn the GPS OFF will it stay off, even when camera next turned on, so I can save battery life and use GPS only when I need it, without having to get into menus and controls to shut off GPS every time I power up?
2. How complicated is it to remove the battery? I'd like to be able to keep two fully charged batteries with camera for travel.
3. Looks like the file compression not too bad for this camera compared to other point-and-shoots, so picture quality should remain relatively high. Am I right?
4. I've read that the Lumix ZS5 is the same camera with smaller display, no GPS, no HDMI port, slightly less able video, otherwise identical. Specs listings indicate this too. Any other difference I should know about? If not, the ZS5 looks pretty good!
2. Not complicated. If it's like every other Panasonic this year, just pop open the compartment, pull back a little tab about 5 millimeters, and it'll pop out.
3. Yes picture quality should be quite good, if other reviews are any indication. It also has to do with the quality of the sensor and the lens, which are both quite good.
4. Pretty much the same camera, those are also the only differences I'm aware of (and the body is a little different as well). If the image quality is the only thing that matters to you, then yes, you can save some money with the ZS5. There is a noticeable difference in the video quality, so just consider that.
Hope this helps.
Thx.
I think that some cameras (dSLRs, I think), can hook up to an external GPS unit to record locations, but I don't think that most compact cameras can do this. I don't believe that you can hook up a TomTom or Garmin navigation device to a camera.
I did spend a week using the Samsung HZ35W, which is another GPS-equipped camera. I wasn't particularly impressed with the GPS function -- for one thing, the signal took forever to lock on. I've never successfully had it lock on in my home city. I was in Baltimore this weekend, and it did lock on, but it seemed like a random occurrence and I was standing in an unobstructed area.
Granted, I was pretty much at the same place all weekend, so the geotagging feature wasn't useful -- I already know that I was there for three days, so I think it would have been more useful had I been on a hike, and it may have locked on more easily away from the city as well.
Anyhow, like I said, I'm not an expert, but I hope this helped to clear it up a little bit.
I want to be Sure I can zoom while in video mode (some just allow before or after).
InquiryMail@yahoo.com
I did just have the ZR3 in for review, somewhat similar model, and it came with an abridged printed manual, and the full manual on a disc. I'd guess it would be the same case for this.
So I am reluctant to try another Panasonic though James here claims that FH20 is the best one for lot light indoor with incorrect info of F/2.0 (it's F/3.3 actually). If anyone compared ZS7 (or even ZR3) against ZS3 in low light indoor colors. I would really appreciate the feedback on it.
Which Olympus models are you referring to? If it's the new batch of TOUGH models, I'm entering them shortly.
If not, we might have the models you're looking for in our database. But if they're rated below a certain grade, they don't appear in our search results. There's a chance that this is the case if they've been out for more than a year. Hope this helps.
Panasonic Lumix ZS7 Reviews
Panasonic Lumix ZS7 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
