Pentax K-5
Pentax K-5
1
Hey! You should know that Pentax has released a newer version of this product: the Pentax K-5 II.
Pentax K-5
| Fetching our Best Offer… |
A-
We've given the K-5 a grade of A-.
User comments
This product is ranked
| 18th | of 25 | in $600 - $1000 |
| 11th | of 13 | in Professional dSLR |
| 2nd | of 10 | in Pentax Digital Cameras |
| 36th | of 106 | in 14-16 Megapixels Digital Cameras |
Editor's Review
The K-5 is Pentax's latest enthusiast/semi-pro dSLR, an update to last year's K-7. It's remarkably similar to that camera, with a few upgrades including a 16.3 megapixel CMOS sensor, expanded ISO range (up to 51,200 expanded), faster continuous shooting, and a true 1080p video mode. Reviews of the camera are overwhelmingly positive, with reviewers noting best-in-class image quality, the solid weather-sealed body, and diminutive size. Pentax has since come out with a couple cameras, the K-01 and new K-30, but at the K-5's current price point that's probably the one to get.
Store Ratings and Offer Details for the
Pentax K-5
| Store Rating | Store Name | Price | Visit Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||
|
|||
Specifications
- 16.3 megapixels
- CMOS sensor
- In-body image stabilization
- 3-inch LCD monitor, 921k dots
- 7fps burst shooting mode
- 11-point autofocus
- 1080p HD video, 25 fps
- 100% viewfinder
- HDR image capture
- JPEG+RAW shooting
- Weatherproof construction
- HDMI output
- Captures to SD/SDHC/SDXC media cards
- Rechargeable lithium-ion battery
- Release Date: Oct 31, 2010
Pentax K-5 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
djr214 (11/09/2011)
Hi, I want to print images up to 48" x 48" at 300ppi. Most of the shots I've been taking are still life, natural light, extreme close up - so that I'd like to print a large image of leaf. My Panasonic DMC-FP3 is fun, but not up to the big task. I'd appreciate your recommendations for a solid upgrade.
reply to this comment
djr214 (11/09/2011)
Hi, I want to print images up to 48" x 48" at 300ppi. Most of the shots I've been taking are still life, natural light, extreme close up - so that I'd like to print a large image of leaf. My Panasonic DMC-FP3 is fun, but not up to the big task. I'd appreciate your recommendations for a solid upgrade.
reply to this comment
El Nino Negro(Tosan) (09/19/2011)
i am about getting a profssional camera that would guarantee me perfect pictures in low light without the flash,a colleage of mine adviced i went for the Nikon D7000,and now am coming across d Pentax K-5 which looks to me like a betta option....pls i need advice on what to go for,do i go fpor the pentax K-5 or the Nikon D7000?
reply to this comment
i am about getting a profssional camera that would guarantee me perfect pictures in low light without the flash,a colleage of mine adviced i went for the Nikon D7000,and now am coming across d Pentax K-5 which looks to me like a betta option....pls i need advice on what to go for,do i go fpor the pentax K-5 or the Nikon D7000?
carmen gillis (07/22/2011)
I need some advice on buying a new dslr camera. I will go up to about 1300, and want to get back into art photography. I cant decide between the K-5 and the D7000...but is there another option better for this range of camera and price. Image quality is my priority. Thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/26/2011)
Those are the two best to choose from in this range -- they're both excellent cameras (they use the same sensor), but it's a matter of personal preference beyond that -- which feels more comfortable. Personally, I can't get the feel of Pentax yet Nikon comes easily, but some of our other staff members are the opposite.
Lens selection/price is a consideration. Nikon lenses are generally cheaper, since they're so plentiful. But, the Pentax has in-body image stabilization, so you'll never need to buy a stabilized lens for it, which keeps costs down somewhat (I think prices are generally higher though). If you'll be using a tripod all the time, stabilization probably isn't a concern.
So one really isn't "better" than the other -- more of it has to do with personal preference, and how you'll use the camera.
reply to this comment
Lens selection/price is a consideration. Nikon lenses are generally cheaper, since they're so plentiful. But, the Pentax has in-body image stabilization, so you'll never need to buy a stabilized lens for it, which keeps costs down somewhat (I think prices are generally higher though). If you'll be using a tripod all the time, stabilization probably isn't a concern.
So one really isn't "better" than the other -- more of it has to do with personal preference, and how you'll use the camera.
Durable (Kyoshibecker@gmail.com — 04/22/2011)
While I haven't used the K5 I've used the K7 (which is very similar) and have found it to be a very durable camera. I shoot motocross and have come to the conclusion that canon's and Sony's just cant put up with the beating that Pentax or Nikon bodies can...
reply to this comment
Pentax K-5 (Barbara C. — 04/13/2011)
I live in a foggy harbor, and my Pentax K-5 is often beading up with moisture. A wipe and it is like new. No fogging of viewfinder or other things like with my Canon T2i. Plus, what great pictures. Note, in fog it is hard to get good autofocus - some practice with manual focus is called for.
reply to this comment
US Water Seal (Joey — 03/11/2011)
The K5 goes with me on every dive. Heck, why don't you try that with a Canon or Nikon and see if they are capable. I recommend you dive 3 meters, then take either of them down to 15 meters. Press the shutter button and there you have it... an underwater camera. Yep, I'm certain you did that on purpose.
reply to this comment
Pentax, how tough is the K-5 in real life? (Russell B. — 01/28/2011)
It's rainy season in Portland, OR, and I hesitate to take my Canon out in the rain for spontaneous pictures. The Pentax k-5 is supposed to be rain resistant. Has any one put this to the test, either by accident or on purpose? That would make this camera my choice for taking quality pictures while on hikes or in the city when weather would challenge most other high end dslr's.
reply to this comment
